Theology Central

What are the "15 rules of hermeneutics" that preachers often reference—and do they actually exist? In this episode, we trace the origin of these so-called rules, examine their historical development, and carefully evaluate each one.

A sermon claims Isaiah 6 teaches how to experience "personal revival." But is that actually what the text is about? In this episode, we examine the passage carefully and ask whether "personal revival" comes from Scripture—or is being read into it.

A study of Luke 15 turns into something else entirely. In this episode, we examine how meaning gets imported into the text—and why that's a problem. Are we hearing Scripture… or speaking over it?

Does unbelief limit God?Matthew 13:58 is often used to explain why miracles don't happen—but is that what the text really says?

I visited a Lutheran church this morning and saw Ezekiel 37—the valley of dry bones. My first thought: Not again.

I finish a review of a message called, No More Boring Bible Study

I continue a review of a message called, No More Boring Bible Study

I review a message called, No More Boring Bible Study

Ephesians 5 presents a problem no one can easily solve.In Part 1, we saw the weight of its commands—and the reality that we don't live them. In this episode, we step back and examine the structure of Ephesians itself. And instead of resolving the tension… it only gets worse. So what are these commands actually doing?

A program about how people listen to sermons wrong… gets a basic historical fact wrong.

What happens when we stop explaining Ephesians 5—and just read it?In this episode, we strip away assumptions, theological systems, and familiar explanations, and face the chapter as it actually appears: a relentless series of commands.

If you've ever felt "on fire" spiritually… and then watched it fade…this episode is for you. Why does it happen?Why does something that feels so real… so powerful… so life-changing…disappear so quickly?

I review a portion of a sermon about God's plan and abortion

A sermon on Psalm 42 claimed the psalm is basically about David in a backslidden state. But does Psalm 42 actually say that? Before continuing the sermon review, this episode pauses to examine what the Bible really means by backsliding.

A sermon recently uploaded to SermonAudio caught my attention. The title: "How Important Is the Lord in Your Life?" The text: Psalm 42:1–5. We review it.

A listener comment pushes the popular claim that Genesis 15 foreshadows Christ's death to its logical conclusion. The result exposes a serious theological problem and highlights the danger of making Scripture say what it never actually says.

Is Christianity becoming a product? In this episode we analyze the song "Too Good" by Gable Price and Friends and explore its sharp critique of consumer Christianity, religious performance culture, and the temptation to reduce God to something that exists to meet our needs.

Late one night I pulled an old album off my shelf and found myself transported back to 1972—before Christian radio, before CCM charts, before the industry existed.

Late at night, in the quiet after midnight, I read the Gospel reading for Sunday: John 4:5–42, where Jesus says, "Whoever drinks the water that I will give him will never thirst again."

Proverbs 20:12 says, "The hearing ear and the seeing eye, the LORD has made them both." But reality forces us to ask hard questions.

Genesis 15 records one of the most important covenant moments in the Bible. Some systematic theologies claim that when God passes through the divided sacrifice it foreshadows Christ's sacrificial death. But does the text actually teach that? In this episode we examine the covenant ritual, how the New Testament uses Genesis 15, and why forcing the passage into a Christ-typology may obscure what the chapter is really about.

Matthew 5:31–32 is one of the most debated and emotionally charged passages in the entire Sermon on the Mount. For centuries Christians have argued about what Jesus meant when He spoke about divorce and remarriage.

In this episode, we examine Matthew 5:28–30, a passage where Jesus mentions hell twice while speaking about lust.But these verses raise an important question:Do they actually teach us anything about hell itself?

A podcast recently asked whether artificial intelligence can be trusted to answer theological questions. But what happens when AI's answers don't align with the theology we already hold?

A podcast recently asked whether artificial intelligence can be trusted to answer theological questions. But what happens when AI's answers don't align with the theology we already hold?

Jesus' words in Matthew 5:22 are often heard as teaching that a single word can damn a person to hell. But when read carefully, the passage reveals something far more unsettling: Jesus is not adding a new sin alongside murder—He is redefining what murder actually is. Anger, contempt, and condemnation are exposed as murder at the heart level, killing without blood.

In this episode, we slow down and work carefully through Matthew 5:22, one of Jesus' earliest uses of the word Gehenna. As part of our commitment to examine every passage that speaks to judgment after death—without skipping anything, we ask a simple but often neglected question: what does this verse actually say, and what does it not say?

A recent message warns Christians about the dangers of artificial intelligence—hallucinations, bias, misplaced authority, and the risk of becoming a "blind guide."

What is the church actually saying to teenagers at youth rallies?In this episode, we do something simple — and intentional. We attend a Friday night youth rally together and listen carefully to a long-form sermon, going in blind, without preloading conclusions or assumptions.

What is the church actually saying to teenagers at youth rallies? In this episode, we do something simple — and intentional. We attend a Friday night youth rally together and listen carefully to a long-form sermon, going in blind, without preloading conclusions or assumptions.

So we take some time to review the sermon that claimed Romans 6 is simple

So we take some time to review the sermon that claimed Romans 6 is simple

So we take some time to review the sermon that claimed Romans 6 is simple

Is Romans 6 really "simple"?This episode examines a common claim often heard in preaching—that Romans, and especially Romans 6, is clear and straightforward

In this episode, we begin working through Chapter 1 of the book, Finally Free: Three Lessons in the Parable of the Prodigal Sin, titled "Belly Slaves."

What does it actually mean to repent?After two thousand years of Christian history, disagreement over this single word remains as sharp as ever. And yet, many Christians today speak with absolute confidence, insisting the meaning is obvious, settled, and beyond debate.

In this late-night reflection, we walk back through an Ash Wednesday service in the Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, listening again to the words that linger after the ashes are gone: dust, confession, judgment, and forgiveness.

Ash Wednesday isn't inspirational.It isn't uplifting. And it isn't a spiritual self-improvement project.It is the church stopping long enough to tell the truth.In this episode, we examine Ash Wednesday through the lens of reality rather than sentimentality

After The Great Satan Hunt, a listener raised an important question: why does Ezekiel 28 address the prince of Tyre and then the king of Tyre? Does this shift signal Satan—or something else entirely?

In the final installment of The Great Satan Hunt, we bring the investigation to its conclusion. Even granting—temporarily—the claim that Satan appears in Ezekiel 28:13–15, verses 16–19 render that interpretation unsustainable.

Exodus 24:8 is one of the most jarring verses in the Old Testament. Without warning, Moses throws blood on the people and declares, "Behold the blood of the covenant." No explanation. No softening. No emotional framing. Just blood, covenant, and obligation.

On Transfiguration Sunday, the lectionary paired Exodus 24:8–18 with Matthew 17:1–9—Sinai and the Mount of Transfiguration. But did those readings really belong together, or did the lectionary simply place them side by side and invite us to imagine a connection?