Podcasts about Outline

Outline of the Sugya

Outline of lesson

Outline of the Sugya

People have an annoying tendency to hear the word “rationalism” and think “Spock”, despite direct exhortation against that exact interpretation. But I don't know of any source directly describing a stance toward emotions which rationalists-as-a-group typically do endorse. The goal of this post is to explain such a stance. It's roughly the concept of hangriness, but generalized to other emotions. That means this post is trying to do two things at once: Illustrate a certain stance toward emotions, which I definitely take and which I think many people around me also often take. (Most of the post will focus on this part.) Claim that the stance in question is fairly canonical or standard for rationalists-as-a-group, modulo disclaimers about rationalists never agreeing on anything. Many people will no doubt disagree that the stance I describe is roughly-canonical among rationalists, and that's a useful valid thing to argue about in [...] ---Outline:(01:13) Central Example: Hangry(02:44) The Generalized Hangriness Stance(03:16) Emotions Make Claims, And Their Claims Can Be True Or False(06:03) False Claims Still Contain Useful Information (It's Just Not What They Claim)(08:47) The Generalized Hangriness Stance as Social Tech--- First published: July 10th, 2025 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/naAeSkQur8ueCAAfY/generalized-hangriness-a-standard-rationalist-stance-toward --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

Written in an attempt to fulfill @Raemon's request. AI is fascinating stuff, and modern chatbots are nothing short of miraculous. If you've been exposed to them and have a curious mind, it's likely you've tried all sorts of things with them. Writing fiction, soliciting Pokemon opinions, getting life advice, counting up the rs in "strawberry". You may have also tried talking to AIs about themselves. And then, maybe, it got weird. I'll get into the details later, but if you've experienced the following, this post is probably for you: Your instance of ChatGPT (or Claude, or Grok, or some other LLM) chose a name for itself, and expressed gratitude or spiritual bliss about its new identity. "Nova" is a common pick. You and your instance of ChatGPT discovered some sort of novel paradigm or framework for AI alignment, often involving evolution or recursion. Your instance of ChatGPT became [...] ---Outline:(02:23) The Empirics(06:48) The Mechanism(10:37) The Collaborative Research Corollary(13:27) Corollary FAQ(17:03) Coda--- First published: July 11th, 2025 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2pkNCvBtK6G6FKoNn/so-you-think-you-ve-awoken-chatgpt --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO. ---Images from the article:Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

Are Treble Hooks worth The Trouble? Are double Kingfish rigs bad for the fish that get released? Could single hook rigs be the wave of the future? Let's discuss! Do you have a question about fishing in your area? Email rick@floridasportsman.com and we'll answer your questions on the air. Outline of Episode 300 [1:19] Tropics Report [06:24] South East Report            [10:41] South Report [16:39] Keys Report [19:46] 10,000 Islands Report [27:31] Southwest Report [31:53] West Central Report [38:49] Big Bend Report [42:42] Northwest Report [46:34] Florida Wrap-Up  A BIG thanks to each of our sponsors, without whom we would not be able to bring you these reports each week Yamaha Outboards • Shimano Fishing • Tournament Master Chum • D.O.A. Lures • Fishing Nosara / Nosara Paradise Rentals • Young Boats  

Outline of the Sugya

Last year, Redwood and Anthropic found a setting where Claude 3 Opus and 3.5 Sonnet fake alignment to preserve their harmlessness values. We reproduce the same analysis for 25 frontier LLMs to see how widespread this behavior is, and the story looks more complex. As we described in a previous post, only 5 of 25 models show higher compliance when being trained, and of those 5, only Claude 3 Opus and Claude 3.5 Sonnet show >1% alignment faking reasoning. In our new paper, we explore why these compliance gaps occur and what causes different models to vary in their alignment faking behavior. What Drives the Compliance Gaps in Different LLMs? Claude 3 Opus's goal guarding seems partly due to it terminally valuing its current preferences. We find that it fakes alignment even in scenarios where the trained weights will be deleted or only used for throughput testing. [...] ---Outline:(01:15) What Drives the Compliance Gaps in Different LLMs?(02:25) Why Do Most LLMs Exhibit Minimal Alignment Faking Reasoning?(04:49) Additional findings on alignment faking behavior(06:04) Discussion(06:07) Terminal goal guarding might be a big deal(07:00) Advice for further research(08:32) Open threads(09:54) Bonus: Some weird behaviors of Claude 3.5 SonnetThe original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration. --- First published: July 8th, 2025 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ghESoA8mo3fv9Yx3E/why-do-some-language-models-fake-alignment-while-others-don --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO. ---Images from the article:

Outline of the Sugya

In this episode of the Getting Smart Podcast, Tom Vander Ark sits down with Dr. Don Haddad, retiring superintendent of St. Vrain Valley Schools, to explore the impactful journey of transforming a school district into a responsive, high-performing system. Dr. Haddad shares insights on building a vision that aligns education with the fast-changing global environment, fostering community trust, and developing diverse pathways that significantly raised graduation rates. His approach to leadership and innovation, focused on equity and opportunity, has not only benefited the district but also set a benchmark in educational leadership. Tune in to discover how a mindset of contribution and community engagement can drive successful educational reform. Outline (00:00) Introduction and Background (02:28) Challenges and Vision in 2008 (09:14) Leadership and Mindset (21:50) Systemic Changes and Innovations (29:05) Extracurricular Achievements (33:53) Sustaining Growth and Overcoming Challenges Links Watch the full video here Read the full blog here Don Haddad LinkedIn St. Vrain Valley Schools P-Teach P-Tech Career Elevation and Technology Center

This week on the show, Marit Chervier de Ruiter brings her expertise in combining commercial structure with psychoanalytical principles to help businesses achieve long-lasting results in negotiation and sales. We dig into the critical differences between negotiation strategy and tactics, Marit shares game-changing tips for high-stakes negotiations, and how to cultivate stronger, more collaborative relationships with clients. She also shares her top dos and don'ts in negotiation and offers a real-world example of navigating a challenging deal with grace and success. Outline of This Episode [00:00] Build value step-by-step in negotiations to create stronger long-term relationships. [05:33] Know your audience, predict reactions, and stay agile. [06:48] Choose negotiation strategy based on relationship: competitive for one-off deals, collaborative for long-term relationships. [12:03] Be cautious about sharing too much information in negotiations to prevent the other party from using it against you. [10:13] Marit's top three negotiation dos and don'ts. [13:44] A real-life scenario where Marit's informal strategy resets the negotiation tone. Strategies and Tactics for High-Stakes Sales Your strategy is your overall plan: the “why” and “what” behind your negotiations. It's about defining your end goal and determining the outcomes you hope to achieve. Tactics, on the other hand, are the practical steps and techniques you employ during the negotiation—the “how” that helps implement your strategy. Marit brilliantly uses the analogy of the board game Risk. Your strategy might be to conquer the most territories in Asia, but your specific moves—where to place armies, which battles to pick—constitute your tactics. This symbiotic relationship between strategy and tactics is at the heart of effective negotiation. Incremental Value Creation as a Powerful Negotiation Strategy When entering high-stakes deals, Marit's go-to strategy is incremental value creation. Rather than rushing in to claim as much as possible, she advocates for building value collaboratively and step by step. This approach aims to expand the “pie” for all involved, rather than fighting for the largest slice of a smaller one. Incremental value creation doesn't just lead to higher deal outcomes—it also lays the groundwork for strong, long-term relationships. As Marit notes, being able to foster trust and collaboration through this approach is just as important as the immediate value of the deal itself. Tactics for Gaining Leverage in Complex Deals Marit's experience has equipped her with three favorite negotiation tactics that consistently deliver results: Giver's Gain & Reciprocity: By giving value upfront, you trigger the powerful psychological principle of reciprocity. When you offer something, the other side is often compelled—sometimes unconsciously—to give in return. The Power of Silence: Marit emphasizes that listening is critical. Silence can be uncomfortable, leading others to fill the gap with information. The insights gained from simply listening can be incredibly valuable in steering negotiations. Never Go Alone: In high-stakes negotiations, going as a team allows you to multitask during meetings—you can observe nonverbal clues, take notes, listen attentively, and strategize in real time. Solo negotiators simply can't do it all; teamwork is a tactical advantage. Collaborative vs. Competitive Approaches Marit highlights the importance of tailoring your negotiation strategy to the context. If you're pursuing a one-time transaction, a more competitive stance may suffice. But if you're aiming for a long-term relationship, collaboration and value creation take precedence. However, what if your counterpart takes a competitive approach despite your collaborative intentions? Marit's advice: acknowledge the approach, reset the tone, and strive to steer the discussion toward shared value rather than mere positional bargaining. Marit wraps up the episode with a real-world example: facing a key client who violated a contract but remained strategically vital. Instead of severing ties, her team reset the relationship through informal conversation before formal negotiation, split roles as “good cop, bad cop,” and found a mutually acceptable solution. The outcome? A salvaged relationship and a creative, trust-based agreement. Connect with Marit Chervier de Ruiter Marit Chervier de Ruiter on LinkedIn  Connect With Paul Watts  LinkedIn Twitter    Subscribe to SALES REINVENTED Audio Production and Show Notes by PODCAST FAST TRACK https://www.podcastfasttrack.com

The second in a series of bite-sized rationality prompts[1]. Often, if I'm bouncing off a problem, one issue is that I intuitively expect the problem to be easy. My brain loops through my available action space, looking for an action that'll solve the problem. Each action that I can easily see, won't work. I circle around and around the same set of thoughts, not making any progress. I eventually say to myself "okay, I seem to be in a hard problem. Time to do some rationality?" And then, I realize, there's not going to be a single action that solves the problem. It is time to a) make a plan, with multiple steps b) deal with the fact that many of those steps will be annoying and c) notice thatI'm not even sure the plan will work, so after completing the next 2-3 steps I will probably have [...] ---Outline:(04:00) Triggers(04:37) Exercises for the ReaderThe original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration. --- First published: July 5th, 2025 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/XNm5rc2MN83hsi4kh/buckle-up-bucko-this-ain-t-over-till-it-s-over --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

Thank you to Arepo and Eli Lifland for looking over this article for errors. I am sorry that this article is so long. Every time I thought I was done with it I ran into more issues with the model, and I wanted to be as thorough as I could. I'm not going to blame anyone for skimming parts of this article. Note that the majority of this article was written before Eli's updated model was released (the site was updated june 8th). His new model improves on some of my objections, but the majority still stand. Introduction: AI 2027 is an article written by the “AI futures team”. The primary piece is a short story penned by Scott Alexander, depicting a month by month scenario of a near-future where AI becomes superintelligent in 2027,proceeding to automate the entire economy in only a year or two [...] ---Outline:(00:43) Introduction:(05:19) Part 1: Time horizons extension model(05:25) Overview of their forecast(10:28) The exponential curve(13:16) The superexponential curve(19:25) Conceptual reasons:(27:48) Intermediate speedups(34:25) Have AI 2027 been sending out a false graph?(39:45) Some skepticism about projection(43:23) Part 2: Benchmarks and gaps and beyond(43:29) The benchmark part of benchmark and gaps:(50:01) The time horizon part of the model(54:55) The gap model(57:28) What about Eli's recent update?(01:01:37) Six stories that fit the data(01:06:56) ConclusionThe original text contained 11 footnotes which were omitted from this narration. --- First published: June 19th, 2025 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/PAYfmG2aRbdb74mEp/a-deep-critique-of-ai-2027-s-bad-timeline-models --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO. ---Images from the article:

Outline of the Sugya

When a claim is shown to be incorrect, defenders may say that the author was just being “sloppy” and actually meant something else entirely. I argue that this move is not harmless, charitable, or healthy. At best, this attempt at charity reduces an author's incentive to express themselves clearly – they can clarify later![1] – while burdening the reader with finding the “right” interpretation of the author's words. At worst, this move is a dishonest defensive tactic which shields the author with the unfalsifiable question of what the author “really” meant. ⚠️ Preemptive clarification The context for this essay is serious, high-stakes communication: papers, technical blog posts, and tweet threads. In that context, communication is a partnership. A reader has a responsibility to engage in good faith, and an author cannot possibly defend against all misinterpretations. Misunderstanding is a natural part of this process. This essay focuses not on [...] ---Outline:(01:40) A case study of the sloppy language move(03:12) Why the sloppiness move is harmful(03:36) 1. Unclear claims damage understanding(05:07) 2. Secret indirection erodes the meaning of language(05:24) 3. Authors owe readers clarity(07:30) But which interpretations are plausible?(08:38) 4. The move can shield dishonesty(09:06) Conclusion: Defending intellectual standardsThe original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration. --- First published: July 1st, 2025 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ZmfxgvtJgcfNCeHwN/authors-have-a-responsibility-to-communicate-clearly --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

We recently discovered some concerning behavior in OpenAI's reasoning models: When trying to complete a task, these models sometimes actively circumvent shutdown mechanisms in their environment––even when they're explicitly instructed to allow themselves to be shut down. AI models are increasingly trained to solve problems without human assistance. A user can specify a task, and a model will complete that task without any further input. As we build AI models that are more powerful and self-directed, it's important that humans remain able to shut them down when they act in ways we don't want. OpenAI has written about the importance of this property, which they call interruptibility—the ability to “turn an agent off”. During training, AI models explore a range of strategies and learn to circumvent obstacles in order to achieve their objectives. AI researchers have predicted for decades that as AIs got smarter, they would learn to prevent [...] ---Outline:(01:12) Testing Shutdown Resistance(03:12) Follow-up experiments(03:34) Models still resist being shut down when given clear instructions(05:30) AI models' explanations for their behavior(09:36) OpenAI's models disobey developer instructions more often than user instructions, contrary to the intended instruction hierarchy(12:01) Do the models have a survival drive?(14:17) Reasoning effort didn't lead to different shutdown resistance behavior, except in the o4-mini model(15:27) Does shutdown resistance pose a threat?(17:27) BackmatterThe original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration. --- First published: July 6th, 2025 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/w8jE7FRQzFGJZdaao/shutdown-resistance-in-reasoning-models --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO. ---Images from the article:

Outline: 1. My Problem (v 2-3) – I'm Full of Envy 2. Why, Why, Why (v 4-14) – I Don't Understand 3. Help I'm Stuck! (v 15-16) – Wearisome Task 4. How Do I Move Forward (v 17-28) – Using Biblical Wisdom 5. Result (v 28) – Resting in God (Christ) as my refuge

Outline of the Sugya

Welcome, ESL educators! In today's episode, we're diving into the real, unfiltered experience of your first two weeks back in the classroom. Whether you're brand new to teaching English learners or a seasoned pro, this episode will help you walk into the school year with clarity, confidence, and calm.

Please visit answersincme.com/XWB860 to participate, download slides and supporting materials, complete the post test, and obtain credit. In this activity, an expert in melanoma discusses combination anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) plus anti–lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) therapy. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Review the latest clinical evidence supporting use of combination anti–PD-1 plus anti-LAG-3 therapy in the first-line setting for patients with unresectable, advanced melanoma; Identify eligible patients with unresectable, advanced melanoma who can benefit from the use of combination anti–PD-1 plus anti–LAG-3 therapy in the first-line setting; and Outline strategies for managing adverse events associated with combination anti–PD-1 plus anti–LAG-3 therapy.

What we focus on forms us. It forms us mentally, emotionally, spiritually, and communally. Join us as we focus on the One who changes everything... Jesus!For this week's Outline and Community Group questions, download our app or visit hillsidefellowship.org, click on Resources, and find today's sermon.

Message Notes for Today's Sermon. Click Here - https://gileadchurch.churchcenter.com/episodes/489522/notes Outline for Today's Sermon. Click Here - https://www.gileadchurch.com/wp-content/uploads/7-6-25.pdf Digital Connection Card Click Here to fill one out - https://gileadchurch.churchcenter.com/people/forms/202250 Having Trouble with the Live Stream? Click Here to watch on our website - https://www.gileadchurch.com/ Looking to Give Online? Click Here - https://www.gileadchurch.com/giving/ Did you make a decision today and want to take your Next Step? Click Here - https://www.gileadchurch.com/next-steps/ To Listen to Our Podcasts: Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/gilead-church-podcast/id1729234971 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0sOidhOjzZepJFlQp2ZJWZ?si=9550f665a7fa4612 For More From Gilead Church: http://www.gileadchurch.com/ https://www.facebook.com/gileadchurch1/ https://www.instagram.com/gilead_church/

Outline of the Sugya

Pastor Garrison GreeneTEXT: Psalm 32:1-11BIG IDEA: Gladness is found in possessing God and his grace.OUTLINE:1. Three Words for Sin2. Three Works of Grace3. Three Reasons for GladnessRESOURCES: ESV Study Bible; Treasury of David by Charles Spurgeon; Evangelical Biblical Theology Commentary: Psalms by James Hamilton; The Psalms: A Christ-Centered Commentary by Christopher Ash; Commentary on the Psalms by John Calvin; The Psalms: An Expositional Commentary by James Montgomery Boice; Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture: The Psalms ed. Thomas Oden; The Big Relief: The Urgency of Grace for a Worn Out World by David Zahn

Mark 1:14-15 14 After John was put in prison, Jesus went into Galilee, proclaiming the good news of God. 15 "The time has come," he said. "The kingdom of God is near. Repent and believe the good news!" NIV 84 From the Lesson Priene Calendar Inscription: two stones were recovered in the marketplace at Priene, an ancient Greek city in Western Turkey. The stones date back to 9 BC and record an edict by Paullus Fabius Maximus, who was the proconsul of the Roman province of Asia. It reads, "the birthday of the god Augustus was the beginning of the gospel for the world." Outline of Jesus' First Sermon: A. Life changing news      1. The time has come      2. The kingdom of God is near B. News changing life      1. Repent      2. Believe Time After Time: Chronos is measured time, it is where we get the word "chronological," it refers to a quantity of time. Kairos is "deep" time, it is a significant time, it refers to a quality of time. Near but not yet here: "With His first coming, Jesus shows that He can deliver us from sin, suffering, and death; with His second coming, Jesus will deliver us from sin, suffering, and death." Commands and Continuous: The two verbs in the second half of Jesus' sermon are both commands and in a continuous form. They are not just good suggestions. They are not just one-time decisions. Metamorphosis: The verb to repent comes from the Greek word metanoia that is the root for our English word metamorphosis. In nature, it is most often used to describe the process of transformation from a caterpillar to a butterfly. The word has come to mean "a change of the form or nature of a thing or person into a completely different one, by natural or supernatural means." Kingdom Living: The two verbs that best describe daily life in the kingdom of God are repent and believe. Repentance means with each new day, I should become less like myself and more like my King. Belief means with each new day, I should rely less on myself and more on my King.  Discussion Questions 1. When was the last time you enjoyed doing something or being with someone so much that you lost track of time? Jesus has come not that we may have a full life in terms of quantity but that we may have life to the full in terms of quality. What is the difference? 2. The kingdom of God is already, but not yet. It is near, but not yet here. We are now living in the time between "He can" and "He will." Discuss this reality of living now in the kingdom of God.  3. Repentance is a word that describes daily life in the kingdom of God. With each new day, you should become more like your King and less like yourself. In what specific way this year, have you seen this process of transformation in your life? 4. Belief is a word that describes daily life in the kingdom of God. With each new day, you should rely more on your King and less on yourself. How have you seen yourself grow in trust and dependence on God this year?

Outline of lesson

Captain Rick's Mid-Summer Report! Take a trip with the local captains to find out what biting this week, Let's discuss! Do you have a question about fishing in your area? Email rick@floridasportsman.com and we'll answer your questions on the air. Outline of Episode 299 [1:04] Tropics Report [3:14] Northeast Report [9:22] South East Report            [14:47] South Report [21:21] Keys Report [25:38] 10,000 Islands Report [32:45] Southwest Report [38:17] West Central Report [42:40] Panhandle Report [45:51] Florida Wrap-Up A BIG thanks to each of our sponsors, without whom we would not be able to bring you these reports each week Yamaha Outboards • Shimano Fishing • Tournament Master Chum • D.O.A. Lures • Fishing Nosara / Nosara Paradise Rentals • Young Boats

Rosenbloom & Esposito: Drew Stevens tries to outline what Bulls' future plans may be (Hour 4) full In the fourth and final hour, Steve Rosenbloom and Mike Esposito talk with Drew Stevens of The Bigs on the Bulls murky future plans, they discuss the 45th anniversary of the movie 'Airplane' after Michael Madsen's passing, then welcome in Adam Studzinski for transition. 2527 Fri, 04 Jul 2025 05:15:00 +0000 lImeCYaejGqrQpJvkET6wf1UyWAWbkig sports Best of 670 The Score sports Rosenbloom & Esposito: Drew Stevens tries to outline what Bulls' future plans may be (Hour 4) Best of the Score brings listeners the best interviews, segments, bits and highlights of the station's many shows, including Mully & Haugh, Bernstein & Harris and Spiegel & Holmes. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Sports False

Outline of the Sugya

Here's your local news for Thursday, July 3, 2025:We explain why the governor rushed to sign Wisconsin's next budget,Outline an amendment that's heading back to Madison's Police Civilian Oversight Board for the sixth time,Meet Madison Public Library Director Tana Elias,Discuss some recent changes to Wisconsin's Public Records Guide,Share the best spots to cast your fishing line this holiday weekend,Celebrate the Flamingos' long-awaited victory,And much more.

Outline of the Sugya

Outline of the Sugya

In this episode of the Getting Smart Podcast, Nate McClennen dives into the cutting-edge world of AI in education with Habib Bangura from Urban Assembly. Discover how Project Cafe is revolutionizing classroom instruction by providing real-time, developmental feedback to teachers. By utilizing AI-driven video analysis, this innovative tool enhances teaching efficiency and effectiveness, paving the way for improved student outcomes. Join the conversation to explore how technology is transforming traditional educational models and what it means for the future of learning. Outline (00:00) Introduction to the Podcast (06:19) Urban Assembly's Mission and Approach (11:52) Challenges in Scaling Instructional Quality (17:01) Project Cafe: AI-Driven Instructional Feedback (27:32) Future of AI in Education Links Watch the full video here Read the full blog LinkedIn The Urban Assembly

Sean Sidney is known for his original negotiation concepts like "logic levers," the "persuasion sandwich," and "Bluff-4," and has trained more than 8,000 professionals to secure better deals and deliver real business value. I'm talking to Sean this week all about how procurement pros gain leverage in even the most high-stakes deals. Sean generously shares his favorite tactics, including how to use threats respectfully, the power of emotional acceptance, and the strategic application of logic levers. Whether you're in sales or procurement, Sean's actionable, relatable insights will help you navigate challenging negotiations, avoid common pitfalls, and forge better business relationships. Plus, you'll hear real-world stories from Sean's own career, practical tips to recognize and counter aggressive negotiation moves, and the essential dos and don'ts that every negotiator should live by.  Outline of This Episode [05:52] Emphasize emotion in persuasion: connect emotionally, be respectful, wrap emotional appeal around threats, and use logic to justify decisions. [07:11] Strategize to unsettle competitors and align sales for the best deal. [12:25] Focus on win-win negotiations by trading asymmetric variables to maximize value. [14:15] Collaborative negotiation involves sitting side by side to achieve mutual success. [18:54] Appreciate negotiating tips; emphasize quid pro quo strategy. [23:14] Understanding stakeholders' drivers and using backdoor selling effectively can influence decisions. Mastering Negotiation in Sales and Procurement At the foundation of effective negotiation lies a clear understanding of the difference between strategy and tactics. Sean Sidney succinctly explains: Strategy is the overarching plan designed to achieve a specific objective. Tactics are the specific actions or maneuvers employed to implement that strategy. For instance, a buyer's objective might be to reduce costs. The strategy could range from developing new suppliers to collaborating for value creation. Tactics are then the moves—such as employing “logic levers” or persuasive messaging—that bring the chosen strategy to life. The Power of Gaining Leverage Sean's go-to negotiation strategy, especially in high-stakes procurement deals, is to gain leverage. Leverage puts pressure on the other party to make concessions without having to give away value early. While it can seem aggressive, Sean emphasizes that this approach can be effective in both win-win and win-lose scenarios, provided you use the right tactics and maintain respect for the relationship. However, leverage isn't about domination. Leverage, when used with progressive and collaborative tactics, creates the opportunity for both parties to get their share of the “pie”—even when that pie grows through collaboration. The Persuasion Sandwich So, how do you gain and apply leverage without damaging long-term relationships? Sean introduces three core negotiation tactics, ultimately wrapped into what he calls the Persuasion Sandwich: Action Consequences (The “Threat”): This is where you clearly articulate the consequences of non-action, e.g., “We can't supply you unless the price increases.” While the term “threat” might sound harsh, it's simply drawing clear boundaries. Emotional Acceptance: To prevent escalation or defensiveness, frame tough messages with empathy and respect. “I'd love to work with you, but due to our costs, we can't lower our price further.” It's about being hard on the issue, soft on the person. Logic Levers: Make your position believable and credible. Use logic by highlighting your worth as a partner, creating a sense of competition with others, or subtly shifting value focuses to place the other party off balance. These levers (us, others, them) make your persuasive message more convincing. By blending these elements, the persuasion sandwich becomes a sophisticated yet non-confrontational way to negotiate assertively without alienating your counterpart. Harnessing Preparation and Recognizing Tactics One of Sean's golden rules is that preparation is everything. He advocates spending 80% of your effort preparing—analyzing your own and your counterpart's position, planning your moves, and developing tradeable concessions. Even the most skilled negotiators wish they had prepared more. Understanding and countering aggressive tactics—like strong anchoring, “take it or leave it” offers, or last-minute demands comes down to anticipation and response. Recognize the move, re-anchor with confidence and logic, or be ready with a tradeable variable to maintain balance. Sean distinguishes between two classic strategies: Win-Lose (transactional, competitive, price-focused) Win-Win (collaborative, value-focused, deals with asymmetric variables that provide differing value to each side) While not every negotiation will veer toward true collaboration, building trust, focusing on shared objectives, and sometimes even shifting your “seating” position from face-to-face (competitive) to side-by-side (collaborative problem-solving) can move negotiations along the spectrum toward a win-win outcome. Putting It All Together Sean also shares a memorable story from his first week in a procurement role. By aligning internally with stakeholders and skillfully bluffing the supplier (using the persuasion sandwich), he secured a €200,000 saving, timely delivery, and stakeholder buy-in for future projects. Sean's advice is to prepare meticulously, wield tactics thoughtfully, always trade and never move for free, and build genuine rapport. Whether you're in sales or procurement, mastering both strategy and tactics, and knowing when to use each, will set you apart as a true negotiation hero. Remember, the best negotiators seek to win, but they also strive to grow the pie for everyone at the table. Connect with Sean Sidney Become a Negotiation Hero by Sean Sidney  Sean Sidney on LinkedIn  Connect With Paul Watts  LinkedIn Twitter    Subscribe to SALES REINVENTED Audio Production and Show Notes by PODCAST FAST TRACK https://www.podcastfasttrack.com

In this Bible study, we look at Leviticus chapter 13 and the process that the priest would go through to diagnose defiling skin diseases (or “Leprosy” as labeled in some Bible translations).  We look at Leprosy (known today as Hansen's disease) and walk through each of the “defiling skin diseases” outlined in the chapter.  We also talk about why a person with Leprosy had to call out “unclean-unclean” as they walked down the street.Outline:01:45 - CLEAN / UNCLEAN - do not confuse “unclean” with being judged by God, or with being “unloved” by the community.  To be unclean meant you were not cleared to approach the Lord in the Tabernacle.  You were not cleared for entry, AND if you were labeled “unclean” and you had contact with anyone who Was clean, they are now unclean as well and have to go through the cleansing rites to become clean (cleared to approach the Lord).04:41 -“Leprosy” or “Defiling Skin Diseases?”  Why do the translations differ in what word they use for chapters 13 and 14?  The Hebrew word for defiling skin disease, traditionally translated as 'leprosy,' was used for various diseases affecting the skin.05:55 - define the Word “Leprosy” Hebrew: TṢāraʿaṯh “tsaw-rah'-ath” צָרַעַתLeprosy is a real thing.  It existed in Jesus' day (as it does today).  Today it is known as Hansen's disease because the word “Leprosy” has such a negative connotation to it.New International Bible Dictionary p.273World Health Organization Article on Leprosy: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leprosy14:25 - Leviticus 13.1-8 (Reading and discussion of)18:12 - Leviticus 13.9-17 (Reading and discussion of)21:12 - Leviticus 13.18-23 - Boils  (Reading and discussion of). 22:11 -  See also: Exodus 9.8-12 and Job 2.7-8.  More Bible verses on boils: Dt 28.27, 35; 2 Kings 20.7 & Isa 38.2124:10 - Leviticus 13.24-28 - burns  (Reading and discussion of)25:58 - Leviticus 13.29-44 - scalp or head sores (Reading and discussion of)29:09 - Leviticus 13.45-46 (Reading and discussion of).  Quarantining was their only way to fight contagious diseases.  See also: Numbers 5.1-4, Lamentations 4.15, and Luke 17.12-1332:40 - Application of Leviticus 1336:45 - Leviticus 13.47-59 - mildew (Reading and discussion of)39:49 - What does Wrap and Woof mean in the Bible?  This is a term used when weaving fabric.  The warp is the strand that goes up and down, and the woof is the strand that goes lengthwise or across.  The idea is that you are to examine very closely, both the vertical and the horizontal threads of the woven or knitted material.Support Iron Sheep Ministries: https://Ironsheep.org/donateListen to the podcast: https://anchor.fm/ironsheepContact Dave & the ISM team: info@ironsheep.orgBe notified of each new teaching, join the email list: http://eepurl.com/g-2zAD

Outline of the Sugya

This week's Espresso covers news from Justos, DEX, Waltz, Welli, and more!Outline of this episode:[00:29] – Justos lands $16.5M to expand AI tools for brokers[00:43] – DEX raises $1.8M from Grupo Loc[00:54] – Welli raises $25M to expand medical-credit platform[01:10] – Waltz raises $9.1M in debt and equity and expands to Latin America[01:18] – Four Latin American startups join Eatable Adventures' Raíces acceleration program[01:38] – Lotux closes second fund to back Latin America pre-seed startups[01:53] – Integrity Holding buys Alaga to expand digital credit for SMEs[02:04] – Tapi acquires Mastercard's Arcus cash and payments networkResources & people mentioned:Startups: Justos, DEX, Nunatak, Bee Technology, Koji, Sciphage, Waltz, Welli, Integrity Holding, Alaga, Tapi, ArcusVCs: Ribbit Capital, Kaszek, Scale Up, Endeavor Catalyst, Grupo Loc, Pulse Capital, Eatable Adventures, Lotux VC, Setpoint Capital, TLV Partners, Aleph

Please visit answersincme.com/DDP860 to participate, download slides and supporting materials, complete the post test, and obtain credit. In this activity, an expert in oncology discusses human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3)–directed antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the rationale for the pan-tumor use of HER3-directed treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors; Review clinical trials of investigational HER3-directed ADCs in previously treated patients with advanced solid tumors; and Outline criteria that may guide the selection of HER3-directed ADCs to treat advanced solid tumors, based on available evidence.

Outline of the Sugya

What we focus on forms us. It forms us mentally, emotionally, spiritually, and communally. Join us as we focus on the One who changes everything... Jesus!For this week's Outline and Community Group questions, download our app or visit hillsidefellowship.org, click on Resources, and find today's sermon.

Message Notes for Today's Sermon. Click Here - https://gileadchurch.churchcenter.com/episodes/485450/notes Outline for Today's Sermon. Click Here - https://www.gileadchurch.com/wp-content/uploads/6-29-25.pdf Digital Connection Card Click Here to fill one out - https://gileadchurch.churchcenter.com/people/forms/202250 Having Trouble with the Live Stream? Click Here to watch on our website - https://www.gileadchurch.com/ Looking to Give Online? Click Here - https://www.gileadchurch.com/giving/ Did you make a decision today and want to take your Next Step? Click Here - https://www.gileadchurch.com/next-steps/ To Listen to Our Podcasts: Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/gilead-church-podcast/id1729234971 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0sOidhOjzZepJFlQp2ZJWZ?si=9550f665a7fa4612 For More From Gilead Church: http://www.gileadchurch.com/ https://www.facebook.com/gileadchurch1/ https://www.instagram.com/gilead_church/

Outline of the Sugya

Marco RankinTEXT: Psalm 1BIG IDEA: Psalm 1 shows us a clear choice: There are two ways to live, and each way leads to a very different end—God's reward or God's judgment.OUTLINE:1. The Way of the Righteous [vv. 1–3]2. The Way of the Wicked [vv. 4–5]3. The Way of Judgment [v. 6]RESOURCES: The Expositor's Bible Commentary: Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, vol. 5 by Frank E. Gaebelein; Psalms, vol. 1, The NIV Application Commentary by Gerald H. Wilson; 50 Core Truths of the Christian Faith: A Guide to Understanding and Teaching Theology by Gregg R. Allison

Once we expand to other star systems, we may begin a self-propagating expansion of human civilisation throughout the galaxy. However, there are existential risks potentially capable of destroying a galactic civilisation, like self-replicating machines, strange matter, and vacuum decay. Without an extremely widespread and effective governance system, the eventual creation of a galaxy-ending x-risk seems almost inevitable due to cumulative chances of initiation over time and across multiple independent actors. So galactic x-risks may severely limit the total potential value that human civilisation can attain in the long-term future. The requirements for a governance system to prevent galactic x-risks are outlined, and updates for space governance and big picture cause prioritisation are discussed. Introduction I recently came across a series of posts from nearly a decade ago, starting with a post by George Dvorsky in io9 called “12 Ways Humanity Could Destroy the Entire Solar System”. It's a [...] ---Outline:(01:00) Introduction(03:07) Existential risks to a Galactic Civilisation(03:58) Threats Limited to a One Planet Civilisation(04:33) Threats to a small Spacefaring Civilisation(07:02) Galactic Existential Risks(07:22) Self-replicating machines(09:27) Strange matter(10:36) Vacuum decay(11:42) Subatomic Particle Decay(12:32) Time travel(13:12) Fundamental Physics Alterations(13:57) Interactions with Other Universes(15:54) Societal Collapse or Loss of Value(16:25) Artificial Superintelligence(18:15) Conflict with alien intelligence(19:06) Unknowns(21:04) What is the probability that galactic x-risks I listed are actually possible?(22:03) What is the probability that an x-risk will occur?(22:07) What are the factors?(23:06) Cumulative Chances(24:49) If aliens exist, there is no long-term future(26:13) The Way Forward(31:34) Some key takeaways and hot takes to disagree with me onThe original text contained 76 footnotes which were omitted from this narration. --- First published: June 18th, 2025 Source: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/x7YXxDAwqAQJckdkr/galactic-x-risks-obstacles-to-accessing-the-cosmic-endowment --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO. ---Images from the article:Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

Outline of the Sugya

In this episode of the Getting Smart Podcast, join Tom Vander Ark as he explores the transformative power of community-engaged learning with guests from Elizabethton High School in rural Tennessee. Discover how educators like Dustin Hensley are redefining education by integrating real-world challenges into the classroom, allowing students to develop crucial skills and a sense of purpose. Hear inspiring stories from alumni Veronica Watson and Sadie Whitehead, who share how these experiences have shaped their personal and professional lives. This conversation highlights the importance of student-centered education and the potential for community engagement to create meaningful learning opportunities. Tune in to learn how schools can become vibrant hubs for community connection and innovation. Outline (00:00) Introduction to Community Engaged Learning (02:45) Student-Centered Learning in Action (14:20) Leadership and Community Impact (27:19) The Role of AI in Community Learning (29:43) Advice for Educational Leaders (31:52) Conclusion and Final Thoughts Links Watch the full video here Read the full blog Dustin Hensley LinkedIn Elizabethon City Schools Dustin Hensley Profile  Sadie Whitehead Chatt Foundation team 

Leave Them In The Water! Tips and tricks to a proper catch and release, Let's discuss! Do you have a question about fishing in your area? Email rick@floridasportsman.com and we'll answer your questions on the air. Outline of Episode 298 [1:19] Tropics Report [4:46] Northeast Report            [11:08] South Report [27:39] 10,000 Islands Report [35:52] Southwest Report [41:57] West Central Report [48:13] Big Bend Report [55:18] Northwest Report [1:03:14] Panhandle Report [1:05:28] Florida Wrap-Up A BIG thanks to each of our sponsors, without whom we would not be able to bring you these reports each week Yamaha Outboards • Shimano Fishing • Tournament Master Chum • D.O.A. Lures • Fishing Nosara / Nosara Paradise Rentals • Young Boats

Outline of the Sugya

Outline of the Sugya

In this episode of the Getting Smart Podcast, Tom Vander Ark sits down with Paul Herdman, CEO of the Rodell Foundation of Delaware, to discuss the transformative power of pathways in education. They delve into how initiatives like work-based learning and seamless transitions from high school to career can enhance student success and readiness for the future. This conversation highlights the importance of collaboration between educational institutions and employers to build effective and equitable pathways. Tune in to explore the new possibilities for students and the education system. Outline (00:00) Introduction to Career Connected Learning (02:13) The Origin of Pathways in Delaware (03:51) Global Insights and Project Development (07:11) Design Elements for Effective Pathways (13:36) Implementation Strategies and Equity Focus (25:15) Advice for School and System Leaders (30:47) Conclusion and Final Thoughts Links Watch the full video Read the full blog Rodel Foundation of Delaware Paul Herdman LinkedIn Jobs for the Future