Podcasts about Jes Staley

The financial aspect of the Jeffrey Epstein case continues to be one of the grearest mysteries of the criminal operation as the story continues to unfold.There are now two separate investigations occurring into his relationship with some of the biggest banks and bankers in the world.One is occurring in New York where regulators are looking at his financial dealings with Deutsche Bank and across the pond in England where Barclays and Jes Staley are getting the same treatment.(commercial at 14:25)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/02/business/jeffrey-epstein-deutsche-bank.html

As the lawsuit filed by the USVI against JP Morgan and Jes Staley continues to unfold, we are learning a lot more about what the contents of those filings contain and what the government of the USVI is alleging. Jamie Dimon, giving an interview on CNBC discussed the problems facing the bank and apolgized for the banks relationship with Jeffrey Epstein but stressed that they are not responsible for his behavior.Meanwhile, back in reality....(commercial at 10:01)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon regrets Jeffrey Epstein relationship (cnbc.com)

In 2023, JPMorgan Chase agreed to pay a combined total of $365 million to resolve two major lawsuits stemming from its years-long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The first was a $290 million class-action settlement with nearly 200 Epstein survivors who accused the bank of enabling Epstein's trafficking operation by continuing to provide him with financial services even after his 2008 sex crime conviction. A separate $75 million settlement was reached with the U.S. Virgin Islands, which had sued JPMorgan for allegedly facilitating Epstein's criminal enterprise within the territory. The bank did not admit wrongdoing in either case but agreed to pay out substantial funds to avoid prolonged litigation, including money earmarked for victim services, law enforcement anti-trafficking efforts, and legal fees.The ramifications of these settlements were far-reaching. JPMorgan's internal handling of the Epstein account came under public and regulatory scrutiny, especially after revelations that senior executives—including Mary Erdoes—ignored repeated warnings and had the authority to sever ties with Epstein years earlier but chose not to. The cases revealed systemic failures in compliance and oversight, severely damaging the bank's reputation and forcing it to review its internal controls. Former JPMorgan executive Jes Staley, who had a close relationship with Epstein, also became a central figure in the scandal and now faces separate legal action. These outcomes sent a powerful signal to the financial industry: enabling or turning a blind eye to human trafficking and abuse for the sake of profit comes with a steep price.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:JPMorgan's Epstein settlement will change how all banks act (afr.com)

In early 2023, JPMorgan filed a lawsuit against Jes Staley—its former head of investment banking—alleging he misled the bank about Jeffrey Epstein's illicit activities in order to preserve Epstein as a high-value client. According to court filings, Staley vouched for Epstein and downplayed troubling behavior, even though internal communications indicated suspicion of criminal conduct by Epstein. The bank asserts it is seeking reimbursement from Staley for any financial penalties or settlements it may incur due to this alleged cover-up, emphasizing that he acted beyond his authority and jeopardized both the bank's legal standing and reputationIn March 2025, a federal judge in Manhattan rejected Staley's attempt to dismiss JPMorgan's claims, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. The judge ruled that the bank provided sufficient evidence to move forward, including references to Staley's personal involvement with Epstein's accounts and his potential knowledge of Epstein's wrongdoing. JPMorgan is aiming to hold Staley personally liable for losses tied to both the U.S. Virgin Islands' case and separate claims from an alleged Epstein victim. A formal written explanation from the court is expected to clarify the legal basis for the decision.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:JP Morgan sues former executive over claims he hid Jeffrey Epstein's sex abuse | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jes Staley, the former private banking head at JPMorgan, found himself at the center of explosive litigation tied to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. JPMorgan sued Staley in 2023, alleging he misled the bank about his relationship with Epstein and helped protect Epstein's status as a high-value client, all while hiding his knowledge of Epstein's predatory behavior. The bank sought to claw back over $80 million in compensation. Staley denied wrongdoing, but the case placed immense pressure on JPMorgan, which simultaneously faced lawsuits from Epstein victims and the U.S. Virgin Islands over its financial ties to the disgraced financier. In the end, JPMorgan reached a confidential settlement with Staley, avoiding a prolonged courtroom spectacle.But the fallout for Staley didn't end there. In the U.K., financial regulators had imposed a lifetime ban and multi-million-pound fine, accusing him of misleading authorities by claiming his relationship with Epstein was purely professional. That claim unraveled when evidence surfaced showing personal emails and inappropriate communications, including messages involving Staley's daughter. A tribunal upheld the regulatory ban, calling his conduct reckless and lacking integrity. Simultaneously, a class-action suit in the U.S. advanced, alleging that both Staley and Barclays misled investors by failing to disclose the depth of his Epstein ties before his appointment as CEO. The legal and reputational consequences continue to pile up for a man once seen as untouchable in elite banking circles.source:JP Morgan sues former executive over claims he hid Jeffrey Epstein's sex abuse | Daily Mail Online

JPMorgan Chase's handling of over $1 billion in Jeffrey Epstein's financial transactions is a searing indictment of institutional greed overriding ethical obligation. Internal documents and testimony revealed that Epstein maintained dozens of accounts with the bank—even after his 2008 conviction for soliciting sex from a minor. Red flags were everywhere: structured cash withdrawals in suspicious amounts, unexplained wire transfers to known co-conspirators, and regular payments to models, hotels, and private flights. Yet, JPMorgan's compliance team either ignored or downplayed the glaring risk. Senior executives, including Jes Staley, maintained personal ties to Epstein, even visiting his properties and exchanging friendly emails. The bank's behavior wasn't negligence—it was willful blindness cloaked in profit motive.Even as internal alerts piled up, JPMorgan continued doing business with Epstein until 2013—five years after his conviction. The reason? Epstein was lucrative. He brought the bank high-value clients and potentially opened doors to wealthier circles. The compliance breakdown wasn't just an oversight; it was a symptom of systemic rot. JPMorgan executives were fully aware of who Epstein was and what he represented. They made a calculated decision: keep the money flowing, and silence the alarms. By enabling his financial activity for years, JPMorgan became a key pillar in the infrastructure that allowed Epstein's operation to flourish unchecked.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:JPMorgan flagged Jeffrey Epstein sex traffic transactions to Treasury (cnbc.com)

JP Morgan's so-called “internal investigation” into its relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was less about uncovering the truth and more about protecting its image. Framed as a move toward accountability, the inquiry conveniently failed to hold any top executive meaningfully responsible—despite damning evidence that Epstein's suspicious activity triggered compliance warnings for years. The bank processed hundreds of millions in transactions for Epstein, including payments to known victims and co-conspirators, while turning a blind eye to the very red flags their own systems flagged. Yet, the internal probe largely focused on low-level compliance missteps and retroactive policy tweaks, rather than confronting the systemic rot or those in leadership who allowed the relationship to thrive unchecked.Worse, the investigation reeked of damage control. It came only after mounting lawsuits and public scrutiny made silence unsustainable, and even then, it felt like a performance choreographed for media consumption. Jes Staley, the high-level executive with deep Epstein ties, somehow skated past intense scrutiny for far too long, raising serious questions about how thorough—or willfully blind—the internal review actually was. The bank's leadership pointed to the report as proof of reform while quietly settling with Epstein's victims and continuing to dodge questions about who knew what and when. In the end, the so-called “investigation” served as yet another bread-and-circus exercise, meant to pacify critics without exposing the deeper corruption at play.source:JPMorgan report found exec invited Epstein to meetings with foreign government officials | Daily Mail Online

JPMorgan Chase's handling of over $1 billion in Jeffrey Epstein's financial transactions is a searing indictment of institutional greed overriding ethical obligation. Internal documents and testimony revealed that Epstein maintained dozens of accounts with the bank—even after his 2008 conviction for soliciting sex from a minor. Red flags were everywhere: structured cash withdrawals in suspicious amounts, unexplained wire transfers to known co-conspirators, and regular payments to models, hotels, and private flights. Yet, JPMorgan's compliance team either ignored or downplayed the glaring risk. Senior executives, including Jes Staley, maintained personal ties to Epstein, even visiting his properties and exchanging friendly emails. The bank's behavior wasn't negligence—it was willful blindness cloaked in profit motive.Even as internal alerts piled up, JPMorgan continued doing business with Epstein until 2013—five years after his conviction. The reason? Epstein was lucrative. He brought the bank high-value clients and potentially opened doors to wealthier circles. The compliance breakdown wasn't just an oversight; it was a symptom of systemic rot. JPMorgan executives were fully aware of who Epstein was and what he represented. They made a calculated decision: keep the money flowing, and silence the alarms. By enabling his financial activity for years, JPMorgan became a key pillar in the infrastructure that allowed Epstein's operation to flourish unchecked.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:JPMorgan flagged Jeffrey Epstein sex traffic transactions to Treasury (cnbc.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jes Staley, during his tenure at JPMorgan Chase, repeatedly went to bat for Ghislaine Maxwell in ways that raised serious ethical and legal questions—especially given her known proximity to Jeffrey Epstein and the mounting allegations surrounding their network. Despite internal concerns and red flags about her role in Epstein's operation, Staley reportedly pushed to maintain the bank's relationship with her, describing her in internal communications as a valuable connection. He didn't just look the other way—he advocated for her behind the scenes, leveraging his position to keep her in JPMorgan's good graces even as the media and law enforcement began circling. This wasn't a neutral business decision—it was a choice to align the institution with someone credibly accused of aiding in the trafficking of minors.What makes Staley's defense of Maxwell particularly galling is the context: this wasn't done in ignorance or innocence. By the time he was propping her up, Epstein had already been convicted, and Maxwell's name was widely associated with disturbing accusations. Yet Staley maintained contact with both of them, including sending effusive messages and allegedly visiting Epstein's properties. His support for Maxwell underscores the broader problem: a banking culture more concerned with preserving elite networks than confronting criminal behavior. In protecting her, Staley wasn't just protecting a client—he was protecting a gateway to a world of influence, access, and secrets. And in doing so, he dragged JPMorgan into the moral quicksand that continues to stain its legacy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://nypost.com/2022/01/26/jes-staley-reportedly-backed-jeffrey-epstein-at-jp-morgan/https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/9-times-prince-andrew-ghislaine-26065153

Jes Staley, during his tenure at JPMorgan Chase, repeatedly went to bat for Ghislaine Maxwell in ways that raised serious ethical and legal questions—especially given her known proximity to Jeffrey Epstein and the mounting allegations surrounding their network. Despite internal concerns and red flags about her role in Epstein's operation, Staley reportedly pushed to maintain the bank's relationship with her, describing her in internal communications as a valuable connection. He didn't just look the other way—he advocated for her behind the scenes, leveraging his position to keep her in JPMorgan's good graces even as the media and law enforcement began circling. This wasn't a neutral business decision—it was a choice to align the institution with someone credibly accused of aiding in the trafficking of minors.What makes Staley's defense of Maxwell particularly galling is the context: this wasn't done in ignorance or innocence. By the time he was propping her up, Epstein had already been convicted, and Maxwell's name was widely associated with disturbing accusations. Yet Staley maintained contact with both of them, including sending effusive messages and allegedly visiting Epstein's properties. His support for Maxwell underscores the broader problem: a banking culture more concerned with preserving elite networks than confronting criminal behavior. In protecting her, Staley wasn't just protecting a client—he was protecting a gateway to a world of influence, access, and secrets. And in doing so, he dragged JPMorgan into the moral quicksand that continues to stain its legacy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://nypost.com/2022/01/26/jes-staley-reportedly-backed-jeffrey-epstein-at-jp-morgan/https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/9-times-prince-andrew-ghislaine-26065153Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein was an American financier and convicted sex offender who became notorious for his involvement in a high-profile sex trafficking ring. Born on January 20, 1953, Epstein worked as a financier and was well-connected with various influential individuals, including politicians, business tycoons, and celebrities.Epstein's activities came to light in the early 2000s when he was investigated by law enforcement agencies for allegedly sexually exploiting underage girls. In 2008, he pleaded guilty to state charges of soliciting prostitution from a minor in Florida and was sentenced to 18 months in jail. However, he served only 13 months and was granted a controversial work release program.Epstein's case gained renewed attention in 2019 when he was arrested on federal charges of sex trafficking of minors. The indictment accused him of operating a vast network that recruited underage girls for sexual exploitation, with incidents alleged to have taken place in his luxurious residences in New York, Florida, and other locations.Epstein's connections to powerful figures, including former U.S. President Bill Clinton, Britain's Prince Andrew, and numerous other prominent individuals, raised significant concerns and led to widespread speculation about the extent of his activities and potential co-conspirators.Before he could stand trial for the federal charges, Epstein was found dead in his jail cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York City on August 10, 2019. The official cause of death was ruled as suicide by hanging, but his death sparked numerous conspiracy theories and allegations of foul play due to the high-profile nature of the case and the potential implications for those connected to Epstein.Epstein's death did not bring an end to the investigations surrounding his activities. Civil lawsuits against his estate, filed by numerous victims, continued, aiming to seek justice and financial compensation.Furthermore, government agencies and law enforcement authorities continued their efforts to uncover the extent of his sex trafficking ring and any possible co-conspirators involved.The case of Jeffrey Epstein remains a subject of public interest and scrutiny, highlighting the issue of sex trafficking and the abuse of power. It exposed the vulnerabilities of the justice system and raised questions about the influence of wealth and privilege.As the lawsuit between JP Morgan, Jes Staley and The USVI continues to roll on, I think it's important to look at the USVI and their behavior during the time Jeffrey Epstein was a resident there and in this episode that is exactly what we do and we are asking the question:Why didn't the USVI do more to stop Jeffrey Epstein?(commercial at 13:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:On Epstein's ‘Little St. Jeff's' island, a hideaway where money bought influence | The StarBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein was an American financier and convicted sex offender who became notorious for his involvement in a high-profile sex trafficking ring. Born on January 20, 1953, Epstein worked as a financier and was well-connected with various influential individuals, including politicians, business tycoons, and celebrities.Epstein's activities came to light in the early 2000s when he was investigated by law enforcement agencies for allegedly sexually exploiting underage girls. In 2008, he pleaded guilty to state charges of soliciting prostitution from a minor in Florida and was sentenced to 18 months in jail. However, he served only 13 months and was granted a controversial work release program.Epstein's case gained renewed attention in 2019 when he was arrested on federal charges of sex trafficking of minors. The indictment accused him of operating a vast network that recruited underage girls for sexual exploitation, with incidents alleged to have taken place in his luxurious residences in New York, Florida, and other locations.Epstein's connections to powerful figures, including former U.S. President Bill Clinton, Britain's Prince Andrew, and numerous other prominent individuals, raised significant concerns and led to widespread speculation about the extent of his activities and potential co-conspirators.Before he could stand trial for the federal charges, Epstein was found dead in his jail cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York City on August 10, 2019. The official cause of death was ruled as suicide by hanging, but his death sparked numerous conspiracy theories and allegations of foul play due to the high-profile nature of the case and the potential implications for those connected to Epstein.Epstein's death did not bring an end to the investigations surrounding his activities. Civil lawsuits against his estate, filed by numerous victims, continued, aiming to seek justice and financial compensation.Furthermore, government agencies and law enforcement authorities continued their efforts to uncover the extent of his sex trafficking ring and any possible co-conspirators involved.The case of Jeffrey Epstein remains a subject of public interest and scrutiny, highlighting the issue of sex trafficking and the abuse of power. It exposed the vulnerabilities of the justice system and raised questions about the influence of wealth and privilege.As the lawsuit between JP Morgan, Jes Staley and The USVI continues to roll on, I think it's important to look at the USVI and their behavior during the time Jeffrey Epstein was a resident there and in this episode that is exactly what we do and we are asking the question:Why didn't the USVI do more to stop Jeffrey Epstein?(commercial at 13:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:On Epstein's ‘Little St. Jeff's' island, a hideaway where money bought influence | The Star

On tonight's episode we take a look at the new revelations surrounding Jes Staley and his lobbying for Epstein to remain a client at JPMorgan even though he was a registered sex offender, and we also take a look at 9 times Maxwell and Prince Andrew appeared to be a lot closer than Andrew wants to admit.(Commercial at 15:18)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://nypost.com/2022/01/26/jes-staley-reportedly-backed-jeffrey-epstein-at-jp-morgan/https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/9-times-prince-andrew-ghislaine-26065153Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On tonight's episode we take a look at the new revelations surrounding Jes Staley and his lobbying for Epstein to remain a client at JPMorgan even though he was a registered sex offender, and we also take a look at 9 times Maxwell and Prince Andrew appeared to be a lot closer than Andrew wants to admit.(Commercial at 15:18)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://nypost.com/2022/01/26/jes-staley-reportedly-backed-jeffrey-epstein-at-jp-morgan/https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/9-times-prince-andrew-ghislaine-26065153

Jeffrey Epstein was enabled by some of the most powerful people in the financial sector. One of the most glaring examples of this, is when JP Morgan dropped Epstein as a client after Jes Staley left the company, Deustche Bank was right there to soften his landing and provide the financial backing for him to continue on with his criminal behavior.(Commercial at 9:20)To contact me;bobbycapucci@protonmail.comSource:https://fortune.com/2020/07/09/deutsche-bank-clients-jp-morgan-chase-fines/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The financial aspect of the Jeffrey Epstein case continues to be one of the grearest mysteries of the criminal operation as the story continues to unfold.There are now two separate investigations occurring into his relationship with some of the biggest banks and bankers in the world.One is occurring in New York where regulators are looking at his financial dealings with Deutsche Bank and across the pond in England where Barclays and Jes Staley are getting the same treatment.(commercial at 14:25)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/02/business/jeffrey-epstein-deutsche-bank.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jes Staley and his relatioship with Jeffrey Epstein was well known to everyone by the time he was hired by Barclays, yet it was not an issue when they decided to bring him on board. After he was hired, and the scrutiny began over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, Barclays was forced to initiate an internal investigation. Upon completion of this investigation, the board and the company backed Jes Staley, even though they were aware of the disturbing messages that Staley was trading back and forth with Jeffrey Epstein. In this episode, we take a look at how Barclays protected Staley from the storm and how their motivations for doing so, seem to be driven by nothing other than the bottom line. (commercial at 6:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein's long shadow falls on JPMorgan and Barclays once more | Financial Times (ft.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Things are becoming much more serious for Jes Staley as he continues to try and navigate the minefield that is the remnants of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. After keeping a relatively low profile as far as the Epstein criminal enterprise was concerned, Staley is now being aired out from all corners. Not only is he being sued by the Virgin Islands he is now being sued by his former company, JP Morgan. (commercial at 7:03)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:JP Morgan sues former executive over claims he hid Jeffrey Epstein's sex abuse | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

As we predicted on the podcast, JP Morgan and the survivor of Jeffrey Epstein who brought the suit against the banking giant have now settled for an undetermined amount of money. The settlement effectively ends the lawsuit against JP Morgan. JP morgan and their lawsuit against Jes Staley is still active and the lawsuit brought by the USVI against JP Morgan and Jes Staley also remain in the system.(commercial at 8:10)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:JPMorgan agrees to settle Jeffrey Epstein victim class action lawsuit | Fox Business

​Former Barclays CEO Jes Staley has admitted to having a consensual sexual encounter with a member of Jeffrey Epstein's staff at a New York apartment owned by Epstein's brother. This revelation emerged during Staley's testimony in his appeal against the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) proposed lifetime ban and £1.8 million fine for allegedly misleading the regulator about his relationship with Epstein. Staley maintains that, despite this incident, his relationship with Epstein was primarily professional, and he was unaware of Epstein's criminal activitiesJes Staley's admission that he slept with one of Jeffrey Epstein's staff is yet another damning piece of evidence exposing his deep entanglement with the disgraced financier. For years, Staley downplayed his relationship with Epstein, insisting it was purely professional. Now, as he faces a lifetime ban from the financial industry, his story is unraveling. His claim that he was unaware of Epstein's crimes is absurd—Epstein's 2008 conviction for sex trafficking should have been enough for any legitimate banker to sever ties. Instead, Staley maintained a cozy, almost servile relationship, exchanging over 1,000 emails with Epstein and even referring to him as “Uncle Jeffrey” in a message to his daughter. This wasn't just a working relationship; it was an alliance, one that helped Epstein continue operating within elite financial circles while he was actively abusing young girls.Staley's excuse that this sexual encounter was “consensual” is equally disgusting, considering Epstein's well-documented pattern of coercion and trafficking. The idea that any of the women under Epstein's control had true agency is laughable—Epstein hand-picked vulnerable girls, manipulated them, and created an environment where they had no real choice. Whether Staley knew the full extent of Epstein's crimes or not, he willingly participated in the toxic, exploitative ecosystem that Epstein cultivated. His desperate attempts to downplay, deny, and distance himself now only serve to highlight his own moral bankruptcy. If he had any integrity, he would have spoken up years ago. Instead, he's in court, feigning ignorance, hoping to escape punishment while his legacy crumbles under the weight of his own lies.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-Barclays boss Jes Staley admits having sex with Jeffrey Epstein's employee in New York building where paedophile trafficked underage girls | Daily Mail Online

​Former Barclays CEO Jes Staley has admitted to having a consensual sexual encounter with a member of Jeffrey Epstein's staff at a New York apartment owned by Epstein's brother. This revelation emerged during Staley's testimony in his appeal against the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) proposed lifetime ban and £1.8 million fine for allegedly misleading the regulator about his relationship with Epstein. Staley maintains that, despite this incident, his relationship with Epstein was primarily professional, and he was unaware of Epstein's criminal activitiesJes Staley's admission that he slept with one of Jeffrey Epstein's staff is yet another damning piece of evidence exposing his deep entanglement with the disgraced financier. For years, Staley downplayed his relationship with Epstein, insisting it was purely professional. Now, as he faces a lifetime ban from the financial industry, his story is unraveling. His claim that he was unaware of Epstein's crimes is absurd—Epstein's 2008 conviction for sex trafficking should have been enough for any legitimate banker to sever ties. Instead, Staley maintained a cozy, almost servile relationship, exchanging over 1,000 emails with Epstein and even referring to him as “Uncle Jeffrey” in a message to his daughter. This wasn't just a working relationship; it was an alliance, one that helped Epstein continue operating within elite financial circles while he was actively abusing young girls.Staley's excuse that this sexual encounter was “consensual” is equally disgusting, considering Epstein's well-documented pattern of coercion and trafficking. The idea that any of the women under Epstein's control had true agency is laughable—Epstein hand-picked vulnerable girls, manipulated them, and created an environment where they had no real choice. Whether Staley knew the full extent of Epstein's crimes or not, he willingly participated in the toxic, exploitative ecosystem that Epstein cultivated. His desperate attempts to downplay, deny, and distance himself now only serve to highlight his own moral bankruptcy. If he had any integrity, he would have spoken up years ago. Instead, he's in court, feigning ignorance, hoping to escape punishment while his legacy crumbles under the weight of his own lies.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-Barclays boss Jes Staley admits having sex with Jeffrey Epstein's employee in New York building where paedophile trafficked underage girls | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Former JPMorgan executive Jes Staley testified that Jeffrey Epstein often possessed more knowledge about the bank's upper echelons than he did. Staley acknowledged that their relationship, which began as a business association, evolved into a personal friendship. He conceded that he "misspoke" when previously downplaying the closeness of their connection.During his tenure at JPMorgan, Staley reportedly advocated for retaining Epstein as a client despite internal concerns about Epstein's involvement in human trafficking and suspicious cash withdrawals. Staley allegedly facilitated discussions between Epstein and the bank's top lawyer, urging consideration of Epstein's perspective.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-JPMorgan banker Jes Staley claims Jeffrey Epstein knew more about 'upper levels' of bank than he did

​Former Barclays CEO Jes Staley has admitted to having a consensual sexual encounter with a member of Jeffrey Epstein's staff at a New York apartment owned by Epstein's brother. This revelation emerged during Staley's testimony in his appeal against the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) proposed lifetime ban and £1.8 million fine for allegedly misleading the regulator about his relationship with Epstein. Staley maintains that, despite this incident, his relationship with Epstein was primarily professional, and he was unaware of Epstein's criminal activitiesJes Staley's admission that he slept with one of Jeffrey Epstein's staff is yet another damning piece of evidence exposing his deep entanglement with the disgraced financier. For years, Staley downplayed his relationship with Epstein, insisting it was purely professional. Now, as he faces a lifetime ban from the financial industry, his story is unraveling. His claim that he was unaware of Epstein's crimes is absurd—Epstein's 2008 conviction for sex trafficking should have been enough for any legitimate banker to sever ties. Instead, Staley maintained a cozy, almost servile relationship, exchanging over 1,000 emails with Epstein and even referring to him as “Uncle Jeffrey” in a message to his daughter. This wasn't just a working relationship; it was an alliance, one that helped Epstein continue operating within elite financial circles while he was actively abusing young girls.Staley's excuse that this sexual encounter was “consensual” is equally disgusting, considering Epstein's well-documented pattern of coercion and trafficking. The idea that any of the women under Epstein's control had true agency is laughable—Epstein hand-picked vulnerable girls, manipulated them, and created an environment where they had no real choice. Whether Staley knew the full extent of Epstein's crimes or not, he willingly participated in the toxic, exploitative ecosystem that Epstein cultivated. His desperate attempts to downplay, deny, and distance himself now only serve to highlight his own moral bankruptcy. If he had any integrity, he would have spoken up years ago. Instead, he's in court, feigning ignorance, hoping to escape punishment while his legacy crumbles under the weight of his own lies.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-Barclays boss Jes Staley admits having sex with Jeffrey Epstein's employee in New York building where paedophile trafficked underage girls | Daily Mail Online

​Former JPMorgan executive Jes Staley testified that Jeffrey Epstein often possessed more knowledge about the bank's upper echelons than he did. Staley acknowledged that their relationship, which began as a business association, evolved into a personal friendship. He conceded that he "misspoke" when previously downplaying the closeness of their connection.During his tenure at JPMorgan, Staley reportedly advocated for retaining Epstein as a client despite internal concerns about Epstein's involvement in human trafficking and suspicious cash withdrawals. Staley allegedly facilitated discussions between Epstein and the bank's top lawyer, urging consideration of Epstein's perspective.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-JPMorgan banker Jes Staley claims Jeffrey Epstein knew more about 'upper levels' of bank than he did

​Former JPMorgan executive Jes Staley testified that Jeffrey Epstein often possessed more knowledge about the bank's upper echelons than he did. Staley acknowledged that their relationship, which began as a business association, evolved into a personal friendship. He conceded that he "misspoke" when previously downplaying the closeness of their connection.During his tenure at JPMorgan, Staley reportedly advocated for retaining Epstein as a client despite internal concerns about Epstein's involvement in human trafficking and suspicious cash withdrawals. Staley allegedly facilitated discussions between Epstein and the bank's top lawyer, urging consideration of Epstein's perspective.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-JPMorgan banker Jes Staley claims Jeffrey Epstein knew more about 'upper levels' of bank than he didBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

As we predicted on the podcast, JP Morgan and the survivor of Jeffrey Epstein who brought the suit against the banking giant have now settled for an undetermined amount of money. The settlement effectively ends the lawsuit against JP Morgan. JP morgan and their lawsuit against Jes Staley is still active and the lawsuit brought by the USVI against JP Morgan and Jes Staley also remain in the system.(commercial at 8:10)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:JPMorgan agrees to settle Jeffrey Epstein victim class action lawsuit | Fox BusinessBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Jes Staley, former CEO of Barclays, is contesting a £1.8 million fine and a lifetime ban imposed by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) over allegations that he misled regulators about his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The FCA asserts that Staley "recklessly misled" both the regulator and the Barclays board regarding the nature and extent of his association with Epstein, leading to his resignation from Barclays in 2021.In his defense, Staley contends that Barclays was fully aware of his longstanding professional relationship with Epstein, emphasizing that their interactions were primarily business-related. He argues that the FCA's decision was reached unfairly, without providing him or Barclays an adequate opportunity to respond. The ongoing tribunal will scrutinize over 1,200 emails exchanged between Staley and Epstein, with testimonies expected from prominent figures, including Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey and Barclays Chairman Nigel Higginsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-Barclays boss Jes Staley says bank knew about his ties to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein - as he appeals a £1.8m fine and ban by the City watchdog | Daily Mail OnlineTo help  support  the  podcast:https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support

​Jes Staley, former CEO of Barclays, is contesting a £1.8 million fine and a lifetime ban imposed by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) over allegations that he misled regulators about his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The FCA asserts that Staley "recklessly misled" both the regulator and the Barclays board regarding the nature and extent of his association with Epstein, leading to his resignation from Barclays in 2021.In his defense, Staley contends that Barclays was fully aware of his longstanding professional relationship with Epstein, emphasizing that their interactions were primarily business-related. He argues that the FCA's decision was reached unfairly, without providing him or Barclays an adequate opportunity to respond. The ongoing tribunal will scrutinize over 1,200 emails exchanged between Staley and Epstein, with testimonies expected from prominent figures, including Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey and Barclays Chairman Nigel Higginsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-Barclays boss Jes Staley says bank knew about his ties to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein - as he appeals a £1.8m fine and ban by the City watchdog | Daily Mail OnlineTo help  support  the  podcast:https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support

​Jes Staley, former CEO of Barclays, is contesting a £1.8 million fine and a lifetime ban imposed by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) over allegations that he misled regulators about his relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The FCA asserts that Staley "recklessly misled" both the regulator and the Barclays board regarding the nature and extent of his association with Epstein, leading to his resignation from Barclays in 2021.In his defense, Staley contends that Barclays was fully aware of his longstanding professional relationship with Epstein, emphasizing that their interactions were primarily business-related. He argues that the FCA's decision was reached unfairly, without providing him or Barclays an adequate opportunity to respond. The ongoing tribunal will scrutinize over 1,200 emails exchanged between Staley and Epstein, with testimonies expected from prominent figures, including Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey and Barclays Chairman Nigel Higginsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-Barclays boss Jes Staley says bank knew about his ties to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein - as he appeals a £1.8m fine and ban by the City watchdog | Daily Mail OnlineTo help  support  the  podcast:https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support

​Jes Staley, the former CEO of Barclays, is currently challenging a ban imposed by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) that prohibits him from holding senior positions in the financial sector. The FCA alleges that Staley misled regulators about the nature and extent of his relationship with the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Central to the FCA's case is a 2019 letter from Barclays to the FCA, which stated that Staley did not have a close relationship with Epstein and that their last contact occurred well before Staley joined Barclays in 2015. However, evidence presented by the FCA, including approximately 1,200 emails exchanged between Staley and Epstein from 2008 to 2012, suggests a closer relationship. In these emails, Staley referred to Epstein as "family" and "one of our deepest friends," contradicting the claims made in the 2019 letter.Staley's defense argues that Barclays was fully aware of his longstanding professional relationship with Epstein, asserting that the bank's board had been briefed on the matter. They contend that the 2019 letter to the FCA was intended solely to confirm that neither Staley nor Barclays had any knowledge of or involvement in Epstein's unlawful conduct, rather than to define the closeness of their relationship. The hearing, which commenced on March 3, 2025, at the Upper Tribunal in London, is expected to last two weeks. It will feature testimonies from prominent figures in the financial sector, including Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey and Barclays Chair Nigel Higgins. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for Staley's career and the broader financial industry, as it brings to light the responsibilities of senior executives in disclosing associations with controversial figures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein: This ex-CEO is risking all to clear his name over the paedophile

​Jes Staley, the former CEO of Barclays, is currently challenging a ban imposed by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) that prohibits him from holding senior positions in the financial sector. The FCA alleges that Staley misled regulators about the nature and extent of his relationship with the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Central to the FCA's case is a 2019 letter from Barclays to the FCA, which stated that Staley did not have a close relationship with Epstein and that their last contact occurred well before Staley joined Barclays in 2015. However, evidence presented by the FCA, including approximately 1,200 emails exchanged between Staley and Epstein from 2008 to 2012, suggests a closer relationship. In these emails, Staley referred to Epstein as "family" and "one of our deepest friends," contradicting the claims made in the 2019 letter.Staley's defense argues that Barclays was fully aware of his longstanding professional relationship with Epstein, asserting that the bank's board had been briefed on the matter. They contend that the 2019 letter to the FCA was intended solely to confirm that neither Staley nor Barclays had any knowledge of or involvement in Epstein's unlawful conduct, rather than to define the closeness of their relationship. The hearing, which commenced on March 3, 2025, at the Upper Tribunal in London, is expected to last two weeks. It will feature testimonies from prominent figures in the financial sector, including Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey and Barclays Chair Nigel Higgins. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for Staley's career and the broader financial industry, as it brings to light the responsibilities of senior executives in disclosing associations with controversial figures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein: This ex-CEO is risking all to clear his name over the paedophileBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​Jes Staley, the former CEO of Barclays, is currently challenging a ban imposed by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) that prohibits him from holding senior positions in the financial sector. The FCA alleges that Staley misled regulators about the nature and extent of his relationship with the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Central to the FCA's case is a 2019 letter from Barclays to the FCA, which stated that Staley did not have a close relationship with Epstein and that their last contact occurred well before Staley joined Barclays in 2015. However, evidence presented by the FCA, including approximately 1,200 emails exchanged between Staley and Epstein from 2008 to 2012, suggests a closer relationship. In these emails, Staley referred to Epstein as "family" and "one of our deepest friends," contradicting the claims made in the 2019 letter.Staley's defense argues that Barclays was fully aware of his longstanding professional relationship with Epstein, asserting that the bank's board had been briefed on the matter. They contend that the 2019 letter to the FCA was intended solely to confirm that neither Staley nor Barclays had any knowledge of or involvement in Epstein's unlawful conduct, rather than to define the closeness of their relationship. The hearing, which commenced on March 3, 2025, at the Upper Tribunal in London, is expected to last two weeks. It will feature testimonies from prominent figures in the financial sector, including Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey and Barclays Chair Nigel Higgins. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for Staley's career and the broader financial industry, as it brings to light the responsibilities of senior executives in disclosing associations with controversial figures.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein: This ex-CEO is risking all to clear his name over the paedophile

Edward Bramson was one of the most outspoken voices on the board at Barclays to call for Jes Staley to be shown the door. In a battle of attrition that lasted over two years, Bramson finally won out when Staley announced he was leaving Barclays over his ties to Epstein. In this episode, we take a look back at how we got here. (Commercial at 11:07)To contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://news.sky.com/story/barclays-activist-renews-attack-on-staley-over-epstein-ties-12078940Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

JP Morgan, in an effort to wiggle out of their own responsiblity for enabling Epstein, has begun a full court press against their former big shot employee, Jes Staley. JP Morgan is alleging that all of their problems and Epstein issues revolve around one relationship and that relationship was the one between Staley and Epstein and according to the bank, Staley should be on the hook for whatever settlement ends up being awarded to the USVI and the accusers. Staley, for his part, has challenged that assertion and has flatly denied that he was the sole reason why Epstein remained a client. The court is expected to go to trial in October if a deal is not reached. (commercial at 8:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.ft.com/content/82486f6d-a507-497b-a059-fe764965a7e5

Jes Staley had a long, established relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Both professionally and personally. Up until recently, he never had to answer for that relationship. Now though, after being shown the door at Barclays, he is also in jeopardy of losing out on big bucks as the company is withholding his deferred salary until the Epstein probe reaches its conclusion.(Commercial at 12:05)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.wsj.com/articles/barclays-profit-falls-on-slowdown-in-investment-banking-11645603658Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Jes Staley has been shrouded in secrecy for quite some time, with Jes Staley doing his best to put distance between himself and Jeffrey Epstein. However, that was never going to cut it, considering what people knew about the very close relationship the two men shared. Now, in new reports, the evidence becomes even more damning as new emails with some disturbing content have now been unearthed. (commercial at 7:29)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-JPMorgan exec and Jeffrey Epstein's emails included photos of women | Toronto Sun

The relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Jes Staley has been shrouded in secrecy for quite some time, with Jes Staley doing his best to put distance between himself and Jeffrey Epstein. However, that was never going to cut it, considering what people knew about the very close relationship the two men shared. Now, in new reports, the evidence becomes even more damning as new emails with some disturbing content have now been unearthed. (commercial at 7:29)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Ex-JPMorgan exec and Jeffrey Epstein's emails included photos of women | Toronto SunBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

JP Morgan, in an effort to wiggle out of their own responsiblity for enabling Epstein, has begun a full court press against their former big shot employee, Jes Staley. JP Morgan is alleging that all of their problems and Epstein issues revolve around one relationship and that relationship was the one between Staley and Epstein and according to the bank, Staley should be on the hook for whatever settlement ends up being awarded to the USVI and the accusers. Staley, for his part, has challenged that assertion and has flatly denied that he was the sole reason why Epstein remained a client. The court is expected to go to trial in October if a deal is not reached. (commercial at 8:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.ft.com/content/82486f6d-a507-497b-a059-fe764965a7e5Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

JP Morgan, the United States Virgin Islands and Jes Staley have been engaged in a battle royale in a courtroom in New York for months now and with the trial less than a month away, things are still cooking at a high degree.According to a new filing by Jes Staley that hit the docket and then was quickly removed, JP Morgan has already spent more than 14 million dollars in legal fees. They are looking to roll that number into the larger number that they say Staley is responsible for and JP Morgan hopes that any ruling made against them, will end up being a burden that Staley has to deal with.Staley, for his part has said that anything he did with Epstein was all part of the job and that if anyone is responsible for missing the fact that Epstein was a human trafficking monster, it was JP Morgan.(commercial at 7:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:JPMorgan legal fees in Jeffrey Epstein sex traffick cases revealed (cnbc.com)

Jes Staley and his on going battle with JP Morgan to avoid responsibility for his role in enabling Jeffrey Epstein and worse, took another turn this week after a new ruling by Judge Rakoff gave the green light for the lawsuit by JP Morgan against Jes Staley to move forward.In this episode, we take a look at the new ruling and what it means for the lawsuit overall. (commercial at 9:49)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jes Staley must face JP Morgan's lawsuit tied to Jeffrey Epstein, judge rules | Fox BusinessBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

JP Morgan, the United States Virgin Islands and Jes Staley have been engaged in a battle royale in a courtroom in New York for months now and with the trial less than a month away, things are still cooking at a high degree.According to a new filing by Jes Staley that hit the docket and then was quickly removed, JP Morgan has already spent more than 14 million dollars in legal fees. They are looking to roll that number into the larger number that they say Staley is responsible for and JP Morgan hopes that any ruling made against them, will end up being a burden that Staley has to deal with.Staley, for his part has said that anything he did with Epstein was all part of the job and that if anyone is responsible for missing the fact that Epstein was a human trafficking monster, it was JP Morgan.(commercial at 7:02)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:JPMorgan legal fees in Jeffrey Epstein sex traffick cases revealed (cnbc.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

As the lawsuit filed by the USVI continues to grow, we are learning more and more about the allegations that they are making and those allegations are damning for JP Morgan if verified. According to new reports, executives at JP Morgan well fully aware of who and what Jeffrey Epstein was, and even made jokes in emails about him and Miley Cyrus (who was on Hannah Montana at the time.) This runs directly head on into the narrative that JP Morgan has been trying to pitch where they, instead have blamed Jes Staley. The trial is set to begin on October 23rd.(commercial at 7:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:JP Morgan execs were familiar with Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of young girls, new lawsuit claims | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A reply to a memorandum of law is a legal document submitted in response to an opposing party's memorandum of law. It serves to address and counter the arguments presented in the original memorandum. The reply aims to clarify the responding party's legal position, reinforce their arguments, and refute points raised by the opposition. Typically, it includes:Introduction: Brief overview of the reply's purpose and main arguments.Argument: Detailed counterpoints to the opposition's memorandum, including legal precedents and supporting evidence.Conclusion: Summary of the key points made and a restatement of the desired outcome.The reply is crucial in legal proceedings as it allows a party to strengthen their case and address any weaknesses or inaccuracies in the opposition's arguments.(commercial at 8:21)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.60.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A reply to a memorandum of law is a legal document submitted in response to an opposing party's memorandum of law. It serves to address and counter the arguments presented in the original memorandum. The reply aims to clarify the responding party's legal position, reinforce their arguments, and refute points raised by the opposition. Typically, it includes:Introduction: Brief overview of the reply's purpose and main arguments.Argument: Detailed counterpoints to the opposition's memorandum, including legal precedents and supporting evidence.Conclusion: Summary of the key points made and a restatement of the desired outcome.The reply is crucial in legal proceedings as it allows a party to strengthen their case and address any weaknesses or inaccuracies in the opposition's arguments.(commercial at 8:21)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.60.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Jes Staley, the former JPMorgan executive, filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against him by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse. However, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff denied this motion, allowing the case to proceed to pre-trial evidence gathering..Staley is accused of protecting Epstein during his tenure at JPMorgan, where he worked from 1979 to 2013. The bank claims that Staley was instrumental in maintaining Epstein's business relationship with JPMorgan despite Epstein's criminal activities. JPMorgan seeks to make Staley financially responsible for any damages the bank might incur from other related lawsuits and to recover compensation paid to him from 2006 to 2013. Staley has denied these allegations, stating that JPMorgan is using him as a scapegoat for its own supervisory failures and claims he was unaware of Epstein's criminal behavior​.(commercial at 8:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Mem. of Law - (11148357.16).docx (courtlistener.com)

Jes Staley, the former JPMorgan executive, filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against him by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse. However, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff denied this motion, allowing the case to proceed to pre-trial evidence gathering..Staley is accused of protecting Epstein during his tenure at JPMorgan, where he worked from 1979 to 2013. The bank claims that Staley was instrumental in maintaining Epstein's business relationship with JPMorgan despite Epstein's criminal activities. JPMorgan seeks to make Staley financially responsible for any damages the bank might incur from other related lawsuits and to recover compensation paid to him from 2006 to 2013. Staley has denied these allegations, stating that JPMorgan is using him as a scapegoat for its own supervisory failures and claims he was unaware of Epstein's criminal behavior​.(commercial at 8:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Mem. of Law - (11148357.16).docx (courtlistener.com)

A reply to a memorandum of law is a legal document submitted in response to an opposing party's memorandum of law. It serves to address and counter the arguments presented in the original memorandum. The reply aims to clarify the responding party's legal position, reinforce their arguments, and refute points raised by the opposition. Typically, it includes:Introduction: Brief overview of the reply's purpose and main arguments.Argument: Detailed counterpoints to the opposition's memorandum, including legal precedents and supporting evidence.Conclusion: Summary of the key points made and a restatement of the desired outcome.The reply is crucial in legal proceedings as it allows a party to strengthen their case and address any weaknesses or inaccuracies in the opposition's arguments.(commercial at 8:21)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.60.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A reply to a memorandum of law is a legal document submitted in response to an opposing party's memorandum of law. It serves to address and counter the arguments presented in the original memorandum. The reply aims to clarify the responding party's legal position, reinforce their arguments, and refute points raised by the opposition. Typically, it includes:Introduction: Brief overview of the reply's purpose and main arguments.Argument: Detailed counterpoints to the opposition's memorandum, including legal precedents and supporting evidence.Conclusion: Summary of the key points made and a restatement of the desired outcome.The reply is crucial in legal proceedings as it allows a party to strengthen their case and address any weaknesses or inaccuracies in the opposition's arguments.(commercial at 8:21)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.60.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan and Chase, the largest bank in the world, is being accused of having direct knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal behavior and still giving the bank the go ahead to do business with him.JP Morgan's lawyers, as expected, have pointed all ten fingers Jes Staley as they look to shrug off any liability in what is turning into a ever more serious situation for JP Morgan, Staley and Dimon.(commercial at 10:27)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jamie Dimon knew about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes: Lawyer (lawandcrime.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jes Staley has tried to play down his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein for years, always saying that they were little more than business associates. However, the evidence was always there that this narrative was nothing more than nonsense. Now, with the emergence of the emails between Jes Staley and Jeffrey Epstein during discovery in the USVI case, it's safe to say that the relationship that Epstein and Staley had shared was one of deep and loyal friendship.In this episode, we take a deep dive into those emails and the relationship between the two.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein-Staley Emails Reveal Friendship Forged at JPMorgan (yahoo.com)