Podcasts about dismiss

They can't harm you if they can't find you! Use code emily and get 60% off annual plans: https://incogni.com/emily  Thanks to Incogni for sponsoring this video. Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/TztbAKcRHkI  In this Case Brief, attorney Adam Lally concludes his testimony in a hearing regarding a motion to dismiss the case against Myles King, primarily addressing key discovery issues and missing evidence. RESOURCES Adam Lally August 2026 Hearing - https://youtu.be/MgpPkl4Cb48 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Popok reports on a new development in the Trump defamation case against the BBC, as Cassidy Hutchinson the "fly on the wall" who watched it all about Trump on Jan6 and testified for 30 hours to the J6 Committee revealed she is being investigated by Trump's DOJ and a Trump friendly Judge says out loud that he is strongly considering dismissing the case outright!?! Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/@LegalAFMTN?sub_confirmation=1 Become a member of Legal AF YouTube community: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJgZJZZbnLFPr5GJdCuIwpA/join Become a member of the Legal AF Substack: https://michaelpopok.substack.com/20off Follow Legal AF on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/legalafmtn.bsky.social Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/mspopok.bsky.social Subscribe to the Legal AF podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/legal-af-by-meidastouch/id1580828595 Subscribe to the Intersection with Michael Popok podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-intersection-with-michael-popok/id1818863274 Subscribe to Unprecedented with Michael Popok and Dina Doll podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/unprecedented-by-legal-af/id1867023089 Subscribe to Court of History with Sidney Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz podcast feed here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-court-of-history/id1867022920 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

All the pleadings have been drafted and filed relating to John Dehlin’s Motion to Dismiss the Church’s trademark infringement case against him. RFM is joined by esteemed co-counsel Kolby Reddish to explain what is going on and who is likely to prevail in the motion to dismiss. As an added bonus, Church lawyer David Jordan… Read More »Will The Church’s Lawsuit Be Dismissed? RFM: 480

Jes Staley's lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase's third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley's actions, which undercut the bank's attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley's side further pointed to JPMorgan's own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.Staley also attacked JPMorgan's separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley's relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein's 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan's later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley's lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan's claims against him with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docx

Jes Staley's lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase's third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley's actions, which undercut the bank's attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley's side further pointed to JPMorgan's own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.Staley also attacked JPMorgan's separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley's relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein's 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan's later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley's lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan's claims against him with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docx

Jes Staley's lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase's third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley's actions, which undercut the bank's attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley's side further pointed to JPMorgan's own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.Staley also attacked JPMorgan's separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley's relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein's 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan's later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley's lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan's claims against him with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Giants may have lost Jaxson Dart, but Evan Roberts refuses to accept that their season is finished. He doubles down on his comparison to the 2015 Jets, arguing that Jameis Winston could become the veteran quarterback who unexpectedly keeps the Giants competitive. Shaun Morash admits a nine or 10-win season would be hard for Giants fans to reject, even if Winston ultimately isn't the long-term answer. That leads to a bigger debate over what Giants fans should actually want now. Would they rather win big with Winston or lose while young players like Abdul Carter emerge as stars? Evan and Tiki Barber push back hard on the idea that development should matter more than serious winning, while Shaun argues there is more nuance when the difference is only a few wins.

Jes Staley's lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase's third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley's actions, which undercut the bank's attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley's side further pointed to JPMorgan's own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.Staley also attacked JPMorgan's separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley's relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein's 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan's later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley's lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan's claims against him with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jes Staley's lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase's third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley's actions, which undercut the bank's attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley's side further pointed to JPMorgan's own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.Staley also attacked JPMorgan's separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley's relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein's 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan's later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley's lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan's claims against him with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jes Staley's lawyers used the May 2023 filing to argue that JPMorgan Chase's third-party claims against him should be dismissed outright. The bank had sought contribution and indemnification from Staley in the lawsuits brought by a Jane Doe plaintiff and the U.S. Virgin Islands over JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but Staley argued those claims were legally defective. His attorneys said the Trafficking Victims Protection Act did not create a right to contribution or indemnification and that JPMorgan could not use New York state law to manufacture one. They also argued that JPMorgan was being sued for its own alleged conduct, not merely for Staley's actions, which undercut the bank's attempt to shift liability onto him. Staley's side further pointed to JPMorgan's own pleadings, which said his alleged misconduct fell outside the scope of his employment, and argued that the bank had failed to show that Staley caused the same injuries for which JPMorgan itself was being sued.Staley also attacked JPMorgan's separate employment-related claims for breach of fiduciary duty and faithless servant, arguing they were time-barred and inadequately pleaded. His attorneys said JPMorgan had been on notice for years that Staley's relationship with Epstein warranted scrutiny, particularly after Epstein's 2019 arrest and after the bank produced more than 1,200 Staley-Epstein emails to U.K. authorities. They argued that JPMorgan could not claim it only recently discovered the alleged misconduct when it possessed decades of records and had ample reason to investigate sooner. The filing also said the bank failed to plead with the required specificity who Staley allegedly deceived, when the deception occurred, or how it caused JPMorgan's later litigation costs and reputational damage. Staley's lawyers ultimately asked the court to dismiss all of JPMorgan's claims against him with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Reply - Doe an(11210113.11).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Job is living between faith and suffering In the midst of suffering, believers must remember… 1. God's wisdom is beyond questioning Job 38:1-40:5  2. God's justice is beyond doubting Job 40:6-14 3. God's authority is beyond challenging Job 40:15-41:34 Job can't handle behemoth or leviathan If Job cannot handle creatures, he is no match for the creator God doesn't owe you an explanation. 3 Responses to suffering… 1. Dismiss it 2. Out work it  3. Surrender it  

A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer who shot and wounded a man in north Minneapolis this winter was arrested Wednesday in downtown Minneapolis. Christian Castro faces federal charges for allegedly lying to the FBI about the January shooting, in which he fired through the closed door of a home and wounded a man from Venezuela. Castro also faces state assault charges. He appeared in state court Thursday and is scheduled to appear in federal court Friday.The latest U.S. Drought Monitor shows the extent of drought in Minnesota largely unchanged over the past week, although conditions have improved in some areas. Much of northeastern Minnesota moved from severe to moderate drought after recent rainfall. About 71 percent of the state remains in some level of drought, with especially dry conditions in the Twin Cities, Red River Valley and east-central Minnesota.Minneapolis police have released body camera footage showing officers' encounter with the gunman during a mass shooting at an apartment complex earlier this month. The September 2 shooting left two residents dead and several people wounded, including two officers. The gunman, Carlton Johnson II, was fatally shot by police. The footage shows four officers' perspectives on an exchange of gunfire in a ninth-floor hallway.Several first-time candidates are running for local office in Pine Island and other Minnesota communities this fall, driven by concerns about new hyperscale data centers. Pine Island's City Council approved Google's plan for an 88-acre facility that could eventually expand to more than 400 acres. City Council candidate Tosca Wohl says she was prompted to run by concerns about transparency. Data centers have become an issue in races around the state, with some candidates supporting moratoriums or additional regulations.

Try Gusto today at https://gusto.com/EDB and get three months free when you run your first payroll. Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/iHGmKM6QNjw  Former Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor was scheduled to testify at a hearing regarding a motion to dismiss in the Myles King murder case, but unexpectedly exercised his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination after a private sidebar with the judge. Defense attorney Rosemary Scapicchio expressed frustration over the sudden reversal, as Proctor's lawyer had previously indicated he would testify. Scapicchio argued that Proctor's lead role in the investigation tainted the case due to explicit racial bias demonstrated in his text messages, asserting this constitutes structural error warranting dismissal. The court order addressed discovery delays and police bias, mandating that remaining testimonies—including continued cross-examination of Attorney Adam Lally and statements from Milton police officers—proceed under narrow focus, with several witnesses submitting evidence via affidavit. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

EXCLUSIVE: Defendants in Voter Guide Case File to Dismiss Charges

Megyn Kelly covers the breaking news as the Lindsay Clancy jury begins day 7 of deliberations. The judge in the case refuses to dismiss the one holdout juror despite the defense's objections. Phil Holloway, Jonna Spilbor and Matt Murphy, all hosts on the MK True Crime channel, join to react. Find ALL MK True Crime shows here:Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/mk-true-crime/id1829831499Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4o80I2RSC2NvY51TIaKkJWYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@MKTrueCrime?sub_confirmation=1 Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms:YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShowFind out more information at:https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Noah Pines spent seven years as a prosecutor in Georgia — weighing sentences, navigating cases, trying to be a fair voice inside a system that does not always reward fairness — before leaving to become a criminal defense attorney and discovering what the justice system looks like from the other side of the courtroom. In this episode of Locked In with Ian Bick, he shares what being a Georgia prosecutor really required of him, why he left after seven years to defend the people he used to prosecute, what working Innocence Project cases and overturning twenty year wrongful conviction sentences actually involved, what the current problems with prosecutors in America actually look like from someone who spent seven years inside that world, and what representing people accused of the worst crimes available actually requires of the attorney who takes those cases. _____________________________________________ #lawyer #criminallaw #prosecutor #truecrimepodcast _____________________________________________ Thank you to CASH APP for sponsoring this episode: Download Cash App Today: https://click.cash.app/ui6m/6pao71et #CashAppPod Cash App is a financial services platform, not a bank. Banking services provided by Cash App's bank partner(s). Prepaid debit cards issued by Sutton Bank, Member FDIC. Cash App Visa® Debit Flex Cards issued by Sutton Bank, Member FDIC, and The Bancorp Bank, N.A., pursuant to a license from Visa U.S.A. Inc. See terms and conditions for the Sutton prepaid card, Sutton debit flex card, and Bancorp debit flex card. Cash App Green features, Savings, Direct deposit, Round ups, Overdraft coverage and Discounts provided by Cash App, a Block, Inc. brand. Visit cash.app/legal/podcast for full disclosures. _____________________________________________ Connect with Noah Pines: https://www.rossandpines.com/attorneys/noah-h-pines/ _____________________________________________ Hosted, Executive Produced & Edited By Ian Bick: https://www.instagram.com/ian_bick/?hl=en https://ianbick.com/ _____________________________________________ Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction: Guilty People Walk 00:13 Meet Noah Pines: From Prosecutor to Defense 00:35 Growing Up Outside Philadelphia 00:56 Childhood and Family Influence 01:42 Parents' Careers and Early Law Exposure 02:32 Deciding to Go to Law School 03:39 Internships and Discovering Trial Law 05:20 What Makes a Good Trial Lawyer 06:44 The Physical Toll of Trials 08:11 Choosing to Become a Prosecutor 09:14 Prosecutorial Discretion and Dismissals 10:27 How Cases Reach Prosecutors 11:27 Arrests Without Charges and Records 12:06 Declining Police Investigations 13:07 Why Police Don't Investigate Anymore 14:08 Prosecutors' Duty to Get It Right 15:10 Building Judgment and Mentorship 16:34 Power of Young Prosecutors 17:29 Sending People to Prison: A Reality Check 18:16 Weighing Sentences in Difficult Cases 19:52 Is There a Just Sentence? 22:12 The Morality of Prosecuting Felonies 23:38 Prosecutorial Mindset and Mandatory Minimums 24:48 A Case for Mercy: Avoiding Life Without Parole 25:25 Dealing with Tough Prosecutors 28:00 Relationships with Prosecutors and Judges 29:05 Advice for New Lawyers 30:12 Telling Clients What They Need to Hear 31:43 The Risk of Trial and Plea Offers 32:52 Lawyer Egos and Slam Dunk Cases 35:53 A Slam Dunk Case That Was Lost 37:21 Guilty People Walk, Innocent People Go to Prison 37:22 Immunity Deals and Witnesses 38:22 Relationships with Judges 39:53 Judges Staying Too Long 41:04 Judicial Impartiality and Bias 42:39 The Turn-In Date Story 44:47 Why I Left the Prosecutor's Office 47:39 Going Back and Then Leaving for Good 48:53 Building a Defense Firm 50:02 Impact as a Defense Attorney 51:28 Falsely Accused College Student Case 52:52 Trusting Clients and Instinct 54:14 Representing Police Officers 56:26 The Self-Defense Shooting Case 58:28 Attacks on Defense Attorneys 01:01:20 Press Releases and Public Perception 01:02:18 Sealing Arrests and Indictments 01:03:35 Most Important Skill from Prosecuting 01:05:39 First Trial as a Defense Attorney 01:07:20 TV Dramatization vs. Reality 01:09:04 Putting Clients on the Stand 01:11:37 Reflections on Ian's Case 01:13:20 Using the Law as a Sword 01:14:56 Teaching High School Kids 01:16:04 Aaron Hernandez and Poor Decisions 01:16:12 Would You Sacrifice Yourself for Your Dad? 01:18:16 Judges Spotting Prosecutorial Misconduct 01:18:40 Innocence Project Cases: Sunny's Story 01:24:33 Joey Watkins' Case 01:27:30 Suing for Wrongful Conviction 01:28:08 Defending the Guilty 01:30:00 Prosecutors Refusing to Dismiss 01:31:20 The Art of Negotiation 01:32:38 Reflecting on Past Cases 01:34:08 Compensation for Wrongful Convictions 01:34:19 Defending Someone 100% Innocent 01:35:35 Taking Difficult Cases 01:36:18 Keeping in Touch with Clients 01:38:41 Judges Seeing Success Stories 01:40:00 Normalizing Felony Convictions 01:40:54 Worst Part of Prison 01:41:52 Best Part of Prison 01:42:39 Learning Lessons and Optimal Sentencing 01:44:43 Judges Understanding Prison 01:46:23 Sex Offender Registry Issues 01:47:05 Vigilante Predator Stings 01:48:28 Entrapment and Sting Operations 01:49:55 Scams and Sextortion 01:50:56 The Arkansas Sheriff Case 01:51:10 One Thing to Change in the Justice System 01:52:24 Future Plans and Special Master Role 01:53:59 Bad Lawyers and Mistakes 01:55:49 Advice for Aspiring Lawyers 01:57:04 Final Thoughts and Thanks _____________________________________________ To advertise on the show, contact sales@advertisecast.com or visit https://advertising.libsyn.com/LockedInWithIanBicka

J&J Show--Hour 1 Wed. 9/2/26--John Martin wants every Memphian to attend the Memphis v Ark State game + NFL is almost here. Titans dismiss media member, barring Stillman access

Send us Fan MailMost women think perimenopause happens in their late 40s. But for many women, the hormonal shift begins quietly in their mid-to-late 30s — with symptoms that are almost always dismissed as stress, anxiety, or just getting older. By the time perimenopause is recognized, most women have already been living with it for years.In this episode of Cycle Wisdom, Dr. Monica Minjeur walks through what perimenopause actually looks like, why progesterone is almost always the first hormone to change, and why recognizing this transition early is one of the most important things a woman can do for her long-term bone, cardiovascular, and brain health. Through Andrea's story — a 37-year-old with regular cycles and no obvious symptoms who turned out to be in early perimenopause — you will see how the signals are often there long before anyone connects them to the right diagnosis.You will learn:Why progesterone declines first — often years before estrogen shifts — and what that means for PMS, sleep, anxiety, and cycle changesWhy a normal FSH does not rule out early perimenopause — and what cycle charting reveals that lab work alone cannotWhat the treatment approach looks like for each stage of the perimenopausal transition — and why bioidentical progesterone is almost always the right starting pointIf you have been told your labs are normal but your cycles and symptoms tell a different story — this episode will help you understand what is actually happening and what to do about it. Learn more or schedule a free discovery call at radiantclinic.com.

The 38 people charged in connection with an anti-ICE protest at a St. Paul church say they have been singled out for selective or vindictive prosecution. A motion to dismiss filed Monday in federal court says the defendants, including journalists who covered the protest, are being prosecuted for protected speech. The motion says protesters who disrupted a service at an LGBTQ-friendly church in Orlando, Florida, last year did not face charges. It alleges the Florida protesters were not prosecuted because their political views aligned with President Donald Trump and his administration.The Democratic candidate running against Republican U.S. Rep. Tom Emmer says Congress has been weakened under President Donald Trump. Election policy expert Doug Chapin is running against Emmer in Minnesota's 6th Congressional District. Emmer is part of Republican House leadership and has won his six previous races easily. Chapin says Emmer has allowed executive power to grow on his watch, but says the changing district and an anti-incumbent mood could work in his favor.A months-long strike in Chisago County is officially over after the county board approved contract agreements for striking workers. About 125 county workers had been on strike since May. That was about a third of the county's staff, including health and human services workers and other government center employees. The union says the three-year deal includes pay raises and better health care plans.Thousands of dead fish have washed up on the shores of Lake Mille Lacs in recent weeks. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources says it is common for some fish to die every summer, but hotter-than-normal weather has increased lake temperatures. That can be hard on cold-water fish such as tullibee, also known as cisco. Cisco populations are under pressure in some Minnesota lakes that are warming due to climate change.

AP's Lisa Dwyer reports that a judge has refused to dismiss Steve Bannon's contempt conviction case, for now.

For a limited time, get 40% off your first Hungryroot order plus a free item in every box for life at https://hungryroot.com/LAWNERD with code LAWNERD. Try Gusto online payroll and benefits software for small businesses at https://gusto.com/LAWNERD and get three months free when you run your first payroll. This episode breaks down several high-profile legal updates, beginning with the Las Vegas murder trial of Keffe D regarding the 30-year-old killing of Tupac Shakur, where the defendant's own book and statements are being used against him by the prosecution. She also discusses the recent Bricks & Minifigs private civil settlement involving a vintage Star Wars LEGO collection, noting that corporate claims have been resolved but she is waiting for names to be formally dismissed from the federal docket. Additionally, she covers the unsealing of a grand jury indictment against 14 individuals running a highly profitable cocaine trafficking ring out of two Penn State fraternities that was uncovered through personal Venmo transactions. Finally, she touches on the Alex Murdaugh case, detailing the dismissal of his lawsuit against clerk Becky Hill for lack of standing, a court-approved change of venue for his upcoming retrial, and an apology from defense attorney Dick Harpootlian for making a false statement about an alleged successful polygraph test. RESOURCES Keffe D Trial - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLN8ZC_l1jpnc  Courthouse Becky's Motion to Dismiss - https://youtu.be/a2-nRldN-jo Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Today's DMN Debrief covers Texas Republicans defending their grip on statewide races, families weighing the rising cost of quinceañeras and how a bird-watching video game could help people with mild memory loss or early-stage Alzheimer's disease. Plus, we look at how the World Cup games impacted the North Texas economy. This digest was partially generated by AI and then reviewed and edited by our newsroom staff. Learn more: dallasnews.com/ai_use. We welcome your feedback: ⁠audience@dallasnews.com⁠. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

When does a wine discount become too good to be true? In this episode, we unpack a court's decision allowing a lawsuit against Safeway over its wine pricing practices to move forward, after plaintiffs challenged whether the retailer's advertised discounts were based on genuine former prices. The case highlights a familiar risk in promotional advertising: a “sale” price can create legal exposure if the reference price used to show the discount does not reflect the price consumers actually paid for a meaningful period. As the litigation continues, the decision serves as another reminder that retailers should carefully substantiate comparative and former-price claims before raising a glass to their next promotion. Hosted by Simone Roach. Based on a blog post by Gonzalo E. Mon.

SPONSOR! Rumble Wallet!Tip creators, not the platform with Rumble Wallet. Get started with Rumble Wallet and use the code Viva5 to claim $5 in US Stablecoin (USA₮)! Download now: http://wallet.rumble.com/vivaVoid where prohibited. No purchase necessary. Offer available to US residents only. Offer not available in New York State. Must be 18+. Offer is available for a limited time and for the first 1000 wallets activated and funded. Restrictions apply. Details and full official rules available at http://rumble.com/promoofficialrules.This is a paid advertisement for Rumble Wallet. Rumble is compensating me for this ad.

Joe and the guys react to Cam Vaughn no longer being with the Miami Hurricanes just weeks before the season opener. Despite the surprising timing, Joe believes Miami will be fine without Vaughn thanks to the depth and talent in the Hurricanes' wide receiver room. Plus, they discuss how Miami's offensive line will compare to last season's unit, which was one of the best in the country, and why matching that level of production will be a major challenge.

Join the conversation with C4 & Bryan Nehman.  Bruce Elliott sat in for Bryan this morning.  MD tax court rules against ad tax.  City judge ruled against a city motion to dismiss the suit against IG.  A decline in student enrollment in schools.  Harford Co Executive Bob Cassilly joined the show discussing data centers & more.  Pete Charalambous also joined the show discussing the latest with Luigi Mangione pleading guilty late last week in the murder of the UHC CEO.  Listen to C4 & Bryan weekdays from 5:30-10am on WBAL News Radio 1090, FM 101.5 & the WBAL Radio app!!

Judge John Judge denied Bryan Kohberger's motion to dismiss the grand jury indictment that charged him with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary in the November 2022 killings of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Kohberger's defense had argued that the indictment should be thrown out because prosecutors had presented insufficient evidence to establish probable cause and because the grand jury had allegedly been given improper or misleading instructions about the legal standard it was supposed to apply. The defense also challenged the manner in which evidence had been presented during the secret grand jury proceedings, contending that irregularities in the process undermined the validity of the indictment. Judge rejected those arguments, finding that prosecutors had presented sufficient evidence for the grand jury to determine that probable cause existed and that the proceedings did not contain errors serious enough to justify dismissing the charges.Judge also rejected the defense's contention that Idaho law required prosecutors to establish a higher standard of proof before an indictment could be returned. Kohberger's attorneys had argued that the grand jury should have been instructed under a standard closer to the one necessary to establish that a defendant was more likely than not guilty, rather than simply determining whether probable cause existed. Judge concluded that Idaho precedent did not support the defense's interpretation and that the grand jury had been properly instructed under the applicable law. The ruling represented an important defeat for Kohberger's defense because it preserved the indictment and allowed the prosecution to continue toward trial without having to return to a preliminary hearing or seek a new indictment. Judge's decision also reinforced that challenges to the ultimate strength of the prosecution's evidence were matters to be resolved at trial rather than grounds for eliminating the case at the indictment stage.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

As Navy families sound the alarm about sailors struggling at sea, President Trump says there's nothing to see here.  Plus, as crime drops across America, Trump takes a victory lap by going after Democrats.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Judge John Judge denied Bryan Kohberger's motion to dismiss the grand jury indictment that charged him with four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary in the November 2022 killings of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. Kohberger's defense had argued that the indictment should be thrown out because prosecutors had presented insufficient evidence to establish probable cause and because the grand jury had allegedly been given improper or misleading instructions about the legal standard it was supposed to apply. The defense also challenged the manner in which evidence had been presented during the secret grand jury proceedings, contending that irregularities in the process undermined the validity of the indictment. Judge rejected those arguments, finding that prosecutors had presented sufficient evidence for the grand jury to determine that probable cause existed and that the proceedings did not contain errors serious enough to justify dismissing the charges.Judge also rejected the defense's contention that Idaho law required prosecutors to establish a higher standard of proof before an indictment could be returned. Kohberger's attorneys had argued that the grand jury should have been instructed under a standard closer to the one necessary to establish that a defendant was more likely than not guilty, rather than simply determining whether probable cause existed. Judge concluded that Idaho precedent did not support the defense's interpretation and that the grand jury had been properly instructed under the applicable law. The ruling represented an important defeat for Kohberger's defense because it preserved the indictment and allowed the prosecution to continue toward trial without having to return to a preliminary hearing or seek a new indictment. Judge's decision also reinforced that challenges to the ultimate strength of the prosecution's evidence were matters to be resolved at trial rather than grounds for eliminating the case at the indictment stage.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Follow Steve! https://x.com/SteveBakerUSA-----Join Locals! https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/BUY A BOOK! https://amzn.to/4qBXikSSEND ME SOMETHING! David Freiheit 20423 SR 7 Ste F6319 Boca Raton 33498TIP WITH CRYPTO! bc1qt0umnqna63pyw5j8uesphsfz0dyrtmqcq5ugwmFor advertising inquiries please email sponsorships@rumble.comTHAT IS ALL!

U.S. Magistrate Judge Raymond E. Patricco denied Ashley Guillard's motion to dismiss the defamation lawsuit brought by University of Idaho professor Rebecca Scofield, rejecting Guillard's attempts to argue that the federal court lacked authority to hear the case. Guillard, who represented herself, contended that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction over her, that Idaho was the wrong venue because she lived in Texas and posted her TikTok videos from there, and that the judge had demonstrated bias against her spiritual and psychic beliefs. The court disagreed, finding that Guillard had intentionally directed her accusations toward an Idaho professor and an Idaho-centered murder case and that Scofield alleged she suffered the resulting reputational, professional and emotional harm in Idaho. The judge concluded that those contacts were sufficient for the Idaho federal court to exercise jurisdiction over Guillard and that Idaho was a proper venue for the lawsuit.Patricco also rejected Guillard's argument that the court had improperly judged the validity of her tarot readings or spiritual practices. The judge explained that the case was not about deciding whether psychic abilities or spiritual beliefs were real; it was about whether Guillard had made actionable defamatory statements about Scofield, including accusations that Scofield had been romantically involved with one of the murdered students and had arranged the killings. At the motion-to-dismiss stage, the court was required to accept Scofield's well-pleaded allegations as true and determine whether they stated a legally viable defamation claim, not decide whether Guillard's accusations were ultimately true. Patricco found that Scofield had adequately alleged defamation and ruled that Guillard's disagreements with earlier court decisions did not establish judicial bias or justify throwing out the case. On November 13, 2023, he therefore denied Guillard's motion to set aside the court's prior rulings and denied her motion to dismiss, allowing Scofield's lawsuit to continue.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

"You do the story that you want to do because you believe in it and it will find an audience. You have to be passionate about something and not try and hop off what's already out there. You have to absolutely 1000% have a vision." — Leslie ZemeckisNot all stories are treated equally — and Leslie Zemeckis and Sara DiVello are on a mission to change that. In this episode, the co-hosts of the Plot Point podcast, founders of the Santa Barbara Literary Festival and Nantucket Book Festival respectively, and bestselling authors in their own right join Rain to break down why the stories we tend to dismiss — romance, thriller, true crime, comedy — are often doing the most important work of all.We talk about how comedy functions as a doorway to empathy, why chasing trends produces what Leslie calls Skittles books, and how to carry the story of a real person with the care and tenderness you would want someone to take with yours. Sara's research into the Great Migration and pioneering female journalists, and Leslie's documentary work shining a light on forgotten women in history, form the backdrop of a conversation about what it really means to give overlooked stories and overlooked storytellers their due.If you are writing your first book, finishing your tenth, or simply trying to figure out what story deserves your attention next, this episode is your reminder: write the thing that lights you up, don't wait for permission, and know that every finish line is just another starting line.In this episode, you will learn to:1. Reject the arbitrary hierarchy that ranks some story genres as serious and others as disposable2. Write the story that sustains you through the full marathon — not the one you think will sell3. Research deeply and carry your subject's story with the care you would want for your own4. Build a creative community instead of working in isolation — it will change your career5. Stop waiting for someone to greenlight your story and go create it nowLinks & ResourcesFollow Leslie Zemeckis:Website → https://www.lesliezemeckis.comInstagram → https://www.instagram.com/lesliezemeckisFestival → Santa Barbara Literary Festival → https://www.santabarbaraliteraryfestival.org/Follow Sara DiVello:Website → https://www.saradivello.comInstagram → https://www.instagram.com/saradivelloFestival → Nantucket Book Festival → https://www.nantucketbookfestival.orgPodcast → The Plot Point Podcast (with Leslie Zemeckis and Sara DiVello)Authors Referenced → Jeffrey ArcherAuthors Referenced → Walter MosleyAuthors Referenced → Wally LambAuthors Referenced → Stephen RowleyAuthors Referenced → Ryan CooglerAuthors Referenced → Ace AtkinsAuthors Referenced → Erica RobuckFor more storytelling tips and strategies, visit:Website → https://rainbennett.comPodcast → https://thestorytellinglabpodcast.comOr follow along at:TikTok → https://www.tiktok.com/@chiefstorytellingofficerTwitter/X → https://twitter.com/rainbennettInstagram → https://www.instagram.com/rainbennettFacebook → https://www.facebook.com/thestorytellinglabYouTube → https://www.youtube.com/@RainBennett Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Raymond E. Patricco denied Ashley Guillard's motion to dismiss the defamation lawsuit brought by University of Idaho professor Rebecca Scofield, rejecting Guillard's attempts to argue that the federal court lacked authority to hear the case. Guillard, who represented herself, contended that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction over her, that Idaho was the wrong venue because she lived in Texas and posted her TikTok videos from there, and that the judge had demonstrated bias against her spiritual and psychic beliefs. The court disagreed, finding that Guillard had intentionally directed her accusations toward an Idaho professor and an Idaho-centered murder case and that Scofield alleged she suffered the resulting reputational, professional and emotional harm in Idaho. The judge concluded that those contacts were sufficient for the Idaho federal court to exercise jurisdiction over Guillard and that Idaho was a proper venue for the lawsuit.Patricco also rejected Guillard's argument that the court had improperly judged the validity of her tarot readings or spiritual practices. The judge explained that the case was not about deciding whether psychic abilities or spiritual beliefs were real; it was about whether Guillard had made actionable defamatory statements about Scofield, including accusations that Scofield had been romantically involved with one of the murdered students and had arranged the killings. At the motion-to-dismiss stage, the court was required to accept Scofield's well-pleaded allegations as true and determine whether they stated a legally viable defamation claim, not decide whether Guillard's accusations were ultimately true. Patricco found that Scofield had adequately alleged defamation and ruled that Guillard's disagreements with earlier court decisions did not establish judicial bias or justify throwing out the case. On November 13, 2023, he therefore denied Guillard's motion to set aside the court's prior rulings and denied her motion to dismiss, allowing Scofield's lawsuit to continue.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The RUNDOWN S6 E121: Please Support Our Sponsors:HITMAN INDUSTRIES - Visit them at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.hitmanindustries.net/⁠⁠⁠⁠THE CALIFORNIA REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY - Visit them at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://cragop.org/⁠USCOMBATGEAR.COM⁠⁠⁠ - Visit them at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.uscombatgear.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠HAWG HOLSTERS - Visit them at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.hawgholsters.com/

Bryan Kohberger's defense sought to have the indictment against him dismissed by attacking the grand-jury process that produced the four first-degree murder charges and burglary charge. In one motion, the defense argued that the grand jury had been given the wrong legal standard when it was told that it could indict Kohberger upon finding probable cause. His attorneys contended that Idaho law and its historical development required a much higher standard, essentially arguing that the grand jury should have been instructed to determine whether the evidence established the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense maintained that because the grand jury had operated under the lower probable-cause threshold, the indictment was legally defective and should either be dismissed or the case returned to a preliminary hearing. The court rejected that interpretation, concluding that Idaho law clearly established probable cause as the proper standard for a grand jury deciding whether sufficient evidence existed to send a defendant to trial.Kohberger's attorneys also filed a broader motion attacking what had actually occurred before the grand jury. They alleged that the grand jury had been biased, that prosecutors had presented inadmissible or insufficient evidence, and that the state had committed prosecutorial misconduct by withholding potentially exculpatory information from the jurors. In effect, the defense argued that the indictment could not be trusted because the grand jury had not received a sufficiently fair or legally sound presentation of the case against Kohberger. Judge John Judge ultimately rejected those claims as well, finding that Kohberger had not demonstrated juror bias, prosecutorial misconduct, or an absence of sufficient admissible evidence. The court determined that an impartial grand jury had heard enough evidence to establish probable cause that Kohberger committed the charged crimes, leaving the indictment intact and allowing the prosecution to continue toward trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

President Donald Trump is pushing back against reports that U.S. stockpiles of key munitions have been depleted from months of military operations against Iran. The president said that "we have unlimited, virtually unlimited supply" of weapons. Trump also said defense manufacturers are rapidly expanding production to replenish inventories, and acknowledged that the military is always looking to expand its stockpiles.Senate Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) is hoping to go through a number of pressing issues on Friday, in a final sprint before the August recess. Thune is putting up votes on a Russian sanctions bill, funding the government, and confirming Todd Blanche as the U.S. Attorney General. The vote on Blanche has been mired in Republican opposition for weeks. The White House secured votes from a few holdouts, but the path forward is still uncertain.Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) is heading to Tennessee's general election for governor after winning the state's GOP primary against fellow Republicans John Rose and Monty Fritts on Thursday. She'll face Democratic nominee Jerri Green in November to succeed Gov. Bill Lee, who is term-limited. In Tennessee's newly redrawn Ninth District, Republican Brent Taylor and Democrat Justin Pearson have advanced to the general election.

VR39 - Vapid Response Wednesday returns with a tasteful pairing of stories about alleged anti-Italian discrimination that go together like chianti and red sauce. Today's specials include: Aperitivo: a tasteless morsel from the least deserving recipient in the history of the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor Primo: a chef's kiss Washington Examiner oped on how NYC mayor Zohran Mamdani “erased” Little Italy Secondo: a spicy molto grosso meatball of a Boston lawsuit over alleged anti-Italian-American discrimination gives a federal court indigestion Dolce: our patrons! Listen ad-free and support the show at patreon.com/law “Mayor Mamdani, Why Did You Erase Little Italy?” Anthony Colombo Jr., Mike Crispi, Gerard Marrone, Washington Examiner (7/10/26)  Second Amended Complaint in North End Chamber of Commerce et al v. City of Boston, filed 3/7/24 Order on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss in North End Chamber of Commerce et al v. City of Boston(12/20/24) North End Chamber of Commerce et al v. City of Boston, No. 25-1063 (1st Cir., 7/30/26) Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do!

FirstBank Puerto Rico has asked a federal judge in New York to dismiss a lawsuit accusing the bank of participating in and profiting from Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The anonymous plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, alleged that FirstBank provided Epstein and his associates with banking services for more than two decades, gaining access to financial information that should have exposed his criminal network. The complaint cited more than 4,725 wire transfers involving approximately $1.08 billion between Epstein and several associates, arguing that the bank ignored warning signs while benefiting financially from the relationship.FirstBank denied having any knowledge of Epstein's trafficking activities and argued that the lawsuit failed to identify evidence showing that its employees knowingly assisted or participated in his crimes. The bank characterized its involvement as the provision of routine financial services and said the complaint relied heavily on allegations made against other financial institutions rather than specific misconduct by FirstBank. It also maintained that it cooperated with law enforcement by filing a suspicious activity report and responding to subpoenas, arguing that the case improperly judged its conduct with the benefit of hindsight and should be dismissed with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

It's A Monday Morning Show -- Ken gets ready for his week, looks back on his past week, and we all try to figure it out together.Get Ken's Comedy Album ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠IN MY DAY⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Purchase Ken's book ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Why We Love Stars: The Great Moments That Built A Galaxy Far, Far Away.⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Enjoy⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The Moonagers⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠kennapzok.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Get Ken's Comedy Album⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ IN MY DAY⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

FirstBank Puerto Rico has asked a federal judge in New York to dismiss a lawsuit accusing the bank of participating in and profiting from Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking operation. The anonymous plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, alleged that FirstBank provided Epstein and his associates with banking services for more than two decades, gaining access to financial information that should have exposed his criminal network. The complaint cited more than 4,725 wire transfers involving approximately $1.08 billion between Epstein and several associates, arguing that the bank ignored warning signs while benefiting financially from the relationship.FirstBank denied having any knowledge of Epstein's trafficking activities and argued that the lawsuit failed to identify evidence showing that its employees knowingly assisted or participated in his crimes. The bank characterized its involvement as the provision of routine financial services and said the complaint relied heavily on allegations made against other financial institutions rather than specific misconduct by FirstBank. It also maintained that it cooperated with law enforcement by filing a suspicious activity report and responding to subpoenas, arguing that the case improperly judged its conduct with the benefit of hindsight and should be dismissed with prejudice.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

VLOG Aug 3 Luigi Mangione trial access: https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/mangione-trial-access-showdown-for Polymarket Maduro bet, bid to dismiss: https://www.patreon.com/MatthewRussellLee/posts/midnight-motion-165434193 FDIC and OCC attack on CRA opposed: https://innercitypress.com/cra2occfdicderegffw073126.html UN ban of Press: @GhanaUN looking into, hats off: https://innercitypress.com/unfreepress1proghanavseuicp080326.html

Former FBI Director Jim Comey is asking a judge to throw out his criminal threats case, arguing he's being singled out as a critic of President Trump. NPR's Carrie Johnson reports.Support NPR and hear every episode of Trump's Terms sponsor-free with NPR+. Sign up at plus.npr.org.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

Ben Standig joins Kevin, as he does every Monday, to explain what led up to the Commanders' decision to dismiss TE coach Ben Steele on Monday morning. Also, Ben weighs in on the ever-present WR2 situation (and especially Brandon Aiyuk), and lays out what to look for as training camp opens this week!

AP Washington correspondent Sagar Meghani reports ex-FBI chief James Comey is asking a judge to drop a federal case against him over a social media picture of seashells on a beach.

Kaitlyn Tiffany notes that by 1966, the media labeled these researchers as "housewives" to dismiss their work, describing them as a "keening pack of speculators." Central to their dissent was the "magic bullet" theory, which claimed a single pristine projectile caused multiple wounds in both JFK and Governor Connally. Dissenters highlighted the bullet's lack of deformation and the FBI's initial reports of a non-exiting back wound. They also investigated the Grassy Knoll for additional shooters. (9)1963

DOCKET ALERTS:   Minnesota passed the "Grandparents' Happy Hour" law making it legal to serve wine to grown adults in assisted living. Skol!   The DOJ's Civil Division got tossed out of court in Massachusetts because it failed to respond to a motion to dismiss its lawsuit over the state's refusal to issue undercover license plates to ICE.   Former Olympian David Hearn moved to dismiss the charge that he vandalized the Reflecting Pool since the government has drained the pool and is now destroying the evidence. Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín issued a temporary restraining order blocking the merger of Paramount and Warner Brothers in the antitrust case brought by California and eleven other states.   DOOFUS OF THE DAY: Senator Darline Graham Nordone who decided she'd like to be a real senator, not just a placeholder for her brother until the election. So now she's ditched her last name and gotten the nod from Trump.   MAIN SHOW:   Trump's defamation trollsuit against the BBC is going terribly. Who knew he'd have give discovery, not just take it? So now the DOJ is bigfooting in trying to save him.   There's a sealed proceeding in DC involving the Alien Terrorist Removal Court, a five-judge panel created in 1996 to hear secret cases against terrorists who need to be removed from the country immediately and without process. It has heard zero cases in the past 30 years, until last week, when the Trump administration tried to use it to deport someone without process. Is this a new ONE WEIRD TRICK the government will use to shove people out of the country?   Judge Todd Eddins of the Supreme Court of Hawai'i let loose on the Supreme Court for burning down democracy in an opinion interpreting the Due Process Clause in the state's constitution. State judges are not okay!   SUBSCRIBER BONUS:   Wired Magazine has published multiple stories about the massive data Madison Square Gardens collects on its patrons. The venue has filed a defamation lawsuit against Wired, its parent company Condé Nast, and journalists Noah Shachtman, Maddy Varner, and Katie Drummond. SLAPP-ity slap!   Andrew was a guest on the "Make It Make Sense" podcast with Grant Hermes.   Andrew's episode of Make It Make Sense https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/how-john-roberts-broke-the-supreme-court-this-term/id1756553746?i=1000777268503   US v. Massachusetts [Undercover plates] https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73400637/united-states-v-the-commonwealth-of-massachusetts/   Hearn Motion to Dismiss https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/28498026-hearnmtd/   California v. Paramount-Skydance https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73606877/the-state-of-california-v-paramount-skydance-corporation/   Trump v. BBC https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72040010/trump-v-british-broadcasting-corporation/   Granillo v. Hawai'i https://www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/SCWC-22-0000740.pdf   Granillo v. Hawaii [Supreme Court of Hawaii; majority opinion] chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/SCWC-22-0000740.pdf   Granillo v. Hawaii [Supreme Court of Hawaii; concurrence] https://www.courts.state.hi.us/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/SCWC-22-0000740con.pdf   Madison Square Gardens v. Advance Magazine Publishers [Wired/Shachtman] https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=L6rt5/_PLUS_WLpjJoHCLRczc_PLUS_A==   Alien Terrorist Removal Court [docket 2026-TRC-1] https://www.atrc.uscourts.gov/docs/2026-TRC-1-Order.pdf   Show Links: https://www.lawandchaospod.com/ BlueSky: @LawAndChaosPod Threads: @LawAndChaosPod Twitter: @LawAndChaosPod  

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/a2-nRldN-jo  This Case Brief involves a civil lawsuit filed by Alex Murdaugh against former clerk of court Rebecca Hill, alleging that her jury tampering during his first murder trial violated his constitutional right to a fair trial. Hill has filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that Murdaugh has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted because he cannot prove her actions caused the $600,000 in legal fees he seeks to recover, while also claiming multiple forms of legal immunity. Murdaugh's response argues that the motion should be denied because nominal and punitive damages are available under federal law for constitutional violations even if actual damages cannot be proven. While Hill contends his requested damages are not redressable or ripe for adjudication, Murdaugh insists Hill's actions rendered the value of his initial defense expenditure worthless, creating a live case and controversy that warrants proceeding to discovery. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

It can seem like they don't like what you like. It can even seem like they don't like you. That's what children do, after all, they try to discover what they like.

Ep 356: She said she got pregnant by the bachelor but what followed blindsided everyone. This is part 2 of the Laura Owens story. Sources for Today's Episode: San Francisco Chronicle Justiceforclayton.com Love Trapped podcast Bankruptcy Court “Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice” Victims of Lauraowens.com Credits: Written and Hosted by Amy Shlosberg and Meghan Sacks Produced by James Varga Audio Editor, Jose Alfonzo Script Editor, Abagail Belcastro Music by Dessert Media Get Even More Women&Crime Episodes: Patreon - Ad-free shows starting at $2 a month, or upgrade for $5 a month to get a new extra episode every month, as well as exclusive virtual HappyHours with Meg & Amy. Check-out other tiers for perks such as lectures, true crime book club, and more! Visit our Patreon page for more info: https://www.patreon.com/womenandcrime/ Apple Subscriptions - Exclusive episodes and ad-free regular stories are now available through Apple's podcast app for only $4.99 a month, or save with an annual membership. YouTube Memberships - Exclusive episode available on YouTube for only $4.99 a month. https://www.youtube.com/@WomenandCrime/membership/ Help is Available: If you or someone you know is in a crisis situation, or a victim of domestic, or other violence, there are many organizations that can offer support or help you in your specific situation. For direct links to these organizations please visit https://womenandcrimepodcast.com/resources/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Ep 354: She said she got pregnant by the bachelor but what followed blindsided everyone. This is the Laura Owens story. Sources for Today's Episode: San Francisco Chronicle Justiceforclayton.com Love Trapped podcast Bankruptcy Court “Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice” Victims of Lauraowens.com Credits: Written and Hosted by Amy Shlosberg and Meghan Sacks Produced by James Varga Audio Editor, Jose Alfonzo Script Editor, Abagail Belcastro Music by Dessert Media Get Even More Women&Crime Episodes: Patreon - Ad-free shows starting at $2 a month, or upgrade for $5 a month to get a new extra episode every month, as well as exclusive virtual HappyHours with Meg & Amy. Check-out other tiers for perks such as lectures, true crime book club, and more! Visit our Patreon page for more info: https://www.patreon.com/womenandcrime/ Apple Subscriptions - Exclusive episodes and ad-free regular stories are now available through Apple's podcast app for only $4.99 a month, or save with an annual membership. YouTube Memberships - Exclusive episode available on YouTube for only $4.99 a month. https://www.youtube.com/@WomenandCrime/membership/ Help is Available: If you or someone you know is in a crisis situation, or a victim of domestic, or other violence, there are many organizations that can offer support or help you in your specific situation. For direct links to these organizations please visit https://womenandcrimepodcast.com/resources/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices