Podcasts about dismiss

​In Case No. 24-CV-07774 (JPO), the defendants, including Sean Combs and associated entities, have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought by the plaintiff, John Doe. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient factual basis and fail to meet the necessary legal standards to proceed. They contend that the claims are speculative and do not establish the required elements to support causes of action against them.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any applicable exceptions to these time constraints. They also challenge the appropriateness of the plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym without prior court approval, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings. Based on these arguments, the defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629907.58.0.pdf

​In Case No. 24-CV-07774 (JPO), the defendants, including Sean Combs and associated entities, have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought by the plaintiff, John Doe. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient factual basis and fail to meet the necessary legal standards to proceed. They contend that the claims are speculative and do not establish the required elements to support causes of action against them.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any applicable exceptions to these time constraints. They also challenge the appropriateness of the plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym without prior court approval, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings. Based on these arguments, the defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629907.58.0.pdf

Send us a textIn this update on the legal feud between Blake Lively v. Justin Baldoni, we will cover Ryan Reynolds attempt to remove himself from the lawsuit. Did he make good arguments? Will he win? Was he just a supportive spouse or is he someone who deliberately attempted to derail Baldoni's entire career?Listen for my legal analysis.Give me feedback on IG @THEDISHMASTER

​In the case of McCrary v. Marriott International, Inc. (Case No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV), the plaintiff has filed an opposition to Marriott's motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The plaintiff argues that the complaint sufficiently alleges that Marriott was complicit in facilitating human trafficking activities on its properties, thereby violating the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA). Specifically, the plaintiff contends that Marriott had knowledge, or should have had knowledge, of the trafficking occurring on its premises and failed to take appropriate action to prevent it.The opposition emphasizes that Marriott's alleged inaction contributed to the plaintiff's victimization and that the claims are adequately supported to withstand a motion to dismiss. The plaintiff asserts that Marriott's motion overlooks the detailed factual allegations presented, which, if proven, demonstrate Marriott's liability under the TVPA. Therefore, the plaintiff requests that the court deny Marriott's motion to dismiss and allow the case to proceed to discovery and trial.​to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.72.0_2.pdf

​In the case of McCrary v. Marriott International, Inc. (Case No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV), the plaintiff has filed an opposition to Marriott's motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The plaintiff argues that the complaint sufficiently alleges that Marriott was complicit in facilitating human trafficking activities on its properties, thereby violating the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA). Specifically, the plaintiff contends that Marriott had knowledge, or should have had knowledge, of the trafficking occurring on its premises and failed to take appropriate action to prevent it.The opposition emphasizes that Marriott's alleged inaction contributed to the plaintiff's victimization and that the claims are adequately supported to withstand a motion to dismiss. The plaintiff asserts that Marriott's motion overlooks the detailed factual allegations presented, which, if proven, demonstrate Marriott's liability under the TVPA. Therefore, the plaintiff requests that the court deny Marriott's motion to dismiss and allow the case to proceed to discovery and trial.​to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.72.0_2.pdf

​In the case of McCrary v. Marriott International, Inc. (Case No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV), the plaintiff has filed an opposition to Marriott's motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The plaintiff argues that the complaint sufficiently alleges that Marriott was complicit in facilitating human trafficking activities on its properties, thereby violating the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA). Specifically, the plaintiff contends that Marriott had knowledge, or should have had knowledge, of the trafficking occurring on its premises and failed to take appropriate action to prevent it.The opposition emphasizes that Marriott's alleged inaction contributed to the plaintiff's victimization and that the claims are adequately supported to withstand a motion to dismiss. The plaintiff asserts that Marriott's motion overlooks the detailed factual allegations presented, which, if proven, demonstrate Marriott's liability under the TVPA. Therefore, the plaintiff requests that the court deny Marriott's motion to dismiss and allow the case to proceed to discovery and trial.​to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.72.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of McCrary v. Marriott International, Inc. (Case No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV), the plaintiff has filed an opposition to Marriott's motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The plaintiff argues that the complaint sufficiently alleges that Marriott was complicit in facilitating human trafficking activities on its properties, thereby violating the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA). Specifically, the plaintiff contends that Marriott had knowledge, or should have had knowledge, of the trafficking occurring on its premises and failed to take appropriate action to prevent it.The opposition emphasizes that Marriott's alleged inaction contributed to the plaintiff's victimization and that the claims are adequately supported to withstand a motion to dismiss. The plaintiff asserts that Marriott's motion overlooks the detailed factual allegations presented, which, if proven, demonstrate Marriott's liability under the TVPA. Therefore, the plaintiff requests that the court deny Marriott's motion to dismiss and allow the case to proceed to discovery and trial.​to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.72.0_2.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Justin Baldoni is ready to take Blake and Ryan Reynolds to court! He is shutting down her Motion to Dismiss. Plus, the donut shop Blake Lively was spotted working at is now being investigated after she was seen not using a hairnet.   Shop New "Justice for Justin" and "Mommy Sleuth" Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio    Book a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIb    Listen to The Pop Report: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-pop-report/id1746150111    Watch Disaster Daters: https://open.spotify.com/show/3L4GLnKwz9Uy5dT8Ey1VPi    Join the Zack Pack Community to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs3Zs51YaK-xw2U5ypi5eqg/join    Couldn't get enough? Follow @justplainzack or @nofilterwithzack 

4-4-25 Morning Rush - Justin Baldoni Responds To Blake Lively Motion To Dismiss & Terrible Tariffs Explained!go to patreon.com/daveneal for more bonus content!

4-3-25 Morning Rush - Hooters Wants To Tone It Down & Blake Lively RESPONDS To Motion To Dismiss & Trump Announces Global Tariffs!go to patreon.com/daveneal for more bonus content!

NEWS: Sandiganbayan junks Jinggoy's dismiss plea | April 4, 2025Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.netFollow us:Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebookInstagram - https://tmt.ph/instagramTwitter - https://tmt.ph/twitterDailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotionSubscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digitalSign up to our newsletters: https://tmt.ph/newslettersCheck out our Podcasts:Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotifyApple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcastsAmazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusicDeezer: https://tmt.ph/deezerStitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimesVisit our website at https://www.manilatimes.netFollow us:Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebookInstagram - https://tmt.ph/instagramTwitter - https://tmt.ph/twitterDailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotionSubscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digitalSign up to our newsletters: https://tmt.ph/newslettersCheck out our Podcasts:Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotifyApple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcastsAmazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusicDeezer: https://tmt.ph/deezerStitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

4-2-25 Morning Rush - Bachelor Grant Drops TEA On Viall Files As Juliana Calls out Litia & Justin Baldoni RESPONDS To Ryan Reynolds Motion To Dismiss & Cory Booker Sets Report With 25 Hr Speech go to patreon.com/daveneal for more bonus content!

The Center Square's Greg Bishop delves into the latest federal court filing against Illinois' migrant sanctuary policies from the U.S. Department of Justice. The state, Cook County and Chicago all motioned to dismiss the case.Support this podcast: https://secure.anedot.com/franklin-news-foundation/ce052532-b1e4-41c4-945c-d7ce2f52c38a?source_code=xxxxxx

​In response to Karen Read's post-trial motion to dismiss charges following a mistrial, the Commonwealth filed a 15-page opposition disputing claims of "extraordinary governmental misconduct." Prosecutors contended that there were no ethical violations or misconduct that would infringe upon Read's right to a fair trial, asserting that the defense's motion should be denied.Judge Beverly Cannone, after reviewing the arguments, denied Read's motion to dismiss, stating that the alleged violations did not warrant the "draconian sanction" of dismissal and that Read's constitutional rights could be fully protected in the forthcoming retrial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Welcome back to the Bar Exam Toolbox podcast! This is the last of three episodes in which we review the substantive Civil Procedure law we've covered on the podcast. We're concluding this series by tracking how a civil lawsuit unfolds, from pleadings to judgment.  In this episode, we discuss: Starting a lawsuit: pleadings and service of process Defendant's response and Rule 12 motions Amendments and pre-trial resolutions Joinder of parties Final judgment and post-judgment motions Resources: Private Bar Exam Tutoring (https://barexamtoolbox.com/private-bar-exam-tutoring/) Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Atlantic_Corp._v._Twombly) Ashcroft v. Iqbal (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Iqbal) Podcast Episode 208: Listen and Learn – Motions to Dismiss a Case (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-208-listen-and-learn-motions-to-dismiss-a-case/) Podcast Episode 286: Listen and Learn – Conclusory Pleadings Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Civ Pro) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-286-listen-and-learn-conclusory-pleadings-under-rule-12b6-civ-pro/) Podcast Episode 203: Listen and Learn – Motions for Summary Judgment (Civ Pro) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-203-listen-and-learn-motions-for-summary-judgment-civ-pro/) Podcast Episode 262: Listen and Learn – Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motions for New Trial (Civ Pro) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-262-listen-and-learn-motions-for-judgment-as-a-matter-of-law-and-motions-for-new-trial-civ-pro/) Podcast Episode 145: Listen and Learn – Permissive Joinder and Required Joinder (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-145-listen-and-learn-permissive-joinder-and-required-joinder/) Podcast Episode 153: Listen and Learn – More Types of Joinder (Civ Pro) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-153-listen-and-learn-more-types-of-joinder-civ-pro/) Podcast Episode 148: Listen and Learn – Claim and Issue Preclusion (Civil Procedure) (https://barexamtoolbox.com/podcast-episode-148-listen-and-learn-claim-and-issue-preclusion-civil-procedure/) Download the Transcript (https://barexamtoolbox.com/episode-306-spotlight-on-civil-procedure-part-3-the-civil-lawsuit/) If you enjoy the podcast, we'd love a nice review and/or rating on  Apple Podcasts (https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-pass-bar-exam-less-stress/id1370651486) or your favorite listening app. And feel free to reach out to us directly. You can always reach us via the contact form on the Bar Exam Toolbox website (https://barexamtoolbox.com/contact-us/). Finally, if you don't want to miss anything, you can sign up for podcast updates (https://barexamtoolbox.com/get-bar-exam-toolbox-podcast-updates/)! Thanks for listening! Alison & Lee

​In Case No. 24-CV-07774 (JPO), the defendants, including Sean Combs and associated entities, have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought by the plaintiff, John Doe. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient factual basis and fail to meet the necessary legal standards to proceed. They contend that the claims are speculative and do not establish the required elements to support causes of action against them.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any applicable exceptions to these time constraints. They also challenge the appropriateness of the plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym without prior court approval, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings. Based on these arguments, the defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629907.58.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In Case No. 24-CV-07774 (JPO), the defendants, including Sean Combs and associated entities, have filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought by the plaintiff, John Doe. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's allegations lack sufficient factual basis and fail to meet the necessary legal standards to proceed. They contend that the claims are speculative and do not establish the required elements to support causes of action against them.Additionally, the defendants assert that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that the plaintiff has not demonstrated any applicable exceptions to these time constraints. They also challenge the appropriateness of the plaintiff proceeding under a pseudonym without prior court approval, emphasizing the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings. Based on these arguments, the defendants request that the court dismiss the complaint in its entirety.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629907.58.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports Justice Department instructed to dismiss legal challenge to Georgia election law

​In response to Karen Read's post-trial motion to dismiss charges following a mistrial, the Commonwealth filed a 15-page opposition disputing claims of "extraordinary governmental misconduct." Prosecutors contended that there were no ethical violations or misconduct that would infringe upon Read's right to a fair trial, asserting that the defense's motion should be denied.Judge Beverly Cannone, after reviewing the arguments, denied Read's motion to dismiss, stating that the alleged violations did not warrant the "draconian sanction" of dismissal and that Read's constitutional rights could be fully protected in the forthcoming retrial.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Attorney General Austin Knudsen asked the Montana Supreme Court Friday to dismiss any punishment for violating rules of conduct. The charges stem from strong language the attorney general used to rebuke the high court in a 2021 case.

Jews for Jesus' social media posts were a part of a larger religious expression about giving Bibles to Israeli soldiers. Constitutional expert, lawyer, author, pastor, and founder of Liberty Counsel Mat Staver discusses the important topics of the day with co-hosts and guests that impact life, liberty, and family. To stay informed and get involved, visit LC.org.

CA Trial Lawyer Daniel Forouzan @danielfourouzan joins to discuss CA laws surrounding harassment in the workplace. Justin Baldoni exposes Blake Lively's company Blakel, Inc in his response to her Motion to Dismiss in his $400M lawsuit. Garcelle walks off the set of the RHOBH reunion. And Gwyneth Paltrow teams up with Meghan Markle!   Start your hair growth journey with Nutrafol. For a limited time, Nutrafol is offering our listeners $10 off your first month's subscription and free shipping at www.Nutrafol.com and use promo code NOFILTER.   Shop New Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio   Book a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIb   Listen to The Pop Report: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-pop-report/id1746150111   Watch Disaster Daters: https://open.spotify.com/show/3L4GLnKwz9Uy5dT8Ey1VPi   Join the Zack Pack Community to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs3Zs51YaK-xw2U5ypi5eqg/join   Couldn't get enough? Follow @justplainzack or @nofilterwithzack

AP correspondent Donna Warder reports on a lawsuit that accuses Vermont child welfare officials of targeting pregnant women considered unsuitable for motherhood.

Get 15% off OneSkin with the code LAWNERD at https://www.oneskin.co/ #oneskinpod #adKaren Read's Case is scheduled to begin, with Jury Selection on April 1st but will not begin the evidence portion until the end of April. The Commonwealth has filed motions asking for things she said to reporters during interviews and the Discovery ID Docuseries. The Federal Appeal is pending as well as a decision on the Motion to Dismiss the entire case. 911 calls in the Bryan Kohberger case have been revealed as well as Amazon purchases in the Motions in Limine. UMG filed a motion to dismiss Drake's case ultimately stating that he lost a rap battle that he willingly participated in. The concept of defamation in rap music, hyperbole, and opinion versus factual statements are challenged in this filing and it's a great read. The Lively and Baldoni cases have been getting more movement as many parties filed motions to dismiss. We'll see what happens next. RESOURCESKaren Read Post-Mistrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKVEoBmOhzUprvqi3-_6JoZ Drake Sues UMG - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5PlpbIL8EEDrake Filing - https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/drake-UMG-defamation-complaint.pdfYSL Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gLrrA5-0W1pG9P5S7Xk6VpoInterview with Sir Mix-A-Lot - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgL4AT4CYYARoommates Text Messages - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_s7V7y2gpOI911 Calls in Kohberger Case - https://youtu.be/oH7AsdGk7HILast Karen Read hearing - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9e9BfCqOIvsThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Is Blake Lively about to win her dismissal in Justin Baldoni's $400M lawsuit? Let's break down Blake's latest court filing.   REQUEST A CITY NEAR YOU FOR A LIVE PODCAST: https://www.x1entertainment.com/zackpeter-cityrequest    Shop New Merch now: https://merchlabs.com/collections/zack-peter?srsltid=AfmBOoqqnV3kfsOYPubFFxCQdpCuGjVgssGIXZRXHcLPH9t4GjiKoaio    Book a personalized message on Cameo: https://v.cameo.com/e/QxWQhpd1TIb    Listen to The Pop Report: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-pop-report/id1746150111    Watch Disaster Daters: https://open.spotify.com/show/3L4GLnKwz9Uy5dT8Ey1VPi    Join the Zack Pack Community to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs3Zs51YaK-xw2U5ypi5eqg/join    Couldn't get enough? Follow @justplainzack or @nofilterwithzack

In today's episode, I shared some explosive updates in the reality TV world. We have the official return date for Sister Wives Season 19, which will air on April 20th with five new episodes and four tell-alls, including a special tribute to Garrison Brown. I also discussed the latest in the legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni, with Lively filing a motion to dismiss Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit against her. Additionally, I revealed some juicy details about Welcome to Plathville Season 7, including Lydia Plath's wedding, Micah and Veronica's breakup, and a physical altercation between Isaac and Micah Plath.  Timestamps: 00:00:00 Intro, Sister Wives news, Blake Lively tea 00:07:19 Sister Wives gets return date, details about upcoming episodes 00:14:14 Blake Lively looks to dismiss lawsuit, what does this mean? 00:21:15 Welcome To Plathville dark updates, breakups, fights, and more!  Get Tickets To Our Virtual Live Podcast show May 1st at 7pm EDT. Here's the link for tickets: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/david-yontef-sarah-fraser-virtual-live-show-ask-us-anything-51-7pm-tickets-1276780297239?aff=erelexpmlt  MY Go Big Podcasting Courses Are Here! Purchase Go Big Podcasting and learn to start, monetize, and grow your own podcast. USE CODE: Cyber10 for 10% OFF **SHOP my Amazon Marketplace - especially if you're looking to get geared-up to start your own Podcast!!!** https://www.amazon.com/shop/thesarahfrasershow Show is sponsored by: Amazfit.com/tsfs are the best, most affordable, and long-lasting performance watches! Use code TSFS for 10% OFF HometownHero.com for the BEST CBD and THC products that support Veterans, and use code TSFS to take 20% off your first purchase Horizonfibroids.com get rid of those nasty fibroids JunesJourney download the free game in the app store, find clues and solves mysteries with this fun game. LittleSaints.com use code TSFS for 20% off your first order, these are my FAV non-alcoholic cocktails, enjoy better sleep, less stress, and more! MeetFabric.com/TSFS join the thousands of parents who trust Fabric to help protect their family. Apply today in just minutes Nutrafol.com use code TSFS for FREE shipping and $10 off your subscription Prolonlife.com/tsfs 15% off sitewide plus a $40 bonus gift when you subscribe to their 5-Day Nutrition Program! ● Try their detox that has REAL FOOD and WORKS! Rula.com/tsfs to get started today. That's R-U-L-A dot com slash tsfs for convenient therapy that's covered by insurance. Quince.com/tsfs for FREE shipping on your order and 365 day returns Follow me on Instagram/Tiktok: @thesarahfrasershow   ***Visit our Sub-Reddit: reddit.com/r/thesarahfrasershow for ALL things The Sarah Fraser Show!!!*** Advertise on The Sarah Fraser Show: thesarahfrasershow@gmail.com Got a juicy gossip TIP from your favorite TLC or Bravo show? Email: thesarahfrasershow@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Blake Lively wants out of her $400M lawsuit from Justin Baldoni! Kim Kardashian blocks North West from hanging out with Kanye West and the Tate Brothers. Rachel Zegler backtracks her comments about Snow White. Hailey Bieber wants to shutdown rumors that she's trying to be like Selena Gomez. Hosted and Produced by Zack Peter and Andy Lalwani - Find us online: https://instagram.com/justplainzack https://instagram.com/andylalwani Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

3-20-25 Afternoon Rush - Blake Lively's Motion To Dismiss Calls Out Baldoni & Other Juicy Trial Updates & A Beautiful Bachelor Hard Launch!! Today's sponsors! Quince: www.quince.com/rushhour for free shipping and 365- day returns! Rula patients typically pay $15 per session when using insurance. Connect with quality therapists and mental health experts who specialize in you at https://www.rula.com/RushHour  #rulapod #adgo to patreon.com/daveneal for more bonus content!

Macro analyst Stephanie Pomboy and I just concluded our bi-weekly live show.This week, Stephanie focused on recession risk and the mental gymnastics many go through to avoid addressing it.Not only are the economic data continuing to weaken, but even the new Administration is telling investors to prepare for a slowdown.Here's US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent yesterday:“The market and the economy have become hooked, become addicted, to excessive government spending and there's going to be a detox period.”At this point, to refuse to plan for even at least the possibility of a recession and/or a further market decline later this year is foolish.Steph and I also discussed her outlook on gold, the employment market, corporate profit margins, the latest retail sales data and several other audience questions.NOTE: these bi-weekly Monday morning live shows with Stephanie are moving to Wednesdays going forward. The next one will take place on Wed March 26th (same 11amET time).

The wife of an alleged serial killer and the mother of his accuser dismisses the allegations, while the Mendocino County Sheriff's Office says its investigation into claims that an 86-year-old resident of the Sherwood Oaks skilled nursing facility yielded no evidence to substantiate the allegations.

"The number one lesson I can offer you where your work is concerned is this: become so skilled, so vigilant, so flat-out fantastic at what you do that your talent cannot be dismissed. Finally, this will save you—stop comparing yourself to other people. You're only on this planet to be you." – Oprah Winfrey「我能给你的第一条职场建议是这样的：让自己变得如此熟练、如此专注、如此出色，让你的才华无法被忽视。最后，这一点非常重要——停止与他人比较。你来到这个世界，只是为了成为你自己。」 ——欧普拉·温弗瑞备注：播客里提到的两档节目“The Oprah Winfrey Show”还有“Super Soul Sunday”已经停播，然而Oprah仍然主持Super Soul Podcast，大家可以搜寻收听下！五个关键单词及解释1. Skill (n.) 技能例句：她不断提升自己的 skill，终于获得了梦想的职位。Example: She continuously improves her skill and finally landed her dream job。2.Vigilant (adj.) 警觉的、谨慎的例句：在快速变化的行业中，保持 vigilant 非常重要。Example: Staying vigilant in a fast-changing industry is crucial。3.Talent (n.) 才华例句：她的 talent 让公司无法忽视她的贡献。Example: Her talent made it impossible for the company to ignore her contributions。4.Dismiss (v.) 忽视、解雇例句：如果你足够优秀，别人无法 dismiss 你的存在。Example: If you're excellent, no one can dismiss your presence。5.Comparison (n.) 比较例句：Comparison 会让我们失去信心，专注于自己更重要。Example: Comparison often leads to self-doubt; focusing on yourself is more important。**喜欢这期节目吗？别忘了订阅并分享。准备好离开舒适圈了吗？现在就到 flywithlily.com 下载「离开舒适圈挑战」。

LESSON 76I Am Under No Laws But God's.We have observed before how many senseless things have seemed to you to be salvation. Each has imprisoned you with laws as senseless as itself. You are not bound by them. Yet to understand that this is so, you must first realize salvation lies not there. While you would seek for it in things that have no meaning, you bind yourself to laws that make no sense. Thus do you seek to prove salvation is where it is not.Today we will be glad you cannot prove it. For if you could, you would forever seek salvation where it is not, and never find it. The idea for today tells you once again how simple is salvation. Look for it where it waits for you, and there it will be found. Look nowhere else, for it is nowhere else.Think of the freedom in the recognition that you are not bound by all the strange and twisted laws you have set up to save you. You really think that you would starve unless you have stacks of green paper strips and piles of metal discs. You really think a small round pellet or some fluid pushed into your veins through a sharpened needle will ward off disease and death. You really think you are alone unless another body is with you.It is insanity that thinks these things. You call them laws, and put them under different names in a long catalogue of rituals that have no use and serve no purpose. You think you must obey the “laws” of medicine, of economics and of health. Protect the body, and you will be saved.These are not laws, but madness. The body is endangered by the mind that hurts itself. The body suffers just in order that the mind will fail to see it is the victim of itself. The body's suffering is a mask the mind holds up to hide what really suffers. It would not understand it is its own enemy; that it attacks itself and wants to die. It is from this your “laws” would save the body. It is for this you think you are a body.There are no laws except the laws of God. This needs repeating, over and over, until you realize it applies to everything that you have made in opposition to God's Will. Your magic has no meaning. What it is meant to save does not exist. Only what it is meant to hide will save you.The laws of God can never be replaced. We will devote today to rejoicing that this is so. It is no longer a truth that we would hide. We realize instead it is a truth that keeps us free forever. Magic imprisons, but the laws of God make free. The light has come because there are no laws but His.We will begin the longer practice periods today with a short review of the different kinds of “laws” we have believed we must obey. These would include, for example, the “laws” of nutrition, of immunization, of medication, and of the body's protection in innumerable ways. Think further; you believe in the “laws” of friendship, of “good” relationships and reciprocity. Perhaps you even think that there are laws which set forth what is God's and what is yours. Many “religions” have been based on this. They would not save but damn in Heaven's name. Yet they are no more strange than other “laws” you hold must be obeyed to make you safe.There are no laws but God's. Dismiss all foolish magical beliefs today, and hold your mind in silent readiness to hear the Voice That speaks the truth to you. You will be listening to One Who says there is no loss under the laws of God. Payment is neither given nor received. Exchange cannot be made; there are no substitutes; and nothing is replaced by something else. God's laws forever give and never take.Hear Him Who tells you this, and realize how foolish are the “laws” you thought upheld the world you thought you saw. Then listen further. He will tell you more. About the Love your Father has for you. About the endless joy He offers you. About His yearning for His only Son, created as His channel for creation; denied to Him by his belief in hell.Let us today open God's channels to Him, and let His Will extend through us to Him. Thus is creation endlessly increased. His Voice will speak of this to us, as well as of the joys of Heaven which His laws keep limitless forever. We will repeat today's idea until we have listened and understood there are no laws but God's. Then we will tell ourselves, as a dedication with which the practice period concludes:I am under no laws but God's.We will repeat this dedication as often as possible today; at least four or five times an hour, as well as in response to any temptation to experience ourselves as subject to other laws throughout the day. It is our statement of freedom from all danger and all tyranny. It is our acknowledgment that God is our Father, and that His Son is saved.- Jesus Christ in ACIM

​In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV, the defendants, including Sean Combs (also known as "P. Diddy") and associated business entities, filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The plaintiff, identified as "Jane Doe," alleges that Combs raped her and threatened her life in 2004. She asserts a claim under the New York City Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, which includes a provision that temporarily revives claims that otherwise would be barred by the statute of limitations.The defendants' motion to dismiss likely argues procedural and substantive grounds, such as the expiration of the statute of limitations and potential deficiencies in the plaintiff's allegations. They may also contend that the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, possibly challenging the sufficiency of evidence or the applicability of the cited legal provisions. The court's decision on this motion will determine whether the case proceeds to discovery and trial or is dismissed at this preliminary stage.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.57.0.pdf

​In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV, the defendants, including Sean Combs (also known as "P. Diddy") and associated business entities, filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The plaintiff, identified as "Jane Doe," alleges that Combs raped her and threatened her life in 2004. She asserts a claim under the New York City Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, which includes a provision that temporarily revives claims that otherwise would be barred by the statute of limitations.The defendants' motion to dismiss likely argues procedural and substantive grounds, such as the expiration of the statute of limitations and potential deficiencies in the plaintiff's allegations. They may also contend that the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, possibly challenging the sufficiency of evidence or the applicability of the cited legal provisions. The court's decision on this motion will determine whether the case proceeds to discovery and trial or is dismissed at this preliminary stage.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.57.0.pdf

​In Case No. 24-CV-08808-JAV, the defendants, including Sean Combs, have filed a Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought against them by the plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe. In their memorandum supporting this motion, the Combs defendants argue that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, asserting that the plaintiff has not demonstrated an "injury in fact" necessary for standing. They contend that the alleged injuries are speculative and not concrete or imminent, as required by legal standards.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsources:gov.uscourts.nysd.632024.32.0.pdf

​In Case No. 24-CV-08808-JAV, the defendants, including Sean Combs, have filed a Motion to Dismiss the complaint brought against them by the plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe. In their memorandum supporting this motion, the Combs defendants argue that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, asserting that the plaintiff has not demonstrated an "injury in fact" necessary for standing. They contend that the alleged injuries are speculative and not concrete or imminent, as required by legal standards.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsources:gov.uscourts.nysd.632024.32.0.pdf

​In the memorandum supporting their motion to dismiss in Case No. 24-CV-07777 (LJL), the Combs Defendants argue that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, asserting that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated an "injury in fact" necessary for standing. They contend that the alleged injuries are speculative and not concrete or imminent, as required by legal standards.Additionally, the defendants assert that venue in the current district is improper, as no substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred there. They suggest that the case should be dismissed or, alternatively, transferred to a more appropriate venue where the defendants reside or where the alleged events took place.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629910.47.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV, the defendants, including Sean Combs (also known as "P. Diddy") and associated business entities, filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The plaintiff, identified as "Jane Doe," alleges that Combs raped her and threatened her life in 2004. She asserts a claim under the New York City Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, which includes a provision that temporarily revives claims that otherwise would be barred by the statute of limitations.The defendants' motion to dismiss likely argues procedural and substantive grounds, such as the expiration of the statute of limitations and potential deficiencies in the plaintiff's allegations. They may also contend that the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, possibly challenging the sufficiency of evidence or the applicability of the cited legal provisions. The court's decision on this motion will determine whether the case proceeds to discovery and trial or is dismissed at this preliminary stage.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.57.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV, the defendants, including Sean Combs (also known as "P. Diddy") and associated business entities, filed a Memorandum of Law supporting their Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. The plaintiff, identified as "Jane Doe," alleges that Combs raped her and threatened her life in 2004. She asserts a claim under the New York City Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, which includes a provision that temporarily revives claims that otherwise would be barred by the statute of limitations.The defendants' motion to dismiss likely argues procedural and substantive grounds, such as the expiration of the statute of limitations and potential deficiencies in the plaintiff's allegations. They may also contend that the Amended Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, possibly challenging the sufficiency of evidence or the applicability of the cited legal provisions. The court's decision on this motion will determine whether the case proceeds to discovery and trial or is dismissed at this preliminary stage.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.57.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the memorandum supporting their motion to dismiss in Case No. 24-CV-07777 (LJL), the Combs Defendants argue that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, asserting that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated an "injury in fact" necessary for standing. They contend that the alleged injuries are speculative and not concrete or imminent, as required by legal standards.Additionally, the defendants assert that venue in the current district is improper, as no substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred there. They suggest that the case should be dismissed or, alternatively, transferred to a more appropriate venue where the defendants reside or where the alleged events took place.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629910.47.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the memorandum supporting their motion to dismiss in Case No. 24-CV-07777 (LJL), the Combs Defendants argue that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, asserting that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated an "injury in fact" necessary for standing. They contend that the alleged injuries are speculative and not concrete or imminent, as required by legal standards.Additionally, the defendants assert that venue in the current district is improper, as no substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred there. They suggest that the case should be dismissed or, alternatively, transferred to a more appropriate venue where the defendants reside or where the alleged events took place.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.629910.47.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Law Nerd App - https://LawNerdApp.comA second superseding indictment has been filed against Diddy, revealing disturbing new details about alleged sexual exploitation, abuse, and forced labor for over 20 years. What does this mean for his upcoming trial in May 2025?Jay Z files a Federal lawsuit against Tony Buzbee, his law Firm and the Jane Doe that filed the civil lawsuit against him and Diddy. Camille Vasquez enters the chat with an affidavit. Multiple lawsuits, extortion claims, and conflicting affidavits, the best thing might be to put Jane Doe on the stand to get clear answers. RESOURCESJay Z & Diddy Civil Lawsuit - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxSCZvUOQywDonna Adelson Live Stream - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKWeTZLRYeYKaren Read Hearing - Motion to Dismiss - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DspEzUu2lGMJay Z Civil Lawsuit Dismissal - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVKvuhuH7VkDepp v Heard Trial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gLVeg1x2AInDBfPU6-ffnD0This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

A court hearing this morning in Manhattan to determine whether a Columbia University graduate student can be deported...The judge deciding whether to dismiss the charges against Adams says he has enough information from both sides full 416 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 09:46:56 +0000 ta6J7w2GHdxmW2QgQxR5y3zo3qXpgcAS news 1010 WINS ALL LOCAL news A court hearing this morning in Manhattan to determine whether a Columbia University graduate student can be deported...The judge deciding whether to dismiss the charges against Adams says he has enough information from both sides The podcast is hyper-focused on local news, issues and events in the New York City area. This podcast's purpose is to give New Yorkers New York news about their neighborhoods and shine a light on the issues happening in their backyard. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc.

On March 5th, 2025, Karen Read had a Hearing for the Motions to Dismiss. The ongoing debate about the Sallyport videos: Are they exculpatory? Why were they not disclosed earlier? And where are the missing portions of the footage? Note from Canton Police Chief: "That is how it records, LOL. No Tampering."Getting an Evidentiary Hearing is the best outcome to clarify what happened to the videos and who was involved. This can lead to the case being dismissed or provide grounds for appeal. Judge Cannone has to determine if the videos are exculpatory. If not, an evidentiary hearing will likely not be granted.In the first trial, someone told Lieutenant Fanning that there were rumors that a juror was expressing opinions about the trial. The juror denied it but was removed anyways. The defense wants to know who told Fanning about the rumors and how they knew to contact him.Karen Read will be back in court on Tuesday, March 18th, 2025.Watch the full coverage: https://youtube.com/live/DspEzUu2lGMThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Law Nerd App - https://LawNerdApp.comThe Karen Read case is speedrunning filings! In this episode, I break down the defense's motion to dismiss for "Extraordinary Governmental Misconduct," the Commonwealth's response, and the key arguments surrounding withheld video evidence and more.Spoiler Alert: A new Sally Port video emerges! Will the Judge push back the Oral Arguments for the Motion to Dismiss? It's going to be a busy week, and I've got you covered with everything you need to know before we head into court!RESOURCESContinued Motions Hearings - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1MFo7kn6g8Trial 1: Day 20 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJ565TtjXW4Expert Related Expenses Hearing - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUswAe3_dKATrial 1: Day 25 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHGmNszEmIMThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Send us a textHow much weight will Judge Cannone give the new motion to dismiss for Extraordinary Government Misconduct? Will she dismiss the case? Probably not, but there will have to be some penalty. The motion is heavily redacted, at least on the Jury Tampering element, described by the defense. The motion also covers the inverted video in the sally-port and Brady violations pertaining to the video and Jen McCabe's visit to Lt. Lank's house, the day after John's murder. This case is a mess and it never should been brought to trial. Please share this episode…yes, right now!WCVB TV-https://bit.ly/4i1n9hcNBC 10-https://bit.ly/4krzUUbX-bcpbeantown Email-barry@bostonconfidential.net

Judge Dale Ho has had a hearing on the efforts of Trump's DOJ officials to dismiss the public corruption prosecution of New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The Judge has to decide if this proposed dismissal is "in the public interest". It clearly is not. Glenn reviews the order issued by Judge Dale Ho.If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts, you can become a Team Justice patron at: / glennkirschner If you'd like to support Glenn and buy Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...Check out Glenn's website at https://glennkirschner.com/Follow Glenn on:Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/glennkirschn...TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/glennkirschner2See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On the DOJ's decision to dismiss charges against Eric Adams. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices