Podcasts about dismiss

The recent news linking Larry Nassar and Jeffrey Epstein stems from a document that appeared in a large federal release of Epstein-related records, described as a handwritten letter from Epstein to Nassar. Almost immediately, officials said the letter was not authentic, citing technical issues with handwriting, mailing details, and dates. On paper, that explanation is straightforward. But given the long history of mishandled evidence, delayed disclosures, and shifting narratives in the Epstein case, it is not unreasonable that the appearance of such a document—however brief—triggered questions before being dismissed.The government's position is that there is no verified connection between Epstein and Nassar beyond this disputed item, and no evidence the two ever corresponded. Still, the episode highlights a recurring problem with how Epstein material has been released: documents surface without context, provenance, or explanation, leaving the public to parse authenticity after the fact. Even if the letter is exactly what authorities say it is, the way it entered the public record reinforces skepticism—not about any specific claim, but about a process that repeatedly introduces confusion into a case where clarity and credibility have already been in short supply.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Letter to Larry Nassar, signed by ‘J. Epstein,' cites “our president” | CNN Politics

The recent news linking Larry Nassar and Jeffrey Epstein stems from a document that appeared in a large federal release of Epstein-related records, described as a handwritten letter from Epstein to Nassar. Almost immediately, officials said the letter was not authentic, citing technical issues with handwriting, mailing details, and dates. On paper, that explanation is straightforward. But given the long history of mishandled evidence, delayed disclosures, and shifting narratives in the Epstein case, it is not unreasonable that the appearance of such a document—however brief—triggered questions before being dismissed.The government's position is that there is no verified connection between Epstein and Nassar beyond this disputed item, and no evidence the two ever corresponded. Still, the episode highlights a recurring problem with how Epstein material has been released: documents surface without context, provenance, or explanation, leaving the public to parse authenticity after the fact. Even if the letter is exactly what authorities say it is, the way it entered the public record reinforces skepticism—not about any specific claim, but about a process that repeatedly introduces confusion into a case where clarity and credibility have already been in short supply.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Letter to Larry Nassar, signed by ‘J. Epstein,' cites “our president” | CNN PoliticsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The recent news linking Larry Nassar and Jeffrey Epstein stems from a document that appeared in a large federal release of Epstein-related records, described as a handwritten letter from Epstein to Nassar. Almost immediately, officials said the letter was not authentic, citing technical issues with handwriting, mailing details, and dates. On paper, that explanation is straightforward. But given the long history of mishandled evidence, delayed disclosures, and shifting narratives in the Epstein case, it is not unreasonable that the appearance of such a document—however brief—triggered questions before being dismissed.The government's position is that there is no verified connection between Epstein and Nassar beyond this disputed item, and no evidence the two ever corresponded. Still, the episode highlights a recurring problem with how Epstein material has been released: documents surface without context, provenance, or explanation, leaving the public to parse authenticity after the fact. Even if the letter is exactly what authorities say it is, the way it entered the public record reinforces skepticism—not about any specific claim, but about a process that repeatedly introduces confusion into a case where clarity and credibility have already been in short supply.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Letter to Larry Nassar, signed by ‘J. Epstein,' cites “our president” | CNN PoliticsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In shocking new reporting by Reuters: "Unprecedented errors are eroding the credibility of Trump's Justice Department."As Reuters further reported, "a federal magistrate judge said the errors were part of a broader pattern of unprecedented prosecutorial missteps, resulting in a 21% dismissal rate of the D.C. U.S. Attorney's office criminal complaints over eight weeks compared to a mere 0.5% dismissal rate over 10 years." Glenn presents an inside perspective from someone who worked at the D.C. U.S. Attorney's office for decades as to how things are supposed to work, and how this horrific dismissal rate is attributable to a lack of leadership from Trump-appointed US Attorney Jeanine Pirro. Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In shocking new reporting by Reuters: "Unprecedented errors are eroding the credibility of Trump's Justice Department."As Reuters further reported, "a federal magistrate judge said the errors were part of a broader pattern of unprecedented prosecutorial missteps, resulting in a 21% dismissal rate of the D.C. U.S. Attorney's office criminal complaints over eight weeks compared to a mere 0.5% dismissal rate over 10 years." Glenn presents an inside perspective from someone who worked at the D.C. U.S. Attorney's office for decades as to how things are supposed to work, and how this horrific dismissal rate is attributable to a lack of leadership from Trump-appointed US Attorney Jeanine Pirro. Find Glenn on Substack: glennkirschner.substack.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

What is a Motion to Dismiss? I’m David Holub, an attorney focusing on personal injury law in northwest Indiana. Welcome to Personal Injury Primer, where we break down the law into simple terms, provide legal tips, and discuss personal injury law topics. Today’s question comes from a caller who stated that his attorney dropped his […] The post Ep 344 What is a Motion to Dismiss? first appeared on Personal Injury Primer.

Over the years, Christian traditions have built different walls around their castles of faith—each convinced they've got it right, and everyone else has it wrong. It's strange, really, that so many walls exist around the same story.But when we read the Bible closely, we discover things happening outside those walls—stories and actions many traditions would call unacceptable. There's one sitting right in the Christmas story itself.So what do we do with that?Do we ignore the biblical accounts?Filter them through our traditions?Dismiss what doesn't fit inside our castle walls?I don't think so.Instead, it's worth reading the stories as they're told—and wrestling honestly with what they invite into our spiritual lives - even if the stories challenge the walls we inherited.That's what we're doing this week: exploring the Christmas story, regardless of whether they fit inside some traditions' walls. Last week it was the exiled shepherds. This week, it's the "wise men".It's going to be a freeing conversation—I promise!Donate to Friends ChurchTo donate to this podcast and support the making of more of these please visit https://friendschurch.ca/podcast

Democrats have dismissed Trump's military bonus, and heads were spinning at CNN because they couldn't spin the CPI.  Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.

For years, it was easy to dismiss talk of UAPs, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, formerly known as UFOs. But director and producer Dan Farah argues that moment is over. In his new documentary, The Age of Disclosure, he speaks with 34 high-level figures from the U.S. government, military, and intelligence world who say non-human intelligent life has already made contact, and a global race is underway to reverse engineer the technology involved. The film makes clear this isn't the age of fringe speculation anymore; it's a turning point. The Age of Disclosure is available to rent or purchase on Prime Video.

In Case No. 24-cv-7201, Sean Combs' legal team, led by attorney Jonathan D. Davis, filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint brought by plaintiff Thalia Graves. The defense argues that Graves' allegations, which pertain to an alleged 2001 rape, are legally insufficient and fail to meet the necessary standards for proceeding to trial. They contend that the complaint lacks specific factual allegations to support claims of misconduct, asserting that the accusations are vague and do not establish a clear connection between Combs' actions and the alleged harms. Furthermore, the defense highlights that the plaintiff's claims are based on generalized assertions without concrete evidence, which, according to them, does not satisfy the legal requirements for a viable lawsuit.Additionally, Combs' attorneys argue that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that Graves has not demonstrated the requisite elements for causes of action such as intentional infliction of emotional distress or negligence. They also assert that the complaint fails to establish a direct link between Combs' conduct and any alleged damages suffered by the plaintiff. Based on these arguments, the defense requests that the court dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety, thereby preventing the case from moving forward to discovery or trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628776.55.0.pdf

In Case No. 24-cv-7201, Sean Combs' legal team, led by attorney Jonathan D. Davis, filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint brought by plaintiff Thalia Graves. The defense argues that Graves' allegations, which pertain to an alleged 2001 rape, are legally insufficient and fail to meet the necessary standards for proceeding to trial. They contend that the complaint lacks specific factual allegations to support claims of misconduct, asserting that the accusations are vague and do not establish a clear connection between Combs' actions and the alleged harms. Furthermore, the defense highlights that the plaintiff's claims are based on generalized assertions without concrete evidence, which, according to them, does not satisfy the legal requirements for a viable lawsuit.Additionally, Combs' attorneys argue that certain claims are barred by statutes of limitations and that Graves has not demonstrated the requisite elements for causes of action such as intentional infliction of emotional distress or negligence. They also assert that the complaint fails to establish a direct link between Combs' conduct and any alleged damages suffered by the plaintiff. Based on these arguments, the defense requests that the court dismiss the amended complaint in its entirety, thereby preventing the case from moving forward to discovery or trial.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628776.55.0.pdf

YouTube embraces payouts in PayPal's PYUSD stablecoin, Apple's foldable phone expected to boost Samsung profits, Amazon pulls AI recap video for Fallout S1. MP3 Please SUBSCRIBE HERE for free or get DTNS Live ad-free. A special thanks to all our supporters–without you, none of this would be possible. If you enjoy what you see youContinue reading "Policymakers Behind US State AI Bills Dismiss Executive EO – DTH"

SPONSOR! Black Forest Supplements! Try World's First Longevity Coffee (Anti-Aging, Clean Energy, No Crash): (Black Friday Buy One Get One FREE For 48HRS Only!) https://blackforestsupplements.com/frei ----- Support Viva: GET MERCH! www.vivafrei.com BUY A BOOK! https://amzn.to/4qBXikS SEND ME SOMETHING! David Freiheit 20423 SR 7 Ste F6319 Boca Raton 33498 TIP WITH CTYPTO! bc1qt0umnqna63pyw5j8uesphsfz0dyrtmqcq5ugwm THAT IS ALL!

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/1TJg6QnTkHY  Day 8 of the Brian Walshe Trial happened on December 10, 2025. The testimony of Gem Mutlu, Ana's former boss and family friend, led to numerous and forceful objections from the defense attorney, who argued that his use of terms like "marital issues" or "marital problems" was his own characterization or opinion, not the exact words Ana used. Hear the shocking details shared by Ana Walshe's bestfriend, Alissa Kirby, who recounts a conversation with Ana just days before her disappearance where Ana admitted she was "falling out of love" with Brian and felt she loved him "not as much anymore." Alissa also describes Ana as reaching a "breaking point" on December 29th, frustrated by the relationship, Brian's constant questioning of her love for him, and his possible attempts to delay his federal case. Learn about Brian Walshe's home confinement restrictions and the suspicious request for an extended Jan 1st window to drop off his mother—despite his mother not being present at the house on New Year's Eve. The Prosecution Rests their Case in Chief. The Defense's Motion to Dismiss was denied, and the focus shifts to the start of the Defense Case in Chief. Don't miss this complete recap of the pivotal final day of the prosecution's case! RESOURCES Brian Walshe Case Overview - https://youtu.be/VbbXdPf4aXY  MA v Brian Walshe Trial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gK0wNHtj-4Xm0KF84vD6VIW  Brian Walshe Trial Daily Case Brief Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFdNnRZUqH63SQSsTnj7ofHMBjdhgSEfK Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

History is filled with great people dismissed as useless dreamers, only for their brilliance to be recognized later. From Lincoln to Semmelweis, John Snow to Ada Lovelace, and even Joseph in Parshat Vayeishev, we repeatedly misjudge visionaries because of our own biases. Rabbi Dunner explores how and why genius is so often hidden in plain sight — and so easily ignored.

Today is Tuesday, Dec. 9, 2025. The Brainerd Dispatch Minute is a product of Forum Communications Co. and is brought to you by reporters at the Brainerd Dispatch. Find more news throughout the day at BrainerdDispatch.com.

Jes Staley, the former JPMorgan executive, filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against him by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse. However, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff denied this motion, allowing the case to proceed to pre-trial evidence gathering..Staley is accused of protecting Epstein during his tenure at JPMorgan, where he worked from 1979 to 2013. The bank claims that Staley was instrumental in maintaining Epstein's business relationship with JPMorgan despite Epstein's criminal activities. JPMorgan seeks to make Staley financially responsible for any damages the bank might incur from other related lawsuits and to recover compensation paid to him from 2006 to 2013. Staley has denied these allegations, stating that JPMorgan is using him as a scapegoat for its own supervisory failures and claims he was unaware of Epstein's criminal behavior​.(commercial at 8:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Mem. of Law - (11148357.16).docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jes Staley, the former JPMorgan executive, filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against him by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse. However, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff denied this motion, allowing the case to proceed to pre-trial evidence gathering..Staley is accused of protecting Epstein during his tenure at JPMorgan, where he worked from 1979 to 2013. The bank claims that Staley was instrumental in maintaining Epstein's business relationship with JPMorgan despite Epstein's criminal activities. JPMorgan seeks to make Staley financially responsible for any damages the bank might incur from other related lawsuits and to recover compensation paid to him from 2006 to 2013. Staley has denied these allegations, stating that JPMorgan is using him as a scapegoat for its own supervisory failures and claims he was unaware of Epstein's criminal behavior​.(commercial at 8:14)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - MTD Mem. of Law - (11148357.16).docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A memorandum in support of a request for dismissal of a complaint is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the reasons why a complaint should be dismissed. This type of memorandum is typically prepared by the defendant or their legal counsel and presented to the court as part of the pre-trial proceedings.In this document, the defendant usually provides legal arguments and evidence to support their request for dismissal. This could include demonstrating that the complaint fails to state a valid legal claim, that there is a lack of jurisdiction, or that there are other legal grounds for dismissal.The memorandum serves as a persuasive tool for the court, aiming to convince the judge that the complaint does not have merit and should not proceed to trial. It is important for the memorandum to be well-researched, clearly written, and supported by relevant legal precedent.In this episode we begin our look at the UMG memorandum in support of dismissing the complaint filed against them by Rodney Jones.   (commercial at 7:27)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.41.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The incident allegedly occurred on September 19, 2024, when Sheriff Stines shot and killed Judge Kevin Mullins in his chambers. The event was recorded on video, which was presented during Stines’ preliminary hearing and shown to the grand jury.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

If you'd like your question answered on next month's episode, call/text 469-213-6381 and leave us a voicemail/text.Each month on Last Month In Healthcare, producer Nathaniel joins me to discuss the previous month's podcasts, headlines, and listener-submitted questions. This month, we're joined by Chris Hamilton! We talk about the J&J lawsuit being dismissed, Eli Lilly switching PBMs, AI in healthcare, and much more. We also play a Christmas game called Home Alone: The Wet Bandit's Bills, where Chris and I try to guess the average hospital price for the injuries incurred by the bandits from the Home Alone films.Chapters: 0:00 - Intro0:42 - J&J Lawsuit Dismissed9:20 - Eli Lily Switches PBMs11:17 - New FDA Rules On Biosimilars16:36 - AI Adoption In The Healthcare Industry25:21 - Survey On At-Home Medical Devices29:57 - Home Alone: The Wet Bandit's Bills42:32 - Ask Spencer AnythingSources: https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/fda-biosimilars-guidance-speed-development-comparative-efficacy-studies/804191/https://www.beckerspayer.com/legal/judge-dismisses-lawsuit-accusing-jj-of-mismanaging-employee-drug-benefits/?origin=PayerE&utm_source=PayerE&utm_medium=email&utm_content=newsletterhttps://www.healthcare-brew.com/stories/2025/11/25/eli-lilly-switches-big-3-pbm-alternative-transparent-rivalhttps://www.fiercehealthcare.com/health-tech/amid-shutdown-health-it-vendors-say-hospitals-are-cutting-back-spendinghttps://www.techtarget.com/virtualhealthcare/news/366633680/Survey-At-home-monitoring-devices-popular-affordablehttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41265449/https://www.emarketer.com/content/ai-spending-healthcare-outpaces-overall-us-economy-

If you'd like your question answered on next month's episode, call/text 469-213-6381 and leave us a voicemail/text.Each month on Last Month In Healthcare, producer Nathaniel joins me to discuss the previous month's podcasts, headlines, and listener-submitted questions. This month, we're joined by Chris Hamilton! We talk about the J&J lawsuit being dismissed, Eli Lilly switching PBMs, AI in healthcare, and much more. We also play a Christmas game called Home Alone: The Wet Bandit's Bills, where Chris and I try to guess the average hospital price for the injuries incurred by the bandits from the Home Alone films.Chapters: 0:00 - Intro0:42 - J&J Lawsuit Dismissed9:20 - Eli Lily Switches PBMs11:17 - New FDA Rules On Biosimilars16:36 - AI Adoption In The Healthcare Industry25:21 - Survey On At-Home Medical Devices29:57 - Home Alone: The Wet Bandit's Bills42:32 - Ask Spencer AnythingSources: https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/fda-biosimilars-guidance-speed-development-comparative-efficacy-studies/804191/https://www.beckerspayer.com/legal/judge-dismisses-lawsuit-accusing-jj-of-mismanaging-employee-drug-benefits/?origin=PayerE&utm_source=PayerE&utm_medium=email&utm_content=newsletterhttps://www.healthcare-brew.com/stories/2025/11/25/eli-lilly-switches-big-3-pbm-alternative-transparent-rivalhttps://www.fiercehealthcare.com/health-tech/amid-shutdown-health-it-vendors-say-hospitals-are-cutting-back-spendinghttps://www.techtarget.com/virtualhealthcare/news/366633680/Survey-At-home-monitoring-devices-popular-affordablehttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41265449/https://www.emarketer.com/content/ai-spending-healthcare-outpaces-overall-us-economy-

Magic fall to San Antonio 114-112 as Franz Wagner's last-second layup was blocked, Clippers part ways with Chris Paul, Kiffin, Ole Miss AD, players have differing accounts of how exit went down, Dallas visits Detroit to begin week 14 in The NFL, more in today's 'Sports Page' with Mike Bianchi

  Give the OG a follow on Instagram @OrangeGroveHotel If you want to set up a home gym, Gym Direct are offering our listeners 5% off using the code WTGDX5 via this link here. We are also proudly supported by iChoice. For a great deal on your home loan, give Jason a call on (02) 9743 0000 or go to ichoice.com.au Click here to check out all our content! Listen live to the WestsLife Podcast twice a week on YouTube, Facebook or Twitter. If you'd like to contribute to the show email us podcast@westslife.com Wests Tigers Life is also sponsored by Shayne and the team at MG Pump Solutions.  See us on the socials: WestsLife YouTube channel WestsLife.com @WestsLifePod on Instagram and Twitter Facebook.com/WestsLifePod Support and contribute to the show at Patreon.com/WestsLife

The Andrews are joined, once again, with Julie Balovich and Shane O'neal who, no one is surprised to hear, are winning once again out west. Listen in as we discuss the latest shenanigans these two have come across. We'll discuss the Motion to Disqualify and Motion to Dismiss filed by Shane and you'll be shocked by the outcome of this trial. Click here to see the Motions

Leicester On Manny The Hitman's Motion To Dismiss #Saitama Scam Syndicate Fraud Case #Crypto #Cryptocurrency #podcast #BasicCryptonomics #SaitaChain #ReZor #Saitamask #SaitaRealty Website: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://CryptoTalk.FM Facebook: ⁠⁠⁠⁠@ThisIsCTR⁠⁠⁠⁠ Discord:⁠⁠⁠⁠ @CryptoTalkRadio⁠⁠⁠⁠ Chapters (00:00:00) - Manny the Hitman's Update(00:00:49) - Fugitive Tran Became a Real Estate Agent After Going On(00:05:23) - Manny the Rug Puller Motion to Dismiss(00:10:37) - The Saitama Fraud Case

In the case Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., No. 1:23-cv-10301-AS, defendant Cecile de Jongh filed a reply in support of her motion to dismiss and/or strike the plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. In her reply, de Jongh argues that the plaintiffs' allegations are insufficient to establish a legal claim against her. She contends that the complaint lacks specific factual allegations linking her to the alleged misconduct and fails to meet the required legal standards for the claims asserted. De Jongh also asserts that certain portions of the complaint are irrelevant or prejudicial and should be stricken from the record. She requests that the court dismiss the claims against her or, alternatively, strike the specified portions of the complaint.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.160.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Not so long ago, India's archaeological community commemorated 100 years of Harappan archaeology and research, which began by acknowledging and announcing the findings from the excavation at Harappa in 1924. This announcement was celebrated for its power to overturn long-held assumptions about India and marked the beginning of a new line of research in archaeology. It proved that the past is much older, extremely rich, and more complex than many suggested. In the storm around Sinauli, many academics dismissed claims of chariots being found. And the public misinterpreted the chariots as a device planted by the govt to fortify Hindutva. Watch this week's column for ThePrint by Archaeologist Disha Ahluwalia:----more----Read full article here: https://theprint.in/opinion/harappa-keeladi-sinauli-archaeological-excavation/2786008/

Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein's victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein's victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein's victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein's victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein's victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Former U.S. Virgin Islands Governor John de Jongh Jr. has filed a memorandum in federal court seeking to dismiss, transfer, or strike the lawsuit brought by five anonymous women identified as Jane Does 1-5, who accuse the Virgin Islands government and several current and former officials of enabling Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking network. De Jongh argues that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction, asserting he has been a resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands for decades and has no substantial ties to New York that would justify the case being heard there. He also claims he was improperly served at a Manhattan address where he says he does not reside or maintain control, insisting the lawsuit should be dismissed or moved to the Virgin Islands, where the alleged conduct occurred.The memorandum further contends that even if the court finds jurisdiction proper, the claims against De Jongh should still be thrown out because they are barred by prior settlement releases signed by Epstein's victims as part of earlier agreements with his estate. He argues that the complaint fails to allege specific wrongful acts committed by him and maintains that any actions connected to Epstein occurred while he was serving in his official capacity, which he says grants him legal immunity. De Jongh also asks the court to strike portions of the complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, describing them as inflammatory rather than grounded in fact. The filing adds another layer to the expanding legal fight over what government officials knew— and failed to stop—while Epstein operated in the Virgin Islands.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The 94 WIP Midday Show are reacting to comments made by Eagles players who seemingly dismiss the idea that the Eagles and the Cowboys are rivals. It appears that the players believe the rivalry talk is more for the fans to have. Joe Giglio is disappointed and feels that the rivalry used to be more of a "thing", and wishes there was more hate between the two teams than there has been in recent years. Hugh Douglas refuses to believe that these current Eagles players do not feel any different playing the Cowboys from another team.

Space to Dream Retreats: Whether you're craving rest, adventure, or soul-nourishing connection, there's something beautiful waiting for you at the Phineas Wright House. Book your space to dream today.Entertaining with Ease Series: Join Wendy in her kitchen as she shares the magic of how to host each of these magnificent holiday experiences for your loved ones. $47 each or purchase the bundle for $150. Nov. 30: How to Host a Tree Trimming PartyDec. 3: Holiday Food GiftsDec 10: How to Host a Cookie Exchange Dec 17: How to Host a New Year's Eve PartyThe Entertaining with Ease BundleWelcome to the Say YES to Yourself! Podcast—the show for midlife women, empty nesters, and anyone navigating life after divorce, burnout, or big transitions. If you're ready to shed cultural expectations, reconnect with your true self, and put your joy first—you're in the right place.In this episode, Wendy sits down with longtime friend Cara Martin, who shares her journey from mysterious symptoms dismissed as "just perimenopause" to a life-saving diagnosis of Cushing's disease caused by a pituitary tumor. After being told by multiple doctors she didn't "look sick enough," Cara advocated relentlessly for herself, sought multiple medical opinions, and ultimately found the right surgical team that performed the complex brain-adjacent surgery that saved her life.They explore:How to trust your body and advocate for yourself when medical professionals dismiss your symptomsThe practice of "the bare minimum" without apologizing, and why it's not weakness to ask for helpWhy hope comes in the morning, and how Cara's 5am practice became her lifeline through illness and recoveryThis is a conversation about resilience, self-advocacy, and learning to say yes to yourself even when—especially when—your body is asking you to slow down. Press play and discover the power of trusting yourself above all else.Connect with Cara:Her Blog: Gayle Force(d) Wisdom________________________________________________________________________________________ Say YES to joining Wendy for her: LinkedinInstagram: @phineaswrighthouseFacebook: Phineas Wright House Website: Phineas Wright House PWH Farm StaysPWH Curated France Trips Podcast Production By Shannon Warner of Resonant Collective Want to start your own podcast? Let's chat! If this episode resonated, follow Say YES to Yourself! and leave a 5-star review—it helps more women in midlife discover the tools, stories, and community that make saying YES not only possible, but powerful.

On Thursday morning, a judge denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the city of Minneapolis against a landlord who allowed dozens of people to camp on a parking lot he owns. The city sued Hamoudi Sabri in September to force him to close the encampment. A few days later, the city cleared the encampment after a shooting there killed one person and injured six others. Sabri's lawyers argued the city could not move forward with the lawsuit without including the people who had been living in the encampment in the case. MPR News reporter Cari Spencer was at the courthouse during the hearing and joined MPR News host Nina Moini to explain.

A judge in Los Angeles has denied a motion to dismiss murder charges against Fraser Michael Bohm—the man accused in a deadly Malibu crash that killed four Pepperdine University students.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this raw episode we dive headfirst into one of the lifestyle's most nerve-wracking moments: the day a parent finds out and isn't thrilled. Kicking off with the real life situation that just happened.  We ask the question, “Do you deny it? Defend it? Or just nod, smile, and change the subject?”  We explore the emotional tightrope of denial (and why it rarely works long-term), the pitfalls of launching into a full-throated defense (it can backfire spectacularly), and the art of the graceful exit acknowledging feelings without inviting a debate. Whether you're newly outed to family, dreading the day it happens, or just want to feel less alone, this episode is a lifeline. Because in the lifestyle, the hardest part isn't always the play, it's the people who should love you most. Email your questions to Nessa here to be part of "Ask Nessa". Please subscribe on your favorite podcast platform. You can catch us on SLSRadio every Wednesday at 4pm Eastern Time. You can find tons of amazing lifestyle show on FullSwapRadio, including our show, Every Wednesday at 6:30pm and Midnight Eastern Time. We are now hosts on the Swinger Society Discord Server as well. If you have your own sexy stories, please call our hotline and share them with us and our audience. 844-4-Hump-Day If you have any questions for us, please email us at humpdayquickies@gmail.com Visit our website as well.  HumpDayQuickies.com Please follow us on all the social platforms: Twitter - HumpDayQuickies Instagram - HumpDayQuickies FaceBook - HumpDayQuickies TikTok - HumpDayQuickies We are adding new content as quickly as we can!

We're joined by two special guests on this milestone episode. Please welcome Andy Pan (the only person who has previously co-hosted a show with us) and Greg Alderton, Virtual Economy's lead moderator! With 14,000 people laid off, studios shuttered, and projects abandoned, Amazon seems ready to give up on most or all of its gaming dreams. Also: EA earnings ride off into the sunset, Capcom posts a strong quarter, Remedy's in trouble, and Microsoft is inscrutable. Also: Sony responds to Tencent's request to dismiss the Light of Moritram lawsuit, Circana report on U.S. video game spending for September 2025, and Microsoft is a little too cozy with the U.S. government.  You can support Virtual Economy's growth via our Ko-Fi and also purchase Virtual Economy merchandise! TIME STAMPS [00:05:44] - Remembering Tomonobu Itagaki [00:10:32] - Episode 200 Celebration [00:34:14] - Circana Report on U.S. Video Game Spending for September 2025 [00:56:18] - Sony Responds to Tencent's Request to Dismiss Light of Moritram Lawsuit [01:06:57] - EA Earnings [01:17:51] - Capcom Earnings [01:27:49] - Remedy Earnings [01:43:45] - Microsoft Earnings [02:16:00] - Why Is Microsoft Allowing the U.S. Government to Use the Halo IP? SOURCES "I Told Him I Loved Him, Because I Do" - A Tribute To The Late Dead Or Alive Creator Tomonobu Itagaki | Time Extension SIE Opposition to Motion to Dismiss 4142-0511-3185 v.2 | United States District Court - Northern District of California Electronic Arts Reports Q2 FY2026 | EA EA and Stability AI partner to empower artists, designers, and developers | EA United Videogame Workers-CWA Statement on Proposed Electronic Arts Buyout | UVW-CWA Consolidated Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 | Capcom Inside information, profit warning: Remedy Entertainment Plc lowers operating profit (EBIT) outlook for 2025 and publishes preliminary Q3 key financial figures | Remedy Change of CEO in Remedy Entertainment Plc | Remedy Business Review - January - September 2025 | Remedy Earnings Release FY26 Q1 | Microsoft

Trump, Johnson dismiss speculation about third term Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Bernie Sanders challenges Amazon's AI-driven layoffs as Corporate Democrats gaslight voters about Medicare for All. Both reveal how the elite's greed destroys faith in democracy.vSubscribe to our Newsletter:https://politicsdoneright.com/newsletterPurchase our Books: As I See It: https://amzn.to/3XpvW5o How To Make AmericaUtopia: https://amzn.to/3VKVFnG It's Worth It: https://amzn.to/3VFByXP Lose Weight And BeFit Now: https://amzn.to/3xiQK3K Tribulations of anAfro-Latino Caribbean man: https://amzn.to/4c09rbE

Thank you Elwyn Hudson, Marg KJ, Jane B In NC

Ever manufacture a reason to not check something out? Our listeners are guilty and they confess their BS reasons to us. Also, playing shows still fun. Going to shows still fun. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Deutsche Bank requested that a U.S. federal court dismiss a class-action lawsuit filed by an accuser of Epstein, arguing that the bank neither participated in nor benefited from Epstein's sex-trafficking operation and therefore is not legally responsible in the way the complaint alleges. The bank asserted that it merely provided “routine banking services” to Epstein from 2013 to 2018, and that the plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts under the federal anti-trafficking statute (Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act) or establish any direct duty by the bank to protect the victim.In addition, Deutsche Bank argued that the plaintiff's claims under New York's Adult Survivors Act (which temporarily allowed claims even after statute-of-limitations expiration) were legally deficient because the bank did not cause the abuse or engage in the trafficking itself. The bank contended that even acknowledging Epstein's misconduct, the claims improperly targeted the “wrong party.” While the court later dismissed several of the claims brought against Deutsche Bank, it allowed several others to proceed, meaning the motion to dismiss was only partly successful.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

From airlines to banks, Facebook and Starbucks, to baseball tickets, companies across the country and around the world are trying to get back to normal after serious issues took their  websites and services offline. Plus, James Comey's legal team launches several different efforts to get the charges against him thrown out.   Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Listen for the latest from Bloomberg News.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

James Comey is going on offense and launching an aggressive bid to get the charges against him thrown out.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

SaVon and Alex return with transparency and laughs as they open with Patreon updates, community member shoutouts, and the winner of the AirPods Max giveaway. Next, the crew fields Patreon questions—starting with their first heartbreaks and how love, therapy, and R&B shaped them (10:41)—then debate whether it hurts more when an ex gets married or has a baby (14:56). Holiday talk follows as Alex plans to channel 50 Cent for Halloween while SaVon reminisces on rapper costumes gone wrong (19:26). The conversation shifts to Tony Yayo and Memphis Bleek and how loyalty looks different under 50 Cent and Jay-Z (26:26) before a spirited Fabolous vs Lloyd Banks debate over bars, mixtapes, and longevity (34:30). The crew then honors the late D'Angelo with reflections on artistry and Black men's health (43:41) and closes by dissecting the viral Marc Lamont Hill vs QueenzFlip moment on The Joe Budden Podcast—arguing that authentic tension and intellect can coexist in modern Black media (51:21). Subscribe to our Patreon for EARLY & EXCLUSIVE access to ad-free episode visuals with music included, exclusive episodes each and every Tuesday, and much more! - www.patreon.com/NeedToKnowPodcast Book your next podcast recording at Need to Know Studios TODAY - https://needtoknowstudios.com/ Join our Twitter/X Community to chop it up with us about all things Need to Know - https://twitter.com/i/communities/1777442897001910433 The Need To Know Podcast Social Handles https://www.instagram.com/needtoknowpod/ https://twitter.com/NeedToKnowPod https://www.tiktok.com/needtoknowpod SaVon https://www.instagram.com/savonslvter/ https://twitter.com/SavonSlvter Alex https://www.instagram.com/balltillwefall/ https://twitter.com/balltillwefall

Save 20% Off Honeylove by going to https://honeylove.com/LAWNERD ! #honeylovepod #ad Get 15% off OneSkin with the code LAWNERD at oneskin.co/HAIR #oneskinpod #ad Use code LAWNERD at http://jonesroadbeauty.com to get a Free Cool Gloss with your first purchase! #JonesRoadBeauty #ad In this episode, I go over various cases to break down the facts of the cases we've been following. The court has ruled on the motion to dismiss in the civil wrongful death suit brought by John O'Keefe's family members against Karen Read. A federal grand juror who leaked confidential information from the Karen Read investigations has been sentenced. Sean Diddy Combs was sentenced to federal prison, where he received just over four years (50 months). D4vd hired a criminal defense lawyer as law enforcement has not made any arrests. The death has not yet been ruled a homicide as the manner of death has yet been determined by the medical examiner and crime(s) have not been set. RESOURCES Karen Read Civil Suit - https://youtu.be/NimCmMVTbfE Grand Jury Member Sentencing Recommendation - https://youtu.be/FNr4NPpIs3U Diddy Denied Bail - https://youtu.be/G1CyEghxd8M Karen Read Motion to Dismiss - https://youtu.be/dDffIE_Rq9k Cardi B Trial - https://youtu.be/HCqlINOcqaM TikTok Psychic Defamation Case - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gJhnNYbw7Go9agKxL9poNLv Alex Murdaugh Trial - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gK8GOeWkGfi7acMnT-D0zaw Donna Adelson Trial - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gL0_OPy2AliqyEjGcI8QzBu Donna Adelson Motion for New Trial - https://youtu.be/FNr4NPpIs3U STAY IN THE LOOP WITH EMILY D. BAKER Download Our FREE App: https://lawnerdapp.com Get the Free Email Alert: https://www.LawNerdAlert.com Case Requests & Business Inquiries: TeamEmilyDBaker@wmeagency.com Help with the shop: https://www.lawnerdshop.com/pages/contact Mailing Address: Emily D. Baker 2000 Mallory Ln. St. 130-185, Franklin TN 37067 LAW NERD MERCH! https://www.LawNerdShop.com LONG FORM CONTENT https://www.youtube.com/@TheEmilyDBaker The Emily Show Podcast on YouTube: https://emilydbaker.com/TheEmilyShowPlaylist Apple Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/AppleTheEmilyShow Spotify Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/SpofityTheEmilyShow On your favorite podcast player Mondays EMILY ON SOCIAL @TheEmilyDBaker Instagram: https://www.Instagram.com/TheEmilyDBaker Twitter: https://www.Twitter.com/TheEmilyDBaker Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheEmilyDBaker MY YOUTUBE TOOLS **My Favorite YOUTUBE TOOL VidIQ https://vidiq.com/LawNerd Follow My Cats on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fredandgeorge_cat Emily's glasses lenses are Irlen tint https://www.irlen.com *This video is not legal advice; it is commentary for educational and entertainment purposes. Some links shared are affiliate links, all sponsorships are stated in video. Videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise stated. Sharing a resource is not an endorsement; it is a resource. Copyright 2020-2025 Baker Media, LLC* Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices