Podcasts about responds

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)

Send us a textBruce "Shu Shu" Carrington: Chasing Champions, Making WavesFresh off a dominant unanimous decision win in his first 12-round fight, Bruce “Shu Shu” Carrington joins The Spar-Inn to talk shutting out critics, chasing elusive champions, and taking his conditioning to new depths—literally—with underwater training.Responds to Tim Bradley's criticism despite his shutout performanceOpens up about failed negotiations with all four champions in his divisionDetails his extreme deep-water training regimenWeighs in on the Top Rank–ESPN split and what it means for his careerReveals his dream venue to headline nextPredicts the Canelo vs. Crawford superfight outcomeSends a message to the New York fight scene—and to the fighters dodging himTHE SPAR-INN ON YOUTUBE

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Amanda reviews WWE SmackDown that aired August 8th, 2025. One that saw Drew McIntyre deliver a vicious claymore to Cody through the announce table, John Cena respond to Brock Lesnar's attack a big tag team match and more!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-wwe-podcast--2187791/support.

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.Virginia Giuffre's response to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for summary judgment was a direct challenge to Maxwell's attempt to dismiss the case without a trial. In her filing, Giuffre argued that Maxwell's statements denying any wrongdoing were not only defamatory, but made with actual malice—because Maxwell knew they were false when she made them. Giuffre's legal team submitted sworn testimony, supporting documentation, and detailed timelines to establish that Maxwell had played a central role in Epstein's trafficking operation and that her denials were part of a broader effort to discredit and silence victims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Giuffre-unseal.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

(00:00) Cam Heyward seeks a new deal(25:00) Micah Parsons reportedly dealing with back tightness(34:30) Caleb Williams responds to criticism from viral video(39:00) Tom Brady statue unveiled Friday night at Gillette Stadium

Comedian Loni Love finally responded to Tamar Braxton’s prior remarks calling her a Big‑Back Cadillac. Loni dismissed the drama, stating, “I have no beef”, and emphasized using her platform to “entertain, inform, and inspire,” not to engage in conflict. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Carl Quintanilla, David Faber and Mike Santoli led off the show with the broader market's upward momentum, including Apple's weekly gain of 9% heading into Friday's trading session. In a letter to Intel employees, CEO Lip-Bu Tan responded to President Trump's call for him to resign. The anchors reacted to Trump nominating Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran to fill a vacant seat at the Federal reserve. Alson in focus: What OpenAI CEO Sam Altman told CNBC about the GPT-5 launch and the possibility of taking the company public, the software sector slump, the stocks that are plummeting on earnings news, one year into Kelly Ortberg's tenure as Boeing CEO -- the turnaround plan and the stock surge. Squawk on the Street Disclaimer

In the second hour, David Haugh was joined by Tribune reporter and Take The North podcast host Dan Wiederer to discuss the latest Bears storylines coming out of training camp. After that, Haugh wondered how good the Bears offense could be under head coach Ben Johnson's direction before sharing a few of his concerns with Chicago's defense.

Intell's CEO responds to President Trump's calls for his resignation. AP correspondent Donna Warder reports.

We're only two episodes in to the new season of South Park and the White House is spilling an awful lot of ink trying to convince America that they're not paying any attention

A 10-year-old girl died at Phoenix Children's Hospital after being abused. Broomhead discusses Gov. Katie Hobbs' response to the incident. 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Caleb Williams responds to viral video criticism, showcasing his resilience in the face of scrutiny. The Chicago Bears' potential franchise quarterback addresses concerns head-on, explaining the context behind the drill footage. Ben Johnson's relentless approach to developing Williams takes center stage, as the offensive coordinator focuses on fundamentals before unleashing the quarterback's natural talents. Training camp standouts emerge, with Dayo Odeyingbo and Montez Sweat making waves on the defensive line. The Bears' aggressive offensive and defensive strategies spark excitement among fans, hinting at a new era for the franchise. Tune in for an in-depth analysis of the Bears' evolving roster and coaching dynamics as they prepare for the upcoming NFL season.Podcast Links: https://linktr.ee/ChiBearsCentralGet at us:Email: ChicagoBearsCentral@gmail.comTwitter:@ChiBearsCentralPhone: ‪(773) 242-9336‬Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Brendan Schaub responds to Renato Moicano's rant about him on Ariel Helwani's show and the guys talk Bryan's progression with his wrestling training, old college girl stories, Howard Stern's show possibly being cancelled, the viral hot Texas cop TikTok controversy and "crackin", Michael Bisping's close call with a serial killer, Bryan's orangutan knowledge, Hunter Biden's statements about Jeffrey Epstein, Jake Paul hiring a very prominent lawyer to sue people who claim he fixes fights and much more.O'Reilly Auto Parts - https://oreillyauto.com/FIGHTERMagic Mind - https://magicmind.com/True Classic - True Classic - Upgrade your wardrobe and save on @trueclassic at https://trueclassic.com/fighter ! #trueclassicpodDrive Fast All Gas - Enter to win my Custom 800+ Horsepower RAM TRX + $10K cash: https://drivefastallgas.com/collections/new-releasesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

From the BBC World Service: President Donald Trump's tariffs are now in effect, ranging from 10% to as high as 50%. We'll hear from reporters and analysts on the ground in Singapore, Delhi, and Zambia to check the mood among business owners. Plus, how far do you travel to pick up your groceries? For people living in the rural Australian settlement of Burringurrah, going shopping used to mean a 500-mile round trip, but that's changed after a new shop opened.

From the BBC World Service: President Donald Trump's tariffs are now in effect, ranging from 10% to as high as 50%. We'll hear from reporters and analysts on the ground in Singapore, Delhi, and Zambia to check the mood among business owners. Plus, how far do you travel to pick up your groceries? For people living in the rural Australian settlement of Burringurrah, going shopping used to mean a 500-mile round trip, but that's changed after a new shop opened.

Southern Oregon University recently announced plans to cut 15% of its budget over three years. The proposal would eliminate 15 majors and 11 minors, and lead to the elimination of more than 60 positions through a combination of layoffs, voluntary retirements and not filling vacancies. SOU President Rick Bailey attributes the university’s ongoing financial crisis to a number of factors including declining enrollment, decreased state funding and federal actions by the Trump administration.   Sage TeBeest is a creative arts program assistant at SOU and the president of SEIU 503 Sublocal 84, which represents classified staff at the university. She joins us with more on how union members are reacting to the cuts.  

An outbreak of crude contamination impacting Azerbaijan's Azeri Light supply has set Europe's refiners on edge. As buyers seek to avoid being hit with corrosive organic chlorides, prices for the premium crude grade have tumbled, and some refiners have been forced to draw on emergency oil reserves. Kelly Norways, a downstream oil news reporter, is joined by senior news team editor Nick Coleman, Sam Angell, manager of Platts EMEA crude oil pricing and light ends reporter Dias Kazym to discuss the impact for crude and products in the impacted regions.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

When Lt. Col. Aguilar reported seeing horrifying war crimes in Gaza, neocons attacked his character and his family. He returns to respond. (00:00) Aguilar Responds to the Accusations Against Him (03:46) The Shady Business Practices of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and UG Solutions (11:32) Aguilar Refutes Claims That He Was Fired (14:06) Is Johnnie Moore a Fraud? (21:49) Aguilar Debunks the Accusations Against Him (43:05) Is This an IDF Operation? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In response to Maxwell's Rule 56.1 “Statement of Contested Facts,” Virginia Giuffre meticulously contested nearly every assertion Maxwell put forth. She denied Maxwell's characterization of her allegations as “obvious lies,” and pointed to FBI interviews and deposition transcripts confirming her account that Maxwell actively recruited and trafficked her to Jeffrey Epstein. Giuffre flagged multiple misrepresentations in Maxwell's filing—ranging from the drafting and distribution of press statements, to claims about the scope and detail of her public disclosures. Giuffre maintains her statements are grounded in evidence, recorded testimony, and contemporaneous documentation—not exaggeration or fabrication, as Maxwell suggested.Giuffre further challenged Maxwell's framing of her motives, rejecting allegations that she sought media attention or monetary gain. Instead, Giuffre emphasized her pursuit of justice under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, her goal to expose governmental failings, and her intention to assist other survivors. She disputed Maxwell's assertion that Giuffre had “sought out media organizations,” clarifying that she was approached, not the other way around. In every contested point, Giuffre created genuine disputes of material fact—underscoring that the truthfulness of her allegations versus Maxwell's denials could not be resolved without witness testimony or trial. This response was crucial in precluding Maxwell from obtaining summary judgment and keeping the defamation case alive.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

In response to the July 31, 2025, orders issued by Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer, the U.S. Government has submitted a formal letter addressing the Court's request for clarification regarding grand jury materials related to the cases United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490) and United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). These materials, previously sealed, are now being reviewed for possible unsealing as part of broader legal efforts to reexamine the handling of both prosecutions. The Government's letter aims to outline the scope, content, and legal justifications for the requested disclosures, as well as any ongoing privacy or investigative concerns that may influence the Court's decision.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.800.0.pdf

In response to Maxwell's Rule 56.1 “Statement of Contested Facts,” Virginia Giuffre meticulously contested nearly every assertion Maxwell put forth. She denied Maxwell's characterization of her allegations as “obvious lies,” and pointed to FBI interviews and deposition transcripts confirming her account that Maxwell actively recruited and trafficked her to Jeffrey Epstein. Giuffre flagged multiple misrepresentations in Maxwell's filing—ranging from the drafting and distribution of press statements, to claims about the scope and detail of her public disclosures. Giuffre maintains her statements are grounded in evidence, recorded testimony, and contemporaneous documentation—not exaggeration or fabrication, as Maxwell suggested.Giuffre further challenged Maxwell's framing of her motives, rejecting allegations that she sought media attention or monetary gain. Instead, Giuffre emphasized her pursuit of justice under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, her goal to expose governmental failings, and her intention to assist other survivors. She disputed Maxwell's assertion that Giuffre had “sought out media organizations,” clarifying that she was approached, not the other way around. In every contested point, Giuffre created genuine disputes of material fact—underscoring that the truthfulness of her allegations versus Maxwell's denials could not be resolved without witness testimony or trial. This response was crucial in precluding Maxwell from obtaining summary judgment and keeping the defamation case alive.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

In hour Tua, more on the Marlins 7-3 loss to the Houston Astros their 2nd in a row. Marlins look to avoid the sweep today but has to be encouraged with rookie Jakob Marsee. we hear form Miami Dolphins DE Jaelan Phillips who had great and funny things to say about LT Patrick Paul. We play our favorite daily segment Mix Bag where we hear from Tua Tagovailoa on President Trump mispronouncing his name.

A new bill is circulating Congress, and it’s called the Save Our Bacon Act. The Save Our Bacon Act aims to restore interstate commerce as the latest response to Proposition-12. Morgan Worek is the Program and Marketing Director at the Wisconsin Pork Association. She shares what the bill would mean for the pork industry.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In response to the July 31, 2025, orders issued by Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer, the U.S. Government has submitted a formal letter addressing the Court's request for clarification regarding grand jury materials related to the cases United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490) and United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). These materials, previously sealed, are now being reviewed for possible unsealing as part of broader legal efforts to reexamine the handling of both prosecutions. The Government's letter aims to outline the scope, content, and legal justifications for the requested disclosures, as well as any ongoing privacy or investigative concerns that may influence the Court's decision.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.800.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In response to Maxwell's Rule 56.1 “Statement of Contested Facts,” Virginia Giuffre meticulously contested nearly every assertion Maxwell put forth. She denied Maxwell's characterization of her allegations as “obvious lies,” and pointed to FBI interviews and deposition transcripts confirming her account that Maxwell actively recruited and trafficked her to Jeffrey Epstein. Giuffre flagged multiple misrepresentations in Maxwell's filing—ranging from the drafting and distribution of press statements, to claims about the scope and detail of her public disclosures. Giuffre maintains her statements are grounded in evidence, recorded testimony, and contemporaneous documentation—not exaggeration or fabrication, as Maxwell suggested.Giuffre further challenged Maxwell's framing of her motives, rejecting allegations that she sought media attention or monetary gain. Instead, Giuffre emphasized her pursuit of justice under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, her goal to expose governmental failings, and her intention to assist other survivors. She disputed Maxwell's assertion that Giuffre had “sought out media organizations,” clarifying that she was approached, not the other way around. In every contested point, Giuffre created genuine disputes of material fact—underscoring that the truthfulness of her allegations versus Maxwell's denials could not be resolved without witness testimony or trial. This response was crucial in precluding Maxwell from obtaining summary judgment and keeping the defamation case alive.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In response to Maxwell's Rule 56.1 “Statement of Contested Facts,” Virginia Giuffre meticulously contested nearly every assertion Maxwell put forth. She denied Maxwell's characterization of her allegations as “obvious lies,” and pointed to FBI interviews and deposition transcripts confirming her account that Maxwell actively recruited and trafficked her to Jeffrey Epstein. Giuffre flagged multiple misrepresentations in Maxwell's filing—ranging from the drafting and distribution of press statements, to claims about the scope and detail of her public disclosures. Giuffre maintains her statements are grounded in evidence, recorded testimony, and contemporaneous documentation—not exaggeration or fabrication, as Maxwell suggested.Giuffre further challenged Maxwell's framing of her motives, rejecting allegations that she sought media attention or monetary gain. Instead, Giuffre emphasized her pursuit of justice under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, her goal to expose governmental failings, and her intention to assist other survivors. She disputed Maxwell's assertion that Giuffre had “sought out media organizations,” clarifying that she was approached, not the other way around. In every contested point, Giuffre created genuine disputes of material fact—underscoring that the truthfulness of her allegations versus Maxwell's denials could not be resolved without witness testimony or trial. This response was crucial in precluding Maxwell from obtaining summary judgment and keeping the defamation case alive.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

In response to Maxwell's Rule 56.1 “Statement of Contested Facts,” Virginia Giuffre meticulously contested nearly every assertion Maxwell put forth. She denied Maxwell's characterization of her allegations as “obvious lies,” and pointed to FBI interviews and deposition transcripts confirming her account that Maxwell actively recruited and trafficked her to Jeffrey Epstein. Giuffre flagged multiple misrepresentations in Maxwell's filing—ranging from the drafting and distribution of press statements, to claims about the scope and detail of her public disclosures. Giuffre maintains her statements are grounded in evidence, recorded testimony, and contemporaneous documentation—not exaggeration or fabrication, as Maxwell suggested.Giuffre further challenged Maxwell's framing of her motives, rejecting allegations that she sought media attention or monetary gain. Instead, Giuffre emphasized her pursuit of justice under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, her goal to expose governmental failings, and her intention to assist other survivors. She disputed Maxwell's assertion that Giuffre had “sought out media organizations,” clarifying that she was approached, not the other way around. In every contested point, Giuffre created genuine disputes of material fact—underscoring that the truthfulness of her allegations versus Maxwell's denials could not be resolved without witness testimony or trial. This response was crucial in precluding Maxwell from obtaining summary judgment and keeping the defamation case alive.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Epstein-Docs.pdf (documentcloud.org)

In response to the July 31, 2025, orders issued by Judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer, the U.S. Government has submitted a formal letter addressing the Court's request for clarification regarding grand jury materials related to the cases United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490) and United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). These materials, previously sealed, are now being reviewed for possible unsealing as part of broader legal efforts to reexamine the handling of both prosecutions. The Government's letter aims to outline the scope, content, and legal justifications for the requested disclosures, as well as any ongoing privacy or investigative concerns that may influence the Court's decision.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.539612.800.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Today: As drug cartels turn to drones for smuggling and surveillance, soldiers at Fort Huachuca are adapting to a rapidly evolving threat along Arizona’s border.Support the show: https://www.myheraldreview.com/site/forms/subscription_services/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Fox News panicking on live tv over the horrible job report that was just released and Meiselas speaks with AFGE President Everett Kelley about what his union is seeing regarding Trump's destruction of jobs. Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Let me be real with you—it's time to stop seeking external validation. That need for approval? It's robbing you of power, money, and freedom. You were not put here to chase permission. You were put here to create. Stop Seeking External Validation in Sales In sales, the moment you seek someone else's approval, you've already […] The post Stop Seeking External Validation: How the Universe Really Responds appeared first on The Successful Mind Podcast.

Jason talks to KARE 11 investigative reporter AJ Lagoe about their look at the housing stabilization program that the State decided to shut down when serious fraud was exposed.

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Republican leaders losing their minds in live tv as Trump is crashing the economy with the worst jobs report in recent history and Meiselas speaks with Michigan State Senator Mallory McMorrow who is running for the United States Senate seat in Michigan. Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

After a week of controversy from an online AE ad that went all the way up to the White House, American Eagle finally issued a statement. BUT, as Amy and T.J. discuss, that statement pissed some people off even more than the original ad! The question, should we be mad, or should we be asking ourselves WHY we’re so mad and how can we all do better?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

After a week of controversy from an online AE ad that went all the way up to the White House, American Eagle finally issued a statement. BUT, as Amy and T.J. discuss, that statement pissed some people off even more than the original ad! The question, should we be mad, or should we be asking ourselves WHY we’re so mad and how can we all do better?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

After a week of controversy from an online AE ad that went all the way up to the White House, American Eagle finally issued a statement. BUT, as Amy and T.J. discuss, that statement pissed some people off even more than the original ad! The question, should we be mad, or should we be asking ourselves WHY we’re so mad and how can we all do better?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Rich Zeoli Show- Hour 2: 4:05pm- A new American Eagle clothing advertisement features Hollywood star Sydney Sweeney bragging about her “great jeans.” Far-left social media users, however, are ridiculously saying that the commercial is secretly promoting eugenics—insisting the ad's “great jeans” line really means “great genes.” American Eagle has now responded to the far-left's complaints, emphasizing the commercial was always just about “jeans.” 4:10pm- On Thursday night, former Vice President Kamala Harris made a guest appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert where she promoted her soon to be released book, “107 Days.” During the interview, Harris bizarrely explained why she loves tethered earbuds rather than wireless airpods. 4:15pm- Rich will be on Fox News with Laura Ingraham tonight—but is he broadcasting out of the back of a van? 4:30pm- On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee declassified intelligence—specifically the annex to former Special Counsel John Durham's report—allegedly revealing that Hillary Clinton personally approved of the efforts to promote the false narrative that then-candidate Donald Trump colluded with Russian officials during the 2016 presidential election. One declassified email exchange reveals that “HRC approved Julia's [Clinton foreign policy advisor Julianne Smith] idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections. That should distract people from her own missing email, especially if the affair goes to the Olympic level.” 4:45pm- While speaking with Glenn Beck, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revealed there are still people working within the intelligence community that weaponized intelligence for political purpose—though, the Trump Administration is actively working on removing them.

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas is joined by Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries to report on Republican Speaker MAGA Mike Johnson panicking in public as he gets bad news about the weakness of the GOP and as Donald Trump's presidency is in total free fall. Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices