Podcasts about Expert witness

Expert witnesses often give key testimonies at criminal trials and are allowed to give their own opinions. But what happens when their opinions don't reflect the facts?  "48 Hours" correspondent Susan Spencer, Harold Dow and Peter Van Sant report. This classic "48 Hours" episode last aired on 8/23/1999. Watch all-new episodes of “48 Hours” on Saturdays and stream on demand on Paramount+.

In 2022, defense attorneys in Ohio were stunned when prosecutors rolled out a cutting-edge tool to place defendants at the scene of a crime. Cybercheck claimed to use AI and historical digital data to identify suspects. But when lawyers examined the technology for themselves, they couldn't figure out how it worked. Attention turned to Cybercheck's creator and expert witness Adam Mosher. The Canadian was cagey about the program's code and his own credentials. Even though the attorneys were sure they had evidence both Cybercheck and its creator were frauds, persuading judges and prosecutors that the miracle tool was a sham would be far more difficult. The latest season of the CBC Podcast “Uncover: The Expert Witness” recounts how lawyers figured out a computer program that claimed to identify criminals was not what it seemed. Host Sam Mullins interviews Adam Mosher, investigates his dubious technology, and asks why there are those in the justice system who still stand by Cybercheck's ability to solve crimes. OUR SPOILER-FREE REVIEWS OF "UNCOVER: THE EXPERT WITNESS" BEGIN IN THE FINAL 10 MINUTES OF THE EPISODE. In Crime of the Week: Through the legal glass. For exclusive podcasts and more, sign up at Patreon.Sign up for our newsletter at crimewriterson.com.This show was recorded in The Caitlin Rogers Project Studio. Click to find out more. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

As a Board-Certified Internal Medicine Physician with over 14 years of clinical experience, Dr. Jordan Romano has a wealth of knowledge and experience to share with fellow healthcare professionals. In addition to his clinical work, Dr. Romano has become the go-to resource for Medical Malpractice Law firms nationwide, providing highly valued expert testimony and consultation. With nearly a decade of Medical Expert Witness experience, he has not only honed his skills, but has also mentored physicians at all stages of their Expert Witness journey. Dr. Romano is passionate about utilizing his expertise to help other medical professionals succeed

In this episode of the Legal Nurse Podcast, we delve into the specialized world of speech and language pathology with expert witness Elizabeth McKinney, who brings 17 years of experience in geriatric care and a wealth of advanced certifications in her field. Elizabeth McKinney sheds light on the extensive educational requirements and ongoing certifications necessary for speech-language pathologists, highlighting their critical role not just in communication but also in swallowing safety, cognitive assessments, and patient advocacy across all care settings. Listeners will gain an insider's perspective on how speech-language pathologists contribute to both pediatric and adult care, often working behind the scenes with vulnerable populations in skilled nursing facilities, hospitals, schools, and even home health. The episode also tackles the legal and ethical responsibilities of these professionals, especially in complex cases involving aspiration pneumonia, diet management, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Through compelling case examples including wrongful death due to preventable choking, Elizabeth McKinney illustrates the real-world stakes of clinical decisions and the vital interplay between nurses, dietitians, and speech pathologists. With her unique view as an expert witness, Elizabeth McKinney discusses both the high standards set by the profession's code of ethics and the impact of proper documentation, team education, and timely intervention on patient outcomes and litigation. Whether you're a healthcare provider, legal professional, or simply curious about the hidden dimensions of post-acute care, this episode will deepen your understanding of how speech and language pathology can shape and safeguard patient lives. What You'll Learn in This Episode on The Overlooked Impact of SLPs in Elder Care and Litigation Here are 5 discussion questions answered in the podcast: What are the implications when recommended swallowing safety precautions are not followed in skilled nursing facilities? How can impulsive or improper diet recommendations by speech-language pathologists contribute to adverse patient outcomes and potential litigation? What mechanisms exist for nurses, dietitians, and speech-language pathologists to communicate and collaborate regarding dietary changes and patient safety? How does the ASHA Code of Ethics guide the practice and decision-making of speech-language pathologists, especially when unethical practices are observed? In what circumstances are speech-language pathologists likely to be named as defendants in malpractice litigation, and how common is this compared to other healthcare providers? Get the free transcripts and also learn about other ways to subscribe. Go to Legal Nurse Podcasts subscribe options by using this short link: http://LNC.tips/subscribepodcast. https://youtu.be/tEBuol12ahY Your Presenter for The Overlooked Impact of SLPs in Elder Care and Litigation Pat Iyer Pat Iyer is a seasoned legal nurse consultant and business coach, renowned for her expertise in guiding new legal nurse consultants to successfully break into the field. As the host of the Legal Nurse Podcast, Pat addresses critical challenges that legal nurse consultants face, such as difficulty in landing clients and a lack of response from attorneys. Through her insightful episodes, she emphasizes the importance of effectively communicating one's value to potential clients. With a wealth of experience, Pat has empowered countless consultants to overcome these hurdles and thrive in their careers. Connect with Pat Iyer by email at patiyer@legalnusebusiness.com Elizabeth McKinney Speech-Language Pathologist, Expert Witness, Advocate Elizabeth has been practicing as a speech-language pathologist for 17 years. She graduated from the University of Florida with her bachelor's degree in communication sciences and disorders with a minor in gerontology and her master's degree in speech-language pathology. She has devoted her career to the care of geriatrics in skilled nursing facilities across Florida. Elizabeth has been an expert witness since 2023 and has served on nearly 20 cases nationwide. When she is not on this podcast, she is enjoying the Florida lifestyle with her husband and two kids. She enjoys reading, volunteering, and running in her spare time. Connect with Elizabeth McKinney by email at emckinneyslp@gmail.com

Sam Mullins looks into Cybercheck's claimed “success stories” and finds they offer little proof of the tool's reliability. One defense attorney benefited from a Cybercheck report that actually pointed to an alternative suspect, helping reduce charges against her client, while a prosecutor and paid Cybercheck consultant praised the technology despite never using it in court. Journalists' extensive public records requests and outreach to law enforcement revealed widespread skepticism, failed tests, and unverifiable claims, with no confirmed example of Cybercheck solving a case. The episode also highlights the conviction of Salah Maddi, where Cybercheck testimony appeared to influence the jury despite weak corroborating evidence, raising concerns that unproven AI may have contributed to wrongful convictions. Ultimately, the investigation concludes that Cybercheck has consumed investigators' time, influenced prosecutions, and spread widely—despite a lack of transparency or clear evidence that it reliably delivers justice.Find out which season of Uncover should be your next listen here.

In Episode 219 of On The Delo, Delo sits down with Manny and Rick from Nightlife Security Consultants to expose the security failures, operational mistakes, and liability risks that cost bars, restaurants, and nightclubs hundreds of thousands of dollars every year. From a $248,000 lawsuit over an $8 bar tab to a man stabbed on a dance floor the night before his sister's wedding, this episode reveals what operators can do today to better protect their guests, employees, and business.With decades of combined experience in law enforcement, nightclub operations, hospitality security, expert witness testimony, and staff training, Manny and Rick have helped operators across the country reduce risk and build safer venues. Together, they break down the five areas where businesses get picked apart in litigation, why hiring the biggest guy isn't always the right move, how post-COVID nightlife is evolving, and what a well-run security operation actually looks like—from the front door to last call.Whether you're a bar owner, restaurant operator, nightclub manager, hospitality professional, insurance agent, or simply interested in hospitality leadership and risk management, this episode is packed with real-world stories and actionable insight.Chapter Guide (Timestamps):(0:40 - 3:10) Intro: Episode 219, Guests Manny & Rick, and San Diego Small Talk(3:11 - 7:26) Origin Story: Nightlife Security Consultants Founded in 1998(7:27 - 12:38) Rick's Background: 20 Years in Law Enforcement, MBA, PhD & Training Philosophy(12:39 - 16:36) State-by-State Laws, Dram Shop Preparation & the Five Areas of Litigation Research(16:37 - 22:02) Proactive Security, Patron Monitoring & the Puppy Analogy(22:03 - 26:21) Risk by Venue Type: Why Culture & Ownership Matter More Than the Concept(26:22 - 30:21) Hiring Smart: Background Checks, Team Diversity & Women in Security(30:22 - 35:29) Why Operators Don't Hire Help—and Who Does(35:30 - 40:00) Nightlife Trends: Post-COVID Habits, Day Drinking & the Gentleman's Club Pivot(40:01 - 45:01) Craziest Claim Stories: $248K Over an $8 Bar Tab & a Stabbing on the Dance Floor(45:02 - 51:12) Services: Training, Consulting, Policies, Major Incident Review & Expert Witness(51:13 - 58:19) Rapid Fire Questions & Outro

Mosher explains that his Cybercheck technology was built to analyze open-source internet data using AI to generate investigative “intelligence,” not courtroom evidence. Mosher admits the company failed early on to clearly communicate those limits, allowing prosecutors to use Cybercheck as evidence, and he acknowledges the risks of relying on AI without independent verification. However, he defends the system's value, denies wrongdoing, and attributes criticism to misunderstandings and aggressive defense attorneys. Despite mounting doubts—including inconsistencies in his claims, refusal to share source code, and questions about peer review—Mosher insists Cybercheck remains useful to law enforcement, while the interview leaves unresolved concerns about its reliability, transparency, and continued use. Mosher tells Sam he needs to speak to the people behind the curtain who are having success with it.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go from here.

In Midland, Texas, prosecutor Lisa Borden took a different approach with Cybercheck. After closely questioning Adam Mosher and finding Cybercheck lacked peer review and proper authentication, she refused to use it in court, concluding the technology was not scientifically reliable. Sam Mullins' gets to sit down with Cybercheck creator Adam Moser. Mosher tells him his backstory as a movie buff. He explains that the technology was inspired by crime TV and movies and built with the help of government grants and technology students. And then just as COVID hit, Moser says, cyber check started reaching out to its first potential clients. But he wasn't prepared for what happened next.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go next

Cybercheck has spread across the U.S. through aggressive cold-email marketing, word of mouth, and partnerships with law enforcement agencies eager to solve cold cases. Journalist Todd Feathers uncovers questionable claims in Cybercheck reports, including supposed access to dark web accounts and the ability to retroactively place phones at crime scenes decades earlier. Despite producing few verifiable results, respected agencies like Ohio's Bureau of Criminal Investigation still promoted the tool to other departments, helping expand its reach. Is there anyone willing to put this tech under the necessary scrutiny? Maybe in West Texas. Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go next

Prosecutors privately begin questioning Adam Mosher's false peer review claims, while defense attorney Don Malarcik uncovers evidence that Cybercheck reports were manually edited—contradicting claims that the system was fully automated. As the critical Daubert hearing approaches, prosecutors abruptly withdraw Cybercheck as evidence rather than defend it in court, effectively ending its use in Summit County without admitting wrongdoing. National reporting and expert analysis further undermine the technology's credibility, comparing it to unsupported pseudoscience. But despite Cybercheck being abandoned locally and Mosher facing investigation, Don realizes the tool has silently continued to spread across the country and raises troubling questions about how easily unproven technology can influence the justice system.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go next

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

DescriptionIn this episode of Perfect Prey, I'm joined by Ann Burgess, pioneering forensic nurse, researcher, educator, and author of Expert Witness. Ann's groundbreaking work transformed how professionals understand trauma, victimization, sexual violence, and offender behavior. Her research has influenced criminal investigations, forensic psychology, victim advocacy, and some of the most well-known criminal cases in modern history.Together, we explore the long-term impact of trauma, why victims are so often disbelieved, and how systems continue to fail those who come forward. Ann shares insights from decades of work studying victims, offenders, serial violence, child abuse, and the psychology of coercion and control. We also discuss institutional betrayal, trauma responses in children and adults, family court failures, pornography, grooming, and what it takes to create meaningful change within systems that were never designed to fully protect victims.What we coverAnn Burgess's pioneering work in victimology and forensic nursingHow trauma impacts behavior across the lifespanWhy victims are often disbelieved by systems and institutionsInstitutional betrayal and systemic failuresCoercive control, fear, and psychological abuseTrauma responses in children and adolescentsChild sexual abuse and delayed disclosureFamily court, victim credibility, and expert testimonyThe role of pornography and grooming in abusive behaviorThe Menendez case and evolving understandings of traumaWhy trauma-informed education is critical for professionalsHow offender thinking patterns develop and escalateWhy listenIf you are a survivor, clinician, attorney, advocate, educator, or protective parent, this episode offers a rare opportunity to hear from one of the most influential voices in trauma and victim research.Ann Burgess's work helped shape how we understand trauma today. Her insights illuminate why victims respond the way they do, why systems often misunderstand those responses, and why meaningful reform requires us to listen more closely to survivors' experiences.Guest BioAnn Burgess, DNSc, APRN, FAAN is an internationally recognized forensic nurse, researcher, educator, and author. She is a professor at Boston College and has spent decades studying trauma, victimization, sexual violence, serial offenders, and forensic mental health.Ann's groundbreaking research on rape trauma syndrome helped transform the understanding of victim responses to sexual assault. She has consulted with the FBI's Behavioral Science Unit, contributed to offender profiling research, and served as an expert witness in numerous high-profile cases.She is the author of several books, including Expert Witness, which chronicles her work at the intersection of trauma, criminal behavior, and justice.Connect with Ann BurgessBook: Expert Witnesshttps://www.amazon.com/stores/Ann-W.-Burgess/author/B0H13DQXPP?ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_3&qid=1780604748&sr=1-3&shoppingPortalEnabled=true&ccs_id=9489809f-1ae4-4998-b8db-a0cbcc536d23Boston College Faculty Profile: https://www.bc.eduConnect with Dr. ChristineProtective Parenting Program: https://www.coercivecontrolconsulting.com/services/for-parents/Dr. C's Community: https://go.drcocchiola.com/innercirclecommunityOfficial site: https://www.coercivecontrolconsulting.com/YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@DrCocchiola-coercivecontrol/videosTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@dr.c_coercivecontrolInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/dr.cocchiola_coercivecontrol/TEDxTalks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp2qByKOue4&t=24sBooks:https://url-shortener.me/c/FramedBookhttps://url-shortener.me/c/EveryMomentOfEveryDayIf this episode landed for you, please share it with someone who needs to hear it, subscribe for more trauma-informed conversations, and consider leaving a review — it helps other survivors find validation and safety.— Dr. Christine Cocchiola & Ann Burgess

In this episode, you'll learn the best strategies for excelling as an expert witness in mock trial.

Don Malarcik might finally uncover how Cybercheck works, as its creator Adam Mosher travels to Ohio to demonstrate the software to Don's legal team and independent experts. While parts of the program appear functional, its core AI remains hidden, and Mosher refuses to provide full access or explain how it reaches conclusions that place suspects at crime scenes. His answers raise concerns about bias, and when he claims Cybercheck was peer-reviewed by a Canadian university, Don discovers the university denies any involvement. Believing this proves Mosher misled the court, Don prepares for a decisive hearing that could determine whether Cybercheck is legitimate evidence—or junk science.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go next

One AI-hallucinated citation on cross-examination, and the expert witness career you built is over. It is already happening. Tracy Liberatore, a former physician assistant turned attorney and founder of the National Expert Academy, walks through the real court cases where clinical experts leaned on generative AI and watched their reports, and their reputations, get thrown out. This episode is based on her article "Expert witness credibility is destroyed by AI opinions," published on KevinMD. You will hear why AI hallucinated citations are ending careers in medical-legal work, why one expert was allowed to keep AI in his workflow because he could account for every prompt, what responsible AI use actually looks like for clinicians writing expert reports, and the brain flip clinicians have to make to defend a process rather than a conclusion. If you do expert witness work, or are thinking about it, this conversation names the line you cannot cross. Partner with me on the KevinMD platform. With over three million monthly readers and half a million social media followers, I give you direct access to the doctors and patients who matter most. Whether you need a sponsored article, email campaign, video interview, or a spot right here on the podcast, I offer the trusted space your brand deserves to be heard. Let's work together to tell your story. PARTNER WITH KEVINMD → https://kevinmd.com/influencer SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST → https://www.kevinmd.com/podcast RECOMMENDED BY KEVINMD → https://www.kevinmd.com/recommended

Elon Musk may still lose this case on a technicality, but Day 8 of the Musk v. Altman trial delivered some of the most damaging testimony OpenAI has faced yet. In this episode of The Valley Current®, Jack Russo breaks down the explosive "witness wall" built by former OpenAI insiders, who described a culture of deceit, broken oversight, and a company racing toward commercial dominance while leaving its nonprofit mission behind. Musk's legal team then deployed a high-powered expert witness to turn those insider accusations into a direct attack on OpenAI's governance structure and future IPO ambitions. But after eight days of devastating testimony, the entire case may still hinge on one brutal reality: Musk may have recognized the problem years too early to win in court. Jack Russo Managing Partner Jrusso@computerlaw.com www.computerlaw.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/jackrusso "Every Entrepreneur Imagines a Better World"®️  

As Don connects with Colorado defense attorney Eric Zale, they compare notes and troubling inconsistencies emerge—Adam Mosher's claims about his experience, expertise, and courtroom testimony don't hold up under scrutiny. Investigators discover that key cases Mosher cited either never went to trial or never involved him at all, leading prosecutors in Colorado to drop charges rather than rely on his evidence. But in Akron, Cybercheck remains in use, and Mosher continues testifying under oath despite mounting doubts. Determined to stop what he believes is a dangerous and unverified system, Don launches a broader effort, reaching out to other defense attorneys and building a coalition to expose the truth—knowing the outcome could affect not just his clients, but the future of criminal justice itself.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go next

What actually happens when domestic violence cases enter the courtroom?In this episode, I'm joined by Dr. Carol Ann Peterson—expert witness, consultant, and longtime advocate—who brings a behind-the-scenes look at how abuse is understood (and often misunderstood) in criminal, civil, and family court.We talk about what expert witnesses really do, when they can make a difference, and why context—not isolated incidents—is critical in understanding abuse. Dr. Peterson also shares how survivors are often misperceived in court, how abusers present, and what decision-makers frequently get wrong.This conversation pulls back the curtain on the systems many survivors are navigating—and highlights where change is still urgently needed.About Carol Ann: Dr. Carol Ann Peterson is an expert witness, consultant, and nationally recognized trainer specializing in domestic and intimate partner violence. She has trained with the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center under the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and has consulted with the U.S. Attorney General's Office, the California Attorney General's Office, the Los Angeles County District Attorney, and the Los Angeles City Attorney.Dr. Peterson has served as an expert witness in criminal, civil, and family court cases for both prosecution and defense, including district attorneys, public defenders, and private attorneys. She is a certified strangulation prevention expert and a member of the Expert Advisory Group for DomesticShelters.org.Join the Rising Beyond Community today. Learn more at https://www.risingbeyondpc.com/membership.htmlPlease leave us a review or rating and follow/subscribe to the show. This helps the show get out to more people.If you want to chat more about this topic I would love to continue our conversation over on Instagram! @risingbeyondpcIf you want to support the show you may do so here at, Buy Me A Coffee. Thank you! We love being able to make this information accessible to you and your community.If you've been looking for a supportive community of women going through the topics we cover, head over to our website to learn more about the Rising Beyond Community. - https://www.risingbeyondpc.com/Where to find more from Rising Beyond:Rising Beyond FacebookRising Beyond LinkedInRising Beyond Pinterest If you're interested in guesting on the show please fill out this form - https://forms.gle/CSvLWWyZxmJ8GGQu7Enjoy some of our freebies!Choosing Your Battles FreebieCanned Responses FreebieMic Drop Moments Freebie...

It's here. AI has arrived in the criminal justice system and it's in the role of witness. The Expert Witness, hosted by Sam Mullins asks: what happens when AI enters the courtroom? Who is benefitting from this mysterious technology? And who's accountable when AI gets it wrong? More episodes of The Expert Witness are available wherever you get your podcasts, and here: https://link.mgln.ai/TEWxTNCAbout UNCOVER: Crime. Investigation. Revelation. Uncover brings you explosive, high-caliber true crime year-round. From CIA mind control to serial abuse, mysterious disappearances to wrongful imprisonment. Each season features a new host who is deeply connected to the story, committed to tracking down the truth.

In the ‘parallel universe' of Boulder Colorado, defense attorney Eric Zale is working on a very similar case. A report claims to link a suspect to incriminating online activity, but offers no clear explanation of how it works or how its conclusions were reached. Unaware of Zale or any other Cybercheck cases outside of Akron, Don Malarcik continues to dig deeper. Don hires experts and investigators, but no one can verify Cyber Check's methods or it's creator Adam Mosher's credentials. Meanwhile, prosecutors continue relying on the technology, presenting it as powerful, cutting-edge evidence. As Don prepares to challenge Mosher in court, he realizes he's not just defending one client—he's confronting a black-box system that could quietly reshape how guilt is determined, without transparency or accountability.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.

The city of Akron, Ohio reels from rising violence and stalled investigations until arrests suddenly begin to happen. A mysterious new AI-powered tool called Cyber Check has arrived. Criminal defense attorney Don Malarcik first encounters the technology when it's used to implicate his young client in a murder. With no clear explanation of how it works, and no public record of its existence, Don and his team begin digging into Cyber Check, uncovering unsettling questions about whether this powerful new technology is delivering justice—or quietly reshaping it.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.

Episodes 1 & 2 coming May 19, 2026.The small city of Akron, Ohio was drowning in unsolved murders. Until one day something happened. And suddenly those cold cases? Started to get closed. A ground breaking Canadian AI technology was coming to the rescue. Tracking criminal behaviour to bring justice where humans had failed. But as the cases stack up, and charges are laid, two lawyers grow skeptical. Human cracks appear in the mysterious new tech. Can the doubters open up this black box and reveal its true workings, before it takes hold across the world? Hosted by Sam Mullins.

"They will remember that I saved the day..." Welcome Melissa Gragg to The Mark Howley Show! This episode feels like listening to juicy gossip between two friends the whole way through. Melissa is a valuation expert witness specializing in divorce and family/ partner disputes. She has seen some wild things in the courtroom, witnessed hundreds of cases, many of which are celebrity splits and shares her ability to cut to the truth of any dispute. Gragg also hosts the Valuation Podcast discussing business & valuations available on all streaming platforms. Please subscribe or follow from your listening platform! We hope to reach more people and share the many ways people find passion and success in life. We appreciate your viewership. Leave us a comment and tell us what you think about this conversation!

Get the FREE GUIDE to 10 Nonclinical Careers at nonclinicalphysicians.com/freeguide. Get a list of 70 nontraditional jobs at nonclinicalphysicians.com/70jobs.                                                                                                 =============== John picks up where he left off, getting into the mechanics of actually building an expert witness consulting practice, from handling the psychological weight of depositions to setting your fees, structuring your LLC, and finding your first cases. No hypotheticals. John gets into the actual mechanics, what to charge, how to find cases, and how to build this into something that runs like a real business He walks through the full breakdown of what the work actually looks like day-to-day: why 80–90% of your time will be in record review, when depositions and trial testimony actually come into play, and how to position yourself so attorneys keep calling you back. He also covers the resources, directories, and training programs that accelerate the process, so you're not starting from zero. You'll find links mentioned in the episode at nonclinicalphysicians.com/guide-to-expert-witness-consulting-part-2/

In this episode of Hiring to Firing, hosts Tracey Diamond and Emily Schifter are joined by Paul White, a partner at Resolution Economics, to demystify the world of expert witnesses in employment matters. Using memorable clips from My Cousin Vinny, Legally Blonde, and The Big Short, they explore what it really means to be an “expert,” how courts evaluate expert qualifications and methodologies, and the tactics attorneys use to challenge or bolster expert testimony. The conversation examines the crucial role experts play in damages calculations, wage and hour disputes, discrimination and pay equity audits, and emerging AI bias reviews, while highlighting why clear, accessible storytelling is just as important as technical rigor. Tune in to learn how employers and their counsel can partner effectively with experts to turn complex data into practical guidance, manage risk, and control litigation and consulting costs. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

If you've ever thought, “There has to be more than just working more shifts to make more money…” — this episode is going to open your eyes.In this conversation, I sit down with Dr. Christopher Cannell, PA-C, who shares how he transitioned from full-time clinical work into a flexible, high-income career combining academia, consulting, and entrepreneurship. What started as a single opportunity turned into a thriving medical legal consulting business—one that allows him to work less clinically, earn more, and take back control of his time.We break down what medical legal consulting actually looks like, how to get started (even without a doctorate), and why this path might be one of the most aligned, ethical, and financially rewarding ways to use your clinical expertise outside traditional practice.What medical legal consulting actually is (and what you'd do)How expert witness work and case review really get paidWhy you don't need another degree to get startedThe balance between clinical work and consultingHow to build income without burnout or overtimeWhy networking (not social media) is your biggest growth leverThe mindset shift from employee → entrepreneurHow this work can actually make you a better clinicianKeywords: medical legal consulting for PAs, expert witness physician assistant, PA side hustle ideas, healthcare consulting income, non clinical careers for physician assistants, medical expert witness jobs, PA entrepreneurship, healthcare side income ideas, physician assistant consulting business, legal nurse consultant alternative, make money as a PA outside clinic, clinician entrepreneurship, work from home healthcare jobs, PA career flexibility, burnout alternatives for clinicians, healthcare side gigs high incomeSPONSORS:PA Moms Women's Medical Summit https://www.pamoms.com/wms26/ Enter “Tracy Bingaman” for who referred you! LINKS:Chris Cannell APConsultant Website: https://theapcconsultant.mykajabi.com/ Clinician Entrepreneur Collective Waitlist www.tracybingaman.com/waitlist Schedule a call with Tracy https://calendly.com/the-pa-is-in/gen-call

Get the FREE GUIDE to 10 Nonclinical Careers at nonclinicalphysicians.com/freeguide. Get a list of 70 nontraditional jobs at nonclinicalphysicians.com/70jobs.                                                                                                 =============== John breaks down how physicians can start building income streams outside of clinical practice without making drastic or risky career moves. Drawing from years of interviews and real-world examples, he explains why relying on a single source of income leaves little flexibility, and how even small, consistent steps toward diversification can create long-term stability and optionality. One of the nonclinical career options available to almost any actively practicing physician is that of expert witness consulting. It is relatively easy to add this service incrementally to current clinical activities, although it does take some planning and investment. In this week's podcast episode, John presents part 1 of his guide to expert witness consulting, covering all of the major activities one would need to get started. Part 2 follows next week, with a list of helpful resources to accelerate the development and growth of this lucrative part-time consulting business. You'll find links mentioned in the episode at nonclinicalphysicians.com/guide-to-expert-witness-consulting-part-1/

This week Dr. Gregg Mays explains why we must give our testimony verbally, not just live it out. Who needs to hear your testimony?Foundation Scriptures: Acts 1:6-8How can Agape Leaders serve you?  Please find us at:         Website:  http://www.agapeleaders.org/    LinkedIn:  https://www.linkedin.com/in/gregg-mays/      Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/agapeleaders.org     Instagram:  https://www.instagram.com/agapeleaders10/    Bible Break With Agape Leaders: http://www.agapeleaders.org/daily-devotionTik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@greggmaysYouTube: https://youtube.com/channel/UCmM7ETR652mLtDSKSjda-pwGet Your Copy of the A Word Wednesday Devotion: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=A+Word+Wednesday+Devotion&ref=nav_bb_sbRead Dr. Mays' book Practical Leadership: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=practical+leadership+lessons+from+an+average+leader&crid=259U5RNS5J5W5&sprefix=Practical+Leadership%2Caps%2C102&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_4_20Give to ALCFM: http://www.agapeleaders.org/store/p15/Agape_Leaders_Christian_Fellowship_Ministry_Support.html

What does it take to testify in hundreds of real estate cases? An expert witness breaks down courtroom property disputes, from pre-trial prep to cross-examination, and why legal and real estate expertise matters. For more information, visit https://www.realestateexpertwitnesses.com/ Real Estate Expert Witnesses, LLC City: Highland Park Address: 1238 Glencoe Ave Website: https://www.realestateexpertwitnesses.com/

Send us Fan MailIn this episode, hosts Scott Kuhlman and Chasity Owens break down real-world court cases where fire investigators were challenged, excluded, or dismantled under legal scrutiny. From Daubert challenges and summary judgment to spoliation of evidence and product liability battles involving companies like Amazon, this episode dives deep into what can make—or break—an expert witness in court. Learn how improper methodology, lack of qualifications, confirmation bias, and failure to follow NFPA 921 can cost a case, and how to protect yourself by conducting every scene as if you're headed straight to trial. Whether you're a seasoned investigator or just entering the field, this episode delivers critical insights to strengthen your reports, testimony, and credibility in the courtroom.Thank you for listening! If you enjoyed the episode, give us 5 stars, hit the follow button, and subscribe on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and anywhere you are listening in from. Follow us on social media!Instagram: @infocusfire_podcastLinkedIn: INFOCUS podcastFacebook: INFOCUS podcastTikTok: @infocus_podcast

In this episode guests (and experts on experts) Deena Pack and Seth Row share practical tips for successfully hiring and managing an expert for your case. Hear it from the pros. It seems like every trial today needs an expert. And the experts you choose to learn from and present can make or break your case. Experts can be some of the most expensive elements of a case. You can't afford to make a mistake. When it comes to hiring an expert, the rule of thumb is “the earlier the better.” You may not even know if you have a case until you have an expert review of the evidence. But where do you find an expert? One who is not only current and knowledgeable, but also relatable to a judge and jury? Sometimes, even the perception as an “outsider” or a “local” expert matters. How do you make the right choice, vet prior testimony, and review qualifications? And don't forget the limits of your client's budget. Plus, a quick tip from Lauren Williams on how to polish your professional reputation by building rapport with courtroom staff. Have a question, comment, or suggestion for an upcoming episode? Get in touch at MRogson@SkywardInsurance.com and JAReeder@JonesDay.com. Resources: American Bar Association American Bar Association Litigation Section

--

Eric Dyson, Executive Director of 90 North Consulting and one of the retirement industry's more active ERISA expert witnesses, joins the 401(k) Specialist Podcast for a practical conversation on how plan sponsors and advisors can reduce fiduciary risk—and be better prepared if the Department of Labor comes calling.Drawing on his experience testifying in more than a dozen ERISA cases, Dyson shares the most common mistakes he sees in litigation and investigations, why a DOL audit may be a bigger risk than a lawsuit for most plans, and what courts actually expect from fiduciaries. He tackles pressing questions around paying advisors and TPAs with plan assets, properly documenting QDIA selections to secure safe harbor protection, conducting RFPs and benchmarking at “reasonable intervals,” and crafting committee meeting minutes that protect rather than expose.Dyson also provides clear, actionable steps sponsors can take before their next committee meeting to strengthen governance, document prudence, and stay off the litigation radar, and reduce fiduciary risk.EDITOR'S NOTE: This podcast episode is part of our new “Deep Dive” special content package for Q1 2026 titled, “How Not to Get Sued.” You can find additional coverage in the links below, and more focused content will be available in the coming days.SEE ALSO:How Not to Get Sued in 2026: Part 1How Not to Get Sued 2026: Part 2

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

X: @MDH_GFU @americasrt1776 @ileaderssummit @NatashaSrdoc @JoelAnandUSA @supertalk Join America's Roundtable radio co-hosts Natasha Srdoc and Joel Anand Samy with Professor Mark David Hall who joined the faculty of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University in 2023. In this special feature leading up to the commencement of America's 250th anniversary celebrations on July 4, 2026, America's Roundtable will present leading voices on the American Founding and highlight the principles which fueled American exceptionalism. America's Roundtable is honored to partner with Freedom 250, an initiative launched by President Trump on December 18, 2025, in leading our nation's 250th anniversary celebrations. America's Roundtable, joined by America's top scholars and a group of senior executives from the publishing industry, are creating an Official Publication - a book and online educational project which will highlight the American Founding, key events and influential leaders who shaped our nation. The book project will share inspiring stories which present a people's commitment to liberty and a strong resilience in advancing freedom within its borders and beyond its shores. Dr. Hall's video featured by The White House: The Story of America: The Faith of Our Founders https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgaVjksOo70 Bio | Dr. Mark Hall Dr. Hall is widely regarded as a leading student of religious liberty and church-state relations in America. Hall serves as an expert witness for the U.S. Department of Justice and prior to Regent, he was the Herbert Hoover Distinguished Professor of Politics at George Fox University. Dr. Hall earned a B.A. in Political Science from Wheaton College (IL) and a Ph.D. in Government from the University of Virginia. Dr. Hall has written, edited, or co-edited a dozen books, including Who's Afraid of Christian Nationalism: Why Christian Nationalism is Not an Existential Threat to America or the Church (by Fidelis Books in 2024); Proclaim Liberty Through All the Land: How Christianity Has Advanced Freedom and Equality for All Americans (by Fidelis, 2023); Did America Have a Christian Founding?: Separating Modern Myth from Historical Truth (by Nelson Books, 2019); Great Christian Jurists in American History (Cambridge University Press, 2019); Faith and the Founders of the American Republic (Oxford University Press, 2014); and Roger Sherman and the Creation of the American Republic (Oxford University Press, 2013). He has also penned more than 150 book chapters, journal articles, reviews, and other pieces. americasrt.com https://summitleadersusa.com/ | https://jerusalemleaderssummit.com/ America's Roundtable on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/americas-roundtable/id1518878472 X: @MDH_GFU @americasrt1776 @ileaderssummit @NatashaSrdoc @JoelAnandUSA @supertalk America's Roundtable is co-hosted by Natasha Srdoc and Joel Anand Samy, co-founders of International Leaders Summit and the Jerusalem Leaders Summit. America's Roundtable radio program focuses on America's economy, healthcare reform, rule of law, security and trade, and its strategic partnership with rule of law nations around the world. The radio program features high-ranking US administration officials, cabinet members, members of Congress, state government officials, distinguished diplomats, business and media leaders and influential thinkers from around the world. Tune into America's Roundtable Radio program from Washington, DC via live streaming on Saturday mornings via 68 radio stations at 7:30 A.M. (ET) on Lanser Broadcasting Corporation covering the Michigan and the Midwest market, and at 7:30 A.M. (CT) on SuperTalk Mississippi — SuperTalk.FM reaching listeners in every county within the State of Mississippi, and neighboring states in the South including Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana and Tennessee. Tune into WTON in Central Virginia on Sunday mornings at 6:00 A.M. (ET). Listen to America's Roundtable on digital platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon, Google and other key online platforms. Listen live, Saturdays at 7:30 A.M. (CT) on SuperTalk | https://www.supertalk.fm

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The lawsuits stem from parallel cases in the Southern District of New York: one brought by Jane Doe on behalf of Epstein's victims and another by the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands, both targeting JPMorgan Chase for its alleged role in enabling Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation. JPMorgan, in turn, filed third-party claims against former executive James Edward Staley, arguing that he should bear responsibility for any liability tied to Epstein, given his close personal and professional ties to the financier. These cases became highly significant in exposing the financial networks that allegedly allowed Epstein's crimes to flourish.In response, Staley filed a motion to exclude JPMorgan Chase's proffered expert opinions, challenging the credibility and admissibility of the bank's expert witnesses. His brief sought to limit the evidence that could be used against him, aiming to weaken JPMorgan's case for shifting liability onto him. This move reflects Staley's broader defense strategy of resisting being scapegoated as the primary enabler within JPMorgan, while the bank itself faced mounting scrutiny for its role in maintaining Epstein as a client despite numerous red flags.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.342.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Expert evidence under pressure – Eavanna FitzGerald on changing court culture | Episode 140On Episode 140 of The Fifth Court, Peter Leonard BL and Mark Tottenham BL examine a quiet but significant shift in Irish litigation: expert witnesses are now under real judicial scrutiny.Eavanna FitzGerald joins the show to explain why the traditional word-of-mouth system for sourcing experts is failing practitioners, and how courts are increasingly testing expert independence, competence and compliance with duties.The episode also covers three Decisis.ie cases:• Gorman v Lynch – proprietary / promissory estoppel claim against an estate dismissed as time-barred • Minister for Justice v Balgova – European Arrest Warrant and strict approach to equivalence • Pepper Finance DAC v O'Reilly – possession proceedings remitted due to insufficient proof of debt transferSponsored by Charlton Solicitors and Collaborative Practitioners. Follow, subscribe and share. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Send us a textPreparing expert witnesses for their testimony is an arduous process. In this episode, Captain Integrity Bob Wade dives into expert witness selection, preparing, and utilization with White Collar Crime Attorney Sean McKenna. Hear how to select the right expert witness, how to ensure the privileges are maintained, how to perform role playing during cross-examinations, the types of cases ripe for expert witnesses, and how to refute an expert witness. Learn more at CaptainIntegrity.com 

Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to murdering four University of Idaho students but planned to defend himself at trial by claiming at least two people committed the crimes. Kohberger's defense team hired an expert who analyzed the scene and also believed more than one weapon was used. Meanwhile, prosecutors hired an expert who was set to testify that one person could have carried out the crimes. Law&Crime's Angenette Levy looks at the defense claim and the controversy it has sparked in this episode of Crime Fix — a daily show covering the biggest stories in crime.PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW: Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code INSIDE at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/inside Host:Angenette Levy https://twitter.com/Angenette5Guest: Joseph Scott Morgan https://x.com/JoScottForensicCRIME FIX PRODUCTION:Head of Social Media, YouTube - Bobby SzokeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinVideo Editing - Daniel CamachoGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This week, Michele Cobb joins host Jo Reed to dig into audiobooks built on backstory, beginning with Expert Witness, where Gabra Zackman delivers Anne Wolbert Burgess' account of trauma, justice, and the evolution of expert testimony with clarity and restraint. Next, they turn to A Fine Line Between Stupid and Clever, a joyful, detail-packed oral history of the 1984 film Spinal Tap—an ensemble cast production led by Rob Reiner, where seemingly spontaneous commentary makes the audiobook the definitive way to experience the story. The episode closes with We Did OK, Kid, a reflective memoir in which Kenneth Branagh's elegant narration frames Anthony Hopkins's vulnerable reflections on craft, ambition, and a life shaped by performance. Together these audiobooks show how lived experience—whether in the courtroom, on a film set, or across a lifetime in acting—gains depth and resonance when shaped by a narrator who knows when to be restrained, playful, or quietly vulnerable. Audiobooks Discussed: Expert Witness: The Weight of Our Testimony When Justice Hangs in the Balance by Ann Wolbert Burgess with Steven Matthew Constantine, read by Gabra Zackman A Fine Line Between Stupid and Clever: The Story of Spinal Tap, written and read by Rob Reiner, Christopher Guest, Michael McKean, and Harry Shearer  We Did Ok, Kid: A Memoir by Sir Anthony Hopkins, read by Kenneth Branagh with the author Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today we discuss Alternative revenue streams for physicians! So what are some things doctors can do outside of the clinic to make some revenue? We discuss some things in this episode!   Alfred Atanda Jr., MD, is the director of the Sports Medicine Program, and a pediatric orthopedic surgeon and sports medicine specialist. He serves as assistant professor of orthopedic surgery and pediatrics at Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University. Dr. Atanda is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, completed an internship and orthopedic surgery residency at the University of Chicago Medical Center, and fellowships in pediatric orthopedic surgery at Nemours Children's and in sports medicine at the Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University. He performs arthroscopic surgery of the knee, elbow, ankle and shoulder, as well as general orthopedic and trauma surgical procedures. His research interests are in upper extremity overuse injury prevention and general orthopedic trauma. Recently, he has developed an interest in technology and digital health innovation and routinely uses telemedicine in his sports medicine practice. He is working with several stakeholders in the organization to re-imagine the process by which pediatric orthopedic patients are triaged, navigated, evaluated and treated during the continuum of their health care experience. Provides care in Wilmington, Del., and Abington, Pa.   We answer questions you may have on the things you will encounter when it comes to billing, like: What is an IME? Expert Witness + more

Even the best clinicians can find themselves in the middle of a malpractice claim, not because they are bad dentists or surgeons, but because their documentation and follow-up were not strong enough to defend the care they provided. In this episode of Everyday Oral Surgery, host Dr. Grant Stucki welcomes back recurring guest Dr. Vic Martel, a general dentist practicing in Florida, to discuss the two most effective ways to avoid malpractice claims. They delve into the realities of dental malpractice, the true meaning of “standard of care,” and why meticulous documentation may be your strongest defense. Dr. Martel talks about his years of experience as an expert witness, the most common types of cases he sees, and how simple decisions around referrals, notes, and informed consent can significantly change outcomes for both patients and providers. Hear practical advice on preventing avoidable problems, handling complications when they do occur, and building charting habits that protect your patients, your license, and your peace of mind. Tune in now!Key Points From This Episode:Learn how Dr. Martel first became involved in malpractice defense work. Uncover the biggest myths and misconceptions around being an expert witness.Find out what “standard of care” actually means in legal terms.Explore how poor or missing clinical notes can sink an otherwise defensible case.Why digital templates can create a false sense of security and should not be relied on.The trends in malpractice cases: rise in nerve injury and implant complication cases.How Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans can make or break cases.Discover a simple framework for writing better notes around complications.Unpack the concept of “shared liability” and what not to say in front of a patient. Insights into different defense strategies and how to effectively mitigate risk. Understand how digital and AI tools can support documentation of informed consent. Why phone calls and text exchanges should be documented on HIPAA-compliant platforms.Dr. Martel's final takeaways and advice for dentists. Links Mentioned in Today's Episode:Dr. Victor Martel on LinkedIn — https://www.linkedin.com/in/victor-martel-dmd-91431922/ Dr. Victor Martel on Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/drvicmartel/ Dr. Victor Martel Email Address — martelacademy@gmail.com Dr. Victor Martel Phone Number — 561 602 7222 Martel Academy — https://martelacademy.com/ Plaud — https://global.plaud.ai/Epic — https://www.epic.com/drtalk — https://www.drtalk.com/Everyday Oral Surgery Website — https://www.everydayoralsurgery.com/ Everyday Oral Surgery on Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/everydayoralsurgery/ Everyday Oral Surgery on Facebook — https://www.facebook.com/EverydayOralSurgery/Dr. Grant Stucki Email — grantstucki@gmail.comDr. Grant Stucki Phone — 720-441-6059

Ann Wolbert Burgess is no ordinary nurse or researcher—she helped shape the FBI's profiling program and redefined forensic nursing. In this episode of Remarkable People, she shares gripping insights from the Menendez brothers trial, the Duke lacrosse case, and decades of work with victims of trauma. We also discuss her new book Expert Witness, which shines light on what really happens inside courtrooms and why hearing the “other side” of a story is crucial for justice.---Guy Kawasaki is on a mission to make you remarkable. His Remarkable People podcast features interviews with remarkable people such as Jane Goodall, Marc Benioff, Woz, Kristi Yamaguchi, and Bob Cialdini. Every episode will make you more remarkable.With his decades of experience in Silicon Valley as a Venture Capitalist and advisor to the top entrepreneurs in the world, Guy's questions come from a place of curiosity and passion for technology, start-ups, entrepreneurship, and marketing. If you love society and culture, documentaries, and business podcasts, take a second to follow Remarkable People.Listeners of the Remarkable People podcast will learn from some of the most successful people in the world with practical tips and inspiring stories that will help you be more remarkable.Episodes of Remarkable People organized by topic: https://bit.ly/rptopologyListen to Remarkable People here: **https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/guy-kawasakis-remarkable-people/id1483081827**Like this show? Please leave us a review -- even one sentence helps! Consider including your Twitter handle so we can thank you personally!Thank you for your support; it helps the show!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.