Podcasts about Expert witness

For complete Medicare guidance, dial (617) 644-0093 to speak with my trusted partner, Chapter Medicare Advisors.Dr. Kirk Heilburn, a psychologist retained by Massachusetts prosecutors as an expert witness to rebut Lindsey Clancy's claims of not guilty by reason of insanity in her killing of her three small children, testified yesterday that he believed that Clancy faked her psychosis—which would make these killings nothing but intentional murders. Many of the so-called experts testifying in this case have come across as remarkably weak and lacking in credibility, but I had precisely the opposite take when I observed clips of Dr. Heilburn's testimony.Join me LIVE at Noon ET as we watch Heilburn's testimony from yesterday, and I break it all down!Make sure you're ready to win the LEGAL FIGHT that follows the PHYSICAL FIGHT if you're ever compelled to defend yourself or your family from criminal predation. Learn why I am PERSONALLY a member of CCW SAFE, and why YOU SHOULD CONSIDER JOINING, TOO:  https://lawofselfdefense.com/ccwsafeClarence Thomas x 9: Perfect SCOTUS Mugs! https://tinyurl.com/k778wj2kFor complete Medicare guidance, dial (617) 644-0093 to speak with my trusted partner, Chapter.All @TheBrancaShow mugs & MORE! https://tinyurl.com/k778wj2kJOIN OUR COMMUNITY! Exclusive Members-only content & perks! Only ~17 cents/day! $5/month! YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/hn32rfz9 Locals: https://tinyurl.com/yck4w9kfFOUNDING FATHERS SPEED DIAL: Founding Fathers SPEED DIAL: https://tinyurl.com/3f7pc8nzEpisode #1421.Chapter and its affiliates are not connected with or endorsed by any government entity or the federal Medicare program. Chapter Advisory, LLC represents Medicare Advantage HMO, PPO, and PFFS organizations and stand alone prescription drug plans that have a Medicare contract. Enrollment depends on the plan's contract renewal. While we have a database of every Medicare plan nationwide and can help you to search among all plans, we have contracts with many but not all plans. As a result, we do not offer every plan available in your area. Currently we represent 50 organizations which offer 18,160 products nationwide. We search and recommend all plans, even those we don't directly offer. You can contact a licensed Chapter agent to find out the number of products available in your specific area. Please contact Medicare.gov, 1-800-Medicare, or your local State Health Insurance Program (SHIP) to get information on all of your options.

The center of it is expert testimony. When a defendant's mental state is the whole question, both sides bring in psychologists, and everything those witnesses say is opinion, not fact. Hawk walks through what it takes to qualify an expert, why the phrase to a reasonable degree of psychological certainty matters, and why cross examination is where these witnesses are really tested. One clip shows a prosecution expert asked repeatedly what he was paid, and struggling to give a number, which is a moment juries tend to remember. The sharpest sequence is the defense attorney taking a line from the prosecution's own opening statement and reading it back to one of the prosecution's own witnesses, who then undercut the prosecution's theory of motive and mental state. Hawk explains why an opening is a promise to the jury, and what it costs when that promise is not kept. Closing arguments are expected next, after jury instructions, with deliberations to follow. SUPPORT & CONNECT WITH HAWK- Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mdg650hawk - Hawk's Merch Store: https://hawkmerchstore.com - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mdg650hawk7thacct - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hawkeyewhackamole - Connect on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mdg650hawk.bsky.social - Connect on Substack: https://mdg650hawk.substack.com - Connect on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hawkpodcasts - Connect on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mdg650hawk - Connect on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/mdg650hawk ALL HAWK PODCASTS INFO- Additional Content Available Here: https://www.hawkpodcasts.comhttps://www.youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts- Listen to Hawk Podcasts On Your Favorite Platform:Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3RWeJfyApple Podcasts: https://apple.co/422GDuLYouTube: https://youtube.com/@hawkpodcastsiHeartRadio: https://ihr.fm/47vVBdPPandora: https://bit.ly/48COaTB

Lindsay Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, Massachusetts, is standing trial for the murders of her three children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 7 months — allegedly strangled with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. She faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, has pleaded not guilty, and her defense, led by Kevin Reddington, is built around an insanity claim: severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication.Cross-examination is where the prosecution's expert stopped having it easy. Dr. Gregory Saathoff, the FBI-affiliated forensic psychiatrist who diagnosed Clancy with bipolar II and testified she was criminally responsible, admitted under Reddington's questioning that he wasn't brought onto this case until January or February of 2026 — well after the killings — and that he didn't even know how much his own university employer got paid for his testimony. Reddington didn't let that sit quietly, either, pressing the point that Saathoff's expert work runs almost exclusively for prosecutors, prisons, and the institutions that write his paychecks.It got more pointed from there. Saathoff confirmed Clancy did tell her husband and mother about homicidal ideation — but when Reddington asked whether she'd complained to doctors, friends, and family about dark, intrusive thoughts of suicide and homicidal ideation more broadly, Saathoff wouldn't concede the homicidal piece. He did admit she kept reaching out for help, and that she told her doctors about dark thoughts and suicidal ideation. What never got asked, notably: whether those thoughts were just thoughts, or whether she experienced them as voices.Saathoff also testified he treated women with postpartum depression back in the 1980s and '90s, background the defense clearly wants jurors weighing against his conclusions today.Clancy is now paralyzed from the waist down after allegedly jumping from a second-story window. Husband Patrick Clancy has relocated to Manhattan. The trial continues in Plymouth Superior Court.LinksJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags #LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #ExpertWitness #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #CrossExamination #Breaking

You know something needs to change in your career, but actually asking for what you need can feel daunting. How do you ask to reduce your hours or take less call without seeming uncommitted? How do you tell your spouse you're thinking about leaving medicine when they're worried about the financial uncertainty? And what do you say when people keep asking "what's next?" and you honestly don't know yet? These conversations at the crossroads can feel so high-stakes that it's tempting to avoid them, soften what you really want, or spend weeks rehearsing the perfect words. In this episode, I'm joined by attorney Heather Hansen to help us navigate them more effectively. Heather spent more than 20 years as a medical malpractice trial attorney defending physicians, has trained thousands of medical residents in communication skills, and now helps healthcare professionals advocate for themselves with clarity, confidence, and compassion. She's also a best-selling author, speaker, mediator, former television anchor, and host of the Elegant Warrior podcast. Together we talk about how to approach the difficult conversations that come with changing your job or career, without becoming defensive, overexplaining, or feeling like you need everyone's approval. In this episode we're talking about: Why conversations at a career crossroads feel so high-stakes, and what makes us avoid them, soften what we want, or over-rehearse How to ask to reduce your hours or take less call without coming across as uncommitted How to tell your spouse you're considering leaving medicine when they're worried about the financial uncertainty What to say when people keep asking "So, what's next?" and you honestly don't know yet How to advocate for yourself with clarity, confidence, and compassion How to navigate high-stakes conversations without becoming defensive, overexplaining, or needing everyone's approval You can find the show notes for this episode and more information by clicking here: www.doctorscrossing.com/episode254   Links for this episode:   Heather Hansen's LinkedIn Profile H Hansen Group The Elegant Warrior Podcast with Heather Hansen  Heather Hansen's Instagram Quiz on Your Style as an Expert Witness by Heather Hansen Private 1:1 Consultations - If you would like some confidential help with your career situation, Dr. Heather Fork offers one-hour paid  Zoom consultations. This one-hour coaching session may be all that you need to gain clarity and have some concrete steps for moving forward. Dr. Fork also has a 5-month coaching program for those physicians wanting additional assistance (subject to availability). For more information including pricing please reach out to Kati at team@doctorscrosing.com. Thank you for listening!

The defense's biggest witness took the stand today — and then the defense rested. Dr. Phillip Resnick, a forensic psychiatrist who specializes in filicide, the rare and specific category of a parent killing their own child, testified by Zoom in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, the Duxbury, Massachusetts mother accused of strangling her three children, 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan, with exercise bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. Clancy faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation. She's pleaded not guilty, and her defense, led by attorney Kevin Reddington, centers on severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication.Resnick spent over three and a half hours evaluating Clancy in person about four months after the crime, plus another hour and a half with her parents. He said she was blunted and matter-of-fact while heavily medicated — and, notably, he pointed out the prosecution's own doctors didn't get to her until three years after the fact. No one, Resnick testified, found evidence she was lying or exaggerating; if anything, she minimized what she'd been through. His diagnosis: Bipolar II with severe depression, postpartum symptoms that got worse with each child, and on the day of the crime, postpartum psychosis — command hallucinations, a dreamlike disconnection from her own body. His bottom line: she couldn't conform her conduct to the law. She believed, he said, that she was doing right by her kids. On cross, prosecutors leaned hard on how statistically rare this is. Then the defense rested its case.Prosecutors are expected to argue Clancy understood the nature of her actions despite the defense's mental-health claims. After the killings, Clancy allegedly attempted to take her own life by jumping from a second-story window, leaving her paralyzed from the waist down. Her husband, Patrick Clancy, was out of the home running errands at the time and has since relocated to Manhattan. The trial, underway in Plymouth Superior Court, is expected to last several weeks.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimerContent on this site is based on publicly available information and reflects commentary and opinion. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Nothing published here constitutes legal, medical, or professional advice.Hashtags #LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #CoraDawsonCallan #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #TrueCrimeToday #Breaking

The murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, 34, continued this week in Plymouth Superior Court, where the Duxbury mother faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation in the January 24, 2023, deaths of her three children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 7 months — inside the family's Summer Street home. Prosecutors allege she used exercise resistance bands. Clancy has pleaded not guilty, and defense attorney Kevin Reddington is arguing insanity, pointing to severe postpartum psychosis compounded by psychiatric overmedication.Wednesday belonged to the defense's clinical psychologist, Dr. Paul Zeizel, continuing testimony he began earlier in the week. His account painted a picture of a woman drowning in intrusive thoughts — thoughts she believed others could somehow hear, thoughts that convinced her she'd lose her children if anyone found out. She reached out for help twice in December, calling a suicide hotline, and was told she didn't meet the standard for intervention because she didn't have a specific plan. Zeizel's testimony framed intrusive thoughts as relentless — not something that fades with a good night's sleep — and said that by January, Clancy's had turned toward telling her to end her own life. He also addressed something juries often get wrong about mental illness: that functioning normally on the outside doesn't rule out psychosis on the inside. His testing, he said, ruled out psychopathy entirely, but turned up bipolar disorder with postpartum psychosis, and in his opinion, no awareness at the time that what she was doing was wrong.Patrick Clancy, her husband, was running errands when it happened and now lives in Manhattan. The trial continues in Plymouth Superior Court and is expected to stretch several weeks.LinksJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimerThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags #LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #CoraDawsonCallan #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #TrueCrimeToday #Breaking

Round Table Group is a Premier Sponsor of the ABA Litigation Section. The selection of the Round Table Group as the subject of this interview should not be construed as an endorsement by the American Bar Association of the Round Table Group and its services. ----- Finding the right expert witness for your case can be a challenge. You want a witness who knows the topic, helps you ask the right questions, can handle a grilling from opposing counsel, and resonates with the judge and the jury. Guest Brice David is the senior manager of IP expert witness services at The Round Table Group, a pioneering firm in the field of expert witness referral services. Successful lawyers know the law, but that doesn't mean they understand highly complicated fields involving technology, patents, applications, even finance. That's what experts are for. When it comes to selecting a witness, there's a lot in play, from technical expertise to presentation style to availability to even something as simple as a regional accent or the wrong suit. Hear some real-world stories about what can go wrong (or right) when choosing an expert.  Plus, a quick tip from Lauren Williams on learning to slow down and enjoy the summer. Have a question, comment, or suggestion for an upcoming episode? Get in touch at MRogson@SkywardInsurance.com or JAReederJr@gmail.com. Resources Mentioned:  Round Table Group American Bar Association American Bar Association Litigation Section

In today's episode David talks to forensic anthropologist Sue Black about what happens when forensic science and forensic expertise end up on trial in the courtroom. When and how did scientists get involved in the business of criminal prosecution? What changed with the advent of DNA testing? Is the adversarial system the best way of testing scientific evidence? Can a jury distinguish between good science, bad science and junk science? And what might have gone wrong in the case of Lucy Letby? Sue Black's An Expert Witness is available now wherever you get your books https://bit.ly/45hcTge Out now on PPF+: a final bad ideas bonus episode in which geneticist and science writer Adam Rutherford explains what's wrong with genealogy: why does wanting to know where we come from lead us down so many blind alleys? To get this and all our bonus episodes plus ad-free listening sign up to PPF+ now https://www.ppfideas.com/join-ppf-plus You can find out everything you need to know about this podcast – who we are, what we do, plus upcoming events and full lists of all episodes including PPF+ bonus episodes on our website https://www.ppfideas.com Next time a brand-new series: The Lives of the Philosophers Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Navigating the complexities of medical malpractice cases demands a unique blend of clinical expertise and legal insight. This episode of the Legal Nurse Podcast welcomes a board-certified physician in emergency medicine, internal medicine, and neurocritical care, who brings more than 24 years of experience as an expert witness with over 300 trial testimonies. Together, they delve into the evolving role of medical experts, from pre-litigation consultations to providing critical insights on causation and damages in both medical malpractice and nursing home cases. Listeners will gain a behind-the-scenes look at how clinicians become involved in the legal world, how reviewing cases sharpens clinical practice, and the ever-changing nature of medical recordkeeping from handwritten notes to searchable digital PDFs and the emerging role of artificial intelligence in case review. Share practical advice for new experts, discusses the importance of honest, evidence-based opinions, and explore the challenges experts face when attorneys or clients may want to influence findings. Whether you're a legal professional, a clinician considering expert witness work, or simply interested in the intersection of medicine and law, this episode provides invaluable perspectives and actionable guidance for navigating tough cases and maintaining integrity in your practice. What You'll Learn in This Episode is The Intersection of Medicine and Law: Dr. Stein Shares Witness Strategies Here are 5 discussion questions answered by Pat Iyer and Kenny Stein in the podcast: How does a multi-specialty background inform his approach to reviewing medical malpractice cases? What are some of the key differences identified between being a testifying and a non-testifying expert? What potential and limitations does see in using AI to analyze medical records or assess standards of care? What are the biggest challenges and advantages that experience when working with electronic medical records compared to traditional paper records? How does recommend handling emotionally invested attorneys or families when a case does not have merit? Listen to our podcasts or watch them using our app, Expert.edu, available at legalnursebusiness.com/expertedu. Get the free transcripts and also learn about other ways to subscribe. Go to Legal Nurse Podcasts subscribe options by using this short link: http://LNC.tips/subscribepodcast. Your Presenters for The Intersection of Medicine and Law: Dr. Stein Shares Witness Strategies Pat Iyer Pat Iyer is a seasoned legal nurse consultant and business coach, renowned for her expertise in guiding new legal nurse consultants to successfully break into the field. As the host of the Legal Nurse Podcast, Pat addresses critical challenges that legal nurse consultants face, such as difficulty in landing clients and a lack of response from attorneys. Through her insightful episodes, she emphasizes the importance of effectively communicating one's value to potential clients. With a wealth of experience, Pat has empowered countless consultants to overcome these hurdles and thrive in their careers. Connect with Pat Iyer by email at patiyer@legalnusebusiness.com Kenny Stein Dr. Stein is board-certified in Emergency Medicine, Internal Medicine, and Subspecialty-certified in Neurocritical Care. Dr. Stein has been an Expert Witness for 24 years, reviewing over 800 cases for both plaintiff and defense. Dr. Stein has testified over 300 times at depositions and trials. Connect with Kenny Stein by email at kennystein1@gmail.com

Join Rob McConnell as he welcomes Dean Tong, a Certified Forensic Consultant, Certified Child Forensic Interviewer, and Expert Witness, for an informative discussion on forensic investigations, child interviewing techniques, and the legal challenges surrounding child abuse allegations and custody disputes. With decades of experience working within the criminal justice and family court systems, Dean has consulted on numerous complex cases involving child protection, forensic interviewing, and investigative procedures. Throughout his career, Dean has specialized in helping attorneys, law enforcement agencies, child protection professionals, and the courts better understand the importance of evidence-based forensic interviewing. He discusses the role of properly conducted child interviews, the dangers of suggestive questioning, the importance of objective investigations, and the need to balance child safety with due process. His work has focused on improving investigative standards while advocating for reliable, professionally conducted forensic evaluations. During this compelling conversation, Rob and Dean explore the science and practice of forensic interviewing, expert witness testimony, child advocacy, criminal investigations, custody disputes, and the evolving standards used by professionals in the legal and child welfare systems. They also discuss the importance of critical thinking, ethics, and evidence when addressing some of society's most sensitive and emotionally charged cases. Whether you're interested in forensic science, criminal justice, child advocacy, investigative procedures, or the legal system, this episode of The 'X' Zone Radio Show offers valuable insights from an experienced forensic consultant dedicated to improving professional standards and protecting the integrity of child investigations.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-x-zone-radio-tv-show--1078348/support.Please note that all CANCOM/XZBN radio and/or television shows are Copyright © REL-MAR McConnell Meda Company, Niagara, Ontario, Canada – www.rel-mar.com. For more Episodes of this show and all shows produced, broadcasted and syndicated from REL-MAR McConell Media Company and The 'X' Zone Broadcast Network and the 'X' Zone TV Channell, visit www.xzbn.net. For programming, distribution, and syndication inquiries, email programming@xzbn.net.We are proud to announce the we have launched TWATNews.com, launched in August 2025.TWATNews.com is an independent online news platform dedicated to uncovering the truth about Donald Trump and his ongoing influence in politics, business, and society. Unlike mainstream outlets that often sanitize, soften, or ignore stories that challenge Trump and his allies, TWATNews digs deeper to deliver hard-hitting articles, investigative features, and sharp commentary that mainstream media won't touch.These are stories and articles that you will not read anywhere else.Our mission is simple: to expose corruption, lies, and authoritarian tendencies while giving voice to the perspectives and evidence that are often marginalized or buried by corporate-controlled media

A deposition can put a business valuation expert in the hot seat, where every answer is tested and every assumption may be challenged. In this episode, we discuss how depositions differ from other professional interactions, what effective preparation looks like, and how experts can work with counsel, handle challenging questioning, and maintain credibility under oath.  Key takeaways A deposition is adversarial by design — you're answering questions, not telling your story. Preparation starts the day the subpoena arrives. You're there for numbers, not emotions.  Continue reading to learn about key resources available at AICPA-CIMA.com to improve your valuation analyses. Guest: Dan Branch, CPA/ABV, ASA, IAG Forensics & Valuation Host:  Gregory Saunders, CPA/ABV/CFF, ASA, Keiter CPAs If you're using a podcast app that does not hyperlink to the resources, please visit our podcast platform to access the show notes with direct links.  Thanks for listening. We'd welcome your feedback at https://www.aicpa-cima.com/podcastsurvey or contact us directly at podcast@aicpa-cima.com. RESOURCES FOR FURTHER EXPLORATION Take your expert witness skills to the next level at the AICPA Expert Witness Skills Workshop, Sep 14-16, 2026, Washington, DC, a hands-on, courtroom-style experience featuring case studies, practice sessions, and a live mock trial, with enrollment limited to just 18 participants to ensure personalized coaching from judges, attorneys, and seasoned experts. At the 2026 Forensic and Valuation Services Conference - B2 hour workshop, Becoming an Effective Expert Witness: Practical Skills for Emerging Professionals (for in-person attendees).  Sharpen your expert witness skills through realistic deposition, arbitration, and courtroom scenarios that help you prepare, communicate effectively, and avoid common credibility pitfalls.  Early bird savings through Sept 20 plus additional savings for AICPA members and ABV/CFF/CVFI holders Join:  The FVS Engage365 Member Community to collaborate with fellow AICPA® members, exchange ideas, and shape the future of the profession together. Early career guidance:  Welcome to a career in forensic and valuation services FVS Practice Aid Library: This library is open to all visitors. Access to and download of the full practice aids is an exclusive benefit of FVS Section membership. AICPA Statement on Standards for Forensic Services (SSFS No. 1)  Click here to join the AICPA FVS Section An active community of FVS peers. You will get 16 credits of complimentary CPE and access to exclusivetechnical content Serving as an Expert Witness or Consultant — FVS Practice Aid   Two perspectives on the path to becoming an FVS expert for litigation  FVS Valuation Podcast archives: From Analysis to Testimony: Key Skills for a Career in Forensic and Valuation Services Expert Witness - Defending your Business Valuation in Litigation Implementing AI in your Valuation Practice LEARN MORE ABOUT THE FOLLOWING AICPA CREDENTIALS: Accredited in Business Valuation (ABV®) – Visit the home page and check out the ABV infographic Certified in the Valuation of Financial Instruments (CVFI®) – Visit the home page and check out the CVFI infographic Certified in Financial Forensics (CFF®) - Visit the home page and check out the CFF infographic  

A deposition can put a business valuation expert in the hot seat, where every answer is tested and every assumption may be challenged. In this episode, we discuss how depositions differ from other professional interactions, what effective preparation looks like, and how experts can work with counsel, handle challenging questioning, and maintain credibility under oath.  Key takeaways A deposition is adversarial by design — you're answering questions, not telling your story. Preparation starts the day the subpoena arrives. You're there for numbers, not emotions.  Continue reading to learn about key resources available at AICPA-CIMA.com to improve your valuation analyses. Guest: Dan Branch, CPA/ABV, ASA, IAG Forensics & Valuation Host:  Gregory Saunders, CPA/ABV/CFF, ASA, Keiter CPAs If you're using a podcast app that does not hyperlink to the resources, please visit our podcast platform to access the show notes with direct links.  Thanks for listening. We'd welcome your feedback at https://www.aicpa-cima.com/podcastsurvey or contact us directly at podcast@aicpa-cima.com. RESOURCES FOR FURTHER EXPLORATION Take your expert witness skills to the next level at the AICPA Expert Witness Skills Workshop, Sep 14-16, 2026, Washington, DC, a hands-on, courtroom-style experience featuring case studies, practice sessions, and a live mock trial, with enrollment limited to just 18 participants to ensure personalized coaching from judges, attorneys, and seasoned experts. At the 2026 Forensic and Valuation Services Conference - B2 hour workshop, Becoming an Effective Expert Witness: Practical Skills for Emerging Professionals (for in-person attendees).  Sharpen your expert witness skills through realistic deposition, arbitration, and courtroom scenarios that help you prepare, communicate effectively, and avoid common credibility pitfalls.  Early bird savings through Sept 20 plus additional savings for AICPA members and ABV/CFF/CVFI holders Join:  The FVS Engage365 Member Community to collaborate with fellow AICPA® members, exchange ideas, and shape the future of the profession together. Early career guidance:  Welcome to a career in forensic and valuation services FVS Practice Aid Library: This library is open to all visitors. Access to and download of the full practice aids is an exclusive benefit of FVS Section membership. AICPA Statement on Standards for Forensic Services (SSFS No. 1)  Click here to join the AICPA FVS Section An active community of FVS peers. You will get 16 credits of complimentary CPE and access to exclusivetechnical content Serving as an Expert Witness or Consultant — FVS Practice Aid   Two perspectives on the path to becoming an FVS expert for litigation  FVS Valuation Podcast archives: From Analysis to Testimony: Key Skills for a Career in Forensic and Valuation Services Expert Witness - Defending your Business Valuation in Litigation Implementing AI in your Valuation Practice LEARN MORE ABOUT THE FOLLOWING AICPA CREDENTIALS: Accredited in Business Valuation (ABV®) – Visit the home page and check out the ABV infographic Certified in the Valuation of Financial Instruments (CVFI®) – Visit the home page and check out the CVFI infographic Certified in Financial Forensics (CFF®) - Visit the home page and check out the CFF infographic  

Get the FREE GUIDE to 10 Nonclinical Careers at nonclinicalphysicians.com/freeguide. Get a list of 70 nontraditional jobs at nonclinicalphysicians.com/70jobs.                                                                                                 =============== Heather Hansen spent over 25 years defending physicians, hospitals, and nurses in high-stakes medical malpractice cases, and she knows exactly what separates an expert witness who holds up under cross-examination from one who falls apart. In this episode, she breaks down the communication skills, mindset, and courtroom strategies that make the difference. Heather covers what attorneys actually want from an expert witness, why depositions are now being treated like trial cross-examinations, and why credibility has less to do with confidence and more to do with cognitive empathy and preparation. She also explains the difference between being an expert and being an authority, and why that distinction determines whether the jury believes you.  You'll find links mentioned in the episode at nonclinicalphysicians.com/medical-expert-witness/

Forensic science has transformed the way crimes are investigated and justice is delivered. From fingerprints and DNA to new forms of anatomical identification, its breakthroughs have helped solve cases once thought impossible. Yet when evidence is misunderstood or experts overreach, the consequences can be devastating. In this episode, doctor and broadcaster Dr Radha Modgil speaks with Professor Lady Sue Black about her forty-year career as one of the world's leading forensic anthropologists. From a childhood spent helping her father prepare animals to work in anatomy laboratories, mortuaries and courtrooms, Sue reflects on the experiences that led her into forensic science and the responsibilities that come with presenting evidence in court. How certain can forensic science ever be? What happens when scientific evidence changes after a conviction? And how can juries be expected to understand complex findings? Drawing on landmark cases and her own pioneering research, Sue examines the role of the expert witness and the human cost of getting justice wrong. Professor Lady Sue Black is an anatomist and forensic anthropologist. She is the author of An Expert Witness, the final book in a trilogy that also includes All That Remains and Written in Bone. Dr Radha Modgil is a doctor, broadcaster and  author whose work explores health, wellbeing and the experiences that shape our lives. If you'd like to become a Member and get access to all our full conversations, plus all of our Members-only content, just visit intelligencesquared.com/membership to find out more. For £4.99 per month you'll also receive: - Full-length and ad-free Intelligence Squared episodes, wherever you get your podcasts - Bonus Intelligence Squared podcasts, curated feeds and members exclusive series - 15% discount on livestreams and in-person tickets for all Intelligence Squared events  ...  Or Subscribe on Apple for £4.99: - Full-length and ad-free Intelligence Squared podcasts - Bonus Intelligence Squared podcasts, curated feeds and members exclusive series … Already a subscriber? Thank you for supporting our mission to foster honest debate and compelling conversations! Visit intelligencesquared.com to explore all your benefits including ad-free podcasts, exclusive bonus content and early access. … Subscribe to our newsletter here to hear about our latest events, discounts and much more. https://www.intelligencesquared.com/newsletter-signup/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Expert witnesses often give key testimonies at criminal trials and are allowed to give their own opinions. But what happens when their opinions don't reflect the facts?  "48 Hours" correspondent Susan Spencer, Harold Dow and Peter Van Sant report. This classic "48 Hours" episode last aired on 8/23/1999. Watch all-new episodes of “48 Hours” on Saturdays and stream on demand on Paramount+.

In 2022, defense attorneys in Ohio were stunned when prosecutors rolled out a cutting-edge tool to place defendants at the scene of a crime. Cybercheck claimed to use AI and historical digital data to identify suspects. But when lawyers examined the technology for themselves, they couldn't figure out how it worked. Attention turned to Cybercheck's creator and expert witness Adam Mosher. The Canadian was cagey about the program's code and his own credentials. Even though the attorneys were sure they had evidence both Cybercheck and its creator were frauds, persuading judges and prosecutors that the miracle tool was a sham would be far more difficult. The latest season of the CBC Podcast “Uncover: The Expert Witness” recounts how lawyers figured out a computer program that claimed to identify criminals was not what it seemed. Host Sam Mullins interviews Adam Mosher, investigates his dubious technology, and asks why there are those in the justice system who still stand by Cybercheck's ability to solve crimes. OUR SPOILER-FREE REVIEWS OF "UNCOVER: THE EXPERT WITNESS" BEGIN IN THE FINAL 10 MINUTES OF THE EPISODE. In Crime of the Week: Through the legal glass. For exclusive podcasts and more, sign up at Patreon.Sign up for our newsletter at crimewriterson.com.This show was recorded in The Caitlin Rogers Project Studio. Click to find out more. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

As a Board-Certified Internal Medicine Physician with over 14 years of clinical experience, Dr. Jordan Romano has a wealth of knowledge and experience to share with fellow healthcare professionals. In addition to his clinical work, Dr. Romano has become the go-to resource for Medical Malpractice Law firms nationwide, providing highly valued expert testimony and consultation. With nearly a decade of Medical Expert Witness experience, he has not only honed his skills, but has also mentored physicians at all stages of their Expert Witness journey. Dr. Romano is passionate about utilizing his expertise to help other medical professionals succeed

Protecting your spray foam contracting business from costly lawsuits requires more than just installing a quality product; it takes meticulous documentation and a solid understanding of building science. Learn how proper jobsite practices, chemical conditioning, and ventilation can protect your operations and keep you out of the courtroom.   On this episode of the R-Value Podcast, IDI expert Ken Allison interviews Tom Harris, owner of PUR Consulting, LLC.   In the spray foam insulation industry, running into a challenging customer or an unexpected jobsite issue is almost inevitable. Tom joins the show to share his extensive background in polyurethane chemistry and field applications, highlighting how contractors can safeguard their businesses. The conversation focuses heavily on the power of documentation, demonstrating how daily work reports, detailed photographs, and adherence to proper chemical storage parameters serve as a contractor's primary defense when a job is called into question.   The discussion also addresses the most common source of homeowner litigation: odor complaints. Ken and Tom look at why proper isolation and ventilation strategies are crucial during and after application, and how tightening a building envelope fundamentally shifts indoor air dynamics. From managing HVAC rebalancing to navigating the legal landscape alongside lawyers and subject matter experts, this episode provides essential operational insights to help your sales and installation teams minimize risk and retain credibility.   Inside this episode... 00:00:00 – Introduction to protecting your business against expert witnesses and an overview of Tom's extensive history in the spray foam industry. 00:10:07 – The critical role of daily jobsite reports, photographs, and accurate documentation in preserving contractor credibility during disputes. 00:13:43 – Understanding drum conditioning, chemical storage parameters, and how cold transit temperatures can cause pump cavitation and off-ratio foam. 00:17:37 – Mitigating homeowner complaints by managing jobsite isolation, ventilation, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to eliminate post-install odors. 00:26:45 – The evolution of professional spray foam equipment, the dangers of unstandardized machinery, and navigating material quality changes. 00:37:13 – Shifting to a whole-house systems approach, including how tightening a building envelope impacts HVAC performance, airflow, and relative humidity.

In this episode of the Legal Nurse Podcast, we delve into the specialized world of speech and language pathology with expert witness Elizabeth McKinney, who brings 17 years of experience in geriatric care and a wealth of advanced certifications in her field. Elizabeth McKinney sheds light on the extensive educational requirements and ongoing certifications necessary for speech-language pathologists, highlighting their critical role not just in communication but also in swallowing safety, cognitive assessments, and patient advocacy across all care settings. Listeners will gain an insider's perspective on how speech-language pathologists contribute to both pediatric and adult care, often working behind the scenes with vulnerable populations in skilled nursing facilities, hospitals, schools, and even home health. The episode also tackles the legal and ethical responsibilities of these professionals, especially in complex cases involving aspiration pneumonia, diet management, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Through compelling case examples including wrongful death due to preventable choking, Elizabeth McKinney illustrates the real-world stakes of clinical decisions and the vital interplay between nurses, dietitians, and speech pathologists. With her unique view as an expert witness, Elizabeth McKinney discusses both the high standards set by the profession's code of ethics and the impact of proper documentation, team education, and timely intervention on patient outcomes and litigation. Whether you're a healthcare provider, legal professional, or simply curious about the hidden dimensions of post-acute care, this episode will deepen your understanding of how speech and language pathology can shape and safeguard patient lives. What You'll Learn in This Episode on The Overlooked Impact of SLPs in Elder Care and Litigation Here are 5 discussion questions answered in the podcast: What are the implications when recommended swallowing safety precautions are not followed in skilled nursing facilities? How can impulsive or improper diet recommendations by speech-language pathologists contribute to adverse patient outcomes and potential litigation? What mechanisms exist for nurses, dietitians, and speech-language pathologists to communicate and collaborate regarding dietary changes and patient safety? How does the ASHA Code of Ethics guide the practice and decision-making of speech-language pathologists, especially when unethical practices are observed? In what circumstances are speech-language pathologists likely to be named as defendants in malpractice litigation, and how common is this compared to other healthcare providers? Get the free transcripts and also learn about other ways to subscribe. Go to Legal Nurse Podcasts subscribe options by using this short link: http://LNC.tips/subscribepodcast. https://youtu.be/tEBuol12ahY Your Presenter for The Overlooked Impact of SLPs in Elder Care and Litigation Pat Iyer Pat Iyer is a seasoned legal nurse consultant and business coach, renowned for her expertise in guiding new legal nurse consultants to successfully break into the field. As the host of the Legal Nurse Podcast, Pat addresses critical challenges that legal nurse consultants face, such as difficulty in landing clients and a lack of response from attorneys. Through her insightful episodes, she emphasizes the importance of effectively communicating one's value to potential clients. With a wealth of experience, Pat has empowered countless consultants to overcome these hurdles and thrive in their careers. Connect with Pat Iyer by email at patiyer@legalnusebusiness.com Elizabeth McKinney Speech-Language Pathologist, Expert Witness, Advocate Elizabeth has been practicing as a speech-language pathologist for 17 years. She graduated from the University of Florida with her bachelor's degree in communication sciences and disorders with a minor in gerontology and her master's degree in speech-language pathology. She has devoted her career to the care of geriatrics in skilled nursing facilities across Florida. Elizabeth has been an expert witness since 2023 and has served on nearly 20 cases nationwide. When she is not on this podcast, she is enjoying the Florida lifestyle with her husband and two kids. She enjoys reading, volunteering, and running in her spare time. Connect with Elizabeth McKinney by email at emckinneyslp@gmail.com

Sam Mullins looks into Cybercheck's claimed “success stories” and finds they offer little proof of the tool's reliability. One defense attorney benefited from a Cybercheck report that actually pointed to an alternative suspect, helping reduce charges against her client, while a prosecutor and paid Cybercheck consultant praised the technology despite never using it in court. Journalists' extensive public records requests and outreach to law enforcement revealed widespread skepticism, failed tests, and unverifiable claims, with no confirmed example of Cybercheck solving a case. The episode also highlights the conviction of Salah Maddi, where Cybercheck testimony appeared to influence the jury despite weak corroborating evidence, raising concerns that unproven AI may have contributed to wrongful convictions. Ultimately, the investigation concludes that Cybercheck has consumed investigators' time, influenced prosecutions, and spread widely—despite a lack of transparency or clear evidence that it reliably delivers justice.Find out which season of Uncover should be your next listen here.

In Episode 219 of On The Delo, Delo sits down with Manny and Rick from Nightlife Security Consultants to expose the security failures, operational mistakes, and liability risks that cost bars, restaurants, and nightclubs hundreds of thousands of dollars every year. From a $248,000 lawsuit over an $8 bar tab to a man stabbed on a dance floor the night before his sister's wedding, this episode reveals what operators can do today to better protect their guests, employees, and business.With decades of combined experience in law enforcement, nightclub operations, hospitality security, expert witness testimony, and staff training, Manny and Rick have helped operators across the country reduce risk and build safer venues. Together, they break down the five areas where businesses get picked apart in litigation, why hiring the biggest guy isn't always the right move, how post-COVID nightlife is evolving, and what a well-run security operation actually looks like—from the front door to last call.Whether you're a bar owner, restaurant operator, nightclub manager, hospitality professional, insurance agent, or simply interested in hospitality leadership and risk management, this episode is packed with real-world stories and actionable insight.Chapter Guide (Timestamps):(0:40 - 3:10) Intro: Episode 219, Guests Manny & Rick, and San Diego Small Talk(3:11 - 7:26) Origin Story: Nightlife Security Consultants Founded in 1998(7:27 - 12:38) Rick's Background: 20 Years in Law Enforcement, MBA, PhD & Training Philosophy(12:39 - 16:36) State-by-State Laws, Dram Shop Preparation & the Five Areas of Litigation Research(16:37 - 22:02) Proactive Security, Patron Monitoring & the Puppy Analogy(22:03 - 26:21) Risk by Venue Type: Why Culture & Ownership Matter More Than the Concept(26:22 - 30:21) Hiring Smart: Background Checks, Team Diversity & Women in Security(30:22 - 35:29) Why Operators Don't Hire Help—and Who Does(35:30 - 40:00) Nightlife Trends: Post-COVID Habits, Day Drinking & the Gentleman's Club Pivot(40:01 - 45:01) Craziest Claim Stories: $248K Over an $8 Bar Tab & a Stabbing on the Dance Floor(45:02 - 51:12) Services: Training, Consulting, Policies, Major Incident Review & Expert Witness(51:13 - 58:19) Rapid Fire Questions & Outro

Mosher explains that his Cybercheck technology was built to analyze open-source internet data using AI to generate investigative “intelligence,” not courtroom evidence. Mosher admits the company failed early on to clearly communicate those limits, allowing prosecutors to use Cybercheck as evidence, and he acknowledges the risks of relying on AI without independent verification. However, he defends the system's value, denies wrongdoing, and attributes criticism to misunderstandings and aggressive defense attorneys. Despite mounting doubts—including inconsistencies in his claims, refusal to share source code, and questions about peer review—Mosher insists Cybercheck remains useful to law enforcement, while the interview leaves unresolved concerns about its reliability, transparency, and continued use. Mosher tells Sam he needs to speak to the people behind the curtain who are having success with it.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go from here.

In Midland, Texas, prosecutor Lisa Borden took a different approach with Cybercheck. After closely questioning Adam Mosher and finding Cybercheck lacked peer review and proper authentication, she refused to use it in court, concluding the technology was not scientifically reliable. Sam Mullins' gets to sit down with Cybercheck creator Adam Moser. Mosher tells him his backstory as a movie buff. He explains that the technology was inspired by crime TV and movies and built with the help of government grants and technology students. And then just as COVID hit, Moser says, cyber check started reaching out to its first potential clients. But he wasn't prepared for what happened next.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go next

Cybercheck has spread across the U.S. through aggressive cold-email marketing, word of mouth, and partnerships with law enforcement agencies eager to solve cold cases. Journalist Todd Feathers uncovers questionable claims in Cybercheck reports, including supposed access to dark web accounts and the ability to retroactively place phones at crime scenes decades earlier. Despite producing few verifiable results, respected agencies like Ohio's Bureau of Criminal Investigation still promoted the tool to other departments, helping expand its reach. Is there anyone willing to put this tech under the necessary scrutiny? Maybe in West Texas. Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go next

Prosecutors privately begin questioning Adam Mosher's false peer review claims, while defense attorney Don Malarcik uncovers evidence that Cybercheck reports were manually edited—contradicting claims that the system was fully automated. As the critical Daubert hearing approaches, prosecutors abruptly withdraw Cybercheck as evidence rather than defend it in court, effectively ending its use in Summit County without admitting wrongdoing. National reporting and expert analysis further undermine the technology's credibility, comparing it to unsupported pseudoscience. But despite Cybercheck being abandoned locally and Mosher facing investigation, Don realizes the tool has silently continued to spread across the country and raises troubling questions about how easily unproven technology can influence the justice system.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go next

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the defamation case Giuffre brought against Maxwell over Maxwell's public denial of Giuffre's trafficking allegations, Bernard J. Jansen provided a sworn expert witness report designed to corroborate Giuffre's credibility and the consistency of her disclosures over time. According to the description of his testimony, Jansen asserted that Giuffre had repeatedly and privately disclosed her experiences of sexual abuse by powerful individuals in Epstein's circle well before the allegations became public, and that she did so without any signs of fabrication, exaggeration, or personal motive to deceive. His report emphasized that these prior disclosures aligned with her later public claims and supported the contention that her testimony was grounded in firsthand experience rather than invented narrative.Jansen's report was introduced to strengthen Giuffre's position against Maxwell's efforts to dismiss or discredit her allegations by arguing that Giuffre's account was not a sudden public invention but reflected a history of consistent reporting to a trusted professional. In essence, Jansen's expert opinion countered attempts to characterize Giuffre's claims as unreliable or malicious, presenting them instead as credible statements from someone who had long communicated her experiences in confidence and had no evident incentive to fabricate them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

DescriptionIn this episode of Perfect Prey, I'm joined by Ann Burgess, pioneering forensic nurse, researcher, educator, and author of Expert Witness. Ann's groundbreaking work transformed how professionals understand trauma, victimization, sexual violence, and offender behavior. Her research has influenced criminal investigations, forensic psychology, victim advocacy, and some of the most well-known criminal cases in modern history.Together, we explore the long-term impact of trauma, why victims are so often disbelieved, and how systems continue to fail those who come forward. Ann shares insights from decades of work studying victims, offenders, serial violence, child abuse, and the psychology of coercion and control. We also discuss institutional betrayal, trauma responses in children and adults, family court failures, pornography, grooming, and what it takes to create meaningful change within systems that were never designed to fully protect victims.What we coverAnn Burgess's pioneering work in victimology and forensic nursingHow trauma impacts behavior across the lifespanWhy victims are often disbelieved by systems and institutionsInstitutional betrayal and systemic failuresCoercive control, fear, and psychological abuseTrauma responses in children and adolescentsChild sexual abuse and delayed disclosureFamily court, victim credibility, and expert testimonyThe role of pornography and grooming in abusive behaviorThe Menendez case and evolving understandings of traumaWhy trauma-informed education is critical for professionalsHow offender thinking patterns develop and escalateWhy listenIf you are a survivor, clinician, attorney, advocate, educator, or protective parent, this episode offers a rare opportunity to hear from one of the most influential voices in trauma and victim research.Ann Burgess's work helped shape how we understand trauma today. Her insights illuminate why victims respond the way they do, why systems often misunderstand those responses, and why meaningful reform requires us to listen more closely to survivors' experiences.Guest BioAnn Burgess, DNSc, APRN, FAAN is an internationally recognized forensic nurse, researcher, educator, and author. She is a professor at Boston College and has spent decades studying trauma, victimization, sexual violence, serial offenders, and forensic mental health.Ann's groundbreaking research on rape trauma syndrome helped transform the understanding of victim responses to sexual assault. She has consulted with the FBI's Behavioral Science Unit, contributed to offender profiling research, and served as an expert witness in numerous high-profile cases.She is the author of several books, including Expert Witness, which chronicles her work at the intersection of trauma, criminal behavior, and justice.Connect with Ann BurgessBook: Expert Witnesshttps://www.amazon.com/stores/Ann-W.-Burgess/author/B0H13DQXPP?ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_3&qid=1780604748&sr=1-3&shoppingPortalEnabled=true&ccs_id=9489809f-1ae4-4998-b8db-a0cbcc536d23Boston College Faculty Profile: https://www.bc.eduConnect with Dr. ChristineProtective Parenting Program: https://www.coercivecontrolconsulting.com/services/for-parents/Dr. C's Community: https://go.drcocchiola.com/innercirclecommunityOfficial site: https://www.coercivecontrolconsulting.com/YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@DrCocchiola-coercivecontrol/videosTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@dr.c_coercivecontrolInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/dr.cocchiola_coercivecontrol/TEDxTalks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp2qByKOue4&t=24sBooks:https://url-shortener.me/c/FramedBookhttps://url-shortener.me/c/EveryMomentOfEveryDayIf this episode landed for you, please share it with someone who needs to hear it, subscribe for more trauma-informed conversations, and consider leaving a review — it helps other survivors find validation and safety.— Dr. Christine Cocchiola & Ann Burgess

In this episode, you'll learn the best strategies for excelling as an expert witness in mock trial.

Don Malarcik might finally uncover how Cybercheck works, as its creator Adam Mosher travels to Ohio to demonstrate the software to Don's legal team and independent experts. While parts of the program appear functional, its core AI remains hidden, and Mosher refuses to provide full access or explain how it reaches conclusions that place suspects at crime scenes. His answers raise concerns about bias, and when he claims Cybercheck was peer-reviewed by a Canadian university, Don discovers the university denies any involvement. Believing this proves Mosher misled the court, Don prepares for a decisive hearing that could determine whether Cybercheck is legitimate evidence—or junk science.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go next

One AI-hallucinated citation on cross-examination, and the expert witness career you built is over. It is already happening. Tracy Liberatore, a former physician assistant turned attorney and founder of the National Expert Academy, walks through the real court cases where clinical experts leaned on generative AI and watched their reports, and their reputations, get thrown out. This episode is based on her article "Expert witness credibility is destroyed by AI opinions," published on KevinMD. You will hear why AI hallucinated citations are ending careers in medical-legal work, why one expert was allowed to keep AI in his workflow because he could account for every prompt, what responsible AI use actually looks like for clinicians writing expert reports, and the brain flip clinicians have to make to defend a process rather than a conclusion. If you do expert witness work, or are thinking about it, this conversation names the line you cannot cross. Partner with me on the KevinMD platform. With over three million monthly readers and half a million social media followers, I give you direct access to the doctors and patients who matter most. Whether you need a sponsored article, email campaign, video interview, or a spot right here on the podcast, I offer the trusted space your brand deserves to be heard. Let's work together to tell your story. PARTNER WITH KEVINMD → https://kevinmd.com/influencer SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST → https://www.kevinmd.com/podcast RECOMMENDED BY KEVINMD → https://www.kevinmd.com/recommended

Elon Musk may still lose this case on a technicality, but Day 8 of the Musk v. Altman trial delivered some of the most damaging testimony OpenAI has faced yet. In this episode of The Valley Current®, Jack Russo breaks down the explosive "witness wall" built by former OpenAI insiders, who described a culture of deceit, broken oversight, and a company racing toward commercial dominance while leaving its nonprofit mission behind. Musk's legal team then deployed a high-powered expert witness to turn those insider accusations into a direct attack on OpenAI's governance structure and future IPO ambitions. But after eight days of devastating testimony, the entire case may still hinge on one brutal reality: Musk may have recognized the problem years too early to win in court. Jack Russo Managing Partner Jrusso@computerlaw.com www.computerlaw.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/jackrusso "Every Entrepreneur Imagines a Better World"®️  

As Don connects with Colorado defense attorney Eric Zale, they compare notes and troubling inconsistencies emerge—Adam Mosher's claims about his experience, expertise, and courtroom testimony don't hold up under scrutiny. Investigators discover that key cases Mosher cited either never went to trial or never involved him at all, leading prosecutors in Colorado to drop charges rather than rely on his evidence. But in Akron, Cybercheck remains in use, and Mosher continues testifying under oath despite mounting doubts. Determined to stop what he believes is a dangerous and unverified system, Don launches a broader effort, reaching out to other defense attorneys and building a coalition to expose the truth—knowing the outcome could affect not just his clients, but the future of criminal justice itself.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.A listener's guide to Uncover: Where to go next

What actually happens when domestic violence cases enter the courtroom?In this episode, I'm joined by Dr. Carol Ann Peterson—expert witness, consultant, and longtime advocate—who brings a behind-the-scenes look at how abuse is understood (and often misunderstood) in criminal, civil, and family court.We talk about what expert witnesses really do, when they can make a difference, and why context—not isolated incidents—is critical in understanding abuse. Dr. Peterson also shares how survivors are often misperceived in court, how abusers present, and what decision-makers frequently get wrong.This conversation pulls back the curtain on the systems many survivors are navigating—and highlights where change is still urgently needed.About Carol Ann: Dr. Carol Ann Peterson is an expert witness, consultant, and nationally recognized trainer specializing in domestic and intimate partner violence. She has trained with the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center under the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and has consulted with the U.S. Attorney General's Office, the California Attorney General's Office, the Los Angeles County District Attorney, and the Los Angeles City Attorney.Dr. Peterson has served as an expert witness in criminal, civil, and family court cases for both prosecution and defense, including district attorneys, public defenders, and private attorneys. She is a certified strangulation prevention expert and a member of the Expert Advisory Group for DomesticShelters.org.Join the Rising Beyond Community today. Learn more at https://www.risingbeyondpc.com/membership.htmlPlease leave us a review or rating and follow/subscribe to the show. This helps the show get out to more people.If you want to chat more about this topic I would love to continue our conversation over on Instagram! @risingbeyondpcIf you want to support the show you may do so here at, Buy Me A Coffee. Thank you! We love being able to make this information accessible to you and your community.If you've been looking for a supportive community of women going through the topics we cover, head over to our website to learn more about the Rising Beyond Community. - https://www.risingbeyondpc.com/Where to find more from Rising Beyond:Rising Beyond FacebookRising Beyond LinkedInRising Beyond Pinterest If you're interested in guesting on the show please fill out this form - https://forms.gle/CSvLWWyZxmJ8GGQu7Enjoy some of our freebies!Choosing Your Battles FreebieCanned Responses FreebieMic Drop Moments Freebie...

It's here. AI has arrived in the criminal justice system and it's in the role of witness. The Expert Witness, hosted by Sam Mullins asks: what happens when AI enters the courtroom? Who is benefitting from this mysterious technology? And who's accountable when AI gets it wrong? More episodes of The Expert Witness are available wherever you get your podcasts, and here: https://link.mgln.ai/TEWxTNCAbout UNCOVER: Crime. Investigation. Revelation. Uncover brings you explosive, high-caliber true crime year-round. From CIA mind control to serial abuse, mysterious disappearances to wrongful imprisonment. Each season features a new host who is deeply connected to the story, committed to tracking down the truth.

In the ‘parallel universe' of Boulder Colorado, defense attorney Eric Zale is working on a very similar case. A report claims to link a suspect to incriminating online activity, but offers no clear explanation of how it works or how its conclusions were reached. Unaware of Zale or any other Cybercheck cases outside of Akron, Don Malarcik continues to dig deeper. Don hires experts and investigators, but no one can verify Cyber Check's methods or it's creator Adam Mosher's credentials. Meanwhile, prosecutors continue relying on the technology, presenting it as powerful, cutting-edge evidence. As Don prepares to challenge Mosher in court, he realizes he's not just defending one client—he's confronting a black-box system that could quietly reshape how guilt is determined, without transparency or accountability.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.

The city of Akron, Ohio reels from rising violence and stalled investigations until arrests suddenly begin to happen. A mysterious new AI-powered tool called Cyber Check has arrived. Criminal defense attorney Don Malarcik first encounters the technology when it's used to implicate his young client in a murder. With no clear explanation of how it works, and no public record of its existence, Don and his team begin digging into Cyber Check, uncovering unsettling questions about whether this powerful new technology is delivering justice—or quietly reshaping it.Binge all 9 episodes of this season on our YouTube page, or get them ad-free on CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.

Episodes 1 & 2 coming May 19, 2026.The small city of Akron, Ohio was drowning in unsolved murders. Until one day something happened. And suddenly those cold cases? Started to get closed. A ground breaking Canadian AI technology was coming to the rescue. Tracking criminal behaviour to bring justice where humans had failed. But as the cases stack up, and charges are laid, two lawyers grow skeptical. Human cracks appear in the mysterious new tech. Can the doubters open up this black box and reveal its true workings, before it takes hold across the world? Hosted by Sam Mullins.

"They will remember that I saved the day..." Welcome Melissa Gragg to The Mark Howley Show! This episode feels like listening to juicy gossip between two friends the whole way through. Melissa is a valuation expert witness specializing in divorce and family/ partner disputes. She has seen some wild things in the courtroom, witnessed hundreds of cases, many of which are celebrity splits and shares her ability to cut to the truth of any dispute. Gragg also hosts the Valuation Podcast discussing business & valuations available on all streaming platforms. Please subscribe or follow from your listening platform! We hope to reach more people and share the many ways people find passion and success in life. We appreciate your viewership. Leave us a comment and tell us what you think about this conversation!

Get the FREE GUIDE to 10 Nonclinical Careers at nonclinicalphysicians.com/freeguide. Get a list of 70 nontraditional jobs at nonclinicalphysicians.com/70jobs.                                                                                                 =============== John picks up where he left off, getting into the mechanics of actually building an expert witness consulting practice, from handling the psychological weight of depositions to setting your fees, structuring your LLC, and finding your first cases. No hypotheticals. John gets into the actual mechanics, what to charge, how to find cases, and how to build this into something that runs like a real business He walks through the full breakdown of what the work actually looks like day-to-day: why 80–90% of your time will be in record review, when depositions and trial testimony actually come into play, and how to position yourself so attorneys keep calling you back. He also covers the resources, directories, and training programs that accelerate the process, so you're not starting from zero. You'll find links mentioned in the episode at nonclinicalphysicians.com/guide-to-expert-witness-consulting-part-2/

If you've ever thought, “There has to be more than just working more shifts to make more money…” — this episode is going to open your eyes.In this conversation, I sit down with Dr. Christopher Cannell, PA-C, who shares how he transitioned from full-time clinical work into a flexible, high-income career combining academia, consulting, and entrepreneurship. What started as a single opportunity turned into a thriving medical legal consulting business—one that allows him to work less clinically, earn more, and take back control of his time.We break down what medical legal consulting actually looks like, how to get started (even without a doctorate), and why this path might be one of the most aligned, ethical, and financially rewarding ways to use your clinical expertise outside traditional practice.What medical legal consulting actually is (and what you'd do)How expert witness work and case review really get paidWhy you don't need another degree to get startedThe balance between clinical work and consultingHow to build income without burnout or overtimeWhy networking (not social media) is your biggest growth leverThe mindset shift from employee → entrepreneurHow this work can actually make you a better clinicianKeywords: medical legal consulting for PAs, expert witness physician assistant, PA side hustle ideas, healthcare consulting income, non clinical careers for physician assistants, medical expert witness jobs, PA entrepreneurship, healthcare side income ideas, physician assistant consulting business, legal nurse consultant alternative, make money as a PA outside clinic, clinician entrepreneurship, work from home healthcare jobs, PA career flexibility, burnout alternatives for clinicians, healthcare side gigs high incomeSPONSORS:PA Moms Women's Medical Summit https://www.pamoms.com/wms26/ Enter “Tracy Bingaman” for who referred you! LINKS:Chris Cannell APConsultant Website: https://theapcconsultant.mykajabi.com/ Clinician Entrepreneur Collective Waitlist www.tracybingaman.com/waitlist Schedule a call with Tracy https://calendly.com/the-pa-is-in/gen-call

Get the FREE GUIDE to 10 Nonclinical Careers at nonclinicalphysicians.com/freeguide. Get a list of 70 nontraditional jobs at nonclinicalphysicians.com/70jobs.                                                                                                 =============== John breaks down how physicians can start building income streams outside of clinical practice without making drastic or risky career moves. Drawing from years of interviews and real-world examples, he explains why relying on a single source of income leaves little flexibility, and how even small, consistent steps toward diversification can create long-term stability and optionality. One of the nonclinical career options available to almost any actively practicing physician is that of expert witness consulting. It is relatively easy to add this service incrementally to current clinical activities, although it does take some planning and investment. In this week's podcast episode, John presents part 1 of his guide to expert witness consulting, covering all of the major activities one would need to get started. Part 2 follows next week, with a list of helpful resources to accelerate the development and growth of this lucrative part-time consulting business. You'll find links mentioned in the episode at nonclinicalphysicians.com/guide-to-expert-witness-consulting-part-1/

This week Dr. Gregg Mays explains why we must give our testimony verbally, not just live it out. Who needs to hear your testimony?Foundation Scriptures: Acts 1:6-8How can Agape Leaders serve you?  Please find us at:         Website:  http://www.agapeleaders.org/    LinkedIn:  https://www.linkedin.com/in/gregg-mays/      Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/agapeleaders.org     Instagram:  https://www.instagram.com/agapeleaders10/    Bible Break With Agape Leaders: http://www.agapeleaders.org/daily-devotionTik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@greggmaysYouTube: https://youtube.com/channel/UCmM7ETR652mLtDSKSjda-pwGet Your Copy of the A Word Wednesday Devotion: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=A+Word+Wednesday+Devotion&ref=nav_bb_sbRead Dr. Mays' book Practical Leadership: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=practical+leadership+lessons+from+an+average+leader&crid=259U5RNS5J5W5&sprefix=Practical+Leadership%2Caps%2C102&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_4_20Give to ALCFM: http://www.agapeleaders.org/store/p15/Agape_Leaders_Christian_Fellowship_Ministry_Support.html

Send us Fan MailIn this episode, hosts Scott Kuhlman and Chasity Owens break down real-world court cases where fire investigators were challenged, excluded, or dismantled under legal scrutiny. From Daubert challenges and summary judgment to spoliation of evidence and product liability battles involving companies like Amazon, this episode dives deep into what can make—or break—an expert witness in court. Learn how improper methodology, lack of qualifications, confirmation bias, and failure to follow NFPA 921 can cost a case, and how to protect yourself by conducting every scene as if you're headed straight to trial. Whether you're a seasoned investigator or just entering the field, this episode delivers critical insights to strengthen your reports, testimony, and credibility in the courtroom.Thank you for listening! If you enjoyed the episode, give us 5 stars, hit the follow button, and subscribe on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and anywhere you are listening in from. Follow us on social media!Instagram: @infocusfire_podcastLinkedIn: INFOCUS podcastFacebook: INFOCUS podcastTikTok: @infocus_podcast

In this episode guests (and experts on experts) Deena Pack and Seth Row share practical tips for successfully hiring and managing an expert for your case. Hear it from the pros. It seems like every trial today needs an expert. And the experts you choose to learn from and present can make or break your case. Experts can be some of the most expensive elements of a case. You can't afford to make a mistake. When it comes to hiring an expert, the rule of thumb is “the earlier the better.” You may not even know if you have a case until you have an expert review of the evidence. But where do you find an expert? One who is not only current and knowledgeable, but also relatable to a judge and jury? Sometimes, even the perception as an “outsider” or a “local” expert matters. How do you make the right choice, vet prior testimony, and review qualifications? And don't forget the limits of your client's budget. Plus, a quick tip from Lauren Williams on how to polish your professional reputation by building rapport with courtroom staff. Have a question, comment, or suggestion for an upcoming episode? Get in touch at MRogson@SkywardInsurance.com and JAReeder@JonesDay.com. Resources: American Bar Association American Bar Association Litigation Section