Podcast appearances and mentions of jane doe

In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdf

Hey Everyone!Fresh out the reactor this week we've got bangers from Tobax, Constructive Sine, Jane Doe, and Mind Theory.In Demos, WIPs, and Promos, we're diving into new heat from IMMERR & Vecster, Ekwols, Project Zeus, and SLWDWN.As always, Ollie's locked in to guide you through the sharpest selections of the week.Check out the track list below and let's dive in!H_Man - Exile EPhttps://cygnusmusic.link/xzmldrrTRACKLIST AND MORE INFO: www.stonxmusic.co.uk/stonxcast-ep146

Have you ever come across one of those rare true crime cases that keep you scratching your head. Things just don't add up and it seems helpless not having more answers. Well, this case will leave you asking questions for sure. Today KCC discusses the case of a Jane Doe who has been nameless for almost 40 years. She was discovered at the scene of a semi-truck crash. The twist, she was found under the trailer. So many theories surround this case and how she ended up underneath a tractor trailer. It was recently thrust back into the media because Fayette County is determined to give her back her name. 

The lawsuit filed by Jane Doe, represented by Tony Buzbee, accuses Sean "Diddy" Combs of sexual assault, coercion, and control from 2020 through 2024. Doe alleges she was drugged during visits to Combs' homes, subjected to abuse, and monitored by his associates. The complaint describes an instance where Doe became pregnant after an assault and was pressured to terminate the pregnancy. Seeking damages for emotional and physical harm, Doe's case forms part of broader legal action involving over 120 accusers represented by Buzbee against Combs for similar misconduct.(commercial at 8:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-biggie-video-party-complaint.pdf (courthousenews.com)

The lawsuit filed by Jane Doe, represented by Tony Buzbee, accuses Sean "Diddy" Combs of sexual assault, coercion, and control from 2020 through 2024. Doe alleges she was drugged during visits to Combs' homes, subjected to abuse, and monitored by his associates. The complaint describes an instance where Doe became pregnant after an assault and was pressured to terminate the pregnancy. Seeking damages for emotional and physical harm, Doe's case forms part of broader legal action involving over 120 accusers represented by Buzbee against Combs for similar misconduct.(commercial at 8:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-biggie-video-party-complaint.pdf (courthousenews.com)

The lawsuit filed by Jane Doe, represented by Tony Buzbee, accuses Sean "Diddy" Combs of sexual assault, coercion, and control from 2020 through 2024. Doe alleges she was drugged during visits to Combs' homes, subjected to abuse, and monitored by his associates. The complaint describes an instance where Doe became pregnant after an assault and was pressured to terminate the pregnancy. Seeking damages for emotional and physical harm, Doe's case forms part of broader legal action involving over 120 accusers represented by Buzbee against Combs for similar misconduct.(commercial at 8:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-biggie-video-party-complaint.pdf (courthousenews.com)

Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThis allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf

Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThis allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf

Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThis allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf

A Michigan woman, identified as Jane Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs and Harve Pierre, alleging sexual assault and exploitation. She claims that in 2015, during a visit to New York City, Combs and Pierre coerced her into non-consensual sexual activities under the pretense of discussing a potential music career. The alleged incident occurred after a party at Combs' residence, where the plaintiff asserts she was manipulated and intimidated into compliance.The lawsuit further alleges that Combs and Pierre leveraged their positions of power within the music industry to silence Jane Doe, threatening to blacklist her if she disclosed the assault. This, she claims, led to significant emotional and psychological distress, as well as detrimental impacts on her professional aspirations. The legal action seeks damages for the alleged assault, emotional suffering, and career harm. Both Combs and Pierre have denied these allegations, describing them as baseless attempts to damage their reputations.(commercial at 8:28)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Doe v. Combs, 1:23-cv-10628 – CourtListener.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Count 3 of the federal indictment against Sean "Diddy" Combs, which charges him with sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion in relation to Victim 2, referred to as "Jane" Doe, accuses him of orchestrating and benefiting from the exploitation of this victim. The charge alleges that Combs used force, manipulation, or deceit to coerce Jane into engaging in sex acts for his benefit, potentially with the knowledge or complicity of his associates. The prosecution's claim hinges on the idea that the victim was not participating in these acts voluntarily but was instead forced or misled into doing so under duress, a key aspect of the trafficking charge under federal law. If the prosecution's evidence is found to be credible, it would prove that Combs played a central role in exploiting Jane, using his power and influence to subject her to coercive circumstances.During the trial, the government presented testimony and evidence suggesting that Combs exerted significant pressure on Jane, using both coercive tactics and the manipulation of power dynamics to force her into sexual acts. Witnesses have claimed that Combs used threats, promises of career advancement, and other forms of psychological manipulation to control Jane's actions, effectively using his position in the entertainment industry to trap her in a situation of trafficking. The defense, on the other hand, has attempted to discredit the victim's testimony, arguing that any interactions between Combs and Jane were consensual, and they are expected to continue challenging the validity of the coercion claims. With the prosecution's evidence already on the table, the key question remains whether the jury will find that the victim was truly coerced or if the defense can sway them to doubt the severity of the alleged trafficking.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Count 3 of the federal indictment against Sean "Diddy" Combs, which charges him with sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion in relation to Victim 2, referred to as "Jane" Doe, accuses him of orchestrating and benefiting from the exploitation of this victim. The charge alleges that Combs used force, manipulation, or deceit to coerce Jane into engaging in sex acts for his benefit, potentially with the knowledge or complicity of his associates. The prosecution's claim hinges on the idea that the victim was not participating in these acts voluntarily but was instead forced or misled into doing so under duress, a key aspect of the trafficking charge under federal law. If the prosecution's evidence is found to be credible, it would prove that Combs played a central role in exploiting Jane, using his power and influence to subject her to coercive circumstances.During the trial, the government presented testimony and evidence suggesting that Combs exerted significant pressure on Jane, using both coercive tactics and the manipulation of power dynamics to force her into sexual acts. Witnesses have claimed that Combs used threats, promises of career advancement, and other forms of psychological manipulation to control Jane's actions, effectively using his position in the entertainment industry to trap her in a situation of trafficking. The defense, on the other hand, has attempted to discredit the victim's testimony, arguing that any interactions between Combs and Jane were consensual, and they are expected to continue challenging the validity of the coercion claims. With the prosecution's evidence already on the table, the key question remains whether the jury will find that the victim was truly coerced or if the defense can sway them to doubt the severity of the alleged trafficking.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

A Michigan woman, identified as Jane Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs and Harve Pierre, alleging sexual assault and exploitation. She claims that in 2015, during a visit to New York City, Combs and Pierre coerced her into non-consensual sexual activities under the pretense of discussing a potential music career. The alleged incident occurred after a party at Combs' residence, where the plaintiff asserts she was manipulated and intimidated into compliance.The lawsuit further alleges that Combs and Pierre leveraged their positions of power within the music industry to silence Jane Doe, threatening to blacklist her if she disclosed the assault. This, she claims, led to significant emotional and psychological distress, as well as detrimental impacts on her professional aspirations. The legal action seeks damages for the alleged assault, emotional suffering, and career harm. Both Combs and Pierre have denied these allegations, describing them as baseless attempts to damage their reputations.(commercial at 8:28)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Doe v. Combs, 1:23-cv-10628 – CourtListener.com

A Michigan woman, identified as Jane Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs and Harve Pierre, alleging sexual assault and exploitation. She claims that in 2015, during a visit to New York City, Combs and Pierre coerced her into non-consensual sexual activities under the pretense of discussing a potential music career. The alleged incident occurred after a party at Combs' residence, where the plaintiff asserts she was manipulated and intimidated into compliance.The lawsuit further alleges that Combs and Pierre leveraged their positions of power within the music industry to silence Jane Doe, threatening to blacklist her if she disclosed the assault. This, she claims, led to significant emotional and psychological distress, as well as detrimental impacts on her professional aspirations. The legal action seeks damages for the alleged assault, emotional suffering, and career harm. Both Combs and Pierre have denied these allegations, describing them as baseless attempts to damage their reputations.(commercial at 8:28)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Doe v. Combs, 1:23-cv-10628 – CourtListener.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A Michigan woman, identified as Jane Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs and Harve Pierre, alleging sexual assault and exploitation. She claims that in 2015, during a visit to New York City, Combs and Pierre coerced her into non-consensual sexual activities under the pretense of discussing a potential music career. The alleged incident occurred after a party at Combs' residence, where the plaintiff asserts she was manipulated and intimidated into compliance.The lawsuit further alleges that Combs and Pierre leveraged their positions of power within the music industry to silence Jane Doe, threatening to blacklist her if she disclosed the assault. This, she claims, led to significant emotional and psychological distress, as well as detrimental impacts on her professional aspirations. The legal action seeks damages for the alleged assault, emotional suffering, and career harm. Both Combs and Pierre have denied these allegations, describing them as baseless attempts to damage their reputations.(commercial at 8:28)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Doe v. Combs, 1:23-cv-10628 – CourtListener.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Recent judicial decisions denying anonymity to plaintiffs in sexual assault lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs could significantly influence other pending and future cases against him. In October 2024, U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that a woman accusing Combs of rape in 2004 must reveal her identity to proceed with her lawsuit. The judge emphasized the public's interest in open judicial proceedings and Combs' right to investigate the accuser's background and credibility. This decision sets a precedent that may compel other plaintiffs to disclose their identities, potentially deterring some from pursuing legal action due to fears of public exposure and retaliation. The implications of this ruling extend beyond individual cases, potentially affecting the broader landscape of sexual assault litigation involving high-profile figures. Legal experts suggest that requiring plaintiffs to identify themselves could discourage victims from coming forward, especially when the accused holds significant power and influence. This development may lead to a chilling effect on the filing of similar lawsuits, as potential plaintiffs weigh the personal risks of public identification against seeking justice. Consequently, the balance between a defendant's right to a fair trial and a plaintiff's right to privacy remains a contentious issue in the legal system.Let's dive in!(commercial at 8:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean ‘Diddy' Combs case: What the Jane Doe ruling could mean for the other already-filed cases | CNN

Count 3 of the federal indictment against Sean "Diddy" Combs, which charges him with sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion in relation to Victim 2, referred to as "Jane" Doe, accuses him of orchestrating and benefiting from the exploitation of this victim. The charge alleges that Combs used force, manipulation, or deceit to coerce Jane into engaging in sex acts for his benefit, potentially with the knowledge or complicity of his associates. The prosecution's claim hinges on the idea that the victim was not participating in these acts voluntarily but was instead forced or misled into doing so under duress, a key aspect of the trafficking charge under federal law. If the prosecution's evidence is found to be credible, it would prove that Combs played a central role in exploiting Jane, using his power and influence to subject her to coercive circumstances.During the trial, the government presented testimony and evidence suggesting that Combs exerted significant pressure on Jane, using both coercive tactics and the manipulation of power dynamics to force her into sexual acts. Witnesses have claimed that Combs used threats, promises of career advancement, and other forms of psychological manipulation to control Jane's actions, effectively using his position in the entertainment industry to trap her in a situation of trafficking. The defense, on the other hand, has attempted to discredit the victim's testimony, arguing that any interactions between Combs and Jane were consensual, and they are expected to continue challenging the validity of the coercion claims. With the prosecution's evidence already on the table, the key question remains whether the jury will find that the victim was truly coerced or if the defense can sway them to doubt the severity of the alleged trafficking.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Recent judicial decisions denying anonymity to plaintiffs in sexual assault lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs could significantly influence other pending and future cases against him. In October 2024, U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that a woman accusing Combs of rape in 2004 must reveal her identity to proceed with her lawsuit. The judge emphasized the public's interest in open judicial proceedings and Combs' right to investigate the accuser's background and credibility. This decision sets a precedent that may compel other plaintiffs to disclose their identities, potentially deterring some from pursuing legal action due to fears of public exposure and retaliation. The implications of this ruling extend beyond individual cases, potentially affecting the broader landscape of sexual assault litigation involving high-profile figures. Legal experts suggest that requiring plaintiffs to identify themselves could discourage victims from coming forward, especially when the accused holds significant power and influence. This development may lead to a chilling effect on the filing of similar lawsuits, as potential plaintiffs weigh the personal risks of public identification against seeking justice. Consequently, the balance between a defendant's right to a fair trial and a plaintiff's right to privacy remains a contentious issue in the legal system.Let's dive in!(commercial at 8:46)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Sean ‘Diddy' Combs case: What the Jane Doe ruling could mean for the other already-filed cases | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

She is one of Sean Combs's latest girlfriends. She was dating Sean Combs when Cassie Ventura's lawsuit went public. She was in the room with him when he found out that CNN had just released the hotel video of him assaulting Cassie. AND - she had plans to visit Sean Combs in New York City, on the very trip that he was arrested on. Jane Doe. Testifying under a pseudonym. There are so many questions that the prosecution, defense, and even the public have for her. Such as - what happened during her relationship?What was Sean Combs's reaction to the hotel video being released?Were her experiences similar to Cassie's?But the most interesting question in the courtroom is - why is Sean Combs still paying for her attorney?And - what does that mean for the case?

As the prosecution works to land its final blows, one witness may have just swung the spotlight in the wrong direction—and Aubrey’s here to unpack every twist Joined by attorney Emily Simpson, Aubrey breaks down the bizarre turns in Jane Doe’s cross-examination: from a warm courtroom hug with Diddy’s defense attorney to the bombshell claim that her legal fees are being paid by the very man she’s testifying against. Together, they dissect what it means when the last victim on the stand appears to blur the lines between accuser and ally. Is Jane caught between trauma and loyalty—or executing a strategy no one saw coming? The prosecution’s case has been powerful. But this witness? She’s a wildcard.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As the prosecution works to land its final blows, one witness may have just swung the spotlight in the wrong direction—and Aubrey’s here to unpack every twist Joined by attorney Emily Simpson, Aubrey breaks down the bizarre turns in Jane Doe’s cross-examination: from a warm courtroom hug with Diddy’s defense attorney to the bombshell claim that her legal fees are being paid by the very man she’s testifying against. Together, they dissect what it means when the last victim on the stand appears to blur the lines between accuser and ally. Is Jane caught between trauma and loyalty—or executing a strategy no one saw coming? The prosecution’s case has been powerful. But this witness? She’s a wildcard.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

It's another rough ride on Eavesdroppin' comedy podcast this week, as Geordie and Michelle look at two Australian hometown murders… When two dirt-bike riders found human bones in the Belanglo State Forest in Australia, 2010, police were stumped. Who was this woman? Had anyone reportedthis Jane Doe as missing? Five years later, an unsuspecting motorist found a body in a suitcase on the side of the road in South Australia and once again police were confounded by the victim's identity. So - who were these victims? Was anyone looking for them? Were they connected? This week, Michelle delves into both cases and uncovers the grim details behind the murders of Karlie and Khandalyce Pearce. Geordie follows with a look at the unsolved case of murdered Australian woman, Rachelle Childs. When a burning body was found on a beach near Gerroa in New South Wales, Australia, in 2001, the remains were quickly identified as belonging to car-dealership worker Rachelle Childs. Police, friends and family were shocked and confused buy the grim discovery – who would want to kill Rachelle? As the subject of a new podcast series called Dear Rachelle, Geordie digs into the case and reveals the number one suspect who potentially has gotten away with murder. Listen to find out more!So pop on your headphones, grab a brown lemonade and join Geordie & Michelle for this week's episode, plus chit-chat about hometowns, Ivan Milat and more, only on Eavesdroppin' podcast. And remember, wherever you are, whatever you do, just keep Eavesdroppin'! *Disclaimer: We don't claim to have any factual info about anything ever and our opinions are just opinions not fact, sooorrrryyy! Don't sue us! Please rate, review, tell your friends and subscribe in all the usual places – we love it when you do! Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/eavesdroppinDo write in with your stories at hello@eavesdroppinpodcast.com or send us a Voice Note!Listen: www.eavesdroppinpodcast.com or https://podfollow.com/eavesdroppinYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqcuzv-EXizUo4emmt9PgfwFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/eavesdroppinpodcast#dearrachelle #angelofbelanglo #karliepearcestevenson #australia #murder #reallife #coldcase #truecrime #rachellechilds #unsolvedmurder #eavesdroppin #eavesdroppinpodcast #eavesdroppincomedypodcast #podcast #comedy Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sam raimi was given a lot of money to do whatever he wanted. Things get silly, talking goat silly. Why does that old hag keep puking? Man, who knows man.NEXT EPISODE ➟ Alaina pending (maybe Autopsy of Jane Doe?)PATREON (BONUS EPISODES, VIDEO CONTENT, AND MORE!) ➟ https://patreon.com/screampodcastSCREAM! SOCIALS: Instagram ➟ https://z-p42.www.instagram.com/screampodcast/ Facebook ➟ https://www.facebook.com/thescreampod/?ref=py_cSCREAMPODCAST@YAHOO.COMHORROR SOUP SOCIALS: Instagram ➟ https://www.instagram.com/horrorsoup/?hl=enYOUTUBE ➟ https://www.youtube.com/c/HorrorSoupLETTERBOXD (MOVIE REVIEW APP) ➟ https://letterboxd.com/horrorsoupcaleb/~Music Credits~ETHAN HURT – WWW.ETHANHURT.COMKYLE HERMAN - @iamkyleherman on InstagramSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Would you rather 4 Million Dollars in Miami or 2 Million in Columbia SC --> YES this was real discussion with the fellas on USC Gamecock QB SellersNEW MERCH DROP - BLOCK PARTY ⁠⁠DADS T-SHIRT⁠⁠Exclusively brought to you by No Grease Barbershop Northlake and Premium OutletsThe fellas react to Trent views on being mentally tough vs mentally smart - (17:09) K. Michelle sits with Cam Newton to discuss how Black Men have to stop creating broken homes - (35:28) DDG says he will go on Joe Budden if Melyssa Ford isnt there but Pastor Mike has some advice for DDG - (41:10) Ray Daniels says Jay-Z should reach out and save Dame and Gavin disagrees wholeheartedly - (01:01:00) List of countries with the most beautiful women is released and the USA is too low! - (01:06:00) Jane Doe released some cloudy details in the Diddy trial and the fellas discuss consent vs coercion - (01:17:00) SPORTS TAKE: Pastor Mike reacts to Magic Johnson definition of what a NBA Superstar is. Submit to #ASKADAD:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://www.blackdadsclub.org/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Subscribe to Our YouTube:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://bit.ly/BDCYTSub ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠JOIN THE DISCORD:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://discord.gg/YcFrdCbFFollow Us Today:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠-⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠

Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing a new lawsuit from a woman identified as "Jane Doe," who alleges that in 2004, at the age of 17, she was sexually assaulted during one of Combs' renowned Fourth of July White Parties in the Hamptons. According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff, then an aspiring model, was invited to the exclusive event, where she was introduced to Combs. She claims that after being offered a drink, she became disoriented and was led to a secluded area, where the alleged assault occurred.This lawsuit is among several recent legal actions against Combs, with multiple individuals accusing him of sexual misconduct spanning over two decades. Combs' legal team has denied these allegations, describing them as baseless and asserting his innocence. The plaintiff in this case is represented by attorney Tony Buzbee, who is also handling numerous other cases against Combs.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New Diddy lawsuit claims he raped girl, 17, at infamous White Party in the Hamptons | Daily Mail Online

​Jane Doe, the woman who accused Jay-Z of raping her in 2000 when she was 13 years old, has filed a motion to dismiss the defamation lawsuit that the rapper filed against her. Jay-Z's lawsuit, filed in March 2025, alleges that Doe and her attorneys knowingly made false and malicious claims in an attempt to extort him, resulting in reputational harm and financial losses exceeding $20 million. In her motion, filed on April 22, Doe argues that her allegations, made in court documents and media interviews, are protected under California law and cannot form the basis for a defamation claim. She also contends that Jay-Z's claims of malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and civil conspiracy lack legal merit and factual support.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jay-Z's Rape Accuser Files Motion to Dismiss His Defamation Lawsuit Against HerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The lawsuit filed by Jane Doe, represented by Tony Buzbee, accuses Sean "Diddy" Combs of sexual assault, coercion, and control from 2020 through 2024. Doe alleges she was drugged during visits to Combs' homes, subjected to abuse, and monitored by his associates. The complaint describes an instance where Doe became pregnant after an assault and was pressured to terminate the pregnancy. Seeking damages for emotional and physical harm, Doe's case forms part of broader legal action involving over 120 accusers represented by Buzbee against Combs for similar misconduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-biggie-video-party-complaint.pdf (courthousenews.com)

Newly resurfaced photos capturing a heated exchange between Sean "Diddy" Combs and Jennifer Lopez at a 2000 MTV Video Music Awards afterparty have drawn significant attention amid fresh allegations against Combs. The images show Combs holding a champagne bottle and engaging with guests at the Lotus nightclub, where the pair were reportedly seen in a tense confrontation. Witnesses recall that Lopez appeared visibly upset and at one point seemed to be reprimanding Combs as he mingled with other celebrities, including Jay-Z and Eminem. Despite the party's glamorous backdrop, the argument escalated, reportedly ending with both leaving the venue together, but with lingering tension evident in their interaction.These photos have resurfaced at a pivotal moment, as Combs faces a new lawsuit accusing him of sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl on that same night. The anonymous plaintiff, represented by attorney Tony Buzbee, alleges that after the afterparty, Combs lured her to a private residence where the assault took place. Combs' legal team categorically denies the allegations, branding them as attempts to tarnish his reputation. This lawsuit adds to Combs' mounting legal issues, including charges of racketeering and sex trafficking, which have kept him detained without bail. The resurfacing of these photos highlights the intense scrutiny on Combs' past actions and the challenges his legal team now faces in defending his reputation.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy and Jennifer Lopez seen having heated argument in unearthed party photos from same night he's accused of raping 13-year-old girl | Daily Mail Online

Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThis allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf

The judge overseeing the lawsuit filed by "Jane Doe" against Sean "Diddy" Combs ruled that the plaintiff cannot proceed anonymously. In her decision, the judge emphasized the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings, noting that while privacy concerns are understandable in sensitive cases, they do not outweigh the legal principle of openness in the courtroom. The court found that the plaintiff's request lacked specific evidence of harm that would justify anonymity, especially given the public interest surrounding the high-profile case. As a result, the plaintiff has been given a deadline to refile her case using her real name if she wishes to proceed; failure to do so could result in the case's dismissal.(commercial at 10:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:doe-v-combs-ruling-usdc-southern-new-york.pdf

The lawsuit filed by Jane Doe, represented by Tony Buzbee, accuses Sean "Diddy" Combs of sexual assault, coercion, and control from 2020 through 2024. Doe alleges she was drugged during visits to Combs' homes, subjected to abuse, and monitored by his associates. The complaint describes an instance where Doe became pregnant after an assault and was pressured to terminate the pregnancy. Seeking damages for emotional and physical harm, Doe's case forms part of broader legal action involving over 120 accusers represented by Buzbee against Combs for similar misconduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-biggie-video-party-complaint.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This is a special drop . To hot to hold. I discuss Gangbang Queen Bonnie Blue got kicked off OF for her wild Gangbang and porn content. But it get better, She is beefing with follow OF girl Sophia Rain as she claims Bonnie's Content is cheapening OF. Then I discuss Kendrick taking over Toronto and the Drake Stans are mad. This proves that love of music sometimes trump petty rap beef alliances. Then I talk about the Jane Doe bragging about her skills during the freak offs and how people can't handle it when a women actually enjoy doing GBs, Threesomes and etc. Plus more. Want More Content? 2 ways to get it1. Subscribe my Savage Smoke Sessions on Spotify ( $4.99 a month)⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/smokethisova/subscribe⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠2. Become A Premium SmokerSubscribe to the Premium Smoke Room On Loyalfans⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.loyalfans.com/PremiumSmokeRoom⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Want More Content. Become a Premium Smoker⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠for 5 Premium Podcasts , Special Events and More $25.99 a monthSponsored ByHottest Adult Mag Online⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://eroticismmagazine.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Hottest Adult Film Company⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠blusherotica.com/videos⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SmokeKind The King Of THCa⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://smokekind.com/?ref=bobbie_lucas⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠PassDat Clothing⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.teepublic.com/user/the-inhaling-potnasPorn/ Music/ Social Media⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://allmylinks.com/pornrapstar⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Get The Merch:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.bonfire.com/store/s-t-o-merch-store/

In the morning session, defense attorney Teny Geragos pressed Jane about intimate details of her relationship with Combs, especially his “hotel nights” or “freak-offs.” She admitted that these events involved group sex with male escorts, drug use, and coercion—recalling one particularly violent 2024 incident where Combs physically attacked her and then ordered her to perform oral sex on another man while he watched.As the defense continued, they honed in on Jane's emotional attachment to Combs. Under cross-examination, she read aloud numerous affectionate text messages—declarations of love and gratitude—that visibly rattled her and led to tears.   Geragos used these messages to argue that her relationship with Combs was based on affection and voluntary involvement, not coercion. Though deeply emotional at points, Jane stood firmly by her account that, despite those feelings, she was compelled to participate in the encounters described as abusive.Jane's testimony is scheduled to continue after lunch and be finished by the end of proceedings on June 12th.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN

Following the midday recess, Jane resumed her testimony amid visible emotional strain. Under cross‑examination, she recounted receiving a distressing voice note from Combs during one of their “hotel nights,” which she described as coercive, drug‑fueled sexual encounters involving multiple men—what the defense refers to as “freak‑offs.” In the clip, Combs told her to “move on” and end their relationship, prompting her to reveal on the stand that the dynamic had grown increasingly unhealthy by late 2023. She tearfully admitted that although she still harbors love for him, the orchestrated group sex sessions had become a source of deep emotional pain.Jane also detailed the stakes behind these encounters, explaining that Combs had threatened to stop paying her rent or even release intimate recordings if she refused to participate. She conveyed to jurors how she felt compelled to comply—to the extent that these interactions had a profound psychological toll. On the stand, she expressed that she would have gladly given up all material benefits—gifts, vacations, financial support—if it meant avoiding those “hotel nights.” Her testimony sought to underscore the prosecution's theory that Combs used financial dependency and emotional manipulation to traffic her for sex.The question is, was it effective?to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 12, 2025 - Day 22 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

Following the midday recess, Jane resumed her testimony amid visible emotional strain. Under cross‑examination, she recounted receiving a distressing voice note from Combs during one of their “hotel nights,” which she described as coercive, drug‑fueled sexual encounters involving multiple men—what the defense refers to as “freak‑offs.” In the clip, Combs told her to “move on” and end their relationship, prompting her to reveal on the stand that the dynamic had grown increasingly unhealthy by late 2023. She tearfully admitted that although she still harbors love for him, the orchestrated group sex sessions had become a source of deep emotional pain.Jane also detailed the stakes behind these encounters, explaining that Combs had threatened to stop paying her rent or even release intimate recordings if she refused to participate. She conveyed to jurors how she felt compelled to comply—to the extent that these interactions had a profound psychological toll. On the stand, she expressed that she would have gladly given up all material benefits—gifts, vacations, financial support—if it meant avoiding those “hotel nights.” Her testimony sought to underscore the prosecution's theory that Combs used financial dependency and emotional manipulation to traffic her for sex.The question is, was it effective?to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 12, 2025 - Day 22 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al. (Civ. No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV), Defendant Marriott International, Inc. has submitted a reply memorandum in further support of its motion to dismiss the complaint. Marriott argues that the plaintiff's allegations fail to establish a legal basis for holding the company liable for the alleged actions of the co-defendants. They contend that the complaint lacks specific factual assertions linking Marriott to any wrongful conduct and that mere association with other defendants does not suffice to state a claim.Furthermore, Marriott emphasizes that the plaintiff's claims against it are speculative and unsupported by concrete evidence. The company asserts that the complaint does not demonstrate how Marriott had any control over or direct involvement in the alleged incidents. As a result, Marriott requests that the court dismiss the claims against it, arguing that allowing the case to proceed without substantive allegations would set a concerning precedent for corporate liability based on tenuous connections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Reply ISO MTD (Marriott _ McCrary)(1618681774.5).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing a new lawsuit from a woman identified as "Jane Doe," who alleges that in 2004, at the age of 17, she was sexually assaulted during one of Combs' renowned Fourth of July White Parties in the Hamptons. According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff, then an aspiring model, was invited to the exclusive event, where she was introduced to Combs. She claims that after being offered a drink, she became disoriented and was led to a secluded area, where the alleged assault occurred.This lawsuit is among several recent legal actions against Combs, with multiple individuals accusing him of sexual misconduct spanning over two decades. Combs' legal team has denied these allegations, describing them as baseless and asserting his innocence. The plaintiff in this case is represented by attorney Tony Buzbee, who is also handling numerous other cases against Combs.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New Diddy lawsuit claims he raped girl, 17, at infamous White Party in the Hamptons | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A woman identified as Jane Doe has filed a lawsuit alleging that Sean "Diddy" Combs sexually assaulted her during an after-party following the MTV Video Music Awards (VMAs) in 2005. The plaintiff claims that Combs invited her to the party under the pretense of discussing potential career opportunities in the music industry. Once there, she alleges that Combs provided her with a drink that was drugged, rendering her incapacitated. The lawsuit asserts that Combs then proceeded to sexually assault her.The legal action accuses Combs of sexual assault, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Jane Doe seeks unspecified damages and emphasizes the lasting psychological impact of the alleged incident. Combs' legal team has categorically denied these allegations, describing them as baseless and asserting that they will vigorously defend against the claims in court.(commercial at 11:08)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630244.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sadly, former MTV VJ host Ananda Lewis passed away at 52 after battling cancer. Jane Doe said the Diddy needed companionship after ex Cassie filed a civil lawsuit against him. And Ryan Gosling will NOT be in the upcoming Black Panther movie after fans spread rumors online that he was!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

Diddy Trial Jane Doe Cross examination Diddy is a confirmed cuckold+ she was jealous of Caresha

Amy, T.J, and Aubrey O’Day explore the layered testimony of Jane Doe — with one foot planted in survivor advocacy, and the other stepping into the uncomfortable complexities of testimony that doesn’t fit neatly into one box. While abuse is always the abuser’s fault, Jane’s story raises hard questions: What happens when love turns transactional, and survival means knowing your price? From contradictions on the stand to Diddy still footing her legal bills, Aubrey asks- how much power can you reclaim when the man you're testifying against you still willingly have signing the checks?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As we wrap up the fourth full week of testimony, Amy and T.J. discuss another crazy day in court that included the judge threatening to kick Diddy out of his own trial for trying to communicate with jurors. Also, a star witness is discredited by the defense and the highly anticipated “Jane Doe” takes the stand.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As we wrap up the fourth full week of testimony, Amy and T.J. discuss another crazy day in court that included the judge threatening to kick Diddy out of his own trial for trying to communicate with jurors. Also, a star witness is discredited by the defense and the highly anticipated “Jane Doe” takes the stand.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As we wrap up the fourth full week of testimony, Amy and T.J. discuss another crazy day in court that included the judge threatening to kick Diddy out of his own trial for trying to communicate with jurors. Also, a star witness is discredited by the defense and the highly anticipated “Jane Doe” takes the stand.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bryan and Anderson review Bring Her Back, Pee-Wee as Himself, The Conversation and The Autopsy of Jane Doe. Then the boys pay tribute to sore thumbs with Top 5 Out of Place Scenes! Listener Survey Loaded for Bear New Promo Video! The Film Vault on Youtube TFV Patreon is Here for Even More Film Vault Anderson's new doc: Loaded for Bear Atty's Antiques Baldywood Newsletter COMEDY CONFESSIONAL  Listener Art:  Jonathan Oxorn and Clark Featured Artist: The Atomic Aces The Film Vault on Twitch Buy Bryan's Book Shrinkage Here The Film Vaulters “Kubrick is Everywhere” Shirt CONNECT WITH US: Instagram: @AndersonAndBryan Facebook.com/TheFilmVault Twitter: @TheFilmVault HAVE A CHAT WITH ANDY HERE ATTY & ANDY: DIRECTED BY A FOUR-YEAR-OLD Subscribe Atty and Andy's Youtube Channel Here THE COLD COCKLE SHORTS RULES OF REDUCTION MORMOAN THE CULT OF CARANO Please Give Groupers a Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score Here Please Rate It on IMDB Here The Blu-ray, US The Blu-ray, International Groupers is now available on these platforms. On Amazon On Google Play  On iTunes On Youtube On Tubi On Vudu Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell are back and we begin today's episode revisiting (01:02) how Scott Spivey was shot to death in his vehicle by Weldon Boyd and Bradley Williams in September 2023.  A significant development comes in the form of a "legal filing", an "absurd 9-page motion to stay" by Bradley Williams' attorney, Robert E. Lee… yup, that's the name he prefers… We'll also share a disturbing, but pertinent call between Weldon and his granny discussing the incident.  Then (23:00) we share updates on the 'updated' sentence of suspended Hilton Head Island attorney Peter Strauss, the as-yet-unscheduled sentencing for Russell Laffitte, Michael Colucci's retrial scheduled for June 16th and Lee Gilley's Houston status hearing on June 4th for his murder trial.   As our primary focus, (25:06) Mandy and Liz critically examine the 2025 Horry County Police investigation into the 2021 death of Chris Skinner, husband of JP Miller's alleged mistress, highlighting discrepancies between the official ruling of accidental death and video evidence suggesting something else. We'll share police interviews with Chris Skinner's friends, noting the friend's belief the death was a suicide possibly influenced by JP Miller, and questioning the wife's inconsistent statements and demeanor.  Ultimately, we are advocating for truth and justice in all these cases.  Lots to cover, so let's dive in...