Podcast appearances and mentions of jane doe

She is one of Sean Combs's latest girlfriends. She was dating Sean Combs when Cassie Ventura's lawsuit went public. She was in the room with him when he found out that CNN had just released the hotel video of him assaulting Cassie. AND - she had plans to visit Sean Combs in New York City, on the very trip that he was arrested on. Jane Doe. Testifying under a pseudonym. There are so many questions that the prosecution, defense, and even the public have for her. Such as - what happened during her relationship?What was Sean Combs's reaction to the hotel video being released?Were her experiences similar to Cassie's?But the most interesting question in the courtroom is - why is Sean Combs still paying for her attorney?And - what does that mean for the case?

As the prosecution works to land its final blows, one witness may have just swung the spotlight in the wrong direction—and Aubrey’s here to unpack every twist Joined by attorney Emily Simpson, Aubrey breaks down the bizarre turns in Jane Doe’s cross-examination: from a warm courtroom hug with Diddy’s defense attorney to the bombshell claim that her legal fees are being paid by the very man she’s testifying against. Together, they dissect what it means when the last victim on the stand appears to blur the lines between accuser and ally. Is Jane caught between trauma and loyalty—or executing a strategy no one saw coming? The prosecution’s case has been powerful. But this witness? She’s a wildcard.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As the prosecution works to land its final blows, one witness may have just swung the spotlight in the wrong direction—and Aubrey’s here to unpack every twist Joined by attorney Emily Simpson, Aubrey breaks down the bizarre turns in Jane Doe’s cross-examination: from a warm courtroom hug with Diddy’s defense attorney to the bombshell claim that her legal fees are being paid by the very man she’s testifying against. Together, they dissect what it means when the last victim on the stand appears to blur the lines between accuser and ally. Is Jane caught between trauma and loyalty—or executing a strategy no one saw coming? The prosecution’s case has been powerful. But this witness? She’s a wildcard.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-01457-JPO, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging personal injury. The court issued a Memorandum and Order addressing several key motions. Firstly, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, allowing her to maintain anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the allegations. Secondly, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the case, finding that the plaintiff's claims were sufficiently plausible to proceed to discovery.Additionally, the court addressed the defendants' motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint, which was denied. The court found that the contested allegations were relevant to the plaintiff's claims and did not prejudice the defendants. The Memorandum and Order concluded by setting a schedule for discovery and encouraging both parties to consider settlement discussions. This decision allows the case to move forward, with both sides preparing for the next stages of litigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:24cv1457 Jones v. Combs Sanctions Order.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

It's another rough ride on Eavesdroppin' comedy podcast this week, as Geordie and Michelle look at two Australian hometown murders… When two dirt-bike riders found human bones in the Belanglo State Forest in Australia, 2010, police were stumped. Who was this woman? Had anyone reportedthis Jane Doe as missing? Five years later, an unsuspecting motorist found a body in a suitcase on the side of the road in South Australia and once again police were confounded by the victim's identity. So - who were these victims? Was anyone looking for them? Were they connected? This week, Michelle delves into both cases and uncovers the grim details behind the murders of Karlie and Khandalyce Pearce. Geordie follows with a look at the unsolved case of murdered Australian woman, Rachelle Childs. When a burning body was found on a beach near Gerroa in New South Wales, Australia, in 2001, the remains were quickly identified as belonging to car-dealership worker Rachelle Childs. Police, friends and family were shocked and confused buy the grim discovery – who would want to kill Rachelle? As the subject of a new podcast series called Dear Rachelle, Geordie digs into the case and reveals the number one suspect who potentially has gotten away with murder. Listen to find out more!So pop on your headphones, grab a brown lemonade and join Geordie & Michelle for this week's episode, plus chit-chat about hometowns, Ivan Milat and more, only on Eavesdroppin' podcast. And remember, wherever you are, whatever you do, just keep Eavesdroppin'! *Disclaimer: We don't claim to have any factual info about anything ever and our opinions are just opinions not fact, sooorrrryyy! Don't sue us! Please rate, review, tell your friends and subscribe in all the usual places – we love it when you do! Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/eavesdroppinDo write in with your stories at hello@eavesdroppinpodcast.com or send us a Voice Note!Listen: www.eavesdroppinpodcast.com or https://podfollow.com/eavesdroppinYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqcuzv-EXizUo4emmt9PgfwFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/eavesdroppinpodcast#dearrachelle #angelofbelanglo #karliepearcestevenson #australia #murder #reallife #coldcase #truecrime #rachellechilds #unsolvedmurder #eavesdroppin #eavesdroppinpodcast #eavesdroppincomedypodcast #podcast #comedy Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sam raimi was given a lot of money to do whatever he wanted. Things get silly, talking goat silly. Why does that old hag keep puking? Man, who knows man.NEXT EPISODE ➟ Alaina pending (maybe Autopsy of Jane Doe?)PATREON (BONUS EPISODES, VIDEO CONTENT, AND MORE!) ➟ https://patreon.com/screampodcastSCREAM! SOCIALS: Instagram ➟ https://z-p42.www.instagram.com/screampodcast/ Facebook ➟ https://www.facebook.com/thescreampod/?ref=py_cSCREAMPODCAST@YAHOO.COMHORROR SOUP SOCIALS: Instagram ➟ https://www.instagram.com/horrorsoup/?hl=enYOUTUBE ➟ https://www.youtube.com/c/HorrorSoupLETTERBOXD (MOVIE REVIEW APP) ➟ https://letterboxd.com/horrorsoupcaleb/~Music Credits~ETHAN HURT – WWW.ETHANHURT.COMKYLE HERMAN - @iamkyleherman on InstagramSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Would you rather 4 Million Dollars in Miami or 2 Million in Columbia SC --> YES this was real discussion with the fellas on USC Gamecock QB SellersNEW MERCH DROP - BLOCK PARTY ⁠⁠DADS T-SHIRT⁠⁠Exclusively brought to you by No Grease Barbershop Northlake and Premium OutletsThe fellas react to Trent views on being mentally tough vs mentally smart - (17:09) K. Michelle sits with Cam Newton to discuss how Black Men have to stop creating broken homes - (35:28) DDG says he will go on Joe Budden if Melyssa Ford isnt there but Pastor Mike has some advice for DDG - (41:10) Ray Daniels says Jay-Z should reach out and save Dame and Gavin disagrees wholeheartedly - (01:01:00) List of countries with the most beautiful women is released and the USA is too low! - (01:06:00) Jane Doe released some cloudy details in the Diddy trial and the fellas discuss consent vs coercion - (01:17:00) SPORTS TAKE: Pastor Mike reacts to Magic Johnson definition of what a NBA Superstar is. Submit to #ASKADAD:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://www.blackdadsclub.org/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Subscribe to Our YouTube:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://bit.ly/BDCYTSub ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠JOIN THE DISCORD:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://discord.gg/YcFrdCbFFollow Us Today:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Instagram ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠-⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Twitter⁠⁠

Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing a new lawsuit from a woman identified as "Jane Doe," who alleges that in 2004, at the age of 17, she was sexually assaulted during one of Combs' renowned Fourth of July White Parties in the Hamptons. According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff, then an aspiring model, was invited to the exclusive event, where she was introduced to Combs. She claims that after being offered a drink, she became disoriented and was led to a secluded area, where the alleged assault occurred.This lawsuit is among several recent legal actions against Combs, with multiple individuals accusing him of sexual misconduct spanning over two decades. Combs' legal team has denied these allegations, describing them as baseless and asserting his innocence. The plaintiff in this case is represented by attorney Tony Buzbee, who is also handling numerous other cases against Combs.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New Diddy lawsuit claims he raped girl, 17, at infamous White Party in the Hamptons | Daily Mail Online

​Jane Doe, the woman who accused Jay-Z of raping her in 2000 when she was 13 years old, has filed a motion to dismiss the defamation lawsuit that the rapper filed against her. Jay-Z's lawsuit, filed in March 2025, alleges that Doe and her attorneys knowingly made false and malicious claims in an attempt to extort him, resulting in reputational harm and financial losses exceeding $20 million. In her motion, filed on April 22, Doe argues that her allegations, made in court documents and media interviews, are protected under California law and cannot form the basis for a defamation claim. She also contends that Jay-Z's claims of malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and civil conspiracy lack legal merit and factual support.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jay-Z's Rape Accuser Files Motion to Dismiss His Defamation Lawsuit Against HerBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The judge overseeing the lawsuit filed by "Jane Doe" against Sean "Diddy" Combs ruled that the plaintiff cannot proceed anonymously. In her decision, the judge emphasized the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings, noting that while privacy concerns are understandable in sensitive cases, they do not outweigh the legal principle of openness in the courtroom. The court found that the plaintiff's request lacked specific evidence of harm that would justify anonymity, especially given the public interest surrounding the high-profile case. As a result, the plaintiff has been given a deadline to refile her case using her real name if she wishes to proceed; failure to do so could result in the case's dismissal.(commercial at 10:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:doe-v-combs-ruling-usdc-southern-new-york.pdf

Newly resurfaced photos capturing a heated exchange between Sean "Diddy" Combs and Jennifer Lopez at a 2000 MTV Video Music Awards afterparty have drawn significant attention amid fresh allegations against Combs. The images show Combs holding a champagne bottle and engaging with guests at the Lotus nightclub, where the pair were reportedly seen in a tense confrontation. Witnesses recall that Lopez appeared visibly upset and at one point seemed to be reprimanding Combs as he mingled with other celebrities, including Jay-Z and Eminem. Despite the party's glamorous backdrop, the argument escalated, reportedly ending with both leaving the venue together, but with lingering tension evident in their interaction.These photos have resurfaced at a pivotal moment, as Combs faces a new lawsuit accusing him of sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl on that same night. The anonymous plaintiff, represented by attorney Tony Buzbee, alleges that after the afterparty, Combs lured her to a private residence where the assault took place. Combs' legal team categorically denies the allegations, branding them as attempts to tarnish his reputation. This lawsuit adds to Combs' mounting legal issues, including charges of racketeering and sex trafficking, which have kept him detained without bail. The resurfacing of these photos highlights the intense scrutiny on Combs' past actions and the challenges his legal team now faces in defending his reputation.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy and Jennifer Lopez seen having heated argument in unearthed party photos from same night he's accused of raping 13-year-old girl | Daily Mail Online

Sean "Diddy" Combs, a prominent music mogul and entrepreneur, has faced multiple allegations of sexual assault spanning several decades. One such allegation involves a woman identified as Jane Doe, who claims she was assaulted by Combs during an event related to the MTV reality show Making the Band.BackgroundIn 2004, Jane Doe, then 19 years old, was a college student in Brooklyn. She met Combs during a promotional event for Making the Band, a reality show he produced that aimed to form a new music group.According to Jane Doe's lawsuit:Invitation to Hotel Room: Combs invited her and a friend to his hotel room in Manhattan under the pretense of discussing potential opportunities in the music industry.Unwanted Advances: Once in the room, Combs allegedly made unsolicited sexual advances, including inappropriate touching and attempts to kiss her.Physical Resistance: Jane Doe resisted his advances, leading to a physical struggle where she was reportedly pushed onto the bed.Assault: She alleges that Combs then sexually assaulted her despite her protests.Following the alleged incident, Jane Doe states she experienced significant emotional distress, including feelings of shame and humiliation. She also claims to have faced professional setbacks as a result of the assault.Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Combs, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault. The case is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkThis allegation is part of a series of accusations against Combs, with multiple individuals coming forward with claims of sexual assault and misconduct. Combs has denied these allegations, and his legal team has stated that he intends to defend himself against these claims.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-da-band-photoshoot-complaint.pdf

The lawsuit filed by Jane Doe, represented by Tony Buzbee, accuses Sean "Diddy" Combs of sexual assault, coercion, and control from 2020 through 2024. Doe alleges she was drugged during visits to Combs' homes, subjected to abuse, and monitored by his associates. The complaint describes an instance where Doe became pregnant after an assault and was pressured to terminate the pregnancy. Seeking damages for emotional and physical harm, Doe's case forms part of broader legal action involving over 120 accusers represented by Buzbee against Combs for similar misconduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-biggie-video-party-complaint.pdf (courthousenews.com)

The lawsuit filed by Jane Doe, represented by Tony Buzbee, accuses Sean "Diddy" Combs of sexual assault, coercion, and control from 2020 through 2024. Doe alleges she was drugged during visits to Combs' homes, subjected to abuse, and monitored by his associates. The complaint describes an instance where Doe became pregnant after an assault and was pressured to terminate the pregnancy. Seeking damages for emotional and physical harm, Doe's case forms part of broader legal action involving over 120 accusers represented by Buzbee against Combs for similar misconduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-biggie-video-party-complaint.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

This is a special drop . To hot to hold. I discuss Gangbang Queen Bonnie Blue got kicked off OF for her wild Gangbang and porn content. But it get better, She is beefing with follow OF girl Sophia Rain as she claims Bonnie's Content is cheapening OF. Then I discuss Kendrick taking over Toronto and the Drake Stans are mad. This proves that love of music sometimes trump petty rap beef alliances. Then I talk about the Jane Doe bragging about her skills during the freak offs and how people can't handle it when a women actually enjoy doing GBs, Threesomes and etc. Plus more. Want More Content? 2 ways to get it1. Subscribe my Savage Smoke Sessions on Spotify ( $4.99 a month)⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/smokethisova/subscribe⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠2. Become A Premium SmokerSubscribe to the Premium Smoke Room On Loyalfans⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.loyalfans.com/PremiumSmokeRoom⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Want More Content. Become a Premium Smoker⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠for 5 Premium Podcasts , Special Events and More $25.99 a monthSponsored ByHottest Adult Mag Online⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://eroticismmagazine.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Hottest Adult Film Company⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠blusherotica.com/videos⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠SmokeKind The King Of THCa⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://smokekind.com/?ref=bobbie_lucas⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠PassDat Clothing⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.teepublic.com/user/the-inhaling-potnasPorn/ Music/ Social Media⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://allmylinks.com/pornrapstar⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Get The Merch:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.bonfire.com/store/s-t-o-merch-store/

The lawsuit filed by Jane Doe, represented by Tony Buzbee, accuses Sean "Diddy" Combs of sexual assault, coercion, and control from 2020 through 2024. Doe alleges she was drugged during visits to Combs' homes, subjected to abuse, and monitored by his associates. The complaint describes an instance where Doe became pregnant after an assault and was pressured to terminate the pregnancy. Seeking damages for emotional and physical harm, Doe's case forms part of broader legal action involving over 120 accusers represented by Buzbee against Combs for similar misconduct.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:combs-biggie-video-party-complaint.pdf (courthousenews.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

A woman identified as Jane Doe has filed a lawsuit alleging that Sean "Diddy" Combs sexually assaulted her during an after-party following the MTV Video Music Awards (VMAs) in 2005. The plaintiff claims that Combs invited her to the party under the pretense of discussing potential career opportunities in the music industry. Once there, she alleges that Combs provided her with a drink that was drugged, rendering her incapacitated. The lawsuit asserts that Combs then proceeded to sexually assault her.The legal action accuses Combs of sexual assault, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Jane Doe seeks unspecified damages and emphasizes the lasting psychological impact of the alleged incident. Combs' legal team has categorically denied these allegations, describing them as baseless and asserting that they will vigorously defend against the claims in court.(commercial at 11:08)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630244.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the morning session, defense attorney Teny Geragos pressed Jane about intimate details of her relationship with Combs, especially his “hotel nights” or “freak-offs.” She admitted that these events involved group sex with male escorts, drug use, and coercion—recalling one particularly violent 2024 incident where Combs physically attacked her and then ordered her to perform oral sex on another man while he watched.As the defense continued, they honed in on Jane's emotional attachment to Combs. Under cross-examination, she read aloud numerous affectionate text messages—declarations of love and gratitude—that visibly rattled her and led to tears.   Geragos used these messages to argue that her relationship with Combs was based on affection and voluntary involvement, not coercion. Though deeply emotional at points, Jane stood firmly by her account that, despite those feelings, she was compelled to participate in the encounters described as abusive.Jane's testimony is scheduled to continue after lunch and be finished by the end of proceedings on June 12th.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNN

Following the midday recess, Jane resumed her testimony amid visible emotional strain. Under cross‑examination, she recounted receiving a distressing voice note from Combs during one of their “hotel nights,” which she described as coercive, drug‑fueled sexual encounters involving multiple men—what the defense refers to as “freak‑offs.” In the clip, Combs told her to “move on” and end their relationship, prompting her to reveal on the stand that the dynamic had grown increasingly unhealthy by late 2023. She tearfully admitted that although she still harbors love for him, the orchestrated group sex sessions had become a source of deep emotional pain.Jane also detailed the stakes behind these encounters, explaining that Combs had threatened to stop paying her rent or even release intimate recordings if she refused to participate. She conveyed to jurors how she felt compelled to comply—to the extent that these interactions had a profound psychological toll. On the stand, she expressed that she would have gladly given up all material benefits—gifts, vacations, financial support—if it meant avoiding those “hotel nights.” Her testimony sought to underscore the prosecution's theory that Combs used financial dependency and emotional manipulation to traffic her for sex.The question is, was it effective?to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 12, 2025 - Day 22 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

A woman identified as Jane Doe has filed a lawsuit alleging that Sean "Diddy" Combs sexually assaulted her during an after-party following the MTV Video Music Awards (VMAs) in 2005. The plaintiff claims that Combs invited her to the party under the pretense of discussing potential career opportunities in the music industry. Once there, she alleges that Combs provided her with a drink that was drugged, rendering her incapacitated. The lawsuit asserts that Combs then proceeded to sexually assault her.The legal action accuses Combs of sexual assault, battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Jane Doe seeks unspecified damages and emphasizes the lasting psychological impact of the alleged incident. Combs' legal team has categorically denied these allegations, describing them as baseless and asserting that they will vigorously defend against the claims in court.(commercial at 11:08)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630244.1.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Following the midday recess, Jane resumed her testimony amid visible emotional strain. Under cross‑examination, she recounted receiving a distressing voice note from Combs during one of their “hotel nights,” which she described as coercive, drug‑fueled sexual encounters involving multiple men—what the defense refers to as “freak‑offs.” In the clip, Combs told her to “move on” and end their relationship, prompting her to reveal on the stand that the dynamic had grown increasingly unhealthy by late 2023. She tearfully admitted that although she still harbors love for him, the orchestrated group sex sessions had become a source of deep emotional pain.Jane also detailed the stakes behind these encounters, explaining that Combs had threatened to stop paying her rent or even release intimate recordings if she refused to participate. She conveyed to jurors how she felt compelled to comply—to the extent that these interactions had a profound psychological toll. On the stand, she expressed that she would have gladly given up all material benefits—gifts, vacations, financial support—if it meant avoiding those “hotel nights.” Her testimony sought to underscore the prosecution's theory that Combs used financial dependency and emotional manipulation to traffic her for sex.The question is, was it effective?to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 12, 2025 - Day 22 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs et al. (Civ. No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV), Defendant Marriott International, Inc. has submitted a reply memorandum in further support of its motion to dismiss the complaint. Marriott argues that the plaintiff's allegations fail to establish a legal basis for holding the company liable for the alleged actions of the co-defendants. They contend that the complaint lacks specific factual assertions linking Marriott to any wrongful conduct and that mere association with other defendants does not suffice to state a claim.Furthermore, Marriott emphasizes that the plaintiff's claims against it are speculative and unsupported by concrete evidence. The company asserts that the complaint does not demonstrate how Marriott had any control over or direct involvement in the alleged incidents. As a result, Marriott requests that the court dismiss the claims against it, arguing that allowing the case to proceed without substantive allegations would set a concerning precedent for corporate liability based on tenuous connections.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - Reply ISO MTD (Marriott _ McCrary)(1618681774.5).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing a new lawsuit from a woman identified as "Jane Doe," who alleges that in 2004, at the age of 17, she was sexually assaulted during one of Combs' renowned Fourth of July White Parties in the Hamptons. According to the lawsuit, the plaintiff, then an aspiring model, was invited to the exclusive event, where she was introduced to Combs. She claims that after being offered a drink, she became disoriented and was led to a secluded area, where the alleged assault occurred.This lawsuit is among several recent legal actions against Combs, with multiple individuals accusing him of sexual misconduct spanning over two decades. Combs' legal team has denied these allegations, describing them as baseless and asserting his innocence. The plaintiff in this case is represented by attorney Tony Buzbee, who is also handling numerous other cases against Combs.(commercial at 7:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New Diddy lawsuit claims he raped girl, 17, at infamous White Party in the Hamptons | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Sadly, former MTV VJ host Ananda Lewis passed away at 52 after battling cancer. Jane Doe said the Diddy needed companionship after ex Cassie filed a civil lawsuit against him. And Ryan Gosling will NOT be in the upcoming Black Panther movie after fans spread rumors online that he was!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

On June 11, the trial entered its fifth day of testimony from the witness known as “Jane,” Combs's former girlfriend and key prosecution witness. She recounted disturbing details about the coercive dynamics of their relationship between 2021 and 2024, including multiday “hotel nights”—sex parties involving male escorts that witnessed her using Rhino erection pills, prepping matching outfits for participants, and being forced into prolonged foreplay that she described as “really not so fun”.   Under direct examination, she detailed how Combs allegedly coerced her into unprotected sex with porn stars and escorts, and physically assaulted her during these “freak-offs”During cross-examination by defense attorney Teny Geragos, Jane was compelled to read aloud dozens of explicit text messages she had sent to Combs—expressions of love, gratitude, and desire—including passages like “I never had a man take care of me like you do”—a strategy aimed at undermining her credibility and suggesting consent.   This emotionally charged moment culminated in Jane breaking down and crying on the stand,   The defense also highlighted luxury gifts—such as a $20,000 business investment, monthly rent, designer bags, and a Van Cleef necklace—to argue she benefited materially from the relationship and wasn't entirely coerced.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 11, 2025 - Day 21 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In the morning session, defense attorney Teny Geragos pressed Jane about intimate details of her relationship with Combs, especially his “hotel nights” or “freak-offs.” She admitted that these events involved group sex with male escorts, drug use, and coercion—recalling one particularly violent 2024 incident where Combs physically attacked her and then ordered her to perform oral sex on another man while he watched.As the defense continued, they honed in on Jane's emotional attachment to Combs. Under cross-examination, she read aloud numerous affectionate text messages—declarations of love and gratitude—that visibly rattled her and led to tears.   Geragos used these messages to argue that her relationship with Combs was based on affection and voluntary involvement, not coercion. Though deeply emotional at points, Jane stood firmly by her account that, despite those feelings, she was compelled to participate in the encounters described as abusive.Jane's testimony is scheduled to continue after lunch and be finished by the end of proceedings on June 12th.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial coverage | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Newly resurfaced photos capturing a heated exchange between Sean "Diddy" Combs and Jennifer Lopez at a 2000 MTV Video Music Awards afterparty have drawn significant attention amid fresh allegations against Combs. The images show Combs holding a champagne bottle and engaging with guests at the Lotus nightclub, where the pair were reportedly seen in a tense confrontation. Witnesses recall that Lopez appeared visibly upset and at one point seemed to be reprimanding Combs as he mingled with other celebrities, including Jay-Z and Eminem. Despite the party's glamorous backdrop, the argument escalated, reportedly ending with both leaving the venue together, but with lingering tension evident in their interaction.These photos have resurfaced at a pivotal moment, as Combs faces a new lawsuit accusing him of sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl on that same night. The anonymous plaintiff, represented by attorney Tony Buzbee, alleges that after the afterparty, Combs lured her to a private residence where the assault took place. Combs' legal team categorically denies the allegations, branding them as attempts to tarnish his reputation. This lawsuit adds to Combs' mounting legal issues, including charges of racketeering and sex trafficking, which have kept him detained without bail. The resurfacing of these photos highlights the intense scrutiny on Combs' past actions and the challenges his legal team now faces in defending his reputation.(commercial at 8:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy and Jennifer Lopez seen having heated argument in unearthed party photos from same night he's accused of raping 13-year-old girl | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The judge overseeing the lawsuit filed by "Jane Doe" against Sean "Diddy" Combs ruled that the plaintiff cannot proceed anonymously. In her decision, the judge emphasized the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings, noting that while privacy concerns are understandable in sensitive cases, they do not outweigh the legal principle of openness in the courtroom. The court found that the plaintiff's request lacked specific evidence of harm that would justify anonymity, especially given the public interest surrounding the high-profile case. As a result, the plaintiff has been given a deadline to refile her case using her real name if she wishes to proceed; failure to do so could result in the case's dismissal.(commercial at 10:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:doe-v-combs-ruling-usdc-southern-new-york.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Diddy Trial Jane Doe Cross examination Diddy is a confirmed cuckold+ she was jealous of Caresha

Amy, T.J, and Aubrey O’Day explore the layered testimony of Jane Doe — with one foot planted in survivor advocacy, and the other stepping into the uncomfortable complexities of testimony that doesn’t fit neatly into one box. While abuse is always the abuser’s fault, Jane’s story raises hard questions: What happens when love turns transactional, and survival means knowing your price? From contradictions on the stand to Diddy still footing her legal bills, Aubrey asks- how much power can you reclaim when the man you're testifying against you still willingly have signing the checks?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jane Doe said P Diddy would watch Dateline after the "freak offs". Glen Powell's ex Gigi Paris opened up about their breakup on the "Too Much" podcast. Paris blamed their breakup on Glen Powell and Sydney Sweeney's off camera romance. Dakota Johnson and Chris Martin split up after 8 years due after wedding complications.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this letter to Judge Subramanian regarding the United States v. Combs trial, the defense objects to several exhibits the government intends to introduce during Jane Doe's testimony—specifically, text messages and Notes App entries Jane used as a diary during her relationship with Sean Combs. The defense argues that many of these notes fail to meet the admissibility standards under Rules 801(d)(1)(B) and 803(3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. They contend that some notes should be excluded entirely because they were written after Jane read Cassie Ventura's lawsuit and after the government began its investigation, thereby lacking the necessary contemporaneity required under Rule 801(d)(1)(B). The defense also asserts that many of the notes do not meet Rule 803(3)'s standards regarding statements of then-existing mental state and should not be used to improperly guide Jane's direct testimony or bolster her credibility.Additionally, the defense objects to Exhibit C-251, arguing it contains inadmissible hearsay in the form of messages between Jane and Kristina Khorram from December 2023. They also raise a Rule 106 objection concerning the admission of certain text messages without fuller contextual information that could alter their meaning. Finally, the defense opposes the admission of Government Exhibit E-171 on both hearsay grounds and under Rule 403, asserting that its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice. The letter urges the Court to prevent what the defense views as improper use of these materials to frame and improperly enhance Jane Doe's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.401.0.pdf

In a letter to Judge Subramanian, the Government opposed the defense's motion to strike exhibits GX E-331-F-R and GX E-331-H-R, which had already been admitted into evidence on June 6, 2025. The Government argued that these exhibits were properly admitted and remain central to proving the sex trafficking allegations against Sean Combs. The letter also addressed the defense's arguments, raised in their June 8th filing and discussed in court, suggesting that the Government's overarching theory of sex trafficking should be limited or curtailed.The prosecution maintained that its theory of sex trafficking, as presented to the jury, is fully supported by both the law and the evidence admitted thus far. The letter emphasized that the exhibits in question are not only relevant but critical to establishing the elements of the trafficking offense, particularly in demonstrating the coercion, pattern of conduct, and exploitation alleged. The Government urged the Court to reject the defense's attempt to narrow the scope of the case or to exclude key evidence that speaks directly to the heart of the charges.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.396.0.pdf

In the case of Doe v. Combs (No. 1:24-cv-08054-MKV), the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a Memorandum of Law supporting her motion for reconsideration of the court's decision denying her request to proceed under a pseudonym. She also sought permission to file a supporting declaration under seal. The plaintiff argued that the court had overlooked critical factors, including the highly sensitive nature of the allegations and the potential for significant harm if her identity were disclosed. She emphasized that revealing her identity could lead to severe emotional distress and possible retaliation, given the prominence of the defendant, Sean Combs.Additionally, the plaintiff contended that allowing her to proceed anonymously would not prejudice the defendants and would serve the public interest by encouraging victims of sexual assault to come forward without fear of exposure. The request to file the declaration under seal was made to protect the confidentiality of detailed personal information pertinent to her motion.(commercial at 7:07)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630450.21.0.pdf

During the afternoon session on June 10th, 2025, at the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, the defense team continued its sustained cross-examination of Jane Doe Victim 2. The questioning remained sharply focused on attempting to undermine her credibility before the jury. Defense attorneys zeroed in on alleged inconsistencies between her in-court testimony and prior statements made to law enforcement and in civil litigation. They pressed her on precise dates, locations, and details of the alleged trafficking incidents she described, suggesting that elements of her narrative had shifted over time. The defense also highlighted text messages and communications that they argued were inconsistent with the portrayal of coercion and control presented by the government.Throughout the afternoon, Jane Doe 2 maintained her composure but showed visible signs of fatigue under the lengthy and at times repetitive questioning. The defense probed her connections to other accusers and her interactions with civil attorneys, implying possible coordination or financial motivation. Prosecutors objected at several points to the tone and scope of the questioning, but Judge Subramanian largely allowed the cross-examination to proceed. No new evidence was introduced; the session remained centered on testing the consistency and reliability of Jane Doe 2's testimony. The court adjourned with the cross-examination still ongoing, setting the stage for its conclusion in the next session.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 10, 2025 - Day 20 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNN

The Town Center at Boca Raton should conjure up images of luxury designers and expensive restaurants but unfortunately for those local to the high-end mall, it is a string of abductions and brutal murders that remains in the forefront of many minds. When women and their children began getting abducted from the mall in 2007, locals to Boca Raton and around the country began asking, is anyone safe?  Chapters: 00:00 Welcome to the Dark Oak 7:54 The Boca Raton Mall Murders 56:33 The Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance     Sources: Nancy & Joey Bochicchio | Boca Raton, FL. (n.d.). https://www.myboca.us/214/Nancy-Joey-Bochicchio Glass, A. (2025, March 24). WPTV News Channel 5 West Palm. WPTV News Channel 5 West Palm. https://www.wptv.com/news/region-s-palm-beach-county/boca-raton/still-no-arrests-18-years-after-boca-raton-mall-abduction-murder Bente, K. (2024, August 7). Still Unsolved: 17 years since Jane Doe abduction and Boca Raton Town Center Mall murders. WPEC. https://cbs12.com/news/cbs12-news-i-team/still-unsolved-17-years-since-jane-doe-abduction-and-boca-raton-town-center-mall-murders-south-florida-news-true-crime-august-6-2024 Markowitz, M. (2025, February 2). Luxury Florida mall's string of murders and kidnapping have one thing in common: retired FBI agent. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/us/luxury-florida-mall-linked-string-murders-kidnapping-have-one-thing-common-retired-fbi-agent Glass, A., & Ostroff, J. (2024, May 24). WPTV News Channel 5 West Palm. WPTV News Channel 5 West Palm. https://www.wptv.com/news/crime/the-missing-piece Criminology. (2025, June 3). The Boca Raton Mall murders [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlaOGe4YOvg   Join The Dark Oak Discussion: Patreon The Dark Oak Podcast Website Facebook Instagram Twitter TikTok Youtube This episode of The Dark Oak was created, researched, written, recorded, hosted, edited, published, and marketed by Cynthia and Stefanie of Just Us Gals Productions with artwork by Justyse Himes and Music by Ryan Creep

Amy, T.J, and Aubrey O’Day explore the layered testimony of Jane Doe — with one foot planted in survivor advocacy, and the other stepping into the uncomfortable complexities of testimony that doesn’t fit neatly into one box. While abuse is always the abuser’s fault, Jane’s story raises hard questions: What happens when love turns transactional, and survival means knowing your price? From contradictions on the stand to Diddy still footing her legal bills, Aubrey asks- how much power can you reclaim when the man you're testifying against you still willingly have signing the checks?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jane Doe, Sean "Diddy" Combs’s most recent ex-girlfriend testifies for another day, that "hotel nights" were the only way she'd ever see him. Growing fears of a serial killer as a young woman is found dead in the woods of Massachusetts, marking the 13th unexplained death across New England since March. A Los Angeles protester is now on the FBI's "Most Wanted" list for allegedly throwing rocks at federal officers. Drew Nelson reports.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In a letter to Judge Subramanian, the Government opposed the defense's motion to strike exhibits GX E-331-F-R and GX E-331-H-R, which had already been admitted into evidence on June 6, 2025. The Government argued that these exhibits were properly admitted and remain central to proving the sex trafficking allegations against Sean Combs. The letter also addressed the defense's arguments, raised in their June 8th filing and discussed in court, suggesting that the Government's overarching theory of sex trafficking should be limited or curtailed.The prosecution maintained that its theory of sex trafficking, as presented to the jury, is fully supported by both the law and the evidence admitted thus far. The letter emphasized that the exhibits in question are not only relevant but critical to establishing the elements of the trafficking offense, particularly in demonstrating the coercion, pattern of conduct, and exploitation alleged. The Government urged the Court to reject the defense's attempt to narrow the scope of the case or to exclude key evidence that speaks directly to the heart of the charges.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.396.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a recent ruling, Judge Analisa Torres of the U.S. District Court granted the accuser in a high-profile lawsuit against Jay-Z the ability to remain anonymous. The accuser, identified only as "Jane Doe," had filed a lawsuit alleging sexual assault by the rapper and business mogul. Judge Torres acknowledged the significant public interest in the case but determined that the plaintiff's privacy and safety outweighed the need for public disclosure of her identity. The order emphasized the potential risks of harassment, intimidation, and stigma that could arise if her identity were revealed, particularly given Jay-Z's prominence and the heightened media scrutiny surrounding the case.The ruling does not impact the progression of the legal proceedings, as the court will ensure both parties have access to necessary information for a fair trial. However, it sets an important precedent in balancing the rights of accusers in sensitive cases with public transparency. Judge Torres underscored that allowing Jane Doe to proceed anonymously would not prejudice Jay-Z's defense or compromise the integrity of the judicial process.(commercial at 8:42)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.630244.53.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this letter to Judge Subramanian regarding the United States v. Combs trial, the defense objects to several exhibits the government intends to introduce during Jane Doe's testimony—specifically, text messages and Notes App entries Jane used as a diary during her relationship with Sean Combs. The defense argues that many of these notes fail to meet the admissibility standards under Rules 801(d)(1)(B) and 803(3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. They contend that some notes should be excluded entirely because they were written after Jane read Cassie Ventura's lawsuit and after the government began its investigation, thereby lacking the necessary contemporaneity required under Rule 801(d)(1)(B). The defense also asserts that many of the notes do not meet Rule 803(3)'s standards regarding statements of then-existing mental state and should not be used to improperly guide Jane's direct testimony or bolster her credibility.Additionally, the defense objects to Exhibit C-251, arguing it contains inadmissible hearsay in the form of messages between Jane and Kristina Khorram from December 2023. They also raise a Rule 106 objection concerning the admission of certain text messages without fuller contextual information that could alter their meaning. Finally, the defense opposes the admission of Government Exhibit E-171 on both hearsay grounds and under Rule 403, asserting that its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice. The letter urges the Court to prevent what the defense views as improper use of these materials to frame and improperly enhance Jane Doe's testimony.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.401.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

During the afternoon session on June 10th, 2025, at the federal trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, the defense team continued its sustained cross-examination of Jane Doe Victim 2. The questioning remained sharply focused on attempting to undermine her credibility before the jury. Defense attorneys zeroed in on alleged inconsistencies between her in-court testimony and prior statements made to law enforcement and in civil litigation. They pressed her on precise dates, locations, and details of the alleged trafficking incidents she described, suggesting that elements of her narrative had shifted over time. The defense also highlighted text messages and communications that they argued were inconsistent with the portrayal of coercion and control presented by the government.Throughout the afternoon, Jane Doe 2 maintained her composure but showed visible signs of fatigue under the lengthy and at times repetitive questioning. The defense probed her connections to other accusers and her interactions with civil attorneys, implying possible coordination or financial motivation. Prosecutors objected at several points to the tone and scope of the questioning, but Judge Subramanian largely allowed the cross-examination to proceed. No new evidence was introduced; the session remained centered on testing the consistency and reliability of Jane Doe 2's testimony. The court adjourned with the cross-examination still ongoing, setting the stage for its conclusion in the next session.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:June 10, 2025 - Day 20 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial | CNNBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jane Doe says that P Diddy is still paying for her attorney fees. Zach Bryan is throwing a concert that is relatively affordable for fans. Sydney Sweeney's soap is selling for $2,000 on Ebay!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this letter to Judge Subramanian, the defense reiterated its renewed objections to the admission of exhibits GXE-331-F-R and GXE-331-H-R, which were introduced during the continued direct examination of the witness “Jane” on June 6, 2025. The defense argued that these exhibits were either improperly authenticated or unfairly prejudicial, lacking the necessary foundation for admission under the Federal Rules of Evidence. They maintained that the government's use of these materials risked misleading the jury and compromising the defendant's right to a fair trial.Additionally, the defense sought to provide broader legal context to guide the Court's rulings on any similar evidentiary issues moving forward. They emphasized the importance of applying a consistent and rigorous standard to the admission of exhibits that could impact witness credibility or the core allegations in the case. The letter urged the Court to sustain the defense's objections and exercise heightened scrutiny to prevent the introduction of unreliable or prejudicial evidence that could unduly influence the jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.387.0.pdf

As we wrap up the fourth full week of testimony, Amy and T.J. discuss another crazy day in court that included the judge threatening to kick Diddy out of his own trial for trying to communicate with jurors. Also, a star witness is discredited by the defense and the highly anticipated “Jane Doe” takes the stand.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.