Podcast appearances and mentions of Benjamin I Page

CE PODCAST A ETE DIFFUSE UNE PREMIERE FOIS LE 28 MARS 2023.Chaleur humaine prend une pause en février, mais je vous propose de réécouter cet épisode qui fait écho à l'actualité de ces dernières semaines. Cet entretien avec Hélène Landemore permet de mieux comprendre les enjeux démocratiques de la transition et revient sur l'expérience de la convention citoyenne pour le climat. A bientôt ! Nabil**** Recevez gratuitement tous les mardis l'infolettre Chaleur humaine en vous inscrivant ici ****Est ce que notre système démocratique est compatible avec l'urgence climatique ? Est ce que l'expérience de la convention citoyenne pour le climat est un modèle à suivre ou un échec cuisant ? Comment faire pour prendre les bonnes décisions - et les faire appliquer - dans le temps qui nous reste pour limiter les effets du changement climatique ?Hélène Landemore est professeure de sciences politiques à l'université de Yale, aux Etats-Unis. Elle a suivi de près les travaux de la Convention citoyenne sur le climat et et est l'autrice de "Open Democracy" (Princeton University Press). Dans le podcast, Hélène Landemore fait référence aux travaux de Martin Gilens et Benjamin I. Page sur l'influence des plus fortunés sur les politiques publiques. Et à cet article sur la cas allemand. Ecoutez gratuitement chaque mardi un nouvel épisode, sur Lemonde.fr, Apple Podcast ou Spotify. Retrouvez ici tous les épisodes. Cet épisode a été produit par Adèle Ponticelli avec l'aide d'Esther Michon, réalisé par Amandine Robillard. Musique originale : Amandine Robillard.Chaleur humaine c'est aussi un livre, que vous pouvez retrouver dans votre librairie favorite. Vous pouvez d'ailleurs y retrouver cet entretien avec Hélène Landemore en version texte.Vous pouvez m'écrire pour me faire part de vos avis, idées, et de vos critiques à l'adresse chaleurhumaine@lemonde.fr. Je réponds chaque semaine dans la newsletter Chaleur humaine à une question sur le défi climatique.

On this timely episode of China Field Notes, Scott Kennedy is joined by Xie Tao, Dean and Professor of the School of International Relations and Diplomacy at Beijing Foreign Studies University. Xie speaks to Scott after a remarkable trip with his students to the United States to observe the 2024 Iowa caucuses amidst a historic blizzard. They discuss how Xie became interested in studying American politics, the importance of field research, the difficulties he encountered entering the U.S., his impressions from Iowa, and his view of America's future. Although Xie is from China, his observations most strikingly reflect the perspective of a political scientist. Xie Tao is Dean and Professor of the School of International Relations and Diplomacy at Beijing Foreign Studies University. He holds a PhD in political science from Northwestern University (2007). His research interests include U.S. Congress, elections, public opinion, and U.S.-China relations. His research has been published in the Journal of Contemporary China and American Politics Research, as well as leading journals in China. He is the author of U.S.-China Relations: China Policy on Capitol Hill (Routledge 2009 and Living with the Dragon: How the American Public Views the Rise of China (with Benjamin I. Page, Columbia University Press, 2010).

De plus en plus, on entend des discours négatifs ou méfiants envers le monde politique : “tous pourris”, “je crois plus à la politique”, “je supporte même plus d'entendre sa voix”. Dans cet épisode, Lucie et Solène s'interrogent : est-ce qu'on peut vraiment agir sans politique ? Est-ce que le discours tous pourris n'est pas aussi très dangereux ? Et si les partis politiques ne sont plus à la page, alors comment organiser le pouvoir ? De plus en plus, on entend des discours négatifs ou méfiants envers le monde politique : “tous pourris”, “je crois plus à la politique”, “je supporte même plus d'entendre sa voix”. Dans cet épisode, Lucie et Solène s'interrogent : est-ce qu'on peut vraiment agir sans politique ? Est-ce que le discours tous pourris n'est pas aussi très dangereux ? Et si les partis politiques ne sont plus à la page, alors comment organiser le pouvoir ? RÉFÉRENCES Podcast : Comment concilier démocratie et urgence climatique ? Chaleur Humaine, lemonde.fr Référence aux travaux de Martin Gilens et Benjamin I. Page sur l'influence des plus fortunés sur les politiques publiques. https://sitebuilder.princeton.edu/ CRÉDITS Grand Écart est un podcast produit par makesense. Co-écriture : Solène Aymon et Lucie Chartouny. Montage/réalisation : Aurore Le Bihan. Identité sonore : Simon Drouard. Accompagnement éditorial : Hélène Binet. Chanson originale et interprétation : Talia Sarfati. Identité graphique : Daniel Buendia

**** Recevez gratuitement tous les mardis l'infolettre Chaleur humaine en vous inscrivant ici ****Les débats autour de la convention citoyenne pour le climat ou le mouvement des Gilets jaunes ont suscité des interrogations sur la capacité des instutions actuelles à répondre aux enjeux du défi climatique. Est ce que notre système démocratique est compatible avec l'urgence climatique ? Est ce que l'expérience de la convention citoyenne pour le climat est un modèle à suivre ou un échec cuisant ? De quels exemples peut-on s'inspirer pour faire progresser de front la démocratie et le climat ? Comment faire pour prendre les bonnes décisions - et les faire appliquer - dans le temps qui nous reste pour limiter les effets du changement climatique ?Hélène Landemore est professeure de sciences politiques à l'université de Yale, aux Etats-Unis. Elle a suivi de près les travaux de la Convention citoyenne sur le climat et et est l'autrice de Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century (Princeton University Press). Elle a codirigé le numéro de la revue Participations intitulé Les assemblées citoyennes, une nouvelle forme de représentation démocratique ?Dans le podcast, Hélène Landemore fait référence aux travaux de Martin Gilens et Benjamin I. Page sur l'influence des plus fortunés sur les politiques publiques. Et à cet article sur la cas allemand. Vous trouverez également ici une tribune d'Hélène Landemore sur la démarche de la convention climat.Un épisode produit par Adèle Ponticelli avec l'aide d'Esther Michon, réalisé par Amandine Robillard. Musique originale : Amandine Robillard.« Chaleur humaine » est un podcast hebdomadaire de réflexion et de débat sur les manières de faire face au défi climatique. Ecoutez gratuitement chaque mardi un nouvel épisode, sur Lemonde.fr, Apple Podcast, Acast ou Spotify. Retrouvez ici tous les épisodes.Vous pouvez m'écrire pour me faire part de vos avis, idées, et de vos critiques à l'adresse chaleurhumaine@lemonde.fr. Je réponds chaque semaine dans la newsletter Chaleur humaine à une question sur le défi climatique. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

We often talk about the need to protect American democracy. But perhaps those of us in the United States don't currently live in a democracy.As research shows, there's pretty much no correlation between the percentage of the population that supports a policy and its likelihood of being enacted. The strongest determinant of whether a policy gets enacted is how much money is behind it.So, how might we not just protect, but better yet revive our democracy? How might we revive  the relationship between the will of the people and the actions of our government?This week on Your Undivided Attention, we're doing something special. As we near the election, and representation is on our minds, we're airing a talk by Harvard Law professor and Creative Commons co-founder Larry Lessig. It's a 2019 talk he gave at the Politics and Prose bookstore in Washington, DC about his book, They Don't Represent Us.The book title has two meanings: first, they — as in our elected representatives — don't represent us. And second, we — as in the people — don't represent ourselves. And this is where social media comes in: we don't represent ourselves because the more we use social media, the more we see extreme versions of the other side, and the more extreme, outraged, and polarized we ourselves become.Last note: Lessig's talk is highly visual. We edited it lightly for clarity, and jump in periodically to narrate things you can't see. But if you prefer to watch his talk, you can find the link below in Recommended Media. RECOMMENDED MEDIA Video: They Don't Represent UsThe 2019 talk Larry Lessig gave at Politics and Prose in Washington, DC about his book of the same nameBook: They Don't Represent UsLarry Lessig's 2019 book that elaborates the ways in which democratic representation is in peril, and proposes a number of solutions to revive our democracy -- from ranked-choice voting to non-partisan open primariesTesting Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens Princeton's Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page study measuring the correlation between the preferences of different groups and the decisions of our government RECOMMENDED YUA EPISODESDigital Democracy is Within Reach with Audrey Tanghttps://www.humanetech.com/podcast/23-digital-democracy-is-within-reachHow Political Language Is Engineered with Drew Westen and Frank Luntzhttps://www.humanetech.com/podcast/53-how-political-language-is-engineeredYour Undivided Attention is produced by the Center for Humane Technology. Follow us on Twitter: @HumaneTech_

Dr. Rikki Dean is post-doctoral fellow at the research unit for Democratic Innovations at the Institute of Political Science at FB 03. In his research, Rikki is interested in the empirical research on democracy. He seeks to combine democratic theory and public administration theory with empirical social science to understand issues in participatory governance. Prior to joining the institute of political science at Goehte, he completed his PhD at the London School of Economics on the topic of "Democratising Bureaucracy", and worked at several universities in the UK, including Birmingham, Manchester, Oxford, and Westminster. He has been a visiting fellow at the Ash Center for Democratic Innovation and Governance at Harvard University and the Université Libre in Brussels. He's just returned to Frankfurt from Brussels and is currently focusing on projects about what citizens and other political actors want democracy to look like, and how citizen deliberation can be integrated into political institutions. Literature Afsahi, Afsoun, Emily Beausoleil, Rikki Dean, Selen A. Ercan, and Jean-Paul Gagnon. 2020. “Democracy in a Global Emergency: Five Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Democratic Theory 7 (2): v–xix. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2020.070201 Dean, Rikki J. 2017. “Beyond Radicalism and Resignation: The Competing Logics for Public Participation in Policy Decisions.” Policy & Politics 45 (2): 213–30. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14531466517034 ———. 2018. “Counter-Governance: Citizen Participation Beyond Collaboration.” Politics and Governance 6 (1): 180–88. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1221 Gilens, Martin, and Benjamin I. Page. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (03): 564–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595 Gough, Ian. 2017. Heat, Greed and Human Need: Climate Change, Capitalism and Sustainable Wellbeing. Heat, Greed and Human Need. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781785365102/chapter01.xhtml McCormick, John P. 2011. Machiavellian Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Smith, Graham. 2009. Democratic Innovations. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609848 Vergara, Camila. 2020. Systemic Corruption: Constitutional Ideas for an Anti-Oligarchic Republic. Princeton University Press. Winters, Jeffrey A., and Benjamin I. Page. 2009. “Oligarchy in the United States?” Perspectives on Politics 7 (04): 731–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709991770 Erfahrt mehr über uns bei Instagram oder Twitter @talksoscience und auf unserer Website

Richard Rorty — Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America Patreon https://www.patreon.com/Howell_Underground Venmo Payments http://www.venmo.com/Howell_Underground Howell_Underground on Odysee https://odysee.com/@Howell_Underground Howell Underground on Youtube https://www.youtube.com/c/HowellUnderground/videos #RichardRorty Richard Rorty — Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achieving_Our_Country Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf Democracy or Plutocracy? - America’s Existential Question by Kishore Mahbubani https://www.cirsd.org/en/horizons/horizons-autumn-2020-issue-no-17/democracy-or-plutocracy---americas-existential-question Corruption is Legal in America https://youtu.be/5tu32CCA_Ig “If our voices are not being heard from within the system, we should face the fact that we won’t be able to fix the problem by voting. It’s then that we should realize that we will need to overthrow the system.” ~Howell Underground “Probably the highest honor humans can achieve in the world—at least as it has existed for the last 100 years—is to be assassinated by the CIA. Most of our very best people have met this end. If Jesus had been around in modern times, you can be sure that he would have met this fate.”~Howell Underground #ForceTheVote #FuckTheSquad #FraudSquad Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley, Ro Khanna, Mark Pocan, Debbie Dingell, Ilhan Omar, Jesús “Chuy” García, Cori Bush, Katie Porter, Jamaal Bowman, Rashida Tlaib, Karen Bass, Jamie Raskin, Marie Newman, Barbara Lee, Pramila Jayapal @jimmy_dore, @SpeakerPelosi, @PramilaJayapal, @AOC, @AyannaPressley, @RoKhanna, @repmarkpocan, @RepDebDingell, @IlhanMN, @RepChuyGarcia, @CoriBush, @RepKatiePorter, @JamaalBowmanNY, @RashidaTlaib, @RepKarenBass, @RepRaskin, @Marie4Congress, @RepBarbaraLee The Who - Won’t Get Fooled Again https://genius.com/The-who-wont-get-fooled-again-lyrics How to Make Protest Signs https://youtu.be/tphh4aTooPk Contact me directly: https://www.facebook.com/allen.kit.howell https://twitter.com/HwlUnderground --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/revolutionorbust/support

With at least one new billionaire in the 2020 presidential race, the politics of the one percent are with us again. What do billionaires believe? And do they believe the same things as the average American? Answering these questions has until now been frustrated by the difficulty of fielding surveys of the very rich. Just finding where they live is hard enough. But a new book has solved part of this problem and answers many questions. Benjamin I. Page, Jason Seawright, and Matthew J. Lacombe have written Billionaires and Stealth Politics (University of Chicago Press, 2019). Page is the Gordon Scott Fulcher Professor of Decision Making at Northwestern University; Seawright is professor of political science at the Northwestern University, and Matthew J. Lacombe is a PhD candidate in the Department of Political Science at Northwestern University and is joining the faculty of Barnard College in the fall. In the book, we learn about the stealthy ways most billionaires participate in politics. They rarely utter a word about their beliefs in public, but do spend huge sums of money influencing politics. Unfortunately, only small amounts of that spending is publicly disclosed. Much of their spending is masked behind the non-transparent organizations that populate American politics. Stealthy politics, like the dark money groups that benefit, is a politics of secrecy and mystery, hardly the democratic politics of openness and transparency. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

With at least one new billionaire in the 2020 presidential race, the politics of the one percent are with us again. What do billionaires believe? And do they believe the same things as the average American? Answering these questions has until now been frustrated by the difficulty of fielding surveys of the very rich. Just finding where they live is hard enough. But a new book has solved part of this problem and answers many questions. Benjamin I. Page, Jason Seawright, and Matthew J. Lacombe have written Billionaires and Stealth Politics (University of Chicago Press, 2019). Page is the Gordon Scott Fulcher Professor of Decision Making at Northwestern University; Seawright is professor of political science at the Northwestern University, and Matthew J. Lacombe is a PhD candidate in the Department of Political Science at Northwestern University and is joining the faculty of Barnard College in the fall. In the book, we learn about the stealthy ways most billionaires participate in politics. They rarely utter a word about their beliefs in public, but do spend huge sums of money influencing politics. Unfortunately, only small amounts of that spending is publicly disclosed. Much of their spending is masked behind the non-transparent organizations that populate American politics. Stealthy politics, like the dark money groups that benefit, is a politics of secrecy and mystery, hardly the democratic politics of openness and transparency. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

With at least one new billionaire in the 2020 presidential race, the politics of the one percent are with us again. What do billionaires believe? And do they believe the same things as the average American? Answering these questions has until now been frustrated by the difficulty of fielding surveys of the very rich. Just finding where they live is hard enough. But a new book has solved part of this problem and answers many questions. Benjamin I. Page, Jason Seawright, and Matthew J. Lacombe have written Billionaires and Stealth Politics (University of Chicago Press, 2019). Page is the Gordon Scott Fulcher Professor of Decision Making at Northwestern University; Seawright is professor of political science at the Northwestern University, and Matthew J. Lacombe is a PhD candidate in the Department of Political Science at Northwestern University and is joining the faculty of Barnard College in the fall. In the book, we learn about the stealthy ways most billionaires participate in politics. They rarely utter a word about their beliefs in public, but do spend huge sums of money influencing politics. Unfortunately, only small amounts of that spending is publicly disclosed. Much of their spending is masked behind the non-transparent organizations that populate American politics. Stealthy politics, like the dark money groups that benefit, is a politics of secrecy and mystery, hardly the democratic politics of openness and transparency. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

With at least one new billionaire in the 2020 presidential race, the politics of the one percent are with us again. What do billionaires believe? And do they believe the same things as the average American? Answering these questions has until now been frustrated by the difficulty of fielding surveys of the very rich. Just finding where they live is hard enough. But a new book has solved part of this problem and answers many questions. Benjamin I. Page, Jason Seawright, and Matthew J. Lacombe have written Billionaires and Stealth Politics (University of Chicago Press, 2019). Page is the Gordon Scott Fulcher Professor of Decision Making at Northwestern University; Seawright is professor of political science at the Northwestern University, and Matthew J. Lacombe is a PhD candidate in the Department of Political Science at Northwestern University and is joining the faculty of Barnard College in the fall. In the book, we learn about the stealthy ways most billionaires participate in politics. They rarely utter a word about their beliefs in public, but do spend huge sums of money influencing politics. Unfortunately, only small amounts of that spending is publicly disclosed. Much of their spending is masked behind the non-transparent organizations that populate American politics. Stealthy politics, like the dark money groups that benefit, is a politics of secrecy and mystery, hardly the democratic politics of openness and transparency. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

With at least one new billionaire in the 2020 presidential race, the politics of the one percent are with us again. What do billionaires believe? And do they believe the same things as the average American? Answering these questions has until now been frustrated by the difficulty of fielding surveys of the very rich. Just finding where they live is hard enough. But a new book has solved part of this problem and answers many questions. Benjamin I. Page, Jason Seawright, and Matthew J. Lacombe have written Billionaires and Stealth Politics (University of Chicago Press, 2019). Page is the Gordon Scott Fulcher Professor of Decision Making at Northwestern University; Seawright is professor of political science at the Northwestern University, and Matthew J. Lacombe is a PhD candidate in the Department of Political Science at Northwestern University and is joining the faculty of Barnard College in the fall. In the book, we learn about the stealthy ways most billionaires participate in politics. They rarely utter a word about their beliefs in public, but do spend huge sums of money influencing politics. Unfortunately, only small amounts of that spending is publicly disclosed. Much of their spending is masked behind the non-transparent organizations that populate American politics. Stealthy politics, like the dark money groups that benefit, is a politics of secrecy and mystery, hardly the democratic politics of openness and transparency. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices