Podcast appearances and mentions of hilary smith

Joining Host Mike Pecci in studio today is the multi talented Actress/Creative Director/Writer/Director Hilary Smith. The two have a deep chat about Hilary's path from studying to be a journalist to working for Ad Agencies, to standup comedy to Acting, and most recently moving into directing films. Get ready for an inspiring episode! --------------------------------- Go to inlovewiththeprocess.com to see trailers and clips! ►Hilary''s Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thehilarysmith/ ►Hilary's Website: http://www.thehilarysmith.com/ ►Mike Pecci's IG: instagram.com/mikepecci ►ILWP's IG: instagram.com/inlovewiththeprocesspod -------------> Featuring Music by: ►Turbo Knight ►Code Elektro ►L'Avenue ------------------ The Episode is Sponsored by ► BearRepublic: bearrepublic.com/ Discount code is PROCESS15 ► Puget Systems: puget.systems/go/ILWTP ► Jambox www.jambox.io ► FujiFilm: fujifilm-x.com/ www.facebook.com/FujifilmXUS/ twitter.com/FujifilmX_US www.instagram.com/fujifilmx_us/ www.youtube.com/c/FujifilmUSACameras

Growing up in in Salt Lake City and Provo, Utah, Bronson was an All-American high school football player. He graduated in Statistics from Brigham Young University and played both football and basketball there. After college and serving a 2 year service mission in Auckland, New Zealand, Bronson was drafted to the NFL in the 3rd round in 2016 to the Baltimore Ravens. During his career he has also been with the New York Jets and Green Bay Packers. Away from the field, Bronson is involved in start ups, real estate, young athlete mentorships, and blockchain. He has been married for 9 years to Hilary Smith and together they have 2 kids. His favorite things to do are spending quality time with the family outside, fishing, golf, shooting, hiking, and helping others succeed. . If you enjoyed this video, please rate it 5-Stars! If you find it helpful, subscribe and share it with friends who would also find it enjoyable. It would mean a lot to me! . Apple Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-jason-walton-live-it-podcast/id1616737862 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-yoPEI23lo41ioZi_OedaQ

The twelve chapters of Moral Foods: The Construction of Nutrition and Health in Modern Asia (U Hawai'i Press, 2020) are divided into three sections: Good Foods, Bad Foods, and Moral Foods. Using case studies from nineteenth- and twentieth-century China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, and Malaysia, these chapters investigate the moralization of food in modern Asia. These studies on moral food regimes are highly specific, but their implications, especially about the malleability of food as an object of moralization, are far reaching. The first chapter in Good Foods, by Francesca Bray, examines the construction of rice as a symbol of self in Japan and Malaysia. Jia-Chen Fu's contribution looks at the “goodness” of soymilk in China. Izumi Nakayama's work is about the emergence of breastmilk as a “good food” in Meiji-period Japan. Finally, Michael Liu writes about Chinese experimentation with nutrition during WWII. David Arnold's chapter on moral foods―especially rice―in India during the period of British colonial rule begins the second section on “bad” and even “dangerous” foods. The other three chapters in this section address bad foods in South Korea, Japan, and Hong Kong, respectively. Tae-Ho Kim looks at discourses on rice, barley, and wheat in modern South Korea. Tatsuya Mitsuda writes on the creation of badness around sweet confections in Japan. Finally, Robert Peckham examines bad foods in the context of British colonial public health programs in Hong Kong. In the final section, Lawrence Zhang shows how changing visions of the health and morality of tea track with geopolitical, cultural, and scientific developments in the modern relations between East Asia and the West. Angela Ki Che Leung's looks at the modern reinterpretation of vegetarianism in China. Volker Scheid also looks at China, specifically at the reconstitution of traditional Chinese medicinal knowledge and practice. Finally, Hilary Smith's chapter tackles the moral meanings that accrued to milk in modern China. Each of these chapters shares the volume's overall interest in both the moral regimes of food in the context of modern nation-building and the bodies and lives of consumers. Nathan Hopson is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen's Department of Foreign Languages. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/food

The twelve chapters of Moral Foods: The Construction of Nutrition and Health in Modern Asia (U Hawai'i Press, 2020) are divided into three sections: Good Foods, Bad Foods, and Moral Foods. Using case studies from nineteenth- and twentieth-century China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, and Malaysia, these chapters investigate the moralization of food in modern Asia. These studies on moral food regimes are highly specific, but their implications, especially about the malleability of food as an object of moralization, are far reaching. The first chapter in Good Foods, by Francesca Bray, examines the construction of rice as a symbol of self in Japan and Malaysia. Jia-Chen Fu's contribution looks at the “goodness” of soymilk in China. Izumi Nakayama's work is about the emergence of breastmilk as a “good food” in Meiji-period Japan. Finally, Michael Liu writes about Chinese experimentation with nutrition during WWII. David Arnold's chapter on moral foods―especially rice―in India during the period of British colonial rule begins the second section on “bad” and even “dangerous” foods. The other three chapters in this section address bad foods in South Korea, Japan, and Hong Kong, respectively. Tae-Ho Kim looks at discourses on rice, barley, and wheat in modern South Korea. Tatsuya Mitsuda writes on the creation of badness around sweet confections in Japan. Finally, Robert Peckham examines bad foods in the context of British colonial public health programs in Hong Kong. In the final section, Lawrence Zhang shows how changing visions of the health and morality of tea track with geopolitical, cultural, and scientific developments in the modern relations between East Asia and the West. Angela Ki Che Leung's looks at the modern reinterpretation of vegetarianism in China. Volker Scheid also looks at China, specifically at the reconstitution of traditional Chinese medicinal knowledge and practice. Finally, Hilary Smith's chapter tackles the moral meanings that accrued to milk in modern China. Each of these chapters shares the volume's overall interest in both the moral regimes of food in the context of modern nation-building and the bodies and lives of consumers. Nathan Hopson is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen's Department of Foreign Languages. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

In June of this year, the tragic story of UK couple, Nicholas and Hilary Smith emerged, after their bodies were discovered in their Co Tipperary bungalow. The Indo Daily revisits those events. Host: Denise Calnan. Guest: Conor Feehan. Have you heard the news - The Indo Daily is up for a Listener's Choice award. You can vote for ‘The Indo Daily' by using this link https://www.theirishpodcastawards.ie/vote/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The twelve chapters of Moral Foods: The Construction of Nutrition and Health in Modern Asia (U Hawai'i Press, 2020) are divided into three sections: Good Foods, Bad Foods, and Moral Foods. Using case studies from nineteenth- and twentieth-century China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, and Malaysia, these chapters investigate the moralization of food in modern Asia. These studies on moral food regimes are highly specific, but their implications, especially about the malleability of food as an object of moralization, are far reaching. The first chapter in Good Foods, by Francesca Bray, examines the construction of rice as a symbol of self in Japan and Malaysia. Jia-Chen Fu's contribution looks at the “goodness” of soymilk in China. Izumi Nakayama's work is about the emergence of breastmilk as a “good food” in Meiji-period Japan. Finally, Michael Liu writes about Chinese experimentation with nutrition during WWII. David Arnold's chapter on moral foods―especially rice―in India during the period of British colonial rule begins the second section on “bad” and even “dangerous” foods. The other three chapters in this section address bad foods in South Korea, Japan, and Hong Kong, respectively. Tae-Ho Kim looks at discourses on rice, barley, and wheat in modern South Korea. Tatsuya Mitsuda writes on the creation of badness around sweet confections in Japan. Finally, Robert Peckham examines bad foods in the context of British colonial public health programs in Hong Kong. In the final section, Lawrence Zhang shows how changing visions of the health and morality of tea track with geopolitical, cultural, and scientific developments in the modern relations between East Asia and the West. Angela Ki Che Leung's looks at the modern reinterpretation of vegetarianism in China. Volker Scheid also looks at China, specifically at the reconstitution of traditional Chinese medicinal knowledge and practice. Finally, Hilary Smith's chapter tackles the moral meanings that accrued to milk in modern China. Each of these chapters shares the volume's overall interest in both the moral regimes of food in the context of modern nation-building and the bodies and lives of consumers. Nathan Hopson is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen's Department of Foreign Languages. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/korean-studies

The twelve chapters of Moral Foods: The Construction of Nutrition and Health in Modern Asia (U Hawai'i Press, 2020) are divided into three sections: Good Foods, Bad Foods, and Moral Foods. Using case studies from nineteenth- and twentieth-century China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, and Malaysia, these chapters investigate the moralization of food in modern Asia. These studies on moral food regimes are highly specific, but their implications, especially about the malleability of food as an object of moralization, are far reaching. The first chapter in Good Foods, by Francesca Bray, examines the construction of rice as a symbol of self in Japan and Malaysia. Jia-Chen Fu's contribution looks at the “goodness” of soymilk in China. Izumi Nakayama's work is about the emergence of breastmilk as a “good food” in Meiji-period Japan. Finally, Michael Liu writes about Chinese experimentation with nutrition during WWII. David Arnold's chapter on moral foods―especially rice―in India during the period of British colonial rule begins the second section on “bad” and even “dangerous” foods. The other three chapters in this section address bad foods in South Korea, Japan, and Hong Kong, respectively. Tae-Ho Kim looks at discourses on rice, barley, and wheat in modern South Korea. Tatsuya Mitsuda writes on the creation of badness around sweet confections in Japan. Finally, Robert Peckham examines bad foods in the context of British colonial public health programs in Hong Kong. In the final section, Lawrence Zhang shows how changing visions of the health and morality of tea track with geopolitical, cultural, and scientific developments in the modern relations between East Asia and the West. Angela Ki Che Leung's looks at the modern reinterpretation of vegetarianism in China. Volker Scheid also looks at China, specifically at the reconstitution of traditional Chinese medicinal knowledge and practice. Finally, Hilary Smith's chapter tackles the moral meanings that accrued to milk in modern China. Each of these chapters shares the volume's overall interest in both the moral regimes of food in the context of modern nation-building and the bodies and lives of consumers. Nathan Hopson is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen's Department of Foreign Languages. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/japanese-studies

The twelve chapters of Moral Foods: The Construction of Nutrition and Health in Modern Asia (U Hawai'i Press, 2020) are divided into three sections: Good Foods, Bad Foods, and Moral Foods. Using case studies from nineteenth- and twentieth-century China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, and Malaysia, these chapters investigate the moralization of food in modern Asia. These studies on moral food regimes are highly specific, but their implications, especially about the malleability of food as an object of moralization, are far reaching. The first chapter in Good Foods, by Francesca Bray, examines the construction of rice as a symbol of self in Japan and Malaysia. Jia-Chen Fu's contribution looks at the “goodness” of soymilk in China. Izumi Nakayama's work is about the emergence of breastmilk as a “good food” in Meiji-period Japan. Finally, Michael Liu writes about Chinese experimentation with nutrition during WWII. David Arnold's chapter on moral foods―especially rice―in India during the period of British colonial rule begins the second section on “bad” and even “dangerous” foods. The other three chapters in this section address bad foods in South Korea, Japan, and Hong Kong, respectively. Tae-Ho Kim looks at discourses on rice, barley, and wheat in modern South Korea. Tatsuya Mitsuda writes on the creation of badness around sweet confections in Japan. Finally, Robert Peckham examines bad foods in the context of British colonial public health programs in Hong Kong. In the final section, Lawrence Zhang shows how changing visions of the health and morality of tea track with geopolitical, cultural, and scientific developments in the modern relations between East Asia and the West. Angela Ki Che Leung's looks at the modern reinterpretation of vegetarianism in China. Volker Scheid also looks at China, specifically at the reconstitution of traditional Chinese medicinal knowledge and practice. Finally, Hilary Smith's chapter tackles the moral meanings that accrued to milk in modern China. Each of these chapters shares the volume's overall interest in both the moral regimes of food in the context of modern nation-building and the bodies and lives of consumers. Nathan Hopson is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen's Department of Foreign Languages. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/chinese-studies

The twelve chapters of Moral Foods: The Construction of Nutrition and Health in Modern Asia (U Hawai'i Press, 2020) are divided into three sections: Good Foods, Bad Foods, and Moral Foods. Using case studies from nineteenth- and twentieth-century China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, and Malaysia, these chapters investigate the moralization of food in modern Asia. These studies on moral food regimes are highly specific, but their implications, especially about the malleability of food as an object of moralization, are far reaching. The first chapter in Good Foods, by Francesca Bray, examines the construction of rice as a symbol of self in Japan and Malaysia. Jia-Chen Fu's contribution looks at the “goodness” of soymilk in China. Izumi Nakayama's work is about the emergence of breastmilk as a “good food” in Meiji-period Japan. Finally, Michael Liu writes about Chinese experimentation with nutrition during WWII. David Arnold's chapter on moral foods―especially rice―in India during the period of British colonial rule begins the second section on “bad” and even “dangerous” foods. The other three chapters in this section address bad foods in South Korea, Japan, and Hong Kong, respectively. Tae-Ho Kim looks at discourses on rice, barley, and wheat in modern South Korea. Tatsuya Mitsuda writes on the creation of badness around sweet confections in Japan. Finally, Robert Peckham examines bad foods in the context of British colonial public health programs in Hong Kong. In the final section, Lawrence Zhang shows how changing visions of the health and morality of tea track with geopolitical, cultural, and scientific developments in the modern relations between East Asia and the West. Angela Ki Che Leung's looks at the modern reinterpretation of vegetarianism in China. Volker Scheid also looks at China, specifically at the reconstitution of traditional Chinese medicinal knowledge and practice. Finally, Hilary Smith's chapter tackles the moral meanings that accrued to milk in modern China. Each of these chapters shares the volume's overall interest in both the moral regimes of food in the context of modern nation-building and the bodies and lives of consumers. Nathan Hopson is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen's Department of Foreign Languages. Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/southeast-asian-studies

The twelve chapters of Moral Foods: The Construction of Nutrition and Health in Modern Asia (U Hawai'i Press, 2020) are divided into three sections: Good Foods, Bad Foods, and Moral Foods. Using case studies from nineteenth- and twentieth-century China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, and Malaysia, these chapters investigate the moralization of food in modern Asia. These studies on moral food regimes are highly specific, but their implications, especially about the malleability of food as an object of moralization, are far reaching. The first chapter in Good Foods, by Francesca Bray, examines the construction of rice as a symbol of self in Japan and Malaysia. Jia-Chen Fu's contribution looks at the “goodness” of soymilk in China. Izumi Nakayama's work is about the emergence of breastmilk as a “good food” in Meiji-period Japan. Finally, Michael Liu writes about Chinese experimentation with nutrition during WWII. David Arnold's chapter on moral foods―especially rice―in India during the period of British colonial rule begins the second section on “bad” and even “dangerous” foods. The other three chapters in this section address bad foods in South Korea, Japan, and Hong Kong, respectively. Tae-Ho Kim looks at discourses on rice, barley, and wheat in modern South Korea. Tatsuya Mitsuda writes on the creation of badness around sweet confections in Japan. Finally, Robert Peckham examines bad foods in the context of British colonial public health programs in Hong Kong. In the final section, Lawrence Zhang shows how changing visions of the health and morality of tea track with geopolitical, cultural, and scientific developments in the modern relations between East Asia and the West. Angela Ki Che Leung's looks at the modern reinterpretation of vegetarianism in China. Volker Scheid also looks at China, specifically at the reconstitution of traditional Chinese medicinal knowledge and practice. Finally, Hilary Smith's chapter tackles the moral meanings that accrued to milk in modern China. Each of these chapters shares the volume's overall interest in both the moral regimes of food in the context of modern nation-building and the bodies and lives of consumers. Nathan Hopson is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen's Department of Foreign Languages. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/south-asian-studies

The twelve chapters of Moral Foods: The Construction of Nutrition and Health in Modern Asia (U Hawai'i Press, 2020) are divided into three sections: Good Foods, Bad Foods, and Moral Foods. Using case studies from nineteenth- and twentieth-century China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, and Malaysia, these chapters investigate the moralization of food in modern Asia. These studies on moral food regimes are highly specific, but their implications, especially about the malleability of food as an object of moralization, are far reaching. The first chapter in Good Foods, by Francesca Bray, examines the construction of rice as a symbol of self in Japan and Malaysia. Jia-Chen Fu's contribution looks at the “goodness” of soymilk in China. Izumi Nakayama's work is about the emergence of breastmilk as a “good food” in Meiji-period Japan. Finally, Michael Liu writes about Chinese experimentation with nutrition during WWII. David Arnold's chapter on moral foods―especially rice―in India during the period of British colonial rule begins the second section on “bad” and even “dangerous” foods. The other three chapters in this section address bad foods in South Korea, Japan, and Hong Kong, respectively. Tae-Ho Kim looks at discourses on rice, barley, and wheat in modern South Korea. Tatsuya Mitsuda writes on the creation of badness around sweet confections in Japan. Finally, Robert Peckham examines bad foods in the context of British colonial public health programs in Hong Kong. In the final section, Lawrence Zhang shows how changing visions of the health and morality of tea track with geopolitical, cultural, and scientific developments in the modern relations between East Asia and the West. Angela Ki Che Leung's looks at the modern reinterpretation of vegetarianism in China. Volker Scheid also looks at China, specifically at the reconstitution of traditional Chinese medicinal knowledge and practice. Finally, Hilary Smith's chapter tackles the moral meanings that accrued to milk in modern China. Each of these chapters shares the volume's overall interest in both the moral regimes of food in the context of modern nation-building and the bodies and lives of consumers. Nathan Hopson is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen's Department of Foreign Languages. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

The twelve chapters of Moral Foods: The Construction of Nutrition and Health in Modern Asia (U Hawai'i Press, 2020) are divided into three sections: Good Foods, Bad Foods, and Moral Foods. Using case studies from nineteenth- and twentieth-century China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, and Malaysia, these chapters investigate the moralization of food in modern Asia. These studies on moral food regimes are highly specific, but their implications, especially about the malleability of food as an object of moralization, are far reaching. The first chapter in Good Foods, by Francesca Bray, examines the construction of rice as a symbol of self in Japan and Malaysia. Jia-Chen Fu's contribution looks at the “goodness” of soymilk in China. Izumi Nakayama's work is about the emergence of breastmilk as a “good food” in Meiji-period Japan. Finally, Michael Liu writes about Chinese experimentation with nutrition during WWII. David Arnold's chapter on moral foods―especially rice―in India during the period of British colonial rule begins the second section on “bad” and even “dangerous” foods. The other three chapters in this section address bad foods in South Korea, Japan, and Hong Kong, respectively. Tae-Ho Kim looks at discourses on rice, barley, and wheat in modern South Korea. Tatsuya Mitsuda writes on the creation of badness around sweet confections in Japan. Finally, Robert Peckham examines bad foods in the context of British colonial public health programs in Hong Kong. In the final section, Lawrence Zhang shows how changing visions of the health and morality of tea track with geopolitical, cultural, and scientific developments in the modern relations between East Asia and the West. Angela Ki Che Leung's looks at the modern reinterpretation of vegetarianism in China. Volker Scheid also looks at China, specifically at the reconstitution of traditional Chinese medicinal knowledge and practice. Finally, Hilary Smith's chapter tackles the moral meanings that accrued to milk in modern China. Each of these chapters shares the volume's overall interest in both the moral regimes of food in the context of modern nation-building and the bodies and lives of consumers. Nathan Hopson is an associate professor of Japanese language and history in the University of Bergen's Department of Foreign Languages. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/east-asian-studies

Hilary Smith is a pediatrician. She has written a novel called "Disconception" that raises some very interesting questions about conception in a futuristic world - and the intentional and unintentional consequences. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/susan-sherayko/support

Covid-19 has made remote workers of many of us, including Frank McKenna of TD Bank working from home in rural N.B. Hilary Smith has been a Digital Nomad for years, travelling the world before settling down here and working remotely for a company outside the region. On this week's episode, Inda Intiar chats with Mark Leger about people like Frank and Hilary and the benefits of building an economy to suit the needs of the remote workforce.

This week we sat down with comedian power couple Rick Darge and Hilary Smith to talk about how couples can work together creatively. We talked about how they met, their backgrounds, and how creating content with your partner can, in fact, come easy. Our interview with this comedic duo was insightful, heartfelt, and hilarious. We had so much fun with the two of them! There were so many more topics we wanted to cover in this interview that we didn’t get to so rest assured we’re going to do our best to get them on again! To find out more about Hilary and Rick check out the info in their links below. Hilary Smith hails from the advertisement world, having worked on a number of high profile campaigns throughout her illustrious career. She’s been trained in performance, having done theater, dance and standup and currently creates original content under the banner Pretty Gross with her partner in crime, Rick Darge. Rick Darge comes from a production background, having worked on a ton of music videos, short films and branded content. Rick got his start as an editor before transitioning to the production world as a cinematographer and now as a writer / director. His debut feature film, Zen Dog, has garnered a handful of awards throughout its indie run. Rick currently finds joy in creating comedy.Check Out with Rick and Hilary are doing:Rick’s podcast with Chris Candy, https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/bumper-2-bumper/id1489405214 that can be found on all podcasting platforms. Zen Dog, available for blue ray purchase at http://www.zendogmovie.com/ and Vimeo on demand. Watch the trailer here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=117&v=5_0DYfJNLwA&feature=emb_logoRick’s film festival Abrakadabra Alakazam. It features short, comedic, and experimental films from all over. You can submit here: http://abracadabraalakazam.com/Prettygross @prettygross.coCortado, a short film produced by Halleloo, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pJHUAfLU6wRick’s Youtube Channel, https://www.youtube.com/c/rickdargeFIND US!Ricks Darge@Rickdarge @bumper2bumperpodcast Hilary Smith@thehilarysmith Husband and Wife TalkFollow along for all the extra fun!@husbandandwifetalkAlexInstagram @dancinggingeralexwww.dancingginger.comCoreyInstagram: @corey_loren @halleloocreativewww.hallelooproductions.com- The H&WT Team audio Block Double-click here to upload or link to a .mp3. Learn more

On the 20th episode of FULLY PARKED: BUMPER 2 BUMPER, Chris and Rick have a chat with Mark Neto about his narrow escape from London to Los Angeles last week. Then Rick brings on his quarantined girlfriend, Hilary Smith to chat about co-existing and making the best out of a situation with ice cream. Opening & Closing Music by The SNL Band

On the 11th episode of BUMPER 2 BUMPER, Chris and Rick take commercial copywriter Hilary Smith for a cruise into a carwash where she chats about her time working for a top ad agency in Los Angeles, the influence of Nora Ephron on her work and having a Bumble relapse over a year ago. You can follow Hilary Smith at www.thehilarysmith.com or on Instagram @thehilarysmith Watch this episode on Youtube at https://youtu.be/ZYqEQVsSW_I Opening / Closing music by Charlie Scovill.

Welcome to the All Fired Up Second Annual Crappy Awards! In this nail biting episode, we hear rants from people all over the world who are letting us know their thoughts on the sh*ttiest diet culture trend for 2018. Hilary Smith, social justice warrior, pole dancer AND winner of last years’ Inaugural Crappy awards, is here to judge the contestants, and my goodness it’s a stiff competition! Pour yourself a drink and get ready to be utterly gobsmacked by the utter diet culture bullsh*t delivered in 2018!   Show Notes It’s time for the 2nd annual Crappy Awards show! Thank you to everybody who submitted their audio rants, we have a very high standard of entries this year! And it is fantastic to have applications from listeners as well as non-diet health professionals. What was the worst, most irritating diet culture trend for 2018? I am joined by last year’s Crappy Award winner, Hilary Smith, who has kindly agreed to come on the show to judge this years entrants and crown the new winner! Hilary will judge each nomination according to Creativity, Quality of the Argument, Passion, and Number of Swear Words. Louise needed to have a little rant about her pet peeve for 2018, the f*cking intermittent fasting craze, with a special mention to Michael Mosely for expanding the spread of such bullsh*t. And to all of the health professionals and researchers pretending that this stupidity is the key to long lasting, effective weight loss, Louise says SCREW YOU! Crappy Award Nominee #1, from New Zealand’s Tania Vincent from Thrive Nutrition: A horrific facebook ad for a fat shaming phone app, using cute little cartoon characters to sell calorie control. Crappy Award Nominee #2, from listener Jade Pettersen: After having gastric surgery, it seems like your body becomes public property! And the support groups online are like breeding grounds for eating disorders! Crappy Award Nominee #3, from listener Ava: Louise reads a heartfelt email about how the weight loss surgery business model is targeting vulnerable people. A good friend of Ava’s was encouraged to take out her superannuation to pay for the surgery, even though her friend has significant mental health issues. Ethics anyone? Crappy Award Nominee #4, from Mind Body Well psychologist Janet Lowndes: The incredibly unethical “Fast Track to Health” trial being run here in Sydney and Melbourne, where adolescents are being  put on intermittent fasting diets for an entire year, in spite of the lack of efficacy for this type of diet. This is just a recipe for an eating disorder, and it is equally heart breaking and enraging that it’s allowed to proceed! Crappy Award Nominee #5, from Heather Eisman all the way from Alaska!: The “Bright Lines Eating” program by Susan Peirce Thompson, a horrendous example of monetising the 12 step programs and increasing restrictive thinking in people who already have eating issues. Crappy Award Nominee #6, from UNTRAPPED member Alyssa: Unsolicited health advice from thin people who think they are doctors. Crappy Award Nominee #7, also from Alyssa: The Cookie Diet - almost no words! Crappy Award Nominee #8, from Anna Hearn from Haven Wellness: The entire diet culture and its relentless toxicity, in particular this idea (incorrect) that we can all ‘choose’ our own body weight. Not supported by science! Crappy Award Nominee #9, from Sona, member of Haven Wellness: Policing people who speak about HAES beyond the idea of body acceptance/body love. Crappy Award Nominee #10, from Natalie Haider, psychologist and yoga instructor from Haven Wellness: Placing the pursuit of health on a pedestal while ignoring all of the other ways humans can be absolute shits to each other. Crappy Award Nominee #11, from listener Mia in California: “WW” and the awful Mindy Grossman, planning to get WW into every home on the planet. Please bugger off Mindy. The Second Annual Crappy Award Prize is a Bullshit Button! The Crappy Award winner is Alyssa, nominee #6, for unsolicited health advice! Unbelievably well delivered sarcasm means Alyssa wins, with 4 equally amazing ties for second place! Resources Mentioned: Hilary Smith’s award winning Crappy rant from last year’s show: The incredibly fatphobic ad for the Huawei mobile phone calorie counter app, thank you to Tania Vincent from Thrive Nutrition for this entry! Find out more about the amazing anti-diet psychologist Janet Lowndes Find out more about Anna Hearn & Haven wellness here

Welcome to the All Fired Up Second Annual Crappy Awards! In this nail biting episode, we hear rants from people all over the world who are letting us know their thoughts on the sh*ttiest diet culture trend for 2018. Hilary Smith, social justice warrior, pole dancer AND winner of last years’ Inaugural Crappy awards, is here to judge the contestants, and my goodness it’s a stiff competition! Pour yourself a drink and get ready to be utterly gobsmacked by the utter diet culture bullsh*t delivered in 2018!   Show Notes It’s time for the 2nd annual Crappy Awards show! Thank you to everybody who submitted their audio rants, we have a very high standard of entries this year! And it is fantastic to have applications from listeners as well as non-diet health professionals. What was the worst, most irritating diet culture trend for 2018? I am joined by last year’s Crappy Award winner, Hilary Smith, who has kindly agreed to come on the show to judge this years entrants and crown the new winner! Hilary will judge each nomination according to Creativity, Quality of the Argument, Passion, and Number of Swear Words. Louise needed to have a little rant about her pet peeve for 2018, the f*cking intermittent fasting craze, with a special mention to Michael Mosely for expanding the spread of such bullsh*t. And to all of the health professionals and researchers pretending that this stupidity is the key to long lasting, effective weight loss, Louise says SCREW YOU! Crappy Award Nominee #1, from New Zealand’s Tania Vincent from Thrive Nutrition: A horrific facebook ad for a fat shaming phone app, using cute little cartoon characters to sell calorie control. Crappy Award Nominee #2, from listener Jade Pettersen: After having gastric surgery, it seems like your body becomes public property! And the support groups online are like breeding grounds for eating disorders! Crappy Award Nominee #3, from listener Ava: Louise reads a heartfelt email about how the weight loss surgery business model is targeting vulnerable people. A good friend of Ava’s was encouraged to take out her superannuation to pay for the surgery, even though her friend has significant mental health issues. Ethics anyone? Crappy Award Nominee #4, from Mind Body Well psychologist Janet Lowndes: The incredibly unethical “Fast Track to Health” trial being run here in Sydney and Melbourne, where adolescents are being  put on intermittent fasting diets for an entire year, in spite of the lack of efficacy for this type of diet. This is just a recipe for an eating disorder, and it is equally heart breaking and enraging that it’s allowed to proceed! Crappy Award Nominee #5, from Heather Eisman all the way from Alaska!: The “Bright Lines Eating” program by Susan Peirce Thompson, a horrendous example of monetising the 12 step programs and increasing restrictive thinking in people who already have eating issues. Crappy Award Nominee #6, from UNTRAPPED member Alyssa: Unsolicited health advice from thin people who think they are doctors. Crappy Award Nominee #7, also from Alyssa: The Cookie Diet - almost no words! Crappy Award Nominee #8, from Anna Hearn from Haven Wellness: The entire diet culture and its relentless toxicity, in particular this idea (incorrect) that we can all ‘choose’ our own body weight. Not supported by science! Crappy Award Nominee #9, from Sona, member of Haven Wellness: Policing people who speak about HAES beyond the idea of body acceptance/body love. Crappy Award Nominee #10, from Natalie Haider, psychologist and yoga instructor from Haven Wellness: Placing the pursuit of health on a pedestal while ignoring all of the other ways humans can be absolute shits to each other. Crappy Award Nominee #11, from listener Mia in California: “WW” and the awful Mindy Grossman, planning to get WW into every home on the planet. Please bugger off Mindy. The Second Annual Crappy Award Prize is a Bullshit Button! The Crappy Award winner is Alyssa, nominee #6, for unsolicited health advice! Unbelievably well delivered sarcasm means Alyssa wins, with 4 equally amazing ties for second place! Resources Mentioned: Hilary Smith’s award winning Crappy rant from last year’s show: The incredibly fatphobic ad for the Huawei mobile phone calorie counter app, thank you to Tania Vincent from Thrive Nutrition for this entry! Find out more about the amazing anti-diet psychologist Janet Lowndes Find out more about Anna Hearn & Haven wellness here

For same sex female couples, one of the first decisions to make when you decide to start a family is who will carry the baby. But sometimes those roles don’t turn out as planned. We hear from Katie Acosta and Hilary Smith, a couple who had worked through those details. But when their chosen path didn’t work, they embarked on a new fertility journey called reciprocal IVF. Today’s host is Melissa Maldonado, Patient Care Supervisor, Progyny. Guests include, Katie Acosta, Hilary Smith, and Dr. Shahin Ghadir from Southern California Reproductive Center (SCRC). For more information visit: www.progyny.com/podcast Have a question, comment, or want to share your story? Email us at thisisinfertility@progyny.com

This week I get into the nitty gritty of how social media affects our body image and eating behaviour with social justice warrior and pole dancer Hilary Smith. Hilary wants to HURL THINGS when she sees Fitspo or other 'inspirational' crap on social media, because she KNOWS that it's doing harm. She even took her passionate disgust to the next level by doing the research! Don't miss this fascinating discussion as Hilary discusses how social media is having an impact on Australian women. Spoiler alert: it's not good. Hope alert: it CAN be good for us, if we know what to follow! HAES anyone?!

This week I get into the nitty gritty of how social media affects our body image and eating behaviour with social justice warrior and pole dancer Hilary Smith. Hilary wants to HURL THINGS when she sees Fitspo or other 'inspirational' crap on social media, because she KNOWS that it's doing harm. She even took her passionate disgust to the next level by doing the research! Don't miss this fascinating discussion as Hilary discusses how social media is having an impact on Australian women. Spoiler alert: it's not good. Hope alert: it CAN be good for us, if we know what to follow! HAES anyone?!

In Episode 1, our inaugural episode, we hear from several nursing students who faced a mile high emergency, a gruesome car crash, an unexpected assessment in a family member's final hours, and more. This week's episode "Great Expectations" explores how registering in nursing school has inevitably changed what our families, friends and complete strangers expect from us. Nursing Student Narratives is a podcast about the stories that stick with us, long after the shift has ended. Executive producers Clare Sheasgreen and Hilary Smith are final year nursing students from the University of Toronto.

We interview Hilary Smith, author of "Welcome to the Jungle : Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Bipolar But Were Too Freaked Out To Ask." Now 24, Hilary was first diagnosed with bipolar disorder in her junior year. While delving into the ins and outs of her new diagnosis, she realized that few books were down to earth and open and honest with teens and young adults about what it's like to first be diagnosed with a mood disorder. From the bungling healthcare system to hippy treatments that might actually, Hilary looks to fill that void with "Welcome To the Jungle." Check out Hilary's site at: http://www.hilarytsmith.com/p/books.html

An interview with Hilary Smith, International Client Relations at Extraordinary Conceptions agency. We find out about the truths behind surrogacy in North America and Hilary dispels some of the myths surrounding what can often be a taboo subject. She tells us about their new hybrid programme, which offers a more affordable way of family building. Find out who uses a surrogate and why… Check out more of our content, real-life stories and expert tips at www.fertilityhelphub.com Join our community on social for giveaways, support and more Website: https://www.fertilityhelphub.com/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fertility_h... Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/fertilityhel... Twitter: https://twitter.com/fertility_hh Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.co.uk/fertility...