Podcast appearances and mentions of ted boutrous

This week on Just Ask the Question: Free Speech is threatened by the government - but Donald Trump isn't the victim. Join us as we talk with First Amendment Attorney Ted Boutrous as we discuss the real problems facing the First Amendment.

The recent defamation trial featuring Johnny Depp and Amber Heard put the word defamation in the headlines. The entire world now knows too many details about the marriage of those two  - more perhaps than many of us care to. But, do we know about defamation and what it really means?Bob says too many people have talked about the trial for him to weigh in...but we bring back an episode with Ted Boutrous, one of the country's leading defamation lawyers...to tell us what that word means and how and when you can sue and win a defamation case....Listen in.

The current Supreme Court term promises to be one of the most eventful and impactful in recent memory. In this episode of "The Two Teds," Ted Boutrous and Ted Olson discuss some of the key cases that will be heard during this session, covering topics that include abortion rights and the First Amendment.

This week, Mehdi opens his show discussing the latest threats to American democracy, from attacks on voting rights to Republican gerrymandering with President of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee Kelly Ward Burton. Former President Trump's lawsuit against his niece Mary Trump with Mary Trump's attorney and First Amendment lawyer Ted Boutrous. For Mehdi's "60 second rant" he shines a light on President Biden's supreme court commission that was tasked with rebalancing the court. Then, actor Kumail Nanjiani joins us to talk about his upcoming film 'The Eternals', his role as the first South Asian superhero, and he weighs in on President Biden's immigration crisis. Mehdi take a look inside a teacher training session in Texas who is being told to explore historical issues from "diverse and contending perspectives".....including the holocaust. Mehdi ends the show with a chat with fellow MSNBC host Ayman Mohyeldin about Jon Stewart's recent comments criticizing the media. 

Gibson Dunn's Ted Olson and Ted Boutrous discuss the firm's work on behalf of “Dreamers,” beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) program, in multiple high-stakes court cases. Learn more about the strategies and the personal stakes at play during these important cases.

歡迎通勤家週一晚上9pm，在Clubhouse上跟我與Peddy一同閒聊、練習英語！快加入 15Mins 通勤學英語直播室吧~   每日英語跟讀 Ep.K211: Tech Giants Are Plunged Into Political Firestorm   On Feb. 6, 2018, Apple received a grand jury subpoena for the names and phone records connected to 109 email addresses and phone numbers. It was one of the more than 250 data requests that the company received on average from U.S. law enforcement each week at the time. An Apple paralegal complied and provided the information. 2018年2月6日，蘋果公司收到一份大陪審團傳票，要求提供和109個電郵地址及電話有關的名字與通聯紀錄。當時蘋果收到來自美國執法單位的提供資料要求，平均每周超過250件，這份傳票只是其一。一名法律助理遵令並提供了相關資訊。 This year, a gag order on the subpoena expired. Apple said it alerted the people who were the subjects of the subpoena, just as it does with dozens of customers each day. But this request was out of the ordinary. 關於這份傳票的一項緘口令今年到期，蘋果公司說，他們向身為傳票目標的人發出警示，如同每天處理數十名顧客的做法。但是，這項要求並不尋常。 Without knowing it, Apple said, it had handed over the data of congressional staffers, their families and at least two members of Congress, including Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., then the House Intelligence Committee's ranking member and now its chair. It turned out the subpoena was part of a wide-ranging investigation by the Trump administration into leaks of classified information. 蘋果表示，在不知情的狀況下，它交出了國會員工、其家人以及至少兩名國會議員的資料，包括眾議院情報委員會前副主席、現任主席謝安達。原來，這份傳票是川普政府追查機密資訊外洩一項大範圍調查的一部分。 The revelations have now plunged Apple into the middle of a firestorm over the Trump administration's efforts to find the sources of news stories, and the handling underscores the flood of law enforcement requests that tech companies increasingly contend with. The number of these requests has soared in recent years to thousands a week, putting Apple and other tech giants like Google and Microsoft in an uncomfortable position between law enforcement, the courts and the customers whose privacy they have promised to protect. 此事曝光，讓蘋果陷入川普政府試圖找出新聞報導消息來源的風暴中，而其處置方式，顯示科技公司一直不斷應付執法單位的大量要求。這些要求的數量近年增加至一周數千件，讓蘋果及谷歌、微軟等科技巨擘處於麻煩立場，夾在執法單位、法院還有他們曾經承諾保護其隱私的顧客之間。 The companies regularly comply with the requests because they are legally required to do so. The subpoenas can be vague, so Apple, Google and others are often unclear on the nature or subject of an investigation. They can challenge some of subpoenas if they are too broad or if they relate to a corporate client. In the first six months of 2020, Apple challenged 238 demands from the government for its customers' account data, or 4% of such requests. 這些公司通常會服從要求，因為依法必須如此。傳票內容可能很含糊，所以蘋果、谷歌和其他公司通常不清楚調查的性質或主題。如果傳票範圍太廣或是和某個企業客戶有關，他們可以提出異議。在2020年的前六個月，蘋果對政府要求取得其顧客帳號數據提出238項異議，占了這類要求的4%。 As part of the same leak investigation by the Trump administration, Google fought a gag order this year on a subpoena to turn over data on the emails of four New York Times reporters. Google argued that its contract as The Times' corporate email provider required it to inform the newspaper of any government requests for its emails, said Ted Boutrous, an outside lawyer for The Times. 在同一個川普政府的洩密調查中，谷歌今年對緘口令提出異議，相關傳票要求交出四名紐約時報記者電郵數據。谷歌主張，根據其作為紐時企業電郵服務供應商的合約，政府任何取得電郵資料的要求皆須通知該報。 But more frequently than not, the companies comply with law enforcement demands. And that underlines an awkward truth: As their products become more central to people's lives, the world's largest tech companies have become surveillance intermediaries and crucial partners to authorities. 但是，這些公司多半會順從執法單位命令，而這凸顯一個棘手事實：隨著他們的產品逐漸成為人們生活中心，這些世界最大科技公司已成為當局的偵察工具和關鍵夥伴。Source article: https://udn.com/news/story/6904/5560507

Real Washington With Ted Boutrous  - “A Precarious Time”: Ted Boutrous, a partner in the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, a member of the Firm's Executive and Management Committees, a specialist in First Amendment law, “Top Lawyer of the Decade” (Los Angeles & San Francisco Daily Journals, 2021), “Litigator of the Year, Grand Prize Winner” (American Lawyer 2019) and “100 Most Influential Lawyers in America” (National Law Journal, 2013) among many other honorifics, joins co-hosts Richard Levick of LEVICK and Michael Zeldin of That Said with Michael Zeldin on CommPRO. Ted discusses the growing threat to New York Times v. Sullivan, a landmark First Amendment case and the bedrock of modern First Amendment law; the Critical Race Theory debate; the current Supreme Court makeup; representing Mary Trump and other issues before the courts. 

Listen to Ted Olson and Ted Boutrous talk about the landmark court cases that helped to define marriage equality in the United States, including their work in overturning California's Proposition 8. You'll hear them discuss the legal strategies at play and why it was important to win over the hearts and minds of the American public.

Sydney Powell; Dominion; Rudy Giuliani; Johnny Depp; Fox News; CNN.. Defamation lawsuits involved all these folks, could one involve you? Have you been defamed?:Meet Ted Boutrous, America’s most respected 1st amendment lawyer who explains what defamation is all about. The Hollywood Reporter once called him Donald Trump’s “First Amendment Nemesis.” He’s perhaps America’s preeminent media lawyer and Supreme Court guru, defending the 1st Amendment. He’s also been known to argue defamation cases for plaintiffs, such as in the current case of actress Ashley Judd against Harvey Weinstein. Listen in as Ted Boutrous joins host Bob Sewell in a freewheeling and UNCENSORED discussion about what is and what isn’t defamation. Also learn about Boutrous’ new podcast “The Two Teds,”  featuring himself and former U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson, discussing the high profile cases handled by two of America’s leading litigators. In this episode: Bob becomes a business owner of imaginary “Bob’s Plumbing,” and is most certain he has been defamed. What should he do?Learn the difference between business defamation and personal defamation and who has to prove “actual malice.”   When you decide to sue and put your reputation on trial…who has the burden of proof? Is the world growing SLAPP happy? What are SLAPP suits and why do they matter?  Why should there be fewer defamation lawsuits in America?    

Protecting First Amendment rights has long been a hallmark of Gibson Dunn's practice. In particular, we have vigilantly defended freedom of the press and its indispensable role in a healthy democracy. On this episode of the podcast, Ted Boutrous and Ted Olson discuss some of the most important and interesting First Amendment cases they've worked on.

When Ted Olson argued Bush v Gore before the Supreme Court, it was one of the most important and historic moments in recent legal history. On this episode of “The Two Teds,” Olson and Ted Boutrous take a deep dive and explain what it took to manage the sprawling legal team and prepare for arguments. They also tackle the most recent election and draw parallels – and differences – between the 2020 and 2000 elections.  

In this first episode of “The Two Teds,” Ted Boutrous and Ted Olson discuss the paths that led them to become two of America's leading litigators. They delve into their backgrounds and what drove them to become lawyers. They also touch on legal cases they've worked on together and Ted Olson's first Supreme Court case.

A group of big cities are seeking damages from the fossil fuel industry over the costs of climate change. These suits against some of the biggest names in the energy world are taking a very old legal idea—the tort—and trying to adapt it to a new environmental problem. On this week's episode of our environmental podcast, Parts Per Billion, we hear from two lawyers involved in this litigation, one representing the plaintiffs and the other with the defendants. Plaintiffs' attorney Katie Jones, with the San Francisco-based firm Sher Edling, talks about the oil and gas companies' role in climate change and why they should be forced to remunerate her clients. And Gibson Dunn's Ted Boutrous, who's defending Chevron in these suits, says the plaintiffs' arguments push the idea of a tort claim way beyond its logical limits.

A discussion with First Amendment Attorney Ted Boutrous on the problems brought about by the Trump administration.Ted Boutrous was named an “Attorney of the Year” by both the California Lawyer and the San Francisco Recorder. In 2019, the Los Angeles and San Francisco Daily Journals named Mr. Boutrous one of the 100 best lawyers in California for the sixteenth year in a row.

Mary Trump legal battles against her uncle might seem like a fun little political soap opera. It’s way more than that, Mary’s lawyer Ted Boutrous explains on the latest episode of The New Abnormal. The attempt to stop her tell-all book before publication—“I think it's really an effort to intimidate people from speaking, to intimidate the press. But also it's a political tool. It's a fundraising tool. It seems to excite people who support president Trump,” he tells Molly Jong-Fast and Rick Wilson. Then! The Beast’s Kate Briquelet—who has broken some of the biggest stories about Jeffrey Epstein’s cabal—joins the dynamic duo to talk about the arrest of Epstein ‘madam’ Ghislaine Maxwell. “There are power players in New York,” she explains “who are very nervous that Ghislaine is going to spill the secrets.” Plus! Does Trump know how to listen to a podcast? Could Kanye’s ‘run for president’ could really, really backfire? How is Ye like Vermin Supreme? And what the hell is “the McKinsey of grift?”Want more? Become a Beast Inside member to enjoy a limited-run series of bonus interviews from The New Abnormal. Guests include Cory Booker, Jim Acosta, and more. Head to newabnormal.thedailybeast.com to join now.  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Ted Boutrous is the one of the leading first amendment attorneys in the country and successfully defended Jim Acosta and CNN after the White House revoked Acosta’s press pass. He’s also working with playboy magazine and Brian Karem to retrieve Brian’s press pass after the White House suspended it. Today he talks about the importance of the first amendment and the Free Press.

Half of Americans perceive made-up news as a big problem for our country; fewer are as worried about the effects of racism. Tom Leatherbury and Ted Boutrous sit down with host Rocky Dhir following their panel at the State Bar’s 2019 Annual Meeting to discuss the legal ramifications of “fake news”, the factors leading to the overuse of the phrase, and how more transparency both in government and journalism could help undercut this worrying trend. Tom Leatherbury is co-leader of Vinson & Elkins’ Appellate Practice Group. Ted Boutrous is a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. Special thanks to our sponsor, LawPay.

May 26, 2019: Neera Tanden, David Frum, Olivia Nuzzi, Ted Boutrous, Scott Pelley, Audrey Cooper and Paul Rieckhoff join Brian Stelter.

Fresh off his court win for CNN reporter Jim Acosta, Gibson Dunn partner Theodore Boutrous Jr. talks about confronting President Trump, defending press freedom and balancing a busy practice. Legal Speak is brought to you by Econ One, offering economic expertise, consulting and dispute resolution, and data analytics.

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Ted Boutrous, who represented CNN and Jim Acosta in their case against the White House. Jim Acosta’s “hard pass” or permanent press pass, was revoked by the Trump administration after Acosta clashed with the President at a November 7th news conference. Dahlia Lithwick and Ted Boutros examine questions of due process and free speech thrown up by the case. Please let us know what you think of Amicus. Join the discussion of this episode on Facebook. Our email is amicus@slate.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Ted Boutrous, who represented CNN and Jim Acosta in their case against the White House. Jim Acosta’s “hard pass” or permanent press pass, was revoked by the Trump administration after Acosta clashed with the President at a November 7th news conference. Dahlia Lithwick and Ted Boutros examine questions of due process and free speech thrown up by the case. Please let us know what you think of Amicus. Join the discussion of this episode on Facebook. Our email is amicus@slate.com. This episode is brought to you by the following advertisers: SimpliSafe, protect your home today with twenty-four seven monitoring for just fifteen dollars a month, visit simplisafe.com/amicus. Simple Contacts. To save $20 off your first order, go to simplecontacts.com/AMICUS and use the promo code AMICUS.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices