Podcasts about childhood arrivals daca

Undocumented young people risked everything decades ago to "come out of the shadows” and push loudly and proudly for their right to stay in this country. That movement is, in large part, the reason that Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) exists. Yet there is still no path to citizenship for most undocumented immigrants and DACA has not accepted new applications since 2017, locking out most current high school and college-age students. As the new Trump administration threatens mass deportation of immigrants, how will schools and students be impacted? What can we learn from the history of undocumented student activism? This episode was recorded live at SXSW EDU, one of the largest education conferences in the country. Guests: Vanesa Cruz Granados, Co-chair, Undocumented Student-led Network Blanca Hernandez, Immigrant rights' advocate This episode also features the voices of: Rafael Martinez, Assistant professor, Arizona State University, and author of "Illegalized: Undocumented Youth Movements in the United States" Jacky Neri Arias, Executive director of student experience and inclusion, Dominican University Alejandra, Undocumented student, University of California Education Beat is a weekly podcast hosted by EdSource's Zaidee Stavely and produced by Coby McDonald.

Hosts Jim Maher and Gayle Knutson explore what lies ahead as the Trump administration pursues its crackdown on undocumented immigrants. Guests include Twin Cities immigration attorney Marc Prokosch (3:00) about how the process works today and what changes may lie ahead; and Mexican immigrant Juventino Meza (24:30), who shares his experiences as a participant in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Also included is an update on local news (43:00). Matt Quast is technical director.This Week's GuestsMarc Prokosch, Immigration AttorneyJuventio Meza, undocumented ImmigrantGovernment Links:City of Marine on St. CroixCity of ScandiaMay TownshipWashington CountyRiver Radio Previous ShowsNovember 23, 2024 show on BooksApril 20, 2024 show on Valley Chamber ChoraleMarch 18, 2023 show on Social SecurityEvent LinksHoliday Programs from Frosted Glass CreativeMarine Holiday Concerts from Billy McLaughlinBusiness/Organization Links:Marine Community LibraryWashington County Environmental CenterWashington County Name a Snowplow Contest Entry Form

In this episode of dotEDU Live, Jon Fansmith and Sarah Spreitzer are joined by a full team of ACE experts—Steven Bloom, Peter McDonough, and Emmanual Guillory—to take a deeper look at what the post-election landscape looks like for higher education policy.   This episode covers key developments, including Linda McMahon's nomination as Secretary of Education, shifts in congressional leadership, and the Trump administration's stance on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). The discussion also explores upcoming regulatory challenges and what to expect during the administration's first 100 days. Tweet suggestions, links, and questions to @ACEducation or podcast@acenet.edu. Here are some of the links and references from this week's show:  Colleges Wonder if They Will Be ‘the Enemy' Under Trump   The New York Times | Nov. 12, 2024   Trump Initiatives Might be Foiled by the Right's Defeat of Chevron   The Washington Post | Nov. 25, 2024  The Only Certainty Is Uncertainty   Inside Higher Ed | July 2, 2024   GOP Caught Between Immigration and Tax Cuts for Early 2025 Priorities   The Washington Post | Dec. 4, 2024   Campuses Advise International Students to Return by Inauguration Day   Inside Higher Ed | Nov. 26, 2024   Trump Says he Wants DACA Recipients to be Able to Stay in the U.S.   NBC News | Dec. 8, 2024   DOJ v. DEI: Trump's Justice Department Likely to Target Diversity Programs   Reuters | Dec. 10, 2024   Trump Likely to End Title IX Trans Protections   Inside Higher Ed | Nov. 15, 2024   How Linda McMahon Might Approach the Dept. of Education   The New York Times | Nov. 20, 2024   On Trump Tax Cuts, Energy and Immigration Plans, Clash Emerges Between House, Senate GOP Leaders   CNBC | Dec. 4, 2024   House Republicans Aim to Pass Higher Ed Overhaul   Inside Higher Ed | Dec. 6, 2024   College Cost Reduction Act: By the Numbers   American Council on Education   Campus Safety Resources on Title IX  American Council on Education  Will Submitting the FAFSA Put Undocumented Parents at Risk? This Group Thinks It Could  NASFAA 

After diving deep on a wild story about Justice Alito palling around with a German princess, Melissa, Kate, and Leah take a look at pending SCOTUS cases, including some that could be affected by the outcome of the election. They also take a look at a crucial case in the 5th circuit about Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Follow us on Instagram, Twitter, Threads, and Bluesky

Chapter 13: Modern Constitutional Issues - Summary. Chapter 13 explores key modern constitutional issues, focusing on the legal challenges and evolving interpretations of several major areas: gun control and the Second Amendment, healthcare and the Affordable Care Act (ACA), immigration and national security, and technology and digital privacy. Each section provides an in-depth analysis of significant Supreme Court cases, legislative developments, and ongoing debates surrounding these pressing topics. 1. Gun Control and the Second Amendment. The chapter begins with a discussion on the historical context of the Second Amendment, which was originally framed to support the formation of militias. Over time, the interpretation shifted toward individual rights. Landmark cases like District of Columbia v Heller (2008) and McDonald v City of Chicago (2010) affirmed the individual's right to bear arms but also recognized that this right is not unlimited. Current debates focus on balancing public safety and individual rights, with issues such as background checks, red flag laws, assault weapons bans, and concealed carry laws at the forefront of the legal landscape. 2. Healthcare and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) The ACA represents a significant battleground in modern constitutional law. Key Supreme Court cases like National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius (2012) upheld most provisions of the ACA, including the individual mandate under Congress's taxing power, while King v Burwell (2015) preserved federal subsidies for healthcare. Ongoing challenges include debates over Medicaid expansion, the removal of the individual mandate penalty, and attempts to introduce Medicaid work requirements. 3. Immigration and National Security. This section delves into the complex constitutional issues surrounding immigration enforcement and national security. The President's broad executive authority over immigration has led to significant constitutional questions, including the creation of programs like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and executive orders, such as the travel ban in Trump v Hawaii (2018). The chapter also addresses the due process rights of non-citizens, immigration detention practices, and legal conflicts between federal immigration enforcement and local sanctuary cities. 4. Technology and Digital Privacy. The chapter concludes with a focus on how advancements in technology have raised new constitutional challenges, particularly under the Fourth Amendment. Cases such as Riley v California (2014) and Carpenter v United States (2018) extended privacy protections to digital data, emphasizing that government searches of cell phones and location data require warrants. Additionally, the collection of personal data by private companies, surveillance programs, and emerging concepts like the right to be forgotten highlight ongoing concerns about digital privacy in the age of big data and social media. Conclusion. The intersection of technology and digital privacy has created new constitutional and legal challenges. As courts grapple with applying the Fourth Amendment to digital searches, data collection, and government surveillance, the boundaries of personal privacy continue to evolve. Landmark cases like Riley v California and Carpenter v United States have extended privacy protections to digital data, reflecting the growing role that technology plays in our daily lives. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Chapter 13: Modern Constitutional Issues - Summary. Chapter 13 explores key modern constitutional issues, focusing on the legal challenges and evolving interpretations of several major areas: gun control and the Second Amendment, healthcare and the Affordable Care Act (ACA), immigration and national security, and technology and digital privacy. Each section provides an in-depth analysis of significant Supreme Court cases, legislative developments, and ongoing debates surrounding these pressing topics. 1. Gun Control and the Second Amendment. The chapter begins with a discussion on the historical context of the Second Amendment, which was originally framed to support the formation of militias. Over time, the interpretation shifted toward individual rights. Landmark cases like District of Columbia v Heller (2008) and McDonald v City of Chicago (2010) affirmed the individual's right to bear arms but also recognized that this right is not unlimited. Current debates focus on balancing public safety and individual rights, with issues such as background checks, red flag laws, assault weapons bans, and concealed carry laws at the forefront of the legal landscape. 2. Healthcare and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) The ACA represents a significant battleground in modern constitutional law. Key Supreme Court cases like National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius (2012) upheld most provisions of the ACA, including the individual mandate under Congress's taxing power, while King v Burwell (2015) preserved federal subsidies for healthcare. Ongoing challenges include debates over Medicaid expansion, the removal of the individual mandate penalty, and attempts to introduce Medicaid work requirements. 3. Immigration and National Security. This section delves into the complex constitutional issues surrounding immigration enforcement and national security. The President's broad executive authority over immigration has led to significant constitutional questions, including the creation of programs like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and executive orders, such as the travel ban in Trump v Hawaii (2018). The chapter also addresses the due process rights of non-citizens, immigration detention practices, and legal conflicts between federal immigration enforcement and local sanctuary cities. 4. Technology and Digital Privacy. The chapter concludes with a focus on how advancements in technology have raised new constitutional challenges, particularly under the Fourth Amendment. Cases such as Riley v California (2014) and Carpenter v United States (2018) extended privacy protections to digital data, emphasizing that government searches of cell phones and location data require warrants. Additionally, the collection of personal data by private companies, surveillance programs, and emerging concepts like the right to be forgotten highlight ongoing concerns about digital privacy in the age of big data and social media. Conclusion. The intersection of technology and digital privacy has created new constitutional and legal challenges. As courts grapple with applying the Fourth Amendment to digital searches, data collection, and government surveillance, the boundaries of personal privacy continue to evolve. Landmark cases like Riley v California and Carpenter v United States have extended privacy protections to digital data, reflecting the growing role that technology plays in our daily lives. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Pelumi Olatinpo's journey, a remarkable tale of resilience and determination, began at fourteen when he and his family escaped Nigeria's military dictatorship. Their quest for a better life led them to Italy, and later, during a fateful trip to Canada, Pelumi and his 12-year-old sister hatched a daring plan to start anew in America. Under the cover of night, they embarked on a 15-minute speedboat journey across the Niagara River, crossing the Canadian border into the United States. As undocumented immigrants, they arrived on the shores of Buffalo, New York. President Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and President Joe Biden's recent executive action were life-altering for Pelumi and his sister. These policies granted them employment authorization documents, social security numbers, and a clear path to citizenship. In 2022, Pelumi proudly became a United States citizen and is now the county executive-appointed commissioner on the Montgomery County (Maryland) Intra-Agency Commission on Homelessness. In his new poetry book, POETA: Sonetas and Sonnets, Pelumi introduces a unique form of sonnets: Sonetas. These condensed sonnets, a testament to his creativity and resilience, serve as a powerful medium for expressing his experiences of oppression, violence, immigration, racism, and hatred, all through the lens of his arduous journey to US citizenship.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/arroe-collins-like-it-s-live--4113802/support.

An action by the Biden administration that allows Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients access to Obamacare, as found in a study by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), might potentially result in billions added to the national deficit. The CBO, after a comprehensive review, has come up with an estimate that approximately 110,000 unauthorized immigrants, who are part of DACA, may opt for Obamacare coverage, thereby increasing the federal deficit by nearly $7 billion over a timeframe of 2025 to 2034. This estimation was brought forth following President Biden's recent declaration that he intends to modify the regulatory structure of Obamacare, thus making DACA recipients eligible for its benefits for the first time. The report by the CBO, along with the Joint Committee on Taxation, indicates that a yearly average of about 110,000 DACA recipients will likely enroll for marketplace coverage due to this change. As a result, it's anticipated the deficit will rise by a projected $7 billion over the decade from 2025 to 2034. While there may be some offset to additional marketplace enrollment costs in terms of decreased emergency Medicaid spending, this won't fully mitigate against the higher costs, as per the agencies' estimates.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This Day in Legal History: Racist Restrictive Covenants Struck DownOn May 3, 1948, a significant legal decision was rendered by the United States Supreme Court, fundamentally altering the landscape of civil rights and property law. The case, Shelley v. Kraemer, addressed the pernicious practice of racially-restrictive covenants in real estate. These covenants were agreements embedded in the deeds of properties that prohibited the sale of these properties to individuals of certain races, most commonly African Americans.The Supreme Court's decision in Shelley v. Kraemer struck down the legal enforcement of these covenants, ruling that while private parties may enter into whatever agreements they choose, they cannot seek judicial enforcement of covenants that violated constitutional principles of equality. The Court held that such enforcement by state courts constituted state action and therefore was subject to the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.The background of the case involved an African American family, the Shelleys, who purchased a home in a neighborhood in St. Louis, Missouri. This neighborhood had an existing covenant that barred African Americans from owning property. When the Shelleys moved in, several of their white neighbors sought to enforce the covenant to prevent them from taking ownership.The Missouri Supreme Court had originally sided with the neighbors, ruling that the covenant was enforceable. However, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision reversed this ruling. Justice Fred M. Vinson, writing for the majority, emphasized that the enforcement of racially restrictive covenants by state courts amounted to a state action that denied equal protection of the laws.This landmark decision was a crucial step forward in the fight against institutionalized racism, particularly in housing. It reflected the growing judicial recognition of civil rights issues and set a precedent for future rulings related to racial discrimination. Moreover, Shelley v. Kraemer highlighted the judiciary's role in upholding constitutional rights against socially entrenched racial discrimination.The ruling did not, however, eliminate racially restrictive covenants overnight. Many neighborhoods continued to observe such agreements informally, and it wasn't until later legislative efforts, such as the Fair Housing Act of 1968, that such practices were comprehensively outlawed. Nevertheless, the Shelley v. Kraemer decision remains a pivotal moment in American legal history, celebrated for its affirmation of the principles of equality and justice enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.The Biden administration is set to implement a rule that will allow undocumented immigrants who arrived in the U.S. as children and are covered under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program to receive subsidized health insurance through Obamacare. This rule, scheduled for release by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), will redefine "lawfully present" individuals to include DACA recipients, enabling them to access premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions when purchasing plans from federal and state marketplaces beginning November 1, 2024.HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra emphasized the importance of this change, noting that over a third of DACA recipients currently lack health insurance. The inclusion of DACA recipients is expected to improve not only their health and wellbeing but also contribute positively to the overall economy. Additionally, the rule will permit these individuals to enroll in basic health programs similar to Medicaid in certain states, provided they earn no more than 200% of the poverty level.The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services anticipate that this adjustment could result in 100,000 previously uninsured DACA recipients gaining health coverage. This decision marks a significant shift from previous policies where DACA recipients were excluded from being considered "lawfully present" for insurance purposes due to the original rationale behind the DACA policy, which did not address eligibility for insurance affordability programs.The significant development in this story is the modification of the definition of "lawfully present" by the HHS to include DACA recipients. This change is crucial as it directly impacts the eligibility of these individuals for health insurance subsidies under Obamacare, a shift in policy that broadens access to healthcare for a previously marginalized group.DACA Immigrants Win Access to Obamacare Subsidies in HHS RuleIn a groundbreaking trial in Chicago, attorneys for Angela Valadez, an 89-year-old woman who developed colon cancer, argued that pharmaceutical companies GSK and Boehringer Ingelheim were aware that the heartburn medication Zantac could become carcinogenic under certain conditions but failed to alert the public. The lawyers contended that Zantac's active ingredient, ranitidine, could transform into a cancer-causing substance called NDMA if it aged or was subjected to high temperatures, and accused the companies of covering up the degradation of the pills by altering their appearance.GSK and Boehringer Ingelheim, the only defendants in this trial after other companies reached settlements, defended their product. They insisted that Zantac has been proven safe and effective through numerous studies and that no direct evidence links Zantac to Valadez's cancer, citing her other risk factors for the disease. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration had removed Zantac and its generic versions from the market in 2020 after detecting NDMA in some samples. Despite this, a significant legal victory came for the companies in 2022 when a judge dismissed about 50,000 claims, questioning the scientific backing of the assertion that Zantac could cause cancer. However, with more than 70,000 cases still pending, largely in Delaware, the issue remains a significant legal and public health concern. A newer version of Zantac with a different active ingredient is currently on the market, which does not contain ranitidine.GSK knew about Zantac cancer risk, attorneys tell jury in first trial | ReutersIn the ongoing criminal trial of former U.S. President Donald Trump in New York, a new defensive angle emerged as Trump's lawyer portrayed the hush money payment at the center of the trial as potentially extortive. The payment in question involved Stormy Daniels, real name Stephanie Clifford, who was reportedly paid to keep quiet about an alleged encounter with Trump prior to the 2016 presidential election.During the proceedings, defense attorney Emil Bove questioned Keith Davidson, Daniels' former lawyer, about his history with negotiating cash-for-dirt agreements with celebrities, hinting that Davidson's actions bordered on extortion. Trump's legal team appears to be focusing on undermining the credibility of prosecution witnesses like Daniels and Michael Cohen, Trump's former lawyer and fixer, who arranged the controversial $130,000 payment. Trump has denied any encounter with Daniels and pleaded not guilty to the charges of falsifying business records to conceal the payment.This trial aspect dovetails with previous testimony regarding Cohen's disappointment over not receiving a major governmental post after Trump's election victory. Cohen, who later disassociated from Trump and criticized him publicly, is expected to be a key witness. He has already served prison time for his role in the payment scheme.Moreover, the trial has seen further complications due to Trump's conduct outside the courtroom. Justice Juan Merchan has had to address violations of a gag order by Trump, who has been fined and could potentially face jail for continuing infractions. Trump has criticized the trial publicly, claiming it is an attempt to prevent his political comeback and alleging conflicts of interest by those involved in the trial.Trump's various legal troubles include other serious charges, such as attempting to overturn the 2020 election results and mishandling classified documents, adding layers of complexity to his current legal battles as he campaigns for the 2024 presidential election. These developments suggest a trial fraught with legal and political ramifications, with Trump's defense pushing back against what they suggest are questionable prosecutorial tactics and witness credibility.Trump trial hears Michael Cohen was 'despondent' he was denied a government post | ReutersTrump lawyer suggests hush money payment was extortion | ReutersThis week's closing theme is by Johannes Brahms.Johannes Brahms, born on May 7, 1833, in Hamburg, Germany, is one of the most revered figures in the history of classical music. His compositions span a wide range of genres, including chamber works, symphonies, and choral compositions. Brahms was known for his perfectionist approach, often taking years to refine his works to his satisfaction.Among his most celebrated creations is Symphony No. 1 in C minor, Op. 68. This symphony, which took Brahms about 14 years to complete, is frequently dubbed "Beethoven's Tenth" due to its stylistic similarities to Ludwig van Beethoven's symphonic work, especially the Ninth Symphony. Brahms's dedication to living up to Beethoven's legacy is evident in the meticulous structure and emotional depth of the piece.Symphony No. 1 was first performed in 1876, and since then, it has become a staple in the orchestral repertoire. It is particularly noted for its profound depth and complexity. The symphony unfolds over four movements, beginning with a dramatic and tense first movement that features a memorable timpani motif, which sets a somber and introspective mood. This is followed by a gentle and lyrical second movement, offering a stark contrast to the dramatic opening. The third movement, often considered the heart of the symphony, showcases Brahms's skill in thematic development and orchestral color. The finale is a triumphant resolution to the symphony's earlier tensions, culminating in a powerful and uplifting theme that echoes Beethoven's own symphonic climaxes.This week's closing theme features this masterful work by Brahms, inviting listeners to explore the depths of his musical genius. Symphony No. 1 stands not just as a nod to Beethoven's influence but as a significant original contribution to the symphonic form, marking Brahms's triumphant emergence as a composer of the first order in the orchestral domain.Without further ado, Brahm's Symphony No. 1 in C Minor, Op. 68 - III. Un poco allegretto e grazioso, enjoy. Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

In the past two decades, progressives have gotten far more savvy at the strategy we call “narrative shift,” learning how to challenge the dominant story and change the common sense on key issues. For example, on same-sex marriage, activists drove a sea change in public sentiment — from 27% support in 1996 to 71% in 2023. And research shows that Occupy Wall Street, which some criticized as a “blip,” was, as one organizer put it, actually a “spark” that ignited mass movements for economic justice, from the Fight for $15 and a Union to the campaigns of Bernie Sanders, and changed how everyday people think about economic inequality. In this episode, we hear from two experts about how to achieve narrative shifts. As co-founder and former head of United We Dream, the largest immigrant youth-led organization in the country, Cristina Jimenez Moreta, was instrumental in crafting a narrative of immigrant pride, dignity, and belonging that helped bring about Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), providing protection against deportation for hundreds of thousands of young immigrants. Cristina is now a Distinguished Lecturer at CUNY and co-chair of Leadership for Democracy and Social Justice, where she mentors young and emerging leaders and encourages them to think through hard questions like how to make the most of upsurge moments like the Movement for Black Lives, how to harness the power of new technologies like AI, and how to rethink our organizing models to build a bigger “we.” Our next guest is Alan Jenkins, a civil rights lawyer and co-founder of The Opportunity Agenda, an organization devoted to narrative shift strategies. Now a Harvard Law professor, Alan has co-authored the 1/6 comic book series, which imagines what might have happened if the MAGA insurrection had succeeded. Alan unpacks the differences between messaging, framing, and narrative shifts, and gives examples of how conservatives and progressives have succeeded in changing the terms of debates. In a wide-ranging conversation, he considers how far we've come since Ronald Reagan suggested we “open the border both ways,” how grassroots activists at the 2008 Heartland Presidential Forum in Iowa steered candidate Obama toward a rhetoric of “community values,” and how comic books and interventions in popular culture can help foster the kinds of conversations our troubled nation needs. Did Occupy Wall Street Make a Difference?, by Ruth Milkman, Stephanie Luce, and Penny Lewis, The Nation, October 4/11, 2021 Changing the Subject: A Bottom-Up Account of Occupy Wall Street in New York City, by Ruth Milkman, Stephanie Luce, and Penny Lewis, January 2013

UC Davis Police swears in its first DACA immigrant officer. Also, a conversation with Senate candidate Rep. Adam Schiff. Finally, the Wild & Scenic Film Festival in Nevada County. UC Davis PD Hires First DACA Officer A recent California law removed the U.S. citizenship requirement for people seeking to become peace officers - expanding eligibility to those with federal work authorization. UC Davis Police Department recently hired its first officer who is a beneficiary of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Officer Ernesto Moron joins Insight to talk about his life experience along with UC Davis police chief Joe Farrow - one of the champions of the new law, who talks about what the expanded eligibility can mean for both police departments and people seeking a career in law enforcement. Senate Candidate Rep. Adam Schiff As we round the corner to the primary election, we're going to narrow in on the pivotal race for Senate and have conversations with the leading candidates. Rep. Adam Schiff joins us about what sets him apart from his opponents - as well as his top priorities if elected. Wild & Scenic Film Festival Lívia Campos de Menezes, Festival Director of the Wild & Scenic Film Festival, discusses how the event has celebrated inspiring activism through film and art. The 22nd annual festival will take place February 15-19 in Nevada County. The Wild & Scenic Film Festival is produced by SYRCL, the South Yuba River Citizens League, and it's the nonprofit's largest annual fundraiser, helping to raise money for year-round conservation projects to protect and restore the Yuba River watershed.

A reminder for new readers. That Was The Week collects the best writing on critical issues in tech, startups, and venture capital. I selected the articles because they are of interest. The selections often include things I entirely disagree with. But they express common opinions, or they provoke me to think. The articles are only snippets. Click on the headline to go to the original. I express my point of view in the editorial and the weekly video below.This Week's Audio:Thanks To This Week's Contributors: @jeffbeckervc, @eshap, @stevesi, @gruber, @daringfireball, @SamuelStolton, @leah_nylen, @mattmday, @chrisheuer, @JoannaStern, @Om, @sarahpereztc, @GeorgeNHammond, @Tabby_Kinder, @NicholasMegaw, @PeterJ_Walker, @SteveAbbott415, @adamlashinskyContents* Editorial: * Essays of the Week* Changing the Customer of Venture Capital (Jeff Becker)* What A Drag It Is (Evan Shapiro)* Building Under Regulation (Steven Sinovsky)* Apple's Plans for the DMA in the European Union (John Gruber)* Amazon Drops iRobot Deal; Roomba Maker Cuts 31% of Staff (By Samuel Stolton, Leah Nylen, and Matt Day)* Envisioning the Future of Human Work in the Age of AI: The 2024 Forecast (Chris Heuer)* Video of the Week* Joanna Stern Wears a Vision Pro for 24 Hours* Product of the Week* The Vision Pro (Daring Fireball)* Apple's Vision Pro -The Meta-Review. (Om Malik)* My 4 magic moments with Vision Pro (Om Malik)* Apple Vision Pro Review: The Best Headset Yet Is Just a Glimpse of the Future (Joanna Stern)* News Of the Week* Spotify calls Apple's DMA compliance plan ‘extortion' and a ‘complete and total farce' (Sarah Perez)* Investors raise billions to buy discounted stakes in start-ups (George Hammond, Tabby Kinder, Nicholas Megaw)* Founders: getting to the next venture stage may take longer than you expect (Peter Walker)* The State of the SaaS Capital Markets: A Look Back at 2023 and Look Forward to 2024 (STEVE ABBOTT Partner, Capital Markets, KEVIN BURKE Partner, Strategy)* PayPal is laying off 2,500 employees (Pranav Dixit)* Startup of the Week* Zum Raises $140M At $1.3B Valuation To Help Kids Get to School Faster With AI (Chris Metinko)* X of the Week* For a moment, I almost felt sorry for Mark Zuckerberg. (Adam Lashinsky)EditorialYou didn't hear it here first but Apple's Vision Pro is a hit.Some wonderful essays in this week's newsletter. I lead with Jeff Becker's look at venture capital, focusing on who the customer is. The question “Who is the customer?” is crucial for any product. The answer is easy when the product is an asset class - the customer is the person investing money. Yet most of the venture world pretends that the customer is the entrepreneur. In reality, the entrepreneur is a supplier. She or He supplies opportunity, commitment, and execution; the goal is to grow value by investing customer cash into that supply.Now it is easy to understand why venture investors sometimes describe the recipient of funding as the customer. It is important that the company feels served by the VC. But serving an investee company is clearly a mission carried out for the VC fund investors, the real customer.Jeff is addressing a real problem - how to best invest in the supply. I will leave you to read his essay and ponder it, but he proposes a radical re-think of how to do early-stage investing, and for the most part, it argues for a more liberal spread of cash, in larger numbers, to far more founders. It's interesting, to say the least.Evan Shapiro focuses on the rapid aging of the US population. He makes a strong case:Since 2019, America's population has grown by 7.8 million. Yet, the US now has 2.7 million fewer kids under 15 than it did in 2019. Meanwhile, there are now 7.1 million more Americans 65-80 than five years ago. America now has half a million fewer people under 40 than it did in 2019 and almost 8.4 million more people over 40.At a time when politicians from both sides are falling over themselves to point a finger at immigration as a major problem, it is refreshing to see analysis demonstrating that the US needs more immigrants. And in a context where there is virtual full employment this needs to be across all skill levels and needs to trend young. The essay is great.Part of the anti-immigrant narrative has focused on DACA - Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Ron Conway is part of a group of over 50 businesses signing an amicus brief to support DACA. Bravo to him.Hostility to immigrants is never OK. It is even less OK when the economy is desperate for skilled and unskilled willing hands.Politically inspired propaganda dominated elsewhere this week. Amazon was prevented from closing the acquisition of iRobot due to EU objections based on competitive concerns. Well done, EU. Amazon dropped the deal, and iRobot may well be in trouble as a result. Thirty percent of staff were laid off. And more EU interference when Apple was ordered to allow alternative app stores on the iPhone. Steven Sinofsky's wonderful essay, “Building Under Regulation,” leverages his vast experience at Microsoft. It seems every day it becomes more obvious that the EU is against innovation, especially when it produces successful big companies.The Congress got in on the act too (see X of the Week), calling social media leaders to DC to be accused, show-trial-like, of being responsible for teen suicides. Sadly, the Meta CEO apologized as if admitting culpability.Teen suicide and causality is a non-trivial issue, but it is fair to say that Social Media does not cause it. Teens (I have one and another two recently in their post-teen phase). All have had growing up challenges. As I recall, I did also. The world can be harsh in the face of those challenges. But to see social media as the only factor, or even a major one, seems superficial and plain wrong. I wish one of the executives had the nerve to push back against the accusations. Adam Lashinsky's piece is interesting.Finally, Chris Heuer has a research piece on AI and the Future of Work. Well done, Chris, this is such an important issue. My PoV is that work, defined as paid labor, will inevitably decline and the average working day will decline. I believe this is a fundamental good for humanity. I also believe it poses enormous global questions about how the abundance made possible will be distributed to improve life for everybody. I do. not think this is the end of human effort. Just the beginning of the end of the need to do paid labor in order to live.Essays of the WeekChanging the Customer of Venture CapitalThe gift of technologyJEFF BECKERJAN 29, 2024TLDR: We need to change the customer of early-stage venture capital so that we can fund the future of technology and build global prosperity for decades to come.Recently, I hosted a group of students from Wharton at Antler's offices and we talked about the future of early-stage VC.I alluded to this a couple weeks ago when I said:…for $5B per year, you could seed the vast majority of meaningful tech companies for 8 years with the amount of money Elon Musk spent on Twitter. (Link here)The reality is, $5B per year just isn't that much money in the grand scheme of private equities—roughly .5-1% depending how you slice it.As a former salesperson, that fact often leaves me wondering, “what if you changed the customer of venture capital?”Could you attract more money, create more impact, and actually produce more returns?Classically, putting your name on building was a way to not only have a fairly durable legacy, but let's be honest, that gift is outdated.And it hardly does any good in the world.Instead, legacies and the world's most important problems alike would be better served by a consolidation of brilliant minds and capital, combined with the speed and leverage of startups.I think there are two interesting solutions, and both should be built.The first is something I'd call the 501-VC, and the second would be to fund all of venture capital for a decade or more through a new kind of Giving Pledge.I'm going to talk about the second one today.Famously,The Giving Pledge is a promise by the world's wealthiest individuals and families to dedicate the majority of their wealth to charitable causes.The problem is, charitable foundations and organizations aren't historically the most efficient way to solve the world's problems. They exist for good reason, but most operate like old corporates rather than savvy startups.However, what if we thought of economic opportunity and global prosperity as a more ubiquitous problem to solve, and instead of funding mission-driven work, we fund the entirety of the tech sector?What if instead of the average high net worth individual trying to get a 3-5X return over 10 years, you focused on the ultra high net worth population, the economic development groups, and the sovereign funds who are both trying to achieve these returns and trying to improve the world?What if you focused on their shared goals and values as customers, like creating economic opportunity and building a durable legacy?What if you could do it in every corner of the planet through access to entrepreneurship?What if instead of one PayPal Mafia, you had thousands?What if you had an investor who could actually deploy $5B per year at the formation stage?That has simply never existed before, and yet it is a defining opportunity for the human race and our evolution as a society.Currently, high potential employees are stuck in their corporate jobs.Our brightest minds handcuffed to benefits and addicted to a salary, never realizing their true potential or having a real impact on the world.Many go get their MBA where they spend money to learn new skills and acquire a network, rather than receive money for becoming a more productive citizen of the world.Many job hop looking for a low-risk way to get on a rocket ship.Some try to build their own, but quickly run out of runway and mental fortitude.It's a broken system, and we need to rebuild it.First it requires a product.The product needs to be for two groups—the founders and the investors.It starts with the infrastructure required to reduce the risk of being a founder which in turn attracts more of the brightest minds to the job itself. At the same time, the product also has to be an investment vehicle that attracts a new type of customer to early-stage VC.… Lots MoreWhat A Drag It IsAmerica Feels OldEVAN SHAPIROJAN 29, 2024Since 2019, America's population has grown by 7.8 million. Yet, the US now has 2.7 million fewer kids under 15 than it did in 2019. Meanwhile, there are now 7.1 million more Americans 65-80 than five years ago. America now has half a million fewer people under 40 than it did in 2019 and almost 8.4 million more people over 40.Because of the sheer size of the Baby Boomer Generation and the fact that younger Americans have pulled out on having kids, in the last five years, America has gotten old - not just compared to itself, but also compared to the rest of the world.In 2019, 63% of the world's population was under 40. Now, 64% of the people of the planet are 39 or younger. In short:Over the last half-decade the world has gotten one percent younger and America has gotten one percent older.One percent may seem small. However, the consequences of this demographic shift are consequential. For countries like the US, the UK, France, Italy, Germany, and Japan, with aging populations where the number of people over 60 is growing faster than the number of people under 15, the coming years will be filled with challenges brought on by their age: Workforce shortages, inverted dependency ratios where a diminishing tax-base struggles to fund a widening social safety net, health care infrastructures ill-equipped to deal with increased demand. As the world's wealthiest and most powerful nations continue to age faster than they reproduce, expect these issues to get increased and more urgent attention.After decades of aging down, the US population is now aging up quickly. In 2000, 58% of the US population was under 40 years old. Now just a slim majority of 51% is under 40. The impacts of this rapid maturation can be felt throughout our culture, but perhaps nowhere as dramatically as in America's Media and Tech industries.Over the last half century (but for some intermittent challenges from Japan and China), the US has led the world in entertainment and technology, setting the standard for the world's consumption of Media. While many TVs and phones are manufactured in other countries, most of the systems, software, and vision for these products has come from America - and the entertainment consumed on these devices has been, for many decades, the United States' most notable export.Now, America's Media Industrial Complex finds itself amidst a widely-reported bloodbath of its own making. Recently, this meltdown has been joined by America's leading Tech firms. Some of this is cyclical, driven by innovation cycles, advertising recessions, and even the aftermath of the worldwide pandemic. But muchof the current Media Apocalypse was as predictable as the upside-down aging ratio of our population.The first decade of the 21st Century was marked by an almost inconceivable level of innovation in American Media and Tech. The internet invaded all aspects of our lives. Broadband grew across the country like a high-speed weed, bringing the universe to our desktops, making all our worlds, at once, much bigger and infinitely smaller. By 2012, tiny supercomputers known as smartphones had reached a critical mass in the US and TV was streaming into our homes.Then, right around that time, America's Media C-Suite inhabitants seemingly started a shared mid-life crisis, through which we are all still living.Bob Iger took over Disney in 2005, when he was 53 years old. Through some of the most masterful deal-making in Media history, and (seemingly) a true vision of the future, Iger took a troubled company and turned it into the greatest proprietor of intellectual property the world has ever known. He bought Pixar in 2006, revitalizing Disney Animation. He bought Marvel in 2009, jump stating the most successful film and TV franchise in history. He bought Lucasfilm in 2012, completing what many see as bar-setting hat-trick of entertainment, bringing the most valuable collection of titles in entertainment all under one roof.… Lots MoreBuilding Under RegulationAn essay on the EU Digital Markets Act and Apple's "Update on apps distributed in the European Union" (and some personal history)STEVEN SINOFSKYJAN 27, 2024Readers note: This is a long post. There are enough hot takes on this super important issue. I welcome corrections as always.This week Apple detailed the software changes that will appear in an upcoming release of iOS to comply with the European Union Digital Markets Act (DMA).  As I read the over 60 pages of the DMA when it was passed (and in drafts before that, little of which changed in the process) my heart sank over the complexity of a regulation so poorly constructed yet so clearly aimed at specific (American) companies and products. As I read through many of the hundreds of pages of Apple documents detailing their compliance implementation my heart sank again. This time was because I so thoroughly could feel the pain and struggle product teams felt in clinging to at best or unwinding at worst the most substantial improvement in computing ever introduced—the promise behind the iPhone since its introduction. The reason the iPhone became so successful was not a fluke. Consumers and customers voted that the value proposition of the product was something they preferred, and they acted by purchasing iPhone and developers responded by building applications for iOS. The regulators have a different view of that promise, so here we are.To be clear, DMA covers a wide range of products and services all deemed to be critical infrastructure in the digital world. It is both an incredibly broad and sometimes oddly specific regulation. As written the regulation covers at least online intermediation services [commercial internet sites/markets], online search engines, web browsers, advertising services, social network services, video sharing platforms, number-independent interpersonal communications services [messaging], operating systems, virtual assistants, and cloud computing.If you're well-versed in online you can map each one of those to precisely who the target might be, or sometimes targets. It is all big tech, almost exclusively US-based companies. There are no EU companies that meet the criteria to be covered—hardcoded revenue of EUR 7.5 billion for three years, EUR 7.5 billion market cap, or 45 million MAU—with Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta, Microsoft, and Samsung acknowledging the criteria apply to various units in addition to the following other “very large online platforms”: Alibaba AliExpress, Booking.com, Pinterest, Snapchat, Twitter, Wikipedia, Zalando [German fashion retailer]. Those thresholds seem strangely not round.I am going to focus on the Apple and primarily their App Store response because I think it is the most important and time critical and because iPhone is the most unique, innovative, and singular product in market. I can easily replace search, a browser, an ad network, a social network, a video site. Even cloud computing is not so sticky, and we all use multiple messaging services. What iPhone delivers is irreplaceable. At least for many of the subset of smartphone users that chose Apple.The thing is, as impressive as Apple has been it is not *that* successful by the measures that count for dominance. Worldwide Apple is clearly the number two smartphone to Google Android which has over 70% share. In the Europe (excluding Russia) Apple iPhone has about a 33% share (I won't debate exact numbers, units sold v in use, revenue v. profit v. units, etc. as all those do is attempt to tell a story that isn't obvious, which is Android is more popular). That's hardly a monopoly share by any standard. In some European countries Apple has a higher share, some data providers would say as high as 50% or nearly 60%, which by most legal standards is still not quite at a monopoly level especially in a dynamic market. Apple has not been fined, sued, or otherwise convicted of having a dominant share let alone abusing the market position it has. No consumer harm has been demonstrated. In Epic v. Applespecifically on the store, Apple prevailed in 9 of 10 claims of damages to Epic due to the store's costs. Of note, the same claims in Epic v. Google resulted in liability from Google and is being appealed. Many of most vocal competitors didn't even exist before the iPhone. They have become huge companies and don't appear to be struggling, and in fact benefit from being part of the iPhone ecosystem. Counter to the text of the DMA, innovation seems to be thriving as measured by the number of new companies and distinct new services.Yet, the EU DMA has declared that Apple is a “gatekeeper”—an ominous term applied to Apple among the others.… Lots MoreApple's Plans for the DMA in the European UnionFriday, 26 January 2024Apple yesterday announced a broad, wide-ranging, and complex set of new policies establishing their intended compliance with the European Union's Digital Markets Act, which comes into effect March 7. There is a lot to remark upon and numerous remaining questions, but my favorite take was from Sebastiaan de With on Twitter/X, the day before any of this was announced.After quipping “Oh god please no” to a screenshot of the phrase “Spotify also wants to roll out alternate app stores”, de With had this conversation:de With:The EU is once again solving absolutely no problems and making everything worse in tech. I gotta say, they are if anything highly consistent.“Anton”:Overly powerful, rent-seeking gatekeepers seem like a problem.de With:I love that I can't tell if you are talking about the EU or Apple in this case.My second-favorite take, from that same thread, was this from Max Rovensky:DMA is not pro-consumer.It's anti-big-business.Those tend to coincide sometimes, which makes it an easy sell for the general public, but do actually read the DMA, it's quite interesting.I'd go slightly further and describe the DMA as anti-U.S.-big-business, because as far as I can tell, nothing in the DMA adversely affects or even annoys any European tech companies. There are aspects of it that seem written specifically for Spotify, in fact.But Rovensky's framing captures the dichotomy. Anti-big-business regulation and pro-consumer results often do go hand-in-hand, but the DMA exposes the fissures. I do not think the DMA is going to change much, if anything at all, for the better for iOS users in the E.U. (Or for non-iOS users in the EU, for that matter.) And much like the GDPR's website cookie regulations, I think if it has any practical effect, it'll be to make things worse for users. Whether these options are better for developers seems less clear.I've often said that Apple's priorities are consistent: Apple's own needs first, users second, developers third. The European Commission's priorities put developers first, users second, and “gatekeepers” a distant third. The DMA prescribes not a win-win-win framework, but a win-win-lose one.Apple is proud, stubborn, arrogant, controlling, and convinced it has the best interests of its customers in mind.The European Commission is proud, stubborn, arrogant, controlling, and convinced it has the best interests of its citizens in mind.Ever since this collision over the DMA seemed inevitable, starting about two years ago, I've been trying to imagine how it would turn out. And each time, I start by asking: Which side is smarter? My money has been on Apple. Yesterday's announcements, I think, show why.APPLE'S PROPOSED CHANGESIt's really hard to summarize everything Apple announced yesterday, but I'll try. Start with the main Apple Newsroom press release, “Apple Announces Changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store in the European Union”:“The changes we're announcing today comply with the Digital Markets Act's requirements in the European Union, while helping to protect EU users from the unavoidable increased privacy and security threats this regulation brings. Our priority remains creating the best, most secure possible experience for our users in the EU and around the world,” said Phil Schiller, Apple Fellow. “Developers can now learn about the new tools and terms available for alternative app distribution and alternative payment processing, new capabilities for alternative browser engines and contactless payments, and more. Importantly, developers can choose to remain on the same business terms in place today if they prefer.”Schiller is the only Apple executive quoted in the press release, and to my ear, his writing hand is all over the entire announcement. Apple was quite clear before the DMA was put into law that they considered mandatory sideloading on iOS a bad idea for users, and their announcement yesterday doesn't back down an inch from still declaring it a bad idea.Apple has also argued, consistently, that they seek to monetize third-party development for the iOS platform, and that being forced to change from their current system — (a) all apps must come from the App Store; (b) developers never pay anything for the distribution of free apps; (c) paid apps and in-app-purchases for digital content consumed in-app must go through Apple's In-App Payments system that automates Apple's 30/15 percent commissions — would greatly complicate how they monetize the platform. And now Apple has revealed a greatly complicated set of rules and policies for iPhone apps in the EU.MG Siegler has a great — and fun — post dissecting Apple's press release line-by-line. Siegler concludes:I'm honestly not sure I can recall a press release dripping with such disdain. Apple may even have a point in many of the points above, but the framing of it would just seem to ensure that Apple is going to continue to be at war with the EU over all of this and now undoubtedly more. Typically, if you're going to make some changes and consider the matter closed, you don't do so while emphatically shoving your middle fingers in the air.Some of these changes do seem good and useful, but most simply seem like convoluted changes to ensure the status quo actually doesn't change much, if at all. Just remember that, “importantly, developers can choose to remain on the same business terms in place today if they prefer.” What do you think Apple prefers?The puzzle Apple attempted to solve was creating a framework of new policies — and over 600 new developer APIs to enable those policies — to comply with the DMA, while keeping the path of least resistance and risk for developers the status quo: Apple's own App Store as it is.….Lots MoreAmazon Drops iRobot Deal; Roomba Maker Cuts 31% of Staff* IRobot CEO steps down and company cuts workforce by 31%* Tech giant to pay $94 million to iRobot over deal terminationBy Samuel Stolton, Leah Nylen, and Matt DayJanuary 29, 2024 at 5:33 AM PSTAmazon.com Inc. has abandoned its planned $1.4 billion acquisition of Roomba maker iRobot Corp. after clashing with European Union regulators who had threatened to block the deal.The fallout came quickly. IRobot, which has been struggling recently, said Chief Executive Officer Colin Angle has stepped downas the company embarks on a restructuring plan that will result in about 350 job cuts, or 31% of the workforce. The vacuum maker's shares tumbled 19% in New York to $13.80, their lowest level since 2009. Amazon's shares were up less than 1% at $160.07.The decision is a sign of the intense pressure Amazon is facing to prove its actions don't harm competition as its influence grows in retail, cloud-computing and entertainment. Antitrust regulators on both sides of the Atlantic have been keen to ensure that the biggest US tech companies don't snap up innovative startups before they have a chance to become formidable competitors on their own.Amazon met with the FTC's senior antitrust staff last week, who informed the company they were recommending a suit over the deal, according to a person familiar with the meeting. Executives and lawyers from the tech giant were scheduled to meet with the FTC's three commissioners this week to make a final push for the acquisition, said the person, who asked not to be named discussing the confidential probe.… Lots MoreEnvisioning the Future of Human Work in the Age of AI: The 2024 ForecastResearch Fellowship ProgramIntroductionAs technological change and the adoption of new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) accelerate, the future of human work will be characterized by disruption, uncertainty, and opportunity. As 2024 approached, the Team Flow Institute Research Fellows gathered for a roundtable to discuss their visions for the future of human-focused work in the age of AI. As described by the institute's co-founder and Managing Director, Chris Heuer, “The Team Flow Institute is an organization dedicated to shaping a human-centric future of work as we face the choice of augmentation or automation in every industry and every function. This transformational decision will reshape what we call work and society itself, requiring us to abandon business as usual and finally design business as possible.” The Team Flow Institute Research Fellows' roundtable discussion delved into the potential opportunities and challenges of this technology revolution driven by the institute's “mission to gather like-minded individuals and organizations to steer our collective destiny toward a more sustainable future, where the essence of humanity and human work is valued and preserved as we increasingly adopt AI tools and technologies, explained Jennifer McClure, Senior Research Fellow, and Advisory Board member. This article analyzes key insights from the discussion, offering a glimpse into the work landscape of 2024 and beyond. As the Team Flow Institute embarks on its inaugural fellowship program, this analysis holds particular significance as it seeks to equip individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to thrive in the evolving landscape of AI-enabled work. Through this program, the Team Flow Institute aims to foster a community of leaders who can guide organizations and individuals toward a future where humans and technology collaborate to create a more sustainable and fulfilling work environment.Part I: AI Progress and PromiseNo longer relegated to science fiction, AI has infiltrated our lives, transforming industries with its vast potential. From automating tedious tasks to streamlining complex decision-making processes, its applications are far-reaching. In the realm of design, AI-powered software is revolutionizing industries like architecture and fashion, enabling rapid prototyping and personalized creations. Team Flow Institute co-founder Jaime Schwarz says, “Imagine being able to prototype a new building or clothing line in minutes instead of weeks. This remarkable advancement accelerates design cycles and fosters increased customization, ultimately leading to more innovative and personalized consumer products.”The creative landscape is also poised for disruption with the emergence of generative AI. Team Flow Institute Research Fellow Shel Holtz describes its transformative potential: “Generative AI is blurring the lines between human and machine creativity. We're seeing machines create realistic text, images, and even music that is nearly indistinguishable from human-generated work.” This democratization of creativity opens doors for individuals with diverse backgrounds and abilities to express themselves in new and exciting ways. But it also opens up philosophical questions and debates about the nature of art and creativity, adds Jen McClure. Amidst these exciting advancements, Chris Heuer reminds us that “AI is not just a science fiction concept anymore; it's here, and it's changing the way we do everything.” This necessitates a thoughtful approach to the future of work, a need to ensure the value of human skills and their role in work, proactive workforce development initiatives to ensure that individuals are equipped with the necessary skills to thrive in the evolving job market, and an elevation of the need for constant communications within organizations, reminds Team Flow Institute Research Fellow Sharon McIntosh.As AI continues to permeate our lives, it is crucial to acknowledge its remarkable potential and challenges. By navigating this dynamic landscape with careful consideration and proactive planning, we can ensure that AI serves as a force for progress, innovation, and a brighter future for all. As Team Flow Institute Research Fellow Gina Debogovich reminds us, it will undoubtedly unlock economic growth. “The 20th century began with a global GDP of $3 trillion and, largely due to technological advancement, ended with a GDP of $33.8 trillion. AI is poised to boost the economy to unseen heights.”AI will be a catalyst for creating new jobs, just as the web did in the mid-1990s. Businesses must integrate these jobs and activities into existing workflows and business models and develop new ones. Indeed, innovative organizations are already experimenting with, if not embracing, the role of prompt engineers. The Team Flow Institute advocates for a Team Flow Facilitator to serve as a coach, a collaboration facilitator, and an AI pilot to support high-performing teams.Part II: The Risks and DownsidesWhile AI offers many benefits, possibilities, and opportunities, its advancements are not without potential pitfalls. AI and automation technologies bring both promise and peril to the workforce. While they offer the potential to augment human capabilities and business efficiencies significantly, understandable concerns persist surrounding job losses and the general impact on workers. Organizations must chart a thoughtful course that fully harnesses technical capabilities without losing sight of the humans at the heart of work.… Lots MoreVideo of the WeekProduct of the WeekThe Vision ProTuesday, 30 January 2024For the last six days, I've been simultaneously testing three entirely new products from Apple. The first is a VR/AR headset with eye-tracking controls. The second is a revolutionary spatial computing productivity platform. The third is a breakthrough personal entertainment device.A headset, a spatial productivity platform, and a personal entertainment device.I'm sure you're already getting it. These are not three separate devices. They're one: Apple Vision Pro. But if you'll pardon the shameless homage to Steve Jobs's famous iPhone introduction, I think these three perspectives are the best way to consider it.THE HARDWAREVision Pro comes in a surprisingly big box. I was expecting a package roughly the dimensions of a HomePod box; instead, a Vision Pro retail box is quite a bit larger than two HomePod boxes stacked atop each other. (I own more HomePods than most people.)There's a lot inside. The top half of the package contains the Vision Pro headset itself, with the light seal, a light seal cushion, and the default Solo Knit Band already attached. The lower half contains the battery, the charger (30W), the cables, the Dual Loop Band, the Getting Started book (which is beautifully printed in full color, on excellent paper — it feels like a keepsake), the polishing cloth1, and an extra light seal cushion.To turn Vision Pro on, you connect the external battery pack's power cable to the Vision Pro's power connector, and rotate it a quarter turn to lock it into place. There are small dots on the headset's dime-sized power socket showing how to align the cable connector's small LED. The LED pulses when Vision Pro turns on. (I miss Apple's glowing power indicator LEDs — this is a really delightful touch.) When Vision Pro has finished booting and is ready to use, it makes a pleasant welcoming sound.Then you put Vision Pro on. If you're using the Solo Knit Band, you tighten and loosen it using a dial on the band behind your right ear. VisionOS directs you to raise or lower the headset appropriately to position it at just the right height on your face relative to your eyes. If Vision Pro thinks your eyes are too close to the displays, it will suggest you switch to the “+” size light seal cushion. You get two light seal cushions, but they're not the same: mine are labeled “W” and “W+”. The “+” is the same width, to match your light seal, but adds a wee bit more space between your eyes and the displays inside Vision Pro. For me the default (non-“+”) one fits fine.The software then guides you through a series of screens to calibrate the eye tracking. It's all very obvious, and kind of fun. It's almost like a simple game: you stare at a series of dots in a circle, and pinch your index finger and thumb as you stare at each one. You go through this three times, in three different artificial lighting conditions: dark, medium, and bright. Near the end of the first-run experience, you're prompted to bring your iPhone or iPad nearby, just like when setting up a new iPhone or iPad. This allows your Vision Pro to get your Apple ID credentials and Wi-Fi password without entering any of that manually. It's a very smooth onboarding process. And then that's it, you're in and using Vision Pro.There's no getting around some fundamental problems with the Vision Pro hardware.First is the fact that it uses an external battery pack connected via a power cable. The battery itself is about the width and height of an iPhone 15/15 Pro, but thicker. And the battery is heavy: about 325g, compared to 187g for an iPhone 15 Pro, and 221g for a 15 Pro Max. It's closer in thickness and weight to two iPhone 15's than it is to one. And the tethered power cable can be an annoyance. Vision Pro has no built-in reserve battery — disconnect the power cable from the headset and it immediately shuts off. It clicks firmly into place, so there's no risk of accidentally disconnecting it. But if you buy an extra Vision Pro Battery for $200, you can't hot-swap them — you need to shut down first.… Lots MoreApple's Vision Pro -The Meta-Review.Apple Vision Pro reviews have started to roll in — and depending on who you read, the consensus vacillates between amazing and work in progress. In most cases, they reflect some version of reality. If one is looking for faults with Apple's face computer, then one will find them. And if you are looking at what it represents, you are going to be excited. I am in the ‘camp' of the amazed, though I am not blinded by the challenges that await Vision Pro in the real world.The Verge's Nilay Patel sums up the challenge of Vision Pro, writing:The technology to build a true optical AR display that works well enough to replace an everyday computer just isn't there yet. The Magic Leap 2 is an optical AR headset that's cheaper and smaller than the Vision Pro, but it's plagued by compromises in field of view and image quality that most people would never accept. So Apple's settled for building a headset with real-time video passthrough — it is the defining tradeoff of the Vision Pro. It is a VR headset masquerading as an AR headset. And let me tell you: the video passthrough on the Vision Pro is really good. It works! It's convincing. You put the headset on, the display comes on, and you're right back where you were, only with a bunch of visionOS windows floating around.Let's get on with the cons: The Verge points out problems like ‘motion blur,' ‘blurriness,' ‘color fringing,' ‘limited field of view,' and ‘vignetting.' I have not personally experienced any of these because, well, I don't have the device.The device is sometimes laggy. It's heavy, and the wired battery is limited to just over 2 hours. You can plug it into a ‘wall charger' with a USB-C cable, or daisy-chain it to another USB-C battery pack. And it does get a tad warm. You need to use the ‘dorky' headband to use the device without feeling the weight (or in some cases, a headache).None of this surprises me! Vision Pro is, after all, a full-blown computer. It's made from magnesium, carbon fiber, and aluminum. It has two high-resolution front-facing cameras (video pass-through), two cameras that face down to track your hands and gestures, a LiDAR, TrueDepth cameras, and some kind of infrared lights. The device has two tiny MicroOLED displays packed with a total of 23 million pixels. (As I noted in an earlier piece, these displays are the magic and the primary reason why Vision Pro is so expensive.)All these sensors, cameras, and displays are powered by an M2 chip and an R1 spatial coprocessor, and fans. Apple has packed this in an enclosure that is about three times the weight of the iPhone 15 Pro Max and is still lighter than the iPad 12.9. Paint me impressed purely from a technological standpoint.…. Lots MoreMy 4 magic moments with Vision ProNo, not again! Not another Vision Pro Review! I feel you — after all the reviews yesterday, I am pretty sure you don't want to read another review. Here's the good news — it's not a review. Instead, I will share my quick impressions from a deep dive at Apple Park, and my four magic moments with the Vision Pro.Unlike the reviewers who published their reviews, my access to the device has come in dribs and drabs. It has been a carefully managed experience — an early demo, exposure to the photos app, and the spatial video capabilities. A few days ago, I got to use the device for less than two hours.This was a highly curated experience — so this doesn't and won't qualify as a review. I am skipping all the stuff that has been covered by the deep dive that professional reviewers have already published. WSJ's Joanna Stern's review is amazing — especially the video version. It is best to consider these as my considered impressions.First, can I wax eloquent about the technological achievement of Vision Pro? As a chip and hardware nerd, I think Vision Pro is a witches' brew of the latest of all types of technologies. Let me quote my post from yesterday:Vision Pro is, after all, a full-blown computer. It's made from magnesium, carbon fiber, and aluminum. It has two high-resolution front-facing cameras (video pass-through), two cameras that face down to track your hands and gestures, a LiDAR, TrueDepth cameras, and some kind of infrared lights. The device has two tiny MicroOLED displays packed with a total of 23 million pixels. (As I noted in an earlier piece, these displays are the magic and the primary reason why Vision Pro is so expensive.)All these sensors, cameras, and displays are powered by an M2 chip and an R1 spatial coprocessor, and fans. Apple has packed this in an enclosure that is about three times the weight of the iPhone 15 Pro Max and is still lighter than the iPad 12.9. Paint me impressed purely from a technological standpoint.What's even more impressive is the sound — Apple is using beamforming to direct the sound into your ears. And unless you are really blasting it out loud — you could get away with wearing it in a public place — though people in Business Class will notice the slight din from the seat next to them. Apple is hoping you will splurge on AirPods Pro.No matter how you see the device — love it or hate it, you can't deny that it is yet another amazing computer built by a company that knows how to build great consumer computers.… Lots MoreApple Vision Pro Review: The Best Headset Yet Is Just a Glimpse of the FutureWorking, cooking, skiing, kicking back—our columnist wore Apple's new mixed-reality headset for a week to see what it's forBy Joanna Stern at the WSJJan. 30, 2024 at 9:00 am ETA few things surprised me after wearing the Vision Pro mixed-reality headset for nearly 24 hours straight:* I didn't puke. * I got a lot of work done.  * I cooked a delicious meal.Also, my Persona—the headset's animated video-call avatar—will haunt your dreams.For the last week, I have been testing Apple's boldest bet yet on the post-smartphone future. Strap on the 1.4-pound goggles and you see apps floating right in your living room. Living room a stress-inducing mess? Go full virtual reality and watch a 3-D movie on a giant screen perched on the mouth of a Hawaiian volcano.Let's get this out of the way: You're probably not going to buy the $3,500 Apple Vision Pro. Unless you're an app developer or an Apple die-hard, you're more likely to spend that kind of money on an actual trip to a Hawaiian volcano.And that's OK. Reviewing the Vision Pro, I wanted to understand the potential of the device, and the technical constraints that keep it from being a must-have, at least for now. Most importantly, I wanted to answer one question: In a world full of screens, what's the benefit of strapping one to your eyes?… Lots MoreNews Of the WeekSpotify calls Apple's DMA compliance plan ‘extortion' and a ‘complete and total farce'Sarah Perez @sarahpereztc / 2:41 PM PST•January 26, 2024Image Credits: Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto (opens in a new window)/ Getty ImagesCount Spotify among those not thrilled with how Apple has chosen to comply with the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA), which sets the stage for sideloading apps, alternative app stores, browser choice, and more. On Friday, the streaming music company issued its response to Apple's new DMA rules, calling the new fees imposed on developers “extortion” and Apple's compliance plan “a complete and total farce,” that demonstrated the tech giant believes that the rules don't apply to them.Apple earlier this week announced a host of changes that comply with the letter of the EU law, if not the spirit. The company said that app developers in the EU will receive reduced commissions, but it also introduced a new “core technology fee” that requires developers to pay €0.50 for each first annual install per year over a 1 million threshold, regardless of their distribution channel. It will also charge a 3% payment processing fee when developers use Apple's in-app payments instead of their own.Epic Games' CEO Tim Sweeney, whose company sued Apple over antitrust concerns, already condemned Apple's plan, saying it was a case of “malicious compliance” and full of “junk fees,” and now Spotify is essentially saying the same.…. Lots MoreInvestors raise billions to buy discounted stakes in start-upsBuyers return after secondary market for private shares was hit by higher interest ratesGeorge Hammond and Tabby Kinder in San Francisco and Nicholas Megaw in New YorkJANUARY 16 2024Investment firms are raising billions of dollars to buy stakes in venture capital-backed technology start-ups, as a long drought in acquisitions and initial public offerings forces early investors to offload their stock at discounts. The start-up secondary market, where investors and employees buy and sell tens of billions of dollars' worth of shares in privately held companies, is becoming an increasingly important trading venue, in the absence of traditional ways of cashing out and given a slowdown in start-up funding. Venture secondaries buyers are primed for a busy year as start-up employees look for a way to sell their stock and investors look to return capital to their own backers or reallocate it elsewhere. Secondary market specialist Lexington Partners last week announced a new $23bn fund to buy up stakes from “large-scale investors”. Lexington had originally aimed to raise $15bn, but upped its target on the back of high demand, and said it was “in the early stages of a generational secondary buying opportunity” that could last years.The fund will predominantly buy shares from private equity funds but also expects to invest as much as $5bn into venture capital secondaries, said a spokesperson.“We are seeing crazy amounts of [limited partner investors] that are distressed and need to lighten their venture load,” said the head of a $2bn venture capital firm. The latest Lexington fund “speaks to the sheer demand” from LPs that feel “over-allocated” to private capital including to start-ups, they said. Other specialist firms such as Pinegrove Capital Partners, a joint vehicle created by Brookfield Asset Management and Sequoia Heritage, and StepStone have also been raising multibillion-dollar funds to target venture secondaries.…. Lots MoreFounders: getting to the next venture stage may take longer than you expectPeter WalkerHead of Insights @ Carta | Data StorytellerThe median number of days between a priced seed and Series A round hit 679 in 2023, a new peak.Median for Series A to B was 744 days (over 2 years). Very similar for Series B to C (739 days, also over 2 years).Fascinating to watch the 25th percentile (green) and the 75th percentile (blue) trends as well. It looks as though the 25th pct has pulled closer to the median for the middle venture rounds - suggesting there are very few companies speed-running through venture fundraising right now. Some of that could be company choice, as founders have cut spend and become more capital-efficient over the prior 12 months. However, I'm certain a lot of the increase in time is due to VCs being far more choosy about where to invest.So what are founders doing if primary rounds are not on the menu? Getting creative.Founders are raising bridge rounds at record rates, usually from insiders already on the cap table. They are turning to SAFEs and Convertible Notes, even between named venture stages. Some are turning to non-dilutive financing and loans.And many are trying to make customer revenue their primary fundraising channel. But switching from growth at all costs to profitability in a short period of time is no easy track change. My bet is that the time between rounds plateaus in 2024 (or maybe even declines just a touch). Maybe that's wishful thinking

On today’s Morning Magazine, a film about missing and murdered indigenous people is set for tomorrow at Chautauqua. We talk with the director. Following that, the fate of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), is uncertain as a Texas judge determines its legality. We will hear from DACA recipients [...]

Nuestra Palabra Presents "Latina Leadership Lessons", the new book featuring many Latina Leaders as written by the Honorable Delia Garcia who is joined by two contributors, Dolores Huerta and Maria Gabriela Pacheco. Listen to this amazing platica in advance to Delia Garcia's speaking engagement at the Latino Bookstore at the Guadalupe Cultural Arts Center on June 9th, 2023 at 6:00 PM. Honorable Delia Garcia is an executive servant leader for over 25 years. She currently serves at the U.S. Department of Labor Women's Bureau as Regional Administrator. Delia Garcia is a trailblazer where she was elected the first Latina & youngest female to the Kansas State Legislature in 2004 where she served six years in the House of Representatives; and in 2019, she was appointed as Cabinet Secretary of Labor for the State of Kansas. She has over 25 years of public service at the national and state level, including non-profit executive leadership service in advocating for economic security for all. She is an author on national women leadership, and recently wrote her first book titled Latina Leadership Lessons. Dolores Huerta is a civil rights & labor rights feminist icon in the world, with schools & streets named after her across our U.S. Dolores is the Founder & President of the Dolores Huerta Foundation and Co-Founder of the National United Farm Workers with Cesar Chavez. Dolores is the Recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipient, the highest civilian award in the United States; as well as the Ohtli Award, the highest award from the Mexican Government. At age 93, she continues to develop leaders & advocate for working women & families thru grassroots organizing. Dolores serves as Delia's mentor, & together they encourage & train Latinas to run for public office across the U.S. Dolores wrote the Foreword to the Latina Leadership Lessons book. Maria Gabriela (“Gaby”) Pacheco is a nationally recognized immigrant rights leader. Since the early 2000s, she has advocated for tuition equity laws and the DREAM Act. In 2006, after Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) raided her home and detained her family, she began to fight for comprehensive immigration reform. On January 1, 2010, along three friends, they led the Trail of Dreams, a four-month walk from Miami to Washington, DC, to call attention to the plight of immigrant families under the threat of deportation. In 2012, as political director for United We Dream, she spearheaded the efforts and strategy that led to the announcement of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Tony Diaz Writer and activist Tony Diaz, El Librotraficante, is a Cultural Accelerator. He was the first Chicano to earn a Master of Fine Arts degree from the University of Houston Creative Writing Program. In 1998, he founded Nuestra Palabra: Latino Writers Having Their Say (NP), Houston's first reading series for Latino authors. The group galvanized Houston's Community Cultural Capital to become a movement for civil rights, education, and representation. When Arizona officials banned Mexican American Studies, Diaz and four veteran members of NP organized the 2012 Librotraficante Caravan to smuggle books from the banned curriculum back into Arizona. He is the author of The Aztec Love God. His book, The Tip of the Pyramid: Cultivating Community Cultural Capital, is the first in his series on Community Organizing. Writer and activist Tony Diaz, El Librotraficante, hosts Latino Politics and News and the Nuestra Palabra Radio Show on 90.1 FM, KPFT, Houston's Community Station. He is also a political analyst on “What's Your Point?” on Fox 26 Houston. He is the author of the forthcoming book: The Tip of the Pyramid: Cultivating Community Cultural Capital. www.Librotraficante.com www.NuestraPalabra.org www.TonyDiaz.net Nuestra Palabra is funded in part by the BIPOC Arts Network Fund. Instrumental Music produced / courtesy of Bayden Records Website | baydenrecords.beatstars.com

In this episode, I share the inspiring journey of Dr. Duran, a family medicine resident who immigrated to the US from Mexico at the age of 14. Despite facing obstacles such as being undocumented and not having a Social Security number, Dr. Duran pursued higher education with the help of supportive individuals like her high school teacher, Mrs. Holland. We delve into the challenges Dr. Duran faced in financing her medical education and navigating the DACA program, as well as the impact it has on her mental health and career. We also discuss the importance of being curious and respectful when interacting with colleagues who may have experiences related to DACA. Join me in this thought-provoking conversation that sheds light on the resilience and determination of DACA recipients like Dr. Duran, who continue to contribute to their communities and the healthcare profession.Chapters:(0:00:00) - Achieving a Career in Medicine(0:13:44) - Navigating DACA and Med School(0:25:51) - DACA Impact on Mental Health(0:34:48) - DACA's Mental Health Impact(0:42:08) - Be Curious and Respectful of Colleagues Chapter Summaries:(0:00:00) - Achieving a Career in Medicine (14 Minutes)In this podcast episode, we discuss the journey of Dr. Duran, a family medicine resident who immigrated to the US from Mexico at the age of 14. Despite facing obstacles such as not having a Social Security number and being undocumented, Dr. Duran pursued higher education with the help of supportive individuals like her high school teacher, Mrs. Holland. Dr. Duran's interest in medicine was sparked by witnessing the health disparities in Southeast Georgia, particularly among the immigrant community.(0:13:44) - Navigating DACA and Med School (12 Minutes)We delve into the challenges faced by Dr. Duran in financing her medical education due to her immigration status and limited financial resources. Through persistence and support from organizations like the Resurrection Project, she was able to obtain a loan and attend medical school. We also discuss the uncertainty and stress surrounding the renewal of her DACA status, which directly impacts her ability to continue her residency and work as a doctor. Despite these obstacles, Dr. Duran remains determined to excel in her profession and contribute to her community as a family medicine physician'(0:25:51) - DACA Impact on Mental Health (9 Minutes)We explore the impact of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program on Dr. Duran's life and career, allowing her to fulfill her intellectual goals and become a doctor. The conversation also addresses the anxiety and vulnerability faced by DACA recipients due to the program's uncertain future and the fact that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services has all their personal information. Dr. Duran discusses her decision to be open and vocal about her immigration status, as well as the intergenerational effects of policies like DACA on recipients' children.(0:34:48) - DACA's Mental Health Impact (7 Minutes)We examine the history and limitations of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and its effects on recipients like Dr. Duran. With over 800,000 DACA recipients and 1.3 million people living with a DACA recipient in the United States, the consequences of ending the program would be far-reaching. Despite providing temporary relief, DACA has significant constraints, such as no clear path to citizenship, limited travel permissions, and challenges in obtaining mortgages. Additionally, since July 2021, no new DACA applications have been accepted, and processing times for renewals can cause applicants to lose their status.(0:42:08) - Be Curious and Respectful of Colleagues (1 Minute)We emphasize...

The man arrested for allegedly leaking top-secret military documents appeared in court for the first time Friday. A former FBI whistleblower joins us to weigh in. The Supreme Court acts on abortion. How does the Biden administration ask the high court to intervene, as lower courts curb access to an abortion pill in question? The White House this week is planning to expand health care to Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients. We hear from an immigration expert who'll give us his analysis on the new proposal, which could take effect soon. An attorney and immigration policy expert joins to discuss how DACA speaks to the polarized immigration issue in the country. What's stopping Democrats and Republicans from creating a system of dialogue and compromise? An update on former President Donald Trump's legal challenges—details are coming out on the seven-hour testimony in at New York Attorney General's office. Republicans are now pushing back against what they call “political prosecutions.” Will Congress create rules for artificial intelligence? Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has a plan that he says is to address national security and education concerns. ⭕️ Watch in-depth videos based on Truth & Tradition at Epoch TV

Lets get THOTty! The Thotful Moment is where we have THOughT provoking conversations about topics that have impacted our life. J & Lesly are excited to introduce our next guest who is out there doing the WORK for the LGBTQ immigrant community, our friend... LUIS GOMEZ! He is the Director of Immigrant Resources at a local non-profit and has a lot of knowledge of immigration and how it intersects with LGBTQIA+ issues. In this episode we talk how he met J, how Luis got into this wonderful work, how non-profit work is hard but rewarding, what is the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and who are Dreamers and what is in store for DACA in 2023. If you are interested in helping young people with DACA, who are at risk of losing their job and residency in the USA, please visit United We Dream for resources on how you can help make sure we find a permanent solution for Dreamers! ——————————— FOLLOW US on INSTAGRAM @HomoInTraining Find us on Facebook! LIKE & FOLLOW our page! EMAIL US your THOTZ: HomoInTrainingPodcast@gmail.com ——————————— Music Credit: Jazzy Abstract Beat by Coma-Media ——————————— --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/homointraining/message

When Doreen Padilla was 14 years old, she met Saul Falcon at a new school just west of Denver, and this young woman, half white and half Hispanic, eventually fell in love with this handsome boy with shiny black hair, and one day, years later, they were married.Like many young couples, they struggled to make ends meet. But they had an extra burden – how to gain permanent residency status for Saul, who had been brought to America from Mexico by his parents at age 2.Saul was a dreamer, an immigrant given protection by President Obama's 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which allowed him to live and work in the U.S. But then, Donald Trump attempted to kill that program, and the pressure for Saul to obtain documentation and his green card intensified.That journey has been revealed in a new book, “Outsiders, a Journey to Belonging,” by Doreen, our guest on the Lean to the Left podcast today.Doreen grew up in the suburbs of Denver, Colorado, where she lives today with her husband, Saul, and two children. She was the first in her family to graduate from college and go on to earn a graduate degree.In her current role in local government, she wears many hats to support employees in her organization. As a public servant she is dedicated to the communities around her and is consistently advocating for positive change."Outsiders: A Journey to Belonging" , which tells the true story of a dreamer growing up in America, is an important part of that effort. Doreen, welcome to Lean to the Left.Q. Tell us about your book and why you wrote it.Some questions we asked Doreen:Q. What was it like battling to keep Saul from being deported to Mexico, especially after Trump tried to kill DACA?Q. Where do things stand now with Saul and his quest to become a citizen?Q. What advice do you give others who face this same situation?Q. Congress continues to be unable to reform our dysfunctional immigration system. What are your thoughts about that?Q. Immigrants, especially those from across our southern border, continue to be targeted by many politicians, mostly Republicans, and used as political pawns to whip up support from their right-wing base. What are your thoughts about that?Q. How did you and your husband feel when Trump was in office pushing his wall along the southern border to keep immigrants from entering the U.S.?Q. What about now, with the current crisis as thousands try to enter the U.S. seeking asylum from violence in their home countries? What should happen?Q. Your husband was a DACA “dreamer.” What contributions has he made to the U.S. and American society?Q. There are about 2 million “dreamers” in the U.S. today, with about 600,000 being beneficiaries of DACA. What should happen to them?Q. Tell us about Barking Beagle Books. Why did you launch your own publishing company, and what's the plan going forward?Q. Where can people find your book?Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-lean-to-the-left-podcast--4719048/support.

When Doreen Padilla was 14 years old, she met Saul Falcon at a new school just west of Denver, and this young woman, half white and half Hispanic, eventually fell in love with this handsome boy with shiny black hair, and one day, years later, they were married.Like many young couples, they struggled to make ends meet. But they had an extra burden – how to gain permanent residency status for Saul, who had been brought to America from Mexico by his parents at age 2.Saul was a dreamer, an immigrant given protection by President Obama's 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which allowed him to live and work in the U.S. But then, Donald Trump attempted to kill that program, and the pressure for Saul to obtain documentation and his green card intensified.That journey has been revealed in a new book, “Outsiders, a Journey to Belonging,” by Doreen, our guest on the Lean to the Left podcast today.Doreen grew up in the suburbs of Denver, Colorado, where she lives today with her husband, Saul, and two children. She was the first in her family to graduate from college and go on to earn a graduate degree.In her current role in local government, she wears many hats to support employees in her organization. As a public servant she is dedicated to the communities around her and is consistently advocating for positive change."Outsiders: A Journey to Belonging" , which tells the true story of a dreamer growing up in America, is an important part of that effort. Doreen, welcome to Lean to the Left.Q. Tell us about your book and why you wrote it.Some questions we asked Doreen:Q. What was it like battling to keep Saul from being deported to Mexico, especially after Trump tried to kill DACA?Q. Where do things stand now with Saul and his quest to become a citizen?Q. What advice do you give others who face this same situation?Q. Congress continues to be unable to reform our dysfunctional immigration system. What are your thoughts about that?Q. Immigrants, especially those from across our southern border, continue to be targeted by many politicians, mostly Republicans, and used as political pawns to whip up support from their right-wing base. What are your thoughts about that?Q. How did you and your husband feel when Trump was in office pushing his wall along the southern border to keep immigrants from entering the U.S.?Q. What about now, with the current crisis as thousands try to enter the U.S. seeking asylum from violence in their home countries? What should happen?Q. Your husband was a DACA “dreamer.” What contributions has he made to the U.S. and American society?Q. There are about 2 million “dreamers” in the U.S. today, with about 600,000 being beneficiaries of DACA. What should happen to them?Q. Tell us about Barking Beagle Books. Why did you launch your own publishing company, and what's the plan going forward?Q. Where can people find your book?

Right now, millions of people across the country are currently awaiting The United States Supreme Court decision on the future of DACA. It took a senior year college application for Briselda Molina (BA Journalism ‘11) to learn that she was a Dreamer. Here at the UO, a “Dreamer” refers to Undocumented, DACA-mented, Tuition Equity, and students of mixed status families. Briselda shares how her undocumented status has shaped her life, including how she got to UO, graduated, then went to grad school as a DACA recipient and became a DACA professional. Today she serves as a career and academic advisor at the School of Journalism and Communication. She is joined by Lynn Stephen, Philip H. Knight Chair and Distinguished Professor of Anthropology and a member of the UO Dreamers Working Group. She shares her insight on the ways UO is promoting the safety, well-being and success of undocumented and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) students, and how others can help. Would you like to help? Please consider giving to the Opportunity Through Excellence Scholarship, which provides scholarship support for students enrolled at the U of O, with a preference for students who self-identify as “undocumented,” as “Dreamers”, or as students with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) status. Students are eligible if they are first-generation college students with financial need, and are ineligible to receive federal financial aid as determined by the UO Office of Student Financial Aid and Scholarships. The Opportunity Through Excellence Scholarship provides significant awards for selected students—sometimes up to $9,000 a student. We have a growing endowment to support Opportunity through Excellence students, which builds sustainability to our annual fundraising efforts to support the scholarship. Thank you to all of our generous donors! Links Briselda's website https://briseldam.wixsite.com/my-site How to give to the Opportunity Through Excellence Scholarship https://securelb.imodules.com/s/1540/foundation/2col.aspx?sid=1540&gid=1&pgid=408&bledit=1&dids=525 Keep in touch! Follow the team @uo_the_duck_stops_here on IG to stay up on the latest podcast and alumni news and events. Leave us a voicemail through Anchor that we can play on the air: https://anchor.fm/theduckstopshere. Shoot us an email at engagement@uoregon.edu About the Podcast: The Duck Stops Here is brought to you by the Regional Engagement Team at the University of Oregon. We are specifically dedicated to building alumni networks in California. Produced and hosted by Michelle Joyce-Fyffe, the Director of Regional Engagement in University Development. Music credits: • "Leaving Home" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ • "Funkorama" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/theduckstopshere/message

Hour 2 -  Good Tuesday morning! Here's what Nick Reed covers this hour: Flyers have begun to appear throughout Washington D.C., warning of a "night of rage" should the Supreme Court overturn Roe v. Wade. Ten years ago, in 2012, former President Barack Obama created the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program via executive order that has allowed nearly 800,000 illegal aliens to evade arrest and deportation. From 2012 to 2018, about 53,792 illegal aliens were awarded DACA despite having prior arrest records. Meanwhile, nearly 8,000 illegal aliens awarded DACA were later arrested for crimes. The United States Army is teaching critical race theory to cadets at West Point Academy.

Accepting first-time requests for consideration of deferred action under Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) based on the terms of the DACA policy in effect prior to Sept. 5, 2017, and in accordance with the Court's Dec. 4, 2020, order; Accepting DACA renewal requests based on the terms of the DACA policy in effect prior to Sept. 5, 2017, and in accordance with the Court's Dec. 4, 2020, order; Accepting applications for advance parole documents based on the terms of the DACA policy prior to Sept. 5, 2017, and in accordance with the Court's Dec. 4, 2020, order; Extending one-year grants of deferred action under DACA to two years; and Extending one-year Employment Authorization Documents under DACA to two years. USCIS will take appropriate steps to provide evidence of the one-year extensions of deferred action and Employment Authorization Documents under DACA to individuals who were issued documentation on or after July 28, 2020, with a one-year validity period under the defunct policy. DHS will comply with the order while it remains in effect, but DHS may seek relief from the order.

Starting next year, 800,000 legal permanent residents will be eligible to vote in New York City, despite not being citizens. The measure applies to legal residents, including those with green cards, and Dreamers who were brought here illegally as children under Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). These residents will not be allowed to vote in state or federal elections, but will be allowed to vote in citywide contests. You can read today's podcast here. You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Our podcast is written by Isaac Saul and produced by Trevor Eichhorn. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75. Our newsletter is edited by Bailey Saul, Sean Brady, Ari Weitzman, and produced in conjunction with Tangle's social media manager Magdalena Bokowa, who also created our logo. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/tanglenews/support

Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is a program that allows undocumented immigrants who came here as children to work and attend school legally for a limited period of time. To close out our discussion of the No Human Is Illegal movement, I talk with Dr. Alessandra Bazo Vienrich about how this legislation has helped young immigrants and where it still falls short. We discuss what it takes to get DACA status, how being undocumented inhibits students' educational success, and what would happen to these undocumented students if DACA ceased to exist. By the end of the episode, you'll not only understand how DACA works, but you'll also get a glimpse into the complicated process of making "good" immigration policies. Follow In Good Society on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ingoodsociety Follow In Good Society on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ingoodsociety/ Follow In Good Society on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ingoodsociety/

Gibson Dunn's Ted Olson and Ted Boutrous discuss the firm's work on behalf of “Dreamers,” beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) program, in multiple high-stakes court cases. Learn more about the strategies and the personal stakes at play during these important cases.

There are some 600,000 so-called “dreamers” in this country and many more waiting to obtain that special status currently afforded the children of illegal immigrants, brought to the U.S., often as infants, and who Donald Trump tried to send back to the country of their birth.The Biden administration has just announced a new rule to protect those recipients of protection under the 2012 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy, or DACA.Reacting to a decision by federal district judge Andrew Hanen in Texas in July, which ruled that the (DACA) policy violated federal law, the Department of Homeland Security said its new rule will "preserve and fortify" the DACA program by addressing objections to how it was implemented.Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas urged Congress to include immigration reform in the reconciliation bill currently being debated and "provide the Dreamers the legal status they need and deserve."The Texas federal district court ruling left the program's benefits intact for DACA recipients who have been unable to obtain legal status after being brought to the U.S. as children, but it blocked future applications by some 50,000 young immigrants who need the protection. The Biden administration has appealed that decision as it seeks a pathway to citizen for Dreamers in Congress.Today we're speaking with Tahmina Watson, a Seattle-based immigration attorney whose law firm focuses exclusively on U.S. immigration and naturalization law.Tahmina is an experienced and passionate attorney who focuses on employment-based, family-based and investor immigration law. She hosts a radio show turned podcast, “Tahmina Talks Immigration”, on which she discusses immigration news updates and interviews immigrants and people who are making an impact.She's also the author of the book, “The Startup Visa: Key to Job Growth & Economy Prosperity in America, which advocates for a new visa category for entrepreneurs and startup founders. Joining me on the podcast is legal thriller author Mark M. Bello, who has just published a new book, Betrayal at the Border.So with that, Tahmina Watson, have these DACA folks not made a huge contribution to this country in the years that they've been here?Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-lean-to-the-left-podcast--4719048/support.

24 de septiembre | Nueva YorkHola, maricoper. D.C. desencadenado.El podcast de La Wikly también está disponible en iTunes, Spotify y iVoox.Añade el podcast a tu plataforma favorita haciendo click en el botón “Listen in podcast app” que aparece justo debajo del reproductor.Apoya el proyecto periodístico independiente de La Wikly con una suscripción premium que incluye tres newsletters extra a la semana, acceso a nuestra comunidad privada de Discord y eventos exclusivos para los maricopers premium:Leer esta newsletter te llevará 10 minutos y 58 segundos.Cuando te lo tomas todo muy en serio. Bienvenido a La Wikly.Lo importante: El Capitolio entra en un periodo crucial que puede concretar o deshacer gran parte de la agenda del presidente Joe Biden. Hay tres proyectos de ley diferentes en marcha, pero el complejo entramado de presiones en Washington D.C. los afecta por igual.¿Qué está en juego los próximos días? El financiamiento del gobierno, ayudas para las víctimas de incendios forestales y del huracán Ida, el futuro de los refugiados de Afganistán, el megaproyecto demócrata de gastos sociales, el proyecto de infraestructura y el aumento del techo de deuda.¿Cuáles son esos tres paquetes legislativos? Empezamos por tres grandes medidas que se incluyen en el primero de ellos:🏛 1a. Financiación gubernamentalLa Cámara de Representantes aprobó este pasado martes un proyecto de ley provisional para mantener al gobierno financiado a los niveles existentes hasta el 3 de diciembre, dando a demócratas y republicanos más tiempo para llegar a un acuerdo que dure hasta el otoño de 2022.Esa parte de la agenda no debería ser particularmente controvertida; demócratas y republicanos suelen estar de acuerdo sobre cómo abordar los gastos interno y militar. Sin embargo, por razones de procedimiento, el proyecto de ley será difícil de aprobar en el Senado.Si no se convierte en ley antes del 30 de septiembre, el gobierno federal cerrará. Esto implica un cese en todas las actividades gubernamentales no-esenciales y multitud de otros departamentos, además de una suspensión de pagos más adelante.La Casa Blanca ya ha comenzado a decirle a las agencias gubernamentales que se preparen para un posible cierre del gobierno si el proyecto no se convierte en ley antes de la fecha estipulada."Estamos dando todos los pasos posibles para mitigar los impactos de un posible cierre", dijo la secretaria de prensa de la Casa Blanca, Jen Psaki, durante una sesión informativa el jueves.🏚 1b. Desastres y AfganistánEse mismo proyecto de ley de financiación del gobierno aprobado por la Cámara incluye 28.600 millones de dólares en ayudas para reparar los daños producidos por desastres como el huracán Ida o los incendios forestales del Oeste estadounidense.También hay 6.300 millones de dólares para ayudar a los refugiados de Afganistán. Eso implica buscarles residencias temporales en instalaciones de EE.UU., realizar los controles de seguridad oportunos y ayudarles a asentarse en un nuevo país.La disposición también cuenta con amplio apoyo en ambas partes.💸 1c. Techo de la deudaDe nuevo, ese proyecto de ley de financiamiento del gobierno aprobado por la Cámara también incluye una extensión del techo de la deuda hasta diciembre de 2022.En principio, eso pone en peligro su aprobación en el Senado, donde los republicanos tienen poder obstruccionista y han dicho que no lo apoyarán.Los republicanos dicen que los demócratas deberían elevar el límite de deuda en el amplio paquete multibillonario* que esperan aprobar en una votación de línea partidista. Es decir, prescindiendo de los votos republicanos mediante el proceso de reconciliación.*De ese paquete hablamos en un momentín.El bloque demócrata se ha negado, diciendo que no sentarán un precedente en el que un solo partido es responsable de pagar las facturas del país que ambos partidos han acumulado durante años.Mientras tanto, el Departamento del Tesoro ha dicho que EE.UU. alcanzará el límite de endeudamiento en algún momento de octubre, advirtiendo de un "daño grave" a la economía si el Capitolio no actúa para extenderlo.⚠️ Frena un momentoPor repasar, el paquete de financiación de gobierno ya aprobado por la Cámara de Representantes también incluye la ayuda para desastres y refugiados afganos y el aumento del techo de deuda.Para resumirlo, a partir de ahora lo llamaremos El Paquetazo.🏗 2. Paquete de infraestructuraEl Senado aprobó el mes pasado un proyecto de ley bipartidista para autorizar 550.000 millones de dólares en nuevos gastos en medidas de transporte de superficie como carreteras, puentes y transporte público. En total, ese paquete tiene una factura superior al billón de dólares.Sin embargo, su futuro en la Cámara es incierto. La presidenta del Caucus Progresista del Congreso, la demócrata Pramila Jayapal, ha prometido que decenas de demócratas rechazarán ese proyecto de ley de infraestructura si el amplio paquete multibillonario* no ha sido aprobado primero por el Senado.*Ya va, ya va.A este paquete lo llamaremos El Paquetista, por aquello de que es bipartidista.🤑 3. Superley de gastoEl megaproyecto de ley es la pieza central de la agenda nacional de Biden. Cuenta con una gran cantidad de inversiones en multitud de medidas sociales y solo necesita de votos demócratas para pasar las dos cámaras antes de acabar en el Despacho Oval. Este megaproyecto incluye, entre otras cosas:Subsidios de Obamacare. Esto es, a grandes rasgos, un mayor abaratamiento de los seguros médicos.Expansión de Medicare. Esto es, a grandes rasgos, una mayor cobertura para el programa de seguros médicos para mayores de 65 años.Abaratamiento de los medicamentos.Guardería universal.Créditos fiscales para familias con niños.Universidad pública gratuita en los dos primeros años.Financiación para paliar los efectos del cambio climático.Inversión en viviendas de protección oficial.Y para financiar este enorme volumen de gasto social, un aumento significativo de los impuestos a las corporaciones y a las personas que ganan más de 400.000 dólares al año.A este lo llamaremos El Paqueterico, porque le sube los impuestos a los ricos para pagar numerosas medidas de ayudas sociales.⚠️ Frena otro momentoPor repasar, en total hay tres paquetes legislativos en marcha: El Paquetazo, El Paquetista y El Paqueterico.♟ Juego de ajedrezPara que esos tres paquetes legislativos lleguen a buen puerto, también tienen que darse muchos acuerdos entre varios grupos. Son frentes abiertos que incluyen guerras externas, entre demócratas y republicanos, y guerras internas, entre los equipos progresista y moderado de los demócratas.El Paqueterico es el más trascendental para Biden porque sería su buque insignia legislativo de cara a las elecciones del año que viene, porque jamás contará con apoyo republicano y porque necesita que prácticamente TODOS los demócratas en ambas cámaras estén a favor de aprobarlo.Es decir, al menos 217 de 220 congresistas demócratas y los 50 senadores demócratas tienen que estar conformes.El Paquetazo es el más trascendental para EE.UU. porque un cierre de gobierno y una suspensión de pagos derivada de no aumentar el techo de deuda pueden suponer un golpe muy duro para la economía.Además, El Paquetazo es diferente porque necesita una mayoría simple en la Cámara de Representantes y 60 votos en el Senado para llegar a Biden.Es decir, al menos 10 senadores republicanos tienen que estar conformes.El Paquetista es el menos trascendental, pero sería una victoria legislativa importante para un presidente que dijo que restauraría el bipartidismo en Washington D.C.Además, como ya ha sido aprobado en el Senado con el apoyo de 19 senadores republicanos, ahora mismo solo necesita la aprobación de la Cámara de Representantes por mayoría simple.Es decir, al menos 217 congresistas demócratas tienen que estar conformes. Con la mayoría de 220 que tienen ahora mismo, solo se pueden permitir perder TRES votos.¿Qué está bloqueando que todo salga adelante? De un lado, la lucha interna demócrata. Del otro, el obstruccionismo republicano.La lucha interna demócrata tiene que ver con El Paqueterico y El Paquetista. La batalla está entre quienes quieren gastar y subir los impuestos mucho (progresistas) y los que no quieren gastar ni subir los impuestos tanto (moderados).Los moderados quieren aprobar cuanto antes El Paquetista porque es un acuerdo bipartidista que ya ha logrado ser aprobado en el Senado y creen que sería una victoria política importante en sus respectivos distritos.Los moderados suelen representar distritos bisagra y una victoria de este calibre puede darles argumentos para revalidar su escaño en las elecciones del año que viene.Los progresistas quieren aprobar El Paqueterico tal y como ha sido concebido: con 3.5 billones de dólares en gasto social y un aumento destacado de los impuestos a los ricos. Para que salga adelante, tienen secuestrado a El Paquetista hasta que los moderados se comprometan a aprobar El Paqueterico.Los progresistas no se atreven a aprobar El Paquetista y que después los moderados se nieguen a aprobar un El Paqueterico que sea… Paquetepobre.You know what I mean?Es decir, la guerra interna demócrata es una batalla ideológica, pero una que podría implicar que ninguno de los bandos acabe anotándose una victoria.La pelota está ahora en los techos de Biden y de los líderes de las mayorías demócratas en Cámara de Representantes (Nancy Pelosi) y Senado (Chuck Schumer). Son ellos los que tienen que encontrar un compromiso entre de sus filas.El obstruccionismo republicano tiene que ver con El Paquetazo. Mitch McConnell, líder de la minoría republicana en el Senado, prefiere que los demócratas suban el techo de deuda a través de El Paqueterico.¿Por qué? Porque el techo de deuda tiene que ser suspendido o levantado antes de mediados de octubre para evitar una catástrofe económica. Si los demócratas se ven obligados a vincular ese aumento del techo de deuda a El Paqueterico, tendrán más presiones para sacarlo adelante cuanto antes.Es decir, menos tiempo para negociar y encontrar compromisos y muy posiblemente el cabreo de alguna de las dos partes en la guerra interna demócrata.Los demócratas argumentan que los republicanos están siendo unos hipócritas por no subir el techo de una deuda en cuyo descontrol también han participado (con recortes de impuestos a los ricos, principalmente).Los republicanos solo quieren ver el mundo arder porque la administración de Biden está en horas bajas y quieren hurgar en la herida evitando victorias legislativas de este tipo.En resumen, nos esperan unas semanas de absoluto salseo de negociaciones en las que están en juego el futuro político demócrata y la economía estadounidense (y global).¡Suerte a todos!¿Desea saber más? Las actualizaciones de Jake Sherman en Twitter son muy valiosas (así como su newsletter Punchbowl News).🎬 Una recomendaciónCon la colaboración de FilminGreen Room es una película estadounidense de 2015 dirigida por Jeremy Saulnier. Sigue a un grupo de punk que presencia un acto sumamente violento durante un concierto en las profundidades del estado de Oregon. De un momento a otro, deben escapar de un grupo de skinheads liderados por Patrick Stewart.La he elegido por el concepto punkis vs. skinheads y por su imprevisibilidad macabra porque casa muy bien con el momento que vive Washington D.C. O algo así.Jeremy Saulnier se hizo famoso con Blue Ruin, su anterior película a esta. Era uno de esos thrillers de fuego lento que implosiona con un momento que te deja en shock durante un par de minutos. Es de esas escenas que no se olvidan.Pero volviendo a Green Room. Es una película mucho más descarnada, encabezada por un reparto redondo (¡Imogen Poots! ¡¡Anton Yelchin!!) y un Saulnier desatado detrás de las cámaras.Lo mejor es el manejo de los tiempos, con un guion sosegado que sabe dar los justos despuntes de violencia para mantener la tensión en el nivel más alto posible durante todo el metraje.Vale, es un poco tortura, pero acabas aplaudiendo esa montaña rusa.Green Room está disponible en Filmin.🥊 Una foto para perderse con DobrikDavid Dobrik, el famoso youtuber del que os hemos hablado largo y tendido en esta newsletter, volvió a EE.UU. esta semana después de quedarse tirado en su Eslovaquia natal por un problema con su Green Card.Dobrik también es famoso por ser uno de los beneficiarios del programa federal estadounidense Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).¿DACA? Es un programa para personas que llegaron de forma ilegal a EE.UU. cuando eran menores. Lo instauró Barack Obama durante su administración para que sus beneficiarios evitaran la deportación y pudieran obtener permisos de trabajo.El pie de página: que sus beneficiarios debían renovarlo cada dos años y que, al ser medida ejecutiva, pendía de un hilo.De hecho, Trump se lo intentó cargar… sin éxito.La familia de Dobrik se mudó a EE.UU. cuando él tenía solo 6 años. Nunca había salido de EE.UU. hasta hace unas semanas, cuando aprovechó el haber obtenido la Green Card (permiso de residencia) para volver a su país natal.De ahí que el susto al ver que no le dejaban volver fuera… dramático.Y aunque Dobrik ya está de vuelta, quería aprovechar su circunstancia para poner el foco en todos aquellos beneficiarios de DACA que siguen enfrentando dificultades para regularizar su residencia en EE.UU. tras muchos años viviendo en el país.Especialmente, ahora que los juzgados han tumbado el programa y ya no se pueden presentar nuevas solicitudes para ser dreamer [soñadores, en español], que es como se conoce a los beneficiarios de DACA.Aquí, el vídeo de Dobrik en Eslovaquia visitando a su familia:En otro orden de cosas, la semana que viene retomaremos la sección de memes. Y mientras tanto, este sábado estaré en directo en Twitch con el directo habitual de cine que hacemos los viernes (sorry, dolor de cuello, can’t do it today).Súmate al stream aquí.Hasta la semana que viene, This is a public episode. Get access to private episodes at www.lawikly.com/subscribe

Episode #113 – On this Wonderful Women Wednesday we talk about Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough and how she can affect immigration reform and DACA.   Who is Elizabeth MacDonough?  In 2015, Elizabeth highlighted budget rules that made it more difficult for Senate Republicans to repeal the Affordable Care Act, former President Barack Obama's signature health care policy.  Democrats reported that on July 21, 2017, the Senate Parliamentarian ruled that a number of provisions of the Republican Better Care Reconciliation Act (BCRA) violate the Byrd Rule, and thus cannot be passed by the Senate using the reconciliation act procedure through which Congress has been trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA).  In February 2021, she ruled against the $15 minimum wage in President Biden proposed Covid-19 relief package being included per the Byrd Rule under budget reconciliation.  In April,2021, she ruled that Democrats can pass spending legislature with a simple majority using a procedure reserved for budget reconciliation, but as we know, Kristen and Joe Arizona and West Virginia Senators, won't agree on anything.  Unlike the Republicans who stick together NO MATTER WHAT, these Democrats refuse to help the country out.  So now with this set-back how does his affect DACA.  Let's talk about what DACAA is.  Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is a United States immigration policy that allows some individuals with unlawful presence in the United States after being brought to the country as children to receive a renewable two-year period of deferred action from deportation and become eligible for a work permit in the U.S. WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY? LINKS BELOW FOR: APPLE, GOOGLE, PANDORA, AND SPOTIFY. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ladiespromotingtransparentadvocacy/id1526382637 https://www.pandora.com/podcast/ladiespromotingtransparentadvocacy/PC:52161?corr=17965216&part=ug&_branch_match_id=819557998249581330 https://open.spotify.com/show/5x7xSxWi2wj2UXPsWnZ0cw?si=peGax6j6SIumBT5tq7_hhg https://podcasts.google.com/?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkLnBvZGJlYW4uY29tL2xhZGllc3Byb21vdGluZ3RyYW5zcGFyZW50YWR2b2NhY3kvZmVlZC54bWw&ep=14 Sources: https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/blog/who-is-the-senate-parliamentarian-and-what-does-she-do  https://www.usatoday.com https://www.boundless.com/immigration-resources/what-is-daca/ https://www.fwd.us/daca-101/, https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20170721.061166/full/ Follow us on Instagram:  @advocacyladies Follow us on Twitter: @AdvocacyLadies Podcast Email: podcasthostshapta19@gmail.com Org. Email: Ladiespromotingtransparentadvo@gmail.com Podcast Call-in Line: 404-855-7723

Emily, Reese and Jasmin speak with Professor George Thurston of NYU Langone's Department of Environmental Medicine about the impact of air pollution, specifically particulate matter, on the human body and the relationship between science, community action, and legislation. They also discuss a Texas judge's ruling against the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy, Greece and other European nations cracking down on migrants arriving by sea, and Indonesia's successful attempts to preserve their rainforests.

Partner and Attorney Angelita Chavez provides an update on the recent legal challenge to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Although appeals are likely, USCIS will not process new or pending initial DACA applications at this time. Angelita provides insight into possible risks to advance parole, DACA renewals, and more. Additionally, Angelita provides an overview of the DACA program as it was before suspension: how to qualify for DACA, and the benefits the program does and does not provide.

Welcome back! Jason and Jeffrey sit down and discuss the week world and weirdness all from their neutral perspectives. Sunday podcasts are always part one to our bi weekly episodes which are generated from our live stream conversations on Youtube. 02:30 - New York TimesSurgeon General Assails Tech Companies Over Misinformation on COVID-19https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/15/us/politics/surgeon-general-vaccine-misinformation.htmlDr. Vivek Murthy issued an advisory declaring health misinformation an “urgent threat” and said tech and social media companies needed to fight it more aggressively.https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-misinformation-advisory.pdf 27:00 - ReutersU.S. judge rules DACA program illegal, suspends new applicationsA federal judge in Texas said that former president Barack Obama exceeded his authority when he created the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program by executive order. The judge ruled that DACA is therefore unlawful and ordered the Biden administration to suspend the program. Current recipients of DACA will be unaffected for now, but there will be no approval of new applicants, according to multiple reports. The Biden administration is expected to appeal the judge's decision, according to The New York Times.https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-judge-blocks-new-applications-daca-program-dreamer-immigrants-2021-07-16/?taid=60f20870c5720500017c272c&utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter52:00 Jason - Public Access AmericaBeing priced out of the Political processPeople seem to believe that we are a political podcast. Not true. At least I believe that, we as a people need to train our government to start working for us again. I see so many people today, giving their hard earned money to political campaigns and I wonder for whatThe way I See it. Someone donating to a politician is getting caught up in the hysteria politics creates, or their living in a fantasy world in which politicians listen to the donators. If someone was to donate $2500 a month for a year, they would have spent $25,000,00 that year. That person will receive no benefit, no meeting, no phone call, Nothing. And even if you donated based on a promise of the politician, at any moment, a PAC, lobbyist, or corporation can come along and donate you out of the process, Getting that meeting, FaceTime, phone call, and influencing that politician in a way, The small dollar donator never could, Essentially pricing me out of the political process that claims to have my best interest at heart. So. No. We are not a political podcast. Politicians see issues from a political lens, People from their lens and so what I hope we can do is pull an issue out of the political perspective we've been convinced is the way to see everything these days and show Americans that the issue is more then that, It's a real meaningful opportunity to make a difference to us, If we can get out voice involved. A seat at the table, Leveling the political playing field for all Americans. Twitter @PublicAccessPodhttps://twitter.com/PublicAccessPodinstagram @PublicAccessAmericahttps://www.instagram.com/publicaccessamericaYouTube Live stream Sunday Noon est 9 am psthttps://www.youtube.com/c/PublicAccessAmericaPodcast/featuredfacebookhttps://www.facebook.com/PublicAccessAmericaSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/public-access-america/exclusive-contentAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

In this episode of The Lawfather Podcast, Tampa-based attorney William Franchi speaks about Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and the ruling that came down last week from U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen. Thanks for listening to The Lawfather Podcast with William Franchi and if you have a question for William, leave a comment […] The post The Lawfather Podcast: DACA appeared first on Radio Influence.

Did you choose the plant-based life or did the plant-based life choose you? In this episode, we are touching on various aspects of wellness with Certified Holistic Nutritionist, Sustainability Advocate, and Influencer, Valentina Padilla (also known as Sunflower Valentine). Passionate about raising awareness on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA immigration), we begin by discussing the beginning of Valentina's advocacy. Having been born in Venezuela and immigrating to the states at a young age with her family, Valentina holds space for educating others on the topic. Founding Thank You Plant Based God, a platform focused on sharing plant-based recipes and wholesomeness, Valentina and I bring awareness to how listening to your body strengthens your intuition. Other topics of discussion in this episode include: finding your voice, being an authentic creator, defining what it means to be an influencer, starting a jewelry line, experiencing growing pains, and more!Thank you so much for listening! :)You can join our conversation and watch this episode on YouTube at youtube.com/c/withjocelynFollow the pod @startingwithgratitude and the host @withjocelyn on InstagramVisit withjocelyn.com for more mindfulness and resourcesAvailable on all podcast platformsSupport the show (https://cash.app/$withjocelyn)

Welcome to Travel Takes, Incoming! Generation Travel Radio is excited to release updates in immigration and travel for those coming into the United States with our knowledgable new voices, Olga Grosh Pratt and Keavy Gilbert. Tune in every 6 weeks to keep up with changes in the travel and immigration landscapes. Show Notes: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) - "Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)": https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/consideration-of-deferred-action-for-childhood-arrivals-daca U.S. Department of State - "Visa Wait Times": https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/visa-information-resources/wait-times.html Biographies Olga Grosh Pratt Olga Grosh was born in Kiev, Ukraine and immigrated to the United States as a child. Olga graduated with high honors from the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, Virginia with a major in Hispanic Studies, and a minor in International Relations. Olga earned her J.D. at the University of California, Hastings College of Law in San Francisco where she realized her passion for immigration law, which she has been practicing since. After her own 15-year struggle to obtain citizenship, Olga is a driven and compassionate representative of immigrants' rights. Olga focuses on removal and deportation proceedings, Board of Immigration and Ninth Circuit Appeals, family petitions, consular processing, adjustment of status, affirmative and defensive asylum, and has particular expertise in U visas and Violence Against Women Act applications for victims of crime and domestic violence. Olga is a member of the Washington, D.C. Bar and is admitted to practice before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Keavy Gilbert Keavy has been working in the field of International Education for 7+ years. During this time, she has held a variety of roles, ranging from Admissions Specialist to her current position of Assistant Director for Student Services and Compliance. In her current position, Keavy supervises the student services and compliance teams at the University of Washington International Student Services office. Keavy is an alumna of the NAFSA Academy, Class 17, and currently serves as Treasurer for NAFSA Region 1.

Listen to this episode with Jen from @Dacagirlsavingdollas, who is in the unique financial circumstances of someone with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). DACA holders, also known as "Dreamers", are people who are undocumented and have a form of temporary deferral of deportation. DACA does not provide citizenship, a green card, or any permanent immigration status. DACA holders are people who have been brought to the U.S. as children, have lived in the U.S. for many years, and meet certain educational and other strict requirements. Developed by the Obama Administration, the DACA program provides people with a work permit, which must be renewed periodically, as well as a social security number. As Jen describes, access to a work permit and social security number can be life-changing in terms of having access to financial opportunities including college and job opportunities. DACA holders face unique financial burdens. There are high fees associated with DACA applications and renewal applications that DACA recipients must save for, adding a financial burden on top of the high costs of immigration lawyer fees and the costs with putting the application together. Jen is a DACA recipient navigating finances as an undocumented person. She aims to build generational wealth despite her immigration status, showcasing her journey and sharing the stories of others. Follow and support Jen's journey on Instagram: @dacagirlsavingdollas -- IMMIGRANT FINANCE™ We help immigrant families build generational wealth through financial education and group coaching on money management and investing, online business development, and community accountability and support. Subscribe to the Immigrant Finance Podcast to learn about personal finances, creating online businesses, and building wealth for immigrants and their families. Join our Private Community Group "Building Wealth for Immigrant Families" and access a network of supportive, financial-oriented immigrant families as well as receive our complimentary trainings on finance and online business: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ImmigrantFinance Sign up to receive our weekly Friday newsletter with resources for immigrant families building wealth: https://immigrantfinance.com/newsletter Apply to join Immigrant Finance School™, our personal finance and online business group coaching program for immigrant families building wealth: https://immigrantfinanceschool.com

The Triplicates host Omar Lujano to discuss his academic journey as a Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program recipient. Omar is a first year PhD student in the San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego joint doctoral program in the House lab studying the tumor microenvironment. He shares some of the hurdles he's had to overcome while navigating higher education, his philosophies for others in his position, and some of the things he likes to do outside of science. Omar mentioned during the show that he had a list of funding opportunities for graduate students. Here is the resource he shared: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pTtAwNLWPKOAiTJ3LFSZO6DkE76wslGB/view?usp=sharing. Want to share your experiences? Email us at triplicatespod@gmail.com. Connect with us on twitter and instagram @triplicatespod. Like us? You can support us on patreon.com/triplicatespod or on ko-fi.com/triplicatespod! --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

Lawyer Alexandria Serra talks immigration with attorney Cynthia Lopez. Ever wonder how much is too much when paying for a lawyer? We discuss the citizenship process, immigration detention facilities, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), and much more. This topic is heavy but learning to navigate the law can help make immigration law easier to […]

On this episode of the Immigration Today! podcast with Angeline Chen, meet Angelica Salas, the Executive Director of the Coalition of Humane Immigrant Rights also known as CHIRLA.  From 1999 to now, she has transformed CHIRLA into one of the nation's largest and most effective immigrant rights organizations.  CHIRLA is a mass membership immigrant-led organization that empowers immigrants and their families to win local, state, and national policies that advance their human, civil, and labor rights.  Among her achievements include: winning in-state, financial aid, and grant programs for California's undocumented students, winning drivers' licenses for undocumented drivers, decoupling local police departments from immigration enforcement, and winning Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).Angelica is an immigrant from Durango, Mexico, and came to the United States as a child to reunite with her parents.  She comes to her understanding of immigrants and immigration first hand.  She and her entire family lived in the country undocumented, experienced deportation, and were able to legalize their status.  In 2008, she became a U.S. citizen. “When you really think about family separation, just think about your kids and ask, ‘How long could I be away from my children? What would I be willing to risk for them?'  And all of a sudden, the answer is…anything.” I have had the pleasure of knowing Angelica through the YWCA Pasadena, where she was a recipient of the Women for Racial Justice Award at the annual breakfast and has been a valuable supporter of the YWCA.  I am truly inspired by her leadership, voice, and unstoppable drive to help immigrants.  Learn more about CHIRLA and how you can help at www.CHIRLA.org and on IG @chirla_org.  DISCLAIMER – No information contained in this Podcast or on this Website shall constitute financial, investment, legal and/or other professional advice and that no professional relationship of any kind is created between you and podcast host, the guests or Clark Hill PLC. You are urged to speak with your financial, investment, or legal advisors before making any investment or legal decisions. 

Viridiana is the co-founder and CEO of ImmSchools, an immigrant led nonprofit organization working to transform K-12 schools into safe and welcoming spaces for undocumented students and families. Viridiana was born in Michoacán, Mexico and immigrated with her family to the United States when she was 11 years old. She began her journey as an immigrant activist in 2004 by co-founding a grassroots organization dedicated to organizing and informing undocumented students of their rights and access to higher education. Viridiana holds bachelor degree in Spanish Literature and Communications from the University of Texas at Austin. For five years, she led Teach For America's efforts to recruit and place teachers with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) in classrooms throughout the country. Through her leadership, the program recruited over 240 DACAmented educators who are teaching in 22 cities across 11 states. Viridiana has been recognized by the League of United American Citizens (LULAC) and the Austin Hispanic Chamber of Commerce for her leadership and dedication to the immigration community. After 14 years, she became a US citizen in 2016 and currently resides in San Antonio, TX www.immschools.com --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

In this episode of Unpacking, Rachel Wainer Apter joins us for a conversation about her personal relationship with Ruth Bader Ginsburg, which began when she served as a law clerk on the Supreme Court for Justice Ginsburg. Rachel's full bio can be found below. To donate or sponsor an episode, please go to darcheinoam.com/donate and select "Unpacking Podcast." Rachel Wainer Apter became the Director of the New Jersey Division on Civil Rights on October 15, 2018. She previously served as Counsel to the Attorney General, advising on civil rights and immigration matters and leading the New Jersey team that defeated a preliminary injunction motion by Texas and seven other states to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Prior to joining the Attorney General's Office, Rachel worked at the American Civil Liberties Union on cases concerning the right to be free from discrimination, reproductive freedom, voting rights, and other federal constitutional questions. She served as counsel in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which considered whether a baker who refused to sell a wedding cake to a same-sex couple on religious grounds was exempt from Colorado's anti-discrimination laws. She also served as counsel on a challenge to the Trump Administration's decision to allow employers with moral or religious objections to contraception to opt out of providing coverage to women employees without ensuring that the women could still access no-cost contraception. Rachel also argued and won a disability discrimination appeal and led a task force regarding investigations of sexual harassment and sexual assault on college campuses. Prior to the ACLU, Rachel worked in the Supreme Court and Appellate practice at Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe, where she briefed and argued cases in federal and state courts. She was also a leader of the firm-wide Women's Initiative. Rachel, who grew up in Rockaway, New Jersey, graduated from the University of Pennsylvania and received her law degree from Harvard Law School. After law school, Rachel served as a law clerk for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the United States Supreme Court, Judge Robert Katzmann on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and Judge Jed Rakoff on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Rachel lives in Englewood with her husband and three children.

Arturo Jiménez grew up in Denver, Colorado, where he still lives and works. Arturo is a bilingual lawyer who has practiced federal immigration law since 1998. His humanitarian practice has represented thousands of individuals in Colorado and other States. Arturo's law office helps unify families through spouse petitions, family immigration, naturalization, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), visas for victims and deportation defense in immigration court. Most of all, they seek to support the humanitarian rights of all individuals with an emphasis on immigrant children. In 2019, he wrote a book called “Dreamers Nightmare: The U.S. War On Immigrant Latinx Children,” where he uses his experiences with clients and at the border to describe how US immigration policy has terrorized immigrant children for decades. Arturo also served on the Denver Public Schools Board of Education from 2007 until 2015. He is happily married to his wife Angelina and is the proud father of three children, Metzli, Leonor, and Citlamina. Arturo's book on Kindle: https://www.amazon.com/DREAMers-NIGHTMARE-IMMIGRANT-LATINX-CHILDREN-ebook/dp/B07XZCZR72 Stay In Touch: Connect on Facebook and Instagram with thoughts, questions, and feedback. RATE and REVIEW the show on iTunes.   Find Us Online: @aworldof.difference on Instagram and A World of Difference on Facebook. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/lori-adams-brown/supportMentioned in this episode:Join Difference MakersJoin us in our membership community for exclusive content for only $5/month at https://www.patreon.com/aworldofdifference. We go deeper with each guest, and it makes such a difference.PatreonDo you want to go deeper?Join us in Difference Makers, a community where we watch and discuss exclusive content that truly makes a difference. Give us $5 a month (the price of a latte), and join in on the conversation with our host Lori and others who want to make a difference. We'd love to have you join us!PatreonThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Chartable - https://chartable.com/privacyPodtrac - https://analytics.podtrac.com/privacy-policy-gdrp

Arturo Jiménez grew up in Denver, Colorado, where he still lives and works. Arturo is a bilingual lawyer who has practiced federal immigration law since 1998. His humanitarian practice has represented thousands of individuals in Colorado and other States. Arturo's law office helps unify families through spouse petitions, family immigration, naturalization, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), visas for victims and deportation defense in immigration court. Most of all, they seek to support the humanitarian rights of all individuals with an emphasis on immigrant children. In 2019, he wrote a book called “Dreamers Nightmare: The U.S. War On Immigrant Latinx Children,” where he uses his experiences with clients and at the border to describe how US immigration policy has terrorized immigrant children for decades. Arturo also served on the Denver Public Schools Board of Education from 2007 until 2015. He is happily married to his wife Angelina and is the proud father of three children, Metzli, Leonor, and Citlamina. Arturo's book on Kindle: https://www.amazon.com/DREAMers-NIGHTMARE-IMMIGRANT-LATINX-CHILDREN-ebook/dp/B07XZCZR72 Stay In Touch: Connect on Facebook and Instagram with thoughts, questions, and feedback. RATE and REVIEW the show on iTunes.   Find Us Online: @aworldof.difference on Instagram and A World of Difference on Facebook. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app (https://anchor.fm/app) Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/lori-adams-brown/support (https://anchor.fm/lori-adams-brown/support)Mentioned in this episode: Patreon Support us for as little as $5/month at Patreon.com/aworldofdifference and receive exclusive audio content and free merch. Coaching Sept 22 Want to get unstuck and make a difference? Go to loriadamsbrown.com/coachnig for a free exploratory session. This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Podcorn - https://podcorn.com/privacy

Today's humble badass is Brenda Ortiz-Torres.  Brenda is a middle school math teacher in Thornton, Colorado who is working on developing a community-based math curriculum to bring more relevance and connection to the subject.  She is also a recipient of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which has allowed her to experience opportunities that she at one point didn't know would be possible. In our conversation, Brenda opens up about the challenges of growing up as an undocumented citizen and how she she developed a persistence to not give up in order to make her family who had made many sacrifices proud.  She talks about the pressures she felt to assimilate to the American culture and how her experiences in school, particularly math, weren't always positive.  She identifies what changed in her mindset about math and education and why she decided to join the teaching profession in order to give students relevant experiences.

On episode 30 of “The Activist Files,” Center for Constitutional Rights Senior Staff Attorney Ghita Schwarz and Attorney Chinyere Ezie talked with Make the Road New York's Lead Organizer Eliana Fernandez about the impact organizing played in the two key Supreme Court of the United States' decisions –  Wolf v. Vidal, the decision that preserves Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which Eliana was a plaintiff, the Bostock/Zarda/Stephens cases, which the Court found that an employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The movement lawyers and activist agreed the organizing and narrative shifting in some of the cases had the justices so worried that the credibility of the court was brought to the forefront. Eliana talks about her brave decision to be a plaintiff in the DACA case – she's a DACA recipient and a mom, who didn't want to be separated from her children. She said Make the Road New York protected her and gave her the tools to empower the movement. And Chinyere, who wrote an amicus brief in Aimee Stephens, of R. G. & G. R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and attended the argument, tied this Title VII case to Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru, which held that Catholic elementary school teachers are “ministers,” so they cannot sue their employer for employment discrimination. While Our Lady of Guadalupe is not about LGBTQIA+ rights, it impacts that community because statutes that prohibit discrimination, from age to disability, were not applied to this case because the employer is a religious organization and the employees, who were subject-matter teachers, were classified as “ministers.” Chinyere noted that Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru did not have a large movement behind the case and wonders if the court didn't feel compelled to uphold the anti-discrimination statutes because of the lack of public awareness and involvement.  Resources:·      Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda·      Aimee Stephens, of R. G. & G. R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission·      R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Aimee Stephens (Amicus)·      Bostock v. Clayton County·      Publ

On June 18, 2020, the Supreme Court released their decision for the case Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California regarding the status of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy. On this episode, Travis and Jeff speak with Jose Ocampo on his personal experience as a Dreamer and what is next for Dreamers after the Supreme Court's recent decision. Guest BiographyJose Ocampo is a “Dreamer” and DACA recipient who has recently graduated from Wingate University with a Bachelor of Science in Marketing. He is currently serving as the worship and youth associate at Iglesia Bautista de Hickory Grove in Charlotte, North Carolina.Resources from the ConversationPress Release | Russell Moore says Dreamers' ‘Entire lives are at stake' and calls on Congress to protect DreamersERLC article | Explainer: What the Supreme Court decision on DACA means for DreamersERLC | Capitol Conversation PodcastPast podcast with Jose | Interview with a Dreamer

The Supreme Court! DACA and Asylum-seekers! The Proposed Police Reform BillsThe Supreme Court has been issueing opinions like fire the past few weeks- tis the season! This week the Supreme Court issued orders and released opinions on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and Asylum seeking immigrants. Then John and Walter break down the proposed police reform bills in the Senate and the House.WARNING! This podcast is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for legal advice. If you have a question or wish to act upon the information in this podcast, we recommend you consult an attorney in your state.*Punk Law 101- A Legal News, Commentary, & Comedy Series*Walter John Deptuch, Esq.: @BrojodeathpunchFollow the podcast at: @punklaw101Punk Law 101 is an informational and entertainment series. Through a series of youtube videos, podcasts and interviews with other lawyers and local stand up comedians. We're gonna try to figure out just how and why our legal system works the way it does... and is there a way it could work better?We'll review recent #SupremeCourt decisions, discuss current and past #political movements, and compare pop culture references like TV Shows, Movies and even Memes!#LegalNews #PolticalNews #PolitcalCommentary #Lawyer #attorney #Esquire #Law #Evidence #CriminalLaw #Trademark #Copyright #Bankruptcy #StudentLoans #PoliticalSatire #BadLawyer #TrueCrime #Arrests

Last week the United States Supreme Court blocked the Trump Administrations effort to end Pres. Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals ("DACA"), program which suspended deportation for individuals brought to the United States illegally when they were children. This is seen a large blow to the Trump Administration and a victory for DACA recipients. However, the Supreme Court only ruled Pres. Trump's reasoning for ending the program was arbitrary and capricious. It did not rule Pres. Trump could rescind the program if he can put forth more legitimate reasons for doing so. Pres. Trump has already announced his intention to try to rescind the program again. In this episode, Kirk is joined by Minneapolis Immigration Attorney Thomas Anderson to discuss this case as well as other current issues with the practice of Immigration law. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/right-to-counsel/message

Today, the Supreme Court will take on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which provides a level of amnesty for young undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as children. The Justices will hear arguments on whether the Trump Administration's decision to end the Obama administration's program was legal. FOX's Supreme Court producer Bill Mears and DACA recipient Hilario Yanez weigh in on today's hearing and its potential impact on the lives of thousands of young immigrants. Public hearings starting this week in the impeachment inquiry into President Trump. The whistleblower, whose complaint kicked off House Democrats' probe, is on the list of witnesses that House Republicans would like to question, but Democratic leaders are not going to allow that. General Counsel for the National Whistleblower Center David Colapinto and FOX's Gregg Jarrett weigh in on whether or not the whistleblower should be publicly identified. Plus, commentary by FOX News contributor and former White House Deputy Chief of Staff to George W. Bush, Karl Rove. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, I analyze the White House's immigration plan. We go in-depth on the research and data behind Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), family-based migration, catch and release, and more. I cover immigration trends and how removals and detentions have shifted under the Trump Administration. Another important immigration topic is the movement of illicit drugs into the country from Mexico and China. Thank you to Mike and Tiana for becoming $15 per month Patrons! … More Ep. 28: In-Depth on Immigration