Podcasts about bush v gore

Sarah and David are joined by Leon Neyfakh—host of Fiasco podcast and co-creator of Slow Burn—to explain what really happened in December of 2000 when the Supreme Court halted the Florida recount. The Agenda: —Butterfly ballots —Dimpled, hanging, and pregnant chads —Independent state legislature theory —Who would've won anyway? —Elián González —The Brooks Brothers riot —Was Bush v. Gore cynical? —Two First Amendment updates Show Notes: —Fiasco on Bush v. Gore —A Statistical Assessment of Buchanan's Vote in Palm Beach County —Bush v. Gore oral arguments —Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Bd. Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch's offerings—including Sarah's Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

ABC's Sarah Isgur looks back at Bush V Gore. Mike sets the record straight on FBI crime stats. Kamala Harris was on FNC last night.....and Brittney Shepard from ABC breaks it down.

ABC's Sarah Isgur looks back at Bush V Gore. Mike sets the record straight on FBI crime stats. Kamala Harris was on FNC last night.....and Brittney Shepard from ABC breaks it down.

How the largely forgotten race between Al Gore and George W. Bush roiled Florida long before anyone had ever heard of a hanging chad. For a full list of sources, check out the Fiasco website.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The US presidential election of 2000 was one of the closest and most contested in history. It was more than a month before the result was decided after a Supreme Court decision. It all came down to the vote in Florida, where irregularities and technical problems added to the confusion.In the end it's thought there were just a few hundred votes in it but the result still divides opinion. Callie Shell was the official photographer for Al Gore's presidential campaign and documented the dramatic events behind closed doors in pictures. She tells Rebecca Kesby what it was like to be there. This programme was first broadcast in 2020.Eye-witness accounts brought to life by archive. Witness History is for those fascinated by the past. We take you to the events that have shaped our world through the eyes of the people who were there. For nine minutes every day, we take you back in time and all over the world, to examine wars, coups, scientific discoveries, cultural moments and much more. Recent episodes explore everything from football in Brazil, the history of the ‘Indian Titanic' and the invention of air fryers, to Public Enemy's Fight The Power, subway art and the political crisis in Georgia. We look at the lives of some of the most famous leaders, artists, scientists and personalities in history, including: visionary architect Antoni Gaudi and the design of the Sagrada Familia; Michael Jordan and his bespoke Nike trainers; Princess Diana at the Taj Mahal; and Görel Hanser, manager of legendary Swedish pop band Abba on the influence they've had on the music industry. You can learn all about fascinating and surprising stories, such as the time an Iraqi journalist hurled his shoes at the President of the United States in protest of America's occupation of Iraq; the creation of the Hollywood commercial that changed advertising forever; and the ascent of the first Aboriginal MP.(Photo: Al Gore and George Bush. Credit: Getty Images)

On this week's On the Media we revisit another fraught moment in American democracy: the contested  election between Al Gore and George W. Bush in 2000. Hear about the extraordinary legal battle that ensued, and what it can teach us about partisan politics today. Leon Neyfakh, host of the podcast Fiasco, takes us back in time to witness how the Gore and Bush campaigns fought for recounts; how “chads” and “military ballots” became central to the contest; and the role of the so-called Brooks Brothers riot.Further listening:Fiasco: Bush v Gore On the Media is supported by listeners like you. Support OTM by donating today (https://pledge.wnyc.org/support/otm). Follow our show on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook @onthemedia, and share your thoughts with us by emailing onthemedia@wnyc.org.

Emily, Ky, Eddie Harris, sleepy demon, and secret Teddy are back to bitch about foisting saving the world onto kids, Bush V Gore, and the hash-slinging half slasher(?). Would you fuck the Flying Dutchman? The team is investigating. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/wineweedweird/message

Patrick Wohl, author of Down Ballot: How A Local Campaign Became A National Referendum on Abortion, talks about this historic race, abortion politics, the key players, how state legislative campaigns are run, the role of ‘dimpled chads' in the outcome locally and in the 2000 presidential race in Florida, why local elections are so important, and much more.

SEASON 2 EPISODE 134: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:44) Trump appears to be suffering from a condition called "Fluent Aphasia." Victims can verbalize intricate long sentences, and appear to be answering questions or making coherent observations. But frequently all they have is the structure and the cadence of coherence; the rhythm of speech. They do not fully understand what they are hearing, cannot convey what they are trying to through speech, and are almost invariably the victims of strokes or head injuries. All attempts to explain "Fluent Aphasia" (or by its formal name, "Wernicke's Aphasia,") use the phrase "Word Salad." And after a three-day series of speeches in which, on literally dozens of occasions, he said things that SOUNDED like sentences but were not, the evidence is mounting and the problem is accelerating: the Trump word salad is "Fluent Aphasia" and on top of all of Trump's other mental and ethical problems, it is disqualifying. He cannot be president. His brain literally does not work correctly, MEANWHILE: “Course I'm respectable,” says John Huston as Noah Cross in Chinatown to Jack Nicholson as Jake Gittes in Chinatown. “I'm OLD. Politicians, ugly buildings and whores all get respectable, if they LAST long enough.” And then there's what happens when you're all three of those things - as the Supreme Court and its justices are all three of those things: Politicians pretending to be justices, working in an ugly building, and as Trump relied upon and was proved correct – they're all whores. “Because the Constitution makes Congress rather than the states responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal office holders and candidates, we reverse,” reads the Court's decision to not enforce the 14th Amendment denying insurrectionists the right to become president or hold other offices. 9-nothing. Except it DOESN'T do that. Section 3, as conservative scholar after conservative scholar has repeatedly stated, is SELF-enforcing. It is automatic. If you engaged in insurrection, you're out. If you think you're being ill-treated, Section 3 provides you an override mechanism: you can get the House AND the Senate to each CLEAR you, each by a two-thirds vote. Period. The constitution says NOTHING about an enforcement responsibility. The Court betrayed democracy yesterday – again: this time by going faster to help Trump. On presidential immunity, it's going SLOWER to help Trump. Its members, including Jackson and Kagan and Sotomayor, who before folding, stood up just long enough to wave BYE BYE to representative government, overruled one of the easiest parts of the constitution to understand for the benefit of one corrupt politician. Individually and as an entity they have proved themselves inept at basic reading comprehension. They have proved themselves to be corrupt and illegitimate. Its usefulness and relevance is at an end, and whatever replaces it, the immediate need is obvious: The Supreme Court must be dissolved. The funny part, of course, is that these idiots have inadvertently given the current sitting president (a Mr. Biden, I believe) a kind of qualified, specific immunity from prosecution in case HE wants to illegally overturn an election. B-Block (25:50) POSTSCRIPTS TO THE NEWS: Another reporter claims Trump is about to pivot and Trump promptly makes her look like an idiot. Trump's new vaccine promise: I'm here to kill your kids. Trump shortens his National Abortion Ban plan. Jack Smith says no, the DOJ 60-Day Secret Unwritten Rule does NOT apply to cases already filed against Trump. And farewell to my old friend Chris Mortensen go ESPN. (33:50) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: Jesse Watters says Biden "licking ice cream" is unmanly and implies he has Alzheimer's. That's before they found the post from five years ago of Watters... licking ice cream. The would-be Republican nominee for governor of Missouri is suing because, he claims, he was only an HONORARY member of the KKK, and Kristin Welker allegedly wins after allegedly graduating from Harvard and allegedly being a White House correspondent and saying Trump "allegedly" tried to overturn the election. C-Block (41:30) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL: My oldest enemy - the one I thought was killed off in the '80s - turns out to be alive and well. My half century battle against "The Auto Train" and its stopped-up toilets of 1972.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

“I think it's impossible to predict when we set up systems whether it won't fail at some point. I don't think that anything man creates is perfect. I'm not so sure that it needs fixing. I don't want to be part of it again, I can tell you that much. I don't want to be in the middle of that sort of thing.” But Clarence Thomas IS part of “it” again. When the Supreme Court Justice said he didn't want to be “in the middle of that sort thing” – it was April 8, 2002, and he was talking about Bush v. Gore – the case that decided the 2000 presidential election. … Now Justice Thomas is hearing oral argument in Trump v. Anderson … and the Supreme Court will decide whether Donald Trump is eligible for Colorado's Republican primary ballot. Like Bush v. Gore nearly a quarter century ago, Trump v. Anderson puts the Supreme Court squarely in a central role in a presidential election. Clarence Thomas is the only remaining member of the Supreme Court that, in December 2000, decided Bush v. Gore. In this week's episode of C-SPAN's podcast “The Weekly,” right as the Court decides a new case with immediate bearing on a presidential election, we hear what Justice Thomas has said about that landmark Supreme Court case, Bush v. Gore. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this week's episode, Jeremi and Zachary are joined by Sanford Levinson to discuss the 2000 election, the Supreme Court decision that finalized it, and how this decision has had ramifications throughout modern history. Zachary sets the scene with his poem entitled, "The Court Has Stopped the Count" Sanford Levinson, who holds the W. St. John Garwood and W. St. John Garwood, Jr. Centennial Chair in Law, joined the University of Texas Law School in 1980. Previously a member of the Department of Politics at Princeton University, he is also a Professor in the Department of Government at the University of Texas. Levinson is the author of approximately 400 articles, book reviews, or commentaries in professional and popular journals--and a regular contributor to the popular blog Balkinization. He has also written six books: Constitutional Faith (1988, winner of the Scribes Award, 2d edition 2011); Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (1998); Wrestling With Diversity (2003); Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (and How We the People Can Correct It)(2006); Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (2012); An Argument Open to All: Reading the Federalist in the 21st Century (2015); and, with Cynthia Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and teh Flaws that Affect Us Today (forthcoming, September 2017). Edited or co-edited books include a leading constitutional law casebook, Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking (6th ed. 2015, with Paul Brest, Jack Balkin, Akhil Amar, and Reva Siegel); Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (2016); Reading Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader (1988, with Steven Mallioux); Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment (1995); Constitutional Stupidities, Constitutional Tragedies (1998, with William Eskridge); Legal Canons (2000, with Jack Balkin); The Louisiana Purchase and American Expansion (2005, with Batholomew Sparrow); Torture: A Collection (2004, revised paperback edition, 2006); and The Oxford Handbook on the United States Constitution (with Mark Tushnet and Mark Graber, 2015). He received the Lifetime Achievement Award from the Law and Courts Section of the American Political Science Association in 2010. He has been a visiting faculty member of the Boston University, Georgetown, Harvard, New York University, and Yale law schools in the United States and has taught abroad in programs of law in London; Paris; Jerusalem; Auckland, New Zealand; and Melbourne, Australia. He was a Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton in 1985-86 and a Member of the Ethics in the Professions Program at Harvard in 1991-92. He is also affiliated with the Shalom Hartman Institute of Jewish Philosophy in Jerusalem. A member of the American Law Institute, Levinson was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2001. He is married to Cynthia Y. Levinson, a writer of children's literature, and has two daughters and four grandchildren.

In a momentous decision the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 ruling, effectively halted the ongoing manual recount in Florida and handed Florida's electoral votes to George W. Bush. This secured his victory in the state and, consequently, the ...

Live from the no panic zone—I'm Steve Gruber—I am America's Voice— Delivering an Equitable and Socially Just news and talk program— using only sustainable topics that maintain maximum diversity and inclusion— and for the record no animals were harmed in the production of this program!   Here are three big Things you need to know right now—   ONE— Could you soon be held in a digital prison? Or are you and the rest of us already there? With so many devices tattling on us 24 hours a day—it seems we just might be—   TWO— California Governor, Democrat Gavin Newsome is cleaning up some loose ends and taking shots at Joe Biden for the Border Crisis—as he gets ready to run for President—   THREE— And so lets dive into this hour—by just saying it—this country is in real trouble—   You cannot let in millions and millions of people—with no place to go, no job, no house and no future and think—hey this is going to go great—   And that is just the beginning of the unravelling of this nation at the hands of the George Soros plan—that has been at work for over 20 years now—to turn America into just another European style socialist nation—with no identity—and no actual culture—   Soros is a pig that has destroyed much of this country with a laser focused effort to kill it—ever since he lost the Bush V Gore argument in 2000—   His attacks have been multi-faceted—and they are continuing today—  

This week we're talking to Cory Doctorow about his new book Chokepoint Capitalism - coauthored with Rebecca Giblin, his as yet unpublished next book The Internet Con: How to Seize the Means of Computation, and how corporate power is shaping our rights. Quick corrections! - GDPR compensation is in theory possible through court action: https://ico.org.uk/your-data-matters/data-protection-and-journalism/taking-your-case-to-court-and-claiming-compensation/ - GDPR Article 80(2) not Section 20 something as I stated! Links - Cory's website: https://craphound.com/ - Chokepoint Capitalism coauthored with Rebecca Giblin: https://doctorow.medium.com/what-is-chokepoint-capitalism-b885c4cb2719 - Giphy and Meta: https://privacyinternational.org/press-release/4911/uk-tribunal-agrees-metas-acquisition-giphy-harms-competition - Chokepoint Capitalism: the audiobook: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/doctorow/chokepoint-capitalism-an-audiobook-amazon-wont-sell - How to leave dying social media platforms (without losing your friends): https://doctorow.medium.com/how-to-leave-dying-social-media-platforms-9fc550fe5ab - Cory on Mastodon: https://mamot.fr/@doctorow and https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic - PI on Mastodon: https://mastodon.xyz/@privacyint - Crad Kilodney documentary: https://vimeo.com/108567007 - Algorithms Exposed: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/825974 or https://algorithms.exposed/ - Bush V Gore election scandal: https://www.britannica.com/event/Bush-v-Gore - Goldacre report: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/better-broader-safer-using-health-data-for-research-and-analysis - Amazon and NHS: https://privacyinternational.org/node/3298 - Rida Qadri: https://ridaqadri.net/research/ and some of her writing on tuyul apps: https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kvpng/delivery-drivers-are-using-grey-market-apps-to-make-their-jobs-suck-less - Oh for fuck's sake, not this fucking bullshit again : https://boingboing.net/2018/09/04/illegal-math.html - Dan Kaminsky's work on Colour blindness: https://dankaminsky.com/2010/12/15/dankam/ - How to get the most out of your Data Subject Access Request: https://privacyinternational.org/explainer/3845/71-tips-how-make-most-out-your-dsar

Audio of Chief Justice Rehnquist's concurring opinion in Bush v. Gore (2000). You'll want to listen to this episode before oral arguments in Moore v. Harper to be scheduled for later this term. Today I'll be reading Chief Justice Rehnquist's concurring opinion in Bush v. Gore (2000) which seems to be the origin of the highly controversial Independent Legislature Theory - the idea that state legislatures are the ultimate authority in determining the rules by which states appoint their allotted number of electors to the electoral college - a power so absolute that it cannot even be checked by state courts and officials.  If this sounds familiar, it's because it's very similar to former president Trump's efforts to appoint unauthorized slates of electors in several states that he lost, hoping to overturn the 2020 election in his favor. While those efforts were ultimately unsuccessful, it is important to note that three sitting justices embrace (and, indeed, endorse) the theory - first described in this concurring opinion from Bush v. Gore, written 22 years ago by Chief Justice William Rehnquist.   Here is a great article about the Independent Legislature Theory from The Brennan Center for Justice. I keep it bookmarked and refer to it often.   Access this SCOTUS opinion with citations and other essential case information on Oyez Music by Epidemic Sound

Audio of the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore (2000). I'm reading this opinion today as homework to prep us for the upcoming case Moore v. Harper, which will require the Court to consider the controversial Independent Legislature Theory. Two questions before the Court were 1) whether the Florida Supreme Court violated Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution; and whether standardless manual recounts violate the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. Over the next few episodes, I'll be reading some opinions of the Court that you'll want to hear before Moore v. Harper is heard and subsequently decided by the Court. If you are interested in learning about the origins of the Independent Legislature Theory, you won't want to miss the next episode in which Chief Justice Rehnquist gives it substance.   Access this SCOTUS opinion with citations and other essential case information at: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000/00-949   Music by Epidemic Sound

In which we launch the new Juice Media Podcast format for Season 3, and talk about the US Supreme Court and it's plans for the 2024 election. Feat. PixelsmixelThis is the podcast companion to our latest Honest Government Ad about the US Supreme Court - SCOTUSYou can also view this episode of the podcast on our YouTube channel (Video coming soon).

Michael's conversation with attorneys David Boies and Theodore Olson, who argued the California Prop 8 case in court together (and were on opposite sides of the 2000 Bush V Gore legal challenges), on their book "Redeeming the Dream: The Case for Marriage Equality." Original air date 24 June 2014. The book was published on 17 June 2014.

A lack of integrity among politicians, declining trust in our institutions, and violence in response to Supreme Court decisions are a few of the big problems facing our nation. How do we fix these issues? In the latest installment of Boyd's interview with Joe Lieberman, the former senator and vice presidential candidate outlines how we can overcome them. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hide your robes! Hide your gavels! This week, Jeff and Seth are back on the podcast to talk about that wacky panel of 9 unelected demagogues who control our destinies from the secret steering wheel of "democracy"... The Supreme Court. Topics include: John Jay, The Royal Exchange, Dred Scott v. Sandford, and much much more. Plus we play I See What You Did There, and two combatants face off in the Thunderdome.Support organized labor, including the Meow Wolf Workers' Collective!Check out some optimistic articles at NREL.org and you might be reading Jeff!And check out Jeff's Murder Mystery in Aurora! Listen to MJO'C's tunes: https://michaeljoconnor.bandcamp.com/And buy some sci-fi books: https://readspaceboy.com/ 

Our episode begins with a takedown by Craig Pittman of the Governor and state legislature for their inaction on protecting manatee.Our guest is recently retired Florida Supreme Court Director of Communications Craig Waters. Waters was the public spokesperson for the Court during its most high profile cases including the recount of 2000 presidential election.Follow the Florida Supreme Court on Facebook and Twitter. This week's show is presented by Visit Sarasota. Soak up the sun along Sarasota's white sand beaches. Treat yourself to diverse dining, enriching arts and culture, shopping districts of all sorts and natural Florida fun. Begin your exploration at VisitSarasota.com. 

It's Casual Friday! Sam and Emma host Heather Digby Parton, contributing writer at Salon and proprietor of the Hullaballoo blog, to round up the week in news. Sam and Emma start out by commemorating the historic Starbucks union vote in Buffalo. Then, Sam, Emma, and Digby dive into the numerous January 6th-related revelations that have come out in the past few weeks, starting with Mark Meadows withdrawing his cooperation with the investigation, most likely due to his fear of incurring Trump's wrath for disclosing his COVID status in his book from last year, as well as Steve Bannon's delayed contempt trial going into July 2022. Digby dives into Meadows history as a garden-variety dolt, and how Trump surrounds himself with obsequious yes-men, conflating loyalty with competence. They then dive into the recently disclosed PowerPoint coup plot document that Meadows turned over to the Jan. 6th committee, something that new Fox News outcast Lara Logan seemed to have on hand before Jan. 6th. They then discuss Trump's year plus-long obsession with the election results, the demographics of the Jan. 6th rioters, as well as the recent Barton Gellman piece in the Atlantic about election fraud and theft becoming standard GOP orthodoxy, with the Bush v. Gore "independent legislature theory" becoming a bedrock of that. Digby, Sam and Emma then touch on how this relates to Mitch McConnell's deal with Chuck Schumer on the debt ceiling, and how Lindsey Graham mounted a revolt amongst the Senate Trump-faithful to that deal, underscoring the deep fear many rank and file GOPers still have of Trump's wrath (think Brad Raffensperger). They then take a look at the extremely bizarre video that came out of Kanye West's publicist threatening a Georgia election worker to admit to election fraud in the state, the Democrats completely unprepared and limp response to all of these new threats of far-right violence being mainstreamed, the bombshell National Guard report about how the Army lied about their preparations to defend the Capitol on Jan. 6th, the deficiencies of the 50/50 Senate, the potential 2022-2024 hangover for Dem voters based on how little they've received after 2018 and 2020, and how state Dems are unwilling to go for the jugular in re-districting in states like Maryland.   Then, Sam and Emma are joined by comedian/Cameo celebrity  Andy Kindler, host of the Thought Spiral podcast! Andy, Sam, and Emma reflect on Bob Dole, lion of the Senate, as well as Andy's haunting Zoom setup and the progress of Sam's shingles vaccine. Then Sam, Andy, and Emma dive into Jim Breuer, new far-right comedy icon, and his positions on jesters, and whether cockatoos really talk about how much they love Dr. Fauci. They take a deeper dive into Clay Clark's psychotic Reawaken America tour, Dr. Oz, Dr. Drew, Celebrity Rehab, and how Thought Spiral is the #1 podcast for white Jews over 59. And in the Fun Half, Reverend Jacque DeGraff evokes Pearl Harbor at the Fox News tree resurrection, the San Diego Board of Supervisors gets a taste of anti-vax Mariah Carey, Lauren Boebert expands upon her Special Forces FART team in Congress, and Tucker Carlson speaks with a Jan. 6th lawyer about the insurrection's FBI "agent provocateur" (the guy is a amateur St. Louis Cardinals mascot who loves Tucker.) Plus, your IM's! Purchase tickets for the live show in Boston on January 16th HERE! https://thewilbur.com/artist/majority-report/ Become a member at JoinTheMajorityReport.com Subscribe to the AMQuickie newsletter here. Join the Majority Report Discord! http://majoritydiscord.com/ Get all your MR merch at our store https://shop.majorityreportradio.com/ (Merch issues and concerns can be addressed here: majorityreportstore@mirrorimage.com) You can now watch the livestream on Twitch Check out today's sponsors: sunsetlakecbd is a majority employee owned farm in Vermont, producing 100% pesticide free CBD products. Great company, great product and fans of the show! Use code Leftisbest and get 20% off at http://www.sunsetlakecbd.com. And now Sunset Lake CBD has donated $2500 to the Nurses strike fund, and we encourage MR listeners to help if they can. Here's a link to where folks can donate: https://forms.massnurses.org/we-stand-with-st-vincents-nurses/ MySolarNerd.com: There are a lot of homeowners that aren't aware of the solar options currently available. It is now possible to retrofit a home with solar panels for no money down. Most homeowners that switch over to solar see significant savings starting in their first year. This is possible thanks to the Solar Investor Tax Credit (going away soon). My Solar Nerd's mission is SIMPLE: Help you find the best solar program for your home and make the transition as EASY and SMOOTH as possible. Go to mysolarnerd.com and fill out the inquiry form now. Make sure you select Majority Report Listener for how you heard about My Solar Nerd to receive a $200 gift card upon installation! Support the St. Vincent Nurses today as they continue to strike for a fair contract! https://action.massnurses.org/we-stand-with-st-vincents-nurses/ Subscribe to Discourse Blog, a newsletter and website for progressive essays and related fun partly run by AM Quickie writer Jack Crosbie. https://discourseblog.com/ Subscribe to AM Quickie writer Corey Pein's podcast News from Nowhere, at https://www.patreon.com/newsfromnowhere Check out Matt's show, Left Reckoning, on Youtube, and subscribe on Patreon! Subscribe to Matt's other show Literary Hangover on Patreon! Check out The Letterhack's upcoming Kickstarter project for his new graphic novel! https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/milagrocomic/milagro-heroe-de-las-calles Check out Matt Binder's YouTube channel! Subscribe to Brandon's show The Discourse on Patreon! Check out The Nomiki Show live at 3 pm ET on YouTube at patreon.com/thenomikishow Check out Jamie's podcast, The Antifada, at patreon.com/theantifada, on iTunes, or at twitch.tv/theantifada (streaming every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday at 7pm ET!) Follow the Majority Report crew on Twitter: @SamSeder @EmmaVigeland @MattBinder @MattLech @BF1nn @BradKAlsop

Wir sind in so etwas wie einer Sommerpause. Damit dir nicht langweilig wird, gibt's hier fünf Podcast-Vorstellungen. 1. Plötzlich Bäcker: Lutz Geißler über das Brotbacken mit Philosophie. 2. Fiasco: Bush v. Gore: Noch viel anstrengender als die Wochen nach der Trump-Abwahl waren die Wochen zwischen Wahltag und Verkündung des Ergebnisses bei der Wahl Bush gegen Gore. Hier der Polit-Thriller noch einmal zum Nachhören. 3. A-Z Phil Collins: Der Ex-Genesis-Drummer höchstselbst erzählt Anekdoten aus seinem Leben und erzählt die Geschichten hinter Songs. 4. Kein Mucks: Bastian Pastewka wählt Hörspiele der 1950er- bis 1980er-Jahre aus dem Radio-Bremen-Archiv aus. 5. Kieltopia – Der Zukunftspodcast: Ein Podcast, der zu ergründen versucht, wie Kiel nachhaltiger und lebenswerter werden kann. Auch interessant, wenn du nicht aus Kiel kommst – und sei es nur als Vorbild für eigene Projekte. Bonus: Wenn du uns einen Gefallen tun willst, gibst du dem Food-Podcast „Iss was, Hase?!“ mal eine Chance. Der hat zwar herzlich wenig mit Schleifenquadrat zu tun, wird aber ebenfalls unter anderem von Falkemedia, dem Medienhaus hinter Mac Life und damit auch Schleifenquadrat, produziert.

What if I told you that in this cutthroat world of marketing, there is one system that goes undefeated and has even led to the winning of several presidential elections? In this episode, Phillip Stutts comes back to reveal some answers. Phillip has over 2 decades of experience working on campaigns with billions of dollars in political ad spend and has contributed to over 1,407 election victories, including 3 U.S. Presidential victories. He plays and wins the game of both political and corporate marketing on the highest level. He is now the author of the book, The Undefeated Marketing System. Don’t miss out on this episode, and tune in to find out more about Phillip and this system that is taking the marketing world by storm. Things you will learn in this episode: *[00:01 - 05:50] Opening Segment* * Sponsored ad * I introduce today’s guest, Phillip Stutts * Marketing Maverick * Achievements * Be sure to check out guestio.com ( https://guestio.com/ ) and start booking * Phillip’s data-driven marketing strategy * What you’ll find in the book * Committed vs. Interested *[05:51 - 21:27] The Undefeated Marketing System* * How do you understand your customer better? * How it works in a political campaign * Finding the issues that are rising to the top * Building out the plan * Build the brand * The example of the Trump campaign * The project Phillip ran * Breaking through 10,000 other ads * Phillip shares a story about an eCommerce business * Building a huge Instagram following * Running insight reports for the client * Another story about a billion-dollar title company * An interesting purchasing behavior among their clients * Building a human connection * A word from our sponsor *[21:28 - 31:47] A Look at the Marketing that Changes of History* * Phillip talks about trends in the 2020 election that wasn’t as well known * 21,500 voters could have changed history * The actions Biden took that worked * Phillip shares about the Bush v. Gore election * Out innovating competitors * Winning more than you lose * Engaging with Phillip’s data and analytics * Utilizing customer data effectively * Free data assessment *[31:48 - 38:56] Closing Segment* * Who you know or what you know? * Always ask who not how * RaNDoM RoUnD * How to engage with Phillip * Links below * Final words *Tweetable Quotes:* “If you have a brand that is not in alignment with what the customer or the voter cares about, then they're gonna leave.” - Phillip Stutts “That’s why everybody struggles so much with digital marketing now because they don’t understand what they’re up against and it’s a science. I just figured out a formulaic system that I know works and I just wanted to put that out into the world.” - Phillip Stutts *Resources Mentioned:* * The Undefeated Marketing System ( https://www.amazon.com/Undefeated-Marketing-System-Business-Presidents/dp/1544520158 ) * Fire Them Now ( https://www.phillipstutts.com/fire-them-now/ ) * Contagious ( https://www.amazon.com/Contagious-Things-Catch-Jonah-Berger/dp/1451686587 ) * Who not How ( https://www.amazon.com/Who-Not-How-Accelerating-Teamwork-ebook/dp/B0867ZJ151 ) Connect with Phillip on Twitter ( https://twitter.com/phillipstutts?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor ) and Instagram ( https://www.instagram.com/phillipstutts/?hl=en ). Go check out https://www.phillipstutts.com ( https://www.phillipstutts.com/insights/ ) to learn even more about your customers. Did you love the value that we are putting out in the show? *LEAVE A REVIEW* and tell us what you think about the episode so we can continue putting out great content just for you! Share this episode and help someone who wants to connect with world-class people. Jump on over to travischapel.com/makemypodcast ( https://travischappell.typeform.com/to/kmf5p4 ) and let my team make you your very own show! If you want to learn how to build YOUR network, check out my website a travischappell.com ( https://travischappell.com/ ).  You can connect with me on Facebook ( https://www.facebook.com/travis.chappell15 ) , Instagram ( https://www.instagram.com/travischappell/ ) , and Twitter ( https://twitter.com/traviscchappell?lang=en ). Be sure to join The Lounge ( https://www.facebook.com/groups/byncommunity ) to become part of the community that’s setting up REAL relationships that add value and create investments. Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

It's election night in 2020 and the media are predicting Al Gore will be the next president of the United States, but overnight that changes to an election that is “too close to call” and what ensues is a long six week battle over election results in the state of Florida that includes riots, hanging chads and the Supreme Court. We take a look back at the 2000 election and discuss how we may see something similar in 2020. Also we find out about Weston's days as a bounty hunter in south Florida. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/blurredpoliticallines/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/blurredpoliticallines/support

Featuring Guest Speaker, Professor Rick Hasen of the University of California, Irvine. In Episode 10 of Notorious, we discussed the case of Bush v. Gore, which involved one of the closest presidential elections in United States history at that time. This case concerned the 2000 presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore. After Gore won the popular vote, the election's outcome was contingent upon Florida and its twenty-five electoral votes. After Gore requested a recount of votes, the Florida Supreme Court held that the recount procedures were constitutional. In a per curium opinion, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Florida Supreme Court, holding that the scheme for recounting ballots was unconstitutional. The Court found that even if the recount was fair in theory, it was unfair in practice because the factual record suggested that different standards were applied from ballot to ballot, precinct to precinct, and county to county. Therefore, the scheme violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thus, with this decision, Bush became the first president since Benjamin Harris in 1888 to lose the popular vote but win the general election.  Justices Ginsburg and Stevens (writing separately) argued that for reasons of federalism, the Florida Supreme Court's decision ought to be respected. This is one of the rare occasions where Justice Ginsburg rejected an Equal Protection Clause argument in one of her opinions.  Professor Rick Hasen, of the University of California, Irvine, joined by Patterson Belknap attorneys, Michelle Bufano and Alejandro Cruz, discuss this case and Justice Ginsburg's unique take on federalism over the Equal Protection Clause.    Related Resources: For a selection of Justice Ginsburg's writings, see Decisions and Dissents of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg:  A Selection, edited by Corey Brettschneider. For more information about Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, see  www.pbwt.com. For information about becoming a guest on Notorious, email Michelle Bufano. For questions or more information about Notorious, email Jenni Dickson. Also, check out the Patterson Belknap podcast, How to Build A Nation in 15 Weeks. Related People: Rick Hasen Michelle Bufano Alejandro Cruz

When Ted Olson argued Bush v Gore before the Supreme Court, it was one of the most important and historic moments in recent legal history. On this episode of “The Two Teds,” Olson and Ted Boutrous take a deep dive and explain what it took to manage the sprawling legal team and prepare for arguments. They also tackle the most recent election and draw parallels – and differences – between the 2020 and 2000 elections.  

Episode 240. Topic: Bush v. Gore. Theme: US Supreme Court cases. How did George W. Bush win the presidential election in the year 2000? And why is this case still so controversial?

Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Stanford University Political Science Professor Larry Diamond is a renowned expert on democracy around the world. In late November of last year, he penned a New York Times essay that said, "The vulnerability of our democracy today doesn’t come in the form that many feared when Donald Trump was elected in 2016. The good news is that two of the three pillars of American democracy—liberty and the rule of law—endure, even if they have been battered. But the third pillar—free and fair elections—is under far more direct threat than my fellow democracy experts predicted." Dr. Diamond went on to predict that President Trump "might pressure the Republican legislatures in battleground states, like Pennsylvania and Florida, to award him their state’s electors, even if the formal vote-counting machinery ultimately declares a Biden victory in the state. . . . [S]uch a scenario would be far more dire and polarizing than even the Bush v. Gore nightmare of 2000, with an incumbent president threatening fire and brimstone if the election were not handed to him, while signaling violent right-wing extremists to 'stand by' but perhaps no longer 'stand down.' " Dr. Diamond says our democratic electoral system, unlike others in the world, "has no comparable standing authority to investigate national-level corruption, and Congress largely investigates and punishes itself." He says that newer democracies have also taken measures to depoliticize their equivalent of a supreme court, including term limits and a broader consensus on court nominees. But, says Dr. Diamond, none of this occurred to America's founders, and while "throughout most of our history, America’s democratic norms have been strong enough and the outcomes have been clear enough to avoid catastrophic conflict over a national election," that might not be true anymore. Come for an important discussion on what changes may be needed in America's institutions in order to preserve our Democracy. This program is part of The Commonwealth Club’s Future of Democracy Series, supported by Betsy and Roy Eisenhardt. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we are currently hosting all of our live programming via YouTube live stream. This program was recorded via video conference on February 9th, 2021 by the Commonwealth Club of California.

Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Stanford University Political Science Professor Larry Diamond is a renowned expert on democracy around the world. In late November of last year, he penned a New York Times essay that said, "The vulnerability of our democracy today doesn't come in the form that many feared when Donald Trump was elected in 2016. The good news is that two of the three pillars of American democracy—liberty and the rule of law—endure, even if they have been battered. But the third pillar—free and fair elections—is under far more direct threat than my fellow democracy experts predicted." Dr. Diamond went on to predict that President Trump "might pressure the Republican legislatures in battleground states, like Pennsylvania and Florida, to award him their state's electors, even if the formal vote-counting machinery ultimately declares a Biden victory in the state. . . . [S]uch a scenario would be far more dire and polarizing than even the Bush v. Gore nightmare of 2000, with an incumbent president threatening fire and brimstone if the election were not handed to him, while signaling violent right-wing extremists to 'stand by' but perhaps no longer 'stand down.' " Dr. Diamond says our democratic electoral system, unlike others in the world, "has no comparable standing authority to investigate national-level corruption, and Congress largely investigates and punishes itself." He says that newer democracies have also taken measures to depoliticize their equivalent of a supreme court, including term limits and a broader consensus on court nominees. But, says Dr. Diamond, none of this occurred to America's founders, and while "throughout most of our history, America's democratic norms have been strong enough and the outcomes have been clear enough to avoid catastrophic conflict over a national election," that might not be true anymore. Come for an important discussion on what changes may be needed in America's institutions in order to preserve our Democracy. This program is part of The Commonwealth Club's Future of Democracy Series, supported by Betsy and Roy Eisenhardt. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we are currently hosting all of our live programming via YouTube live stream. This program was recorded via video conference on February 9th, 2021 by the Commonwealth Club of California. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Florida Courts have been leading the nation in social media with 90 percent of their jurisdictions utilizing social media platforms. Joining us for this episode we have Craig Waters, who has been credited for this accolade. Waters is the current director of the Public Information Office at the Florida Supreme Court, where he has worked for the last 34 years. He is also an attorney and former journalist. He launched his career in court communications in 1994 when, as a staff attorney, he created the court’s first website.The innovative communications programs he spearheaded included establishing the court’s Public Information Office in 1996, organizing the first gavel-to-gavel livestreams of his court’s oral arguments starting in 1997, founding Florida’s first professional association for court PIOs in 2005, and using social media for court communications starting in 2009. He is best known as the public spokesperson for the Florida Supreme Court during the 36 days of election disputes 20 years ago known to history as Bush v. Gore.

In this episode, Simone and Cass discuss Bush v. Gore, the happenings at the Capital Building and of course, black twitter. Cass unveils her songs of the week naming Scottie Beam by Freddie Gibbs as her Number 1 pick, and Simone teaches us how to make a Mediterranean Frittata! Plus the Black Business shoutout of the week goes to Yam Jewelry (@yam_nyc on insta).

At the request of the Bush campaign, the United States Supreme Court halts the recount mandate in Florida and agrees to hear Bush v. Gore. In this episode, campaign attorneys, journalists, and legal and political analysts discuss the Supreme Court case that decided a presidential election.   This episode features: Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), Former Attorney for George W. Bush Brit Hume, Fox News Senior Political Analyst Bill Hemmer, Host of Bill Hemmer Reports Shannon Bream, Host of FOX News @ Night with Shannon Bream Steve Zack, Attorney for the Gore Campaign Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

December 12 is a significant and oft-infamous date in history. In 1941 it was infamous because of Hitler's vile, terrifying and genocidal pronouncements against Jewish people. In 1987 the date saw the dawn of a new political activist movement. In 2000 it meant an unforgivable, disturbing and coup-enabling U.S. Supreme Court decision (Bush v. Gore). And exactly one year ago today the date saw a Boris Johnson and Conservative landslide rout of the Labour Party in the U.K. General Election. Omar Moore examines December 12 and each of these events. December 12, 2020. Featured in this episode: Bush v. Gore U.S. Supreme Court decision, December 12, 2000: https://bit.ly/347tXWP IMPORTANT— Please phonebank *now* for: Jon Ossoff for Georgia US Senate: https://electjon.com AND Rev. Raphael Warnock for Georgia US Senate: https://votewarnock.com VOTE EARLY! Voting by mail is going on now in Georgia. Early in-person voting starts: December 14. Plus— FULL VIDEO (Nov. 30) THE POLITICRAT podcast episode—a conversation with Professor of Law Dorit Reiss (University of California at Hastings College of Law) about vaccines, coronavirus and ethics. https://bit.ly/3fUL4Qb NOTE: You can now listen to THE POLITICRAT daily podcast free on Audible: https://adbl.co/35MvRNL Latest post at Medium: VICTORY. https://bit.ly/2UkcWU5 MOORE THOUGHTS —The Day After Tomorrow: https://bit.ly/3l5CZdl Omar's film review of “Da 5 Bloods” (bit.ly/37nliju). MOORE THOUGHTS: moore.substack.com. Moore On Medium: medium.com/@omooresf The Politicrat YouTube page: bit.ly/3bfWk6V The Politicrat Facebook page: bit.ly/3bU1O7c The Politicrat blog: politicrat.politics.blog PLEASE SUBSCRIBE to this to this podcast! Follow/tweet Omar at: http://twitter.com/thepopcornreel

Hva holder Trump på med om dagen? Og hva med Bidens kommende administrasjon? I anledning Thanksgiving setter vi oss deretter ned for å snakke om hva vi er takknemlige for når det kommer til amerikansk politikk... 2020 er en podkast fra AmerikanskPolitikk.no og Dagsavisen. I denne episoden, som er sponset av Cappelen Damm, hører du AmerikanskPolitikk.nos Vårin Alme, Sigrid Rege Gårdsvoll og Are Tågvold Flaten, og Nationens Henrik Østensen Heldahl. Støtter du oss via Patreon.com/ampol får du merch i posten og tilgang til spesialutgaver av podkasten.***Tips nevnt rundt bordet:Henrik: Valgnerder på Twitter: @redistrict, @baseballot, @mcimaps, @taniel, @IAstartinglinePodkaster: "Fiasco: Bush v. Gore" og "Deep Bench"Sigrid: Twitter: US Elections Project @electproject, Drew Sawicki @SenhorRaposa, Dave Wasserman @redistrictJohn Dickerson og boka “The Hardest Job in the World”, samt artikkelen “Why you don’t mess around with presidential transitions”The West WingVårin: Tim Albertas "The Inside Story of Michigan’s Fake Voter Fraud Scandal"Podkast: "So You Wanna Be President? With Chris Matthews"Politiske memoarer, som disse.Are: Iowa State FairRichard Ben Cramers "What It Takes"The Almanac of American Politics

On Thursday’s Mark Levin show, we bring you the best of Mark Levin! The reporting on the Trump campaign's legal challenges is just as bad as the reporting on the Russia hoax. CNN and MSNBC don't care about the facts at all. America deserves better. There are two types of challenges being brought: Constitutional challenges citing the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause as referenced by SCOTUS in Bush v. Gore; if there's disparate treatment of votes it's unfair. Period.   Also, regarding election evidence and those ignorant of civil litigation, expedited discovery can be ordered by the court as an immediate remedy. Discovery has not even occurred in this case. Affidavits from credible individuals that raise a reasonable question are enough to establish a need for expedited discovery per the rules of civil procedure. Concerning the Constitutional challenges, per Article II Section II Clause II, each state's legislature has the power over election laws. State courts, County officials, Governors, or their appointees do not. Moreover, all voters must be treated the same under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. How will history remember us during this time? Will history say that we are judicious and wise or that we abdicated our responsibility to protect our republic?  Finally, Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig joins the program to discuss Lessig's column critiquing this program's comments on Article II of the Constitution. Lessig agreed with Mark Levin's point that Article II grants the state legislatures the power over the manner of the selection of electors. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On Thursday’s Mark Levin show, we bring you the best of Mark Levin! The reporting on the Trump campaign's legal challenges is just as bad as the reporting on the Russia hoax. CNN and MSNBC don't care about the facts at all. America deserves better. There are two types of challenges being brought: Constitutional challenges citing the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause as referenced by SCOTUS in Bush v. Gore; if there's disparate treatment of votes it's unfair. Period.   Also, regarding election evidence and those ignorant of civil litigation, expedited discovery can be ordered by the court as an immediate remedy. Discovery has not even occurred in this case. Affidavits from credible individuals that raise a reasonable question are enough to establish a need for expedited discovery per the rules of civil procedure. Concerning the Constitutional challenges, per Article II Section II Clause II, each state's legislature has the power over election laws. State courts, County officials, Governors, or their appointees do not. Moreover, all voters must be treated the same under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. How will history remember us during this time? Will history say that we are judicious and wise or that we abdicated our responsibility to protect our republic?  Finally, Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig joins the program to discuss Lessig's column critiquing this program's comments on Article II of the Constitution. Lessig agreed with Mark Levin's point that Article II grants the state legislatures the power over the manner of the selection of electors. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Faith and Culture Contributor Pastor Jeff Logsdon and Zach talk about practicing gratitude and thankfulness, on Thanksgiving Eve. Zach discusses dynamics of Election 2020, how it's different from Bush v. Gore, and where do we go from here.

Noted political consultant and strategist Dick Morris sits down with Greg Kelly to explain why Trump's legal arguments are more than just a stalling tactic. He alleges that the Democrats have spent 20 years plotting a way to steal an election from the American people—they never got over Bush v. Gore. The former Clinton adviser explains why Giuliani's press conferences—lampooned as circuses by the Mainstream Media—are actually "breaking new ground" in the fight to make sure this and every future Presidential Election stays secure and accurate. Morris also delves into the many controversies surrounding Bill Clinton, including details of conversations between the former president and his wife about Clinton's many affairs. This is a can't-miss insiders look into the reality of the Washington Swamp's attack on our very own democratic process. Follow Greg Kelly on: Twitter: https://twitter.com/gregkellyusa Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/gregkellyusa/  Find out more information at:https://gregkellypodcast.com/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On Thursday's Mark Levin Show, the reporting on the Trump campaign's legal challenges is just as bad as the reporting on the Russia hoax. CNN and MSNBC don't care about the facts at all. America deserves better. There are two types of challenges being brought: Constitutional challenges citing the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause as referenced by SCOTUS in Bush v. Gore; if there's disparate treatment of votes it's unfair. Period. Plus, there are Article II challenges with respect to who has the authority to make election laws. This can have an effect on results states across the country. Secondly, there are fraud allegations and the quantity of fraud is not the test. The Trump team has multiple affidavits and there isn't even another case in history that even comes close to having this many sworn affidavits. The mere fact of fraud lends itself to voter disenfranchisement and the Court can create a remedy to address that. Then, Sen. Tom Cotton calls in to highlight the importance of truth in American history, unlike the revisionist charlatans who wrote the 1619 Project. Cotton also pointed out how dangerous consent decrees are to the republic. Afterward, President Trump defied the odds, while not only following the science on coronavirus but making strides in science with Operation Warp Speed to accelerate the China virus vaccine creation and distribution. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

As America awaits the final results of this year’s Presidential Election, Mike Slater takes a look back at another iconic election: Bush vs. Gore 2000.

David Savage, Los Angeles Times, 20th Anniversary of Bush v. Gore SCOTUS Case  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Vi diskuterar domen från Supreme Court som avgjorde presidentvalet i USA 2000, gör kopplingar till det aktuella presidentvalet 2020, och jämför med det svenska valsystemet. Del 2 av 2.

Vi diskuterar domen från Supreme Court som avgjorde presidentvalet i USA 2000, gör kopplingar till det aktuella presidentvalet 2020, och jämför med det svenska valsystemet.

In this episode, Siobhan talks with Charles L. Zelden about the new expanded edition of his book, Bush v. Gore: Exposing the Growing Crisis in American Democracy (University Press of Kansas, 2020). Zelden is a professor in the Department of History and Political Science at Nova Southeastern University's Halmos College of Arts and Sciences, where he teaches courses in history, government and legal studies. Who could forget the Supreme Court's controversial 5-4 decision in Bush v. Gore or the 2000 presidential campaign and election that preceded it? Hanging chads, butterfly ballots, endless recounts, raucous allegations, and a constitutional crisis were all roiled into a confusing and potentially dangerous mix—until the Supreme Court decision allowed George W. Bush to become the 43rd President of the United States, despite losing the popular vote to Al Gore. Praised by scholars and political pundits alike, the original edition of Charles Zelden's book set a new standard for our understanding of that monumental decision. A probing chronicle and critique of the vexing and acrimonious affair, it offered the most accurate and up-to-date analysis of a remarkable episode in American politics. Highly readable, its comprehensive coverage, depth of documentation and detail, and analytic insights remain unrivaled on the subject. In this third expanded edition Zelden offers a powerful history of voting rights and elections in America since 2000. Bush v. Gore exposes the growing crisis by detailing the numerous ways in which the unlearned and wrongly learned “lessons of 2000” have impacted American election law through the growth of voter suppression via legislation and administrative rulings, and, provides a clear warning of how unchecked partisanship arising out of Bush v. Gore threatens to undermine American democracy in general and the 2020 election in particular. Siobhan M. M. Barco, J.D. explores legal history at Princeton University   Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

From the co-creators of Slow Burn comes a podcast documentary about politics, power, and uncertainty hosted by Leon Neyfakh. Fiasco season 1 takes listeners to the contested 2000 election between Al Gore and George W. Bush, and the extraordinary legal battle that unfolded in Florida. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Cross your fingers this election year doesn't turn out like 2000 - if it does, we'll end up in the Supreme Court. Before you head to the polls in November, listen up! --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

This program began in the year 2000 with coverage of the contested election of President George W. Bush. Changes in the following 17 years were supposed to improve the integrity of the electoral process. Is the "guarantee" that every American has the right to vote more — or less — a reality?