Podcasts about diederik stapel

We all hate “urban decay”—graffiti, litter, boarded-up buildings. But does urban decay cause crime? That's the premise of the “broken windows” theory: seeing a dilapidated and poorly-maintained physical environment emboldens criminals.In this episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart discuss the history of, and the evidence for, broken windows theory. The theory has inspired social psychologists, criminologists, and others to do an awful lot of studies—and as we'll discover in this episode, it seems to have inspired scientists to commit a few crimes themselves…The Studies Show is brought to you by Works in Progress magazine. In particular, it's brought to you by this recent article on the world's first electric grid, which is representative of the thoughtful, data-rich, well-written articles on human progress that you'll find everywhere on the main site and its associated Substack.Show notes* Robert Jenrick confronts fare-dodgers on the London Tube…* …and talks about “broken windows” in an interview afterwards* The original “broken windows” article from The Atlantic in 1982* Philip Zimbardo's 1969 article, including the “Bronx vs. Palo Alto” study* Diederik Stapel's 2011 Science article on “coping with chaos”* …and an article about him after his fraud was revealed* The famous Keizer et al. study from 2008 (also in Science)* 2014 article that's highly critical of Keizer's research* 2017 failed replication of Keizer et al.* Useful 2020 review article on the empirical evidence for broken windows theory* 2018 Australian panel study on informal social control and crime* Article arguing NYC had a major crime decline in the 1990s, but that it wasn't through broken-windows policing* Data on homicides in NYC by yearCreditsThe Studies Show is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.thestudiesshowpod.com/subscribe

Babbage, C. (1830). Reflections on the Decline of Science in England: And on Some of Its Causes. B. Fellowes. Sokal, A. D. (1996). Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity. Social Text, 46/47, 217. https://doi.org/10.2307/466856 Grievance studies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair It is legal to own and/or read Mein Kampf in The Netherlands (and Germany). Hand, D. (2007). Deception and dishonesty with data: Fraud in science. Significance, 4(1), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2007.00215.x Gross, C. (2016). Scientific Misconduct. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(Volume 67, 2016), 693–711. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033437 Paolo Macchiarini: https://www.science.org/content/article/macchiarini-guilty-misconduct-whistleblowers-share-blame-new-karolinska-institute The Truth about China's Cash-for-Publication Policy: https://www.technologyreview.com/2017/07/12/150506/the-truth-about-chinas-cash-for-publication-policy/ Claudine Gay plagiarism: https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2024/01/22/harvard-releases-details-of-claudine-gay-investigation/ Many Co-Authors: https://manycoauthors.org/ Paper describing a replication study where students make up data: Azrin, N. H., Holz, W., Ulrich, R., & Goldiamond, I. (1961). The control of the content of conversation through reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 25–30. Francesca Gino defamation case dismissed: https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2024/9/12/judge-dismisses-gino-lawsuit-defamation-charges/ Retractions in Social Influence of the work of Guéguen: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15534510.2024.2431408, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15534510.2024.2431415, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15534510.2024.2431421   Diederik Stapel's book: http://nick.brown.free.fr/stapel/FakingScience-20161115.pdf   Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089193

In 2011, after years of analysing other people's actions, world famous social psychologist Diederik Stapel was suddenly confronted by his own.  Actions that cast a shadow on the world of academia. What is it they say? Don't let the truth get in the way of a good study? A Somethin' Else Production. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

John Bargh, PhD is a Professor of Psychology and Management at Yale University. His name may be familiar because of the replication crisis, but there is so much more to John Bargh than a couple of experiments that were challenged during replication. John has authored more than 100 peer-reviewed articles, chapters in over 30 books, and he founded The ACME lab at Yale in order to research the unconscious and implicit influences on social judgment, motivation, and behavior.  Over the years, his research has focused on embodied cognition effects, or how physical experiences (such as washing one’s hands or holding something warm or rough) influence metaphorically related social variables (like how physical warmth leads to feelings of physical warmth, for example).  Recently, he’s been focused on how social goals and political attitudes can be influenced by the satisfaction of underlying physical-level motivations; for example, how immunization against the flu virus influences attitudes towards immigration as ‘invaders’ of one’s ‘cultural body.’ We feel fortunate to have such a wide-ranging and fun conversation with John and we’re pleased to share his insights and humor with our listeners. If you’ve not subscribed to our Patreon site, please check it out at www.patreon.com/behavioralgrooves. © 2020 Behavioral Grooves   Links John Bargh, PhD: https://psychology.yale.edu/people/john-bargh ACME Lab: https://acmelab.yale.edu/ Bargh & Williams’ Coffee Study: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/suppl/2008/10/23/322.5901.606.DC1/Williams.SOM.pdf Jeff Simpson, PhD: https://twin-cities.umn.edu/content/faculty-profile-jeffry-simpson John Bowlby, PhD: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bowlby Dante Alighieri “The Divine Comedy”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_Comedy Priming: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priming_(psychology) Richard Nisbett, PhD: https://lsa.umich.edu/psych/people/emeriti-faculty/nisbett.html Tim Wilson, PhD: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Wilson Gary Latham, PhD: https://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/FacultyAndResearch/Faculty/FacultyBios/Latham Peter Gollwitzer, PhD: https://as.nyu.edu/psychology/people/faculty.peter-m-gollwitzer.html Howard Gardner, PhD “The Mind’s New Science”: https://www.amazon.com/Minds-New-Science-Cognitive-Revolution/dp/0465046355 “The Effect of Primed Goals on Employee Performance: Implications for Human Resource Management,” Shantz & Latham: https://www-2.rotman.utoronto.ca/facbios/file/37%20-%20Shantz%20&%20Latham%20HRM%202011.pdf On Diederik Stapel’s bad data: “The case of Diederik Stapel”: https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2011/12/diederik-stapel Jeff Greenberg, PhD on “Terror Management Theory”: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/terror-management-theory Sigmund Freud: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud William James: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_James Susan Fiske, PhD: https://psych.princeton.edu/person/susan-fiske Apocalypse of St. Paul: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocalypse_of_Paul The Zeigarnik Effect: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XHpBr0VFcaT8wIUpr-9zMIb79dFMgOVFRxIZRybiftI/edit Feng Shui: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feng_shui Chameleon Effect: https://acmelab.yale.edu/sites/default/files/1999_the_chameleon_effect.pdf Lucien Stryk: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucien_Stryk Adam Grant “Pre-Crastination”: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/opinion/sunday/why-i-taught-myself-to-procrastinate.html Kristen Berman on Behavioral Grooves – Episode 149: https://behavioralgrooves.com/uncategorized/covid-19-crisis-kristen-berman-on-remote-work-quaranteams-and-marinades/ Wim Hof: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wim_Hof Gary Latham on Behavioral Grooves – Episode 147: https://behavioralgrooves.com/episode/gary-latham-phd-goal-setting-prompts-priming-and-skepticism/    Artist Links King Louie & Bo$$ Woo “Gumbo Mobsters” (Drill): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BA1XYIdz3TA&feature=emb_title Jimmy Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Page Robert Plant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Plant Talking Heads “Fear of Music”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear_of_Music Alan Parsons Project “Sirius (Eye in the Sky)”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkC_oi0ksuw YoYo Ma on Bach Cello Suite No. 1 in G Major Prelude: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1prweT95Mo0  

The wisdom of the prudent person is that he understands the road that he walks and knows the end to which it leads. We must not allow foolishness to deceive us or lead us to use deceit in our course of life. Wisdom will help us ensure that our road follows the course of life that leads to living with the fear of Yahweh and not to trouble Illustration: Dutch Social psychologist Diederik Stapel’s falsifying his research Verses: Prov. 14:8 Teacher: Jerry Wierwille If you were blessed by this episode, please consider supporting this podcast by donating at https://spiritandtruthonline.org/donate

The wisdom of the prudent person is that he understands the road that he walks and knows the end to which it leads. We must not allow foolishness to deceive us or lead us to use deceit in our course of life. Wisdom will help us ensure that our road follows the course of life that leads to living with the fear of Yahweh and not to trouble Illustration: Dutch Social psychologist Diederik Stapel’s falsifying his research Verses: Prov. 14:8 Teacher: Jerry Wierwille If you were blessed by this episode, please consider supporting this podcast by donating at https://spiritandtruthonline.org/donate

Those dealing with data must always remember “If you torture data long enough, it will confess to anything.” The answers that computers give must themselves be questioned. Robert J. Marks and Gary Smith address artificial intelligence, spurious correlations, and data research on Mind Matters. Show Notes 01:34 | Introduction to Gary Smith, the Fletcher Jones Professor of Economics at Pomona Read More › Source

Those dealing with data must always remember “If you torture data long enough, it will confess to anything.” The answers that computers give must themselves be questioned. Robert J. Marks and Gary Smith address artificial intelligence, spurious correlations, and data research on Mind Matters. Show Notes 01:34 | Introduction to Gary Smith, the Fletcher Jones Professor of Economics at Pomona… Source

Many key findings in psychological research are under question, as the results of some of its most well-known experiments – such as the marshmallow effect, ego depletion, stereotype threat and the Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment – have proved difficult or impossible to reproduce. This has affected numerous careers and led to bitter recriminations in the academic community. So can the insights of academic psychology be trusted and what are the implications for us all? Featuring contributions from John Bargh, Susan Fiske, John Ioannidis, Brian Nosek, Stephen Reicher, Diederik Stapel and Simine Vazire. Presenter David Edmonds Producer Ben Cooper

Diederik Stapel zoog onderzoeksresultaten uit zijn duim. De Amerikaanse voedingspsycholoog Brian Wansink verloor onlangs zijn hoogleraarschap omdat hij goochelde met getallen. En gisteren kondigde de universiteit Tilburg een onderzoek aan naar een omstreden promotie naar salafisme. Het doet het vertrouwen in de wetenschap geen goed, dit soort zaken. Vanaf aanstaande maandag is er nu een nieuwe versie van de integriteitscode voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek. Wij praten erover met Daniël Lakens, psycholoog en universitair docent aan de Universiteit Eindhoven. Hij zet zich in voor betrouwbaarder onderzoek en geeft les over deze code.

Daniël Lakens is een van de meest uitgesproken figuren in de replicatiebeweging in de wetenschap. In dit eerste deel komen we te spreken over Diederik Stapel, of Daniël wel eens zijn eigen werk heeft gerepliceerd (14:57), Publicatiebias (20:04), het bekendste geval van wetenschappelijke fraude in de politicologie van de afgelopen jaren (30:01), p-waardes en 'p-hacking' (39:55) en het ontstaan van de replicatiebeweging in de psychologie (49:00).

In Adieu God? gaat Tijs van den Brink in gesprek met kerkverlaters. Zij zijn christelijk opgevoed en gingen vroeger naar de kerk. Wat is daarvan over? Bijna drie jaar geleden veranderde Diederik Stapel in een klap van sterwetenschapper in fraudeur. In zijn eerste televisie interview sinds dat moment vertelt Stapel aan presentator Tijs van den Brink over de existentiële crisis die hij doormaakte sinds zijn publieke val. Die crisis leidde tot een zoektocht waarin hij wanhopig gezocht heeft naar vaste grond onder zijn voeten. ‘Ik wilde mezelf uitgummen: was ik er maar niet meer.’ Hij bezoekt kerkdiensten, mediteert, leest in de bijbel en in het werk van mystici, en praat met veel mensen. ‘Mijn grote thema is nu: wat geeft ons houvast? Met alleen ratio houd ik het niet vol.’

Het was een groot wetenschappelijk spektakel vijf jaar geleden in Nederland. Diederik Stapel, internationaal gerenommeerd professor sociale psychologie, valt keihard van zijn pied-de-stal. Al jaren blijkt hij de boel te belazeren. Zijn bevindingen, die in tientallen hoog aangeschreven tijdschriften gepubliceerd zijn, blijken verzonnen.Hij wordt meteen ontslagen uit al zijn academische functies. Na zijn ontmaskering zegt een vriend hem: je bent je onderzoeksdomein kwijt, maar je hebt er voor je hele leven een bij: jezelf. Het zelfonderzoek van de fraudeprof is nu vijf jaar aan de gang. En het ziet ernaar uit dat zijn vriend gelijk krijgt: het zal nog zijn hele leven duren. Vragen, opmerkingen of suggesties voor Iemand zijn welkom op iemand@radio1.be Bekijk het hele podcast-aanbod van Radio 1 op radio1.be/podcasts.

In May this year All in the Mind featured an intriguing Dutch study which reported that when there's a lot of rubbish in the street we're more likely to stereotype other people. Earlier this year it was found that the co author, Diederik Stapel had made up the data. As well as fooling us, he fooled the journal Science. Now the three Dutch universities involved have published their interim report on the extent of his fraud. Claudia talks to Martin Keulemanns, Science Editor at the Dutch broadsheet, the Volkskrant to ask why Stapel was able to get away with it for so long and what questions does his case raise about the way psychological research is conducted. Also in the programme, Claudia reports on an innovative mentoring project in Manchester where people with social phobia, agoraphobia or other anxiety disorders are matched up with volunteer mentors who've been through, and are mostly recovered from their own experiences of anxiety. Claudia meets the mentors and mentees who meet once a week for six months and finds out how successful the scheme has been so far. That catchy tune in your head - or earworm - might help to uncover some of the workings of memory. Dr Vicky Williamson who lectures on Music, Mind & Brain at Goldsmiths University of London is studying hundreds of earworms to try to come up with strategies for banishing them. She also explains why her research could help get rid of more intrusive and troubling memories like those resulting from post-traumatic stress disorder.