Podcasts about American Sociological Review

Authors Fabiana Silva, Irene Bloemraad, and Kim Voss discuss the article, "Frame Backfire: The Trouble with Civil Rights Appeals in the Contemporary United States," published in the June 2025 issue of American Sociological Review.

In this episode, we are speaking with Professor Scott Duxbury about his work on group politics and the sociology of punishment.   Scott W. Duxbury is an Associate Professor of sociology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. His research examines social networks, criminal law, mass incarceration, racism, public opinion, drug markets, and computational methods. His work has appeared in American Sociological Review, American Journal of Sociology, and Social Forces, among other outlets.

Author Ioana Sendroiu discusses the article, "Time's Up? How Temporal Maps of Climate Change Shape Climate Action," published in the April 2025 issue of American Sociological Review.

Besure to watch this and every episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/pXpkkT0DyZA Today Dr. Liz Hale and Dr. Dave Schramm sit down with Dr. Brad Wilcox, professor of sociology and Director of the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia. Dr. Wilcox shares compelling research on why marriage matters more today than ever before. They explore key benefits of marriage, including emotional support, financial stability, child well-being, and community strength. He also discusses challenges couples face, such as cohabitation risks, communication struggles, and shifting cultural attitudes toward commitment. This episode provides practical insights for couples navigating the complexities of modern relationships and offers hope for those seeking to build a strong, lasting marriage. About Dr. Wilcox: Freedom Fellow at the Institute for Family Studies, and a nonresident senior fellow atthe American Enterprise Institute. The author of Get Married: Why Americans Should Defy theElites, Forge Strong Families and Save Civilization (Harper Collins, 2024), Wilcox studiesmarriage, fatherhood, and the impact of strong and stable families on men, women, andchildren. Professor Wilcox is the author and coauthor of six books and has written for scientific journalssuch as The American Sociological Review and The Journal of Marriage and Family, as well aspopular outlets like The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Atlantic, and NationalReview. With Nicholas H. Wolfinger, Wilcox is the co-author of Soul Mates: Religion, Sex, Love, andMarriage Among African Americans and Latinos (Oxford, 2016), which shines a spotlight on the lives of strong and happy minority couples. He is also the coauthor of Gender and Parenthood: Biological and Social Scientific Perspectives (Columbia, 2013) with Kathleen Kovner Kline. His research has been featured in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Atlantic, National Review Online, NPR, NBC’s The Today Show, and many other media outlets. Wilcox consults regularly with companies such as Nestle, Procter & Gamble, and Kimberly- Clark on fertility and marriage trends in the United States.As an undergraduate, Wilcox was a Jefferson Scholar at the University of Virginia (’92) and later earned his Ph.D. from Princeton University. Prior to coming to the University of Virginia, he held research fellowships at Princeton University, Yale University, and the Brookings Institution. Insights: Brad: "I think the one extra thing that I would that I would say is just trying to understand and appreciate kind of how you bring something unique to your marriage and family, and how, your spouse brings something unique to I think part of the challenge today is that in a more egalitarian age like ours, there can be kind of like competition or resentment around things not being exactly 5050, you know, in a marriage or family, and trying to just cultivate a sense of like, my wife does this, you know so much better than I do or vice my husband does that. You know so much better than I do. So just cultivating a sense of appreciation for the distinctive gifts andtalents that your spouse brings, and expressing that gratitude for those gifts and talents on regular basis, think is helpful." Liz: "Just say no to cohabiting and just say yes to getting married and staying married." Dave: "It's just a simple message earlier that you talked about, but you know what relation all relationships are going to have struggles. And we talked a little bit about intentionality, right where there it is choosing what to focus on, what to look at, what to text, how to respond. It's more of a kind of a slowing down, learning to respond, instead of react so quickly to things that are going on in the in the relationship, and to offer couples hope. You know, there's hope and happiness. We talk a lot about some doom and gloom, maybe some challenges and struggles that a lot of couples feel, but I really feel like there is, there is hope, sticking to the the basics, some of the basics that we've talked about, holding true to those, to those virtues, or those, those foundational principles. I think that that you've been taught, or maybe haven't been taughtin the home, but you can be a transitional character." Dr. Wilcox Links: Institute For Family Studies: https://ifstudies.org/blog/author/brad-wilcox American Enterprise Institute: https://www.aei.org/profile/w-bradford-wilcox/ Books: Get Married Soul Mates Gender and Parenthood   Visit our site for FREE relationship resources and regular giveaways:  Strongermarriage.org  Podcast.stongermarriage.org Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/strongermarriage/ Facebook Marriage Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/770019130329579 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/strongermarriagelife/   Dr. Dave Schramm: http://drdaveschramm.com http://drdavespeaks.com   Dr. Liz Hale: http://www.drlizhale.com    This episode provides a compassionate and practical guide for anyone seeking to build healthier perspectives around sexuality, reduce shame, and improve intimacy in their relationships. Don't miss this deeply insightful discussion!

Broad, W. J., & Wade, N. (1983). Betrayers of the truth. New York : Simon and Schuster. http://archive.org/details/betrayersoftruth00broa Wolfgang Stroebe, Tom Postmes, & Russell Spears. (2012). Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 670–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460687   Zotero can track if you are citing retractions: https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/12/want-to-check-for-retractions-in-your-personal-library-and-get-alerts-for-free-now-you-can/   100% CI blog: The Untold Mystery of Rogue RA https://www.the100.ci/2024/12/18/rogue-ra/   Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089193   Senior RIKEN scientist involved in stem cell scandal commits suicide https://www.science.org/content/article/senior-riken-scientist-involved-stem-cell-scandal-commits-suicide   Kis, A., Tur, E. M., Lakens, D., Vaesen, K., & Houkes, W. (2022). Leaving academia: PhD attrition and unhealthy research environments. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0274976. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274976

Babbage, C. (1830). Reflections on the Decline of Science in England: And on Some of Its Causes. B. Fellowes. Sokal, A. D. (1996). Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity. Social Text, 46/47, 217. https://doi.org/10.2307/466856 Grievance studies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair It is legal to own and/or read Mein Kampf in The Netherlands (and Germany). Hand, D. (2007). Deception and dishonesty with data: Fraud in science. Significance, 4(1), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2007.00215.x Gross, C. (2016). Scientific Misconduct. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(Volume 67, 2016), 693–711. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033437 Paolo Macchiarini: https://www.science.org/content/article/macchiarini-guilty-misconduct-whistleblowers-share-blame-new-karolinska-institute The Truth about China's Cash-for-Publication Policy: https://www.technologyreview.com/2017/07/12/150506/the-truth-about-chinas-cash-for-publication-policy/ Claudine Gay plagiarism: https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2024/01/22/harvard-releases-details-of-claudine-gay-investigation/ Many Co-Authors: https://manycoauthors.org/ Paper describing a replication study where students make up data: Azrin, N. H., Holz, W., Ulrich, R., & Goldiamond, I. (1961). The control of the content of conversation through reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 25–30. Francesca Gino defamation case dismissed: https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2024/9/12/judge-dismisses-gino-lawsuit-defamation-charges/ Retractions in Social Influence of the work of Guéguen: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15534510.2024.2431408, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15534510.2024.2431415, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15534510.2024.2431421   Diederik Stapel's book: http://nick.brown.free.fr/stapel/FakingScience-20161115.pdf   Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635–659. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089193

Author Joya Misra discusses the article, "Sociological Solutions: Building Communities of Hope, Justice, and Joy," published in the February 2025 issue of American Sociological Review.

Author Ericka S. Weathers discusses the article, "Is Separate Still Unequal? New Evidence on School Segregation and Racial Academic Achievement Gaps," published in the December 2024 issue of American Sociological Review.

Gaslighting is a type of psychological abuse that can make others feel crazy or surreal experiences. This can be detrimental to the health of others. Gaslighting can be a weapon used by many for psychological manipulation. After all, if you can't believe yourself, who can you believe? To help you stay safe from gaslighting and manipulation, here's 6 types of gaslighting to be aware of. Awareness is key! Disclaimer: But please do note, if you can relate to any of these signs, please do not take this feedback as an attack on your character. We here at Psych2Go believe that there is room for growth and improvement for everyone, and we wish to spread awareness about potentially harmful behavior in relation to gaslighting for this article. We also made a video on the common phases used by people who may just be gaslighting you and manipulate you into doing something they want:    • 7 Phrases People Who Gaslight Say   Writer: Max Cabrera Script Editor: Vanessa Tao & Dawn Tan Script Manager: Kelly Soong Voice: Amanda Silvera (   / amandasilvera  ) Animator: Julie Ma (new animator) YouTube Manager: Cindy Cheong References: Abramson, K. (2014). TURNING UP THE LIGHTS ON GASLIGHTING. Philosophical Perspectives, 28, 1–30. www.jstor.org/stable/26614542 Arabi, S. (2017, November 9). 50 shades of gaslighting: Disturbing signs an abuser is twisting your reality [2020 updated]. Thought Catalog. Retrieved from thoughtcatalog.com/shahida-arabi/2017/11/50-shades-of-gaslighting-the-disturbing-signs-an-abuser-is-twisting-your-reality/ Chloe. (2021, March 20). 7 Phrases Gaslighters Often Use. Psych2Go. Retrieved from psych2go.net/7-phrases-gaslighters-often-use/ Hightower, E. (2017). An exploratory study of personality factors related to psychological abuse and gaslighting (Doctoral dissertation, William James College). Merino , A. (n.d.). Gaslighting: What You Need to Know . UTEP. Retrieved from www.utep.edu/healthy-mind/articles/gaslightning.html Psych2Go. (2021). 10 Examples of What Gaslighting Sounds Like. YouTube. Retrieved from    • 10 Examples of What Gaslighting Sound...  . Sweet, P. L. (2019). The Sociology of Gaslighting. American Sociological Review, 84(5), 851–875. doi.org/10.1177/0003122419874843

Namesaking is the practice of naming a child for someone else- usually a close relative. Today, we will be exploring the psychology and impacts of this practice. Sources for this episode: Abel, E. L. (2013), Jr. Naming Etiquette. Names 61(4): 230-238. Bird, A. E. and McAndrew, F. T. (2019), Does Namesaking a Child Influence Attachment Style? North American Journal of Psychology 21(13): 39-44. Busse, T. V., Busse, K. and Busse, M. (1979), Identical First Names for Parent and Child. The Journal of Social Psychology 107(2): 293-294. Cameron, C. (1987), Trouble With Junior: Father-Naming, Child Abuse, and Deliquency. Sociology and Social Research 71(3): 200-204. McAndrew, F. T., King, J. C. and Honoroff, L. R. (2006), A Sociobiological Analysis of Namesaking Patterns in 322 American Families. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32(4): 851-864. McAndrew, F. T. (2022), The namesaking of children as an investment strategy for managing kin relations and bonding fathers to their children. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences 16(3): 220-228. Rossi, A. S. (1965), Naming Children in Middle-Class Families. American Sociological Review 30(4): 499-513. Šaffa, G., Štĕrbová, Z; and Prokop, P. (2021), Parental Investment is Biased toward Children Named for Their Fathers. Human Nature 32: 387-405. Author unknown, Wikipedia (date unknown), Eleanor Roosevelt (online) (Accessed 16/04/2024). Author unknown, Wikipedia (date unknown), Joe Biden (online) (Accessed 15/04/2024). Author unknown, Wikipedia (date unknown), Manila City Council (online) (Accessed 11/04/2024).

Author Mario L. Small discusses the article, "The Avoidance of Strong Ties," published in the August 2024 issue of American Sociological Review.

In this episode, we continue our discussion of replications. We talk about how to analyze replication studies, which studies are worth replicating, and what is the status of replications in other scientific disciplines.    Shownotes Mack, R. W. (1951). The Need for Replication Research in Sociology. American Sociological Review, 16(1), 93–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/2087978 Smith, N. C. (1970). Replication studies: A neglected aspect of psychological research. American Psychologist, 25(10), 970–975. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029774 Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of Scientific Research: Evaluating Experimental Data in Psychology (New edition). Cambridge Center for Behavioral. Ebersole, C. R., Mathur, M. B., Baranski, E., Bart-Plange, D.-J., Buttrick, N. R., Chartier, C. R., Corker, K. S., Corley, M., Hartshorne, J. K., IJzerman, H., Lazarević, L. B., Rabagliati, H., Ropovik, I., Aczel, B., Aeschbach, L. F., Andrighetto, L., Arnal, J. D., Arrow, H., Babincak, P., … Nosek, B. A. (2020). Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920958687 Isager, P. M., van Aert, R. C. M., Bahník, Š., Brandt, M. J., DeSoto, K. A., Giner-Sorolla, R., Krueger, J. I., Perugini, M., Ropovik, I., van 't Veer, A. E., Vranka, M., & Lakens, D. (2023). Deciding what to replicate: A decision model for replication study selection under resource and knowledge constraints. Psychological Methods, 28(2), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000438 Aldhous, P. (2011). Journal rejects studies contradicting precognition. New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20447-journal-rejects-studies-contradicting-precognition/ Stanley, D. J., & Spence, J. R. (2014). Expectations for Replications: Are Yours Realistic? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528518 Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567341 Nosek, B.A., Errington, T.M. (2017) Reproducibility in Cancer Biology: Making sense of replications. eLife 6:e23383. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23383      

In the next two episodes, we will discuss replication studies, which are essential to building reliable scientific knowledge.   Shownotes Mack, R. W. (1951). The Need for Replication Research in Sociology. American Sociological Review, 16(1), 93–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/2087978 Smith, N. C. (1970). Replication studies: A neglected aspect of psychological research. American Psychologist, 25(10), 970–975. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029774 Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of Scientific Research: Evaluating Experimental Data in Psychology (New edition). Cambridge Center for Behavioral. Ebersole, C. R., Mathur, M. B., Baranski, E., Bart-Plange, D.-J., Buttrick, N. R., Chartier, C. R., Corker, K. S., Corley, M., Hartshorne, J. K., IJzerman, H., Lazarević, L. B., Rabagliati, H., Ropovik, I., Aczel, B., Aeschbach, L. F., Andrighetto, L., Arnal, J. D., Arrow, H., Babincak, P., … Nosek, B. A. (2020). Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920958687 Isager, P. M., van Aert, R. C. M., Bahník, Š., Brandt, M. J., DeSoto, K. A., Giner-Sorolla, R., Krueger, J. I., Perugini, M., Ropovik, I., van 't Veer, A. E., Vranka, M., & Lakens, D. (2023). Deciding what to replicate: A decision model for replication study selection under resource and knowledge constraints. Psychological Methods, 28(2), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000438 Aldhous, P. (2011). Journal rejects studies contradicting precognition. New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20447-journal-rejects-studies-contradicting-precognition/ Stanley, D. J., & Spence, J. R. (2014). Expectations for Replications: Are Yours Realistic? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528518 Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567341  

This week on our Father's Day special, we delve into the heart of family and fatherhood. To start, we have Blake Masters, a friend of the show and candidate for Congressional District 8 in Arizona. Blake shares his insights on the pressing concerns of voters in his district, his plans for the military and the border. Then, we're joined by Brad Wilcox, Professor of Sociology and Director of the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia. Brad explores the profound impact of fathers on their children's lives and delves into the importance of strong, stable marriages for societal well-being. Our final guest, Ben Leuschner, President of the Phoenix Police Sergeants and Lieutenants Association, joins to discuss the DOJ targeting local police. To end the show, we have an update on the Karen Read Trial during Kiley's Corner, where she explains what is going on in the Yung Thug case. And finally, we end the show on a positive note with our Sunshine Moment, where Jenna discusses the good in the world.Connect with us:www.breakingbattlegrounds.voteTwitter: www.twitter.com/Breaking_BattleFacebook: www.facebook.com/breakingbattlegroundsInstagram: www.instagram.com/breakingbattlegroundsLinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/breakingbattlegrounds-Show Sponsors:Invest YrefyYrefy offers a secure, collateralized portfolio with a strong, fixed rate of return - up to a 10.25%. There is no attack on your principal if you ever need your money back. You can let your investment compound daily, or take your income whenever you choose. Make sure you tell them Sam and Chuck sent you!Learn more at investyrefy.com4Freedom MobileExperience true freedom with 4Freedom Mobile, the exclusive provider offering nationwide coverage on all three major US networks (Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile) with just one SIM card. Our service not only connects you but also shields you from data collection by network operators, social media platforms, government agencies, and more.Use code ‘Battleground' to get your first month for $9 and save $10 a month every month after.Learn more at: 4FreedomMobile.comDot VoteWith a .VOTE website, you ensure your political campaign stands out among the competition while simplifying how you reach voters.Learn more at: dotvote.vote-About our guests:Blake Masters is a Conservative, America First Republican running to represent Arizona's 8th Congressional District. A father, husband, entrepreneur and bestselling author, Blake was endorsed by President Donald Trump in his 2022 race for U.S. Senate. Blake grew up and attended high school in Arizona before graduating from Stanford University and Stanford Law School. He and his wife, Catherine, have four sons.-Brad Wilcox is Professor of Sociology and Director of the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia, the Future of Freedom Fellow at the Institute for Family Studies, and a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. The author of Get Married: Why Americans Should Defy the Elites, Forge Strong Families and Save Civilization (HarperCollins, 2024), Wilcox studies marital quality, marital stability, and the impact of strong and stable marriages upon men, women, and children. The author and editor of six books, Wilcox has written for scientific journals such as The American Sociological Review and The Journal of Marriage and Family, as well as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Atlantic, and National Review. A Connecticut native, he now lives in Charlottesville, Virginia with his wife and family.-Ben Leuschner has been with the Phoenix Police Department for almost 28 years, over 20 of those as a supervisor.  He worked in nearly every precinct, as well as in investigations.  He has been a member of the Phoenix Police Sergeants and Lieutenants Association Executive Board since 2013 and in that time he has seen the damage that can be caused by an ineffective union and a lack of competent representation.  He has been a PPSLA representative for almost 9 years and, now that he has been elected President, he is committed to providing outstanding representation to PPSLA members and ensuring that PPSLA is transparent, accountable, and responsive to the needs to its members. Get full access to Breaking Battlegrounds at breakingbattlegrounds.substack.com/subscribe

Author Paige L. Sweet discusses the article, "Clustered Vulnerabilities: The Unequal Effects of COVID-19 on Domestic Violence," published in the June 2024 issue of American Sociological Review.

WE GOT US NOW #KeepFamiliesConnected campaign series WELCOME to Season 4 of the WE GOT US NOW Podcast series POWERED by The Just Trust For our 6th annual #KeepFamiliesConnected multimedia campaign series that runs from Mother's Day through Father's Day, WE spotlight voices from our community, and uplift our allies working across the field to create a just and equitable society that seeks to keep justice-impacted families connected. Anna R. Haskins is the Andrew V. Tackes Associate Professor of Sociology and Associate Director of Notre Dame's Initiative on Race and Resilience (IRR). Her research examines how three of America's most powerful social institutions—the education system, the family, and the criminal justice system—connect and interact in ways that both preserve and mitigate social inequality, with emphasis on early educational outcomes, intergenerational impacts, and disparities by race/ethnicity. Her work has been published in the American Sociological Review, Sociology of Education and Social Science Research, among other scholarly outlets, and she is co-editor of a recent book – When Parents are Incarcerated: Interdisciplinary Research and Interventions to Support Children (2018, APA Press). Her research focuses on how a parent's incarceration impacts how they interact with schools and its impact on a child's educational outcomes. Anna is a former elementary school teacher and prior to coming to Notre Dame she was an assistant professor of sociology at Cornell University. In February 2024, Notre Dame Student Government awarded Haskins the Black Excellence Faculty Award to honor her work as an outstanding Black community member. In this episode, Anna shares about her research on children and youth with incarcerated fathers and highlights their optimism, hope and resilience, and the dampening effect that hampers their view of success due to lack of access to resources. This episode is NOT TO BE MISSED! FOR MORE INFORMATION, GO TO: WEGOTUSNOW.org | Instagram | Twitter LISTEN to the WE GOT US NOW Podcast on SPOTIFY, APPLE Podcasts and all podcasts platforms. #WEGOTUSNOW  #10MillionInspired #ChildWellBeing #SocialConnection #Community #MentalHealthMatters #ChildrenwithIncarceratedParents  #keepfamiliesconnected #WeGotUsNowPodcast

In this episode, we discuss objectivity and disinterestedness in science. We talk about norms, values, interests, and objectivity in research practice, peer review, and hiring decisions. Is it possible to be completely objective? Is objectivity a feature of epistemic products or epistemic processes? And most importantly, how would you objectively rate this podcast?   Shownotes Armstrong, J. S. (1979). Advocacy and objectivity in science. Management Science, 25(5), 423–428. Declaration of Interest by Stephen Senn: http://senns.uk/Declaration_Interest.htm Djørup, S., & Kappel, K. (2013). The norm of disinterestedness in science; a restorative analysis. SATS, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/sats-2013-0009 Elliott, K. C. (2017). A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190260804.001.0001 Feyerabend, Paul. "How to defend society against science." Philosophy: Basic Readings (1975): 261-271. Jamieson, K. H., McNutt, M., Kiermer, V., & Sever, R. (2019). Signaling the trustworthiness of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19231–19236. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913039116 Janack, M. (2002). Dilemmas of objectivity. Social Epistemology, 16(3), 267-281. John, S. (2021). Objectivity in science. Cambridge University Press. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press. Mitroff, I. I. (1974). Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094423 Mitroff, I. I. (1974). The subjective side of science: A philosophical inquiry into the psychology of the Apollo moon scientists (First Edition). Elsevier. A Russian polar researcher has been charged trying to stab a colleague to death at a remote Antarctic base https://www.businessinsider.com/sergey-savitsky-alleged-attempted-murder-at-antarctic-bellingshausen-2018-10  Stamenkovic, P. (2023). Facts and objectivity in science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2150807  

Author Walker Nelson Kahn discusses the article, "Safe as Houses: Financialization, Foreclosure, and Precarious Homeownership in the United States," published in the April 2024 issue of American Sociological Review.

A tale of greed, a cursed ancient amulet, and the worst looking mummy of all time. In this episode, we examine Mummy Reborn from 2019. Email: mummymoviepodcast@gmail.com Words and Terms Uraeus - the symbol of a cobra, standing on its tale, and ready to spit fire at any who threaten the pharaoh. This symbol represented Wadjet, the cobra goddess of Lower Egypt. Winged Scarab Beetle Amulet - a type of amulet that became popular in the Late Period of Egypt. These were typically made of Egyptian faience, and were made to link the deceased with the newly born sun. Egypt Faience Items Winged Scarab = https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/552844 Lotiform Chalice - https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/548339 Shabti - https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/561108 Bibliography Cooney, K. M. (2008). Scarab. UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, 1(1). Hart, G. (2005). The Routledge dictionary of Egyptian gods and goddesses. Routledge Ikram, S. (2003). Death and burial in Ancient Egypt. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press IMDB. (2023). The Mummy Reborn. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/?ref_=nv_home IMDB. (2023). The Mummy Rebirth. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/?ref_=nv_home Nicholson, P, T, and Rose, P, J. Egyptian Faience. (2000). In Nicholson. P. T and Shaw. I (Eds), Ancient Egyptian materials and technology. PP. 177-195.Middleton, R. (1962). Brother-sister and father-daughter marriage in ancient Egypt. American Sociological Review, 603-611. Pinch, G. (2003). Ancient Egyptian Magic. University of Texas Press; Univ of Texas PR ed. edition Toivari-Viitala, J. (2013). Marriage and divorce. UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, 1(1). Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

About the Guest(s):Lauren Rivera is an esteemed scholar with a focus on discrimination, specifically hiring discrimination, and the complex interplay between social class, gender, and race in social structures. Specializing in sociology, Rivera's professional expertise extends to studying how various forms of discrimination manifest within societal institutions. In a rare blend of personal experience and academic rigor, she has delved into the topic of disability discrimination in educational access through her recent research article published in the American Sociological Review titled "Not in My Schoolyard: Disability Discrimination in Education Access." As a parent of a child with disabilities, Rivera brings a deeply personal perspective to her work, illuminating the substantial barriers faced by families seeking equitable education for their children.Episode Summary:Lauren Rivera shares groundbreaking findings from her study on principals' discriminatory behavior towards families with children with disabilities. The episode opens up with Rivera recounting her groundbreaking research, where over 20,000 school principals in four states were contacted through a field experiment aimed at uncovering discrimination at the very beginning of educational access – the school tour request process.Rivera's study examined the response rate to emails requesting school tours, varying the presence of an Individualized Education Program (IEP) for the child and the perceived race of the parents. The results were eye-opening, revealing a pervasive pattern of discrimination against children with IEPs, which was significantly more pronounced if the child was also perceived to be from a Black family. The research sheds light not only on the discriminatory challenges encountered before enrollment but also on the stressors such experiences impose on families searching for fitting educational settings for their children.Transcript: https://otter.ai/u/rVp3c8HJOXLHdQtwn4WJWd5N3wMKey Takeaways:School officials are less likely to respond to tour requests for children with IEPs, especially if the parents are perceived as Black.Discrimination in educational access occurs before enrollment, influenced by disability status and race.The experiment suggests principals perceive children with IEPs as resource burdens and Black parents as less involved school community members.Rivera's personal experience as a parent of a child with disabilities adds a poignant layer to the discussion and research findings.Resources:For Students with Disabilities, Discrimination Starts Before They Even Enter School: https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/students-disabilities-discriminationThank you to our sponsor, Brookes Publishing: https://brookespublishing.com/Enter to win a free book from Brookes here: https://bit.ly/brookes-giveaway-0224.MCIE: https://mcie.org/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Authors Julia C. Lerch, David John Frank, and Evan Schofer discuss the article, "The Social Foundations of Academic Freedom: Heterogeneous Institutions in World Society, 1960 to 2022," published in the February 2024 issue of American Sociological Review.

在 YouTube 上看這集：https://youtu.be/xzsCuP1ooLI -- 歲末年終，把家裡／辦公室的老舊延長線，換成超美、性能超強的 Unipapa 快充延長線吧！ ⚡️輸入折扣碼『 壽司坦丁 』有序快充延長線 85 折優惠！

-- 在 YouTube 上看這集：https://youtu.be/twRmVjqqQ3M -- 把握 WORD UP 多益返現計畫的最後訂購機會！12/31 前訂購，三個月內完成課程任務，全額退費！快趁年底前衝刺多益高分吧！https://url.wordup.com.tw/gAw4M -- 訂閱壽司坦丁，別錯過國際上最新、有趣的社會科學研究發現！ 喜歡有畫面感的朋友，也可以在 YouTube 找到壽司坦丁的身影。 -- 壽司坦丁 Sociostanding 的其他精彩影片： 以女代賑：社畜秩序的第一塊拼圖｜Silvia Federici “Caliban and the Witch” https://youtu.be/WEeay11SSbE 基層公務員有「病」：公家機關如何侵蝕道德能力？｜兼談台灣的貧窮治理：「假性脱遊」與「製造低收入戶」 https://youtu.be/zfMtgTNM9Ds 帝國吸納的誘餌：一國兩制為何總是失敗？香港會消失嗎？｜孔誥烽《邊際危城》 https://youtu.be/AHbpfyWJlDE -- 註1：但其實還是很小的樣本，lesbian family 子女共 163，gay 家庭子女共 73，總共 236 註2：美國的非預期懷孕（Unintended Pregnancy）的比例（佔所有懷孕）歷年在 45%-50%。 -- 參考資料 1. Mazrekaj et al. 2020. School Outcomes of Children Raised by Same-Sex Parents: Evidence from Administrative Panel Data. American Sociological Review 82(5): 830-856. 免費全文 Open Access: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0003122420957249 13:59 不過這項研究的樣本包含 1998 年開放伴侶註記（registered partnership）後生下的孩子 2. Regnerus, Mark. 2012. How Different Are the Adult Children of Parents Who Have Same-Sex Relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study. Social Science Research 41: 752-770. 3. Philip Cohen's blog #Regnerus https://familyinequality.wordpress.com/?s=regnerus 馬里蘭大學的社會學者的 Philip Cohen，簡直是 Regnerus 的虛擬監護人

Read the full transcript here. What interesting social phenomena can be observed at nightclubs? What are "whales" hoping to achieve by spending big at nightclubs? Trying too obviously to increase social status tends to backfire; so how can people buy status without appearing to do so? What do "promoters" gain from these social interactions? How does their work differ from or overlap with sex work? How can they make money without being seen as "gold-diggers"? What ethnicities tend to comprise these nightclub groups? How do wealthy people attempt to navigate the norms of the various elite substrata which expect them both to put their wealth on display and to do so without being ostentatious or gaudy?Ashley Mears is a professor of sociology and women's, gender, and sexuality studies at Boston University, and she's the co-founder of the Ethnographic Cafe and BU's Precarity Lab. She received her BA in sociology from the University of Georgia in 2002 and her PhD in sociology at New York University in 2009. Working primarily at the intersections of economic and cultural sociology and gender, she studies how societies value people and things; she researches value and exchange in the context of labor, beauty, free stuff, elites, consumption, and social media; and she has written on theory and qualitative methods. She has held visiting positions at the University of Amsterdam and the Central European University in Budapest. In 2021-2022, she was a Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study in Budapest. She currently serves on the editorial boards of American Sociological Review and Qualitative Sociology. Learn more about her at her website, ashleymears.com.Further reading:Very Important People: Status and Beauty in the Global Party Circuit by Ashley Mears" The Great Happiness Space: Tale of an Osaka Love Thief " [Read more]

In today's episode, we discuss intellectual vices. How can we tell the difference between justified confidence and unjustified arrogance? How do we deal with feelings of envy or negative comparison with other scientists? What is the difference between building one's career and careerism? And what do we do about scientists who do not care about the truth?    Shownotes Azrin, N. H., Holz, W., Ulrich, R., & Goldiamond, I. (1961). The control of the content of conversation through reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1961.4-25  Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1086/288135   Mitroff, I. I. (1974). Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 39(4), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094423 Susan Blackmore: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Blackmore 

Author Rachel Best discusses the article, "The Stigma of Diseases: Unequal Burden, Uneven Decline," published in the October 2023 issue of American Sociological Review.

GHWCC Global Businesswomen's Pod Video Episode 64 Hear Author of In Too Deep: Class and Mothering in a Flooded Community Rachel Tolbert Kimbro is the Dean for the School of Social Sciences at Rice University and has been a Professor of Sociology since 2007. She was a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholar at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she received interdisciplinary training in population health. Dr. Kimbro has served as a past editorial board member of the Journal of Health and Social Behavior and the American Sociological Review. She has served as associate editor for the Population Research and Policy Review.

GHWCC Global Businesswomen's Pod Episode 64 Hear Author of In Too Deep: Class and Mothering in a Flooded Community Rachel Tolbert Kimbro is the Dean for the School of Social Sciences at Rice University and has been a Professor of Sociology since 2007. She was a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholar at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she received interdisciplinary training in population health. Dr. Kimbro has served as a past editorial board member of the Journal of Health and Social Behavior and the American Sociological Review. She has served as associate editor for the Population Research and Policy Review.          

Author Andrew K. Jorgenson discusses the article, "Guns versus Climate: How Militarization Amplifies the Effect of Economic Growth on Carbon Emissions," published in the June 2023 issue of American Sociological Review.

Kita-Gutscheine beantragen, Kindergeburtstage planen, Vorsorgeuntersuchungen im Blick haben: Besonders wenn Kinder ins Spiel kommen, wird der Organisationsaufwand in Familien immer größer. Und auch wenn Familienbelange zunehmend gleichberechtigter aufgeteilt werden: Bei heterosexuellen Eltern sind es fast immer die Frauen, die diese unsichtbare Arbeit stemmen, das zeigen Forschungsbefunde ganz klar. Doch woran liegt das - und was ließe sich ändern? Wissenschaftsredakteurin Beke Schulmann hat sich mit den soziologischen und psychologischen Erkenntnissen zu Mental Load beschäftigt. Im Gespräch mit Host Lucie Kluth erklärt sie, wie man das Phänomen unsichtbarer Arbeit überhaupt erforschen kann, wie berechtigt der Vorwurf des "Maternal Gate Keeping" ist - und was der Kapitalismus mit all dem zu tun hat. DIE HINTERGRUNDINFORMATIONEN: Comic der Illustratorin Emma | You should have asked. https://english.emmaclit.com/2017/05/20/you-shouldve-asked/. [Aufgerufen am 24. März 2023]. Buch über Mental Load | Cammarata, P.: Raus aus der Mental Load Falle. Weihnheim: Beltz, 2020. Die Ergebnisse Studie der TU Darmstadt zum männlichen Ernährermodell |Koppetsch, C. /Speck, S.: Wenn der Mann kein Ernährer mehr ist. Geschlechterkonflikte in Krisenzeiten. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2015. Studie zu Folgen von Arbeitslosigkeit | Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P.-F., Zeisel, H.: Hans Zeisel, Marie Jahoda, Paul F. Lazarsfeld: Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal. Ein soziographischer Versuch über die Wirkungen langandauernder Arbeitslosigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Edition Suhrkamp, 1975. Buch zur Verteilung von Hausarbeit | Russell, Hochschild, A.: The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home. London: Penguin Books, 2012. Zusammenfassung des Gleichstellungsberichts der Bundesregierung | Gender Care Gap - ein Indikator für die Gleichstellung. https://www.bmfsfj.de/bmfsfj/themen/gleichstellung/gender-care-gap/indikator-fuer-die-gleichstellung/gender-care-gap-ein-indikator-fuer-die-gleichstellung-137294#:~:text=Aus%20dem%20Gutachten%20f%C3%BCr%20den,f%C3%BCr%20unbezahlte%20Sorgearbeit%20als%20M%C3%A4nner [Aufgerufen am 24. März 2023]. Übersicht DeStatis über Verteilung von Elterngeld | Eltern- und Kindergeld. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Soziales/Elterngeld/Tabellen/_tabellen-innen-elterngeld.html [Abgerufen am 24. März 2023]. Studie über das Bild des Familienernährers | VAPRO - You don't need to be Superheroes : Einblicke in die vielfältigen Lebenslagen von Vätern ; Abschlussbericht. https://leopard.tu-braunschweig.de/receive/dbbs_mods_00071776 [Aufgerufen am 24. März 2023]. Studie zur Verteilung von Hausarbeit | Daminger, A.. The Cognitive Dimension of Household Labor. American Sociological Review. 2019,4 : 609-633. Buch über Unsichtbare Arbeit und ihren Hintergrund | Mayer-Ahuja, N. und Nachtwey, O.: Verkannte Leistungsträger:innen: Berichte aus der Klassengesellschaft. Berlin: Edition Suhrkamp, 2021. Studie der Techniker Krankenkasse zum Thema Stress | TK-Stressstudie 2021 „Entspann Dich, Deutschland“. https://www.tk.de/presse/themen/praevention/gesundheitsstudien/tk-stressstudie-2021-2116458 [Aufgerufen am 24. März 2023]. Webseite mit Tipps zum Umgang mit Mental Load | pipedrive: Mental Load: Unsichtbare Arbeitsbelastung für Frauen. https://www.pipedrive.com/de/blog/mental-load [Aufgerufen am 24. März 2023]. Selbst-Test zu Mental Load | Equal Care Day. www.equalcareday.de [Aufgerufen am 24. März 2023].

在 YouTube 上看這集：https://youtu.be/C0MRQ1QHcV4 . 「只要你相信，就一定會實現。」這種聽起來很像雞湯文或魔法玄學的東西，在某些條件下，卻是社會科學在過去一個世紀以來不斷證明的現象。這種被稱為「#自我實現的預言」的現象，在人類個體和集體的層次，都找得到許多例證。 . 這集我之所以把看起來風馬牛不相及的 #台灣缺蛋 和 #矽谷銀行倒閉 放在一起講，並不只是因為這是兩個最近最夯的兩個新聞事件，而是因為它們都是牽涉到「自我實現的預言」的信心危機。 . 透過社會學家和歷史學家的研究，我在這集向大家呈現三種很詭異的情況： 1. 明明存在、卻沒人發現的危機 2. 明明不存在、但大家卻都相信存在的危機 3. 本來不存在、但因為大家都相信、結果因此成真的危機 . 這些研究告訴我們，人類很多時候，根本搞不清楚我們的社會中，現在正在發生什麼。 . 我們以為現在某個事件超嚴重，但三四十年後的研究可能會發現，靠北當時的人為什麼相信一個虛構的危機啊！？ . Cathy Caruth 說：「正是由於歷史在其發生時不可被知曉的特質，歷史才是歷史」（“A history can be grasped only in the very inaccessibility of its occurrence.”）。這些關於危機的研究，似乎間接佐證了這樣的歷史觀。 . 這集的主要參考文獻 1. Fink, Pierre-Christian. 2023. “Caught between Frontstage and Backstage: The Failure of the Federal Reserve to Halt Rule Evasion in the Financial Crisis of 1974.” American Sociological Review 88(1): 24-52. 2. Clemens, Elisabeth S. 2015. “Organizing Powers in Eventful Times.” Social Science History 39(1):1– 24. 3. Zoeller, Christoffer and Nina Bandelj. 2019. “Crisis as Opportunity: Nixon's Announcement to Close the Gold Window.” Socius 5. . 關鍵字: #矽谷銀行, #銀行倒閉, #銀行危機, #銀行擠兌, #金融危機, #金融監管, #危機, #缺蛋, #蛋荒, #囤蛋, #沒蛋, #搶蛋, #禽流感, #政府, #農委會, #雞蛋量, #信心, #聯準會, #美聯儲, #社會科學, #危機社會學, #莫頓, #經濟學, #金融學, #金融界, #社會心理學, #心理學, #社會學, #歷史, #SVB, , #台灣, #台灣缺蛋, #SiliconValleyBank, #FinancialCrisis, #FinancialRegulation, #RegulatoryAgencies, #BankFailure, #BankingCrisis, #Crisis, #Confidence, #eggshortage, #Fed, #federalreserve, #FDIC, #Treasury, #deposit, #self-fulfillingprophecy, #sociologyofcrisis, #sociology, #socialscience, #RobertMerton, #economics, #finance, #socialpsychology, #psychology, #history, #ElisabethClemens, #ChristofferZoeller, #NinaBandelj, #Silvergate, #FirstRepublic, #theGreatDepression, #bankrun, #bank collapse

Authors Daniel Karell, Andrew Linke, Edward Holland, and Edward Hendrickson discuss their article, "“Born for a Storm”: Hard-Right Social Media and Civil Unrest," published in the April 2023 issue of American Sociological Review.

在 YouTube 上看這一集：https://youtu.be/h3p0tObkn98 約炮暈船很遜？女生「天生」就比較難高潮？「性愛分離」是男性的獨有特質？通往女人心的是陰道？（順便幫張愛玲洗白一下，他真的沒有贊同這句話啦⋯⋯） 這一集，我想跟大家介紹一些非常有趣的研究，這些研究圍繞著人類的性行為，這個看起來最趨近原始慾望和生物本能、但其實超級「社會建構」的活動。 這些研究都在研究一種看起來很新、但其實也沒那麼新的性活動：#約炮。跟陌生人發生關係這件事情，其實不是什麼新聞，美國 1960 年代之後就開始吹起 casual sex 的風潮，台灣網路和家用電腦普及之後，2000 年代初期的 #尋夢園聊天室，也比 tinder 世代早了十幾年。 但這些研究覺得有些新的東西正在發生，因為打炮這件事情，本來就牽涉一大堆精細複雜的文化規範。是的，學者們發現的，是約炮這個活動的文化，出現了一些新的發展方向，而這個發展方向，讓不少美國大學生在其中受到傷害。 而且，這些研究也發現，約炮好像未必像它在各種文化渠道中展現的那樣解放，因為很多在 #異性戀 關係中存在的 #性取悅 的分工不平等，在約炮中並沒啥兩樣，有時甚至還更惡化。 一起來聽聽這些研究在說些什麼吧！ 以下是這集提到的一些研究： 1. Wade, Lisa. 2017. American Hookup: The New Culture of Sex on Campus. 2. Bogle, Kathleen. 2008. Hooking Up: Sex, Dating, and Relationships on Campus. 3. Paula England 主持的 Online College Social Life Survey: https://pages.nyu.edu/ocsls/2010/ 4. England 等人用上述資料發在 ASR 的論文：Armstrong et al. 2012. Accounting for Women's Orgasm and Sexual Enjoyment in College Hookups and Relationships. American Sociological Review 77(3): 435-462. 5. Frederick et al. 2018. Differences in Orgasm Frequency Among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Men and Women in a U.S. National Sample. Arch Sex Behav 47(1):273-288. 6. Lin, Ken-Hou, and Jennifer Lundquist. “Mate Selection in Cyberspace: The Intersection of Race, Gender, and Education.” American Journal of Sociology 119(1): 183-215.

In the first instalment of our poignant, hard-hitting series: Gaslight, Gatekeep, Girlboss; Hannah and Maia breakdown "gaslight" and its terrible evolution. From a 1944 psycho-thriller starring Ingrid Bergman about a woman being tormented by her greedy husband, to a catchall for anytime anyone is ever unfriendly to us - the term "gaslight" is now a spectre of what it used to be. In this little series we ask - is this a natural linguistic evolution, or is the cultural abstraction of these words more damaging than we think? Support us on Patreon and get special bonus content! https://www.patreon.com/rehashpodcast Intro and outro song produced by our talented friend Ian Mills: https://linktr.ee/ianmillsmusic SOURCES: Caleb Madison “Are You Using Gaslight Correctly?” (2022), The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/are-you-using-gaslight-correctly/629522/ Ella Feldman, “‘Gaslighting' Is Merriam Webster's Word of the Year”, (2022) Smithsonian Magazine https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/gaslighting-merriam-webster-word-of-the-year-180981203/ Paige L. Sweet, “The Sociology of Gaslighting” (2019), American Sociological Review https://www.jstor.org/stable/48602118 Daniel Kurtzleben, “When Republicans Attack ‘Cancel Culture' What Does It Mean?" (2021), NPR https://www.npr.org/2021/02/10/965815679/is-cancel-culture-the-future-of-the-gop Ben Zimmer (2017) https://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/ads-l/2017-January/145910.html Julie Beck, “The Concept Creep of Emotional Labor” (2018), The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/11/arlie-hochschild-housework-isnt-emotional-labor/576637/ "What is Gaslighting?”, National Domestic Violence Hotline https://www.thehotline.org/resources/what-is-gaslighting/ Chi Luu, “Do You Even Language, Bro? Understanding Why Nouns Become Verbs” (2016), JSTOR Daily https://daily.jstor.org/in-which-we-science-why-nouns-become-verbs-because-language/

In this re-released episode, we dive into, The Awakening, staring Charlton Heston from 1980.Email: Mummymoviepodcast@gmail.comBibliographyAldred, C. (1979). More light on the Ramesside tomb robberies. In J. Ruffle, G. Gaballa, and K. Kitchen (Eds), Glimpses of Ancient Egypt: studies in honour of H. W. Fairman (pp. 96-99). London: Aris and PhillipsCline, E. H. (2006). Thutmose III: a new biography. University of Michigan Press.Kitchen, K, A. (2012). Ramesside inscriptions: translated & annotated: translations. Volume VI. Oxford: BlackwellMiddleton, R. (1962). Brother-sister and father-daughter marriage in ancient Egypt. American Sociological Review, 603-611.Roehrig, C. H., Dreyfus, R., & Keller, C. A. (2005). Hatshepsut, from queen to Pharaoh. Metropolitan Museum of art.The Awakening. Retrieved from https://www.boxofficemojo.com/Wilkinson, R. H., & Reeves, N. (1996). The complete Valley of the Kings: tombs and treasures of Egypt's greatest pharaohs. Thames and Hudson. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Authors Marc Schneiberg and Adam Goldstein discuss their article, "Embracing Market Liberalism? Community Structure, Embeddedness, and Mutual Savings and Loan Conversions to Stock Corporations," published in the Februrary 2023 issue of American Sociological Review.

On this episode of Gender: A Wider Lens, Stella & Sasha sit down with Dr. Michael Biggs, Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Oxford and a Fellow of St Cross College. Dr. Biggs has been key in uncovering vital information that led to the independent Cass Review on GIDS at Tavistock. Biggs has since turned his laser-like focus on the Dutch Protocol and in this episode, he discusses many of the issues with this flawed model. His distinguished body of work includes articles on social movements and collective protest published in all the leading disciplinary journals, including the American Journal of Sociology, American Sociological Review, British Journal of Sociology, and Social Forces. In this conversation, Dr. Biggs tells the story of his experience as a professor in a graduate sociology program when he encountered pushback from students about discussing gender identity from a sociological perspective as part of a classroom exercise. Dr. Biggs has a longstanding history of advocating on behalf of LGBT issues and found himself puzzled when students questioned his intentions. He decided to dig into the literature to try to understand where and how the topic of gender generated such surprising responses from a few of his students. After diving deep into pediatric gender medicine, he continued pursuing investigations into the unreported outcomes for patients at the largest pediatric gender clinic in the world, the Tavistock's Gender Identity Development Services (GIDS). After a lack of response when he requested information from the GIDS directly, Dr. Biggs filed a Freedom of Information request to access data about research and treatment protocols being conducted at the clinic. Ultimately, the buried outcomes of using puberty blockers in children and adolescents were far less than positive. Biggs began to wonder: how was the puberty blocker pathway worthy of its reputation as the “gold standard” for pediatric transgender care? Where was the research to back up that claim? What motivated Michael to dedicate so much effort to learning and reporting on medical experimentation in gender-affirming care? Dr. Biggs describes feeling compelled to a sense of duty and responsibility to use his privilege to fight for academic truth. His pursuit of the truth, along with that of several other key “whistleblowers” from within Tavistock itself, ultimately yielded momentum for the systematic “Cass Review.” The review process took over two years, but the interim findings reported in late 2022 ultimately resulted in the closure of the GIDS clinic.Links:Puberty Blockers and Suicidality in Adolescents Suffering from Gender Dysphoriahttps://rdcu.be/c4YpUThe Dutch Protocol for Juvenile Transsexuals: Origins and Evidencehttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0092623X.2022.2121238?scroll=top&needAccess=true&role=tabGender Trender — 4th wave nowhttps://4thwavenow.com/2018/11/17/wordpress-dumps-gendertrender-gallus-mag-responds/The Wrong Body (video series - viewing requests available from the British Film Institute)Part 1 - https://www2.bfi.org.uk/films-tv-people/4ce2b80c5d9ba Part 2 - https://www2.bfi.org.uk/films-tv-people/4ce2b7f121f1bIf you liked this...

In this episode, we dive into, The Awakening, staring Charlton Heston from 1980.Email: Mummymoviepodcast@gmail.comBibliographyAldred, C. (1979). More light on the Ramesside tomb robberies. In J. Ruffle, G. Gaballa, and K. Kitchen (Eds), Glimpses of Ancient Egypt: studies in honour of H. W. Fairman (pp. 96-99). London: Aris and PhillipsCline, E. H. (2006). Thutmose III: a new biography. University of Michigan Press.Kitchen, K, A. (2012). Ramesside inscriptions: translated & annotated: translations. Volume VI. Oxford: BlackwellMiddleton, R. (1962). Brother-sister and father-daughter marriage in ancient Egypt. American Sociological Review, 603-611.Roehrig, C. H., Dreyfus, R., & Keller, C. A. (2005). Hatshepsut, from queen to Pharaoh. Metropolitan Museum of art.The Awakening. Retrieved from https://www.boxofficemojo.com/Wilkinson, R. H., & Reeves, N. (1996). The complete Valley of the Kings: tombs and treasures of Egypt's greatest pharaohs. Thames and Hudson. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Since the fall of 2022, the women of Iran have confronted the authority of the Islamic Republic of Iran after one young woman died in the state's custody. Ali Kadivar views the advocacy of those brave women through the broader struggle for democracy around the world. Kadivar is an Assistant Professor of Sociology and International Studies at Boston College.  He also directs the Middle East Popular Politics Lab at Boston College, which focuses on collecting and analyzing quantitative and qualitative data on various instances of contentious mobilization such as revolutions, wars, civil wars, anti-regime protests, and pro-regime mobilization globally, in the Middle East, and particularly in Iran.  Kadivar's work contributes to political and comparative-historical sociology by exploring the interaction between protest movements and democratization and draws on his experience as a participant-observer of the pro-democracy movement in Iran, but his research agenda moves outward from this case to explore these issues on a global scale, using case studies, comparative-historical methods, and statistical analyses.  His research has been published in the American Sociological Review, Social Forces, Comparative Politics, Socius, and Mobilization, and has won awards from the Collective Behavior and Social Movement (CBSM), Comparative Historical Sociology, Global and Transnational Sociology, Sociology of Development, and Peace, War and Social Conflict sections of the American Sociological Association (ASA).  His new book is “Popular Politics and the Path to Durable Democracy,” from Princeton University Press.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

If you're a follower of Jesus today, part of what you “signed up” for was a relationship with God and other people. It's mission-critical that you do. Why don't we do it more often? There are obstacles. Here are the three most significant barriers people tell us: fear, tiredness, and busyness.Fear. We have to talk, open ourselves up, and be vulnerable. That's difficult. It can be scary to let people see us. What if you go out to brunch with that person who asked you to, and they're a weirdo? Or what if they find out you're the weirdo?Tiredness. Fatigue affects every area of your life. Being tired is not just keeping you from going to a group once a week for a couple of months or getting together with a friend.Busyness. We're all busy people. My calendar is jam-packed with things. Your calendar is jam-packed with things. Sarah wrote about this in the last post, which is worth reading: https://madisonchurch.com/community-as-self-care/.No matter the obstacle, when you feel like you need a circle the least is when you need a circle the most. Those who make being in a circle of priority understand biblical wisdom. They know how God has wired them. They understand how they can live their best life, and it is in a community.While in circles, you have people who are there for you. When you fall, you have other people who know you. They know your story. They don't need to be told where you live or what your kids' names are when something happens.Many spend a lot of time building their individual lives. They work hard to get ahead. At some point, we all get exhausted. Some of us burn out. This is when we often give into temptation, which precedes failure. That could be with a relationship, finances, or a career, but it happens and is life-changing in all ways we don't want it to be.A crisis is going to happen to you at some point. If you've lived long enough, you've lived long enough to see it happen a couple of times.According to the American Sociological Review, one in four people say they don't have anyone to talk to. Another 20% said they had one, just one. That likely means half the people reading this have no one or just one person they can talk with.And that just shouldn't be.That's not how you were made to live. That's not how God wants you to live. This is why we're doing this series. Half the people randomly polled may not have someone to talk to, but those at MC should have multiple people they can speak with.Sarah challenged you to sign up for a small group. If you still need to do that, do that here: https://madisonchurch.churchcenter.com/groups/small-groups?enrollment=open_signup%2Crequest_to_join%2Cclosed&filter=enrollment.If you already have signed up, the next challenge is to show up. A little common sense here. You signed up, and now you gotta show up.Our mission at MC is to connect people with God and each other, and one hour a week isn't gonna get it done. We need these between Sunday moments.When we look back at the life of Jesus, we see that Jesus spent time with people. If there was anybody who could have gotten away with being lonely and isolated, it would have been Jesus, but he was consistently in a circle. Let's follow his lead.Support the show

This week we speak with Wayne Osgood, a professor emeritus at Penn State University's Department of Sociology and Criminology. Wayne walks us through his early career and how he became a criminologist. Then we talk about one of his signature pieces, a 1996 publication in American Sociological Review, "Routine Activities and Individual Deviant Behavior." Finally, Wayne gives us his thoughts on the field and where we should go moving forward. It was an absolute pleasure to speak with Wayne Osgood.    Wayne has been published in journals such as Criminology, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, and Journal of Research on Adolescence. 

University of Colorado-Boulder professors Jeff York and Brad Werner distill entrepreneurship research into actionable insights while enjoying fine craft beverages. CREATIVE DISTILLATION Jeff York | Associate Professor | Research Director
jeffrey.york@colorado.edu Brad Werner | Instructor | Teaching Director
walter.werner@colorado.edu Deming Center for Entrepreneurship | CU Leeds School of Business
303.492.9018 | deming@colorado.edu -- EPISODE 32: Ethan Poskanzer (CU-Boulder) on Legacy Admissions This week on Creative Distillation, we're still at Beyond the Mountain Brewing in Gunbarrel, Colorado, where Brad and Jeff discuss academic research with Ethan Poskanzer, Assistant Professor at CU's Leeds School of Business, and the author of a paper about why academic organizations (still) prefer legacy admissions. Learn more about our research guest, Ethan Poskanzer, on his faculty page at the Leeds School of Business. https://www.colorado.edu/business/leeds-directory/faculty/ethan-poskanzer His paper, “Through the Front Door: Why Do Organizations (Still) Prefer Legacy Applicants?”, was published in American Sociological Review. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00031224221122889 Learn more about Beyond the Mountain and order merch at: https://beyondthemountainbrewing.com. Learn more about CU's Deming Center for Entrepreneurship:  https://deming.colorado.edu Comments/criticism/suggestions/feedback? We'd love to hear it. Drop us a note at CDpodcast@colorado.edu. Thanks for listening. -
An Analog Digital Arts Production for the Deming Center for Entrepreneurship
 Produced, recorded and edited by Joel Davis "Whiskey Before Breakfast" [Traditional] performed by Jeffrey York and Brad Werner. Recorded, mixed and mastered by George Figgs

The new year approaches. But what if you had to learn a completely new calendar for the coming year? For about a dozen years starting in the late 19th century, France abandoned the Gregorian calendar for an entirely different one. Research:  Alfred, Randy. “Sept. 22, 1792: Day One of Revolutionary Calendar.” Wired. Sept. 22, 2011. https://www.wired.com/2011/09/0922revolutionary-calendar/ Suplee, Curt. “A Brief History of Time-keeping.” Washington Post. Nov. 16, 1994. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1994/11/16/a-brief-history-of-time-keeping/1735193f-0c41-4657-af73-16e7b54a9665/ Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Gregorian calendar". Encyclopedia Britannica, 6 Oct. 2022, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Gregorian-calendar Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "year". Encyclopedia Britannica, 3 Dec. 2015, https://www.britannica.com/science/year Bickerman, E.J. , Ziadeh, Nicola Abdo , Buitenen, J.A.B. van , Proskouriakoff, Tatiana , Schmidt, John D. , Wiesenberg, E.J. , Lin, Chao and Ronan, Colin Alistair. "calendar". Encyclopedia Britannica, 7 Jul. 2022, https://www.britannica.com/science/calendar Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Julian calendar". Encyclopedia Britannica, 1 Jul. 2019, https://www.britannica.com/science/Julian-calendar Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Roman republican calendar". Encyclopedia Britannica, 26 Apr. 2011, https://www.britannica.com/science/Roman-republican-calendar Warren, Howard C. “Psychological Aspects of Calendar Reform.” The Scientific Monthly, vol. 33, no. 5, 1931, pp. 440–42. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/15247 Carrigan, Richard A. “Decimal Time: Unlike the Metric System of Measurements, Decimal Time Did Not Survive the French Revolution. But Is Dividing the Day by Tens a Possibility for the Future?” American Scientist, vol. 66, no. 3, 1978, pp. 305–13. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27848641 Zerubavel, Eviatar. “The French Republican Calendar: A Case Study in the Sociology of Time.” American Sociological Review, vol. 42, no. 6, 1977, pp. 868–77. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2094573 Simon, Ed. “Why the French Revolution's ‘Rational' Calendar Wasn't.” JSTOR Daily. May 23, 2018. https://daily.jstor.org/why-the-french-revolutions-rational-calendar-wasnt/ See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Authors Henrich R. Greve, Huggy Rao, Paul Vicinanza, and Echo Zhou discuss their article, "Online Conspiracy Groups: Micro-Bloggers, Bots, and Coronavirus Conspiracy Talk on Twitter," published in the December 2022 issue of American Sociological Review.

在 YouTube 上看這一集：https://youtu.be/-r-07Rfw9Aw . 你有沒有想過，為什麼我們眼中的「邪教」，總是可以吸引一堆信眾，心甘情願的捐錢供養「師父」？為什麼有人會願意為了宗教所謂的「聖戰」，犧牲自己的生命？我們通常覺得，這些人不是智商超低，就是被神棍洗腦，也就是說，他們的「理性」被剝奪了。但這真的是合理的解釋嗎？ . 最新的科學研究發現，可能會扭轉你對於這些現象的因果認知。在宗教信仰中的人們，很可能不是因為宗教狂熱而去做「不理性」的事情，事實可能剛好相反：人在宗教場域中，如果遭受到一些痛苦，很可能會提高他對這個宗教的認同。這是什麼抖M劇情？請讓壽司坦丁完整介紹給你聽。 . 如果你喜歡我的內容，歡迎到 YouTube 搜尋「壽司坦丁」，你也可以在 Tik-Tok、Medium（如果你是喜歡閱讀文字的朋友）找到我的身影。 . 贊助壽司坦丁，您的支持，讓我可以繼續製作高 CP 值的科學迴轉壽司： SoundOn 贊助連結： https://pay.soundon.fm/podcasts/a2bcd5ee-0216-4f22-92dd-86fa7357905a . 本集主要參考資料： Aksoy, Ozan and Diego Gambetta. 2022. Commitment through Sacrifice: How Longer Ramadan Fasting Strengthens Religiosity and Political Islam. American Sociological Review 87(4): 555-583. Stark and Finke. 2000. *Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion. *University of California Press. Biggs, Michael. 2005. Dying without Killing: Self-Immolations, 1963-2002. Pp. 173-208 in Making Sense of Suicide Missions, edited by Diego Gambetta. Oxford University Press. ----------- 時間軸 (00:00-02:19) 前言：釋廣德「發明」自焚 (02:19-03:15) 釋廣德的行為違反經濟學的「需求法則」 03:15-04:58) 為什麼人會「失去理性」？經濟學的解釋 (04:58-08:09) 社會學的質疑 (08:09-09:24) 心理學的對「不理性」解釋：認知失調 (09:24-12:08) Askoy和Gambetta的「齋戒月」研究 (12:08-end) 結語：壓制某宗教，很可能反而助長那個宗教

Stand Up is a daily podcast. I book,host,edit, post and promote new episodes with brilliant guests every day. Please subscribe now for as little as 5$ and gain access to a community of over 800 awesome, curious, kind, funny, brilliant, generous souls Check out StandUpwithPete.com to learn more Dr Victor Ray is the author of On Critical Race Theory WHY IT MATTERS & WHY YOU SHOULD CARE Professor Ray was born in Pittsburgh and raised in western Pennsylvania. After receiving his bachelor of arts in urban studies at Vassar, he earned his PhD from Duke University in 2014. His work has been published in a number of peer-reviewed journals, including American Sociological Review and The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Dr. Ray is a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and his research has been funded by the Ford Foundation. As an active public scholar, his social and critical commentary has appeared in outlets such as The Washington Post, Newsweek, Harvard Business Review, and Boston Review. Victor Ray currently resides in Iowa City. An alum of 2016 Bernie Sanders presidential campaign, Melissa Byrne is a national campaigner for various progressive organizations. She served on the Democratic National Committee's transition committee and as a former state director for MoveOn.org in Pennsylvania and New Hampshire. Check out all things Jon Carroll Follow and Support Pete Coe Pete on YouTube Pete on Twitter Pete On Instagram Pete Personal FB page Stand Up with Pete FB page  

In this podcast we cover - 1. Mental models on bad jobs and great careers. 2. Nuances of ethnographic study when you are both the subject and the researcher. 3. The experience economy and bodily capital in the world of night clubs. Dr. Ashley Mears in her own words - "Working primarily at the intersections of economic and cultural sociology and gender, I study how societies value people and things. I research value and exchange in the context of labor, beauty, free stuff, elites, consumption, and social media, and I have written on theory and qualitative methods. My work has been funded by the National Science Foundation and the Marion and Jasper Whiting Foundation, and featured in The New York Times, The New Yorker, The Economist, NPR, the BBC, and Chinese Cosmo, among others. I received my BA in sociology from the University of Georgia in 2002, and my PhD in sociology at New York University in 2009. I have held visiting positions at the University of Amsterdam and the Central European University in Budapest. In 2021-22, I was a Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study in Budapest. I serve on the editorial boards of American Sociological Review and Qualitative Sociology. I am a co-founder of the Ethnographic Cafe and BU's Precarity Lab."

This week we're Back in Black! As we speak with Brian Johnson, a professor of criminology and criminal justice at the University of Maryland, about how facial characteristics may or may not help people convicted of doing Dirty Deeds (possibly Done Dirt Cheap)! He answers questions about whether or not judges are Givin the Dog a Bone if they rank higher in things like attractiveness.  Brian has been published in journals like Criminology, American Sociological Review, and Crime and Justice.

In this episode we talk with Dr. Eva Rosen, an Assistant Professor at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy, Dr. Philip Garboden, the HCRC Professor in Affordable Housing Economics, Policy, and Planning at the University of Hawaii Manoa, Dr. Jennifer Cossyleon, a Senior Policy and Advocacy Manager at Community Change Action. Dr. Rosen, Dr. Garboden, and Dr. Cossyleon join us to discuss a recent article published in the American Sociological Review (2021), "Racial Discrimination in Housing: How Landlords use Algorithms and Home Visits to Screen Tenants." The conversation explores their mixed methods approach to research, the different types of landlords in the housing rental market, inequitable screening practices, the importance of understanding intersectional discrimination, and what an equitable approach to matching landlords and tenants might look like. Intro/Closing Song: Free Music Library, YouTube, “Clover 3” URL: www.youtube.com/audiolibrary

Chris Bail is Professor of Sociology, Public Policy, and Data Science at Duke University, where he directs the Polarization Lab. A leader in the emerging field of computational social science, Bail's research examines fundamental questions of social psychology, extremism, and political polarization using social media data, bots, and the latest advances in machine learning.Bail is the recipient of Guggenheim and Carnegie Fellowships. His research appears in top journals, such as Science, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and the American Sociological Review. ContributeA note from Lev:I am a high school teacher of history and economics at a public high school in NYC, and began the podcast to help demystify economics for teachers.  The podcast is now within the top 2% of podcasts worldwide in terms of listeners (per Listen Notes) and individual episodes are frequently listed by The Syllabus (the-syllabus.com) as among the 10 best political economy podcasts of a particular week.  The podcast is reaching thousands of listeners each month.  The podcast seeks to provide a substantive alternative to mainstream economics media; to communicate information and ideas that contribute to equitable and peaceful solutions to political and economic issues; and to improve the teaching of high school and university political economy. I am looking to be able to raise money in order to improve the technical quality of the podcast and website and to further expand the audience through professionally designed social media outreach. I am also hoping to hire an editor. Our goal is to raise $12,000 this year. If you can donate a few dollars each month it will help us reach that goal. And if you know of a family foundation that might be interested in donating to A Correction please be in touch. Thank you! (And a huge thank you to all of the people who have already supported the podcast!)Best, Lev