Podcasts about insurance act

The recent high-profile Income-Allianz saga led to the Singapore government’s unprecedented intervention and a swift amendment of the Insurance Act. That incident also sparked widespread debates about the relevance and role of co-ops in Singapore. Ahead of Singapore’s co-op movement’s centennial milestone later this year, on this episode of Morning Shot, Ang Hin Kee, CEO of the Singapore National Co-operative Federation shares his insights on co-ops and their relevance in today's world. Presented by: Emaad Akhtar & Ryan HuangProduced & Edited by: Yeo Kai Ting (ykaiting@sph.com.sg)Assistant Producer: Muhammad Nazirul AsrarPhoto credits: BT FileSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Steven Devecseri was insured by the respondent Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company of Canada (“RSA”) under a standard motor vehicle policy. Under this policy, Mr. Devecseri was prohibited from operating a motorcycle with any alcohol in his bloodstream. To do so would constitute a policy violation. In 2006, Jeffrey Bradfield, Mr. Devecseri and another were riding their motorcycles. Mr. Devecseri drove onto the wrong side of the road and collided with an automobile. Mr. Devecseri was killed. Mr. Bradfield the automobile driver were injured. RSA engaged an adjuster to investigate the accident. The adjuster obtained the police report, which made no mention of alcohol. The adjuster noted that the coroner's report would confirm whether alcohol had been a factor in the accident, but neither he nor RSA took steps to obtain the report. Mr. Bradfield commenced and later settled an action against Mr. Devecseri's estate and his own insurer for uninsured and underinsured coverage. The other motorcyclist brought a personal injury action against Mr. Devecseri and Mr. Bradfield. RSA retained counsel to defend Mr. Devecseri's estate in both actions. Three years after the accident, RSA became aware that Mr. Devecseri had consumed beer before the accident. It then took steps to obtain the coroner's report, which confirmed that Mr. Devecseri's blood alcohol level was above zero at the time of death. RSA then took the position that the matter was off-coverage and it stopped defending Mr. Devecseri's estate. Mr. Bradfield commenced an action against RSA alleging that it was too late for RSA to take an off-coverage position. He argued that, having defended Mr. Devecseri's estate to the point of examinations for discovery even though it was or should have been aware of the policy breach, RSA had waived Mr. Devecseri's policy breach, or was estopped for denying the coverage. The chambers judge granted the application, finding that RSA's failure to take an off-coverage position after June 2006, and its defence of the claim amounted to a waiver by conduct of Mr. Devecseri's breach of the insurance policy. The Court of Appeal allowed RSA's appeal and dismissed Mr. Bradfield's action. Keywords Insurance - Automobile insurance, Contracts, Estoppel - Insurance - Automobile insurance - Exclusions - Contracts - Waiver - Estoppel - Reasonable investigation of policy breach - Insured caused vehicular accident insured by defendant insurer - Plaintiff injured in accident - Policy prohibited operating vehicle with blood alcohol level above zero - Insurer retained counsel to defend insured's estate - Insurer later obtained coroner's report indicating insured's blood alcohol level was above zero at time of accident - Insurer took off-coverage position - Whether the Court should decide case despite mootness - Whether insurer could use insured's policy breach as a defence to injured party's action - How the Insurance Act scheme interacts with waiver and estoppel with respect to rights under insurance contract - When insurer's assumption and continuation of defence of action is assurance of coverage for purposes of estoppel - If so, what amounts to “detrimental reliance”. Notes (Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave) Disclaimers This podcast is created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada's highest court. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. The original version of this hearing may be found on the Supreme Court of Canada's website. The above case summary was prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch).

LLN (5/25/21) – An Illinois congressman wants to increase your insurance requirements by more than 500%. OOIDA has issued a call to action, and we’ll have the details. Also, we recently covered the story of a compliance officer in Maine who was checking on an OOIDA member’s paper logs and asked for the driver’s GPS for cross-reference. The driver wondered – is that legal? A Texas effort to shield trucking operations from frivolous lawsuits is a step closer to becoming law, while Pennsylvania lawmakers once again try to allow local police to use speed radar. And truckers are used to disappointment with our representatives in Washington. Even when they get something right, it usually includes something disappointing. One Senate committee’s first stab at a highway bill is a good example. 0:00 – Newscast. 10:15 – The legal side of Maine GPS requests. 25:05 – Texas liability reform; Pennsylvania speed radar; call to action. 39:56 – Highway bill: the good, the bad and the ugly.

In the overnight session, the S&P 500 and the Dow closed at all-time highs as worries about rising inflation subsided, while a bigger-than-expected fall in weekly jobless claims and the signing of a  $1.9 trillion stimulus bill into law reinforced expectations of a strong economic recovery. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.58%, the S&P 500 gained 1.04% and the Nasdaq Composite added 2.52%. Following a strong finish for US stocks, its Asian peers also climbed. Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 Index rose 0.8%, Japan’s Topix index advanced 0.2% and South Korea’s Kospi index added 1.3%. Indian markets too looked set top open on a firm footing, amid a firm global setup. The SGX Nifty was trading at 15,420 levels around 7.15 am against Wednesday close of 15,209. However, rising Covid-19 cases in the country, which have led to a lockdown in Nagpur, Maharashtra, could dampen the sentiment on Street. Yet, investors could take heart from the news that Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin has been given the regular emergency use authorisation, putting it on a par with the approval granted to Serum Institute’s Covishield’s. This development could help speed up India's inoculation process. Besides that, investors would also watch out for industrial production data for January and CPI inflation data for February that are slated to be released today. Now, a look at the stock-specific developments that are likely to sway the market today: Insurance stocks are likely to be in focus today after the cabinet has approved changes to the Insurance Act for increasing the foreign direct investment (FDI) limit to 74 per cent from the present 49 per cent. IDBI Bank has been taken out of the PCA framework by the RBI. The bank has provided a written commitment that it would comply with the norms of minimum regulatory capital, net NPA and leverage ratio on an ongoing basis. JSW Steel's crude steel production in February 2021 declined to 13.06 lakh tonnes from 13.20 lakh tonnes in the same month last year. Max Healthcare raises Rs 1,200 crore via the qualified institutional process. REC Ltd and Power Finance Corporation (PFC) have entered into a pact with Bhutan-based Kholongchhu Hydro Energy Ltd (KHEL) to finance a 600-megawatt hydroelectric project at Trashiyangtse in the neighbouring country. Wipro has appointed Pierre Bruno as Chief Executive Officer of its European operations. Lastly, an update on the primary market. Anupam Rasayan's Rs 760 crore IPO would open for subscription today. The company has fixed a price band of Rs 553-555 a share for its initial share sale, which will open for public subscription on March 12 and close on March 16. On Wednesday, it raised Rs 225 crore from anchor investors.

Q&A series part no 127 Podcast Episode #144 of AmitRaj Sharma Show| aaj ke episode me hum uttar denge apne YouTube family ke question ke | Insurance act 1938 section 45| YouTheReal bika hua hai| AmitRaj Sharma kitne pese leta hai| sare prashano ke uttar jannne le liye podcast episode ko ant tak sune| asha karta hu apko apne samay ka mulya prapt hoga. AP apne Question mujhe inche diye hue links pe share kr sakte Hain. Instagram : - https://www.instagram.com/youthereal007/ , AUR FACEBOOK पर APNE QUESTIONS/ प्रशन जरूर भेझे https://m.facebook.com/pg/YouTheReaL.info/reviews/?ref=page_internal&msite_tab_async=1 v धन्यवाद

There are calls for an urgent review of the Insurance Act after the recently approved sale of AMP Life to a tax haven-based life insurance owner that specialises in buying so called 'zombie funds'.

Interview with Prof. Zach Finn of Butler University about PRIA - The Pandemic Risk Insurance Act that we desperately need. Incredibly interesting episode!Prof. Zach Finn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/zachary-finn-msm-arm-ains-b235095/

Episode #65 of YouTheReal Show, In today's episode I am answering the questions of Mr. Rahul Dubey his Questions is | what is life insurance act 1938| and Mr. Sethu Raghu Ram G asked that | does Life insurance premium will be same till the maturity| I had mentioned important details in this episode in a very simple language, To know all detailed information do Listen this podcast Episode till the end and I hope you find some value out of it. Keep asking the question it'll really helpful for all YouTheReal family members. You can send me your question on Instagram and Facebook by below link ⤵️ ⤵️ I love to hear you INSTAGRAM : - https://www.instagram.com/youthereal007/ , Facebook:- https://m.facebook.com/pg/YouTheReaL.info/reviews/?ref=page_internal&msite_tab_async=1 , Who is AmitRaj Sharma? A helping man who is behind YouTheReal and working happily continuously since class 6th and always love to help people with his Real Life Solution & Realistic Motivational approach (startups, Sales Training for Products & services, individual personality growth, Insurance & Financial Planning) as per person NEED And Never afraid of failure & because he strongly believes in Learn & Grow. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/youthereal/message

Welcome to our second episode of Tarion Talks. Last May, Tarion held its 2017 Annual Public Meeting and there were a number of questions about illegal building that were discussed, which led us to select illegal building as the topic for this episode. Just what is illegal building? Almost all new homes sold in Ontario are required by law to be built by a registered builder and be enrolled in the New Home Warranty Program administered by Tarion. Illegal building falls into two buckets: When a builder or vendor who is not registered with Tarion sells a newly built home, and, When a builder -- even one registered with Tarion -- begins construction of a new home without enrolling the home with Tarion. All builders in Ontario must be registered with Tarion. And all builders and vendors of newly built homes must enrol the home with Tarion. But why does this matter? Working with a registered builder is important for new home buyers for a number of reasons: It ensures buyers are aware of the warranty coverage for their new home and that they can turn to Tarion for help. Illegally built homes often do not meet Ontario Building Code standards, which means there could be safety issues. Illegal builders often ignore other laws like Ontario’s Workplace Safety and Insurance Act and the Occupational Health and Safety Act. Illegal building promotes an underground economy and creates unfair competition in the building industry. Illegal builders damage the reputation of reputable, registered builders and the home-building industry. In this episode, we talk more about how Tarion is combatting illegal building in Ontario and what happens to a builder who appears to be building illegally. We also share some of the warning signs that your builder may be building illegally and how to protect yourself and your home. This episode is hosted by Laurie Stephens, Tarion’s Director of Strategic Communications. Her special guest is Tanya Gibson, Director of Enforcement at Tarion. Tune in for our next episode this fall.

This week, we discuss a new Cisco vulnerability, a remote attack on Tesla cars, and the implications of the new Insurance Act on cyber security insurance policies

This week on Hull on Estates, David and Nadia discuss issues that arise surrounding the designation of beneficiaries under the Insurance Act and how they interact with provisions in testamentary documents. If you have any comments, send us an email at or leave a comment on our blog.  

Attorney David Burstein from the law firm Lang Michener in Toronto, Ontario discusses Canada's Insurance Act and an appeal on a coverage matter involving an accident with a parked truck.