Podcasts about msi mmr

In this week's episode, we discuss the management of stage II colon adenocarcinoma, which is defined by a lack of nodal involvement and invasion through the muscularis layer of the colon. If you have not done so already, be sure to check out episode 099 (overview of colorectal cancer) and episode 100 for stage III colon cancer, as we will building on concepts discussed already. Content: - Is there a role for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer patients? - What is the impact on MSI/MMR testing in stage II colon cancer patients? - Is there a role for evaluating circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in colon cancer patients? - Is there a role for immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting?** Want to review the show notes for this episode and others? Check out our website: https://www.thefellowoncall.com/our-episodesLove what you hear? Tell a friend and leave a review on our podcast streaming platforms!Twitter: @TheFellowOnCallInstagram: @TheFellowOnCallListen in on: Apple Podcast, Spotify, and Google Podcast

Go online to PeerView.com/GNU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With the continued expansion of the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific agents or combinations have become crucial. Predictive biomarkers such as measurement of PD-L1 expression and assessment of MSI/MMR or TMB status have an established role in some tumor types and settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results persist, and significant improvements are needed. There is also a need for ways to assess response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings as part of perioperative multimodal management of solid malignancies. Recently, pathologic response assessment has emerged as a potential new gold standard for measurement of impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there has been limited guidance on how to define pathologic response, process and evaluate resected specimens, and report and apply assessment results in the settings of clinical trials and practice. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on current and emerging immunotherapy biomarkers, the rationale for and practicalities of biomarker testing as a guide for immunotherapy selection for different solid tumors, and the nuances of pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, practical guidance is provided to help multidisciplinary coordination of care based on biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment so that more patients receive personalized immunotherapy and experience improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the evidence and rationale for the role of biomarkers to predict and assess response to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic and resectable solid malignancies; Conduct cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment congruent with the latest evidence, requirements, and recommendations; and Personalize cancer immunotherapy treatment and response assessment by collaborating with multidisciplinary care team members to optimally select and interpret biomarkers.

Go online to PeerView.com/GNU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With the continued expansion of the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific agents or combinations have become crucial. Predictive biomarkers such as measurement of PD-L1 expression and assessment of MSI/MMR or TMB status have an established role in some tumor types and settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results persist, and significant improvements are needed. There is also a need for ways to assess response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings as part of perioperative multimodal management of solid malignancies. Recently, pathologic response assessment has emerged as a potential new gold standard for measurement of impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there has been limited guidance on how to define pathologic response, process and evaluate resected specimens, and report and apply assessment results in the settings of clinical trials and practice. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on current and emerging immunotherapy biomarkers, the rationale for and practicalities of biomarker testing as a guide for immunotherapy selection for different solid tumors, and the nuances of pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, practical guidance is provided to help multidisciplinary coordination of care based on biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment so that more patients receive personalized immunotherapy and experience improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the evidence and rationale for the role of biomarkers to predict and assess response to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic and resectable solid malignancies; Conduct cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment congruent with the latest evidence, requirements, and recommendations; and Personalize cancer immunotherapy treatment and response assessment by collaborating with multidisciplinary care team members to optimally select and interpret biomarkers.

Go online to PeerView.com/GNU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With the continued expansion of the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific agents or combinations have become crucial. Predictive biomarkers such as measurement of PD-L1 expression and assessment of MSI/MMR or TMB status have an established role in some tumor types and settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results persist, and significant improvements are needed. There is also a need for ways to assess response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings as part of perioperative multimodal management of solid malignancies. Recently, pathologic response assessment has emerged as a potential new gold standard for measurement of impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there has been limited guidance on how to define pathologic response, process and evaluate resected specimens, and report and apply assessment results in the settings of clinical trials and practice. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on current and emerging immunotherapy biomarkers, the rationale for and practicalities of biomarker testing as a guide for immunotherapy selection for different solid tumors, and the nuances of pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, practical guidance is provided to help multidisciplinary coordination of care based on biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment so that more patients receive personalized immunotherapy and experience improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the evidence and rationale for the role of biomarkers to predict and assess response to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic and resectable solid malignancies; Conduct cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment congruent with the latest evidence, requirements, and recommendations; and Personalize cancer immunotherapy treatment and response assessment by collaborating with multidisciplinary care team members to optimally select and interpret biomarkers.

Go online to PeerView.com/GNU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With the continued expansion of the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific agents or combinations have become crucial. Predictive biomarkers such as measurement of PD-L1 expression and assessment of MSI/MMR or TMB status have an established role in some tumor types and settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results persist, and significant improvements are needed. There is also a need for ways to assess response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings as part of perioperative multimodal management of solid malignancies. Recently, pathologic response assessment has emerged as a potential new gold standard for measurement of impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there has been limited guidance on how to define pathologic response, process and evaluate resected specimens, and report and apply assessment results in the settings of clinical trials and practice. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on current and emerging immunotherapy biomarkers, the rationale for and practicalities of biomarker testing as a guide for immunotherapy selection for different solid tumors, and the nuances of pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, practical guidance is provided to help multidisciplinary coordination of care based on biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment so that more patients receive personalized immunotherapy and experience improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the evidence and rationale for the role of biomarkers to predict and assess response to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic and resectable solid malignancies; Conduct cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment congruent with the latest evidence, requirements, and recommendations; and Personalize cancer immunotherapy treatment and response assessment by collaborating with multidisciplinary care team members to optimally select and interpret biomarkers.

Go online to PeerView.com/GNU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With the continued expansion of the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific agents or combinations have become crucial. Predictive biomarkers such as measurement of PD-L1 expression and assessment of MSI/MMR or TMB status have an established role in some tumor types and settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results persist, and significant improvements are needed. There is also a need for ways to assess response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings as part of perioperative multimodal management of solid malignancies. Recently, pathologic response assessment has emerged as a potential new gold standard for measurement of impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there has been limited guidance on how to define pathologic response, process and evaluate resected specimens, and report and apply assessment results in the settings of clinical trials and practice. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on current and emerging immunotherapy biomarkers, the rationale for and practicalities of biomarker testing as a guide for immunotherapy selection for different solid tumors, and the nuances of pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, practical guidance is provided to help multidisciplinary coordination of care based on biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment so that more patients receive personalized immunotherapy and experience improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the evidence and rationale for the role of biomarkers to predict and assess response to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic and resectable solid malignancies; Conduct cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment congruent with the latest evidence, requirements, and recommendations; and Personalize cancer immunotherapy treatment and response assessment by collaborating with multidisciplinary care team members to optimally select and interpret biomarkers.

Go online to PeerView.com/GNU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With the continued expansion of the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific agents or combinations have become crucial. Predictive biomarkers such as measurement of PD-L1 expression and assessment of MSI/MMR or TMB status have an established role in some tumor types and settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results persist, and significant improvements are needed. There is also a need for ways to assess response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings as part of perioperative multimodal management of solid malignancies. Recently, pathologic response assessment has emerged as a potential new gold standard for measurement of impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there has been limited guidance on how to define pathologic response, process and evaluate resected specimens, and report and apply assessment results in the settings of clinical trials and practice. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on current and emerging immunotherapy biomarkers, the rationale for and practicalities of biomarker testing as a guide for immunotherapy selection for different solid tumors, and the nuances of pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, practical guidance is provided to help multidisciplinary coordination of care based on biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment so that more patients receive personalized immunotherapy and experience improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the evidence and rationale for the role of biomarkers to predict and assess response to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic and resectable solid malignancies; Conduct cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment congruent with the latest evidence, requirements, and recommendations; and Personalize cancer immunotherapy treatment and response assessment by collaborating with multidisciplinary care team members to optimally select and interpret biomarkers.

Go online to PeerView.com/GNU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With the continued expansion of the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific agents or combinations have become crucial. Predictive biomarkers such as measurement of PD-L1 expression and assessment of MSI/MMR or TMB status have an established role in some tumor types and settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results persist, and significant improvements are needed. There is also a need for ways to assess response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings as part of perioperative multimodal management of solid malignancies. Recently, pathologic response assessment has emerged as a potential new gold standard for measurement of impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there has been limited guidance on how to define pathologic response, process and evaluate resected specimens, and report and apply assessment results in the settings of clinical trials and practice. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on current and emerging immunotherapy biomarkers, the rationale for and practicalities of biomarker testing as a guide for immunotherapy selection for different solid tumors, and the nuances of pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, practical guidance is provided to help multidisciplinary coordination of care based on biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment so that more patients receive personalized immunotherapy and experience improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the evidence and rationale for the role of biomarkers to predict and assess response to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic and resectable solid malignancies; Conduct cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment congruent with the latest evidence, requirements, and recommendations; and Personalize cancer immunotherapy treatment and response assessment by collaborating with multidisciplinary care team members to optimally select and interpret biomarkers.

Go online to PeerView.com/GNU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. With the continued expansion of the cancer immunotherapy arsenal, reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific agents or combinations have become crucial. Predictive biomarkers such as measurement of PD-L1 expression and assessment of MSI/MMR or TMB status have an established role in some tumor types and settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results persist, and significant improvements are needed. There is also a need for ways to assess response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings as part of perioperative multimodal management of solid malignancies. Recently, pathologic response assessment has emerged as a potential new gold standard for measurement of impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there has been limited guidance on how to define pathologic response, process and evaluate resected specimens, and report and apply assessment results in the settings of clinical trials and practice. This PeerView educational activity, based on a recent live symposium, focuses on current and emerging immunotherapy biomarkers, the rationale for and practicalities of biomarker testing as a guide for immunotherapy selection for different solid tumors, and the nuances of pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Additionally, practical guidance is provided to help multidisciplinary coordination of care based on biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment so that more patients receive personalized immunotherapy and experience improved outcomes. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the evidence and rationale for the role of biomarkers to predict and assess response to cancer immunotherapy in metastatic and resectable solid malignancies; Conduct cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment congruent with the latest evidence, requirements, and recommendations; and Personalize cancer immunotherapy treatment and response assessment by collaborating with multidisciplinary care team members to optimally select and interpret biomarkers.

Go online to PeerView.com/FTC860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As the cancer immunotherapy arsenal and its impact on patient care continues to expand, it's more important than ever to refine testing for predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection and clinical decisions about treatment. Assessments of PD-L1 expression and MSI/MMR or TMB status have a role in some tumor types and treatment settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results remain, and better predictive tools are needed. There is also an increasing need for new ways to measure response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings in different solid tumors. Pathologic response assessment has emerged as a promising approach for evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in lung, breast, and other cancers. However, limited guidance has been available on how to define and measure pathologic response, and report and apply assessment results. In this educational activity, experts provide up-to-date instruction and practical guidance on how to improve predictive immunotherapy biomarker testing and establish best practices for pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on the evolving evidence, new guidelines, and illustrative case scenarios. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the recommendations and practical considerations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment in different tumors and treatment settings; Perform appropriate immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment to cancer immunotherapies according to the latest evidence, requirements, and best practice recommendations across different tumors and treatment settings; and Implement effective strategies for multidisciplinary communication, collaboration, and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests and pathologic response assessment to guide clinical decision-making across different tumors and treatment settings

Go online to PeerView.com/FTC860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As the cancer immunotherapy arsenal and its impact on patient care continues to expand, it's more important than ever to refine testing for predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection and clinical decisions about treatment. Assessments of PD-L1 expression and MSI/MMR or TMB status have a role in some tumor types and treatment settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results remain, and better predictive tools are needed. There is also an increasing need for new ways to measure response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings in different solid tumors. Pathologic response assessment has emerged as a promising approach for evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in lung, breast, and other cancers. However, limited guidance has been available on how to define and measure pathologic response, and report and apply assessment results. In this educational activity, experts provide up-to-date instruction and practical guidance on how to improve predictive immunotherapy biomarker testing and establish best practices for pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on the evolving evidence, new guidelines, and illustrative case scenarios. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the recommendations and practical considerations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment in different tumors and treatment settings; Perform appropriate immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment to cancer immunotherapies according to the latest evidence, requirements, and best practice recommendations across different tumors and treatment settings; and Implement effective strategies for multidisciplinary communication, collaboration, and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests and pathologic response assessment to guide clinical decision-making across different tumors and treatment settings

Go online to PeerView.com/FTC860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As the cancer immunotherapy arsenal and its impact on patient care continues to expand, it's more important than ever to refine testing for predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection and clinical decisions about treatment. Assessments of PD-L1 expression and MSI/MMR or TMB status have a role in some tumor types and treatment settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results remain, and better predictive tools are needed. There is also an increasing need for new ways to measure response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings in different solid tumors. Pathologic response assessment has emerged as a promising approach for evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in lung, breast, and other cancers. However, limited guidance has been available on how to define and measure pathologic response, and report and apply assessment results. In this educational activity, experts provide up-to-date instruction and practical guidance on how to improve predictive immunotherapy biomarker testing and establish best practices for pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on the evolving evidence, new guidelines, and illustrative case scenarios. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the recommendations and practical considerations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment in different tumors and treatment settings; Perform appropriate immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment to cancer immunotherapies according to the latest evidence, requirements, and best practice recommendations across different tumors and treatment settings; and Implement effective strategies for multidisciplinary communication, collaboration, and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests and pathologic response assessment to guide clinical decision-making across different tumors and treatment settings

Go online to PeerView.com/FTC860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As the cancer immunotherapy arsenal and its impact on patient care continues to expand, it's more important than ever to refine testing for predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection and clinical decisions about treatment. Assessments of PD-L1 expression and MSI/MMR or TMB status have a role in some tumor types and treatment settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results remain, and better predictive tools are needed. There is also an increasing need for new ways to measure response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings in different solid tumors. Pathologic response assessment has emerged as a promising approach for evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in lung, breast, and other cancers. However, limited guidance has been available on how to define and measure pathologic response, and report and apply assessment results. In this educational activity, experts provide up-to-date instruction and practical guidance on how to improve predictive immunotherapy biomarker testing and establish best practices for pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on the evolving evidence, new guidelines, and illustrative case scenarios. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the recommendations and practical considerations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment in different tumors and treatment settings; Perform appropriate immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment to cancer immunotherapies according to the latest evidence, requirements, and best practice recommendations across different tumors and treatment settings; and Implement effective strategies for multidisciplinary communication, collaboration, and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests and pathologic response assessment to guide clinical decision-making across different tumors and treatment settings

Go online to PeerView.com/FTC860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As the cancer immunotherapy arsenal and its impact on patient care continues to expand, it's more important than ever to refine testing for predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection and clinical decisions about treatment. Assessments of PD-L1 expression and MSI/MMR or TMB status have a role in some tumor types and treatment settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results remain, and better predictive tools are needed. There is also an increasing need for new ways to measure response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings in different solid tumors. Pathologic response assessment has emerged as a promising approach for evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in lung, breast, and other cancers. However, limited guidance has been available on how to define and measure pathologic response, and report and apply assessment results. In this educational activity, experts provide up-to-date instruction and practical guidance on how to improve predictive immunotherapy biomarker testing and establish best practices for pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on the evolving evidence, new guidelines, and illustrative case scenarios. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the recommendations and practical considerations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment in different tumors and treatment settings; Perform appropriate immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment to cancer immunotherapies according to the latest evidence, requirements, and best practice recommendations across different tumors and treatment settings; and Implement effective strategies for multidisciplinary communication, collaboration, and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests and pathologic response assessment to guide clinical decision-making across different tumors and treatment settings

Go online to PeerView.com/FTC860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As the cancer immunotherapy arsenal and its impact on patient care continues to expand, it's more important than ever to refine testing for predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection and clinical decisions about treatment. Assessments of PD-L1 expression and MSI/MMR or TMB status have a role in some tumor types and treatment settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results remain, and better predictive tools are needed. There is also an increasing need for new ways to measure response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings in different solid tumors. Pathologic response assessment has emerged as a promising approach for evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in lung, breast, and other cancers. However, limited guidance has been available on how to define and measure pathologic response, and report and apply assessment results. In this educational activity, experts provide up-to-date instruction and practical guidance on how to improve predictive immunotherapy biomarker testing and establish best practices for pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on the evolving evidence, new guidelines, and illustrative case scenarios. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the recommendations and practical considerations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment in different tumors and treatment settings; Perform appropriate immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment to cancer immunotherapies according to the latest evidence, requirements, and best practice recommendations across different tumors and treatment settings; and Implement effective strategies for multidisciplinary communication, collaboration, and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests and pathologic response assessment to guide clinical decision-making across different tumors and treatment settings

Go online to PeerView.com/FTC860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As the cancer immunotherapy arsenal and its impact on patient care continues to expand, it's more important than ever to refine testing for predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection and clinical decisions about treatment. Assessments of PD-L1 expression and MSI/MMR or TMB status have a role in some tumor types and treatment settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results remain, and better predictive tools are needed. There is also an increasing need for new ways to measure response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings in different solid tumors. Pathologic response assessment has emerged as a promising approach for evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in lung, breast, and other cancers. However, limited guidance has been available on how to define and measure pathologic response, and report and apply assessment results. In this educational activity, experts provide up-to-date instruction and practical guidance on how to improve predictive immunotherapy biomarker testing and establish best practices for pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on the evolving evidence, new guidelines, and illustrative case scenarios. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the recommendations and practical considerations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment in different tumors and treatment settings; Perform appropriate immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment to cancer immunotherapies according to the latest evidence, requirements, and best practice recommendations across different tumors and treatment settings; and Implement effective strategies for multidisciplinary communication, collaboration, and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests and pathologic response assessment to guide clinical decision-making across different tumors and treatment settings

Go online to PeerView.com/FTC860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As the cancer immunotherapy arsenal and its impact on patient care continues to expand, it's more important than ever to refine testing for predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection and clinical decisions about treatment. Assessments of PD-L1 expression and MSI/MMR or TMB status have a role in some tumor types and treatment settings, but a number of challenges related to testing and interpretation of results remain, and better predictive tools are needed. There is also an increasing need for new ways to measure response to immunotherapies as they transition to early-stage, curative-intent settings in different solid tumors. Pathologic response assessment has emerged as a promising approach for evaluating the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in lung, breast, and other cancers. However, limited guidance has been available on how to define and measure pathologic response, and report and apply assessment results. In this educational activity, experts provide up-to-date instruction and practical guidance on how to improve predictive immunotherapy biomarker testing and establish best practices for pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy based on the evolving evidence, new guidelines, and illustrative case scenarios. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the recommendations and practical considerations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment in different tumors and treatment settings; Perform appropriate immunotherapy biomarker testing and pathologic response assessment to cancer immunotherapies according to the latest evidence, requirements, and best practice recommendations across different tumors and treatment settings; and Implement effective strategies for multidisciplinary communication, collaboration, and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests and pathologic response assessment to guide clinical decision-making across different tumors and treatment settings

El Dr. Luis Alfonso Romero, oncólogo médico de León, Guanajuato, México, en este episodio de “Pase de visita” abordará un caso clínico de un paciente con un adenocarcinoma colorrectal de colon trasverso metastásico. Como invitados al episodio se encuentran dos médicos residentes mexicanos, el Dr. Gonzalo M. Rodríguez del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología y el Dr. Leonardo Barba del CMN “Siglo XXI” del IMSS, ambos de la Ciudad de México, México; así como el Dr. Saúl Campos, oncólogo médico adscrito al Centro Oncológico Estatal ISSEMyM en Toluca, Estado de México, México, ellos responderán con base en evidencia científica y a su experiencia a 2 interrogantes. El caso trata de hombre de 52 años, que en sus antecedentes cuenta con dos familiares de línea directa de 49 y 42 años con diagnóstico de cáncer colorrectal. El paciente tiene pérdida ponderal de 10 kg en 3 meses (no intencionada) y en sus laboratorios destaca la presencia de anemia normocítica normocrómica. Después de realizarse estudios de colonoscopia y tomografías, se le diagnostica un adenocarcinoma colorrectal de colon trasverso con lesiones metastásicas en hígado en segmentos 1, 2, 4 y 8, a lo que se les pregunta a los médicos: Para el tratamiento de 1L ¿Qué biomarcadores se deben solicitar y cuál es el impacto de estos para la toma de decisiones? Desde el punto de vista de la cirugía oncológica ¿Este paciente sería candidato a un tratamiento de resección de oligometástasis? ¿Cuáles son los criterios quirúrgicos para considerar a un paciente totalmente irresecable, potencialmente resecable e irresecable? Fecha de grabación: 6 y 19 de septiembre, 12 de octubre de 2022. Todos los comentarios emitidos por los participantes son a título personal y no reflejan la opinión de ScienceLink u otros. Se deberá revisar las indicaciones aprobadas en el país para cada uno de los tratamientos y medicamentos comentados. Las opiniones vertidas en este programa son responsabilidad de los participantes o entrevistados, ScienceLink las ha incluido con fines educativos. Este material está dirigido a profesionales de la salud exclusivamente.

El Dr. Juan Carlos Samamé, oncólogo médico adscrito al Hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza, a la Clínica San Felipe y al Centro Oncológico ALIADA, en Lima, Perú, tiene como invitado especial al Dr. Federico Esteso, oncólogo médico adscrito al Instituto Alexander Fleming, en Buenos Aires, Argentina, para desarrollar un caso clínico sobre cáncer de colon presentado por el Dr. Jaime López de Lara, residente de Oncología Médica en el Centro Médico Nacional "20 de Noviembre", en la Ciudad de México, México, en este episodio de Comité de tumores. Dentro de su conversación, los expertos resuelven las siguientes preguntas sobre un caso clínico de una mujer de 62 años con un diagnóstico inicial en enero de 2020 de un adenocarcinoma de colon moderadamente diferenciado y en febrero de 2020 etapificado como un EC IVA: ¿Es válida la terapia de conversión? ¿anti-EGFR? ¿Se debería dejar a los pacientes con terapia de mantenimiento con anti-EGFR? ¿Fluoropirimidina + anti-EGFR? Hoy en día, con los resultados que se tienen de inmunoterapia, ¿Consideraría un estándar la determinación de MSI/MMR para tomar una línea de tratamiento basada en inmunoterapia antes que quimioterapia? En líneas subsecuentes, ¿Cuál sería la mejor opción en 3L? ¿Regorafenib o TAS 102? ¿Existe algún rol actual de la mutación KRAS G12C en líneas subsecuentes para un blanco terapéutico? Participe en el programa mandándonos su caso clínico a ser discutido con un líder de opinión al correo: contacto@sciencelink.com Videograbado: 23 de febrero de 2021 Todos los comentarios emitidos por los participantes son a título personal y no reflejan la opinión de ScienceLink u otros. Se deberá revisar las indicaciones aprobadas en el país para cada uno de los tratamientos y medicamentos comentados. Las opiniones vertidas en este programa son responsabilidad de los participantes o entrevistados, ScienceLink las ha incluido con fines educativos. Este material está dirigido a profesionales de la salud exclusivamente.

Go online to PeerView.com/JEN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, a panel of experts discuss clinical decision-making, current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing, and the potential utility of such testing in improving disease management and clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest clinical data informing the use of available targeted, immune, and chemotherapeutic agents in upfront and recurrent settings for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Summarize key clinical trial data on emerging agents and combinations for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, and consider their utility in improving disease management and clinical outcomes, Apply current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing—including testing for RAS and BRAF mutations, MSI/MMR status, HER2 overexpression, and NTRK fusions—to guide the selection of targeted and immune-based therapies for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Implement personalized treatment algorithms for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC—including the consideration of clinical trial enrollment—based on clinical evidence, practice guidelines, and collaboration with members of the care team.

Go online to PeerView.com/JEN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, a panel of experts discuss clinical decision-making, current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing, and the potential utility of such testing in improving disease management and clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest clinical data informing the use of available targeted, immune, and chemotherapeutic agents in upfront and recurrent settings for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Summarize key clinical trial data on emerging agents and combinations for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, and consider their utility in improving disease management and clinical outcomes, Apply current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing—including testing for RAS and BRAF mutations, MSI/MMR status, HER2 overexpression, and NTRK fusions—to guide the selection of targeted and immune-based therapies for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Implement personalized treatment algorithms for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC—including the consideration of clinical trial enrollment—based on clinical evidence, practice guidelines, and collaboration with members of the care team.

Go online to PeerView.com/JEN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, a panel of experts discuss clinical decision-making, current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing, and the potential utility of such testing in improving disease management and clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest clinical data informing the use of available targeted, immune, and chemotherapeutic agents in upfront and recurrent settings for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Summarize key clinical trial data on emerging agents and combinations for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, and consider their utility in improving disease management and clinical outcomes, Apply current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing—including testing for RAS and BRAF mutations, MSI/MMR status, HER2 overexpression, and NTRK fusions—to guide the selection of targeted and immune-based therapies for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Implement personalized treatment algorithms for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC—including the consideration of clinical trial enrollment—based on clinical evidence, practice guidelines, and collaboration with members of the care team.

Go online to PeerView.com/JEN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, a panel of experts discuss clinical decision-making, current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing, and the potential utility of such testing in improving disease management and clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest clinical data informing the use of available targeted, immune, and chemotherapeutic agents in upfront and recurrent settings for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Summarize key clinical trial data on emerging agents and combinations for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, and consider their utility in improving disease management and clinical outcomes, Apply current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing—including testing for RAS and BRAF mutations, MSI/MMR status, HER2 overexpression, and NTRK fusions—to guide the selection of targeted and immune-based therapies for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Implement personalized treatment algorithms for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC—including the consideration of clinical trial enrollment—based on clinical evidence, practice guidelines, and collaboration with members of the care team.

Go online to PeerView.com/JEN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, a panel of experts discuss clinical decision-making, current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing, and the potential utility of such testing in improving disease management and clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest clinical data informing the use of available targeted, immune, and chemotherapeutic agents in upfront and recurrent settings for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Summarize key clinical trial data on emerging agents and combinations for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, and consider their utility in improving disease management and clinical outcomes, Apply current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing—including testing for RAS and BRAF mutations, MSI/MMR status, HER2 overexpression, and NTRK fusions—to guide the selection of targeted and immune-based therapies for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Implement personalized treatment algorithms for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC—including the consideration of clinical trial enrollment—based on clinical evidence, practice guidelines, and collaboration with members of the care team.

Go online to PeerView.com/JEN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, a panel of experts discuss clinical decision-making, current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing, and the potential utility of such testing in improving disease management and clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest clinical data informing the use of available targeted, immune, and chemotherapeutic agents in upfront and recurrent settings for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Summarize key clinical trial data on emerging agents and combinations for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, and consider their utility in improving disease management and clinical outcomes, Apply current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing—including testing for RAS and BRAF mutations, MSI/MMR status, HER2 overexpression, and NTRK fusions—to guide the selection of targeted and immune-based therapies for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Implement personalized treatment algorithms for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC—including the consideration of clinical trial enrollment—based on clinical evidence, practice guidelines, and collaboration with members of the care team.

Go online to PeerView.com/JEN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, a panel of experts discuss clinical decision-making, current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing, and the potential utility of such testing in improving disease management and clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest clinical data informing the use of available targeted, immune, and chemotherapeutic agents in upfront and recurrent settings for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Summarize key clinical trial data on emerging agents and combinations for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, and consider their utility in improving disease management and clinical outcomes, Apply current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing—including testing for RAS and BRAF mutations, MSI/MMR status, HER2 overexpression, and NTRK fusions—to guide the selection of targeted and immune-based therapies for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Implement personalized treatment algorithms for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC—including the consideration of clinical trial enrollment—based on clinical evidence, practice guidelines, and collaboration with members of the care team.

Go online to PeerView.com/JEN860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, a panel of experts discuss clinical decision-making, current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing, and the potential utility of such testing in improving disease management and clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest clinical data informing the use of available targeted, immune, and chemotherapeutic agents in upfront and recurrent settings for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Summarize key clinical trial data on emerging agents and combinations for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, and consider their utility in improving disease management and clinical outcomes, Apply current guideline recommendations for biomarker testing—including testing for RAS and BRAF mutations, MSI/MMR status, HER2 overexpression, and NTRK fusions—to guide the selection of targeted and immune-based therapies for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC, Implement personalized treatment algorithms for patients with advanced/metastatic CRC—including the consideration of clinical trial enrollment—based on clinical evidence, practice guidelines, and collaboration with members of the care team.

Go online to PeerView.com/ZEQ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies and immunotherapy-based combinations have become key components in the cancer treatment arsenal, and testing for predictive biomarkers to refine patient selection is of increasing importance. Assessment of PD-L1 expression plays an essential role in a number of tumor types, determination of MSI/MMR and TMB status has a place in current practice as well, and many other putative biomarkers are undergoing evaluation. To realize the potential of precision immuno-oncology, pathologists and oncologists must come together and establish effective communication and workflows for immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation of results to accurately guide clinical decisions. This PeerView educational activity based on a recent web broadcast highlights important recent advances with immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations in lung, gastrointestinal, and other cancers, and provides practical guidance for implementing biomarker testing in modern pathology and oncology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established and emerging biomarkers and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/ZEQ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies and immunotherapy-based combinations have become key components in the cancer treatment arsenal, and testing for predictive biomarkers to refine patient selection is of increasing importance. Assessment of PD-L1 expression plays an essential role in a number of tumor types, determination of MSI/MMR and TMB status has a place in current practice as well, and many other putative biomarkers are undergoing evaluation. To realize the potential of precision immuno-oncology, pathologists and oncologists must come together and establish effective communication and workflows for immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation of results to accurately guide clinical decisions. This PeerView educational activity based on a recent web broadcast highlights important recent advances with immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations in lung, gastrointestinal, and other cancers, and provides practical guidance for implementing biomarker testing in modern pathology and oncology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established and emerging biomarkers and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/ZEQ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies and immunotherapy-based combinations have become key components in the cancer treatment arsenal, and testing for predictive biomarkers to refine patient selection is of increasing importance. Assessment of PD-L1 expression plays an essential role in a number of tumor types, determination of MSI/MMR and TMB status has a place in current practice as well, and many other putative biomarkers are undergoing evaluation. To realize the potential of precision immuno-oncology, pathologists and oncologists must come together and establish effective communication and workflows for immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation of results to accurately guide clinical decisions. This PeerView educational activity based on a recent web broadcast highlights important recent advances with immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations in lung, gastrointestinal, and other cancers, and provides practical guidance for implementing biomarker testing in modern pathology and oncology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established and emerging biomarkers and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/ZEQ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies and immunotherapy-based combinations have become key components in the cancer treatment arsenal, and testing for predictive biomarkers to refine patient selection is of increasing importance. Assessment of PD-L1 expression plays an essential role in a number of tumor types, determination of MSI/MMR and TMB status has a place in current practice as well, and many other putative biomarkers are undergoing evaluation. To realize the potential of precision immuno-oncology, pathologists and oncologists must come together and establish effective communication and workflows for immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation of results to accurately guide clinical decisions. This PeerView educational activity based on a recent web broadcast highlights important recent advances with immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations in lung, gastrointestinal, and other cancers, and provides practical guidance for implementing biomarker testing in modern pathology and oncology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established and emerging biomarkers and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/ZEQ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies and immunotherapy-based combinations have become key components in the cancer treatment arsenal, and testing for predictive biomarkers to refine patient selection is of increasing importance. Assessment of PD-L1 expression plays an essential role in a number of tumor types, determination of MSI/MMR and TMB status has a place in current practice as well, and many other putative biomarkers are undergoing evaluation. To realize the potential of precision immuno-oncology, pathologists and oncologists must come together and establish effective communication and workflows for immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation of results to accurately guide clinical decisions. This PeerView educational activity based on a recent web broadcast highlights important recent advances with immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations in lung, gastrointestinal, and other cancers, and provides practical guidance for implementing biomarker testing in modern pathology and oncology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established and emerging biomarkers and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/ZEQ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies and immunotherapy-based combinations have become key components in the cancer treatment arsenal, and testing for predictive biomarkers to refine patient selection is of increasing importance. Assessment of PD-L1 expression plays an essential role in a number of tumor types, determination of MSI/MMR and TMB status has a place in current practice as well, and many other putative biomarkers are undergoing evaluation. To realize the potential of precision immuno-oncology, pathologists and oncologists must come together and establish effective communication and workflows for immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation of results to accurately guide clinical decisions. This PeerView educational activity based on a recent web broadcast highlights important recent advances with immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations in lung, gastrointestinal, and other cancers, and provides practical guidance for implementing biomarker testing in modern pathology and oncology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established and emerging biomarkers and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/ZEQ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies and immunotherapy-based combinations have become key components in the cancer treatment arsenal, and testing for predictive biomarkers to refine patient selection is of increasing importance. Assessment of PD-L1 expression plays an essential role in a number of tumor types, determination of MSI/MMR and TMB status has a place in current practice as well, and many other putative biomarkers are undergoing evaluation. To realize the potential of precision immuno-oncology, pathologists and oncologists must come together and establish effective communication and workflows for immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation of results to accurately guide clinical decisions. This PeerView educational activity based on a recent web broadcast highlights important recent advances with immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations in lung, gastrointestinal, and other cancers, and provides practical guidance for implementing biomarker testing in modern pathology and oncology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established and emerging biomarkers and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/ZEQ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies and immunotherapy-based combinations have become key components in the cancer treatment arsenal, and testing for predictive biomarkers to refine patient selection is of increasing importance. Assessment of PD-L1 expression plays an essential role in a number of tumor types, determination of MSI/MMR and TMB status has a place in current practice as well, and many other putative biomarkers are undergoing evaluation. To realize the potential of precision immuno-oncology, pathologists and oncologists must come together and establish effective communication and workflows for immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation of results to accurately guide clinical decisions. This PeerView educational activity based on a recent web broadcast highlights important recent advances with immune checkpoint inhibitors and combinations in lung, gastrointestinal, and other cancers, and provides practical guidance for implementing biomarker testing in modern pathology and oncology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established and emerging biomarkers and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other care team professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/JZJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, so has the importance of predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decisions and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and others. Pathologists play an essential role in carrying out appropriate testing for these biomarkers. This onDemand activity based on a recent live PeerView Virtual Seminar and Workshop provides pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminar segments, an expert panel reviews evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Workshop segments focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals to interpret biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established/emerging biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB, among others) and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/JZJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, so has the importance of predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decisions and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and others. Pathologists play an essential role in carrying out appropriate testing for these biomarkers. This onDemand activity based on a recent live PeerView Virtual Seminar and Workshop provides pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminar segments, an expert panel reviews evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Workshop segments focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals to interpret biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established/emerging biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB, among others) and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/JZJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, so has the importance of predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decisions and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and others. Pathologists play an essential role in carrying out appropriate testing for these biomarkers. This onDemand activity based on a recent live PeerView Virtual Seminar and Workshop provides pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminar segments, an expert panel reviews evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Workshop segments focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals to interpret biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established/emerging biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB, among others) and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/JZJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, so has the importance of predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decisions and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and others. Pathologists play an essential role in carrying out appropriate testing for these biomarkers. This onDemand activity based on a recent live PeerView Virtual Seminar and Workshop provides pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminar segments, an expert panel reviews evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Workshop segments focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals to interpret biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established/emerging biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB, among others) and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/JZJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, so has the importance of predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decisions and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and others. Pathologists play an essential role in carrying out appropriate testing for these biomarkers. This onDemand activity based on a recent live PeerView Virtual Seminar and Workshop provides pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminar segments, an expert panel reviews evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Workshop segments focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals to interpret biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established/emerging biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB, among others) and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/JZJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, so has the importance of predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decisions and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and others. Pathologists play an essential role in carrying out appropriate testing for these biomarkers. This onDemand activity based on a recent live PeerView Virtual Seminar and Workshop provides pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminar segments, an expert panel reviews evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Workshop segments focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals to interpret biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established/emerging biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB, among others) and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/JZJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, so has the importance of predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decisions and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and others. Pathologists play an essential role in carrying out appropriate testing for these biomarkers. This onDemand activity based on a recent live PeerView Virtual Seminar and Workshop provides pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminar segments, an expert panel reviews evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Workshop segments focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals to interpret biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established/emerging biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB, among others) and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/JZJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, so has the importance of predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decisions and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and others. Pathologists play an essential role in carrying out appropriate testing for these biomarkers. This onDemand activity based on a recent live PeerView Virtual Seminar and Workshop provides pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminar segments, an expert panel reviews evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Workshop segments focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals to interpret biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established/emerging biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB, among others) and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/JZJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, so has the importance of predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decisions and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and others. Pathologists play an essential role in carrying out appropriate testing for these biomarkers. This onDemand activity based on a recent live PeerView Virtual Seminar and Workshop provides pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminar segments, an expert panel reviews evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Workshop segments focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals to interpret biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established/emerging biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB, among others) and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/JZJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, so has the importance of predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decisions and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and others. Pathologists play an essential role in carrying out appropriate testing for these biomarkers. This onDemand activity based on a recent live PeerView Virtual Seminar and Workshop provides pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminar segments, an expert panel reviews evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Workshop segments focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals to interpret biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established/emerging biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB, among others) and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/JZJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, so has the importance of predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decisions and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and others. Pathologists play an essential role in carrying out appropriate testing for these biomarkers. This onDemand activity based on a recent live PeerView Virtual Seminar and Workshop provides pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminar segments, an expert panel reviews evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Workshop segments focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals to interpret biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established/emerging biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB, among others) and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/JZJ860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, so has the importance of predictive biomarkers to guide clinical decisions and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from specific immune checkpoint inhibitors or combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and others. Pathologists play an essential role in carrying out appropriate testing for these biomarkers. This onDemand activity based on a recent live PeerView Virtual Seminar and Workshop provides pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminar segments, an expert panel reviews evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Workshop segments focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals to interpret biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Evaluate the latest evidence on established/emerging biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, and TMB, among others) and the rationale for their use to predict benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Apply the latest evidence and recommendations for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding selection and interpretation of immunotherapy biomarker tests to guide clinical decision-making in immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/Precision20?Promocode=860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for pathology practice. This PeerView Live Seminars and Tumor Board symposium will provide participating pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminars segments, our expert panel will review evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Tumor Board will focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals in interpreting biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Characterize the efficacy/safety profiles and clinical roles of current and emerging immunotherapies and combinations across different malignancies, along with relevant biomarker alignments, Evaluate the latest evidence supporting the use of PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, and other emerging biomarkers and multiparametric approaches as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in pathology practice, including companion diagnostic use requirements, benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies, assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Implement best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in collaboration with oncologists and other relevant professionals to guide and refine the use of cancer immunotherapies in current practice

Go online to PeerView.com/Precision20?Promocode=860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for pathology practice. This PeerView Live Seminars and Tumor Board symposium will provide participating pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminars segments, our expert panel will review evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Tumor Board will focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals in interpreting biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Characterize the efficacy/safety profiles and clinical roles of current and emerging immunotherapies and combinations across different malignancies, along with relevant biomarker alignments, Evaluate the latest evidence supporting the use of PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, and other emerging biomarkers and multiparametric approaches as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in pathology practice, including companion diagnostic use requirements, benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies, assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Implement best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in collaboration with oncologists and other relevant professionals to guide and refine the use of cancer immunotherapies in current practice

Go online to PeerView.com/Precision20?Promocode=860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for pathology practice. This PeerView Live Seminars and Tumor Board symposium will provide participating pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminars segments, our expert panel will review evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Tumor Board will focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals in interpreting biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Characterize the efficacy/safety profiles and clinical roles of current and emerging immunotherapies and combinations across different malignancies, along with relevant biomarker alignments, Evaluate the latest evidence supporting the use of PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, and other emerging biomarkers and multiparametric approaches as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in pathology practice, including companion diagnostic use requirements, benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies, assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Implement best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in collaboration with oncologists and other relevant professionals to guide and refine the use of cancer immunotherapies in current practice

Go online to PeerView.com/Precision20?Promocode=860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for pathology practice. This PeerView Live Seminars and Tumor Board symposium will provide participating pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminars segments, our expert panel will review evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Tumor Board will focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals in interpreting biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Characterize the efficacy/safety profiles and clinical roles of current and emerging immunotherapies and combinations across different malignancies, along with relevant biomarker alignments, Evaluate the latest evidence supporting the use of PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, and other emerging biomarkers and multiparametric approaches as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in pathology practice, including companion diagnostic use requirements, benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies, assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Implement best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in collaboration with oncologists and other relevant professionals to guide and refine the use of cancer immunotherapies in current practice

Go online to PeerView.com/Precision20?Promocode=860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for pathology practice. This PeerView Live Seminars and Tumor Board symposium will provide participating pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminars segments, our expert panel will review evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Tumor Board will focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals in interpreting biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Characterize the efficacy/safety profiles and clinical roles of current and emerging immunotherapies and combinations across different malignancies, along with relevant biomarker alignments, Evaluate the latest evidence supporting the use of PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, and other emerging biomarkers and multiparametric approaches as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in pathology practice, including companion diagnostic use requirements, benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies, assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Implement best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in collaboration with oncologists and other relevant professionals to guide and refine the use of cancer immunotherapies in current practice

Go online to PeerView.com/Precision20?Promocode=860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for pathology practice. This PeerView Live Seminars and Tumor Board symposium will provide participating pathology professionals with evidence-based and practical expert instruction on biomarker testing in the era of precision cancer immunotherapy. In the Seminars segments, our expert panel will review evidence on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers, and the Tumor Board will focus on the nuances of applying this evidence to pathology practice, as well as strategies for collaborating with oncology professionals in interpreting biomarker testing results when making clinical decisions for patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Characterize the efficacy/safety profiles and clinical roles of current and emerging immunotherapies and combinations across different malignancies, along with relevant biomarker alignments, Evaluate the latest evidence supporting the use of PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, and other emerging biomarkers and multiparametric approaches as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in pathology practice, including companion diagnostic use requirements, benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies, assays, cutpoints, and other nuances, Implement best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation in collaboration with oncologists and other relevant professionals to guide and refine the use of cancer immunotherapies in current practice

Go online to PeerView.com/UJT860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for clinical practice. This activity provides participating professionals with updates on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers as well as practical guidance for immuno-oncology biomarker testing in pathology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the mechanistic underpinnings and current evidence supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, including thoracic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, dermatologic, and other cancers, Evaluate the rationale for use and current/emerging roles of established and new cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and composite biomarkers) as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies to guide precision treatment decisions, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Establish best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings based on the latest evidence and recommendations, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding cancer biomarker testing and interpretation of results to guide clinical decisions in the precision immuno-oncology era

Go online to PeerView.com/UJT860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for clinical practice. This activity provides participating professionals with updates on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers as well as practical guidance for immuno-oncology biomarker testing in pathology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the mechanistic underpinnings and current evidence supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, including thoracic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, dermatologic, and other cancers, Evaluate the rationale for use and current/emerging roles of established and new cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and composite biomarkers) as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies to guide precision treatment decisions, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Establish best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings based on the latest evidence and recommendations, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding cancer biomarker testing and interpretation of results to guide clinical decisions in the precision immuno-oncology era

Go online to PeerView.com/UJT860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for clinical practice. This activity provides participating professionals with updates on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers as well as practical guidance for immuno-oncology biomarker testing in pathology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the mechanistic underpinnings and current evidence supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, including thoracic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, dermatologic, and other cancers, Evaluate the rationale for use and current/emerging roles of established and new cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and composite biomarkers) as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies to guide precision treatment decisions, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Establish best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings based on the latest evidence and recommendations, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding cancer biomarker testing and interpretation of results to guide clinical decisions in the precision immuno-oncology era

Go online to PeerView.com/UJT860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for clinical practice. This activity provides participating professionals with updates on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers as well as practical guidance for immuno-oncology biomarker testing in pathology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the mechanistic underpinnings and current evidence supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, including thoracic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, dermatologic, and other cancers, Evaluate the rationale for use and current/emerging roles of established and new cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and composite biomarkers) as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies to guide precision treatment decisions, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Establish best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings based on the latest evidence and recommendations, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding cancer biomarker testing and interpretation of results to guide clinical decisions in the precision immuno-oncology era

Go online to PeerView.com/UJT860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for clinical practice. This activity provides participating professionals with updates on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers as well as practical guidance for immuno-oncology biomarker testing in pathology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the mechanistic underpinnings and current evidence supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, including thoracic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, dermatologic, and other cancers, Evaluate the rationale for use and current/emerging roles of established and new cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and composite biomarkers) as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies to guide precision treatment decisions, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Establish best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings based on the latest evidence and recommendations, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding cancer biomarker testing and interpretation of results to guide clinical decisions in the precision immuno-oncology era

Go online to PeerView.com/UJT860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for clinical practice. This activity provides participating professionals with updates on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers as well as practical guidance for immuno-oncology biomarker testing in pathology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the mechanistic underpinnings and current evidence supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, including thoracic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, dermatologic, and other cancers, Evaluate the rationale for use and current/emerging roles of established and new cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and composite biomarkers) as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies to guide precision treatment decisions, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Establish best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings based on the latest evidence and recommendations, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding cancer biomarker testing and interpretation of results to guide clinical decisions in the precision immuno-oncology era

Go online to PeerView.com/UJT860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for clinical practice. This activity provides participating professionals with updates on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers as well as practical guidance for immuno-oncology biomarker testing in pathology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the mechanistic underpinnings and current evidence supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, including thoracic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, dermatologic, and other cancers, Evaluate the rationale for use and current/emerging roles of established and new cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and composite biomarkers) as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies to guide precision treatment decisions, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Establish best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings based on the latest evidence and recommendations, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding cancer biomarker testing and interpretation of results to guide clinical decisions in the precision immuno-oncology era

Go online to PeerView.com/UJT860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Cancer immunotherapies are demonstrating remarkable clinical activity in an increasing number of malignancies, and as the immunotherapy arsenal has continued to expand, it has become clear that reliable biomarkers are needed to guide clinical decisions regarding treatment selection and identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from specific agents or immune-based combinations. A number of proven and putative biomarkers have been and continue to be evaluated, including PD-L1 expression, MSI/MMR, TMB, and others. Testing for these biomarkers has significant implications for clinical practice. This activity provides participating professionals with updates on current and emerging immunotherapies and biomarkers as well as practical guidance for immuno-oncology biomarker testing in pathology practice. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Describe the mechanistic underpinnings and current evidence supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, including thoracic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, dermatologic, and other cancers, Evaluate the rationale for use and current/emerging roles of established and new cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (including PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, LAG-3, and composite biomarkers) as predictors of benefit from cancer immunotherapies to guide precision treatment decisions, Discuss the practical aspects of immunotherapy biomarker testing and interpretation, including benefits/limitations of different testing methodologies/platforms/assays, cut-points, and other nuances, Establish best practices for cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing in community and academic settings based on the latest evidence and recommendations, Implement effective strategies for interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination among pathologists, oncologists, and other key professionals regarding cancer biomarker testing and interpretation of results to guide clinical decisions in the precision immuno-oncology era

Go online to PeerView.com/FQK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As a result of intense research efforts, the foundational understanding of the interplay between cancer and immunity and how to harness it for therapeutic benefit is deepening. As the evidence base grows exponentially, the treatment landscape is becoming more complicated, highlighting the need for precision approaches to maximize the potential of immuno-oncology. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held in San Francisco, CA, experts in immuno-oncology explore the latest evidence and data on the present and future of cancer immunotherapies and biomarkers, debate critical issues, and share practical guidance that you can use in the care of your patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Review the most up-to-date evidence and mechanistic understanding supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, Evaluate the latest evidence on the role and use of established, novel, and emerging cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (eg, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, TILs, LAG-3, composite biomarkers, et cetera), Integrate into practice up-to-date cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing approaches and immune-based therapies/combinations according to the latest evidence, recommendations, and principles of precision immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/FQK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As a result of intense research efforts, the foundational understanding of the interplay between cancer and immunity and how to harness it for therapeutic benefit is deepening. As the evidence base grows exponentially, the treatment landscape is becoming more complicated, highlighting the need for precision approaches to maximize the potential of immuno-oncology. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held in San Francisco, CA, experts in immuno-oncology explore the latest evidence and data on the present and future of cancer immunotherapies and biomarkers, debate critical issues, and share practical guidance that you can use in the care of your patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Review the most up-to-date evidence and mechanistic understanding supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, Evaluate the latest evidence on the role and use of established, novel, and emerging cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (eg, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, TILs, LAG-3, composite biomarkers, et cetera), Integrate into practice up-to-date cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing approaches and immune-based therapies/combinations according to the latest evidence, recommendations, and principles of precision immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/FQK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As a result of intense research efforts, the foundational understanding of the interplay between cancer and immunity and how to harness it for therapeutic benefit is deepening. As the evidence base grows exponentially, the treatment landscape is becoming more complicated, highlighting the need for precision approaches to maximize the potential of immuno-oncology. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held in San Francisco, CA, experts in immuno-oncology explore the latest evidence and data on the present and future of cancer immunotherapies and biomarkers, debate critical issues, and share practical guidance that you can use in the care of your patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Review the most up-to-date evidence and mechanistic understanding supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, Evaluate the latest evidence on the role and use of established, novel, and emerging cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (eg, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, TILs, LAG-3, composite biomarkers, et cetera), Integrate into practice up-to-date cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing approaches and immune-based therapies/combinations according to the latest evidence, recommendations, and principles of precision immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/FQK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As a result of intense research efforts, the foundational understanding of the interplay between cancer and immunity and how to harness it for therapeutic benefit is deepening. As the evidence base grows exponentially, the treatment landscape is becoming more complicated, highlighting the need for precision approaches to maximize the potential of immuno-oncology. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held in San Francisco, CA, experts in immuno-oncology explore the latest evidence and data on the present and future of cancer immunotherapies and biomarkers, debate critical issues, and share practical guidance that you can use in the care of your patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Review the most up-to-date evidence and mechanistic understanding supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, Evaluate the latest evidence on the role and use of established, novel, and emerging cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (eg, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, TILs, LAG-3, composite biomarkers, et cetera), Integrate into practice up-to-date cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing approaches and immune-based therapies/combinations according to the latest evidence, recommendations, and principles of precision immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/FQK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As a result of intense research efforts, the foundational understanding of the interplay between cancer and immunity and how to harness it for therapeutic benefit is deepening. As the evidence base grows exponentially, the treatment landscape is becoming more complicated, highlighting the need for precision approaches to maximize the potential of immuno-oncology. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held in San Francisco, CA, experts in immuno-oncology explore the latest evidence and data on the present and future of cancer immunotherapies and biomarkers, debate critical issues, and share practical guidance that you can use in the care of your patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Review the most up-to-date evidence and mechanistic understanding supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, Evaluate the latest evidence on the role and use of established, novel, and emerging cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (eg, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, TILs, LAG-3, composite biomarkers, et cetera), Integrate into practice up-to-date cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing approaches and immune-based therapies/combinations according to the latest evidence, recommendations, and principles of precision immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/FQK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As a result of intense research efforts, the foundational understanding of the interplay between cancer and immunity and how to harness it for therapeutic benefit is deepening. As the evidence base grows exponentially, the treatment landscape is becoming more complicated, highlighting the need for precision approaches to maximize the potential of immuno-oncology. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held in San Francisco, CA, experts in immuno-oncology explore the latest evidence and data on the present and future of cancer immunotherapies and biomarkers, debate critical issues, and share practical guidance that you can use in the care of your patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Review the most up-to-date evidence and mechanistic understanding supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, Evaluate the latest evidence on the role and use of established, novel, and emerging cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (eg, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, TILs, LAG-3, composite biomarkers, et cetera), Integrate into practice up-to-date cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing approaches and immune-based therapies/combinations according to the latest evidence, recommendations, and principles of precision immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/FQK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As a result of intense research efforts, the foundational understanding of the interplay between cancer and immunity and how to harness it for therapeutic benefit is deepening. As the evidence base grows exponentially, the treatment landscape is becoming more complicated, highlighting the need for precision approaches to maximize the potential of immuno-oncology. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held in San Francisco, CA, experts in immuno-oncology explore the latest evidence and data on the present and future of cancer immunotherapies and biomarkers, debate critical issues, and share practical guidance that you can use in the care of your patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Review the most up-to-date evidence and mechanistic understanding supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, Evaluate the latest evidence on the role and use of established, novel, and emerging cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (eg, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, TILs, LAG-3, composite biomarkers, et cetera), Integrate into practice up-to-date cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing approaches and immune-based therapies/combinations according to the latest evidence, recommendations, and principles of precision immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/FQK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As a result of intense research efforts, the foundational understanding of the interplay between cancer and immunity and how to harness it for therapeutic benefit is deepening. As the evidence base grows exponentially, the treatment landscape is becoming more complicated, highlighting the need for precision approaches to maximize the potential of immuno-oncology. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held in San Francisco, CA, experts in immuno-oncology explore the latest evidence and data on the present and future of cancer immunotherapies and biomarkers, debate critical issues, and share practical guidance that you can use in the care of your patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Review the most up-to-date evidence and mechanistic understanding supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, Evaluate the latest evidence on the role and use of established, novel, and emerging cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (eg, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, TILs, LAG-3, composite biomarkers, et cetera), Integrate into practice up-to-date cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing approaches and immune-based therapies/combinations according to the latest evidence, recommendations, and principles of precision immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/FQK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As a result of intense research efforts, the foundational understanding of the interplay between cancer and immunity and how to harness it for therapeutic benefit is deepening. As the evidence base grows exponentially, the treatment landscape is becoming more complicated, highlighting the need for precision approaches to maximize the potential of immuno-oncology. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held in San Francisco, CA, experts in immuno-oncology explore the latest evidence and data on the present and future of cancer immunotherapies and biomarkers, debate critical issues, and share practical guidance that you can use in the care of your patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Review the most up-to-date evidence and mechanistic understanding supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, Evaluate the latest evidence on the role and use of established, novel, and emerging cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (eg, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, TILs, LAG-3, composite biomarkers, et cetera), Integrate into practice up-to-date cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing approaches and immune-based therapies/combinations according to the latest evidence, recommendations, and principles of precision immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/FQK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As a result of intense research efforts, the foundational understanding of the interplay between cancer and immunity and how to harness it for therapeutic benefit is deepening. As the evidence base grows exponentially, the treatment landscape is becoming more complicated, highlighting the need for precision approaches to maximize the potential of immuno-oncology. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held in San Francisco, CA, experts in immuno-oncology explore the latest evidence and data on the present and future of cancer immunotherapies and biomarkers, debate critical issues, and share practical guidance that you can use in the care of your patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Review the most up-to-date evidence and mechanistic understanding supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, Evaluate the latest evidence on the role and use of established, novel, and emerging cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (eg, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, TILs, LAG-3, composite biomarkers, et cetera), Integrate into practice up-to-date cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing approaches and immune-based therapies/combinations according to the latest evidence, recommendations, and principles of precision immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/FQK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As a result of intense research efforts, the foundational understanding of the interplay between cancer and immunity and how to harness it for therapeutic benefit is deepening. As the evidence base grows exponentially, the treatment landscape is becoming more complicated, highlighting the need for precision approaches to maximize the potential of immuno-oncology. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held in San Francisco, CA, experts in immuno-oncology explore the latest evidence and data on the present and future of cancer immunotherapies and biomarkers, debate critical issues, and share practical guidance that you can use in the care of your patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Review the most up-to-date evidence and mechanistic understanding supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, Evaluate the latest evidence on the role and use of established, novel, and emerging cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (eg, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, TILs, LAG-3, composite biomarkers, et cetera), Integrate into practice up-to-date cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing approaches and immune-based therapies/combinations according to the latest evidence, recommendations, and principles of precision immuno-oncology.

Go online to PeerView.com/FQK860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. As a result of intense research efforts, the foundational understanding of the interplay between cancer and immunity and how to harness it for therapeutic benefit is deepening. As the evidence base grows exponentially, the treatment landscape is becoming more complicated, highlighting the need for precision approaches to maximize the potential of immuno-oncology. In this activity, based on a recent live symposium held in San Francisco, CA, experts in immuno-oncology explore the latest evidence and data on the present and future of cancer immunotherapies and biomarkers, debate critical issues, and share practical guidance that you can use in the care of your patients with cancer. Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to: Review the most up-to-date evidence and mechanistic understanding supporting the use of current and emerging cancer immunotherapies, including single-agent and combination approaches, across a spectrum of different malignancies, Evaluate the latest evidence on the role and use of established, novel, and emerging cancer immunotherapy biomarkers (eg, PD-L1, MSI/MMR, TMB, TILs, LAG-3, composite biomarkers, et cetera), Integrate into practice up-to-date cancer immunotherapy biomarker testing approaches and immune-based therapies/combinations according to the latest evidence, recommendations, and principles of precision immuno-oncology.