LOGICAL MINDS ONLY

This essay argues that the state and globalism nurture parasitism, leading to the "Ten Great Evils" of unemployment, debt, poverty, inflation, pollution, waste, taxation, homelessness, war, and injustice. It asserts that these evils are created by government actions that empower non-productive individuals. The author contends that Christians and Western civilizations are targeted for replacement by more submissive groups and critiques the concept of a One World Government, which is seen as an attempt to gain control over everything. To combat this, conservatives are urged to defeat parasitism and the ten great evils by promoting self-sufficiency and proper ownership of property, based on biblical principles.

The essay discusses the nature of power, equating it to control over property and people. It describes a dichotomous view of society, divided into workers and robbers, or positive (conservatives) and negative (liberals) forces. The author argues that Trump's policies, viewed as biblical, promote self-reliance and small government, contrasting with what is described as the parasitic nature of the left. The essay portrays Trump's actions as a necessary measure to combat the exploitation by the left, claiming that his efforts are restoring wealth to its rightful producers. The ultimate aim is to create a more biblical life, emphasizing the importance of winning the ideological war against parasitism.

This essay explores the fundamental differences between liberalism and conservatism, emphasizing their roots in political philosophy and their relationship with power, property, and morality. The author argues that politics is inherently about managing property and that without the ability to expropriate property, liberalism would be meaningless. Liberalism relies on the expropriation of property, which is legitimized through political means, often leading to tyranny.Conversely, conservatism is portrayed as inherently aligned with producing wealth and creating property. Conservatives are depicted as naturally uncomfortable with politics because their focus is on the free market and economic principles, which are seen as incompatible with political engagement. The essay suggests that conservatives are the heirs of the church, with a natural inclination toward Christianity and its moral teachings.The term conservatism arose when the church failed to uphold its social contract, and conservatism is seen as an attempt to bring the church back to its foundational principles. The essay concludes that conservatism is about overcoming sin and fighting principalities and powers, rather than tolerating them or adjusting to them.

In this essay we discuss the dichotomy between power and the free market, suggesting that true freedom and equality can only be achieved through mutual exchange in a free market, free of parasitism. It argues that both capitalism and communism involve the state, which prevents a true free market. The author connects economic principles with spiritual beliefs, emphasizing that perfection is achieved collectively as the church, free from parasitic forces, rather than individually.

This essay discusses the concept of rebirth and salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. It argues that humans cannot restore life to themselves and need Jesus's intervention to be reborn. The essay critiques universalism, which suggests that Jesus's death eliminated all punishments for everyone, and limited atonement, which implies Jesus died for a select group. It emphasizes that faith must be attached to something fundamental, as faith allows individuals to create value and be charitable. It concludes by stating that death is the absence of faith, and only through faith can life be fought for and communication be established.

The essay delves into the logical contradictions of blanket salvation, arguing that salvation has meaning only if some are condemned. It asserts that salvation cannot be earned and requires a rebirth into a new identity, symbolized by the church. Faith is essential for this rebirth, as those who have faith become part of the church and are saved by Christ, who presents the church as His bride. The essay concludes that faith re-establishes the relationship with God, lost in Eden, and that salvation comes through Christ's creation of the church, contingent upon individual faith.

This essay argues that God is trustworthy and that faith in God negates the need for external laws, contrasting divine faith with human laws that arise from fear and distrust. It asserts that Christianity uniquely addresses human problems at their source—the human heart—by promoting internal reflection and faithful adherence to God's teachings. The essay criticizes other systems for creating conflicts of interest and mistrust, particularly between workers and governments, and posits that only Christianity respects workers' rights and eliminates the exploitation perpetuated by governments and their allies.

Herein we discuss the complexity of defining and granting rights, particularly in the context of animal welfare and protection. It emphasizes that rights encompass both legal entitlements and moral considerations. Human rights are crucial for a just society, providing a framework for dignity, freedom, and equality. Governments play a key role in protecting these rights, but they must balance their authority with respect for individual rights.The text then critiques the role of governments, arguing that they use taxation as a means of control and justification for their existence. It describes government as a protection racket, claiming that taxation is the most organized form of parasitism, taking wealth from producers to benefit freeloaders. The author suggests that eliminating freeloading would eliminate the need for government and taxation, likening the current system to an illness needing a cure.

This talk explores the concept of measurement and its relationship to technology and sensitivity. It discusses the (erroneous) idea that life and faith cannot be measured like physical entities. It compares the lifestyles of animals and subsistence cultures, which live in the present without investing in the future, to higher forms of life that require faith for future investment. The essay concludes that investing in the future is essential for a full life, and this investment requires faith and since investing is a measurable activity, its precursors that is faith and life, are also measurable as correlates.

The text discusses the contrast between a society governed by external, hierarchical authority, which can lead to either societal weakness or brittle rigidity, and a Christian system guided by the Holy Spirit that promotes self-sufficiency and mutual respect. In the Christian model, each individual's work is valued and compensated, eliminating debts, taxes, and social issues, thereby fostering peace and cohesion. The passage advocates for a transformation towards a Christian society where the church facilitates a fair and self-sustaining system, free from the oppressive influences of the state.

There is no way, at present, to quantify the social sciences, because they rely on narrative descriptions. But if we study Scripture, it provides a path by which the humanities can be hardened. Under the present view of reality, the law of the jungle reigns. This is the notion that might makes right. The author argues that true rights and justice cannot be founded on historical power dynamics but rather on a rejection of the law of the jungle and adherence to divine principles. The essay emphasizes the importance of actions over appearances in the Christian faith and suggests that the true value of work can be measured through the Biblical concept of the Labor Theory of Value, which quantifies all human endeavors as an expenditure of labor. Because all work is a form of labor and labor can be measured, there is a path towards the quantification of the social sciences.

Faith, as discussed, is not merely a belief in the saving grace of Christ but a motivator for a life of works that reflect one's faith. Unlike works done for show, which are phenomenological and lack true meaning, works imbued with faith are operational and impactful. Faith is demonstrated through a commitment to the community of believers, emphasizing investment in the church's growth over immediate consumption of personal gains. This approach to faith aligns with the teachings of James, positioning faith as an active, productive force within Christian life, essential for true Christianization.

There are five major passages in the Bible that are studiously ignored by Christians. By rejecting the importance of one the church makes it impossible to understand or implement the others.

The accompanying essay discusses the role tariffs in creating a prosperous economy. The focus is on the role of the church in adding value to the assets under the stewardship of Christians. The sovereignty of God over all assets is emphasized. It highlights the importance of integrating new Christians into the economic life of the church, where each member can contribute meaningfully. Tariffs are presented as tools to protect crucial parts of the economy and to shift production towards higher-value, and the more competitive sectors. The ultimate goal of a tariff is to improve the national balance sheet and enhance overall productivity and value creation, ensuring that the populace benefits from and tariff and later adjustments.

This essay argues that regardless of the plan or methods implemented by Trump, extracting wealth from the productive sector to fund the state, which is inherently parasitic, is inherently problematic. It posits that neither capitalism nor communism is compatible with Christianity and that true solutions to social problems require eliminating the state and parasitism. The author suggests an Apriorian system based on logical deduction from the premise that God exists, leading to a society free of inequality and parasites. Ultimately, the essay concludes that only the Bible provides solutions to eliminate both class I and II parasites, with class I parasites including the state and those in positions of power.

A theocracy is presented as an ideal system where true equality prevails, unlike other forms of government that centralize power and wealth. In a theocracy, individuals do not surrender their voice to a central authority but remain equal, owning only what they create without claims on others' creations. This encourages innovation and specialization, ensuring progress. Everyone has equal rights and cannot be deprived of them, fostering a society free from parasitic tendencies and totalitarianism, with all members equal under God.

The essay emphasizes the importance of grace in the Christian faith, highlighting that while salvation is a gift of grace from God, unearned and bestowed through Jesus Christ's sacrifice, believers are called to extend grace and forgiveness to others. This cycle of forgiveness not only aligns with the divine example but also distinguishes the righteous from those who take more than they give. By manifesting grace, believers add value to the world, contribute to God's kingdom, and become a beacon of Christ's light. Grace is both a divine favor and a virtuous act, integral to building the church and fostering spiritual growth.

This document discusses the concept of rebirth in Christianity, emphasizing that believers are reborn as infants and require a process of perfection through reconciliation and faith. It highlights the importance of works as a measure of faith, stating that faith without works is dead. Scriptures from 2 Corinthians, James, and Matthew are referenced to support these points. The new kingdom is described as a new economy focused on value created through works. The ultimate goal is to build a theocracy that reflects the degree of faith and adherence to God's intended way of living.

Here we argue that conservatives base their morality on God's absolute standards, which provide a clear, unchanging guide for righteous living, whereas liberals rely on subjective interpretations and personal freedom, leading to a morality that is inconsistent and human-centered. It claims that true morality is divinely ordained and intrinsic to reality, while ethics, created by humans, lack this divine foundation. Therefore, without God, liberals live by ethical codes, not true morality, and this reliance on human-made laws results in a life governed by legalism rather than genuine moral principles.

Paul's epistle to the Romans and other New Testament passages highlight that faith is a gift from God, distributed unevenly among individuals. This distribution is part of God's divine plan, requiring believers to cultivate and strengthen their faith. The text emphasizes the relationship between faith and labor, suggesting that true faith is reflected in the value of one's work. The Apriorian Ministry focuses on conservatives and labor, asserting that labor is sanctified and holy, and that faith and love are expressed through labor. The document criticizes the lack of trust in society and underscores the importance of valuing human labor as the world's most valuable resource.

This production argues that heuristics, or simplified problem-solving methods, inherently support the principles of a free market by reducing operational costs and promoting direct consumer-to-provider transactions. It contrasts the free market's efficiency in job creation with more convoluted state interventions. Thus, the Theocratic Party, which advocates for the elimination of state mechanisms in favor of a direct relationship between individuals and God, aligns itself with heuristic methodologies that ultimately endorse free market solutions.;p0009

The essay, American People American Power, examines the intricate dynamics between state power, property rights, and the relationship between rulers and the governed. It highlights how the state creates and mediates competing claims on resources, defines categories of ownership, and maintains control by regulating access to property. The state's power is rooted in its ability to withhold or grant ownership, which compels compliance from its subjects. In a democracy, representatives administer national assets, but the perpetual promise to control more resources during election cycles results in people unknowingly voting away their direct access to property. Ultimately, the state's monopoly over assets limits individuals' direct ownership and access, whereas without the state, the people would have direct access to the goods and services the state rations. This essay looks at access to property when property is controlled by the state, contrasted with a scenario where no such state intervention exists.

The church as an experiment, demonstrates the distinction between the spiritual and material worlds. Trust, essential for personal relationships, professional success, and societal stability, involves reliability and confidence in others. Although science can measure physical reality, it fails when faced with faith. Trust, built through empathy, honesty, and effective communication, forms the foundation for cooperation and progress. In contrast, a lack of trust leads to societal division and personal isolation. True spiritual maturity arises from faith, underpinning civilization through specialization, which is impossible without mutual trust. Thus, the church's value and impact can be measured through the assets devoted to God and the work of believers, offering an objective comparison to the fallen world.

The concept of a single North American economic zone necessitates a free-market system where goods and services are priced based on labor inputs, devoid of state-imposed premiums, and governed by the labor theory of value. This essay is critical of the state's role in property rights and regulatory licencing, advocating for a theocratic approach where the church holds property for believers to access according to their specializations within twelve economic sectors. These sectors, each functioning as a ministry, are responsible for the welfare and job provision of their members, transcending political boundaries but organized into twelve geographical administrative units. This essay advocates for the reconfiguring of the North American economy into a free market structure based solely on the Labor Theory of Value.

This document outlines a vision for establishing a theocratic Canada, emphasizing the need for spiritual rebirth and a distinct Christian culture. It argues that true governance must be centered on God, separating believers from secular influences.• Theocracy Defined: A theocracy is characterized by a society with God at the center, built on Biblical truths. • Role of Repentance: The first step towards a theocratic society is repentance, which is viewed as a necessary but historically unachieved goal among humanity. • Christian Identity: Christians are described as a new spiritually mature race. • Separation from Materialism: Achieving a perfected theocracy requires a separation from the materialistic and fallen world, giving rise to a culture free from parasitism. • Concept of Rebirth: Spiritual rebirth is essential for transformation, involving a profound change in one's inner being and alignment with God's will. • Community and Mutual Dependency: The document emphasizes the necessity of community in achieving spiritual growth, contrasting faith with coercive societal structures that promote parasitic relationships.

This essay explores the balance between faith and works in Christianity, emphasizing that while works alone cannot bring salvation, faith without accompanying works is incomplete. The ideal Christian community is depicted as one that is spiritually mature and separate from the materialistic world, guided by the Holy Spirit. This community is free from parasitic behaviors, striving for perfection through spiritual growth and unity, as illustrated by the biblical command in 2 Corinthians 6:17 to remain separate from the world. The ultimate goal is to create a church that glorifies God and supports the spiritual development of all its members.

Todays essay critiques both the right and left political ideologies, arguing that both sides fail to acknowledge the fundamental principle of divine ownership of the natural world. The right's belief in individual ownership and free markets overlooks God's creation, while the left's disregard for individual property rights does not extend to government regulation. Trump's approach of decentralizing resource management and promoting American individualism is seen as a continuation of past errors, leading to the emergence of a new class of powerful, self-serving individuals, akin to Robber Barons, who control property unjustly. Ultimately, the text suggests that neither political side achieves true justice or righteousness.

This essay explores the concept of the unforgivable sin, which is characterized as blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, emphasizing that true repentance and fear of having committed this sin are actually signs of the Holy Spirit's work. It underscores the importance of the church as the vehicle of salvation and the necessity of the Holy Spirit's presence for one's spiritual maturation and ultimate salvation. The essay also contrasts those who spiritually mature and contribute positively to the community with those who remain spiritually immature and dependent on others, arguing that the latter blaspheme the Holy Spirit and, like parasites, cannot be forgiven.

A theocracy operates without physical coercion because its laws are intrinsic to the system, as exemplified by Jesus' fulfillment of the law in Matthew 5:17-20. In contrast to human exocratic systems, which are governed externally, God's creation is isocratic, where truth and morality are absolute. Sin, which harms oneself, and evil, which harms others, are detrimental to the success of individuals and society. In a theocracy, there is a clear direction and a single objective, rooted in an inherent truth that defines right and wrong, making it a perfect system in comparison to the flawed, external governance of human systems.

The author argues that a culture with lower taxes and crime is superior to cultures where social costs are high. He then posits that achieving this lower taxes and crime threshold, requires transitioning to a theocracy. This essay is a critique of cultural relativism, suggesting that without a belief in objective right and wrong, society will descend into nihilism and chaos. The author contends that embracing a theocracy, which eliminates taxes and minimizes crime, is essential for humanity's survival, as cultural relativism ultimately leads to societal destruction.

This essay examines the concept of duality within various systems, critiquing both capitalism and communism for their inherent divisions, while proposing that the true line of division lies between those aligned with God and those aligned with the devil. It contrasts individuals who are driven by external forces and centralized power with those who are called by visions of the future. The deepest division is between those who contribute positively to society and those who are burdensome, framing spiritual maturity and faith as key determinants of one's value in God's creation. Ultimately, the text asserts that everything either enhances or diminishes the glory of God's creation, distinguishing between the saved and spiritually mature, and the parasites, sinners, and ungodly.

The concept of being set apart, or sanctified, is fundamental in Christian theology, emphasizing a distinct lifestyle and higher moral standards for believers. This transformation begins with accepting Jesus Christ, leading to a new, God-aligned nature. Christians' uniqueness is reflected in their adherence to love, compassion, and forgiveness as taught by Jesus, and their strong sense of community and fellowship. Despite societal challenges and persecution, Christians strive to be a beacon of hope, reflecting God's love and truth. Moreover, the text highlights the Apriorian perspective, encouraging spiritual maturity by focusing on a future defined by God, rather than being constrained by the past.

The church, as described, is the equity produced by good works, binding believers through ministry, much like a free market where precision is key. This binding normalizes relationships with friends and enemies, requiring an objective measure of value, unlike the worlds currencies, which are all asset based. The collective identity in Christ allows believers to transform from sinners to a unified, perfected church through charity and faith-based works, embodying the grace of God and rebirth in the spirit. The paradox between man as sinner and man perfected in the image of God, is resolved in the church and the ministry that forms it.

Christians ought to understand the importance of doing our best in all endeavors, avoiding both blatant and subtle forms of causing harm. The Christian principle of ministry is the way the church perfects believers. Ministry involves helping others reach their potential and binding them in spiritual maturity to the church. Sin is defined as the waste of God's provisions to you, while evil is the destruction of what God created for all. Sin is personal. Evil is general. Ministry teaches believers to avoid waste and destruction, thus honoring God's gifts and fostering mutual support and growth within the faith community. Through ministry believers are perfected.

The document argues for a paradigm shift among Christians, suggesting that value creation through preferred shares can eliminate state dependency and inflation. It challenges Christians to reevaluate their participation in secular politics and traditional missions, emphasizing that voting for politicians equates to supporting parasitism. Missions, often seen as central to Christianity, are portrayed as mere works, while true spiritual growth is achieved through ministry, as illustrated by biblical passages such as Ephesians 4:11-13. The author advocates for focusing on ministry to achieve spiritual perfection and unity in faith.

In this essay we argue that Christians have mistakenly focused on missions rather than ministry. Ministry should be used to help believers achieve spiritual maturity, rather suggesting that Christians have overly prioritized missions at the expense of focusing on ministry work that aids in the growth of faith.

Democracy is inherently flawed and detrimental because it leads individuals to place their faith in the political process rather than in God. It claims that both left and right political arguments are weak and fail to convince the opposing side. The essence of democracy, which involves voting for change, inherently rejects divine guidance in favour of human governance. This reliance on politicians to fulfill promises undermines faith in God, leading to a society that values short-term gains over long-term, intelligent, and moral decisions. Ultimately, democracy fails by encouraging dependence on human solutions instead of divine wisdom.

Human governance, whether through democracy or other systems, inevitably leads to a paradoxical problem akin to hitting a "brick wall" because such systems perpetuate parasitism and legalism. It suggests that true solutions and successful trajectories can only be found by abandoning legalistic and state-controlled systems in favor of a theocracy, where trust among individuals and submission to God's will replace the imposition of laws by the few on the many. This shift requires a profound transformation analogous to dying and being reborn, moving from a state of legalistic control to one of divine governance.

This essay explores the intricate relationship between law, faith, and the Holy Spirit, emphasizing that true obedience to God transcends legalistic adherence to rules. It asserts that one's conscience and logical thinking are integral to aligning with God's reality, and that revolutions and reforms often fail because they disregard the spiritual transformation essential for true change. The text highlights the necessity of moving beyond the law and power disparities to embrace faith and the guidance of the Holy Spirit, which nullifies the constraints of the law and fosters spiritual maturity.

Plato's philosophy underscores the profound link between choice, morality, and truth, emphasizing that true freedom is found not in endless options but in making the right choice informed by knowledge and virtue. This essay explores the tension between the freedom to choose and the moral responsibility it entails, highlighting Plato's advocacy for Philosopher Kings—rulers guided by wisdom, justice, and the common good. It critiques the practicality of selecting such leaders, pointing out the gap between the ideal and its realization, and ultimately suggests that biblical scripture provides a roadmap for achieving this transformation towards a just society.

The document explores the concept of truth and deception, particularly focusing on the power of Satan to deceive people into believing falsehoods. It discusses how both atheists and Christians can be deceived, the challenges of discerning truth in religious and political contexts, and the role of faith in shaping one's perception of truth. The document also delves into the Christian concept of "bearing fruit," emphasizing the importance of spiritual growth, obedience, and community in living a fruitful Christian life. Ultimately, it highlights the struggle between subjective personal truths and objective, absolute truths, and the role of faith in navigating this complex landscape.

The document discusses the concept of communicating with God, emphasizing that God perceives our hearts rather than our physical appearance. It explains that the Holy Spirit resides in our hearts, enabling us to communicate with God and manifest good deeds in the world. The text highlights the importance of spiritual maturity, the role of the Holy Spirit in understanding God's word, and the value of labor in adding value to God's creation. It contrasts the naturalist view of reality, governed by law, with the theocratic view, where true value and civilization are achieved through divine guidance.

Some countries such as Canada and Australia had the worst possible beginnings. Under constant attack by natives and far from any source of assistance, the early settlers faced incredible hardship and the harshest of conditions, to over time, build highly advanced civilizations. Whereas other, far older and better situated populations never made it far beyond the stone age, if that far. No amount of assistance has been enough to move them very far forward, and the advancements made are often due to external aid. But even in the most developed of nations, there are still people trapped in poverty. There does not seem to be any correlation between where the person starts or the amount of help they get. Whether a person or nation remains trapped in poverty appears to be unrelated to anything outside of themselves. This essay explains how to identify what really keeps people trapped in poverty and what can be done to overcome these intergenerational forces that keep people trapped in poverty.

There is truth, there must be or neither life nor the world has meaning. If there is no meaning then there is no truth and sentience itself is negated. But if there is a truth then it has to have a source and the source of truth is beyond truth, because only that which is beyond truth has the ability to fashion and express truth. Apologetics is the search for the source of truth and the attempt to explain the truth in terms of its origins.

The Epicurean Paradox is an ironic mockery of human sin, it has little or nothing to do with God. It says far more about the perversity of the human mind than it does about God.

Confused about faith and works? How about the issue of free will versus predeterminism? If we are chosen for salvation before the beginning of the world, what has faith to do with salvation? We do not have time to repent before we are saved because we are, according to some thinkers, before being born. What about works? If we are saved without works, why do we need to do works after we are saved? If we have been chosen to be saved, how can we lose our salvation because of a failure to stop sinning and a paucity of good works. This is your chance to resolve all of these issues based on scriptural quotations.

A theocracy is a people under God. A democracy is a people let loose and trying to rule themselves. There is nothing Biblical about self-rule or putting power into the hands of the largest political group. There is no virtue in allowing the strongest political faction decide who we will worship or what laws we will follow. Democracy is fully Satanic and has no relevance to Scripture.

The Western world appears to have settled on democracy as the preferred form of government, even though most are or were nations titularly Christian. Where in the Bible does it say issues are to be settled by a majority vote?

The parasitic church is a corrupt church taken over by democratic sentiments and liberal agendas, as such it is cursed.

Apriorian is a works based church with a mission to end parasitism.

Virtually every problem could be eliminated if everyone was employed and would be eliminated if every employed person was required to pay every one of his or her costs. Interestingly, we would have full employment if everyone paid for their own costs. Conversely, so long as we have parasites and people living off of the avails of others, full employment is not possible. We tell you how to fix it.