Logic is not opinion nor is it moved by assumptions. Logic follows its own course and rules. Logic cannot be rescinded, reconfigured or reformed. Logic is implacable and absolute. LOGICAL MINDS ONLY follow logic to where it leads. Those who do not follow logic to wherever it leads end up in a place that is demonstrably irrational. LOGICAL MINDS ONLY is a podcast for those whose commitment to logic is absolute. Those whose commitment is to an ideology, or particular worldview, or set of assumptions or who want to find factoids to support an assumption are wasting their time here.
The fall of Babylon is the fall of what we have lived in since we were ejected from Eden. The fall of Babylon is then a story of epochal change. The fall of Babylon represents the end of one era and the start of another. The fall of Babylon represents the end of one period of history and the beginning of another. This essay discusses where the line between epochs is and what is on one side of the line but not on the other. What specifically is eliminated when Babylon falls? The answer is sin in the general sense, but what is the thing that is common to all sin and what does the world look like at the end of this era?
This essay advocates for a shift from a rights-based governance model to a transactional economy. It argues that traditional concepts of rights, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, are flawed and should be replaced by systems where individuals earn what they need through equal-value exchanges. Governments, which currently expropriate wealth from citizens, are urged to dismantle such practices and instead enable a transactional economy focused on full employment.In this model, businesses exist not to generate wealth for a few but to provide jobs and essential goods and services. The state's role is to empower businesses organized into sectors to offer sustainable jobs without prioritizing profit. The essay ultimately calls for the restructuring of the economy and government, prioritizing employment and equitable value exchange over wealth accumulation and handouts.
The essay emphasizes the role of Christians in shaping a society aligned with biblical values such as justice, integrity, and love. It advocates for intentional action in politics and daily life to reflect God's truth and foster unity. Christians are called to act as a light to others, guiding them to God by living purposefully and selflessly.The text explores the tension between selfishness and selflessness, questioning how these approaches align with Christ's mission. It stresses the importance of balance, as all are equal in God's eyes, and no one has a greater obligation to uplift others. This equality underscores the need for a "flat" church and a transactional society where value is exchanged fairly.Finally, the essay argues that enabling sin or taking unearned rewards hinders the work of the Holy Spirit. The resolution lies in creating a "transactional church" that encourages accountability and mutual responsibility while maintaining a focus on winning souls to Christ.
Have you wondered how, if we are chosen for salvation before the beginning of time, how can we be saved by faith, and if we are saved before we are born, what is the point of works?The article explores the relationship between faith, salvation, and predestination, emphasizing the balance between divine omniscience and human responsibility. It asserts that while God determines salvation by establishing the church as the Bride of Christ, human actions and collective faith within the church play a critical role.
This article explores theological concepts surrounding sin, community, and the inevitable triumph of good over evil. It argues that sin is inherently self-defeating, as it relies on parasitic exploitation, which ultimately leads to its own destruction. The church is presented as the ideal form of community, emphasizing mutual support and sacrificial contributions, mirroring Christ's example. The victory of good is rooted in the nature of God as absolute Good, with sin having no sustainable power. Technological progress is linked to humanity's ability to thrive and exemplify works of faith, while evil persists only temporarily through oppression until righteousness prevails.
This essay explores the Christian response to secular and ungodly systems, emphasizing resistance rooted in biblical principles such as love, service, and righteousness. It delves into the cost of opposing such systems, drawing on teachings of Jesus and examples like the civil rights movement, while urging believers to persevere in faith and uphold God's truth. The text critiques the compatibility of church and state, highlighting the logical compromises that lead to moral failings. Sin is described as cumulative, necessitating active resistance by Christians who must rebel against worldly corruption to forge a new, godly existence within the church, viewed as the New Eden. Ultimately, the essay calls for unwavering commitment to God's vision and the rejection of the fallen world.
This essay explores the principles of a biblical management system rooted in decentralization, accountability, and mutual care, modeled after the early Church. It advocates for clearly defined roles, collective decision-making, and conflict resolution guided by biblical teachings such as Matthew 18:15-17, emphasizing reconciliation over punishment. Inspired by the parable of the talents (Matthew 25:14-30), the essay underscores responsible resource management through transparency, equity, and investment in community growth. Ecclesiasticism is contrasted with liberalism, emphasizing servant leadership and the rejection of parasitic behaviors that impose burdens on others. It calls for self-sufficiency, ethical work practices, and the elimination of freeloading. We are commanded to pay laborers their wages and to live in accordance with God's vision for humanity. We argue for a system that aligns with divine principles, ensuring that individuals honor their duties without exploiting others. Only when we can eliminate parasitism and freeloading will we have a just and harmonious community. Liberalism promotes and legitimizes parasitism. Ecclesiastical communities eliminate freeloading because it eliminates the justifications used to perpetuate it.
This essay argues that the concept of morality is inherently tied to the existence of God. It posits that the "moral ought" must be divinely inspired and transcend human subjectivity to maintain objectivity and legitimacy. Without God, morality becomes relative, introspective, and ultimately self-justifying, lacking any universal standard. The essay suggests that a moral law must be as intrinsic to reality as energy or motion, serving as a quantifiable and transcendent principle that guides human behavior.The essay further contends that God, as the Creator, has absolute and uncontested rights over His creation, mirroring the rights humans hold over what they create. This divine authority underpins the Christian perspective, asserting that the moral ought obligates us to respect the rights of the Creator. It critiques atheistic perspectives as emotionally driven and lacking a foundational basis for legitimacy. Ultimately, the essay concludes that the moral ought demands adherence to the principle that only the creator of something holds rightful claim to it, fundamentally shaping the relationship between humans, morality, and God.
The author explores various ethical theories, including Ethical Relativism, Feminist Ethics, Kantian deontology, Mill's consequentialism, and Aristotle's virtue ethics, highlighting their contributions and limitations. It emphasizes the importance of the "moral ought," a logical foundation for universal justice and law, noting that ethical systems often reflect cultural or ideological biases rather than universally defensible principles. The absence of a universally defensible moral ought leads to the formation of laws rooted in power disparities rather than in intrinsic values and abstract principles.The argument progresses further, to suggest that the "moral ought" is inherent to reality, akin to natural laws such as gravity. Ownership of what we create, and the right to transfer what we own to a buyer, are posited as universally uncontestable truths. In short, we already quantify evil when we value stolen goods. Evil can be measured based on the value of what is unjustly taken, linking morality to the tangible construct of ownership and evil to offenses against the rightful owner defined by the identity of its creator.
The text explores the theological implications of God's existence as described in the Bible, emphasizing a purposeful trajectory for creation. Key ideas include the existence of an objective moral order based on God's holy and just nature, leading to human accountability for actions. It highlights humanity's purpose as knowing, loving, and serving God, in alignment with His will, while offering hope through the promise of eternal life for those who accept His salvation. Biblical references such as Romans 2:6-8, Matthew 22:37-39, and John 11:25-26 underscore these conclusions.The deduction made assume the Bible's authority as a guide, and without this presupposition, interpretations of God's nature and purposes could differ significantly, underscoring both the depth and complexity of deriving theological insights from scripture.
This essay explores the tension between market-driven democracy and the concept of meritocracy. It argues that when the market dictates value, it filters availability based on demand rather than true merit, aligning success with popularity rather than exceptionalism. Merit, defined as being exceptional and enabling progress, requires individual specialization and differentiation, which cannot be fully gauged or decided by democratic processes or collective decision-making.The author posits that progress stems from individual innovation and that the majority cannot guide or evaluate specialization effectively. While democracy empowers the masses, it may inadvertently stifle progress by reducing the space for individual merit to flourish. The essay concludes by highlighting the incompatibility between democracy and meritocracy, emphasizing that merit is ultimately validated through the group's organic response to individual contributions rather than dictated by centralized authority.
The essay explores the biblical call to hate evil, emphasizing that ordained hatred is not directed at individuals but at sin and spiritual forces opposing God's kingdom. It highlights the importance of courage, humility, and discernment in confronting evil while avoiding self-righteousness or hatred of people. The text distinguishes between personal sins and acts of evil that harm the church, urging believers to forgive personal wrongs but to stand against harm inflicted on others, especially within the community of faith. Ultimately, it calls for aligning with God's holiness, loving sinners, and actively opposing evil in a way that reflects God's grace and transforms the world.
The essay emphasizes the indispensable role of the church in addressing humanity's spiritual and social challenges. It argues that humanity, in its sinful state, cannot achieve salvation or resolve societal problems such as unemployment, debt, poverty, and crime without God's intervention through the church. The author stresses that these issues cannot be resolved within the secular world but can be eliminated within the church for those who fully commit to it. The text challenges the notion of self-sufficiency and highlights the need for repentance and obedience to God's commands. It also stresses the point that freeloading is the root cause of societal problems, asserting that true solutions require acknowledging God's truth and following His Word.
The essay explores the fundamental tension between Christianity and capitalism, highlighting their opposing principles. While capitalism revolves around privatization and the pursuit of profit, often based on the false assumption of ownership granted by the state, Christianity emphasizes stewardship under God's ownership, where all assets and their increase belong to God. Christians, as stewards, are bound by principles that glorify God, contrasting sharply with capitalism's liberal and unprincipled nature, which permits anything the market values. This inherent conflict, rooted in differing views of ownership, morality, and regulation, renders reconciliation between Christianity and capitalism, as well as its liberal foundation, impossible.
This essay discusses the impact of capitalism on pricing and morality. It argues that under capitalism, prices are determined by what the market will bear, without moral limits. Capitalism's pricing model links it to atheism. Historically, Christianity promoted the concept of a just price, but liberal economics and social theory have removed such boundaries. The essay contrasts capitalism's "law of the jungle" with the church's moral principles, claiming capitalism undermines the church's influence and maturity. Ultimately, it suggests capitalism has degraded the church and faith, misleadingly appearing synergistic at times but actually destructive to Western values built on faith.
The essay argues that a deflationary economy, characterized by high trust and productivity, is inherently more beneficial than an inflationary one. It claims that the white race progressed due to a deflationary economy until capitalism, which requires inflation, emerged. Feudalism and mercantilism contributed to the development of capitalism by accumulating capital for investment. However, progress and innovation are inherently deflationary, as they enable higher productivity with less labor, suggesting that the cost of goods should decrease, not increase, over time. The current system, however, necessitates inflation, contradicting the natural outcome of reduced production costs.
This essay argues that the state and globalism nurture parasitism, leading to the "Ten Great Evils" of unemployment, debt, poverty, inflation, pollution, waste, taxation, homelessness, war, and injustice. It asserts that these evils are created by government actions that empower non-productive individuals. The author contends that Christians and Western civilizations are targeted for replacement by more submissive groups and critiques the concept of a One World Government, which is seen as an attempt to gain control over everything. To combat this, conservatives are urged to defeat parasitism and the ten great evils by promoting self-sufficiency and proper ownership of property, based on biblical principles.
The essay discusses the nature of power, equating it to control over property and people. It describes a dichotomous view of society, divided into workers and robbers, or positive (conservatives) and negative (liberals) forces. The author argues that Trump's policies, viewed as biblical, promote self-reliance and small government, contrasting with what is described as the parasitic nature of the left. The essay portrays Trump's actions as a necessary measure to combat the exploitation by the left, claiming that his efforts are restoring wealth to its rightful producers. The ultimate aim is to create a more biblical life, emphasizing the importance of winning the ideological war against parasitism.
This essay explores the fundamental differences between liberalism and conservatism, emphasizing their roots in political philosophy and their relationship with power, property, and morality. The author argues that politics is inherently about managing property and that without the ability to expropriate property, liberalism would be meaningless. Liberalism relies on the expropriation of property, which is legitimized through political means, often leading to tyranny.Conversely, conservatism is portrayed as inherently aligned with producing wealth and creating property. Conservatives are depicted as naturally uncomfortable with politics because their focus is on the free market and economic principles, which are seen as incompatible with political engagement. The essay suggests that conservatives are the heirs of the church, with a natural inclination toward Christianity and its moral teachings.The term conservatism arose when the church failed to uphold its social contract, and conservatism is seen as an attempt to bring the church back to its foundational principles. The essay concludes that conservatism is about overcoming sin and fighting principalities and powers, rather than tolerating them or adjusting to them.
In this essay we discuss the dichotomy between power and the free market, suggesting that true freedom and equality can only be achieved through mutual exchange in a free market, free of parasitism. It argues that both capitalism and communism involve the state, which prevents a true free market. The author connects economic principles with spiritual beliefs, emphasizing that perfection is achieved collectively as the church, free from parasitic forces, rather than individually.
This essay discusses the concept of rebirth and salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. It argues that humans cannot restore life to themselves and need Jesus's intervention to be reborn. The essay critiques universalism, which suggests that Jesus's death eliminated all punishments for everyone, and limited atonement, which implies Jesus died for a select group. It emphasizes that faith must be attached to something fundamental, as faith allows individuals to create value and be charitable. It concludes by stating that death is the absence of faith, and only through faith can life be fought for and communication be established.
The essay delves into the logical contradictions of blanket salvation, arguing that salvation has meaning only if some are condemned. It asserts that salvation cannot be earned and requires a rebirth into a new identity, symbolized by the church. Faith is essential for this rebirth, as those who have faith become part of the church and are saved by Christ, who presents the church as His bride. The essay concludes that faith re-establishes the relationship with God, lost in Eden, and that salvation comes through Christ's creation of the church, contingent upon individual faith.
This essay argues that God is trustworthy and that faith in God negates the need for external laws, contrasting divine faith with human laws that arise from fear and distrust. It asserts that Christianity uniquely addresses human problems at their source—the human heart—by promoting internal reflection and faithful adherence to God's teachings. The essay criticizes other systems for creating conflicts of interest and mistrust, particularly between workers and governments, and posits that only Christianity respects workers' rights and eliminates the exploitation perpetuated by governments and their allies.
Herein we discuss the complexity of defining and granting rights, particularly in the context of animal welfare and protection. It emphasizes that rights encompass both legal entitlements and moral considerations. Human rights are crucial for a just society, providing a framework for dignity, freedom, and equality. Governments play a key role in protecting these rights, but they must balance their authority with respect for individual rights.The text then critiques the role of governments, arguing that they use taxation as a means of control and justification for their existence. It describes government as a protection racket, claiming that taxation is the most organized form of parasitism, taking wealth from producers to benefit freeloaders. The author suggests that eliminating freeloading would eliminate the need for government and taxation, likening the current system to an illness needing a cure.
This talk explores the concept of measurement and its relationship to technology and sensitivity. It discusses the (erroneous) idea that life and faith cannot be measured like physical entities. It compares the lifestyles of animals and subsistence cultures, which live in the present without investing in the future, to higher forms of life that require faith for future investment. The essay concludes that investing in the future is essential for a full life, and this investment requires faith and since investing is a measurable activity, its precursors that is faith and life, are also measurable as correlates.
The text discusses the contrast between a society governed by external, hierarchical authority, which can lead to either societal weakness or brittle rigidity, and a Christian system guided by the Holy Spirit that promotes self-sufficiency and mutual respect. In the Christian model, each individual's work is valued and compensated, eliminating debts, taxes, and social issues, thereby fostering peace and cohesion. The passage advocates for a transformation towards a Christian society where the church facilitates a fair and self-sustaining system, free from the oppressive influences of the state.
There is no way, at present, to quantify the social sciences, because they rely on narrative descriptions. But if we study Scripture, it provides a path by which the humanities can be hardened. Under the present view of reality, the law of the jungle reigns. This is the notion that might makes right. The author argues that true rights and justice cannot be founded on historical power dynamics but rather on a rejection of the law of the jungle and adherence to divine principles. The essay emphasizes the importance of actions over appearances in the Christian faith and suggests that the true value of work can be measured through the Biblical concept of the Labor Theory of Value, which quantifies all human endeavors as an expenditure of labor. Because all work is a form of labor and labor can be measured, there is a path towards the quantification of the social sciences.
Faith, as discussed, is not merely a belief in the saving grace of Christ but a motivator for a life of works that reflect one's faith. Unlike works done for show, which are phenomenological and lack true meaning, works imbued with faith are operational and impactful. Faith is demonstrated through a commitment to the community of believers, emphasizing investment in the church's growth over immediate consumption of personal gains. This approach to faith aligns with the teachings of James, positioning faith as an active, productive force within Christian life, essential for true Christianization.
There are five major passages in the Bible that are studiously ignored by Christians. By rejecting the importance of one the church makes it impossible to understand or implement the others.
The accompanying essay discusses the role tariffs in creating a prosperous economy. The focus is on the role of the church in adding value to the assets under the stewardship of Christians. The sovereignty of God over all assets is emphasized. It highlights the importance of integrating new Christians into the economic life of the church, where each member can contribute meaningfully. Tariffs are presented as tools to protect crucial parts of the economy and to shift production towards higher-value, and the more competitive sectors. The ultimate goal of a tariff is to improve the national balance sheet and enhance overall productivity and value creation, ensuring that the populace benefits from and tariff and later adjustments.
This essay argues that regardless of the plan or methods implemented by Trump, extracting wealth from the productive sector to fund the state, which is inherently parasitic, is inherently problematic. It posits that neither capitalism nor communism is compatible with Christianity and that true solutions to social problems require eliminating the state and parasitism. The author suggests an Apriorian system based on logical deduction from the premise that God exists, leading to a society free of inequality and parasites. Ultimately, the essay concludes that only the Bible provides solutions to eliminate both class I and II parasites, with class I parasites including the state and those in positions of power.
A theocracy is presented as an ideal system where true equality prevails, unlike other forms of government that centralize power and wealth. In a theocracy, individuals do not surrender their voice to a central authority but remain equal, owning only what they create without claims on others' creations. This encourages innovation and specialization, ensuring progress. Everyone has equal rights and cannot be deprived of them, fostering a society free from parasitic tendencies and totalitarianism, with all members equal under God.
The essay emphasizes the importance of grace in the Christian faith, highlighting that while salvation is a gift of grace from God, unearned and bestowed through Jesus Christ's sacrifice, believers are called to extend grace and forgiveness to others. This cycle of forgiveness not only aligns with the divine example but also distinguishes the righteous from those who take more than they give. By manifesting grace, believers add value to the world, contribute to God's kingdom, and become a beacon of Christ's light. Grace is both a divine favor and a virtuous act, integral to building the church and fostering spiritual growth.
This document discusses the concept of rebirth in Christianity, emphasizing that believers are reborn as infants and require a process of perfection through reconciliation and faith. It highlights the importance of works as a measure of faith, stating that faith without works is dead. Scriptures from 2 Corinthians, James, and Matthew are referenced to support these points. The new kingdom is described as a new economy focused on value created through works. The ultimate goal is to build a theocracy that reflects the degree of faith and adherence to God's intended way of living.
Here we argue that conservatives base their morality on God's absolute standards, which provide a clear, unchanging guide for righteous living, whereas liberals rely on subjective interpretations and personal freedom, leading to a morality that is inconsistent and human-centered. It claims that true morality is divinely ordained and intrinsic to reality, while ethics, created by humans, lack this divine foundation. Therefore, without God, liberals live by ethical codes, not true morality, and this reliance on human-made laws results in a life governed by legalism rather than genuine moral principles.
Paul's epistle to the Romans and other New Testament passages highlight that faith is a gift from God, distributed unevenly among individuals. This distribution is part of God's divine plan, requiring believers to cultivate and strengthen their faith. The text emphasizes the relationship between faith and labor, suggesting that true faith is reflected in the value of one's work. The Apriorian Ministry focuses on conservatives and labor, asserting that labor is sanctified and holy, and that faith and love are expressed through labor. The document criticizes the lack of trust in society and underscores the importance of valuing human labor as the world's most valuable resource.
This production argues that heuristics, or simplified problem-solving methods, inherently support the principles of a free market by reducing operational costs and promoting direct consumer-to-provider transactions. It contrasts the free market's efficiency in job creation with more convoluted state interventions. Thus, the Theocratic Party, which advocates for the elimination of state mechanisms in favor of a direct relationship between individuals and God, aligns itself with heuristic methodologies that ultimately endorse free market solutions.;p0009
The essay, American People American Power, examines the intricate dynamics between state power, property rights, and the relationship between rulers and the governed. It highlights how the state creates and mediates competing claims on resources, defines categories of ownership, and maintains control by regulating access to property. The state's power is rooted in its ability to withhold or grant ownership, which compels compliance from its subjects. In a democracy, representatives administer national assets, but the perpetual promise to control more resources during election cycles results in people unknowingly voting away their direct access to property. Ultimately, the state's monopoly over assets limits individuals' direct ownership and access, whereas without the state, the people would have direct access to the goods and services the state rations. This essay looks at access to property when property is controlled by the state, contrasted with a scenario where no such state intervention exists.
The church as an experiment, demonstrates the distinction between the spiritual and material worlds. Trust, essential for personal relationships, professional success, and societal stability, involves reliability and confidence in others. Although science can measure physical reality, it fails when faced with faith. Trust, built through empathy, honesty, and effective communication, forms the foundation for cooperation and progress. In contrast, a lack of trust leads to societal division and personal isolation. True spiritual maturity arises from faith, underpinning civilization through specialization, which is impossible without mutual trust. Thus, the church's value and impact can be measured through the assets devoted to God and the work of believers, offering an objective comparison to the fallen world.
The concept of a single North American economic zone necessitates a free-market system where goods and services are priced based on labor inputs, devoid of state-imposed premiums, and governed by the labor theory of value. This essay is critical of the state's role in property rights and regulatory licencing, advocating for a theocratic approach where the church holds property for believers to access according to their specializations within twelve economic sectors. These sectors, each functioning as a ministry, are responsible for the welfare and job provision of their members, transcending political boundaries but organized into twelve geographical administrative units. This essay advocates for the reconfiguring of the North American economy into a free market structure based solely on the Labor Theory of Value.
This document outlines a vision for establishing a theocratic Canada, emphasizing the need for spiritual rebirth and a distinct Christian culture. It argues that true governance must be centered on God, separating believers from secular influences.• Theocracy Defined: A theocracy is characterized by a society with God at the center, built on Biblical truths. • Role of Repentance: The first step towards a theocratic society is repentance, which is viewed as a necessary but historically unachieved goal among humanity. • Christian Identity: Christians are described as a new spiritually mature race. • Separation from Materialism: Achieving a perfected theocracy requires a separation from the materialistic and fallen world, giving rise to a culture free from parasitism. • Concept of Rebirth: Spiritual rebirth is essential for transformation, involving a profound change in one's inner being and alignment with God's will. • Community and Mutual Dependency: The document emphasizes the necessity of community in achieving spiritual growth, contrasting faith with coercive societal structures that promote parasitic relationships.
This essay explores the balance between faith and works in Christianity, emphasizing that while works alone cannot bring salvation, faith without accompanying works is incomplete. The ideal Christian community is depicted as one that is spiritually mature and separate from the materialistic world, guided by the Holy Spirit. This community is free from parasitic behaviors, striving for perfection through spiritual growth and unity, as illustrated by the biblical command in 2 Corinthians 6:17 to remain separate from the world. The ultimate goal is to create a church that glorifies God and supports the spiritual development of all its members.
Todays essay critiques both the right and left political ideologies, arguing that both sides fail to acknowledge the fundamental principle of divine ownership of the natural world. The right's belief in individual ownership and free markets overlooks God's creation, while the left's disregard for individual property rights does not extend to government regulation. Trump's approach of decentralizing resource management and promoting American individualism is seen as a continuation of past errors, leading to the emergence of a new class of powerful, self-serving individuals, akin to Robber Barons, who control property unjustly. Ultimately, the text suggests that neither political side achieves true justice or righteousness.
This essay explores the concept of the unforgivable sin, which is characterized as blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, emphasizing that true repentance and fear of having committed this sin are actually signs of the Holy Spirit's work. It underscores the importance of the church as the vehicle of salvation and the necessity of the Holy Spirit's presence for one's spiritual maturation and ultimate salvation. The essay also contrasts those who spiritually mature and contribute positively to the community with those who remain spiritually immature and dependent on others, arguing that the latter blaspheme the Holy Spirit and, like parasites, cannot be forgiven.
A theocracy operates without physical coercion because its laws are intrinsic to the system, as exemplified by Jesus' fulfillment of the law in Matthew 5:17-20. In contrast to human exocratic systems, which are governed externally, God's creation is isocratic, where truth and morality are absolute. Sin, which harms oneself, and evil, which harms others, are detrimental to the success of individuals and society. In a theocracy, there is a clear direction and a single objective, rooted in an inherent truth that defines right and wrong, making it a perfect system in comparison to the flawed, external governance of human systems.
The author argues that a culture with lower taxes and crime is superior to cultures where social costs are high. He then posits that achieving this lower taxes and crime threshold, requires transitioning to a theocracy. This essay is a critique of cultural relativism, suggesting that without a belief in objective right and wrong, society will descend into nihilism and chaos. The author contends that embracing a theocracy, which eliminates taxes and minimizes crime, is essential for humanity's survival, as cultural relativism ultimately leads to societal destruction.
This essay examines the concept of duality within various systems, critiquing both capitalism and communism for their inherent divisions, while proposing that the true line of division lies between those aligned with God and those aligned with the devil. It contrasts individuals who are driven by external forces and centralized power with those who are called by visions of the future. The deepest division is between those who contribute positively to society and those who are burdensome, framing spiritual maturity and faith as key determinants of one's value in God's creation. Ultimately, the text asserts that everything either enhances or diminishes the glory of God's creation, distinguishing between the saved and spiritually mature, and the parasites, sinners, and ungodly.
The concept of being set apart, or sanctified, is fundamental in Christian theology, emphasizing a distinct lifestyle and higher moral standards for believers. This transformation begins with accepting Jesus Christ, leading to a new, God-aligned nature. Christians' uniqueness is reflected in their adherence to love, compassion, and forgiveness as taught by Jesus, and their strong sense of community and fellowship. Despite societal challenges and persecution, Christians strive to be a beacon of hope, reflecting God's love and truth. Moreover, the text highlights the Apriorian perspective, encouraging spiritual maturity by focusing on a future defined by God, rather than being constrained by the past.
The church, as described, is the equity produced by good works, binding believers through ministry, much like a free market where precision is key. This binding normalizes relationships with friends and enemies, requiring an objective measure of value, unlike the worlds currencies, which are all asset based. The collective identity in Christ allows believers to transform from sinners to a unified, perfected church through charity and faith-based works, embodying the grace of God and rebirth in the spirit. The paradox between man as sinner and man perfected in the image of God, is resolved in the church and the ministry that forms it.
Christians ought to understand the importance of doing our best in all endeavors, avoiding both blatant and subtle forms of causing harm. The Christian principle of ministry is the way the church perfects believers. Ministry involves helping others reach their potential and binding them in spiritual maturity to the church. Sin is defined as the waste of God's provisions to you, while evil is the destruction of what God created for all. Sin is personal. Evil is general. Ministry teaches believers to avoid waste and destruction, thus honoring God's gifts and fostering mutual support and growth within the faith community. Through ministry believers are perfected.
The document argues for a paradigm shift among Christians, suggesting that value creation through preferred shares can eliminate state dependency and inflation. It challenges Christians to reevaluate their participation in secular politics and traditional missions, emphasizing that voting for politicians equates to supporting parasitism. Missions, often seen as central to Christianity, are portrayed as mere works, while true spiritual growth is achieved through ministry, as illustrated by biblical passages such as Ephesians 4:11-13. The author advocates for focusing on ministry to achieve spiritual perfection and unity in faith.