LOGICAL MINDS ONLY

Trump failed because Trump became a politician and politicians always fail. There is no path to success for a politician, the successful ones merely do not fail as bad as the rest but if you look at their career and the aftermath it will gradually become more obvious, especially with the passage of time, just how little they accomplished and how much negative results flowed from the policies they enacted. To write a positive history of a politician requires a lot of empathy and imaginative writing.

There is no truth and no certainty other than that which we can acquire through logical coherence. But there is no logical coherence possible in a relativistic or causal system.

God gave to the church the worlds most powerful admirative system. Nothing man made can compete. However the church, in its wisdom, followed the blind leaders of this world and took up the teachings of this worlds experts, thereby permitting the world to defeat it and marginalize it. Yet all the church needs to do is to do what God told them to do at the beginning.

Man has endeavored to be the measure of all things, up to and including his own salvation. But the one thing he cannot serve as the standard of is logic. Logic measures itself by its own internal coherence. One can play games with this and posit logically incoherent arguments but coherence does not just apply to a three sentence statement, it applies to reality as well, and if what you say does not cohere with observation, the logical coherence is just an illusion and a contrivance and no logical at all.

What is “The African Solution”? It is three believers and a simpler interpretation of the Bible. The Bible is a handbook, not a metaphysical textbook. Scripture is an instruction manual that makes the rest of the worlds books redundant. Africa needs three or more persons and the Holy Spirits guidance and a process can be started that will turn it, or any other place that gives Scripture its proper place in the community, into a perfect community. There is no other place to end up if you follow God, that in a state of perfection. Try and prove me wrong, follow the program set out here and see where you end up.

This essay will discuss the elimination of unemployment, the elimination of the state, taxation and laws, the end of war and crime and it may well include a piece on how to create a jail without walls, it will tell you how to create a classical free market, and how to eliminate debt, risk liabilities and create a sensible Utopia. Perfection is possible, equality is possible, a system of honest persons is possible, if you want it.

There can be only one problem from which all others are derived. If there is only one original problem, there is only one solution. If what we do has not identified the one problem but seeks to ameliorate various problems derived from the central problem there will be no solution.

A radical believes that society requires fundamental, structural change, and that such changes must address the root causes of the issues. While traditionally associated with the far-left, anti-establishment movements, the term spans the political spectrum and favors drastic overhaul over gradual reform. An Apriorian Radical believes this radical change can come from only one source; the Bible.

The perfect mission is defined by the technology of separation. We cannot be perfect within a framework of corruption. The Perfect Mission gives people a perfect destination defined by a way to guide the direction in which we head as a society. The crucial element is to separate from the imperfections of this world as we embrace the perfection of the missions objective.

There is an offer you cannot refuse because you cannot remain in the situation you are in. There is only one way out of it and at some point, you will have to accept this offer or go down with the system you are in. This system you are in cannot be repaired nor made to work because it was made to destroy itself and everyone whom it can take with it.

What is sin in the most basic of senses? Is it akin to the law whereas if one breaks a rule one has sinned, or is there something deeper and more logical about sin that defines it more of a moral problem than an ethical one. In this essay we look at the fundamental of sin so we understand the metaphysics of sin.

There is only one truth and it is logical. Inductive truth is relative and probabilistic and technically speaking, is not truth at all. Induction provides us with observations and educated guesses but these cannot be considered truths in the logical meaning of the word.

Risk is contested ownership. If there is only one owner and there are no other claiments to the thing, there is no risk attached to it, and there are no liabilities. A liability is the recognition of a level of risk attached to an asset, due to someone who has a claim to the asset along with the primary owner. When risk exists opportunity declines, because the increase in risk increase the potential loss.

There are no piecemeal solutions. Every part of the system is dependent on all other parts. The Protestant Reformation tried to correct the worst elements of the Catholic Church but ended up dependent on a state that was in even worse shape than Catholicism. In this essay the author lays out a logically consistent reformation that changes everything.

Problems disappear with only a few people and a program that systematically eliminates unemployment, debt, poverty, inflation, pollution, waste, taxation, homelessness, war, and crime. When these are eliminated the mother of all parasites, the State also disappears. Along with these problems, Apriorian Magic makes the Five Foundational Errors disappear, these foundational errors give the state is power and image of legitimacy, they are democracy, ownership, currency, laws, and power disparities.

Where do you look for the Abomination of Desolation. What form do you think it will take? Will it have a sign on it, or will a notification be issued? Or, perhaps, will you have passed it by and shook hands with it and perhaps danced with it along with your generations and saw it every day of your life. Perhaps when you see it, nothing will have changed, but you will see it because the scales have fallen off of your eyes.

To be rational requires a line of division between reason and unreason. One cannot be rational if it is not also possible to be irrational. Therefore, there is a quality to reason lacking in what we observe to be irrationality. That quality that applies to reason is charity. A reasonable man is a charitable man, whereas the unreasonable are strategic. Yet, strategy plays a major role in politics, business and even religion.

To be radical is to be extreme, at least in the eyes of the world. There is nothing more extremist than opposing the entirety of the system we are in. If one is not radical it is difficult to see how one could be Christian. Jesus was certainly considered a radical. He was radical enough to be crucified essentially for treason.

Without intention there is no mind. Mind is intention. If we do not intend to do what we do, we cannot argue that the mind was involved. Things done under compulsion, addition and coercion are not intentional acts and not under the aegis of the mind.

The Apriorian Compact is a settlement between man and God in which we the signatories give up freedom in exchange for guidance and the provision of a path towards perfection.

There is no shortage of nations that refer to themselves as a republic. There is, however, a total absence of nations that fit the profile of a republic, namely a system in which …”supreme authority belongs to the voting public.” But even though many Western nations mock the East where the voter is given only one option to choose, things are not that much better in the West. The selection is still orchestrated, and the voter is akin to a figurehead, with more ceremonial power than actual authority.

Imagine a group of persons, of any size. Imagine if they were scrupulously honest. They never lied and never did anything they would have to lie about or that was dishonest.What crime would exist, what problems would there be? What would the state do in a population of totally honest people. The Radical Theorem is this, that in a group of honest people utopia is the only possible situation. Which beg the question: Why are there so many dishonest people and why are we tolerating them?

It seems easier for men to hate than love. Is this natural? It could be said to be natural in this system of things. If not natural, it can certainly be understood. Everyone, without many exceptions, represents a risk, a threat that if one lets down ones guard and begins to trust someone, you will open yourself up to the hurt and damage of betrayal.

There is no path to intentionality by means of a dishonest mind. If we intend something we need to be honest about it.

The age-old problem has always been how does the regular citizen wrest power from the parasites. This explains the process using the example of an Intentional Community.

The true power of Christianity resides it is power to create intentionality. But let me explain what I mean below.

We all develop physically. We do not all develop spiritually. This is the Apriorian's guild to spiritual development.

What does it mean to be justified and what is the process of achieving it.

Humans are not their body, they are their programming. The person who is raised in one culture may have the same body as someone raised in another culture, but he will be a different kind of person. A new race of man does not require the morphology be different, only the type of programming needs to alter to a significant degree and a fundamental level.

How many opportunities came and went and you did nothing. They are all part of this system. This is an opportunity that is greater than all those others you missed because it makes them redundant. And it is free.

A constitution is a founding document but if it is to be truly basic it needs to iterate the most basic truths, which means, the truths established by God. Anything else is not justifiable.

Abstract: Confused about why crime, war, poverty, unemployment and all of the other failures of this world exist? Do you wonder why we can be at one and the same time, brilliant in a technological sense at one end of the spectrum, and over-grown children socially at the other end? The simple answer most people are technically insane because they gamble on an outcome they know will never come about.

There are five solutions that implemented would restore reality to the condition God designed it to be in.

If you can throw a party, have a bar b q or arrange a wedding, you have everything it takes to start a successful business, without risk.

Every problem we encounter is caused by parasitism. No exceptions.

Apriorian Apologetics is a scientific approach to apologetics. While we need always to be ready to give an answer for the faith we have, too often this is done resorting to generalities and subjective impressions. Apriorian Apologetics is an attempt to express our reasons in a way that can be accepted by a professional audience.

How to be a moral leader is surprisingly simple. All a person has to do is to strip freedom from himself and preferentially give it to others, or at least not do anything to deprive anyone of a freedom to benefit oneself.

The First Order Principle is an arcane problem discussed by philosophers for generations but ignored by the vast majority or persons, but if the First Order Principle tells us where the line between good and evil is and what are priorities ought to be, lacking an understanding of what the First Order Principle is, seriously damages our ability to marshal our resources or determine the nature of justice. A shortfall rectified herein.

Perfection, as an issue, is a non-starter. It is classed as the same type of thing as a utopia, which is interesting because imperfect beings cannot possess a perfect community nor can an imperfect place house morally perfect beings. We cannot have one without the other, and so we have resigned ourselves, prematurely, to having neither. Prematurely is the key word, in the sentence above.

What we need can only be answered when we know what is wrong with the world and why. Only when we have figured out what went wrong can we figure out what it will take to fix it.

The theology of Apriorian is based on our apologetics which is an explanation for the faith we have. Our reason is the life we have been given. Our theology is a way of life that bears fruit and in the sharing of our life and the reason for our faith, our theology becomes a charity.

Man must submit to the leading of the Spirit and the woman submits to the man. Man must mature by being able to take care of his own. The woman's maturity is achieved by means of her submission and her ability to work within the home.

The magnificent mind is a perfect mind, perfect in faith and disciplined in truth and sanctified by faith. For a perfect mind we need a new perfect faith, the Apriorian Faith.

Apriorism is the belief that truth comes from deductive reasoning not phenomenological observation. This only works if the mind can be disciplined. In this essay we look at how the mind is disciplined to construct reality.

The Disciplined Mind is the seeker of truth. Without discipline the mind cannot find truth and without truth, there is no progress or economic development. All progress flows from a disciplined mind and without that, there is no progress.

To create a totally different world, one in which unemployment, debt, poverty, inflation, pollution, waste, taxation, homelessness, war, and crime do not exist and in which the state no longer exists, all we had to do is implement what we can the Doctrine of Apriorian, a simple, self-evident rule that changes everything.

Christians have the unfortunate attitude of thinking they can do as they wish, live as they wish and everything will fall in their lap, including sanctification, as if this was just a word with no qualifications attached. To be a Christian requires discipline. The most simple position or credentialled position in reality requires disciple and certification, but salvation and sanctification just needs our consent?

The state is the symptom of a far greater and more contagious disease. Eliminating the state is akin to getting rid of a fever when the disease is still present in the body. There is no benefit to getting rid of the state, it will whither away as the actual disease is eliminated.

Genius is not being smart it is being different but to be different assumes a lot of things, most of which your average man cannot understand nor probably accept. Which tends to prove the point being made.

If there is a truth then it is one thing, not a collection of self-contained and isolated ideas. We cannot discover the truth inductively, there must be a deductive process by which the truth can not only be discovered by found in a single format that unites all other sciences and fields of inquiry.

Both rich and poor can be greedy and lazy. Being poor does not stop a person from being mean or greedy. Wealth does not mean the person is not lazy. The thing they have in common is that neither rich or poor pay the cost of their lifestyle. That falls on the rest of us to pay for.