LOGICAL MINDS ONLY

"The Great Hypothesis" explores the fundamental question of existence and origins, arguing that there must be a single source for all life and reality. It posits that without acknowledging the existence of God, one cannot logically explain the emergence of reality or maintain a coherent moral worldview. The author contrasts the belief in God with atheistic and legalistic perspectives, emphasizing that without God, society is left with the law of the jungle, where might makes right. The church provides a moral framework and community for believers, while non-believers struggle with distrust and lack of common purpose.

No one is likely to deny that the rich are not a problem, and the wealthier they are the greater problem the become. But capitalism cannot work without capital accumulation, which is also said to be delayed satisfaction. Profits which permit wealth to be accumulated without limit, are portrayed as the reward. How then can we deal with the issue of the rich if we do not deal first with the need for private interests to make sacrifices in order to produce economic development. If we require a sacrifice, then we are obliged to give them a reward. So, lets look at what we as a society do wrong, before we blame others for doing what we as a group, oblige them to do.

Why The One Reality Hypothesis Fails is offered as an explanation why science has become divided between a set of data driven physical or hard sciences and a set of narrative driven social or soft sciences that few consider part of the scientific community anymore.The problem is not the sciences, per se, so much as the reality these fields represent. The idea that reality is all one piece and all science studies the same substance, regardless of if they are a material science or part of the humanities. The reader can argue in defense of the One Reality Hypothesis, if they wish, but it is easily proved that an alternative hypothesis produces better results. The choice is between a reality that is logically incoherent and restricted to highly artificial environments, or a reality that hardens the soft science, and produces results in an environment that is far more humane.

The most focused and significant question we can ask is, if there is a solution? Life is a process of solving a series of problems. Throughout history the approach has been ad hoc and piece-meal. We have dealt with problems as the come up, dealing with one problem at a time, with little in the way of an over-arching philosophy or process, let alone an algorithm. But problems do not spontaneously emerge out of the ether. They had to have an antecedent and a cause. They need to have come from somewhere and that source or origin is the real problem we need to tackle, because what we struggle with are the symptoms of a problem. One thing is certain; we cannot solve the problem by dealing with symptoms on a one-to-one basis as they occur. This essay takes you to the root of the problem and because it reveals the root cause, it also reveals the solution to all of the symptoms.

"What Is Man Without God" explores the philosophical and theological implications of a world without a divine presence. It argues that there are two races of man and two realities, and that the one reality hypothesis, which posits a single, all-encompassing reality, is inherently contradictory. The document suggests that without God, man lacks boundaries, direction, and purpose, leading to a relativistic universe where truth is uncertain and morality is ad hoc. It emphasizes that the absence of God results in a lack of absolute truth, which ultimately fails to provide a coherent understanding of existence.The document further contends that the presence of God provides a foundation for absolute truth, morality, and purpose. It argues that assuming the existence of an uncreated Creator allows for a coherent understanding of reality and the establishment of a meaningful life. The text highlights the negative consequences of denying God's existence, such as the prioritization of short-term gratification over long-term benefits. Ultimately, the document asserts that man without God is left with a purposeless existence and a moral framework that lacks a foundation.

“The Church Is The New Eden” emphasizes the spiritual transformation of Christians. It argues that Christians are spiritual beings, set apart from the physical world, and must die to the flesh to be reborn in the spirit. The church is portrayed as a spiritual entity, not a physical institution, where believers live in unity and faith, free from worldly concerns like unemployment, debt, and poverty. The document also highlights the importance of separating from the world that does not reflect the perfect will of God and conforming to the new reality of the spiritually mature.

There is one factor and one factor only that determines if a people become civilized or not. “Decoding The One Factor Responsible For Civilization” discusses the crucial role of faith in the rise and sustainability of civilizations. It argues that faith, leads to works of faith, which produces civilization. Those cultures with strong faith and trust in their communities tend to innovate and progress economically, more than those who do not trust their neighbors. Ultimately, the evidence demonstrates that deflation is the sole determinate factor in the creation of economic development and prosperity. Without an ability to deflate prices the economy cannot produce the goods and services required to produce a civilized society. Inflation is an indicator of excessive parasitism.

What Is A Nation explores the concept of a nation, emphasizing its complexity and fluidity. It discusses how nations are often perceived as simple entities defined by geographical boundaries, but in reality, they are deeply rooted in shared characteristics such as culture, language, history, and ethnicity. The document highlights the distinction between a nation and a state, noting that a nation may not always have its own state, as seen with the Kurds or Poland during partition. It also delves into the idea that nations are often modern inventions tied to the rise of the state, industrialization, and capitalism, and how political events can shape national identity. The document further examines the role of shared citizenship, values, and political principles in defining nations, particularly in diverse states like the U.S. and France, and contrasts this with ethnic nationalism.The challenges of forging national identity in the face of globalization and migration, is also addressed. National identity remains a potent force despite the rise of supranational entities like the EU. Of far greater importance is family and faith in forming national identity.

The Christian Covenant discusses the concept of the New Covenant in Christianity, which is established through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. This covenant is rooted in biblical texts, particularly in Jeremiah 31:31-34 and Hebrews 8:6-13, and is seen as God's promise to forgive sins and establish a renewed relationship with His people. The New Covenant is contrasted with the Old Covenant (Mosaic Covenant), which was based on adherence to the Law given through Moses. Instead, the New Covenant emphasizes grace through faith in Jesus Christ, the forgiveness of sins, and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.The document highlights key features of the New Covenant, such as its universal access to all people who accept Christ, regardless of ethnicity or background, and the role of Jesus as the mediator of this covenant. Christian practices like Communion serve as tangible reminders of the New Covenant, and believers are called to live out its principles by following Jesus' teachings, particularly the command to love God and others as yourself.

Neo-nationalism is a modern iteration of nationalism that emphasizes the nation as a collective entity owned by its citizens, akin to the Biblical church. Nationalism is distinct from fascism. Nationalists do not idolize the state but view the nation as synonymous with the church. Extreme nationalism, which prioritizes one nation over others contradicts the inclusive vision of the gospel. The document further elaborates on the New Testament's teachings regarding the relationship between believers and governing authorities, emphasizing submission to earthly authorities while maintaining ultimate allegiance to God. It argues that nationalism tied to aggression or national loyalty that requires ultimate allegiance can become idolatrous. Leaders need to be Christian and view the nation as a place in which the people serve God. The document concludes that while the New Testament does not explicitly discuss modern concepts of nations or nationalism, the implication is that ultimately the nation and the church are identical in substance.

"A Racialized History" explores the concept of race from a theological perspective, particularly through the lens of the Bible. It argues that history has a racial component and that the Bible provides the necessary data to understand this racialized interpretation. The document emphasizes the duality in humanity as seen in the Bible, dividing people into two groups: the saved and the unsaved. The saved are those who have accepted Jesus Christ and are spiritually reborn, while the unsaved live according to the sinful patterns of the world and are separated from God.The document further explains that the Bible's understanding of race is distinct from the worldly view. It describes the saved as a new race of spiritually mature individuals who live in a different reality, set apart for God's purposes. In contrast, the unsaved are bound by the law and live in the flesh, influenced by the world's systems and Satan's deception. The document concludes that there are only two possible races: those who live according to the truths of Scripture and those who do not.

“What Is Man” discusses the definition of man, highlighting various philosophers' definitions. Plato considered humans rational souls and Descartes' thought man was a thinking substance. Most definitions focus on man's physical features yet cannot help but take notice of our uniqueness compared to other forms of creation. However, in this essay it is demonstrated we cannot understand the nature of man apart from his creator.

The essay “The Great Unresolved Miscalculation That Condemns Many”, explores the theological tension between human worth, divine justice, and salvation, contrasting two views: humans have innate worth as God's image-bearers but face hell due to unrepentant sin, or humans must earn value through good works. Scripture, particularly Genesis 1:26-27 and Psalm 8, affirms intrinsic human worth rooted in the imago Dei, while passages like Ephesians 2:8-9 and Romans 3:28 emphasize salvation by grace through faith, not works. Hell reflects God's justice for rejecting grace, not a denial of worth. The essay critiques the works-based view as undermining grace, arguing that faith, not works, enables salvation, with works as evidence of faith.The essay further clarifies that salvation occurs not in the "terrestrial" (fleshly) state but in the spiritual state within the church. Faith, coupled with works within the church, binds believers to God's grace, transforming them into a new spiritual identity. The miscalculation lies in believing salvation happens in the flesh rather than through participation in the church, where faith and works together manifest the spiritual reality of salvation as and in the church.Without a true Biblical church being a reflection of faith to be saved in and through, salvation is made problematical.

"The Spiritual State Party" discusses the inherent limitations and issues within political parties and the state. It argues that political parties, regardless of their orientation, only modify the state within predefined limits and fail to address the root problems. The state is portrayed as inherently parasitic, benefiting from the productivity of others without contributing value. The document suggests that the true solution lies in a spiritual state, represented by the church, which is composed of spiritually mature Christians who eliminate parasitism and protect the rights of those who create value. The Spiritual State Party solves the problem of voting for different parties and getting the same result or worse.

The idea of human free will and God's Omniscient Power have never been easy to reconcile. The existence of evil and human accountability were along debated subjects, but a less debated but perhaps more problematical dilemma is predestination and the freedom of man.In this essay, “How God Predestines Us”, the author looks at some clear and uncontroversial scriptural versus to make sense of what heretofore has been a few, contrived solutions.Two facts emerge, man dies in the flesh but our faith does save us, but the power belongs to God.

“What Is Better Than Gold” explores the concept of money, its characteristics, and its role in the economy. What Is Better Than Gold discusses the nature of money, explaining that it is an asset that can be divided into convenient units of value and is owned by someone who sells or lends access. The document discusses the challenges of debt repayment, the limitations of using gold as money, and the importance of trust in currency. It also highlights the various forms of money, including commodity money, representative money, fiat money, and digital money, and the historical evolution of money from barter systems to modern digital currencies. The document concludes by emphasizing the need for a monetary system based on faith. The church could issue money based on faith expressed in the work we do. Faith is better than gold as without it, there is no economy nor workable currency. With faith we can issue a monetary unit that produces no debt or inflation.

“A Private Message for Christians” challenges modern believers to reevaluate what it truly means to live out their faith. It argues that many churches focus too heavily on baptisms and attendance numbers while neglecting the second part of the Great Commission: teaching obedience to Jesus' teachings. Christianity, according to the text, must be more than spiritual sentiment—it must be practical, logical, and visibly separate from worldly systems. The Bible is framed not just as a sacred book but as a handbook rooted in truth, capable of withstanding scientific and logical scrutiny. Obedience requires Christians to fully separate from "Babylon," or the world's culture. Living our faith means—turning the other cheek, giving generously, forgiving repeatedly, and more—is only possible as a church that is outside of the state. There needs to be a radical re-centering of Christian life around community, obedience, and theological soundness. Christianity loses its power and purpose if believers do not commit fully to building and being a new spiritual identity, a race that calls itself the church.

"Three Questions That Frighten Christians" explores three fundamental questions that Christians often avoid: what is this reality outside of Eden, where do we go when we separate from the world of sin, and how do we achieve perfection if we are sinners in a world of sin? Christians need to separate themselves from the fallen world and strive for spiritual maturity and perfection, as the church. It is only as the church that we can separate from this world, be perfected in faith as a new creature and a new race, in a place that is not part of this physical world.

There is a sharp line of demarcation between a workable civilization and a country in decline. It is a knife edge that divides a workable system and one that is autophagic. The success of a civilization is the difference between consumption and investment or even a profit and a loss. The more parasites, the more consumption eats into your future, until there is no future.

If we look at ten different trends as separate problems, we will never find a solution. We will find they are interrelated and as we try and fix one, we impact the other nine in unwanted ways. But if these problems are all interrelated they all come from the same source. When we start to deal with the single causative factor, we find we can eliminate all ten issues at the same time.

There is only one reason why you think the situation is complicated, and that is because if you understood how simple things really were, you would no longer consent to being exploited and what you have been taken from you.If you are productive, you are a host to a very aggressive and successful parasite. And that is all you really need to know about all these problems that appear intransigent. They are caused by parasites and your own consent to being and remaining a host. Stop parasitism and eliminate the source of the problem. Its that simple.

The document explores the concept of the church, emphasizing that it is not merely a physical building or an assembly of people in pews, but rather a community of believers in Jesus Christ. It highlights various aspects of the church, such as being the body of Christ, a community of faith, and having both universal and local expressions. The church's mission is to glorify God, spread the Gospel, administer sacraments, and serve others through acts of love and justice. Different denominations emphasize different aspects of the church, but all agree that it is fundamentally a spiritual and relational entity centered on Christ.The document further argues that the church is a practical device that enables believers to fulfill their purpose and acquire their true identity through work. It posits that the church builds itself by binding believers together, creating work for its members, and generating value. The church is seen as a technology of separation, helping Christians to live under a new master and a new covenant, separate from the fallen world. Ultimately, the church works as it creates work for its members, fostering faith and cooperation among them, and serving as a measure of the works they do.

“Doctrine Of The Two Races” discusses the concept of race. The author takes the position that humanity is divided into two distinct races. This division is not based on cultural, political, economic, or religious differences, but rather on a moral and logical separation between those of the flesh and those of the spirit, a division created by God. The two races are characterized by their inherent tendency to either create or destroy. Creative individuals add value to the world, while destructive individuals diminish it. The document emphasizes that true economic development can only occur when individuals work for themselves and retain their earnings, and it advocates for a theocratic economy based on biblical principles to clearly delineate the two races and prevent exploitation and corruption.

“God Created Evil But Did Not” explores the theological and philosophical debate surrounding the existence of evil and its relationship with God. It delves into various perspectives, including the idea that evil is not a distinct entity created by God but rather a result of free will and human choices. The document references biblical texts, such as Isaiah 45:7, and interpretations by theologians like St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas, who describe evil as a "privation of good." It also discusses the views of different religious traditions, including Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and Zoroastrianism, on the nature and origin of evil.God Created Evil But Did Not also examines the argument that evil is an emergent property of creation, arising from the freedom granted to created beings. It highlights the notion that evil is not a substance but a distortion of good or a consequence of moral failure. The text also addresses the problem of natural disasters and the role of free will in the existence of evil. Overall, the document presents a comprehensive analysis of the complex issue of evil, emphasizing the diversity of perspectives and the ongoing debate among theologians and philosophers.

The Doctrine of the Three Generations outlines a recurring cycle in history based on three personality-driven political archetypes:First Generation (Liberal/Subsistence-based): Emphasizes equality and self-reliance but leads to stagnation; associated with tribal societies and early American settlers.Second Generation (Conservative/Industrialized): Fueled by surplus and hierarchy; drives innovation, progress, and inequality—seen in industrial Britain and post-settlement America.Third Generation (Apriorian/Christian): Rooted in spiritual principles; promotes cooperation, moral responsibility, and upliftment—not through force but inspired mutual growth.Only the Third Generation model—grounded in Christian ethics—can create a truly just, prosperous society.

The essay argues that agorophobia, redefined as a fear of free markets and accountability, is a widespread, undiagnosed spiritual disease manifesting as evil, characterized by dependency on state intervention and moral immaturity. It posits that this illness is prevalent among both the dependent poor and the excessively wealthy, who rely on the state to sustain their lifestyles, and is exacerbated by migration from undeveloped nations, leading to social decay. The state, depicted as inherently flawed and parasitic, perpetuates this disease by fostering dependency and enabling wealth expropriation from self-sufficient "agorocrats"—those who value free markets and personal responsibility—while aligning with freeloaders to maintain its existence, thus creating societal problems like poverty, crime, and war.Two groups are contrasted: the spiritually immature, who fear market accountability and cling to state-supported parasitism, and the spiritually mature agorocrats, who thrive in a free market without needing state regulation. All social issues stem from this parasitic dynamic between state and its allies. The solution lies in separating from those exhibiting agorophobia, aligning with biblical principles of self-reliance and moral accountability, to create a flawless system where individuals pay their own way, free from state interference and exploitation.

"Diversity Destroys Legitimacy" argues that diversity (for its own sake) undermines Western society's cohesion and legitimacy by introducing conflicting cultural values and identities. It challenges the claim that diversity strengthens society, asserting that the West's historical power derives from its cultural and technological advancements, that stem from a particular cultural mosaic, that despite its diversity, was still limited and cohesive in its primary values. Activities such as human sacrifice or self-destructive practices (e.g., abortion and childlessness) add to diversity but not survivability.Diversity, as a man-made construct, is said to divide rather than unite, hindering the shared trust needed for development by prioritizing diversity for diversity sake, rather than seeing diversity as a secondary and derivative value. The author critiques the notion that all cultures are equally valid, arguing that incompatible values, such as Sharia versus Western law, force a choice that threatens societal legitimacy. Diversity is only beneficial in context, and unchecked, it risks eroding a community's core identity and values. As Westerners we need to seek diversity within the context of the Wests core values and priorities, rather than, as has been done, increase diversity as if it is the single most important social variable. There are other factors that are as equally important or more important.

The author views Africa's underdevelopment as a systemic disease rather than caused by external factors such as colonialism. The central issue is morality and the lack of a path to legitimate ownership. Disagreements about ownership lead to wars and inefficiency.Claims to resources often rely on force rather than on the exercise of legitimate ownership. Weak governments only increase anarchy, prompting entrepreneurs to seek ways to protect their investments using markets.The potential for ownership through illicit means using force and corrupt agencies, creates numerous claimants, increasing the potential for conflict over valuable resources. A cultural expectation that surplus goods will be shared or ought to be shared, inhibits personal investment and ownership, as individuals feel ownership is always conditional and never safe from outside claims based on tribal affiliations or family ties.Establishing a basis where people can claim a moral right to what they have is essential for progress; without it, individuals cannot claim the fruits of their labor. Africa needs to develop a spiritual community, or church that is able to emphasize trust based on the moral right to own what we create. Africa needs to abandon the natural rights model that necessitates resorting to armed interventions and cumbersome court proceedings.

The Mechanics Of Rebirth explores the concept of spiritual rebirth and becoming a "new man" in Christian theology. It emphasizes that rebirth is not a mere upgrade of the old self but a profound transformation into a new creature, characterized by a renewed heart, Christ-like character, and a sense of eternal purpose. This process involves repentance, faith, regeneration, and ongoing sanctification, empowered by God's grace and the Holy Spirit.A key argument presented is that the "new man" is not an individualistic entity but intrinsically tied to the Church, understood as the collective body of Christ. True rebirth requires subsuming personal identity into the Church, where faith becomes the foundation of one's new identity. The essay asserts that salvation is through faith alone, as faith enables full immersion into the Church and alignment with the body of Christ.The author also highlights the inseparability of believers and the Church, advocating for a unity where "we" represents both the individual and the collective Church. Any dependence on worldly identity is seen as a lack of faith that undermines the growth of the Church and the transformation of the believer. Ultimately, the essay calls for a complete identification with the Church as the manifestation of rebirth and faith in action.

The essay explores both the tangible and intangible aspects of culture, emphasizing its role in shaping societies and reflecting human creativity. Material culture consists of physical artefacts like tools, buildings, and technology, while non-material culture includes beliefs, norms, language, and customs that influence thought and behavior. Language is highlighted as a key medium for communication and cultural preservation, while traditions, systems of governance, art, and symbols are seen as expressions of cultural identity.The essay also discusses the diversity of culture, noting the existence of subcultures shaped by geography, ethnicity, religion, or social class. However, it asserts a specific perspective, claiming that culture has value only when it aligns with Christianity. It argues that Christian values uniquely create true culture. Christian culture is uniquely meritocratic because meritocracy follows belief in Scripture.

The essay critiques the modern conflation of the roles of evangelist and pastor roles, suggesting pastors overly focus on evangelism rather than deeper pastoral care, limiting their societal impact. It argues that the church has ceded its community role to the state, which inefficiently uses resources taken from the faithful. The "rise of the Right" is presented as a movement to reclaim control over resources, rejecting state overreach grounded in power rather than morality. The Right should rely on the Word of God and market-driven solutions (“agorocracy”), not violence or leftist tactics, to restore Christian values and reduce state dominance, fostering a society where individuals retain the fruits of their labor.

If we give men power, they will use this power to gain more power. If we put men in charge of regulating the free market, it will cease to be driven solely by the supply and demand equation. These men will use the free market to give themselves an edge. There is a way to have an unregulated free market. However, we have to avoid supporting people, organizations, institutions and other social elements that require government intervention to exist. In other words, our societal institutions cannot preclude the existence of a free market if we wish free markets to exist.

Pan-scripturalism is a theological approach that treats the entirety of the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation, as unified, interconnected, and equally authoritative. It emphasizes the coherence of Scripture, where every verse and book contributes to the overarching narrative of God's redemptive plan. Central principles include the unity of Scripture, the equal authority of all biblical texts, and the interconnectedness of biblical themes, stressing that no passage can be fully understood in isolation from the broader biblical context. Coupled with Solar Scriptura it encourages Christians to look at the Bible as an authoritative whole giving it primacy over all other sources of knowledge.

This essay explores the relationship between humanity, the environment, and the concept of faith. It asserts that humans, unlike animals, are ill-adapted to survive in nature and must create environments tailored to their needs through cooperation. Cooperation is essential for human survival, but greed and corruption erode trust and faith in society. Without trust, systems and societies decay.The essay emphasizes the transactional nature of faith, positing that faith is built on mutual exchange and trust. As God provides everything to humanity, humans are obligated to give everything to God and to others who support and help them. Failure to reciprocate leads to betrayal, loss of trust, and ultimately societal collapse. The author warns against greed and dishonesty, advocating for a transactional approach to relationships and faith to uphold societal integrity and ensure communal survival.

The text explores the compatibility of meritocracy with Christian values, arguing that the Bible supports the idea of rewarding individual effort, ability, and diligence. While Christians are equal as sinners and created in the image of God, this equality does not negate differences in performance and productivity. The Bible acknowledges and rewards faithfulness and diligence, aligning with meritocratic principles.Key biblical passages supporting meritocracy include:- Proverbs 22:29: Emphasizing recognition and opportunity for skilled work.- Colossians 3:23–24: Linking diligent work to divine reward.The text concludes that Christians can advocate for meritocracy while remaining faithful to biblical values by recognizing the importance of individual responsibility, effort, and stewardship. It positions meritocracy not as a rejection of equality but as a framework for rewarding faithfulness and diligence in alignment with Scripture.

Its more complicated than most Christians seem to understand. Turning the other cheek does not make a Christian a pacifist, nor is obedience the same as being empathetic. There is a far deeper meaning to the Scripture than what the churches tell us.

This essay explores the concept of relevance and purpose within neo-Protestantism. It argues that true purpose lies in emulating God and achieving a god-like state, motivated by divine principles. Conversion and teaching others Christ's instructions are central to fulfilling this purpose. The essay critiques modern society's focus on power and property, asserting that true value comes from merit, which reflects actions aligned with God's will. Neo-Protestantism emphasizes relevance through helping individuals reach their full potential by mirroring God's will, and rewards merit as an expression of this relevance.

This essay explores biblical teachings concerning sin within the church, emphasizing the importance of holiness, repentance, and accountability among believers. Citing passages from both the Old and New Testaments, it highlights how Scripture calls for addressing sin to protect the spiritual integrity of the church. Key points include the dangers of tolerating sin, the process for reconciliation and discipline, and the balance between correction and love. The essay underscores the responsibility of the church to uphold biblical principles, ensuring that unrepentant sin does not compromise its mission or witness while reflecting God's transformative love and truth.

The essay argues that all governments are inherently Satanic as they oppose God's authority and perpetuate lies rooted in moral relativism. It explores the Biblical basis for resisting unjust authorities when they conflict with divine commands, emphasizing obedience to God over earthly powers. The essay critiques governments as parasitic entities reliant on coercion and falsehoods to sustain their authority, highlighting their opposition to the mission of the church and God's sovereignty. Ultimately, it calls for Christians to live in alignment with God's will as a means of resisting the corrupt nature of the state.

The fall of Babylon is the fall of what we have lived in since we were ejected from Eden. The fall of Babylon is then a story of epochal change. The fall of Babylon represents the end of one era and the start of another. The fall of Babylon represents the end of one period of history and the beginning of another. This essay discusses where the line between epochs is and what is on one side of the line but not on the other. What specifically is eliminated when Babylon falls? The answer is sin in the general sense, but what is the thing that is common to all sin and what does the world look like at the end of this era?

This essay advocates for a shift from a rights-based governance model to a transactional economy. It argues that traditional concepts of rights, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, are flawed and should be replaced by systems where individuals earn what they need through equal-value exchanges. Governments, which currently expropriate wealth from citizens, are urged to dismantle such practices and instead enable a transactional economy focused on full employment.In this model, businesses exist not to generate wealth for a few but to provide jobs and essential goods and services. The state's role is to empower businesses organized into sectors to offer sustainable jobs without prioritizing profit. The essay ultimately calls for the restructuring of the economy and government, prioritizing employment and equitable value exchange over wealth accumulation and handouts.

The essay emphasizes the role of Christians in shaping a society aligned with biblical values such as justice, integrity, and love. It advocates for intentional action in politics and daily life to reflect God's truth and foster unity. Christians are called to act as a light to others, guiding them to God by living purposefully and selflessly.The text explores the tension between selfishness and selflessness, questioning how these approaches align with Christ's mission. It stresses the importance of balance, as all are equal in God's eyes, and no one has a greater obligation to uplift others. This equality underscores the need for a "flat" church and a transactional society where value is exchanged fairly.Finally, the essay argues that enabling sin or taking unearned rewards hinders the work of the Holy Spirit. The resolution lies in creating a "transactional church" that encourages accountability and mutual responsibility while maintaining a focus on winning souls to Christ.

Have you wondered how, if we are chosen for salvation before the beginning of time, how can we be saved by faith, and if we are saved before we are born, what is the point of works?The article explores the relationship between faith, salvation, and predestination, emphasizing the balance between divine omniscience and human responsibility. It asserts that while God determines salvation by establishing the church as the Bride of Christ, human actions and collective faith within the church play a critical role.

This article explores theological concepts surrounding sin, community, and the inevitable triumph of good over evil. It argues that sin is inherently self-defeating, as it relies on parasitic exploitation, which ultimately leads to its own destruction. The church is presented as the ideal form of community, emphasizing mutual support and sacrificial contributions, mirroring Christ's example. The victory of good is rooted in the nature of God as absolute Good, with sin having no sustainable power. Technological progress is linked to humanity's ability to thrive and exemplify works of faith, while evil persists only temporarily through oppression until righteousness prevails.

This essay explores the Christian response to secular and ungodly systems, emphasizing resistance rooted in biblical principles such as love, service, and righteousness. It delves into the cost of opposing such systems, drawing on teachings of Jesus and examples like the civil rights movement, while urging believers to persevere in faith and uphold God's truth. The text critiques the compatibility of church and state, highlighting the logical compromises that lead to moral failings. Sin is described as cumulative, necessitating active resistance by Christians who must rebel against worldly corruption to forge a new, godly existence within the church, viewed as the New Eden. Ultimately, the essay calls for unwavering commitment to God's vision and the rejection of the fallen world.

This essay explores the principles of a biblical management system rooted in decentralization, accountability, and mutual care, modeled after the early Church. It advocates for clearly defined roles, collective decision-making, and conflict resolution guided by biblical teachings such as Matthew 18:15-17, emphasizing reconciliation over punishment. Inspired by the parable of the talents (Matthew 25:14-30), the essay underscores responsible resource management through transparency, equity, and investment in community growth. Ecclesiasticism is contrasted with liberalism, emphasizing servant leadership and the rejection of parasitic behaviors that impose burdens on others. It calls for self-sufficiency, ethical work practices, and the elimination of freeloading. We are commanded to pay laborers their wages and to live in accordance with God's vision for humanity. We argue for a system that aligns with divine principles, ensuring that individuals honor their duties without exploiting others. Only when we can eliminate parasitism and freeloading will we have a just and harmonious community. Liberalism promotes and legitimizes parasitism. Ecclesiastical communities eliminate freeloading because it eliminates the justifications used to perpetuate it.

This essay argues that the concept of morality is inherently tied to the existence of God. It posits that the "moral ought" must be divinely inspired and transcend human subjectivity to maintain objectivity and legitimacy. Without God, morality becomes relative, introspective, and ultimately self-justifying, lacking any universal standard. The essay suggests that a moral law must be as intrinsic to reality as energy or motion, serving as a quantifiable and transcendent principle that guides human behavior.The essay further contends that God, as the Creator, has absolute and uncontested rights over His creation, mirroring the rights humans hold over what they create. This divine authority underpins the Christian perspective, asserting that the moral ought obligates us to respect the rights of the Creator. It critiques atheistic perspectives as emotionally driven and lacking a foundational basis for legitimacy. Ultimately, the essay concludes that the moral ought demands adherence to the principle that only the creator of something holds rightful claim to it, fundamentally shaping the relationship between humans, morality, and God.

The author explores various ethical theories, including Ethical Relativism, Feminist Ethics, Kantian deontology, Mill's consequentialism, and Aristotle's virtue ethics, highlighting their contributions and limitations. It emphasizes the importance of the "moral ought," a logical foundation for universal justice and law, noting that ethical systems often reflect cultural or ideological biases rather than universally defensible principles. The absence of a universally defensible moral ought leads to the formation of laws rooted in power disparities rather than in intrinsic values and abstract principles.The argument progresses further, to suggest that the "moral ought" is inherent to reality, akin to natural laws such as gravity. Ownership of what we create, and the right to transfer what we own to a buyer, are posited as universally uncontestable truths. In short, we already quantify evil when we value stolen goods. Evil can be measured based on the value of what is unjustly taken, linking morality to the tangible construct of ownership and evil to offenses against the rightful owner defined by the identity of its creator.

The text explores the theological implications of God's existence as described in the Bible, emphasizing a purposeful trajectory for creation. Key ideas include the existence of an objective moral order based on God's holy and just nature, leading to human accountability for actions. It highlights humanity's purpose as knowing, loving, and serving God, in alignment with His will, while offering hope through the promise of eternal life for those who accept His salvation. Biblical references such as Romans 2:6-8, Matthew 22:37-39, and John 11:25-26 underscore these conclusions.The deduction made assume the Bible's authority as a guide, and without this presupposition, interpretations of God's nature and purposes could differ significantly, underscoring both the depth and complexity of deriving theological insights from scripture.

This essay explores the tension between market-driven democracy and the concept of meritocracy. It argues that when the market dictates value, it filters availability based on demand rather than true merit, aligning success with popularity rather than exceptionalism. Merit, defined as being exceptional and enabling progress, requires individual specialization and differentiation, which cannot be fully gauged or decided by democratic processes or collective decision-making.The author posits that progress stems from individual innovation and that the majority cannot guide or evaluate specialization effectively. While democracy empowers the masses, it may inadvertently stifle progress by reducing the space for individual merit to flourish. The essay concludes by highlighting the incompatibility between democracy and meritocracy, emphasizing that merit is ultimately validated through the group's organic response to individual contributions rather than dictated by centralized authority.

The essay explores the biblical call to hate evil, emphasizing that ordained hatred is not directed at individuals but at sin and spiritual forces opposing God's kingdom. It highlights the importance of courage, humility, and discernment in confronting evil while avoiding self-righteousness or hatred of people. The text distinguishes between personal sins and acts of evil that harm the church, urging believers to forgive personal wrongs but to stand against harm inflicted on others, especially within the community of faith. Ultimately, it calls for aligning with God's holiness, loving sinners, and actively opposing evil in a way that reflects God's grace and transforms the world.