Podcasts about murdaugh trial

The Cheat Sheet is The Murder Sheet's segment breaking down weekly news and updates in some of the murder cases we cover.Today, we'll be covering three high-profile cases: the social media-related homicide involving Justin Mohn and his father Michael in Pennsylvania, the mysterious deaths of David Harrington, Ricky Johnson, and Clayton McGeeney outside Jordan Willis's home in Kansas City, Missouri, and the jury tampering angle of the case against Alex Murdaugh.NBC's coverage of the slaying of Michael Mohn in Pennsylvania:https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pa-man-arrested-decapitating-father-youtube-video-rcna1365096 ABC Action News's coverage of Justin Mohn's bizarre behavior before his father's killing: https://6abc.com/man-accused-of-beheading-father-justin-mohn-michael-middletown-township-pennsylvania/14377336/https://nypost.com/2024/01/26/news/5th-kansas-city-chiefs-fan-at-party-where-3-died-idd-as-alex-weamer-lee-report/Coverage from Fox News about Jordan Willis checking into rehab: https://www.foxnews.com/us/kansas-city-chiefs-fans-deaths-jordan-willis-checks-rehab-families-await-toxicology-resultsNBC's coverage of the latest hearing around jury tampering in the Alex Murdaugh case: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/clerk-denies-jury-tampering-alex-murdaugh-seeks-new-trial-hearing-rcna136161Send tips to murdersheet@gmail.com.The Murder Sheet is a production of Mystery Sheet LLC .See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The U.S. vows to retaliate following a drone strike in Jordan that killed three Americans. Plus, House Republicans push to impeach the Secretary of Homeland Security as a bipartisan group of lawmakers work on a potential border security bill. Also, Elon Musk announces the first human has received an implant from his brain-chip company. And, a judge denied Alex Murdaugh's motion for re-trial after his team alleged jury tampering by the clerk. 

A judge has ruled that former South Carolina attorney, Alex Murdaugh, will not receive a new murder trial. Three US soldiers killed in a drone attack have been identified, as the number of those injured continues to rise. In a new intelligence report, Israel details its claims against UN aid workers it alleges were involved in Hamas's October 7th attack. A man who stole and leaked former President Donald Trump's tax records has been sentenced. A Russian figure skater has been banned for doping. Lastly, tickets for this year's Super Bowl are smashing records. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

President Joe Biden says the US will respond to a deadly drone strike in Jordan that killed three American troops. Negotiations between Israel and Hamas appear to have stalled, and so has aid. We'll tell you which Democrat could upend President Joe Biden's 2024 campaign. A hearing is expected today to decide if Alex Murdaugh should get a new trial because of allegations of jury tampering. Plus, the fallout continues at WWE. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The journey to a potential second murder trial for Alex Murdaugh has entered a labyrinth of legal complexities, as recently dissected in the "Hidden Killers" podcast. Host Tony Brueski and guest Bob Motta, a defense attorney and podcast host, unraveled the intricate details of a recent hearing that could pave the way for Murdaugh's retrial. The discussion shed light on the heightened burden of proof set by Justice Gene Toll and the narrowed scope of the upcoming evidentiary hearing.  Motta expressed no surprise at the daunting challenge laid before Murdaugh's defense. The requirement to demonstrate not only that court clerk Becky Hill tampered with the jury but also that she did so with an intention to prejudice against Murdaugh has created what Motta calls an “almost impossible task.” “The judge has set a very high burden, making it very difficult to prove Becky Hill's intent,” Motta elaborated, underscoring the steep uphill battle facing the defense.  With a focus strictly on Hill's interactions with jurors and their ability to reach an impartial verdict, the trial's scope is markedly limited. This exclusion of peripheral issues like Hill's alleged embezzlement and the wiretapping scandal involving her son narrows the defense's path to proving jury tampering. Motta highlighted this constraint: “They're not allowing them to dig into her possible motives, which was the book. All that stuff's out.”  Brueski raised an intriguing point regarding the human element in this legal drama. The juror who alleges Hill influenced their verdict decision could potentially profit from a book deal or media attention. While emphasizing the lack of any concrete evidence of such motives, Brueski and Motta acknowledged the potential for human greed to play a role in the juror's testimony. “People do crazy things for money,” Motta noted, adding a layer of complexity to the juror's credibility.  Even if Murdaugh's quest for a new trial through this avenue fails, his legal battles are far from over. “There's going to be a direct appeal as well,” Motta assured, indicating the likelihood of further appeals encompassing the entire scope of the original trial. Murdaugh's legal team is expected to continue fighting, potentially leading to an exhaustive series of appeals.  The case against Alex Murdaugh, with its myriad twists and challenges, embodies the complexity and unpredictability of high-profile legal proceedings. As the public awaits the outcome of the evidentiary hearing, the question lingers: Will Murdaugh's defense navigate this legal maze successfully, or will the burden of proof prove too formidable a barrier to a retrial? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The journey to a potential second murder trial for Alex Murdaugh has entered a labyrinth of legal complexities, as recently dissected in the "Hidden Killers" podcast. Host Tony Brueski and guest Bob Motta, a defense attorney and podcast host, unraveled the intricate details of a recent hearing that could pave the way for Murdaugh's retrial. The discussion shed light on the heightened burden of proof set by Justice Gene Toll and the narrowed scope of the upcoming evidentiary hearing.  Motta expressed no surprise at the daunting challenge laid before Murdaugh's defense. The requirement to demonstrate not only that court clerk Becky Hill tampered with the jury but also that she did so with an intention to prejudice against Murdaugh has created what Motta calls an “almost impossible task.” “The judge has set a very high burden, making it very difficult to prove Becky Hill's intent,” Motta elaborated, underscoring the steep uphill battle facing the defense.  With a focus strictly on Hill's interactions with jurors and their ability to reach an impartial verdict, the trial's scope is markedly limited. This exclusion of peripheral issues like Hill's alleged embezzlement and the wiretapping scandal involving her son narrows the defense's path to proving jury tampering. Motta highlighted this constraint: “They're not allowing them to dig into her possible motives, which was the book. All that stuff's out.”  Brueski raised an intriguing point regarding the human element in this legal drama. The juror who alleges Hill influenced their verdict decision could potentially profit from a book deal or media attention. While emphasizing the lack of any concrete evidence of such motives, Brueski and Motta acknowledged the potential for human greed to play a role in the juror's testimony. “People do crazy things for money,” Motta noted, adding a layer of complexity to the juror's credibility.  Even if Murdaugh's quest for a new trial through this avenue fails, his legal battles are far from over. “There's going to be a direct appeal as well,” Motta assured, indicating the likelihood of further appeals encompassing the entire scope of the original trial. Murdaugh's legal team is expected to continue fighting, potentially leading to an exhaustive series of appeals.  The case against Alex Murdaugh, with its myriad twists and challenges, embodies the complexity and unpredictability of high-profile legal proceedings. As the public awaits the outcome of the evidentiary hearing, the question lingers: Will Murdaugh's defense navigate this legal maze successfully, or will the burden of proof prove too formidable a barrier to a retrial? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The journey to a potential second murder trial for Alex Murdaugh has entered a labyrinth of legal complexities, as recently dissected in the "Hidden Killers" podcast. Host Tony Brueski and guest Bob Motta, a defense attorney and podcast host, unraveled the intricate details of a recent hearing that could pave the way for Murdaugh's retrial. The discussion shed light on the heightened burden of proof set by Justice Gene Toll and the narrowed scope of the upcoming evidentiary hearing.  Motta expressed no surprise at the daunting challenge laid before Murdaugh's defense. The requirement to demonstrate not only that court clerk Becky Hill tampered with the jury but also that she did so with an intention to prejudice against Murdaugh has created what Motta calls an “almost impossible task.” “The judge has set a very high burden, making it very difficult to prove Becky Hill's intent,” Motta elaborated, underscoring the steep uphill battle facing the defense.  With a focus strictly on Hill's interactions with jurors and their ability to reach an impartial verdict, the trial's scope is markedly limited. This exclusion of peripheral issues like Hill's alleged embezzlement and the wiretapping scandal involving her son narrows the defense's path to proving jury tampering. Motta highlighted this constraint: “They're not allowing them to dig into her possible motives, which was the book. All that stuff's out.”  Brueski raised an intriguing point regarding the human element in this legal drama. The juror who alleges Hill influenced their verdict decision could potentially profit from a book deal or media attention. While emphasizing the lack of any concrete evidence of such motives, Brueski and Motta acknowledged the potential for human greed to play a role in the juror's testimony. “People do crazy things for money,” Motta noted, adding a layer of complexity to the juror's credibility.  Even if Murdaugh's quest for a new trial through this avenue fails, his legal battles are far from over. “There's going to be a direct appeal as well,” Motta assured, indicating the likelihood of further appeals encompassing the entire scope of the original trial. Murdaugh's legal team is expected to continue fighting, potentially leading to an exhaustive series of appeals.  The case against Alex Murdaugh, with its myriad twists and challenges, embodies the complexity and unpredictability of high-profile legal proceedings. As the public awaits the outcome of the evidentiary hearing, the question lingers: Will Murdaugh's defense navigate this legal maze successfully, or will the burden of proof prove too formidable a barrier to a retrial? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As things begin to come to a head in the murder trial of Alex Murdaugh, there are still a few more hurdles to get over. One of those hurdles is a field trip that is now planned for the jury. That field trip will see them head over to Moselle, where Alex Murdaugh is alleged to have murdered his wife and his son. The defense hopes that with them getting a look at the property themselves, it will give them a better perspective on what happened.(commercial at 7:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jurors deciding Alex Murdaugh's fate will take ‘jury view' field trip to the hunting lodge where his wife and son were murdered (msn.com)

As the legal saga of Alex Murdaugh unfolds, the potential for a second murder trial looms, raising critical questions about the integrity of the judicial process and the role of court officials. Tony Brueski, the host of "Hidden Killers," recently engaged in a thought-provoking discussion with Eric Faddis, a former felony prosecutor, exploring the intricate details and implications of the case.    The focal point of this legal maelstrom is Becky Hill, the former clerk of court, whose alleged misconduct could pave the way for Murdaugh's retrial. The allegations against Hill, including jury tampering and other ethical breaches, have cast a shadow of doubt over the verdict of the first trial. The upcoming evidentiary hearing, set to scrutinize Hill's interactions with the jury, promises to be a pivotal moment in determining the future course of this high-profile case.    Faddis, shedding light on the legal intricacies, explains that Murdaugh's team must demonstrate substantial prejudice resulting from the alleged jury tampering. The burden of proof rests on establishing that Hill's actions significantly impacted the trial's outcome. According to Faddis, “Usually, someone in Murdaugh's position would have to prove that but for the jury tampering, there would have been a different outcome.”    The strength of the evidence for Murdaugh's claim is a subject of considerable debate. Faddis anticipates testimony from a juror alleging direct influence by Hill. If corroborated under oath, this evidence could gravely undermine the prosecution's case, potentially leading to a new trial. "If that juror gets up there and says that under oath, I think that is a big problem for the prosecution," Faddis asserts.    Interestingly, the judge presiding over the hearing has made it clear that the focus is solely on the issue of jury tampering. While Hill's alleged misconduct in her official capacity and personal affairs is indeed troubling, these issues are peripheral to the central question at hand. However, Faddis points out that these aspects could still influence the hearing due to their relevance to Hill's credibility.    The legal implications of this case extend far beyond the fate of Alex Murdaugh. It highlights the critical importance of maintaining ethical standards and impartiality within the judicial system. The allegations against Hill, if proven true, not only question the legitimacy of the Murdaugh trial but also expose vulnerabilities in the legal process that demand urgent attention.    As the legal community and the public await the outcome of the evidentiary hearing, the case stands as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between justice and the human element in legal proceedings. The decision rendered will not only determine the possibility of a second trial for Murdaugh but also set a precedent for handling similar allegations of judicial misconduct in the future.    In conclusion, the Murdaugh case, with its twists and turns, serves as a complex tapestry of legal, ethical, and human dilemmas. The upcoming hearing is more than just a procedural step; it is a litmus test for the integrity of the legal system. As Faddis aptly notes, the judge's ability to steer this complicated case will be crucial in shaping its outcome. The question remains: Will justice prevail in the face of adversity, or will the shadows of doubt continue to loom over this controversial case? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the legal saga of Alex Murdaugh unfolds, the potential for a second murder trial looms, raising critical questions about the integrity of the judicial process and the role of court officials. Tony Brueski, the host of "Hidden Killers," recently engaged in a thought-provoking discussion with Eric Faddis, a former felony prosecutor, exploring the intricate details and implications of the case.    The focal point of this legal maelstrom is Becky Hill, the former clerk of court, whose alleged misconduct could pave the way for Murdaugh's retrial. The allegations against Hill, including jury tampering and other ethical breaches, have cast a shadow of doubt over the verdict of the first trial. The upcoming evidentiary hearing, set to scrutinize Hill's interactions with the jury, promises to be a pivotal moment in determining the future course of this high-profile case.    Faddis, shedding light on the legal intricacies, explains that Murdaugh's team must demonstrate substantial prejudice resulting from the alleged jury tampering. The burden of proof rests on establishing that Hill's actions significantly impacted the trial's outcome. According to Faddis, “Usually, someone in Murdaugh's position would have to prove that but for the jury tampering, there would have been a different outcome.”    The strength of the evidence for Murdaugh's claim is a subject of considerable debate. Faddis anticipates testimony from a juror alleging direct influence by Hill. If corroborated under oath, this evidence could gravely undermine the prosecution's case, potentially leading to a new trial. "If that juror gets up there and says that under oath, I think that is a big problem for the prosecution," Faddis asserts.    Interestingly, the judge presiding over the hearing has made it clear that the focus is solely on the issue of jury tampering. While Hill's alleged misconduct in her official capacity and personal affairs is indeed troubling, these issues are peripheral to the central question at hand. However, Faddis points out that these aspects could still influence the hearing due to their relevance to Hill's credibility.    The legal implications of this case extend far beyond the fate of Alex Murdaugh. It highlights the critical importance of maintaining ethical standards and impartiality within the judicial system. The allegations against Hill, if proven true, not only question the legitimacy of the Murdaugh trial but also expose vulnerabilities in the legal process that demand urgent attention.    As the legal community and the public await the outcome of the evidentiary hearing, the case stands as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between justice and the human element in legal proceedings. The decision rendered will not only determine the possibility of a second trial for Murdaugh but also set a precedent for handling similar allegations of judicial misconduct in the future.    In conclusion, the Murdaugh case, with its twists and turns, serves as a complex tapestry of legal, ethical, and human dilemmas. The upcoming hearing is more than just a procedural step; it is a litmus test for the integrity of the legal system. As Faddis aptly notes, the judge's ability to steer this complicated case will be crucial in shaping its outcome. The question remains: Will justice prevail in the face of adversity, or will the shadows of doubt continue to loom over this controversial case? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As the legal saga of Alex Murdaugh unfolds, the potential for a second murder trial looms, raising critical questions about the integrity of the judicial process and the role of court officials. Tony Brueski, the host of "Hidden Killers," recently engaged in a thought-provoking discussion with Eric Faddis, a former felony prosecutor, exploring the intricate details and implications of the case.    The focal point of this legal maelstrom is Becky Hill, the former clerk of court, whose alleged misconduct could pave the way for Murdaugh's retrial. The allegations against Hill, including jury tampering and other ethical breaches, have cast a shadow of doubt over the verdict of the first trial. The upcoming evidentiary hearing, set to scrutinize Hill's interactions with the jury, promises to be a pivotal moment in determining the future course of this high-profile case.    Faddis, shedding light on the legal intricacies, explains that Murdaugh's team must demonstrate substantial prejudice resulting from the alleged jury tampering. The burden of proof rests on establishing that Hill's actions significantly impacted the trial's outcome. According to Faddis, “Usually, someone in Murdaugh's position would have to prove that but for the jury tampering, there would have been a different outcome.”    The strength of the evidence for Murdaugh's claim is a subject of considerable debate. Faddis anticipates testimony from a juror alleging direct influence by Hill. If corroborated under oath, this evidence could gravely undermine the prosecution's case, potentially leading to a new trial. "If that juror gets up there and says that under oath, I think that is a big problem for the prosecution," Faddis asserts.    Interestingly, the judge presiding over the hearing has made it clear that the focus is solely on the issue of jury tampering. While Hill's alleged misconduct in her official capacity and personal affairs is indeed troubling, these issues are peripheral to the central question at hand. However, Faddis points out that these aspects could still influence the hearing due to their relevance to Hill's credibility.    The legal implications of this case extend far beyond the fate of Alex Murdaugh. It highlights the critical importance of maintaining ethical standards and impartiality within the judicial system. The allegations against Hill, if proven true, not only question the legitimacy of the Murdaugh trial but also expose vulnerabilities in the legal process that demand urgent attention.    As the legal community and the public await the outcome of the evidentiary hearing, the case stands as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between justice and the human element in legal proceedings. The decision rendered will not only determine the possibility of a second trial for Murdaugh but also set a precedent for handling similar allegations of judicial misconduct in the future.    In conclusion, the Murdaugh case, with its twists and turns, serves as a complex tapestry of legal, ethical, and human dilemmas. The upcoming hearing is more than just a procedural step; it is a litmus test for the integrity of the legal system. As Faddis aptly notes, the judge's ability to steer this complicated case will be crucial in shaping its outcome. The question remains: Will justice prevail in the face of adversity, or will the shadows of doubt continue to loom over this controversial case? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

It's true crime Friday on The Megyn Kelly Show, with defense attorneys Mark Geragos and Jonna Spilbor. They discuss whether Alex Murdaugh could actually get a new trial due to jury tampering, whether the tampering affected the verdict, the allegations against Becky Hill, Gypsy Rose's former boyfriend who committed the murder of her mom wanting a new trial now, his lawyer's arguments about diminished capacity, whether Gypsy Rose's release and media tour will help his chances, the bizarre story of Natalia Grace who her adoptive parents said was actually an adult dwarf instead of a child, claims of child neglect, the new revelations that she actually may have been a child after all, whether Grace's adoptive parents could be held criminally or civilly liable, the strange story of Nicholas Rossi, also called Nicholas Alahverdian, who faked his death and fled to the U.K. who is now back in the U.S. awaiting trial, his insistance that he's a different person, the allegations of sexual assault against him, the Daniel Penny case in New York City and the decline of NYC, and more. Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at: https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

What happens when those entrusted with upholding justice become the ones threatening its very foundation? This question looms large in the latest chapter of the Alex Murdaugh case, particularly revolving around Becky Hill, the former clerk of court. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, engaged in a profound discussion with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to dissect Hill's controversial role in the saga.    Becky Hill, a central figure in the Murdaugh murder trial, stands accused of not just jury tampering but also a series of ethical transgressions that go beyond the courtroom. Allegations against her include misusing her position for personal gain, notably cashing a $10,000 check intended for Colleton County and granting preferential treatment to a photographer, actions that Robin Dreeke described as “continuously undermining her credibility.”    The case's intrigue deepened with revelations about Hill's son, charged with wiretapping within the courthouse where he worked as the IT director. This familial connection to alleged criminal activities adds another layer to the complex judicial drama.    But perhaps the most striking aspect of Hill's conduct is her reported act of plagiarism. Dreeke expressed disbelief at Hill's audacity to lift content from an email exchange with a BBC reporter and present it as her own in her book, "Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders." Such an act, he argues, not only displays a lack of judgment but also signifies a pattern of behavior where rules seem inconsequential.    Dreeke and Brueski delved into the psychology behind Hill's actions, exploring how her likable personality might have shielded her from scrutiny. Dreeke, drawing from his extensive FBI experience, noted that people often overlook misconduct in those they find affable, leading to a dangerous "halo effect." This phenomenon, he explains, can result in significant oversights, especially in environments where trust and integrity are paramount.    The conversation then shifted to the broader implications of Hill's actions on the Murdaugh trial. Dreeke opined that if the allegations against Hill hold true, they could critically impact the trial's outcome, potentially leading to a retrial. “If they don't get a retrial, I'll be shocked,” he stated, highlighting the gravity of Hill's alleged misconduct.    As the podcast drew to a close, Dreeke offered a piece of advice to Hill in the wake of the brewing storm: own up to her mistakes. He emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in restoring public trust. “The only way to inspire trust in others is through open, honest communication,” he advised.    The unfolding saga of Becky Hill in the Alex Murdaugh case raises critical questions about the integrity of the judicial system and the responsibility of those within it. As the evidentiary hearing approaches, the eyes of the nation remain fixed on Colleton County, where the next chapter of this judicial drama is set to unfold.    What other revelations might emerge from this case, and how will they shape our understanding of justice and integrity in the legal system? Only time will tell. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

What does it take to shake the foundations of a high-profile murder trial? This question lingers as the saga of Alex Murdaugh's trial takes another twist with the upcoming evidentiary hearing in January 2024. The focus is on Becky Hill, the former clerk of court, whose actions have raised serious concerns about the integrity of the trial proceedings. In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski was joined by Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI special agent, to unravel the complexities of this unfolding drama.    Hill, who finds herself at the center of allegations ranging from jury tampering to plagiarism and misuse of office, denies any wrongdoing. However, the evidence against her credibility is mounting, with two jurors coming forward with affidavits that potentially incriminate her. Coffindaffer expressed disappointment at each new allegation, stating, “With each new allegation, I keep wondering what more is next.”    The situation is complicated further by allegations against Hill's son involving wiretapping within the Colleton County Courthouse, where he was the information technology director. Additionally, Hill's recent admission to plagiarism adds another layer of doubt about her character. Brueski and Coffindaffer discussed the implications of these developments, questioning Hill's potential influence on the jury's decision.    Coffindaffer highlighted the significance of the jurors' total experiences and perceptions, emphasizing that the judge's decision at the January hearing will hinge on the totality of what was perceived and said by all jurors. “It's really going to come down to what is the totality,” Coffindaffer noted, underlining the complexity of reaching a legal conclusion based on these testimonies.    Discussing the character considerations in such cases, Coffindaffer pointed out the importance of looking at acts of moral turpitude when investigating allegations. “When you discover that a person has fraud in their background or lies in their background, it makes you wonder about that track record going forward,” she explained.    The conversation then turned to the potential impact of these allegations on the Murdaugh trial. Brueski questioned whether Hill's pattern of behavior, including her recent admissions, could lead to suspicions of her possibly tampering with the jurors. Coffindaffer acknowledged this possibility but stressed the importance of a careful legal analysis of the facts.    Regarding the wiretapping charges against Hill's son and the confiscation of her phone, Coffindaffer expressed that law enforcement would only pursue such actions based on reasonable suspicion. “You never start fishing,” she said, “You go where evidence leads you.”    The podcast delved into the repercussions for the jurors, who now face the possibility of revisiting a grueling and emotionally taxing trial. Coffindaffer sympathized with their plight, acknowledging the burden of potentially participating in a retrial. “A trial is so depleting,” she remarked, “especially for the jurors more than anyone.”    As the evidentiary hearing approaches, questions linger about the potential for a retrial and the impact on the judicial system's credibility. With Becky Hill's actions casting shadows over the Murdaugh trial's integrity, the legal community and public eagerly await the hearing's outcome. Will this hearing mark a turning point in the Murdaugh case, or will it simply add another layer of complexity to an already convoluted legal saga? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

What does it take to shake the foundations of a high-profile murder trial? This question lingers as the saga of Alex Murdaugh's trial takes another twist with the upcoming evidentiary hearing in January 2024. The focus is on Becky Hill, the former clerk of court, whose actions have raised serious concerns about the integrity of the trial proceedings. In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski was joined by Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI special agent, to unravel the complexities of this unfolding drama.    Hill, who finds herself at the center of allegations ranging from jury tampering to plagiarism and misuse of office, denies any wrongdoing. However, the evidence against her credibility is mounting, with two jurors coming forward with affidavits that potentially incriminate her. Coffindaffer expressed disappointment at each new allegation, stating, “With each new allegation, I keep wondering what more is next.”    The situation is complicated further by allegations against Hill's son involving wiretapping within the Colleton County Courthouse, where he was the information technology director. Additionally, Hill's recent admission to plagiarism adds another layer of doubt about her character. Brueski and Coffindaffer discussed the implications of these developments, questioning Hill's potential influence on the jury's decision.    Coffindaffer highlighted the significance of the jurors' total experiences and perceptions, emphasizing that the judge's decision at the January hearing will hinge on the totality of what was perceived and said by all jurors. “It's really going to come down to what is the totality,” Coffindaffer noted, underlining the complexity of reaching a legal conclusion based on these testimonies.    Discussing the character considerations in such cases, Coffindaffer pointed out the importance of looking at acts of moral turpitude when investigating allegations. “When you discover that a person has fraud in their background or lies in their background, it makes you wonder about that track record going forward,” she explained.    The conversation then turned to the potential impact of these allegations on the Murdaugh trial. Brueski questioned whether Hill's pattern of behavior, including her recent admissions, could lead to suspicions of her possibly tampering with the jurors. Coffindaffer acknowledged this possibility but stressed the importance of a careful legal analysis of the facts.    Regarding the wiretapping charges against Hill's son and the confiscation of her phone, Coffindaffer expressed that law enforcement would only pursue such actions based on reasonable suspicion. “You never start fishing,” she said, “You go where evidence leads you.”    The podcast delved into the repercussions for the jurors, who now face the possibility of revisiting a grueling and emotionally taxing trial. Coffindaffer sympathized with their plight, acknowledging the burden of potentially participating in a retrial. “A trial is so depleting,” she remarked, “especially for the jurors more than anyone.”    As the evidentiary hearing approaches, questions linger about the potential for a retrial and the impact on the judicial system's credibility. With Becky Hill's actions casting shadows over the Murdaugh trial's integrity, the legal community and public eagerly await the hearing's outcome. Will this hearing mark a turning point in the Murdaugh case, or will it simply add another layer of complexity to an already convoluted legal saga? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

What does it take to shake the foundations of a high-profile murder trial? This question lingers as the saga of Alex Murdaugh's trial takes another twist with the upcoming evidentiary hearing in January 2024. The focus is on Becky Hill, the former clerk of court, whose actions have raised serious concerns about the integrity of the trial proceedings. In a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski was joined by Jennifer Coffindaffer, a retired FBI special agent, to unravel the complexities of this unfolding drama.    Hill, who finds herself at the center of allegations ranging from jury tampering to plagiarism and misuse of office, denies any wrongdoing. However, the evidence against her credibility is mounting, with two jurors coming forward with affidavits that potentially incriminate her. Coffindaffer expressed disappointment at each new allegation, stating, “With each new allegation, I keep wondering what more is next.”    The situation is complicated further by allegations against Hill's son involving wiretapping within the Colleton County Courthouse, where he was the information technology director. Additionally, Hill's recent admission to plagiarism adds another layer of doubt about her character. Brueski and Coffindaffer discussed the implications of these developments, questioning Hill's potential influence on the jury's decision.    Coffindaffer highlighted the significance of the jurors' total experiences and perceptions, emphasizing that the judge's decision at the January hearing will hinge on the totality of what was perceived and said by all jurors. “It's really going to come down to what is the totality,” Coffindaffer noted, underlining the complexity of reaching a legal conclusion based on these testimonies.    Discussing the character considerations in such cases, Coffindaffer pointed out the importance of looking at acts of moral turpitude when investigating allegations. “When you discover that a person has fraud in their background or lies in their background, it makes you wonder about that track record going forward,” she explained.    The conversation then turned to the potential impact of these allegations on the Murdaugh trial. Brueski questioned whether Hill's pattern of behavior, including her recent admissions, could lead to suspicions of her possibly tampering with the jurors. Coffindaffer acknowledged this possibility but stressed the importance of a careful legal analysis of the facts.    Regarding the wiretapping charges against Hill's son and the confiscation of her phone, Coffindaffer expressed that law enforcement would only pursue such actions based on reasonable suspicion. “You never start fishing,” she said, “You go where evidence leads you.”    The podcast delved into the repercussions for the jurors, who now face the possibility of revisiting a grueling and emotionally taxing trial. Coffindaffer sympathized with their plight, acknowledging the burden of potentially participating in a retrial. “A trial is so depleting,” she remarked, “especially for the jurors more than anyone.”    As the evidentiary hearing approaches, questions linger about the potential for a retrial and the impact on the judicial system's credibility. With Becky Hill's actions casting shadows over the Murdaugh trial's integrity, the legal community and public eagerly await the hearing's outcome. Will this hearing mark a turning point in the Murdaugh case, or will it simply add another layer of complexity to an already convoluted legal saga? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As 2024 dawns, the legal landscape surrounding Alex Murdaugh, already riddled with drama and surprise, could be heading towards another seismic shift. The possibility of a retrial looms large, hinging on a January hearing that will delve into allegations of jury tampering by Becky Hill, the clerk of court during Murdaugh's trial. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, recently sat down with Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries, to dissect the potential outcomes of this critical hearing.    At the core of the retrial debate lies the credibility of Becky Hill. Her role in the Murdaugh trial has been brought under intense scrutiny, with her actions outside the courtroom – including alleged plagiarism and misusing public funds – casting a long shadow over her judicial conduct. Motta emphasized the significance of these developments, stating, “The defense is sure going to try to bring all of it in order to attack her credibility.”    The South Carolina Supreme Court's upcoming ruling will be pivotal in determining the scope of evidence permissible in the hearing. Motta noted that while Hill's actions regarding her son and her book are tangential to the direct allegations of jury tampering, they are crucial in evaluating her trustworthiness. “It's all about credibility,” Motta stressed, “Can we trust anything she says?”    Motta also shed light on the procedural dynamics of such hearings, explaining that unlike a jury trial, a judge's decision at a hearing is heavily influenced by all available information, including aspects that might not typically be admissible in court. “The judge is going to have knowledge of all these allegations,” Motta said, underscoring the impact this could have on the decision.    Discussing Hill's forthcoming hearing, Motta pondered the strategy her legal team might employ. Faced with mounting allegations, Hill's options seem limited. Motta speculated, “If she gets up there and for whatever reason takes the fifth, it's creating a nasty situation. We can only infer one thing when somebody takes the fifth – that they've done something wrong.”    The conversation then veered towards the broader implications of a potential retrial. Motta voiced his belief that Murdaugh might indeed be granted a retrial, primarily due to the complexities surrounding jury tampering allegations. “If she tampered, we can prove that she tampered at all, the guy gets a new trial,” he asserted, highlighting the stringent legal standards against jury tampering.    Reflecting on the resource-intensive nature of retrials, Motta lamented the potential waste of public funds and judicial time. “It's a huge waste of resources in terms of…being retried on the grounds of the case,” he remarked, pointing to the significant implications of Hill's alleged misconduct beyond the legal arena.    Motta closed with predictions about the retrial's outcome and its timing, suggesting it could be later in 2024. He also didn't shy away from criticizing Murdaugh's previous decision to testify, advising against a repeat in the retrial. “Your testimony is what got you convicted,” Motta noted, underlining the risks involved.    The interview with Motta paints a picture of a legal saga that continues to evolve and surprise. With the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision pending, the fate of Alex Murdaugh hangs in balance, teetering on the revelations and decisions yet to come.    As the legal community and public await the outcome of the January hearing, one question remains: How will the latest chapter in the Murdaugh case unfold, and what further twists and turns lie ahead in this ongoing judicial drama? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As 2024 dawns, the legal landscape surrounding Alex Murdaugh, already riddled with drama and surprise, could be heading towards another seismic shift. The possibility of a retrial looms large, hinging on a January hearing that will delve into allegations of jury tampering by Becky Hill, the clerk of court during Murdaugh's trial. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, recently sat down with Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries, to dissect the potential outcomes of this critical hearing.    At the core of the retrial debate lies the credibility of Becky Hill. Her role in the Murdaugh trial has been brought under intense scrutiny, with her actions outside the courtroom – including alleged plagiarism and misusing public funds – casting a long shadow over her judicial conduct. Motta emphasized the significance of these developments, stating, “The defense is sure going to try to bring all of it in order to attack her credibility.”    The South Carolina Supreme Court's upcoming ruling will be pivotal in determining the scope of evidence permissible in the hearing. Motta noted that while Hill's actions regarding her son and her book are tangential to the direct allegations of jury tampering, they are crucial in evaluating her trustworthiness. “It's all about credibility,” Motta stressed, “Can we trust anything she says?”    Motta also shed light on the procedural dynamics of such hearings, explaining that unlike a jury trial, a judge's decision at a hearing is heavily influenced by all available information, including aspects that might not typically be admissible in court. “The judge is going to have knowledge of all these allegations,” Motta said, underscoring the impact this could have on the decision.    Discussing Hill's forthcoming hearing, Motta pondered the strategy her legal team might employ. Faced with mounting allegations, Hill's options seem limited. Motta speculated, “If she gets up there and for whatever reason takes the fifth, it's creating a nasty situation. We can only infer one thing when somebody takes the fifth – that they've done something wrong.”    The conversation then veered towards the broader implications of a potential retrial. Motta voiced his belief that Murdaugh might indeed be granted a retrial, primarily due to the complexities surrounding jury tampering allegations. “If she tampered, we can prove that she tampered at all, the guy gets a new trial,” he asserted, highlighting the stringent legal standards against jury tampering.    Reflecting on the resource-intensive nature of retrials, Motta lamented the potential waste of public funds and judicial time. “It's a huge waste of resources in terms of…being retried on the grounds of the case,” he remarked, pointing to the significant implications of Hill's alleged misconduct beyond the legal arena.    Motta closed with predictions about the retrial's outcome and its timing, suggesting it could be later in 2024. He also didn't shy away from criticizing Murdaugh's previous decision to testify, advising against a repeat in the retrial. “Your testimony is what got you convicted,” Motta noted, underlining the risks involved.    The interview with Motta paints a picture of a legal saga that continues to evolve and surprise. With the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision pending, the fate of Alex Murdaugh hangs in balance, teetering on the revelations and decisions yet to come.    As the legal community and public await the outcome of the January hearing, one question remains: How will the latest chapter in the Murdaugh case unfold, and what further twists and turns lie ahead in this ongoing judicial drama? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As 2024 dawns, the legal landscape surrounding Alex Murdaugh, already riddled with drama and surprise, could be heading towards another seismic shift. The possibility of a retrial looms large, hinging on a January hearing that will delve into allegations of jury tampering by Becky Hill, the clerk of court during Murdaugh's trial. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, recently sat down with Bob Motta, defense attorney and host of the podcast Defense Diaries, to dissect the potential outcomes of this critical hearing.    At the core of the retrial debate lies the credibility of Becky Hill. Her role in the Murdaugh trial has been brought under intense scrutiny, with her actions outside the courtroom – including alleged plagiarism and misusing public funds – casting a long shadow over her judicial conduct. Motta emphasized the significance of these developments, stating, “The defense is sure going to try to bring all of it in order to attack her credibility.”    The South Carolina Supreme Court's upcoming ruling will be pivotal in determining the scope of evidence permissible in the hearing. Motta noted that while Hill's actions regarding her son and her book are tangential to the direct allegations of jury tampering, they are crucial in evaluating her trustworthiness. “It's all about credibility,” Motta stressed, “Can we trust anything she says?”    Motta also shed light on the procedural dynamics of such hearings, explaining that unlike a jury trial, a judge's decision at a hearing is heavily influenced by all available information, including aspects that might not typically be admissible in court. “The judge is going to have knowledge of all these allegations,” Motta said, underscoring the impact this could have on the decision.    Discussing Hill's forthcoming hearing, Motta pondered the strategy her legal team might employ. Faced with mounting allegations, Hill's options seem limited. Motta speculated, “If she gets up there and for whatever reason takes the fifth, it's creating a nasty situation. We can only infer one thing when somebody takes the fifth – that they've done something wrong.”    The conversation then veered towards the broader implications of a potential retrial. Motta voiced his belief that Murdaugh might indeed be granted a retrial, primarily due to the complexities surrounding jury tampering allegations. “If she tampered, we can prove that she tampered at all, the guy gets a new trial,” he asserted, highlighting the stringent legal standards against jury tampering.    Reflecting on the resource-intensive nature of retrials, Motta lamented the potential waste of public funds and judicial time. “It's a huge waste of resources in terms of…being retried on the grounds of the case,” he remarked, pointing to the significant implications of Hill's alleged misconduct beyond the legal arena.    Motta closed with predictions about the retrial's outcome and its timing, suggesting it could be later in 2024. He also didn't shy away from criticizing Murdaugh's previous decision to testify, advising against a repeat in the retrial. “Your testimony is what got you convicted,” Motta noted, underlining the risks involved.    The interview with Motta paints a picture of a legal saga that continues to evolve and surprise. With the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision pending, the fate of Alex Murdaugh hangs in balance, teetering on the revelations and decisions yet to come.    As the legal community and public await the outcome of the January hearing, one question remains: How will the latest chapter in the Murdaugh case unfold, and what further twists and turns lie ahead in this ongoing judicial drama? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

What happens when those entrusted with upholding justice become the ones threatening its very foundation? This question looms large in the latest chapter of the Alex Murdaugh case, particularly revolving around Becky Hill, the former clerk of court. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, engaged in a profound discussion with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to dissect Hill's controversial role in the saga.    Becky Hill, a central figure in the Murdaugh murder trial, stands accused of not just jury tampering but also a series of ethical transgressions that go beyond the courtroom. Allegations against her include misusing her position for personal gain, notably cashing a $10,000 check intended for Colleton County and granting preferential treatment to a photographer, actions that Robin Dreeke described as “continuously undermining her credibility.”    The case's intrigue deepened with revelations about Hill's son, charged with wiretapping within the courthouse where he worked as the IT director. This familial connection to alleged criminal activities adds another layer to the complex judicial drama.    But perhaps the most striking aspect of Hill's conduct is her reported act of plagiarism. Dreeke expressed disbelief at Hill's audacity to lift content from an email exchange with a BBC reporter and present it as her own in her book, "Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders." Such an act, he argues, not only displays a lack of judgment but also signifies a pattern of behavior where rules seem inconsequential.    Dreeke and Brueski delved into the psychology behind Hill's actions, exploring how her likable personality might have shielded her from scrutiny. Dreeke, drawing from his extensive FBI experience, noted that people often overlook misconduct in those they find affable, leading to a dangerous "halo effect." This phenomenon, he explains, can result in significant oversights, especially in environments where trust and integrity are paramount.    The conversation then shifted to the broader implications of Hill's actions on the Murdaugh trial. Dreeke opined that if the allegations against Hill hold true, they could critically impact the trial's outcome, potentially leading to a retrial. “If they don't get a retrial, I'll be shocked,” he stated, highlighting the gravity of Hill's alleged misconduct.    As the podcast drew to a close, Dreeke offered a piece of advice to Hill in the wake of the brewing storm: own up to her mistakes. He emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in restoring public trust. “The only way to inspire trust in others is through open, honest communication,” he advised.    The unfolding saga of Becky Hill in the Alex Murdaugh case raises critical questions about the integrity of the judicial system and the responsibility of those within it. As the evidentiary hearing approaches, the eyes of the nation remain fixed on Colleton County, where the next chapter of this judicial drama is set to unfold.    What other revelations might emerge from this case, and how will they shape our understanding of justice and integrity in the legal system? Only time will tell. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

What happens when those entrusted with upholding justice become the ones threatening its very foundation? This question looms large in the latest chapter of the Alex Murdaugh case, particularly revolving around Becky Hill, the former clerk of court. Tony Brueski, host of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, engaged in a profound discussion with retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke to dissect Hill's controversial role in the saga.    Becky Hill, a central figure in the Murdaugh murder trial, stands accused of not just jury tampering but also a series of ethical transgressions that go beyond the courtroom. Allegations against her include misusing her position for personal gain, notably cashing a $10,000 check intended for Colleton County and granting preferential treatment to a photographer, actions that Robin Dreeke described as “continuously undermining her credibility.”    The case's intrigue deepened with revelations about Hill's son, charged with wiretapping within the courthouse where he worked as the IT director. This familial connection to alleged criminal activities adds another layer to the complex judicial drama.    But perhaps the most striking aspect of Hill's conduct is her reported act of plagiarism. Dreeke expressed disbelief at Hill's audacity to lift content from an email exchange with a BBC reporter and present it as her own in her book, "Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders." Such an act, he argues, not only displays a lack of judgment but also signifies a pattern of behavior where rules seem inconsequential.    Dreeke and Brueski delved into the psychology behind Hill's actions, exploring how her likable personality might have shielded her from scrutiny. Dreeke, drawing from his extensive FBI experience, noted that people often overlook misconduct in those they find affable, leading to a dangerous "halo effect." This phenomenon, he explains, can result in significant oversights, especially in environments where trust and integrity are paramount.    The conversation then shifted to the broader implications of Hill's actions on the Murdaugh trial. Dreeke opined that if the allegations against Hill hold true, they could critically impact the trial's outcome, potentially leading to a retrial. “If they don't get a retrial, I'll be shocked,” he stated, highlighting the gravity of Hill's alleged misconduct.    As the podcast drew to a close, Dreeke offered a piece of advice to Hill in the wake of the brewing storm: own up to her mistakes. He emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in restoring public trust. “The only way to inspire trust in others is through open, honest communication,” he advised.    The unfolding saga of Becky Hill in the Alex Murdaugh case raises critical questions about the integrity of the judicial system and the responsibility of those within it. As the evidentiary hearing approaches, the eyes of the nation remain fixed on Colleton County, where the next chapter of this judicial drama is set to unfold.    What other revelations might emerge from this case, and how will they shape our understanding of justice and integrity in the legal system? Only time will tell. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

As things continue to unfold down in South Carolina, it's becoming more clear that Becky Hill, the court clerk, and her son apparently, have plenty to answer for. The question that still needs to be figured out however is, will their alleged transgressions give Alex Murdaugh that hail mary he was hoping for? Let's dive in and see what's up!(commercial at 7:08)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Murdaugh Jury Tampering Hearing: Status Conference Held - FITSNewsThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

As things continue to unfold down in South Carolina, it's becoming more clear that Becky Hill, the court clerk, and her son apparently, have plenty to answer for. The question that still needs to be figured out however is, will their alleged transgressions give Alex Murdaugh that hail mary he was hoping for? Let's dive in and see what's up!(commercial at 7:08)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Murdaugh Jury Tampering Hearing: Status Conference Held - FITSNewsThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

In the latest episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of the podcast Defense Diaries, delve into the complexities of the Alex Murdaugh case, a legal saga that continues to captivate the nation. Their discussion illuminates the interconnected webs of deceit, corruption, and crime within the South Carolina legal system.    The episode focuses on Alex Murdaugh, who recently faced his financial crime victims in court. Murdaugh, who has been embroiled in a series of legal battles, including murder charges for the death of his wife and son, made a notable appearance in court, addressing those he wronged. Motta described Murdaugh's court demeanor as a mix of taking responsibility and simultaneously challenging details that portrayed him negatively.    Murdaugh's behavior in court, as observed by Brueski and Motta, highlighted his penchant for denying the murder charges. His interaction with a friend, whom he financially wronged, became particularly telling when the friend accused him of murder. Murdaugh was quick to refute this, focusing on his innocence in the murder charges.    Motta and Brueski discussed another layer of complexity added by the recent arrest of Jeffrey Colton Hill, son of South Carolina clerk of court Becky Hill, who is under scrutiny for alleged jury tampering. The younger Hill faces wiretapping charges, leading to speculation about potential involvement in the Murdaugh case. Motta pointed out that this development paints a disturbing picture of a possible culture of corruption within the courthouse, raising questions about whether these incidents are isolated or part of a larger, interconnected issue.    The conversation then shifted to the potential retrial of Murdaugh's murder charges. With Becky Hill's legal troubles and her son's arrest, Motta expressed his preference for a new trial to ensure justice is served correctly. He highlighted the changing nature of defense strategies and the potential for Murdaugh to alter his testimony, particularly regarding his whereabouts on the night of the murders.    Motta shared his theory on the murder case, suggesting that Murdaugh may have orchestrated the killings without directly participating. This perspective sheds light on Murdaugh's ability to compartmentalize his actions, accepting guilt for financial misdeeds while denying involvement in the murders.    As the podcast episode drew to a close, Brueski and Motta reflected on the never-ending drama surrounding the Murdaugh case. With new developments emerging regularly, the case continues to be a source of fascination and speculation. The conversation concluded with a sense of anticipation for future revelations, as the legal saga of Alex Murdaugh and the South Carolina legal system shows no signs of abating.    In summary, the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Bob Motta offers a deep dive into the Alex Murdaugh case, exploring its many facets and the broader implications for the legal system. As listeners eagerly await the next chapter in this ongoing legal drama, one question remains: What new twists and revelations will the Murdaugh case bring, and how will they shape our understanding of justice and corruption? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of the podcast Defense Diaries, delve into the complexities of the Alex Murdaugh case, a legal saga that continues to captivate the nation. Their discussion illuminates the interconnected webs of deceit, corruption, and crime within the South Carolina legal system.    The episode focuses on Alex Murdaugh, who recently faced his financial crime victims in court. Murdaugh, who has been embroiled in a series of legal battles, including murder charges for the death of his wife and son, made a notable appearance in court, addressing those he wronged. Motta described Murdaugh's court demeanor as a mix of taking responsibility and simultaneously challenging details that portrayed him negatively.    Murdaugh's behavior in court, as observed by Brueski and Motta, highlighted his penchant for denying the murder charges. His interaction with a friend, whom he financially wronged, became particularly telling when the friend accused him of murder. Murdaugh was quick to refute this, focusing on his innocence in the murder charges.    Motta and Brueski discussed another layer of complexity added by the recent arrest of Jeffrey Colton Hill, son of South Carolina clerk of court Becky Hill, who is under scrutiny for alleged jury tampering. The younger Hill faces wiretapping charges, leading to speculation about potential involvement in the Murdaugh case. Motta pointed out that this development paints a disturbing picture of a possible culture of corruption within the courthouse, raising questions about whether these incidents are isolated or part of a larger, interconnected issue.    The conversation then shifted to the potential retrial of Murdaugh's murder charges. With Becky Hill's legal troubles and her son's arrest, Motta expressed his preference for a new trial to ensure justice is served correctly. He highlighted the changing nature of defense strategies and the potential for Murdaugh to alter his testimony, particularly regarding his whereabouts on the night of the murders.    Motta shared his theory on the murder case, suggesting that Murdaugh may have orchestrated the killings without directly participating. This perspective sheds light on Murdaugh's ability to compartmentalize his actions, accepting guilt for financial misdeeds while denying involvement in the murders.    As the podcast episode drew to a close, Brueski and Motta reflected on the never-ending drama surrounding the Murdaugh case. With new developments emerging regularly, the case continues to be a source of fascination and speculation. The conversation concluded with a sense of anticipation for future revelations, as the legal saga of Alex Murdaugh and the South Carolina legal system shows no signs of abating.    In summary, the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Bob Motta offers a deep dive into the Alex Murdaugh case, exploring its many facets and the broader implications for the legal system. As listeners eagerly await the next chapter in this ongoing legal drama, one question remains: What new twists and revelations will the Murdaugh case bring, and how will they shape our understanding of justice and corruption? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of the podcast Defense Diaries, delve into the complexities of the Alex Murdaugh case, a legal saga that continues to captivate the nation. Their discussion illuminates the interconnected webs of deceit, corruption, and crime within the South Carolina legal system.    The episode focuses on Alex Murdaugh, who recently faced his financial crime victims in court. Murdaugh, who has been embroiled in a series of legal battles, including murder charges for the death of his wife and son, made a notable appearance in court, addressing those he wronged. Motta described Murdaugh's court demeanor as a mix of taking responsibility and simultaneously challenging details that portrayed him negatively.    Murdaugh's behavior in court, as observed by Brueski and Motta, highlighted his penchant for denying the murder charges. His interaction with a friend, whom he financially wronged, became particularly telling when the friend accused him of murder. Murdaugh was quick to refute this, focusing on his innocence in the murder charges.    Motta and Brueski discussed another layer of complexity added by the recent arrest of Jeffrey Colton Hill, son of South Carolina clerk of court Becky Hill, who is under scrutiny for alleged jury tampering. The younger Hill faces wiretapping charges, leading to speculation about potential involvement in the Murdaugh case. Motta pointed out that this development paints a disturbing picture of a possible culture of corruption within the courthouse, raising questions about whether these incidents are isolated or part of a larger, interconnected issue.    The conversation then shifted to the potential retrial of Murdaugh's murder charges. With Becky Hill's legal troubles and her son's arrest, Motta expressed his preference for a new trial to ensure justice is served correctly. He highlighted the changing nature of defense strategies and the potential for Murdaugh to alter his testimony, particularly regarding his whereabouts on the night of the murders.    Motta shared his theory on the murder case, suggesting that Murdaugh may have orchestrated the killings without directly participating. This perspective sheds light on Murdaugh's ability to compartmentalize his actions, accepting guilt for financial misdeeds while denying involvement in the murders.    As the podcast episode drew to a close, Brueski and Motta reflected on the never-ending drama surrounding the Murdaugh case. With new developments emerging regularly, the case continues to be a source of fascination and speculation. The conversation concluded with a sense of anticipation for future revelations, as the legal saga of Alex Murdaugh and the South Carolina legal system shows no signs of abating.    In summary, the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Bob Motta offers a deep dive into the Alex Murdaugh case, exploring its many facets and the broader implications for the legal system. As listeners eagerly await the next chapter in this ongoing legal drama, one question remains: What new twists and revelations will the Murdaugh case bring, and how will they shape our understanding of justice and corruption? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of the podcast Defense Diaries, delve into the complexities of the Alex Murdaugh case, a legal saga that continues to captivate the nation. Their discussion illuminates the interconnected webs of deceit, corruption, and crime within the South Carolina legal system.    The episode focuses on Alex Murdaugh, who recently faced his financial crime victims in court. Murdaugh, who has been embroiled in a series of legal battles, including murder charges for the death of his wife and son, made a notable appearance in court, addressing those he wronged. Motta described Murdaugh's court demeanor as a mix of taking responsibility and simultaneously challenging details that portrayed him negatively.    Murdaugh's behavior in court, as observed by Brueski and Motta, highlighted his penchant for denying the murder charges. His interaction with a friend, whom he financially wronged, became particularly telling when the friend accused him of murder. Murdaugh was quick to refute this, focusing on his innocence in the murder charges.    Motta and Brueski discussed another layer of complexity added by the recent arrest of Jeffrey Colton Hill, son of South Carolina clerk of court Becky Hill, who is under scrutiny for alleged jury tampering. The younger Hill faces wiretapping charges, leading to speculation about potential involvement in the Murdaugh case. Motta pointed out that this development paints a disturbing picture of a possible culture of corruption within the courthouse, raising questions about whether these incidents are isolated or part of a larger, interconnected issue.    The conversation then shifted to the potential retrial of Murdaugh's murder charges. With Becky Hill's legal troubles and her son's arrest, Motta expressed his preference for a new trial to ensure justice is served correctly. He highlighted the changing nature of defense strategies and the potential for Murdaugh to alter his testimony, particularly regarding his whereabouts on the night of the murders.    Motta shared his theory on the murder case, suggesting that Murdaugh may have orchestrated the killings without directly participating. This perspective sheds light on Murdaugh's ability to compartmentalize his actions, accepting guilt for financial misdeeds while denying involvement in the murders.    As the podcast episode drew to a close, Brueski and Motta reflected on the never-ending drama surrounding the Murdaugh case. With new developments emerging regularly, the case continues to be a source of fascination and speculation. The conversation concluded with a sense of anticipation for future revelations, as the legal saga of Alex Murdaugh and the South Carolina legal system shows no signs of abating.    In summary, the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Bob Motta offers a deep dive into the Alex Murdaugh case, exploring its many facets and the broader implications for the legal system. As listeners eagerly await the next chapter in this ongoing legal drama, one question remains: What new twists and revelations will the Murdaugh case bring, and how will they shape our understanding of justice and corruption? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of the podcast Defense Diaries, delve into the complexities of the Alex Murdaugh case, a legal saga that continues to captivate the nation. Their discussion illuminates the interconnected webs of deceit, corruption, and crime within the South Carolina legal system.    The episode focuses on Alex Murdaugh, who recently faced his financial crime victims in court. Murdaugh, who has been embroiled in a series of legal battles, including murder charges for the death of his wife and son, made a notable appearance in court, addressing those he wronged. Motta described Murdaugh's court demeanor as a mix of taking responsibility and simultaneously challenging details that portrayed him negatively.    Murdaugh's behavior in court, as observed by Brueski and Motta, highlighted his penchant for denying the murder charges. His interaction with a friend, whom he financially wronged, became particularly telling when the friend accused him of murder. Murdaugh was quick to refute this, focusing on his innocence in the murder charges.    Motta and Brueski discussed another layer of complexity added by the recent arrest of Jeffrey Colton Hill, son of South Carolina clerk of court Becky Hill, who is under scrutiny for alleged jury tampering. The younger Hill faces wiretapping charges, leading to speculation about potential involvement in the Murdaugh case. Motta pointed out that this development paints a disturbing picture of a possible culture of corruption within the courthouse, raising questions about whether these incidents are isolated or part of a larger, interconnected issue.    The conversation then shifted to the potential retrial of Murdaugh's murder charges. With Becky Hill's legal troubles and her son's arrest, Motta expressed his preference for a new trial to ensure justice is served correctly. He highlighted the changing nature of defense strategies and the potential for Murdaugh to alter his testimony, particularly regarding his whereabouts on the night of the murders.    Motta shared his theory on the murder case, suggesting that Murdaugh may have orchestrated the killings without directly participating. This perspective sheds light on Murdaugh's ability to compartmentalize his actions, accepting guilt for financial misdeeds while denying involvement in the murders.    As the podcast episode drew to a close, Brueski and Motta reflected on the never-ending drama surrounding the Murdaugh case. With new developments emerging regularly, the case continues to be a source of fascination and speculation. The conversation concluded with a sense of anticipation for future revelations, as the legal saga of Alex Murdaugh and the South Carolina legal system shows no signs of abating.    In summary, the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Bob Motta offers a deep dive into the Alex Murdaugh case, exploring its many facets and the broader implications for the legal system. As listeners eagerly await the next chapter in this ongoing legal drama, one question remains: What new twists and revelations will the Murdaugh case bring, and how will they shape our understanding of justice and corruption? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast, host Tony Brueski and Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of the podcast Defense Diaries, delve into the complexities of the Alex Murdaugh case, a legal saga that continues to captivate the nation. Their discussion illuminates the interconnected webs of deceit, corruption, and crime within the South Carolina legal system.    The episode focuses on Alex Murdaugh, who recently faced his financial crime victims in court. Murdaugh, who has been embroiled in a series of legal battles, including murder charges for the death of his wife and son, made a notable appearance in court, addressing those he wronged. Motta described Murdaugh's court demeanor as a mix of taking responsibility and simultaneously challenging details that portrayed him negatively.    Murdaugh's behavior in court, as observed by Brueski and Motta, highlighted his penchant for denying the murder charges. His interaction with a friend, whom he financially wronged, became particularly telling when the friend accused him of murder. Murdaugh was quick to refute this, focusing on his innocence in the murder charges.    Motta and Brueski discussed another layer of complexity added by the recent arrest of Jeffrey Colton Hill, son of South Carolina clerk of court Becky Hill, who is under scrutiny for alleged jury tampering. The younger Hill faces wiretapping charges, leading to speculation about potential involvement in the Murdaugh case. Motta pointed out that this development paints a disturbing picture of a possible culture of corruption within the courthouse, raising questions about whether these incidents are isolated or part of a larger, interconnected issue.    The conversation then shifted to the potential retrial of Murdaugh's murder charges. With Becky Hill's legal troubles and her son's arrest, Motta expressed his preference for a new trial to ensure justice is served correctly. He highlighted the changing nature of defense strategies and the potential for Murdaugh to alter his testimony, particularly regarding his whereabouts on the night of the murders.    Motta shared his theory on the murder case, suggesting that Murdaugh may have orchestrated the killings without directly participating. This perspective sheds light on Murdaugh's ability to compartmentalize his actions, accepting guilt for financial misdeeds while denying involvement in the murders.    As the podcast episode drew to a close, Brueski and Motta reflected on the never-ending drama surrounding the Murdaugh case. With new developments emerging regularly, the case continues to be a source of fascination and speculation. The conversation concluded with a sense of anticipation for future revelations, as the legal saga of Alex Murdaugh and the South Carolina legal system shows no signs of abating.    In summary, the "Hidden Killers" podcast with Tony Brueski and Bob Motta offers a deep dive into the Alex Murdaugh case, exploring its many facets and the broader implications for the legal system. As listeners eagerly await the next chapter in this ongoing legal drama, one question remains: What new twists and revelations will the Murdaugh case bring, and how will they shape our understanding of justice and corruption? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest twist of the Alex Murdaugh saga, the embattled former lawyer, convicted of financial crimes and accused of murder, is seeking a new trial amid allegations of jury tampering. The case, which has captured the nation's attention, raises profound questions about the fairness of Murdaugh's trial and the integrity of the judicial process. Defense Attorney and podcast host Bob Motta joined Tony Brueski on "Hidden Killers" to dissect these developments.    The focus of Murdaugh's appeal hinges on allegations against Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill, accused of having undue influence on the jury. Despite Hill's denial of these allegations, the implications are significant. As Motta points out, “If those allegations are true, and Judge Newman believes that jurors could have been influenced by those comments, then Murdaugh is entitled to a new trial.”    The discussion then turned to Judge Clifton Newman, who presided over Murdaugh's trial. Motta expressed respect for Newman's handling of the high-profile case but raised concerns about his impartiality following public comments about Murdaugh. “Judges are prone to do that occasionally, especially in a case like that where it's so high profile,” Motta noted. He suggested that Newman should recuse himself, not because of bias, but because he could potentially be a witness in the jury tampering allegations.    Motta delved deeper into the dynamics between judges and court clerks, emphasizing the unlikely scenario that Newman knew of any alleged misconduct by Hill. “I think the odds that he was aware of it and let it go unchecked are slim and none,” Motta said. This perspective underscores the complexity of the situation, where multiple layers of the legal system are under scrutiny.    The conversation then addressed the challenges of proving jury tampering. Motta highlighted the difficulties of ascertaining whether Hill's alleged comments affected the jury's verdict. “It's incredibly hard to prove, even from the jurors' perspective,” Motta explained, illustrating the intricacies of determining the impact of such comments on a jury's decision-making process.    The potential for a new trial raises questions about Murdaugh's defense strategy. Motta pondered whether Murdaugh's team would present a different narrative or stick to their original defense. “There's always going to be the default position to assume that the judge can remain objective and impartial,” Motta stated, hinting at the challenges Murdaugh's defense faces in shifting the narrative.    The issue of public opinion and its influence on legal proceedings was also discussed. Motta pointed out that judges, like Newman, must balance their roles as impartial arbiters with the public scrutiny that comes with high-profile cases. This balance is particularly delicate in a case as sensational and emotionally charged as Murdaugh's.    As the episode concluded, Brueski and Motta reflected on the broader implications of the Murdaugh case for the justice system. The allegations of jury tampering and the questions surrounding Newman's role underscore the complexities and challenges of ensuring a fair trial in high-profile cases.    The Murdaugh case, with its twists and turns, continues to hold the public's attention. As Motta aptly summarized, “It'll be interesting, man. Like, I tend to think it'll get denied. But I could be wrong, you know, it depends on what comes out at the hearing.” This sentiment encapsulates the unpredictability of the case and the keen interest it has generated nationwide. As the legal drama unfolds, one question lingers: Will Alex Murdaugh get a new trial, and if so, what revelations might it bring? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest twist of the Alex Murdaugh saga, the embattled former lawyer, convicted of financial crimes and accused of murder, is seeking a new trial amid allegations of jury tampering. The case, which has captured the nation's attention, raises profound questions about the fairness of Murdaugh's trial and the integrity of the judicial process. Defense Attorney and podcast host Bob Motta joined Tony Brueski on "Hidden Killers" to dissect these developments.    The focus of Murdaugh's appeal hinges on allegations against Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill, accused of having undue influence on the jury. Despite Hill's denial of these allegations, the implications are significant. As Motta points out, “If those allegations are true, and Judge Newman believes that jurors could have been influenced by those comments, then Murdaugh is entitled to a new trial.”    The discussion then turned to Judge Clifton Newman, who presided over Murdaugh's trial. Motta expressed respect for Newman's handling of the high-profile case but raised concerns about his impartiality following public comments about Murdaugh. “Judges are prone to do that occasionally, especially in a case like that where it's so high profile,” Motta noted. He suggested that Newman should recuse himself, not because of bias, but because he could potentially be a witness in the jury tampering allegations.    Motta delved deeper into the dynamics between judges and court clerks, emphasizing the unlikely scenario that Newman knew of any alleged misconduct by Hill. “I think the odds that he was aware of it and let it go unchecked are slim and none,” Motta said. This perspective underscores the complexity of the situation, where multiple layers of the legal system are under scrutiny.    The conversation then addressed the challenges of proving jury tampering. Motta highlighted the difficulties of ascertaining whether Hill's alleged comments affected the jury's verdict. “It's incredibly hard to prove, even from the jurors' perspective,” Motta explained, illustrating the intricacies of determining the impact of such comments on a jury's decision-making process.    The potential for a new trial raises questions about Murdaugh's defense strategy. Motta pondered whether Murdaugh's team would present a different narrative or stick to their original defense. “There's always going to be the default position to assume that the judge can remain objective and impartial,” Motta stated, hinting at the challenges Murdaugh's defense faces in shifting the narrative.    The issue of public opinion and its influence on legal proceedings was also discussed. Motta pointed out that judges, like Newman, must balance their roles as impartial arbiters with the public scrutiny that comes with high-profile cases. This balance is particularly delicate in a case as sensational and emotionally charged as Murdaugh's.    As the episode concluded, Brueski and Motta reflected on the broader implications of the Murdaugh case for the justice system. The allegations of jury tampering and the questions surrounding Newman's role underscore the complexities and challenges of ensuring a fair trial in high-profile cases.    The Murdaugh case, with its twists and turns, continues to hold the public's attention. As Motta aptly summarized, “It'll be interesting, man. Like, I tend to think it'll get denied. But I could be wrong, you know, it depends on what comes out at the hearing.” This sentiment encapsulates the unpredictability of the case and the keen interest it has generated nationwide. As the legal drama unfolds, one question lingers: Will Alex Murdaugh get a new trial, and if so, what revelations might it bring? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In the latest twist of the Alex Murdaugh saga, the embattled former lawyer, convicted of financial crimes and accused of murder, is seeking a new trial amid allegations of jury tampering. The case, which has captured the nation's attention, raises profound questions about the fairness of Murdaugh's trial and the integrity of the judicial process. Defense Attorney and podcast host Bob Motta joined Tony Brueski on "Hidden Killers" to dissect these developments.    The focus of Murdaugh's appeal hinges on allegations against Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill, accused of having undue influence on the jury. Despite Hill's denial of these allegations, the implications are significant. As Motta points out, “If those allegations are true, and Judge Newman believes that jurors could have been influenced by those comments, then Murdaugh is entitled to a new trial.”    The discussion then turned to Judge Clifton Newman, who presided over Murdaugh's trial. Motta expressed respect for Newman's handling of the high-profile case but raised concerns about his impartiality following public comments about Murdaugh. “Judges are prone to do that occasionally, especially in a case like that where it's so high profile,” Motta noted. He suggested that Newman should recuse himself, not because of bias, but because he could potentially be a witness in the jury tampering allegations.    Motta delved deeper into the dynamics between judges and court clerks, emphasizing the unlikely scenario that Newman knew of any alleged misconduct by Hill. “I think the odds that he was aware of it and let it go unchecked are slim and none,” Motta said. This perspective underscores the complexity of the situation, where multiple layers of the legal system are under scrutiny.    The conversation then addressed the challenges of proving jury tampering. Motta highlighted the difficulties of ascertaining whether Hill's alleged comments affected the jury's verdict. “It's incredibly hard to prove, even from the jurors' perspective,” Motta explained, illustrating the intricacies of determining the impact of such comments on a jury's decision-making process.    The potential for a new trial raises questions about Murdaugh's defense strategy. Motta pondered whether Murdaugh's team would present a different narrative or stick to their original defense. “There's always going to be the default position to assume that the judge can remain objective and impartial,” Motta stated, hinting at the challenges Murdaugh's defense faces in shifting the narrative.    The issue of public opinion and its influence on legal proceedings was also discussed. Motta pointed out that judges, like Newman, must balance their roles as impartial arbiters with the public scrutiny that comes with high-profile cases. This balance is particularly delicate in a case as sensational and emotionally charged as Murdaugh's.    As the episode concluded, Brueski and Motta reflected on the broader implications of the Murdaugh case for the justice system. The allegations of jury tampering and the questions surrounding Newman's role underscore the complexities and challenges of ensuring a fair trial in high-profile cases.    The Murdaugh case, with its twists and turns, continues to hold the public's attention. As Motta aptly summarized, “It'll be interesting, man. Like, I tend to think it'll get denied. But I could be wrong, you know, it depends on what comes out at the hearing.” This sentiment encapsulates the unpredictability of the case and the keen interest it has generated nationwide. As the legal drama unfolds, one question lingers: Will Alex Murdaugh get a new trial, and if so, what revelations might it bring? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can one alleged act of jury tampering unravel the verdict in a high-profile murder case? This is the pivotal question that has emerged following Alex Murdaugh's motion for a new trial. The once-prominent South Carolina lawyer, convicted in a saga that gripped the nation, is seeking another chance in court, claiming jury tampering by a court official. In an eye-opening episode of "Hidden Killers," trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine delves into the murky waters of this claim with host Tony Brueski.    During the podcast, Constantine articulated skepticism about the jury tampering allegations involving Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill. "The four jurors unequivocally say...she never told us that," Constantine stated, referencing the jurors' dismissal of any improper influence. Despite these claims, the notion of Hill potentially being too personable with jurors sparked debate about courtroom boundaries and the implications for Murdaugh's conviction.    "If there was prejudicial influence, then, of course, a new trial is warranted," Constantine asserted. Yet the crux of the matter remains proving such influence occurred, a challenge that looms large over the case. The jurors, according to Constantine, have no incentive to protect Hill: "There's no skin in the game."    The discussion took a turn when Brueski asked about Murdaugh's previous courtroom demeanor. Constantine did not mince words: "He's a horrible witness." Her blunt assessment of Murdaugh's testimony painted a picture of a man who was not just unconvincing but appeared to be outright deceptive. "He lied, continued to lie, and then admitted he lied," she said, concluding that if Murdaugh were to take the stand in a potential new trial, his lawyers would face an uphill battle to manage his presentation.    The conversation went deeper into the psyche of Murdaugh as Constantine dissected his patterns of lying and manipulation. "When you listen to a person long enough, you start to figure out how they lie," she explained. Her analysis of Murdaugh was unyielding: "He is the textbook liar."    Moreover, the potential for a new trial raised questions about what Murdaugh's defense could present differently. Constantine speculated that new evidence or witnesses would be the likely route. "Had we had this information, this would have come out," she posited, hypothetically speaking from the defense's perspective.    In an environment where the credibility of the justice system is often under scrutiny, the Murdaugh case stands out as a complex amalgam of legal drama, personal tragedy, and a deep dive into human behavior. With experts like Constantine providing insights, the public gets a glimpse into the intricate processes that determine the fate of those who stand trial.    The episode of "Hidden Killers" wrapped up, leaving listeners with a profound question that encapsulates the entire saga: If Alex Murdaugh is granted a new trial, what new narratives, evidence, or strategies will come into play, and will they be enough to navigate the "maze" of the legal system for a different outcome? Or will the same patterns that led to his initial conviction simply re-emerge, solidifying the case against him?    As the legal community and the public alike await further developments, one thing is clear—Alex Murdaugh's story is far from over, and the world is watching. Will justice be served, or will it be reframed? What do you think? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can one alleged act of jury tampering unravel the verdict in a high-profile murder case? This is the pivotal question that has emerged following Alex Murdaugh's motion for a new trial. The once-prominent South Carolina lawyer, convicted in a saga that gripped the nation, is seeking another chance in court, claiming jury tampering by a court official. In an eye-opening episode of "Hidden Killers," trial consultant and body language expert Susan Constantine delves into the murky waters of this claim with host Tony Brueski.    During the podcast, Constantine articulated skepticism about the jury tampering allegations involving Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca Hill. "The four jurors unequivocally say...she never told us that," Constantine stated, referencing the jurors' dismissal of any improper influence. Despite these claims, the notion of Hill potentially being too personable with jurors sparked debate about courtroom boundaries and the implications for Murdaugh's conviction.    "If there was prejudicial influence, then, of course, a new trial is warranted," Constantine asserted. Yet the crux of the matter remains proving such influence occurred, a challenge that looms large over the case. The jurors, according to Constantine, have no incentive to protect Hill: "There's no skin in the game."    The discussion took a turn when Brueski asked about Murdaugh's previous courtroom demeanor. Constantine did not mince words: "He's a horrible witness." Her blunt assessment of Murdaugh's testimony painted a picture of a man who was not just unconvincing but appeared to be outright deceptive. "He lied, continued to lie, and then admitted he lied," she said, concluding that if Murdaugh were to take the stand in a potential new trial, his lawyers would face an uphill battle to manage his presentation.    The conversation went deeper into the psyche of Murdaugh as Constantine dissected his patterns of lying and manipulation. "When you listen to a person long enough, you start to figure out how they lie," she explained. Her analysis of Murdaugh was unyielding: "He is the textbook liar."    Moreover, the potential for a new trial raised questions about what Murdaugh's defense could present differently. Constantine speculated that new evidence or witnesses would be the likely route. "Had we had this information, this would have come out," she posited, hypothetically speaking from the defense's perspective.    In an environment where the credibility of the justice system is often under scrutiny, the Murdaugh case stands out as a complex amalgam of legal drama, personal tragedy, and a deep dive into human behavior. With experts like Constantine providing insights, the public gets a glimpse into the intricate processes that determine the fate of those who stand trial.    The episode of "Hidden Killers" wrapped up, leaving listeners with a profound question that encapsulates the entire saga: If Alex Murdaugh is granted a new trial, what new narratives, evidence, or strategies will come into play, and will they be enough to navigate the "maze" of the legal system for a different outcome? Or will the same patterns that led to his initial conviction simply re-emerge, solidifying the case against him?    As the legal community and the public alike await further developments, one thing is clear—Alex Murdaugh's story is far from over, and the world is watching. Will justice be served, or will it be reframed? What do you think? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Is the quest for justice in the Alex Murdaugh case blurring the lines between right and wrong, and revealing deep-seated issues within the South Carolina legal system? These are the questions that Tony Brueski and former defense attorney, Lori Hellis, tackle in a recent episode of the "Hidden Killers" podcast as they discuss the shocking allegations of jury tampering and potential misconduct by Colleton County Clerk of Court, Rebecca Hill.   Alex Murdaugh has officially filed a motion in state court seeking a new trial, citing allegations of jury tampering and potentially damning misconduct. Hill, who remains in her position and denies the allegations, is at the center of this legal maelstrom. Lori Hellis, with her extensive background in law, provides a nuanced perspective on the implications of these allegations.    "If those allegations are true, and the judge who hears the motion believes that jurors could have been influenced by those comments, then Alex Murdaugh is entitled to a new trial," Hellis explains. This statement underscores the gravity of the situation, highlighting the importance of integrity and fairness within the legal system.    Hellis goes on to discuss the broader issues plaguing South Carolina's justice system, pointing out the incestuous relationships and revolving doors between law enforcement, legislators, judges, and lawyers. "The level of corruption, the level of control that a small number of people have over the justice system, is troubling," Hellis remarks, emphasizing the urgent need for reform and transparency.    The conversation takes a darker turn as they delve into the murky waters of Alex Murdaugh's lead counsel, Jim Griffin, and his role as a legislator, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest and undue influence. The possibility of third-party interference, particularly by the clerk of the court, adds another layer of complexity to the case.    The discussion shifts to Rebecca Hill's book and her public statements, scrutinizing them for potential clues or admissions of guilt. Hellis reads between the lines, questioning Hill's motivations and the potential impact of her words on the trial. "Did she have an agenda? You have to wonder," Hellis muses, leaving the audience to draw their own conclusions.    As the podcast episode comes to a close, Brueski and Hellis ponder the broader implications of the case. "Is this just how things run at that court in South Carolina? Is this an isolated incident, or a symptom of a systemic issue?" Brueski asks, challenging the audience to think critically about the state of the justice system, not just in South Carolina, but across the nation.    In the end, the conversation leaves listeners with more questions than answers, and a lingering sense of unease about the state of justice in South Carolina. The Alex Murdaugh case has peeled back the curtain, revealing a system rife with corruption, influence, and secrecy. As Hellis aptly notes, "These kinds of cases always create an avalanche effect."    The "Hidden Killers" podcast has once again succeeded in shedding light on the dark corners of the legal world, challenging its listeners to question everything and settle for nothing less than the truth. As the saga of Alex Murdaugh continues to unfold, one can't help but wonder: what other secrets are hiding in the shadows, and what will it take to bring them to light? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Megyn Kelly begins the show by announcing her interview with former President Donald Trump coming up next Thursday on September 14. Then Ric Grenell, former acting DNI Director, joins to discuss the state of the media, President Biden tanking in the polls, the potential "elites" coming together at the Democratic convention to appoint Gov. Gretchen Whitmer as the nominee, VP Kamala Harris' continued struggles, former VP Pence speaking out against Trump and populism, Grenell's believe that DeSantis' campaign is "homophobic" after their LGBT ad, the gay community and the GOP, DeSantis' policies in Florida, and more. Then defense lawyers Jonna Spilbor and David Wohl join to talk about the potential jury tampering in the Alex Murdaugh trial by a clerk, how that could actually lead to an entirely new trial and potential criminal charges, the relevance of the clerk's motivations, Trump potentially taking the stand in the classified documents trial, Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio sentenced to 22 years in prison over January 6, whether Tarrio's sentencing was politically motivated, the hypocrisy in criminal consequences for January 6 rioters and BLM-Antifa rioters, and more. Then Mike Baker, host of "The President's Daily Brief," joins to discuss how the Russia-Ukraine conflict could actually end, the danger to America as Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un are getting closer, new details about how caught off-guard the Biden administration was by the botched Afghanistan withdrawal, Hunter Biden facing a gun charge now, Biden walking out and White House spin, and more.Grenell: https://twitter.com/RichardGrenellSpilbor: https://jonnaspilbor.comWohl: https://cucamongacriminaldefense.attorneyBaker: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-presidents-daily-brief/id1617887885 Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKellyTwitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShowInstagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShowFacebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow Find out more information at:https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow

Developing stories you need to know just in time for your drive home. Get the facts first on Morning Wire. Renewal by Andersen: "Shop Renewal by Andersen's Summer Sale by Texting ‘WIRE' to 200-300."