Podcasts about motta

“Tutta La Juve che Vuoi” con Dario Ghiringhelli e Consuelo Motta. Ospiti: Caterina Baffoni, Leomina.

“Tutta La Juve che Vuoi” con Dario Ghiringhelli e Consuelo Motta. Ospiti: Caterina Baffoni, Leomina.

Presidente da Câmara dos Deputados se torna empecilho para avanço da PEC que acaba com a maioridade penal.Meio-Dia em Brasília traz as principais notícias e análises da política nacional direto   de Brasília.     Com apresentação de José Inácio Pilar e Wilson Lima, o programa aborda os temas mais quentes do cenário político e econômico do Brasil.     Com um olhar atento sobre política, notícias e economia, mantém o público bem informado.    Transmissão ao vivo de segunda a sexta-feira às 12h no nosso canal do Youtube.  https://www.youtube.com/@OAntagonista  Apoie o jornalismo independente. Assine O Antagonista e Crusoé com 10% via Pix ou Google Pay:  https://assine.oantagonista.com.br/   Siga O Antagonista no X:  https://x.com/o_antagonista   Acompanhe O Antagonista no canal do WhatsApp. Boletins diários, conteúdos exclusivos em vídeo e muito mais.  https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va2SurQHLHQbI5yJN344  Leia mais em www.oantagonista.com.br | www.crusoe.com.br #CCJ #MaioridadePenal #HugoMotta #Podcast #Politica #Noticias #Brasilia #CamaraDosDeputados #SegurancaPublica #Justica #DebatePolitico #Constituicao #Direito #Sociedade #Brasil #Tendencias #Internet #Opiniao #Informacao #Atualidades

The prosecution presented Mackenzie Shirilla's text messages and threatening statements as evidence of premeditated intent. The trial court characterized her as "hell on wheels" and convicted her on four counts of murder. No clinical or psychological expert testimony was presented to provide an alternative framework for interpreting the defendant's behavior — specifically, whether a seventeen-year-old's volatile conduct represents a fixed personality pathology or an adolescent brain that has not completed neurological development.Shavaun Scott — licensed psychotherapist, author of The Minds of Mass Killers, with experience in forensic settings, domestic violence shelters, and crisis intervention — provides the clinical analysis the trial never heard. She identifies narcissistic presentation that clinically masks fragility rather than indicating calculated predation. She distinguishes between personality disorder and adolescent neurodevelopmental immaturity — the prefrontal cortex, responsible for impulse control and consequence assessment, does not reach full maturation until approximately the mid-twenties. The texts and threats the prosecution relied upon reveal specific clinical information about Shirilla's internal psychological state that differs materially from the inferences the prosecution drew from them.The post-conviction landscape presents a separate set of strategic concerns. Shirilla's participation in Netflix's The Crash was intended to present her narrative publicly. Within days of release, a fellow inmate provided a contradictory account of Shirilla's behavior in custody — descriptions fundamentally inconsistent with the on-camera presentation. The documentary reignited the prosecution's characterization rather than countering it. Shirilla's pre-incarceration social media presence continues to circulate publicly as characterological evidence. The victims' families have increased their public visibility.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta evaluates the post-conviction decision-making. Shirilla's appellate remedies are exhausted. Her earliest parole eligibility is 2037. Her consistent claim of amnesia regarding the crash may be clinically accurate but is strategically counterproductive before a parole board that requires demonstrated accountability. Motta examines whether the documentary, the public persona, and the memory claim collectively advance or impede the prospect of eventual release — and whether the current trajectory reflects competent post-conviction guidance.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MackenzieShirilla #TheCrash #TheCrashNetflix #DominicRusso #DavionFlanagan #ShavaunScott #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ForensicPsychology

Defense failure. Prosecutorial overreach. Systemic rigidity. And a defendant making post-conviction choices that may be sealing her own fate. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta says the Mackenzie Shirilla case isn't just one thing that went wrong — it's a cascade of failures that compounded at every stage.Shirilla was seventeen when the crash in Strongsville, Ohio killed Dominic Russo and Davion Flanagan. She was convicted of four counts of murder in a bench trial. Her defense raised a medical condition but never proved it. The prosecution charged murder without a confession. A post-conviction petition with expert evidence was rejected over a one-day filing miss. And then she agreed to a Netflix documentary that reignited every negative characterization and prompted a fellow inmate to publicly contradict her on-camera persona.Motta, host of the Defense Diaries podcast, sat down for a full examination of the case. He starts with what the defense should have done — the experts that were needed, the evidence that was available, and the strategy that could have challenged the prosecution's narrative. He moves into the prosecution's overreach — whether murder was the right charge and whether the bench trial format gave the state an unfair advantage. And he addresses the post-conviction reality — the documentary fallout, the families' opposition, the social media footprint, and what Mackenzie should actually be doing inside prison to have any chance at parole in 2037.The legal system processed Mackenzie Shirilla. The question is whether it processed her correctly — and whether anything she does from here can change the trajectory.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MackenzieShirilla #TheCrash #TheCrashNetflix #DominicRusso #DavionFlanagan #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Justice

The Netflix documentary was supposed to be Mackenzie Shirilla's moment. The first time the public heard her voice since the conviction. A chance to tell her side. Instead, it may have been the worst decision she's made since the crash itself.She sat in front of cameras, composed and remorseful, maintaining she has no memory. A fellow inmate immediately contradicted her — described a different Mackenzie entirely, someone performing behind bars the same way she performs on camera. The pre-crash TikTok persona resurfaced across social media. The characterization the prosecution built — cold, image-obsessed, calculating — didn't soften. It hardened. People who were undecided moved to guilty. The documentary that was meant to generate sympathy may have cemented the public narrative that convicted her.Shirilla is serving fifteen years to life for the Strongsville, Ohio crash that killed Dominic Russo and Davion Flanagan. Her appeals are done. Her first shot at parole is 2037. Everything she does between now and then either helps that hearing or hurts it — and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta says most of what she's done so far falls in the wrong column.Motta examines the documentary decision, the damage of the inmate contradiction, how social media from when she was seventeen could follow her into a parole hearing, what the families' public activism means for her chances, and whether "I don't remember" is an answer that will ever satisfy a parole board. The trial is over. The question is whether Mackenzie Shirilla knows how to fight the battle she's actually in.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MackenzieShirilla #TheCrash #TheCrashNetflix #DominicRusso #DavionFlanagan #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #Justice

Durante décadas, Armande de Polignac permaneceu praticamente ausente da história da música. O seu nome desapareceu dos programas de concerto e muitas obras sobreviveram apenas em manuscritos dispersos. Agora, os pianistas Bruno Belthoise e João Costa Ferreira recuperam a compositora num disco que inclui primeiras gravações mundiais, revelando uma figura essencial da transição entre o romantismo tardio e a modernidade musical francesa do início do século XX. Esquecida durante mais de um século, Armande de Polignac regressa agora através de um disco de Bruno Belthoise e João Costa Ferreira, dedicado a manuscritos reencontrados e primeiras gravações mundiais. Entre simbolismo, impressionismo e modernismo do início do século XX, o álbum revela uma compositora singular, cuja obra foi apagada da memória musical apesar da originalidade, da estética e da proximidade aos grandes centros artísticos franceses do início do século XX. “A música de Armande de Polignac é realmente uma coisa para descobrir”, começa por contar Bruno Belthoise. Para o pianista francês, a compositora pertence a um momento decisivo da cultura europeia, em que as mulheres começaram lentamente a conquistar espaço no universo da criação musical. “Ela fazia parte de uma família muito dedicada às artes e à música” e iniciou “muito jovem” os seus estudos musicais. Sobretudo, acrescenta Bruno Belthoise, pertenceu a uma geração que beneficiou de mudanças profundas na sociedade francesa: “Nos séculos antigos era quase impossível ser mulher compositora.” Bruno Belthoise recorda que o início do século XX coincidiu com a abertura gradual das grandes instituições musicais às mulheres. “Ela aproveitou uma dinâmica muito importante”, explica, referindo-se ao momento em que compositoras passaram a poder apresentar-se ao Prix de Rome. “Estas mulheres começaram a ser mais conhecidas no início do século XX.” Embora Armande de Polignac nunca tenha concorrido ao prémio, desenvolveu uma carreira intensa e ligada ao meio musical parisiense. “Ela dedicou a vida inteira à composição”, sublinha Bruno Belthoise. Estudou com figuras fundamentais da música francesa, entre elas Vincent d'Indy, Eugène Gigout e Gabriel Fauré. “Deixou uma obra muito importante, quase 200 obras em todos os domínios”, acrescenta. Música para piano, música de câmara, obras orquestrais, ópera e ballet fazem parte de um catálogo hoje ainda pouco conhecido. A compositora dirigiu igualmente as suas próprias obras no Théâtre du Châtelet, em Paris, e estreou a ópera Petite Sirène na Opéra de Nice. Para Bruno Belthoise, Armande de Polignac “simboliza a passagem entre a música romântica e a música moderna francesa”, num território onde convivem o impressionismo, o simbolismo e as novas linguagens do século XX. Ainda assim, a compositora acabou por desaparecer quase totalmente da memória musical europeia. “As suas obras não foram muito divulgadas, não foram muito editadas”, lamenta Bruno Belthoise. Grande parte da produção permaneceu inédita ou acessível apenas através de manuscritos. “Mesmo apesar de poder participar na programação de concertos em Paris, as mulheres não eram muito destacadas.” Ao ouvir o disco, a ausência prolongada na história da música de Armande de Polignac torna-se difícil de compreender. João Costa Ferreira descreve uma música construída sobre timbres delicados e ressonâncias quase suspensas. “Quando ouvimos Nos Jardins do Palácio do Sultão, sentimos esse universo tímbrico muito especial”, explica. O pianista português destaca ainda a importância do instrumento utilizado na gravação: “Havia um Steinway cujas características permitiam certas coisas que outros pianos não permitem.” A estética de Armande de Polignac revela uma forte influência do exotismo francês do início do século XX. João Costa Ferreira fala numa “procura por cores de países longínquos, como o mundo árabe e sobretudo o mundo asiático”. A compositora escreveu obras inspiradas na China, no Japão e nas atmosferas orientais das Mil e Uma Noites. “Ela seguia essa corrente estética modernista da procura por essas sonoridades exóticas”, acrescenta. Segundo João Costa Ferreira, essa linguagem resulta tanto do ambiente artístico parisiense como da influência directa dos mestres com quem Armande de Polignac estudou. “Vê-se claramente a influência dos seus pares e da sua época”, observa. A tradição impressionista francesa, marcada por Debussy e pelas Exposições Universais de Paris, atravessa muitas destas obras. Ainda assim, as referências nunca surgem como mera imitação. Há ecos de Fauré, Debussy ou mesmo de certas escolas russas, mas a escrita mantém sempre uma identidade própria. Bruno Belthoise enquadra essa diversidade no ambiente cultural extremamente aberto do início do século XX. “Era tudo aberto no início do século XX”, afirma. “Tchaikovsky chegou a Paris no fim do século XIX, Gustav Mahler no início do século XX. Essa convergência era importante para desenvolver a imaginação dos compositores.” Na escrita pianística, Bruno Belthoise identifica “uma mistura entre romantismo e modernismo”, associada a um trabalho particularmente sofisticado sobre a ressonância sonora. “Da maneira francesa, havia realmente este desenvolvimento do piano através das ressonâncias do instrumento”, explica. “Mas também a parte russa desenvolveu muito a escrita para piano.” Para João Costa Ferreira, interpretar estas partituras implica uma experiência rara no mundo contemporâneo da música clássica: tocar obras praticamente sem memória auditiva acumulada. “Hoje em dia, quando interpretamos Chopin ou Beethoven, temos todas as referências auditivas dessas obras”, explica. “Aqui criamos uma interpretação a partir do nada.” Esse desafio tornou-se central no percurso artístico dos dois pianistas. “Sentimos que estamos a descobrir algo pela primeira vez”, afirma João Costa Ferreira. “Propor uma primeira escuta, uma primeira interpretação de algo que nunca foi ouvido, pelo menos nos últimos cem anos, é muito estimulante.” Bruno Belthoise partilha a mesma visão. “Procurar repertório diferente é importante para nós”, diz. “Descobrir obras novas é uma coisa muito estimulante.” Esse trabalho de redescoberta já levou os dois pianistas a explorar repertórios esquecidos de compositores como José Vianna da Motta, Fernando Lopes-Graça ou Gabriel Fauré. Mas este disco surge também de uma dimensão pessoal. Bruno Belthoise revela que a ideia do projecto nasceu de “duas influências diferentes”. A primeira foi o pianista francês Laurent Martin, figura central na recuperação de compositoras francesas esquecidas. “O Laurent Martin gravou muitos discos e interpretou muitas vezes compositoras francesas”, recorda Bruno Belthoise. “Ele confiou-me uma quantidade de partituras dela, perguntando-me se eu estaria interessado em trabalhar a obra de Armande de Polignac para a fazer conhecer”. Essa transmissão entre músicos revelou-se decisiva para o projecto. Laurent Martin, conhecido pelo trabalho de investigação em torno do romantismo francês e das compositoras esquecidas, funcionou como verdadeiro impulsionador da redescoberta de Armande de Polignac. A segunda influência surgiu em Lisboa, através de uma descoberta inesperada. Um manuscrito de Cloches, ligado à família Assis de Barros, apareceu nas mãos de Bruno Belthoise graças ao investigador João Pedro Mendes dos Santos. “Foi exactamente como um arqueólogo”, admite o pianista francês. “Esse manuscrito surgiu completamente sem preparação e caiu nas minhas mãos.” A descoberta revelou uma ligação pouco conhecida entre Armande de Polignac e Portugal. “Ela tinha uma ligação particular à família Assis de Barros e visitou Lisboa várias vezes”, explica Bruno Belthoise. O disco inclui ainda várias obras para piano a quatro mãos, formação que exige uma relação muito específica entre intérpretes. “Tocar a quatro mãos é uma coisa de que gosto imenso”, afirma Bruno Belthoise. “É um pequeno exercício de equilibrismo.” A proximidade física obriga a reinventar gestos, movimentos e respirações. “É muito importante ensaiar juntos”, acrescenta. “Não podemos fazer piano a quatro mãos sem esse trabalho comum.” Para João Costa Ferreira, essa construção colectiva faz parte da própria identidade artística do duo. “Este desafio é completamente diferente do que gravar o grande repertório canónico”, afirma. Depois da edição do álbum, seguem-se agora concertos em Lisboa, Tavira, Madeira e França. Bruno Belthoise interpretou igualmente obras para piano solo de Armande de Polignac em Saint-Leu-la-Forêt, no Val-d'Oise, no passado 30 de Maio.

Come riportato nel comunicato di oggi, martedì 2 giugno, del Bologna Fc 1909 Domenico Tedesco è il nuovo allenatore dei felsinei con un contratto fino al 30 giugno 2028 con opzione per una stagione successiva. Ne parlano Nicola Bondavalli e Simone Solario.Potrero, dove tutto ha inizio. Un podcast sul calcio italiano e internazionale.Su Como TV (https://tv.comofootball.com) nel 2026 potete seguire in diretta le partite della Saudi Pro League, Saudi King's Cup, Supercoppa d'Arabia, Copa Libertadores, Copa Sudamericana, Recopa, Liga Profesional Argentina, Trofeo de Campeones argentino, Eredivisie, Coppa di Francia, Scottish Premiership, Coppa di Scozia, Scottish League Cup, Scottish Championship, Coppa di Portogallo, Supercoppa di Portogallo, HNL croata e tutti i contenuti di calcio italiano e internazionale on demand.Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/potrero--5761582/support.

O presidente da Câmara reforçou a importância da aprovação da redução da jornada de trabalho e do fim da escala 6 por 1. Em Lisboa, em um Fórum Jurídico promovido pelo ministro do STF Gilmar Mendes, Hugo Motta destacou a prioridade com o trabalhador. A medida deve contar com algumas propostas de mudança por parte do Senado. O Giro de Notícias mantém você por dentro das principais informações do Brasil e do mundo. Confira mais atualizações na próxima edição.

Anna Kepner's ex-boyfriend's father has publicly claimed he tried to warn the family. Timothy Hudson was allegedly fixated on Anna. He reportedly wanted to date her despite being her stepbrother. He was allegedly seen climbing on top of her while she slept during a FaceTime call. He reportedly always carried a large knife. Anna's aunt said Anna didn't want to go on the cruise. Anna was afraid of him.Despite all of that, Anna was placed in a cabin with Hudson aboard the Carnival Horizon. No parents present.On November 7, 2025, Anna's body was found under a bed in that stateroom. Wrapped in a blanket. Covered with life preservers. The medical examiner ruled her death a homicide caused by mechanical asphyxiation. Hudson is reportedly on camera as the only person entering and leaving the cabin. A federal grand jury indicted him as an adult on first-degree murder and aggravated harm charges. He's pleaded not guilty. The trial has been pushed to September 8th.This isn't a question of identity. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta examines what the defense does when the fight isn't about who — it's about charges, degree, and the constellation of adult decisions that allegedly preceded that night. If the defense argues these adults failed Anna, they have to do it without making the jury despise them for pointing fingers. Motta walks through how that calculation works.Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer addresses why prosecutors would use "no warning" language in their filings when the public record suggests a documented pattern of escalating behavior toward Anna. She examines how investigators handle a crime scene showing deliberate concealment from a suspect who reportedly claims total memory loss — and what that combination signals about premeditation.Timothy's biological mother and her husband have both reportedly said they won't attend the trial. His father alleges she chose her marriage over her son. When your own mother won't show up to your murder trial, what does that absence communicate to twelve jurors?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #CarnivalHorizon #FederalTrial #JusticeForAnna #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #BobMotta #JenniferCoffindaffer #CruiseShipCase

Prosecutors say Timothy Hudson killed Anna Kepner "without any warning." Jennifer Coffindaffer spent 28 years at the FBI and wants to know why they'd use that language when the public record suggests something very different.Anna's ex-boyfriend reportedly told investigators Hudson tried to climb on top of her during a FaceTime call. He was allegedly fixated on her. He reportedly wanted to date her despite being her stepbrother. He allegedly always carried a large knife. Anna's aunt said Anna was afraid of him. Reports say she didn't want to go on the cruise. The adults put her in a shared cabin with him aboard the Carnival Horizon. No parents present.On November 7, 2025, Anna's body was found under a bed in that stateroom — wrapped in a blanket, covered with life preservers. The medical examiner ruled it homicide by mechanical asphyxiation. Hudson is reportedly on camera as the only person entering and leaving. A grand jury indicted him as an adult. He's pleaded not guilty. Trial is September 8th.Coffindaffer examines what the alleged behavioral pattern tells an investigator about whether this was escalation toward a foreseeable outcome versus an isolated event. She addresses how the FBI reads a crime scene showing deliberate concealment alongside a suspect who reportedly claims complete memory loss — and why those two elements existing together carry specific forensic significance.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta addresses the defense's strategic dilemma. Identity isn't the fight. The fight is charges, degree, and the adults' decisions. If the defense argues the family failed Anna — put her in danger they'd been warned about — they risk the jury's contempt for deflecting responsibility. Motta walks through how you thread that needle.Timothy's biological mother reportedly won't attend the trial. His father alleges she chose her marriage over her son. Coffindaffer examines what that family fracture looks like to a jury — and whether it helps or hurts the defense when the person who should be sitting behind the defendant has reportedly walked away.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #CarnivalHorizon #FederalTrial #JusticeForAnna #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JenniferCoffindaffer #BobMotta #FBI

Confira os destaques do Jornal da Manhã desta quinta-feira (28): O plenário da Câmara dos Deputados aprovou a Proposta de Emenda à Constituição que reduz a jornada semanal de trabalho de 44 para 40 horas e permite o fim da escala 6x1. A medida foi aprovada em dois turnos, com ampla maioria entre os parlamentares, e prevê um período de transição de até 14 meses para implementação das novas regras. Agora, a proposta segue para análise do Senado Federal. A aprovação da PEC que reduz a jornada semanal de trabalho de 44 para 40 horas e permite o fim da escala 6x1 provocou reação de parlamentares da oposição na Câmara dos Deputados. Integrantes de partidos contrários à proposta classificaram a medida como irresponsável e alertaram para possíveis impactos sobre empregos, produtividade e custos para empresas. Apesar das críticas, o texto foi aprovado com ampla maioria em dois turnos e agora seguirá para análise do Senado Federal. A Polícia Federal enviou ao Supremo Tribunal Federal uma representação apontando indícios de irregularidades em repasses financeiros relacionados à produção do filme “Dark Horse”. Segundo a investigação, parte dos R$ 61 milhões negociados pelo senador Flávio Bolsonaro com o ex-banqueiro Daniel Vorcaro pode ter sido utilizada para custear despesas do ex-deputado Eduardo Bolsonaro nos Estados Unidos. Os Estados Unidos realizaram novos ataques contra o Irã, segundo informações divulgadas pela agência Reuters e confirmadas por uma autoridade americana. De acordo com o relato, militares dos EUA bombardearam uma instalação militar iraniana considerada uma ameaça às tropas americanas e ao tráfego marítimo comercial no estratégico Estreito de Ormuz. O presidente da Câmara dos Deputados, Hugo Motta, defendeu a aprovação da PEC que reduz a jornada semanal de trabalho e acaba com a escala 6x1. Segundo Motta, mudanças sociais importantes sempre enfrentaram resistência e a redução da jornada representa uma medida estrutural de promoção da saúde e qualidade de vida dos trabalhadores. O parlamentar comparou o debate atual a marcos históricos como a criação da carteira de trabalho e o fim da escravidão, afirmando que o Brasil historicamente optou por avanços civilizatórios diante de críticas iniciais. O presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva afirmou que a aprovação da PEC que acaba com a escala 6x1 e reduz a jornada semanal de trabalho sem corte salarial representa uma “conquista histórica e civilizatória”. Em declaração após a votação na Câmara dos Deputados, Lula agradeceu ao presidente da Casa, Hugo Motta, pelo avanço da proposta e afirmou que o governo atuará para garantir a aprovação do texto no Senado Federal. A medida prevê a redução da jornada de 44 para 40 horas semanais e o fim gradual da escala 6x1. O plenário da Câmara dos Deputados aprovou a PEC que reduz a jornada semanal de trabalho de 44 para 40 horas e permite o fim da escala 6x1, medida que agora segue para análise do Senado Federal. O setor de bares e restaurantes acompanha com atenção os possíveis impactos da proposta, especialmente sobre custos operacionais, contratações e funcionamento dos estabelecimentos. Para comentar o tema, a Jovem Pan entrevista Paulo Solmucci, presidente da Abrasel. O presidente da Ucrânia, Volodymyr Zelensky, enviou uma carta ao presidente dos Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, e ao Congresso americano alertando para a grave escassez de mísseis de defesa aérea no país. Segundo o governo ucraniano, o atual ritmo de entrega de armamentos pelo programa PURL já não acompanha a intensidade dos ataques russos. No documento, Zelensky também citou recentes ofensivas da Rússia, incluindo o uso de mísseis balísticos do tipo Oreshnik, e reforçou o pedido por apoio militar diante da ameaça de escalada no conflito. Essas e outras notícias você acompanha no Jornal da Manhã. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta provides legal analysis across three active criminal matters in a single session.In the Nancy Guthrie disappearance, no arrest has been made and no suspect has been publicly identified. The Pima County Board of Supervisors referred perjury allegations against Sheriff Nanos to the Arizona Attorney General. The sheriff's deputies voted unanimously in a no-confidence measure. DNA evidence remains in processing at the FBI laboratory. Motta addresses the family's legal remedies, including the viability of compelling an outside investigative review.In the Timothy Hudson federal prosecution, the defendant was indicted on charges of first-degree murder and aggravated sexual abuse in the death of Anna Kepner aboard the Carnival Horizon. Hudson, sixteen, is being tried as an adult. The trial was continued from June 1st to September 8th. He entered a not guilty plea and requested a jury trial. Motta evaluates the defense's available strategies when surveillance evidence reportedly depicts the defendant as the sole individual accessing the relevant stateroom.In the Aaron Spencer second-degree murder case, the June 22nd trial date is set before Judge Ralph Wilson, who replaced the removed Judge Elmore. The defense filed a motion to dismiss based on law enforcement's loss of a dashcam SD card. Wilson reversed prior rulings on reputation testimony and expert witness admissibility. Motta assesses the procedural posture, the viability of dismissal or spoliation remedies, and whether the prosecution's pretrial position supports charge modification.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #AnnaKepner #AaronSpencer #BobMotta #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CriminalDefense #JusticeSystem #TrueCrimeToday #LegalAnalysis

Aaron Spencer faces second-degree murder charges with a firearm enhancement in the October 2024 shooting death of Michael Fosler in Lonoke County, Arkansas. The trial is scheduled to commence June 22nd before Circuit Judge Ralph Wilson, who was assigned after the Arkansas Supreme Court stayed proceedings and Judge Barbara Elmore was removed from the case.The defense filed a motion to dismiss based on the loss or destruction of an SD card recovered from Fosler's dashcam. Testimony at pretrial hearings revealed the card was not entered into evidence until October 2025 — approximately one year after the incident. The lead detective acknowledged the card was in his office during that period. The dashcam was never photographed at the scene. The card was subsequently reported missing. Wilson declined to dismiss but reserved the defense's right to pursue the destruction claim through additional motions or hearings.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta addresses the procedural posture. Wilson reversed the prior judge's ruling limiting reputation testimony to a narrow geographic scope and allowed FBI expert witness testimony previously ruled inadmissible. The prosecution retains 404(b) bodycam footage in which Spencer allegedly made prior statements regarding Fosler. Motta evaluates the viability of dismissal, the strategic weight of a potential spoliation instruction, and whether the pretrial record creates conditions for a charge reduction or plea negotiation prior to June 22nd.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AaronSpencer #MichaelFosler #LonokeCounty #Arkansas #MurderTrial #DefenseOfOthers #MissingEvidence #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Timothy Hudson, sixteen, has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of first-degree murder and aggravated sexual abuse in connection with the death of Anna Kepner aboard the Carnival Horizon on November 7, 2025. The cause of death was determined to be mechanical asphyxiation. Hudson's trial was initially scheduled for June 1st and has been continued to September 8th in the Southern District of Florida. He entered a not guilty plea on April 22nd and requested a jury trial.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta addresses the procedural and strategic considerations facing the defense. Hudson is reportedly depicted on surveillance footage as the sole individual entering and exiting the stateroom where Kepner's body was found. When the identification element is functionally resolved, what legal theories remain available? The defense timeline between now and September presents specific requirements — expert witness retention, independent forensic review, and mental health evaluation. Hudson was reportedly prescribed ADHD and insomnia medication and allegedly missed his insomnia medication on two consecutive nights aboard the vessel.The custody proceedings between Hudson's biological parents have introduced additional considerations. His biological father, Thomas Hudson, has alleged in filings that Hudson's mother declined to support the defense. Both Shauntel and Christopher Kepner have reportedly indicated they will not attend the September proceedings. Motta evaluates the legal implications of a defendant whose family structure has functionally split along adversarial lines.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #CarnivalCruise #CarnivalHorizon #FederalTrial #TrueCrime #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #JusticeForAnna #CruiseShipDeath

No arrest has been made in the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie from her residence in Tucson's Catalina Foothills community. DNA evidence recovered from the scene was transferred from a private laboratory in Florida to the FBI for advanced analysis. The Pima County Board of Supervisors referred perjury allegations against Sheriff Chris Nanos to the Arizona Attorney General but declined to exercise their authority to remove him. The Pima County Sheriff's Deputies Association voted unanimously in a no-confidence measure against Nanos. A recall petition is reportedly circulating, requiring more than 122,000 signatures.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta addresses the legal remedies available to the Guthrie family from a procedural standpoint. What standing does a family have to petition for an outside agency to assume investigative authority? What are the evidentiary risks of initiating a private investigation that runs parallel to an active law enforcement case? A retired Pima County detective stated publicly that the suspect's identity may already exist within the accumulated case materials — is there any legal instrument that compels the department to submit to an independent review of those files?Motta provides a candid assessment of the family's position given the current procedural posture — no identified suspect, no pending charges, and an investigation led by a department facing simultaneous crises of leadership and credibility.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #Tucson #PimaCounty #SheriffNanos #MissingPerson #TrueCrime #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #ColdCase

The evidentiary picture in Aaron Spencer's case has shifted dramatically since Judge Ralph Wilson replaced Judge Barbara Elmore. The defense filed a motion to dismiss based on the destruction of evidence — an SD card from Michael Fosler's dashcam containing front-facing and rear-facing video and audio from the night of the shooting. Four officers and a defense tech expert testified about the card's handling. The dashcam was never photographed at the scene. The SD card sat in a detective's office for over a year. Investigators admitted they did not follow their own protocols.Wilson declined to dismiss outright but left the defense the option to pursue the destruction claim through motions or a dedicated hearing. He reversed the previous judge's restrictions on reputation witnesses, opening the door to testimony from individuals who knew Fosler during his time in Indiana. He also reversed the prior ruling blocking FBI expert testimony on behavioral patterns.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta examines the defense's position through the lens of the evidentiary record. The prosecution retains bodycam footage from three months prior to the shooting in which Spencer allegedly made statements about handling things himself. They've stated publicly that the trial will present information the public hasn't heard. Motta assesses whether dismissal remains viable, what a spoliation instruction accomplishes strategically, and whether the prosecution's pretrial losses have changed the calculus on charges or a potential plea.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AaronSpencer #MichaelFosler #LonokeCounty #Arkansas #MurderTrial #DefenseOfOthers #MissingEvidence #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta examines three active cases through the lens of evidentiary reality and legal strategy. The Nancy Guthrie disappearance has produced no arrest, no identified suspect, and an investigation led by a department facing a no-confidence vote, a perjury referral, and a recall effort. A retired detective stated publicly that the suspect's identity may already exist within the case files. The Guthrie family reportedly remains without a private investigator.The Timothy Hudson federal case presents a narrow defensive landscape. He is reportedly depicted on surveillance as the sole individual entering and exiting the Carnival Horizon stateroom where Anna Kepner was found dead from asphyxiation. The trial was continued to September 8th. Hudson's biological mother and her husband reportedly declined to attend. His biological father is the only parent supporting his defense while simultaneously litigating custody of a younger child.The Aaron Spencer murder case arrives at its June 22nd trial date carrying significant evidentiary damage. The dashcam SD card from the night of the shooting is missing. Judge Ralph Wilson reversed multiple rulings from the removed judge, expanded the scope of allowable testimony, and left the defense's dismissal motion unresolved. Motta assesses each case on its evidentiary merits and examines what legal options remain available to each family.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #AnnaKepner #AaronSpencer #BobMotta #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CriminalDefense #JusticeSystem #TrueCrimeToday #LegalAnalysis

Every major pretrial ruling under Judge Ralph Wilson has gone the defense's way in Aaron Spencer's murder case. Wilson reversed the removed judge's restrictions on reputation witnesses. He allowed an FBI behavioral expert to testify. He left the door open on the defense's motion to dismiss based on law enforcement losing the dashcam SD card. And the June 22nd trial date is holding.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta analyzes the strategic landscape. The defense is pursuing the most extreme remedy available — full dismissal — based on the missing SD card. Even if Wilson doesn't dismiss, a spoliation instruction telling the jury that law enforcement lost evidence favorable to the defense could be devastating before the first witness is sworn. The prosecution's position relies on bodycam footage from three months before the shooting and statements Spencer allegedly made about not trusting the system.The question Motta examines: at what point does a pattern of favorable pretrial rulings start to signal how a judge sees the strength of a case? Wilson has been on this case for months. The defense has won at every turn. With less than a month until jury selection, what's the single biggest unresolved issue — and what can't the defense afford to lose?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AaronSpencer #MichaelFosler #LonokeCounty #Arkansas #MurderTrial #DefenseOfOthers #MissingEvidence #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

No podcast ‘Notícia No Seu Tempo’, confira em áudio as principais notícias da edição impressa do jornal ‘O Estado de S.Paulo’ desta terça-feira (26/05/2026): Em reunião ontem cedo, o presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva e o presidente da Câmara, Hugo Motta (Republicanos-PB), fecharam acordo para a inclusão na Proposta de Emenda à Constituição (PEC) sobre o fim da escala 6x1 de uma regra de transição para a redução da jornada de trabalho de 44 para 40 horas semanais. Pelos termos acertados, 60 dias após promulgação final da proposta haveria uma redução de duas horas, até 42 horas. As últimas duas horas seriam reduzidas 12 meses depois – o que, pelo cronograma, ocorreria em 2027. O tema é bandeira eleitoral do presidente Lula, que tenta a reeleição. Política: Equipe econômica quer barrar PEC que dá autonomia ao BC Metrópole: Dino dá 10 dias a União e Estados para que divulguem plano para El Niño Internacional: Trump exige que países reconheçam Israel como parte de acordo com Irã Cultura: Papa alerta para riscos e cobra regulação da inteligência artificialSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The behavioral question at the center of the Becky Hill lawsuit isn't whether she tampered with the jury. The Supreme Court already answered that. The question is whether she did it alone — and whether the people around her knew.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke examine the federal civil rights claim Murdaugh's defense team filed against Hill. The Section 1983 lawsuit alleges she deprived Murdaugh of his constitutional right to a fair trial. But the real purpose is the discovery process. Civil subpoenas, depositions, sworn testimony — tools the state never deployed. Jim Griffin raised it directly at the press conference: was Becky Hill a lone wolf? The complaint flags the removal of juror Myra Crosby as an incident that demands scrutiny the state's investigation never provided.Dreeke brings the behavioral lens. What does Hill's pattern of conduct — the perjury conviction, the book deal timing, the behavior the Supreme Court documented — reveal about whether she was operating independently or with awareness from others? Motta addresses the legal mechanics: what discovery actually looks like in a Section 1983 action, what Hill can be compelled to answer, and how the defense can use anything uncovered in the civil case to build leverage heading into the criminal retrial.The defense argues the state never treated Hill's conduct as the constitutional violation the Supreme Court ultimately found it to be. This federal suit goes where the state wouldn't.On the retrial itself, the defense strategy is taking shape. The financial evidence firewall created by the Supreme Court's ruling changes the entire landscape. No DNA, no blood, both weapons missing, no eyewitnesses, a compromised crime scene — those forensic gaps were buried under financial testimony the first time. Now they're the case. The biggest unknown: does Murdaugh take the stand again, and does the kennel video recording leave him any choice?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #MurdaughRetrial #Section1983 #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #JuryTampering #SCSupremeCourt #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Presidente da Câmara pretende votar proposta no plenário da Casa na próxima semana, às vésperas das eleições.Você já leu uma notícia hoje e sentiu que já viveu esse momento antes?   Essa sensação de déjà Vu não é coincidência. No Brasil, o que é manchete hoje costuma ser o eco de decisões e fatos que analisamos meses, ou até anos atrás.   Para celebrar os 8 anos da Crusoé, decidimos enfrentar esse ciclo. Pegamos o que nasceu no digital e, pela primeira vez, transformamos em um registro físico, tátil e permanente.   Chegou a edição especial Crusoé impressa.   É um item colecionável, atemporal e limitado. Uma revista feita para quem gosta de ler com calma, longe das notificações do celular. Um exemplar para guardar sobre o que realmente importa na história recente do brasil.   Esta edição é um presente exclusivo para novos assinantes do Combo de 2 anos O Antagonista e Crusoé.   Utilize o cupom 8ANOSCRUSOE e acesse o link:   https://bit.ly/crusoe-edicao-impressa  Meio-Dia em Brasília traz as principais notícias e análises da política nacional direto   de Brasília.     Com apresentação de José Inácio Pilar e Wilson Lima, o programa aborda os temas mais quentes do cenário político e econômico do Brasil.     Com um olhar atento sobre política, notícias e economia, mantém o público bem informado.    Transmissão ao vivo de segunda a sexta-feira às 12h no nosso canal do Youtube.  https://www.youtube.com/@OAntagonista   Siga O Antagonista no X:  https://x.com/o_antagonista   Acompanhe O Antagonista no canal do WhatsApp. Boletins diários, conteúdos exclusivos em vídeo e muito mais.  https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va2SurQHLHQbI5yJN344  Leia mais em www.oantagonista.com.br | www.crusoe.com.br #FimDaEscala6x1 #Motta #JornadaDeTrabalho #CLT #DireitosTrabalhistas #CongressoNacional #Politica #Economia #Trabalho #PEC #DebatePublico #Noticias #Atualidades #Emprego #ReformaTrabalhista #Brasil #Jornalismo #PodcastDePolitica #GiroDeNoticias #Motta6x1

No 3 em 1 desta segunda-feira (18), o destaque foi o presidente Lula (PT-SP) que estuda reenviar o nome de Jorge Messias (PT-PE) para o STF, ignorando a recente rejeição da indicação pelo Senado Federal. A manobra é vista como uma afronta. O presidente Lula (PT-SP) intensificou o confronto com o Congresso Nacional após a rejeição de nomes estratégicos e o veto a pautas do Executivo. A relação com o presidente do Senado, Rodrigo Pacheco (PSD-MG), e com a Câmara, liderada pela oposição, atingiu o ponto mais crítico do mandato. O presidente da Câmara, Hugo Motta (Republicanos-PB), afirmou que não cederá à pressão pela abertura imediata de uma CPI para investigar o Caso Master. Motta declarou que o tema será tratado de forma estritamente regimental, o que foi lido como uma tentativa de "esfriar" a crise que envolve o banqueiro Daniel Vorcaro e o senador Ciro Nogueira (PP-PI). O senador Flávio Bolsonaro (PL-RJ) convocou uma reunião de emergência com a bancada do PL nesta segunda-feira (18/05) para explicar os áudios enviados ao banqueiro Daniel Vorcaro. Em um movimento inesperado, o presidente Donald Trump anunciou o adiamento de uma ofensiva militar contra alvos estratégicos no Irã, que estava prevista para esta terça-feira (19). O deputado federal Eduardo Bolsonaro (PL-SP) quebrou o silêncio sobre o orçamento do documentário "Dark Horse". Ele afirmou que o valor de R$ 134 milhões é "até barato" para uma produção de padrão internacional e negou que o montante tenha relação com o banqueiro Daniel Vorcaro. Uma nova pesquisa revela que 40% dos brasileiros consideram a atuação do STF ruim ou péssima em 2026. O índice reflete o desgaste da Corte em meio a decisões monocráticas e embates com o Congresso sobre o Caso Master. O presidente Lula (PT-SP) enviou um recado direto a Donald Trump, sugerindo que os EUA abandonem o conflito direto com a China pelo controle das terras raras e foquem em parcerias estratégicas com o Brasil. O técnico Carlo Ancelotti anunciou oficialmente os 26 jogadores que representarão o Brasil na Copa do Mundo de 2026. A grande novidade é a presença de Neymar, que garantiu sua vaga após muita polêmica. Tudo isso e muito mais você acompanha no 3 em 1. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Confira os destaques do Jornal da Manhã desta segunda-feira (18): O técnico Carlo Ancelotti divulga nesta segunda-feira (18), às 17h, a lista final com os 26 convocados da Seleção Brasileira para a Copa do Mundo de 2026. O anúncio será realizado em um evento no Museu do Amanhã, no Rio de Janeiro, onde o treinador italiano apresentará oficialmente os jogadores escolhidos para representar o Brasil no Mundial. O presidente da Câmara dos Deputados, Hugo Motta (Republicanos-PB), afirmou neste domingo (17) que a análise do pedido de abertura de uma Comissão Parlamentar de Inquérito para investigar o caso do Banco Master seguirá o regimento interno da Casa. Atualmente, o Congresso Nacional acumula sete pedidos de investigação relacionados ao caso, sendo um deles protocolado na Câmara. Durante conversa com jornalistas na Corrida da Câmara, em Brasília, Motta declarou que a situação receberá “tratamento regimental” e que a decisão será tomada conforme as regras da Câmara dos Deputados. Motta ainda afirmou ue a votação do fim da escala de trabalho 6x1 será uma das prioridades da Casa ainda neste mês de maio. Segundo o parlamentar, a proposta precisa ser construída em diálogo com diferentes setores da sociedade e não pertence a nenhum partido específico. O texto está em análise em uma comissão especial criada para discutir a PEC, e a expectativa é que o relator, deputado Léo Prates (Republicanos-BA), apresente uma primeira versão do parecer na quarta-feira. Após a votação na comissão, a proposta ainda precisará passar pelo plenário da Câmara e pelo Senado. O senador e pré-candidato à Presidência da República Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) vai viajar para São Paulo para participar de reuniões com empresários, investidores da Faria Lima e representantes do setor financeiro. O objetivo dos encontros é conter os danos políticos, acalmar o mercado e tentar preservar sua imagem após a divulgação de áudios envolvendo o banqueiro Daniel Vorcaro. O Tribunal de Contas do Estado do Rio de Janeiro e o Ministério Público do Rio apuram uma denúncia sobre o uso irregular de jatinhos pelo ex-governador Cláudio Castro. A deputada estadual Martha Rocha protocolou uma representação pedindo a abertura de investigações por possível improbidade administrativa e desvio de finalidade no uso de aeronaves fretadas pelo ex-governador. O documento cita contratos que somam quase R$ 30 milhões destinados ao fretamento e manutenção de aeronaves, incluindo acordo firmado com a empresa Líder Táxi Aéreo. Pesquisa Datafolha divulgada neste domingo (17) pela Folha de S.Paulo mostra que 70% dos brasileiros avaliam que a relação entre o presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva e o Congresso Nacional é marcada mais por confronto do que por colaboração. Segundo o levantamento, 20% acreditam que existe mais cooperação entre os poderes, enquanto 2% dizem não enxergar nem confronto nem colaboração. Outros 8% afirmaram não saber responder. O presidente dos Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, voltou a subir o tom contra o Irã e afirmou que “o tempo está se esgotando” enquanto as negociações para encerrar a guerra seguem paralisadas. Em publicação na Truth Social, Trump escreveu que o Irã precisa agir rapidamente “ou não restará nada deles”. O presidente também compartilhou uma imagem do Oriente Médio coberta por uma bandeira dos Estados Unidos, com setas vermelhas apontando diretamente para o território iraniano. Vários países europeus estão negociando com o Irã para obter autorização de travessia pelo Estreito de Ormuz, rota estratégica para o transporte mundial de petróleo que permanece bloqueada desde o início da guerra no Oriente Médio. A informação foi divulgada neste sábado (16) pela televisão estatal iraniana. Essas e outras notícias você acompanha no Jornal da Manhã. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The defense raised FBI cell data that contradicted the van timeline. They raised a confession that named the wrong method. They raised an alternative suspect whose interview was allegedly recorded over by investigators. Indiana's answer: procedural default, waiver, harmless error. When a prosecution holding a 130-year conviction won't engage with the underlying record, three appeals judges have to ask themselves why.Defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski to break down what Indiana's procedural strategy actually tells you about the strength of what went to the jury. He walks through the selective admission of Richard Allen's jailhouse calls — one played for the jury, two excluded. One of the excluded calls is Allen asking his own father how much longer he can stay lucid. That call speaks directly to the voluntariness of the confessions the State is relying on, and the jury never heard it.Motta also addresses the search warrant now facing de novo review — the one issue where the Court of Appeals owes no deference to Judge Fran Gull. If three judges rule the warrant was deficient, the .40-caliber pistol is gone. Not just from this case. From any retrial. The defense has formally requested oral arguments. Indiana has not joined that request. Who wants to stand in front of three judges and answer questions, and who would rather the panel stay in the file room — that asymmetry is the loudest signal in the docket about where this appeal actually stands.Allen remains in an Oklahoma prison more than a thousand miles from Indiana, designated for safekeeping. Three judges are reading. A decision is coming.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #AbbyAndLibby #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #SearchWarrant #OralArguments

The Delphi defense identified an alternative suspect. According to the appeal, that suspect's interview was recorded over by investigators. His weapon was never collected. His phone was never searched. Those aren't things that happen by accident in a case where two girls were found dead and a community spent years waiting for answers. And now three judges at the Indiana Court of Appeals are looking at the full record — including what investigators did and didn't do with the leads that didn't point toward Richard Allen.Defense attorney Bob Motta walks through the significance of the recorded-over interview with Tony Brueski. He explains why it lands harder in an appeal than it did at trial — because the appellate standard asks whether the outcome was reliable, and investigative gaps that were hand-waved in front of a jury look different when judges are reading transcripts and measuring the record against constitutional standards.Motta also gets into the confession problem. Allen told a prison psychiatrist he shot the victims. The medical examiner said they were killed with a blade. The State is relying on confessions that don't match the forensic evidence, from a man whose own jailhouse call to his father — asking how much longer he could stay lucid — was excluded from the jury.Indiana's response brief answered most of the defense's factual challenges with procedural objections, not substantive ones. Filed wrong. Argued too late. The defense has now requested oral arguments. Indiana hasn't. If the search warrant fails under the de novo review, the .40-caliber pistol is gone from the case permanently. Three judges are sitting on the full record. A decision is coming.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #IndianaCourtOfAppeals #AbbyAndLibby #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #AlternativeSuspect #SearchWarrant

Parecer do Conselho de Ética da Câmara defende suspensão de dois meses a três deputados federais; eles vão recorrer.Você já leu uma notícia hoje e sentiu que já viveu esse momento antes?   Essa sensação de déjà Vu não é coincidência. No Brasil, o que é manchete hoje costuma ser o eco de decisões e fatos que analisamos meses, ou até anos atrás.   Para celebrar os 8 anos da Crusoé, decidimos enfrentar esse ciclo. Pegamos o que nasceu no digital e, pela primeira vez, transformamos em um registro físico, tátil e permanente.   Chegou a edição especial Crusoé impressa.   É um item colecionável, atemporal e limitado. Uma revista feita para quem gosta de ler com calma, longe das notificações do celular. Um exemplar para guardar sobre o que realmente importa na história recente do brasil.   Esta edição é um presente exclusivo para novos assinantes do Combo de 2 anos O Antagonista e Crusoé.   Utilize o cupom 8ANOSCRUSOE e acesse o link:   https://bit.ly/crusoe-edicao-impressa  Papo Antagonista é o programa que explica e debate os principais acontecimentos do dia com análises críticas e aprofundadas sobre a política brasileira e seus bastidores.       O programa traz contexto e opinião sobre os temas mais quentes da atualidade.       Com foco em jornalismo, eleições e debate, é um espaço essencial para quem busca informação de qualidade.       Ao vivo de segunda a sexta-feira às 18h no nosso canal no Youtube.   https://www.youtube.com/@OAntagonista   Siga O Antagonista no X:  https://x.com/o_antagonista   Acompanhe O Antagonista no canal do WhatsApp. Boletins diários, conteúdos exclusivos em vídeo e muito mais.  https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va2SurQHLHQbI5yJN344  Leia mais em www.oantagonista.com.br | www.crusoe.com.br #CamaraDosDeputados #HugoMotta #Politica #Brasilia #Punicao #ConselhoDeEtica #CongressoNacional #Noticias #Bastidores #Democracia #Legislativo #Deputados #Ordem #MeioDiaEmBrasilia #Poder #Fiscalizacao #EticaNaPolitica #Brasil #Manchetes #Decisao

Jim Norton and Matt Serra react to the fallout from UFC Perth before welcoming two returning guests to the show.First, Nikolas Motta checks in following a long recovery from jaw surgery that sidelined him after his last fight. Motta opens up about discovering the injury, the challenges of the recovery process, and what it means to finally be cleared to return to full training.Then, Malcolm Wellmaker returns for his third appearance on the podcast as he prepares for his May 16 matchup against Juan Diaz. He reflects on what he learned from his loss to Ethyn Ewing and how he's evolved since.Plus, Jim and Matt break down the biggest takeaways from UFC Perth — including Carlos Prates' breakout performance before locking in picks for this weekend's UFC 328 card.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The AG's ninety-four-page response to Richard Allen's appeal is built on one word used over and over — harmless. Every excluded witness. Every blocked piece of evidence. Every ruling that went against the defense at trial. Harmless error. But there are two factual problems that word cannot fix — and defense attorney Bob Motta starts there.Problem one: the van timeline. The defense obtained surveillance footage and FBI cell phone data suggesting the van prosecutors placed near the Monon High Bridge arrived after Libby German's phone had already stopped moving. The State's response to this is not that the data is wrong — it is that the defense did not file its paperwork correctly. That is a procedural argument, not a factual one. The data either contradicts the State's timeline or it does not.Problem two: the wrong cause of death. Richard Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot Abby Williams and Libby German. They were not shot. They were killed with a blade. In ninety-four pages, the Indiana Attorney General does not explain why a man confessing to the murders he allegedly committed described a method of killing that did not happen. The confessions were the State's case. No DNA linked Allen to the crime scene. No murder weapon was recovered. No direct eyewitness placed him with the victims. If the confessions are unreliable, there is nothing underneath them.Motta breaks down the full AG response across a three-part panel — the procedural waiver strategy designed to prevent the appeals court from reaching the substance, the State's argument that more than thirteen months in solitary confinement as a pretrial detainee does not constitute coercion, and the religious conversion theory offered to explain why Allen confessed. He examines the evidence the jury never heard — the Bridge Guy sketch, the firearms expert who would have challenged the bullet-matching evidence, the phone calls where Allen questioned his own sanity before and after confessing, and the alternative suspects with documented connections to the case whose interviews were destroyed.Allen's attorneys have filed their reply brief and a motion requesting oral arguments before the appeals court. Three judges are reading documents. Allen is serving 130 years. The families of Abby and Libby were told a verdict meant closure. This appeal is testing whether that verdict was built on evidence or on what the jury was not allowed to see.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #BobMotta #FalseConfession #LibbyGerman #AbbyWilliams

The Indiana Attorney General's response to Richard Allen's appeal uses harmless error the way a contractor uses spackle — applied to every crack in the wall and meant to convince you the structure is sound. Defense attorney Bob Motta reads the ninety-four-page brief as a document designed not to defend the evidence, but to prevent the appeals court from ever reaching it.The procedural strategy is waiver — arguing that the defense failed to properly preserve its objections at trial, which would shut down most of the appeal before substance is addressed. Where the AG does engage on substance, the framework is consistent: even if the trial court was wrong, it did not matter. The eyewitness sketch excluded from the jury — harmless. The firearms expert who would have challenged whether a bullet could be linked to Allen's weapon — harmless. The phone calls where Allen questioned his own sanity minutes before and after confessing — harmless. The confessions themselves — in which Allen told his prison psychiatrist he shot the girls, when they were killed with a blade — apparently reliable enough to sustain a 130-year sentence.Motta examines what the AG does not address. The van timeline — surveillance footage and FBI cell phone data obtained by the defense suggesting the van arrived after Libby German's phone stopped moving. The State's response is not that the data is inaccurate. It is that the paperwork was not filed correctly. Motta explains what that distinction means for the appeals court and why a procedural dodge on a factual question is itself a signal.There is no DNA linking Allen to the crime scene. No murder weapon was recovered. No direct eyewitness identification placed him with the victims. The confessions were the case. And the confessions contain a cause of death that did not happen.Motta walks through what comes next — the defense reply brief, the motion for oral arguments, what a partial reversal would mean, and what this process means for the families of Abby Williams and Libby German who were told a verdict meant resolution. He gives an honest answer about the reversal rate and what it actually measures — because the families watching this deserve honesty, not false reassurance in either direction.Allen is serving 130 years. Three judges will decide what happens next.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #DelphiAppeal #AbbyAndLibby #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #HarmlessError #FalseConfession #MononHighBridge

Charlotte Studey's death was classified as self-inflicted for nearly forty years. She reportedly died in Omaha in 1984 from a rifle shot to the head. She was five-foot-two. Nothing was documented at the scene that she could have used to trigger the weapon. The original crime scene and autopsy photographs are missing from Omaha police records. In 2023, a re-autopsy found a possible defensive wound on her arm and reclassified her manner of death as undetermined. Charlotte was one of Don Studey's wives — and not the only one to die under circumstances that have drawn investigative scrutiny decades later.Don Studey's first wife Lucy reportedly died by hanging in 1970. Their daughter, Lucy Studey-McKiddy, has alleged since 2007 that her father killed dozens of women and buried them in wells on the family's property in the Green Hollow area near Thurman, Iowa — Fremont County, approximately forty miles from Omaha. The alleged victims were reportedly vulnerable women targeted near bus stops and truck stops. Don's sister Marilyn Kepler reportedly wrote a hundred-and-sixty-eight-page journal describing alleged killings and indicated the body count could reach a hundred. Studey died in 2013 at age seventy-five without ever being charged.The FBI investigated in 2022. Cadaver dogs alerted at four locations across the property, which spans over four hundred and twenty acres. After three days of searching, investigators departed and announced they found nothing. Lucy McKiddy maintains they searched the wrong well.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta — host of Defense Diaries — conducted an independent sixteen-month investigation. He spent over a hundred hours with Lucy McKiddy, accessed the FBI dig site, and uncovered information not previously reported — including a deputy's claim that the first victim of John Wayne Gacy was from Green Hollow and related to the Studey family, alleged ties between Studey and the Kansas City mob, and an unsolved robbery connected to Studey's activities. In Tabor and Thurman, Motta documented accounts from residents who described Studey as the most feared man in the area.Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Drake provides behavioral analysis of the case — examining the pattern of deaths connected to Studey, the evidentiary basis for the allegations, what the FBI's abbreviated investigation reveals about how the case was prioritized, and whether the totality of documented evidence and witness accounts meets the threshold that should have triggered a more comprehensive search of the property.Lucy's sister Susan disputes the allegations entirely. The family remains divided. No remains have been recovered. The Paramount+ documentary My Killer Father: The Green Hollow Murders is now streaming and reportedly presents new witness testimony and alleged accomplice accounts not included in prior investigations.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DonStudey #GreenHollow #GreenHollowMurders #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MyKillerFather #ColdCase #FBI #CharlotteStudey

Three of Don Studey's five wives are dead under circumstances that, when laid side by side, form a pattern no behavioral analyst would ignore. His wife Lucy reportedly died by hanging in 1970. His daughter Lucy McKiddy says her father told her for decades he choked her too hard or too long. His wife Charlotte reportedly died in Omaha in 1984 from a rifle shot to the head — she was five-two, nothing was documented at the scene to explain how she could have triggered the weapon, and the death was classified as self-inflicted for nearly forty years. A 2023 re-autopsy found a possible defensive wound on her arm and reclassified the manner of death as undetermined. The original crime scene and autopsy photos are missing from police records.Retired FBI Special Agent Robin Drake applies behavioral analysis to the full scope of the allegations — from the documented deaths of Studey's wives to his daughter's claims that he killed dozens of vulnerable women targeted near bus stops and truck stops in the Omaha area and buried them in wells on a property spanning over four hundred and twenty acres in the remote Green Hollow area near Thurman, Iowa. Drake examines what the FBI's 2022 investigation — cadaver dogs alerting at four locations, followed by a three-day dig that recovered nothing — reveals about how the case was assessed and why the search was limited to a fraction of the property.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta — host of Defense Diaries — brings sixteen months of on-the-ground investigation to the conversation. He spent over a hundred hours with Lucy McKiddy testing her story. He infiltrated the FBI dig site in a rental car that got waved past a checkpoint. A local deputy connected the Studey family to the first victim of John Wayne Gacy. Residents of Tabor and Thurman described Don as the man everyone feared. Bob uncovered alleged ties to the Kansas City mob. Don's sister Marilyn Kepler reportedly wrote a hundred-and-sixty-eight-page journal describing alleged killings and put the potential count at a hundred.Drake and Motta examine the case from opposite angles — behavioral pattern analysis and on-the-ground investigative instinct — and both arrive at the same conclusion: the investigation that occurred does not match the scale of the allegations. Lucy's sister Susan insists the claims are fabricated. The family remains deeply divided. No bodies have been recovered from the property.The Paramount+ documentary My Killer Father: The Green Hollow Murders is streaming now with new witnesses and alleged accomplice testimony The wells have not been fully searched. The women Lucy says are down there have never been identified, and nobody has gone back to look.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#DonStudey #GreenHollow #GreenHollowMurders #RobinDrake #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #FBI #ColdCase #MyKillerFather

David Anthony Burke, twenty-one, professionally known as D4VD, has been charged by the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office with first-degree murder with three special circumstances — lying in wait, commission of a crime for financial gain, and killing a witness to a crime — as well as continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen years of age, lewd and lascivious acts with an individual under fourteen, and mutilation of human remains. Burke has entered a plea of not guilty. The combined special circumstances render Burke eligible for life in prison without the possibility of parole or the death penalty. Prosecutors have not yet announced whether they will seek the death penalty.The prosecution's theory as articulated by District Attorney Nathan Hochman is that Burke killed Celeste Rivas Hernandez, fourteen, when she threatened to expose his criminal conduct and end his music career. Prosecutors place Celeste at Burke's Hollywood Hills residence on April 23, 2025 — the last date she was known alive. Her dismembered remains were discovered approximately five months later in the front trunk of an impounded Tesla registered to Burke. Head and torso were reportedly recovered in one bag, limbs in another.The financial gain special circumstance alleges Burke acted to protect a lucrative recording career. The witness-killing circumstance is linked to the sexual abuse charges — prosecutors contend the relationship with a minor created the motive for permanent silencing. The lying-in-wait allegation has not been detailed publicly.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta provides analysis of the prosecution's charging strategy. He examines how the layered special circumstances interact, the evidentiary challenge created by five months of decomposition — which LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell acknowledged publicly — and the strength required of a circumstantial case to sustain charges of this magnitude. Motta also addresses the digital evidence trail: Twitch livestream communications, Discord messages reportedly dating to 2022, photographs, and concert access patterns documented over the course of Celeste's involvement with Burke. Burke's attorneys have stated they will vigorously defend his innocence and have requested an expedited public preliminary hearing.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #TrueCrimeToday #LAPD #JusticeForCeleste #BobMotta #SpecialCircumstances #FirstDegreeMurder #LegalAnalysis

David Anthony Burke, twenty-one, professionally known as D4VD, has been charged by the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office with first-degree murder with three special circumstances — lying in wait, commission of a crime for financial gain, and killing a witness to a crime — as well as continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen years of age and mutilation of human remains in the death of Celeste Rivas Hernandez. Burke has entered a plea of not guilty. The special circumstances render Burke eligible for life in prison without the possibility of parole or the death penalty.The defense posture warrants close legal examination. Lead defense attorney Blair Berk stated publicly that Burke "was not the cause of her death" — language that specifically contests causation rather than broadly asserting innocence. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta provides analysis of what that framing signals. If the defense has reviewed the now-unsealed autopsy findings and is confident the cause of death supports an alternative theory, Motta examines what that theory might look like at trial and whether it can survive the prosecution's evidentiary presentation.The prosecution's financial motive allegation — that Burke killed Celeste because she threatened to expose his criminal conduct and destroy his career — represents one of the three special circumstances. Motta addresses whether the defense can effectively dismantle that theory. He also examines the mutilation charge and the legal question of whether causation of death can be separated from the condition of the remains in front of a jury.Separately, a parallel investigation has emerged into the year preceding Celeste's death. Records indicate eleven sheriff's department calls to the Rivas Hernandez home in fourteen months. Celeste was enrolled in no school for a full academic year. She was documented on surveillance video in her own neighborhood months after being reported missing, and was returned to her mother's home by law enforcement at least once. A licensed private investigator has publicly questioned whether certain family members had knowledge not disclosed to investigators.Burke's inner circle has demonstrated a pattern of resistance — family members challenging grand jury subpoenas in Texas, an associate arrested on a material witness warrant for failing to appear. Motta and former FBI behavioral expert Robin Dreeke examine how both the defense strategy and the systemic failures converge in this case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #TrueCrimeToday #LAPD #JusticeForCeleste #BobMotta #DefenseStrategy #SpecialCircumstances #LegalAnalysis

First-degree murder with special circumstances. Lying in wait. Financial gain. Killing a witness. Continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen. Mutilation of human remains. Those are the charges filed against David Anthony Burke — the artist known as D4VD — in the death of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. He has pleaded not guilty. His defense team says the evidence will show he did not cause her death. The death penalty is on the table.This is not a standard murder charge. This is the most serious set of charges a California DA's office can bring. Prosecutors say Celeste walked into Burke's Hollywood Hills home on April 23 of last year and was never heard from again. Months later, her dismembered remains were found in the trunk of his Tesla — head and torso in one bag, limbs in another. The car had been sitting abandoned on a residential street before it was towed and impounded.The financial gain allegation is specific: prosecutors allege Burke killed Celeste because she was threatening his music career. A fourteen-year-old girl, according to the DA, was treated as a liability to a brand and allegedly eliminated. The "killing a witness" special circumstance ties directly to the abuse charges — the prosecution's theory is that the relationship with a child created the motive to silence her permanently.But the evidence trail was hiding in plain sight for years. A Twitch livestream where he allegedly told a thirteen-year-old to "delete everything." Discord messages dating back to 2022. Photos near her home. Backstage at his concerts. Matching tattoos. Twelve days before prosecutors say Celeste entered that home for the last time, Burke was performing at Coachella.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to break down how layering these charges strengthens the prosecution's case, where the seams might be, and what happens when five months of decomposition have degraded crucial evidence. The LAPD chief acknowledged that challenge. The DA says they have physical, forensic, and digital evidence. Motta analyzes whether a circumstantial case can carry charges this heavy.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForCeleste #BobMotta #FirstDegreeMurder #LAPD #SpecialCircumstances

Celeste Rivas Hernandez was not actually missing for most of the year the public was told she was gone. She was at her cousin's high school graduation in May of 2024. She was on surveillance video fighting with neighbors in her own backyard in September of 2024. She was back at her mother's house at least twice — once alone, once brought home by police. Eleven sheriff's department calls to the Rivas Hernandez home in fourteen months. A seventh-grader enrolled in no school for a full year. An ex-boyfriend on the record saying she had been telling friends she wanted out. A licensed private investigator publicly asking whether certain family members knew more than they told police. A verified GoFundMe organized by the same cousin that investigator is asking hard questions about.That is the first story — the one sitting in the public record, waiting for someone to read it out loud.The second story is the defense. David Anthony Burke now faces first-degree murder with three special circumstances, continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen, and mutilation of human remains. He has pleaded not guilty. His attorney Blair Berk drew a line before charges were even filed: Burke "was not the cause of her death." Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta explains what that language is actually building toward. If the defense knows the cause of death from the now-unsealed autopsy and they're confident it helps them, Motta breaks down what kind of alternative explanation that phrasing is designed to support.Prosecutors allege Burke killed Celeste because she threatened to expose his conduct and destroy his career. That's their financial motive. But explaining how a fourteen-year-old connected to Burke ended up in the condition she was found in is a separate evidentiary problem — one the defense cannot avoid. Motta examines whether you can separate the killing from what happened afterward in front of a jury.The episode also examines the pattern of resistance from Burke's circle — parents fighting subpoenas in Texas, an associate arrested on a material witness warrant — and what the prosecution faces if this goes to trial.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#CelesteRivasHernandez #D4VD #DavidAnthonyBurke #LakeElsinore #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForCeleste #BobMotta #DefenseStrategy #SystemsFailure

David Anthony Burke faces the most serious charges the Los Angeles County DA can bring. First-degree murder with three special circumstances. Continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen. Mutilation of human remains. The death penalty is a possibility. His defense team — led by Blair Berk — drew a line before charges were even filed: Burke "was not the cause of her death." He has pleaded not guilty.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins Robin Dreeke and Tony Brueski to break down how a defense team fights charges this severe — and where the strategy either holds or collapses.Motta examines the specific language Berk used. That is not a vague denial. If the defense already knows the cause of death from the unsealed autopsy findings and they're confident it helps them, Motta explains what kind of alternative explanation that phrasing is designed to support. Because at some point, Burke's lawyers have to tell a jury a story that explains how a fourteen-year-old girl he was publicly connected to ended up in the condition she was found — not just poke holes, but give jurors a version that makes sense.Prosecutors allege Celeste was threatening Burke's career the night she was last seen alive. That's their financial motive special circumstance. Motta examines how the defense dismantles that — and whether it can work. He also addresses the mutilation charge and whether a defense team can separate causation of death from what happened to the body afterward in front of a jury.But there is a second story in this case. Celeste was not actually missing for most of the year the public was told she was gone. Eleven sheriff's calls to her family home in fourteen months. No school enrollment for a full year. Surveillance video placing her in her own neighborhood months after she was reported missing. An ex-boyfriend on the record. A private investigator asking hard questions. Motta and Dreeke address how both stories converge — and what the defense does with them.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #BobMotta #DavidAnthonyBurke #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #JusticeForCeleste #DefenseStrategy #LegalAnalysis #DeathPenaltyCase

The Los Angeles County District Attorney has filed the most serious charges California law allows against David Anthony Burke — first-degree murder with three special circumstances, continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen, and mutilation of human remains in the death of Celeste Rivas Hernandez. Burke has pleaded not guilty. The death penalty is a possibility. His defense team says the evidence will show he did not cause Celeste's death.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins Robin Dreeke and Tony Brueski to break down what prosecutors are communicating by stacking the charges this way — and where the case could fracture.The financial gain special circumstance is specific: prosecutors allege Burke killed Celeste because she was threatening to expose his conduct and destroy his music career. Twelve days before prosecutors say she entered his Hollywood Hills home for the last time, Burke was performing at Coachella. His album was dropping. The career was accelerating. According to the DA, a fourteen-year-old girl was allegedly treated as a threat to that trajectory. The "killing a witness" circumstance ties directly to the abuse charges — the prosecution's theory is that the relationship itself created the motive to silence her permanently. Motta explains how layering those charges together strengthens the entire case and where the seams might give under defense pressure.The LAPD chief acknowledged publicly that five months of decomposition degraded crucial evidence. The cause of death has only recently been unsealed. Misinformation has saturated the public record. Motta analyzes how solid a circumstantial case needs to be to carry charges this heavy — and whether physical, forensic, and digital evidence can do what an eyewitness cannot.The evidence trail that was visible for years also gets examined: Twitch livestreams, Discord messages dating to 2022, photos, backstage access at concerts, matching tattoos, and a girl reported missing three separate times who kept appearing in the same orbit. Motta and Dreeke break down what prosecutors just told the world — and whether they can prove it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #BobMotta #DavidAnthonyBurke #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #JusticeForCeleste #LegalAnalysis #SpecialCircumstances #DeathPenaltyCase

Joseph Garrett Duggar, thirty-one, formerly of TLC's 19 Kids and Counting, has been charged in Bay County, Florida, with lewd and lascivious molestation of a victim under twelve years of age and lewd and lascivious conduct — charges classified as life felonies under Florida law. Duggar has entered a plea of not guilty and was released on six hundred thousand dollars bond. The court has ordered no unsupervised contact with any minor, including Duggar's own four children.The charges stem from a 2020 family vacation to Panama City Beach. A fourteen-year-old victim participated in a forensic interview, disclosing incidents from when she was nine years old. According to the arrest affidavit, the victim's father confronted Duggar on March 17, 2026, and Duggar admitted to the alleged conduct. Tontitown, Arkansas, detectives subsequently monitored a second call between the father and Duggar, during which Duggar allegedly admitted to the actions a second time.Separately, Joseph and Kendra Duggar face charges in Washington County, Arkansas — four counts each of second-degree endangering the welfare of a minor and four counts each of second-degree false imprisonment. The Arkansas charges followed a home visit during which investigators reportedly discovered exterior-mounted locks on the couple's children's bedroom doors. The Duggars' four children have been placed in state custody. Kendra Duggar was restricted from contact with her children for approximately one month following the charges. She has retained separate legal counsel.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta provides analysis of the legal posture across both jurisdictions. He examines the evidentiary weight of two alleged recorded admissions, the strategic implications of simultaneous prosecution in two states, and the legal significance of Kendra Duggar's decision to retain independent counsel — including whether her path to custody restoration may involve cooperation with prosecutors. Motta also addresses the jailhouse communications now in the public record, including correspondence from family members Jim Bob and Anna Duggar. This is the second Duggar sibling to face serious criminal allegations involving minors. Josh Duggar is currently serving twelve and a half years in federal prison.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #KendraDuggar #DuggarFamily #TrueCrimeToday #19KidsAndCounting #BobMotta #ChildProtection #FloridaCharges #ArkansasCharges #JusticeMatters

Joseph Duggar, thirty-one, a former star of TLC's 19 Kids and Counting, has been charged in Florida with lewd and lascivious molestation of a child under twelve and lewd and lascivious conduct — a life felony — stemming from a 2020 family vacation to Panama City Beach. A fourteen-year-old girl told investigators that Joseph repeatedly asked her to sit on his lap when she was nine, positioned her under a blanket on a couch, and manipulated her underwear. He has pleaded not guilty and was released on six hundred thousand dollars bond. He is barred from unsupervised contact with any minor, including his own four children.According to the arrest affidavit, the victim's father confronted Joseph, who admitted to the alleged abuse. Arkansas detectives then monitored a second call where he allegedly admitted again. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta explains what happens when recorded admissions become the prosecution's centerpiece — and how you build a defense around words your client already said out loud.Joseph is simultaneously fighting charges in two states. In Arkansas, he and his wife Kendra face four counts each of endangering the welfare of a minor and false imprisonment after a home visit reportedly revealed locks on the outside of their children's bedroom doors. Their four children are in state custody. Kendra told Joseph on a recorded jail call that she'd hired her own attorney — "It's not for you. It's only for me." Motta examines what that separation signals to prosecutors and whether Kendra's path to regaining custody runs directly through testifying against her husband.The family's private communications — emails from Jim Bob and Anna Duggar, calls from family members reportedly prioritizing forgiveness over the alleged victim — are now public. This is the second Duggar brother to face serious allegations involving children. Josh Duggar is currently serving twelve and a half years in federal prison.Robin Dreeke and Bob Motta break down the charges, the alleged confessions, the family communications, and the strategic catastrophe of fighting two criminal cases in two states simultaneously.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #KendraDuggar #DuggarFamily #19KidsAndCounting #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #ChildProtection #JusticeMatters

Joseph Duggar faces a life felony charge in Bay County, Florida, for the alleged repeated molestation of a child under 12 during a 2020 family vacation. He has pleaded not guilty. Separately, he and his wife Kendra Duggar each face four counts of endangering the welfare of a minor and four counts of false imprisonment in Washington County, Arkansas, stemming from a home search conducted in connection with the Florida investigation.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to provide legal analysis of the dual-jurisdiction prosecution and the strategic obstacles confronting the defense.Central to the Florida case are two alleged admissions by the defendant: one made directly to the victim's father during a confrontation, and a second captured during a telephone call monitored by law enforcement. Motta analyzes the evidentiary weight of these recorded statements and the limited legal mechanisms available to suppress or challenge them.The episode examines Kendra Duggar's retention of independent legal counsel—attorney Travis Story—and her explicit statement on a recorded jail call that the representation does not extend to Joseph. Motta addresses the prosecutorial implications of this separation, including whether it creates a pathway to cooperation.Additionally, the restricted access to Arkansas court records is analyzed for what it suggests about the ongoing scope of the investigation and whether the evidence could support expanded charges. The family's jailhouse communications, now part of the public record, are examined for their potential impact on jury selection and trial strategy.Thorough legal analysis of charges, evidence, and defense constraints across two simultaneous state prosecutions.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #KendraDuggar #DuggarFamily #19KidsAndCounting #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #ChildProtection #JusticeMatters #TrueCrimePodcast

Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to provide detailed legal analysis of two significant active prosecutions: the first-degree murder case with special circumstances against David Anthony Burke (D4VD) in the death of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez, and the multi-jurisdiction charges against Joseph and Kendra Duggar.In the Burke matter: Motta examines the three special circumstances—lying in wait, financial gain, and killing a witness—the prosecution's theory connecting the sexual abuse charges to the murder motive, the defense's stated position and its potential legal basis, the independent evidentiary challenge of the mutilation charge, and the strategic implications of a pending death penalty determination.In the Duggar matter: Motta addresses the Florida life felony charge and the defendant's alleged recorded admissions, the simultaneous Arkansas prosecution for child endangerment and false imprisonment, independent legal representation retained by the co-defendant, restricted access to court records in the Arkansas proceeding, and the potential admissibility and jury impact of publicly disclosed family communications.Comprehensive legal analysis of both active cases including charging strategy, evidentiary assessment, defense constraints, and anticipated developments.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #JosephDuggar #DuggarFamily #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #BobMotta #JusticeForCeleste #FirstDegreeMurder #TrueCrimePodcast

The Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office has filed first-degree murder charges with special circumstances against David Anthony Burke, professionally known as D4VD, in connection with the death of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. The special circumstances include lying in wait, murder for financial gain, and murder of a witness. Additional charges include continuous sexual acts with a minor, lewd and lascivious acts with an individual under 14, and mutilation of human remains. DA Nathan Hochman stated the maximum sentence is life without the possibility of parole or the death penalty.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to provide legal analysis of the charging decision and the prosecution's stated theory.The financial gain special circumstance is examined in detail: prosecutors allege Burke killed the victim to protect his music career, which she allegedly threatened. Motta analyzes the evidentiary burden associated with proving financial motive in a murder prosecution.The episode addresses how the sexual abuse charges intersect with the witness-killing special circumstance to form the prosecution's central theory: that the sexual relationship with a minor created both the vulnerability and the motive for the alleged murder.Motta also examines the challenge of proving premeditation when five months of decomposition degraded physical evidence, the DA's stated confidence in physical, forensic, and digital evidence, and the evidentiary standard required for circumstantial evidence to support death-penalty-eligible charges.Comprehensive legal analysis of the charges, the prosecution's theory, and the evidentiary framework required to sustain them.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForCeleste #BobMotta #FirstDegreeMurder #LAPDArrest #TrueCrimePodcast

David Anthony Burke faces first-degree murder with three special circumstances, charges carrying a maximum penalty of death or life without parole. His defense team, led by attorney Blair Berk, has asserted that Burke “was not the cause of her death”—a statement criminal defense attorney Bob Motta identifies as a deliberate preview of the defense's legal theory.Motta joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to provide legal analysis of the defense's strategy and the challenges it confronts.The episode examines how the defense may leverage the now-available autopsy findings to support an alternative explanation for the victim's death. Motta analyzes what that alternative theory must look like to create reasonable doubt against charges of this severity with a 14-year-old victim.The financial gain special circumstance is addressed from the defense perspective: the prosecution alleges the defendant killed the victim to protect his music career. Motta examines the defense's likely counter-argument and the evidentiary standard for disproving motive.The mutilation charge is analyzed as an independent obstacle: the victim's body was dismembered, and the defense must address the condition of the remains even if they successfully challenge the cause of death. Motta provides analysis on whether the act of killing can be separated from the disposal in the jury's assessment of culpability.The episode further examines the investigative resistance from the defendant's associates, the strategic implications of the death penalty determination still pending, and whether charges of this magnitude push toward plea negotiations or total trial warfare.Comprehensive legal analysis of the defense's position against the most serious charges available under California law.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForCeleste #BobMotta #FirstDegreeMurder #LAPDArrest #TrueCrimePodcast

Los Angeles County DA Nathan Hochman announced charges against David Anthony Burke—D4VD—that represent the most serious criminal exposure available under California law. First-degree murder with three special circumstances: lying in wait, murder for financial gain, and killing a witness. Additional charges include continuous sexual acts and lewd acts with an individual under 14, and mutilation of human remains.Prosecutors allege Celeste Rivas Hernandez, 14, arrived at D4VD's Hollywood Hills residence on April 23, 2025 and was never heard from again. Her dismembered remains were discovered five months later in a Tesla registered to the singer.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to dissect the charging strategy. The financial gain allegation is specific: the DA stated D4VD allegedly killed Celeste to protect his music career because she was “threatening” it. That means prosecutors believe they can prove a 14-year-old girl was killed because she was a liability to someone's brand. Motta examines what evidence that theory requires and whether it can survive scrutiny.The “killing a witness” special circumstance is directly tied to the sexual abuse charges—the prosecution's theory is that the underage relationship created the motive for murder. Motta explains how layering those charges together compounds the legal exposure exponentially.The episode also addresses the evidentiary challenge created by five months of decomposition, the DA's stated confidence in physical, forensic, and digital evidence, and what it takes for a circumstantial case to carry death-penalty-eligible charges.A detailed legal breakdown of the charges, the evidence, and the prosecution's theory of this case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForCeleste #BobMotta #FirstDegreeMurder #LAPDArrest #TrueCrimePodcast

Two cases dominating the true crime landscape. Both involving allegations against men in positions of trust. Both revealing systemic failures. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to provide comprehensive legal analysis of both the D4VD murder prosecution and the Joseph Duggar molestation case.On D4VD: Prosecutors filed first-degree murder with three special circumstances—lying in wait, financial gain, and killing a witness—along with sexual abuse charges and mutilation of remains. The death penalty remains a possibility. Motta examines the prosecution's theory that D4VD killed 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez to protect his music career, how the defense's precise public statement may preview their strategy, and whether the mutilation charge makes it impossible to separate cause of death from disposal in a jury's assessment.On the Duggars: Joseph Duggar faces a life felony in Florida and eight misdemeanor charges in Arkansas. Motta breaks down the legal weight of two alleged recorded admissions, Kendra Duggar's separate legal representation and what it signals, the sealed Arkansas investigation into the family home, and the family's publicly disclosed jailhouse communications.Two cases examined through every legal lens available. Charges, evidence, defense strategy, and what comes next.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #JosephDuggar #DuggarFamily #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #BobMotta #JusticeForCeleste #FirstDegreeMurder #TrueCrimePodcast

Joseph Duggar is facing a life felony in Florida for the alleged repeated molestation of a 9-year-old girl during a 2020 family vacation. He and his wife Kendra are also facing eight misdemeanor charges each in Arkansas after a search of their home reportedly uncovered exterior-mounted locks on their children's bedroom doors. Their four children have been placed in state custody.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to dissect the legal complexity of simultaneous prosecutions in two jurisdictions—and why this case may be more legally precarious for the defense than it first appears.The arrest affidavit details two alleged admissions: one to the victim's father in a direct confrontation, and a second during a detective-monitored phone call. Motta explains the legal weight of a defendant's own recorded statements and the extremely narrow options a defense team has to challenge them.Kendra Duggar has retained separate counsel—attorney Travis Story—and told Joseph on a recorded jail call that the representation is exclusively for her. Motta examines the prosecutorial implications of that split and whether Kendra's path to custody restoration could require cooperation against Joseph.Arkansas officials have restricted public access to court records tied to the investigation, citing its active and ongoing nature. Motta analyzes what that level of secrecy suggests about the scope of evidence uncovered during the home search and whether the case could expand.The episode also examines the family's jailhouse communications—including messages from Jim Bob and Anna Duggar that prioritize religious framing over accountability—and their potential impact on a jury pool already saturated with Duggar family controversy.A detailed legal breakdown of every front Joseph Duggar is fighting on.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#JosephDuggar #KendraDuggar #DuggarFamily #19KidsAndCounting #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #ChildProtection #JusticeMatters #TrueCrimePodcast

Blair Berk's first public statement on behalf of D4VD was deliberately precise: David Burke “was not the cause of her death.” Now that prosecutors have filed first-degree murder with special circumstances—including lying in wait, financial gain, and killing a witness—that statement is either the foundation of a viable defense or a promise the evidence will expose.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta joins Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke to analyze the defense strategy against charges this severe.If the defense has reviewed the now-unsealed autopsy findings and believes the cause of death supports their position, Motta explains what alternative theory could be emerging. The defense doesn't just need to create reasonable doubt—in a case with a 14-year-old victim and death-penalty eligibility, they eventually need to offer a jury a coherent alternative narrative.The prosecution's financial gain theory—that D4VD killed Celeste because she was threatening his career—is examined from the defense perspective. Motta analyzes how the defense dismantles a motive built on career protection when the alleged gain is keeping a lucrative brand alive.The mutilation charge presents a separate challenge: even if the defense casts doubt on the cause of death, explaining why Celeste's body was dismembered—head and torso separated from limbs—requires its own answer. Motta examines whether the killing and the disposal can be separated in a jury's mind.The episode also addresses the pattern of investigative resistance from D4VD's circle and the strategic implications if prosecutors pursue the death penalty.Defense strategy analysis for the most serious criminal case in Los Angeles.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForCeleste #BobMotta #FirstDegreeMurder #LAPDArrest #TrueCrimePodcast

Benjamin Torres lost his mother when he was six years old. Valerie Mack disappeared in 2000. Her dismembered remains were found in Manorville that same year and went unidentified for two decades. Rex Heuermann has now pleaded guilty to her murder. But for Torres, the admission that ended the criminal case opened something else entirely — a wrongful death lawsuit naming Heuermann, his ex-wife Asa Ellerup, and their daughter Victoria as defendants.The complaint alleges the two women knew about or concealed the crimes, lived with access to a secured vault-like room in the basement of the Massapequa Park home, and collected over a million dollars from a Peacock documentary. Plaintiff's attorney John Ray has argued publicly that the family could not have been unaware in a house of roughly 1,300 square feet. Hair evidence linked to both Ellerup and Victoria was recovered from victims' remains. Prosecutors have attributed that to ordinary household transference. Ray frames it as evidence of proximity.The defense response has been aggressive. Ellerup's attorney called the suit reckless and completely unsupported by the facts. Victoria was approximately three when Mack was killed. Prosecutors have maintained consistently that Heuermann acted alone and timed his crimes for when the family was away. Neither woman has been charged.Asa called Heuermann her savior. She maintained she would have known if something was wrong. Victoria sat in the courtroom during the plea and has publicly said she believes her father most likely committed the killings. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the psychology behind that split — how denial functions inside a family where one person's identity is built entirely around the other, and what happens when a guilty plea collapses the framework that held "not knowing" in place.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta breaks down the legal mechanics of the plea itself. Every pre-trial motion failed — the DNA challenge, the motion to sever the cases, the 178-page omnibus motion. Whole genome sequencing was admitted in a New York courtroom for the first time. A deleted planning document was recovered from Heuermann's hard drive. The sentence — life without parole — was reportedly identical whether he went to trial or pled. So what did the plea actually accomplish? Motta examines what the defense calculated, what the families lost when the plea replaced testimony, and what open cases along the Gilgo corridor still need answers. Heuermann has agreed to cooperate with the FBI.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #ValerieMack #AsaEllerup #VictoriaHeuermann #LISK #WrongfulDeath #ShavaunScott #BobMotta #HiddenKillers

Let's go back to where it all began. Enjoy this bonus episode from 2022, when Motta was still relatively new to the true crime space.