Podcasts about motta

Will the Science Prove Karen Read's Innocence? Attorney Bob Motta Thinks So In the premiere segment, Tony Brueski and Bob Motta cut straight to the most decisive element of the Karen Read case: the forensic evidence. According to Motta, this case isn't about drama, hearsay, or even Karen Read's bizarre behavior. It's about whether the physical evidence proves she hit John O'Keefe with her Lexus — and right now, the science says she didn't. Motta places his trust in independent experts — specifically the ARCCA engineers hired by the Department of Justice, who testified that the damage to the Lexus and the injuries to O'Keefe do not match a typical vehicle-pedestrian strike. In other words, no broken bones, no directional wounds, no blood patterns to suggest a hit-and-run. And this testimony, unlike Proctor's or McCabe's, doesn't change. It's science. Tony counters with a key question: what happens if new vehicle data does emerge — like black box logs or OnStar records — that shows a collision at the time of death? Motta admits that would be damning. But he's not holding his breath. If prosecutors had a “smoking gun” like that, he says, they'd have led with it. This episode explores the growing tension between Karen Read's self-incriminating statements and the cold, hard science that seems to contradict them. It's the ultimate courtroom clash: Karen's words vs. the data. Hashtags: #KarenRead #ScienceVsConfession #ForensicEvidence #BobMotta #TrueCrimePodcast #ARCCA #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #BlackBoxData #KarenReadTrial #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Will the Science Prove Karen Read's Innocence? Attorney Bob Motta Thinks So In the premiere segment, Tony Brueski and Bob Motta cut straight to the most decisive element of the Karen Read case: the forensic evidence. According to Motta, this case isn't about drama, hearsay, or even Karen Read's bizarre behavior. It's about whether the physical evidence proves she hit John O'Keefe with her Lexus — and right now, the science says she didn't. Motta places his trust in independent experts — specifically the ARCCA engineers hired by the Department of Justice, who testified that the damage to the Lexus and the injuries to O'Keefe do not match a typical vehicle-pedestrian strike. In other words, no broken bones, no directional wounds, no blood patterns to suggest a hit-and-run. And this testimony, unlike Proctor's or McCabe's, doesn't change. It's science. Tony counters with a key question: what happens if new vehicle data does emerge — like black box logs or OnStar records — that shows a collision at the time of death? Motta admits that would be damning. But he's not holding his breath. If prosecutors had a “smoking gun” like that, he says, they'd have led with it. This episode explores the growing tension between Karen Read's self-incriminating statements and the cold, hard science that seems to contradict them. It's the ultimate courtroom clash: Karen's words vs. the data. Hashtags: #KarenRead #ScienceVsConfession #ForensicEvidence #BobMotta #TrueCrimePodcast #ARCCA #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #BlackBoxData #KarenReadTrial #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Will The Jury Understand Michael Proctor's Disdain for Karen Read This Time? Michael Proctor may not be on the prosecution's witness list, but his presence looms large over the Karen Read trial. In this episode, Bob Motta and Tony Brueski analyze the explosive text messages, the professional fallout, and the deep personal contempt Proctor seemed to harbor for Karen Read. The big question: will jurors see his bias for what it is — or will they relate to it? Tony makes a controversial but intriguing point: if the prosecution has already made Karen Read look like a highly unlikable person, then Proctor's attitude may feel relatable to the jury. They may not like how he said it — but they might get why he said it. Motta pushes back, arguing that Proctor is a textbook example of tunnel vision, and that his venomous language (“That bitch is going down”) reflects not passion for justice but prejudice. More importantly, his bias infected the investigation from day one. The two go deep on what it means to be a “hired gun,” how Proctor's credibility was destroyed in the first trial, and why the prosecution would rather let the defense call him than risk their own case imploding. This episode is a masterclass in understanding law enforcement bias, jury psychology, and how a single investigator's ego might jeopardize an entire murder conviction. Hashtags: #KarenRead #MichaelProctor #KarenReadTrial #BobMotta #JuryBias #TunnelVision #HiddenKillersPodcast #JusticeSystem #ProctorTexts #LawEnforcementAccountability Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Will The Jury Understand Michael Proctor's Disdain for Karen Read This Time? Michael Proctor may not be on the prosecution's witness list, but his presence looms large over the Karen Read trial. In this episode, Bob Motta and Tony Brueski analyze the explosive text messages, the professional fallout, and the deep personal contempt Proctor seemed to harbor for Karen Read. The big question: will jurors see his bias for what it is — or will they relate to it? Tony makes a controversial but intriguing point: if the prosecution has already made Karen Read look like a highly unlikable person, then Proctor's attitude may feel relatable to the jury. They may not like how he said it — but they might get why he said it. Motta pushes back, arguing that Proctor is a textbook example of tunnel vision, and that his venomous language (“That bitch is going down”) reflects not passion for justice but prejudice. More importantly, his bias infected the investigation from day one. The two go deep on what it means to be a “hired gun,” how Proctor's credibility was destroyed in the first trial, and why the prosecution would rather let the defense call him than risk their own case imploding. This episode is a masterclass in understanding law enforcement bias, jury psychology, and how a single investigator's ego might jeopardize an entire murder conviction. Hashtags: #KarenRead #MichaelProctor #KarenReadTrial #BobMotta #JuryBias #TunnelVision #HiddenKillersPodcast #JusticeSystem #ProctorTexts #LawEnforcementAccountability Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Reações à decisão do STF ficaram apenas na conta de deputados amigos da parlamentar; Jair Bolsonaro preferiu o silêncio.Meio-Dia em Brasília traz as principais notícias e análises da política nacional direto   de Brasília.     Com apresentação de José Inácio Pilar e Wilson Lima, o programa aborda os temas mais quentes do cenário político e econômico do Brasil.     Com um olhar atento sobre política, notícias e economia, mantém o público bem informado.   Transmissão ao vivo de segunda a sexta-feira às 12h.    Não espere mais, assine agora e garanta 2 anos com 30% OFF - últimos dias.   2 anos de assinatura do combo O Antagonista e Crusoé com um super desconto de 30% adicional* utilizando o voucher 10A-PROMO30 Use o cupom 10A-PROMO30 e assine agora:  meio-dia ( https://bit.ly/promo2anos-meiodia)   (*) desconto de 30% aplicado sobre os valores promocionais vigentes do Combo anual | Promoções não cumulativas com outras campanhas vigentes. | **Promoção válida só até o dia 31/05 

Hoje Thais entrevista a maquiadora e influenciadora Juliana Motta, que começou no interior do Rio de Janeiro, e hoje fala com milhões de seguidores em suas redes sociais. Ju virou referência em challenges e também em vídeos de ASMR, que ajudam as pessoas a se acalmarem e se desconectarem no dia a dia. Vambora entender esse sucesso?CURSO – De Carona Na Carreirahttps://www.decaronanacarreira.com.br/Livro – De Carona Na Carreirahttps://amzn.to/4fGu271Toda semana tem novo episódio no ar, pra não perder nenhum, siga: ​LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/thaisroque/​Instagram Thais: https://www.instagram.com/thaisroque/ ​Instagram DCNC: https://www.instagram.com/decaronanacarreira/​TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@decaronanacarreira​YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@Decaronanacarreira?sub_confirmation=1Thaís veste​Macacão – Apartamento 03 - https://www.instagram.com/apartamento03/​Sapatos – Bottega​Stylist – André Puertas ​Beleza – Cris DalléLink da Juliana:​Insta – https://www.instagram.com/julianamotta/Mala de viagem:​Mulheres que correm com os lobos - https://amzn.to/4miMypu​Titanic - https://www.adorocinema.com/filmes/filme-5818/​Sem limites - https://www.adorocinema.com/filmes/filme-135564/​Modus Operandi - https://open.spotify.com/show/1k2AsiW1iHQBnqOVcmmWDW​Jaqueline Guerreiro - https://www.youtube.com/c/JaquelineGuerreiroOficialEquipe que faz acontecer:​Criação, roteiro e apresentação: Thais Roque​Consultoria de conteúdo: Beatriz Fiorotto​Produção: José Newton Fonseca​Sonorização e edição: Felipe Dantas​Identidade Visual: João Magagnin

Ep. 600 - Il segreto del successo del Bologna. Che passa da Mihajlovic, Sartori, Motta, Di Vaio e Italiano

Maracanà con Marco Piccari e Stefano Impallomeni. Ospiti: Signori:" La strada del Bologna è quella della Dea." Bazzani:" Impressionante la consapevolezza del Bologna." De Carolis:" Italiano ha fatto meglio di Motta."

Why Did The Alberts Stay Inside While Police Swarmed Their Yard? What would you do if police and paramedics were investigating a possible death just feet from your front door? That's the question Tony Brueski poses as he and Bob Motta explore one of the most baffling parts of the Karen Read case: the silence from the Albert household on the morning of John O'Keefe's death. Despite the chaos unfolding in their front yard — with Read sobbing, paramedics arriving, and police combing for clues — not one person from inside the house came out. Why? Were they asleep? Unaware? Or was it something else? Motta doesn't make accusations — but he does point to how wildly out of the norm this is for police culture. These weren't just civilians inside — these were cops and first responders. If someone collapses in your yard, especially someone you know, you go outside. You check. You help. Unless you're trying to stay hidden. Tony challenges this by acknowledging that weird behavior doesn't prove guilt — but both men agree: the optics are terrible. They also discuss how the lack of initial investigation into the house compounds the problem. The cops didn't go in. They didn't ask to. And now the jury has to make sense of that silence — both literal and investigative. If the prosecution's theory is that Karen dropped John off and drove away, then why didn't anyone in the house see him? Or respond when he was discovered freezing and bleeding out in the yard? This episode dissects the psychological, procedural, and legal ramifications of inaction. Hashtags: #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #BrianAlbert #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #JohnOKeefe #HouseOfSilence #CrimeSceneQuestions #JuryDoubt    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Why Did The Alberts Stay Inside While Police Swarmed Their Yard? What would you do if police and paramedics were investigating a possible death just feet from your front door? That's the question Tony Brueski poses as he and Bob Motta explore one of the most baffling parts of the Karen Read case: the silence from the Albert household on the morning of John O'Keefe's death. Despite the chaos unfolding in their front yard — with Read sobbing, paramedics arriving, and police combing for clues — not one person from inside the house came out. Why? Were they asleep? Unaware? Or was it something else? Motta doesn't make accusations — but he does point to how wildly out of the norm this is for police culture. These weren't just civilians inside — these were cops and first responders. If someone collapses in your yard, especially someone you know, you go outside. You check. You help. Unless you're trying to stay hidden. Tony challenges this by acknowledging that weird behavior doesn't prove guilt — but both men agree: the optics are terrible. They also discuss how the lack of initial investigation into the house compounds the problem. The cops didn't go in. They didn't ask to. And now the jury has to make sense of that silence — both literal and investigative. If the prosecution's theory is that Karen dropped John off and drove away, then why didn't anyone in the house see him? Or respond when he was discovered freezing and bleeding out in the yard? This episode dissects the psychological, procedural, and legal ramifications of inaction. Hashtags: #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #BrianAlbert #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #JohnOKeefe #HouseOfSilence #CrimeSceneQuestions #JuryDoubt Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Presidente da Câmara ingressa com recurso para tentar livrar Alexandre Ramagem das garras do Supremo.Meio-Dia em Brasília traz as principais notícias e análises da política nacional direto   de Brasília.     Com apresentação de José Inácio Pilar e Wilson Lima, o programa aborda os temas mais quentes do cenário político e econômico do Brasil.     Com um olhar atento sobre política, notícias e economia, mantém o público bem informado.   Transmissão ao vivo de segunda a sexta-feira às 12h.    Não espere mais, assine agora e garanta 2 anos com 30% OFF - últimos dias.   2 anos de assinatura do combo O Antagonista e Crusoé com um super desconto de 30% adicional* utilizando o voucher 10A-PROMO30 Use o cupom 10A-PROMO30 e assine agora:  meio-dia ( https://bit.ly/promo2anos-meiodia)   (*) desconto de 30% aplicado sobre os valores promocionais vigentes do Combo anual | Promoções não cumulativas com outras campanhas vigentes. | **Promoção válida só até o dia 31/05 

O presidente da Câmara dos Deputados, Hugo Motta (Republicanos-PB), recorreu da decisão da Primeira Turma do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) que manteve o processo contra o deputado federal Alexandre Ramagem (PL-RJ), investigado no inquérito do plano de golpe de Estado. O recurso foi protocolado nesta terça-feira, e enviado ao presidente da Corte, ministro Luís Roberto Barroso. No documento, Motta e a advocacia da Câmara afirmam que a decisão da Primeira Turma é uma invasão à competência do Legislativo em sustar processos contra parlamentares. A petição ainda cita que a decisão deveria ser tomada apenas pelo plenário da Corte.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

O presidente da Câmara dos Deputados, Hugo Motta (Republicanos-PB), recorreu da decisão da Primeira Turma do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) que manteve o processo contra o deputado federal Alexandre Ramagem (PL-RJ), investigado no inquérito do plano de golpe de Estado. O recurso foi protocolado nesta terça-feira, e enviado ao presidente da Corte, ministro Luís Roberto Barroso. No documento, Motta e a advocacia da Câmara afirmam que a decisão da Primeira Turma é uma invasão à competência do Legislativo em sustar processos contra parlamentares. A petição ainda cita que a decisão deveria ser tomada apenas pelo plenário da Corte.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

CPI das Bets vira palco de influenciadora digital. Motta recorre ao plenário do STF contra decisão sobre Ramagem. Prejuízos com desastres climáticos nas cidades passam dos R$ 700 bi em 12 anos. Imagens inéditas mostram momento em que um coração começa a se formar. Cynthia Erivo volta ao teatro para interpretar 23 papéis em ‘Drácula’. Festival de Cannes começa com musical e homenagem a Robert De Niro. TikTok lança IA que transforma fotos em vídeos bizarros e divertidos. E morre Pepe Mujica, ex-presidente do Uruguai. Essas e outras notícias, você escuta No Pé do Ouvido, com Yasmim Restum.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

O Manhã Brasil desta quarta (14), com o jornalista Mauro Lopes como âncora, tem os seguintes destaques: 1) De NY, onde participou de eventos dos dois maiores grupos de lobby da burguesia brasileira, Hugo Motta retrucou ao STF e entrou com recurso para manter decisão da Câmara que suspendeu ação contra os golpistas; 2) Morre Pepe Mujica, de uma vida tão larga quanto generosa. Guerrilheiro, torturado, presidente, morreu sem se vender ao capitalismo, com uma vida simples e de coração aberto; 3) Ata do Copom indica: não há qualquer possibilidade de redução dos juros no país nos próximos mesesPessoas convidadas:Fabiano Mielniczuk, docente do Departamento de Ciência Política e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Política, além de docente permanente e colaborador do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Estratégicos Internacionais. Coordenador da Linha de Pesquisa Rússia e a ordem internacional no NEBRICS (Núcleo de Estudos do BRICS+)Élida Graziane, procuradora do Ministério Público de Contas do Estado de São Paulo. Possui graduação simultânea em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais e em Administração Pública pela Fundação João Pinheiro (2001); Doutorado em Direito Administrativo pela UFMG (2006), com estudos pós-doutorais em Administração pela Fundação Getúlio Vargas (2010); bem como Livre-Docência em Direito Financeiro pela Universidade de São Paulo (2022). Na qualidade de Visiting Scholar, realizou estágio pós-doutoral no Center for Brazil Studies, vinculado ao David L. Boren College of International Studies (CIS), da Universidade de Oklahoma entre agosto de 2023 e maio de 2024.

Will A Sloppy Investigation Set Karen Read Free? Bob Motta Talks Tony Brueski and Bob Motta tackle the elephant in the courtroom: the sloppy, questionable, and arguably negligent police investigation into the death of John O'Keefe. From the inexplicable failure to request a consent search of the Albert residence — where O'Keefe was allegedly dropped off — to the mishandling of key evidence like clotted blood in Solo cups and a fragmented taillight that appeared only after Proctor revisited the scene, Motta argues that this case is riddled with procedural red flags. Motta explains the legal strategy at play — invoking the Bowden defense — which allows the defense to argue that reasonable doubt stems not from what the state proved, but from what they failed to investigate. If you're prosecuting Karen Read but never checked inside the house she claims O'Keefe entered, did you really do your job? The trial, Motta says, doesn't hinge only on what happened, but on what the government didn't bother to find out. Tony plays devil's advocate, raising the issue of practical challenges like a blizzard burying the crime scene — but Motta maintains: if Proctor hadn't tunnel-visioned on Karen Read from day one, better decisions would've followed. The system didn't just fail Karen Read — it failed John O'Keefe too. This episode breaks down the difference between proving innocence and exposing investigative incompetence — and why the latter just might be enough for a not guilty verdict. Hashtags: #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #BadInvestigation #BobMotta #ProctorProblem #SoloCups #PoliceAccountability #TrueCrime #BowdenDefense #JusticeForJohnOKeefe    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

 Will A Sloppy Investigation Set Karen Read Free? Bob Motta Talks Tony Brueski and Bob Motta tackle the elephant in the courtroom: the sloppy, questionable, and arguably negligent police investigation into the death of John O'Keefe. From the inexplicable failure to request a consent search of the Albert residence — where O'Keefe was allegedly dropped off — to the mishandling of key evidence like clotted blood in Solo cups and a fragmented taillight that appeared only after Proctor revisited the scene, Motta argues that this case is riddled with procedural red flags. Motta explains the legal strategy at play — invoking the Bowden defense — which allows the defense to argue that reasonable doubt stems not from what the state proved, but from what they failed to investigate. If you're prosecuting Karen Read but never checked inside the house she claims O'Keefe entered, did you really do your job? The trial, Motta says, doesn't hinge only on what happened, but on what the government didn't bother to find out. Tony plays devil's advocate, raising the issue of practical challenges like a blizzard burying the crime scene — but Motta maintains: if Proctor hadn't tunnel-visioned on Karen Read from day one, better decisions would've followed. The system didn't just fail Karen Read — it failed John O'Keefe too. This episode breaks down the difference between proving innocence and exposing investigative incompetence — and why the latter just might be enough for a not guilty verdict. Hashtags: #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #BadInvestigation #BobMotta #ProctorProblem #SoloCups #PoliceAccountability #TrueCrime #BowdenDefense #JusticeForJohnOKeefe Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The 3rd & Longhorn crew sit down with Lucas Motta, Vice President of Longhorn Sports Properties at LEARFIELD, to dive into the evolving landscape of college sports marketing, NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness), and brand partnerships at Texas.In this episode, Lucas shares insights into his journey from breaking into the sports business to leading the charge at Texas, where his team has built powerful partnerships and marketing strategies. We discuss the impact of NIL on both athletes and brands, how Texas is positioning itself on the national stage, and the importance of authenticity in building lasting brand relationships.Welcome to 3rd & Longhorn, your ultimate destination for all things Texas Longhorn Football! Join us weekly for an in-depth show featuring analysis and commentary from Lifetime Longhorn Football players Derrick Johnson, Alex Okafor, Fozzy Whittaker, Rod Babers, Jeremy Hills, and Clark Field Collective/Texas One Fund co-founder Nick Shuley.3rd & Longhorn takes you deep inside the world of Texas Football, offering a unique perspective from some of the best to ever put on the pads at the 40 Acres. Whether you're a die-hard Longhorn fan or new to the scene, our show provides unparalleled insight, behind-the-scenes stories, and expert breakdowns of games, players, and strategies.Meet Our Team:Derrick Johnson: NFL All-Pro and Texas Longhorn legend, providing unparalleled defensive insights. Alex Okafor: Former NFL defensive end, breaking down the line of scrimmage battles. Jeremy Hills: Renowned trainer and former Longhorn running back, discussing player development. Fozzy Whittaker: NFL veteran and special teams ace, offering game day analysis.Rod Babers: Longhorn cornerback great and media personality, sharing insider knowledge.Nick Shuley: Co-founder of Clark Field Collective/Texas One Fund, discussing the business side of college sports.What to Expect:• Game Highlights & Recaps: Relive the best moments from every game with comprehensive highlights and in-depth recaps.• Expert Analysis: Get detailed breakdowns of team performance, player statistics, and game strategies from our seasoned analysts.• Behind-the-Scenes Access: Enjoy exclusive stories and insights from former players who know the program inside and out.• Player Spotlights: Learn about the standout athletes making waves on the field and their journeys to success.• Recruiting News: Stay updated on the latest recruiting developments and future Longhorn stars.• Fan Interactions: Engage with our hosts and fellow fans through live Q&A sessions and social media.Subscribe to 3rd & Longhorn and never miss an episode. Hit the notification bell to get alerts for our latest uploads. Join us in celebrating the legacy and future of Texas Longhorn Football!Connect with Us:Follow us on Instagram:Derrick Johnson - https://www.instagram.com/superdj56Alex Okafor - https://www.instagram.com/alexokaforJeremy Hills - https://www.instagram.com/jhills5Fozzy Whittaker - https://www.instagram.com/fozzywhittRod Babers - https://www.instagram.com/rodbabersNick Shuley - https://www.instagram.com/nickshuleyFor the most comprehensive coverage and insider access to TDerrick Johnson: https://www.instagram.com/superdj56Alex Okafor: https://www.instagram.com/alexokaforJeremy Hills: https://www.instagram.com/jhills5Fozzy Whittaker: https://www.instagram.com/fozzywhittRod Babers: https://www.instagram.com/rodbabersNick Shuley: https://www.instagram.com/nickshuley

No Fórum Onze e Meia de hoje: Bomba! Advogado de hacker entrega Bolsonaro: autorizou Zambelli, diz advogado; Hugo Motta se bolsonarizou?Participam do programa os jornalistas Felipe Pena e José Fernandes JuniorApresentação de Dri Delorenzo e comentários de Renato Rovai.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/forum-onze-e-meia--5958149/support.

O Manhã Brasil desta terça (13), com o jornalista Mauro Lopes como âncora, tem os seguintes destaques: 1) pesquisa Quaest indica que a, nas redes, a crise do INSS está sendo ainda pior para o governo do que foi a do Pix. Segundo a Quaest, a comparação dos primeiros 15 dias de repercussão dos dois casos mostra um volume de mensagens 2,6 vezes maior no episódio do INSS; 2) a confrontação entre a Câmara e o STF pode subir um degrau, depois que Hugo Motta encomendou parecer à área jurídica da Casa e avisou a deputados que haverá resposta à Corte; 3) nesta terça haverá o encontro entre a Comunidade de Estados Latino-Americanos e Caribenhos (CELAC) e o governo chinês em Beijing. Acordos anunciados entre a China e o Brasil são, até agora, tímidos e não ultrapassam por enquanto US$5 bilhões.Pessoas convidadas:Valdete Souto Severo, professora de direito do trabalho na Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Ufrgs) e juíza do Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da 4ª Região (RS). É organizadora, com Jorge Souto Severo, de Resistência III: o direito do trabalho diz não à terceirização (Expressão Popular, 2016) e autora, entre outros, de A Perda do Emprego no Brasil (Editora Sulina, 2024), Elementos para o uso transgressor do Direito do Trabalho e Contribuições para uma teoria geral do processo do trabalho (Lacier, 2025)Thiago André, militar de carreira por 14 anos na Marinha, em 2013, ingressou na Universidade Federal de Pelotas, onde se formou em história. Em 2018, fundou o podcast História Preta, que rapidamente ganhou notoriedade. Com mais de 1 milhão de plays e uma audiência fiel de 100 mil ouvintes.

Will Karen Read's Multiple Stories Send Her To Prison? Bob Motta Weighs In In this gripping breakdown from Hidden Killers, host Tony Brueski and veteran defense attorney Bob Motta dive deep into one of the most damaging elements in the Karen Read trial: her own ever-changing story. Across months of interviews, voicemails, and secondhand accounts, Karen Read has made conflicting statements about the last time she saw her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe. From claiming she saw him go into the house, to saying he was in the general vicinity of the curb, to suggesting she might have clipped him with her car — the versions are endless. Motta takes a nuanced approach, explaining how defense attorneys have to carefully navigate these inconsistencies. Do they try to explain them away? Or do they lean into them as signs of trauma and confusion from a woman who doesn't actually remember what happened? Tony, however, takes a more psychological view — arguing that Read's constant shifting might not stem from confusion, but from manipulation and a fear of losing her image. They debate whether jurors, as emotional and flawed humans, can separate confusing testimony from actual guilt — and whether someone who acts like they have “consciousness of guilt” is more likely to be convicted even if there's no clear proof of intent. Is Karen Read lying to save herself? Or is she a blackout witness to her own worst night? This episode sets the tone for the entire discussion around narrative control, narcissistic traits, and what happens when your own mouth becomes your worst enemy in a murder trial. Hashtags: #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrimePodcast #CourtroomDrama #ConflictingStories #ConsciousnessOfGuilt #LegalBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Will Karen Read's Multiple Stories Send Her To Prison? Bob Motta Weighs In In this gripping breakdown from Hidden Killers, host Tony Brueski and veteran defense attorney Bob Motta dive deep into one of the most damaging elements in the Karen Read trial: her own ever-changing story. Across months of interviews, voicemails, and secondhand accounts, Karen Read has made conflicting statements about the last time she saw her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe. From claiming she saw him go into the house, to saying he was in the general vicinity of the curb, to suggesting she might have clipped him with her car — the versions are endless. Motta takes a nuanced approach, explaining how defense attorneys have to carefully navigate these inconsistencies. Do they try to explain them away? Or do they lean into them as signs of trauma and confusion from a woman who doesn't actually remember what happened? Tony, however, takes a more psychological view — arguing that Read's constant shifting might not stem from confusion, but from manipulation and a fear of losing her image. They debate whether jurors, as emotional and flawed humans, can separate confusing testimony from actual guilt — and whether someone who acts like they have “consciousness of guilt” is more likely to be convicted even if there's no clear proof of intent. Is Karen Read lying to save herself? Or is she a blackout witness to her own worst night? This episode sets the tone for the entire discussion around narrative control, narcissistic traits, and what happens when your own mouth becomes your worst enemy in a murder trial. Hashtags: #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #BobMotta #HiddenKillers #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrimePodcast #CourtroomDrama #ConflictingStories #ConsciousnessOfGuilt #LegalBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

In this powerful episode, Chris Burns and returning guest Daniel Calvert sit down with legendary Jiu-Jitsu Professor Marcelo Motta. With decades of elite success in the sport, Prof. Marcelo reflects not just on championships, but on what he considers his greatest victories—mentoring, coaching, and the lives he's helped shape through discipline and dedication. From heartfelt coaching lessons to life-changing mentorship stories, this conversation dives deep into how martial arts can save lives far beyond the mat. Thank you Prof. Marcelo and Prof. Daniel. For more information, check out Prime Jiu-Jitsu in Colorado Springs.

Is the Prosecution Crushing It? The State's Case Against Karen Read Examined What happens when a party ends in death—and a community turns against one of its own? Defense Attorney Bob Motta joins to dissect week two of the Karen Read trial, where the prosecution's pivot has jurors on edge. From conflicting forensic software interpretations to the mysterious 2:27am search, every detail feels engineered to sway doubt or deepen it. Why did the prosecution abandon its original strategy? Is Cellebrite really exposing the truth—or just another layer of interpretation? Motta, host of Defense Diaries, pulls no punches breaking down the courtroom chess moves, especially Brennan's precision with video clips and witness sequencing. As more partygoers take the stand, the narrative of a spontaneous group conspiracy to kill a fellow officer strains belief—but so does the timeline that could exonerate Karen Read. Whether you're convinced of her innocence or not, this case is unraveling in ways no one predicted. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #KarenReadTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #CelebriteEvidence #ForensicAnalysis #HiddenKillersPodcast #MassachusettsTrial Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Is the Prosecution Crushing It? The State's Case Against Karen Read Examined What happens when a party ends in death—and a community turns against one of its own? Defense Attorney Bob Motta joins to dissect week two of the Karen Read trial, where the prosecution's pivot has jurors on edge. From conflicting forensic software interpretations to the mysterious 2:27am search, every detail feels engineered to sway doubt or deepen it. Why did the prosecution abandon its original strategy? Is Cellebrite really exposing the truth—or just another layer of interpretation? Motta, host of Defense Diaries, pulls no punches breaking down the courtroom chess moves, especially Brennan's precision with video clips and witness sequencing. As more partygoers take the stand, the narrative of a spontaneous group conspiracy to kill a fellow officer strains belief—but so does the timeline that could exonerate Karen Read. Whether you're convinced of her innocence or not, this case is unraveling in ways no one predicted. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #KarenReadTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #CelebriteEvidence #ForensicAnalysis #HiddenKillersPodcast #MassachusettsTrial Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Eles são empreendedores que revolucionaram o mercado de construção civil, criando um ecossistema de negócios que já impactou 350 mil alunos. Com mais de R$ 100 milhões faturados, um programa de TV e destaque na Forbes Under 30, eles vieram ensinar um pouco do que sabem no Kiwicast.O nome deles são Vinicius Motta e Diego Carielo e eles conversaram com a gente sobre:O início do projeto Minha Casa FinanciadaComo eles buscaram a lucratividade no negócioQual é o tipo de cliente para o Minha Casa FinanciadaConquistando a confiança da audiência com brandingEles criaram uma série de TV sobre construção civilDicas essenciais para começar um negócio no digitalComo adicionar recorrência ao negócioCriando fluxo de caixa e solidez num negócioE muito mais!Quer saber tudo o que o Vinicius Motta e o Diego Carielo disseram pra gente?Dá o play no Kiwicast de hoje.E conta pra gente nos comentários o maior insight que você tirou do episódio.

Why Karen Read's Own Words May Be the Most Damaging Evidence Yet What if everything we thought about how John O'Keefe died is wrong? As testimony unfolds in the Karen Read trial, Defense Attorney Bob Motta of the Defense Diaries podcast breaks down a theory that challenges the entire foundation of the prosecution's case. This episode dives into whether a drunken fight—not a cold-blooded conspiracy—might explain what happened that night. Was it a tragic accident inside the house that everyone is too afraid to admit? Or is it truly absurd to believe so many people could stay silent while their friend died in the snow? Motta explores the psychology of bar brawls gone bad, digital breadcrumbs from Karen's phone, and how real-life defense cases mirror the chaos now playing out in court. With careers, reputations, and possible jail time on the line, what really happened between Karen Read, John O'Keefe, and the people inside that house? #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #KarenReadTrial #HiddenKillersPodcast #TrueCrimePodcast #LegalAnalysis #O'KeefeDeath #BarFightTheory Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Why Karen Read's Own Words May Be the Most Damaging Evidence Yet What if everything we thought about how John O'Keefe died is wrong? As testimony unfolds in the Karen Read trial, Defense Attorney Bob Motta of the Defense Diaries podcast breaks down a theory that challenges the entire foundation of the prosecution's case. This episode dives into whether a drunken fight—not a cold-blooded conspiracy—might explain what happened that night. Was it a tragic accident inside the house that everyone is too afraid to admit? Or is it truly absurd to believe so many people could stay silent while their friend died in the snow? Motta explores the psychology of bar brawls gone bad, digital breadcrumbs from Karen's phone, and how real-life defense cases mirror the chaos now playing out in court. With careers, reputations, and possible jail time on the line, what really happened between Karen Read, John O'Keefe, and the people inside that house? #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #KarenReadTrial #HiddenKillersPodcast #TrueCrimePodcast #LegalAnalysis #O'KeefeDeath #BarFightTheory Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Sem perspectiva para a instalação da Comissão Parlamentar de Inquérito (CPI) do roubo dos aposentados na Câmara, a oposição conseguiu, nesta segunda-feira, 5, as assinaturas necessárias para pedir uma outra CPI sobre o assunto, mas com a participação de deputados e senadores. O requerimento será apresentado hoje à tarde, quando está prevista uma coletiva de imprensa na Câmara. "Se é uma CPI protocolada na Câmara depende do aval de seu presidente. Hugo Motta está espremido entre o STF, Palácio do Planalto e a bancada da Oposição. Mas se é uma CPMI, simplesmente tem de ser encaminhada e não depende de canetadas", diz Cantanhêde.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Sem perspectiva para a instalação da Comissão Parlamentar de Inquérito (CPI) do roubo dos aposentados na Câmara, a oposição conseguiu, nesta segunda-feira, 5, as assinaturas necessárias para pedir uma outra CPI sobre o assunto, mas com a participação de deputados e senadores. O requerimento será apresentado hoje à tarde, quando está prevista uma coletiva de imprensa na Câmara. "Se é uma CPI protocolada na Câmara depende do aval de seu presidente. Hugo Motta está espremido entre o STF, Palácio do Planalto e a bancada da Oposição. Mas se é uma CPMI, simplesmente tem de ser encaminhada e não depende de canetadas", diz Cantanhêde.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Can the Defense Recover? Bob Motta on the Risks of Karen Read's Trial Strategy The prosecution in the Karen Read trial has changed course—and it's turning heads. Defense Attorney Bob Motta joins to break down what's happening inside the courtroom. From the courtroom strategy shift led by ADA Brennan to the forensic breakdown of cell phone data by Ian Whiffin, this episode dives deep into the prosecution's evolving case and why it's suddenly more effective. Is Celebrite's software really more accurate than Magnet, or is it all a matter of interpretation? And why did the prosecution drop the “pre-buttle” approach? Motta also explains why he believes the infamous 2:27am “how long to die in cold” search may be a legal dead end, despite how gripping it sounds. If you're following this trial, the details revealed here are absolutely essential. #KarenRead #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #HiddenKillersPodcast #TonyBruski #CantonCoverUp #IanWhiffin #Cellbrite #ForensicTestimony #TrueCrime2025 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Can the Defense Recover? Bob Motta on the Risks of Karen Read's Trial Strategy The prosecution in the Karen Read trial has changed course—and it's turning heads. Defense Attorney Bob Motta joins to break down what's happening inside the courtroom. From the courtroom strategy shift led by ADA Brennan to the forensic breakdown of cell phone data by Ian Whiffin, this episode dives deep into the prosecution's evolving case and why it's suddenly more effective. Is Celebrite's software really more accurate than Magnet, or is it all a matter of interpretation? And why did the prosecution drop the “pre-buttle” approach? Motta also explains why he believes the infamous 2:27am “how long to die in cold” search may be a legal dead end, despite how gripping it sounds. If you're following this trial, the details revealed here are absolutely essential. #KarenRead #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #HiddenKillersPodcast #TonyBruski #CantonCoverUp #IanWhiffin #Cellbrite #ForensicTestimony #TrueCrime2025 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

No episódio dessa semana falamos sobre a importância do 1º de Maio e como estão as relação de trabalho atualmente, a polêmica da possível camisa vermelha da seleção brasileira, as nova federação entre PP e União Brasil, a fusão entre PSDB e Podemos, os novos desdobramentos da fraude no INSS e muito mais.APOIE financeiramente a continuidade do MIDCast:- Apoia.se : https://apoia.se/midcast- Chave PIX : podcastmid@gmail.com# COMPRE a estampa "Tem que Dilapidar as Fortunas": bit.ly/estampamidcast# CANAL do MIDCast Política no WhatsApp: bit.ly/midcast-zap# GRUPO dos ouvintes no Telegram: bit.ly/midcastgrupo# LISTA de paródias do MIDCast: bit.ly/parodiasmidcast PARTICIPANTES:------------------Anna Raissa - https://bsky.app/profile/annarraissa.bsky.socialDiego Squinello - https://bsky.app/profile/diegosquinello.bsky.socialRodrigo Hipólito - https://bsky.app/profile/rodrigohipolito.bsky.socialThais Kisuki - https://bsky.app/profile/thaiskisuki.bsky.socialCOMENTADO NO EPISÓDIO------------------POUT-POURRI DE NOTÍCIASCentrais sindicais se reúnem com Lula e cobram mais empenho do governo na pauta dos trabalhadoresCleitinho ameaça CPI contra CBF após possível uniforme vermelho da seleçãoCCJ da Câmara rejeita recurso de Glauber Braga, e cassação de mandato vai ao plenárioRelatora aponta falso testemunho, e CPI das Bets do Senado prende empresário durante sessãoJustiça do DF condena deputado Nikolas Ferreira a pagamento de indenizaçãoUNIÕESUnião Brasil aprova aliança com o PP e 'superfederação' será anunciada nesta terçaFederação União-PP, fusão PSDB-Podemos: entenda a diferença dos modelos e da estratégia de junção desses partidosFRAUDE NO INSSOposição protocola pedido de CPI do INSS, mas avalia alternativa após Motta citar fila de requerimentosLupi: ‘A gente sabia que tinha algum descontrole. E não é de hoje'Lula nomeia procurador federal para presidência do INSS

Is Lori Vallow Mentally Ill or Legally Responsible? Motta Dissects the Case-WEEK IN REVIEW  Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.   Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.  Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Is Lori Vallow Mentally Ill or Legally Responsible? Motta Dissects the Case-WEEK IN REVIEW  Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.   Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.  Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Is Lori Vallow Mentally Ill or Legally Responsible? Motta Dissects the Case What if one of America's most infamous convicted killers got a second chance to defend herself—and actually did a halfway decent job? In Lori Vallow Daybell's Arizona trial, the once-apocalyptic mom ditched the theatrics and came surprisingly prepared. No doomsday visions. No courtroom outbursts. Just a self-represented defendant who, shockingly, managed to land a few arguments. Defense attorney Bob Motta joins to dissect Lori's unexpected legal performance, the prosecution's late-inning rally, and the judge's tightrope walk between patience and control. Why did this seven-day trial feel like it could have gone either way? What role did circumstantial evidence—and the things the jury didn't hear—really play? And how close did Lori come to walking free? This isn't just another chapter in a bizarre case—it's a rare look at what happens when justice, ego, and strategy collide in real time. #LoriVallowDaybell #LoriVallowTrial #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #HiddenKillersPodcast #TrueCrimeToday #ArizonaTrial #SelfRepresentation #TrueCrimePodcast #LDSMurderTrial Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Is Lori Vallow Mentally Ill or Legally Responsible? Motta Dissects the Case What if one of America's most infamous convicted killers got a second chance to defend herself—and actually did a halfway decent job? In Lori Vallow Daybell's Arizona trial, the once-apocalyptic mom ditched the theatrics and came surprisingly prepared. No doomsday visions. No courtroom outbursts. Just a self-represented defendant who, shockingly, managed to land a few arguments. Defense attorney Bob Motta joins to dissect Lori's unexpected legal performance, the prosecution's late-inning rally, and the judge's tightrope walk between patience and control. Why did this seven-day trial feel like it could have gone either way? What role did circumstantial evidence—and the things the jury didn't hear—really play? And how close did Lori come to walking free? This isn't just another chapter in a bizarre case—it's a rare look at what happens when justice, ego, and strategy collide in real time. #LoriVallowDaybell #LoriVallowTrial #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #HiddenKillersPodcast #TrueCrimeToday #ArizonaTrial #SelfRepresentation #TrueCrimePodcast #LDSMurderTrial Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Defense Attorney Bob Motta on Karen Read: A Case Built on Flawed Evidence Why did Karen Read's defense drop the rage-filled voicemail theory? What did Brennan do differently this time—and could it mean the prosecution is aiming for something far less than second-degree murder? In this explosive breakdown, criminal defense attorney Bob Motta (host of the podcast Defense Diaries) joins Tony Brueski to dissect the trial's opening moves. From radically different strategies to new forensic angles and mysterious eyewitnesses, Motta reveals how both sides are rewriting the case—and how the jury might be swayed not by emotion, but by science. This episode dives deep into the unsettling possibility that even Karen doesn't remember what really happened that night. And if the defense leans into that blackout… could it actually work? Listen in for the legal nuance, conflicting narratives, and the growing tension that might force Karen Reed to take the stand. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #DefenseDiaries #BobMotta #TrueCrimePodcast #KarenReadTrial #BostonCrime #HiddenKillers #CourtroomDrama #LegalBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Defense Attorney Bob Motta on Karen Read: A Case Built on Flawed Evidence Why did Karen Read's defense drop the rage-filled voicemail theory? What did Brennan do differently this time—and could it mean the prosecution is aiming for something far less than second-degree murder? In this explosive breakdown, criminal defense attorney Bob Motta (host of the podcast Defense Diaries) joins Tony Brueski to dissect the trial's opening moves. From radically different strategies to new forensic angles and mysterious eyewitnesses, Motta reveals how both sides are rewriting the case—and how the jury might be swayed not by emotion, but by science. This episode dives deep into the unsettling possibility that even Karen doesn't remember what really happened that night. And if the defense leans into that blackout… could it actually work? Listen in for the legal nuance, conflicting narratives, and the growing tension that might force Karen Reed to take the stand. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #DefenseDiaries #BobMotta #TrueCrimePodcast #KarenReadTrial #BostonCrime #HiddenKillers #CourtroomDrama #LegalBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Manipulation or Miscommunication? Jurors Hear Karen Read's Final Texts to O'Keefe What if the only thing they can prove is that she was drunk? Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of Defense Diaries, joins Tony Bruski to dissect the tangled web of Karen Read's statements, intoxication, and the dangerously blurred lines of memory and guilt. From fluctuating drink counts to the question of blackouts, the conversation unravels how intoxication is being used both as a weapon and a shield in this case. Motta doesn't just analyze her words—he lays out how the defense can turn chaos into reasonable doubt. This isn't about proving who's likable—it's about whether a jury can convict someone whose every retelling contradicts the last. The deeper you go, the more disturbing it gets: relationships layered with manipulation, emotional volatility, and the raw reality of alcohol-fueled confusion. How much of what Karen says is trauma and how much is strategy? And if she was truly blacked out, does that make her less guilty—or more dangerous? #KarenRead #DefenseDiaries #BobMotta #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrimeAnalysis #DrunkDefense #CourtroomStrategy #ToxicRelationships #MurderTrial #LegalBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 

Manipulation or Miscommunication? Jurors Hear Karen Read's Final Texts to O'Keefe What if the only thing they can prove is that she was drunk? Defense Attorney Bob Motta, host of Defense Diaries, joins Tony Bruski to dissect the tangled web of Karen Read's statements, intoxication, and the dangerously blurred lines of memory and guilt. From fluctuating drink counts to the question of blackouts, the conversation unravels how intoxication is being used both as a weapon and a shield in this case. Motta doesn't just analyze her words—he lays out how the defense can turn chaos into reasonable doubt. This isn't about proving who's likable—it's about whether a jury can convict someone whose every retelling contradicts the last. The deeper you go, the more disturbing it gets: relationships layered with manipulation, emotional volatility, and the raw reality of alcohol-fueled confusion. How much of what Karen says is trauma and how much is strategy? And if she was truly blacked out, does that make her less guilty—or more dangerous? #KarenRead #DefenseDiaries #BobMotta #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrimeAnalysis #DrunkDefense #CourtroomStrategy #ToxicRelationships #MurderTrial #LegalBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

What the Jury Didn't See: Bob Motta on the Karen Read Trial's Missing Pieces What if the evidence doesn't match the story either side is telling? Defense Attorney Bob Motta breaks down the first major moments of the Karen Read trial—and he's not holding back. Why did the prosecution suddenly drop the idea this was an intentional act? What does new DNA on a shoe mean for the defense? And is Jackson's opening too bold to back up? Motta walks us through openings that shocked court watchers, the weight of big promises made in front of a jury, and the strange contradictions in the case—from voicemail rage to claims of indifference. Could Karen Read really take the stand? And are the injuries to John O'Keefe even consistent with being hit by a car? If the prosecution's own narrative is shifting, what does that mean for the jury—and for justice? #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimePodcast #CourtroomDrama #ManslaughterCase #DNAEvidence #CrimeSceneMystery #LegalAnalysis Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

What the Jury Didn't See: Bob Motta on the Karen Read Trial's Missing Pieces What if the evidence doesn't match the story either side is telling? Defense Attorney Bob Motta breaks down the first major moments of the Karen Read trial—and he's not holding back. Why did the prosecution suddenly drop the idea this was an intentional act? What does new DNA on a shoe mean for the defense? And is Jackson's opening too bold to back up? Motta walks us through openings that shocked court watchers, the weight of big promises made in front of a jury, and the strange contradictions in the case—from voicemail rage to claims of indifference. Could Karen Read really take the stand? And are the injuries to John O'Keefe even consistent with being hit by a car? If the prosecution's own narrative is shifting, what does that mean for the jury—and for justice? #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #TrueCrimePodcast #CourtroomDrama #ManslaughterCase #DNAEvidence #CrimeSceneMystery #LegalAnalysis Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

‘Tell Me If You're Seeing Someone Else' — Karen Read's Texts Read Aloud in Court What happens when a murder case becomes more about the investigator than the evidence? In this episode of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski is joined by Defense Attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries to unravel the legal chaos surrounding the Karen Read trial. With Proctor—the lead investigator—accused of bias and misconduct, and crucial physical evidence like hair and taillight fragments pointing in conflicting directions, the courtroom becomes a battleground for credibility. Is this a textbook example of reasonable doubt, or a tragic accident wrapped in conspiracy and bad policing? Motta dives deep into why this case is less about what happened and more about what can be proven, and exposes the strategic decisions that could make or break the defense. This isn't just another true crime episode—it's a raw look at how fragile justice can be when personal bias contaminates the process. #KarenRead #HiddenKillersPodcast #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #JohnOKeefe #ProctorInvestigation #ReasonableDoubt #TrueCrimeAnalysis #CorruptCops #LegalDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

‘Tell Me If You're Seeing Someone Else' — Karen Read's Texts Read Aloud in Court What happens when a murder case becomes more about the investigator than the evidence? In this episode of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski is joined by Defense Attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries to unravel the legal chaos surrounding the Karen Read trial. With Proctor—the lead investigator—accused of bias and misconduct, and crucial physical evidence like hair and taillight fragments pointing in conflicting directions, the courtroom becomes a battleground for credibility. Is this a textbook example of reasonable doubt, or a tragic accident wrapped in conspiracy and bad policing? Motta dives deep into why this case is less about what happened and more about what can be proven, and exposes the strategic decisions that could make or break the defense. This isn't just another true crime episode—it's a raw look at how fragile justice can be when personal bias contaminates the process. #KarenRead #HiddenKillersPodcast #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #JohnOKeefe #ProctorInvestigation #ReasonableDoubt #TrueCrimeAnalysis #CorruptCops #LegalDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Alexandre Garcia comenta sobre a cassação de Glauber Braga, do enterro do projeto da anistia e a intimação de Bolsonaro na UTI.

O presidente da Câmara dos Deputados, Hugo Motta (Republicanos-PB), anunciou que não vai pautar o pedido de urgência para o projeto de lei da anistia aos condenados pelo 8 de janeiro de 2023. Motta comunicou a decisão em coletiva de imprensa nesta quinta-feira, 24, após reunião com líderes partidários. Felipe Moura Brasil, Duda Teixeira e Ricardo Kertzman comentam:Papo Antagonista é o programa que explica e debate os principais acontecimentos do   dia com análises críticas e aprofundadas sobre a política brasileira e seus bastidores.     Apresentado por Felipe Moura Brasil, o programa traz contexto e opinião sobre os temas mais quentes da atualidade.     Com foco em jornalismo, eleições e debate, é um espaço essencial para quem busca informação de qualidade.     Ao vivo de segunda a sexta-feira às 18h.    “Atenção você que é leitor de O Antagonista e Crusoé e ainda não é nosso assinante. Estamos chegando na reta final da promoção de 30% de desconto para novas assinaturas de 2 anos.   Clique agora no link e faça como Carmelina Dias e Felipe Coelho, que agora usufruem do acesso integral ao conteúdo de O Antagonista e Crusoé em uma navegação livre de anúncios invasivos. Apoie o jornalismo independente. Assine agora:  papo-antagonista (https://bit.ly/promo-2anos-papo)   Desconto de 30% aplicado sobre os valores vigentes do Combo anual | Promoção não cumulativa com outras campanhas vigentes. 

Is ANYONE A Reliable Witness In The Karen Read Trial? Defense Attorney Bob Motta Weighs In Did John O'Keefe really die from being hit by a car—or is that just the easiest story to sell? Tony Brueski and Defense Attorney Bob Motta aren't holding back in this deep dive into the latest twists in the Karen Read case. With damning new evidence and a defense strategy that's walking a tightrope over a pit of conflicting statements, the big question is: will Karen Read take the stand to tell her side—or will silence speak louder? The episode dissects the fragile timeline, inconsistent witness accounts, and the defense's risky third-party blame game. Motta unpacks why the science—like the injuries to John O'Keefe and the damage (or lack thereof) to Read's SUV—might be the only reliable witness left. Everyone was drunk. No one remembers. And the truth may have been lost in that blizzard of booze and bad decisions. Could the defense's own narrative open the door to more incriminating testimony? And what happens if the only person who claims John walked into that house never says it under oath? #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #ReasonableDoubt #CrimeSceneMystery Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Is ANYONE A Reliable Witness In The Karen Read Trial? Defense Attorney Bob Motta Weighs In Did John O'Keefe really die from being hit by a car—or is that just the easiest story to sell? Tony Brueski and Defense Attorney Bob Motta aren't holding back in this deep dive into the latest twists in the Karen Read case. With damning new evidence and a defense strategy that's walking a tightrope over a pit of conflicting statements, the big question is: will Karen Read take the stand to tell her side—or will silence speak louder? The episode dissects the fragile timeline, inconsistent witness accounts, and the defense's risky third-party blame game. Motta unpacks why the science—like the injuries to John O'Keefe and the damage (or lack thereof) to Read's SUV—might be the only reliable witness left. Everyone was drunk. No one remembers. And the truth may have been lost in that blizzard of booze and bad decisions. Could the defense's own narrative open the door to more incriminating testimony? And what happens if the only person who claims John walked into that house never says it under oath? #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrimePodcast #HiddenKillers #DefenseDiaries #ReasonableDoubt #CrimeSceneMystery Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com