Podcasts about jurors

A pastor preaching virtue. A mistress promised “truth.” A wife who knew nothing. And a murder that ripped the mask off a so-called “ethical non-monogamy.” In 2019, Executive Pastor Brodes Perry of Mississippi Boulevard Christian Church was shot to death inside his Tennessee apartment by Latoshia Daniels, a woman who believed she was part of a consensual “open” relationship — one the pastor insisted his wife had approved. Except… she hadn't. Now, years later, Daniels is on trial for first-degree murder and attempted murder of Perry's wife Tabatha, who survived the attack and took the stand to tell a very different story. Jurors have seen videos of Perry himself describing “ethical non-monogamy” — claiming transparency, honesty, and divine understanding — while prosecutors say those same words expose the lies that fueled the killing. In this episode, Tony Brueski breaks down how a pastor's moral branding turned into manipulation, how a so-called modern “ethic” became a weapon of deceit, and why this trial isn't just about one shooting — it's about the danger of self-righteous hypocrisy hiding behind the language of enlightenment. This is not about alternative lifestyles. This is about control, delusion, and the rot that grows when a man of God decides the rules no longer apply to him.

A pastor preaching virtue. A mistress promised “truth.” A wife who knew nothing. And a murder that ripped the mask off a so-called “ethical non-monogamy.” In 2019, Executive Pastor Brodes Perry of Mississippi Boulevard Christian Church was shot to death inside his Tennessee apartment by Latoshia Daniels, a woman who believed she was part of a consensual “open” relationship — one the pastor insisted his wife had approved. Except… she hadn't. Now, years later, Daniels is on trial for first-degree murder and attempted murder of Perry's wife Tabatha, who survived the attack and took the stand to tell a very different story. Jurors have seen videos of Perry himself describing “ethical non-monogamy” — claiming transparency, honesty, and divine understanding — while prosecutors say those same words expose the lies that fueled the killing. In this episode, Tony Brueski breaks down how a pastor's moral branding turned into manipulation, how a so-called modern “ethic” became a weapon of deceit, and why this trial isn't just about one shooting — it's about the danger of self-righteous hypocrisy hiding behind the language of enlightenment. This is not about alternative lifestyles. This is about control, delusion, and the rot that grows when a man of God decides the rules no longer apply to him.

In the wild world of viral embarrassments, two scandals are duking it out for ultimate facepalm supremacy: the TikTok-fueled freakout over "embarrassing" boyfriends—as we discussed before—and the Houston hustler's brick-flinging hoax that's left a trail of bad checks and worse excuses. One's a soft-launch social media sigh; the other's a hard-knock scam straight out of a true-crime TikTok. But who's really got the deeper shade? Let's unpack the chaos.First, rewind to September 2023: Enter Roda Osman, the self-proclaimed "Brick Lady" of Houston, who went mega-viral after tearfully claiming an Uber driver hurled a brick at her face for rejecting his creepy advances. Hospital selfies, swollen-lump close-ups, and a GoFundMe raking in $42,000 for her "recovery" had the internet in a rage-fueled frenzy—until surveillance footage dropped the mic. Turns out, *she* was the aggressor, whacking the guy first (with who-knows-what), and he clapped back with... a plastic water bottle. Her story flip-flopped like a bad Tinder bio, and by January 2024, she was slapped with theft-by-deception charges for blowing donor cash on Jamaica jaunts, NYC splurges, and spa days. Fast-forward to October 2024: Guilty as charged, with a 90-day jail stint, 10 years' probation (GPS anklet included), a full $42K payback order, and a decade-long social media ban to boot. The kicker? Jurors had to tell her to chill out post-verdict, and her victim, Olan Douglas, called her a manipulative nightmare who turned his life into "living hell." Embarrassing? This is next-level: From sympathy queen to scam artist in 4K.Cut to 2025's hotter mess: the boyfriend blackout sweeping TikTok, where straight women are whispering that coupling up is now "culturally loser-ish" and straight-up uncool. It kicked off with a British *Vogue* bombshell by Chante Joseph—"Is Having a Boyfriend Embarrassing Now?"—positing that in our post-heteronormative doom-scroll era, flaunting a man feels like admitting defeat. Think: muting feeds that start with "my boyf—," cropping dudes out of pics, or "soft-launching" with a blurry hand on a steering wheel to snag partnership perks without the ick. Why the shade? Superstition (jinxing it with the "evil eye"), privacy paranoia (what if it tanks and you're left archiving a digital ex-shrine?), and clout calculus—influencers like Stephanie Yeboah tanked followers after "hard-launching" their guys, with comments roasting trips as "beige" or boyfriends as "lame Republicans." TikTok's flooded with "period vogue" vibes: women joking about blurring faces or celebrating singledom as the real flex, amid a vibe where heterosexuality feels like a sinking ship and solo life screams empowerment. Even coupled gals nod along, admitting it dials down their "aura."But hold up—not everyone's buying the boycott. *Evie Magazine* fires back: This ain't embarrassment; it's clout-chasing cynicism, where women dodge vulnerability to stay "feminist" and feed the algorithm, romanticizing isolation over intimacy. Psychologist Dr. Ana Yudin calls it out as Gen Z's selfish twenties trap—delaying real growth for superficial single flexes that leave you emotionally marooned by 30. And *The Guardian*'s Emma Beddington? She laughs it off: "No affectionate, non-abusive relationship is uncool," unless you're dating a DiCaprio-type age-gap disaster. Bottom line: Boyfriends aren't the problem; performative detachment and "heterofatalism" are, turning love into a PR nightmare.So, verdict in the embarrassment Olympics? Brick Lady wins gold for felony-level fraud and a lifetime L, but boyfriends snag silver for turning everyday romance into a viral villain arc. Either way, in 2025's scroll-or-perish society, the real loser is anyone still trusting a GoFundMe—or their own thirst trap judgment. Who's your pick for peak embarrassment?### Boyfriends or Brick Lady: Which Embarrassment Takes the Crown?In the wild world of viral embarrassments, two scandals are duking it out for ultimate facepalm supremacy: the TikTok-fueled freakout over "embarrassing" boyfriends—as we discussed before—and the Houston hustler's brick-flinging hoax that's left a trail of bad checks and worse excuses. One's a soft-launch social media sigh; the other's a hard-knock scam straight out of a true-crime TikTok. But who's really got the deeper shade? Let's unpack the chaos.First, rewind to September 2023: Enter Roda Osman, the self-proclaimed "Brick Lady" of Houston, who went mega-viral after tearfully claiming an Uber driver hurled a brick at her face for rejecting his creepy advances. Hospital selfies, swollen-lump close-ups, and a GoFundMe raking in $42,000 for her "recovery" had the internet in a rage-fueled frenzy—until surveillance footage dropped the mic. Turns out, *she* was the aggressor, whacking the guy first (with who-knows-what), and he clapped back with... a plastic water bottle. Her story flip-flopped like a bad Tinder bio, and by January 2024, she was slapped with theft-by-deception charges for blowing donor cash on Jamaica jaunts, NYC splurges, and spa days. Fast-forward to October 2024: Guilty as charged, with a 90-day jail stint, 10 years' probation (GPS anklet included), a full $42K payback order, and a decade-long social media ban to boot. The kicker? Jurors had to tell her to chill out post-verdict, and her victim, Olan Douglas, called her a manipulative nightmare who turned his life into "living hell." Embarrassing? This is next-level: From sympathy queen to scam artist in 4K.Cut to 2025's hotter mess: the boyfriend blackout sweeping TikTok, where straight women are whispering that coupling up is now "culturally loser-ish" and straight-up uncool. It kicked off with a British *Vogue* bombshell by Chante Joseph—"Is Having a Boyfriend Embarrassing Now?"—positing that in our post-heteronormative doom-scroll era, flaunting a man feels like admitting defeat. Think: muting feeds that start with "my boyf—," cropping dudes out of pics, or "soft-launching" with a blurry hand on a steering wheel to snag partnership perks without the ick. Why the shade? Superstition (jinxing it with the "evil eye"), privacy paranoia (what if it tanks and you're left archiving a digital ex-shrine?), and clout calculus—influencers like Stephanie Yeboah tanked followers after "hard-launching" their guys, with comments roasting trips as "beige" or boyfriends as "lame Republicans." TikTok's flooded with "period vogue" vibes: women joking about blurring faces or celebrating singledom as the real flex, amid a vibe where heterosexuality feels like a sinking ship and solo life screams empowerment. Even coupled gals nod along, admitting it dials down their "aura."But hold up—not everyone's buying the boycott. *Evie Magazine* fires back: This ain't embarrassment; it's clout-chasing cynicism, where women dodge vulnerability to stay "feminist" and feed the algorithm, romanticizing isolation over intimacy. Psychologist Dr. Ana Yudin calls it out as Gen Z's selfish twenties trap—delaying real growth for superficial single flexes that leave you emotionally marooned by 30. And *The Guardian*'s Emma Beddington? She laughs it off: "No affectionate, non-abusive relationship is uncool," unless you're dating a DiCaprio-type age-gap disaster. Bottom line: Boyfriends aren't the problem; performative detachment and "heterofatalism" are, turning love into a PR nightmare.So, verdict in the embarrassment Olympics? Brick Lady wins gold for felony-level fraud and a lifetime L, but boyfriends snag silver for turning everyday romance into a viral villain arc. Either way, in 2025's scroll-or-perish society, the real loser is anyone still trusting a GoFundMe—or their own thirst trap judgment. Who's your pick for peak embarrassment?Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/depraved-and-debaucherous--5267208/support.Contact KOP for professional podcast production, imaging, and web design services at http://www.kingofpodcasts.comSupport KOP by subscribing to his YouTube channel and search for King Of PodcastsFollow KOP on X and TikTok @kingofpodcasts (F Meta!)Listen to KOP's other programs, Podcasters Row… and the Wrestling is Real Wrestling Podcast and The Broadcasters Podcast.Buy KOP a Coffee https://buymeacoffee.com/kingofpodcastsDrop KOP a PayPal https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=3TAB983ZQPNVLDrop KOP a Venmo https://account.venmo.com/u/kingofpodcastsDrop KOP a CashApp https://cash.app/$kingofallpodcasts

This episode examines Juror #2, Clint Eastwood's most recent—and perhaps final—film. Juror #2 centers around the trial of a man accused of murdering his girlfriend after a fight at a bar, leaving her in a ditch by the side of a road. The twist comes early: Justin Kemp a/k/a Juror #2 (played by Nicholas Hoult) soon realizes that the wrong man is on trial—as he hears the evidence, Kemp figures out that he, and not the defendant, killed the victim. Kemp realizes that he accidentally hit the defendant's girlfriend with his car while she was walking along the side of a road on a dark and rainy night—thinking at the time, that he had hit a deer. Kemp, otherwise portrayed as a good man—a loving husband with a baby on the way—must navigate the moral dilemma as he serves on a jury that seems prepared to condemn an innocent man. Eastwood's first courtroom drama in a long and legendary career, Juror #2 explores themes of justice, morality, and the imperfections of the legal system. Timestamps:0:00      Introduction2:46       A flawed process7:05       The ex-police detective on the jury and the motion for a mistrial15:40     The lawyer's problematic advice23:16     A prosecutor who eventually does the right thing27:17      The public defender31:28      A good person caught in terrible circumstances?40:40    Missing scenes in the legal narrative44:46     A dark picture of the U.S. criminal justice systemFurther reading:“A Forensic Review of ‘Juror #2,'” J. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, vol. 53(1) (2025)  Banner, Adam, “Honesty in jury pool examined in ‘Juror #2,'” ABA Bar Journal (Jan. 28, 2025)Brody, Richard, “In ‘Juror #2,' Clint Eastwood Judges the System Harshly,” New Yorker (Oct 30, 2024)Melonic, Emina, “The Storytelling of Clint Eastwood,” Law & Liberty (Jan. 10, 2025)Upendra, Chidella, “The Ethical Vision of Clint Eastwood,” Journal of Religion & Film, vol. 17(2) (Oct. 2013)Zagha, Muriel, “Clint Eastwood's Puritan Morality Tale,” Engelsberg Ideas (Dec. 2, 2024)  Law on Film is created and produced by Jonathan Hafetz. Jonathan is a professor at Seton Hall Law School. He has written many books and articles about the law. He has litigated important cases to protect civil liberties and human rights while working at the ACLU and other organizations. Jonathan is a huge film buff and has been watching, studying, and talking about movies for as long as he can remember. For more information about Jonathan, here's a link to his bio: https://law.shu.edu/profiles/hafetzjo.htmlYou can contact him at jonathanhafetz@gmail.comYou can follow him on X (Twitter) @jonathanhafetz You can follow the podcast on X (Twitter) @LawOnFilmYou can follow the podcast on Instagram @lawonfilmpodcast

True Crime was the 94th-highest grossing movie of 1999, grossing just $17 million on a $50 million budget with a fairly limited release. Starring and directed by Clint Eastwood, True Crime was largely forgotten and remains overlooked most likely due to its release at what can be described as Eastwood's most prolonged artistic lull in the mid 1990s, starting with 1997's Absolute Power and Midnight in the Garden of Eden, 2000's Space Cowboys, and 2002's Blood Work. That lull would end with 2003's acclaimed Mystic River, which earned Oscars for both Sean Penn and Tim Robbins as well as Best Director and Best Picture nominations for Eastwood. But True Crime is still an interesting entry on Eastwood's resume, exploring many of the themes of injustice and moral ambiguity that he frequently explores in his work. So does the similarly-themed 2024 film Juror #2, which Eastwood directed in his mid-90s. So this week we're talking about them both, and joining is us is Aaron from the podcast Hit Factory.

Jurors reach a verdict in the civil trial over the fatal shooting of a protester, changes could be coming to the gaming industry in light of the gambling scandal tied to the NBA and the mafia, free events bring thousands of people to Downtown Las Vegas and more on 7@7.

On today's episode: Trump administration limits refugee admissions to mostly white South Africans Trump appears to suggest the US will resume testing nuclear weapons for first time in 30 years 5 more arrests as Louvre jewel heist probe deepens and key details emerge 4 Republicans back Senate resolution to undo Trump's tariffs around the globe Aid workers fear for those missing from a city in Sudan's Darfur region seized by paramilitary force Appeals court blocks order requiring Bovino to brief judge on Chicago immigration sweeps. US strikes another alleged drug-carrying boat in the Pacific and kills all 4 aboard, Hegseth says. Federal Reserve cuts key rate as government shutdown clouds economic outlook. Younger Americans less concerned about political violence and free speech threats AP-NORC poll. Jurors convict Illinois deputy of killing Sonya Massey but can't agree on first-degree murder charge. Russian mobsters sentenced to 25 years for foiled plot to assassinate Iranian dissident journalist. A man who spent 43 years in prison before his conviction was overturned now faces deportation. Wall Street waffles around its records after the Fed cuts rates but won't guarantee more. Toronto moves one win away from a World Series title, a Fall Classic strikeout record for a rookie pitcher, Minnesota hires its next manager, a buzzer-beater saves the Lakers without LeBron and Luka, key NBA figures on leave in gambling cases will not receive pay and an NFL defensive star gets a new contract. Brad Marchand steps away from the Panthers to help a friend whose daughter died of cancer. Haiti, Jamaica and Cuba pick up the pieces after Melissa's destruction. 5 more arrests made in Louvre jewel heist. Putin says Russia's nuclear-armed underwater drone was tested successfully. North Korea touts missile tests as Trump visits South Korea. A wrong subject has thrown classes into disarray in parts of Australia. —The Associated Press About this program Host Terry Lipshetz is managing editor of the national newsroom for Lee Enterprises. Besides producing the daily Hot off the Wire news podcast, Terry conducts periodic interviews for this Behind the Headlines program, co-hosts the Streamed & Screened movies and television program and is the former producer of Across the Sky, a podcast dedicated to weather and climate. Theme music The News Tonight, used under license from Soundstripe. YouTube clearance: ZR2MOTROGI4XAHRX

At Scott Peterson's 2004 trial, one expert witness sealed his fate. Dr. Terry D'Vor told jurors that baby Connor's fetal measurements proved Laci Peterson died on or before Christmas Eve 2002—the same day Scott went fishing. Jurors called his testimony “the nail in the coffin.” Now, in 2024, D'Vor has recanted. After reviewing modern NIH and WHO fetal-growth studies, he signed an affidavit admitting the old 1990s charts he used were scientifically obsolete. The updated data show Connor's gestational age was consistent with a January death, not December 24. That's when Scott Peterson was already under 24-hour police surveillance. Meaning: he couldn't have done it. This episode dissects the science that collapsed and the law that lets outdated forensics destroy lives. We'll explain California's Penal Code § 1473 (b)(2), written for exactly this scenario—when an expert's own recantation proves the state's theory was wrong. If modern science shows Laci and Connor died while Scott was being followed by cops, what's left of the prosecution's timeline? #ScottPeterson #LaciPeterson #LAInnocenceProject #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TonyBrueski #WrongfulConviction #ForensicScience #JusticeForLaci #CrimePodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

At Scott Peterson's 2004 trial, one expert witness sealed his fate. Dr. Terry D'Vor told jurors that baby Connor's fetal measurements proved Laci Peterson died on or before Christmas Eve 2002—the same day Scott went fishing. Jurors called his testimony “the nail in the coffin.” Now, in 2024, D'Vor has recanted. After reviewing modern NIH and WHO fetal-growth studies, he signed an affidavit admitting the old 1990s charts he used were scientifically obsolete. The updated data show Connor's gestational age was consistent with a January death, not December 24. That's when Scott Peterson was already under 24-hour police surveillance. Meaning: he couldn't have done it. This episode dissects the science that collapsed and the law that lets outdated forensics destroy lives. We'll explain California's Penal Code § 1473 (b)(2), written for exactly this scenario—when an expert's own recantation proves the state's theory was wrong. If modern science shows Laci and Connor died while Scott was being followed by cops, what's left of the prosecution's timeline? #ScottPeterson #LaciPeterson #LAInnocenceProject #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TonyBrueski #WrongfulConviction #ForensicScience #JusticeForLaci #CrimePodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

At Scott Peterson's 2004 trial, one expert witness sealed his fate. Dr. Terry D'Vor told jurors that baby Connor's fetal measurements proved Laci Peterson died on or before Christmas Eve 2002—the same day Scott went fishing. Jurors called his testimony “the nail in the coffin.” Now, in 2024, D'Vor has recanted. After reviewing modern NIH and WHO fetal-growth studies, he signed an affidavit admitting the old 1990s charts he used were scientifically obsolete. The updated data show Connor's gestational age was consistent with a January death, not December 24. That's when Scott Peterson was already under 24-hour police surveillance. Meaning: he couldn't have done it. This episode dissects the science that collapsed and the law that lets outdated forensics destroy lives. We'll explain California's Penal Code § 1473 (b)(2), written for exactly this scenario—when an expert's own recantation proves the state's theory was wrong. If modern science shows Laci and Connor died while Scott was being followed by cops, what's left of the prosecution's timeline? #ScottPeterson #LaciPeterson #LAInnocenceProject #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TonyBrueski #WrongfulConviction #ForensicScience #JusticeForLaci #CrimePodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Cleanup begins in Jamaica following Hurricane Melissa's wrath that has cause death and destruction from Haiti to Cuba. Jurors find Illinois deputy guilty of second-degree murder in the shooting death of a Black woman who called 9-1-1 for help. President Trump set to meet China's President Xi in South Korea. CBS News Correspondent Jennifer Keiper with tonight's World News Roundup. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

AP correspondent Jennifer King reports on the jury verdict in the shooting death of Sonya Massey.

Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team requested that the court allow them to privately screen potential jurors ahead of her federal sex-trafficking trial, arguing that extensive media coverage and the high-profile nature of the case made it impossible to ensure impartiality in a public setting. Her lawyers pushed for closed-door questioning sessions, claiming that prospective jurors might be reluctant to speak candidly about sensitive topics like sexual abuse if reporters or spectators were present. They also urged the court to keep juror questionnaires sealed, arguing that making them public could allow individuals to manipulate their answers to secure a place on the jury.The court, however, rejected Maxwell's motion, siding with prosecutors and media organizations that argued transparency was vital in a case of such public importance. The judge ruled that jury selection must remain open to ensure accountability and to preserve confidence in the judicial process. Critics of Maxwell's request saw it as a strategic ploy—one more attempt to control optics and quietly shape the jury pool in her favor. Given the longstanding pattern of secrecy surrounding Maxwell and Epstein's operations, her team's push for privacy only reinforced perceptions that she sought to keep damaging information from ever seeing daylight.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Bill Kanasky, Jr. Ph.D. shares a comparison between two different performances by witnesses at a recent mock trial and how their deposition performance impacted jurors' perceptions of the credibility of the witnesses and jurors' views of the case. One of the witnesses gave several pivoting responses, using phrases like "Yeah, but...." many times, which the jurors found evasive and did not like. Bill talks about how to handle situations where witnesses are asked questions related to bad facts or potentially problematic information and describes a much better approach than pivoting or arguing with the questioning attorney. Bill emphasizes the importance of owning your conduct and why that's the best way to diffuse this line of questioning from opposing counsel. Lastly, Bill addresses how to help witnesses address accusatory questions without pivoting.

Owner of Clinton Twp. building that exploded, caught fire in 2024 ordered to trial Northville street closures bring rift to traditionally tight-knit community Jurors in trial of ex-Zamboni driver Sobotka speak out: 'Something was a little fishy'

Watch on YouTube: https://youtu.be/eYoYVbkEDX0 Today's podcast is interesting on many levels. Rich is going to tell you a story about the time when he was a juror on a murder trial… and how the district attorney's failure to clearly educate the jury on certain specific points that he THOUGHT were readily apparent to everyone confused the heck out of the jury and caused them to draw all kinds of false conclusions. Cool story--but what does it have to do with marketing, you may ask?! In a word: EVERYTHING! Your business is on trial, your product or service is the defendant, your customers are the jury… and YOU are the attorney in charge of defense. You've got to make absolutely 100% sure that the jury understands exactly what you mean every time you open your mouth. Because guess what? They're NOT experts on what you do and what you sell and how you do it and what they should look out for. So it's your job to educate them.

Jurors will have an unusual choice in the Bionca Ellis case: they're not deciding between guilty and not guilty; they're deciding if Ellis was legally insane when she stabbed a toddler and his mom in a store parking lot, killing the boy. #CourtTV - What do YOU think?Binge all episodes of #ClosingArguments here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/closing-arguments-with-vinnie-politan/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/TVFwtaUogbAWatch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of Closing Arguments Podcast was hosted by Vinnie Politan, produced by Kerry O'Connor and Robynn Love, and edited by Autumn Sewell. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Join Tom Fox as he welcomes back MoFo partner James M. Koukios to discuss the themes and strategies observed in recent FCPA trials and the DOJ's prosecutorial approach. They explore the importance of making juries care about corruption cases, the themes of abuse of power and financial motive, and the significance of concealment in establishing guilt. The conversation also touches on the future of FCPA trials and the DOJ's commitment to prosecuting individuals involved in corporate misconduct. And of course Go Blue!  Key Highlights  ·      Making juries care about the impact of corruption is crucial. ·      Abuse of power is a central theme in corruption cases. ·      Concealment of actions indicates consciousness of guilt. ·      Compliance programs must emphasize transparency and documentation. ·      Jurors expect good governance and are sensitive to abuse of power. ·      Financial incentives in corporations should align with compliance. ·      Prosecuting individuals remains a priority for the DOJ.  Resources  Morrison Foerster James Koukios Expect DOJ To Repeat 4 Themes From 2024's FCPA Trials  Tom Fox Instagram Facebook YouTube Twitter LinkedIn   For more information on the use of AI in Compliance programs, my new book, Upping Your Game. You can purchase a copy of the book on Amazon.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Have you ever heard a phrase in court and cringe a little? Not because it's wrong, but because it's so… overused.  We've all said them. BUT.  The game has changed. Jurors are sharper. Attention is shorter.  And credibility is everything. So in this week's podcast, I'm breaking down 7 phrases that are killing your case and offering better ways to build connection and trust. Tune in NOW!

This podcast covers New Girl Season 5, Episode 10, Goosebumps Walkaway, which originally aired on March 8, 2016 and was written by Berkeley Johnson and directed by Trent O'Donnell. Here's a quick recap of the episode:Jess is back and Reagan helps her find her missed connection! Meanwhile, Schmidt is learning to “let loose”.This episode got a 9/10 rating from both Kritika and Kelly; Kritika's favorite character was Winston and Kelly's favorite was Nick.Episode Sections:(00:00) Welcome (01:33) Episode Recap: Dancing(11:47) Episode Recap: Reagan Leaving and Finding Jess's Juror(41:48) Schmidtism(43:36) Pop Culture(47:24) Guest Stars(50:48) Trivia & Fun Facts + Bear Hunt(54:10) Rating & Favorite Character(56:49) SpoilersWhile not discussed in the podcast, we noted other references in this episode including:Goldilocks - When Reagan finds Jess in her bed, Jess explains that she "went full Goldilocks" because the bed looked so good."The Humpty Dance" / Digital Underground - This song by the group Digital Underground played in the dance class Winston took Schmidt and Cece to.Golden Girls Theme Song - Jess sings a version of this song with different lyrics to Reagan. 800-Pound Gorilla / Elephant in the Room - When trying to get Jess and Reagan to talk about his past with both of them, Nick confuses the phrase "800-pound gorilla" with "elephant in the room."Beijing Opening Ceremony - Schmidt mentions that he will call his "Beijing Opening Ceremonies contact" to learn a new wedding dance instead of taking a dance class. ()Pat Sajak - When referring to a designer named "Lawrence of Brentwood," Jess says he sounds like a sponsor at the end of a game show, like "Pat Sajak's wardrobe furnished by Lawrence of Brentwood." Time Warp - Schmidt hangs up on Jess while saying that someone is "desecrating the Time Warp" at the dance class.Cookie Monster - Winston compares Jess and Gary on the news to "Cookie Monster's parents" because of their muffled voices. Zuul - After being told that she and Gary sounded great on television, Jess jokingly says she wants to be remembered as "blurry and talking like Zuul." Thanks for listening and stay tuned for Episode 10 Bonus Episode!Music: "Hotshot” by ⁠scottholmesmusic.com⁠Follow us on ⁠Instagram⁠ or email us at ⁠whosthatgirlpod@gmail.com⁠!Website: ⁠https://smallscreenchatter.com/⁠

A jury is deliberating the guilt or innocence of an 18 year old boy accused of murdering his father. What seems like an open and shut case gets flipped upside down when Juror #8 expresses reasonable doubt.

Sean “Diddy” Combs has been sentenced to four years and two months in prison for his conviction on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. He also must pay a $500,000 fine. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Jurors, we need your help! What should we call our "catch up" episodes? We value your input so let us know your thoughts! We break down the BravoCon lineup, with what panels are being featured and what Bravolebs will be on-site. We chat some pop culture news, including Nicole & Keith break up, looking forward to The Life of a Showgirl, Lala and Ocean and so much more! We also discuss this week's episode of Dancing with the Stars, our professional critiques and ranking the dances. Come judge with us!You can find us:Instagram & Threads: @twojudgeygirlsTikTok: @marytwojudgeygirls & @courtneytjgFacebook: www.facebook.com/twojudgeygirlsPodcast: ACast, iTunes, Spotify, wherever you listen!Merch: www.etsy.com/shop/twojudgeygirls Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/FNr4NPpIs3U We delve into the case of the very chatty Karen Read grand juror, who was indicted for leaking confidential grand jury information and pleaded guilty on August 4th, 2025. We discuss the initial media reports, the details of the indictment, and the common practice of grand jurors serving on multiple cases. Find out how the leak became public, leading to serious consequences, including the loss of the leaker's job at the Department of Children and Families, a position she had worked years to achieve. The defendant communicated with a former friend, to whom she disclosed grand jury information, believing it would remain private. The government's perspective, highlighting that the defendant divulged information across several months, including witness identities, testimony topics, and even a sealed indictment before arrests were made! The joint recommendation for a sentence of incarceration for one day (deemed served) and 24 months of supervised release, aimed at deterring similar offenses in the future. RESOURCES Massachusetts Grand Juror Charged - https://youtu.be/iiBTBRG3hLg Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this episode, Michael and Sari discuss the intricacies of jury selection, the importance of understanding juror bias, and the application of the funnel method in trial strategy. They emphasize the need for attorneys to engage jurors through personal experiences and the significance of practicing trial skills. The conversation also highlights the mindset required for attorneys to effectively communicate with juries and the critical role of damages in trials.TakeawaysBias is inherent in jurors; understanding it is crucial.Jurors are not the enemy; they can be motivated to act.Principle-centered voir dire focuses on universal truths.The funnel method guides jurors to key principles.Engaging jurors through personal experiences can be effective.Practice is essential for trial preparation and success.Mindset impacts how jurors perceive attorneys and cases.Asking for damages requires confidence and clarity.Money is a tool for justice, not a taboo subject.There are no bad answers in jury selection; they can be leveraged.

In Part 2 of my coverage on the McStay Family Murders, I cover the trial of Chase Merritt, the man arrested for the murders of Summer and Joseph McStay, and their two little boys, Gianni and Joey Jr. The case against Chase Merritt was built entirely on circumstantial evidence, and three years after my original coverage, I'm still not entirely sure police got the right guy. From the discourse between the prosecution and defense, cell phone and computer records suggesting Chase Merritt's movements were not as straightforward as the police would have you believe, and PayPal records suggesting another suspect stood to gain from Joseph McStay's death, I went over it all, putting together a picture that suggests that someone, somewhere, may have gotten things wrong. Connect with us on Social Media!You can find us at:Instagram: @bookofthedeadpodX: @bkofthedeadpodFacebook: The Book of the Dead PodcastTikTok: BookofthedeadpodOr visit our website at www.botdpod.comFeaturing a promo for Ghost Bites:Ghost Bites is a weekly podcast from Mike and J.T. of Brew Crime, for quick, 5–10 minute dives into the haunted, spooky, and paranormal. Get your weekly dose of all things creepy, served with a side of laughs. It's the perfect podcast for anyone looking for a fun and frightening experience that won't take up their whole day.Listen hereAradillas, E. (2014, November 9). Patrick McStay has a theory about why his family was murdered. People.com. https://people.com/crime/mcstay-family-murders-patrick-mcstays-theory-about-why-they-were-killed/Dziemianowicz, J. (2023, December 30). ‘Monster' slaughters entire family — mom, dad, 2 young sons — and buries them in the desert. Oxygen. https://www.oxygen.com/killer-motive/crime-news/mcstay-family-murders-who-killed-themFalcon, G. (2013, January 26). Three years later, no sign of missing family. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2013/01/26/justice/mcstay-family-disappearance/index.htmlFigueroa, T. (2013, November 15). How the McStay case unfolded. U-T San Diego. https://web.archive.org/web/20131203005025/http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2013/Nov/15/timeline-mcstay-disappearance-case/Flynn, S. (2022, May 21). McStay murders: A man is on death row for the brutal killings of a young family found in shallow graves in the desert – but did he really do it? The Independent. https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/mcstay-murder-california-documentary-chase-merritt-b2084210.htmlFraga, K. (2025, July 10). The McStay family murders and the “Monster” behind them. All That's Interesting. https://allthatsinteresting.com/mcstay-family-murdersGarske, M. (2020, January 17). Charles Merritt's DNA found in McStay family car: search warrants. NBC 7 San Diego. https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/charles-merritt-mcstay-family-murders-search-warrants-unsealed/52907/Gotfredson, D. (2025, July 12). New book details evidence that led to conviction in McStay family murders. cbs8.com. https://www.cbs8.com/article/news/crime/true-crime/new-book-evidence-conviction-mcstay-family-murders/509-8001a9cb-cfeb-42da-b257-c6993f1aa668Gutglueck, M. (2019, April 19). Kavanaugh hacked into McStay's PayPal account a week after the murders. SBC Sentinel. https://sbcsentinel.com/2019/04/kavanaugh-hacked-mcstay-paypalaccount/Kaye, R. (2015, June 16). Desert Deaths Mystery: Five questions about the McStay case. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2014/07/01/justice/mcstay-case-five-questionsProsecutors begin presenting evidence against Charles “Chase” Merritt in McStay murder case. (2015, June 15). CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/prosecutors-begin-presenting-evidence-in-mcstay-murder-case/Richard K. De Atley The Press-Enterprise. (2019, January 25). Jurors in Merritt murder trial hear crucial recording. Victorville Daily Press. https://www.vvdailypress.com/story/news/courts/2019/01/25/jurors-in-merritt-murder-trial/6204138007/Slifer, S. (2013, November 15). McStay Family Update: Joseph McStay's father calls probe of Calif. family's 2010 disappearance “botched, inept.” CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mcstay-family-update-joseph-mcstays-father-calls-probe-of-calif-familys-2010-disappearance-botched-inept/Slifer, S. (2015, January 24). Search warrants unsealed in McStay family murder case in California. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/search-warrants-unsealed-in-mcstay-murder-case/VVNG - Victor Valley News. (2015, June 11). New Evidence Suggest a Sledge Hammer was Used in Murdering McStay Family. Victor Valley News. https://www.vvng.com/new-evidence-suggest-a-sledge-hammer-was-used-in-murdering-mcstay-family/If you enjoyed the episode, consider leaving a review or rating! It helps more than you know! If you have a case suggestion, or want attention brought to a loved one's case, email me at bookofthedeadpod@gmail.com with Case Suggestion in the subject line.Stay safe, stay curious, and stay vigilant.

Inside the Heuermann Gilgo Killer's Home Search: Secret Room, Cage, and the Eerie Doll Big procedural swing: one jury hears all seven counts. With Jennifer Coffindaffer we break down why prosecutors pushed for joinder and why the defense is already circling “prejudice” in red ink. The state's pitch is pattern—victim type, geography, MO—one coherent story. The defense counters: decades apart, different methods, and the danger of letting weaker counts draft behind stronger ones. We also cut through the “creepy” optics of the search haul—secret room, large doll, cage. Creepy is not the standard. Agents don't cart off curios for sport; they seize what they believe they can justify in court. Those items matter only when tied to timelines, transfer, and corroboration that shrink alternatives. There's a trust problem too. This investigation lived under a cloud for a long time. Jurors will want clean lines, not shortcuts. That's why joinder is both rocket fuel and a tripwire—the narrative has to stay tight. This segment lays out the rules of engagement: what gets in, what's risky, and how you tell a decades-long story without losing a 12-person audience in the first act. Hashtags  #HiddenKillers #GilgoBeach #RexHeuermann #Court #Joinder #Evidence #LongIsland #TrueCrime #TonyBrueski #JenniferCoffindaffer Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Inside the Heuermann Gilgo Killer's Home Search: Secret Room, Cage, and the Eerie Doll Big procedural swing: one jury hears all seven counts. With Jennifer Coffindaffer we break down why prosecutors pushed for joinder and why the defense is already circling “prejudice” in red ink. The state's pitch is pattern—victim type, geography, MO—one coherent story. The defense counters: decades apart, different methods, and the danger of letting weaker counts draft behind stronger ones. We also cut through the “creepy” optics of the search haul—secret room, large doll, cage. Creepy is not the standard. Agents don't cart off curios for sport; they seize what they believe they can justify in court. Those items matter only when tied to timelines, transfer, and corroboration that shrink alternatives. There's a trust problem too. This investigation lived under a cloud for a long time. Jurors will want clean lines, not shortcuts. That's why joinder is both rocket fuel and a tripwire—the narrative has to stay tight. This segment lays out the rules of engagement: what gets in, what's risky, and how you tell a decades-long story without losing a 12-person audience in the first act. Hashtags  #HiddenKillers #GilgoBeach #RexHeuermann #Court #Joinder #Evidence #LongIsland #TrueCrime #TonyBrueski #JenniferCoffindaffer Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Juror #50, identified publicly as Scotty David, became a focal point of controversy after Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Before the trial, on his juror questionnaire, he answered “no” when asked if he or any close relation had ever been the victim of sexual abuse. But after the verdict, David gave interviews saying he had been sexually abused as a child, and that during jury deliberations he shared parts of that experience to help other jurors understand how memory and trauma work—insisting his personal history informed their view of witness testimony.Maxwell's defense seized on those revelations, demanding a new trial on the grounds that David's omission and his post-trial statements suggested bias and a failure of the Court's vetting process. In response, Judge Alison Nathan held a hearing, granted David immunity to answer questions, and ultimately ruled that his misstatement was an “inadvertent mistake” (not a deliberate lie) and did not prove that he was unable to be fair or had tainted the verdict. The appellate court later agreed, rejecting the retrial request, concluding that David's presence on the jury did not, under law, amount to a violation of Maxwell's right to a fair jury.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Did This Ex-Police Officer Get a Fair Trial? Was he guilty of 2nd degree murder? The case of former Rocky Ford Police Officer James Ashby continues to raise questions. You can listen and decide for yourself. The Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast promoted across their Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , Medium and other social media platforms. A Fatal Encounter in Colorado. James is the guest on the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast, available for free on their website, on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and most podcast platforms. In October 2014, Ashby shot and killed a 27-year-old inside his home while on duty. Prosecutors said Ashby followed the young man after a confrontation on the street and ultimately fired the fatal shot in front of his mother. Look for supporting stories about this and much more from Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast in platforms like Medium , Blogspot and Linkedin . Did This Ex-Police Officer Get a Fair Trial? Was he guilty of 2nd degree murder? In 2016, a jury convicted Ashby of second-degree murder, making him the first Colorado officer in decades to be found guilty of murder for an on-duty shooting. He was sentenced to 16 years in prison. Ashby's Side of the Story Speaking recently on the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast, available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and other major platforms, Ashby described the trial as deeply flawed. “I was bewildered by the continued prosecution,” Ashby said. “There were problems with the investigation, and I couldn't believe it when the jury came back with a guilty verdict.” Available for free on their website and streaming on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and other podcast platforms. Did This Ex-Police Officer Get a Fair Trial? He spent more than eight years behind bars before being transferred to a halfway house. Ashby now says his prison experience was nothing like what the public sees from Hollywood. “So much of what people think they know about prison comes from TV and legacy media,” he explained. “The reality is far different.” Legal Challenges and Appeals Ashby has not stopped fighting his conviction. His defense has filed multiple appeals, most recently a 35C motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and lack of access to critical police reports. Despite these claims, the court denied relief, leaving his 16-year sentence in place. “It's frustrating,” Ashby said. “We know there were serious issues in the trial, but the system doesn't want to admit mistakes.” The trial judge himself called it “the most difficult case he's had and probably will ever have.” Did This Ex-Police Officer Get a Fair Trial? Was he guilty of 2nd degree murder? Rare Conviction for a Police Officer The rarity of Ashby's conviction cannot be overstated. In the United States, it is unusual for law enforcement officers to be prosecuted and convicted of murder in the line of duty. Jurors deliberated for 11 hours before finding him guilty. Though Ashby originally faced up to 48 years in prison, he received a 16-year sentence. Meanwhile, the young man's family won a $1.3 million settlement against the City of Rocky Ford, alleging that city officials acted irresponsibly in hiring Ashby. A Mission to Clear His Name Now, Ashby is speaking out through social platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn, sharing his story under the page Prisoner of War on Police. Did This Ex-Police Officer Get a Fair Trial? “I don't want this to happen to anyone else,” he said. “I'm determined to clear my name and to shed light on what went wrong in my case.” Final Thoughts The story of James Ashby remains divisive. Supporters believe he was unfairly targeted and prosecuted, while critics argue that justice was delivered for what they called a bad police shooting. Listeners can hear Ashby's full account on the Law Enforcement Talk Podcast, streaming on Apple, Spotify, and other podcast platforms. So the question remains for the public to decide: Did this ex-police officer get a fair trial—or was he wrongfully convicted of 2nd degree murder? The full interview is streaming now on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show website. Get the latest news articles, without all the bias and spin, from the Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast on Medium , which is free. Find a wide variety of great podcasts online at The Podcast Zone Facebook Page , look for the one with the bright green logo. Be sure to check out our website . Be sure to follow us on MeWe , X , Instagram , Facebook, Pinterest, Linkedin and other social media platforms for the latest episodes and news. You can help contribute money to make the Gunrunner Movie . The film that Hollywood won't touch. It is about a now Retired Police Officer that was shot 6 times while investigating Gunrunning. He died 3 times during Medical treatment and was resuscitated. You can join the fight by giving a monetary “gift” to help ensure the making of his film at agunrunnerfilm.com . Background song Hurricane is used with permission from the band Dark Horse Flyer. You can contact John J. “Jay” Wiley by email at Jay@letradio.com , or learn more about him on their website . The Law Enforcement Talk Radio Show and Podcast promoted across their Facebook , Instagram , LinkedIn , Medium and other social media platforms. Did This Ex-Police Officer Get a Fair Trial? Was he guilty of 2nd degree murder? Attributions KKTV Reuters The Denver Post Facebook Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on  ⁨@TheEmilyDBaker⁩  YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/sZPcuRkkWVwEmily delves into Donna Adelson's motion for a new trial and exploring the legal arguments presented. We cover the defense's claims of juror misconduct, including instances of jurors posting on social media and appearing on podcasts, and the implications of these actions. The discussion also examines the defense's argument that Donna Adelson did not have sufficient time to make a knowing and voluntary decision regarding her testimony. Join us as we break down the complexities of this case, the standards for a new trial, and what these legal maneuvers could mean for the appeal process. RESOURCES Donna Adelson Trial Playlist - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gL0_OPy2AliqyEjGcI8QzBu&si=Zgsa0W2Rnp6LiCkoSarah Boone Trial Playlist - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gIpOZ3VSy0hcyIRjHn86Mac&si=BIQJoAX7B79X_4v4Alex Murdaugh Trial Playlist - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gK8GOeWkGfi7acMnT-D0zaw&si=9iOx1G2JbzWeqp04 Ghislaine Maxwell & Prince Andrew Playlist - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gL31tnzpu6Du3wLHoQRaIq8&si=I7zk1CK-ijRnoEk2Juror Foreperson Speaks on TikTok - https://youtu.be/DX1_r1vbw0c STAY IN THE LOOP WITH EMILY D. BAKER Download Our FREE App: https://lawnerdapp.com Get the Free Email Alert: https://www.LawNerdAlert.com Case Requests & Business Inquiries: TeamEmilyDBaker@wmeagency.com Help with the shop: https://www.lawnerdshop.com/pages/contact Mailing Address: Emily D. Baker 2000 Mallory Ln. St. 130-185, Franklin TN 37067 LAW NERD MERCH! https://www.LawNerdShop.com LONG FORM CONTENT https://www.youtube.com/@TheEmilyDBaker The Emily Show Podcast on YouTube: https://emilydbaker.com/TheEmilyShowPlaylist Apple Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/AppleTheEmilyShow Spotify Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/SpofityTheEmilyShow On your favorite podcast player Mondays EMILY ON SOCIAL @TheEmilyDBaker Instagram: https://www.Instagram.com/TheEmilyDBaker Twitter: https://www.Twitter.com/TheEmilyDBaker Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheEmilyDBaker MY YOUTUBE TOOLS **My Favorite YOUTUBE TOOL VidIQ https://vidiq.com/LawNerd Follow My Cats on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fredandgeorge_cat Emily's glasses lenses are Irlen tint https://www.irlen.com *This video is not legal advice; it is commentary for educational and entertainment purposes. Some links shared are affiliate links, all sponsorships are stated in video. Videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise stated. Sharing a resource is not an endorsement; it is a resource. Copyright 2020-2025 Baker Media, LLC* Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Donna Adelson Juror's TIKTOK Posts Could TRIGGER A Mistrial!  Just when you thought the Adelson family saga couldn't get more chaotic, convicted murderer Donna Adelson is already making a bold play for a new trial. In this segment, we're joined by defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis to break down the explosive allegations at the heart of her appeal—and it centers on a juror's shocking behavior on social media. We reveal the defense's claim that the jury foreperson was actively posting on TikTok during the trial, identifying herself and her role in this high-profile case. This single act could have opened the door to a flood of outside influence, tainting the entire legal process and potentially violating Donna Adelson's right to a fair trial. Eric Faddis provides his expert legal analysis on whether this constitutes grounds for a mistrial. This case exposes a massive crisis in our modern justice system. How can courts ensure an impartial jury in the age of smartphones and constant connectivity? We engage in a heated debate about the practicality of instructing jurors to stay offline and whether self-control is a reasonable expectation anymore. Is the integrity of our legal system being destroyed by our addiction to social media? This isn't just about Donna Adelson; it's a critical look at a problem that threatens every future trial in America. The verdict is in, but the battle is far from over. Hashtags: #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #JurorMisconduct #Mistrial #TrueCrime #JusticeForDan #AdelsonFamily #LawAndCrime #CourtTV #LegalAnalysis Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson Juror's TIKTOK Posts Could TRIGGER A Mistrial! Just when you thought the Adelson family saga couldn't get more chaotic, convicted murderer Donna Adelson is already making a bold play for a new trial. In this segment, we're joined by defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis to break down the explosive allegations at the heart of her appeal—and it centers on a juror's shocking behavior on social media. We reveal the defense's claim that the jury foreperson was actively posting on TikTok during the trial, identifying herself and her role in this high-profile case. This single act could have opened the door to a flood of outside influence, tainting the entire legal process and potentially violating Donna Adelson's right to a fair trial. Eric Faddis provides his expert legal analysis on whether this constitutes grounds for a mistrial. This case exposes a massive crisis in our modern justice system. How can courts ensure an impartial jury in the age of smartphones and constant connectivity? We engage in a heated debate about the practicality of instructing jurors to stay offline and whether self-control is a reasonable expectation anymore. Is the integrity of our legal system being destroyed by our addiction to social media? This isn't just about Donna Adelson; it's a critical look at a problem that threatens every future trial in America. The verdict is in, but the battle is far from over. Hashtags: #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #JurorMisconduct #Mistrial #TrueCrime #JusticeForDan #AdelsonFamily #LawAndCrime #CourtTV #LegalAnalysis Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Political Trade Secrets: Inside the Mind of Voters, Jurors, & Consumers — Join host Dustin Olson as he sits down with his favorite Democrat pollster, renowned Focus Group leader, & Courtroom Strategy expert, Carey Crantford for a revealing conversation on how to peel back the onion of public opinion.We'll dig into:

Donna Adelson Juror's TIKTOK Posts Could TRIGGER A Mistrial!  Just when you thought the Adelson family saga couldn't get more chaotic, convicted murderer Donna Adelson is already making a bold play for a new trial. In this segment, we're joined by defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis to break down the explosive allegations at the heart of her appeal—and it centers on a juror's shocking behavior on social media. We reveal the defense's claim that the jury foreperson was actively posting on TikTok during the trial, identifying herself and her role in this high-profile case. This single act could have opened the door to a flood of outside influence, tainting the entire legal process and potentially violating Donna Adelson's right to a fair trial. Eric Faddis provides his expert legal analysis on whether this constitutes grounds for a mistrial. This case exposes a massive crisis in our modern justice system. How can courts ensure an impartial jury in the age of smartphones and constant connectivity? We engage in a heated debate about the practicality of instructing jurors to stay offline and whether self-control is a reasonable expectation anymore. Is the integrity of our legal system being destroyed by our addiction to social media? This isn't just about Donna Adelson; it's a critical look at a problem that threatens every future trial in America. The verdict is in, but the battle is far from over. Hashtags: #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #JurorMisconduct #Mistrial #TrueCrime #JusticeForDan #AdelsonFamily #LawAndCrime #CourtTV #LegalAnalysis Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Donna Adelson's DESPERATE Appeal: Juror TikTok, Bias Claims & More The focus shifts squarely onto Donna Adelson's official appeal — and the cracks in her defense are glaring. Tony, Stacy, and Todd lay out the claims point by point, revealing just how shaky her legal team's strategy appears. Among the arguments: a juror posted on TikTok during the trial, another juror spoke out after the fact, and Donna's defense insists her courtroom reactions shouldn't have been considered at all. Add to that an allegation of “judicial favoritism” because the prosecution was given more time to set up technology, and the picture becomes clear: this isn't a strong legal attack, it's a desperate attempt to find any lifeline. The team doesn't let these arguments slide. They dissect them with sharp analysis and biting humor. Should a TikTok post really overturn a conviction in a murder-for-hire conspiracy? Should a jury ignore how a defendant reacts in the middle of trial testimony? And is it really the judge's fault if Donna's lawyer can't figure out how to use a projector? What becomes obvious in this breakdown is that Donna's defense isn't presenting new evidence or major legal flaws — they're trying to poke holes where none exist. This segment highlights just how weak the appeal looks in real time and raises the question: Is this just going through the motions, or does Donna truly believe these arguments will set her free?

Donna Adelson's DESPERATE Appeal: Juror TikTok, Bias Claims & More The focus shifts squarely onto Donna Adelson's official appeal — and the cracks in her defense are glaring. Tony, Stacy, and Todd lay out the claims point by point, revealing just how shaky her legal team's strategy appears. Among the arguments: a juror posted on TikTok during the trial, another juror spoke out after the fact, and Donna's defense insists her courtroom reactions shouldn't have been considered at all. Add to that an allegation of “judicial favoritism” because the prosecution was given more time to set up technology, and the picture becomes clear: this isn't a strong legal attack, it's a desperate attempt to find any lifeline. The team doesn't let these arguments slide. They dissect them with sharp analysis and biting humor. Should a TikTok post really overturn a conviction in a murder-for-hire conspiracy? Should a jury ignore how a defendant reacts in the middle of trial testimony? And is it really the judge's fault if Donna's lawyer can't figure out how to use a projector? What becomes obvious in this breakdown is that Donna's defense isn't presenting new evidence or major legal flaws — they're trying to poke holes where none exist. This segment highlights just how weak the appeal looks in real time and raises the question: Is this just going through the motions, or does Donna truly believe these arguments will set her free?

Donna Adelson's DESPERATE Appeal: Juror TikTok, Bias Claims & More The focus shifts squarely onto Donna Adelson's official appeal — and the cracks in her defense are glaring. Tony, Stacy, and Todd lay out the claims point by point, revealing just how shaky her legal team's strategy appears. Among the arguments: a juror posted on TikTok during the trial, another juror spoke out after the fact, and Donna's defense insists her courtroom reactions shouldn't have been considered at all. Add to that an allegation of “judicial favoritism” because the prosecution was given more time to set up technology, and the picture becomes clear: this isn't a strong legal attack, it's a desperate attempt to find any lifeline. The team doesn't let these arguments slide. They dissect them with sharp analysis and biting humor. Should a TikTok post really overturn a conviction in a murder-for-hire conspiracy? Should a jury ignore how a defendant reacts in the middle of trial testimony? And is it really the judge's fault if Donna's lawyer can't figure out how to use a projector? What becomes obvious in this breakdown is that Donna's defense isn't presenting new evidence or major legal flaws — they're trying to poke holes where none exist. This segment highlights just how weak the appeal looks in real time and raises the question: Is this just going through the motions, or does Donna truly believe these arguments will set her free?

Donna Adelson isn't done fighting. Just days after being convicted on September 4th for the brutal murder of her ex–son-in-law, Dan Markel, Adelson and her defense team have filed an explosive 18-page motion for a new trial. In it, they question jurors and say they want to interview them about their conduct and verdict. The motion also points fingers at the jail informants and allege the trial itself was unfair from the start. Once the controlling matriarch of the Adelson family, Donna is now battling for her freedom behind bars—her latest legal move raising new questions about whether justice for Dan Markel will finally stand, or if the courtroom drama is far from over. Welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the show that brings you the #Bestguests in all of #truecrime. In this STS episode, Emmy Award-Winning Host Joel Waldman brings on Attorney Tim Jansen, Law Professor Jo Potuto and Justice for Dan's Jared Ross to discuss the latest motions and if any of will stick.Thanks for supporting the show and being a part of #STSNation! Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Recapping after Donna Adelson's guilty verdict with victim impact statements, Prosecutor Cappleman's presser, and juror interviews since the verdict. Court TV Juror 6 - https://www.courttv.com/title/donna-adelson-juror-6-reveals-what-went-on-in-the-deliberation-room/Foreperson Tik Tok - https://www.tiktok.com/@laceywithaj/video/7546688064698027294STS interview with Juror 5 - https://www.youtube.com/live/eHV39boZWXcVictim impact statements - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGsfmmnOE10ALL MERCH 10% off with code Sherlock10 at checkout  - NEW STYLES Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on  ⁨@TheEmilyDBaker⁩  YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/DX1_r1vbw0c The Donna Adelson trial has concluded, with a guilty verdict delivered on Thursday, September 4th, 2025. In this Case Brief, we dive deep into what the jury foreperson had to say! In less than 24 hours after the conviction, she took to TikTok to share her experience. And yes, she even talks about Wendi Adelson! Don't miss this insightful look into the jury's perspective on one of the most talked-about murder-for-hire cases! RESOURCES Tallahassee Democrat Article - https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/local/2025/09/05/donna-adelson-trial-jury-foreman-takes-to-tiktok-after-guilty-verdict/85996070007/ Foreperson's TikToks - https://www.tiktok.com/@laceywithajDonna Adelson Trial Playlist - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gL0_OPy2AliqyEjGcI8QzBu Karen Read 2024 Mistrial Playlist - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTS Hannah Gutierrez Trial Playlist - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKWeltMPnhrxlML9y75pbj6 Gwyneth Paltrow Trial Playlist - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gIlMUdeLtN4mNQCerfWxONy Depp v. Heard Trial Playlist - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gLVeg1x2AInDBfPU6-ffnD0 STAY IN THE LOOP WITH EMILY D. BAKER Download Our FREE App: https://lawnerdapp.com Get the Free Email Alert: https://www.LawNerdAlert.com Case Requests & Business Inquiries: TeamEmilyDBaker@wmeagency.com Help with the shop: https://www.lawnerdshop.com/pages/contact Mailing Address: Emily D. Baker 2000 Mallory Ln. St. 130-185, Franklin TN 37067 LAW NERD MERCH! https://www.LawNerdShop.com LONG FORM CONTENT https://www.youtube.com/@TheEmilyDBaker The Emily Show Podcast on YouTube: https://emilydbaker.com/TheEmilyShowPlaylist Apple Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/AppleTheEmilyShow Spotify Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/SpofityTheEmilyShow On your favorite podcast player Mondays EMILY ON SOCIAL @TheEmilyDBaker Instagram: https://www.Instagram.com/TheEmilyDBaker Twitter: https://www.Twitter.com/TheEmilyDBaker Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheEmilyDBaker MY YOUTUBE TOOLS **My Favorite YOUTUBE TOOL VidIQ https://vidiq.com/LawNerd Follow My Cats on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fredandgeorge_cat Emily's glasses lenses are Irlen tint https://www.irlen.com *This video is not legal advice; it is commentary for educational and entertainment purposes. Some links shared are affiliate links, all sponsorships are stated in video. Videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise stated. Sharing a resource is not an endorsement; it is a resource. Copyright 2020-2025 Baker Media, LLC* Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Juror “Sprinkler Man” breaks his silence LIVE on STS! He reveals why he thought Donna Adelson was guilty in the Dan Markel murder trial, the testimony that stood out most, and answers YOUR burning questions. Don't miss this rare behind-the-scenes look at how justice for Dan Markel was delivered. In this Special STS Episode, STS Host Joel Waldman brings on a juror, known to STS as "Sprinkler Man," as a #BestGuest to answers all the questions we've been wanting to know about the jury. This episode also includes #BestGuests Tim Jansen and Jo Potuto.Thanks for supporting the show and being a part of #STSNation! Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor 

Donna Adelson Trial's Juror #6 is revealing the key witnesses, explosive testimony, and the exact moment he knew Donna was guilty of plotting the murder of Dan Markel. His behind-the-scenes account gives viewers rare insight into how the jury reached its decision and why the evidence was so compelling. With Donna Adelson now convicted and her son Charlie Adelson already behind bars, this juror's perspective highlights how the walls are closing in on the Adelson family as justice for Dan Markel continues to unfold.Thanks for supporting the show and being a part of #STSNation! Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor

Vinnie and guests weigh in on the Donna Adelson jury foreperson's decision to tell all on her TikTok account, from her unique observations in court to what she thinks might happen to Donna's daughter, Wendi. #CourtTV - What do YOU think? - FL v. Donna Adelson: Matriarch Mastermind Murder TrialMORE HERE: https://www.courttv.com/tag/donna-adelson/#CourtTV - What do YOU think?Binge all episodes of #ClosingArguments here: https://www.courttv.com/trials/closing-arguments-with-vinnie-politan/Watch the full video episode here: https://youtu.be/dKNfx2H3LIUWatch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo5E9pEhK_9kWG7-5HHcyRg/joinFOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of Closing Arguments Podcast was hosted by Vinnie Politan, produced by Kerry O'Connor and Robynn Love, and edited by Autumn Sewell.

The DNA Breakthrough & What Comes Next Rex Heuermann's Burlap, Hair, and Pizza: The Forensic Breaks That Nailed the Gilgo Suspect After years of dead ends, the case against Rex Heuermann broke open with a slice of pizza. Surveillance teams tailing him in 2023 collected a discarded crust, extracting DNA that matched hairs found on the burlap sacks wrapped around the Gilgo Beach victims. Not just his hair—familial matches tied back to his wife and daughter, consistent with the chaotic, unclean hoarder house investigators uncovered. Forensic science has now caught up with cold cases. Whole-genome sequencing—a powerful new tool—can analyze even hairs without roots, building a near-complete profile. Defense lawyers fought to keep it out, calling it “untested.” But the court just ruled: it's in. Jurors may not understand the science, but they'll understand this: it's precise, it's definitive, and it ties Rex Heuermann to the crime scene. We dig into what that means: how genome sequencing strengthens forensic cases, why it will likely become the new courtroom standard, and why Rex's arguments about “new science” may backfire. And we ask: what about Asa? Did she know nothing, or was she so trauma-bonded and compartmentalized that denial became her survival? Her claim that “I still feel Rex is here” after the house raid shows a connection that goes beyond ordinary loyalty. From DNA on pizza crust to notes in the basement, the walls are closing in. The trial date hasn't been set, but with DNA admitted, the odds of Rex Heuermann ever walking free again are vanishing. This is the turn from cold case to courtroom reality—and it's decades in the making. Hashtags #RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #LongIslandSerialKiller #DNAEvidence #WholeGenomeSequencing #HiddenKillers #ColdCaseSolved #TrueCrime #PizzaCrustDNA #CourtroomDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The DNA Breakthrough & What Comes Next Rex Heuermann's Burlap, Hair, and Pizza: The Forensic Breaks That Nailed the Gilgo Suspect After years of dead ends, the case against Rex Heuermann broke open with a slice of pizza. Surveillance teams tailing him in 2023 collected a discarded crust, extracting DNA that matched hairs found on the burlap sacks wrapped around the Gilgo Beach victims. Not just his hair—familial matches tied back to his wife and daughter, consistent with the chaotic, unclean hoarder house investigators uncovered. Forensic science has now caught up with cold cases. Whole-genome sequencing—a powerful new tool—can analyze even hairs without roots, building a near-complete profile. Defense lawyers fought to keep it out, calling it “untested.” But the court just ruled: it's in. Jurors may not understand the science, but they'll understand this: it's precise, it's definitive, and it ties Rex Heuermann to the crime scene. We dig into what that means: how genome sequencing strengthens forensic cases, why it will likely become the new courtroom standard, and why Rex's arguments about “new science” may backfire. And we ask: what about Asa? Did she know nothing, or was she so trauma-bonded and compartmentalized that denial became her survival? Her claim that “I still feel Rex is here” after the house raid shows a connection that goes beyond ordinary loyalty. From DNA on pizza crust to notes in the basement, the walls are closing in. The trial date hasn't been set, but with DNA admitted, the odds of Rex Heuermann ever walking free again are vanishing. This is the turn from cold case to courtroom reality—and it's decades in the making. Hashtags #RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #LongIslandSerialKiller #DNAEvidence #WholeGenomeSequencing #HiddenKillers #ColdCaseSolved #TrueCrime #PizzaCrustDNA #CourtroomDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The high-stakes murder trial of Donna Adelson has reached its most dramatic moment yet, as both the prosecution and defense deliver fiery closing arguments in front of a captivated jury. Adelson, accused of orchestrating the 2014 murder of her former son-in-law, FSU law professor Dan Markel, now faces the moment of truth. Prosecutors argue that the mountain of evidence – from wiretaps to witness testimony – makes her guilt undeniable, while the defense insists there's still plenty of reasonable doubt. The big question remains: will jurors side with the state's narrative of a calculated family conspiracy, or will they believe Donna Adelson's defense story and send her home free? The verdict could come any moment, and the courtroom tension is at an all-time high.Thanks for supporting the show and being a part of #STSNation! Donate to STS' Trial Travel: Https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/GJ...VENMO: @STSPodcast or Https://www.venmo.com/stspodcastCheck out STS Merch: Https://www.bonfire.com/store/sts-store/Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivor