Podcasts about South Carolina Supreme Court

Play Episode Listen Later May 14, 2025 31:54

I pledge allegiance to the flag of The United States Of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Oh, beautiful for spacious skies, for amber waves of grain, for purple mountain majesties above the fruit of the plain. America. America. America is back. Yes, sir. Welcome back to the program. Alright. Idaho, South Dakota, Iowa, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, West Virginia, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina all have something in common. They ban abortion at either conception or after six weeks. Well, the South Carolina Supreme Court has upheld that in the courts. Let's talk with South Carolina state representative Josiah Magnuson, right now. Josiah, welcome to the program. This is a pretty big deal for the Supreme Court. Right? Thank you, Charlie. Yes. Absolutely. This is a big win. And, you know, I think those that were paying attention knew that we had to uphold it. You know, this was so important that we, you know, not go with what planned parenthood was saying. Planned parenthood, you know, I think their arguments were just really illogical, but we have, fortunately, a pretty conservative supreme court, now, and they upheld the state law. And, you know, we're gonna continue to protect unborn babies, beginning about six weeks, you know, when the heartbeat can be detected. Yeah. Now they say, you know, planned parenthood's argument was like, yep. That's not a real that's not really a heartbeat. That's not really a heartbeat. Heart doesn't form until nine weeks is what they were saying. Right? Yeah. So they're trying to say that the law can only take effect once essentially, the the baby's heart is fully formed, which is around nine weeks. But there is cardiac activity Yeah. Beginning around six weeks. And so that was pretty clear that that was the intent of the law. And this is where it's really important that we have good debate and articulate things correctly when we're talking on the floor of the house because it affects what we call legislative intent. Mhmm. And that's what the Supreme Court looked at was the legislative intent. What did the legislature intend to do? It's very clear that the that the legislature intended to prohibit abortion as soon as that cardiac activity can be detected because you can hear the heart, you know, beating even though it's not fully formed. You can hear the heart beating beginning at six weeks. That was what the law, said, and so that was what the Supreme Court upheld. In this article that I'm reading, it says, if the Supreme Court sides with South Carolina, which they did, its decision could pave the way for other registry states to cut Planned Parenthood out of their Medicaid program. Is that the plan? That would be the hope. That's a a court case that's at the federal level right now. Right. But we haven't seen the results yet. I've been proposing, I think, you know, Charlie, you know, to try to take the planned parent funding out of the state budget. Mhmm. And that's been, you know, not, adopted, unfortunately. But McMaster has some executive work that he's been doing an executive action to take, Planned Parenthood out from being a Medicaid provider and just say they're they're they're not counted in that system. And so that's been challenging court. So that's what now is gonna come back from the from the US Supreme Court hopefully pretty soon. Right. We're talking about Josiah Magdiss and South Carolina representatives. So what was the what was the amendment that was put forward? Was it Jordan Pace that that put this forward the other day on the last day of session? So that is something that would have allowed us I'm I'm glad you're bringing this up because that would have allowed us to actually come back and deal with a pro life bill again in the off season. We have something called sine die Right. Which is the law that determines wha ...

Hour 3, Segment 1 : The Charlie James Show - (5:00pm) - Wednesday May 14th, 2025 - interview with SC Rep John Mccravy

Play Episode Listen Later May 14, 2025 8:20

I know we talked about it a little bit before, but let's do it again. Idaho, Texas, Oklahoma, South Carola South Dakota, Iowa, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, West Virginia, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida all have banned abortion at conception or after six weeks. Well, the South Carolina Supreme Court recently upheld that here in South Carolina. Joining us right now is representative John McCravy, who is, very excited about this bill. Representative McCravy, welcome to the program. Hope you're doing well. Thank you, Charlie. Thanks for having me on. So it was I mean, that was good news from the Supreme Court, five to zero, upholding it. Right? It was. And and it was a good common sense opinion. It took them 27 pages to say that if you hear the heartbeat, the baby is protected. So so but but it was a good decision. And, you know, one of the things that the family caucus and I have worked hard on is to make sure we get conservative judges Right. Who don't don't replace their opinion for our constitution and for for law. Is it let me ask you something. I mean, is are there changes that need to be made to the South Carolina constitution about abortion? You know, that's a that's an issue. We we don't have in South Carolina. We do not have, that type of those type of laws that they have in California where they just willy nilly change the constitution. We'd have to have a two thirds vote of both bodies to even get to that. But we're elected and we're supposed to go down there and do what our people elect us to do. And so that's what we we try to do, you know? And and I wanna say this, Charlie, and I I know, you know, I I I was the author of the heartbeat bill originally, and I I authored a lot of the changes to it that that are in there now. But I wanna say this, the heartbeat bill was never written to be the final bill for South Carolina. The final bill that we wrote for it and representative Magnuson was on the committee, that you had on earlier. He's been a a staunch supporter of life from day one. But but we wrote something called the Human Life Protection Act that is that is still sitting in the house judiciary along with about 10 other good bills. So we've we've got to we've got to keep fighting because we're still having 2,000 babies a year aborted for birth control in South Carolina. Right. So it's it's a time to say, okay. This is great, but we can't stop there. We can't we can't allow that many children to be killed in South Carolina. And so we're gonna continue to fight for that. I'm never gonna give up fighting for that. You know that, Charlie. Oh, I absolutely know that. So let me ask something. What is the difference between the bill we have now and the Human Life Protection Act? The Human Life Protection Act would protect babies in the womb. If if a woman is pregnant, that baby is protected. Mhmm. So it would take it back basically to conception, but but at least it would protect any baby that is in the womb. So now for birth control. Now, you know, the whether the exceptions come in, that's another issue, by a lot of different things. But but we don't want birth control to be applied to living babies. Like the abortion pill? That's right. And and and all other types as well. That's right. That's right. Charlie, they they're sending those things in. That's another whole story I could talk about for an hour. Yeah. But but we have a lot of bad things going on. But but, you know, what I wanna emphasize is let's please get the Human Life Protection Act out of that house judiciary committee along with a lot of other good things that need to come out, like closing the primaries, house judiciary Right. Ranked choice voting, house judiciary, student privacy act, keeping men out of girls' lives, house judiciary, punishing preventing parents from being punished from affirming their own biological sex with their child. Yeah. House judiciary. Changing the sex on the ...

Hour 3 : The Charlie James Show - (5:00pm) - Wednesday May 14th, 2025

Play Episode Listen Later May 14, 2025 30:54

I know we talked about it a little bit before, but let's do it again. Idaho, Texas, Oklahoma, South Carol South Dakota, Iowa, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, West Virginia, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida all have banned abortion at conception or after six weeks. Well, the South Carolina Supreme Court recently upheld that here in South Carolina. Joining us right now is representative John McCravey, who is, very excited about this bill. Representative McCravey, welcome to the program. Hope you're doing well. Thank you, Charlie. Thanks for having me on. So it was I mean, that was good news from the Supreme Court, five to zero, upholding it. Right? It was. And and it was a good common sense opinion. It took them 27 pages to say that if you hear the heartbeat, the baby is protected. So so but but it was a good decision. And, you know, one of the things that the family caucus and I have worked hard on is to make sure we get conservative judges Right. Who don't don't replace their opinion for our constitution and for for law. Is it let me ask you something. I mean, is are there changes that need to be made to the South Carolina constitution about abortion? You know, that's a that's an issue. We we don't have in South Carolina. We do not have, that type of those type of laws that they have in California where they just willy nilly change the constitution. We have to have a two thirds vote of both bodies to even get to that. But we're elected and we're supposed to go down there and do what our people elect us to do. And so that's what we we try to do, you know? And and I wanna say this, Charlie, and I I know, you know, I I I was the author of the heartbeat bill originally, and I I authored a lot of the changes to it that that are in there now. But I wanna say this, the heartbeat bill was never written to be the final bill for South Carolina. The final bill that we wrote for it and represented Magnuson was on the committee, that you had on earlier. He's been a a staunch supporter of life from day one. But but we wrote something called the Human Life Protection Act that is that is still sitting in the house judiciary along with about 10 other good bills. So we've we've got we've got to keep fighting because we're still having 2,000 babies a year aborted for birth control in South Carolina. Right. So it's it's a time to say, okay. This is great, but we can't stop there. We can't we can't allow that many children to be killed in South Carolina. And so we're gonna continue to fight for that. I'm never gonna give up fighting for that. You know that, Charlie. Oh, I absolutely know that. So let me ask you something. What is the difference between the bill we have now and the Human Life Protection Act? The Human Life Protection Act will protect babies in the womb. If if a woman is pregnant, that baby is protected. Mhmm. So it would take it back basically to conception, but but at least it would protect any baby that is in the womb. So now for birth control. Now, you know, the whether the exceptions come in, that's another issue, by a lot of different things. But but we don't want birth control to be applied to living babies. Like the abortion pill. That's right. And and and all other types as well. That's right. That's right. Charlie, they they're sending those things in. That's another whole story I could talk about for an hour. Yeah. But but we have a lot of bad things going on. But but, you know, what I wanna emphasize is let's please get the Human Life Protection Act out of that house judiciary committee along with a lot of other good things that need to come out, like closing the primary is house judiciary. Right. Right choice voting house judiciary. Student privacy act. Keeping men out of girls' locker room. House judiciary. Punishing preventing parents from being punished from affirming their own biological sex with their child. Yeah. House judiciary. Changing the sex on a ...

Hour 2, Segment 1 : The Charlie James Show - (4:00pm) - Wednesday May 14th, 2025

Dishin' Dirt with Gary Pickren

Play Episode Listen Later May 14, 2025 9:01

I pledge allegiance to the flag of The United States Of America and to the Republic Oh, beautiful for spacious skies, for amber waves of grain, for purple mountain majesties above the America is back. Yes, sir. Welcome back to the program. Alright. Idaho, South Dakota, Iowa, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, West Virginia, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina all have something in common. They ban abortion at either conception or after six weeks. Well, the South Carolina Supreme Court has upheld that in the courts. Let's talk with South Carolina state representative Josiah Magnuson, right now. Josiah, welcome to the program. This is a pretty big deal for the Supreme Court. Right? Thank you, Charlie. Yes. Absolutely. This is a big win. And, you know, I think those that were paying attention knew that we had to uphold it. You know, this was so important that we, you know, not go with what planned parenthood was saying. Planned parenthood, you know, I think their arguments were just really illogical, but we have fortunately a pretty conservative supreme court, now, and they upheld the state law. And, you know, we're gonna continue to protect unborn babies, beginning about six weeks, you know, when the heartbeat can be detected. Yeah. Now they say, you know, planned parenthood's argument was like, yep. That's not a real that's not really a heartbeat. That's not really a heartbeat. Heart dog doesn't form until nine weeks is what they were saying. Right? Yeah. So they're trying to say that the law can only take effect once essentially, the the baby's heart is fully formed, which is around nine weeks. But there is cardiac activity Yeah. Beginning around six weeks. And so that was pretty clear that that was the intent of the law. And this is where it's really important that we have good debate and articulate things correctly when we're talking on the floor of the house because it affects what we call legislative intent. Mhmm. And that's what the Supreme Court looked at was the legislative intent. What did the legislature intend to do? It's very clear that the that the legislature intended to prohibit abortion as soon as that cardiac activity can be detected because you can hear the heart, you know, beating even though it's not fully formed. You can hear the heart beating beginning at six weeks. That was what the law, said, and so that was what the Supreme Court upheld. In this article that I'm reading, it says, if the Supreme Court sides with South Carolina, which they did, its decision could pave the way for other registry states to cut Planned Parenthood out of their Medicaid program. Is that the plan? That would be the hope. That's a a court case that's at the federal level right now. Right. But we haven't seen the results yet. I've been proposing, I think, you know, Charlie, you know, to try to take the Planned Parenthood funding out of the state budget. Mhmm. And that's been, you know, not, adopted, unfortunately. But McMaster has some executive work that he's been doing, an executive action to take, Planned Parenthood out from being a Medicaid provider and just say they're they're they're not counted in that system. And so that's been challenging court. So that's what now is gonna come back from the from the US Supreme Court hopefully pretty soon. Right. We're talking about Josiah Magnus and South Carolina representatives. So what was the what was the amendment that was put forward? Was it Jordan Pace that that put this forward the other day on the last day of session? So that is something that would have allowed us I'm I'm glad you're bringing this up because that would have allowed us to actually come back and deal with a pro life bill again in the off season. We have something called sine die Right. Which is the law that determines what topics can be addressed when the legislature is not technically in session. Mhmm. And our position my position, the Free ...

Hannah Dugan Claims Judicial Immunity and Justice for Biden's Autopen Pardons

"Tapp" into the Truth

Play Episode Listen Later May 14, 2025 123:09

The Sean “Diddy” Combs trial has begun. But I'm not really going to talk much about it.A federal grand jury indicted Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan on charges of concealing a person from arrest and obstruction of proceedings. Her defense is not denying her crimes; they are claiming “judicial immunity” for her actions. Ed Martin, the incoming Department of Justice pardon attorney and director of the DOJ's Weaponization Working Group, has announced that he will review the rash of questionable “autopen” pardons issued in the final days of the Biden White House, saying that they “need some scrutiny.”The South Carolina Supreme Court rejected an effort from Planned Parenthood to water down the state's pro-life heartbeat law, ruling that the state could enforce its protections for preborn baby humans at six weeks of development.California Gov. Gavin Newsom, in an effort to look more moderate and Presidential, is pushing to freeze enrollment for illegal alien migrants in the state's free health care program. This is after California lawmakers and Gov. Newsom recently approved a $3.4 billion loan to pay for the expanded program's extra expenses through June.Become a supporter of Tapp into the Truth: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tapp-into-the-truth--556114/supportTake This Quiz To Find Out The Best & Worst Foods To Avoid For Joint Pain!If you love high-quality jerky, you need to check out Jerky Snob. They deliver small-batch, artisan jerky straight to your door every month—no MSG, no nitrates, just premium cuts and bold flavors. You can choose from 2, 4, or 8-bag subscriptions, and every delivery brings something new and delicious. One of my favorite things is the variety—spicy, smoky, sweet, all from different craft makers. It's like a jerky-tasting adventure every month. Plus, it makes an awesome gift! Grab your subscription at tappintofood.com and treat yourself to better jerky. When planning for your family's preparedness, you want to ensure your emergency backup power solution can withstand an EMP. The problem is, no one could figure out how to make an “EMP-hardened” solar generator at a price regular folks could afford… until now. I'm thrilled to introduce you to the latest preparedness breakthrough from My Patriot Supply, The Grid Doctor 3300 Solar Generator System: The First Solar Generator EVER with built-in EMP Intercept Technology.Diversify and protect your hard-earned wealth. Use America's Premiere Conservative Gold Company, Harvard Gold Group. Use promo code TAPP.Support American jobs! Support the show! Get great products at great prices! Go to My Pillow and use promo code TAPP to save! Visit patriotmobile.com or Call (817) 380-9081 to take advantage of a FREE Month of service when you switch using promo code TAPP! Morning Kick is a revolutionary new daily drink from Roundhouse Provisions that combines ultra-potent greens like spirulina and kale with probiotics, prebiotics, collagen, and even ashwagandha. Just mix with water, stir, and enjoy!If you are a content creator in need of a professional drone or you just enjoy flying a drone on the weekend, EXO Drones has you covered! EXO Drones Plus, get 15% off your order by using this link.Follow Tapp into the Truth on Locals Follow Tapp into the Truth on SubstackIf recent events have proven anything, you need to be as prepared as possible for when things go sideways. You certainly can't count on the government for help. True liberty requires self-reliance. My Patriot SupplyHero SoapPatriot DepotBlue CoolersKoa CoffeeBrainMDDiamond CBDSauce Bae2nd SkullEinstokBeanstoxBelle IsleMomento AIHoneyFund"Homegrown" Boone's BourbonBlackout Coffee Co.Full Circle Brewing Co.Pasmosa Sangria

Dishin' Dirt on Major Supreme Court Ruling In Favor of Real Estate Agents!!!!!!

Play Episode Listen Later May 1, 2025 27:36

Send us a textA MAJOR VICTORY FOR ALL REAL ESTATE AGENTS!!Today we discuss a significant ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court that protects real estate agents from liability under the South Carolina Residential Property Condition Disclosure Act. The ruling states that there is no private cause of action against real estate agents under the Act allowing buyers to sue agents for the false or misleading statements of the Seller. This ruling shifts the responsibility solely to property owners. This landmark decision is seen as a major victory for real estate professionals, providing them with much-needed protection in a challenging industry.Don't forget to like us and share us!Gary* Gary serves on the South Carolina Real Estate Commission as a Commissioner. The opinions expressed herein are his opinions and are not necessarily the opinions of the SC Real Estate Commission. This podcast is not to be considered legal advice. Please consult an attorney in your area.

supreme court real estate south carolina act favor dirt commissioners sellers real estate agents liability supreme court ruling dishin south carolina supreme court gary gary

Alex Murdaugh Murder Appeal Delayed 120 Days – Here's What Happens Next

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 16, 2025 30:31

Alex Murdaugh Murder Appeal Delayed 120 Days – Here's What Happens Next In this episode, we're diving into the latest twist in the Alex Murdaugh murder appeal—the South Carolina Supreme Court's unexpected decision to grant prosecutors a 120-day extension to respond. With the new deadline now set for August 8, 2025, Murdaugh's defense team is sounding the alarm, accusing the Attorney General's Office of stalling and mismanaging the case. The State, on the other hand, claims “extraordinary circumstances” justify the delay, pointing to a massive 6,000-page trial record and staff turnover. This isn't just a boring scheduling change—it's a courtroom clash that exposes just how complicated, politically sensitive, and high-stakes this appeal really is. The defense argues the longer this drags out, the longer Murdaugh sits in prison on what they claim was a structurally flawed trial. Prosecutors say they need time to do it right. Legal analysts say it's rare to see such a public fight over an appellate deadline, especially one involving a case this notorious. We break down what this extension means, how it affects the timeline of the appeal, and what it tells us about the strategies on both sides. From the controversial role of court clerk Becky Hill to the looming oral arguments in late 2025 or early 2026, this delay sets the tone for what could be one of the most consequential appellate rulings in South Carolina history. Subscribe now for all the updates as this legal saga continues to unfold. Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Alex Murdaugh Murder Appeal Delayed 120 Days – Here's What Happens Next

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 16, 2025 30:31

Alex Murdaugh Murder Appeal Delayed 120 Days – Here's What Happens Next In this episode, we're diving into the latest twist in the Alex Murdaugh murder appeal—the South Carolina Supreme Court's unexpected decision to grant prosecutors a 120-day extension to respond. With the new deadline now set for August 8, 2025, Murdaugh's defense team is sounding the alarm, accusing the Attorney General's Office of stalling and mismanaging the case. The State, on the other hand, claims “extraordinary circumstances” justify the delay, pointing to a massive 6,000-page trial record and staff turnover. This isn't just a boring scheduling change—it's a courtroom clash that exposes just how complicated, politically sensitive, and high-stakes this appeal really is. The defense argues the longer this drags out, the longer Murdaugh sits in prison on what they claim was a structurally flawed trial. Prosecutors say they need time to do it right. Legal analysts say it's rare to see such a public fight over an appellate deadline, especially one involving a case this notorious. We break down what this extension means, how it affects the timeline of the appeal, and what it tells us about the strategies on both sides. From the controversial role of court clerk Becky Hill to the looming oral arguments in late 2025 or early 2026, this delay sets the tone for what could be one of the most consequential appellate rulings in South Carolina history. Subscribe now for all the updates as this legal saga continues to unfold. Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Alex Murdaugh Murder Appeal Delayed 120 Days – Here's What Happens Next

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 16, 2025 30:31

Alex Murdaugh Murder Appeal Delayed 120 Days – Here's What Happens Next In this episode, we're diving into the latest twist in the Alex Murdaugh murder appeal—the South Carolina Supreme Court's unexpected decision to grant prosecutors a 120-day extension to respond. With the new deadline now set for August 8, 2025, Murdaugh's defense team is sounding the alarm, accusing the Attorney General's Office of stalling and mismanaging the case. The State, on the other hand, claims “extraordinary circumstances” justify the delay, pointing to a massive 6,000-page trial record and staff turnover. This isn't just a boring scheduling change—it's a courtroom clash that exposes just how complicated, politically sensitive, and high-stakes this appeal really is. The defense argues the longer this drags out, the longer Murdaugh sits in prison on what they claim was a structurally flawed trial. Prosecutors say they need time to do it right. Legal analysts say it's rare to see such a public fight over an appellate deadline, especially one involving a case this notorious. We break down what this extension means, how it affects the timeline of the appeal, and what it tells us about the strategies on both sides. From the controversial role of court clerk Becky Hill to the looming oral arguments in late 2025 or early 2026, this delay sets the tone for what could be one of the most consequential appellate rulings in South Carolina history. Subscribe now for all the updates as this legal saga continues to unfold. Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Episode 362 - Several Murdaugh Updates - (4/16/25)

Holy City Sinner Radio

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 16, 2025 12:51

On today's show: 1. The cast for Hulu's 'Murdaugh Murders' true crime show is shaping up. Here's who will star - https://www.postandcourier.com/free-times/news/murdaugh-murders-podcast-hulu-show-sc/article_73eabffe-b885-471b-beea-6853567248e0.html 2. SC Supreme Court grants prosecutors additional time to respond to Murdaugh appeal - https://abcnews4.com/news/local/sc-supreme-court-grants-prosecutors-additional-time-to-respond-to-murdaugh-appeal-wciv-abc-news-4-richard-alexander-murdaugh-south-carolina-supreme-court-former-colleton-county-clerk-of-court-becky-hill-paul-maggie-murdaugh-moselle-estate-double-murder# 3. Ex-Murdaugh banker Russell Laffitte to plead guilty to financial crimes, avoiding retrial - https://www.postandcourier.com/murdaugh-updates/russell-laffitte-plea-agreement-retrial-canceled/article_e9321c75-ac57-4ac0-9965-f8d6d27671a6.html This episode's music is by Tyler Boone (tylerboonemusic.com). The episode was produced by LMC Soundsystem.

hulu murdaugh south carolina supreme court tyler boone russell laffitte

Murdaugh to SC: You've Had Long Enough

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2025 17:26

Murdaugh to SC: You've Had Long Enough The South Carolina Attorney General's Office wants more time to answer Alex Murdaugh's Supreme Court appeal—and Murdaugh's team isn't having it. In a rare move that flips the courtroom script, it's the defense pressing to move things forward, while the prosecution is asking the highest court in the state to slow it down. On April 3, the AG's Office asked for a second extension in Murdaugh's appeal process. They're asking for 120 more days, which would push their deadline to respond until August 8. But Murdaugh's lawyers fired back almost immediately with a simple message: No. Richard Harpootlian, one of Murdaugh's lead attorneys, didn't mince words. In an email directly to the state's attorneys, he said, “We will not consent.” The state's request comes in response to a 121-page appeal filed by Murdaugh's legal team back in December. That appeal is no small document—it accuses former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill of jury tampering, questions the way evidence was presented, and basically asks the court to take a second look at one of the most widely followed trials in recent memory. The Supreme Court received both motions—the AG's request for time and the defense's refusal—but hasn't yet ruled on either. Murdaugh, the disbarred attorney turned convicted murderer, was sentenced to back-to-back life terms last year for the 2021 shooting deaths of his wife Maggie and son Paul. He has always denied involvement in the killings. His legal team filed for appeal last December, citing what they claim were serious errors during the trial, including that explosive allegation of jury tampering. Originally, the AG's Office had 90 days to respond to the appeal—a deadline they agreed on with the defense. That gave them until April 10. But now they want four more months, claiming the scope of the case is just too big to tackle in time. Their reasoning? For starters, the trial transcripts span over 6,000 pages. Add to that audio recordings, video exhibits, legal briefs, and side hearings, and you've got a mountain of material to review. The AG's team also says they're dealing with other major cases, including death penalty litigation, and their attorneys are simply stretched thin. But Murdaugh's side isn't buying it. They say this appeal has already been pending far too long. They point out that if the extension is granted, it will have taken the state an entire year to respond to their brief. They say they've never heard of that happening in any criminal case—capital or otherwise. They also argue that if the Attorney General's Office can't keep up with its caseload, they should hire outside help. With 90 attorneys on staff, the defense questions why this one case needs so much extra time. Then there's the most telling part: Murdaugh's lawyers say they believe the state's case won't hold up on appeal. They argue that dragging this out only delays justice—and that unless the AG's Office is hiding some blockbuster argument, the state's trying to stall a process that could ultimately lead to overturning the murder convictions. Let's be clear: even if Murdaugh wins this appeal, it doesn't mean he walks out of prison. He's already pleaded guilty to a laundry list of financial crimes—millions stolen from clients and colleagues—and those come with their own steep sentences. But overturning the murder convictions would shake up the legacy of a trial that gripped the country. Now, it's up to the South Carolina Supreme Court to decide whether the state deserves more time—or if the clock has already run out. #AlexMurdaugh #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #LegalNews #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

office murder crime trial supreme court catching sean combs attorney generals downfall murdaugh ad free alex murdaugh long enough stephen smith long island serial killer karen read bryan kohberger lucy letby ana walshe kouri richins lori daybell south carolina supreme court madeline kingsbury delphi murders inside malevolent mormon mommys colleton county clerk court becky hill

Murdaugh to SC: You've Had Long Enough

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2025 17:26

Murdaugh to SC: You've Had Long Enough The South Carolina Attorney General's Office wants more time to answer Alex Murdaugh's Supreme Court appeal—and Murdaugh's team isn't having it. In a rare move that flips the courtroom script, it's the defense pressing to move things forward, while the prosecution is asking the highest court in the state to slow it down. On April 3, the AG's Office asked for a second extension in Murdaugh's appeal process. They're asking for 120 more days, which would push their deadline to respond until August 8. But Murdaugh's lawyers fired back almost immediately with a simple message: No. Richard Harpootlian, one of Murdaugh's lead attorneys, didn't mince words. In an email directly to the state's attorneys, he said, “We will not consent.” The state's request comes in response to a 121-page appeal filed by Murdaugh's legal team back in December. That appeal is no small document—it accuses former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill of jury tampering, questions the way evidence was presented, and basically asks the court to take a second look at one of the most widely followed trials in recent memory. The Supreme Court received both motions—the AG's request for time and the defense's refusal—but hasn't yet ruled on either. Murdaugh, the disbarred attorney turned convicted murderer, was sentenced to back-to-back life terms last year for the 2021 shooting deaths of his wife Maggie and son Paul. He has always denied involvement in the killings. His legal team filed for appeal last December, citing what they claim were serious errors during the trial, including that explosive allegation of jury tampering. Originally, the AG's Office had 90 days to respond to the appeal—a deadline they agreed on with the defense. That gave them until April 10. But now they want four more months, claiming the scope of the case is just too big to tackle in time. Their reasoning? For starters, the trial transcripts span over 6,000 pages. Add to that audio recordings, video exhibits, legal briefs, and side hearings, and you've got a mountain of material to review. The AG's team also says they're dealing with other major cases, including death penalty litigation, and their attorneys are simply stretched thin. But Murdaugh's side isn't buying it. They say this appeal has already been pending far too long. They point out that if the extension is granted, it will have taken the state an entire year to respond to their brief. They say they've never heard of that happening in any criminal case—capital or otherwise. They also argue that if the Attorney General's Office can't keep up with its caseload, they should hire outside help. With 90 attorneys on staff, the defense questions why this one case needs so much extra time. Then there's the most telling part: Murdaugh's lawyers say they believe the state's case won't hold up on appeal. They argue that dragging this out only delays justice—and that unless the AG's Office is hiding some blockbuster argument, the state's trying to stall a process that could ultimately lead to overturning the murder convictions. Let's be clear: even if Murdaugh wins this appeal, it doesn't mean he walks out of prison. He's already pleaded guilty to a laundry list of financial crimes—millions stolen from clients and colleagues—and those come with their own steep sentences. But overturning the murder convictions would shake up the legacy of a trial that gripped the country. Now, it's up to the South Carolina Supreme Court to decide whether the state deserves more time—or if the clock has already run out. #AlexMurdaugh #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #LegalNews #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

office murder crime trial supreme court catching sean combs attorney generals downfall murdaugh ad free alex murdaugh long enough stephen smith long island serial killer karen read bryan kohberger lucy letby ana walshe kouri richins lori daybell south carolina supreme court madeline kingsbury delphi murders inside malevolent mormon mommys colleton county clerk court becky hill

Murdaugh to SC: You've Had Long Enough

My Crazy Family | A Podcast of Crazy Family Stories

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2025 17:26

Murdaugh to SC: You've Had Long Enough The South Carolina Attorney General's Office wants more time to answer Alex Murdaugh's Supreme Court appeal—and Murdaugh's team isn't having it. In a rare move that flips the courtroom script, it's the defense pressing to move things forward, while the prosecution is asking the highest court in the state to slow it down. On April 3, the AG's Office asked for a second extension in Murdaugh's appeal process. They're asking for 120 more days, which would push their deadline to respond until August 8. But Murdaugh's lawyers fired back almost immediately with a simple message: No. Richard Harpootlian, one of Murdaugh's lead attorneys, didn't mince words. In an email directly to the state's attorneys, he said, “We will not consent.” The state's request comes in response to a 121-page appeal filed by Murdaugh's legal team back in December. That appeal is no small document—it accuses former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill of jury tampering, questions the way evidence was presented, and basically asks the court to take a second look at one of the most widely followed trials in recent memory. The Supreme Court received both motions—the AG's request for time and the defense's refusal—but hasn't yet ruled on either. Murdaugh, the disbarred attorney turned convicted murderer, was sentenced to back-to-back life terms last year for the 2021 shooting deaths of his wife Maggie and son Paul. He has always denied involvement in the killings. His legal team filed for appeal last December, citing what they claim were serious errors during the trial, including that explosive allegation of jury tampering. Originally, the AG's Office had 90 days to respond to the appeal—a deadline they agreed on with the defense. That gave them until April 10. But now they want four more months, claiming the scope of the case is just too big to tackle in time. Their reasoning? For starters, the trial transcripts span over 6,000 pages. Add to that audio recordings, video exhibits, legal briefs, and side hearings, and you've got a mountain of material to review. The AG's team also says they're dealing with other major cases, including death penalty litigation, and their attorneys are simply stretched thin. But Murdaugh's side isn't buying it. They say this appeal has already been pending far too long. They point out that if the extension is granted, it will have taken the state an entire year to respond to their brief. They say they've never heard of that happening in any criminal case—capital or otherwise. They also argue that if the Attorney General's Office can't keep up with its caseload, they should hire outside help. With 90 attorneys on staff, the defense questions why this one case needs so much extra time. Then there's the most telling part: Murdaugh's lawyers say they believe the state's case won't hold up on appeal. They argue that dragging this out only delays justice—and that unless the AG's Office is hiding some blockbuster argument, the state's trying to stall a process that could ultimately lead to overturning the murder convictions. Let's be clear: even if Murdaugh wins this appeal, it doesn't mean he walks out of prison. He's already pleaded guilty to a laundry list of financial crimes—millions stolen from clients and colleagues—and those come with their own steep sentences. But overturning the murder convictions would shake up the legacy of a trial that gripped the country. Now, it's up to the South Carolina Supreme Court to decide whether the state deserves more time—or if the clock has already run out. #AlexMurdaugh #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #LegalNews #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

office murder crime trial supreme court catching sean combs attorney generals downfall murdaugh ad free alex murdaugh long enough stephen smith long island serial killer karen read bryan kohberger lucy letby ana walshe kouri richins lori daybell south carolina supreme court madeline kingsbury delphi murders inside malevolent mormon mommys colleton county clerk court becky hill

Murdaugh to SC: You've Had Long Enough

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2025 17:26

Murdaugh to SC: You've Had Long Enough The South Carolina Attorney General's Office wants more time to answer Alex Murdaugh's Supreme Court appeal—and Murdaugh's team isn't having it. In a rare move that flips the courtroom script, it's the defense pressing to move things forward, while the prosecution is asking the highest court in the state to slow it down. On April 3, the AG's Office asked for a second extension in Murdaugh's appeal process. They're asking for 120 more days, which would push their deadline to respond until August 8. But Murdaugh's lawyers fired back almost immediately with a simple message: No. Richard Harpootlian, one of Murdaugh's lead attorneys, didn't mince words. In an email directly to the state's attorneys, he said, “We will not consent.” The state's request comes in response to a 121-page appeal filed by Murdaugh's legal team back in December. That appeal is no small document—it accuses former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill of jury tampering, questions the way evidence was presented, and basically asks the court to take a second look at one of the most widely followed trials in recent memory. The Supreme Court received both motions—the AG's request for time and the defense's refusal—but hasn't yet ruled on either. Murdaugh, the disbarred attorney turned convicted murderer, was sentenced to back-to-back life terms last year for the 2021 shooting deaths of his wife Maggie and son Paul. He has always denied involvement in the killings. His legal team filed for appeal last December, citing what they claim were serious errors during the trial, including that explosive allegation of jury tampering. Originally, the AG's Office had 90 days to respond to the appeal—a deadline they agreed on with the defense. That gave them until April 10. But now they want four more months, claiming the scope of the case is just too big to tackle in time. Their reasoning? For starters, the trial transcripts span over 6,000 pages. Add to that audio recordings, video exhibits, legal briefs, and side hearings, and you've got a mountain of material to review. The AG's team also says they're dealing with other major cases, including death penalty litigation, and their attorneys are simply stretched thin. But Murdaugh's side isn't buying it. They say this appeal has already been pending far too long. They point out that if the extension is granted, it will have taken the state an entire year to respond to their brief. They say they've never heard of that happening in any criminal case—capital or otherwise. They also argue that if the Attorney General's Office can't keep up with its caseload, they should hire outside help. With 90 attorneys on staff, the defense questions why this one case needs so much extra time. Then there's the most telling part: Murdaugh's lawyers say they believe the state's case won't hold up on appeal. They argue that dragging this out only delays justice—and that unless the AG's Office is hiding some blockbuster argument, the state's trying to stall a process that could ultimately lead to overturning the murder convictions. Let's be clear: even if Murdaugh wins this appeal, it doesn't mean he walks out of prison. He's already pleaded guilty to a laundry list of financial crimes—millions stolen from clients and colleagues—and those come with their own steep sentences. But overturning the murder convictions would shake up the legacy of a trial that gripped the country. Now, it's up to the South Carolina Supreme Court to decide whether the state deserves more time—or if the clock has already run out. #AlexMurdaugh #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #LegalNews #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

office murder crime trial supreme court catching sean combs attorney generals downfall murdaugh ad free alex murdaugh long enough stephen smith long island serial killer karen read bryan kohberger lucy letby ana walshe kouri richins lori daybell south carolina supreme court madeline kingsbury delphi murders inside malevolent mormon mommys colleton county clerk court becky hill

COJ #125 - What Happened To Alex Murdaugh's Roadside Shooting Case? + Why Buster Murdaugh's Latest Move Hurts His Case + Latest On Hulu Murdaugh Show

man rape incest mace exception state house abortion ban north charleston south carolina supreme court tyler boone

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 8, 2025 66:18

Investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell and attorney Eric Bland — (3:21) talk about the big reveal this past week of A-List Hollywood actor Jason Clarke in full costume as Alex Murdaugh. Clarke, who stars in the upcoming Hulu production based on the Murdaugh Murders Podcast — now True Sunlight Podcast — was seen filming in Atlanta and … let's just say he has more than just the LUNSHARK team excited for the series. It turns out the fake Alex Murdaugh wasn't the only one getting headlines this past week. The lawyers for the real (13:35) Alex did what the lawyers for the real Alex do best and that's getting mainstream media to help them wrongly paint the state Attorney General's Office as sneaky and underhanded. As usual, it's much ado about nothing. Also on the show, (34:08) will Buster Murdaugh's latest strategy in his federal defamation case against Warner Brothers actually work? Mandy and Liz pick Eric's brain on whether Alex's remaining son has a chance. Plus the latest in the (49:01) Sara Lynn Colucci case and why prosecutors need to rethink their interactions with victims and their families. Premium Episode Resources Deuxmoi's Instagram Post of Jason Clarke as Alex Murdaugh

Episode 349 - An abortion ban with no exception for rape or incest returns to the SC Statehouse - (3/7/25)

Holy City Sinner Radio

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 7, 2025 23:08

On today's show: 1. Special election set for North Charleston council seats left vacant after federal corruption charges - https://www.postandcourier.com/news/special-election-city-council-north-charleston-corruption/article_1fc4b324-f913-11ef-8ad3-5f940e39c70a.html 2. An abortion ban with no exception for rape or incest has come to the SC Statehouse - https://www.postandcourier.com/politics/abortion-ban-south-carolina-no-exceptions/article_e6ff9a92-f901-11ef-bc36-97efabaf3760.html 3. South Carolina Supreme Court rejects man's final appeal, clearing way for firing squad execution - https://apnews.com/article/firing-squad-brad-sigmon-south-carolina-execution-cab4c3e71f4e94e1004918193b2597a2 4. Man accused by Rep. Mace of being predator demands evidence or retraction in open letter - https://abcnews4.com/news/local/man-accused-by-rep-mace-of-being-predator-demands-evidence-or-retraction-in-open-letter-wciv-abc-news-4-house-of-representatives-south-carolina-house-floor-sexual-assault-eric-bland-state-law-enforcement-division-lowcountry-isle-of-palms-sullivans-island This episode's music is by Tyler Boone (tylerboonemusic.com). The episode was produced by LMC Soundsystem.

RM333: From Lifetime Registration to Tiered Systems: The SORA Shift

Registry Matters

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 4, 2025 42:23

In this episode of Registry Matters we cover the South Carolina Supreme Court upheld the revised PFR registration system, emphasizing legislative authority over individual rights. And then we cover the expansion of federal judgeships is mired in politics, impacting case resolution and judicial efficiency. [3:58] The South Carolina Supreme Court case McSwain challenges the constitutionality...

shift lifetime sora tiered pfr mcswain south carolina supreme court

Alex Murdaugh's Appeal: The Legal Battle That Could Change Everything

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 26, 2025 28:33

Alex Murdaugh's appeal is shaping up to be just as explosive as his trial, and we're diving deep into the legal battle that could change everything. With claims of jury tampering, courtroom misconduct, and the media's overwhelming influence, this case isn't just about guilt or innocence anymore—it's about whether the justice system itself was compromised. In this episode, we break down the strongest arguments in Murdaugh's appeal, the shocking allegations against court clerk Becky Hill, and what the South Carolina Supreme Court's ruling could mean for one of the most infamous murder cases in modern history. Did Becky Hill's alleged private conversations with jurors impact the verdict? Could the overwhelming media coverage have tainted the jury pool beyond repair? And if the Supreme Court grants a new trial, how could prosecutors and Murdaugh's defense team approach the case differently the second time around? We explore the high-stakes legal chess match playing out behind the scenes and the broader implications for the criminal justice system. From Netflix documentaries to social media-fueled speculation, the Murdaugh case has played out in front of millions. But beneath the headlines and viral clips lies a deeper story—one about power, corruption, and the fine line between justice and spectacle. Join us as we unpack the latest developments in the Murdaugh appeal, what the legal experts are saying, and how this case could set a precedent for high-profile trials in the digital age. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Alex Murdaugh's Appeal: The Legal Battle That Could Change Everything

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 26, 2025 28:33

Alex Murdaugh's appeal is shaping up to be just as explosive as his trial, and we're diving deep into the legal battle that could change everything. With claims of jury tampering, courtroom misconduct, and the media's overwhelming influence, this case isn't just about guilt or innocence anymore—it's about whether the justice system itself was compromised. In this episode, we break down the strongest arguments in Murdaugh's appeal, the shocking allegations against court clerk Becky Hill, and what the South Carolina Supreme Court's ruling could mean for one of the most infamous murder cases in modern history. Did Becky Hill's alleged private conversations with jurors impact the verdict? Could the overwhelming media coverage have tainted the jury pool beyond repair? And if the Supreme Court grants a new trial, how could prosecutors and Murdaugh's defense team approach the case differently the second time around? We explore the high-stakes legal chess match playing out behind the scenes and the broader implications for the criminal justice system. From Netflix documentaries to social media-fueled speculation, the Murdaugh case has played out in front of millions. But beneath the headlines and viral clips lies a deeper story—one about power, corruption, and the fine line between justice and spectacle. Join us as we unpack the latest developments in the Murdaugh appeal, what the legal experts are saying, and how this case could set a precedent for high-profile trials in the digital age. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Alex Murdaugh's Appeal: The Legal Battle That Could Change Everything

planned parenthood edt case no south carolina supreme court

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 26, 2025 28:33

Alex Murdaugh's Appeal: The Legal Battle That Could Change Everything Alex Murdaugh's appeal is shaping up to be just as explosive as his trial, and we're diving deep into the legal battle that could change everything. With claims of jury tampering, courtroom misconduct, and the media's overwhelming influence, this case isn't just about guilt or innocence anymore—it's about whether the justice system itself was compromised. In this episode, we break down the strongest arguments in Murdaugh's appeal, the shocking allegations against court clerk Becky Hill, and what the South Carolina Supreme Court's ruling could mean for one of the most infamous murder cases in modern history. Did Becky Hill's alleged private conversations with jurors impact the verdict? Could the overwhelming media coverage have tainted the jury pool beyond repair? And if the Supreme Court grants a new trial, how could prosecutors and Murdaugh's defense team approach the case differently the second time around? We explore the high-stakes legal chess match playing out behind the scenes and the broader implications for the criminal justice system. From Netflix documentaries to social media-fueled speculation, the Murdaugh case has played out in front of millions. But beneath the headlines and viral clips lies a deeper story—one about power, corruption, and the fine line between justice and spectacle. Join us as we unpack the latest developments in the Murdaugh appeal, what the legal experts are saying, and how this case could set a precedent for high-profile trials in the digital age. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

South Carolina Supreme Court Planned Parenthood v. South Carolina, Case No. 24-997

Audio Arguendo

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 18, 2025

Abortion: What does it mean for a fetal heartbeat to be detected? - Argued: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:37:42 EDT

Jury Tampering Allegations Bring Murdaugh Case to South Carolina Supreme Court-2024 Year in Review

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 25, 2024 10:36

This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Jury Tampering Allegations Bring Murdaugh Case to South Carolina Supreme Court-2024 Year in Review

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 25, 2024 10:36

This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Jury Tampering Allegations Bring Murdaugh Case to South Carolina Supreme Court-2024 Year in Review

The Murdaugh Family Murders: Impact of Influence

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 25, 2024 10:36

This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news. This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events. Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience. Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Alex Murdaugh Files Brief Outlining His Appeal. Does It Stand A Chance?

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 20, 2024 34:44

Alex Murdaugh filed a 132-page appellate brief that asks the South Carolina Supreme Court to overturn his convictions on the murder of his wife, Maggie and his youngest son, Paul. We discuss with Seton's father and attorney Matt Siembieda. Matt Siembieda is an attorney and law professor at Temple Law School. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime past and present from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and Youtub Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

stand influence impact files appeal outlining alex murdaugh seton matt harris paul murdaugh south carolina supreme court temple law school

Diddy's Latest Motions And Hearing. Alex Murdaugh Appeal. Becky Hill's Ethics Violations On Hold?

Get Legit Law & Sh!t

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 18, 2024 53:37

Use code emilybaker50 at https://www.GreenChef.com/emilybaker50 to get 50% off, plus 20% off your next two months.Visit https://thrivecausemetics.com/LAWNERD for 20% off your first order.Go to https://shopify.com/lawnerd now to grow your business – no matter what stage you're in.Diddy is denied Motion Seeking Discovery and Evidentiary Hearing related to alleged case leak information by the government. Diddy is allowed to have access to a laptop that doesn't have access to the internet so that he can review discovery information regarding his case from his lawyers.Alec Murdaugh filed his full appeal to the South Carolina Supreme Court as they have agreed to take up his case. This can change the standing law of the state that can overturn the verdict. The main grounds for appeal is that an elected official, Clerk of Court, Becky Hill, tampered with the jury. Becky Hill's 76 Ethics Complaints are on hold while the criminal investigation is in progress.RESOURCESLaffite New Trial - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aFD93lUr60 First Murdaugh Coverage - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPbdI4DO_yg https://www.youtube.com/@lunasharkmedia Alex Murdaugh Trial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gK8GOeWkGfi7acMnT-D0zaw Juror Speaks Out - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QZ0dDzioIg Becky Hill 76 Ethics Complaints - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I15TNtPfC3w Diddy Witness Intimidation - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMzcZLezpdkThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

court hearing ethics sean combs appeal motions violations clerk alex murdaugh green chef becky hill south carolina supreme court alec murdaugh podscribe

COJ #110 - Cups Up from Hollywood! + Alex Murdaugh's Long List of Grievances + Cory Fleming's First Prison Photo Is Out

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 17, 2024 52:21

Live from Hollywood! This week attorney Eric Bland asks investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell about their visit to to 'La La Land' and the writers' room of Hulu's upcoming scripted series based on the Murdaugh Murders Podcast. As always, there was a lot to talk about (including Eric's connection to the Luigi Mangione case?!). Last week, Alex Murdaugh filed a 132-page initial brief for his consolidated appeal in front of the South Carolina Supreme Court and … it's A LOT. Team Murdaugh went full Team Misdirection and added a number of new grievances while leaving out a lot of old context (no surprise there). Mandy, Liz and Eric talk about Alex's chances at getting a new trial and what his latest strategy seems to be. Also on the show, the first prison photo of Cory Fleming has emerged and, let's just say, Hot Summer Cory is officially over. Accountability is coming in all forms…

live hollywood mission prison accountability hulu new books peloton cups la la land grievances paperback llp alex murdaugh longlist marcia clark premium members south carolina supreme court eric bland cory fleming murdaugh murders podcast

Appeal Raises New Questions in Alex Murdaugh Murder Convictions

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 13, 2024 16:09

Alex Murdaugh's defense team has filed a 132-page appeal to the South Carolina Supreme Court, seeking to overturn his convictions for the 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. Central to the appeal are allegations of misconduct by court clerk Becky Hill and claims that the trial judge erred in allowing evidence of Murdaugh's financial crimes to be presented to the jury. The disgraced attorney, once a prominent figure in South Carolina's legal world, is serving life in prison after being found guilty of the brutal killings. Murdaugh has consistently denied committing the murders, including during his emotional testimony at trial. Defense attorneys Jim Griffin and Dick Harpootlian argue that the integrity of the trial was compromised by Hill's alleged behavior. They cite testimony from jurors and other witnesses claiming Hill encouraged jurors to closely scrutinize Murdaugh's testimony, implying his guilt. According to the appeal, Hill suggested that a guilty verdict would enhance the sales of her book about the trial. “Providing Murdaugh with the fair trial that every citizen of South Carolina would expect for himself is necessary to assure all that no one — powerful or humble, innocent or guilty, hated or beloved — is proscribed from due process and the equal protection of the law,” the defense wrote in the appeal. Earlier this year, Judge Jean Toal determined that Hill's actions, while “foolish” and motivated by publicity, did not actively change jurors' minds. However, Murdaugh's lawyers contend that the appearance of impropriety is sufficient grounds for overturning the convictions. The appeal also challenges the admissibility of evidence related to Murdaugh's financial crimes, which prosecutors argued provided a motive for the killings. The trial judge, Clifton Newman, allowed the jury to hear six days of testimony about Murdaugh's theft from clients and his law firm, reasoning that it demonstrated his “desperation” to divert attention from his financial misdeeds. The defense maintains that the inclusion of financial crime evidence was prejudicial and unnecessary, writing, “The State was improperly permitted to introduce evidence of Murdaugh's alleged financial crimes solely to impugn his character to bolster its otherwise weak case.” Physical evidence linking Murdaugh to the murders was minimal, the appeal asserts. The weapons used in the crimes were never found, and only small amounts of blood were detected on Murdaugh's clothes. Defense attorneys also questioned the reliability of forensic evidence presented during the trial, including an investigator's unrecorded experiments with an iPhone to support the prosecution's theory about Maggie's phone. Prosecutors have yet to respond to the appeal. The South Carolina Supreme Court will review the arguments, along with extensive materials from the six-week trial. A hearing is not expected for several months. Even if the convictions are overturned, Murdaugh is unlikely to regain his freedom. He is serving an additional 40-year sentence for financial crimes after pleading guilty to embezzling millions from clients and his law firm. As part of his plea agreement, Murdaugh waived his right to appeal those convictions. The case has captivated public attention due to Murdaugh's once-powerful family's influence in South Carolina's legal community and the shocking allegations of betrayal and violence. #AlexMurdaugh #MurderTrial #LegalAppeal #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #BeckyHill Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Appeal Raises New Questions in Alex Murdaugh Murder Convictions

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 13, 2024 16:09

Alex Murdaugh's defense team has filed a 132-page appeal to the South Carolina Supreme Court, seeking to overturn his convictions for the 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. Central to the appeal are allegations of misconduct by court clerk Becky Hill and claims that the trial judge erred in allowing evidence of Murdaugh's financial crimes to be presented to the jury. The disgraced attorney, once a prominent figure in South Carolina's legal world, is serving life in prison after being found guilty of the brutal killings. Murdaugh has consistently denied committing the murders, including during his emotional testimony at trial. Defense attorneys Jim Griffin and Dick Harpootlian argue that the integrity of the trial was compromised by Hill's alleged behavior. They cite testimony from jurors and other witnesses claiming Hill encouraged jurors to closely scrutinize Murdaugh's testimony, implying his guilt. According to the appeal, Hill suggested that a guilty verdict would enhance the sales of her book about the trial. “Providing Murdaugh with the fair trial that every citizen of South Carolina would expect for himself is necessary to assure all that no one — powerful or humble, innocent or guilty, hated or beloved — is proscribed from due process and the equal protection of the law,” the defense wrote in the appeal. Earlier this year, Judge Jean Toal determined that Hill's actions, while “foolish” and motivated by publicity, did not actively change jurors' minds. However, Murdaugh's lawyers contend that the appearance of impropriety is sufficient grounds for overturning the convictions. The appeal also challenges the admissibility of evidence related to Murdaugh's financial crimes, which prosecutors argued provided a motive for the killings. The trial judge, Clifton Newman, allowed the jury to hear six days of testimony about Murdaugh's theft from clients and his law firm, reasoning that it demonstrated his “desperation” to divert attention from his financial misdeeds. The defense maintains that the inclusion of financial crime evidence was prejudicial and unnecessary, writing, “The State was improperly permitted to introduce evidence of Murdaugh's alleged financial crimes solely to impugn his character to bolster its otherwise weak case.” Physical evidence linking Murdaugh to the murders was minimal, the appeal asserts. The weapons used in the crimes were never found, and only small amounts of blood were detected on Murdaugh's clothes. Defense attorneys also questioned the reliability of forensic evidence presented during the trial, including an investigator's unrecorded experiments with an iPhone to support the prosecution's theory about Maggie's phone. Prosecutors have yet to respond to the appeal. The South Carolina Supreme Court will review the arguments, along with extensive materials from the six-week trial. A hearing is not expected for several months. Even if the convictions are overturned, Murdaugh is unlikely to regain his freedom. He is serving an additional 40-year sentence for financial crimes after pleading guilty to embezzling millions from clients and his law firm. As part of his plea agreement, Murdaugh waived his right to appeal those convictions. The case has captivated public attention due to Murdaugh's once-powerful family's influence in South Carolina's legal community and the shocking allegations of betrayal and violence. #AlexMurdaugh #MurderTrial #LegalAppeal #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #BeckyHill Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Appeal Raises New Questions in Alex Murdaugh Murder Convictions

My Crazy Family | A Podcast of Crazy Family Stories

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 13, 2024 16:09

Alex Murdaugh's defense team has filed a 132-page appeal to the South Carolina Supreme Court, seeking to overturn his convictions for the 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. Central to the appeal are allegations of misconduct by court clerk Becky Hill and claims that the trial judge erred in allowing evidence of Murdaugh's financial crimes to be presented to the jury. The disgraced attorney, once a prominent figure in South Carolina's legal world, is serving life in prison after being found guilty of the brutal killings. Murdaugh has consistently denied committing the murders, including during his emotional testimony at trial. Defense attorneys Jim Griffin and Dick Harpootlian argue that the integrity of the trial was compromised by Hill's alleged behavior. They cite testimony from jurors and other witnesses claiming Hill encouraged jurors to closely scrutinize Murdaugh's testimony, implying his guilt. According to the appeal, Hill suggested that a guilty verdict would enhance the sales of her book about the trial. “Providing Murdaugh with the fair trial that every citizen of South Carolina would expect for himself is necessary to assure all that no one — powerful or humble, innocent or guilty, hated or beloved — is proscribed from due process and the equal protection of the law,” the defense wrote in the appeal. Earlier this year, Judge Jean Toal determined that Hill's actions, while “foolish” and motivated by publicity, did not actively change jurors' minds. However, Murdaugh's lawyers contend that the appearance of impropriety is sufficient grounds for overturning the convictions. The appeal also challenges the admissibility of evidence related to Murdaugh's financial crimes, which prosecutors argued provided a motive for the killings. The trial judge, Clifton Newman, allowed the jury to hear six days of testimony about Murdaugh's theft from clients and his law firm, reasoning that it demonstrated his “desperation” to divert attention from his financial misdeeds. The defense maintains that the inclusion of financial crime evidence was prejudicial and unnecessary, writing, “The State was improperly permitted to introduce evidence of Murdaugh's alleged financial crimes solely to impugn his character to bolster its otherwise weak case.” Physical evidence linking Murdaugh to the murders was minimal, the appeal asserts. The weapons used in the crimes were never found, and only small amounts of blood were detected on Murdaugh's clothes. Defense attorneys also questioned the reliability of forensic evidence presented during the trial, including an investigator's unrecorded experiments with an iPhone to support the prosecution's theory about Maggie's phone. Prosecutors have yet to respond to the appeal. The South Carolina Supreme Court will review the arguments, along with extensive materials from the six-week trial. A hearing is not expected for several months. Even if the convictions are overturned, Murdaugh is unlikely to regain his freedom. He is serving an additional 40-year sentence for financial crimes after pleading guilty to embezzling millions from clients and his law firm. As part of his plea agreement, Murdaugh waived his right to appeal those convictions. The case has captivated public attention due to Murdaugh's once-powerful family's influence in South Carolina's legal community and the shocking allegations of betrayal and violence. #AlexMurdaugh #MurderTrial #LegalAppeal #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #BeckyHill Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Appeal Raises New Questions in Alex Murdaugh Murder Convictions

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 13, 2024 16:09

Alex Murdaugh's defense team has filed a 132-page appeal to the South Carolina Supreme Court, seeking to overturn his convictions for the 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. Central to the appeal are allegations of misconduct by court clerk Becky Hill and claims that the trial judge erred in allowing evidence of Murdaugh's financial crimes to be presented to the jury. The disgraced attorney, once a prominent figure in South Carolina's legal world, is serving life in prison after being found guilty of the brutal killings. Murdaugh has consistently denied committing the murders, including during his emotional testimony at trial. Defense attorneys Jim Griffin and Dick Harpootlian argue that the integrity of the trial was compromised by Hill's alleged behavior. They cite testimony from jurors and other witnesses claiming Hill encouraged jurors to closely scrutinize Murdaugh's testimony, implying his guilt. According to the appeal, Hill suggested that a guilty verdict would enhance the sales of her book about the trial. “Providing Murdaugh with the fair trial that every citizen of South Carolina would expect for himself is necessary to assure all that no one — powerful or humble, innocent or guilty, hated or beloved — is proscribed from due process and the equal protection of the law,” the defense wrote in the appeal. Earlier this year, Judge Jean Toal determined that Hill's actions, while “foolish” and motivated by publicity, did not actively change jurors' minds. However, Murdaugh's lawyers contend that the appearance of impropriety is sufficient grounds for overturning the convictions. The appeal also challenges the admissibility of evidence related to Murdaugh's financial crimes, which prosecutors argued provided a motive for the killings. The trial judge, Clifton Newman, allowed the jury to hear six days of testimony about Murdaugh's theft from clients and his law firm, reasoning that it demonstrated his “desperation” to divert attention from his financial misdeeds. The defense maintains that the inclusion of financial crime evidence was prejudicial and unnecessary, writing, “The State was improperly permitted to introduce evidence of Murdaugh's alleged financial crimes solely to impugn his character to bolster its otherwise weak case.” Physical evidence linking Murdaugh to the murders was minimal, the appeal asserts. The weapons used in the crimes were never found, and only small amounts of blood were detected on Murdaugh's clothes. Defense attorneys also questioned the reliability of forensic evidence presented during the trial, including an investigator's unrecorded experiments with an iPhone to support the prosecution's theory about Maggie's phone. Prosecutors have yet to respond to the appeal. The South Carolina Supreme Court will review the arguments, along with extensive materials from the six-week trial. A hearing is not expected for several months. Even if the convictions are overturned, Murdaugh is unlikely to regain his freedom. He is serving an additional 40-year sentence for financial crimes after pleading guilty to embezzling millions from clients and his law firm. As part of his plea agreement, Murdaugh waived his right to appeal those convictions. The case has captivated public attention due to Murdaugh's once-powerful family's influence in South Carolina's legal community and the shocking allegations of betrayal and violence. #AlexMurdaugh #MurderTrial #LegalAppeal #SouthCarolina #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #BeckyHill Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Episode 323 - Family of CEO shooting suspect Luigi Mangione has ties to Charleston - (12/13/24)

Holy City Sinner Radio

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 13, 2024 23:06

On today's show: 1. Family of CEO shooting suspect Luigi Mangione has ties to Charleston, city's art scene https://www.postandcourier.com/news/luigi-mangione-ceo-murder-ties-charleston-sc/article_c29f422e-b76b-11ef-beed-eb9ca72586ac.html 2. Rep. Nancy Mace says she was ‘physically accosted' on Capitol grounds - https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/10/politics/nancy-mace-says-she-was-physically-accosted?cid=ios_app 2a. Foster advocacy group denies that arrested member assaulted Rep. Nancy Mace - https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/12/11/assault-nancy-mace-congress-arrest/ 3. Convicted killer Alex Murdaugh files appeal of double-murder conviction - https://abcnews4.com/news/local/convicted-killer-alex-murdaugh-files-appeal-of-double-murder-conviction-paul-maggie-buster-murdaugh-hampton-county-colleton-county-wciv-abc-news-4 3a. Murdaugh files appeal of double murder conviction with SC Supreme Court - https://www.live5news.com/2024/12/11/murdaugh-files-appeal-double-murder-conviction-with-sc-supreme-court/ 4. Summerville High School to play in state championship game, no school Friday - https://www.live5news.com/app/2024/12/11/summerville-high-school-play-state-championship-game-no-school-friday/ This episode's music is by Tyler Boone (tylerboonemusic.com). The episode was produced by LMC Soundsystem.

ceo family shooting capitol foster charleston luigi ties suspect convicted murdaugh mangione alex murdaugh nancy mace south carolina supreme court tyler boone summerville high school

South Carolina Supreme Court to Review Jury Tampering Allegations in Murdaugh Murder Trial

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 12, 2024 7:43

Convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh has launched a new bid for freedom, filing an appeal to overturn his convictions for the brutal 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. This latest development, a meticulously crafted 121-page document submitted to the South Carolina Supreme Court, alleges jury tampering by Becky Hill, the former clerk of court for Colleton County. The appeal raises questions about judicial integrity, challenging the fairness of one of the most high-profile trials in recent history. Allegations of Jury Tampering Murdaugh, once a scion of South Carolina's powerful Low Country legal dynasty, is serving two consecutive life sentences for the killings, convictions handed down after a jury deliberated for less than three hours. His legal team now claims that Hill, who resigned earlier this year under a cloud of ethics violations, improperly influenced the jury. Allegations include Hill's private conversations with jurors about Murdaugh's guilt and advice to “watch his body language.” These accusations include claims that Hill entered the jury room during deliberations, a breach of protocol that contradicts judicial procedures meant to ensure impartiality. Hill's actions have drawn further scrutiny due to her decision to publish a book, Behind the Doors of Justice, shortly after the trial. While the book reportedly earned her significant financial gains, it has since been removed from circulation. Critics argue that her financial and public aspirations created a conflict of interest, compromising the sanctity of the trial process. Murdaugh's attorneys argue that Hill's actions should result in a mistrial, emphasizing that interference of this nature cannot stand in a court of law, particularly in such a critical case. The appeal also revives debates about the evidence used during the trial. Central to Murdaugh's conviction was damning cell phone data that placed him at the Moselle estate near the time of the murders. Prosecutors presented a chilling narrative: Murdaugh ambushed his son, Paul, in the kennel area, shooting him twice with a shotgun before using a .300 Blackout semi-automatic rifle on Maggie, firing five times even as she collapsed to her knees. The brutal nature of the killings and the forensic evidence presented were pivotal in securing the guilty verdict. Murdaugh's defense contends that the jury's ability to fairly weigh this evidence was compromised by Hill's alleged misconduct. They argue that her reported comments to jurors introduced bias, undermining the principle of impartiality. Hill's alleged ethical lapses extend beyond the Murdaugh trial. In June, South Carolina officials filed ethics violations against her, citing misuse of county funds, unauthorized bonuses, and orchestrating a photograph of Murdaugh in his holding cell—a move that further sensationalized an already high-profile case. Hill has denied wrongdoing related to the trial, stating that her resignation in March was prompted by public scrutiny and a desire to focus on her family. Nevertheless, these allegations have fueled debates about the integrity of Murdaugh's conviction. Legal experts and the public alike are grappling with the implications of a trial potentially compromised by personal ambition and ethical violations. The murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh shocked South Carolina and drew national attention, partly due to the family's storied history. For nearly a century, the Murdaughs wielded unparalleled influence as solicitors and district attorneys in the Low Country region. That legacy began to unravel with revelations of Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes. Concurrent with his murder convictions, Murdaugh was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison for defrauding clients of millions. Prosecutors accused him of exploiting vulnerable clients to fund a lavish lifestyle. At sentencing, Murdaugh expressed remorse but offered little solace to those he'd wronged. The Supreme Court Steps In In January, Murdaugh's defense first raised the issue of jury tampering with former South Carolina Chief Justice Jean Toal, who dismissed the allegations, citing insufficient evidence to prove the comments swayed the verdict. However, in August, the Supreme Court overturned Toal's decision, agreeing to consider whether the alleged tampering merits a retrial. Legal analysts have noted that the court's decision to review the matter reflects the seriousness of the allegations and their potential to undermine public confidence in the justice system. Public opinion remains sharply divided. To some, Murdaugh's appeal is a desperate ploy from a man already convicted of heinous crimes. To others, the allegations against Hill represent a betrayal of judicial ethics that, if proven, could undermine the legitimacy of the verdict. As the Supreme Court prepares to deliberate, the implications are clear: justice must not only be done but be seen to be done. Murdaugh's legal team is also contesting the inclusion of his financial crimes during the murder trial, arguing that the evidence prejudiced the jury by portraying him as morally bankrupt. Prosecutors counter that the financial pressures Murdaugh faced provided a motive for the murders, a theory central to their case. The inclusion of this evidence remains a contentious point that could play a pivotal role in the Supreme Court's decision. Legal experts continue to debate whether admitting financial crimes was necessary to understand Murdaugh's motives or whether it unfairly tainted the jury's perception of him. As South Carolina awaits the court's ruling, the Murdaugh saga continues to captivate and polarize. At its core lies a complex interplay of privilege, power, and justice, with each development adding new layers of intrigue. Whether this appeal will result in a retrial or reaffirm the convictions, one thing is certain: the reverberations of this case will be felt for years to come. The outcome will not only determine Murdaugh's future but also set a precedent for addressing allegations of misconduct in high-stakes trials, ensuring the integrity of the justice system remains uncompromised. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

South Carolina Supreme Court to Review Jury Tampering Allegations in Murdaugh Murder Trial

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 12, 2024 7:43

Convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh has launched a new bid for freedom, filing an appeal to overturn his convictions for the brutal 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. This latest development, a meticulously crafted 121-page document submitted to the South Carolina Supreme Court, alleges jury tampering by Becky Hill, the former clerk of court for Colleton County. The appeal raises questions about judicial integrity, challenging the fairness of one of the most high-profile trials in recent history. Allegations of Jury Tampering Murdaugh, once a scion of South Carolina's powerful Low Country legal dynasty, is serving two consecutive life sentences for the killings, convictions handed down after a jury deliberated for less than three hours. His legal team now claims that Hill, who resigned earlier this year under a cloud of ethics violations, improperly influenced the jury. Allegations include Hill's private conversations with jurors about Murdaugh's guilt and advice to “watch his body language.” These accusations include claims that Hill entered the jury room during deliberations, a breach of protocol that contradicts judicial procedures meant to ensure impartiality. Hill's actions have drawn further scrutiny due to her decision to publish a book, Behind the Doors of Justice, shortly after the trial. While the book reportedly earned her significant financial gains, it has since been removed from circulation. Critics argue that her financial and public aspirations created a conflict of interest, compromising the sanctity of the trial process. Murdaugh's attorneys argue that Hill's actions should result in a mistrial, emphasizing that interference of this nature cannot stand in a court of law, particularly in such a critical case. The appeal also revives debates about the evidence used during the trial. Central to Murdaugh's conviction was damning cell phone data that placed him at the Moselle estate near the time of the murders. Prosecutors presented a chilling narrative: Murdaugh ambushed his son, Paul, in the kennel area, shooting him twice with a shotgun before using a .300 Blackout semi-automatic rifle on Maggie, firing five times even as she collapsed to her knees. The brutal nature of the killings and the forensic evidence presented were pivotal in securing the guilty verdict. Murdaugh's defense contends that the jury's ability to fairly weigh this evidence was compromised by Hill's alleged misconduct. They argue that her reported comments to jurors introduced bias, undermining the principle of impartiality. Hill's alleged ethical lapses extend beyond the Murdaugh trial. In June, South Carolina officials filed ethics violations against her, citing misuse of county funds, unauthorized bonuses, and orchestrating a photograph of Murdaugh in his holding cell—a move that further sensationalized an already high-profile case. Hill has denied wrongdoing related to the trial, stating that her resignation in March was prompted by public scrutiny and a desire to focus on her family. Nevertheless, these allegations have fueled debates about the integrity of Murdaugh's conviction. Legal experts and the public alike are grappling with the implications of a trial potentially compromised by personal ambition and ethical violations. The murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh shocked South Carolina and drew national attention, partly due to the family's storied history. For nearly a century, the Murdaughs wielded unparalleled influence as solicitors and district attorneys in the Low Country region. That legacy began to unravel with revelations of Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes. Concurrent with his murder convictions, Murdaugh was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison for defrauding clients of millions. Prosecutors accused him of exploiting vulnerable clients to fund a lavish lifestyle. At sentencing, Murdaugh expressed remorse but offered little solace to those he'd wronged. The Supreme Court Steps In In January, Murdaugh's defense first raised the issue of jury tampering with former South Carolina Chief Justice Jean Toal, who dismissed the allegations, citing insufficient evidence to prove the comments swayed the verdict. However, in August, the Supreme Court overturned Toal's decision, agreeing to consider whether the alleged tampering merits a retrial. Legal analysts have noted that the court's decision to review the matter reflects the seriousness of the allegations and their potential to undermine public confidence in the justice system. Public opinion remains sharply divided. To some, Murdaugh's appeal is a desperate ploy from a man already convicted of heinous crimes. To others, the allegations against Hill represent a betrayal of judicial ethics that, if proven, could undermine the legitimacy of the verdict. As the Supreme Court prepares to deliberate, the implications are clear: justice must not only be done but be seen to be done. Murdaugh's legal team is also contesting the inclusion of his financial crimes during the murder trial, arguing that the evidence prejudiced the jury by portraying him as morally bankrupt. Prosecutors counter that the financial pressures Murdaugh faced provided a motive for the murders, a theory central to their case. The inclusion of this evidence remains a contentious point that could play a pivotal role in the Supreme Court's decision. Legal experts continue to debate whether admitting financial crimes was necessary to understand Murdaugh's motives or whether it unfairly tainted the jury's perception of him. As South Carolina awaits the court's ruling, the Murdaugh saga continues to captivate and polarize. At its core lies a complex interplay of privilege, power, and justice, with each development adding new layers of intrigue. Whether this appeal will result in a retrial or reaffirm the convictions, one thing is certain: the reverberations of this case will be felt for years to come. The outcome will not only determine Murdaugh's future but also set a precedent for addressing allegations of misconduct in high-stakes trials, ensuring the integrity of the justice system remains uncompromised. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

South Carolina Supreme Court to Review Jury Tampering Allegations in Murdaugh Murder Trial

The Murdaugh Family Murders: Impact of Influence

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 12, 2024 7:43

Convicted murderer Alex Murdaugh has launched a new bid for freedom, filing an appeal to overturn his convictions for the brutal 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul. This latest development, a meticulously crafted 121-page document submitted to the South Carolina Supreme Court, alleges jury tampering by Becky Hill, the former clerk of court for Colleton County. The appeal raises questions about judicial integrity, challenging the fairness of one of the most high-profile trials in recent history. Allegations of Jury Tampering Murdaugh, once a scion of South Carolina's powerful Low Country legal dynasty, is serving two consecutive life sentences for the killings, convictions handed down after a jury deliberated for less than three hours. His legal team now claims that Hill, who resigned earlier this year under a cloud of ethics violations, improperly influenced the jury. Allegations include Hill's private conversations with jurors about Murdaugh's guilt and advice to “watch his body language.” These accusations include claims that Hill entered the jury room during deliberations, a breach of protocol that contradicts judicial procedures meant to ensure impartiality. Hill's actions have drawn further scrutiny due to her decision to publish a book, Behind the Doors of Justice, shortly after the trial. While the book reportedly earned her significant financial gains, it has since been removed from circulation. Critics argue that her financial and public aspirations created a conflict of interest, compromising the sanctity of the trial process. Murdaugh's attorneys argue that Hill's actions should result in a mistrial, emphasizing that interference of this nature cannot stand in a court of law, particularly in such a critical case. The appeal also revives debates about the evidence used during the trial. Central to Murdaugh's conviction was damning cell phone data that placed him at the Moselle estate near the time of the murders. Prosecutors presented a chilling narrative: Murdaugh ambushed his son, Paul, in the kennel area, shooting him twice with a shotgun before using a .300 Blackout semi-automatic rifle on Maggie, firing five times even as she collapsed to her knees. The brutal nature of the killings and the forensic evidence presented were pivotal in securing the guilty verdict. Murdaugh's defense contends that the jury's ability to fairly weigh this evidence was compromised by Hill's alleged misconduct. They argue that her reported comments to jurors introduced bias, undermining the principle of impartiality. Hill's alleged ethical lapses extend beyond the Murdaugh trial. In June, South Carolina officials filed ethics violations against her, citing misuse of county funds, unauthorized bonuses, and orchestrating a photograph of Murdaugh in his holding cell—a move that further sensationalized an already high-profile case. Hill has denied wrongdoing related to the trial, stating that her resignation in March was prompted by public scrutiny and a desire to focus on her family. Nevertheless, these allegations have fueled debates about the integrity of Murdaugh's conviction. Legal experts and the public alike are grappling with the implications of a trial potentially compromised by personal ambition and ethical violations. The murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh shocked South Carolina and drew national attention, partly due to the family's storied history. For nearly a century, the Murdaughs wielded unparalleled influence as solicitors and district attorneys in the Low Country region. That legacy began to unravel with revelations of Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes. Concurrent with his murder convictions, Murdaugh was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison for defrauding clients of millions. Prosecutors accused him of exploiting vulnerable clients to fund a lavish lifestyle. At sentencing, Murdaugh expressed remorse but offered little solace to those he'd wronged. The Supreme Court Steps In In January, Murdaugh's defense first raised the issue of jury tampering with former South Carolina Chief Justice Jean Toal, who dismissed the allegations, citing insufficient evidence to prove the comments swayed the verdict. However, in August, the Supreme Court overturned Toal's decision, agreeing to consider whether the alleged tampering merits a retrial. Legal analysts have noted that the court's decision to review the matter reflects the seriousness of the allegations and their potential to undermine public confidence in the justice system. Public opinion remains sharply divided. To some, Murdaugh's appeal is a desperate ploy from a man already convicted of heinous crimes. To others, the allegations against Hill represent a betrayal of judicial ethics that, if proven, could undermine the legitimacy of the verdict. As the Supreme Court prepares to deliberate, the implications are clear: justice must not only be done but be seen to be done. Murdaugh's legal team is also contesting the inclusion of his financial crimes during the murder trial, arguing that the evidence prejudiced the jury by portraying him as morally bankrupt. Prosecutors counter that the financial pressures Murdaugh faced provided a motive for the murders, a theory central to their case. The inclusion of this evidence remains a contentious point that could play a pivotal role in the Supreme Court's decision. Legal experts continue to debate whether admitting financial crimes was necessary to understand Murdaugh's motives or whether it unfairly tainted the jury's perception of him. As South Carolina awaits the court's ruling, the Murdaugh saga continues to captivate and polarize. At its core lies a complex interplay of privilege, power, and justice, with each development adding new layers of intrigue. Whether this appeal will result in a retrial or reaffirm the convictions, one thing is certain: the reverberations of this case will be felt for years to come. The outcome will not only determine Murdaugh's future but also set a precedent for addressing allegations of misconduct in high-stakes trials, ensuring the integrity of the justice system remains uncompromised. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Attorney for Dismissed Murdaugh Juror Asks SC Supreme Court To Unseal Records

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 20, 2024 30:26

Joe McCulloch is the attorney for Myra Crosby. Crosby is also known as the "egg juror' and "juror 785". Crosby was dismissed from the Murdaugh jury just hours before deliberation. McCulloch, on Crosby's behalf, has petitioned the South Carolina Supreme Court to give a reason as why the court has not allowed certain parts of the Murdaugh murder trial proceedings, including en camera discussions between Judge Newman and his client, to be released to the public. McCulloch maintains it is a violation of his client's rights to not have those records released. The full interview with Myra Crosby is available in the August 28th episode "Dismissed Murdaugh Juror Speaks Out" Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime past and present from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and Youtube. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

influence impact records attorney jurors dismissed murdaugh mcculloch matt harris paul murdaugh south carolina supreme court

The Latest On Alex Murdaugh's Request For A New Murder Trial From SC Supreme Court

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 22, 2024 21:05

On this episode, Tony Brueski digs into the explosive new developments surrounding Alex Murdaugh's murder trial. With the South Carolina Supreme Court agreeing to review the case, the question of jury tampering has taken center stage. Former jurors reveal behind-the-scenes interactions with court clerk Rebecca Hill, raising serious concerns about fairness and ethics in the courtroom. Could these revelations be the key to Murdaugh's shot at a new trial—or just another twist in his ongoing legal saga? From courtroom drama to public scrutiny, Tony breaks down the latest developments and what they mean for Murdaugh's future—and for the public's trust in the justice system. Stay with us as we unravel the tangled web of power, betrayal, and redemption in one of the most gripping legal battles in recent memory. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

murder crime trial catching sean combs downfall murdaugh murder trial ad free alex murdaugh stephen smith long island serial killer karen read bryan kohberger lucy letby ana walshe kouri richins lori daybell south carolina supreme court madeline kingsbury tony brueski delphi murders inside malevolent mormon mommys

The Latest On Alex Murdaugh's Request For A New Murder Trial From SC Supreme Court

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 22, 2024 21:05

On this episode, Tony Brueski digs into the explosive new developments surrounding Alex Murdaugh's murder trial. With the South Carolina Supreme Court agreeing to review the case, the question of jury tampering has taken center stage. Former jurors reveal behind-the-scenes interactions with court clerk Rebecca Hill, raising serious concerns about fairness and ethics in the courtroom. Could these revelations be the key to Murdaugh's shot at a new trial—or just another twist in his ongoing legal saga? From courtroom drama to public scrutiny, Tony breaks down the latest developments and what they mean for Murdaugh's future—and for the public's trust in the justice system. Stay with us as we unravel the tangled web of power, betrayal, and redemption in one of the most gripping legal battles in recent memory. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

murder crime trial catching sean combs downfall murdaugh murder trial ad free alex murdaugh stephen smith long island serial killer karen read bryan kohberger lucy letby ana walshe kouri richins lori daybell south carolina supreme court madeline kingsbury tony brueski delphi murders inside malevolent mormon mommys

More Alex Murdaugh Jurors Speak Out Against Becky Hill's Behavior & Confirm Jury Tampering

The Murdaugh Family Murders: Impact of Influence

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 15, 2024 12:08

In this gripping episode of True Crime Deep Dive, we explore the latest twist in the notorious case of Alex Murdaugh, the disgraced attorney convicted of murdering his wife and son. After being sentenced to life without parole, Murdaugh's legal team is now pushing for a new trial, alleging jury tampering involving former court clerk Rebecca Hill. As doubts emerge from key jurors and the South Carolina Supreme Court agrees to review the case, we take you through the unsettling details of the trial, the accusations of misconduct, and the questions still looming. Could this be the beginning of a new chapter in one of America's most shocking crime stories? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Mini Murdaugh Update

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 25, 2024 9:28

The South Carolina Supreme Court gave new instructions to Alex Murdaugh's defense team. Plus updates on the Mallory Beach family's case against Parkers. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime past and present fro the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and Youtube. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

influence impact murdaugh alex murdaugh parkers matt harris paul murdaugh south carolina supreme court mallory beach

COJ #99 - Buster Murdaugh Defamation Case Defendants Finally Speak Out + Dick Harpootlian's Sunlight Scheme

ohio minnesota discord pastor democrats minneapolis candidates pope francis atheists andy beshear hemant south carolina supreme court kentucky gov

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 24, 2024 63:55

Cup of Justice Co-hosts Mandy Matney, Liz Farrell and Eric Bland — have returned to their respective studios for the latest episode of Cup of Justice in which there was A LOT to talk about. Over the past few weeks there have been several court filings, including in Alex Murdaugh's murder conviction appeal. Dick Harpootlian suddenly has love for more sunlight in this case and is advocating for the South Carolina Supreme Court to unseal SLED's investigation into Juror 785 … you know, the Egg Lady juror, who was dismissed from Alex's jury WITHOUT objection from Dick. It's not clear what Team Murdaugh wants the public to see, but we're sure it's more distraction and nonsense. Filings in Buster Murdaugh's defamation case accuse Buster and his attorney of misrepresenting the words of a Hampton County reporter in a Netflix documentary that aired last year. As the big name production companies fight to move Buster's case to federal court, Buster's team has promised to push back. Also on the show, the P Diddy case spotlights a hard truth: People knew bad things were happening, making bystanders nothing more than accomplices. Premium Members get an extra discussion on capital punishment and a deeper dive into the P-Diddy situation... But also!! Premium Members will get a LIVE Virtual Broadcast of our 100th Episode of COJ - open to all Premium Members! Join us Friday, September 27th at 7pm ET on an unlisted YouTube link to be released on your premium feed this week - join today at lunashark.supercast.com. Premium Members also get access to episode videos, case files, live trial coverage and exclusive live experiences with our hosts. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. Check out Luna Shark Merch With a Mission shop at lunasharkmerch.com/ What We're Buying... Lumen - https://www.lumen.me/coj for 15% off your purchase. Your metabolic health, in your hands. Understand your unique metabolism, promote fat burn, lose weight, and boost energy naturally. CBDistillery - https://cbdistillery.com with code “COJ” for 20% off. No fluff. No fillers. Just pure, effective cannabinoid products. Over 43,000 Verified Reviews. 60-Day Money-Back Guarantee. Free Shipping Over $75. Subscribe & Save Up To 30% Here's a link to some of our favorite things: https://amzn.to/4cJ0eVn Find us on social media: Twitter.com/mandymatney - Twitter.com/elizfarrell - Twitter.com/theericbland https://www.facebook.com/cupofjustice/ | https://www.instagram.com/cojpod/ YouTube TIKTOK SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBM *** Alert: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email info@lunasharkmedia.com and we'll send fun merch to the first listener that finds something that needs to be adjusted! *** *The views expressed on the Cup of Justice bonus episodes do not constitute legal advice. Listeners desiring legal advice for any particular legal matter are urged to consult an attorney of their choosing who can provide legal advice based upon a full understanding of the facts and circumstances of their claim. The views expressed on the Cup of Justice episodes also do not express the views or opinions of Bland Richter, LLP, or its attorneys. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Ep. 549 - Pope Francis: Both Candidates are "Against Life"

Friendly Atheist Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 19, 2024 77:52

Patreon supporters who give $5 a month will get an ad-free version of the show! Join our private Facebook group and Discord server! Jessica and I spoke about several stories from the past week involving religion and politics. — Hemant will be speaking in Minneapolis on Saturday, Sep. 21. More details are here! — Pope Francis pushes false claim that both presidential candidates are "against life." (3:15) — Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear courageously bans "conversion therapy" on minors. (14:08) — Pastor claims he miraculously cured a man hospitalized due to voting for Democrats. (26:05) — In Ohio, taxpayer dollars are being used to expand Christian schools. (36:56) — South Carolina Supreme Court strikes down voucher scheme giving tax dollars to private schools. (47:40) — Atheists to court: It's okay to ban "faith statements" in taxpayer-funded Minnesota program. (55:31) SPONSOR: Sign up at butcherbox.com/friendly and use code friendly to get chicken breast, salmon or ground beef FREE in every order for a year plus $20 off your first order! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Ep. 549 - Pope Francis: Both Candidates are "Against Life"

Friendly Atheist Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 19, 2024 71:22

Patreon supporters who give $5 a month will get an ad-free version of the show!Join our private Facebook group and Discord server!Jessica and I spoke about several stories from the past week involving religion and politics.— Hemant will be speaking in Minneapolis on Saturday, Sep. 21. More details are here! — Pope Francis pushes false claim that both presidential candidates are "against life." (3:15)— Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear courageously bans "conversion therapy" on minors. (14:08)— Pastor claims he miraculously cured a man hospitalized due to voting for Democrats. (26:05)— In Ohio, taxpayer dollars are being used to expand Christian schools. (36:56)— South Carolina Supreme Court strikes down voucher scheme giving tax dollars to private schools. (47:40)— Atheists to court: It's okay to ban "faith statements" in taxpayer-funded Minnesota program. (55:31)SPONSOR: Sign up at butcherbox.com/friendly and use code friendly to get chicken breast, salmon or ground beef FREE in every order for a year plus $20 off your first order! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

ohio minnesota discord pastor democrats minneapolis candidates pope francis atheists andy beshear hemant south carolina supreme court kentucky gov

COJ #94 - Why Alex Murdaugh Didn't Score a Major ‘Win' Last Week + Mica Francis' Report about Stolen Notary Is a Very Big Deal