Podcasts about South Carolina Supreme Court

Alex Murdaugh's name has become synonymous with deceit, greed, and betrayal. The former South Carolina attorney confessed to stealing millions from clients, friends, and even his own firm — but does that make him a murderer? In this explosive episode of Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski, we strip away the money, the scandals, and the headlines to ask one uncomfortable question: did the jury convict Alex Murdaugh for murder, or for being a monster they already hated? In March 2023, Murdaugh was found guilty of killing his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, at their Moselle property. But with no murder weapon, no direct forensic link, and no eyewitnesses, the case depended heavily on his financial crimes to establish motive. His own attorney, Dick Harpootlian, admits Murdaugh is a “horrible person” for what he did financially — but insists that doesn't mean he pulled the trigger. As the South Carolina Supreme Court weighs whether to grant a new trial amid allegations of jury tampering by former court clerk Becky Hill, the debate over guilt versus prejudice is heating back up. Tony breaks down the real evidence: what points to guilt, what points to innocence, and why removing the financial narrative changes everything. Was Murdaugh's conviction built on facts — or on disgust? Is he a murderer, or just a morally bankrupt man who became the perfect villain for America's true-crime obsession? It's time to separate what can be proven from what just feels true.

Alex Murdaugh's name has become synonymous with deceit, greed, and betrayal. The former South Carolina attorney confessed to stealing millions from clients, friends, and even his own firm — but does that make him a murderer? In this explosive episode of Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski, we strip away the money, the scandals, and the headlines to ask one uncomfortable question: did the jury convict Alex Murdaugh for murder, or for being a monster they already hated? In March 2023, Murdaugh was found guilty of killing his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, at their Moselle property. But with no murder weapon, no direct forensic link, and no eyewitnesses, the case depended heavily on his financial crimes to establish motive. His own attorney, Dick Harpootlian, admits Murdaugh is a “horrible person” for what he did financially — but insists that doesn't mean he pulled the trigger. As the South Carolina Supreme Court weighs whether to grant a new trial amid allegations of jury tampering by former court clerk Becky Hill, the debate over guilt versus prejudice is heating back up. Tony breaks down the real evidence: what points to guilt, what points to innocence, and why removing the financial narrative changes everything. Was Murdaugh's conviction built on facts — or on disgust? Is he a murderer, or just a morally bankrupt man who became the perfect villain for America's true-crime obsession? It's time to separate what can be proven from what just feels true.

The American Democracy Minute Radio News Report & Podcast for Sept. 22, 2025South Carolina Supreme Court Decides ‘All elections shall be free and open' Doesn't Mean Partisan Gerrymandering is UnconstitutionalIn June, we told you about a South Carolina state supreme court case challenging the state constitutionality of partisan gerrymandering. The court ruled September 17th that manipulating voting districts for partisan power does NOT violate the state's constitution. Some podcasting platforms strip out our links.  To read our resources and see the whole script of today's report, please go to our website at https://AmericanDemocracyMinute.orgToday's LinksArticles & Resources:American Democracy Minute - Is Partisan Gerrymandering Unconstitutional Under South Carolina's Constitution?  A Pro-Voter Challenge Takes the Legislature to Task.South Carolina Supreme Court - Opinion in League of Women Voters v. AlexanderSouth Carolina Daily Gazette - SC Supreme Court upholds voting map, throws out partisan gerrymandering claimLeague of Women Voters - South Carolina Supreme Court Green-lights Partisan Gerrymandered Maps  Independent Voters News - South Carolina Justices Say Politicians Can Keep Picking Their Voters Groups Taking Action:League of Women Voters SC, ACLU SCRegister or Check Your Voter Registration:U.S. Election Assistance Commission – How to Register And Vote in Your StatePlease follow us on Facebook and Bluesky Social, and SHARE! Find all of our reports at AmericanDemocracyMinute.orgWant ADM sent to your email?  Sign up here!Are you a radio station?  Find our broadcast files at Pacifica Radio Network's Audioport and PRX#News #Democracy  #DemocracyNews #SouthCarolina #RacialGerrymandering #PartisanGerrymandering #FairMaps 

NEW MURDAUGH TRIAL? The Fight to Overturn a Guilty Verdict Begins You thought the Alex Murdaugh saga was over? Think again. While the disgraced legal scion sits in a cell, a new and complex battle is just beginning in the South Carolina Supreme Court. In this segment, we break down the critical first steps in Alec Murdaugh's fight to overturn his double murder conviction. The state has filed its brief, calling the evidence "overwhelming," but Murdaugh's defense team, led by Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin, is firing back with stunning allegations of jury tampering, fabricated evidence, and a "perfect storm of investigative failures." We'll explain exactly what the "official record of appeal" is and why every single document and transcript from the original trial is about to be put under a microscope. This isn't just a legal formality; it's the foundation for what could become South Carolina's most notorious trial... for a second time. Then, we dive into how Hollywood is tackling this chilling story. We watch and react to the brand new trailer for Hulu's upcoming drama, Murdaugh: Death in the Family. How accurate is this dramatized version? From the fatal boat crash to the dark underbelly of a legal dynasty, we analyze the trailer's portrayal of the family's secrets and lies. Does this Hollywood retelling capture the true horror of what happened at Moselle, or is it just another sensationalized true crime adaptation? Join us as we explore the intersection of justice and entertainment, and what it means when a family's darkest moments become a national spectacle. The fight for Alec Murdaugh's future is officially underway, and you won't believe the twists that are already emerging. Hashtags: #Murdaugh #AlecMurdaugh #TrueCrime #Hulu #MurdaughMurders #BeckyHill #SouthCarolina #Justice #LegalDrama #Documentary Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

NEW MURDAUGH TRIAL? The Fight to Overturn a Guilty Verdict Begins You thought the Alex Murdaugh saga was over? Think again. While the disgraced legal scion sits in a cell, a new and complex battle is just beginning in the South Carolina Supreme Court. In this segment, we break down the critical first steps in Alec Murdaugh's fight to overturn his double murder conviction. The state has filed its brief, calling the evidence "overwhelming," but Murdaugh's defense team, led by Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin, is firing back with stunning allegations of jury tampering, fabricated evidence, and a "perfect storm of investigative failures." We'll explain exactly what the "official record of appeal" is and why every single document and transcript from the original trial is about to be put under a microscope. This isn't just a legal formality; it's the foundation for what could become South Carolina's most notorious trial... for a second time. Then, we dive into how Hollywood is tackling this chilling story. We watch and react to the brand new trailer for Hulu's upcoming drama, Murdaugh: Death in the Family. How accurate is this dramatized version? From the fatal boat crash to the dark underbelly of a legal dynasty, we analyze the trailer's portrayal of the family's secrets and lies. Does this Hollywood retelling capture the true horror of what happened at Moselle, or is it just another sensationalized true crime adaptation? Join us as we explore the intersection of justice and entertainment, and what it means when a family's darkest moments become a national spectacle. The fight for Alec Murdaugh's future is officially underway, and you won't believe the twists that are already emerging. Hashtags: #Murdaugh #AlecMurdaugh #TrueCrime #Hulu #MurdaughMurders #BeckyHill #SouthCarolina #Justice #LegalDrama #Documentary Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

NEW MURDAUGH TRIAL? The Fight to Overturn a Guilty Verdict Begins You thought the Alex Murdaugh saga was over? Think again. While the disgraced legal scion sits in a cell, a new and complex battle is just beginning in the South Carolina Supreme Court. In this segment, we break down the critical first steps in Alec Murdaugh's fight to overturn his double murder conviction. The state has filed its brief, calling the evidence "overwhelming," but Murdaugh's defense team, led by Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin, is firing back with stunning allegations of jury tampering, fabricated evidence, and a "perfect storm of investigative failures." We'll explain exactly what the "official record of appeal" is and why every single document and transcript from the original trial is about to be put under a microscope. This isn't just a legal formality; it's the foundation for what could become South Carolina's most notorious trial... for a second time. Then, we dive into how Hollywood is tackling this chilling story. We watch and react to the brand new trailer for Hulu's upcoming drama, Murdaugh: Death in the Family. How accurate is this dramatized version? From the fatal boat crash to the dark underbelly of a legal dynasty, we analyze the trailer's portrayal of the family's secrets and lies. Does this Hollywood retelling capture the true horror of what happened at Moselle, or is it just another sensationalized true crime adaptation? Join us as we explore the intersection of justice and entertainment, and what it means when a family's darkest moments become a national spectacle. The fight for Alec Murdaugh's future is officially underway, and you won't believe the twists that are already emerging. Hashtags: #Murdaugh #AlecMurdaugh #TrueCrime #Hulu #MurdaughMurders #BeckyHill #SouthCarolina #Justice #LegalDrama #Documentary Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

NEW MURDAUGH TRIAL? The Fight to Overturn a Guilty Verdict Begins You thought the Alex Murdaugh saga was over? Think again. While the disgraced legal scion sits in a cell, a new and complex battle is just beginning in the South Carolina Supreme Court. In this segment, we break down the critical first steps in Alec Murdaugh's fight to overturn his double murder conviction. The state has filed its brief, calling the evidence "overwhelming," but Murdaugh's defense team, led by Dick Harpootlian and Jim Griffin, is firing back with stunning allegations of jury tampering, fabricated evidence, and a "perfect storm of investigative failures." We'll explain exactly what the "official record of appeal" is and why every single document and transcript from the original trial is about to be put under a microscope. This isn't just a legal formality; it's the foundation for what could become South Carolina's most notorious trial... for a second time. Then, we dive into how Hollywood is tackling this chilling story. We watch and react to the brand new trailer for Hulu's upcoming drama, Murdaugh: Death in the Family. How accurate is this dramatized version? From the fatal boat crash to the dark underbelly of a legal dynasty, we analyze the trailer's portrayal of the family's secrets and lies. Does this Hollywood retelling capture the true horror of what happened at Moselle, or is it just another sensationalized true crime adaptation? Join us as we explore the intersection of justice and entertainment, and what it means when a family's darkest moments become a national spectacle. The fight for Alec Murdaugh's future is officially underway, and you won't believe the twists that are already emerging. Hashtags: #Murdaugh #AlecMurdaugh #TrueCrime #Hulu #MurdaughMurders #BeckyHill #SouthCarolina #Justice #LegalDrama #Documentary Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

On today's show: 1. Charleston Co. magistrate judge charged with possessing child sex abuse material - https://www.live5news.com/2025/09/16/charleston-co-magistrate-judge-charged-with-possessing-child-sex-abuse-material/ 2. SC State Election Commission ousts executive director amid federal voter data controversy - https://abcnews4.com/newsletter-daily/sc-state-election-commission-ousts-executive-director-amid-federal-voter-data-controversy-wciv-abc-news-4-charleston-sc-south-carolina-howard-knapp-trump-administration-sc-votes 3. State Supreme Court rules partisan gerrymandering constitutional - https://www.counton2.com/news/south-carolina-news/state-supreme-court-rules-partisan-gerrymandering-constitutional/ 3a. 'A troubling prospect;' SC Supreme Court dismisses case challenging state gerrymandering - https://abcnews4.com/newsletter-daily/a-troubling-prospect-sc-supreme-court-dismisses-case-challenging-state-gerrymandering-wciv-abc-news-4-charleston-sc-south-carolina-redistricting-nonjusticiable-political-question-legislature-republican-democrat-aclu-league-of-women-voters 4. Omar says Mace not ‘well or smart' for suggesting ‘Somalia can take you back' - https://www.counton2.com/hill-politics/omar-says-mace-not-well-or-smart-for-suggesting-somalia-can-take-you-back/ 5. 2nd Annual Charleston Comedy Week Boasts Pete Holmes, Pauly Shore, and More - https://holycitysinner.com/entertainment/2nd-annual-charleston-comedy-week-boasts-pete-holmes-pauly-s/ 6. Six Charleston Area Restaurants Make Southern Living's List of The South's Top 50 Barbecue Joints - https://holycitysinner.com/food-bev/six-charleston-area-restaurants-make-southern-living-s-list-south-s-top-50-barbecue-joints/ This episode's music is by Tyler Boone (tylerboonemusic.com). The episode was produced by LMC Soundsystem.

Vincent and Joel sit down with guest - Executive Director of the SC Lottery - and discuss how the lottery works, how it benefits the state, and the Dolly's background in the State of South Carolina. Hear Bourbon Briefs to get your latest political update where the Senators discuss the newest developments in the gubernatorial race, new candidates in the upstate, guaranteed paid parental leave, the race for SC Supreme Court seats, and more!Join Senators Sheheen and Lourie in this week's episode where they take a deeper look at upcoming legislation and lawmakers' actions in S.C.  Support the showKeep up to Date with BITBR: Twitter.com/BITBRpodcastFacebook.com/BITBRpodcasthttps://bourboninthebackroom.buzzsprout.com

Alex Murdaugh Appeal EXPOSED: Prosecutors DENY IMPACT Of Jury Tampering Claims The battle over Alex Murdaugh's murder conviction just hit another explosive chapter — and this time, it's the State firing back. In a newly filed 182-page brief, South Carolina prosecutors are urging the state supreme court to reject Murdaugh's push for a new trial, despite allegations of jury tampering by court clerk Becky Hill. Hill allegedly told jurors during the trial to “watch his body language,” a comment Murdaugh's defense team says crossed the line and poisoned the verdict. They argue that when a court official makes a statement like that, the law should presume prejudice — and that presumption alone should be enough to warrant a retrial. But prosecutors aren't conceding an inch. They describe Hill's conduct as “foolish and fleeting,” not the kind of influence that changes the outcome. They point to the January 2024 evidentiary hearing, where retired Chief Justice Jean Toal found no credible proof the remark affected deliberations. And they remind the court of the evidence that sealed Murdaugh's fate: the kennel video placing him at the crime scene minutes before the murders, his repeated lies about being there, and the phone data locking him into the timeline. The State also defends the week of financial-crime testimony — which the defense claims was unfairly prejudicial — saying it established a clear motive. They argue that even if Hill's comment was improper, the evidence against Murdaugh was overwhelming, making any misstep harmless. Now, with Murdaugh's team preparing their reply and oral arguments expected in the fall, the South Carolina Supreme Court will have to decide: was this a harmless slip, or a crack in the foundation big enough to collapse the whole verdict? #AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #JuryTampering #MurdaughTrial #LegalNews #CrimeNews #SouthCarolina #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Alex Murdaugh Appeal EXPOSED: Prosecutors DENY IMPACT Of Jury Tampering Claims The battle over Alex Murdaugh's murder conviction just hit another explosive chapter — and this time, it's the State firing back. In a newly filed 182-page brief, South Carolina prosecutors are urging the state supreme court to reject Murdaugh's push for a new trial, despite allegations of jury tampering by court clerk Becky Hill. Hill allegedly told jurors during the trial to “watch his body language,” a comment Murdaugh's defense team says crossed the line and poisoned the verdict. They argue that when a court official makes a statement like that, the law should presume prejudice — and that presumption alone should be enough to warrant a retrial. But prosecutors aren't conceding an inch. They describe Hill's conduct as “foolish and fleeting,” not the kind of influence that changes the outcome. They point to the January 2024 evidentiary hearing, where retired Chief Justice Jean Toal found no credible proof the remark affected deliberations. And they remind the court of the evidence that sealed Murdaugh's fate: the kennel video placing him at the crime scene minutes before the murders, his repeated lies about being there, and the phone data locking him into the timeline. The State also defends the week of financial-crime testimony — which the defense claims was unfairly prejudicial — saying it established a clear motive. They argue that even if Hill's comment was improper, the evidence against Murdaugh was overwhelming, making any misstep harmless. Now, with Murdaugh's team preparing their reply and oral arguments expected in the fall, the South Carolina Supreme Court will have to decide: was this a harmless slip, or a crack in the foundation big enough to collapse the whole verdict? #AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #JuryTampering #MurdaughTrial #LegalNews #CrimeNews #SouthCarolina #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Alex Murdaugh Appeal EXPOSED: Prosecutors DENY IMPACT Of Jury Tampering Claims The battle over Alex Murdaugh's murder conviction just hit another explosive chapter — and this time, it's the State firing back. In a newly filed 182-page brief, South Carolina prosecutors are urging the state supreme court to reject Murdaugh's push for a new trial, despite allegations of jury tampering by court clerk Becky Hill. Hill allegedly told jurors during the trial to “watch his body language,” a comment Murdaugh's defense team says crossed the line and poisoned the verdict. They argue that when a court official makes a statement like that, the law should presume prejudice — and that presumption alone should be enough to warrant a retrial. But prosecutors aren't conceding an inch. They describe Hill's conduct as “foolish and fleeting,” not the kind of influence that changes the outcome. They point to the January 2024 evidentiary hearing, where retired Chief Justice Jean Toal found no credible proof the remark affected deliberations. And they remind the court of the evidence that sealed Murdaugh's fate: the kennel video placing him at the crime scene minutes before the murders, his repeated lies about being there, and the phone data locking him into the timeline. The State also defends the week of financial-crime testimony — which the defense claims was unfairly prejudicial — saying it established a clear motive. They argue that even if Hill's comment was improper, the evidence against Murdaugh was overwhelming, making any misstep harmless. Now, with Murdaugh's team preparing their reply and oral arguments expected in the fall, the South Carolina Supreme Court will have to decide: was this a harmless slip, or a crack in the foundation big enough to collapse the whole verdict? #AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrime #CourtroomDrama #JuryTampering #MurdaughTrial #LegalNews #CrimeNews #SouthCarolina #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Alex Murdaugh Appeal EXPOSED: Jury Tampering, Flawed Forensics, & Missing Evidence The Alex Murdaugh case is back in the spotlight — not because of new charges, but because of an explosive appeal that could rewrite the ending of one of the most notorious murder trials in South Carolina history. In December 2024, Murdaugh's defense team filed a 132-page appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court, claiming his double murder trial was “infected with unfairness” from start to finish. The allegations are staggering: jury tampering by former court clerk Becky Hill, the use of questionable forensic evidence, the admission of six days of testimony about unrelated financial crimes, and the discovery of previously unseen text messages between Murdaugh and longtime associate Curtis “Eddie” Smith. At the heart of the appeal is Hill's alleged interference with jurors — comments she's accused of making during the trial, urging them not to believe Murdaugh's testimony. Hill has since been arrested on perjury, obstruction, and misconduct charges, but not for jury tampering itself. The defense says this is enough to demand a new trial. The State says it's inappropriate but not enough to overturn the verdict. The forensic fights are just as intense, with the defense attacking shell casing toolmark analysis and an unscientific “iPhone toss” demonstration used to rebut their theory of a third-party culprit. And now, the Eddie Smith texts have thrown fuel on the fire, with the defense claiming they were never disclosed. The State's response is due any day now. Oral arguments could happen this fall, but a ruling may not come until 2026. If the convictions fall, it won't mean Murdaugh is declared innocent — it will mean the court decided the trial itself wasn't fair. #AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughAppeal #TrueCrime #BeckyHill #EddieSmith #SouthCarolina #CourtroomDrama #LegalUpdate #MurdaughMurders #Justice Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Alex Murdaugh Appeal EXPOSED: Jury Tampering, Flawed Forensics, & Missing Evidence The Alex Murdaugh case is back in the spotlight — not because of new charges, but because of an explosive appeal that could rewrite the ending of one of the most notorious murder trials in South Carolina history. In December 2024, Murdaugh's defense team filed a 132-page appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court, claiming his double murder trial was “infected with unfairness” from start to finish. The allegations are staggering: jury tampering by former court clerk Becky Hill, the use of questionable forensic evidence, the admission of six days of testimony about unrelated financial crimes, and the discovery of previously unseen text messages between Murdaugh and longtime associate Curtis “Eddie” Smith. At the heart of the appeal is Hill's alleged interference with jurors — comments she's accused of making during the trial, urging them not to believe Murdaugh's testimony. Hill has since been arrested on perjury, obstruction, and misconduct charges, but not for jury tampering itself. The defense says this is enough to demand a new trial. The State says it's inappropriate but not enough to overturn the verdict. The forensic fights are just as intense, with the defense attacking shell casing toolmark analysis and an unscientific “iPhone toss” demonstration used to rebut their theory of a third-party culprit. And now, the Eddie Smith texts have thrown fuel on the fire, with the defense claiming they were never disclosed. The State's response is due any day now. Oral arguments could happen this fall, but a ruling may not come until 2026. If the convictions fall, it won't mean Murdaugh is declared innocent — it will mean the court decided the trial itself wasn't fair. #AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughAppeal #TrueCrime #BeckyHill #EddieSmith #SouthCarolina #CourtroomDrama #LegalUpdate #MurdaughMurders #Justice Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Alex Murdaugh Appeal EXPOSED: Jury Tampering, Flawed Forensics, & Missing Evidence The Alex Murdaugh case is back in the spotlight — not because of new charges, but because of an explosive appeal that could rewrite the ending of one of the most notorious murder trials in South Carolina history. In December 2024, Murdaugh's defense team filed a 132-page appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court, claiming his double murder trial was “infected with unfairness” from start to finish. The allegations are staggering: jury tampering by former court clerk Becky Hill, the use of questionable forensic evidence, the admission of six days of testimony about unrelated financial crimes, and the discovery of previously unseen text messages between Murdaugh and longtime associate Curtis “Eddie” Smith. At the heart of the appeal is Hill's alleged interference with jurors — comments she's accused of making during the trial, urging them not to believe Murdaugh's testimony. Hill has since been arrested on perjury, obstruction, and misconduct charges, but not for jury tampering itself. The defense says this is enough to demand a new trial. The State says it's inappropriate but not enough to overturn the verdict. The forensic fights are just as intense, with the defense attacking shell casing toolmark analysis and an unscientific “iPhone toss” demonstration used to rebut their theory of a third-party culprit. And now, the Eddie Smith texts have thrown fuel on the fire, with the defense claiming they were never disclosed. The State's response is due any day now. Oral arguments could happen this fall, but a ruling may not come until 2026. If the convictions fall, it won't mean Murdaugh is declared innocent — it will mean the court decided the trial itself wasn't fair. #AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughAppeal #TrueCrime #BeckyHill #EddieSmith #SouthCarolina #CourtroomDrama #LegalUpdate #MurdaughMurders #Justice Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Alex Murdaugh Appeal EXPOSED: Jury Tampering, Flawed Forensics, & Missing Evidence The Alex Murdaugh case is back in the spotlight — not because of new charges, but because of an explosive appeal that could rewrite the ending of one of the most notorious murder trials in South Carolina history. In December 2024, Murdaugh's defense team filed a 132-page appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court, claiming his double murder trial was “infected with unfairness” from start to finish. The allegations are staggering: jury tampering by former court clerk Becky Hill, the use of questionable forensic evidence, the admission of six days of testimony about unrelated financial crimes, and the discovery of previously unseen text messages between Murdaugh and longtime associate Curtis “Eddie” Smith. At the heart of the appeal is Hill's alleged interference with jurors — comments she's accused of making during the trial, urging them not to believe Murdaugh's testimony. Hill has since been arrested on perjury, obstruction, and misconduct charges, but not for jury tampering itself. The defense says this is enough to demand a new trial. The State says it's inappropriate but not enough to overturn the verdict. The forensic fights are just as intense, with the defense attacking shell casing toolmark analysis and an unscientific “iPhone toss” demonstration used to rebut their theory of a third-party culprit. And now, the Eddie Smith texts have thrown fuel on the fire, with the defense claiming they were never disclosed. The State's response is due any day now. Oral arguments could happen this fall, but a ruling may not come until 2026. If the convictions fall, it won't mean Murdaugh is declared innocent — it will mean the court decided the trial itself wasn't fair. #AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughAppeal #TrueCrime #BeckyHill #EddieSmith #SouthCarolina #CourtroomDrama #LegalUpdate #MurdaughMurders #Justice Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

On today's show: 1. Visitors to Charleston historical sites are being asked to report 'negative' stories about America - https://www.postandcourier.com/charleston_sc/fort-moultrie-sumter-history-erasure-nps-signs/article_39f0973c-0431-4a05-a545-d34ea1ada656.html 2. Republicans admit gerrymandering. SC Supreme Court weighs if that's allowed - https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article309329780.html 3. Supreme Court sides with South Carolina in ruling allowing states to cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood - https://www.counton2.com/news/south-carolina-news/supreme-court-sides-with-south-carolina-in-ruling-allowing-states-to-cut-off-medicaid-funding-to-planned-parenthood/ 4. 3 Lowcountry sheriffs endorse South Carolina AG Alan Wilson for governor - https://www.live5news.com/2025/06/26/3-lowcountry-sheriffs-endorse-south-carolina-ag-alan-wilson-governor/ 5. What's that in the sky? We're not sure, but the fireball was very bright - https://apnews.com/article/bright-object-sky-meteor-2b593ef65516b1fff5ad5a9243cd9441 This episode's music is by Tyler Boone (tylerboonemusic.com). The episode was produced by LMC Soundsystem.

Today's top headlines:  Magnolia Landing site to host M.A.R.S.H. cleanup during construction phase City of Charleston plans to add second lane on Maybank Highway off Johns Island Dorchester Co. seeks public input on multi-million-dollar road widening projects ‘Ring the phones’: Reward offered in search for Orangeburg County mass shooting suspect Dorchester County deputies spot suspect in woods; chase leads to arrest ‘It’s a sticky situation’: Accused West Ashley squatter to stay in jail while pregnant Standoff in Georgetown County ends peacefully after negotiations, resolution Charleston Co. School District votes on next steps to replace constituent boards Trump sends Marines and more National Guard members to Los Angeles ‘The wrong way to do it’: Lawmaker pay raise fight reaches SC Supreme Court ‘No end in sight’: Euthanasia looms for overcrowded Colleton Co. shelter dogs 

Planned Parenthood argued that an unborn baby does not have a “heart” until all four chambers of the heart are formed at about nine weeks gestation. Constitutional expert, lawyer, author, pastor, and founder of Liberty Counsel Mat Staver discusses the important topics of the day with co-hosts and guests that impact life, liberty, and family. To stay informed and get involved, visit LC.org.

It's Friday, May 16th, A.D. 2025. This is The Worldview in 5 Minutes heard on 125 radio stations and at www.TheWorldview.com.  I'm Adam McManus. (Adam@TheWorldview.com) By Adam McManus Nigerian Muslims kill 2 Christian teachers Boko Haram Muslim terrorists recently targeted Christians traveling near a Nigerian army base along the deadly Damboa–Maiduguri highway, reports International Christian Concern. On May 12th, two Christian teachers were killed and several others were injured when their vehicle struck an improvised explosive device allegedly planted by the Islamic terror group. Blessing Luka and Gideon Bitterleaf were both devoted Christian educators with the Damboa Local Education Authority. Pray that these Muslim murderers will be held accountable. Genesis 9:6 says, "Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind." More children in United Kingdom have gender dysphoria Soaring numbers of children in England and Wales are waiting for specialist gender care from the National Health Service -- as youngsters of any age are now eligible for referral after the health service “caved to the pressure” of transgender activists to remove age limits, reports The Daily Mail and World Magazine. Average waiting times have grown to more than two years for a confused child to get a first appointment at a specialist health service clinic, with 157 of those aged under ten. There were 6,225 confused kids on the national waiting list at the end of March. That's up 12 per cent from the same point a year earlier. Young children believed to have gender dysphoria are generally given counselling and therapy with their family, but thankfully no longer prescribed hormone treatments.  Indeed, Britain's National Health Service has moved away from a “medical model” in favor of a “holistic” approach to children's gender care, as per recommendations from the Cass Review. Puberty blockers are no longer prescribed to children for the treatment of gender dysphoria, after a ban last year was made permanent in December. Former FBI Director calls for Trump's assassination Former FBI Director James Comey is facing massive backlash after he posted a photo on his Instagram page calling for the assassination of President Donald Trump, reports Christian Talk show host Todd Starnes. An image of seashells that had been arranged on the beach to spell “86 47” was posted on Comey's personal Instagram account. The number “86” is code for killing someone. And, of course, “47” refers to the fact that Donald Trump is the 47th president of the United States. Comey wrote, “Cool shell formation on my beach walk.” Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem tweeted, “Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey just called for the assassination of President Trump. [the Department of Homeland Security] and Secret Service is investigating this threat and will respond appropriately.” And Republican Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama tweeted, “This is a direct THREAT against President Trump, who has already survived two assassination attempts. BEYOND despicable. James Comey MUST face consequences.” RFK Jr. agrees to examine the dangers of Abortion Kill Pill A recent study by the Ethics and Public Policy Center on the Abortion Kill Pill, mifepristone, showed that 11% of women experience adverse effects serious enough to send them to the Emergency Room. That's 22 times higher than what the Food and Drug Administration claims.   Appearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee on May 15th, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. agreed to a comprehensive review and relabeling of Mifepristone in response to a pointed question from Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri, reports The Guardian. Listen. HAWLEY: “There's been a major study by the Ethics and Public Policy Center of 865,727 prescribed cases of mifepristone abortions, chemical abortions, between 2017 and 2023. This data shows the biggest study on mifepristone done, I think, ever, and it showed that nearly 11% of women experience very serious adverse health effects to include sepsis, hemorrhaging, infection, of course, emergency room visits. That rate is 22 times higher than the FDA's current label which says it's just 0.5 the incidence of serious adverse health events. “So, my question to you is this: You previously testified at the committee that you would do a top-to-bottom review of mifepristone. Do you continue to stand by that? And don't you think that this new data shows the need to do a review is, in fact, very pressing?” KENNEDY: “It's alarming, and clearly it indicates that, at very least, the label should be changed. I've asked Marty Makary, who's the director of FDA, to do a complete review and to report back.” HAWLEY: “Good!” South Carolina Supreme Court affirms Heartbeat Law The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that the state may enforce its heartbeat-based abortion ban, rejecting an argument by Planned Parenthood to weaken the law, reports LifeSiteNews.com. Enacted in 2023, the law effectively bans most abortions after about six weeks gestation. South Carolina Republican Governor Henry McMaster told the Daily Wire, “Time and time again, we have defended the right to life in South Carolina, and time and time again, we have prevailed. Today's ruling is another clear and decisive victory that will ensure the lives of countless unborn children remain protected and that South Carolina continues to lead the charge in defending the sanctity of life.” Psalm 127:3 says, "Children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward." Christian band under fire by atheists and superintendent And finally, a popular Christian band is under fire from atheists along with Davidson County Schools in North Carolina, reports Blue Ridge Broadcasting. The 3 Heath Brothers band had been invited to host an anti-bullying event at Hasty Elementary School. Their performance included a number of songs that mentioned God. Afterwards, they gave the kids a devotional pamphlet that included Bible verses. The Freedom From Religion Foundation was enraged over the performance and accused the school of being a recruiting ground for Christianity. The God-hating attorney, Madeline Ziegler, wrote, “The district cannot allow non-school persons to treat schools as a recruiting ground for their religious mission.  Public schools are not an appropriate place for outside adults to convince students to convert to Christianity.” Sadly, the School Superintendent Gregg Slate was just as horrified with the Christian band and wrote a lengthy letter of apology to the atheists. But then, the school district went a step further. They had the audacity to demand that the 3 Heath Brothers remove video of the event from their social media pages. A bizarre request indeed. School officials claim they were duped. But Nicholas Heath of the 3 Heath Brothers denied that there was any proselytizing or worship service at the event. Close And that's The Worldview on this Friday, May 16th, in the year of our Lord 2025. Subscribe for free by Spotify, Amazon Music or by iTunes or email to our unique Christian newscast at www.TheWorldview.com. Or get the Generations app through Google Play or The App Store. I'm Adam McManus (Adam@TheWorldview.com). Seize the day for Jesus Christ.

If you're seeking news not covered by the legacy media, you've come to the right place. It's Crosstalk and our Friday News Round-Up & Comment broadcast. Here's a sample of content from the program:--Former FBI Director James Comey is facing a federal investigation after he posted an image that U.S. officials say appeared to call for the assassination of President Trump. --It was another record year for Planned Parenthood. Although they bill themselves as a women's health organization, in their annual report they indicate they aborted a record 402,230 babies in the past year while generating over 2 billion dollars in revenue.--A Louisiana woman killed her 20 week unborn child via an abortion pill and then threw the baby in a garbage can. --A Michigan judge has struck down several pro-life laws designed to protect unborn babies and ensure women's safety, ruling them unconstitutional under the state's 2022 pro-abortion amendment.--The South Carolina Supreme Court has unanimously upheld the Fetal Heartbeat and Protection Act that protects the lives of unborn children when a heartbeat is detected, usually by six weeks gestational age.--New York is on track to become the 11th state to legalize assisted suicide.--During his trip to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, President Donald Trump told the world who is in charge and it's not human authority. Jim provided audio from the president.--President Trump launched his Middle East visit by saying Iran needed to "make the right decision" about its nuclear program "because something's going to happen one way or the other." He also said, "So we'll either do it friendly or we'll do it very unfriendly."

If you're seeking news not covered by the legacy media, you've come to the right place. It's Crosstalk and our Friday News Round-Up & Comment broadcast. Here's a sample of content from the program: --Former FBI Director James Comey is facing a federal investigation after he posted an image that U.S. officials say appeared to call for the assassination of President Trump. --It was another record year for Planned Parenthood. Although they bill themselves as a women's health organization, in their annual report they indicate they aborted a record 402,230 babies in the past year while generating over 2 billion dollars in revenue. --A Louisiana woman killed her 20 week unborn child via an abortion pill and then threw the baby in a garbage can. --A Michigan judge has struck down several pro-life laws designed to protect unborn babies and ensure women's safety, ruling them unconstitutional under the state's 2022 pro-abortion amendment. --The South Carolina Supreme Court has unanimously upheld the Fetal Heartbeat and Protection Act that protects the lives of unborn children when a heartbeat is detected, usually by six weeks gestational age. --New York is on track to become the 11th state to legalize assisted suicide. --During his trip to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, President Donald Trump told the world who is in charge and it's not human authority. Jim provided audio from the president. --President Trump launched his Middle East visit by saying Iran needed to "make the right decision" about its nuclear program "because something's going to happen one way or the other." He also said, "So we'll either do it friendly or we'll do it very unfriendly."

Today on Truth in Politics and Culture the South Carolina Supreme Court unanimously upholds the Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion Act, after a 26 hour marathon, the House passes the framework for the budget bill, and President Trump negotiates investment deals with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and announces the lifting of U.S. sanctions against Syria,

Today's top headlines:  911 calls released from deadly U-Haul chase in Charleston County Charleston Police make 2 arrests in connection to West Ashley homicide Folly Beach residents push for more speed limit signs amidst tourism season Family demands justice amid Williamsburg County student confrontation video Berkeley County Camp Hall rail line construction continues, impacts explained Folly Beach works to revise parking ordinance following class action lawsuit Supreme Court to hear “birthright” citizenship case Lowcountry nurse highlights need for connection, access to mental health care ‘We have prevailed’: Governor praises SC Supreme Court 6-week abortion ban ruling

AP correspondent Haya Panjwani reports on an abortion update in South Carolina.

I pledge allegiance to the flag of The United States Of America and to the Republic Oh, beautiful for spacious skies, for amber waves of grain, for purple mountain majesties above the America is back. Yes, sir. Welcome back to the program. Alright. Idaho, South Dakota, Iowa, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, West Virginia, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina all have something in common. They ban abortion at either conception or after six weeks. Well, the South Carolina Supreme Court has upheld that in the courts. Let's talk with South Carolina state representative Josiah Magnuson, right now. Josiah, welcome to the program. This is a pretty big deal for the Supreme Court. Right? Thank you, Charlie. Yes. Absolutely. This is a big win. And, you know, I think those that were paying attention knew that we had to uphold it. You know, this was so important that we, you know, not go with what planned parenthood was saying. Planned parenthood, you know, I think their arguments were just really illogical, but we have fortunately a pretty conservative supreme court, now, and they upheld the state law. And, you know, we're gonna continue to protect unborn babies, beginning about six weeks, you know, when the heartbeat can be detected. Yeah. Now they say, you know, planned parenthood's argument was like, yep. That's not a real that's not really a heartbeat. That's not really a heartbeat. Heart dog doesn't form until nine weeks is what they were saying. Right? Yeah. So they're trying to say that the law can only take effect once essentially, the the baby's heart is fully formed, which is around nine weeks. But there is cardiac activity Yeah. Beginning around six weeks. And so that was pretty clear that that was the intent of the law. And this is where it's really important that we have good debate and articulate things correctly when we're talking on the floor of the house because it affects what we call legislative intent. Mhmm. And that's what the Supreme Court looked at was the legislative intent. What did the legislature intend to do? It's very clear that the that the legislature intended to prohibit abortion as soon as that cardiac activity can be detected because you can hear the heart, you know, beating even though it's not fully formed. You can hear the heart beating beginning at six weeks. That was what the law, said, and so that was what the Supreme Court upheld. In this article that I'm reading, it says, if the Supreme Court sides with South Carolina, which they did, its decision could pave the way for other registry states to cut Planned Parenthood out of their Medicaid program. Is that the plan? That would be the hope. That's a a court case that's at the federal level right now. Right. But we haven't seen the results yet. I've been proposing, I think, you know, Charlie, you know, to try to take the Planned Parenthood funding out of the state budget. Mhmm. And that's been, you know, not, adopted, unfortunately. But McMaster has some executive work that he's been doing, an executive action to take, Planned Parenthood out from being a Medicaid provider and just say they're they're they're not counted in that system. And so that's been challenging court. So that's what now is gonna come back from the from the US Supreme Court hopefully pretty soon. Right. We're talking about Josiah Magnus and South Carolina representatives. So what was the what was the amendment that was put forward? Was it Jordan Pace that that put this forward the other day on the last day of session? So that is something that would have allowed us I'm I'm glad you're bringing this up because that would have allowed us to actually come back and deal with a pro life bill again in the off season. We have something called sine die Right. Which is the law that determines what topics can be addressed when the legislature is not technically in session. Mhmm. And our position my position, the Free ...

I pledge allegiance to the flag of The United States Of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Oh, beautiful for spacious skies, for amber waves of grain, for purple mountain majesties above the fruit of the plain. America. America. America is back. Yes, sir. Welcome back to the program. Alright. Idaho, South Dakota, Iowa, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, West Virginia, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina all have something in common. They ban abortion at either conception or after six weeks. Well, the South Carolina Supreme Court has upheld that in the courts. Let's talk with South Carolina state representative Josiah Magnuson, right now. Josiah, welcome to the program. This is a pretty big deal for the Supreme Court. Right? Thank you, Charlie. Yes. Absolutely. This is a big win. And, you know, I think those that were paying attention knew that we had to uphold it. You know, this was so important that we, you know, not go with what planned parenthood was saying. Planned parenthood, you know, I think their arguments were just really illogical, but we have, fortunately, a pretty conservative supreme court, now, and they upheld the state law. And, you know, we're gonna continue to protect unborn babies, beginning about six weeks, you know, when the heartbeat can be detected. Yeah. Now they say, you know, planned parenthood's argument was like, yep. That's not a real that's not really a heartbeat. That's not really a heartbeat. Heart doesn't form until nine weeks is what they were saying. Right? Yeah. So they're trying to say that the law can only take effect once essentially, the the baby's heart is fully formed, which is around nine weeks. But there is cardiac activity Yeah. Beginning around six weeks. And so that was pretty clear that that was the intent of the law. And this is where it's really important that we have good debate and articulate things correctly when we're talking on the floor of the house because it affects what we call legislative intent. Mhmm. And that's what the Supreme Court looked at was the legislative intent. What did the legislature intend to do? It's very clear that the that the legislature intended to prohibit abortion as soon as that cardiac activity can be detected because you can hear the heart, you know, beating even though it's not fully formed. You can hear the heart beating beginning at six weeks. That was what the law, said, and so that was what the Supreme Court upheld. In this article that I'm reading, it says, if the Supreme Court sides with South Carolina, which they did, its decision could pave the way for other registry states to cut Planned Parenthood out of their Medicaid program. Is that the plan? That would be the hope. That's a a court case that's at the federal level right now. Right. But we haven't seen the results yet. I've been proposing, I think, you know, Charlie, you know, to try to take the planned parent funding out of the state budget. Mhmm. And that's been, you know, not, adopted, unfortunately. But McMaster has some executive work that he's been doing an executive action to take, Planned Parenthood out from being a Medicaid provider and just say they're they're they're not counted in that system. And so that's been challenging court. So that's what now is gonna come back from the from the US Supreme Court hopefully pretty soon. Right. We're talking about Josiah Magdiss and South Carolina representatives. So what was the what was the amendment that was put forward? Was it Jordan Pace that that put this forward the other day on the last day of session? So that is something that would have allowed us I'm I'm glad you're bringing this up because that would have allowed us to actually come back and deal with a pro life bill again in the off season. We have something called sine die Right. Which is the law that determines wha ...

I know we talked about it a little bit before, but let's do it again. Idaho, Texas, Oklahoma, South Carola South Dakota, Iowa, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, West Virginia, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida all have banned abortion at conception or after six weeks. Well, the South Carolina Supreme Court recently upheld that here in South Carolina. Joining us right now is representative John McCravy, who is, very excited about this bill. Representative McCravy, welcome to the program. Hope you're doing well. Thank you, Charlie. Thanks for having me on. So it was I mean, that was good news from the Supreme Court, five to zero, upholding it. Right? It was. And and it was a good common sense opinion. It took them 27 pages to say that if you hear the heartbeat, the baby is protected. So so but but it was a good decision. And, you know, one of the things that the family caucus and I have worked hard on is to make sure we get conservative judges Right. Who don't don't replace their opinion for our constitution and for for law. Is it let me ask you something. I mean, is are there changes that need to be made to the South Carolina constitution about abortion? You know, that's a that's an issue. We we don't have in South Carolina. We do not have, that type of those type of laws that they have in California where they just willy nilly change the constitution. We'd have to have a two thirds vote of both bodies to even get to that. But we're elected and we're supposed to go down there and do what our people elect us to do. And so that's what we we try to do, you know? And and I wanna say this, Charlie, and I I know, you know, I I I was the author of the heartbeat bill originally, and I I authored a lot of the changes to it that that are in there now. But I wanna say this, the heartbeat bill was never written to be the final bill for South Carolina. The final bill that we wrote for it and representative Magnuson was on the committee, that you had on earlier. He's been a a staunch supporter of life from day one. But but we wrote something called the Human Life Protection Act that is that is still sitting in the house judiciary along with about 10 other good bills. So we've we've got to we've got to keep fighting because we're still having 2,000 babies a year aborted for birth control in South Carolina. Right. So it's it's a time to say, okay. This is great, but we can't stop there. We can't we can't allow that many children to be killed in South Carolina. And so we're gonna continue to fight for that. I'm never gonna give up fighting for that. You know that, Charlie. Oh, I absolutely know that. So let me ask something. What is the difference between the bill we have now and the Human Life Protection Act? The Human Life Protection Act would protect babies in the womb. If if a woman is pregnant, that baby is protected. Mhmm. So it would take it back basically to conception, but but at least it would protect any baby that is in the womb. So now for birth control. Now, you know, the whether the exceptions come in, that's another issue, by a lot of different things. But but we don't want birth control to be applied to living babies. Like the abortion pill? That's right. And and and all other types as well. That's right. That's right. Charlie, they they're sending those things in. That's another whole story I could talk about for an hour. Yeah. But but we have a lot of bad things going on. But but, you know, what I wanna emphasize is let's please get the Human Life Protection Act out of that house judiciary committee along with a lot of other good things that need to come out, like closing the primaries, house judiciary Right. Ranked choice voting, house judiciary, student privacy act, keeping men out of girls' lives, house judiciary, punishing preventing parents from being punished from affirming their own biological sex with their child. Yeah. House judiciary. Changing the sex on the ...

I know we talked about it a little bit before, but let's do it again. Idaho, Texas, Oklahoma, South Carol South Dakota, Iowa, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, West Virginia, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida all have banned abortion at conception or after six weeks. Well, the South Carolina Supreme Court recently upheld that here in South Carolina. Joining us right now is representative John McCravey, who is, very excited about this bill. Representative McCravey, welcome to the program. Hope you're doing well. Thank you, Charlie. Thanks for having me on. So it was I mean, that was good news from the Supreme Court, five to zero, upholding it. Right? It was. And and it was a good common sense opinion. It took them 27 pages to say that if you hear the heartbeat, the baby is protected. So so but but it was a good decision. And, you know, one of the things that the family caucus and I have worked hard on is to make sure we get conservative judges Right. Who don't don't replace their opinion for our constitution and for for law. Is it let me ask you something. I mean, is are there changes that need to be made to the South Carolina constitution about abortion? You know, that's a that's an issue. We we don't have in South Carolina. We do not have, that type of those type of laws that they have in California where they just willy nilly change the constitution. We have to have a two thirds vote of both bodies to even get to that. But we're elected and we're supposed to go down there and do what our people elect us to do. And so that's what we we try to do, you know? And and I wanna say this, Charlie, and I I know, you know, I I I was the author of the heartbeat bill originally, and I I authored a lot of the changes to it that that are in there now. But I wanna say this, the heartbeat bill was never written to be the final bill for South Carolina. The final bill that we wrote for it and represented Magnuson was on the committee, that you had on earlier. He's been a a staunch supporter of life from day one. But but we wrote something called the Human Life Protection Act that is that is still sitting in the house judiciary along with about 10 other good bills. So we've we've got we've got to keep fighting because we're still having 2,000 babies a year aborted for birth control in South Carolina. Right. So it's it's a time to say, okay. This is great, but we can't stop there. We can't we can't allow that many children to be killed in South Carolina. And so we're gonna continue to fight for that. I'm never gonna give up fighting for that. You know that, Charlie. Oh, I absolutely know that. So let me ask you something. What is the difference between the bill we have now and the Human Life Protection Act? The Human Life Protection Act will protect babies in the womb. If if a woman is pregnant, that baby is protected. Mhmm. So it would take it back basically to conception, but but at least it would protect any baby that is in the womb. So now for birth control. Now, you know, the whether the exceptions come in, that's another issue, by a lot of different things. But but we don't want birth control to be applied to living babies. Like the abortion pill. That's right. And and and all other types as well. That's right. That's right. Charlie, they they're sending those things in. That's another whole story I could talk about for an hour. Yeah. But but we have a lot of bad things going on. But but, you know, what I wanna emphasize is let's please get the Human Life Protection Act out of that house judiciary committee along with a lot of other good things that need to come out, like closing the primary is house judiciary. Right. Right choice voting house judiciary. Student privacy act. Keeping men out of girls' locker room. House judiciary. Punishing preventing parents from being punished from affirming their own biological sex with their child. Yeah. House judiciary. Changing the sex on a ...

Send us a textA MAJOR VICTORY FOR ALL REAL ESTATE AGENTS!!Today we discuss a significant ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court that protects real estate agents from liability under the South Carolina Residential Property Condition Disclosure Act. The ruling states that there is no private cause of action against real estate agents under the Act allowing buyers to sue agents for the false or misleading statements of the Seller.  This ruling shifts the responsibility solely to property owners. This landmark decision is seen as a major victory for real estate professionals, providing them with much-needed protection in a challenging industry.Don't forget to like us and share us!Gary* Gary serves on the South Carolina Real Estate Commission as a Commissioner. The opinions expressed herein are his opinions and are not necessarily the opinions of the SC Real Estate Commission. This podcast is not to be considered legal advice. Please consult an attorney in your area.

Alex Murdaugh Murder Appeal Delayed 120 Days – Here's What Happens Next  In this episode, we're diving into the latest twist in the Alex Murdaugh murder appeal—the South Carolina Supreme Court's unexpected decision to grant prosecutors a 120-day extension to respond. With the new deadline now set for August 8, 2025, Murdaugh's defense team is sounding the alarm, accusing the Attorney General's Office of stalling and mismanaging the case. The State, on the other hand, claims “extraordinary circumstances” justify the delay, pointing to a massive 6,000-page trial record and staff turnover. This isn't just a boring scheduling change—it's a courtroom clash that exposes just how complicated, politically sensitive, and high-stakes this appeal really is. The defense argues the longer this drags out, the longer Murdaugh sits in prison on what they claim was a structurally flawed trial. Prosecutors say they need time to do it right. Legal analysts say it's rare to see such a public fight over an appellate deadline, especially one involving a case this notorious. We break down what this extension means, how it affects the timeline of the appeal, and what it tells us about the strategies on both sides. From the controversial role of court clerk Becky Hill to the looming oral arguments in late 2025 or early 2026, this delay sets the tone for what could be one of the most consequential appellate rulings in South Carolina history. Subscribe now for all the updates as this legal saga continues to unfold.    Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Alex Murdaugh Murder Appeal Delayed 120 Days – Here's What Happens Next  In this episode, we're diving into the latest twist in the Alex Murdaugh murder appeal—the South Carolina Supreme Court's unexpected decision to grant prosecutors a 120-day extension to respond. With the new deadline now set for August 8, 2025, Murdaugh's defense team is sounding the alarm, accusing the Attorney General's Office of stalling and mismanaging the case. The State, on the other hand, claims “extraordinary circumstances” justify the delay, pointing to a massive 6,000-page trial record and staff turnover. This isn't just a boring scheduling change—it's a courtroom clash that exposes just how complicated, politically sensitive, and high-stakes this appeal really is. The defense argues the longer this drags out, the longer Murdaugh sits in prison on what they claim was a structurally flawed trial. Prosecutors say they need time to do it right. Legal analysts say it's rare to see such a public fight over an appellate deadline, especially one involving a case this notorious. We break down what this extension means, how it affects the timeline of the appeal, and what it tells us about the strategies on both sides. From the controversial role of court clerk Becky Hill to the looming oral arguments in late 2025 or early 2026, this delay sets the tone for what could be one of the most consequential appellate rulings in South Carolina history. Subscribe now for all the updates as this legal saga continues to unfold.    Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Alex Murdaugh Murder Appeal Delayed 120 Days – Here's What Happens Next  In this episode, we're diving into the latest twist in the Alex Murdaugh murder appeal—the South Carolina Supreme Court's unexpected decision to grant prosecutors a 120-day extension to respond. With the new deadline now set for August 8, 2025, Murdaugh's defense team is sounding the alarm, accusing the Attorney General's Office of stalling and mismanaging the case. The State, on the other hand, claims “extraordinary circumstances” justify the delay, pointing to a massive 6,000-page trial record and staff turnover. This isn't just a boring scheduling change—it's a courtroom clash that exposes just how complicated, politically sensitive, and high-stakes this appeal really is. The defense argues the longer this drags out, the longer Murdaugh sits in prison on what they claim was a structurally flawed trial. Prosecutors say they need time to do it right. Legal analysts say it's rare to see such a public fight over an appellate deadline, especially one involving a case this notorious. We break down what this extension means, how it affects the timeline of the appeal, and what it tells us about the strategies on both sides. From the controversial role of court clerk Becky Hill to the looming oral arguments in late 2025 or early 2026, this delay sets the tone for what could be one of the most consequential appellate rulings in South Carolina history. Subscribe now for all the updates as this legal saga continues to unfold.    Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

On today's show: 1. The cast for Hulu's 'Murdaugh Murders' true crime show is shaping up. Here's who will star - https://www.postandcourier.com/free-times/news/murdaugh-murders-podcast-hulu-show-sc/article_73eabffe-b885-471b-beea-6853567248e0.html 2. SC Supreme Court grants prosecutors additional time to respond to Murdaugh appeal - https://abcnews4.com/news/local/sc-supreme-court-grants-prosecutors-additional-time-to-respond-to-murdaugh-appeal-wciv-abc-news-4-richard-alexander-murdaugh-south-carolina-supreme-court-former-colleton-county-clerk-of-court-becky-hill-paul-maggie-murdaugh-moselle-estate-double-murder# 3. Ex-Murdaugh banker Russell Laffitte to plead guilty to financial crimes, avoiding retrial - https://www.postandcourier.com/murdaugh-updates/russell-laffitte-plea-agreement-retrial-canceled/article_e9321c75-ac57-4ac0-9965-f8d6d27671a6.html This episode's music is by Tyler Boone (tylerboonemusic.com). The episode was produced by LMC Soundsystem.

Murdaugh to SC: You've Had Long Enough The South Carolina Attorney General's Office wants more time to answer Alex Murdaugh's Supreme Court appeal—and Murdaugh's team isn't having it. In a rare move that flips the courtroom script, it's the defense pressing to move things forward, while the prosecution is asking the highest court in the state to slow it down. On April 3, the AG's Office asked for a second extension in Murdaugh's appeal process. They're asking for 120 more days, which would push their deadline to respond until August 8. But Murdaugh's lawyers fired back almost immediately with a simple message: No. Richard Harpootlian, one of Murdaugh's lead attorneys, didn't mince words. In an email directly to the state's attorneys, he said, “We will not consent.” The state's request comes in response to a 121-page appeal filed by Murdaugh's legal team back in December. That appeal is no small document—it accuses former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill of jury tampering, questions the way evidence was presented, and basically asks the court to take a second look at one of the most widely followed trials in recent memory. The Supreme Court received both motions—the AG's request for time and the defense's refusal—but hasn't yet ruled on either. Murdaugh, the disbarred attorney turned convicted murderer, was sentenced to back-to-back life terms last year for the 2021 shooting deaths of his wife Maggie and son Paul. He has always denied involvement in the killings. His legal team filed for appeal last December, citing what they claim were serious errors during the trial, including that explosive allegation of jury tampering. Originally, the AG's Office had 90 days to respond to the appeal—a deadline they agreed on with the defense. That gave them until April 10. But now they want four more months, claiming the scope of the case is just too big to tackle in time. Their reasoning? For starters, the trial transcripts span over 6,000 pages. Add to that audio recordings, video exhibits, legal briefs, and side hearings, and you've got a mountain of material to review. The AG's team also says they're dealing with other major cases, including death penalty litigation, and their attorneys are simply stretched thin. But Murdaugh's side isn't buying it. They say this appeal has already been pending far too long. They point out that if the extension is granted, it will have taken the state an entire year to respond to their brief. They say they've never heard of that happening in any criminal case—capital or otherwise. They also argue that if the Attorney General's Office can't keep up with its caseload, they should hire outside help. With 90 attorneys on staff, the defense questions why this one case needs so much extra time. Then there's the most telling part: Murdaugh's lawyers say they believe the state's case won't hold up on appeal. They argue that dragging this out only delays justice—and that unless the AG's Office is hiding some blockbuster argument, the state's trying to stall a process that could ultimately lead to overturning the murder convictions. Let's be clear: even if Murdaugh wins this appeal, it doesn't mean he walks out of prison. He's already pleaded guilty to a laundry list of financial crimes—millions stolen from clients and colleagues—and those come with their own steep sentences. But overturning the murder convictions would shake up the legacy of a trial that gripped the country. Now, it's up to the South Carolina Supreme Court to decide whether the state deserves more time—or if the clock has already run out. #AlexMurdaugh #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #LegalNews #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Murdaugh to SC: You've Had Long Enough The South Carolina Attorney General's Office wants more time to answer Alex Murdaugh's Supreme Court appeal—and Murdaugh's team isn't having it. In a rare move that flips the courtroom script, it's the defense pressing to move things forward, while the prosecution is asking the highest court in the state to slow it down. On April 3, the AG's Office asked for a second extension in Murdaugh's appeal process. They're asking for 120 more days, which would push their deadline to respond until August 8. But Murdaugh's lawyers fired back almost immediately with a simple message: No. Richard Harpootlian, one of Murdaugh's lead attorneys, didn't mince words. In an email directly to the state's attorneys, he said, “We will not consent.” The state's request comes in response to a 121-page appeal filed by Murdaugh's legal team back in December. That appeal is no small document—it accuses former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill of jury tampering, questions the way evidence was presented, and basically asks the court to take a second look at one of the most widely followed trials in recent memory. The Supreme Court received both motions—the AG's request for time and the defense's refusal—but hasn't yet ruled on either. Murdaugh, the disbarred attorney turned convicted murderer, was sentenced to back-to-back life terms last year for the 2021 shooting deaths of his wife Maggie and son Paul. He has always denied involvement in the killings. His legal team filed for appeal last December, citing what they claim were serious errors during the trial, including that explosive allegation of jury tampering. Originally, the AG's Office had 90 days to respond to the appeal—a deadline they agreed on with the defense. That gave them until April 10. But now they want four more months, claiming the scope of the case is just too big to tackle in time. Their reasoning? For starters, the trial transcripts span over 6,000 pages. Add to that audio recordings, video exhibits, legal briefs, and side hearings, and you've got a mountain of material to review. The AG's team also says they're dealing with other major cases, including death penalty litigation, and their attorneys are simply stretched thin. But Murdaugh's side isn't buying it. They say this appeal has already been pending far too long. They point out that if the extension is granted, it will have taken the state an entire year to respond to their brief. They say they've never heard of that happening in any criminal case—capital or otherwise. They also argue that if the Attorney General's Office can't keep up with its caseload, they should hire outside help. With 90 attorneys on staff, the defense questions why this one case needs so much extra time. Then there's the most telling part: Murdaugh's lawyers say they believe the state's case won't hold up on appeal. They argue that dragging this out only delays justice—and that unless the AG's Office is hiding some blockbuster argument, the state's trying to stall a process that could ultimately lead to overturning the murder convictions. Let's be clear: even if Murdaugh wins this appeal, it doesn't mean he walks out of prison. He's already pleaded guilty to a laundry list of financial crimes—millions stolen from clients and colleagues—and those come with their own steep sentences. But overturning the murder convictions would shake up the legacy of a trial that gripped the country. Now, it's up to the South Carolina Supreme Court to decide whether the state deserves more time—or if the clock has already run out. #AlexMurdaugh #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #LegalNews #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Murdaugh to SC: You've Had Long Enough The South Carolina Attorney General's Office wants more time to answer Alex Murdaugh's Supreme Court appeal—and Murdaugh's team isn't having it. In a rare move that flips the courtroom script, it's the defense pressing to move things forward, while the prosecution is asking the highest court in the state to slow it down. On April 3, the AG's Office asked for a second extension in Murdaugh's appeal process. They're asking for 120 more days, which would push their deadline to respond until August 8. But Murdaugh's lawyers fired back almost immediately with a simple message: No. Richard Harpootlian, one of Murdaugh's lead attorneys, didn't mince words. In an email directly to the state's attorneys, he said, “We will not consent.” The state's request comes in response to a 121-page appeal filed by Murdaugh's legal team back in December. That appeal is no small document—it accuses former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill of jury tampering, questions the way evidence was presented, and basically asks the court to take a second look at one of the most widely followed trials in recent memory. The Supreme Court received both motions—the AG's request for time and the defense's refusal—but hasn't yet ruled on either. Murdaugh, the disbarred attorney turned convicted murderer, was sentenced to back-to-back life terms last year for the 2021 shooting deaths of his wife Maggie and son Paul. He has always denied involvement in the killings. His legal team filed for appeal last December, citing what they claim were serious errors during the trial, including that explosive allegation of jury tampering. Originally, the AG's Office had 90 days to respond to the appeal—a deadline they agreed on with the defense. That gave them until April 10. But now they want four more months, claiming the scope of the case is just too big to tackle in time. Their reasoning? For starters, the trial transcripts span over 6,000 pages. Add to that audio recordings, video exhibits, legal briefs, and side hearings, and you've got a mountain of material to review. The AG's team also says they're dealing with other major cases, including death penalty litigation, and their attorneys are simply stretched thin. But Murdaugh's side isn't buying it. They say this appeal has already been pending far too long. They point out that if the extension is granted, it will have taken the state an entire year to respond to their brief. They say they've never heard of that happening in any criminal case—capital or otherwise. They also argue that if the Attorney General's Office can't keep up with its caseload, they should hire outside help. With 90 attorneys on staff, the defense questions why this one case needs so much extra time. Then there's the most telling part: Murdaugh's lawyers say they believe the state's case won't hold up on appeal. They argue that dragging this out only delays justice—and that unless the AG's Office is hiding some blockbuster argument, the state's trying to stall a process that could ultimately lead to overturning the murder convictions. Let's be clear: even if Murdaugh wins this appeal, it doesn't mean he walks out of prison. He's already pleaded guilty to a laundry list of financial crimes—millions stolen from clients and colleagues—and those come with their own steep sentences. But overturning the murder convictions would shake up the legacy of a trial that gripped the country. Now, it's up to the South Carolina Supreme Court to decide whether the state deserves more time—or if the clock has already run out. #AlexMurdaugh #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #LegalNews #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Murdaugh to SC: You've Had Long Enough The South Carolina Attorney General's Office wants more time to answer Alex Murdaugh's Supreme Court appeal—and Murdaugh's team isn't having it. In a rare move that flips the courtroom script, it's the defense pressing to move things forward, while the prosecution is asking the highest court in the state to slow it down. On April 3, the AG's Office asked for a second extension in Murdaugh's appeal process. They're asking for 120 more days, which would push their deadline to respond until August 8. But Murdaugh's lawyers fired back almost immediately with a simple message: No. Richard Harpootlian, one of Murdaugh's lead attorneys, didn't mince words. In an email directly to the state's attorneys, he said, “We will not consent.” The state's request comes in response to a 121-page appeal filed by Murdaugh's legal team back in December. That appeal is no small document—it accuses former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill of jury tampering, questions the way evidence was presented, and basically asks the court to take a second look at one of the most widely followed trials in recent memory. The Supreme Court received both motions—the AG's request for time and the defense's refusal—but hasn't yet ruled on either. Murdaugh, the disbarred attorney turned convicted murderer, was sentenced to back-to-back life terms last year for the 2021 shooting deaths of his wife Maggie and son Paul. He has always denied involvement in the killings. His legal team filed for appeal last December, citing what they claim were serious errors during the trial, including that explosive allegation of jury tampering. Originally, the AG's Office had 90 days to respond to the appeal—a deadline they agreed on with the defense. That gave them until April 10. But now they want four more months, claiming the scope of the case is just too big to tackle in time. Their reasoning? For starters, the trial transcripts span over 6,000 pages. Add to that audio recordings, video exhibits, legal briefs, and side hearings, and you've got a mountain of material to review. The AG's team also says they're dealing with other major cases, including death penalty litigation, and their attorneys are simply stretched thin. But Murdaugh's side isn't buying it. They say this appeal has already been pending far too long. They point out that if the extension is granted, it will have taken the state an entire year to respond to their brief. They say they've never heard of that happening in any criminal case—capital or otherwise. They also argue that if the Attorney General's Office can't keep up with its caseload, they should hire outside help. With 90 attorneys on staff, the defense questions why this one case needs so much extra time. Then there's the most telling part: Murdaugh's lawyers say they believe the state's case won't hold up on appeal. They argue that dragging this out only delays justice—and that unless the AG's Office is hiding some blockbuster argument, the state's trying to stall a process that could ultimately lead to overturning the murder convictions. Let's be clear: even if Murdaugh wins this appeal, it doesn't mean he walks out of prison. He's already pleaded guilty to a laundry list of financial crimes—millions stolen from clients and colleagues—and those come with their own steep sentences. But overturning the murder convictions would shake up the legacy of a trial that gripped the country. Now, it's up to the South Carolina Supreme Court to decide whether the state deserves more time—or if the clock has already run out. #AlexMurdaugh #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #LegalNews #TrueCrime Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell and attorney Eric Bland — (3:21) talk about the big reveal this past week of A-List Hollywood actor Jason Clarke in full costume as Alex Murdaugh. Clarke, who stars in the upcoming Hulu production based on the Murdaugh Murders Podcast — now True Sunlight Podcast — was seen filming in Atlanta and … let's just say he has more than just the LUNSHARK team excited for the series.  It turns out the fake Alex Murdaugh wasn't the only one getting headlines this past week. The lawyers for the real (13:35) Alex did what the lawyers for the real Alex do best and that's getting mainstream media to help them wrongly paint the state Attorney General's Office as sneaky and underhanded. As usual, it's much ado about nothing.  Also on the show, (34:08) will Buster Murdaugh's latest strategy in his federal defamation case against Warner Brothers actually work? Mandy and Liz pick Eric's brain on whether Alex's remaining son has a chance.  Plus the latest in the (49:01) Sara Lynn Colucci case and why prosecutors need to rethink their interactions with victims and their families. Premium Episode Resources Deuxmoi's Instagram Post of Jason Clarke as Alex Murdaugh 

On today's show: 1. Special election set for North Charleston council seats left vacant after federal corruption charges - https://www.postandcourier.com/news/special-election-city-council-north-charleston-corruption/article_1fc4b324-f913-11ef-8ad3-5f940e39c70a.html 2. An abortion ban with no exception for rape or incest has come to the SC Statehouse - https://www.postandcourier.com/politics/abortion-ban-south-carolina-no-exceptions/article_e6ff9a92-f901-11ef-bc36-97efabaf3760.html 3. South Carolina Supreme Court rejects man's final appeal, clearing way for firing squad execution - https://apnews.com/article/firing-squad-brad-sigmon-south-carolina-execution-cab4c3e71f4e94e1004918193b2597a2 4. Man accused by Rep. Mace of being predator demands evidence or retraction in open letter - https://abcnews4.com/news/local/man-accused-by-rep-mace-of-being-predator-demands-evidence-or-retraction-in-open-letter-wciv-abc-news-4-house-of-representatives-south-carolina-house-floor-sexual-assault-eric-bland-state-law-enforcement-division-lowcountry-isle-of-palms-sullivans-island This episode's music is by Tyler Boone (tylerboonemusic.com). The episode was produced by LMC Soundsystem.

In this episode of Registry Matters we cover the South Carolina Supreme Court upheld the revised PFR registration system, emphasizing legislative authority over individual rights. And then we cover the expansion of federal judgeships is mired in politics, impacting case resolution and judicial efficiency. [3:58] The South Carolina Supreme Court case McSwain challenges the constitutionality...

Alex Murdaugh's appeal is shaping up to be just as explosive as his trial, and we're diving deep into the legal battle that could change everything. With claims of jury tampering, courtroom misconduct, and the media's overwhelming influence, this case isn't just about guilt or innocence anymore—it's about whether the justice system itself was compromised. In this episode, we break down the strongest arguments in Murdaugh's appeal, the shocking allegations against court clerk Becky Hill, and what the South Carolina Supreme Court's ruling could mean for one of the most infamous murder cases in modern history. Did Becky Hill's alleged private conversations with jurors impact the verdict? Could the overwhelming media coverage have tainted the jury pool beyond repair? And if the Supreme Court grants a new trial, how could prosecutors and Murdaugh's defense team approach the case differently the second time around? We explore the high-stakes legal chess match playing out behind the scenes and the broader implications for the criminal justice system. From Netflix documentaries to social media-fueled speculation, the Murdaugh case has played out in front of millions. But beneath the headlines and viral clips lies a deeper story—one about power, corruption, and the fine line between justice and spectacle. Join us as we unpack the latest developments in the Murdaugh appeal, what the legal experts are saying, and how this case could set a precedent for high-profile trials in the digital age. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Alex Murdaugh's appeal is shaping up to be just as explosive as his trial, and we're diving deep into the legal battle that could change everything. With claims of jury tampering, courtroom misconduct, and the media's overwhelming influence, this case isn't just about guilt or innocence anymore—it's about whether the justice system itself was compromised. In this episode, we break down the strongest arguments in Murdaugh's appeal, the shocking allegations against court clerk Becky Hill, and what the South Carolina Supreme Court's ruling could mean for one of the most infamous murder cases in modern history. Did Becky Hill's alleged private conversations with jurors impact the verdict? Could the overwhelming media coverage have tainted the jury pool beyond repair? And if the Supreme Court grants a new trial, how could prosecutors and Murdaugh's defense team approach the case differently the second time around? We explore the high-stakes legal chess match playing out behind the scenes and the broader implications for the criminal justice system. From Netflix documentaries to social media-fueled speculation, the Murdaugh case has played out in front of millions. But beneath the headlines and viral clips lies a deeper story—one about power, corruption, and the fine line between justice and spectacle. Join us as we unpack the latest developments in the Murdaugh appeal, what the legal experts are saying, and how this case could set a precedent for high-profile trials in the digital age. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Alex Murdaugh's Appeal: The Legal Battle That Could Change Everything Alex Murdaugh's appeal is shaping up to be just as explosive as his trial, and we're diving deep into the legal battle that could change everything. With claims of jury tampering, courtroom misconduct, and the media's overwhelming influence, this case isn't just about guilt or innocence anymore—it's about whether the justice system itself was compromised. In this episode, we break down the strongest arguments in Murdaugh's appeal, the shocking allegations against court clerk Becky Hill, and what the South Carolina Supreme Court's ruling could mean for one of the most infamous murder cases in modern history. Did Becky Hill's alleged private conversations with jurors impact the verdict? Could the overwhelming media coverage have tainted the jury pool beyond repair? And if the Supreme Court grants a new trial, how could prosecutors and Murdaugh's defense team approach the case differently the second time around? We explore the high-stakes legal chess match playing out behind the scenes and the broader implications for the criminal justice system. From Netflix documentaries to social media-fueled speculation, the Murdaugh case has played out in front of millions. But beneath the headlines and viral clips lies a deeper story—one about power, corruption, and the fine line between justice and spectacle. Join us as we unpack the latest developments in the Murdaugh appeal, what the legal experts are saying, and how this case could set a precedent for high-profile trials in the digital age. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Abortion: What does it mean for a fetal heartbeat to be detected? - Argued: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:37:42 EDT

This is the " The Year in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this year's most compelling headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that have dominated the news.    This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.    Throughout the past year, we've followed and dissected cases such as P. Diddy, Karen Read, Scott Peterson, Ruby Franke and Jodi Hildebrand, the Delphi Murders, Kouri Richins, Bryan Kohberger, Rex Heuermann, Alex Murdaugh, Chad and Lori Daybell, and the Adelson family. Each episode navigates through these stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.    Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "The Year in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Alex Murdaugh filed a 132-page appellate brief that asks the South Carolina Supreme Court to overturn his convictions on the murder of his wife, Maggie and his youngest son, Paul. We discuss with Seton's father and attorney Matt Siembieda. Matt Siembieda is an attorney and law professor at Temple Law School. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime past and present from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and Youtub Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Use code emilybaker50 at https://www.GreenChef.com/emilybaker50 to get 50% off, plus 20% off your next two months.Visit https://thrivecausemetics.com/LAWNERD for 20% off your first order.Go to https://shopify.com/lawnerd now to grow your business – no matter what stage you're in.Diddy is denied Motion Seeking Discovery and Evidentiary Hearing related to alleged case leak information by the government. Diddy is allowed to have access to a laptop that doesn't have access to the internet so that he can review discovery information regarding his case from his lawyers.Alec Murdaugh filed his full appeal to the South Carolina Supreme Court as they have agreed to take up his case. This can change the standing law of the state that can overturn the verdict. The main grounds for appeal is that an elected official, Clerk of Court, Becky Hill, tampered with the jury. Becky Hill's 76 Ethics Complaints are on hold while the criminal investigation is in progress.RESOURCESLaffite New Trial - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aFD93lUr60 First Murdaugh Coverage - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPbdI4DO_yg https://www.youtube.com/@lunasharkmedia Alex Murdaugh Trial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gK8GOeWkGfi7acMnT-D0zaw Juror Speaks Out - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QZ0dDzioIg Becky Hill 76 Ethics Complaints - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I15TNtPfC3w Diddy Witness Intimidation - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMzcZLezpdkThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Live from Hollywood! This week attorney Eric Bland asks investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell about their visit to to 'La La Land' and the writers' room of Hulu's upcoming scripted series based on the Murdaugh Murders Podcast.  As always, there was a lot to talk about (including Eric's connection to the Luigi Mangione case?!). Last week, Alex Murdaugh filed a 132-page initial brief for his consolidated appeal in front of the South Carolina Supreme Court and … it's A LOT. Team Murdaugh went full Team Misdirection and added a number of new grievances while leaving out a lot of old context (no surprise there). Mandy, Liz and Eric talk about Alex's chances at getting a new trial and what his latest strategy seems to be. Also on the show, the first prison photo of Cory Fleming has emerged and, let's just say, Hot Summer Cory is officially over. Accountability is coming in all forms… 

Joe McCulloch is the attorney for Myra Crosby. Crosby is also known as the "egg juror' and "juror 785". Crosby was dismissed from the Murdaugh jury just hours before deliberation. McCulloch, on Crosby's behalf, has petitioned the South Carolina Supreme Court to give a reason as why the court has not allowed certain parts of the Murdaugh murder trial proceedings, including en camera discussions between Judge Newman and his client, to be released to the public. McCulloch maintains it is a violation of his client's rights to not have those records released. The full interview with Myra Crosby is available in the August 28th episode "Dismissed Murdaugh Juror Speaks Out" Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime past and present from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and Youtube. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices