Podcasts about murdaugh

Former Chief Justice Jean Toal sat individual jurors down and asked them whether Becky Hill's comments changed their votes. The South Carolina Supreme Court said she had no right to do that. Rule 606(b) protects the privacy of jury deliberations — you can ask whether external contact happened, but you cannot ask jurors how they voted or why. Toal crossed that line, and the Supreme Court corrected it by overruling one of its own prior decisions that had allowed broader inquiry.Defense attorney Eric Faddis walks through the legal mechanics of the reversal with Tony Brueski. The court adopted the Fourth Circuit's Cheek test as binding law in South Carolina. Once the defense demonstrated that Hill's comments were more than innocuous — telling jurors not to be fooled by the defense, to watch Murdaugh's body language, that deliberations shouldn't take long — prejudice was presumed automatically. The burden shifted to the State to prove no reasonable possibility the verdict was influenced. The State couldn't do it. Hill pled guilty to perjury in December 2025 and the court found she was driven by a book deal.But the ruling does more than reverse. It restructures the retrial. The prosecution spent twelve and a half hours on financial crimes the first time. The court flagged specific testimony as having zero probative value on motive and ordered any retrial to limit that evidence to material directly supporting the exposure timeline — the CFO confrontation the morning of the killings, the hearing three days later. The emotional weight that helped convict Murdaugh in the first trial is now subject to exclusion.Faddis addresses which unresolved evidentiary issues — the firearm analysis, the raincoat, the gunshot residue, the iPhone demonstration — give the defense its strongest ground at retrial.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #JeanToal #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JuryTampering #MurdaughTrial

The South Carolina Supreme Court didn't just reverse Alex Murdaugh's conviction. It overruled one of its own prior decisions to do it. The court formally adopted the Fourth Circuit's three-step Cheek test for evaluating juror tampering claims, replacing the standard Jean Toal relied on when she denied the new trial motion. That's not a routine correction. That's the court deciding its own precedent was wrong — and the Murdaugh case was significant enough to rewrite the law.Defense attorney Eric Faddis walks through what the Cheek test actually requires. Once the defense showed that Becky Hill's comments to jurors were more than innocuous, prejudice was presumed automatically. The burden then shifted to the State to prove there was no reasonable possibility the verdict was influenced. The court found the State couldn't meet it. Hill told jurors not to be fooled by the defense, to watch Murdaugh's body language, and that deliberations shouldn't take long. She pled guilty to perjury in December 2025 for lying about her conduct under oath. The court found she was motivated by a book deal.Toal also violated Rule 606(b) by questioning individual jurors about whether the Clerk's comments changed their votes — a direct invasion of jury deliberation privacy. The Supreme Court said the proper inquiry stops at whether external contact occurred and whether it was prejudicial. You don't ask jurors how they voted or why.Faddis also addresses the retrial landscape. The court flagged specific financial crimes testimony as having zero probative value on motive and ordered prosecutors to limit that evidence significantly. The State's motive theory survives only if it stays tethered to the exposure timeline — the CFO confrontation the morning of the murders, the hearing three days later. Everything else is subject to challenge.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #EricFaddis #CheekTest #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JuryTampering #MurdaughTrial

Before the retrial even starts, the Murdaugh defense has to make a decision that could determine the outcome. Do they fight to exclude financial crimes evidence entirely — and risk the judge letting it all back in under the motive exception? Or do they let it in on their terms and attack the connection between a man stealing money and a man allegedly killing his wife and son? Defense attorney Eric Faddis says that strategic fork is the first and most consequential call the defense team has to make.The South Carolina Supreme Court ordered prosecutors to limit financial evidence at retrial to material directly supporting the motive theory. They flagged specific testimony from the first trial as having zero probative value — details about individual theft victims that made Murdaugh look like a monster but had no connection to why he would allegedly commit murder on June 7th, 2021. The State's motive theory survives only through the exposure timeline: the CFO confrontation the morning of the killings and the hearing scheduled three days later that would have forced financial disclosure.Faddis also walks through the evidentiary challenges the Supreme Court left unresolved. The firearm analysis. The blue raincoat. The gunshot residue testimony. The iPhone demonstration that placed Murdaugh at the kennels. He identifies which one gives the defense its strongest argument and explains why the prosecution may face a fundamentally different case the second time — one where the emotional leverage that drove the first conviction is no longer available.The reversal itself was unanimous. Five justices found Becky Hill tampered with the jury, Toal applied the wrong legal standard, and the court overruled its own precedent to adopt the Cheek test. AG Wilson confirmed the State will retry. Murdaugh remains incarcerated on financial convictions.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #MurdaughEvidence #EricFaddis #SCSupremeCourt #FinancialCrimes #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MotiveEvidence #MurdaughTrial

The prosecution spent twelve and a half hours presenting Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes to the jury at his murder trial. The South Carolina Supreme Court just said that was excessive — and any retrial has to cut it down significantly. The question is whether the State can build the same emotional momentum without the parade of individual theft victims who made Murdaugh look terrible but had no direct connection to why he would allegedly commit murder on June 7th, 2021.Defense attorney Eric Faddis breaks down what survives and what doesn't. The State's motive theory rests on a specific exposure timeline: the firm's CFO confronted Murdaugh about missing fees the morning of the killings, and an opposing attorney had a hearing scheduled three days later to force financial disclosure. That timeline can come back at retrial. The testimony about individual victims whose money Murdaugh allegedly stole — the emotional weight that made the jury despise him — likely cannot.Faddis also identifies a strategic fork the defense has to navigate before retrial even begins. Do you fight to keep the financial evidence out entirely and risk the judge letting it all back in? Or do you let it in on your terms and attack the link between financial fraud and murder — arguing that a man stealing money has no reason to kill his wife and son over it?He also addresses evidentiary challenges the Supreme Court left unresolved for retrial: the firearm analysis, the blue raincoat, the gunshot residue testimony, and the iPhone demonstration that placed Murdaugh at the kennels. Faddis identifies which one gives the defense its strongest argument and why.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #MurdaughEvidence #EricFaddis #SCSupremeCourt #FinancialCrimes #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MotiveEvidence #MurdaughTrial

Former Chief Justice Jean Toal denied Alex Murdaugh's motion for a new trial by requiring him to prove the Clerk's comments actually harmed his case. The South Carolina Supreme Court just ruled unanimously that she had it backwards. Under federal law, the burden falls on the State to prove there is no reasonable possibility the verdict was influenced. All five justices found the State couldn't meet that standard. Toal also improperly questioned jurors about whether the comments changed their individual votes — violating the protections around jury deliberation privacy.The Clerk in question is Becky Hill, who the court found made unprecedented improper statements to jurors during the trial. She told them not to be fooled by the defense evidence, to watch Murdaugh's body language closely, and that deliberations shouldn't take long. The court determined her conduct was driven by a book deal that depended on a guilty verdict. Hill pled guilty to perjury in December 2025 for lying under oath about what she did.With retrial confirmed by AG Alan Wilson, the Supreme Court also drew a line: prosecutors presented over twelve hours of financial crimes evidence at the first trial. The court called that excessive and restricted any retrial to financial evidence directly supporting the motive theory. Murdaugh remains incarcerated on financial convictions.And while the courts sort through the wreckage, Blanca Simpson — the Murdaughs' housekeeper for fifteen years — is detailing what she found inside the house after the murders. Staged pajamas. A misplaced wedding ring. An unidentified truck at the property. Alex trying to establish a false detail about his clothing. And an investigator who allegedly told her to stop obsessing when she tried to report it. The system failed at more than one level in this case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #BeckyHill #JeanToal #SCSupremeCourt #BlancaSimpson #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughTrial #ColletonCounty

Maggie Murdaugh's pajamas were laid out in the laundry room doorway when Blanca Simpson walked into the house twelve hours after the murders. Underclothes were set out with them. Blanca knew immediately — Maggie never wore underclothes to bed. In fifteen years of cleaning that home, washing those clothes, knowing that routine inside and out, Blanca says she recognized the setup for what it was. Someone who didn't know Maggie's habits tried to make the scene look normal and got it wrong.In this segment of her interview with Tony Brueski, Blanca walks through everything she noticed that morning. Pots in the refrigerator with lids on, something completely out of character for anyone in the household. Maggie's Mercedes parked in a spot she'd never use, as if someone unfamiliar with the routine had moved it. One of Maggie's three wedding bands under the driver's seat — Blanca says if Maggie removed one ring, she removed all three, and she always placed them in the same spots. A beach towel from the laundry room found inside Alex's Suburban, which told Blanca he had been in the room where the pajamas were staged and where the shirt in question came from.Then Alex arrived at the guest house, pacing and disheveled, and asked Blanca to confirm he'd been wearing a specific Vineyard Vines shirt. She knew that wasn't what he had on. She didn't know he'd just returned from a SLED interview.Blanca also describes a white truck and a tractor with a digging bucket on the property the day of the murders — details she says SLED showed no interest in when she tried to report them. An investigator allegedly told her to stop obsessing and get professional help.LINKS & LEGALJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MurdaughTrial #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #SLED #MurdaughFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughMurders

A case that people thought was closed – the Murdaugh murders case in South Carolina – was turned on its head this week. A judge overturned the convictions of Richard Alexander Murdaugh, known as Alex Murdaugh, for allegedly killing his wife and son, and ordered a new trial. While the Murdugh case made plenty of headlines this week, you may have missed an update to another high-profile case, the 2024 Kansas City Super Bowl parade shooting. This week, two men convicted of the shooting went free. We'll also check in on the Tanner Horner case in Texas and other quick updates from across the U.S. Featuring audio from 1010 WINS in New York, NYW Newsradio in Philadelphia, KRLD 1080 in Dallas, The Dana & Parks Show out of KMBZ in Kansas City, The Tara Show out of 98.9 WORD in Greenville, South Carolina and KCBS Radio out of the Bay Area.

A case that people thought was closed – the Murdaugh murders case in South Carolina – was turned on its head this week. A judge overturned the convictions of Richard Alexander Murdaugh, known as Alex Murdaugh, for allegedly killing his wife and son, and ordered a new trial. While the Murdugh case made plenty of headlines this week, you may have missed an update to another high-profile case, the 2024 Kansas City Super Bowl parade shooting. This week, two men convicted of the shooting went free. We'll also check in on the Tanner Horner case in Texas and other quick updates from across the U.S. Featuring audio from 1010 WINS in New York, NYW Newsradio in Philadelphia, KRLD 1080 in Dallas, The Dana & Parks Show out of KMBZ in Kansas City, The Tara Show out of 98.9 WORD in Greenville, South Carolina and KCBS Radio out of the Bay Area.

Alex Murdaugh walked into the guest house pacing, shirt half untucked, rubbing his stomach in circles, holding a spit cup in one hand. He told Blanca Simpson to sit down. Then he asked her a question: do you remember what I was wearing that day? The Vineyard Vines shirt? She sat there and listened. In the back of her mind, she knew that wasn't what he was wearing. She didn't know he'd just come from a SLED interview. She didn't know investigators were already looking at him.In this segment of her interview with Tony Brueski, Blanca details the hours after the Murdaugh murders from inside the family's orbit. She walked into the Moselle house twelve hours after Maggie and Paul were found dead and immediately started noticing things that were wrong. Pajamas set out with underclothes Maggie never wore to bed. Pots in the refrigerator with lids on — something no one in that family would do. Maggie's car parked in a spot she'd never park it. One wedding band out of three, found under the driver's seat of the Mercedes.Then came the beach towel in Alex's Suburban — the detail Blanca calls her biggest clue. That towel came from the laundry room. The same room where the pajamas were staged. The same room where the shirt Alex was asking about would have been. Blanca called her husband after the conversation. He told her it didn't sound right.She also reveals a white Ford F-150 at the property on the day of the murders that she assumed was Paul's — until she learned Paul's truck was in the shop. And a tractor with a digging bucket heading toward the back fields. She believes someone was preparing a location to hide evidence. When she tried to share these observations with SLED, they allegedly told her to get professional help.LINKS & LEGALJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MurdaughTrial #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #SLED #MurdaughFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughMurders

A juror in Alex Murdaugh's double murder trial had questions about his guilt. She voted to convict anyway — after the Clerk of Court told the jury not to be fooled by the defense. All five South Carolina Supreme Court justices just ruled unanimously that Becky Hill's conduct was unprecedented in the state's history and that her comments tainted the verdict. The court found Hill was motivated by a book deal that depended on a guilty verdict. She pled guilty to perjury in December 2025.The ruling dismantled the earlier decision by former Chief Justice Jean Toal, who denied Murdaugh's motion for a new trial using the wrong legal standard. Toal required Murdaugh to prove harm. The law requires the State to prove no reasonable possibility of influence. The court said the State couldn't do that. The justices also found Toal improperly questioned jurors about whether the Clerk's comments affected their votes, violating deliberation protections.For retrial, the court ordered prosecutors to limit financial crimes evidence to material directly supporting the motive theory — calling the twelve-plus hours of financial testimony at the first trial excessive. AG Alan Wilson confirmed the State will retry. Murdaugh remains behind bars on financial convictions.And while the legal system continues to reckon with itself, the Murdaugh family's longtime housekeeper is filling in the gaps the investigation left open. Blanca Simpson walked into the Moselle house twelve hours after the murders and found staged pajamas, a misplaced wedding ring, and a pattern of evidence that pointed to help — people she calls "the cleaners." She also saw an unidentified white truck at the property the day of the murders that was never accounted for. When she tried to report it to SLED, she says they told her to stop obsessing.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #BlancaSimpson #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughTrial #NewTrial #ColletonCounty

Blanca Simpson calls them “the cleaners.” In her telling, Alex Murdaugh did not handle the aftermath of Maggie and Paul's murders alone. Someone moved Maggie's car and parked it in a spot she'd never use — close to the kitchen entrance, as if following Alex's vehicle without knowing the household's parking routine. Someone removed one of Maggie's three wedding bands, and Blanca believes it fell from a pocket into the space under the driver's seat during the rush. If Blanca's theory holds, this wasn't a crime of impulse. It was planned, and it had help.In this segment of her interview with Tony Brueski, Blanca details the evidence trail she pieced together after walking into the Moselle house twelve hours after the murders. The pajamas staged in the laundry room doorway with underclothes Maggie never wore to bed — a detail only someone who knew her daily routine would catch. The pots stored wrong in the refrigerator. The beach towel from the laundry room found in Alex's Suburban, which told Blanca he'd been in the room where the staging happened.She describes Alex arriving at the guest house, pacing, shirt half untucked, asking her to confirm he'd been wearing a Vineyard Vines shirt that day. She knew he wasn't. She later learned he'd just come from a SLED interview.Before any of that, on the day of the murders, Blanca saw a white Ford F-150 at the property she assumed was Paul's. Paul's truck was in the shop. She saw a tractor with a front-end bucket heading toward the back fields. She believes someone was preparing a concealment site. When she tried to share what she noticed with SLED, they allegedly told her to stop obsessing and get help. She stopped talking.LINKS & LEGALJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MurdaughTrial #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #SLED #MurdaughFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughMurders

AG Alan Wilson confirmed the State will retry Alex Murdaugh for the murders of Maggie and Paul. But the South Carolina Supreme Court attached a condition that could reshape the entire case. Prosecutors spent over twelve hours presenting financial crimes evidence at the first trial. The court called that excessive and ordered any retrial to limit financial testimony to evidence that directly supports the motive theory — no more lengthy, inflammatory detail designed to make the defendant look bad rather than prove the charge.The reversal itself was unanimous. All five justices found that Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill made improper comments to jurors during the original trial, telling them not to be fooled by the defense, to watch Murdaugh's body language, and that deliberations shouldn't take long. The court found Hill was driven by a book deal that a guilty verdict would help sell. She pled guilty to perjury in December 2025.The justices also found that former Chief Justice Jean Toal applied the wrong legal standard when she denied Murdaugh's new trial motion. Toal required Murdaugh to prove harm. The law requires the State to prove no reasonable possibility the verdict was influenced — and the court said the State couldn't do it. Toal also violated jury deliberation protections by questioning individual jurors about whether the Clerk's comments changed their votes. Murdaugh remains incarcerated on financial convictions while retrial proceedings move forward.While the legal fight resets, our interview with Blanca Simpson — fifteen years as the Murdaugh family's housekeeper — is raising questions the investigation never answered. She walked into the house twelve hours after the murders and found evidence of staging, an unidentified vehicle at the property, and a pattern she believes points to accomplices she calls "the cleaners." SLED allegedly told her to get help when she tried to report what she saw.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #BlancaSimpson #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughTrial #AlanWilson #ColletonCounty

The South Carolina Supreme Court didn't split on this. All five justices agreed — Becky Hill's comments to the jury during Alex Murdaugh's murder trial were improper enough to reverse the conviction. The court found Hill told jurors not to be fooled by defense evidence, to watch Murdaugh's body language, and that deliberations shouldn't take long. Her motive, according to the ruling: a book deal that needed a guilty verdict to sell. Hill pled guilty to perjury in December 2025 for lying about her actions under oath.The justices also took apart former Chief Justice Jean Toal's handling of the new trial motion. Toal applied the wrong legal standard, putting the burden on Murdaugh instead of requiring the State to prove the comments couldn't have influenced the verdict. The court said the State failed that test. Toal also improperly questioned individual jurors about whether the Clerk's statements changed their votes — a direct violation of jury deliberation protections.The ruling sets boundaries for retrial. Prosecutors spent twelve-plus hours on financial crimes evidence the first time around. The court called it excessive and ordered any future trial to limit that material to evidence directly tied to the motive theory. AG Alan Wilson says the State will retry. Murdaugh remains incarcerated on his financial convictions.At the same time, our ongoing interview with Blanca Simpson — the Murdaugh family's housekeeper for fifteen years — continues to surface details the first investigation apparently had no interest in pursuing. An unidentified truck at the property. A tractor with a digging bucket heading toward the fields. Alex asking Blanca to confirm a shirt she knew he wasn't wearing. And SLED allegedly telling her to get professional help when she tried to share what she saw.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #BlancaSimpson #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughTrial #NewTrial #ColletonCounty

There was a white Ford F-150 at the Murdaugh property on the day of the murders. Blanca Simpson saw it from inside the house and assumed it was Paul's. She didn't think twice about it — Maggie had told her Alex asked Paul to come home. It wasn't until later that Blanca learned Paul's truck was in the shop. That truck has never been publicly identified.In this segment of her interview with Tony Brueski, Blanca also describes a tractor with a front-end bucket crossing the old landing strip toward the back fields that same day. She believes whoever was driving it may have been preparing a spot to conceal evidence — clothing, shoes, whatever needed to disappear. Moselle had four access points, miles of property, and enough regular tractor activity that fresh tracks wouldn't raise suspicion. Blanca doesn't believe the evidence is still there. She thinks it was buried, then retrieved and moved later.When Blanca returned to the house twelve hours after the murders, the details kept piling up. Maggie's pajamas were laid out in the laundry room doorway with underclothes she never wore to bed. Pots were stored in the refrigerator in a way nobody in that family would do. One of Maggie's three wedding bands was under the driver's seat of her Mercedes. And a beach towel from the laundry room was in Alex's Suburban — the detail that told Blanca he had been in that room.Alex later came to Blanca and asked her to confirm he'd been wearing a Vineyard Vines shirt. She knew he wasn't. When she tried to bring her observations to SLED, an investigator allegedly told her she was obsessing and needed professional help. She stopped talking after that.LINKS & LEGALJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MurdaughTrial #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #SLED #MurdaughFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughMurders

Paul Murdaugh kept Mallory Beach's obituary tucked into the door frame of his truck. Every time he climbed in, it was right there. Blanca Simpson saw it because she'd been inside the Murdaugh home for fifteen years and knew things about that family the cameras and courtrooms never captured. In this interview with Tony Brueski, Blanca tells the story of who the Murdaughs actually were behind the front door — and why the public version doesn't match what she witnessed.She goes back to the beginning — meeting Alex in the late '90s, translating for his cases, and eventually becoming the family's housekeeper after the real estate crash left her between jobs. Over the years, the relationship deepened from cleaning to running the household, cashing checks, and becoming someone Maggie trusted enough to confide in when Alex wouldn't give her the full truth about a $30 million lawsuit bearing down on the family.Blanca challenges the public image of both Maggie and Paul. She describes Maggie as the opposite of the cold socialite in a fur coat — loud, funny, generous, and always shopping local to support the community. She remembers Paul's humor and his arrogance in equal measure, but insists the version the media handed the public after the boating incident erased the person he actually was.She reveals the private fractures: Maggie wanting to sell everything to make things right while Alex wouldn't sit down long enough to explain the situation. The joke about Maggie divorcing Alex for Tom Brady that got twisted into a serious rumor. And the two months before the murders when Alex started retreating — staying in bed, showing up late, carrying something nobody around him could fully see.LINKS & LEGALJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MurdaughTrial #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina

Researchers have identified a type of family annihilator called "anomic" — men who see their families as symbols of their own success and destroy them when the facade collapses. James Lasdun's new book The Family Man places Alex Murdaugh alongside documented cases that mirror his almost exactly. The most disturbing constant: in every single one, the people closest to the killer described him as a loving family man. Nobody saw it coming. Nobody believed it was possible.The book profiles Jean-Claude Romand, a Frenchman who faked being a doctor for eighteen years, stole money from everyone who trusted him, and killed his wife, both children, and his parents when the lies started to fall apart. The financial fraud, the decades of deception, the moment of exposure — the parallels to the Murdaugh case are specific and documented.Co-prosecutor John Meadors went off-script during closing arguments and suggested maybe Alex "just lost it" — that the murders weren't calculated. The book argues both could be true. The research on psychopathy lists planning and impulsivity as traits of the same condition. The first officer at Moselle described Alex's eyes as wrong — low blink rate, staring off as if reading from a script. Hours later, Alex was sobbing in a SLED agent's car and it looked completely real. The book suggests the grief and the deception were happening simultaneously. That both were genuine.But the manipulation went back years. Morgan Doughty's first statement allegedly said someone else was driving the boat the night Mallory Beach was killed. The story changed after Alex showed up at the hospital. He sat with a sketch artist and drew a composite of his "attacker" after the staged shooting — it allegedly looked like a boat crash survivor. He wrote a $5,000 backdated check to a police chief who was at the murder scene. The pattern didn't start at the kennels. It started years before.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #FamilyAnnihilator #TheFamilyMan #JamesLasdun #CriminalPsychology #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MurdaughTrial #MaggieMurdaugh #MalloryBeach

A case that people thought was closed – the Murdaugh murders case in South Carolina – was turned on its head this week. A judge overturned the convictions of Ricard Alexander Murdaugh, known as Alex Murdaugh, for allegedly killing his wife and son, and ordered a new trial. While the Murdugh case made plenty of headlines this week, you may have missed an update to another high-profile case, the 2024 Kansas City Super Bowl parade shooting. This week, two men convicted of the shooting went free. Those are just some of the cases we'll cover in this episode. Featuring audio from 1010 WINS in New York, NYW Newsradio in Philadelphia, KRLD 1080 in Dallas, The Dana & Parks Show out of KMBZ in Kansas City, The Tara Show out of 98.9 WORD in Greenville, South Carolina, KCBS Radio out of the Bay Area, WBEN News & Talk in Buffalo and WCCO News Talk in the Twin Cities.

A case that people thought was closed – the Murdaugh murders case in South Carolina – was turned on its head this week. A judge overturned the convictions of Ricard Alexander Murdaugh, known as Alex Murdaugh, for allegedly killing his wife and son, and ordered a new trial. While the Murdugh case made plenty of headlines this week, you may have missed an update to another high-profile case, the 2024 Kansas City Super Bowl parade shooting. This week, two men convicted of the shooting went free. Those are just some of the cases we'll cover in this episode. Featuring audio from 1010 WINS in New York, NYW Newsradio in Philadelphia, KRLD 1080 in Dallas, The Dana & Parks Show out of KMBZ in Kansas City, The Tara Show out of 98.9 WORD in Greenville, South Carolina, KCBS Radio out of the Bay Area, WBEN News & Talk in Buffalo and WCCO News Talk in the Twin Cities.

Morgan Doughty's first written statement — given before Alex Murdaugh got to anyone — allegedly said Connor Cook took over driving the boat before the crash that killed Mallory Beach. By the next day, the story had changed. According to James Lasdun's new book The Family Man, a whispered conversation between survivors at the hospital happened while Alex was prowling the hallways, allegedly trying to force his way into patients' rooms and telling people what to say. The accepted narrative of who was behind the wheel may have been constructed after the fact.That's the kind of detail The Family Man is built on — patterns of manipulation that predate the murders by years and that have never been fully reported. After the staged roadside shooting, Alex sat with a sketch artist and created a composite of his supposed attacker. According to the book, the portrait looked like Anthony Cook, a boat crash survivor. With a bullet wound in his head, Alex was still allegedly pointing investigators toward specific people.Lasdun also uncovered a $5,000 personal check Alex wrote to a Yemassee police chief who was at the Moselle crime scene the night of the murders — backdated by months, never explained. And connections between Alex and a jellyfish-processing operation near Moselle, whose lawyer was convicted decades earlier of laundering drug money through offshore accounts.The book goes further into the psychology. Researchers have identified a type of family annihilator called "anomic" — men who see their families as extensions of their own success. When the empire falls, the family becomes obsolete. The documented cases that mirror Alex's profile share one constant: the people closest to the killer always described him as a loving family man. The first officer at Moselle said Alex's eyes were wrong — low blink rate, staring off like he was reading from a script. Hours later, he was sobbing in a SLED agent's car and it looked completely real. The book argues both may have been genuine simultaneously.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #TheFamilyMan #MalloryBeach #BoatCrash #JamesLasdun #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #MurdaughTrial #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh

Maggie Murdaugh told her housekeeper she would have sold everything — the house, the land, all of it — to settle the $30 million lawsuit and make things right for the families involved. Alex wouldn't even give her a straight answer about where the money stood. Blanca Simpson heard both sides of that conversation because she'd spent fifteen years inside the Murdaugh home, trusted enough to be in the room when the walls started closing in.In this interview with Tony Brueski, Blanca opens up about the family she knew versus the family the public was given. She traces her relationship with the Murdaughs from a chance meeting with Alex in the late '90s through the years she spent embedded in their household — cleaning, running errands, cashing checks, and becoming someone Maggie leaned on when Alex wouldn't give her the full picture.Blanca describes a Maggie the media never showed — casual, generous, loud, and funny. A woman who supported local businesses and made friends with everyone she crossed paths with. She remembers Paul as a jokester who carried Mallory Beach's obituary in his truck and thought about her every day, long after the coverage moved on and the public reduced him to his worst moment.She details Alex's behavioral shift in the months before the murders — retreating into bed, arriving late to work, carrying the weight of a dying father and mounting legal exposure while shielding everyone around him from the truth. She dismantles the divorce rumor by tracing it to a joke about Maggie leaving Alex for Tom Brady that someone overheard and twisted into something it never was.And she walks through the morning of June 7th, 2021 — the last ordinary morning before the Murdaugh name became something else entirely.LINKS & LEGALJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MurdaughTrial #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina

The Murdaugh divorce rumor traveled through the case like established fact. Blanca Simpson says it started as a joke — Maggie telling the boys she was going to divorce Alex and marry Tom Brady. Somebody overheard half a phone call and ran with it. Blanca was in the room when Maggie said it, and she's been waiting to set the record straight ever since. That's the kind of access fifteen years inside the Murdaugh home gave her — close enough to know what was real and what the public got wrong.In this interview with Tony Brueski, Blanca traces her full history with the Murdaugh family. She met Alex at his law office in the late '90s, translated for his cases, and by 2007 had become Maggie's housekeeper. Over the years, the role expanded well beyond cleaning — errands, groceries, bank runs, and eventually becoming someone both Maggie and Alex depended on without having to ask.Blanca offers a portrait of the family that contradicts nearly every public narrative. Maggie wasn't the socialite. She was casual, warm, and preferred local shops to high-end stores. Paul wasn't the one-dimensional figure the media constructed after the boating incident. He was a jokester who carried Mallory Beach's obituary in his truck and mourned her quietly long after the headlines moved on.She also details what was building beneath the surface. Maggie pulling her aside about a $30 million lawsuit Alex wouldn't fully explain. Alex telling Maggie just enough to keep her from pressing further. The behavioral shift in the months before the murders — Alex retreating into bed, showing up late, visibly worn down. And the morning of June 7th, 2021, when Blanca saw Alex for the last time before the night that ended Maggie and Paul's lives.LINKS & LEGALJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MurdaughTrial #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina

Alex Murdaugh is going to be spending the next month and some change inside of a single cell in the solitary confinement wing at Kirkland Correctional unit. Kirkland is one of the most notorious facilities in South Carolina with four inmates being strangled to death there in 2022. After an evaluation period, the department of corrections will make a final decision on where Alex Murdaugh will spend the rest of his life and will be shipped to that facility after his evaluation period ends. (commercial at 7:32)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Inside the hellhole prison where Alex Murdaugh is under 24/7 surveillance in isolation cell | Daily Mail Online

Alex Murdaugh will be spending the rest of his life in Prison and now a Judge has ruled that he won't have access to his 401k funds to help pay for his appeal. The Judge made the ruling based on the fact that Murdaugh owes restitution to several victims and his money will go towards making them whole before he has access to it. Murdaugh was found guilty of murdering his wife and his son and is also facing charges of fraud in several other cases as well.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Alex Murdaugh is denied access to his retirement accounts for $160,000 to fund his appeal | Daily Mail Online

Alex Murdaugh spent two days on the stand giving testimony in his own defense during the trial that see's him accused of murdering his wife and his son. Depending on who you ask, it was either a shrewd move on the part of the defense to Murdaugh on the stand, where some say he humanized himself to the jury or he made a fool of himself and exposed himself to be the liar that the state has painted him to be. In this episode, we take a look at some of those moments on the stand and how they might impact the jury as they prepare to deliberate. to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:As the murder trial finishes, Alex Murdaugh's lie about his whereabouts, and his reversal, weigh heavily, legal experts say | CNN

Maggie Murdaugh asked a direct question about $30 million. Alex gave her just enough of an answer to stop her from pressing further — then moved on. That pattern repeated itself for months inside the Murdaugh household, and Blanca Simpson watched it happen from closer than almost anyone alive. She'd been the family's housekeeper for fifteen years. She was trusted enough to hear the conversations that never made it outside the house.In this sit-down with Tony Brueski, Blanca walks through the full arc of her time inside the Murdaugh home. She met Alex in the late '90s, translated for his legal cases, and eventually became embedded in the family's daily routine after the real estate crash. What started as housekeeping became something Maggie depended on far more personally — errands, bank runs, emotional support after the boating incident, and a trusted presence during the most strained period the family had ever faced.Blanca paints a version of the Murdaughs that doesn't match what most people think they know. Maggie dressed casually, supported local businesses, and treated everyone the same regardless of who they were. Paul was a jokester who hid her cleaning supplies and carried Mallory Beach's obituary in his truck every single day. The divorce attorney story was actually a running joke about Maggie leaving Alex for Tom Brady.She also describes the quiet deterioration she witnessed in the months before the murders. Alex staying in bed longer, arriving late to his own office, looking more worn down each week under the weight of his father's illness and the financial walls closing in. Maggie confiding behind closed doors that she couldn't get her husband to tell her the whole truth. And then the morning of June 7th, 2021 — the last time Blanca saw Alex before that night changed everything.LINKS & LEGALJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MurdaughTrial #AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #BlancaSimpson #MurdaughFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MurdaughMurders #SouthCarolina

A case that people thought was closed – the Murdaugh murders case in South Carolina – was turned on its head this week. A judge overturned the convictions of Ricard Alexander Murdaugh, known as Alex Murdaugh, for allegedly killing his wife and son, and ordered a new trial. While the Murdugh case made plenty of headlines this week, you may have missed an update to another high-profile case, the 2024 Kansas City Super Bowl parade shooting. This week, two men convicted of the shooting went free. Those are just some of the cases we'll cover in this episode. Featuring audio from 1010 WINS in New York, NYW Newsradio in Philadelphia, KRLD 1080 in Dallas, The Dana & Parks Show out of KMBZ in Kansas City, The Tara Show out of 98.9 WORD in Greenville, South Carolina, KCBS Radio out of the Bay Area, WBEN News & Talk in Buffalo and WCCO News Talk in the Twin Cities.

In this episode of True Crime News The Sidebar Podcast: Joshua Ritter breaks down the biggest cases making headlines across the nation. He discusses the ruling overturning Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions after an unfortunate case of jury tampering, the start of Larry Millete's trial for the death of his missing wife Maya, and the path to extradition for Lee Gilley. Tweet your questions for future episodes to Joshua Ritter using the hashtag #TCNSidebar. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In today's  episode KJ and Jim bring you the week's trending crime related headlines. Check out the below for all the topics of the headlines we are covering today!Timestamps05:00 Alex Murdaugh's Murder Convictions Overturned.13:00 (27) Disney Cruise Line Workers Arrested for CSAM.19:00 Louisiana State Police Colonel Robert Hodges “Stepping Down”.24:00 Bus Stop Shooting Suspect Had Ankle Monitor.30:00 “Tenant From Hell” Arrest in the Bronx.35:00 Goldilocks Style Crime Targets Popular Sportscaster.40:00 “Utterly Unrelated Segment” - Stuck on the Roller Coaster.48:00 The “Teen Takeover” Trend Leads to 22 Arrests in Florida.53:00 Colorado Man Hit By Commercial Jet on Runway.56:00 Pennsylvania Man Sets Fire to Romantic Interest House.OVERTIMEKing Henry IV *True Crime Time MachineFireFighter Drives 8 Hours to Kill FamilyMan Evades Police for 20 Years.“Dentist Behind the Door” TrialVIDEO VERSION OF CRIME WIRE WEEKLY ON PATREON can be found via either link below: Exposed PatreonUnspeakable Patreon

The Supreme Court said the prosecution went "far too long and far too deep" into Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes at the first trial. They singled out testimony with "zero probative value" on motive that existed only to make Murdaugh look like someone who takes advantage of the helpless. Any retrial has to be leaner. The question is whether lean is enough.Eric Fadds brings his prosecutorial experience to the problem. The State's motive theory depends on a specific convergence of events in the days before the killings: the CFO's confrontation about missing fees, the upcoming hearing that would have forced financial disclosure, the tightening noose around years of theft. The court said that timeline is fair game. But the detailed victim testimony, the emotional narratives, the hours of accounting — the court made clear that was propensity evidence dressed up as motive.Fadds also tackles the evidentiary issues the court left open for the retrial judge to decide — the firearm analysis, the raincoat, the gunshot residue, the iPhone demonstration — and the defense strategy question that underlies everything: concede the financial conduct and attack the motive link, or try to keep all of it out.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughRetrial #MurdaughEvidence #EricFadds #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #FinancialCrimes #Rule403 #MurdaughTrial

Three years between the verdict and the reversal. In that time, the defense picked up a perjury conviction against the clerk who tampered with the jury and a Supreme Court opinion restricting the financial evidence that dominated the first trial. The prosecution picked up a complete transcript of Murdaugh's testimony and additional time to refine its forensic case.Eric Faddis weighs the advantages from both sides. Murdaugh's prior testimony is potentially the State's most valuable asset — a locked-in record that constrains the defense whether Murdaugh testifies again or not. But the defense has something it never had before: an official judicial finding that the first trial was unfair, backed by the harshest language the Supreme Court could muster against a court officer.Faddis addresses whether Hill's misconduct can be put before the retrial jury as part of the defense narrative, whether the State has new evidence to bring, and the jury selection challenge that may define the entire proceeding — finding twelve people in South Carolina who haven't already formed an opinion about this case.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughRetrial #EricFaddis #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #NewTrial #JurySelection #MurdaughTrial

A former Chief Justice of South Carolina evaluated Becky Hill's jury conduct and concluded Alex Murdaugh wasn't prejudiced. Five sitting Supreme Court justices looked at the same record and said she applied the wrong legal standard entirely. The conviction is gone.Eric Fadds brings his experience as both a former prosecutor and current defense attorney to the question of how that happened. The court found Toal committed multiple errors: she placed the burden of proof on Murdaugh instead of the State, she questioned jurors about whether Hill's comments changed their votes in violation of Rule 606(b), and she relied on those improper answers to deny the new trial motion. The Supreme Court overruled one of its own prior decisions to reinforce that juror mental processes are off-limits.Fadds breaks down the Remmer presumption the court formally adopted, explains how Toal's handling of Juror Z's contradictory testimony gave the Supreme Court an opening to reject her credibility findings, and addresses how unusual it is for an appellate court to credit witness testimony that the lower court tried to limit from the record.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #BeckyHill #MurdaughRetrial #JuryTampering #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #EricFadds #JeanToal #MurdaughTrial

The South Carolina Supreme Court threw out Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions, restricted the evidence that dominated his first trial, and rewrote the legal standard for jury tampering claims in the state. Eric Faddis — a former prosecutor who now practices defense — provides the full analysis.The ruling: Toal placed the burden on Murdaugh, violated evidence rules by questioning jurors about their mental processes, and relied on testimony that was inadmissible. The court adopted the Cheek framework, making it the governing standard in South Carolina, and found the State could not prove the verdict was unaffected by Hill's comments.The evidence: twelve and a half hours of financial crimes testimony flagged as excessive. The motive timeline survives. The inflammatory details do not. The defense also has unresolved challenges to forensic evidence the court declined to address.The retrial: Murdaugh's prior testimony locked in as a prosecution asset. Hill's conviction as a potential defense narrative. A venue fight with no obvious answer. And Faddis' answer to the question every trial lawyer in the country is asking — which side would you rather be on?LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughRetrial #EricFaddis #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #BeckyHill #JuryTampering #MurdaughEvidence #NewTrial

James Lasdun spent years investigating the Murdaugh case for The New Yorker and his book The Family Man. This interview covers it all — the manipulation patterns that started long before the murders, the evidence that was kept from the jury, and the psychology that finally explains how a father kills his own family.The book reveals that the boat crash narrative may have been built after the fact, traces Alex's staging and framing patterns through the hospital and the roadside shooting, and uncovers a backdated check to a police chief who was at the crime scene.It surfaces calls with men with criminal records on the day of the murders that prosecutors left off the jury's timeline, Cousin Eddie's failed polygraph, and physical evidence — unidentified tire tracks, Maggie's car in the wrong position — that was never investigated or explained.And it draws on decades of criminal psychology research to place Alex alongside documented family annihilators. Men who appeared devoted. Men who were described as loving. Men who killed their families when exposure became inevitable.The full interview. One conversation that reframes the entire case.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #TheFamilyMan #MurdaughMurders #FamilyAnnihilator #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeToday #CousinEddie #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #CriminalPsychology

The conviction is reversed. The retrial is coming. And the case Alex Murdaugh faces the second time around is fundamentally different from the one that produced a guilty verdict in March 2023. Eric Faddis — who has tried cases from both the prosecution and defense side — provides the complete legal analysis.Faddis dissects the Supreme Court's unanimous ruling, from Toal's reversed burden of proof to the Rule 606(b) violation to the court's independent crediting of witness testimony that Toal tried to limit from the record. He maps the evidence landscape for retrial — identifying which financial crimes testimony survives the court's restriction and which gets cut, and flagging the unresolved evidentiary challenges from the direct appeal that the defense will press.The conversation covers the full retrial picture: Murdaugh's locked-in prior testimony, Hill's perjury conviction as a potential narrative weapon, the venue and jury selection challenge, and the strategic advantages each side carries into a courtroom where the rules have been rewritten.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #EricFaddis #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #SCSupremeCourt #BeckyHill #MurdaughCase #JuryTampering #NewTrial

Both sides of the Murdaugh case gained leverage over the past three years — but the advantages cut in opposite directions. The defense has a Supreme Court opinion calling the first trial fundamentally unfair and a former clerk with a perjury conviction. The prosecution has a locked-in transcript of everything Murdaugh said under oath and three years of investigative refinement.Eric Faddis analyzes the strategic landscape. Murdaugh's first-trial testimony creates a trap: testify again and face impeachment with his own prior words, or stay silent and let the jury wonder why. The defense may try to put Hill's misconduct before the retrial jury as a narrative weapon, but the judge could rule the tampering issue is resolved and keep her out. Meanwhile, the prosecution may have new forensic work or expert testimony that wasn't available the first time.Faddis also confronts the venue problem head-on — after three years of saturation coverage, a Supreme Court reversal, and a clerk's criminal conviction, the question of where you find twelve impartial people in this state may be the most consequential pretrial fight of all.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #JurySelection #MurdaughCase #NewTrial

Twelve and a half hours. Ten days of trial. Ten witnesses. That is how much time the prosecution spent on Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes the first time around. The South Carolina Supreme Court said the State could have made its motive argument in a fraction of that time — and ordered the next trial to do exactly that.Eric Fadds analyzes what the restriction means for the prosecution's case. The motive theory has a specific spine: Murdaugh's financial schemes were converging toward exposure in the days before the killings. That evidence can survive. But the detailed testimony about individual clients, the emotional dimensions of each theft, the description of a victim's brother as a vulnerable adult — the court said none of that connected to why Murdaugh would allegedly commit murder, and all of it carried enormous potential to turn the jury against the defendant on character rather than evidence.Fadds identifies which unresolved evidentiary issues from the direct appeal give the defense the best chance at reshaping the case further, and breaks down the strategic choice Murdaugh's team faces: fight to exclude all financial evidence or concede the conduct and attack the motive theory directly.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #MurdaughEvidence #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #SCSupremeCourt #EricFadds #FinancialCrimes #Rule403 #MurdaughCase

The Colleton County Clerk of Court told jurors not to be fooled by the defense. She told them to watch Alex Murdaugh's movements. She signaled that deliberations should be quick. The South Carolina Supreme Court found every one of those comments credible and ruled unanimously that they destroyed the integrity of the verdict.Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Fadds dissects the legal framework the court used to reach that conclusion. Former Chief Justice Jean Toal denied Murdaugh's motion for a new trial by placing the burden of proof on the defense — requiring Murdaugh to demonstrate he was harmed by Hill's conduct. The Supreme Court said that was backwards. Under the Remmer presumption, which the court formally adopted through the Fourth Circuit's Cheek test, prejudice is presumed automatically once the defendant shows the contact was more than innocuous. The burden then shifts entirely to the State to prove the verdict wasn't affected.Fadds explains how Toal's questioning of jurors about their deliberative mental processes violated Rule 606(b), why the court went so far as to overrule its own precedent to close that door, and what Hill's subsequent perjury conviction meant for the Supreme Court's assessment of the entire evidentiary record.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughNewTrial #BeckyHill #JuryTampering #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #SCSupremeCourt #EricFadds #MurdaughCase #Justice

This is the interview that changes how you see the Murdaugh case. James Lasdun's The Family Man spent years pulling threads that nobody else followed — and what he found reframes everything from the boat crash to the verdict.The book reveals that the accepted narrative of who was driving the boat the night Mallory Beach died may have been built after the fact. It traces Alex's manipulation patterns through the hospital that night, through the staged roadside shooting months later, through a $5,000 backdated check to a police chief, and through business connections with convicted drug launderers.It surfaces evidence the jury was never shown. Phone calls on the day of the murders with men with criminal records — cut from the timeline. A deleted call log. Cousin Eddie's failed polygraph and fabricated story. Maggie's car in the wrong position. Unidentified tire tracks nobody investigated.And it goes deeper into the psychology than any other Murdaugh book — drawing on documented cases of family annihilators whose lives mirror Alex's with disturbing precision. Men who appeared devoted. Men whose families described them as loving. Men who killed everyone when the lies collapsed.The patterns. The evidence. The psychology. All in one conversation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #TheFamilyMan #MurdaughMurders #FamilyAnnihilator #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CousinEddie #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #CriminalPsychology

Juror Z had doubts about guilt. She said so under oath. She said the Clerk of Court's comments made her feel like Murdaugh was already guilty before deliberations started. Former Chief Justice Toal heard that testimony and found it not credible. The Supreme Court disagreed — and reversed everything.Eric Fadds provides a detailed legal breakdown of the unanimous ruling. The court adopted the Fourth Circuit's three-step Cheek framework, making it the governing standard for jury tampering claims in South Carolina. Under that framework, once Murdaugh cleared the low bar of showing Hill's comments were more than innocuous, prejudice was presumed and the State bore the heavy burden of proving the verdict wasn't affected. The court found the State failed.Fadds explains Toal's specific errors — the reversed burden, the Rule 606(b) violation, the selective credibility findings — and addresses how the court went around Toal's evidentiary limitations by independently crediting testimony from Juror 785 and the alternate juror that Toal had either excluded or ignored.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughNewTrial #BeckyHill #JuryTampering #SCSupremeCourt #EricFadds #MurdaughCase #ColletonCounty #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

The most comprehensive legal analysis of the Murdaugh reversal and retrial. Eric Faddis covers every layer — from the Supreme Court's dismantling of Toal's ruling to the evidence restrictions that will reshape the prosecution's case to the strategic realities both sides face walking into a second trial.The ruling adopted a new legal framework for South Carolina, found Hill's comments far more extensive than Toal acknowledged, and held that the State could not overcome the presumption of prejudice. Faddis explains each of Toal's errors and why Hill's perjury conviction may have been the decisive factor.The evidence fight centers on twelve and a half hours of financial testimony the court called excessive. Faddis identifies what survives, what gets cut, and which unresolved evidentiary challenges from the direct appeal give the defense the most leverage. He addresses the defense's strategic fork — exclude all financial evidence or concede the conduct and sever the link to murder.The retrial landscape covers Murdaugh's locked-in testimony, Hill as a potential defense narrative weapon, the venue nightmare, whether the State has new forensic material, and the bottom-line question: prosecution or defense — which side would a former prosecutor choose?LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #EricFaddis #MurdaughCase #SCSupremeCourt #BeckyHill #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #JuryTampering #NewTrial

The retrial won't be a replay. Eric Faddis walks through every major variable that has changed since the first jury convicted Alex Murdaugh in March 2023. The evidence restrictions from the Supreme Court's ruling. Becky Hill's perjury conviction. The locked-in transcript of Murdaugh's testimony. The unresolved forensic questions. The jury selection nightmare.Faddis identifies the single most dangerous thing Murdaugh said on the stand that the prosecution will use against him and explores whether the defense has any realistic option to keep him from testifying again. He analyzes whether Hill's misconduct becomes a defense narrative tool at retrial or whether the judge walls it off as a resolved issue.The conversation closes with a forced choice: if Faddis had to walk into this retrial and pick a side — prosecution or defense — which side would he rather be on and what's the single biggest advantage that side holds walking into a courtroom where the rules have fundamentally changed.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #EricFaddis #MurdaughCase #SCSupremeCourt #BeckyHill #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #NewTrial #ColletonCounty

The South Carolina Supreme Court calculated that the prosecution spent twelve and a half hours of jury testimony on Alex Murdaugh's financial crimes — spread over ten days of a six-week trial. The court said the State could have made the motive argument in a fraction of that time and ordered any retrial to present this evidence efficiently.Eric Faddis provides a witness-by-witness analysis of what survives the restriction and what likely gets cut. The Seckinger confrontation about missing fees on the morning of the killings. The Tinsley hearing scheduled days later. The Chris Wilson fee discrepancy. Those connect directly to the exposure timeline that forms the spine of the State's motive theory. But the individual victim narratives, the Tony Satterfield testimony about his brother's disability, the extended accounting of each theft scheme — the court made clear those crossed from probative into unfairly prejudicial.Fadds also identifies which of the unresolved evidentiary challenges from Murdaugh's direct appeal gives the defense the best leverage at retrial, and addresses the fundamental strategic fork: fight to exclude or concede and sever.LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #MurdaughEvidence #EricFaddis #SCSupremeCourt #FinancialCrimes #MurdaughCase #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #ColletonCounty

The complete interview with The Family Man author James Lasdun — covering the findings that reframe everything about the Murdaugh case.The book traces Alex's manipulation patterns back years. The boat crash narrative may have been constructed after the fact. After the staged roadside shooting, Alex helped create a composite sketch of his supposed attacker that looked like one of the boat crash survivors. A $5,000 backdated check to a police chief at the Moselle crime scene has never been explained.Evidence the jury never saw — phone calls with men with criminal records on the day of the murders, removed from the prosecution's timeline. Alex's deleted call log. Cousin Eddie's failed polygraph and fabricated story. Maggie's car found with the seat position wrong. Unidentified tire tracks near the bodies.And the psychology no other book has explored — documented cases of family annihilators whose fabricated lives, financial fraud, and family murders mirror Alex's with disturbing precision. The research has been there for decades. Nobody applied it to this case until now.The patterns. The evidence gaps. The psychology. Every finding. One conversation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #TheFamilyMan #MurdaughMurders #FamilyAnnihilator #TrueCrime #CousinEddie #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #MurdaughTrial #Moselle

BREAKING NEWS: Alex Murdaugh WILL face a new trial. A South Carolina court has overturned the 2023 murder convictions of ex-lawyer Alex Murdaugh. Five out of five Supreme Court judges ruled that he deserved a new trial because the jury had been unfairly biased against him.Listen to our full episode from 2023, to get the full story on one of the most sprawling true crime cases out there…--The Murdaugh murders are not one story; they are a seemingly endless web of lies, entitlement, and confusion. At the centre of the web are the bodies of Paul and Maggie Murdaugh, found at their hunting lodge.But tangled in it are the tragic deaths of three other completely innocent people, dragged in by the most powerful family in South Carolina.--Patreon - Ad-free & Bonus EpisodesYouTube - Full-length Video EpisodesTikTok / Instagram

Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions are tossed out by South Carolina's Supreme Court. Russia launches nearly a thousand drones into Ukraine as concerns in Moscow rise. And as a national reckoning grows chaotic, gunfire erupts in the Philippine Senate. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In episode 2058, Jack and Miles are joined by actor, comedian, writer, pop culture expert, and host of TV, I Say with Ashley Ray, Ashley Ray, to discuss… The KKK Pop Out Continues…, ALEX MURDERAAAUGH, Ivermectin Sales Are Booming, Thanks To Mel Gibson And The GOP and more! GOP Rep. Jen Kiggans says she agrees that Hakeem Jeffries has “cotton-picking hands” Reporter: "Do you have any more to say after agreeing with racist comments made by a radio host?" Kiggans: "..." Prosecutors to retry Alex Murdaugh in deaths of wife and son after high court overturned convictions Amid Hantavirus Panic, the Ivermectin Super Fans Are Back 'Should work': Texas doc sells horse dewormer for hantavirus despite COVID-19 reprimand Can ivermectin cure hantavirus? Controversial Covid treatment touted for rat disease outbreak More Cancer Patients Are Taking Ivermectin. Mel Gibson and Joe Rogan Might Be Why. Mel Gibson Drops Two Medical Bombshells on the Joe Rogan Podcast Ivermectin is making a post-pandemic comeback, among cancer patients Under Florida bill, controversial drug ivermectin could be sold over the counter Utah bill would allow pharmacies to dispense ivermectin Over-the-counter ivermectin sales proposed in Georgia Oklahoma lawmakers want to make dewormer drug ivermectin available over the counter 11 calls made to Oklahoma Center for Poison and Drug Information regarding Ivermectin Bill making ivermectin an over-the-counter drug signed by Gov. Greg Abbott Ivermectin could become available over the counter in Georgia despite concerns about potential harms River blindness treatment receives Nobel Prize Ivermectin was touted as a cure for COVID, now it’s being tested for cancer. But what can it actually treat? LISTEN: Crash Landing by Mary In The JunkyardSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

PREVIEW for Later Today: Author James Lasdun explores the case of Alex Murdaugh, a convicted "beefy good old boy" killer and swindler. Lasdun connects Murdaugh's betrayal and embezzlement to Dante's circles of hell, analyzing the psychology of the crime.1793

Eric Alan discusses the Murdaugh boating accident that killed Mallory Beach ood afternoon, everyone. Bill Cannon here from Police Off the Cuff. We're looking into a boat crash where the discussion centers on who was driving, an important aspect of any crime investigation. We'll analyze the details of the boats involved and statements made, similar to how we approach other true crime cases, such as those involving paul murdaugh. Our experts, including retired nypd detectives, will offer their insights. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The South Carolina Supreme Court has overturned Alex Murdaugh's murder conviction, ordering a brand-new trial. Criminal defense attorney and host of the Courtroom Confidential podcast, Joshua Ritter, depicts the groundbreaking allegations of jury tampering involving former court clerk Rebecca Hill. He explains whether a fair trial is even possible in a community captivated by the Murdaugh legacy and discusses whether the defense can successfully argue for a change of venue.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Everyone go wish Wells a Happy Birthday this weekend because those Saturday birthdays only come around once every seven years. (We think? Don't check the math.) On today's ep, Wells and Brand-eye bring a TON of favorites to the table. Wells is STILL obsessed with From on MGM+ and needs everyone to watch immediately, Brandi is fully locked in on Margot's Got Money Troubles on Hulu (an absolute must-watch in her opinion), and the Deadpool Killer doc on Netflix has Wells spiraling in the best way possible. They also get into the latest Murdaugh murder update, UFO files dropping left and right, and some... interesting Terrence Howard opinions. And the good news just keeps rolling in for Brandi: bloodwork confirming she's basically a 26-year-old lioness, Miley getting a Hollywood star, and a last-minute call to DJ the ACM Awards because the universe just works like that. Plus, Wells dives into your @yftpodcast DMs for more recommendations, Brandi shares why Lainey Wilson's Netflix documentary is worth the watch, and there's finally an update on Savannah Guthrie's mom. Love ya, Fam! Our Favorite Things: (10:48) From (MGM+) (11:25) Lord of the Flies (13:53) Widow's Bay (14:06) Margot's Got Money Troubles (24:14) The Deadpool Killer (28:23) Unchosen (30:02) Marshals (Yellowstone spin-off) (35:28) Lainey Wilson Documentary Your Favorite Things: (36:28) Million Dollar Secret (37:27) "Nobody's Baby" and "All or Nothing" by Fightmaster (37:38) Righteous Gemstones (on HBO Max) (38:18) The Handmaid's Tale spin-off Thank you to our awesome sponsors: Betterhelp: Sign up and get 10% off at BetterHelp.com/yft.Hers: Visit forhers.com/yft to get personalized, affordable care that gets you.Penrose HIll: Head to TryFirstleaf.com/YFT to sign up and you'll get 50% OFF your first box PLUS free shipping for an entire year. Quince: Head to Quince.com/yft for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns.Skims: Shop Everyday Cotton, and all of my favorite bras and underwear at skims.com #skimspartnerSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.