Lawyer specializing in the defense of individuals and companies charged with criminal conduct
POPULARITY
Defense Attorney Joe Tacopina calls into Sid & Friends in the Morning for his weekly Friday morning hit with Sid. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
It's one of those stories that makes you stop and ask — what the hell happened to justice? In Lonoke County, Arkansas, Aaron Spencer — a father who allegedly shot a known predator he found with his 14-year-old daughter — isn't being hailed as a hero. He's being prosecuted for second-degree murder. Meanwhile, the same system that failed to protect his child seems more determined to protect its own image. The man he shot, Michael Fosler, wasn't a mystery to law enforcement. His record included sexual indecency with a child and online predation charges. Yet somehow, he was still free — free enough to allegedly lure a teenage girl onto a dark rural road. Police say when Spencer found them together, he reacted the way any terrified father might. Now, that reaction could send him to prison. And here's where it gets even more surreal: Aaron Spencer is now running for sheriff — against the very department that arrested him. His campaign slogan: “Restoring Trust.” For many in Lonoke County, that message hits harder than any political ad. They see a broken system, a failed chain of protection, and a father who finally drew a line the system refused to. So why is this happening? Why does a man who defended his daughter face murder charges, while the institutions that failed her face none? Joining me is Defense Attorney and Former Prosecutor Bob Motta — host of Defense Diaries and BURIED: Inside the John Wayne Gacy Investigation — to unpack how a story of survival turned into a political and legal firestorm. Hosted by Tony Brueski | Guest: Bob Motta Subscribe for more true-crime conversations that expose the system behind the stories. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
It's one of those stories that makes you stop and ask — what the hell happened to justice? In Lonoke County, Arkansas, Aaron Spencer — a father who allegedly shot a known predator he found with his 14-year-old daughter — isn't being hailed as a hero. He's being prosecuted for second-degree murder. Meanwhile, the same system that failed to protect his child seems more determined to protect its own image. The man he shot, Michael Fosler, wasn't a mystery to law enforcement. His record included sexual indecency with a child and online predation charges. Yet somehow, he was still free — free enough to allegedly lure a teenage girl onto a dark rural road. Police say when Spencer found them together, he reacted the way any terrified father might. Now, that reaction could send him to prison. And here's where it gets even more surreal: Aaron Spencer is now running for sheriff — against the very department that arrested him. His campaign slogan: “Restoring Trust.” For many in Lonoke County, that message hits harder than any political ad. They see a broken system, a failed chain of protection, and a father who finally drew a line the system refused to. So why is this happening? Why does a man who defended his daughter face murder charges, while the institutions that failed her face none? Joining me is Defense Attorney and Former Prosecutor Bob Motta — host of Defense Diaries and BURIED: Inside the John Wayne Gacy Investigation — to unpack how a story of survival turned into a political and legal firestorm. Hosted by Tony Brueski | Guest: Bob Motta Subscribe for more true-crime conversations that expose the system behind the stories. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
It's one of those stories that makes you stop and ask — what the hell happened to justice? In Lonoke County, Arkansas, Aaron Spencer — a father who allegedly shot a known predator he found with his 14-year-old daughter — isn't being hailed as a hero. He's being prosecuted for second-degree murder. Meanwhile, the same system that failed to protect his child seems more determined to protect its own image. The man he shot, Michael Fosler, wasn't a mystery to law enforcement. His record included sexual indecency with a child and online predation charges. Yet somehow, he was still free — free enough to allegedly lure a teenage girl onto a dark rural road. Police say when Spencer found them together, he reacted the way any terrified father might. Now, that reaction could send him to prison. And here's where it gets even more surreal: Aaron Spencer is now running for sheriff — against the very department that arrested him. His campaign slogan: “Restoring Trust.” For many in Lonoke County, that message hits harder than any political ad. They see a broken system, a failed chain of protection, and a father who finally drew a line the system refused to. So why is this happening? Why does a man who defended his daughter face murder charges, while the institutions that failed her face none? Joining me is Defense Attorney and Former Prosecutor Bob Motta — host of Defense Diaries and BURIED: Inside the John Wayne Gacy Investigation — to unpack how a story of survival turned into a political and legal firestorm. Hosted by Tony Brueski | Guest: Bob Motta Subscribe for more true-crime conversations that expose the system behind the stories. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Defense Attorney Joe Tacopina calls in to talk about legal battles surrounding President Donald Trump in the past, focusing on the numerous indictments and investigations, and Tacopina's role in defending Trump. Tacopina criticizes public figures like New York Attorney General Letitia James and discuss the implications of her actions, before touching on his new role as a U.S. Army Ambassador and his involvement in supporting military personnel. The conversation shifts to the recent New York mayoral debate, expressing concern over the potential election of controversial candidate Zohran Mamdani. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
In this episode, Jeff points out the ridiculousness of the belief that President Trump has brought peace to the Middle East with the ceasefire agreement he got Israel and Hamas to sign. There is a mountain of evidence which makes clear that this ceasefire is simply a lull until the next war. In the meantime, the leftists/terrorists are making massive inroads into America and our failure to cut off the head of the terror snake will be our country's greatest failure in the not so distant future.In other news, Bruce Cutler has passed, at one point the most famous lawyer in the world. Bruce also was the lawyer who had a large part in getting Jeff to drop Pre-med in college and go to law school. In this podcast, Jeff recounts some very funny Bruce stories from years past. RIP Bruce.
Defense Attorney Joe Tacopina joins the show for his weekly Friday morning appearance on the program with Sid. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Save 20% Off Honeylove by going to https://honeylove.com/LAWNERD ! #honeylovepod #ad Get 15% off OneSkin with the code LAWNERD at oneskin.co/HAIR #oneskinpod #ad Use code LAWNERD at http://jonesroadbeauty.com to get a Free Cool Gloss with your first purchase! #JonesRoadBeauty #ad In this episode, I go over various cases to break down the facts of the cases we've been following. The court has ruled on the motion to dismiss in the civil wrongful death suit brought by John O'Keefe's family members against Karen Read. A federal grand juror who leaked confidential information from the Karen Read investigations has been sentenced. Sean Diddy Combs was sentenced to federal prison, where he received just over four years (50 months). D4vd hired a criminal defense lawyer as law enforcement has not made any arrests. The death has not yet been ruled a homicide as the manner of death has yet been determined by the medical examiner and crime(s) have not been set. RESOURCES Karen Read Civil Suit - https://youtu.be/NimCmMVTbfE Grand Jury Member Sentencing Recommendation - https://youtu.be/FNr4NPpIs3U Diddy Denied Bail - https://youtu.be/G1CyEghxd8M Karen Read Motion to Dismiss - https://youtu.be/dDffIE_Rq9k Cardi B Trial - https://youtu.be/HCqlINOcqaM TikTok Psychic Defamation Case - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gJhnNYbw7Go9agKxL9poNLv Alex Murdaugh Trial - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gK8GOeWkGfi7acMnT-D0zaw Donna Adelson Trial - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gL0_OPy2AliqyEjGcI8QzBu Donna Adelson Motion for New Trial - https://youtu.be/FNr4NPpIs3U STAY IN THE LOOP WITH EMILY D. BAKER Download Our FREE App: https://lawnerdapp.com Get the Free Email Alert: https://www.LawNerdAlert.com Case Requests & Business Inquiries: TeamEmilyDBaker@wmeagency.com Help with the shop: https://www.lawnerdshop.com/pages/contact Mailing Address: Emily D. Baker 2000 Mallory Ln. St. 130-185, Franklin TN 37067 LAW NERD MERCH! https://www.LawNerdShop.com LONG FORM CONTENT https://www.youtube.com/@TheEmilyDBaker The Emily Show Podcast on YouTube: https://emilydbaker.com/TheEmilyShowPlaylist Apple Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/AppleTheEmilyShow Spotify Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/SpofityTheEmilyShow On your favorite podcast player Mondays EMILY ON SOCIAL @TheEmilyDBaker Instagram: https://www.Instagram.com/TheEmilyDBaker Twitter: https://www.Twitter.com/TheEmilyDBaker Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheEmilyDBaker MY YOUTUBE TOOLS **My Favorite YOUTUBE TOOL VidIQ https://vidiq.com/LawNerd Follow My Cats on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fredandgeorge_cat Emily's glasses lenses are Irlen tint https://www.irlen.com *This video is not legal advice; it is commentary for educational and entertainment purposes. Some links shared are affiliate links, all sponsorships are stated in video. Videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise stated. Sharing a resource is not an endorsement; it is a resource. Copyright 2020-2025 Baker Media, LLC* Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Defense Attorney Joe Tacopina joins Sid for his weekly Friday morning appearance to discuss a variety of topics, beginning with a lighthearted discussion about hockey seasons and team loyalties, particularly focusing on the Rangers and Panthers. They touch briefly on the Yankees advancing to the ALDS and Tacopina's connection to various sports figures. The main discussion shifts to legal matters, covering the P Diddy sentencing and Jim Comey's potential legal repercussions for lying to Congress. Throughout, the conversation also delves into political commentary, including remarks on Donald Trump, the weaponization of the justice system, and controversial figures like Jay-Z and Bad Bunny involved in NFL halftime shows. The episode concludes with a discourse on international issues, particularly focusing on safety and cultural changes in the UK. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
SlimFast didn't get donuts, and Lazlo and Summer are BUMMED. What are Lazlo and Slims' “Don't knock it till you try it,” life hacks? Lazlo and SlimFast brainstorm questions to ask a Defense Attorney. Wichita was voted as the least friendliest cities?? And SlimFast heavily agrees? In Headlines, Lazlo and SlimFast discuss Trumps' order with Tik Tok, Hegseth calling top military leaders to a meeting, the singer D4vd and the on-going murder-case, Trump thinking about moving FIFA, and much more! Stream The Church of Lazlo podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts!
Send us a textDefense attorney Brian Karalus joined Liz Collin on the latest episode of her podcast. Brian spoke about the tragic case of his friend, who was brutally stabbed and slashed in the face and neck and scarred for life—and how Hennepin County prosecutors only charged the suspect, Camron Wayne Draper, with second degree assault and let him out on bail.Support the show
In this podcast, Jeff discusses the assassination of Charlie Kirk by yet another deranged leftist shooter. As disturbing as the shooting was, the celebrations from the left — which included professionals, teacher and health care providers — were even more troubling. Jeff discusses what needs to come next if we are to avoid sliding into the abyss as a country.
Episode 27: We are really bad at catching up. And we lost Episodes 25 and 26. But we are BACK BABY!!! Your favorite Criminal Defense Attorney and trusted Sidekick are making a comeback.
Defense Attorney Joe Tacopina calls in for his weekly Friday morning hit with Sid to talk about the FBI's update on the Kirk assassination suspect, confirmed by President Trump, touching on the implications of political assassinations, the current divisive climate in America, and Tacopina's personal connection to the 9/11 attacks. Tacopina reflects on the legal and emotional aspects of representing controversial clients and shares his stance on the death penalty, particularly in the context of the Kirk assassination. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This is the debut segment of 'Criminal Law 101' on The Lynch & Taco Show. This week, meet criminal defense attorney Ken Eulow from The Smith & Eulow law firm. Each week, Ken will share insight on legal matters and answer your questions in the area of criminal law
Defense Attorney Joe Tacopina joins the show for his weekly Friday morning appearance to talk about the New York mayoral race and Manhattan DA contest. Tacopina reflects on Jim Walden's exit from the race, praising his qualifications but recognizing Curtis Sliwa as the candidate gaining real momentum. He criticizes Alvin Bragg for abandoning common-sense prosecution and praises Maud Maron for her strong plan to restore accountability and public safety, including repealing bail reform and Bragg's “day one memo.” He also discusses the lack of mandatory debates, which allows incumbents like Bragg to avoid scrutiny. The conversation then shifts to sports scandals, where Tacopina bluntly asserts that Shohei Ohtani did bet on baseball and criticizes MLB for protecting its stars. Finally, Tacopina shares a lighthearted story about having lunch with Alex Rodriguez, praising his career, ownership role with the Timberwolves, and making the case that A-Rod deserves to be in the Hall of Fame. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Veteran criminal defense attorney Martin Minnella has spent over 50 years inside Connecticut courtrooms, taking on some of the nation's most high-profile murder trials—and winning. He was the defense attorney in the infamous “Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It” case, and now he's pulling back the curtain on the dark side of the justice system. From federal agents abusing power to false accusations destroying lives, Martin shares shocking real-life stories, lessons from decades of experience, and why he believes evil is real. If you're interested in true crime, courtroom drama, and behind-the-scenes stories from one of the most seasoned attorneys in America, this is an episode you don't want to miss. #TrueCrime #CriminalDefense #JusticeSystem #CourtroomDrama #FalseAccusations #TheConjuring #CrimeStories #CorruptionExposed Connect with Martin Minella: https://www.mtelawfirm.com/ Hosted, Executive Produced & Edited By Ian Bick: https://www.instagram.com/ian_bick/?hl=en https://ianbick.com/ Presented by Tyson 2.0 & Wooooo Energy: https://tyson20.com/ https://woooooenergy.com/ Use code LOCKEDIN for 20% OFF Wooooo Energy Buy Merch: http://www.ianbick.com/shop Timestamps: 00:00 Meet Martin Manella: Legendary Defense Attorney 02:57 Career Stories: High-Profile Cases & Big Wins 07:03 The Role of Experts & Trial Strategies 13:02 Inside the Minds: Clients, Juries & Legal Ethics 25:12 Police Misconduct & Justice for Minorities 32:33 Media, Accusations & Reputation Damage 39:47 Justice System Flaws: Advertising, Public Perception, and Reform 44:32 Guns, Sentencing, and Changing Laws 51:35 Prison System Failures: Health Hazards & Neglect 01:01:49 Battling the System: Government, Power & Corruption 01:09:31 Winning Against the Odds: Jury Trials & Law Enforcement Lies 01:18:43 Grand Juries & Prosecutorial Advantages 01:27:02 Preparing for Trial: Delays, Tactics, and Systemic Hurdles 01:32:08 The Conjuring Case: Demons, Defense & Pop Culture 01:39:13 Reflections: The Future of Justice & Young Lawyers 01:42:14 Final Thoughts: Justice, Publicity, and the Nathan Carman Story Powered by: Just Media House : https://www.justmediahouse.com/ Creative direction, design, assets, support by FWRD: https://www.fwrd.co Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Donna Adelson's Family Turns: Inside the Explosive Testimony from Her Own Children In this gripping breakdown, we dive into the raw courtroom moments that could define the fate of Donna Adelson—testimony not from prosecutors or hired experts, but from her own children. Defense Attorney and Former Prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski to dissect the emotionally charged statements from Robert and Wendy Adelson, revealing a family dynamic that's anything but united. Robert came across as blunt, clinical, and disturbingly honest about his mother's controlling nature, while Wendy played the “I don't remember” card with an Olympic level of consistency. What does it mean when your own children don't defend you—or worse, distance themselves entirely? Eric breaks down how jurors digest this kind of testimony, and whether these cracks in the family's public image translate into hard evidence in court. Is it character assassination… or a clear window into Donna's true influence? This episode pulls apart the psychology, strategy, and possible consequences of this damaging testimony—and what it could mean as the trial heads into even darker territory. Hashtags: #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #EricFaddis #TonyBrueski #CourtroomDrama #AdelsonFamily #HiddenKillers #WendyAdelson Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Donna Adelson's Family Turns: Inside the Explosive Testimony from Her Own Children In this gripping breakdown, we dive into the raw courtroom moments that could define the fate of Donna Adelson—testimony not from prosecutors or hired experts, but from her own children. Defense Attorney and Former Prosecutor Eric Faddis joins Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski to dissect the emotionally charged statements from Robert and Wendy Adelson, revealing a family dynamic that's anything but united. Robert came across as blunt, clinical, and disturbingly honest about his mother's controlling nature, while Wendy played the “I don't remember” card with an Olympic level of consistency. What does it mean when your own children don't defend you—or worse, distance themselves entirely? Eric breaks down how jurors digest this kind of testimony, and whether these cracks in the family's public image translate into hard evidence in court. Is it character assassination… or a clear window into Donna's true influence? This episode pulls apart the psychology, strategy, and possible consequences of this damaging testimony—and what it could mean as the trial heads into even darker territory. Hashtags: #DonnaAdelson #DanMarkel #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #EricFaddis #TonyBrueski #CourtroomDrama #AdelsonFamily #HiddenKillers #WendyAdelson Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Defense Attorney Joe Tacopina joins Sid for his weekly Friday morning appearance to discuss the tragic Minnesota church shooting, where Tacopina discussed whether parents of the shooter could face charges, stressing that parents bear special responsibility if they ignore clear warning signs. He noted the shooter's mother had already retained a defense attorney and said he would only represent her if he believed she was not complicit. The discussion then moved to New York politics, with Tacopina criticizing Andrew Cuomo's defense of cashless bail, calling it a failed social experiment that endangers public safety. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
In this podcast, Jeff talks about his trip to Italy and love of Italians — and notes the many similarities between Italians and Jews and one glaring difference. Italy was great but the constant content making of young people in Capri annoyed him. Only this dopey, lazy mentality could drive the success of Zorhan Mamdani, a Socialist Hamas supporter, in the NYC mayoral race.
Defense Attorney Joe Tacopina calls into the show to talk about several high-profile issues. He delves into the Eric Adams administration's outreach to Curtis and the implications for the upcoming campaign. The conversation shifts to Wendy Williams's recent phone-in to the show and her legal struggles, with Joe asserting her competency and criticizing her confinement. Joe and Sid also debate the suitability of parole for the Menendez brothers, citing their crimes and behavior in prison. Additionally, they analyze the controversy surrounding Alina Habba's appointment as acting US Attorney in New Jersey, criticizing the partisan judgment against her. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Former talk show host and media personality, Wendy Williams, along with Defense Attorney Joe Tacopina, calls into the program to talk about her current situation under an allegedly abusive guardianship. Williams, who disputes recent reports of dementia, describes her restricted life in a costly facility where she is confined to a memory care floor with limited freedom of movement and communication. Tacopina asserts that the claims against Williams are false and a violation of her rights, noting efforts to appeal her guardianship in court. Williams expresses hope for her release and a possible return to the entertainment industry, while calling for public support. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Sid Rosenberg chats with powerhouse defense attorney Joseph Tacopina. They reflect on longtime friendships, career moments, and hilarious past incidents—like a dog gone missing from a luxury kennel, which Tacopina successfully resolved. Tacopina shares details of an intense visit to a U.S. Army base in Germany, working out with elite military leaders like General Donahue and Delta Force veterans. He also weighs in on the heroic actions of soldiers at Fort Stewart during a recent shooting and slams pro-Hamas activists, calling for the deportation of extremist Mahmoud Khalil. The conversation wraps up with Tacopina blasting NYC Mayor Eric Adams for dishonesty in a social media post, and Sid preparing for a secretive meeting with the mayor later that day. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Criminal defense attorney Danny Rubin joined "Forbes Newsroom" to discuss convicted sex offender and longtime Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell being moved to a minimum-security prison in Texas following her meetings with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
In this episode, Jeff returns after a few weeks off — and explains how one press conference in Chicago spiraled into a fabricated international incident with the Mexican government. Representing Ovidio Guzmán (El Chapo's son) became less about legal defense and more about being scapegoated by terrified politicians. In the end, free speech and the truth will always shine through. And the Mexican people? Jeff notes that his respect for them has grown exponentially.Also covered: Hamas' newest PR strategy — letting Gaza starve while hoarding food in tunnels and filming propaganda videos of emaciated kids (whose fat parents are somehow not starving). The lies grow louder, the propaganda slicker, and yet Western liberal and far-right Jew haters just can't stop blaming Israel and taking it out on Jews. All while the next mayor of NYC will be a Hamas cheerleader who wants government-owned supermarkets and to arrest the Prime Minster of Israel. The downward spiral that began in 2008 nears completion.And finally, Jeff goes full collector mode: a breakdown of the baseball card National Show in Chicago. Too many rooms, too many scammers, but one glorious vintage Orioles cabinet card makes the entire hellscape worth it.
Aaron Spencer Case: Parental Instinct vs. Premeditated Force: A Defense Attorney's Playbook How far can a parent go to protect their child—and when does that line become a crime? In Part 2 of our Aaron Spencer deep dive, we flip the script and step into the defense's war room. Spencer's legal team says he acted out of necessity. Prosecutors say it was murder. But the jury? They're going to have to decide whether this was justifiable force… or personal revenge with deadly consequences. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis returns to explore how this case could—and likely will—play out at trial. What are Spencer's strongest defenses under Arkansas law? How does the presence of a no-contact order, a prior history of alleged sexual abuse, and the discovery of the victim in Fosler's truck shape the legal argument? And how dangerous is that reload moment—the one detail that could shift the entire perception of whether this was about protection… or punishment? We also dive into jury strategy: what kind of jurors are likely to sympathize with Spencer? What emotional arguments work—and which could backfire? And what role will the testimony of Spencer's daughter play in either exonerating him… or sealing his fate? This episode peels back the tactical side of the case. The courtroom chess. The human drama behind the legal filings. Because this isn't just a question of law—it's a test of how the justice system handles instinct, trauma, and the deep, terrifying fear that your child might not make it home unless you intervene. This case is far from over—but the battle lines are being drawn. #AaronSpencerCase #SelfDefenseOrMurder #TrueCrimeAnalysis #JusticeForVictims #ParentalInstinct #CriminalDefenseStrategy #ArkansasTrial #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersPodcast #LegalBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Aaron Spencer Case: Parental Instinct vs. Premeditated Force: A Defense Attorney's Playbook How far can a parent go to protect their child—and when does that line become a crime? In Part 2 of our Aaron Spencer deep dive, we flip the script and step into the defense's war room. Spencer's legal team says he acted out of necessity. Prosecutors say it was murder. But the jury? They're going to have to decide whether this was justifiable force… or personal revenge with deadly consequences. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis returns to explore how this case could—and likely will—play out at trial. What are Spencer's strongest defenses under Arkansas law? How does the presence of a no-contact order, a prior history of alleged sexual abuse, and the discovery of the victim in Fosler's truck shape the legal argument? And how dangerous is that reload moment—the one detail that could shift the entire perception of whether this was about protection… or punishment? We also dive into jury strategy: what kind of jurors are likely to sympathize with Spencer? What emotional arguments work—and which could backfire? And what role will the testimony of Spencer's daughter play in either exonerating him… or sealing his fate? This episode peels back the tactical side of the case. The courtroom chess. The human drama behind the legal filings. Because this isn't just a question of law—it's a test of how the justice system handles instinct, trauma, and the deep, terrifying fear that your child might not make it home unless you intervene. This case is far from over—but the battle lines are being drawn. #AaronSpencerCase #SelfDefenseOrMurder #TrueCrimeAnalysis #JusticeForVictims #ParentalInstinct #CriminalDefenseStrategy #ArkansasTrial #EricFaddis #HiddenKillersPodcast #LegalBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Michael Leonard, Federal Defense Attorney at Leonard Trial Lawyers, joins Jon Hansen on Your Money Matters to discuss criminal actions at work, right to counsel during investigations, why you should ask for a lawyer, and more. For more information, call 312-380-6559. Patrick Dolan, Employment Lawyer at Conti & Dolan, also chimes in about cross-examinations.
Defense attorney Joe Tacopina calls in to express his outrage over Wendy Williams' guardianship situation, highlighting the lack of public understanding, and discussing a proposed 'Wendy's Law' to protect people in similar predicaments. Tacopina also shifts to political interference in the legal system, particularly citing recent cases involving President Donald Trump, before he discusses other notable cases, including his recent legal win for Yonkers cop Hector Cartagena, comparing it to high-profile cases he has handled. He criticizes judges, district attorneys, and political figures, emphasizing the need for justice and integrity in the legal system. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Roy Black, Defense Lawyer for William Kennedy Smith and Epstein, Dies at 80 Please Subscribe + Rate & Review Philip Teresi on KMJ wherever you listen! --- KMJ’s Philip Teresi is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or wherever else you listen. --- Philip Teresi, Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific News/Talk 580 & 105.9 KMJ DriveKMJ.com | Podcast | Facebook | X | Instagram --- Everything KMJ: kmjnow.com | Streaming | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
07/21/25: Joel Heitkamp is joined by Dane DeKrey, criminal defense lawyer at Ringstrom DeKrey. Ringstrom DeKrey represented Minnesota State Senator Nicole Mitchell in her trial. The jury began deliberating on the fourth day of testimony regarding the charges against Sen. Mitchell of Woodbury and delivered a verdict after about three hours. She was charged with felony first-degree burglary and possession of burglary or theft tools after the alleged break-in on April 22, 2024. Dane DeKrey said for the first time on-air that Senator Mitchell will be resigning within two weeks of today. (Joel Heitkamp is a talk show host on the Mighty 790 KFGO in Fargo-Moorhead. His award-winning program, “News & Views,” can be heard weekdays from 8 – 11 a.m. Follow Joel on X/Twitter @JoelKFGO.)See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Defense Attorney Joe Tacopina joins the show for his weekly Friday morning appearance to discuss his latest legal victory involving a decorated Yonkers Police Sergeant falsely indicted due to political vendetta. Tacopina also touches on the upcoming New York City mayoral race, highlighting candidates like Curtis Sliwa and Jim Walden, and discussing electability and campaign dynamics. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Fallout from the Karen Read Retrial continues, focusing on Boston Police Commissioner Cox's statements regarding Officer Kelly Dever and a strongly worded letter from Attorney Alan Jackson asking she be added to the Brady List. Officer Dever testified in the Karen Read Retrial, stating that her initial observations to the FBI about Burkowitz and Higgins in the Canton PD sallyport garage were a "false memory." She claimed she didn't recall the Commissioner telling her to "do the right thing," despite previously telling the defense he said that to her. Commissioner Cox denied knowing Officer Dever was associated with the Karen Read case and that he influenced her testimony, despite her acknowledging a meeting with him where he offered support. He stated he "encourages" many officers. Karen's Defense Attorney, Alan Jackson, sent a formal letter to Commissioner Cox, requesting that Officer Kelly Dever be included in the Brady database. This is due to her changed testimony and "false memory" claim, which he argues irreparably compromises her credibility and reliability as a law enforcement officer. Jackson asserts that if she lied, it's perjury, and if she truly suffers from false memories, she's unfit to serve. Jackson's letter warns that failure to disclose this information would be a constitutional violation, potentially leading to severe sanctions, including the dismissal of any cases Officer Dever is involved in, even post-prosecution, if this information is not disclosed to the defense. RESOURCESKaren Read Retrial Day 25 - https://youtube.com/live/agSsaDTCZJcKaren Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-voBoston 25 News Article - https://www.boston25news.com/news/25-investigates/25-investigates-read-defense-demands-boston-officer-be-placed-brady-list/IEOICYHT4VE4ZKQWLWKM7M5T3M/Alec Baldwin Trial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gLvDml0N_vUJ4wINrMLKHHS Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Defense Attorney Joe Tacopina calls in to cover the Eugene Carroll case against President Trump rearing its ugly head again, the implications of the P. Diddy trial, and the Idaho murders, touching on the controversial plea deal for Bryan Kohberger. Tacopina also delves into various political issues, including President Donald Trump's multiple indictments and the political landscape involving figures like Eric Adams and Curtis Sliwa. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Defense Attorney Joe Tacopina calls in to discuss an ongoing legal case involving Sergeant Hector Cartagena, a decorated police officer. Tacopina highlights the trial's complexities, emphasizing the perceived injustice as Cartagena, who followed department guidelines, is being treated like a criminal despite his exemplary service record. Joe then touches on the P. Diddy trial, providing his insights on the outcomes and implications of the case, as well as the sentencing prospects for P. Diddy. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Inside The NEW Charges Against Barry Morphew: Defense Attorney Questions If Jury Will Believe Description: Barry Morphew is facing new murder charges in 2025—nearly three years after his first case was dismissed. This time, prosecutors are armed with something they didn't have before: Suzanne Morphew's remains, discovered in a shallow grave, and forensic analysis showing BAM—a rare animal tranquilizer—was present in her bones. But does this forensic discovery change the game, or are prosecutors still standing on shaky ground? In this episode, we're joined by Defense Attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis to break down the anatomy of the new charges. How strong is the forensic evidence, really? And will a jury be willing to convict without a weapon, a confession, or a confirmed cause of death? We dig into the differences between the original case and the 2025 re-indictment. What new strategies might the prosecution use this time around? And how might the defense punch holes in a narrative that's still largely circumstantial? Eric offers his legal take on how jurors typically react to technical forensic evidence—especially rare substances like BAM that carry emotional weight but can be attacked for lack of direct sourcing. We also explore the legal risk of retrying a case after the original prosecution team was disbarred for discovery violations. Can the new team escape the shadow of those failures, or will the defense use them to build a new layer of doubt? If you want to understand the legal chess match behind the headlines, this episode is for you. High stakes, high scrutiny, and a justice system trying to clean up its own mess. Hashtags: #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #NewCharges #2025Trial #ColdCase #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #ForensicEvidence #JusticeForSuzanne #TrueCrimeLaw Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Inside The NEW Charges Against Barry Morphew: Defense Attorney Questions If Jury Will Believe Description: Barry Morphew is facing new murder charges in 2025—nearly three years after his first case was dismissed. This time, prosecutors are armed with something they didn't have before: Suzanne Morphew's remains, discovered in a shallow grave, and forensic analysis showing BAM—a rare animal tranquilizer—was present in her bones. But does this forensic discovery change the game, or are prosecutors still standing on shaky ground? In this episode, we're joined by Defense Attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis to break down the anatomy of the new charges. How strong is the forensic evidence, really? And will a jury be willing to convict without a weapon, a confession, or a confirmed cause of death? We dig into the differences between the original case and the 2025 re-indictment. What new strategies might the prosecution use this time around? And how might the defense punch holes in a narrative that's still largely circumstantial? Eric offers his legal take on how jurors typically react to technical forensic evidence—especially rare substances like BAM that carry emotional weight but can be attacked for lack of direct sourcing. We also explore the legal risk of retrying a case after the original prosecution team was disbarred for discovery violations. Can the new team escape the shadow of those failures, or will the defense use them to build a new layer of doubt? If you want to understand the legal chess match behind the headlines, this episode is for you. High stakes, high scrutiny, and a justice system trying to clean up its own mess. Hashtags: #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #NewCharges #2025Trial #ColdCase #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #ForensicEvidence #JusticeForSuzanne #TrueCrimeLaw Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
This episode starts with a few minutes of taking listener comments and questions. Then a replay of an episode from November 2023. A few weeks ago Matt and Seton Interviewed Dick Harpootlian who prosecuted Pee Wee Gaskins. In this episode you will hear from the other side of the courtroom in the Gaskins trial. Donald Henry "Pee Wee" Gaskins Jr. is one of South Carolina's most notorious serial killers. He murdered more than a dozen people between 1970 and 1975. Gaskins was sentenced to 10 concurrent life sentences. While serving his sentence at Central Correctional Institute (CCI) prison in Columbia, South Carolina, he murdered another inmate. Dick Harpootlian prosecuted Pee Wee and Jack Swerling defended Pee Wee Gaskins. Gaskins was sentenced to death, which was administered in September of 1991. In this episode you will hear from Jack Swerling about the case and his dealings with Pee Wee Gaskins. Seton Tucker and Matt Harris began the Impact of Influence podcast shortly after the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh. Now they cover true crime past and present from the southeast region of the U.S. Impact of Influence is part of the Evergreen Podcast Company. Look for Impact of Influence on Facebook and Youtube. Please support our sponsors Elevate your closet with Quince. Go to Quince dot com slash impact for free shipping on your order and three hundred and sixty-five -day returns Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
An Inside Look At Barry Morphew's Secret Deleted Texts Description: Barry Morphew told police his marriage was “great.” But Suzanne Morphew's phone—and what Barry allegedly tried to erase from it—tells a very different story. In this episode, we go deep with Defense Attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis to examine the deleted digital evidence prosecutors say could reveal Barry's motive for murder. At the center of this forensic puzzle is a critical message Suzanne sent just three days before her disappearance: “I'm done. Let's figure this out civilly.” Investigators say Barry deleted the message—but took a screenshot of it. Why? Was it an emotional trigger? A digital souvenir? Or something more calculated? We explore what these deletions reveal about Barry's potential state of mind in the days leading up to Suzanne's vanishing. Could this be an example of psychological unraveling—or legal narrative control? Eric Faddis brings his unique expertise as both a former prosecutor and defense attorney to analyze how prosecutors use deleted data as circumstantial proof, and how defense teams attack that logic. We also examine the broader digital trail: text logs, phone activity, and why Barry's phone went into airplane mode shortly after Suzanne's last selfie was sent. Was it a coincidence—or part of a cover-up? In a world where our phones are our diaries, our alibis, and our confessions, Barry's deleted texts may be more damning than anything he said aloud. Join us as we dissect how technology, timing, and motive collide in this chilling case—and what it means for the upcoming trial. Hashtags: #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #DeletedTexts #DigitalEvidence #TrueCrimeBreakdown #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #ForensicPsychology #JusticeForSuzanne #TrueCrimePodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
An Inside Look At Barry Morphew's Secret Deleted Texts Description: Barry Morphew told police his marriage was “great.” But Suzanne Morphew's phone—and what Barry allegedly tried to erase from it—tells a very different story. In this episode, we go deep with Defense Attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis to examine the deleted digital evidence prosecutors say could reveal Barry's motive for murder. At the center of this forensic puzzle is a critical message Suzanne sent just three days before her disappearance: “I'm done. Let's figure this out civilly.” Investigators say Barry deleted the message—but took a screenshot of it. Why? Was it an emotional trigger? A digital souvenir? Or something more calculated? We explore what these deletions reveal about Barry's potential state of mind in the days leading up to Suzanne's vanishing. Could this be an example of psychological unraveling—or legal narrative control? Eric Faddis brings his unique expertise as both a former prosecutor and defense attorney to analyze how prosecutors use deleted data as circumstantial proof, and how defense teams attack that logic. We also examine the broader digital trail: text logs, phone activity, and why Barry's phone went into airplane mode shortly after Suzanne's last selfie was sent. Was it a coincidence—or part of a cover-up? In a world where our phones are our diaries, our alibis, and our confessions, Barry's deleted texts may be more damning than anything he said aloud. Join us as we dissect how technology, timing, and motive collide in this chilling case—and what it means for the upcoming trial. Hashtags: #BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #DeletedTexts #DigitalEvidence #TrueCrimeBreakdown #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #ForensicPsychology #JusticeForSuzanne #TrueCrimePodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Defense attorney Joe Tacopina calls in for his weekly Friday morning hit to discuss Mayor Eric Adams' alleged corruption and his performance as Mayor, asserting that Adams could have faced jail time without intervention. Tacopina also touches on the potential impact of socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani on New York City, the political climate surrounding figures like Andrew Cuomo and Curtis Sliwa, before he delves into the role he's playing in various legal cases involving celebrities such as Fat Joe and 50 Cent. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Latest 2A news and current events, self defense successful defense in Portland Oregon shooting caught on tape.
Defense attorney Joe Tacopina calls in to delve into his busy schedule, including upcoming trials, before him and Sid sidetrack into light-hearted discussions about music preferences and personal anecdotes. The conversation shifts toward mutual acquaintances, such as Vinny Viola's accomplishments with the Stanley Cup Champion Florida Panthers, and ends with a deep dive into the P-Diddy trial, discussing potential outcomes and the intricacies of legal proceedings. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The evidence is in and the case is in the hands of the jury. Defense attorney Matt Tympanick joins us to discuss the case, the evidence, and what comes next.Check out our new True Crime Substack the True Crime TimesGet Prosecutors Podcast MerchJoin the Gallery on FacebookFollow us on TwitterFollow us on InstagramCheck out our website for case resources:Hang out with us on TikTokSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Karen Read Closing Arguments In Full From Defense Attorney Alan Jackson In this comprehensive episode, we present defense attorney Alan Jackson's complete closing argument in the Karen Read murder retrial, where he attempts to counter the prosecution's evidence that Read struck and killed her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, with her SUV in January 2022. Jackson, known for his theatrical courtroom style, delivered an hour and twenty-six minute presentation that challenged the Commonwealth's case while the prosecution maintains Read was intoxicated and left O'Keefe to die in the snow. Jackson opened by repeating three times: "There was no collision," directly contradicting the prosecution's physical evidence including taillight fragments found at the scene and damage to Read's vehicle. The defense attorney focused heavily on attacking the credibility of lead investigator Michael Proctor, who was terminated for misconduct after the first trial. However, prosecutors argue that Proctor's personal failings don't negate the physical evidence or witness testimony supporting their case. Jackson attempted to explain away Read's own statements at the scene, where multiple first responders heard her say "I hit him." While Jackson characterized these as confused questions, prosecutors maintain these were admissions of guilt from someone who knew what she had done. The defense presented an alternative theory involving a fight inside the Albert home, though prosecutors note that O'Keefe's phone data shows he never entered the house and stopped moving outside where his body was found. Jackson concluded dramatically: "Find Karen Read not guilty, not guilty, not guilty." Throughout the retrial, prosecutors have presented forensic evidence, witness testimony, and Read's own angry voicemails to O'Keefe that night, building their case that she struck him during a drunken rage. This episode provides viewers with Jackson's full defense strategy as the jury weighs whether the prosecution has proven guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. #KarenRead #AlanJackson #ClosingArguments #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CourtTV #BostonPolice #CantonMA #TrueCrime #Retrial #CommonwealthVsRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #Prosecution #Defense #TrialCoverage #VehicularHomicide #NorfolkCounty #LegalAnalysis #BigBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/_U9Gv2ieltoDay 29 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on June 9, 2025. On week 8 of the trial, will the jury get the case this week to deliberate?Special Prosecutor, Hanke Brennan, asks Dr. Wolfe, the Director of Accident Reconstruction at ARCCA, about the appearance of holes on the back of Mr. O'Keefe's hoodie and whether these holes are consistent with road rash or other damage. He asked him if he'd ever consider if Mr. O'Keefe may have fallen or landed on his back. Dr. Wolf stated he did not consider whether Mr. O'Keefe had fallen or landed on his back. Defense Attorney, Robert Alessi, asked for a Mistrial with Prejudice due to Intentional Misconduct by the prosecution regarding questioning about the hoodie and its damage. The defense argued the prosecution intentionally left out evidence about the holes on the back of the hoodie being clippings from the crime lab. The judge did not grant a mistrial but agreed to instructed the jury to disregard the questions and give a strong admonishment about the prosecution. When it came time to it, the Judge did not give a strong admonishment or admit the pictures into evidence. At the end of the day, the defense said that they will address this the following day.A Voir Dire of Dr. Laposata was conducted and Judge Cannone ruled she cannot testify that the wounds on John O'Keefe's arm were from a dog, but she will be able to testify about the original opinions about the cause and manner of death. Direct Examination continues on Day 30.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/IduAs7XWVEUDay 22 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 28, 2025. After a brief Direct Examination by Special Prosecutor, Hank Brennan, of their Accident Reconstructionist, Dr. Welcher, Cross Examination took up the whole day and will continue on Day 23. Defense Attorney, Robert Alessi, ross-examination was rigorous and focused on challenging the credibility, methodology, and conclusions of the Commonwealth's expert witness. Dr. Welcher was repeatedly admonished by the court for looking at his computer and searching for information during the cross-examination, rather than answering directly from memory.Alessi questioned Dr. Welchre about the significant amount his firm, Aperture, was being paid by the Norfolk County District Attorney's Office ($325,000), and the details surrounding the purchase and sale of a Lexus exemplar for testing. The defense sought to highlight potential bias due to financial incentives.Alessi challenged inconsistencies in Dr. Welchre's testimony, such as the distance the Lexus traveled in reverse during a test (initially said to be 53 feet, then 87 feet), and the explanation of the 8 mph threshold for tail light breakage.Alessi delved into Dr. Welcher's use of data and images from Trooper Paul's report, questioning the extent to which Dr. Welcher relied on that information in his analysis. There was a dispute about a drone image and other diagrams, leading to a "Voir dire" (examination outside the presence of the jury) to clarify the sources of these materials.The voir dire aimed to clarify the sources of Dr. Welcher's materials and to determine the extent to which he relied on Trooper Paul's report or other evidence. It highlighted the defense's effort to question the independence of Dr. Welcher's analysis and the Commonwealth's attempt to defend it. The voir dire concluded with plans to continue the cross-examination the following day, with the understanding that time was limited due to a juror's scheduling issue.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/bmNghhaIVikDay 20 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 21, 2025. Involving court delays, individual jurors questioned at sidebar, and a shift in witness order. Judge Cannone addressed the jury when they came back from the inquiry and asked them if they refrained from doing research or independent investigations. She noted that she had already asked them about discussing the case with anyone or seeing, hearing or reading information about the case. Their seats were rearranged and the court day moved forward.Dr. Aizik Wolf, a neuro brain surgeon, testified about the injuries to John O'Keefe's head, stating they were consistent with a fall backward. The doctor also clarified that other facial lacerations would not have been caused by this type of fall.Scientific evidence from Christina Hanley, a Trace Analyst, a state crime lab, analyzed the glass and plastic fragments. She linked clear and red plastic pieces from John O'Keefe's clothing to the tail light housing. Defense Attorney, Alan Jackson, presented a demonstrative exhibit showing which evidence items matched and which didn't. The ones that didn't match were collected by Trooper Michael Proctor. RESOURCESRetrial Day 17 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_Lo2vXvHyM What You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/IJgD247smlQDay 19 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 20, 2025. Defense Attorney, Robert Alessi, continued cross examining Shanon Burgess. Questions arose regarding the accuracy of dates and timeline in the expert's analysis, with errors of 24 hours. Burgess kept saying that the event happened the night of January 29-30th when in reality is it was January 28-29th. Shanon's analysis of call logs, text streams, and vehicle data was scrutinized. There were concerns about the use of approximate times and potential confirmation bias. The expert did not have the raw data for the techstream information, he instead got it from Welcher's report. During redirect examination, Special Prosecutor, Hank Brennan, attempted to clarify Burgess' credentials and data interpretation. Pointing out that he didn't need that degree to perform his job and that work life balance made it a challenge to complete his degree.On Re-Cross Examination, Alessi pointed out that in a federal court filing in Texas, Burgess' resume stated he was anticipating a BGS - Bachelor of General Science in 2024. There is no Bachelor of General Science degree in Alabama and he has been pursuing this degree since 2008. The use of the Commonwealths presenting video and audio clips, especially the voicemail, appears to be related to establishing a timeline of Karen Read's movements and actions around the time of John O'Keefe's death. The defense may use it to show her actions were consistent, while the prosecution may use it to point out inconsistencies. The 12:25/12:30 timeframe she gives for John's passing may be challenged given her audio from the voicemail at 12:41AM.Later in the day, Christina Hanley, a trace analyst expert witness from the lab testified about a mechanical match on glass. The court adjourned early after sidebar discussions. We'll get back to her on Day 20.RESOURCESRetrial Day 10 - Voicemails - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2vEF0vxG2wWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy