POPULARITY
44 episodes with Preska
29 episodes with Preska
5 episodes with Preska
2 episodes with Preska
2 episodes with Preska
23 episodes with Preska
4 episodes with Preska
2 episodes with Preska
A new round of records from Virginia Giuffre's 2015 defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell was set to become public after Judge Loretta Preska rejected Maxwell's latest attempt to keep the material sealed. Giuffre had sued Maxwell after Maxwell publicly accused her of lying about being sexually trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and others, including Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. The case eventually settled in 2017, but enormous portions of the discovery record remained hidden under a sweeping protective order imposed by Judge Robert Sweet. Investigative journalist Julie K. Brown and the Miami Herald spent years fighting for access to those materials, arguing that the blanket sealing was inconsistent with the public's right to inspect judicial records. Brown said she had been told that the discovery contained damaging evidence involving Epstein, Maxwell and other men, including extensive material Giuffre had submitted in support of her allegations that Epstein and Maxwell operated an underage sex-trafficking network.The significance of the coming disclosures went beyond simply adding another batch of documents to the already massive Epstein record. According to Brown, the original court had sealed enormous quantities of evidence, hearings and even judicial decisions without conducting the document-by-document analysis normally required before judicial records could be withheld from the public. Maxwell continued fighting disclosure, but Preska concluded that the Epstein Files Transparency Act superseded arguments Maxwell had relied upon to maintain secrecy. The decision therefore reopened one of the most important repositories of evidence connected to Giuffre's allegations and Maxwell's relationship with Epstein, potentially exposing material that had remained inaccessible for more than a decade. The records were particularly important because they originated from the discovery process in litigation where Giuffre had been forced to substantiate her accusations after Maxwell publicly attacked her credibility, meaning the files could provide considerably more detail about the people, communications and evidence surrounding Epstein and Maxwell than what had previously been available publicly.to ocntact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Docs in Virginia Giuffre Suit Against Maxwell to Be Unsealed
The background matters. Judge Sweet's 2016 protective order let the attorneys themselves designate documents confidential, with no judicial review unless the other side objected. Dozens of filings went under seal on that basis and stayed there after the 2017 settlement. Maxwell was deposed twice in 2016, and prosecutors later charged her with perjury over that testimony. Preska's holding is that the Epstein Files Transparency Act controls. A federal statute can override grand jury secrecy under Rule 6(e). It does not violate separation of powers or due process. Maxwell raised seven objections and the court rejected the lot. What comes out is the material Giuffre's attorneys produced to the government under grand jury subpoena, subject to redaction obligations. The parties and the Miami Herald have until August 28th to propose next steps. Civil discovery is broader than criminal. There is likely a great deal here nobody has seen. SUPPORT & CONNECT WITH HAWK- Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mdg650hawk - Hawk's Merch Store: https://hawkmerchstore.com - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mdg650hawk7thacct - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hawkeyewhackamole - Connect on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mdg650hawk.bsky.social - Connect on Substack: https://mdg650hawk.substack.com - Connect on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hawkpodcasts - Connect on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mdg650hawk - Connect on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/mdg650hawk ALL HAWK PODCASTS INFO- Additional Content Available Here: https://www.hawkpodcasts.comhttps://www.youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts- Listen to Hawk Podcasts On Your Favorite Platform:Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3RWeJfyApple Podcasts: https://apple.co/422GDuLYouTube: https://youtube.com/@hawkpodcastsiHeartRadio: https://ihr.fm/47vVBdPPandora: https://bit.ly/48COaTB
A federal judge in New York ordered the unsealing of grand jury-related materials connected to the investigation of Ghislaine Maxwell, rejecting Maxwell's attempts to keep the records from becoming public. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska granted the Justice Department's request to release materials that had originally been obtained through grand jury subpoenas from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner. Those records originated in Virginia Giuffre's civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell and included evidence tied to Maxwell's 2016 depositions. Preska ruled that Maxwell's procedural, statutory and constitutional objections were without merit and said the remaining materials in the government's possession should become part of the public record, with appropriate redactions to protect victims. The disclosure was ordered under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, legislation requiring the Justice Department to release records related to the federal investigations of Jeffrey Epstein and his associates.The significance of the records was that Maxwell's testimony in the Giuffre litigation later became the foundation for two federal perjury charges against her. Prosecutors accused Maxwell of lying under oath when she denied knowledge of Epstein's sexual abuse and recruitment of young women and girls. Those perjury counts were eventually separated from Maxwell's sex-trafficking prosecution and later dropped after her 2021 conviction remained intact, but the underlying testimony continued to represent an important part of the government's case against her. The new unsealing order therefore opened another portion of the investigative record surrounding Maxwell and Epstein, particularly evidence that had previously been shielded by grand jury secrecy and the confidentiality surrounding the earlier civil litigation. Preska's ruling represented another step toward making previously sealed Epstein-related investigative materials available to the public while maintaining protections for victims whose identities or private information could appear in the records.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New York judge orders unsealing of Ghislaine Maxwell-related grand jury subpoenas | Courthouse News Service
A federal judge in New York ordered the unsealing of grand jury-related materials connected to the investigation of Ghislaine Maxwell, rejecting Maxwell's attempts to keep the records from becoming public. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska granted the Justice Department's request to release materials that had originally been obtained through grand jury subpoenas from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner. Those records originated in Virginia Giuffre's civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell and included evidence tied to Maxwell's 2016 depositions. Preska ruled that Maxwell's procedural, statutory and constitutional objections were without merit and said the remaining materials in the government's possession should become part of the public record, with appropriate redactions to protect victims. The disclosure was ordered under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, legislation requiring the Justice Department to release records related to the federal investigations of Jeffrey Epstein and his associates.The significance of the records was that Maxwell's testimony in the Giuffre litigation later became the foundation for two federal perjury charges against her. Prosecutors accused Maxwell of lying under oath when she denied knowledge of Epstein's sexual abuse and recruitment of young women and girls. Those perjury counts were eventually separated from Maxwell's sex-trafficking prosecution and later dropped after her 2021 conviction remained intact, but the underlying testimony continued to represent an important part of the government's case against her. The new unsealing order therefore opened another portion of the investigative record surrounding Maxwell and Epstein, particularly evidence that had previously been shielded by grand jury secrecy and the confidentiality surrounding the earlier civil litigation. Preska's ruling represented another step toward making previously sealed Epstein-related investigative materials available to the public while maintaining protections for victims whose identities or private information could appear in the records.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New York judge orders unsealing of Ghislaine Maxwell-related grand jury subpoenas | Courthouse News ServiceBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Judge Loretta Preska played the decisive role in beginning the large-scale release of documents from Virginia Giuffre's defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. After taking responsibility for reviewing the sealed record, Preska rejected the idea that entire categories of court filings should remain hidden indefinitely. She examined the materials individually, weighed legitimate privacy concerns against the public's right of access and repeatedly ordered depositions, emails, exhibits and witness statements unsealed. Her rulings established that secrecy had to be specifically justified rather than automatically preserved simply because the case involved famous, wealthy or politically connected people.Those decisions got the transparency process moving and created a framework for the gradual release of records that had remained inaccessible for years. Preska continued reviewing objections from people identified in the documents, protecting survivors and sensitive personal information where necessary while refusing to allow embarrassment or reputational concerns alone to justify sealing. Her later orders resulted in additional releases, including the widely publicized unsealing of names and documents in January 2024. Through that sustained judicial review, Preska opened a substantial portion of the evidentiary record and gave the public a clearer view of Epstein and Maxwell's network, the allegations against them and the information gathered during the Giuffre-Maxwell litigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Judge Loretta Preska played the decisive role in beginning the large-scale release of documents from Virginia Giuffre's defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. After taking responsibility for reviewing the sealed record, Preska rejected the idea that entire categories of court filings should remain hidden indefinitely. She examined the materials individually, weighed legitimate privacy concerns against the public's right of access and repeatedly ordered depositions, emails, exhibits and witness statements unsealed. Her rulings established that secrecy had to be specifically justified rather than automatically preserved simply because the case involved famous, wealthy or politically connected people.Those decisions got the transparency process moving and created a framework for the gradual release of records that had remained inaccessible for years. Preska continued reviewing objections from people identified in the documents, protecting survivors and sensitive personal information where necessary while refusing to allow embarrassment or reputational concerns alone to justify sealing. Her later orders resulted in additional releases, including the widely publicized unsealing of names and documents in January 2024. Through that sustained judicial review, Preska opened a substantial portion of the evidentiary record and gave the public a clearer view of Epstein and Maxwell's network, the allegations against them and the information gathered during the Giuffre-Maxwell litigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Judge Loretta Preska played the decisive role in beginning the large-scale release of documents from Virginia Giuffre's defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. After taking responsibility for reviewing the sealed record, Preska rejected the idea that entire categories of court filings should remain hidden indefinitely. She examined the materials individually, weighed legitimate privacy concerns against the public's right of access and repeatedly ordered depositions, emails, exhibits and witness statements unsealed. Her rulings established that secrecy had to be specifically justified rather than automatically preserved simply because the case involved famous, wealthy or politically connected people.Those decisions got the transparency process moving and created a framework for the gradual release of records that had remained inaccessible for years. Preska continued reviewing objections from people identified in the documents, protecting survivors and sensitive personal information where necessary while refusing to allow embarrassment or reputational concerns alone to justify sealing. Her later orders resulted in additional releases, including the widely publicized unsealing of names and documents in January 2024. Through that sustained judicial review, Preska opened a substantial portion of the evidentiary record and gave the public a clearer view of Epstein and Maxwell's network, the allegations against them and the information gathered during the Giuffre-Maxwell litigation.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Molili so člani Karitas iz župnij Preska in Smlednik.
Loretta Preska became one of the most important judicial figures connected to the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell saga through her oversight of major unsealing battles in federal court. Serving as a judge in the Southern District of New York, Preska inherited responsibility for handling large portions of the long-running defamation case involving Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell. Her courtroom became the focal point for disputes over whether sealed records tied to Epstein's network should be made public. Preska ultimately ordered the release of thousands of pages of depositions, emails, contact information, and court materials connected to Epstein, Maxwell, and numerous high-profile associates, helping expose the breadth of Epstein's social and institutional connections. Those disclosures fueled worldwide media coverage and intensified public scrutiny surrounding powerful figures tied to Epstein.Preska's role placed her at the center of one of the most politically and socially explosive transparency fights in modern federal court history. She repeatedly weighed arguments involving privacy rights, reputational harm, victim protection, and public interest as lawyers fought over what information should remain sealed. Supporters of disclosure viewed her decisions as a major step toward exposing how Epstein and Maxwell operated within elite circles for decades, while critics argued that some releases risked turning the process into a spectacle driven by public curiosity rather than direct criminal relevance. Regardless, Preska's rulings became pivotal in dismantling years of secrecy surrounding the Epstein-Maxwell litigation and opened the door to a wave of public revelations that continued shaping investigations, media reporting, and civil lawsuits tied to Epstein's network.to contact me:bobbycapucci!protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Loretta Preska became one of the most important judicial figures connected to the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell saga through her oversight of major unsealing battles in federal court. Serving as a judge in the Southern District of New York, Preska inherited responsibility for handling large portions of the long-running defamation case involving Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell. Her courtroom became the focal point for disputes over whether sealed records tied to Epstein's network should be made public. Preska ultimately ordered the release of thousands of pages of depositions, emails, contact information, and court materials connected to Epstein, Maxwell, and numerous high-profile associates, helping expose the breadth of Epstein's social and institutional connections. Those disclosures fueled worldwide media coverage and intensified public scrutiny surrounding powerful figures tied to Epstein.Preska's role placed her at the center of one of the most politically and socially explosive transparency fights in modern federal court history. She repeatedly weighed arguments involving privacy rights, reputational harm, victim protection, and public interest as lawyers fought over what information should remain sealed. Supporters of disclosure viewed her decisions as a major step toward exposing how Epstein and Maxwell operated within elite circles for decades, while critics argued that some releases risked turning the process into a spectacle driven by public curiosity rather than direct criminal relevance. Regardless, Preska's rulings became pivotal in dismantling years of secrecy surrounding the Epstein-Maxwell litigation and opened the door to a wave of public revelations that continued shaping investigations, media reporting, and civil lawsuits tied to Epstein's network.to contact me:bobbycapucci!protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Molili so člani Karitas iz župnij Preska in Smlednik.
Molili so člani Karitas iz župnij Preska in Smlednik.
Molili so člani Karitas iz župnij Preska in Smlednik.
In her December 2023 ruling, Loretta Preska, the U.S. District Judge overseeing the case stemming from the civil suit by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, determined that more than 150 names that had been redacted from court filings would be unsealed as of January 1, 2024. She explained that the public interest in transparency outweighed the privacy interests of many involved, particularly because a significant portion of the information—such as names of associates and witnesses—was already in the public domain via media reporting, depositions, or previous filings. She granted anyone named in the documents a deadline to request a further redaction before the release.However, Judge Preska also made clear that not all records would become public: she insisted that names of minors or individuals whose involvement stemmed solely from victim-status would remain shielded, because their privacy interests outweighed any public benefit in disclosure. She cautioned that many of the names being released may lack context as to how they relate to the litigation or alleged misconduct — meaning a name in the filings does not automatically imply innocence or guilt.We also hear from Tartaglione's lawyer about the missing video.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
In her December 2023 ruling, Loretta Preska, the U.S. District Judge overseeing the case stemming from the civil suit by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, determined that more than 150 names that had been redacted from court filings would be unsealed as of January 1, 2024. She explained that the public interest in transparency outweighed the privacy interests of many involved, particularly because a significant portion of the information—such as names of associates and witnesses—was already in the public domain via media reporting, depositions, or previous filings. She granted anyone named in the documents a deadline to request a further redaction before the release.However, Judge Preska also made clear that not all records would become public: she insisted that names of minors or individuals whose involvement stemmed solely from victim-status would remain shielded, because their privacy interests outweighed any public benefit in disclosure. She cautioned that many of the names being released may lack context as to how they relate to the litigation or alleged misconduct — meaning a name in the filings does not automatically imply innocence or guilt.We also hear from Tartaglione's lawyer about the missing video.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In her December 2023 ruling, Loretta Preska, the U.S. District Judge overseeing the case stemming from the civil suit by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, determined that more than 150 names that had been redacted from court filings would be unsealed as of January 1, 2024. She explained that the public interest in transparency outweighed the privacy interests of many involved, particularly because a significant portion of the information—such as names of associates and witnesses—was already in the public domain via media reporting, depositions, or previous filings. She granted anyone named in the documents a deadline to request a further redaction before the release.However, Judge Preska also made clear that not all records would become public: she insisted that names of minors or individuals whose involvement stemmed solely from victim-status would remain shielded, because their privacy interests outweighed any public benefit in disclosure. She cautioned that many of the names being released may lack context as to how they relate to the litigation or alleged misconduct — meaning a name in the filings does not automatically imply innocence or guilt.We also hear from Tartaglione's lawyer about the missing video.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In her December 2023 ruling, Loretta Preska, the U.S. District Judge overseeing the case stemming from the civil suit by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell, determined that more than 150 names that had been redacted from court filings would be unsealed as of January 1, 2024. She explained that the public interest in transparency outweighed the privacy interests of many involved, particularly because a significant portion of the information—such as names of associates and witnesses—was already in the public domain via media reporting, depositions, or previous filings. She granted anyone named in the documents a deadline to request a further redaction before the release.However, Judge Preska also made clear that not all records would become public: she insisted that names of minors or individuals whose involvement stemmed solely from victim-status would remain shielded, because their privacy interests outweighed any public benefit in disclosure. She cautioned that many of the names being released may lack context as to how they relate to the litigation or alleged misconduct — meaning a name in the filings does not automatically imply innocence or guilt.We also hear from Tartaglione's lawyer about the missing video.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In December 2023, Judge Loretta Preska of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ordered a massive unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein–related documents from the Ghislaine Maxwell defamation case. These files, long kept under seal, contained names of associates, depositions, and exhibits that had been hidden for years. Preska ruled that the public interest outweighed any remaining privacy concerns, emphasizing that secrecy was no longer justified except for information identifying minor victims. The decision paved the way for one of the largest Epstein document releases yet—revealing hundreds of pages that shed light on how Epstein and Maxwell operated their network and who may have been connected to it.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit later affirmed the underlying principle behind Preska's ruling, upholding that the presumption of public access applies to judicial records in Epstein-related litigation. This affirmation followed the precedent set in Brown v. Maxwell (2019), where the court found that lower courts must provide a “particularized review” before keeping such documents sealed. By affirming the transparency mandate, the Second Circuit reinforced the public's right to know and ensured that future attempts to hide materials related to Epstein's crimes would face steep judicial resistance. Together, these rulings represent a rare and decisive push toward accountability in a case long plagued by secrecy and institutional protection.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
In December 2023, Judge Loretta Preska of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ordered a massive unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein–related documents from the Ghislaine Maxwell defamation case. These files, long kept under seal, contained names of associates, depositions, and exhibits that had been hidden for years. Preska ruled that the public interest outweighed any remaining privacy concerns, emphasizing that secrecy was no longer justified except for information identifying minor victims. The decision paved the way for one of the largest Epstein document releases yet—revealing hundreds of pages that shed light on how Epstein and Maxwell operated their network and who may have been connected to it.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit later affirmed the underlying principle behind Preska's ruling, upholding that the presumption of public access applies to judicial records in Epstein-related litigation. This affirmation followed the precedent set in Brown v. Maxwell (2019), where the court found that lower courts must provide a “particularized review” before keeping such documents sealed. By affirming the transparency mandate, the Second Circuit reinforced the public's right to know and ensured that future attempts to hide materials related to Epstein's crimes would face steep judicial resistance. Together, these rulings represent a rare and decisive push toward accountability in a case long plagued by secrecy and institutional protection.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In December 2023, Judge Loretta Preska of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ordered a massive unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein–related documents from the Ghislaine Maxwell defamation case. These files, long kept under seal, contained names of associates, depositions, and exhibits that had been hidden for years. Preska ruled that the public interest outweighed any remaining privacy concerns, emphasizing that secrecy was no longer justified except for information identifying minor victims. The decision paved the way for one of the largest Epstein document releases yet—revealing hundreds of pages that shed light on how Epstein and Maxwell operated their network and who may have been connected to it.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit later affirmed the underlying principle behind Preska's ruling, upholding that the presumption of public access applies to judicial records in Epstein-related litigation. This affirmation followed the precedent set in Brown v. Maxwell (2019), where the court found that lower courts must provide a “particularized review” before keeping such documents sealed. By affirming the transparency mandate, the Second Circuit reinforced the public's right to know and ensured that future attempts to hide materials related to Epstein's crimes would face steep judicial resistance. Together, these rulings represent a rare and decisive push toward accountability in a case long plagued by secrecy and institutional protection.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Virginia Giuffre, formerly known as Virginia Roberts, publicly praised Judge Loretta Preska's decision to unseal hundreds of pages of Epstein-related court documents, calling it a “major step toward truth and transparency.” She said the public had a right to know the full scope of Epstein's network, the powerful figures involved, and how so many were able to escape accountability for so long. Giuffre framed the unsealing as a victory not just for herself, but for every survivor silenced or ignored, adding that sunlight is “the best disinfectant” when it comes to systemic abuse. She also cautioned that while the move was an important breakthrough, it was only the beginning — “there's still a lot more that needs to come out,” she said.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In her civil racketeering (CICO) investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands, former Attorney General Denise George aggressively sought detailed financial records and transactional documents to trace how Epstein's wealth was structured, moved, and possibly laundered through shell companies, banks, and trusts. Her office subpoenaed institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Citibank, demanding account statements, wire transfers, communications, and internal documents tied to more than 30 corporate entities and trusts connected to Epstein.George's subpoenas and lawsuits did more than simply map Epstein's money flows—they asserted that major financial players may have knowingly facilitated or concealed elements of his sex trafficking enterprise. In December 2022, she filed a federal suit accusing JPMorgan of “turning a blind eye” to Epstein's operations and of financially benefiting from themIn her effort to dig into Jeffrey Epstein's financial networks under the Virgin Islands' CICO (racketeering) statute, Attorney General Denise George asked U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska to unseal and grant her access to court documents, including deposition transcripts and filings in related Epstein-linked proceedings. In September of 2020, Preska granted part—but not all—of George's request, allowing her to review certain sealed materials while still protecting sensitive portions.This decision by Preska gave George a stronger footing in her investigation, enabling her team to follow paper trails, understand prior testimony, and press subpoenas against financial institutions with more clarity on the evidentiary landscape. At the same time, Preska maintained limitations on disclosure, balancing public interest and transparency against privacy, privilege, and security concernsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
In her civil racketeering (CICO) investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands, former Attorney General Denise George aggressively sought detailed financial records and transactional documents to trace how Epstein's wealth was structured, moved, and possibly laundered through shell companies, banks, and trusts. Her office subpoenaed institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Citibank, demanding account statements, wire transfers, communications, and internal documents tied to more than 30 corporate entities and trusts connected to Epstein.George's subpoenas and lawsuits did more than simply map Epstein's money flows—they asserted that major financial players may have knowingly facilitated or concealed elements of his sex trafficking enterprise. In December 2022, she filed a federal suit accusing JPMorgan of “turning a blind eye” to Epstein's operations and of financially benefiting from themIn her effort to dig into Jeffrey Epstein's financial networks under the Virgin Islands' CICO (racketeering) statute, Attorney General Denise George asked U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska to unseal and grant her access to court documents, including deposition transcripts and filings in related Epstein-linked proceedings. In September of 2020, Preska granted part—but not all—of George's request, allowing her to review certain sealed materials while still protecting sensitive portions.This decision by Preska gave George a stronger footing in her investigation, enabling her team to follow paper trails, understand prior testimony, and press subpoenas against financial institutions with more clarity on the evidentiary landscape. At the same time, Preska maintained limitations on disclosure, balancing public interest and transparency against privacy, privilege, and security concernsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In her civil racketeering (CICO) investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands, former Attorney General Denise George aggressively sought detailed financial records and transactional documents to trace how Epstein's wealth was structured, moved, and possibly laundered through shell companies, banks, and trusts. Her office subpoenaed institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Citibank, demanding account statements, wire transfers, communications, and internal documents tied to more than 30 corporate entities and trusts connected to Epstein.George's subpoenas and lawsuits did more than simply map Epstein's money flows—they asserted that major financial players may have knowingly facilitated or concealed elements of his sex trafficking enterprise. In December 2022, she filed a federal suit accusing JPMorgan of “turning a blind eye” to Epstein's operations and of financially benefiting from themIn her effort to dig into Jeffrey Epstein's financial networks under the Virgin Islands' CICO (racketeering) statute, Attorney General Denise George asked U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska to unseal and grant her access to court documents, including deposition transcripts and filings in related Epstein-linked proceedings. In September of 2020, Preska granted part—but not all—of George's request, allowing her to review certain sealed materials while still protecting sensitive portions.This decision by Preska gave George a stronger footing in her investigation, enabling her team to follow paper trails, understand prior testimony, and press subpoenas against financial institutions with more clarity on the evidentiary landscape. At the same time, Preska maintained limitations on disclosure, balancing public interest and transparency against privacy, privilege, and security concernsto contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
VLOG Sept 3 Diddy's precedents, after US Mann Act ranges from 33 to 7 months in SDNY https://www.patreon.com/posts/diddy-dockets-us-138002091 Bronx District Leader, 2 years. Habeas, dysphoria; CBP shot case to Judge Preska, & Epstein files. UN cites "Inner Circle Press" https://innercitypress.com/unguterres7bcorruptunmikoios090225.html
Virginia Roberts Giuffre forcefully praised Judge Loretta Preska's decision to unseal hundreds of documents from her 2015 defamation suit against Ghislaine Maxwell, emphasizing that the public's right to know was far more important than the shield of secrecy favored by the elite. Giuffre—whose suit formed the backbone of the Epstein revelations—welcomed the court's move to begin releasing names and redacted filings, saying that letting these documents remain buried was exactly the kind of suppression that protected predators and damaged survivors who dared to speak out.She made clear that the disclosures were far overdue, and that the people who sought to keep these documents sealed were the ones with something to lose. Giuffre argued that while pseudonymous third parties and powerful individuals lurked behind most sealing motions, transparency should never be sacrificed at the altar of privacy—especially when the crimes involved minors and high‑level enablers. By characterizing Preska's unsealing order as a minor yet vital victory, Giuffre signaled that sunlight remains the most powerful disinfectant in the Epstein saga.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre taunts those to be named in unsealed docs (nypost.com)
Virginia Roberts Giuffre forcefully praised Judge Loretta Preska's decision to unseal hundreds of documents from her 2015 defamation suit against Ghislaine Maxwell, emphasizing that the public's right to know was far more important than the shield of secrecy favored by the elite. Giuffre—whose suit formed the backbone of the Epstein revelations—welcomed the court's move to begin releasing names and redacted filings, saying that letting these documents remain buried was exactly the kind of suppression that protected predators and damaged survivors who dared to speak out.She made clear that the disclosures were far overdue, and that the people who sought to keep these documents sealed were the ones with something to lose. Giuffre argued that while pseudonymous third parties and powerful individuals lurked behind most sealing motions, transparency should never be sacrificed at the altar of privacy—especially when the crimes involved minors and high‑level enablers. By characterizing Preska's unsealing order as a minor yet vital victory, Giuffre signaled that sunlight remains the most powerful disinfectant in the Epstein saga.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre taunts those to be named in unsealed docs (nypost.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
VLOG July 21 Epstein unsealing bids Judge Berman & Nathan - but also Preska (civil cases) Maximum Maxwell: https://amazon.com/Maximum-Maxwell-Prosecution-Collusion-Verdicts/dp/B09P7RNGK6US v. Roman Storm https://amazon.com/dp/B0FHXTCNCRAAUP v. Rubio; Hanratty, ammo in the court.UN corruption scoops https://innercitypress.com/ungate4unisfaicp072025.html
Virginia Roberts took to X after the news that Judge Preska was going ahead with the unsealing of the names of over 170 Jane and John Does to comment about the decison that has been a long time in the making.In this episode, we dive into her comments and we take a look at what the decsion to unseal by Judge Preska could mean for transparency in other facets of the case moving forward.(commercial at 7:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre taunts those to be named in unsealed docs (nypost.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The world is in the grips of a globe wide pandemic but the wheels of justice continue to turn.Ghislaine Maxwell and her lawyers found that out the hard way when they attempted to delay proceedings in the trial for a month due to the Covid-19 pandemic.This request was flatly rejected by Preska who said that pandemic or not, the trial continues.Join me as I break it down!(Commercial at 10:07)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.courthousenews.com/pandemic-wont-slow-fight-over-sealed-jeffrey-epstein-docs/
The world is in the grips of a globe wide pandemic but the wheels of justice continue to turn.Ghislaine Maxwell and her lawyers found that out the hard way when they attempted to delay proceedings in the trial for a month due to the Covid-19 pandemic.This request was flatly rejected by Preska who said that pandemic or not, the trial continues.Join me as I break it down!(Commercial at 10:07)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.courthousenews.com/pandemic-wont-slow-fight-over-sealed-jeffrey-epstein-docs/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
As we prepare for the document dump ordered by Judge Preska at the start of the new year, Doe 107 has asked that her information not be part of it. According to the filing, Doe 107 fears that if she is named her life will be at risk due to many factors including that she lives in a very conservative country. The Miami Herald and Virginia Roberts have both agreed that her name should remain sealed and it will now be up to Judge Preska after Doe 107 filed an affidavit with the court appealing to the Judge to not release her idenity. (commercial at 8:50)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Woman tied to Jeffrey Epstein begs judge not to release her name along with 170 others linked to the pedophile because she 'lives in a culturally conservative country' and 'fears for her safety' | Daily Mail Online
As we prepare for the document dump ordered by Judge Preska at the start of the new year, Doe 107 has asked that her information not be part of it. According to the filing, Doe 107 fears that if she is named her life will be at risk due to many factors including that she lives in a very conservative country.The Miami Herald and Virginia Roberts have both agreed that her name should remain sealed and it will now be up to Judge Preska after Doe 107 filed an affidavit with the court appealing to the Judge to not release her idenity.(commercial at 8:50)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Woman tied to Jeffrey Epstein begs judge not to release her name along with 170 others linked to the pedophile because she 'lives in a culturally conservative country' and 'fears for her safety' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team has once again filed a motion in Judge Preska's court room attempting to keep the second deposition sealed.After the precedent set by not only Preska in her court room but the 2nd circuit court of Appeals, Maxwell is in for an uphill climb.(commercial at 10:40)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.heraldmailmedia.com/news/nation/jeffrey-epstein-associate-ghislaine-maxwell-fights-to-keep-sexually-charged-testimony-sealed/article_712ec123-51e9-5e5d-94d1-d72916d0baca.html
Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team has once again filed a motion in Judge Preska's court room attempting to keep the second deposition sealed.After the precedent set by not only Preska in her court room but the 2nd circuit court of Appeals, Maxwell is in for an uphill climb.(commercial at 10:40)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.heraldmailmedia.com/news/nation/jeffrey-epstein-associate-ghislaine-maxwell-fights-to-keep-sexually-charged-testimony-sealed/article_712ec123-51e9-5e5d-94d1-d72916d0baca.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
As we prepare for the document dump ordered by Judge Preska at the start of the new year, Doe 107 has asked that her information not be part of it. According to the filing, Doe 107 fears that if she is named her life will be at risk due to many factors including that she lives in a very conservative country. The Miami Herald and Virginia Roberts have both agreed that her name should remain sealed and it will now be up to Judge Preska after Doe 107 filed an affidavit with the court appealing to the Judge to not release her idenity. (commercial at 8:50)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Woman tied to Jeffrey Epstein begs judge not to release her name along with 170 others linked to the pedophile because she 'lives in a culturally conservative country' and 'fears for her safety' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
As we prepare for the document dump ordered by Judge Preska at the start of the new year, Doe 107 has asked that her information not be part of it. According to the filing, Doe 107 fears that if she is named her life will be at risk due to many factors including that she lives in a very conservative country.The Miami Herald and Virginia Roberts have both agreed that her name should remain sealed and it will now be up to Judge Preska after Doe 107 filed an affidavit with the court appealing to the Judge to not release her idenity.(commercial at 8:50)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Woman tied to Jeffrey Epstein begs judge not to release her name along with 170 others linked to the pedophile because she 'lives in a culturally conservative country' and 'fears for her safety' | Daily Mail Online
As we prepare for the document dump ordered by Judge Preska at the start of the new year, Doe 107 has asked that her information not be part of it. According to the filing, Doe 107 fears that if she is named her life will be at risk due to many factors including that she lives in a very conservative country.The Miami Herald and Virginia Roberts have both agreed that her name should remain sealed and it will now be up to Judge Preska after Doe 107 filed an affidavit with the court appealing to the Judge to not release her idenity.(commercial at 8:50)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Woman tied to Jeffrey Epstein begs judge not to release her name along with 170 others linked to the pedophile because she 'lives in a culturally conservative country' and 'fears for her safety' | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In this illuminating podcast episode, listeners are invited into the world of KC Preska, an alternative and transformative coach whose mission is to facilitate healing, awakening, and thriving through holistic health services. KC shares her inspiring journey, which began as a personal quest for wellness and self-discovery. Drawing from her own experiences and transformational insights, she delves into the techniques and philosophies that have guided her path to holistic well-being. With authenticity and passion, KC offers invaluable wisdom and practical advice, empowering listeners to embark on their own transformative journeys towards greater health, fulfillment, and vitality. This episode serves as a beacon of inspiration for anyone seeking to embrace holistic approaches to wellness and embark on a journey of self-healing and personal growth. Connect with KC: www.floweroflifehealingarts.com IG: @fol_healingartsSupport the showShow sponsors:UNLMTD Active & Lounge: www.unlmtdbrands.comMeal Prep Menus:www.mealprepmenus.comGuest bookings:https://calendly.com/theunscriptedpodcast/30minIf you love what you hear and want to support in a big way, you can help us continue making great content for listeners everywhere by signing up as a paid subscriber. Thank you for your support! https://www.buzzsprout.com/1851664/support
Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team has once again filed a motion in Judge Preska's court room attempting to keep the second deposition sealed.After the precedent set by not only Preska in her court room but the 2nd circuit court of Appeals, Maxwell is in for an uphill climb.(commercial at 10:40)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.heraldmailmedia.com/news/nation/jeffrey-epstein-associate-ghislaine-maxwell-fights-to-keep-sexually-charged-testimony-sealed/article_712ec123-51e9-5e5d-94d1-d72916d0baca.htmlBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Virginia Roberts took to X after the news that Judge Preska was going ahead with the unsealing of the names of over 170 Jane and John Does to comment about the decison that has been a long time in the making.In this episode, we dive into her comments and we take a look at what the decsion to unseal by Judge Preska could mean for transparency in other facets of the case moving forward.(commercial at 7:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre taunts those to be named in unsealed docs (nypost.com)
Virginia Roberts took to X after the news that Judge Preska was going ahead with the unsealing of the names of over 170 Jane and John Does to comment about the decison that has been a long time in the making.In this episode, we dive into her comments and we take a look at what the decsion to unseal by Judge Preska could mean for transparency in other facets of the case moving forward.(commercial at 7:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre taunts those to be named in unsealed docs (nypost.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
JACOB ELORDI. ¿Eh? ¿Qué? ¿Perdón? No, bueno, eso, vimos dos películas dirigidas por nepo babies que justo tienen al mismo actor de Euphoria. Priscilla (2023) de Sofia Coppola y Saltburn (2023) de Emerald Fennell. Muchas cosas por decir, la verdad, muchas. En coyuntura la cosa viene tranquila y no tanto porque el primer Mickey pasó a dominio público y la justicia publicó material de un caso resuelto vinculado con Jeffrey Epstein y se llenó de fake news sobre Hollywood. Si Flor y Calu (o sea Fio Sargenti y Santiago Calori) te caen bien también podés escucharlos en Matar Está Mal y colaborar con todo este universo entrando en hoytrasnoche.com. Fin.
As we prepare for the document dump ordered by Judge Preska at the start of the new year, Doe 107 has asked that her information not be part of it. According to the filing, Doe 107 fears that if she is named her life will be at risk due to many factors including that she lives in a very conservative country. The Miami Herald and Virginia Roberts have both agreed that her name should remain sealed and it will now be up to Judge Preska after Doe 107 filed an affidavit with the court appealing to the Judge to not release her idenity. (commercial at 7:34)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Woman tied to Jeffrey Epstein begs judge not to release her name along with 170 others linked to the pedophile because she 'lives in a culturally conservative country' and 'fears for her safety' | Daily Mail OnlineThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
Virginia Roberts took to X after the news that Judge Preska was going ahead with the unsealing of the names of over 170 Jane and John Does to comment about the decison that has been a long time in the making. In this episode, we dive into her comments and we take a look at what the decsion to unseal by Judge Preska could mean for transparency in other facets of the case moving forward. (commercial at 7:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre taunts those to be named in unsealed docs (nypost.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
As we prepare for the document dump ordered by Judge Preska at the start of the new year, Doe 107 has asked that her information not be part of it. According to the filing, Doe 107 fears that if she is named her life will be at risk due to many factors including that she lives in a very conservative country. The Miami Herald and Virginia Roberts have both agreed that her name should remain sealed and it will now be up to Judge Preska after Doe 107 filed an affidavit with the court appealing to the Judge to not release her idenity. (commercial at 8:50)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Woman tied to Jeffrey Epstein begs judge not to release her name along with 170 others linked to the pedophile because she 'lives in a culturally conservative country' and 'fears for her safety' | Daily Mail OnlineThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
Virginia Roberts took to X after the news that Judge Preska was going ahead with the unsealing of the names of over 170 Jane and John Does to comment about the decison that has been a long time in the making. In this episode, we dive into her comments and we take a look at what the decsion to unseal by Judge Preska could mean for transparency in other facets of the case moving forward. (commercial at 7:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre taunts those to be named in unsealed docs (nypost.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team has once again filed a motion in Judge Preska's court room attempting to keep the second deposition sealed.After the precedent set by not only Preska in her court room but the 2nd circuit court of Appeals, Maxwell is in for an uphill climb.(commercial at 10:40)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.heraldmailmedia.com/news/nation/jeffrey-epstein-associate-ghislaine-maxwell-fights-to-keep-sexually-charged-testimony-sealed/article_712ec123-51e9-5e5d-94d1-d72916d0baca.htmlThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement
The world is in the grips of a globe wide pandemic, but the wheels of justice continue to turn.Ghislaine Maxwell and her lawyers found that out the hard way when they attempted to delay proceedings in the trial for a month due to the Covid-19 pandemic.This request was flatly rejected by Preska who said that pandemic or not, the trial continues.Join me as I break it down!(Commercial at 10:05)To contact me:Bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:https://www.courthousenews.com/pandemic-wont-slow-fight-over-sealed-jeffrey-eThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
