Podcasts about damning

Guests: Yair Rosenberg, Harry Litman, Rep. Veronica Escobar, John KirbyAs antisemitism and hate grow around the country, the dangerous implications of the world's richest man suggesting Jews stoke hatred of white people. Then, will George Santos get bounced from Congress in the wake of today's devastating ethics report? Plus, how the judge in the stolen documents case is once again delaying justice. And Biden National Security spokesman John Kirby on what we know about the Israeli raid on Shifa hospital. 

Seth takes a closer look at the House Ethics Committee releasing a devastating report about alleged lawbreaking by Republican Rep. George Santos and damning new evidence coming out in the Georgia criminal case against Trump. Then, Iman Vellani talks about watching The Sopranos for the first time, Billy Joel being an inspiration for her comic book Ms. Marvel: The New Mutant and working with Samuel L. Jackson in The Marvels.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

PLEASE SUPPORT THE SHOW:To learn more about the Genetic Witness Program and how to join GEDmatch, head over to www.gedmatch.com/Sidebar! HOST:Jesse Weber: https://twitter.com/jessecordweberLAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:YouTube Management - Bobby SzokePodcasting - Sam GoldbergVideo Editing - Michael DeiningerScript Writing & Producing - Savannah WilliamsonGuest Booking - Alyssa Fisher & Diane KayeSocial Media Management - Vanessa BeinSTAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:Watch Law&Crime Network on YouTubeTV: https://bit.ly/3td2e3yWhere To Watch Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3akxLK5Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: https://bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletterRead Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: https://bit.ly/3td2IqoLAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lawandcrime/Twitter: https://twitter.com/LawCrimeNetworkFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/lawandcrimeTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/lawandcrimenetworkTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@lawandcrimeSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Gareth and Lauren react to the independent review of the Welsh Rugby Union's culture with interim chief executive Nigel Walker and incoming chief executive Abi Tierney.

Can a love triangle turn deadly, and if it does, how does a suspect try to evade justice? These are the gripping questions surrounding the Kaitlin Armstrong case, a complex puzzle of romance, jealousy, and alleged murder discussed by Tony Brueski and former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer on the "Hidden Killers" podcast.    Kaitlin Armstrong stands accused of murdering Anna Moriah "Mo" Wilson, a cyclist romantically linked to Armstrong's lover, Colin Strickland. "You know, her motive followed by her actions. Her fleeing not once, but twice," Coffindaffer remarks, suggesting a 'consciousness of guilt'. Yet, the case's twists and turns might be more convoluted than they appear.    Strickland has been absolved, possessing a "rock-solid alibi," according to Brueski. Nonetheless, Armstrong's defense points to strange occurrences at her place that made her feel unsafe. "She could be a target of somebody, and that's why she left," Coffindaffer hypothesizes. But the question lingers, why flee with her sister's identification, and why undergo plastic surgery in Costa Rica? These actions seemingly underline the prosecution's narrative of premeditation and guilt.    Further complicating the matter is the presence of Armstrong's DNA on Wilson's bicycle, discarded after the shooting, and Armstrong's car, captured near the crime scene. However, security footage does not explicitly place Armstrong at the scene. "There's all this camera footage yet you never see her enter or exit," points out Brueski. Could this point towards innocence or merely careful planning?    The prosecution is expected to lean heavily on ballistic evidence. Brueski queries, "How strong is the ballistic evidence in this case?" Tool mark experts could tie the murder weapon to casings found at Armstrong's residence. "The jurors love it," Coffindaffer explains, "They love stuff that is not subjective." The ballistic evidence, while not as incontrovertible as DNA, could still be compelling in court.    Yet, in a moment of apparent oversight, the murder weapon was left by Armstrong for authorities to find. "She's smart enough to sell her car, get the money, go to another country, but she leaves her gun there?" Brueski expresses incredulity over such a critical mistake. This paradoxical combination of calculated escape and seemingly amateurish errors adds layers to Armstrong's profile in this case.    The defense might argue the similar nature of ballistic markings from identical weapons, an angle that Coffindaffer acknowledges: "It's like 90 percent on the projectiles that go through the barrels." This testimony opens a sliver of doubt about the ballistic evidence's uniqueness, possibly enough to influence a jury.    The case against Armstrong may be fortified by her post-crime behavior. "Typically, people who are innocent do not go to these lengths to avoid being found," Coffindaffer states. Armstrong's actions post-murder—a rapid escape, significant appearance alteration, and abandoning key evidence—could lead a jury to perceive a 'consciousness of guilt'.    This intricate tale of jealousy, forensic evidence, and a flight to another country could be perceived as either a tragic outcome of a love triangle or a misjudgment by a panicked individual. As Brueski and Coffindaffer dissect the case, the conversation oscillates between Armstrong's potential guilt and the prosecution's burden of proof.    In closing, one can't help but ponder, does the evidence truly reveal the full story, or is there a chapter of innocence we are overlooking? Does the case against Kaitlin Armstrong close as neatly as her quick departure, or are we yet to see a twist in the tale that could exonerate her? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Can a love triangle turn deadly, and if it does, how does a suspect try to evade justice? These are the gripping questions surrounding the Kaitlin Armstrong case, a complex puzzle of romance, jealousy, and alleged murder discussed by Tony Brueski and former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer on the "Hidden Killers" podcast.    Kaitlin Armstrong stands accused of murdering Anna Moriah "Mo" Wilson, a cyclist romantically linked to Armstrong's lover, Colin Strickland. "You know, her motive followed by her actions. Her fleeing not once, but twice," Coffindaffer remarks, suggesting a 'consciousness of guilt'. Yet, the case's twists and turns might be more convoluted than they appear.    Strickland has been absolved, possessing a "rock-solid alibi," according to Brueski. Nonetheless, Armstrong's defense points to strange occurrences at her place that made her feel unsafe. "She could be a target of somebody, and that's why she left," Coffindaffer hypothesizes. But the question lingers, why flee with her sister's identification, and why undergo plastic surgery in Costa Rica? These actions seemingly underline the prosecution's narrative of premeditation and guilt.    Further complicating the matter is the presence of Armstrong's DNA on Wilson's bicycle, discarded after the shooting, and Armstrong's car, captured near the crime scene. However, security footage does not explicitly place Armstrong at the scene. "There's all this camera footage yet you never see her enter or exit," points out Brueski. Could this point towards innocence or merely careful planning?    The prosecution is expected to lean heavily on ballistic evidence. Brueski queries, "How strong is the ballistic evidence in this case?" Tool mark experts could tie the murder weapon to casings found at Armstrong's residence. "The jurors love it," Coffindaffer explains, "They love stuff that is not subjective." The ballistic evidence, while not as incontrovertible as DNA, could still be compelling in court.    Yet, in a moment of apparent oversight, the murder weapon was left by Armstrong for authorities to find. "She's smart enough to sell her car, get the money, go to another country, but she leaves her gun there?" Brueski expresses incredulity over such a critical mistake. This paradoxical combination of calculated escape and seemingly amateurish errors adds layers to Armstrong's profile in this case.    The defense might argue the similar nature of ballistic markings from identical weapons, an angle that Coffindaffer acknowledges: "It's like 90 percent on the projectiles that go through the barrels." This testimony opens a sliver of doubt about the ballistic evidence's uniqueness, possibly enough to influence a jury.    The case against Armstrong may be fortified by her post-crime behavior. "Typically, people who are innocent do not go to these lengths to avoid being found," Coffindaffer states. Armstrong's actions post-murder—a rapid escape, significant appearance alteration, and abandoning key evidence—could lead a jury to perceive a 'consciousness of guilt'.    This intricate tale of jealousy, forensic evidence, and a flight to another country could be perceived as either a tragic outcome of a love triangle or a misjudgment by a panicked individual. As Brueski and Coffindaffer dissect the case, the conversation oscillates between Armstrong's potential guilt and the prosecution's burden of proof.    In closing, one can't help but ponder, does the evidence truly reveal the full story, or is there a chapter of innocence we are overlooking? Does the case against Kaitlin Armstrong close as neatly as her quick departure, or are we yet to see a twist in the tale that could exonerate her? Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The University of Cape Town's (UCT's) council was grilled by Parliament's Higher Education and Training Portfolio Committee following the release of a scathing report into former vice-chancellor Mamokgethi Phakeng's "divisive" leadership at the institution. The council briefed the committee following the release of the independent investigation, which found that Phakeng and council chair Babalwa Ngonyama had committed "serious governance failures" by "mendaciously misleading" the university about the resignation of a colleague. The new council chairperson, advocate Norman Arendse, told the committee that they were determined to use the report as a road map to guide them toward a future marked by accountability and transparency, as well as a renewed commitment to strengthening the governance of the university. "Council has acknowledged that during the period under review, in important respects, it did not exercise its fiduciary responsibilities timeously and that it did not always act in the best interests of the university," Arendse said. "Council has acknowledged publicly that had it at the time fulfilled its governance role as required, the events that unfolded and the emotional trauma caused to many individuals could have been avoided." Arendse also used the opportunity to publicly apologise to the staff mentioned in the report. "Council has publicly indicated its regret for not acting sooner and has apologised unreservedly," he stressed. A panel was set up last year following allegations that Ngonyama had supplied false reasons to the UCT senate for the early departure of Professor Lis Lange, who was the deputy vice-chancellor for learning and teaching. According to Ngonyama, Lange chose to leave of her own accord for personal reasons, News24 previously reported. However, Lange denied this, saying Ngonyama had effectively pushed her out and told her that Phakeng didn't want her to continue as her second in command. The report found Lange's departure was a constructive dismissal. The 179-page report found Phakeng used race and racial difference as a "weapon" to abuse colleagues. It also highlighted the profound repercussions of the breakdown in executive and governance relations. Arendse said that, in relation to the individuals implicated in the report, the council was deliberating an appropriate course of action. "This will be done in line with UCT policies, procedures, and codes of conduct," he said. Committee chairperson Nompendulo Mkhatshwa said: "Whatever has happened here at UCT should be used as a case study to ensure this never happens again." Dr Marcia Socikwa, Deputy Director-General in the Department of Higher Education and Training, told the committee that Minister Blade Nzimande would consider the report.

Topics include: 1)Never before seen video of Ray Epps emerges and it's damning; 2)Trump leads Biden in 5 swing state polls; 3)David Axelrod tells Biden he should consider not running for reelection; 4)Iowa Gov Kim Reynolds will endorse Gov DeSantis in a HUGE and needed win for his campaign, and 5)ten races republicans need to win on Tuesday 11/7/2023 More: www.TheCarljacksonshow.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio witter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow http://www.TheCarlJacksonPodcast.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Topics include: 1)Never before seen video of Ray Epps emerges and it's damning; 2)Trump leads Biden in 5 swing state polls; 3)David Axelrod tells Biden he should consider not running for reelection; 4)Iowa Gov Kim Reynolds will endorse Gov DeSantis in a HUGE and needed win for his campaign, and 5)ten races republicans need to win on Tuesday 11/7/2023 More: www.TheCarljacksonshow.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio witter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow http://www.TheCarlJacksonPodcast.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Love Triangle EXPOSES Sam Fisher by airing DAMNING phone call with his secret GF during filming! Inside the LEAKED letter Channel Nine sent to Charming Street locals ahead of ‘EXPLOSIVE' auction day! MAFS' Bronte Schofield ROASTS Harrison Boon after he makes COOKED comments about Kirra Schofield! PLUS LOTS MORE! Want more of the latest gossip? Get extra hot tea on PATREON! Visit SO DRAMATIC! ONLINE and sign up for our newsletter! Follow on INSTAGRAM, FACEBOOK, TIKTOK, and join the FACEBOOK GROUP! Got a tip, request, question, or receipts? Contact: tips@sodramaticmedia.com! Want to partner or advertise with us? Contact: hello@sodramaticmedia.com! This is an independent podcast by entertainment journalist Megan Pustetto, who is dedicated to bringing you the hottest reality TV tea each week!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This week we look at more statements from witnesses, the occult angle, and more.Join the Coffee ClubFacebookPatreonPlease check out this weeks sponsors:BlendJet 2:Use my special link https://zen.ai/deathcast to save 12% at blendjet.com. The discount will be applied at checkoutChinese Teacher Jessica: https://tinyurl.com/tcjessicaThe Deathcast is a production of Corpse Creek Publishing and Big Pond Podcasts#truecrime #TheDeathcast #Truecrimepodcast #WESTMEMPHISTHREE #WM3Show less

Former University of Cape Town, UCT Vice-Chancellor Professor Mamokgethi Phakeng is considering legal action following a damning report by the University against her. The report found Phakeng and Council chairperson, Babalwa Ngonyama, guilty of serious governance failures at the institution. Professor Phakeng says she will study the report further with her legal team as it is inaccurate and potentially damaging to her reputation. For reaction to the report Elvis Presslin spoke to Ntokozo Mahlangu, spokesperson for the EFF Student Command in the Western Cape

The UN problem in Israel a furious row over the words of Antonio Gutteres. An All-British space mission what on earth can the U.K. add to the space race?  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The UN problem in Israel a furious row over the words of Antonio Gutteres. An All-British space mission what on earth can the U.K. add to the space race?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Rich Zeoli Show- Hour 3: During a Spaces conversation on X with David Sacks and Vivek Ramaswamy, Elon Musk warned that the United States may be “sleepwalking” its way into “World War III.” Several weeks ago, Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) pulled a fire alarm in the Cannon House Office Building just prior to the House holding its vote on a stopgap spending measure to avoid a government shutdown. Although Rep. Bowman has claimed he pulled the alarm in error, some have speculated that it was a tactic to delay the House vote—providing Democrat members of the House additional time to read through the Republican proposed legislation. On Thursday, Bowman pleaded guilty to falsely pulling the fire alarm at a congressional office building—a misdemeanor. He will have to pay a $1,000 fine, serve a three-month probation, and write a letter of apology. Brooke Singman of Fox News reports: “The FBI maintained more than 40 confidential human sources on various criminal matters related to the Biden family, including Joe Biden, dating back to his time as vice president, according to information obtained by Sen. Chuck Grassley…Grassley learned that an FBI task force within the Washington Field Office sought to, and in some cases, successfully, shut down reporting and information from those sources by falsely discrediting the information as foreign disinformation. That effort ‘caused investigative activity to cease.'” You can read the full report here: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-received-criminal-information-40-confidential-sources-joe-biden-hunter-jim-grassley Perhaps unsurprisingly, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell are both advocating for packaging Ukrainian aid and Israeli aid together in the same spending bill. Maddie Hanna of The Philadelphia Inquirer writes, “The Pennridge School District has adopted a policy specifying that sports teams are divided by sex, barring transgender students from participating on teams aligned with their gender identities. The policy, passed unanimously by the school board Tuesday, follows a move by the district earlier this year requiring that students use group bathrooms based on sex, rather than gender identity.” You can read Hanna's full article here: https://www.inquirer.com/education/pennridge-athletics-policy-sex-transgender-20231025.html Matt defends his decision to forgo wine and instead drink Coca-Cola with pizza while in Italy. Rich demands that he be fired immediately.  

Married at First Sight's Ella Ding announces her ENGAGEMENT in the cringest way! A Farmer Wants a Wife Farmer has tied the knot in SECRET! The Bachelor's Ciarran Stott's ex Ruby Burciaga moves on with a popular Aussie influencers baby daddy! Love Triangle's Sam Fisher drops proof he DID have a SECRET GF during filming! Jackson Lonie moves on with ANOTHER MAFS bride! Damning evidence that The Block's Kyle and Leslie DID cheat during backyard week! The truth about MAFS' Evelyn Ellis's relationship with Andrew Tate! Real Housewives of Sydney BOMBSHELLS: The real reason Krissy Marsh pretended not to know Dr Kate Adams! The full extent of Krissy's 'sexuality-shaming' comments to Kate! More intel about the drama that's set to go down on RHOS this season! PLUS LOTS MORE! Want more of the latest gossip? Get extra hot tea on PATREON! Visit SO DRAMATIC! ONLINE and sign up for our newsletter! Follow on INSTAGRAM, FACEBOOK, TIKTOK, and join the FACEBOOK GROUP! Got a tip, request, question, or receipts? Contact: tips@sodramaticmedia.com! Want to partner or advertise with us? Contact: hello@sodramaticmedia.com! This is an independent podcast by entertainment journalist Megan Pustetto, who is dedicated to bringing you the hottest reality TV tea each week!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In today's episode of Empire the Jason and Santi are back, diving into In this week's Empire Roundup, Jason and Santi welcome Blockworks' Senior Reporter, Casey Wagner, for an in-depth look into the unfolding Sam Bankman-Fried trial in the Southern District of New York. Casey shares firsthand observations, including compelling witness accounts from Caroline Ellison and Nishad Singh that implicate SBF. The trio delve into the prosecution's tactics, jury sentiment, and anticipates the defense's forthcoming arguments. Additionally, the episode explores the ripple effects of these developments on GBTC's prospects for Bitcoin ETF conversion, the future viability of Genesis and DCG amid NYAG lawsuit allegations, and the recent controversy surrounding Uniswap's fee structure changes.  - - MetaMask Portfolio is your one-stop shop for all things web3. Instead of connecting to multiple exchanges, dapps, and tools, you just need to connect to one simple dapp to track and manage all your assets across different networks and accounts. MetaMask Portfolio provides a secure and convenient way to perform common tasks such as Buy, Sell, Swap, Bridge, and Stake.  Try MetaMask Portfolio at https://blckwrks.co/MetaMaskEmpire - - Chronicle Protocol is a novel Oracle solution that has exclusively secured over $10B in assets for MakerDAO and its ecosystem since 2017. With a history of innovation, including the invention of the first Oracle on Ethereum, Chronicle Protocol continues to redefine Oracles. A blockchain-agnostic protocol, Chronicle overcomes the current limitations of transferring data on-chain by developing the first truly scalable, cost-efficient, decentralized, and verifiable Oracles, rewriting the rulebook on data transparency and accessibility.   Learn more about Chronicle Protocol: https://chroniclelabs.org/ Join the Chronicle Labs team: https://chroniclelabs.org/careers#open_roles - - Follow Santi: https://twitter.com/santiagoroel Follow Jason: https://twitter.com/JasonYanowitz Follow Empire: https://twitter.com/theempirepod Subscribe on YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/4fdhhb2j Subscribe on Apple: https://tinyurl.com/mv4frfv7 Subscribe on Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/wbaypprw Get top market insights and the latest in crypto news. Subscribe to Blockworks Daily Newsletter: https://blockworks.co/newsletter/ --  Timestamps: (00:00) SBF Trial Updates (23:20) Timeline for SBF Sentencing (29:24) Chronicle Ad (30:40) Metamask Ad (31:26) Gemini, Genesis, DCG Sued by New York AG (50:00) Ramifications of Explosions in Crypto (55:34) Uniswap Fee Switch (01:04:33) Pudgy Penguins LIVE Unboxing — Disclaimer: Nothing said on Empire is a recommendation to buy or sell securities or tokens. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and any views expressed by anyone on the show are solely our opinions, not financial advice. Santiago, Jason, and our guests may hold positions in the companies, funds, or projects discussed.

Overpriced JPEGs - Courthouse Edition! I was in court all day at SBF's trial and heard former FTX + Alameda exec, Nishad Singh, talk about the time SBF wanted to lie to the CFTC... and also describe the moment he found out Alameda was using FTX customer money to fund their lavish spending. sambankmanfried #sambankmanfriednews #sbf #crypto #cryptocurrency #carolineellison #nishadsingh OPJ Gin Bottle Redemption: https://overpricedjpegs.cc/gin OPJ NFT Link: https://overpricedjpegs.cc/buy-opj-nft OPENSEA | STUDIO Check out the latest drops in OpenSea: https://overpricedjpegs.cc/OpenSea   WEB3SENSE | DEMO Find out more + get a demo today: https://overpricedjpegs.cc/web3sense

Caroline Ellison is the prosecutions star witness in the case against Sam Bankman-Fried, and after this week it's not hard to see why. NLW covers the most shocking details, including massive bribes to Chinese officials and more.  Today's Sponsor: Kraken Kraken Pro is the one-stop destination for pro traders - https://k.xyz/TheBreakdownPod Enjoying this content? SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast: https://pod.link/1438693620 Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/nathanielwhittemorecrypto Subscribe to the newsletter: https://breakdown.beehiiv.com/ Join the discussion: https://discord.gg/VrKRrfKCz8 Follow on Twitter: NLW: https://twitter.com/nlw Breakdown: https://twitter.com/BreakdownNLW

Bitcoin dumps on news of more conflict with Israel. Carolina Ellison takes the stand in the SBF trial and more crypto news on today's episode of Discover crypto. Trade like a pro on APEX  ➡️ https://pro.apex.exchange/trade/BTC-U... 

This week, Bobbin and Justin are joined by Julia Yoshimoto, director of OJRC's Women's Justice Project, as they dive into the recently published Gender Informed Practices Assessment (GIPA) of Coffee Creek Correctional Facility.Links:Gender-Informed Practices Assessment (GIPA) report about Coffee Creek Correctional Facility, by the Women's Justice InitiativeA Serious Response to a Sobering Reality: OJRC response to the GIPA reportThe Trail Blazing Justice podcast is a production of the Oregon Justice Resource Center.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Liverpool's manager Jurgen Klopp has called for a rematch between Liverpool and Tottenham after a VAR mistake was made in their match against the London team.Off the Ball's Shane Hannon joined Pat to discuss.

Ken Chesebro is the Georgia Trump co-conspirator and attorney we love the most so far. Because he keeps leaking damning information—like the Prosecutor's evidence affidavit against him and the others, we hadn't seen before. Michael Popok of Legal AF looks under the hood of Chesebro's email search warrant fight with Fani Willis, and explains why he's so helplessly wrong on the law. Try Mosh today and use LEGALAF to save 20% plus free shipping at https://moshlife.com/LEGALAF Visit https://meidastouch.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the Meidas Media Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://pod.link/1510240831 Legal AF: https://pod.link/1580828595 The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://pod.link/1595408601 The Influence Continuum: https://pod.link/1603773245 Kremlin File: https://pod.link/1575837599 Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://pod.link/1530639447 The Weekend Show: https://pod.link/1612691018 The Tony Michaels Podcast: https://pod.link/1561049560 American Psyop: https://pod.link/1652143101 Burn the Boats: https://pod.link/1485464343 Majority 54: https://pod.link/1309354521 Political Beatdown: https://pod.link/1669634407 Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://pod.link/1676844320 Uncovered: https://pod.link/1690214260 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In Spite of Damning, Salacious Testimony, Texas Republicans Acquit AG Paxton | Mitt Romney, the Last Honest Republican in the Senate | The History of What Contributed to the Tragic Loss of Life in Libya backgroundbriefing.org/donate twitter.com/ianmastersmedia facebook.com/ianmastersmedia

00:00 – 23:33 – Colts linebacker Zaire Franklin joins us and discusses Anthony Richardson giving the team headphones, getting drug tested after his 18 tackle performance, the punchout play that saw DeForest Buckner score, seeing Shaq Leonard's journey to return to the field, on his leadership role growing, Anthony Richardson said he got some “welcome to the league” hits in his debut 23:34 – 34:51 – Caller asks why Chris Ballard and Frank Reich got extensions when their track record is worse than Jonathan Taylor's 34:52 – 46:20 - Longtime Houston Texans reporter John McClain joins us to tell us expectations for the Texans with C.J. Stroud and Will Anderson, DeMeco Ryans coaching debut and Stroud's debut, Stroud's relationship with Anthony Richardson, the beat up offensive line, what should the Colts be mindful of heading into Sunday?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

UnAIRED Compilation Of Damning Clips Recordings From 9/11 by Kate Dalley

Mea Culpa welcomes back our old friend Harry Litman, the former US Attorney and Deputy Assistant Attorney General. Litman is currently the legal affairs columnist for the Los Angeles Times and a professor of Constitutional Law at UCLA and UCSD. Harry can be seen as a legal and political commentator on CBS, NPR MSNBC, and CNN. Litman is also the creator and host of the Talking Feds Podcast. Check out their latest show featuring a who's who of prosecutorial muscle and special guests like former Senator Al Franken. Also, make sure to check out their new YouTube channel. They may have a face for radio but its content you won't want to miss. New episodes are posted daily and he features the greatest legal minds and tough as nails former prosecutors breaking down the legal news and all things Trump indictment. But today Harry is here to give us the rundown on what's happening in Georgia and discuss just what was on Evan Corcoran's phone and how it will damage Donald Trump. So let's go now to that conversation.

A highly anticipated report into the state of New Zealand Rugby landed yesterday, and it makes for bad reading for the national game. The report finds a big overhaul is needed at the game's governing body to address stagnant participation rates, flailing professional competitions, and poor organisation and planning. Rugby commentator Scotty Stevenson spoke to Corin Dann.

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Welcome to the "Week In Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week In Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to listen to ALL our Podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for 3 days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Chad & Lori Daybell, The Long Island Serial Killer, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the acclaimed podcast "Hidden Killers", host Tony Brueski had a riveting conversation with Forensic Psychologist Kate Wallinga. The focal point of their discussion was the ongoing Rex Heuerman case, which has witnessed yet another twist. As per recent developments, Heuerman's DNA is set for another round of testing.   Last week, the case gained attention when the defense argued that there wasn't sufficient probable cause to mandate a DNA test. Their contention was quickly dismissed by a judge, stating, “The court finds contrary to the defendant's contentions. There is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed the crimes charged, and therefore a basis to compel for the buccal swab."   This buccal swab, a procedure where cells are collected from the inside of a person's cheek, is pivotal. The DNA obtained will be compared with the mitochondrial DNA sample that was retrieved from a strand of hair. This hair was found on some of the victims, specifically on the burlap sacks that were used to cover their heads. Another compelling piece of evidence was a pizza crust found outside of Heuerman's office, which eventually led to his arrest.   Brueski expressed astonishment at the defense's argument, considering the substantial evidence already available. He posed a significant question: "I was amazed that anybody could be making the argument if this doesn't reach the level of probable cause, considering everything they pulled out of his house and all the other pieces of evidence that seem to link him to these crimes. What possibly does?"   Wallinga, with her forensic expertise, provided a comprehensive explanation. "The police's job is to find you guilty. Like cops, that's what they do. Their job is to find ways that you are getting in trouble and hold you accountable," she began. She clarified the roles of the police and defense attorneys, stating that while police aim to find guilt, the defense's job is to ensure that every step taken by the police is legitimate and above board. The defense's duty is to hold the police accountable.   She further delved into the intricacies of DNA-related cases, shedding light on the nuances involved. "It's really common in DNA cases like this where they find the mitochondrial DNA in the trash, for instance, because trash becomes public property. And then after that, you have to get a search warrant for a cheek swab," Wallinga explained.   This suggests that while the process may seem straightforward to the public, the legal intricacies and procedures involved can be complex. Both the police and the defense have their specific roles and responsibilities, and ensuring that each party adheres to their duties is crucial for the integrity of the justice system.   As the Rex Heuerman case progresses, it becomes evident that DNA testing and its legal stipulations play an indispensable role. Both Brueski and Wallinga's conversation underscores the importance of understanding the legal procedures, ensuring that justice is not only done but is also seen to be done. As new evidence unfolds and the legal debate continues, listeners and followers of the case await the next chapter in this intriguing saga. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a riveting episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delved into the mysteries surrounding Kohberger's decision to study in Pullman, Washington, with Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University Joseph Scott Morgan.   Their conversation began with Brueski's questioning the peculiar choice of Pullman for Kohberger's education. Morgan speculated that answers might soon surface from the forensic analysis of Kohberger's digital devices, revealing potential premeditated tracking or stalking of the victims.   Morgan commented, "I think that it's going to be a treasure trove more than likely." He emphasized the importance of physical evidence in his work but showed equal enthusiasm for the discoveries digital forensics might offer.   Brueski recalled media footage that highlighted the seizure of a tower computer from Kohberger's residence, wondering about Kohberger's activities during the late hours. The focus, Morgan noted, shouldn't be on message boards but rather on search histories. These could provide a comprehensive understanding of Kohberger's intentions and actions leading up to the alleged crime.   Interestingly, Morgan made it clear that despite speculations, Kohberger was no "criminal mastermind from a forensic standpoint," essentially only as educated as one might be from watching YouTube videos. This statement perhaps sought to highlight the significant difference between actual forensic expertise and superficial knowledge from online sources.   Brueski then shifted the conversation towards Kohberger's alibi, sarcastically noting its predictability: driving around at night. The major evidence against this alibi is the cell phone triangulation data, which placed Kohberger at the crime scene.   Morgan elaborated on the accuracy of cell phone data, noting its terrifying precision, "everywhere we go, we are tracked." The data essentially serves as the "DNA of the phone," he mused, pointing out its undeniable reliability in linking individuals to specific locations.   With Kohberger's defense arguing that he frequently drove that route as a night owl and PhD student looking to clear his mind, the prosecution faces the challenge of proving that on the particular night in question, something was different. This might be where the fact that Kohberger's cell phone is connected to the victim's Wi-Fi becomes pivotal.   "If he is following this same route that ends up going by the house... Does that show more likely that he did this?" pondered Brueski.   Morgan suggested that the "totality of circumstances" would be a central argument. The prosecution would need to combine various pieces of evidence to paint a convincing picture of Kohberger's guilt, while the defense would try to poke holes in their narrative.   The podcast episode hinted at an intense legal battle ahead, especially concerning electronic evidence. Apart from the triangulation data, Kohberger's digital searches, social media interactions, and potential aliases would be under scrutiny.   Morgan concluded with a profound thought on the complexity of the case, especially in the realm of electronics, suggesting it would be an area of contention. He stated, "There's so many different ways, Tony, that we can go in this particular circumstance, just in this one area of electronics, that it's a bit overwhelming."   This gripping episode sheds light on the modern challenges and intricacies of forensic investigation, making it clear that in the digital age, our electronic footprints might speak louder than any other evidence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a riveting episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski delved into the mysteries surrounding Kohberger's decision to study in Pullman, Washington, with Forensic Scientist and Distinguished Scholar of Applied Forensics at Jacksonville State University Joseph Scott Morgan.   Their conversation began with Brueski's questioning the peculiar choice of Pullman for Kohberger's education. Morgan speculated that answers might soon surface from the forensic analysis of Kohberger's digital devices, revealing potential premeditated tracking or stalking of the victims.   Morgan commented, "I think that it's going to be a treasure trove more than likely." He emphasized the importance of physical evidence in his work but showed equal enthusiasm for the discoveries digital forensics might offer.   Brueski recalled media footage that highlighted the seizure of a tower computer from Kohberger's residence, wondering about Kohberger's activities during the late hours. The focus, Morgan noted, shouldn't be on message boards but rather on search histories. These could provide a comprehensive understanding of Kohberger's intentions and actions leading up to the alleged crime.   Interestingly, Morgan made it clear that despite speculations, Kohberger was no "criminal mastermind from a forensic standpoint," essentially only as educated as one might be from watching YouTube videos. This statement perhaps sought to highlight the significant difference between actual forensic expertise and superficial knowledge from online sources.   Brueski then shifted the conversation towards Kohberger's alibi, sarcastically noting its predictability: driving around at night. The major evidence against this alibi is the cell phone triangulation data, which placed Kohberger at the crime scene.   Morgan elaborated on the accuracy of cell phone data, noting its terrifying precision, "everywhere we go, we are tracked." The data essentially serves as the "DNA of the phone," he mused, pointing out its undeniable reliability in linking individuals to specific locations.   With Kohberger's defense arguing that he frequently drove that route as a night owl and PhD student looking to clear his mind, the prosecution faces the challenge of proving that on the particular night in question, something was different. This might be where the fact that Kohberger's cell phone is connected to the victim's Wi-Fi becomes pivotal.   "If he is following this same route that ends up going by the house... Does that show more likely that he did this?" pondered Brueski.   Morgan suggested that the "totality of circumstances" would be a central argument. The prosecution would need to combine various pieces of evidence to paint a convincing picture of Kohberger's guilt, while the defense would try to poke holes in their narrative.   The podcast episode hinted at an intense legal battle ahead, especially concerning electronic evidence. Apart from the triangulation data, Kohberger's digital searches, social media interactions, and potential aliases would be under scrutiny.   Morgan concluded with a profound thought on the complexity of the case, especially in the realm of electronics, suggesting it would be an area of contention. He stated, "There's so many different ways, Tony, that we can go in this particular circumstance, just in this one area of electronics, that it's a bit overwhelming."   This gripping episode sheds light on the modern challenges and intricacies of forensic investigation, making it clear that in the digital age, our electronic footprints might speak louder than any other evidence. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the renowned podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski had an illuminating conversation with Joni Johnston, a clinical and forensic psychologist & licensed private investigator. The focus was the complex and highly debated case against Brian Kohberger.   Kohberger's alibi, that he likes to drive at night, raised eyebrows and led many to question its credibility. As Johnston remarked, "The defense probably worked with what they had." The glaring concern remains: if Kohberger routinely drove at night, why would he turn off his phone, and how frequently did he do so? A crucial detail Johnston pointed out is that modern technology, specifically phone data, can offer insights into his driving patterns. "His phone should be able to tell everybody how often he was driving around at night and where he was driving to," she mentioned.   However, a pattern observed with Kohberger's nightly drives has been problematic. The route he frequently took allegedly aligns with the vicinity of a house where four murders occurred. "It is a problem if you are a night wanderer only to a specific location," Johnston observed. It would be more believable if Kohberger's alibi showed he drove to multiple locations consistently, as opposed to focusing mainly on one area.   Yet even with this defense, Brueski raised a pertinent point: "Even if they can establish a pattern of behavior here with other trends on his phone showing that yes, he does drive this route a lot at night, would that be positive or negative for him?" The key issue here is the speculation that Kohberger might have stalked the area before the murders.   Johnston also touched on the challenge the defense will face in trying to discredit cell phone triangulation, which pinpoints a person's location based on their phone's connection to cell towers. "Certainly that will be part of their testimony," Johnston noted. "They're gonna be having experts come on and talk about how inaccurate triangulation is, or the range that these towers can actually reach."   Beyond the alibi and location, Brueski and Johnston delved deeper into the psychological implications of the crimes. The victims were asleep when attacked, highlighting a choice in targeting the vulnerable. "Most people who commit premeditated murder are looking to either murder a vulnerable victim, or they're looking to find someone in a vulnerable position," Johnston explained. The audacity and confidence required to break into someone's home and attack them in their sleep speak volumes about Kohberger's state of mind.   Furthermore, there's the perplexing decision of Kohberger to commit these alleged crimes away from his original residence in Pennsylvania, instead opting for the Washington and Idaho areas. This choice implies a deliberate effort to maintain a distance from familiar territory while still remaining in a recognizable setting. "I think it does Tony, in the sense that he would pick a place that was close enough to be familiar to him but wasn't too close where he would be noticed by people who knew him," explained Johnston.   Johnston's insights into the Kohberger case provided a deep dive into the psyche of an accused, the challenges faced by the defense, and the extensive role that technology plays in modern trials. As the case unfolds, it's evident that the intersection of psychology, technology, and law will be integral in determining Kohberger's fate. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In a recent episode of the renowned podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski had an illuminating conversation with Joni Johnston, a clinical and forensic psychologist & licensed private investigator. The focus was the complex and highly debated case against Brian Kohberger.   Kohberger's alibi, that he likes to drive at night, raised eyebrows and led many to question its credibility. As Johnston remarked, "The defense probably worked with what they had." The glaring concern remains: if Kohberger routinely drove at night, why would he turn off his phone, and how frequently did he do so? A crucial detail Johnston pointed out is that modern technology, specifically phone data, can offer insights into his driving patterns. "His phone should be able to tell everybody how often he was driving around at night and where he was driving to," she mentioned.   However, a pattern observed with Kohberger's nightly drives has been problematic. The route he frequently took allegedly aligns with the vicinity of a house where four murders occurred. "It is a problem if you are a night wanderer only to a specific location," Johnston observed. It would be more believable if Kohberger's alibi showed he drove to multiple locations consistently, as opposed to focusing mainly on one area.   Yet even with this defense, Brueski raised a pertinent point: "Even if they can establish a pattern of behavior here with other trends on his phone showing that yes, he does drive this route a lot at night, would that be positive or negative for him?" The key issue here is the speculation that Kohberger might have stalked the area before the murders.   Johnston also touched on the challenge the defense will face in trying to discredit cell phone triangulation, which pinpoints a person's location based on their phone's connection to cell towers. "Certainly that will be part of their testimony," Johnston noted. "They're gonna be having experts come on and talk about how inaccurate triangulation is, or the range that these towers can actually reach."   Beyond the alibi and location, Brueski and Johnston delved deeper into the psychological implications of the crimes. The victims were asleep when attacked, highlighting a choice in targeting the vulnerable. "Most people who commit premeditated murder are looking to either murder a vulnerable victim, or they're looking to find someone in a vulnerable position," Johnston explained. The audacity and confidence required to break into someone's home and attack them in their sleep speak volumes about Kohberger's state of mind.   Furthermore, there's the perplexing decision of Kohberger to commit these alleged crimes away from his original residence in Pennsylvania, instead opting for the Washington and Idaho areas. This choice implies a deliberate effort to maintain a distance from familiar territory while still remaining in a recognizable setting. "I think it does Tony, in the sense that he would pick a place that was close enough to be familiar to him but wasn't too close where he would be noticed by people who knew him," explained Johnston.   Johnston's insights into the Kohberger case provided a deep dive into the psyche of an accused, the challenges faced by the defense, and the extensive role that technology plays in modern trials. As the case unfolds, it's evident that the intersection of psychology, technology, and law will be integral in determining Kohberger's fate. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

In this jam-packed episode of Adams Archive, we plunge headfirst into a whirlwind of controversy, unearthing the stories that are setting the stage in both politics and pop culture. We kick things off with a deep dive into the indictment of former President Donald Trump, scrutinizing the charges and dissecting the bias in his legal predicament. Then we pivot, bringing you some startling footage of Trump and Governor Ron DeSantis amidst a smear campaign that has tongues wagging. Next, we delve into the world of religion and free speech, highlighting a disturbing incident where a young Wisconsin preacher finds himself at odds with the law for spreading his beliefs at a drag event. We question the direction our society is heading in, where the lines of freedom of speech seem blurred. Then, hold onto your seats as we navigate the murky waters of celebrity scandal. We examine the explosive allegations of sexual harassment against pop icon Lizzo. From there, we venture into the world of tech and social media, where Meta is shaking things up in Canada. The climax of our narrative? An intriguing exploration into the familial history of Justin Trudeau, and the striking evidence suggesting his lineage might trace back to the infamous Cuban dictator Fidel Castro. All Links: https://linktr.ee/theaustinjadams Substack: https://austinadams.substack.com Merch: Https://antielite.club ----more---- Full Transcription:  Adams Archive.   Hello, you beautiful people and welcome to the Adams Archive. My name is Austin Adams, and thank you so much for listening. Today. On today's episode, we are going to be discussing the recent indictment of Donald Trump. The former president of the United States has now been indicted over the January 6th. Insurrection. So we'll look at those charges, who the judge is, which is, it happens to be an Obama appointed judge who has a history of going after people and giving longer sentences that are related to January 6th. So we'll discuss that. Then we will look at Trump's response to all of this. Moving after that, we'll look at his some of the videos that he put out, which is pretty hilarious of him and Ron DeSantis that is going on this smear campaign. And then we will move over into the Devin Archer interview that was conducted by Tucker Carlson. Following up on that conversation. And after that there was a Wisconsin preacher, a young man who was arrested after. Preaching the Lord's word at a drag event on his sidewalk. So pretty infuriating when you watch this video. I, I remember seeing this stuff in Canada, and I never would've thought it would've come to the United States. You know, we, we always talk about the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion and all of these things that, that we supposedly have written down on documents that should not be imposed upon. And here we are. Next up, we'll get into some little fun, fun and disgusting pop culture with Lizzo getting sued for sexual harassment by several of her former dancers, and then also some sexual accusations made to her. Involving bananas, so I'm sorry to do that to your ears. After that we'll also get into the recent hearing in or recent judgment in Canada regarding meta Facebook and Instagram no longer allowing for news to be posted in Canada, which happens to come on the same day as Justin Trudeau and his wife. Separating after 18 years of marriage. And that leading us into a conversation about Justin Trudeau, his family history, and whether or not he actually happens to be the son of once Dictator Fidel Castro. Hmm. And there's actually some, you know, there's a striking resemblance, which is one thing. There's some videos by Joe Rogan where they talk about it. But it's one thing for the resemblance, it's another thing with all of the corroborated evidence that we will go through. So stick around for that. The longer you're here. The deeper we get. All right. First thing I need you to do is head over to the sub stack, Austin Adams dot sub stack.com. Go ahead and sign up for the Sub Stack Companion for the podcast. All of the clips, articles, links, everything will be on there that we discussed today. Then you will also check out the original sub stack that I put from the last episode about the silent weapons for quiet wars, which we'll be having the part two come out. On Friday early morning I believe, or Saturday for you. So make sure that you're subscribed to the podcast. You follow me on YouTube 'cause you can actually walk through the documents with me. You'll be able to see what I'm looking at on this episode today as well. And leave a five. Star review. Guys, I can't stress that enough. I is the single way that you can give back to me for all of the time, effort, and energy that goes into this. It is now 10 30 at night. I just put my kids to bed putting together this episode for you. So I hope you appreciate it. And what you can do to show that appreciation is just by going and pressing a button. And I, I ask you every episode, and it truly means a lot to me. Just to be having these conversations and that you're listening. But the next step is just kind of giving back by pressing that little tiny button. That's all you have to do for me. And then every time that you hear this, when you listen to the episodes next week and moving forward, you'll always just know that you already did it. You'll feel good inside. It's a little bit of good karma for you. So head over. Leave a five star review. Join the sub stack, Austin Adams dot sub stack.com and let's jump. The Adams archive. Alright, episode number 80, I believe. Pretty wild that we've been here together for 80 episodes from the Red Pill Revolution podcast. Now to the Adams Archive. I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart. So, 80 episodes kind of a landmark and can't. I can't wait to keep this going and, and getting up to a hundred. So on the very first article of today's episode, we're going to be discussing President Donald Trump has been indicted for his involvement in the conspiracy of January 6th. Now, if I've, I've actually done several deep dives into this conversation. I did a deep dive into the CIA's responsibility and who Ray Epps was. So we'll get into maybe some of that conversation today, but let's jump into what this indictment looks like. Like, and then I'll give my opinion on it and what I think is actually going on, because I think it's pretty cut and dry. I think we know that by now. One thing that I did see DC Draino point out was that the type of indictment that we have here, the charges that we have Maybe I can pull up the tweet to get the specifics, but it does not allow them to disqualify him from running for president as a result of these these indictments. So that was a, a big distinction here that that was very relieving to see was that the indictments that we have here are fluff. They're nothing that's not gonna stop him from running for the presidential candidacy in 2024 against Joe Biden and hopefully not against Joe Biden. Hopefully against. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. If I was a perfect world, and you know, I've already given my thoughts on that in some of the past episodes, but. Trump has been indicted for obviously political additional political weaponization of our Department of Justice, and you've probably heard that over and over and over again because this is the fourth indictment that has been going on during the last, I don't know, three to four months of, of Donald Trump. Meanwhile, and, and we, again, we talked about this laps last at some point, but it's so crazy to me that a single time in history, we have both the current president. The last president being indicted on federal charges of corruption conspiracy. I don't know if there's ever been another period of time where that's been happening and it just shows you, it just, it just clues you into what I've talked about all along, which is that the government is just a mafiaa of. Slick haired mafiosos who are there to siphon money out of a pool of your taxes in any which way that they can for their own profitability. Right? Everybody throws money, throws money into a big pile in the middle of of the room, and I. All these politicians are looking to do is siphon money from that in, in through different deals that they're doing with, you know, maybe Ukrainian energy companies and maybe Chinese bio labs. And eventually their goal is just to see what, what they can pull out of your tax money by sending a bunch of money to a Ukraine bio lab and then having that same company pay them off to come speak at some event with 12 people at it for $40 million later. Right. It's, it's just so crazy to see how, how much of a. Comparison there is between our government even taking those taxes from people the same way that the Mexican drug cartels go to business owners and say, Hey, if you don't give us 25% of your profits, we're going to maliciously and violently shut you down, which is what they do with taxes. They tell you that if you don't pay us taxes, we're gonna throw you in jail and throw away the key. It's like, Maybe likely not, but if you're Wesley Snipes, they might make an example of you. Right. So it's pretty crazy to see how we actually have two simultaneous presidents, the sitting president and the previous president. I. Both being charged with criminal criminal offenses simultaneously, which is wild. So here's the article. This is coming from Atlas News. One of my favorite, most trusted news sources, which covers news around the world. Not sponsored or anything by them, but just really like the work that they do. It's a lot of like wartime news. So they're, they're covering the current kta in Niger, there's some fine lines that you have to walk in that I saw. I saw a response to Atlas News where somebody commented back to them regarding the kta in, in Niger, and they said one, one letter away from getting banned by Instagram with like a sweating emoji. And the response from Atlas News was like, I can't tell you how many times I proofread this article. Alright, this article says Donald Trump indicted on electoral interference and conspiracy charges. Former United States President Donald Trump has been federally indicted on charges in relation to his alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Charges include, so it breaks down all four charges for you conspiracy to defraud the United States. By using dishonesty, fraud, and deceit to impair, obstruct, and defend the lawful federal government function by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted, and certified by the federal government. So let's break down each one of these charges. Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding. Did knowingly combine conspire, confederate and agree with co-conspirators, known and unknown to the grand jury, to corruptly, obstruct, and impede an official proceeding that is the certification of the electoral vote, and then obstruction of an official proceeding attempted to and did corruptly obstruct and impede an official proceeding that is the certification of the electoral vote like this so vague, attempted to. Corruptly, obstruct and impede an official proceeding. Like what are you even talking about? What does that even mean? And the last one being conspiracy against rights. Did knowingly combine conspire confederate and agree to co-conspirators known and unknown to the grand jury to injure a press, threaten and intimidate one or more persons in the free exercise and enjoyment of their a right. Privilege secured to them by the Constitution and Laws in violation of Title 18, the United States Code Section 2 41 of the United States. That is the right to vote and to have one's vote counted, which is funny because none of this actually came to fruition. They say that, oh, he did impede and interfere with this. It's like, no, what did he specifically do? Right? He called for a protest. If anything, you should be charging the F B I with conspiracy to. Have election interference. You know, maybe for what they did against Hunter Biden's laptop, by going to all the tech companies preemptively and telling them not to run the story or to actively stifle free speech. Maybe it's for implanting people like Ray Epps to go out there and say, let's go into the Capitol, into the Capitol. M maybe one of the many, many things that we've seen, including the F B I, you know, weaponizing itself against the documents at Mar-a-Lago against. I mean, all of these things add up over time and, but, but, you know, let's go after the one guy who's running for president and, and against the person that we installed as the president of the United States in this Banana Republic. I can't help but think of the, the brand Banana Republic when I, when I say that, but it is so true, right? It's like, what is even the definition of Banana Republic, we hear it, you know, being utilized in this sense over and over again, right? And it's like, you kind of get the sense of it, but the Banana Republic is the first thing that comes up is actually the brand. Right? Of course. But let's see what the, the actual definition of a Banana Republic is for you. It's like an installed government that a third world country that weaponizes itself against people. But a Banana Republic is a politically and economically unstable country that with an econ economy dependent solely on the export of natural resources. The term originated in 1904 to describe Honduras in Costa Rica under economic exploitation by US corporations such as the United Fruit Company. Typically a Banana Republic has a society of extremely stratified social classes, usually a large impoverished working class and a ruling class. Plutocracy composed of the business, political and military elites. Such exploitation is enabled by collusion between the state and favored economic monopolies in which the profit derived from the private exploitation of public lands is private property while the debts incurred, therefore are the financial responsibility of the public treasury. So there you go. That is the actual definition that has nothing to do with tight, skinny jeans, in case you were curious. Alright, now it says that there was six co-conspirators. But it does not name them. But it says that they are an attorney who is willing to spread knowingly false claims and pursue strategies that the defendant's 2020 reelection campaign attorneys would not. Hmm. Is that one Rudy Giuliani. Co-conspirator. Two. An attorney who devised and attempted to implement a strategy to leverage the Vice President's ceremonial role overseeing certification proceedings to obstruct the certification of the presidential election co-conspirator. Three. An attorney whose unfounded claims of election fraud the defendant publicly acknowledged to others sounded crazy. Nonetheless, the defendant embraced and publicly amplified co-conspirator three's disinformation. Co-conspirator four is a Justice Department official who worked on civil matters, who with the defendant, attempted to use the Justice Department to open sham election crime investigations. Oh, could you imagine and influence state legislators? With knowingly false claims of election fraud. And then number five is an attorney who assisted in devising and attempting to implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to abstain or obstruct the certification proceedings. And then the last one being a political consultant who helped implement a plan to submit fraudulent slates of presidential electors to obstruct the certification proceedings. So there you go. Those are the charges, and those are the co-conspirators, which I guess we'll find out who they actually are here in the following weeks, but, Like I said, we all know that the F b I was the one who actually caused this insurrection, even if you want to call it that. We know it wasn't that from the footage that we saw. Right. We know it was more of a glorified museum tour as you see the police walking through the hallways with them and letting them through the doors. As you see them politely speaking with authorities as they're walking through you know, walking through the building, it's pretty wild to see how much they can make it. And I think this was their plan all along. I think this was absolutely the plan of the F B I to in, in to plant the seed of this insurrection back all the way in 2020. And to cause them to have the ability to go after Donald Trump four years later, so he cannot rerun. Now, obviously, as we talked about, I don't believe that's the case with these charges and we'll see. Maybe I can get up DC drain o's post about this and I believe it was on Twitter, so maybe I can pull it up and, and see that the differentiation or x I guess they call it now. But let's see if we can pull it up. It says Pence implicitly admits, so that's something we should look at too, is Mike Pence, what Mike Pence actually said, which was like the craziest, most stupid thing in America. Pretty wild, but let's see if we can find this first. So DC Draino said, wow, he tweets a lot. This isn't a swing of the miss friendly reminder that Adam Schiff is one of 25 congressmen us, or history to be censored. Let's see. The feds and Jack now know Trump is going to win in the landslide. The proof is in the polls that came from Trump's nephew is the Twitter account. I am not seeing it here. Hmm, maybe it was on Instagram, but I do recall him posting something. Oh, here we go. Okay, so it says President Trump has been indicted on four federal counts, conspiracy to defraud the US conspiracy. Let's go ahead and pull this actually up for you guys. Conspiracy to defraud the US conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding obstruction of an attempt to obstruct an official proceeding conspiracy against rights. It is very important to note that he was not charged with seditious. Conspiracy or insurrection, those two charges, if convicted by a leftist DC jury, would prohibit him from running in 2024 dc. Dino said, these charges are desperate acts from a desperate regime trying to do everything they can to stop a man that will hold them accountable in 2025. Agreed. Right. So good to know that that's actually not gonna stop him from running. And it just continues the narrative that they're weaponizing the actual federal government. So let's see. Donald Trump's responses to this, and he's posted lots and lots of videos about this, but let's read his actual, let's read Donald Trump's response to this. Indictment. It says, this is nothing more than the latest corrupt charter or chapter in the continued pathetic attempt by the Biden crime family and their weaponized Department of Justice to interfere with the 2024 election in which President Trump is the undisputed front runner in leading by substantial margins. But, Why did they wait two and a half years to bring these fake charges right in the middle of President Trump's winning campaign for 2024? Why was it announced the day after the big crooked Joe Biden scandal broke out from the halls of Congress? The answer is election interference. Donald Trump says The lawlessness of these persecutions of President Trump and his supporters is reminiscent of Nazi Germany in the 1930s, the former Soviet Union. Another authoritarian, dictor, or dictator role dictator role regimes. President Trump has always followed the law and the constitution, but with advice from many highly accomplished attorneys. These un-American witch hunts will fail and President Trump will be a reelected to the White House so he can save our country. From the abuse, incompetence and corruption that is running through the veins of our country at levels never seen before. Three years ago, we had strong borders, energy, independence, no inflation, and a great economy. Today we have a nation in decline. President Trump will not be the turd. By disgraceful and unprecedented political targeting. Alright, and Donald Trump said from his account also, why are they putting out another fake indictment the day after crook, Joe Biden scandal, one of the biggest in American history, broke out in the tall in the halls of Congress, a nationwide decline. Interesting. Another tweet that or truth that came from him was, I hear that deranged Jack Smith, nor did they interfere with the presidential election of 2024, will be putting out a yet another fake indictment of your favorite President me at 5:00 PM Why didn't they do this two and a half years ago? Why did they wait so long? Because they wanted to put it right in the middle of my campaign prosecutorial misconduct. Interesting. Alright, so then he goes on, let's see if there's any other tweets here. So he has some videos that we can watch. But I don't know the value of those other than what we've already discussed here. But he did post some funny things about Ron DeSantis and. Here he says thank you to everyone. I have never had so much support on anything before this unprecedented indictment of a former highly successful president. He says, in the leading candidate by far in the, both the Republican Party and the 2024 general election has awoken the world to the corruption scandal and failure that has taken place in the United States for the past three years. America is a nation in decline, but we will make it great again, greater than ever before. I love you all and. Just video after video that he posted. Here's a, let's see if there's anything to this one. 10 minutes of Democrats denying election results. That's a real thing that what I'm scared about in 2020, but rightly, because I think he's an illegitimate president that didn't really win. So how do you, you know, fight against that in 2020? You are absolutely right. He's an illegitimate president in my mind. Would you be my vice presidential candidate? But folks, look, I absolutely agree. Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election and he was put in the office. This was Jimmy Carter, Russia's affair. Trump knows he's an illegitimate president. The president elect, although legally elected is not legitimate. I don't see this president elect as a legitimate president. You said you believe that Russia's interference altered the outcome of the election. I don't. Hmm. So just 10 minutes of Democrats denying election results, and now they're indicting him for, you know, whatever it is, words he said that they're saying should go to jail for right over and over and over again. We see them trying these things and over and over and over again, we see them fail. I. And it's more about the, because when you can get a headline, the headline is 80% of the, the, the purpose. Like it's like 80% of the value is in just putting that subconscious framework out there for you, right? There's something called neurolinguistic programming, and when you can put something in front of somebody, Over and over and over and over again. Eventually people start to believe you, whether it's about the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax, whether it's about election interference, whether it's about an insurrection, insurrection, insurrection, right? It doesn't matter whether what you're saying is truth or not, it matters more so that you say it. Over and over again consistently enough to where it drops into the subconscious of the human psyche. So when they're putting these headlines out there and they're doing these fake bullshit Indic indictments that are going to go absolutely nowhere, the purpose isn't for him to go to jail. In any of these cases, Donald Trump will not go to jail. But what will happen and what they know will happen is that by putting out these headlines and having this negativity surrounding his campaign, there's going to be a sub. Conscious reaction from the general public, even if there's no merit to it, right? If you just say, you know, the sky's green, the sky's green, the sky's green, the sky's green over and over and over and over and over and over again. The children, when they're in the 10th grade, eventually they might look up and see a hue of blue that they start to vividly look at as green. So it's, it's not as much about what happens as it is about the headline itself. He was on Sean Hannity recently, the lots and lots of different discussions that he posted from True Social. But I will save you, you can head over to his True Social account and check those out yourself. Now in the midst of all of this Donald Trump indictments the day before Devin Archer. So I just wonder if they have like a portfolio of bullshit that they're just sitting on, which, you know, if you watched like the House of Cards, they kind of alluded to that. Right. They have like a black file on everybody that no matter what happens, they can just push out some sort of. Negative campaigns surrounding an individual at any given time and, and it just makes you wonder whether or not they've been sitting on this for something like the Deon Archer situation to come out while simultaneously, while a business partner of Hunter Biden comes out to a select committee hearing and. Just tells them everything, tells them the, the inappropriate conversations that he had with business people in, in Ukraine and China comes out and, you know, talks about where the money came from, that they were getting all of that simultaneously, you just so happened to have the next day that this comes out, you happen to have the president or former president of the United States get indicted. So he went on to Deon Archer being the former prison former. Business Associate of Hunter Biden from Rosemont Seneca, who also sat on the board of the Ukrainian biotech company and Energy Company, Bura came out and spoke out against him. Now, the reason that Devon Archer did this was because of a lot of people have. Kind of concluded was because there's a text message that Marjorie Taylor Greene came out with in a tweet recently, like yesterday or the day before that showed that there was a feud back and forth between Hunter Biden and Deon Archer, and what a stupid combination of names between. Archer and Hunter. But anyways the fact that there, the, what what was happening was Deon Archer had the Department of Justice allegedly weaponized against him to throw him in jail. He was, I believe, convicted and sentenced to a year in jail as a result, which he still has not served. So my hypothesis is, which he was claiming that. Directly to Hunter, that it was Hunter's fault and his association with his family. That was the result of him having to get this one year sentencing for whatever associations that he had as a result of that. So there's a, a, a thought here that the reason that Devin Archer is going to the select Committee hearings and, and in doing all of this, was because he was either mad or getting some sort of deal surrounding his sentencing. So here's the article from the Post-Millennial talking about Deon Archer. Admitting to Tucker Carlson on the phone, or Deon Archer admits to Tucker Carlson. The phone calls from Joe Biden were an absolute abuse of power. I. And here is the article. It says in the new episode of Tucker on Twitter, Tucker Carlson sat down with former Hunter Biden's business partner Devin Archer, to discuss the Biden family's corrupt overseas business dealings. Archer, who testified before Congress on Monday in a closed door meeting told Carlson of the more than 20 phone calls during business meetings that Hunter Biden would put his father on speakerphone, and it was an absolute. Abuse of soft power and here is some of the interview that we will look at and listen to together if it, you know, Plays quickly enough for you. But we'll read the article while it's loading. It says the power to have that access in that conversation. It's not in a scheduled conference call and it's part of your family. That's like the pinnacle of power in dc. Archer said, Archer said he could definitely say that at these business meetings where Biden was put on the phone. He knew there were business associates. I don't know if it was an orchestrated call in or not. It certainly was powerful though, because you know, if you're sitting with a foreign business person and you hear the Vice President's voice, that's prized enough. I mean, that's pretty impactful stuff for anybody. When asked what Hunter Biden brought to the table in skills, Archer said at the end of the day, he, you know, he had a career in Washington. He graduated from Yale Law School and had a very big network in DC and brought that know-how and understanding of DC and ultimately the Biden. Brand, that Biden brand bullshit drives me nuts. There's absolutely no, there's no brand behind a vice president. It's not a brand. It's, it's, it's an assumption of power. It's an assumption that if I give you this thing, you will give me whatever it is that I want back. Right? You will, you will in, in the case of the. Bio or of the energy company, Barisma. What they wanted was to leverage Joe Biden and they did it successfully, allegedly, to stop the prosecution of their company in Ukraine. So you are not so it's not a brand, there's no brand behind Joe Biden. The only brand he has is falling asleep while he is talking, not being able to finish a sentence, and also sniffing small children, right? So, so here's the video. Let's go ahead and watch it and see what they had in their conversation. Hunter Biden in a bunch of different businesses. What were the skill, the specific skills that he brought to clients? Well, at the end of the day, he, you know, he had a career in Washington. Yeah. Graduated Yale Law School and had a very big network in, in DC and brought that knowhow and understanding of DC and ultimately the Biden brand, the know-how. So as far as I could tell, he wasn't. Doing legal work? Correct? I mean, he wasn't in the council's office at Barisma, right? No. No. So the, the network and the Biden brand sounds like the, the kind of key component of Absolutely. Yeah. What he was bringing. Yep. Do you think that he would have been in those businesses not having a business background without his father being in a government position? It's hard to speculate in in those regards. I mean, yeah, I think when we initially met and and he talked about his advisory business, his business that needed to transition from lobbying to advisory and the interest in private equity, it seemed. You know, it seems like a new and interesting network for us to expand our business. Whether he could have, you know, been in that position. It's, it's hard for me to speculate, right. But obviously the brand of Biden, you know, adds a lot of power when New York Dad's Vice President for sure. And there was a time maybe 10 years ago when private equity, maybe like AI now was just one of those terms people were throwing out, I'm in private equity, right? But the mechanics, having done it, coming from a business background yourself are. Kind of complex, are they not? Absolutely. Absolutely. Yeah. No, it's a complex business. Takes years of training, but again, they're the initial idea around the business that they were gonna provide, you know, the government insight and an additional network to raise capital and then, you know, deal with regulatory issues that you might have at the corporate level. Right. Regulatory issues. Exactly. Okay, so that would be more his area, right? That would be his space. Right. But did he have a, a sophisticated understanding of regulation, do you think? I think that he led a team that had had a, had a sophisticated, okay. Because I lived in Washington a long time around a lot of regulation. Also a very complex area. Absolutely. Absolutely. I think there's, you know, you gotta be an expert in knowing the guy. And he was the guy that was the expert in knowing the guy. He was an expert in knowing the guy. Right. And who was the guy he knew? Well, he knew a lot of people, Joe Biden. Yeah. But obviously there was some familiar, you know, some, his brother, his father yeah. Some of his, his father's siblings. So he, he knew a lot of people. And, and obviously I know you're pointing to, you know, the father being the key relationship. Well, no, I, I'm just trying to get a sense of Washington's not a money town. Right. You know, people don't, aren't in business in Washington for the most part. Right. And most people don't have business skills that I've noticed in 30 years of living there. So really the business of Washington is, is selling access. That's what it looked like to me. Yes. Not just Hunter Biden, but like, yeah, no, do I think that's, I mean, I think that's the, one of the like core misconceptions. I mean, it seems like when I, you know, understanding a regulatory environment means selling access at the end of the day. Yeah. That's how I interpret it. And I think that's how most people on, you know, in Wall Street, whether they admit it or not interpret it. Yeah. So we're gonna, we've got a complex business that intersects with government. We need a guy who knows a guy, right? How do I, you know, deal with getting a guy a visa that needs to come over for a business deal, right? Call our lobbyist that knows the guy in d h s or used to work in D H Ss or you know, in customs border patrol or the people at the embassy and state, they, they might be able to help. So they're very like tactical elements that are regulatory and compliance and governance that you have to go through. And you gotta know the guy that right, worked at the old agency that now has the lobbying firm that can go back to the agency and. You know, get, get things put to the front of the line. So the reason I'm asking this is because it is not to give the Bidens a pass hardly. Right? But when people say, well, there's some question about whether Hunter was trading on his father's name, I. If you live in Washington, like that's the whole city right there. Right? Right. I think you, you know the answer to that at the end of the day. Right. So anyone, he had the best advantage to do that because of where he was. And you know, we thought that when we went into business, this was a great opportunity for us. So I get it. And you're not the only one who did that. Right. There were a lot of lot. Well, what's crazy too is it's like, it's not selling access, it's selling influence. It's, it's if, if you're the guy who can call the guy and get the guy to get a visa and skirt around, what would normally be the proper channels of communication and steps to take to have something accomplished, but you know, you can call somebody to have something done that is not normally allowed. If that person that you're calling to have something done with is. The president or the vice president of the United States and happens to be your father there, there should be some level of removed access from the children being able to pedal their father's influence as the vice president or president of the United States. It's right. It's like it's not selling a brand. It's not selling, it's not selling access. It's selling decision making and influencing. The very decision making of the person who was put into office by the, the general public. Right? It's, it's, it's has nothing to do with access. It has everything to do with decision making. So when you have a vice president of the United States, le they're, and they're not even levy levying their own power. They're levying the power of the United States that was bestowed upon them by the public. By you and I, by our tax dollars, by our alleged 81 million votes. Right? So, so that's, that's the infuriating part about this and, and, and where it even gets even deeper and darker and more murky waters is the 10% to the big guy. Right? Maybe, maybe it's Maybe Hunter Biden should be in jail. Right? Maybe, maybe. It's hard to, to define how Joe Biden played a part in this, but if that 10% to the big guy, if all of the influence who's of everybody, if you had to say there's a statistical likelihood of the connections that Hunter Biden has, who would the big guy be? Who do you think that would be? Would it be, you know, the guy that was in his contacts list as Petto Pete, his father, Joe Biden, the president of the United States. And God, it seems like such a dystopian weird thing that Joe Biden is actually the president in, in this simulation theory, right? I've said this several times, you know? This simulation must just be a comedy because the fact that we have Joe Biden as the president and we have this like sleeping old man cabinet of, of politicians running our entire country, and this interwoven fabric of oligarchy and, and. Elitist families who pedal the the, the money, like have all of the, the corporate and, and personal power in the world to drive change for everybody involved. Right. And then meanwhile, we have a man who can't even stay awake while he talks to other presidents from other countries. When it was like, who was it? The president of Israel, who he was speaking with, where he. Couldn't even finish a whole sentence. Like it's, it's so crazy to me that we've gotten to this point in reality and it just is proof of the simulation theory. To me, Biden is not the only son of a famous government official who's done this right at all. But I just wonder, like when you hear people say, well, it's kind of an open question, right? About why they hired Hunter Biden. Like, that's pretty disingenuous. No. Right. I think at the end of it, so. When you look at the whole, there, there are people that maybe were, you know, sons or relatives or brother-in-laws of other high ranking officials, but I think what we ran into and with, with what Hunter ran into was like almost like an Icarus issue. So he got a little, it was too close to the sun. Right. It was too good to be true. And the connections were, were too close in the scrutiny. Too much. Yes. And it ended up destroying, you know, he, it left the wake of a lot of dis, you know, a lot of destruction in businesses over a number of years. You know, so how many it's been reported, and you have said that there were occasions when Joe Biden would call in with clients present on a speaker phone. Right. How, how many times do you think that happened? I mean, over a 10 year partnership? I would you know, the number I'm going with is 20. That's probably the, the, the amount that I, so a lot kind of record. Yeah, a lot you could say. So Joe Biden, who's very much a product of Washington, of course, must have known that he was calling in to effectively a business meeting that his son was having. He must have understood that, that that was kind of what his son was selling. Well, that's, I mean, it's hard for me to speculate on that, but like, I guess my que, just to keep it to the facts, Tucker Joe Biden, then the city Vice President. Knew that there were hunter's business in the row there it in your face. Yeah, I think I can, I could definitively say at particular dinners or meetings. He knew there were business associates and he, you know, we, or if I was there, I was a business associate too. Yeah. So I think or if, you know, any of the other colleagues from the DC office or the New York office were there. So, yeah, at times there were from the, you know, to be, you know, completely clear on the calls. I don't know if it was an orchestrated call in or not. It certainly was powerful though, because, you know, if you're sitting with a foreign business person and you hear the Vice president's voice, that's prize enough. I mean, that's, that's, that's pretty impactful stuff for anyone in the world. It's, it's been reported and I know that it is true that the hunter and his brother were very close to their dad. Absolutely. Which I. They were also very close to Bo's, his other son's wife. If you recall that you know, hunter Biden actually took on his brother's ex widowed wife after Bo died, turned her into his girlfriend and sexual partner entering the very same vicinity of, of flesh that his brother did. Pretty disgusting stuff happening in this family. I think it's great. Yep. I've got a lot of kids. I'm very close to 'em. Talk to 'em every day. Yeah. Never called them on speaker during a business meeting. That's weird. Yeah. You've got a lot of kids, you're close to them. Do you call them on speaker during business meetings? I. Do I call, I mean, yeah. What is that? A grown man calling his dad on a speaker phone for sure. During a business meeting. Right. And to be clear, sometimes it was the call was coming in and the speaker would go on. Yeah. Yeah. So it was, it's just the presence. You have to be, I mean, you're, you, you understand DC right? So the power to have that. Access in that conversation, and it's not in a scheduled conference call and it's a part of your family that's, that's like the pinnacle of of power in DC a hundred. So he was selling power, right. There you go. If you wanna go watch it Tucker on Twitter is obviously on Twitter and you can see the entire interview there. Alright, moving on. There was, and I wanna make sure this is the exact video that I was looking at. Yeah, it's, this is an absolutely infuriating, infuriating. So let me give you my synopsis of this. First, there was some young men who were sitting out there preaching the Lord's word, reading from a Bible, nonetheless, from a public sidewalk in the United States of America during a drag show. Speaking the, the, the words of the Bible, and they came up and arrested one of these guys while he was speaking from the Bible. We saw this in Canada, right in the dystopian socialist world. That is Canada, just in Trudeau's socialist, communist stomping grounds. But now it's happening in the United States. This video, if this doesn't infuriate you, I don't know what will. This is against everything that we stand for in the United States of America. Here we go. Here you go. I'll walk you through what we're looking at here. So there's some police officers. I see him speaking from the Bible and he's trying to rip out the microphone from his hand. Right? And these guys are probably 22 or so. Absolutely doing the right thing. 22 years old, sitting out there on a sidewalk with a big speaker speaking out against this like drag some type of parade or something that's going on while they're on a public sidewalk. There's absolutely, you're right, you have the freedom of speech. You can say whatever you want in the public forum. You can protest, you can do whatever you want as long as you're not saying fire or calling for violence. Right? And he's sitting there ripping a microphone from his hand. These police officers should be absolutely ashamed of themselves. They should be removed from their positions of power. Their, their family and friends should dis be disgusted by them, and he is ripping stuff out of their hands as one police officer is I. This is, well, how come there's no amplification? What's this? So here we go. Start this over for you guys. You'll be consumed by one another. So here he is talking about it. Hey, what are doing? Grabs the microphone out of his hand. What is the problem? Vacation? Whatcha doing? What's wrong with it? What are doing? I, he didn't give him any warning. He grabbed the money. Oh, this is the same one that we had. Yeah, that was in there. It was not out here. What are the wrong, what are you doing? Let go you guys. Morning. They said we can have, they said we can speak out here on the sidewalk freely. You can speak, but there's no amplified devices. Nobody told us that there's no amplified devices. Is that, is that in the constitution? How come there's no amplification? This, Hey, you guys pushing him. They're grabbing his arm from behind. Three police officers grabbing this young man right to be out here engaging in speech. Sirens. He has everything and they put him in handcuffs speech. There's cars driving by with their radios playing. That's amplified sound. People are standing out here with radios. That's amplified sound. The ordinance has to do with a decibel gauge. You don't just get to pick and choose which amplification you like and which you don't. That's selective enforcement of the law. That's discrimination on the basis of speech. That's what you all just did. Content-based, discrimination based on speech, and they detained this young man in handcuffs for speaking words from the Bible on a public sidewalk. This is unbelievable in the United States of America where we have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and meanwhile this. Coward of a police officer takes it into his own hands to stop this, this atrocious act of saying the Lord's word on a public forum. Right? And then they use the bullshit tactic of saying that it's because of the amplification. Like, oh, oh, is it, is it, and it has nothing to do with you wanting to tuck your dick between your legs and pretend to be a woman with your what, what is it called? Whatever that fetish is of dressing up as a woman that these drag guys do. You know, I, I'm sure this police officer just loved being on the side of the street where he gets to look at all these men talking their dick between their legs and then go and arrest some young nice man for reading from the Bible. I. That that is one of the most infuriating things that I've seen in a very long time. So it says, A Christian protesting a pride event over the weekend in Watertown, Wisconsin, was handcuffed and detained by police in the video that went viral. Several members of the Christian group Warriors for Christ were Evangel evangelizing at the city's annual pride in the park on Saturday, an event. Organizers advertised as family friendly. In the video, Marcus Schroeder is reading from the Bible in a Into a Microphone when officers surround him and grab his microphone and speaker as his group questions. The officers, they handcuff Schroeder and explain that he was being arrested for violating a sound ordinance. About noise amplification. Jason Storms, a fellow member of the Evangelical Ministry who filmed the encounter and shared it on Twitter, told the Republic Sentinel that police had also arrested three other young people from the group who were prey and talking to attendees on orders from city leaders. The police per orders from city leaders arrived. Or arrested several young people. Three were arrested earlier in the day while inside the park praying and talking to attendees, and then released with warnings. Yeah, because you had no fundamental legal basis for detaining them. You cowered. Storms alleged the officers were violating the right to free speech correctly as Schroeder was preaching on a sidewalk across from the public event. He told the outlet that the young man was charged with unlawful use of sound amplification and resisting arrest. Or resisting arrest. Yeah. Okay. However, the Christian youth who were arrested said they didn't regret their actions. Of course, and you shouldn't. It was worth it. It's actually an honor to be counted worthy, to stand with the cloud of witnesses who have gone before us and been arrested for the sake of spreading Christ in his kingdom. If the police wanted to try and set an example for others or anything like that, the only thing I've seen is actually the exact opposite, where more and more people are seeing the severity of what's going on and being called to more action. Good. Absolutely. Good. Alright, so here comes the most disgusting part of this episode, which has to do with Lizzo. But first I need you to hit the subscribe button, leave a five star review, and head over to the ck. You get everything that we're talking about here. I'll include the YouTube videos, some of the breakdown of clips, the articles that we're discussing here, all of that on the sub stack, Austin Adams dot sub stack.com. Go check it out right now.  Alright.  Lizzo was sued by former dancers for sexual harassment in creating a hostile work inve environment. So it says, while on tour with the singer, three women alleged that they were pressured at a strip club and weight shamed. So when you have the single fattest. Most obese artist in the history of popularity in the United States of America and probably the world next to maybe Jba the Hutt. She's now fat shaming her own dancers. I, I, I don't know yet, without reading this article, whether or not it was, they weren't fat enough or they weren't skinny enough, but I guess we'll find out. So it says that Lizzo has been sued by three former dancers for sexual harassment and creating a hostile work environment. N B C News reports The lawsuit viewed by Pitchfork was filed Tuesday or today in Los Angeles Superior Court and also named Liz O's Big Girl, big touring production company in Dance. Captain Charlene Quigley, the dancers. Are suing for damages over emotional distress distress, including unpaid wages, loss of earnings, and attorney fees. Pitchfork has reached out to Liz O's, representatives and Quigley for comment. The three dancers behind the lawsuit all began working with Lizzo in 2021. Arianna Davis and Crystal Williams were hired around the Amazon Reality Series. Watch Out for the Big Girls. A third Noelle Rodriguez was hired after appearing in the 2021 Rumors video. The lawsuit also described an incident that took place at a post show after party in Amsterdam earlier this year, where Lizzo allegedly pressured Davis to touch the breasts of a nude performer with Goding chants. The lawsuit also claimed Lizzo Wass encouraged answers to. Catch dildos launched from the performer's, vaginas and eat bananas, protruding from the performer's vaginas. So that's where the secondary article comes in, which says, Lizzo forced fat dancers to eat bananas from hooker's, vaginas, bombshell lawsuit alleges. Hmm. I like to eat, eat, eat bananas from vaginas. Maybe you know that song if you're a parent and if you don't it's probably just a little weird. But I happen to be a parent. I like to oat, oat, oat. Bananas from prostitute vaginas. Three former dancers from Lizzo are suing the rotund rapper for alleged fat shaming them and forcing them to endure sexually depraved behaviors and participate in disturbing sex acts. Plaintiff's Ariana Davis, crystal Williams and Noelle Rodriguez claim the 44 page lawsuit that Lizzo and her team. We're responsible for a hostile work environment, sexual harassment, assault, racial and religious harassment, disability discrimination, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and false imprisonment. What Lizzo herself pressured plaintiffs and all her employees to attend outings were new to the in sexuality were a focal point in disregarded any apprehensions from plaintiffs the suit reads. This work environment would shock the conscious of anybody as it did for the plaintiffs. In one disturbing account, the plaintiffs alleged that while at Lizzo the special tour in Amsterdam in February, 2023, the purported performer invited them out for a night on the town. Which ended with them visiting the infamous Red Light district, known for sex shops and clubs and sex theaters featuring full nudity. At that point, things quickly got out of hand. The lawsuit states Lizzo began inviting cast members to take turns touching the new performers, catching dildos launched from their vaginas and eating bananas, protruding from the performers, vaginas the lawsuit states adding that Lizzo allegedly pressured and goaded Davis into touching one of the new performers breasts. The plaintiff's claimed that a monthly. Later, Lizzo 35, deceived them once again. Oh no, you deceived me. After all of that, they had no expectation that they would ever be deceived again. Deceived them into attending a n show, therefore robbing them from the choice not to participate. Davis also claimed in the lawsuit that at one point she had no choice but to soil herself on stage during an excruciating re-audition, fearing the repercussions of re excusing herself to go to the bathroom. What, excuse me if I have to shit myself for any employer, I'm out, whether you're Lizzo, Elvis, the Lord himself. If that's your requirements for occupation, then sorry. I'm not your guy. Not your guy. I, I enjoy bathrooms and honestly, I enjoy bidets Japanese bidets from the depths of, you know Kyoko Japan. Maybe that's a little bit more my style than, you know, soiling myself on stage at a Lizzo concert. Davis also alleged that Lizzo was recently had a meltdown over disparaging comments about her excessive weight on Twitter. Fat shamed her in a meeting while asking Davis why she seemed less committed and less bubbly and vivacious. In professional dance, a dancer's weight gain is often seemed as the dancer getting lazy or worse off as a performer of the suit reads, Lizzo and the choreograph choreographer's questions, choreographer's questions about Mrs. Davis' commitment to the tour were then thinly veiled concerns about Mrs. Davis weight gain. The plaintiff's attorneys Ron, like, what did you expect? You hired a bunch of fat girls to dance behind you because you're fat. You wanted to make yourself feel better, and now all of a sudden they're getting fatter. Like, but what do you think got them there? You thought they were just at a point and they were done like, oh, this is it. This is all I'm eating. This is exactly the weight I'm gonna maintain. Like prob probably not. In a professional dance, a dancer's weight gain is often seen as the dancer getting lazy or worse off as a performer. The plaintiff's attorneys, Ron Zaro, called out Liz's hypocrisy in the blistering statement, which said the stunning nature of how Lizzo and her management team treated their performers seems to go against everything. Lizzo stands for publicly. Well privately, she weight shames her dancers and demeans them in ways that are not only illegal, but absolutely demoralizing. Davison Williamson. Were among the 13 contestants of the Emmy winning Lizzo. Watch out for the big girls, which debuted an Amazon last year. I will include the entire 'cause I know you really want to read it. The entire lawsuit on my ck which I'm looking at right now, I will download this and have this for you 'cause I know. Just know you want to read it and I would read it for you. But I don't know if that's the best use of our time here. So I will include that on the sub stack. Alright, next up. Justin Trudeau and his wife's Sophie Trudeau are getting divorced after 18 years of marriage. Alright, and so, I, I couldn't imagine anybody actually wanting to be engaged or, or married to that man. So it, it's not a surprise to me, but 18 years of marriage is a pretty long time to event, you know, just suddenly get into a divorce. So this article comes from Reuters and it says that Justin and Sophie Trudeau separate after 18 years of marriage. I. It goes on to say August 2nd today, the Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau and his wife Sophie, said on Wednesday that they were separating an unexpected announcement that appeared to mark the end of the couple's 18 year high profile marriage. The couple had talked, frankly, in the past about difficulties in the relationship and in recent years where even seen less often together in public, there was actually some sort of allegations against Justin Trudeau with underage girls. I believe they had talked frankly. Allegedly they've talked frankly in the past about difficulties in the relationship and in recent years where I've seen less often together. Trudeau 51, it looks pretty good for 51. That's about the only positive quality this man has. But he looks pretty good for 51. And Sophie, Greg Gore, Trudeau I wonder if he's had a lot of the you know, Hollywood. Wine as one would say, we're married in May of 2005 and have three children together, age 15, 14, and nine. While that's super unfortunate, if you get divorced at that time, like that's such a crucial critical time for your children and to have a, so he had a child when he was 42. It's kind of late on their anniversary in 2020. He described her as my rock, my partner, and my best friend. Yeah, sounds like it. For Trudeau, there was also a painful historical parallels. His father, former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, separated from his wife Margaret in 1977, which were just about to get into when he were in a second. The development is also one of the biggest personal crisis of Trudeau since he became Prime Minister in 2015, especially since he often stresses the importance of family life. The couple made the announcement that week after Trudeau unveiled a massive cabinet shuffle and a bid to boost the fortunes of his liberal party, which is trailing in the polls. AIDS said AIDS said that he also determined to lead the liberal into the next election liberals into the next elections, which must be held by October, 2025. Sophie and I would like to share the fact that after many meaningful and difficult conversations, we have made the decision to separate the Canadian Broadcasting Corp at Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc. One of Trudeau's closest allies with brief members of the cabinet later on Wednesday. Wow. Yeah, he looks pretty good for 51. She doesn't look too bad for 48, but you know, he's definitely drinking something. Maybe it has to do with the internal saturated blood of who knows, people underage. I joke. Kind of. Alright, so here's where it gets fun. Justin Trudeau, A lot of people seem to think that while being born in Ottawa, which is a considerable distance from Havana, that his mother, Margaret Trudeau visited Cuba nine months exactly before Justin was born. And there are photos of her mingling with Fidel Castro. On the right of this photo is Pierre Trudeau. His father, allegedly, his father and his wife. Castro, which I don't know about you, but if anybody touched my wife like this while I was standing in the room with them, we would be having a problem. And I'm not somebody who's like, you know, super possessive, but this looks like a little bit more like if anybody's fucking in these. In this picture, it looks like the two people on the left, like the dictator with a cigar in his mouth, and the younger woman, they're not the businessman 10 feet away from them. So there's this whole narrative. Now, if you go actually look at some of these pictures that I'm about to show you, or you go look them up yourself, you'll see that there is a substantial amount of evidence physically and historically around the idea that Justin Trudeau is actually the son of Fidel Castro. Lots of it, and many, many people have thought of this. So there's actually a video that will come up here that talks about Jo Joe Rogan. So let me give you the name of the account. This is coming from D O M L U C R E on Twitter, and he does some really good stuff, big following does some great deep dives into different topics. But this is the account that I will be following as I walk you through this discussion. And he says, according to Canadian and the to Canadian, the globe, and male, Pierre Trudeau and his wife Margaret, crossed paths with Fidel Castro. For the first time in 1970, the Globe reports and during friendship between the arc arch Liberal Pierre Trudeau and the Marxist revolutionary, Fidel Castro was formed. Now the article that is being put here, In front of us says Castro in Trudeau, a famous but also fraught friendship. And this comes from 2016. And it says Robert Wright teaches history as the, the writer. It says, just days ago when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made his official visit to Havana, the rumor mill was a buzz with the aspersion that Fidel Castro was somehow snubbed. Had somehow snubbed him by refusing a private meeting. Now with Fidel Castro's death, we may surmise that the official Cuban line was true, that his health was so precarious as to preclude even the short whatever this word is. Tati. I don't know what the hell that is. Certainly Mr. Joe himself gave no indication that he had been affronted. Yeah, maybe he wanted to see his dad before he died. It says fact checkers love refuting. The allegations that the Trudeaus were in Havana nine months just before Justin was born. There are certain truths that they just refuse to confront during the same period that Judo went on a Caribbean vacation on April to April 12th, 1971 to an unidentified island. And this is a snippet of a newspaper article. Which says Barbados Prime Minister Trudeau and his wife, or it says in Bridgetown, Barbados, prime Minister Trudeau and his wife left here Monday by chartered plane on a quick side trip to an unidentified nearby island. They arrived here Thursday on a brief second honeymoon and have reportedly been staying at a private residence on the island's posh West Coast. Heavy security measures have been in the fact since their arrival and the local press was asked to respect the newlyweds desire for. Privacy. There were also stories on trips to numerous Caribbean islands. While Cuba was not on the official itinerary, it seems unfathomable. Unfathomable that they would tour adjacent islands and choose not to visit their close Buddy Castro in Havana Wall in the area. He spoke also at Trudeau's funeral. Interesting. And there's an article that came from a website that shows the actual discussion that Fidel had to Pierre Trudeau, which says Fidel bids farewell to Pierre Trudeau. The 3rd of October, 2000 Cuban president Fidel Castro arrived in Montreal to attend the state funeral of former Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau. Fidel was asked by the family to serve as the honorary pallbearer. Wow. Alongside us former president Jimmy Carter Fidel arrived at the church, was greeted by shouts of Viva Fidel and Viva Cuba. I had come from Cuba at this time. He said of profound sadness of the Canadian people to pay my respects to the unforgettable memory of Pierre Trudeau, a WorldCast, a world class statesman for whom I had personal bonds with. His wife may be a friendship born of feelings of sincere admiration. I always considered him to be a serious political leader and with real concerns for the problems of the world. In the third world, a rational politician who made a trans transcendent contribution to modern Canadian history, a righteous and courageous man. I. Who encouraged in difficult circumstances, relations between his country and Cuba goes on and on and on. After Cuba Cuban Communist dictator, Fidel Castro's death was reported. Trudeau stated he was mourning his death and among other positive statements called Castro, a remarkable leader outrage erupted and many mocked him with Trudeau hashtag Trudeau eulogies on Twitter. And here is the video. It is been 14 years since the Cuban Missile Crisis, but with the present situation in Angola, prime Minister Trudeau's visit to Cuba this week was regarded as a bit dicey politically. His entourage thought the trip came off very well. They were very impressed by a certain quality of Premier Castro's, and it's a familiar word, charisma. 16 years ago, Pierre Trudeau tried to paddle a canoe from Miami to Havana, but he was turned back by American authorities. This time he made it and was royally welcomed, die hours before his arrival. Cubans by the tens of thousands lined the streets. Such enthusiasm was sustained for the three day visit and was clearly orchestrated by Premier Castro himself. It was his way of expressing gratitude to Canada for continued trade throughout the blockade with relations between Cuba and the United States going sour again because of Angola, premier Castro was eager to strengthen the Canadian Cuban connection. At a rally in the south coastal city of San Fuegos, not even a five hour wait under a blazing sun could diminish the enthusiasm of 25,000 sugar cane workers who chanted long-lived friendship between Cuba and Canada. The charismatic presence of Dr. Castro is always a drawing card for Cubans, but adding a fluently Spanish speaking leader like Trudeau made it an event. Few wanted to miss. Brotherhood and independence were the impressions both leaders wanted to convey to the world. Informal talks at an island Hideaway intensified their respect for each other and their mutual enjoyment of skin diving. Added to the rapport, the controversial skin diving. His wife was debated and Premier Castro defended his position that a Canadian reception. He pointed out that much of his country's population is of African extraction, and so a call for solidarity from Angolans to help defend their country against South African Invaders justified his support. We cannot do anything. Than to help the Ang people. Alright, so there you go. Just some legitimacy to what we're discussing here. It says, on January 1st, 1971, Margaret Trudeau described Fidel Castro as the sexiest man she's ever met, and claims that Prince Charles Ld down the front of her dress in her autobiography Beyond Reason Margaret was famed in the 1970s for her risque before marrying Trudeau. And here it says, prime ministerial mothers usually dwell as the far fringes of the spotlight. Stephen Harper's mother, who this is just reading an excerpt from her autobiography it says, I use my mother as an obvious example because she's the person closest to me worried about the stock market these days. Harper said at the time, Margaret Trudeau, by contras

Krystal and Saagar discuss new polling showing Trump demolishing his rivals on every single issue, NYTimes saying Trump is in a stronger winning position than in 2016, Dems accidentally admit Biden lies on Hunter, CNN spins damning Hunter testimony, Elon denying Starlink internet services to Ukraine offensive, a secret Chinese Biolab raided in CA contains HIV and COVID, the Pentagon calling the UFO whistleblowers liars, Krystal looks into AI harvesting content sparking a revolt in the "fan fiction" community, and Saagar looks into Gen Z Boys data showing a boost in conservatism. To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show uncut and 1 hour early visit: https://breakingpoints.supercast.com/ Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Krystal and Saagar discuss new polling showing Trump demolishing his rivals on every single issue, NYTimes saying Trump is in a stronger winning position than in 2016, Dems accidentally admit Biden lies on Hunter, CNN spins damning Hunter testimony, Elon denying Starlink internet services to Ukraine offensive, a secret Chinese Biolab raided in CA contains HIV and COVID, the Pentagon calling the UFO whistleblowers liars, Krystal looks into AI harvesting content sparking a revolt in the "fan fiction" community, and Saagar looks into Gen Z Boys data showing a boost in conservatism.To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show uncut and 1 hour early visit: https://breakingpoints.supercast.com/Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoicesSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Forensic psychologist Kate Wallinga joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to discuss the upcoming sentencing of Lori Vallow Daybell, a woman found guilty of crimes against her children. They tackled the intersection of religion, law, and mental health and questioned whether Vallow Daybell's religious beliefs, which seemed to influence her actions, would be considered during her sentencing. Wallinga explains that under usual circumstances, strong religious beliefs should incline one towards good rather than evil. However, in Vallow Daybell's case, she believes this approach might make matters worse. Wallinga states, "If you're coming from a platform of having these serious religious beliefs, theoretically, that should make you less likely to do things like kill children."   Despite the gruesome nature of Vallow Daybell's actions, Wallinga remains skeptical about the effectiveness of a lengthy prison sentence. She expresses her concerns about the U.S. prison industrial complex, currently the largest provider of mental health services in the country. She notes that people often halt neurodevelopment once they are incarcerated, resulting in a persistent survival mode. Upon release, these individuals may have aged chronologically, but their development as a person often remains stagnant, mirroring their state of mind when first entering prison.   This reality presents an ethical conundrum when considering how society should deal with people like Vallow Daybell. Wallinga believes that while such individuals should not be released back into the community due to the danger they pose, the current system does little to address the core issues at hand. She suggests a shift from a punitive system to a correctional rehabilitative one. She states, "We've proven that we cannot punish the bad behavior out of people. So there's gotta be another approach and instead, we just keep building more prisons."   The conversation takes a turn toward the influence of religious beliefs on parenting and the welfare of children. Brueski questions whether this case should trigger stricter regulations on how religious beliefs can influence parenting. Wallinga agrees that while everyone has the right to worship in their own way, there should be limits to how children are treated under the umbrella of religious beliefs. She concludes, "Children fall in a protective class, so there is no excuse, religion, mental illness, substance abuse. There's no excuse for a child to exist in a harmful environment." As the discussion wraps up, Wallinga and Brueski agree on the necessity for change in how society and the legal system address cases like Vallow Daybell's. They recognize the complex intersection of religious freedom, mental health, and the safety and well-being of children, concluding that while change is necessary, its implementation remains uncertain. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj More On This Case: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com/category/taylor-schabusiness-trial/ Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this podcast extra, Watergate icon Bob Woodward recounts his extensive interviews with former President Trump and decodes the damning “Trump Tapes” with MSNBC's Ari Melber. Plus, hear Woodward's past conversations with Melber on “The Beat.”

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Head writer and researcher for Glenn Beck Jason Buttrill and Blake Kresses join the show to discuss the recent damning findings released by the Ways and Means Committee today that state an IRS whistleblower testified that the Department of Justice under the helm of President Joe Biden interfered in the tax investigation of Hunter Biden. California Democratic Congressman Adam Schiff was finally censured yesterday by his fellow congressional members. The censure was sponsored by Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna and 11 of her fellow representatives. The censure comes after pressure from the GOP over Schiff's spreading of the Russia collusion hoax in 2016 and onward. U.S. Assistant Secretary of Health Rachel Levine told educators yesterday that "gender-affirming care" is medically necessary, safe, and effective for transgender and non-binary youth, claiming that it is their "superpower." There is a fight brewing between social media rivals Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. Will we soon see a cage match between the two social media giants? Today's Sponsors: Jase Daily from Jase Medical is a great way to keep yourself prepared. It's a prescription supply service that allows you to get up to 12-months of backup supply of your prescription medication in case of emergency. Go to http://www.JaseMedical.com and enter code NEWS. Liver Health Formula contains 12 powerful botanicals that have been clinically proven to recharge and protect your liver at the cellular level. You can try Liver Health Formula completely risk-free and receive five FREE gifts when you order today. First, you'll receive a FREE bottle of Blood Sugar Formula to reduce sugar cravings. You'll also get four FREE eBooks to support every aspect of your health. Act today and go to https://www.GetLiverHelp.com/News. BlazeTV is rescuing comedy from the humorless Left. So, join us every Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday at 10 p.m. EST for "Normal World." Head over to youtube.com/@NormalWorld and hit the notification bell so you don't miss out on the fun. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Krystal and Saagar discuss their new studio reveal, the facts of the Trump indictment, Trump's former AG Bill Bar defending the indictment, Trump's response, Trump's 2024 opponents defending him, Trump's explosive leads in primary polls, an FBI informant claiming Biden took 5 million bribe as VP, Zuckerberg in an interview admits to Covid Censorship failures, Saagar looks into the recent UFO incidents to parse fact from fiction, Krystal looks into the legacy of the Unabomber after his death.To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show uncut and 1 hour early visit: https://breakingpoints.supercast.com/To listen to Breaking Points as a podcast, check them out on Apple and SpotifyApple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/breaking-points-with-krystal-and-saagar/id1570045623 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4Kbsy61zJSzPxNZZ3PKbXl Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoicesSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Krystal and Saagar discuss their new studio reveal, the facts of the Trump indictment, Trump's former AG Bill Bar defending the indictment, Trump's response, Trump's 2024 opponents defending him, Trump's explosive leads in primary polls, an FBI informant claiming Biden took 5 million bribe as VP, Zuckerberg in an interview admits to Covid Censorship failures, Saagar looks into the recent UFO incidents to parse fact from fiction, Krystal looks into the legacy of the Unabomber after his death. To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show uncut and 1 hour early visit: https://breakingpoints.supercast.com/ To listen to Breaking Points as a podcast, check them out on Apple and Spotify Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/breaking-points-with-krystal-and-saagar/id1570045623   Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4Kbsy61zJSzPxNZZ3PKbXl Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.