Podcasts about habeas

Habeas corpus is at the center of a constitutional fight over immigration detention playing out in courtrooms across the Midwest, including here in Iowa. An analysis by The Marshall Project and The Midwest Newsroom found that habeas corpus filings in four Midwestern states have been overwhelmingly successful thus far, but the legal landscape is changing. We hear from the reporters involved in the recent investigation and from a law professor about what comes next. Then, researchers hope to expand water testing capabilities with a drone that carries its own water-testing lab.

Federico Leoni, Charles Melman"La guerra è una cosa da vecchi?"Castelvecchi Editorewww.castelvecchieditore.comIn un dialogo lucido e raffinato Charles Melman e Federico Leoni interrogano il ritorno della guerra nel cuore dell'Europa e ne mostrano il carattere non residuale ma costitutivo delle no­stre democrazie. La guerra appare allora come “una cosa da vecchi” solo per chi si illude di averne preso congedo: in realtà, essa abita da sempre il campo de­mocratico, esito precario e provvisorio di una serie di conflitti. Da qui la diagnosi si allarga all'emergere di élite non più orientate dal linguaggio ma dall'algo­ritmo; alla sostituzione dei leader politici con «capi-comici» reclutati tra le fila dei clown e degli uomini di spettacolo; ai popoli di oggi, catturati da «scritture vocali» e immersi in un nuovo ordine allucinatorio. Siamo ancora “figli del nome”, eredi della parola che fonda il nostro legame sociale, politico, economico? O siamo ormai “figli del numero”, educati da scher­mi fluidi e sciami diffusi? Tra critica del presente e apertura al possibile, Melman e Leoni esplorano la grande mutazione in corso: da un lato, il declino del logos e delle forme classiche della soggettività; dall'altro, l'emergere di nuovi regimi di segni. Un'in­dagine che costringe a riconsiderare il rapporto tra democrazia e potenza, tra linguaggio e numero, tra guerra e vita collettiva – e che lascia intravedere, più che una risposta, la trasformazione in atto del nostro stesso modo di essere soggetti.Charles Melman(Parigi, 1931-2022)Psichiatra e psicoanalista, allievo di Jacques Lacan, ha lavorato per decenni negli ospedali psichiatrici di Parigi ed è fondatore dell'Association Lacanienne Internationale. Castelvecchi ha pubblicato Le mie sere con Lacan (2021), Viaggio clandestino con Lacan (2022) e Disforia di genere (2024).Federico LeoniInsegna Antropologia filosofica all'Università di Verona, dove è condirettore del Centro di ricerca “Tiresia” per la filosofia e la psicoanalisi. Scrive su varie riviste, tra cui «aut aut» e «doppiozero». Ha pubblicato fra l'altro Habeas corpus. Sei genealogie del corpo occidentale (Bruno Mondadori, 2008), L'idiota e la lettera. Quattro saggi sul Flaubert di Sartre (Orthotes, 2013), Jacques Lacan, una scienza di fantasmi (Orthotes, 2019) e Henri Bergson. Segni di vita (Feltrinelli, 2021).Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

VLOG May 6 Harvey Weinstein trial, exhibit blackout https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-harvey-weinstein-retrial-409 Mangione's Justice Carro does a jury selection. Taibbi defamation case dismissed, 1st report https://innercitypress.com/sdny56adanielstaibbihigginsicp050526.html Habeas, ICE 3:30. UN Nairobi @USUN corruption https://innercitypress.com/ungate1unonicp050526.html

Ghislaine Maxwell's habeas corpus petition is, at its core, a reheated attempt to relitigate issues that were already raised, argued, and rejected at trial and on direct appeal—most notably her fixation on alleged juror misconduct. Maxwell centers her petition on the claim that a juror failed to fully disclose past experiences with sexual abuse during voir dire, arguing this tainted the verdict and violated her Sixth Amendment rights. But courts that have already examined this issue concluded that there was no evidence of intentional deception or bias sufficient to overturn the conviction. Habeas relief is not a “do-over” for defendants unhappy with a jury's conclusion, and Maxwell's petition conspicuously ignores the extremely high bar required to show that any alleged juror error had a decisive, unconstitutional impact on the outcome of the trial.Beyond the juror issue, the petition leans heavily on familiar defense talking points—claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and constitutional violations framed in sweeping, conclusory language rather than supported by new, compelling evidence. What's striking is how little the petition grapples with the overwhelming testimonial and documentary record that led to Maxwell's conviction for facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of minors. Instead, it attempts to recast procedural disputes as fundamental injustices while sidestepping the reality that multiple courts have already found the trial to be fair, the evidence to be strong, and the verdict to be sound. In that sense, the habeas filing reads less like a serious constitutional challenge and more like a last-ditch effort to chip away at a lawful conviction by exhausting every remaining procedural avenue—no matter how thin the underlying arguments have become.to contact me:Ghislaine Maxwell files petition challenging sex trafficking convictionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell's habeas corpus petition is, at its core, a reheated attempt to relitigate issues that were already raised, argued, and rejected at trial and on direct appeal—most notably her fixation on alleged juror misconduct. Maxwell centers her petition on the claim that a juror failed to fully disclose past experiences with sexual abuse during voir dire, arguing this tainted the verdict and violated her Sixth Amendment rights. But courts that have already examined this issue concluded that there was no evidence of intentional deception or bias sufficient to overturn the conviction. Habeas relief is not a “do-over” for defendants unhappy with a jury's conclusion, and Maxwell's petition conspicuously ignores the extremely high bar required to show that any alleged juror error had a decisive, unconstitutional impact on the outcome of the trial.Beyond the juror issue, the petition leans heavily on familiar defense talking points—claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and constitutional violations framed in sweeping, conclusory language rather than supported by new, compelling evidence. What's striking is how little the petition grapples with the overwhelming testimonial and documentary record that led to Maxwell's conviction for facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of minors. Instead, it attempts to recast procedural disputes as fundamental injustices while sidestepping the reality that multiple courts have already found the trial to be fair, the evidence to be strong, and the verdict to be sound. In that sense, the habeas filing reads less like a serious constitutional challenge and more like a last-ditch effort to chip away at a lawful conviction by exhausting every remaining procedural avenue—no matter how thin the underlying arguments have become.to contact me:Ghislaine Maxwell files petition challenging sex trafficking conviction

VLOG April 30 Live Nation, Inner City Press unsealing filing: https://courtlistener.com/docket/68557723/1477/united-states-of-america-v-live-nation-entertainment-inc/ Blake Lively-Baldoni experts May 7 or 8. Harvey Weinstein's Teny grills Mann: https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/mann-on-the-cross-harvey-weinstein Habeas judge shopping; OppFi BNC hit: https://innercitypress.com/cra39oppfibncnatbankicp042926.html Grossi abuse?

O Supremo Tribunal Federal rejeitou o recurso do senador Sergio Moro e manteve a abertura de uma ação penal contra ele por calúnia.O caso teve origem em um vídeo de 2023 no qual o senador falava em "comprar um habeas corpus" do ministro Gilmar Mendes.Embora a defesa alegue que a fala era uma brincadeira de festa junina, a Primeira Turma do STF aceitou a denúncia da Procuradoria-Geral da República por unanimidade em 2024.Você já leu uma notícia hoje e sentiu que já viveu esse momento antes?   Essa sensação de déjà Vu não é coincidência. No Brasil, o que é manchete hoje costuma ser o eco de decisões e fatos que analisamos meses, ou até anos atrás.   Para celebrar os 8 anos da Crusoé, decidimos enfrentar esse ciclo. Pegamos o que nasceu no digital e, pela primeira vez, transformamos em um registro físico, tátil e permanente.   Chegou a edição especial Crusoé impressa.   É um item colecionável, atemporal e limitado. Uma revista feita para quem gosta de ler com calma, longe das notificações do celular. Um exemplar para guardar sobre o que realmente importa na história recente do brasil.   Esta edição é um presente exclusivo para novos assinantes do Combo de 2 anos O Antagonista e Crusoé.   Utilize o cupom 8ANOSCRUSOE e acesse o link:   https://bit.ly/crusoe-edicao-impressa  Papo Antagonista é o programa que explica e debate os principais acontecimentos do dia com análises críticas e aprofundadas sobre a política brasileira e seus bastidores.       O programa traz contexto e opinião sobre os temas mais quentes da atualidade.       Com foco em jornalismo, eleições e debate, é um espaço essencial para quem busca informação de qualidade.       Ao vivo de segunda a sexta-feira às 18h no nosso canal no Youtube.   https://www.youtube.com/@OAntagonista   Siga O Antagonista no X:  https://x.com/o_antagonista   Acompanhe O Antagonista no canal do WhatsApp. Boletins diários, conteúdos exclusivos em vídeo e muito mais.  https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va2SurQHLHQbI5yJN344  Leia mais em www.oantagonista.com.br | www.crusoe.com.br #SergioMoro #STF #GilmarMendes #Justiça #PolíticaBrasil #LavaJato #Noticias #DireitoPenal #Senado #Brasil #PGR #DecisãoJudicial #Atualidades #PapoAntagonista #NoticiasUrgentes

This Day in Legal History: Lincoln Suspends Habeas CorpusOn April 27, 1861, President Abraham Lincoln authorized military officials to suspend the writ of habeas corpus along the rail lines between Philadelphia and Washington, D.C. The order came in the opening weeks of the Civil War, when Washington was vulnerable, Union troops were moving through hostile territory, and federal officials feared sabotage and rebellion along critical transportation routes.Habeas corpus is one of the oldest protections in Anglo-American law, allowing a detained person to demand that the government justify their imprisonment before a court. By suspending it, Lincoln allowed military authorities to detain certain people without immediately producing them for judicial review. The legal problem was that the Constitution says habeas corpus may be suspended “when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it,” but it does not clearly say which branch of government may do the suspending.Lincoln argued that the rebellion created an emergency that required swift executive action. Critics argued that the suspension power belonged to Congress, not the president, because the Suspension Clause appears in Article I, the part of the Constitution dealing mostly with legislative powers. The conflict soon came to a head in Ex parte Merryman, after John Merryman, a Maryland secessionist, was arrested by military authorities and denied ordinary habeas review.Chief Justice Roger Taney, sitting as a circuit judge, ruled that Lincoln had exceeded his constitutional authority and that only Congress could suspend the writ. Lincoln did not comply with Taney's order, maintaining that the survival of the Union justified extraordinary action. Congress later gave statutory support for wartime habeas suspension, but the controversy over Lincoln's initial action has remained central to debates over presidential power, civil liberties, and constitutional government during crisis.The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear a case involving Cisco Systems and the Alien Tort Statute, focusing on whether U.S. companies can face liability for allegedly helping foreign governments commit human rights abuses. The case comes from Falun Gong practitioners who claim Cisco built surveillance tools for China's “Golden Shield” program that helped officials identify, detain, torture, and persecute members of the religious movement. A federal district court dismissed the case, but the Ninth Circuit revived much of it in 2023, finding the plaintiffs had plausibly alleged that Cisco aided and abetted violations of international law. Cisco argues that the Ninth Circuit improperly expanded the Alien Tort Statute by recognizing aiding-and-abetting liability even though Congress did not expressly create that cause of action. The company says the ATS was originally meant to cover only a narrow set of claims, such as piracy, violations of safe conduct, and harms to ambassadors. Cisco also relies on Supreme Court precedent to argue that courts should not create secondary liability unless Congress clearly authorizes it.The Falun Gong plaintiffs respond that aiding-and-abetting liability has long been part of international law and is especially important when serious abuses require technology, infrastructure, or corporate support. They argue that torture, extrajudicial killing, disappearances, and prolonged arbitrary detention are already recognized as serious international-law violations that can support ATS claims. Business groups and the federal government warn that expanding ATS liability could chill foreign investment and interfere with U.S. foreign relations by forcing American courts to judge the conduct of foreign governments. Supporters of the plaintiffs argue that corporate accountability can discourage companies from profiting from foreign repression and can promote fair competition for businesses that follow human rights standards. The Supreme Court's ruling could shape how much legal risk U.S. companies face when selling technology or services to governments accused of human rights abuses.Justices To Focus On Alien Tort Statute In Cisco Spying CaseThe U.S. Supreme Court is hearing Bayer's attempt to limit or end a large wave of lawsuits over Roundup, the weedkiller Bayer acquired when it bought Monsanto in 2018. The case involves John Durnell, a Missouri man who won a $1.25 million jury verdict after claiming years of Roundup exposure contributed to his non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Bayer argues that federal pesticide law should block state-law failure-to-warn claims because the Environmental Protection Agency has approved Roundup labels without a cancer warning. The company says EPA approval shows the product was not legally “misbranded” and that Bayer could not substantially change the label without agency approval. Durnell's lawyers argue that EPA registration does not make the label immune from challenge and that Missouri warning law mirrors federal requirements rather than adding new ones.The dispute turns on the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, which regulates pesticide labeling and limits states from imposing requirements that differ from federal law. Bayer says more than 100,000 plaintiffs have brought Roundup-related cancer claims and that a Supreme Court win could largely end the litigation. The company has also proposed a $7.25 billion settlement to resolve many current and future claims, though some pending appeals and excluded claims would remain outside the deal. Agricultural and crop industry groups, along with the Trump administration, support Bayer, while environmental, farmworker, and public health groups support Durnell. Bayer warns that the lawsuits could threaten its ability to keep supplying glyphosate products to farmers. A decision is expected by the end of June.US Supreme Court hears Bayer's fight against Roundup lawsuits | ReutersElon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI, Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and Microsoft is headed to trial in federal court in Oakland, California. Musk claims OpenAI betrayed its original nonprofit mission by creating a for-profit structure after he left the board, while using his name and early financial support to build what he calls a profit-driven enterprise. He is reportedly seeking $150 billion in damages, with money going to OpenAI's charitable arm, and also wants OpenAI returned to nonprofit status. OpenAI denies wrongdoing and argues that Musk's real motive is to regain control and help his own AI company, xAI. Microsoft also denies collusion and says its partnership with OpenAI began after Musk had left.The trial is expected to feature testimony from major tech figures, including Musk, Altman, and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella. Internal documents are likely to play a major role, including diary entries from Brockman that reveal tension inside OpenAI over Musk's influence and the organization's future. Musk's side points to those materials as evidence that OpenAI's leaders became focused on profit rather than the public-benefit mission. OpenAI's side says Musk knew about possible restructuring plans, wanted to be CEO, and later attacked the company after it became successful. The case comes as OpenAI faces heavy competition, major computing costs, and possible IPO plans, while Musk's xAI is also trying to compete in the AI market. The broader fight is not just about money, but about who controls one of the most influential companies in artificial intelligence.Elon Musk's trial against Sam Altman to reveal the ongoing power struggle for OpenAI | ReutersCole Tomas Allen, a 31-year-old California man, is expected to appear in Washington federal court after allegedly trying to breach security at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner while President Donald Trump was present. Authorities say Allen shot at a U.S. Secret Service agent at a hotel checkpoint before being tackled and arrested. The agent was hit, but a tactical vest stopped the shot, and the agent was later released from the hospital. Formal charges had not yet been filed at the time of the report, but prosecutors said Allen is expected to face charges including assault on a federal officer and using a firearm during a crime of violence. Officials also said more serious charges, including attempted assassination, could still be considered as the investigation continues.Authorities say Allen traveled from California to Washington by train and booked a room at the Washington Hilton, where the dinner was held. They also say he left family members a manifesto referring to himself as the “Friendly Federal Assassin” and discussing plans to target senior Trump administration officials. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said Trump may have been among the intended targets. The shooting disrupted the high-profile dinner, forced attendees to take cover, and led security personnel to move senior officials out of the room. Monday's court hearing is expected to be brief, with a judge advising Allen of his rights and prosecutors likely asking that he remain detained. The incident has renewed concerns about security for Trump and other public officials.Suspect in Washington dinner shooting set to appear in court | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

VLOG April 23 Harvey Weinstein retrial, case of the lying witness? https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/fallen-stars-harvey-weinstein-retrialSBF withdraws bid for new trial https://www.patreon.com/posts/crypto-in-court-156289868 Habeas judge-shopping? https://innercitypress.com/sdny2ahabeaestradasantosicp042226.html UN Security banned list - @USUN silent https://innercitypress.com/ungate2michaudipiundssicp042226.html

What happens when your marketing works too well? In this first interview with Jennifer Bade, Esq., a contributor to the Immigration Lawyers Toolbox Magazine, John explores how video marketing led to overwhelming client demand and forced major changes in how her firm operates. From managing consultation overload to building better intake systems and handling a surge in habeas cases, this episode gives a real look at what it takes to grow an immigration law firm today. Spotify | iTunes | YouTube Music | YouTube   Follow eimmigration by Cerenade: Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Start your Business Immigration Practice! (US LAWYERS ONLY - SCREENING REQUIRED): E-2 Course EB-1A Course Get the Toolbox Magazine!  Join our community (Lawyers Only) Get Started in Immigration Law! The Marriage/Family-Based Green Card course is for you Our Website: ImmigrationLawyersToolbox.com Not legal advice. Consult with an Attorney. Attorney Advertisement. #podcaster #Lawyer #ImmigrationLawyer #Interview #Immigration #ImmigrationAttorney #USImmigration #ImmigrationLaw #ImmigrationLawyersToolbox

Whether you're studying law or just curious about how these cases unfold, I'll help you understand the real steps, strategy, and legal framework that govern state and federal lawsuits.Welcome back to Lawyer Talk! I'm Steve Palmer, and in this episode, Troy and I look into a great listener question:According to the Constitution, if a state is a party in a case, does the Supreme Court have original jurisdiction?I walk through how Article III of the Constitution lays out the Supreme Court's authority—especially when two states are involved in a dispute, like boundary issues or environmental matters.But most cases where a state is suing the federal government, especially those we saw during COVID, actually start in lower federal courts. Troy jumps in with insights about venue selection and how lawyers can “forum shop” for a friendly judge.We break down the process that gets a case from your local Ohio court all the way up to the US Supreme Court, highlighting the difference between preliminary injunctions and final decisions on the merits. I clarify why the Supreme Court isn't there to fix mistakes, but to interpret and shape constitutional law.Here are 3 key takeaways from our conversation:Original jurisdiction is limited: The Supreme Court only has original jurisdiction in very specific cases, such as disputes between two or more states, not just when any state is involved.Most cases climb a long ladder: State litigation usually starts in the lowest courts and works its way up. Even after reaching the state's highest court (like the Ohio Supreme Court), cases might move to the U.S. Supreme Court under strict requirements, especially needing a substantial constitutional issue.Habeas corpus offers another path, but it's rare: After state appeals are exhausted, federal habeas corpus proceedings can be used—starting in district court, up to the circuit court, and possibly, the Supreme Court. However, the Supreme Court rarely takes these cases.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At LawMentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Ruby Powers, Esq. is back on the show and she's got a lot to share! From powerful habeas corpus wins — including securing the release of a detained Haitian woman and two young boys — to navigating the chaos of ever-changing travel bans, increased ICE check-ins, and asylum cases being pushed into removal proceedings, Ruby gives us a raw, real look at what's happening on the ground in immigration law right now. She also drops some practical tips on staying sharp in a shifting legal landscape and previews some exciting upcoming events! Spotify | iTunes | YouTube Music | YouTube Follow eimmigration by Cerenade: Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Start your Business Immigration Practice! (US LAWYERS ONLY - SCREENING REQUIRED): E-2 Course EB-1A Course Get the Toolbox Magazine!  Join our community (Lawyers Only) Get Started in Immigration Law! The Marriage/Family-Based Green Card course is for you Our Website: ImmigrationLawyersToolbox.com Not legal advice. Consult with an Attorney. Attorney Advertisement. #podcaster #Lawyer #ImmigrationLawyer #Interview #Immigration #ImmigrationAttorney #USImmigration #ImmigrationLaw #ImmigrationLawyersToolbox  

NotiMundo Estelar - Alexandra Villacís, Habeas data para recuperar el cargo en el Consejo de la Judicatura by FM Mundo 98.1

Ghislaine Maxwell's habeas corpus petition is, at its core, a reheated attempt to relitigate issues that were already raised, argued, and rejected at trial and on direct appeal—most notably her fixation on alleged juror misconduct. Maxwell centers her petition on the claim that a juror failed to fully disclose past experiences with sexual abuse during voir dire, arguing this tainted the verdict and violated her Sixth Amendment rights. But courts that have already examined this issue concluded that there was no evidence of intentional deception or bias sufficient to overturn the conviction. Habeas relief is not a “do-over” for defendants unhappy with a jury's conclusion, and Maxwell's petition conspicuously ignores the extremely high bar required to show that any alleged juror error had a decisive, unconstitutional impact on the outcome of the trial.Beyond the juror issue, the petition leans heavily on familiar defense talking points—claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and constitutional violations framed in sweeping, conclusory language rather than supported by new, compelling evidence. What's striking is how little the petition grapples with the overwhelming testimonial and documentary record that led to Maxwell's conviction for facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of minors. Instead, it attempts to recast procedural disputes as fundamental injustices while sidestepping the reality that multiple courts have already found the trial to be fair, the evidence to be strong, and the verdict to be sound. In that sense, the habeas filing reads less like a serious constitutional challenge and more like a last-ditch effort to chip away at a lawful conviction by exhausting every remaining procedural avenue—no matter how thin the underlying arguments have become.to contact me:Ghislaine Maxwell files petition challenging sex trafficking convictionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

VLOG Feb 23 "Justice never sleeps" - 2d Circuit hears Noel Francisco for Dubai Islamic Bank despite blizzard.Exhibits fight; Habeas fireworks: https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/ice-and-fireworks-beat-mexican-man; UN Saunders wastes money, what'll @USUN @MichaelGWaltz & @HeyTammyBruce do on SG's Press ban?

VLOG Feb 13 Alexander bros Minor Victim 3 https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-us-v-alexander-brothers-6e5 US v Live Nation. Associated Bancorp Needs to Improve. Habeas Belarus, Guatemala, ES. 100 Centre "Federal consequences." @USAmbUN @MichaelGWaltz at MSC, no action on UN ban of Press yet: #MUNGA?

Miot, et al. v. Trump, et al., No. 25-cv-02471 (D.D.C. Feb. 2, 2026)TPS for Haiti; pretextual termination of TPS; INA § 242(f); APA vacatur and set aside; APA stay; equal protection; McNary; using public statements in litigation Matter of G-M-I-, 29 I&N Dec. 431 (BIA 2026)reliability and persuasiveness of expert testimony; factual basis for expert opinion; CAT; imprisonment for drugs; China Matter of Yadav, 29 I&N Dec. 438 (BIA 2026)sua sponte reopening based on marriage to a U.S. citizen; equities acquired after removal order Michelin, et al. v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correctional Center, et al., No. 24-2990 (3d Cir. Feb. 2, 2026)EAJA; habeas; sovereign immunity canon; civil action; importance of habeas; unreasonable prolonged detention  Montejo-Gonzalez, et al. v. Bondi, No. 21-304 (9th Cir. Feb. 5, 2026) (en banc)in absentia motion to reopen based on exceptional circumstances; unconscionable result; totality of the circumstances; traffic accidents; motivation to attend hearing Pinilla Perez v. Bondi, No. 23-6363 (2d Cir. Feb. 5, 2026)equitable tolling; reopening; OIL admission that N.Y. Penal Law § 220.39(1) attempted sale of cocaine is not a removable offense; Minter; N.Y. Crim. Proc. § 440.10(1)(k); change of law; reasonable diligence of removed noncitizensKurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years. Gonzales & Gonzales Immigration BondsP: (833) 409-9200immigrationbond.com  EB-5 Support"EB-5 Support is an ongoing mentorship and resource platform created specifically for immigration attorneys."Contact: info@eb-5support.comWebsite: https://eb-5support.com/Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Click me!The Pen and SwordClick me!Discount code: ImmigrationReview26 Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATION:Email: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerSupport the show

VLOG Jan 29 On Luigi Mangione, NY wants July 1 trial. On Diddy, Clayton Howard files, v 50 Cent. Today Alexander bros trial Day 3, Hampton Horrors: https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-us-v-alexander-brothers-632. Federal Reserve says no docs on SVB conflict. 3 habeas. UNSG @AntonioGuterres lies at noon

VLOG Jan 19 Unsealing in US v Alexander Bros 1.23 after https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26468179-before-alexander-brothers-trial-courtroom-sealed-and-superseder-restricted-so-filing-here/LGA habeas petition; NYC Rechnitz, felon Stephen Calk applies to FRB. On MLK Day Home BancShares in TN challenged https://innercitypress.com/mergers10hometnffw011926.htmlUN fails Uganda, book: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GDJJMN4L

VLOG Jan 16 Habeas mooted as ICE flies woman to Ecuador? https://innercitypress.com/sdny102aoetkenbrisenoicp011526.html Pokemon card fraud cooperator https://www.patreon.com/posts/card-games-in-on-148329336Fed loses UBS letter? https://innercitypress.com/bank33cubsfedoccicp011526.html asks Fulton branch closings. CBU Bank death industry M&A. @UNMediaLiaison press ban

Understanding the Foundations of Criminal Procedure: A Deep DiveThis conversation provides a comprehensive overview of criminal procedure, detailing the flow of the justice system from investigation to post-conviction relief. It emphasizes the balancing act between societal needs and individual rights, the role of the prosecutor, and the complexities of federal habeas corpus. The discussion highlights key procedural rules, the importance of constitutional protections, and the challenges faced by defendants in navigating the legal system.Imagine standing at the crossroads of law and liberty, where every decision shapes the balance between societal safety and individual rights. This is the realm of criminal procedure, a complex yet fascinating field that defines how justice is administered.The Structure of Criminal Procedure:Criminal procedure is the backbone of the justice system, dictating how the government can investigate, arrest, and prosecute individuals. It is built on constitutional principles and court rules, ensuring that every step from investigation to conviction respects individual rights. The process begins with the investigation phase, where law enforcement must determine if a crime occurred and identify the perpetrator, all while adhering to constitutional safeguards.Key Components:Searches and Seizures: Governed by the Fourth Amendment, this aspect addresses when and how the government can intrude on personal privacy. Interrogations: The Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination, ensuring individuals are aware of their rights through the Miranda warning. Identifications: Procedures like lineups and DNA testing must meet due process standards to avoid unfairness.The Role of the Prosecutor:The prosecutor wields significant power, deciding whether to charge an individual based on the evidence. This decision initiates the judicial process, where the accused is formally charged and advised of their rights.The Judicial Process:From the first court appearance to the trial, each stage is designed to uphold constitutional rights. The preliminary hearing offers a glimpse into the prosecution's case, allowing the defense to strategize effectively. The trial itself culminates in a verdict, leading to sentencing and potential appeals.Criminal procedure is a delicate balancing act between enforcing the law and protecting individual freedoms. It is a testament to the complexity of justice, where every rule and decision shapes the landscape of liberty.Subscribe now to stay informed on the latest in legal insights and justice system developments.TakeawaysCriminal procedure is about the structure that defines liberty.The investigation phase is governed by constitutional rules.The prosecutor has immense power in the charging decision.Preliminary hearings provide critical insights for the defense.The federal system of courts operates in a hierarchical structure.Incorporation applies most rights in the Bill of Rights to the states.State constitutions can offer more protections than federal law.Habeas corpus serves as a last resort for state prisoners.Procedural hurdles can bar federal claims if not properly navigated.Actual innocence is a procedural tool, not a substantive right.criminal procedure, investigation, prosecution, trial, habeas corpus, constitutional rights, legal process, justice system, appeals, law students

In Ohio, police share security camera video of a person of interest in the shooting deaths of a dentist and his wife. In Georgia, a widow accused of killing her husband stands trial for the third time. In Los Angeles, an update in the Nick Reiner case. Plus, an arson investigator on what tools he uses to solve a crime. Find out more about the cases covered each week here: www.datelinetruecrimeweekly.com Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

VLOG Jan 6 US v Maduro; Delcy Rodriguez was questioned by Inner City Press at UN before @AntonioGuterres threw the Press out https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-maduro-and-wife-plead-not-guilty crypto Roman Storm to April 22, Chastain retrial? Habeas Guayana murder, Afghan. UN book: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GDJJMN4L

Criminal Law: Balancing Liberty and State ControlThis conversation delves into the philosophical foundations of criminal law, focusing on the Liberty Balancing Approach (LBA) which seeks to balance individual liberty with state power. It discusses the crisis of over-criminalization in the U.S., the implications of proxy crimes, and the importance of the principle of legality and due process. The conversation also touches on the role of habeas corpus as a check on state power and the ongoing debate over individual liberty versus popular sovereignty.In the realm of criminal law, the balance between individual liberty and state control is a delicate one. This blog post delves into the philosophical foundations of American penal law, exploring the Liberty Balancing Approach (LBA) and its implications on the justice system.The Liberty Balancing Approach: The LBA is a framework that emphasizes the protection of individual liberties while maintaining social order. It mandates that criminal law must be narrowly defined, focusing on protecting specific legitimate liberties. The approach scrutinizes the necessity and legitimacy of state actions, questioning whether the current system truly balances liberty or prioritizes control.The Three Liberty Interests: Criminal transactions involve three distinct parties: the victim, the offender, and the community. Each has its liberty interests at stake, and the LBA examines how these interests are protected or infringed upon by the law. The framework warns against over-criminalization and the broad definition of community liberties, which can lead to mission creep in the justice system.Alternatives to Criminal Law: The LBA advocates for using alternatives to criminal law, such as tort law, financial regulations, and civil penalties, to address certain offenses. These alternatives can provide redress without resorting to harsh punishments and the stigma of a criminal record.The Crisis of Over-Criminalization: The United States faces a crisis of over-criminalization, with an overwhelming number of statutes leading to selective enforcement and injustice. The LBA highlights the failure of mass incarceration to deliver promised public safety benefits and its criminogenic impacts on society.The Liberty Balancing Approach offers a framework for evaluating the legitimacy of criminal laws and their impact on individual liberties. By questioning the necessity and legitimacy of state actions, the LBA seeks to ensure that the justice system truly balances liberty and control.Subscribe Now: Stay informed about the latest discussions in criminal law by subscribing to our blog. Join us as we continue to explore the complexities of the justice system and the balance between liberty and state control.TakeawaysUnderstanding the theoretical underpinning of criminal law is critical for law students.The Liberty Balancing Approach (LBA) emphasizes individualism in criminal law.Over-criminalization leads to a crisis of legitimacy in the legal system.Alternatives to criminal law should be exhausted before resorting to punishment.Political incentives often drive legislative overreach in criminal law.Proxy crimes can lead to abusive enforcement practices.Drug prohibition exemplifies the failure of proxy crime legislation.The principle of legality ensures laws are clear and defined by legislatures.Due process requires laws to be understandable to the average citizen.Habeas corpus serves as a vital check on government power.criminal law, Liberty Balancing Approach, over-criminalization, due process, habeas corpus, individual liberty, state power, legal paternalism, proxy crimes, political incentives

In Episode 454 of the Immigration Lawyers Toolbox® Podcast, host John Q. Khosravi, Esq. speaks with Enes Hajdarpasic, Esq., an immigration litigator with prior experience as a DHS trial attorney and Assistant U.S. Attorney.   They discuss immigration court practice, removal defense, habeas petitions, mandamus actions, federal litigation strategy, and how attorneys must adapt as bond eligibility tightens and agency delays increase. Enes also shares insights from defending the government and how that experience now informs advocacy for immigrants. Spotify | iTunes | YouTube Music | YouTube Timestamps: 00:00 Opening 00:33 Introduction 02:23 Enes's path into immigration law 03:16 Becoming a DHS attorney 03:43 Federal court responsibilities 04:37 Types of cases handled 05:24 Government delays explained 07:42 Why immigration law 08:37 Bond, detention, and removal defense 12:35 Mid-episode break 14:05 Habeas cases in practice 16:30 Practice tips from both sides 18:11 Looking ahead to 2026 21:22 Contacting Enes Follow eimmigration by Cerenade: Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Start your Business Immigration Practice! (US LAWYERS ONLY - SCREENING REQUIRED): E-2 Course EB-1A Course Get the Toolbox Magazine!  Join our community (Lawyers Only) Get Started in Immigration Law! The Marriage/Family-Based Green Card course is for you Our Website: ImmigrationLawyersToolbox.com Not legal advice. Consult with an Attorney. Attorney Advertisement. #podcaster #Lawyer #ImmigrationLawyer #Interview #Immigration #ImmigrationAttorney #USImmigration #ImmigrationLaw #ImmigrationLawyersToolbox  

VLOG Dec 26 Epstein files 1 million more pages, Maximum Maxwell https://amazon.com/Maximum-Maxwell-Prosecution-Collusion-Verdicts/dp/B09P7RNGK6Habeas beat: Guinea, Senegal out, Imran Ahmed, censorship sanctions- why not UN @AntonioGuterres? (Q for @USUN @USAmbUN) Fifth Third tries hire legitimacy, UN silent on Nigeria

Ghislaine Maxwell's habeas corpus petition is, at its core, a reheated attempt to relitigate issues that were already raised, argued, and rejected at trial and on direct appeal—most notably her fixation on alleged juror misconduct. Maxwell centers her petition on the claim that a juror failed to fully disclose past experiences with sexual abuse during voir dire, arguing this tainted the verdict and violated her Sixth Amendment rights. But courts that have already examined this issue concluded that there was no evidence of intentional deception or bias sufficient to overturn the conviction. Habeas relief is not a “do-over” for defendants unhappy with a jury's conclusion, and Maxwell's petition conspicuously ignores the extremely high bar required to show that any alleged juror error had a decisive, unconstitutional impact on the outcome of the trial.Beyond the juror issue, the petition leans heavily on familiar defense talking points—claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and constitutional violations framed in sweeping, conclusory language rather than supported by new, compelling evidence. What's striking is how little the petition grapples with the overwhelming testimonial and documentary record that led to Maxwell's conviction for facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of minors. Instead, it attempts to recast procedural disputes as fundamental injustices while sidestepping the reality that multiple courts have already found the trial to be fair, the evidence to be strong, and the verdict to be sound. In that sense, the habeas filing reads less like a serious constitutional challenge and more like a last-ditch effort to chip away at a lawful conviction by exhausting every remaining procedural avenue—no matter how thin the underlying arguments have become.to contact me:Ghislaine Maxwell files petition challenging sex trafficking conviction

Ghislaine Maxwell's habeas corpus petition is, at its core, a reheated attempt to relitigate issues that were already raised, argued, and rejected at trial and on direct appeal—most notably her fixation on alleged juror misconduct. Maxwell centers her petition on the claim that a juror failed to fully disclose past experiences with sexual abuse during voir dire, arguing this tainted the verdict and violated her Sixth Amendment rights. But courts that have already examined this issue concluded that there was no evidence of intentional deception or bias sufficient to overturn the conviction. Habeas relief is not a “do-over” for defendants unhappy with a jury's conclusion, and Maxwell's petition conspicuously ignores the extremely high bar required to show that any alleged juror error had a decisive, unconstitutional impact on the outcome of the trial.Beyond the juror issue, the petition leans heavily on familiar defense talking points—claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and constitutional violations framed in sweeping, conclusory language rather than supported by new, compelling evidence. What's striking is how little the petition grapples with the overwhelming testimonial and documentary record that led to Maxwell's conviction for facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of minors. Instead, it attempts to recast procedural disputes as fundamental injustices while sidestepping the reality that multiple courts have already found the trial to be fair, the evidence to be strong, and the verdict to be sound. In that sense, the habeas filing reads less like a serious constitutional challenge and more like a last-ditch effort to chip away at a lawful conviction by exhausting every remaining procedural avenue—no matter how thin the underlying arguments have become.to contact me:Ghislaine Maxwell files petition challenging sex trafficking convictionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Ghislaine Maxwell's habeas corpus petition is, at its core, a reheated attempt to relitigate issues that were already raised, argued, and rejected at trial and on direct appeal—most notably her fixation on alleged juror misconduct. Maxwell centers her petition on the claim that a juror failed to fully disclose past experiences with sexual abuse during voir dire, arguing this tainted the verdict and violated her Sixth Amendment rights. But courts that have already examined this issue concluded that there was no evidence of intentional deception or bias sufficient to overturn the conviction. Habeas relief is not a “do-over” for defendants unhappy with a jury's conclusion, and Maxwell's petition conspicuously ignores the extremely high bar required to show that any alleged juror error had a decisive, unconstitutional impact on the outcome of the trial.Beyond the juror issue, the petition leans heavily on familiar defense talking points—claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, and constitutional violations framed in sweeping, conclusory language rather than supported by new, compelling evidence. What's striking is how little the petition grapples with the overwhelming testimonial and documentary record that led to Maxwell's conviction for facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of minors. Instead, it attempts to recast procedural disputes as fundamental injustices while sidestepping the reality that multiple courts have already found the trial to be fair, the evidence to be strong, and the verdict to be sound. In that sense, the habeas filing reads less like a serious constitutional challenge and more like a last-ditch effort to chip away at a lawful conviction by exhausting every remaining procedural avenue—no matter how thin the underlying arguments have become.to contact me:Ghislaine Maxwell files petition challenging sex trafficking convictionBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Episode 442 of the Immigration Lawyer's Toolbox® Podcast breaks down the week's Top 10 immigration law updates, including major litigation wins restoring access to counsel after LA raids, the reinstated SIJS deferred action policy, the surge in habeas petitions tied to DHS's new bond memo, California's fight over masked ICE agents, challenges to million-dollar civil fines, and growing concerns over Border Patrol's expanded surveillance and domestic airport detentions. John also continues his Law Firm Management Series with a focus on knowledge and quality, and shares updates on the upcoming consular processing training, the ILT community, and so much more. Spotify | iTunes | YouTube Music | YouTube Timestamps: 00:00 – Opening 00:33 – Introduction 02:52 – Judge Rules Gov't Illegally Restricted Attorney Access at LA Detention Site (B-18 Case) 03:38 – Court Grants Stay of the SIJS Deferred Action Policy Rescission (Nov. 19, 2025) 04:22 – Surge in Habeas Petitions After DHS Memo Alters Bond Eligibility 06:45 – Trump Administration Sues California Over Ban on Masked Immigration Agents 07:42 – Lawsuit: Immigrants Fined Up to $1.8M for Remaining in the U.S. 08:25 – Mid-Episode Break 09:12 – Trump Announces End of TPS for Somali Community in Minnesota 09:35 – DHS Secretary Calls for Hiring "Deportation Judges" 10:08 – Border Patrol Tracking U.S. Drivers & Detaining 'Suspicious' Travel Patterns 10:57 – Reports: Travelers Detained at Domestic Airports Despite Lawful Entry & Pending Cases 11:48 – Seven Star Service (Star 2): Case Review & Analysis 14:29 – Outro Show Notes: (1) "This summer, two organizations, [CHIRLA] and Immigrant Defenders Law Center, told this Court that federal law enforcement was keeping individuals picked up in immigration raids in the basement of a federal building in downtown Los Angeles and keeping them from talking to lawyers who could help them navigate the legal process." Article here (2) Excellent news from the SIJS (Special Immigrant Juvenile Status) Backlog Coalition this morning. The 2022 SIJS Deferred Action Policy is back in effect, and "the government must conduct deferred-action and employment authorization adjudications pursuant to the 2022 Policy Alert." Shout out to Rebecca Scholtz from NIPNLG for some great lawyering. Post here (3) Habeas corpus petitions surged after DHS issued memo changing bond eligibility Link (4) Trump administration sues California over ban on masked immigration agents  (5) Lawsuit filed on behalf of immigrants fined up to $1.8 million for remaining in the country (6) Trump says he's ending Temporary Protected Status for Somalis in Minnesota (7) DHS Secretary seeking "Deportation Judges" (8) Border Patrol is monitoring US drivers and detaining those with 'suspicious' travel patterns (9) Travelers are now reportedly being detained at domestic airports—even when they entered legally and have proof of a pending immigration case. Link (10) Seven Start Service (Star 2) Live Consular Processing training for lawyers Dec 18, 10:00–11:45 a.m. PT - NVC packets & DS-260 - Interview prep & follow-up - Timelines, fees, and real-world workflows Register here! Follow eimmigration by Cerenade: Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn Start your Business Immigration Practice! (US LAWYERS ONLY - SCREENING REQUIRED): E-2 Course EB-1A Course Get the Toolbox Magazine!  Join our community (Lawyers Only) Get Started in Immigration Law! The Marriage/Family-Based Green Card course is for you Our Website: ImmigrationLawyersToolbox.com Not legal advice. Consult with an Attorney. Attorney Advertisement. #podcaster #Lawyer #ImmigrationLawyer #Interview #Immigration #ImmigrationAttorney #USImmigration #ImmigrationLaw #ImmigrationLawyersToolbox

VLOG Nov 24 With US v Ghislaine Maxwell tweets "Unavailable," Q&A with @Grok on unblocking InnerCityPress https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-blocked-from-inner-city-press For Alexander Bros https://www.patreon.com/posts/shackle-battle-144110341 Diddy case(s) habeas, UN scams and JPM Chase Epstein, debanking challenged to OCC https://innercitypress.com/jpmchase1epsteinhmdadebankingffw112425.html

VLOG Nov 13 Epstein links of Bank of America cited to OCC by Fair Finance Watch opposing BofA branch closings https://innercitypress.com/branchclosings1bofaoccicp111325.htmlSudan BNP Paribas loss, now fight, book https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FWTSDM7LHabeas sleight of hand https://innercitypress.com/sdnyhabeas9apachecoicp111225.html UN censors

Daley v. Choate, et al., No. 24-1191 (10th Cir. Nov. 3, 2025)EAJA; habeas; sovereign immunity canon; Loper Bright; civil action; importance of habeas Martinez-Martinez v. Bondi, No. 241464 (4th Cir. Nov. 5, 2025)false testimony; INA § 101(f)(6); BIA review of missed questions of law and fact; Wilkinson; Patel; jurisdiction; failure to disclose alias Rosa Arevalo v. Bondi, Nos. 24-60349, 24-60620 (5th Cir. Nov. 5, 2025)Illinois law vacating criminal conviction for procedural or substantive defect; motion to reopen; due diligence; equitable tolling Dominguez Reyes v. Bondi,  No. 25-60016 (5th Cir. Nov. 6, 2025)INA § 101(a)(43)(D) aggravated felony; circumstance specific approach; Matter of Babaisakov; tethered to offense; contesting forfeiture; profit not material Calderon-Uresti v. Bondi, No. 24-60445 (5th Cir. Nov. 6, 2025)VAWA cancellation of removal; extreme cruelty; failure to corroborate credible testimony; exhaustion  United States v. Miller, 23-13069 (11th Cir. Nov. 6, 2025)sentence enhancement; ACCA; Florida cocaine derivative; categorical approach point of comparison Iuflopane; drug definition at point of committing the offenseKurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years. Eimmigration "Simplifies immigration casework. Legal professionals use it to advance cases faster, delight clients, and grow their practices."Homepage!Demo Link!Get the Guide! Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Promo Code: STAFI2025Click me! Gonzales & Gonzales Immigration BondsP: (833) 409-9200immigrationbond.com  EB-5 Support"EB-5 Support is an ongoing mentorship and resource platform created specifically for immigration attorneys."Contact: info@eb-5support.comWebsite: https://eb-5support.com/ Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page! CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

Clay and historian Beau Breslin discuss the doctrine of habeas corpus and its role in the current debate about how to handle undocumented immigrants in the United States. In a nutshell, habeas corpus means "hey, produce the body." You cannot just arbitrarily snatch someone off the street and make them disappear. Habeas corpus was so important to the Founding Fathers that they embedded it in the first Article of the Constitution, right off the top, and did not postpone it to the Bill of Rights. The United States has a mixed history of its adherence to the doctrine of habeas corpus, which Beau Breslin believes is THE fundamental right in America and all over the world. And yet, Professor Breslin, who teaches at an elite college in New York state, admitted that the majority of his students, even in a class on constitutional theory, would probably be unable to define just what habeas corpus means, where it came from, and why it is critically important to a free and enlightened society. This episode was recorded on September 12, 2025.

VLOG Oct 8: US ok with Diddy to Fort Dix. Blake Lively docket, some unsealing coming https://www.patreon.com/posts/lively-docket-in-140688776 Habeas corpus in Penn Station bathroom: https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-man-charged-with-flashing-in OCC dumpster fire, $PNC FirstBank Astroturf. UN faux budget cuts https://innercitypress.com/ungate1guterresstaffingscamicp100825.html

Wednesday, October 1st, 2025Today, Secretary of Defense Pete Kegseth told a room full of flag officers to ignore the laws of engagement; Donald Trump says he wants a shutdown so he can “get rid of a lot of Democrat things;” Reagan appointed Judge Young issued an excoriating ruling against the Trump administration in a First Amendment case comparing ICE to the KKK; Oregon mayors condemn Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Portland; a judge rebukes Kari Lake in court alleging contempt; the Trump regime has deported a planeload of Iranians after a deal with Tehran; Kilmar Abrego's lawyers file a reply to the government's response to his Habeas petition before Judge Xinis; a judge orders Trump to preserve $233M in FEMA funding ahead of a potential shutdown; and Allison and Dana deliver your Good News.Guest: Guest: Adam KlasfeldAll Rise NewsAll Rise News - Bluesky, @klasfeldreports.com - BlueSky, @KlasfeldReports - TwitterJudge sounds alarm in ruling denouncing Trump's targeting student protesters | All Rise NewsStoriesTrump Tells Generals the Military Will Be Used to Fight ‘Enemy Within' | Wall Street JournalOregon mayors condemn Trump's plan to send troops to Portland | POLITICOU.S. Deports Planeload of Iranians After Deal With Tehran, Officials Say | The New York TimesJudge orders Trump administration to preserve $233M in FEMA grants it attempted to pull from blue states | POLITICOGood Trouble“Oklahoma has the shortest signature gathering window at 90 days and we must collect a minimum of 173,000 valid signatures, which in reality means we need to get about 300,000 voters to sign our petitions in that 90-day time.  If any of the Leguminati in Oklahoma(or elsewhere) want to help spread the word, and they want to find out when and where to sign the petition to get State Question 836 on the ballot, here is the link: ” Vote Yes 836 - Oklahoma**OCTOBER 18 - NoKings.org, Leave some notes around town to spread the word.**California needs your help | Proposition 50 Vote YES !! Yes On Prop 50 | Special Election Phone Banks - mobilize.us**Help ensure safety of public servants. Hold RFK Jr accountable by signing the letter: savehhs.org, @firedbutfighting.bsky.social on Bluesky**SIGN THE STATEMENT OF SOLIDARITY for the FEMA Katrina Declaration.**How to Organize a Bearing Witness Standout**Fire Kilmeade - foxfeedback@foxnews.com, Submit a request – Fox News**Indiana teacher snitch portal - Eyes on Education**Find Your Representative | house.gov, Contacting U.S. SenatorsFrom The Good NewsVote Yes 836 - OklahomaJuvenile Healing to Wellness Courts Fact Sheet Purpose Area 8The Deathless One | Book by Emma Hamm | Official Publisher Page | Simon & SchusterPizza LuceFOX 25's Wendy Suares questions State Supt. Ryan Walters after he announced his resignation - YouTubePatrons Sponsoring Patrons - The Daily Beans(Mark your calendar for November 14th, 2025 - Chicago, Illinois - Dana)Our Donation LinksNational Security Counselors - DonateMSW Media, Blue Wave California Victory Fund | ActBlueWhistleblowerAid.org/beansFederal workers - email AG at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Find Upcoming Actions 50501 Movement, No Kings.org, Indivisible.orgDr. Allison Gill - Substack, BlueSky , TikTok, IG, TwitterDana Goldberg - BlueSky, Twitter, IG, facebook, danagoldberg.comMore from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | SubstackReminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Our Donation LinksNational Security Counselors - DonateMSW Media, Blue Wave California Victory Fund | ActBlueWhistleblowerAid.org/beansFederal workers - feel free to email AG at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Find Upcoming Actions 50501 Movement, No Kings.org, Indivisible.orgDr. Allison Gill - Substack, BlueSky , TikTok, IG, TwitterDana Goldberg - BlueSky, Twitter, IG, facebook, danagoldberg.comCheck out more from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | SubstackShare your Good News or Good TroubleMSW Good News and Good TroubleHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?The Daily Beans | SupercastThe Daily Beans & Mueller, She Wrote | PatreonThe Daily Beans | Apple Podcasts Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

I'm tackling the twists and turns of the criminal appellate process—particularly the difference between direct and indirect appeals, also known as post-conviction or habeas corpus actions. I'm drawing directly from my experiences and real questions that come up in my practice, breaking down what I call the “appellate ladder” that anyone must climb after a conviction, especially here in Ohio.I'll explain why you can't just skip steps in the appeal process, even if it feels like it might save time or money. Skipping a rung can create procedural traps, especially if you're hoping to take your case up to the federal courts later on. I know how tempting it can be to jump ahead, but I'll show you why following every step is crucial if you want a real shot at relief.I'm here to cut through the legal jargon and share practical advice for anyone facing an appeal—or just curious about how the process really works. And yes, I'll even throw in a Mario Bros. analogy to make it all a bit more fun. Stick around if you want to understand the true “appeal” of appeals!Moments00:00 Consider indirect appeal first; it's often more successful and cost-effective than the direct appeal, saving time and legal resources.03:30 Habeas corpus in federal court is complex; missing technicalities at the state level can lead to case dismissal.Here are 3 key takeaways from the episode:There Are Two Appellate Ladders: The criminal appellate process includes a direct appeal (challenging errors from the trial as recorded in the official record) and an indirect or post-conviction appeal (addressing issues outside the record). Both play crucial roles.Don't Skip Steps: As tempting as it is to save time and money by jumping straight to the “stronger” argument, skipping any step in the ladder can lead to procedural default—meaning federal courts may not even consider your case.Strategic Foresight is Vital: Allowing each court level to rule preserves your right to seek relief at the federal level (like habeas corpus). Shortcuts, unfortunately, just aren't an option in appellate law.Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm...

VLOG Sept 3 Diddy's precedents, after US Mann Act ranges from 33 to 7 months in SDNY https://www.patreon.com/posts/diddy-dockets-us-138002091 Bronx District Leader, 2 years. Habeas, dysphoria; CBP shot case to Judge Preska, & Epstein files. UN cites "Inner Circle Press" https://innercitypress.com/unguterres7bcorruptunmikoios090225.html

When the government delays your immigration case or detains you unfairly, you don't have to wait in silence. In this episode of Immigration Law Made Easy, Attorney Hillary Walsh breaks down two powerful tools Habeas and Mandamus lawsuits that can force action, stop illegal detention, and push your case forward. Learn when and how these federal court strategies can protect you, reunite families, and hold the government accountable. Whether you're facing ICE detention, a stalled I-130, or years of waiting for an asylum interview, this episode gives you the knowledge you need o take action.

Still in Denver, Tore talks with lawyer Grant on the latest moves in the Tina Peters case. They also touch on other important and related issues. Then it's off to New York City and more preparation for what comes next.

Mark Geragos reveals a pivotal update in the Menendez brothers' case: an order to show cause has been issued, opening the door to challenge their conviction.Watch Beyond A Reasonable Doubt and all Reasonable Doubt video content on YouTube exclusively at YouTube.com/ReasonableDoubtPodcast and subscribe while you're thereSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem got a pop quiz at a senate hearing this week. The question came from Democratic Senator Maggie Hassan, of New Hampshire.Hassan asked Noem to to explain habeas corpus. For the record, habeas corpus is the legal principle, enshrined in the Constitution, that protects people from illegal detention. The reason that this bit of Latin is under discussion – is because the Trump administration says it's considering suspending habeas corpus. This core constitutional protection has been an obstacle to the President's mass deportation plan. Habeas corpus is a principle that's hundreds of years older than America itself.What would it mean if the President suspended it? And could he, under the Constitution? For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.Email us at considerthis@npr.org.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Wednesday, May 21st, 2025Today, Trump prosecutors have dropped the charges against Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, but have arrested and charged Congresswoman LaMonica McIver; Trump's Gestapo Czar doesn't know what habeas corpus is; the Supreme Court allows Maine Rep Libby to vote again despite her censure by the legislature for transphobic comments; USAID cuts leaves food for millions rotting in storage; a federal appeals court leaves in place an order requiring the Trump administration to return Daniel Lozano-Camargo to the US after having sent him there in violation of a legal settlement; Republicans in Congress have decided to phase out Biden's clean energy tax credits to make more room for billionaire tax cuts; the Senate has confirmed convicted felon Charles Kushner to be the ambassador of France; and Allison and Dana deliver your Good News.Thank You, Helix27% Off Sitewide plus Free Bedding Bundle with any Luxe or Elite Mattress Order, when you go to HelixSleep.com/dailybeansMSW Media, Blue Wave California Victory Fund | ActBlueStories:The Head of Trump's Gestapo Thinks Habeas Corpus is a Presidential Power | muellershewrote.comRep. LaMonica McIver charged after skirmish at ICE facility; Newark Mayor Baraka's charges dropped | ABC7 New YorkExclusive: US aid cuts leave food for millions mouldering in storage | ReutersTrump admin must seek return of wrongly deported man to El Salvador, appeals court rules | POLITICOUS Senate confirms Trump nominee Kushner to be ambassador to France | ReutersRepublicans tweak megabill's SNAP, Medicaid provisions - Live Updates | POLITICOA Jan. 6 rioter tried to recoup $63K he made filming the mob. A judge said no. | POLITICOGood Trouble: Your good trouble today is to contact the Attorney General of New Jersey, Matt Platkin, and have him look into code 3.12 Malicious Prosecution (Prior Criminal Proceeding) in the case of Mayor Ras Baraka. You can use the email dcjtipline@njdcj.org. Let him know you think Alina Habba has violated 3.12 by arresting and then dropping the case against Mayor Baraka, and that her actions satisfy the elements of malicious prosecution action based upon a prior criminal proceeding.Find Upcoming Demonstrations And Actions:50501 MovementJune 14th Nationwide Demonstrations - NoKings.orgIndivisible.orgFederal workers - feel free to email me at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Share your Good News or Good Trouble:dailybeanspod.com/goodFrom The Good NewsAdd or Manage a Security Freeze | InnovisThe Man Who Calculated Deaththreads.com/@indivisiblebuckscoDogs i pet (@dogs__i__pet) • InstagramReminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Mega Happy Hour Zoom Call - you can interact with not just me and Harry Dunn, Andy McCabe, and Dana Goldberg. They'll all be there this Friday 5/23/2025 at 7 PM ET 4 PM PT. Plus, you'll get these episodes ad free and early, and get pre-sale tickets and VIP access to our live events. You can join at patreon.com/muellershewrote for as little as $3 a month. Federal workers - feel free to email me at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen.Share your Good News or Good Trouble:https://www.dailybeanspod.com/good/ Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewrote , Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote,Dana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedyHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/Patreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts

In this episode of Good Morning Liberty, hosts Nate Thurston and Charles 'Sleepy' Thompson dive deep into major political and social topics of the day. They kick off with discussions about the latest political maneuvers by President Trump, particularly his ongoing feud with Congressman Thomas Massey. They explore the intricacies of current legislative debates, the implications of new bills, and the rhetoric surrounding government spending. The discussion also critiques recent Supreme Court decisions and public reactions, as well as misinformation and hypocritical stances in politics. Nate and Charles also touch on the impacts of recent extreme weather events, deregulation debates, and the contentious topic of misgendering laws in Colorado. Don't miss the engaging commentary on these pressing topics! (00:00) Introduction (01:55) Dumb Bleep of the Week: Big Beautiful Bill (06:44) Massey vs. Trump: The Political Showdown (13:00) Fiscal Hawks and Government Spending (19:19) Hypocrisy in Politics (21:57) Tornado Aftermath and Housing Deregulation (24:33) Misgendering Law in Colorado (28:09) Biden's Age and Media Contradictions (33:17) Hillary Clinton's Advice and Patriarchy (36:03) Habeas Corpus Misunderstanding (40:35) Dumb Bleep of the Week Voting Links:   https://gml.bio.link/   YOUTUBE:   https://bit.ly/3UwsRiv   RUMBLE:   https://rumble.com/c/GML   Check out Martens Minute!   https://martensminute.podbean.com/   Follow Josh Martens on X:   https://twitter.com/joshmartens13   Join the private discord & chat during the show!   joingml.com   Bank on Yourself bankonyourself.com/gml   Get FACTOR Today! FACTORMEALS.com/factorpodcast     Good Morning Liberty is sponsored by BetterHelp! Rediscover your curiosity today by visiting Betterhelp.com/GML (Get 10% off your first month)     Protect your privacy and unlock the full potential of your streaming services with ExpressVPN. Get 3 more months absolutely FREE by using our link EXPRESSVPN.com/GML  

00:04:47:07 - 00:16:34:22Argentine President Javier Milei overhauls immigration system to curb illegal migration, ban criminals, and mandate health service payments. Host supports stricter policies, arguing unchecked immigration erodes cultural identity and burdens taxpayers.00:16:35:00 - 00:28:43:00Eric Peters' article critiques property taxes as preventing true homeownership, forcing perpetual payments like rent to the government. Host compares modern homeowners to feudal serfs, emphasizing loss of freedom.00:52:02:14 - 01:01:50:11Trump moves to rescind appliance efficiency standards, which host argues make appliances less functional, costlier, and less reliable. Regulations favor large companies, limiting consumer choice and innovation.01:09:04:20 - 01:29:39:06New American article critiques statues of generic black women replacing historical figures like Thomas Jefferson in Times Square, arguing they celebrate mediocrity and erase history. Contrasts with statues of Father Francis Duffy and George M. Cohan, honored for significant achievements. Links to Marxist tactics and cultural decline, emphasizing identity politics over merit and history's role in identity.01:35:17:01 - 01:39:06:02Fort Detrick bio lab shut down after a researcher deliberately damaged another's containment suit over a lover's quarrel, risking pathogen leaks. Highlights poor safety culture and unqualified personnel in critical government roles, questioning the existence of such labs.01:50:45:18 - 01:55:04:15Trump administration considers suspending habeas corpus for immigration cases, threatening constitutional rights. Habeas corpus ensures individuals can challenge detention legality, and suspension risks authoritarianism, undermining fundamental human rights.02:23:36:07 - 02:31:24:22Celente critiques global leaders and Germany's $1 trillion military buildup, ignoring its recession and historical aggression. Host details U.S. provocation in Ukraine via NATO expansion and regime change, fueling Russian response. Both condemn U.S. callousness toward Ukraine's suffering, warning of cultural and human losses in a potential European war.02:36:46:05 - 02:43:02:09Celente predicts a dot-com bust 2.0 due to overvalued AI stocks, citing Chinese efficiency (DeepSeek's $6M vs. $100M costs). Forecasts office building bust from remote work, with 20% vacancy in major U.S. cities, leading to bank failures. Remains bullish on gold despite price dips.02:50:55:23 - 02:56:05:20Host and Celente denounce Israel's actions in Gaza, citing over 100 daily civilian deaths and child maiming. Criticize Trump and Kushner for viewing Gaza as exploitable land, ignoring Palestinian history. Celente refutes anti-Semitism claims, noting Jewish opposition to Israel's policies.Follow the show on Kick and watch live every weekday 9:00am EST – 12:00pm EST https://kick.com/davidknightshow Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code KNIGHT Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.

00:04:47:07 - 00:16:34:22Argentine President Javier Milei overhauls immigration system to curb illegal migration, ban criminals, and mandate health service payments. Host supports stricter policies, arguing unchecked immigration erodes cultural identity and burdens taxpayers.00:16:35:00 - 00:28:43:00Eric Peters' article critiques property taxes as preventing true homeownership, forcing perpetual payments like rent to the government. Host compares modern homeowners to feudal serfs, emphasizing loss of freedom.00:52:02:14 - 01:01:50:11Trump moves to rescind appliance efficiency standards, which host argues make appliances less functional, costlier, and less reliable. Regulations favor large companies, limiting consumer choice and innovation.01:09:04:20 - 01:29:39:06New American article critiques statues of generic black women replacing historical figures like Thomas Jefferson in Times Square, arguing they celebrate mediocrity and erase history. Contrasts with statues of Father Francis Duffy and George M. Cohan, honored for significant achievements. Links to Marxist tactics and cultural decline, emphasizing identity politics over merit and history's role in identity.01:35:17:01 - 01:39:06:02Fort Detrick bio lab shut down after a researcher deliberately damaged another's containment suit over a lover's quarrel, risking pathogen leaks. Highlights poor safety culture and unqualified personnel in critical government roles, questioning the existence of such labs.01:50:45:18 - 01:55:04:15Trump administration considers suspending habeas corpus for immigration cases, threatening constitutional rights. Habeas corpus ensures individuals can challenge detention legality, and suspension risks authoritarianism, undermining fundamental human rights.02:23:36:07 - 02:31:24:22Celente critiques global leaders and Germany's $1 trillion military buildup, ignoring its recession and historical aggression. Host details U.S. provocation in Ukraine via NATO expansion and regime change, fueling Russian response. Both condemn U.S. callousness toward Ukraine's suffering, warning of cultural and human losses in a potential European war.02:36:46:05 - 02:43:02:09Celente predicts a dot-com bust 2.0 due to overvalued AI stocks, citing Chinese efficiency (DeepSeek's $6M vs. $100M costs). Forecasts office building bust from remote work, with 20% vacancy in major U.S. cities, leading to bank failures. Remains bullish on gold despite price dips.02:50:55:23 - 02:56:05:20Host and Celente denounce Israel's actions in Gaza, citing over 100 daily civilian deaths and child maiming. Criticize Trump and Kushner for viewing Gaza as exploitable land, ignoring Palestinian history. Celente refutes anti-Semitism claims, noting Jewish opposition to Israel's policies.Follow the show on Kick and watch live every weekday 9:00am EST – 12:00pm EST https://kick.com/davidknightshow Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code KNIGHT Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-real-david-knight-show--5282736/support.

Alex Jordan rejoins the show to see if he can impersonate Danny as well as he impersonated Derek a couple of weeks ago. He and Derek discuss the India-Pakistan ceasefire, Donald Trump's big Persian Gulf tour (filled with Deals, Bribes, and announcements about Syrian sanctions and Iranian nuclear talks), the latest developments in Gaza, the US-China tariff pause, the PKK's major disarmament announcement, a new round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks, major clashes between militias in Libya, the arrival of the first group of Afrikaner refugees to the US, Luis Arce's decision to quit the Bolivian presidential race, the sacking of US National Intelligence Council staff for daring to contradict President Trump, and whether or not the US is still going to have habeas corpus for much longer.You can watch Alex Jordan on the Quincy Institute's inaugural episode of the YouTube program “Always at War," which he co-hosted with Courtney Rawlings.Topics:01:23 India-Pakistan ceasefire announcement.04:18 Trump's Persian Gulf tour and deals.07:49 Trump's announcement regarding Syria sanctions.10:40 Efforts to revive the Iran nuclear deal.15:28 Israeli efforts to displace Palestinians in Gaza.17:24 New US-led humanitarian foundation for Gaza.21:27 Release of American-Israeli hostage by Hamas.26:46 US-China trade war detente.29:13 PKK announces major disarmament.32:19 Diplomatic efforts to end Russia-Ukraine war.35:45 Major clashes between militias in Libya.39:33 Arrival of the first group of Afrikaner refugees to the US.41:17 Luis Arce's decision to quit the Bolivian presidential race.43:09 Sacking of US National Intelligence Council staff for contradicting President Trump.46:04 Potential suspension of habeas corpus in the US.48:47 Habeas corpus suspension and executive power.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Episode #738: Bryan & Krissy discuss the intricate and secret process behind the Conclave slated to take place soon. Will we soon hear "Habeas Pump'em"? Or is it Habmeus pompem? We shall all find out once the black smoke turns white and the hard partying 75 year old men return with an answer. Then. South Georgia Sean calls in to talk about his unusual profession of nuisance control in the swamps of low country! TCBit: WSHIT's Focus On Community takes a look at Pastor Pattycake and his traveling exorcism road show and meme coin! Watch EP #738 on YouTube! Text us or leave us a voicemail: +1 (212) 433-3TCB FOLLOW US: Instagram:  ⁠@thecommercialbreak⁠ Youtube: ⁠youtube.com/thecommercialbreak⁠ TikTok: ⁠@tcbpodcast⁠ Website: ⁠www.tcbpodcast.com⁠ CREDITS: Hosts: ⁠Bryan Green⁠ &⁠ Krissy Hoadley⁠ Executive Producer: Bryan Green Producer: Astrid B. Green Voice Over: Rachel McGrath TCBits Written, Voiced and Produced by Bryan Green To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Episode #738: Bryan & Krissy discuss the intricate and secret process behind the Conclave slated to take place soon. Will we soon hear "Habeas Pump'em"? Or is it Habmeus pompem? We shall all find out once the black smoke turns white and the hard partying 75 year old men return with an answer. Then. South Georgia Sean calls in to talk about his unusual profession of nuisance control in the swamps of low country! TCBit: WSHIT's Focus On Community takes a look at Pastor Pattycake and his traveling exorcism road show and meme coin! Watch EP #738 on YouTube! Text us or leave us a voicemail: +1 (212) 433-3TCB FOLLOW US: Instagram:  ⁠@thecommercialbreak⁠ Youtube: ⁠youtube.com/thecommercialbreak⁠ TikTok: ⁠@tcbpodcast⁠ Website: ⁠www.tcbpodcast.com⁠ CREDITS: Hosts: ⁠Bryan Green⁠ &⁠ Krissy Hoadley⁠ Executive Producer: Bryan Green Producer: Astrid B. Green Voice Over: Rachel McGrath TCBits Written, Voiced and Produced by Bryan Green To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices