Podcasts about habeas

Ozturk v. Hyde, et al., No. 25-1019 (2d Cir. May 7, 2025) and Mahdawi v. Trump, et al., No. 25-1113 (2d Cir. May 9, 2025)habeas; transfer of noncitizens; INA § 241(g); venue; jurisdiction; INA § 242(a)(2)(B)(ii); INA § 242(g); INA § 242(b)(9); other jurisdiction stripping provisions; government motion for stay; government motion for mandamus  Matter of Choc-Tut, 29 I&N Dec. 48 (BIA 2025)bond; burdens; DUI; criminal court findings Sandoval Argueta v. Bondi, No. 23-60080 (5th Cir. May 9, 2025)crime of child abuse; attempt; Loper Bright; no requirement for actual minor; INA § 237(a)(2)(E)(ii); motion top reconsider from abroad; judicial estoppel; DHS concessions Calvary Albuquerque Inc., et al v. Rubio, et al., No. 24-2066 (10th Cir. May 6, 2025)doctrine of consular nonreviewability; Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA); R-1 religious visa; renumeration or payment for B-1 work; fraud or willful misrepresentation; statutory interpretationSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Demo Link!Click me too!Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Promo Code: STAFI2025Click me!Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

May 12, 2025 ~ Habeas corpus has been suspended only a few times in the U.S. history, and now President Donald Trump is looking at options to do so yet again in order to aid the efforts to deport undocumented individuals. George Donnini, criminal defense attorney with Butzel Long Law Firm, talks with Lloyd, Jamie, and Chris Renwick about legal implications of this action.

About the Guest(s): Willie Lawson is a dedicated media personality and the host of "THE MORNING REPORT" produced by Fightbackmedia.com and FightbackMediaTV.com. With a passion for political discourse and constitutional rights, Lawson has carved out a niche presenting nuanced, thought-provoking conversations surrounding constitutional law, immigration, and national politics. His work is aimed at providing insightful dialogue on preserving the American republic, balancing legal frameworks with political realities, and encouraging civic engagement. Episode Summary: Join Willie Lawson on this riveting episode of "THE MORNING REPORT," where the intricate balances of constitutional law, immigration, and national security collide. At the heart of this discussion is the controversial concept of suspending habeas corpus, a critical constitutional right that allows individuals to challenge unlawful detention. As global political dynamics shift, Lawson unpacks the profound implications of using such an extreme measure in the context of immigration and national sovereignty. In a detailed dissection, Lawson explores whether current immigration scenarios could justify the suspension of habeas corpus, a move rarely seen in American history. With references to historical precedents like Lincoln's Civil War suspension and the ongoing migrant crisis, Lawson examines the constitutional provisions that might allow such a policy shift. His analysis foregrounds the pivotal role of Congress vs. presidential powers in making these decisions. Lawson emphasizes the weight of the Republican Congress's alignment with executive intentions, and the legal challenges that could arise from defining "invasion" in modern terms. Tackling weighty topics, Lawson calls his audience to consider constitutional purity in the face of contemporary political pressures. Key Takeaways:Habeas corpus is a fundamental legal right allowing people to challenge unlawful detention in court, which is foundational for liberty and accountability in government.Historically, habeas corpus has been suspended in extreme scenarios involving rebellion or invasion, emphasizing why any such modern use requires careful scrutiny.The debate on immigration as an "invasion" highlights the need for aligning political rhetoric with constitutional law and historical context.Achieving policy changes necessitates Congress's cooperation, underscoring the critical nature of balancing executive reach and legislative authority.Lawson warns of the slippery slope that comes from undermining habeas corpus, advocating for constitutional fidelity to preserve democratic principles.Notable Quotes:"It's about the Constitution, it's about the country. It's about the Republic.""Habeas corpus is not just about law. It's about power.""If we lose the right to challenge detention, the government gains the right to detain without challenge.""That same bat that you use to bludgeon your opponent will be that same bat that you get bludgeoned by.""We have to be really, really careful, right? So Congress has got to play along."Resources:Fightbackmedia.comMammoth NationSeven Weeks Coffee promotional discussionHistorical references to previous suspensions of habeas corpus during key conflicts (i.e., Civil War and Pearl Harbor)By diving deep into the dynamics of habeas corpus and its historical application, listeners are invited to ponder the legal and ethical ramifications of current policy debates. Engage with the full episode for a comprehensive understanding of these constitutional issues and for more thought-provoking content on national governance from "THE MORNING REPORT." Stay tuned for future episodes exploring America's crucial political conversations.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/morning-report--3694168/support.

Episode #738: Bryan & Krissy discuss the intricate and secret process behind the Conclave slated to take place soon. Will we soon hear "Habeas Pump'em"? Or is it Habmeus pompem? We shall all find out once the black smoke turns white and the hard partying 75 year old men return with an answer. Then. South Georgia Sean calls in to talk about his unusual profession of nuisance control in the swamps of low country! TCBit: WSHIT's Focus On Community takes a look at Pastor Pattycake and his traveling exorcism road show and meme coin! Watch EP #738 on YouTube! Text us or leave us a voicemail: +1 (212) 433-3TCB FOLLOW US: Instagram:  ⁠@thecommercialbreak⁠ Youtube: ⁠youtube.com/thecommercialbreak⁠ TikTok: ⁠@tcbpodcast⁠ Website: ⁠www.tcbpodcast.com⁠ CREDITS: Hosts: ⁠Bryan Green⁠ &⁠ Krissy Hoadley⁠ Executive Producer: Bryan Green Producer: Astrid B. Green Voice Over: Rachel McGrath TCBits Written, Voiced and Produced by Bryan Green To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Zelensky Doubles Down on Stupidity Over Crimea | Do Illegals Deserve Due Process? | 4.24.25Live show Monday-Thursday, 3pm est. SOCIALS: https://linktr.ee/drewberquist NEWS: https://DrewBerquist.com MERCH: https://RedBeachNation.com#DrewBerquist #ThisIsMyShow #TIMSTop 100 Political News Podcast with https://www.millionpodcasts.com/political-news-podcasts/Show Notes/Links:Tim Walz on Illegal immigrants being thrown into "gulags" without due processhttps://x.com/Breaking911/status/1915208664924795172JD Vance rejects idea that Kilmar Abrego Garcia did not receive due processhttps://x.com/Jules31415/status/1915227991606530493Tom Homan crushes Democrats on TVhttps://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1915044307154698339New poll on due processhttps://x.com/BreannaMorello/status/1915386904410726766Trump not happy with Putin strikeshttps://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1915381642681602176Trump's message on Zelenskyy's position on Crimeahttps://x.com/JDVance/status/1915339434532229383Russia hits Kyiv with strikehttps://x.com/nypost/status/1915386757681459659White liberal woman goes off on Rahm Emmanunel over trans issueshttps://x.com/amuse/status/1915003660959965566Oakland just elected a new mayor who thinks a $50 minimum wage will solve inflationhttps://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1914688895033454905

VLOG April 8 Supreme Court says habeas in Texas, but Boasberg still contempt? US v. Nadine Menendez https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-after-bob-menendez-got-11-years-5dfEthereum Bueno bots https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-after-taking-25m-from-ethereumMiles Guo https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D9MDQZX8UN @MelissaFleming no answers, Haiti, bans Press

Confira nesta edição do JR 24 Horas: Imagens flagraram o autor do atentado contra o STF, Francisco Wanderley, comprando os fogos de artifícios usados no ataque. Os funcionários da loja disseram que ele fez duas compras, no valor total de R$ 1.545, dias antes do crime. E ainda: Habeas corpus do ex-jogador Robinho começa a ser julgado nesta sexta (15). 

The evidence after two trials seems clear that Lyle and Erik Menendez murdered their parents in Beverly Hills in 1989. They were convicted after their second trial in 1996. The brothers filed a Habeas petition asking the court to vacate the conviction based on new evidence. On Thursday, 10-3-24, District Attorney Gascon stated there will be a hearing at the end of November. Tupac's family hired Alex Spiro, Alec Baldwin's attorney in the Rust case, to investigate to see if Diddy has any connection with the murder. Now that Diddy is in custody, that investigation may be easier to do. It would be natural to question Keefe D and Suge Knight. I will cover more Diddy updates in this week's podcast.Karen Read's retrial has a new special prosecutor who will be paid up to $75k for the prosecution. Hank Brennan's, who worked on the defense team for Whitey Bulger, has an hourly rate is $250 per hour.Hannah Gutierrez motion for New Trial, Dismissal and Immediate Release was denied by the judge. A decision still hasn't been made in the Alec Baldwin motion to reconsider the dismissal of his case.Jury election for the Sarah Boone case begins on Monday, October 7th. She was arrested in 2020 for the murder of her boyfriend. She said they were playing hide and seek and he hid in a zipped up suitcase. Police found a video in Sarah's phone of Jorge Torres pleading to be released because he couldn't breathe. Sarah has gone through 8 different attorneys. The judge said that she was going to have to represent herself due to her behavior. Boone wrote an advertisement and is now being represented by a private attorney using the battered spouse defense. The court denied the motion to suppress her police statements.Netflix and Fiona Harvey and going through mediation for the Baby Reindeer Show Lawsuit. However, Netflix also filed an Appeal to the Anti-SLAPP denial. I will keep you in the loop. He went into court to formalize the plea and sentencing hasn't happened yet.The headlines are saying that one of the doctors in the Matthew Perry case has plead guilty. This is the same doctor we talked about that took the deal before the case went to court.RESOURCESJudge's Ruling on Hannah Gutierrez's Case: https://www.youtube.com/live/8OfqoJjeWKA?t=1770sThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacyChartable - https://chartable.com/privacy

O podcast desta quinta-feira, dia 29, traz um bate-papo descontraído com Luis Otávio, proprietário do Habeas Copos, uma casa de eventos de reggae localizada no Centro Histórico, que está completando 5 anos. Acompanhe agora, em poucos minutos, com o DJ Waldiney.

O Tribunal Federal da segunda região revogou mandado de prisão contra o ex-CEO das Lojas Americanas Miguel Gutierrez. Ele chegou a ser preso em junho, em Madri, mas foi solto pelas autoridades espanholas. Com o habeas corpus, o nome dele será retirado da lista vermelha da interpol.

In September 2011, a shooting occurred in South Philadelphia, and two suspects were implicated based on eyewitness identification. There would be inconsistencies in the eyewitness testimonies, and both suspects had alibis. Despite this, both would be charged and placed on trial for the shooting. What followed was a travesty of justice, where the suspects would face the potential of serving decades behind bars.TakeawaysEyewitness identification can be unreliable and subject to inconsistencies.Having a strong alibi and supporting evidence is crucial in building a defense.Proper legal representation is essential for a fair trial.Mishandling of investigations can lead to wrongful arrests and convictions. The importance of having a good understanding of the legal systemThe impact of financial resources on the quality of legal representationThe consequences of inadequate representation in criminal trialsThe need for proper preparation and attention to detail in legal cases Ineffective legal representation can have severe consequences for defendants, as seen in CJ Rice's case.Sanjay Weaver, CJ's defense attorney, failed to provide a strong defense and neglected crucial evidence.The judge's lack of intervention and the prosecution's reliance on weak evidence further contributed to the injustice.After years of appeals and reinvestigation, CJ's habeas petition was granted, leading to his release and eventual exoneration.The case highlights the importance of competent legal representation and the need for oversight in the criminal justice system.Chapters00:00 Introduction to the Shooting Incident03:18 Eyewitness Identification and Inconsistencies05:48 Strong Alibis and Supporting Evidence09:46 Lack of Proper Legal Representation14:08 Mishandling of the Investigation29:39 The Impact of Financial Resources on Legal Representation36:13 The Mishandling of CJ Rice's Trial58:56 The Consequences of Inadequate Representation01:05:26 Ineffective Legal Representation01:17:24 Exoneration and Injustice01:19:07 Sandjai Weaver's Incompetence01:21:27 Reinvestigation and Murky Evidence01:25:14 Lessons Learned and Compensation01:26:19 Acknowledging Weaver's One Right Move01:31:48 Dumb Criminal: Burglar Hiding Under a CouchBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/crimepedia--5894684/support.

O ex-jogador de futebol Robinho foi preso pela Polícia Federal na noite desta quinta-feira no prédio onde mora, no bairro Aparecida, em Santos, litoral de São Paulo. O fato ocorre após a Corte Especial do Superior Tribunal de Justiça homologar a sentença da justiça italiana que condenou o brasileiro a 9 anos de prisão por estupro coletivo.

Falo sobre uma importante decisão do STJ (RHC181.907) que considerou como "prova obtida por meio ilícito" a denúncia feita pelo médico que atendeu a uma mulher que fez um aborto ilegal. O Tribunal lembrou que a atitude do médico viola o direito à privacidade entre médico e paciente e, não apenas mandou extinguir a ação penal como também que sejam oficiados o CRM e o MP de Minas para que tomem providências contra o profissional.

Federico Leoni"Metafisica dello specchio"Anish Kapoor e la poesia delle superficiMarsilio Artewww.marsilioeditori.itArtista del non-oggetto, poeta della dualità, autore di opere sospese tra materiale e immateriale, Anish Kapoor esplora la soglia che divide e riunisce luce e ombra, maschile e femminile, concavità e convessità, in un incessante andirivieni di pieni e vuoti. I suoi oggetti sono dotati di una presenza incisiva e sottrattiva insieme: massimamente consistenti, capaci di imporsi con forza irrefutabile, allo stesso tempo e per lo stesso motivo possiedono una qualità evanescente, illocalizzabile, fantasmatica. Sembrano essere nel mondo, ma anche disegnare un passaggio in cui il mondo è destinato a riversarsi per scomparire o da cui sembra dover risorgere.Grazie a opere come Sky Mirror, Cloud Gate, Dirty Corner, l'inesauribile ricerca condotta dal maestro degli opposti ci consegna «la più chiara esperienza di noi stessi, il nostro ritratto più ovvio, più quotidiano». In un tempo in cui tutto è «crosta delle cose», in cui oggetti e persone parlano di sé attraverso la pelle, lo specchio riporta in superficie la profondità, quella forma scura, quel buco nero che racchiude le domande fondamentali sull'Essere.Federico Leoni(1974) insegna Antropologia filosofica all'Università di Verona, dove dirige, insieme a Riccardo Panattoni, il Centro di ricerca «Tiresia» per la filosofia e la psicoanalisi.È coordinatore scientifico del festival Kum! di Pesaro. Scrive su «aut aut», «Alias», «doppiozero» e su varie riviste italiane e straniere. Tra i suoi libri più recenti: Habeas corpus (2008), L'idiota e la lettera (2013),Bergson (2021), L'immagine-scatola (2022).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

We interviewed attorney Michael Ausbrook about his work on the Habeas Project at the Indiana Maurer School of Law, as well as law student Emma Kilbreath. They'll speak about the project, the cases they've tackled, and the impact their work has had on the lives of incarcerated defendants. Send tips to murdersheet@gmail.com.The Murder Sheet is a production of Mystery Sheet LLC .See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Episode 8 – The Great Writ This month on Calendar Call, Paul talks with Attorney Arnold Amore, Assistant Public Defender for the CT Innocence Project, Post-Conviction Unit about Habeas Corpus, commonly referred to as The Great Writ. Paul and Attorney Amore discuss what a Habeas is, the difference between an appeal and Habeas petition, and ineffective assistance of counsel cases vs lapse plea cases. Paul and Attorney Amore also talk about common mistakes that lead to ineffective assistance of counsel claims, what happens over the course of a Habeas proceeding, the role of the Public Defender in the Post-Conviction Unit, and more. Artl.S9.C2.1 Suspension Clause and Writ of Habeas Corpus Connecticut Constitution, Article 1, Sec. 12 Amdt6.6.5.1 Overview of the Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel Magna Carta: Muse and Mentor Habeas Corpus FAQ

Join me and my great friend, aerial athlete, educator, and powerhouse: Shannon McKenna, for a very fancy conversation!If you're looking for the waitlist for Cycle 26 of The Audacity Project, you can find it right here.Highlights include:How we met (we don't remember) and how we became close (because those are different things) by going through The Artist's Way together.  Even though we were already friends before that.What gives you the AUDACITY?  Considering the impact you wish to make on the worldOn Making Your Life as an Artist a truly open source resource by Andrew Simonet.  You can use the link above to download the book on a sliding scale (including for free)Creating the next phase of life, and exploring the next phase of life as a circus artistHow I found my voice at 35, because of course Shannon started asking ME questionsOn accents and dialects in theaterDisciplines in circus and what's next on the horizon On Grief.  If you listen to nothing else this episode, listen to this, around 30:00.  Grief, and how it affects your brain, and how to know when you should take a real break from social media because of grief.How our grief cycles overlappedThe Inversion Encyclopedia (previously known as Aerial Inversions for All) Shannon's most popular resourceHow time + attention = changeEverything in nature has periods of stagnationHow you don't even KNOW about Monday...Her best advice to emerging artists about how you can truly value yourself and take your work seriously (it's bangorang!)You can check out tons of resources from Shannon here on her website, or visit her on Instagram which you undoubtedly already do...but just in case, you should.Habeas corpus, bitches.Don't go back to sleep.xoRachelSign up here for monthly blasts and functional wooFind me on InstagramSupport this podcast on Patreon

Appeals. Grounds for Appeal. An appeal in criminal law is a request to a higher court to review and change the decision of a lower court. The grounds for appeal can include: Legal Error: Arguing that a legal mistake was made during the trial. Insufficient Evidence: Claiming that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to justify the verdict. Prosecutorial Misconduct: Alleging improper actions by the prosecutor. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Arguing that the defense attorney's performance was so poor it affected the trial's outcome. Sentencing Errors: Challenges to the legality or reasonableness of the sentence imposed. Procedure and Standards of Review. The appeals process involves several steps: Filing a Notice of Appeal: This is the first step, usually filed with the trial court. Preparation of the Record: The trial court record, including all documents and transcripts, is prepared for the appellate court. Briefs Submission: Both parties submit written arguments (briefs) to the appellate court. Oral Arguments: In some cases, the court allows oral arguments from both parties. Standards of Review: De Novo Review: The appellate court reviews legal issues with a fresh perspective. Abuse of Discretion: Used for reviewing decisions at the trial court's discretion. Clear Error: Applied when reviewing factual findings. Habeas Corpus. Purpose and Procedure. Habeas corpus is a legal procedure that challenges the legality of a person's detention, imprisonment, or other restraint. Key Aspects: Initiating a Petition: A person in custody files a petition arguing their imprisonment is unlawful. Grounds for Habeas Corpus: Typical grounds include constitutional rights violations, lack of sufficient evidence, or errors in applying the law. Federal and State Considerations. Habeas corpus petitions can be filed in both state and federal courts, but the considerations differ: State Habeas Corpus: Used for challenging a state court's decision on grounds of constitutional rights violations. Federal Habeas Corpus: Typically employed after state remedies are exhausted, challenging federal constitutional violations. Exhaustion of State Remedies. Before a federal habeas corpus petition can be considered, the petitioner must exhaust all available state court remedies. Significance of Exhaustion Requirement: This requirement prevents premature interference with state criminal proceedings and respects state court systems. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Welcome to another fascinating episode of Adam's Archive! I'm your host, Austin Adams, and today we're diving deep into some of the most compelling and lesser-known stories of political intrigue and historical conspiracies.

We recently interviewed attorney Michael Ausbrook about the Indiana Supreme Court cases involving Richard Alle. Ausbrook is a professor at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, and is the director of the Habeas Project there. He has years of experience working habeas cases, and also serves as a board member of the Indiana Public Defender Council.Send tips to murdersheet@gmail.com.The Murder Sheet is a production of Mystery Sheet LLC .See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Aristotle and Holland Taylor once said, "The law is reason, free from passion." Valerie and Helen once said, "Oh man, we really should cover Legally Blonde at some point."  And six or so years later, here we are -- covering 2001's beloved Legally Blonde with long-overdue repeat guest, beloved Vanessa Riley from The Square Roots Podcast.  Habeas corpus! 

Join Laura and Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Maggie Freleng in this episode as they delve deep into the Menendez Brothers case. Content warning: Listener discretion is advised. Episode Highlights: Pam Bozanich Speaks Out: Listen to the Deputy District Attorney who prosecuted the Menendez brothers at their first trial share her own words. Her recent startling comments, published in April 2023, are thoroughly examined by Laura. New Evidence Uncovered: Laura and Maggie dissect the latest evidence in the Menendez case. They also analyze the socio-political climate in Los Angeles between the first and second Menendez trials, taking into account significant events like the McMartin pre-school molestation case, the Rodney King assault, and the O.J. Simpson acquittal, and how these events impacted the second trial. Understanding Neuroscience: Gain insights into what we now know about the neuroscience and brain development in individuals under 25 years old, shedding light on the Menendez Brothers' case. Predicting the Future: Laura and Maggie share their thoughts on what might happen next in the Menendez case. Join the Conversation: Don't miss out on this intriguing discussion. Join the conversation and share your thoughts on this captivating episode. #MenendezMurders #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #Podcast #TrueCrimePodcast #MenendezMurders #LyleMenendez #ErikMenendez #KittyMenendez #JoseMenendez #CoerciveControl #MaleViolence #Patriarchy  Clip https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5_KLaU5cAY https://www.courttv.com/title/menendez-brothers-attorney-talks-about-new-evidence-in-case/   Sources https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-03-06-mn-30790-story.html https://storage.googleapis.com/www-courttv-uploads/2023/05/cd3c2c86-petition-for-writ-of-habeas-corpus_court-tv.pdf https://www.courttv.com/trials/ca-v-menendez-1993/ https://www.courttv.com/news/menendez-brothers-attorneys-say-new-evidence-could-overturn-life-sentences/     YouTube, Socials and Website YouTube @crimeanalyst Instagram @crimeanalyst @laurarichards999 Twitter @thecrimeanalyst @laurarichards999 TikTok @crimeanalystpod Website www.crime-analyst.com Crime Analyst Merch https://crime-analyst.myshopify.com/ Leave a Review https://www.crime-analyst.com/reviews/new/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This week on Onward, Rosie has a fascinating conversation with Lyle Menendez. Many of a certain age will remember the sensational trials of Lyle and his brother Eric, found guilty of the murder of their parents. So sensational within the American zeigeist; this case has been made into movies and tv shows, it has also been studied in law school as well as a mainstay of cultural conversation.Recently, new information and evidence has been revealed in a documentary that now gives room for the brothers' to file a Habeas; which could mean freedom, after serving 34 years in prison.  Join us as Rosie and Lyle talk about the past, the possible future of what this new evidence could mean; and, how one has to find it within themself to remain hopeful, but truthful, even in the worst of circumstances.After listening, please send voice memos of your thoughts, observations and questions on this episode to: OnwardRosie@gmail.comTrigger Warning: Rape, Sexual and Emotional Child Abuse, and Incest is discussed in this episode.Please Note: This discussion is not graphic in nature, but, this is a truthful account of events.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Laura interviews Pulitzer Prize winning reporter and producer Maggie Freleng. Maggie has spent her career focusing on wrongful convictions, the criminal legal system, and social issues. She is host and producer of “Wrongful Conviction with Maggie Freleng”, “Murder in Alliance”, and “Unjust and Unsolved” podcasts focusing on wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice.   Laura and Maggie analyse the 21-page habeas petition submitted by Mark Geragos and Cliff Gardner who are the attorneys for Lyle and Erik Menendez. The petition cites two pieces of evidence which supports the brothers' accounts that their father was sexually abusing them.   Laura and Maggie break down the new evidence. Is it enough to get the Menendez brothers another court hearing, a new trial or for the court to vacate their 1989 convictions as requested by the brothers? You'll have to listen and find out what Laura and Maggie think.   Content warning: Listener discretion is advised. #MenendezMurders #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #Podcast #TrueCrimePodcast #LyleMenendez #ErikMenendez #KittyMenendez #JoseMenendez #CoerciveControl #MaleViolence #Patriarchy  Clip https://www.newsnationnow.com/banfield/menendez-brothers-attorney-is-cautiously-optimistic/ https://www.tiktok.com/@free.menendez.broth3rs/video/7058671713671974190   Sources https://storage.googleapis.com/www-courttv-uploads/2023/05/cd3c2c86-petition-for-writ-of-habeas-corpus_court-tv.pdf https://www.courttv.com/trials/ca-v-menendez-1993/ https://www.courttv.com/news/menendez-brothers-attorneys-say-new-evidence-could-overturn-life-sentences/     Sponsors Visit www.Microdose.com and use the code CRIMEANALYST to get free shipping and 30% off your first order. Right now, you can get an exclusive 20% off your first order at www.Thrivecausemetics.com/CRIMEANALYST     YouTube, Socials and Website YouTube @crimeanalyst Instagram @crimeanalyst @laurarichards999 Twitter @thecrimeanalyst @laurarichards999 TikTok @crimeanalystpod Website www.crime-analyst.com Crime Analyst Merch https://crime-analyst.myshopify.com/ Leave a Review https://www.crime-analyst.com/reviews/new/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Mauritanian (2021) recounts Mohamedou Ould Slahi's nightmare journey of secret rendition, torture, and detention at Guantanamo Bay—an odyssey that lasted 15 years, until Mr. Slahi was finally released in 2016, never having been charged with a crime. The film is based on the book, Guantanamo Diary, which Mr. Slahi wrote and had published while still a prisoner at Guantanamo. The book became a critically acclaimed international bestseller. The film was directed by Kevin Macdonald and features Tahar Rahim as Mohamedou Slahi, Jodie Foster as Nancy Hollander, Mr. Slahi's lead lawyer, Shailene Woodley as Teri Duncan, her co-counsel, and Benedict Cumberbatch as Ltn. Col. Stuart Couch, the military officer assigned to prosecute Mr. Slahi. The film was nominated for and won numerous awards, including a Golden Globe for Jodi Foster's portrayal of Nancy Hollander. Our guests are Mohamedou Slahi, the former Guantanamo prisoner and now world-famous author, and Nancy Hollander, Mohamedou's attorney and a leading criminal defense attorney.Timestamps:0:00.       Introduction7:11        Mohamedou's nightmare begins10:47     What law?12:43      Habeas petition granted, but imprisonment continues18:51      Endless interrogations25:19      Mohamedou first hears he will face the death penalty28:08      Military prosecutor Stuart Couch takes a stand against torture32:19      Writing Guantanamo Diary in a new language34:34       “My life, 24/7 in darkness”37:01       “I have a vow of kindness”38:59:      Getting Mohamedou's story out of Guantanamo43:33        Mohamedou sees his book's success on Russian TV at Guantanamo48:17        The freedom that is inside you49:48        An advocate for Mohamedou before the Periodic Review Board50:57        “I needed a miracle” 53:26         Americans are supposed to be the good guys56:29         The near impossibility of leaving Guantanamo58:41         Mohamedou and his former guard, and friend, Steve Wood1:00:52     Don't give up; miracles can happen1:02:49     The long shadow of Guantanamo1:04:02     To be free again1:06:26     Capturing the small details about Guantanamo1:08:31      A small nit about the film1:11:14      What it's like to see yourself being portrayed on screenFurther reading:Bravin, Jess, “The Conscience of the Colonel,” Wall St. J. (Mar. 31, 2007)Coll, Steven, “An Eloquent Voice from Guantánamo,” N.Y.R.B. (Jan. 14, 2016)Hafetz, Jonathan, Habeas Corpus after 9/11: Confronting America's New Global Detention System (2011)Rosenberg, Carol, “The Legacy of America's Post-9/11 Turn to Torture,” N.Y. Times (Sept. 12. 2021)Slahi, Mohamedou Ould, Guantámao Diary (Larry Siems, ed.) (2015)Law on Film is created and produced by Jonathan Hafetz. Jonathan is a professor at Seton Hall Law School. He has written many books and articles about the law. He has litigated important cases to protect civil liberties and human rights while working at the ACLU and other organizations. Jonathan is a huge film buff and has been watching, studying, and talking about movies for as long as he can remember. For more information about Jonathan, here's a link to his bio: https://law.shu.edu/faculty/full-time/jonathan-hafetz.cfmYou can contact him at jonathanhafetz@gmail.comYou can follow him on X (Twitter) @jonathanhafetz You can follow the podcast on X (Twitter) @LawOnFilm

Our heroes teleport home, only to have their loyalties called into question. Azlo extols the virtues of wealth preservation. Shabba plays gatekeeper. Tokas picks up a prospect.

Episode 44 of Cousins By Blood will be coming out on this RSS feed ASAP. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/matt-duff9/support

Leah and Kate delve in to the latest chapter of Supreme Court justices going on secret fancy vacations with billionaires, this time starring Samuel Alito. And then it's opinion-palooza, recapping the opinions we got last week while we wait with bated breath for the horrors the last week of the term will bring.Follow @CrookedMedia on Instagram and Twitter for more original content, host takeovers and other community events. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter, Threads, and Bluesky

Dans ce dernier épisode de la saison 2 de Comme un poisson dans l'eau, on parle de la Déclaration de Toulon, proclamée le 29 mars 2019, qui affirme la nécessité de reconnaître les autres animaux comme des personnes et non comme des choses !  Cette Déclaration appelle à changer profondément, et même à bouleverser les choses pour les autres animaux par rapport à la situation actuelle. Énoncer que les animaux sont des personnes et non des choses, c'est s'attaquer à un des aspects les plus importants de la domination sur les autres animaux : leur statut de propriété, qui rend littéralement leur corps appropriable.  Il était plus que temps d'avoir dans le podcast un épisode sur la question du droit, de ce qu'il permet mais surtout de ce qu'il empêche dans la défense des intérêts des animaux autres qu'humains.  Mon invitée, l'enseignante-chercheuse en droit des animaux Caroline Regad, et co-rédactrice de la Déclaration de Toulon, défend justement l'octroi de la personnalité juridique aux animaux. Un entretien pour mieux comprendre de quoi il retourne et les arguments qui plaident pour cette reconnaissance.  Hâte d'avoir vos retours ! Merci d'avance pour vos partages si l'épisode et/ou le podcast vous plaisent ! Et puis bisous bien sûr hein comme d'habitude ________________________________ Références et sources citées dans l'entretien :  - Déclaration de Toulon - Charte du droit du vivant - La loi Grammont - Être le bien d'un autre - Florence Burgat - La Summa Divisio - Chapitre de Cédric Riot dans La personnalité juridique de l'animal : les animaux liés à un fonds (Tome II) - Procès des animaux - Jurisprudence de la Terre - Programme Harmonie avec la nature de l'ONU - Déclaration de Cambridge - La guerre de Troie n'aura pas lieu - Jean Giraudoux - Projet Grands singes - Cecilia, premier chimpanzé au monde reconnue sujet de droits non humains et libérée par un tribunal grâce à un Habeas corpus - La semaine juridique ‘Rubrique d'anticipation juridique : la personnalité juridique des fleuves'  - Soft law ou 'droit mou' Recommandations de Caroline Regad : - Illustrations : le buisson de la vie à l'origine du droit du vivant et le schéma de l'évolution de la personnalité juridique de l'animal, telle que le proposent Caroline Regad et ses collègues - Vidéo : "La Charte du droit du vivant – Genèse d'un droit d'avenir"  diffusée lors du deuxième congrès international en droit des animaux qui s'est tenu en Argentine en novembre 2021: - Livre : L'Approche historique et anthropologique du droit des animaux écrit par Caroline Regad elle-même, intégrant les développements sur le droit du vivant et la jurisprudence de la Terre (et publié en partenariat avec le programme Harmony with Nature de l'ONU) ________________________________ SOUTENIR : https://linktr.ee/poissonpodcast Comme un poisson dans l'eau est un podcast indépendant et sans publicité : votre soutien est indispensable pour qu'il puisse continuer à exister. Merci d'avance ! Les comptes Instagram, Twitter, Facebook et Mastodon du podcast sont également à retrouver dans le link tree ! ________________________________ CRÉDITS Comme un poisson dans l'eau est un podcast indépendant créé et animé par Victor Duran-Le Peuch. Charte graphique : Ivan Ocaña Générique : Synthwave Vibe par Meydän Musique : The Travelling Symphony par Savfk

The last couple of weeks have been interesting. Politicians have called for the silencing of media personalities, such as AOC and Mitch McConnel. Networks have fired primary journalists and commentators, CNN's Don Lemon and Tucker Carlson. And much talk concerning Free Speech has been bantered. So what exactly is Free Speech? Introduction of Panel Tucker's J6 coverage 3:16-5:04 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Opy7MLGAPBk Tucker's Mulvaney Coverage 0:00-0:33 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr8OPmPE-j4 AOC's Response Full: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Mt4LW1TtmPc Dylan Mulvaney's Response Full https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzJcs1hmT_A First off, it is important to note the shifting definition from the founding of the United States through the present day. Webster's 1828 Definitions: FREE'DOM, noun 1. A state of exemption from the power or control of another; liberty; exemption from slavery, servitude or confinement. freedom is personal, civil, political, and religious. [See Liberty.] 2. Particular privileges; franchise; immunity; as the freedom of a city. 3. Power of enjoying franchises. 4. Exemption from fate, necessity, or any constraint in consequence of predetermination or otherwise; as the freedom of the will. 5. Any exemption from constraint or control. 6. Ease or facility of doing any thing. He speaks or acts with freedom 7. Frankness; boldness. He addressed his audience with freedom 8. License; improper familiarity; violation of the rules of decorum; with a plural. Beware of what are called innocent freedoms. SPEECH, noun 1. The faculty of uttering articulate sounds or words, as in human beings; the faculty of expressing thoughts by words or articulate sounds. speech was given to man by his Creator for the noblest purposes. 2. Language; words as expressing ideas. The acts of God to human ears cannot without process of speech be told. 3. A particular language, as distinct form others. Psalms 19:2. 4. That which is spoken; words uttered in connection and expressing thoughts. You smile at my speech 5. Talk; mention; common saying. The duke did of me demand, what was the speech among the londoners concerning the French journey. 6. Formal discourse in public; oration; harangue. The member has made his first speech in the legislature. 7. Any declaration of thoughts. I, with leave of speech implor'd, repli'd. 2023 Merriam-Webster's definitions are as follows: Free Speech: speech that is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution also : the right to such speech an unconstitutional restraint on free speech — Nat'l Law Jour. What changed? The former meaning was as bestowed by the Creator, the second is as bestowed by the State. That is indeed interesting. As the world has become less Godly, Jefferson's Bill of Rights has become more and more restricted. We see this inclination towards more laws in our Second and Fourth Amendments in the form of Gun Control and TSA's unlawful searches of citizens without Probable Cause. We have also seen this in modern times, but it is worth noting that the debate of how freedoms should be restricted or not has always been present. Noah Webster, author of the 1828 Webster's dictionary didn't believe that the Bill of Rights was prudent as it would allow for crimes to be committed under the color of “Rights”. He and Jefferson debated this publicly and even wrote letters back and forth on the topic. In Jefferson's Letter to Noah Webster in December of 1790, Jefferson stated: “It had become an universal and almost uncontroverted position in the several states, that the purposes of society do not require a surrender of all our rights to our ordinary governors: that there are certain portions of right not necessary to enable them to carry on an effective government, and which experience has nevertheless proved they will be constantly incroaching on, if submitted to them. That there are also certain fences which experience has proved peculiarly efficacious against wrong, and rarely obstructive of right, which yet the governing powers have ever shewn a disposition to weaken and remove. Of the first kind for instance is freedom of religion: of the second, trial by jury, Habeas corpus laws, free presses.” https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-18-02-0091 We can find the more modern sensibilities, in a perverse way, in Webster's reply: “That both policy and right require that the delegation should at all times possess the whole power of the state for the purpose of preventing all possible wrong and obtaining all possible good—That every right claimed by a citizen of a free government is liable to vary with circumstances; except what rest wholly on the moral law; that therefore every right, created by political law, should be always subject to be modified by the power that created it, viz. the will of the state, which is always the will of the delegation.—That in short, the election and organization of the body which is to express the will of the state, is the only power which the people and a convention can exercise, and the only power which an ordinary legislature can not. ”https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-18-02-0106Jefferson also wrote this to David Humpreys in a 1789 letter: "There are rights which it is useless to surrender to the government and which governments have yet always been found to invade. These are the rights of thinking and publishing our thoughts by speaking or writing; the right of free commerce; the right of personal freedom. There are instruments for administering the government so peculiarly trustworthy that we should never leave the legislature at liberty to change them. The new Constitution has secured these in the executive and legislative department, but not in the judiciary. It should have established trials by the people themselves, that is to say, by jury. There are instruments so dangerous to the rights of the nation and which place them so totally at the mercy of their governors that those governors, whether legislative or executive, should be restrained from keeping such instruments on foot but in well-defined cases. Such an instrument is a standing army." --Thomas Jefferson to David Humphreys, 1789. ME 7:323 Remember that both of these men were arguing from the Judeo-Christian Framework and had both agreed upon morality. The debate was concerning the long term good of the nation. Webster saw the need to enforce morality via the government. Jefferson, however, feared the tyranny that they had just escaped returning in the form of a hard theocracy, and wished to institute a government governed by Godly men, in a sort of soft Theocracy. We can see that the worst fears of both men have been realized. We can also see the playing out of this debate in the form of Supreme Court Decisions over the years. Not all speech is protected. In Roth vs the United States, Roth was charged with indecency for his “A Quarterly for the Fancy-Free” publication, a porno magazine subscription. The case was decided against Roth in that the material was harmful if in the hands of children. The dissenting opinion of Justice Earl Warren in the Roth vs United States case was interesting. His concern was “the broad language used here may eventually be applied to the arts and sciences and freedom of communication generally.” This was stated in spite of Justice Warren's assent that pornography was not constitutionally protected. So what then, is Freedom of Speech limited? If so, how and why? Let us look at another case. In Hess vs Indiana, Gregory Hess screamed in public that the protest would “take the *bleeping* streets later.” The Supreme Court overturned a call to violence charge in that there was no definite time laid out in Hess's call to violence. So what is the defining line? What is protected speech? In a legal sense, the simplest and most true to an originalist interpretation of the Bill of Rights is likely the following: “You have full personal autonomy, until you commit an offense against another individual and are found guilty of a crime under common law.” Now, as a Christian, we should understand this principle well. What our Founding Fathers in America created was a very similar legal system to the moral system that our Heavenly Father has instituted: You have the freedom to make moral decisions, but lack the freedom to decide the consequences for your sins. Actions, not thoughts, expressed or spoken are what warrant punishment. We need to hold that standard clearly for ourselves and for our nation so that we can be a witness and testimony to the world. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-18-02-0091 https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-18-02-0106 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39kc29lCQ94 https://languagemuseum.org/noah-webster-an-american-dictionary-for-an-american-english/ https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/thomas-jefferson

This week on Gin & Justice, Justine and Amanda talk with true criminal defense queen, Elizabeth Franklin-Best.  Elizabeth owns Elizabeth Franklin-Best, P.C., a boutique law firm that specializes in appellate criminal defense in both State and Federal, Habeas petitions, and various avenues of Post-Conviction Relief.  Ever wonder what the individuals on the Exoneration episodes go through to prove their innocence or become exonerated? She breaks down the process step by step.  She also discusses the Supreme Court decision in NYS Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, Compassionate Release Petitions and more.  To learn more about Elizabeth Franklin-Best, or contact her firm, visit:https://elizabethfranklinbest.com/To read more about Jade Janks story:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/jury-finds-jade-janks-guilty-of-murdering-stepdad-after-finding-nude-photos/ar-AA15zQ2qDon't forget to leave us a review and follow us on social media!https://www.ginandjusticepodcast.comhttps://www.facebook.com/GinAndJustice/IG: @ginandjusticepodcastTwitter: Gin_JusticePodTikTok: Gin_and_Justice

Garcia-Aranda v. Garland, No. 18-2281 (2d Cir. Nov. 21, 2022)asylum; CAT; family membership; under color of law; public official; corrupt police; Mara 18; Honduras Gonzalez Aquino v. Att'y Gen. U.S., No. 21-3317 (3d Cir. Nov. 22, 2022)regulatory violation; fundamental right; prejudice; harmless error; exhaustion (low bar); CAT; Dominican Republic Adongafac v. Garland, No. 21-1800 (8th Cir. Nov. 21, 2022)venue; asylum; past persecution; corroboration; objective evidence; opportunity to explain; Anglophone Cameroon Gonzalez-Rivas v. Garland, No. 21-3364 (8th Cir. Nov. 23, 2022)Patel; jurisdiction; Guerrero Lasprilla; hardship standard; best interests of the child; mixed question of law and fact Rodriguez Diaz v. Garland, et al., No. 20-16245 (9th Cir. Nov. 21, 2022)detention; due process; INA § 236(a); Jennings v. Rodriguez; history of immigration detention in the Ninth Circuit; burdens; Matthews Test; detention post final order of removal*Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Capital Good Fund"A social change organization that uses financial services to tackle poverty in America."Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your host!More episodes!Case notes!Top 15 immigration podcast in the U.S.!Featured in San Diego Voyager!DISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0Support the show

Elliot Jay O'Neill & BT Calloway are joined by Dando & Guy from Four Finger Discount to review;   S.3 E.20 “Colonel Homer” S.34 E.1 “Habeas Tortoise”   This is a Side Quest Studios Production Huge THANK YOU to our Heroes over at Patreon Grant Prusi // 16_oz_mouse // Philip Wolf // Timothy Burleson // Chris Tar // Azoko Loko // Freezer // Stephanie // David James Young // Paul Salt // Paul Goodman You too can become a Hero by supporting us on Patreon and you'll also unlock over 90 exclusive podcasts www.patreon.com/sidequeststudios    Pulp Fury Radio; our fiction anthology podcast. Season 1 available now at www.pulpfuryradio.com (or wherever you get your podcasts)   Bunk with web series tonight www.daveplusone.com    We reviewed Game of Thrones in reverse order on our podcast “Thrones Of Game” https://thronesofgame.podbean.com   Check out more of Four Finger Discount at their website https://www.fourfingerdiscount.com.au  All the links to our socials are here  Facebook  Twitter  Instagram

Affirmative action is making headlines as a Supreme Court blockbuster, but there's a closely watched financial reporting case and two others dealing with criminal matters on tap as well in the November sitting that actually kicks off on Halloween. Bloomberg Law Supreme Court reporters Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin bring listeners up to speed in this latest episode of Cases and Controversies. The two affirmative action challenges out of Harvard and the University of North Carolina are set for argument on Monday. The justices will follow up with argument in coming days on cases dealing with the Bank Secrecy Act and technical habeas issues. The episode will also breakdown what's been happening outside of the courtroom. This includes two emergency requests stemming from the 2020 presidential election, new comments from Justice Samuel Alito on last term's draft opinion leak, and the next Supreme Court postage stamp. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

After Homer humiliates himself in a town meeting, he looks for acceptance in an internet group hunting for a missing tortoise but finds something much more sinister. Download and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. anchor.fm/138simpsons Email us at 138simpsons@gmail.com Check out our store at teepublic.com/user/annoyedgruntboys Or just click our link in our bio! ***Next Episode: S34 E02 - One Angry Lisa*** #thesimpsons #simpsons #138simpsonspodcast #annoyedgruntboys #podcast #homersimpson #margesimpson #bartsimpson #lisasimpson #maggiesimpson #foxtv #simpsonspodcast #tvpodcast #tv #disney #disneyplus --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/138simpsons/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/138simpsons/support

Alan brings the case against his wife, Tawni. Tawni has accumulated a lot of plants in their apartment. She says that some of the plants need to have grow lights in order to thrive. But, Alan does not like the lights. He would rather have plants that don't need the lights. Who's right? Who's wrong?Thank you to Twitter User @IronyMaiden for naming this week's case! To suggest a title for a future episode, follow us on Twitter for naming opportunities: @JesseThorn & @Hodgman. Or keep track using the Twitter hashtag #JJHoCaseNames.

This week on Piece Meal, we read and discuss chapters 668-678 of Famously Ongoing Manga One Piece, wherein we go window shopping at the mass-murder store, speedrun Geneva Conventions violations, and are tired of the skies, King Kai...Your hosts this week are: Tyler, Dave,  Jayson, Matt, TheoCheck out Tyler's other shows, What the Folklore? and Destructo DiscourseEmail us at piecemealpodcast@gmail.com with any questions or comments, or follow us @MealPiece!

Join the CV crew  we recap and review She-Hulk episode 1! Spoiler: It's fun and the CGI is better than expected   https://linktr.ee/characterversepod Intro: Fearless First by Kevin MacLeod Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/3742-fearless-first License: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license Outro: The Descent by Kevin MacLeod Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/4490-the-descent License: https://filmmusic.io/standard-license Interlude: Marvel introduction sound

Down Scott's Movie Hole we go with a South African horror paired with fun stories and facts about exorcisms. In Web Droppings, a Utah non-cannibal county attorney sets the record straight and bees are fish now. Get Lost!

Escucha un nuevo episodio de Unlimited Spanish, tu material favorito para practicar tu español hablado y oído. También aprenderás sobre el estilo de vida y la cultura, el idioma, el vocabulario y cómo mejorar tu inglés de forma más efectiva. Transcripción: ¿Sabes lo que te digo? ¡Campus Diem! Creo que quieres decir Carpe Diem Ahhh… Eso, perdón… ¡Hola a todos! Soy Òscar, fundador de unlimitedspanish.com. Quiero ayudarte a hablar español fluidamente. ¡Hablar español es más fácil de lo que parece! Solo tienes que usar el material y técnicas adecuadas. Hoy, en este episodio… Nos vamos a poner intelectuales. Vamos a aprender algunos latinismos que se utilizan en el español. A continuación, una pequeña lección de punto de vista donde practicaremos el vocabulario visto en el episodio de hoy. Recuerda que puedes conseguir el texto del episodio en www.unlimitedspanish.com De acuerdo. Como decía, hoy vamos a hablar un poco de los latinismos en el español, pero… Primero de todo… ¿Qué es un latinismo? En esencia es una palabra o expresión que proviene del latín. El latín es una antigua lengua que se extendió por todo el imperio romano. Esta lengua es la base de las lenguas románicas como el español, portugués, italiano, catalán o francés. Algunas de estas expresiones son muy conocidas, pero otras son utilizadas sobre todo para impresionar o para intentar parecer más inteligente. No obstante, es cierto que muchas se utilizan en ámbitos técnicos, como por ejemplo en el campo jurídico. Mi idea para este episodio es presentarte algunas de las palabras o expresiones más conocidas que provienen del latín. Algunas están tan integradas en el español que pocos dirían que provienen del latín. Bien. Vamos a ver algunos ejemplos: Alumni Se refiere, como seguro que sabes, a los antiguos alumnos de una institución académica. Y continuando en el ámbito académico, tenemos: Campus Esta palabra literalmente quiere decir campo y se refiere a un terreno plano. Se utiliza mucho en el ámbito universitario para designar las zonas donde hay parques o jardines o simplemente espacio abierto. Currículum Seguro que sabes esta. La palabra currículum es ampliamente utilizada y es donde resumimos nuestra experiencia laboral y logros académicos. Normalmente enviamos currículums a las empresas para encontrar trabajo. Algunas personas utilizan un exceso de creatividad parar escribir su currículum. Es decir, exageran en lo que escriben, pero eso es otra historia

Each month, a panel of constitutional experts convenes to discuss the Court's upcoming docket sitting by sitting. The cases that will be covered are included below. United States v. Washington (April 18) – workers' compensation; state and federal lawSiegel v. Fitzgerald (April 18) – Bankruptcy Judgeship Act; Bankruptcy Clause of the U.S. Constitution George v. McDonough (April 19) – veterans' claims and Department of Veterans Affairs agency interpretationKemp v. United States (April 19) – Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1)Vega v. Tekoh (April 20) – Habeas motions under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and relief for Miranda violationsKennedy v. Bremerton (April 25) – the Speech and Establishment Clauses of the First AmendmentNance v. Ward (April 25) – method of execution and 42 U.S.C. 1983 habeas motionsBiden v. Texas (April 26) – remain in Mexico immigration policyShoop v. Twyford (April 26) – the All Writs Act and habeas petitionsOklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (April 27) – Indian Law Featuring:-- Noel J. Francisco, Partner-in-Charge Washington, Jones Day-- Allyson Newton Ho, Partner and Co-Chair, Constitutional and Appellate Law Practice Group, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP-- Aaron M. Streett, Chairman, Supreme Court and Constitutional Law Practice, Baker Botts LLP -- Misha Tseytlin, Partner, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP-- Moderator: Elbert Lin, Partner, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

We focus in on two Latin words this week: habeas and mandamus. Both usually mean "you lose." But things somehow turned out differently in the Fourth Circuit and Fifth Circuit. Hear the story of a man trapped in prison for a small drug sale for almost a decade who fights his way through the state and federal courts and wins himself a new trial. IJ's Bob Belden tells that tale. And then there's a story about guns, the Internet, speech, the differences between Texas and New Jersey, and transfer orders. Alexa Gervasi gets us up to speed on that saga. She also previews a new IJ case about a prosecutor working for a judge he practiced before. It's as bad as it sounds. Wilson v. Midland County (IJ's prosecutor case), https://ij.org/case/midland-prosecutor/ Witherspoon v. Stonebreaker, https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/197276.P.pdf Defense Distributed v. Bruck, http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-50327-CV0.pdf Bob Belden, https://ij.org/staff/bob-belden/ Alexa Gervasi, https://ij.org/staff/alexa-gervasi/ Anthony Sanders, https://ij.org/staff/asanders/

Ep. 100 thank yous, and TPS update!Said v. U.S. Att'y Gen., No. 21-12917 (11th Cir. Mar. 24, 2022)possession of marijuana in violation of Fla. Stat. § 893.13(6)(a); Matter of Guaderrama; realistic probability test; relevant divisibility; modified categorical approach; Ramos; Moncrieffe Tazu v. Att'y Gen. U.S., et al., 975 F.3d 292 (3d Cir. 2020)waivers; jurisdiction; habeas; INA § 242(g); INA § 242(b)(9); detention; challenging execution of removal order Julmice v. Garland, No. 21-1177 (4th Cir. Mar. 23, 2022)INA § 237(a)(1)(H) waiver; deceased qualifying relative; statutory interpretation; Chevron deference; present tense; Matter of Federiso*Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewLearn about your host!More episodes!Case notes!Top 15 immigration podcast in the U.S.!DISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/immigrationreview)

Federico Leoni"Henri Bergson"Feltrinelli Editorehttps://www.feltrinellieditore.it/Bergson è un antico. Pensa la natura, non l'umano. Crede che il pensiero sia una cosa, disposta nell'universo, non una funzione del cervello o la prestazione di un soggetto. Poi, il pensatore più francese d'Europa è forse cinese. Osserva eventi impersonali, rileva equilibri momentanei. Pensa senza fondamento, pensa per superfici sottilissime, aliene a qualsiasi illusione di significato. Infine è il veggente che ha parlato con un secolo di anticipo del nostro mondo. La tentazione del negativo, della denuncia, della nostalgia gli è stata radicalmente estranea. Bergson pensa che tutto sia immagine, ma non pensa che sia sembianza, illusione, manipolazione. Pensa piuttosto che tutto sia immagine e cioè costellazione di doppi, moltiplicazione di eventi, disseminazione di occasioni. Pensa che tutto sia natura, materialità, concatenamento, ma non pensa che tutto sia inerte, che ci siano solo spazi inumani, meccanismi senza invenzione. Pensa che le nostre società vadano verso forme di frammentazione sempre più spinta e di coordinamento sempre più impersonale, ma non pensa che questo significhi nichilismo, annientamento etico, globalizzazione tecnocratica. Pensa piuttosto che un nuovo mondo senza soggetti apra a un nuovo tempo comune. Un tempo in cui urge mettere in campo una serie di nuovi gesti politici. Non decidere ma regolare, non rivoluzionare orizzonti ma riarticolare piani d'immanenza, non oltrepassare situazioni ma riconfigurare concatenamenti. Bergson il greco, il cinese, il contemporaneo ci attende all'orizzonte, dove noi siamo già senza esserci ancora.Bergson è il più necessario, il più contemporaneo dei maestri del Novecento. Poi è anche il più lontano, il più antico, il più enigmatico. Guarda le cose con lo sguardo impersonale di un greco.Federico Leoni insegna Antropologia filosofica all'Università di Verona. Scrive su varie riviste, tra cui “aut aut”, “doppiozero”, “il manifesto”. Ha pubblicato fra l'altro: Habeas corpus. Sei genealogie del corpo occidentale (2008), L'idiota e la lettera. Quattro saggi sul Flaubert di Sartre (2013), Jacques Lacan, una scienza di fantasmi (2019) e L'automa. Leibniz, Bergson (2019). Ha curato un numero di “aut aut” intitolato Sade, Masoch. Due etiche dell'immanenza (2019).IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

This week in news, Bobbin & Eric debrief the Legislative Short session, the failure of ODOC to protect women at Coffee Creek Correctional Facility from sexual abuse, and The Who-Cares-If-You're-Innocent-Project article that discusses federal judicial nominations/appointments and nominees who have backgrounds as public defenders or working on wrongful convictions...and, one political party is blaming an innocence attorney for the rise in crime rights! Bobbin and Eric re-introduce Post-Conviction Review and State Habeas Corpus, discussing what they are and how, in theory, they provide a check on state actors.=Juan Chavez was not able to join us this week, but we will hear from our Civil Rights Associate Director, Franz Bruggemeier next week to talk about teargas and the lack of accountability in the Portland police.Produced by Beatrix Li, OJRC Policy & Communications Associate

Welcome back, everybody! This week we cover Season 2 Episode 20 of the show that literally can't slow down for a second to find a rest stop to let the ids pee, Riverdale! Episode Highlights: Veronica gets courted by mob princes and tries(and fails) to start a LEGAL Casino, Betty tries to prove her dad is the Black Hood, Archie starts to like his dad again, Reg is Hirame's new Archie, Jughead tries to save Fangs from being wrongly prosecuted for Midge's death...and Cheryl gets a visit from The Black Hood! If you liked this episode please leave us a review wherever you listen! Follow us on Twitter to stay updated on episodes and other shenanigans, and email us if you want a missive from Jim's dead grandma. And As Always, Be Kind and Don't Fuck By A Fred. Our Email! arrtipod@gmail.com Our Twitter! www.twitter.com/RiverdaleRuns

In this episode, Jason explains a few of the "terms of art" that are used in the Constitution in Article I, Section 9: Writ of Habeas Corpus, Bill of Attainder, & ex post facto laws. These terms are all authorities that are specifically denied to Congress with extremely limited exceptions. Tune in to find out why these are part of what Jason calls the Bill of Rights 1.0.

Kathleen Sabo speaks with General Counsel Adrianne Turner and Appellate Defender Kim Chavez Cook from the Law Offices of the Public Defender, and Staff Attorney Lalita Moskowitz of the ACLU of NM about the ethics of keeping people in prisons and jails during the pandemic, and legal and other actions taking place in an effort to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in those institutions and their surrounding communities. Resources: http://nmethicswatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/COVID-Sign-on-Letter_City-of-Santa-Fe.docx.pdf http://nmethicswatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Sup-Ct-Petition-Writ-Appendix-FILED.pdf http://nmethicswatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/SC-38252-Ltr-Supp-Auth-with-attachments.pdf http://nmethicswatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/NMDAA-Response-final.pdf http://nmethicswatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/NMCD-Verified-Response.pdf http://nmethicswatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/NMAG-Response-to-Emergency-Petition-for-Emergency-Mandamus-and-or-Habeas....pdf http://nmethicswatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Motion-for-reply-Reply-Appx-E-2.pdf Action Item: https://action.aclu.org/send-message/tell-governor-lujan-grisham-immediately-reduce-overcrowding-jails-and-prisons-protect Newspaper articles: http://nmindepth.com/2020/05/05/lujan-grisham-administration-says-it-will-conduct-wide-scale-covid-19-testing-in-nm-prisons/ https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/coronavirus/union-corrections-department-refuses-to-share-covid-19-plans/article_1706143c-907f-11ea-82d4-8fb723de96c0.html --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/ethics-now/message

Em uma "solução intermediária", ministro Gilmar Mendes propôs conceder liberdade provisória a Lula até habeas corpus sobre suspeição do ex-juiz Sérgio Moro fosse julgado. Por 3 a 2, Segunda Turma manteve o ex-presidente preso. Ato de Mendes foi meramente político? Analisamos numa conversa com o professor de Direito da Faap, Luis Fernando Amaral. Confira ainda nesta edição tudo o que cerca a proposta que endurece a lei de abuso de autoridade. Senado deve votá-la ainda hoje. O que pensa o meio jurídico? Ela representa um revide da classe política à operação Lava Jato?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.