Podcasts about legal analysis

  • 215PODCASTS
  • 538EPISODES
  • 45mAVG DURATION
  • 5WEEKLY NEW EPISODES
  • Aug 2, 2025LATEST

POPULARITY

20172018201920202021202220232024


Best podcasts about legal analysis

Latest podcast episodes about legal analysis

Bitcoin Magazine
Trump's Crypto-Dollarization Gameplan | Bitcoin Policy Hour Ep. 14

Bitcoin Magazine

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 2, 2025 61:47


In this episode of the Bitcoin Policy Hour, hosts Zack Cohen, Zack Shapiro, and Matt Pines unpack the most revealing U.S. government crypto report to date — and how it quietly lays the groundwork for a Bitcoin-aligned, post-CBDC dollar strategy.With references to the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, a clear rejection of retail CBDCs, and surprising pro-Bitcoin signals embedded in White House language, the report reads less like bureaucratic filler — and more like a covert blueprint for crypto-dollarization.The group provides an outlook on strategic bitcoin accumulation by the US government as well as the latest on Tornado Cash, Samourai Wallet and implications for open source crypto development. Read the full Digital Assets Report: https://www.whitehouse.gov/crypto/⭐ ANNOUNCING the BPI Congressional Fellowship Program 2025 - applications now open!

The Richard Heydarian Podcast
"SUPREME COURT RULING ON SARA DUTERTE": A LEGAL ANALYSIS

The Richard Heydarian Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 28, 2025 58:41


A conversation with Atty Jesus Flacks .

Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum
CRU with Sheryl McCollum and Joshua Schiffer: 7.25.25 | Kohberger Sentencing & the Power of Victim Impact

Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 25, 2025 28:23 Transcription Available


This week marks a powerful shift on Crime Roundup as Emmy-winning CSI Sheryl “Mac” McCollum welcomes her new cohost: legal heavyweight and courtroom force Joshua Schiffer. In this episode, Sheryl and Joshua unpack the sentencing of Bryan Kohberger, the man behind one of the most gut-wrenching mass murders in recent memory. Through the lens of law, justice, and most of all, parenthood, they reflect on the strength of the victims' families, the purpose of the court system, and the brutal reality of maximum-security prison. They also examine the legal mechanics behind the plea deal that spared Kohberger the death penalty, the boldness of the Chapin family’s absence, and the lasting impact of survivor statements. With heart, grit, and powerful legal insight, Sheryl and Joshua hold nothing back in honoring the victims—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—and challenging listeners to choose light in the darkest of stories. Show Notes: (0:00) Welcome to the “Schiffa Zone” – Sheryl introduces new cohost Joshua Schiffer (1:00) Kohberger’s sentencing through the eyes of parents and legal pros (2:30) “Our system hasn’t worked better... We received justice that was fulsome and appropriate.” —Joshua on justice done right (4:00) Grief, guilt, and impact: survivor and family statements that shook the courtroom (12:30) A look inside maximum-security prison: no peace, no control (15:00) “The warden don’t run that place”—violence, silence, and punishment (18:00) Justice over vengeance: why the plea deal was the right call (23:45) Why the Chapin family’s absence may have been the most powerful message (24:15) Final reflections: the power of memory, and the choice to look up --- About the Hosts Joshua Schiffer is a veteran trial attorney and one of the Southeast’s most respected legal voices. He is a founding partner at ChancoSchiffer P.C., where he has litigated high-stakes criminal, civil rights, and personal injury cases for over two decades. Known for his bold courtroom presence and ability to clearly explain complex legal issues, Schiffer is a frequent media contributor and fearless advocate for accountability. Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnLine, Forensic and Crime Scene Expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and a CSI for a metro Atlanta Police Department. She is the co-author of the textbook Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. If you enjoyed this episode, follow Crime Roundup on your favorite podcast platform and leave a review to help others find the show. Have a case you’d like Sheryl and Joshua to cover? Email coldcase2004@gmail.com, or connect with the hosts on social media: Sheryl on X at @ColdCaseTips or Facebook at @sheryl.mccollum Joshua on X at and Instagram at @lawyerschiffSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Dershow
Should Kohberger have been spared execution? My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 23, 2025 28:26


The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz  Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz   Thanks for watching!   ==============   MORE places to tune in ➡︎Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... ➡︎Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc...      / alandersh   ▶️ Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/Dershow

The Brian Lehrer Show
Legal News Roundup: The DOJ and Emil Bove

The Brian Lehrer Show

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 18, 2025 43:19


Elie Honig, senior legal analyst at CNN, New York Magazine columnist, former state and federal prosecutor and author of Untouchable: How Powerful People Get Away With it (Harper, 2023) offers legal analysis of how the DOJ is functioning during President Trump's second term, plus the latest news on Trump's controversial nomination of Emil Bove to the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals and more.

The Tudor Dixon Podcast
The Tudor Dixon Podcast: The Inside Scoop on Jeffrey Epstein with Alan Dershowitz

The Tudor Dixon Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 18, 2025 27:07 Transcription Available


In this episode, Tudor interviews attorney Alan Dershowitz, who discusses the complexities surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case, the legal implications of redacted names, and the importance of transparency in the justice system. Dershowitz emphasizes the need for a thorough investigation into accusations, the role of Ghislaine Maxwell, and the impact of conspiracy theories on public perception. The Tudor Dixon Podcast is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network. For more visit TudorDixonPodcast.com Watch The Tudor Dixon Podcast on RumbleSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Dershow
An insider view of Epstein conspiracy theories: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 14, 2025 30:30


The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz  Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz Please support our sponsor Goldco IRA.  Go to http://alanlikesgold.com to see their free gold kit. #Goldco partners  Thanks for watching!   ==============   MORE places to tune in ➡︎Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... ➡︎Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc...   =============   Follow me HERE: 

WBEN Extras
WBEN's Tom Puckett gets legal analysis on the Max Hairston civil lawsuit

WBEN Extras

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 3, 2025 0:59


WBEN's Tom Puckett gets legal analysis on the Max Hairston civil lawsuit full 59 Thu, 03 Jul 2025 08:12:00 +0000 VdnAyUKdsUfnMRkrvumsYsyGDidRhcWq news & politics,news WBEN Extras news & politics,news WBEN's Tom Puckett gets legal analysis on the Max Hairston civil lawsuit Archive of various reports and news events 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. News & Politics News False https://player.amper

The Dershow
ENDEDReplay is being prepared As I predicted Combs found not guilty, on major charges. My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 2, 2025 31:47


SUPPORT MY WORK: Our new sponsor is Goldco. Please click on the link in the description below:  https://alanlIikesgold.com    SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

Bachelor Rush Hour With Dave Neal
7-1-25 Afternoon Rush - A Chat With Omar Serrato About Laura Owens Trial & Blake Lively v Justin Baldoni Trial!

Bachelor Rush Hour With Dave Neal

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 1, 2025 31:40


The Richard Heydarian Podcast
“SARA IMPEACHMENT TRIAL”: A LEGAL ANALYSIS.

The Richard Heydarian Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 24, 2025 52:33


A conversation with Atty Dino De Leon and Atty Star Ellamparo.

The Dershow
Trump acted lawfully and properly: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 23, 2025 31:33


SUPPORT MY WORK: Our new sponsor is Goldco. Please click on the link in the description below:  https://alanlIikesgold.com    SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
SCOTUS upholds restrictions on transgender surgery and medication: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 18, 2025 32:57


SUPPORT MY WORK: Our new sponsor is Goldco please click on link in the description bellow to see their free gold kit: https://alanlIikesgold.com    SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

Brian Lehrer: A Daily Politics Podcast
Legal Analysis SCOTUS OKs States Blocking Care For Trans Kids

Brian Lehrer: A Daily Politics Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 18, 2025 22:11


This morning,  the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on gender affirming care for transgender children.On Today's Show:Kate Shaw, professor at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, co-host of the Supreme Court podcast Strict Scrutiny and a contributing opinion writer with the New York Times, discusses the latest news coming out of the Supreme Court, including the latest decision to uphold Tennessee's ban on gender affirming care for transgender children, the legal battle over the Trump administration's deployment of the National Guard in California — currently headed to a federal appeals court — and President Donald Trump's use of "the shadow docket," which has made it so SCOTUS often votes in his favor.

The Dershow
Trump V. Newsom who will win: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 9, 2025 30:54


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum
CRU with Nancy Grace: 6.6.25 | Is Diddy Controlling the Courtroom?

Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 6, 2025 38:55 Transcription Available


Today Nancy Grace and Sheryl McCollum break down the jaw-dropping courtroom antics in Diddy's case—think nodding at jurors and asking sketch artists to "soften" his look. Is he playing the jury or just playing himself? The ladies dive deep into RICO charges, witness intimidation, and public perception, all while pulling back the curtain on what really goes down behind the scenes. Plus, get the latest scoop on the Bryan Kohberger trial and what his defense might be cooking up. Sharp, smart, and just the right amount of savage. Show Notes: (0:00) Welcome! Nancy and Sheryl introduce this week’s crime roundup (0:30) Nancy Grace opens with the potential NON conviction of Diddy (1:00) Subliminal messaging in court rooms (2:30) Court room tactics and jury manipulation (7:00) RICO patterns - evidence piles up (12:00) Public relations vs. legal reality (14:30) “His whole life is like a movie he’s filming in his head” (16:30) What Happened to Ellen?: An American Miscarriage of Justice (18:00) The stretch artist controversy (20:00) The Kohberger case - a new wave of witnesses (30:00) DNA strategies and doubts (31:30) Framing theories (33:00) The need for concrete arguments in trial (37:00) Wrap up --- Nancy Grace is an outspoken, tireless advocate for victims’ rights and one of television's most respected legal analysts. Nancy Grace had a perfect conviction record during her decade as a prosecutor. She is the founder and publisher of CrimeOnline.com, a crime- fighting digital platform that investigates breaking crime news, spreads awareness of missing people and shines a light on cold cases. In addition, Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, a daily show hosted by Grace, airs on SIRIUS XM’s Triumph Channel 111 and is downloadable as a podcast on all audio platforms - https://www.crimeonline.com/ Connect with Nancy: X: @nancygrace Instagram: @thenancygrace Facebook: @nancygrace Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnLine, Forensic and Crime Scene Expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and a CSI for a metro Atlanta Police Department. She is the co-author of the textbook., Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. Connect with Sheryl: Email: coldcase2004@gmail.com X: @ColdCaseTips Facebook: @sheryl.mccollumSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Constitutionalist
#62 - The Mayflower Compact

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 6, 2025 43:48


On the sixty-second episode of the Constitutionalist, Ben, Shane, and Matthew discuss the Mayflower Compact, and its implications for American political life as one of the nation's earliest constitutional compacts. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast co-hosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives heritage nonprofits political science liberal abraham lincoln civil rights impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren ideology constitutional thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin electoral college mitch mcconnell baylor university supreme court justice american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul marco rubio polarization chuck schumer alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar civic engagement dianne feinstein rule of law john kennedy civil liberties senate judiciary committee mike lee josh hawley claremont polarized supreme court decisions ron johnson constitutional law house of representatives paul revere ideological george clinton constitutional rights department of education federalism james smith aaron burr rick scott chris murphy tom cotton robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez political philosophy john witherspoon senate hearings constitutional convention constitutional amendments fourteenth john hancock susan collins john marshall patrick henry 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government aei samuel adams marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones social activism john jay tim kaine political discourse dick durbin jack miller colonial america political thought joni ernst political debate sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse mark warner john cornyn tammy duckworth abigail adams political commentary american experiment ed markey checks and balances grad student ron wyden american presidency originalism michael bennet john thune legal education constitutional studies electoral reform publius john hart department of homeland security political analysis bill cassidy legal analysis separation of powers national constitution center richard blumenthal department of labor chris coons legal history department of energy thom tillis american founding tammy baldwin constitutionalism chris van hollen james lankford tina smith civic education summer institute department of transportation stephen hopkins richard burr war powers rob portman constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king john morton department of agriculture jon tester mazie hirono mayflower compact judicial review pat toomey mike braun john dickinson social ethics jeff merkley plymouth colony benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters landmark cases deliberative democracy debbie stabenow historical analysis american constitution society department of veterans affairs george taylor civic responsibility civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington founding principles political education constitutional government charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander temperance movement ben cardin antebellum america kevin cramer department of state mike rounds george ross cindy hyde smith revolutionary america apush department of commerce state sovereignty brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe gouverneur morris constitutional change founding era roger sherman early american republic contemporary politics martin heinrich maggie hassan jeanne shaheen constitutional advocacy john barrasso pat roberts roger wicker william williams american political thought william floyd elbridge gerry george wythe jacky rosen mercy otis warren constitutional accountability center living constitution civic learning department of the interior tom carper richard henry lee constitutional affairs legal philosophy mayflower pilgrims alcohol prohibition samuel chase constitutional conventions american political development richard stockton mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional conservatism constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History
Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case? -WEEK IN REVIEW

Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 1, 2025 11:16


Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case? -WEEK IN REVIEW

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 1, 2025 11:11


Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe
Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case? -WEEK IN REVIEW

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 1, 2025 11:16


Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Constitutionalist
#61 - Bureaucracy and the Constitution w/ Joseph Natali

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later May 30, 2025 83:19


On the sixty-first episode, Shane and Ben are joined by Joseph Natali, a Ph.D. student at Baylor University dissertating on the constitutionalism of bureaucracy and how Presidents succeed or fail in exercising control over the executive branch. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew K. Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives heritage nonprofits presidents political science liberal abraham lincoln civil rights impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren ideology constitutional thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin electoral college mitch mcconnell baylor university supreme court justice american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul marco rubio polarization chuck schumer alexander hamilton cory booker james madison bureaucracy lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar civic engagement dianne feinstein rule of law john kennedy civil liberties senate judiciary committee mike lee josh hawley claremont polarized supreme court decisions ron johnson constitutional law house of representatives paul revere ideological george clinton constitutional rights department of education federalism james smith aaron burr rick scott chris murphy tom cotton robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy senate hearings constitutional convention constitutional amendments fourteenth john hancock natali susan collins john marshall patrick henry 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government aei samuel adams marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones social activism john jay tim kaine political discourse dick durbin jack miller political thought joni ernst political debate david perdue sherrod brown ben sasse mark warner john cornyn tammy duckworth abigail adams political commentary american experiment ed markey checks and balances grad student ron wyden american presidency originalism michael bennet john thune legal education constitutional studies electoral reform publius john hart department of homeland security political analysis bill cassidy legal analysis separation of powers richard blumenthal national constitution center department of labor chris coons legal history department of energy thom tillis american founding tammy baldwin constitutionalism chris van hollen james lankford tina smith civic education summer institute department of transportation stephen hopkins richard burr war powers rob portman constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king john morton department of agriculture jon tester mazie hirono judicial review pat toomey mike braun john dickinson social ethics jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters landmark cases deliberative democracy debbie stabenow historical analysis american constitution society george taylor department of veterans affairs civic responsibility civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington founding principles political education constitutional government charles carroll lamar alexander cory gardner temperance movement ben cardin antebellum america kevin cramer department of state mike rounds george ross cindy hyde smith revolutionary america department of commerce apush state sovereignty brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe gouverneur morris constitutional change founding era roger sherman early american republic contemporary politics martin heinrich jeanne shaheen maggie hassan constitutional advocacy john barrasso pat roberts roger wicker william williams american political thought william floyd elbridge gerry george wythe jacky rosen mercy otis warren constitutional accountability center civic learning living constitution department of the interior tom carper richard henry lee constitutional affairs legal philosophy constitutional conventions alcohol prohibition samuel chase american political development richard stockton mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional conservatism constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Dershow
Can Trump block foreign student visas: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later May 28, 2025 31:36


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History
Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case?

Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History

Play Episode Listen Later May 28, 2025 11:11


Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case? Karen Read is on trial for second-degree murder—but what if the case is less about what she allegedly did, and more about what she didn't do? In this edition of Hidden Killers, Eric Faddis, former prosecutor and legal analyst, explores the idea that inaction—not direct intent—could be central to the case. With Dr. Wolf testifying that John O'Keefe did not die immediately after his injuries, and with no evidence that Karen Read ever attempted to render aid, the legal question becomes chillingly simple: if she left him there, did that constitute a fatal decision? Tony and Eric dig into the duty to render aid, legal definitions of “depraved indifference,” and how a failure to act—especially when time could've saved a life—can cross the line into criminal liability. This isn't just about science. It's about responsibility. #KarenRead #LegalResponsibility #EricFaddis #FailureToAct #TrueCrimeAnalysis #HiddenKillers #JohnOKeefe #DutyToRenderAid #TimelineEvidence #CriminalNegligence Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case?

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later May 28, 2025 11:11


Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case? Karen Read is on trial for second-degree murder—but what if the case is less about what she allegedly did, and more about what she didn't do? In this edition of Hidden Killers, Eric Faddis, former prosecutor and legal analyst, explores the idea that inaction—not direct intent—could be central to the case. With Dr. Wolf testifying that John O'Keefe did not die immediately after his injuries, and with no evidence that Karen Read ever attempted to render aid, the legal question becomes chillingly simple: if she left him there, did that constitute a fatal decision? Tony and Eric dig into the duty to render aid, legal definitions of “depraved indifference,” and how a failure to act—especially when time could've saved a life—can cross the line into criminal liability. This isn't just about science. It's about responsibility. #KarenRead #LegalResponsibility #EricFaddis #FailureToAct #TrueCrimeAnalysis #HiddenKillers #JohnOKeefe #DutyToRenderAid #TimelineEvidence #CriminalNegligence Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe
Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case?

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

Play Episode Listen Later May 28, 2025 11:11


Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case? Karen Read is on trial for second-degree murder—but what if the case is less about what she allegedly did, and more about what she didn't do? In this edition of Hidden Killers, Eric Faddis, former prosecutor and legal analyst, explores the idea that inaction—not direct intent—could be central to the case. With Dr. Wolf testifying that John O'Keefe did not die immediately after his injuries, and with no evidence that Karen Read ever attempted to render aid, the legal question becomes chillingly simple: if she left him there, did that constitute a fatal decision? Tony and Eric dig into the duty to render aid, legal definitions of “depraved indifference,” and how a failure to act—especially when time could've saved a life—can cross the line into criminal liability. This isn't just about science. It's about responsibility. #KarenRead #LegalResponsibility #EricFaddis #FailureToAct #TrueCrimeAnalysis #HiddenKillers #JohnOKeefe #DutyToRenderAid #TimelineEvidence #CriminalNegligence Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Constitutionalist
#60 - Educating the Statesman with Shilo Brooks

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later May 24, 2025 59:57


On the sixtieth episode, Matthew and Ben are joined by Shilo Brooks, Executive Director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at Princeton University, to discuss his immensely popular course "The Art of Statesmanship and the Political Life." We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew K. Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power art house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden executive director elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives heritage nonprofits political science liberal abraham lincoln civil rights impeachment public policy amendment graduate educating baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs institutions elizabeth warren ideology constitutional thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin electoral college mitch mcconnell baylor university supreme court justice american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul marco rubio polarization chuck schumer alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar civic engagement dianne feinstein rule of law john kennedy civil liberties senate judiciary committee mike lee josh hawley claremont polarized supreme court decisions ron johnson constitutional law house of representatives paul revere ideological george clinton constitutional rights department of education federalism james smith aaron burr rick scott chris murphy tom cotton robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez political philosophy john witherspoon senate hearings constitutional convention constitutional amendments fourteenth john hancock statesman susan collins john marshall patrick henry 14th amendment benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government aei samuel adams marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones social activism john jay tim kaine political discourse dick durbin jack miller joni ernst political thought political debate shilo david perdue sherrod brown ben sasse mark warner john cornyn tammy duckworth political leadership abigail adams political commentary american experiment ed markey checks and balances grad student ron wyden american presidency originalism michael bennet john thune legal education constitutional studies electoral reform publius john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy political life legal analysis separation of powers richard blumenthal national constitution center department of labor chris coons legal history department of energy thom tillis american founding tammy baldwin constitutionalism chris van hollen liberal education tina smith james lankford civic education summer institute department of transportation stephen hopkins american ideals richard burr war powers rob portman constitutionalists bob casey statesmanship benjamin harrison angus king john morton department of agriculture jon tester james madison program mazie hirono judicial review pat toomey mike braun john dickinson social ethics jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters landmark cases debbie stabenow deliberative democracy historical analysis american constitution society george taylor department of veterans affairs civic responsibility civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington founding principles political education moral leadership constitutional government charles carroll lamar alexander cory gardner temperance movement ben cardin antebellum america kevin cramer department of state mike rounds george ross cindy hyde smith revolutionary america apush department of commerce state sovereignty brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe gouverneur morris constitutional change founding era roger sherman early american republic contemporary politics martin heinrich jeanne shaheen maggie hassan constitutional advocacy pat roberts john barrasso roger wicker william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen mercy otis warren constitutional accountability center living constitution civic learning department of the interior tom carper richard henry lee legal philosophy samuel chase american political development alcohol prohibition constitutional conventions richard stockton mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional conservatism constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
Passing Judgment
The Comey 8647 Controversy Explained

Passing Judgment

Play Episode Listen Later May 20, 2025 8:10


In this episode of Passing Judgment, we examine the legal controversy over James Comey's deleted “8647” social media post and the ensuing federal investigation. Host Jessica Levinson analyzes whether Comey's message amounted to an unlawful threat against former president Trump or was simply protected political speech. She guides listeners through the legal standards for incitement, fighting words, and true threats, concluding that the greater threat may be government efforts to silence political opponents. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss:James Comey's Social Media Post: Jessica Levinson introduces the controversy surrounding former FBI director James Comey, who is under federal investigation for a now-deleted social media post featuring shells arranged as "8647" on the beach. The crux of the issue is whether this was a coded call to "get rid of" (86) President Trump, who is both the 45th and 47th president, or simply a form of political commentary.The Legal Question: Free Speech vs. True Threats: Levinson dives into the central legal dilemma: Was Comey advocating violence, or exercising his First Amendment right to political speech? She explains the importance of distinguishing between punishable incitement or threats and protected political advocacy.Historical and Contextual Perspective: The episode puts this controversy in a broader context, mentioning similar uses of "86" by other politicians, notably Matt Gaetz, without triggering federal investigations. Levinson argues that context matters—whether the intent is referencing a metaphorical political ouster or a literal threat.Follow Our Host: @LevinsonJessica

The Constitutionalist
#59 - Tocqueville - The Omnipotence of the Majority

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later May 16, 2025 52:00


On the fifty-ninth episode of the Constitutionalist, Ben and Matthew discuss Volume 1, Part 2, Chapter 7 of Alexis De Tocqueville's "Democracy in America" on the omnipotence of the majority. They discuss Tocqueville's warnings of the detrimental effects of democracy on the citizen. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast co-hosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives heritage nonprofits political science liberal abraham lincoln civil rights impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs majority elizabeth warren ideology constitutional thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin electoral college mitch mcconnell baylor university supreme court justice american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul marco rubio polarization chuck schumer alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott amy klobuchar civic engagement dianne feinstein rule of law john kennedy civil liberties senate judiciary committee mike lee josh hawley claremont polarized supreme court decisions ron johnson constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton constitutional rights department of education federalism james smith aaron burr rick scott chris murphy omnipotence tom cotton robert morris alexis de tocqueville thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez political philosophy john witherspoon senate hearings constitutional convention constitutional amendments fourteenth john hancock susan collins john marshall patrick henry 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government aei samuel adams marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones social activism john jay tim kaine political discourse dick durbin jack miller political thought joni ernst political debate sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse mark warner john cornyn tammy duckworth abigail adams american experiment political commentary ed markey checks and balances grad student ron wyden originalism michael bennet john thune legal education constitutional studies electoral reform publius john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy political analysis legal analysis separation of powers national constitution center richard blumenthal department of labor chris coons legal history american founding thom tillis tammy baldwin constitutionalism chris van hollen tina smith james lankford civic education department of transportation summer institute stephen hopkins richard burr war powers rob portman constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king john morton department of agriculture jon tester mazie hirono judicial review pat toomey mike braun john dickinson social ethics jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters landmark cases deliberative democracy debbie stabenow historical analysis american constitution society department of veterans affairs george taylor civic responsibility civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington founding principles political education constitutional government charles carroll lamar alexander cory gardner temperance movement ben cardin antebellum america kevin cramer department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith revolutionary america apush department of commerce state sovereignty brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris founding era roger sherman early american republic contemporary politics martin heinrich jeanne shaheen maggie hassan constitutional advocacy pat roberts john barrasso roger wicker william williams american political thought william floyd elbridge gerry george wythe jacky rosen mercy otis warren constitutional accountability center civic learning department of the interior tom carper richard henry lee american political development samuel chase constitutional conventions alcohol prohibition richard stockton mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional conservatism constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
Stanford Legal
AI, Liability, and Hallucinations in a Changing Tech and Law Environment

Stanford Legal

Play Episode Listen Later May 15, 2025 39:31


Since ChatGPT came on the scene, numerous incidents have surfaced involving attorneys submitting court filings riddled with AI-generated hallucinations—plausible-sounding case citations that purport to support key legal propositions but are, in fact, entirely fictitious. As sanctions against attorneys mount, it seems clear there are a few kinks in the tech. Even AI tools designed specifically for lawyers can be prone to hallucinations. In this episode, we look at the potential and risks of AI-assisted tech in law and policy with two Stanford Law researchers at the forefront of this issue: RegLab Director Professor Daniel Ho and JD/PhD student and computer science researcher Mirac Suzgun. Together with several co-authors, they examine the emerging risks in two recent papers, “Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models” (Oxford Journal of Legal Analysis, 2024) and the forthcoming “Hallucination-Free?” in the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. Ho and Suzgun offer new insights into how legal AI is working, where it's failing, and what's at stake.Links:Daniel Ho  >>> Stanford Law pageStanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) >>> Stanford University pageRegulation, Evaluation, and Governance Lab (RegLab) >>> Stanford University pageConnect:Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast WebsiteStanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn PageRich Ford >>>  Twitter/XPam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School PageStanford Law School >>> Twitter/XStanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/X (00:00:00) Introduction to AI in Legal Education (00:05:01) AI Tools in Legal Research and Writing(00:12:01) Challenges of AI-Generated Content (00:20:0) Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback(00:30:01) Audience Q&A

The Constitutionalist
#58 - Montesquieu and the Founding with William B. Allen

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later May 9, 2025 58:24


On the fifty-eighth episode, Shane, Matthew, and Ben are joined by William B. Allen, Professor Emeritus of Political Philosophy at Michigan State University, to discuss Montesquieu's political philosophy and its influence on the American Founding and eighteenth-century British politics. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew K. Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american founders history president donald trump culture power house politics british phd colorado joe biden elections dc local congress political supreme court union bernie sanders federal kamala harris constitution conservatives heritage nonprofits michigan state university political science liberal abraham lincoln civil rights impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor founding george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz elizabeth warren ideology constitutional thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin professor emeritus electoral college mitch mcconnell baylor university supreme court justice american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul marco rubio polarization chuck schumer cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar civic engagement dianne feinstein rule of law civil liberties senate judiciary committee mike lee josh hawley claremont polarized supreme court decisions ron johnson house of representatives ideological george clinton department of education federalism james smith rick scott chris murphy tom cotton thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez political philosophy senate hearings constitutional convention constitutional amendments fourteenth john hancock susan collins john marshall patrick henry 14th amendment benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense aei samuel adams marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones montesquieu social activism john jay tim kaine political discourse dick durbin jack miller joni ernst political thought david perdue sherrod brown ben sasse mark warner john cornyn tammy duckworth abigail adams american experiment political commentary ed markey checks and balances grad student ron wyden american presidency originalism michael bennet john thune constitutional studies electoral reform publius john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy political analysis legal analysis separation of powers richard blumenthal department of labor chris coons legal history american founding thom tillis tammy baldwin chris van hollen james lankford tina smith summer institute department of transportation richard burr war powers rob portman constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king department of agriculture jon tester mazie hirono judicial review pat toomey mike braun social ethics jeff merkley patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters landmark cases deliberative democracy historical analysis department of veterans affairs civic responsibility civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington founding principles political education constitutional government lamar alexander cory gardner temperance movement ben cardin antebellum america kevin cramer department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith revolutionary america apush department of commerce state sovereignty brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe gouverneur morris constitutional change founding era roger sherman early american republic martin heinrich maggie hassan jeanne shaheen constitutional advocacy pat roberts john barrasso roger wicker william williams elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe william b allen constitutional accountability center civic learning living constitution department of the interior tom carper richard henry lee american political development samuel chase alcohol prohibition constitutional conventions richard stockton mike crapo government structure department of health and human services american governance constitutional conservatism constitutional rights foundation
SmartHERNews
QUICK HIT: The 100+ Year-Old Law At The Center Of Diddy's Case

SmartHERNews

Play Episode Listen Later May 7, 2025 8:40


The federal case against Sean Combs begins this week, and historic context matters. The Mann Act, of 1910, is central to the charges he faces. We cover the law's origins and its application in notable cases. Plus what to watch for next.  ~~~~ 00:00 Introduction to the Case Against Sean Combs 01:30 Understanding the Mann Act and Its Historical Context 02:51 The Application of the Mann Act in Notable Cases 06:10 Racial Dynamics and Legal Arguments in Combs's Case 08:33 Trial Expectations and Future Developments ~~~~ Love nonpartisan news? Want a bigger serving of the serious headlines?  Here's how you can become a SCOOP insider: https://www.scoop.smarthernews.com/get-the-inside-scoop/    Shop our gear!  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/smarthernews/  Website: https://smarthernews.com/  YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/smarthernews 

TechCrunch Startups – Spoken Edition
Supio, an AI-powered legal analysis platform, lands $60M

TechCrunch Startups – Spoken Edition

Play Episode Listen Later May 2, 2025 3:28


Supio, a startup that uses AI to automate data collection and analysis for legal teams, has raised $60 million in a funding round led by Sapphire Ventures with participation from Mayfield and Thomson Reuters Ventures. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Dershow
Trump's first hundred days: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 29, 2025 31:01


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

Crime Talk with Scott Reisch
The Kohberger Case: 911 Call, Autism, and Experts – Let's Talk About It!

Crime Talk with Scott Reisch

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 25, 2025 113:53


The Kohberger Case: 911 Call, Autism, and Experts – Let's Talk About It! #BryanKohberger, #TrueCrime, #KohbergerCase, #911Call, #ExpertWitness, #CourtroomDrama

The Constitutionalist
#57 - Tocqueville's Point of Departure

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 25, 2025 65:24


On the fifty-seventh episode of the Constitutionalist, Shane and Matthew discuss Volume 1, Chapter 2 of Alexis De Tocqueville's "Democracy in America." We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast co-hosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives heritage nonprofits political science liberal abraham lincoln civil rights impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz departure public affairs elizabeth warren ideology constitutional thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin electoral college mitch mcconnell baylor university supreme court justice american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul marco rubio polarization chuck schumer alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott american democracy amy klobuchar civic engagement dianne feinstein rule of law john kennedy civil liberties senate judiciary committee mike lee josh hawley claremont polarized supreme court decisions ron johnson constitutional law house of representatives paul revere ideological george clinton constitutional rights department of education federalism james smith aaron burr rick scott chris murphy tom cotton robert morris american exceptionalism alexis de tocqueville thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez political philosophy john witherspoon senate hearings constitutional convention constitutional amendments fourteenth john hancock susan collins john marshall patrick henry 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government aei samuel adams marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones social activism john jay tim kaine political discourse dick durbin jack miller joni ernst political thought political debate david perdue sherrod brown ben sasse mark warner john cornyn tammy duckworth abigail adams political commentary american experiment ed markey checks and balances grad student ron wyden originalism michael bennet john thune legal education constitutional studies electoral reform publius john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy legal analysis separation of powers richard blumenthal national constitution center department of labor chris coons legal history department of energy thom tillis american founding tammy baldwin constitutionalism chris van hollen james lankford tina smith civic education summer institute department of transportation stephen hopkins richard burr war powers rob portman constitutionalists bob casey democracy in america benjamin harrison angus king john morton department of agriculture mazie hirono jon tester judicial review pat toomey mike braun john dickinson social ethics jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters landmark cases deliberative democracy debbie stabenow historical analysis american constitution society george taylor department of veterans affairs civic responsibility civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington founding principles political education constitutional government charles carroll lamar alexander cory gardner temperance movement ben cardin antebellum america kevin cramer department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith revolutionary america department of commerce apush state sovereignty brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe gouverneur morris constitutional change founding era roger sherman early american republic martin heinrich jeanne shaheen maggie hassan constitutional advocacy pat roberts john barrasso roger wicker william williams american political thought william floyd elbridge gerry george wythe jacky rosen mercy otis warren constitutional accountability center living constitution civic learning department of the interior tom carper richard henry lee constitutional affairs legal philosophy civic culture alcohol prohibition samuel chase constitutional conventions american political development richard stockton mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance american political culture lyman hall constitutional conservatism constitutional rights foundation
The Dershow
Trump versus Harvard: Trump wins! My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 23, 2025 31:35


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

Afternoon Drive with John Maytham
The DA Challenge to the VAT hike

Afternoon Drive with John Maytham

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 22, 2025 5:02


Dennis Davis joins John Maytham to unpack the DA and EFF’s court challenge to Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana’s VAT hike. Davis, a retired judge and constitutional law expert, explains why the case matters, what’s at stake in terms of parliamentary process, and how the outcome could shape future tax legislation.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Dershow
Can Trump defund and deny tax benefits to discriminating universities? My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 21, 2025 31:07


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Constitutionalist
#56 - Federalist 37

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 18, 2025 52:14


On the fifty-sixth episode of the Constitutionalist, Shane, Ben, and Matthew discuss Federalist 37, and Madison's teachings on political and epistemological limits. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast co-hosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives heritage nonprofits political science liberal civil rights impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren ideology constitutional thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin electoral college mitch mcconnell baylor university supreme court justice american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul marco rubio polarization chuck schumer alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar civic engagement dianne feinstein rule of law john kennedy civil liberties senate judiciary committee mike lee josh hawley claremont polarized supreme court decisions ron johnson constitutional law house of representatives paul revere ideological george clinton constitutional rights department of education federalism james smith aaron burr rick scott chris murphy tom cotton robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez political philosophy john witherspoon senate hearings constitutional convention constitutional amendments fourteenth john hancock susan collins john marshall patrick henry 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government aei samuel adams marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse dick durbin jack miller political thought joni ernst political debate sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse mark warner john cornyn tammy duckworth abigail adams american experiment political commentary ed markey checks and balances grad student ron wyden american presidency originalism michael bennet john thune legal education constitutional studies electoral reform publius john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy political analysis legal analysis separation of powers richard blumenthal national constitution center department of labor chris coons legal history department of energy american founding thom tillis tammy baldwin constitutionalism chris van hollen tina smith james lankford civic education department of transportation summer institute stephen hopkins richard burr war powers rob portman constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king john morton department of agriculture jon tester mazie hirono judicial review pat toomey mike braun john dickinson jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young gary peters jmc landmark cases deliberative democracy debbie stabenow historical analysis american constitution society department of veterans affairs george taylor civic responsibility civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington founding principles political education constitutional government charles carroll lamar alexander cory gardner ben cardin kevin cramer department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith revolutionary america apush department of commerce state sovereignty brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris founding era roger sherman early american republic contemporary politics martin heinrich jeanne shaheen maggie hassan constitutional advocacy pat roberts john barrasso roger wicker william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen mercy otis warren constitutional accountability center civic learning living constitution department of the interior tom carper richard henry lee constitutional affairs legal philosophy american political development samuel chase constitutional conventions richard stockton mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional conservatism constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Dershow
Can judge hold Trump in contempt for refusing to return deportees? My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 16, 2025 29:42


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
SCOTUS rules in favor of Trump's power-but not necessarily on how he uses it: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2025 30:38


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
Does Trump have the power to dismiss the criminal charges against mayor Adams? My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 2, 2025 31:11


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
Can Trump actually serve a third term? My legal analysis may surprise you.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 31, 2025 33:43


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
Are Trump's deportations and efforts to impeach judges lawful? My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 18, 2025 30:46


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
Are Biden auto signed documents invalid, as Trump alleges? My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 17, 2025 31:47


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Brian Lehrer Show
Legal Analysis of Mahmoud Khalil's Arrest

The Brian Lehrer Show

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 12, 2025 25:12


U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has detailed Mahmoud Khalil—a legal permanent resident with a green card and prominent student-activist-turned-negotiator in pro-Palestine demonstrations at Colombia University. Peter Markowitz, professor of law at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and the founding faculty member and co-director of the Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic, offers legal analysis of the detention.

Brian Lehrer: A Daily Politics Podcast
Legal Analysis of the Columbia Protester Deportation Case

Brian Lehrer: A Daily Politics Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 12, 2025 19:20


U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has detailed Mahmoud Khalil—a legal permanent resident with a green card and prominent student-activist-turned-negotiator in pro-Palestine demonstrations at Colombia University.On Today's Show:Peter Markowitz, professor of law at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and the founding faculty member and co-director of the Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic, offers legal analysis of the detention.

Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum
3.7.25 CRU with Nancy Grace: Tot Mom's Disturbing Move!

Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 7, 2025 29:48 Transcription Available


Today Nancy Grace and Sheryl McCollum dive straight into a controversial topic by discussing Casey Anthony's a.k.a “tot mom” recent claim of being a victim's advocate. Nancy Grace passionately recounts the details of three-year-old Caylee Anthony's murder and criticizes Casey Anthony’s post-trial actions. Secondly, Nancy gives updates on the Kohberger case, addressing legal objections, DNA evidence, and defense strategies. Nancy and Sheryl explain the implications of DNA found under Maddie Mogen’s fingernails and discuss the impact on the investigation. Show Notes: (0:00) Welcome! Nancy and Sheryl introduce this week’s crime roundup (0:10) Sherly opens up CRU with news regarding the latest on Casey Anthony (3:00) Latest move on Casey Anthony - money grab (7:20) “It ain’t slander if it’s true.” (9:00) Bryan Kohberger DNA analysis (12:00) Understanding DNA degradation in criminal cases (22:00) Kohbergers defense to try and exclude evidence and avoid death penalty (25:00) Closing thoughts --- Nancy Grace is an outspoken, tireless advocate for victims’ rights and one of television's most respected legal analysts. Nancy Grace had a perfect conviction record during her decade as a prosecutor. She is the founder and publisher of CrimeOnline.com, a crime- fighting digital platform that investigates breaking crime news, spreads awareness of missing people and shines a light on cold cases. In addition, Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, a daily show hosted by Grace, airs on SIRIUS XM’s Triumph Channel 111 and is downloadable as a podcast on all audio platforms - https://www.crimeonline.com/ Connect with Nancy: X: @nancygrace Instagram: @thenancygrace Facebook: @nancygrace Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnLine, Forensic and Crime Scene Expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and a CSI for a metro Atlanta Police Department. She is the co-author of the textbook., Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. Connect with Sheryl: Email: coldcase2004@gmail.com X: @ColdCaseTips Facebook: @sheryl.mccollumSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Dershow
Is SCOTUS blocking PODUS? My legal analysis of today's Supreme Court decision.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 5, 2025 32:08


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
Are Dems crying wolf about Trump causing constitutional crisis. My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 12, 2025 32:14


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz