Podcasts about legal analysis

  • 218PODCASTS
  • 552EPISODES
  • 45mAVG DURATION
  • 5WEEKLY NEW EPISODES
  • Oct 1, 2025LATEST

POPULARITY

20172018201920202021202220232024


Best podcasts about legal analysis

Latest podcast episodes about legal analysis

Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History
Yogurt Shop Murders Solved After 34 Years: Press Confession Reactions + Bob Motta's Legal Analysis

Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 1, 2025 115:52


Yogurt Shop Murders Solved After 34 Years: Press Confession Reactions + Bob Motta's Legal Analysis This is the episode that finally puts everything in perspective. In this special Hidden Killers Live breakdown, we take you inside the full Austin Police press conference announcing the long-awaited resolution of the Yogurt Shop Murders—a case that haunted Austin for 34 years. But we don't just play the tape. We unpack every revelation, contradiction, and implication in real time. And joining us for this explosive episode is defense attorney Bob Motta, host of Defense Diaries, to offer a no-BS legal breakdown from the defense side—a perspective the public rarely hears. Here's what we cover: The Y-STR DNA match that finally named Robert Eugene Brashers as the killer Why that match took decades—despite the evidence being in storage for years The false confessions that led to two innocent men being convicted—one of them sentenced to death How prosecutors ignored exculpatory DNA, clung to a collapsing narrative, and refused to back down Bob's analysis of the coercive tactics used in the interrogations, and why courts continue to let this happen The broader systemic problem: tunnel vision, evidence suppression, and a culture of “win the case” over “get it right” Why Brashers was never on the radar, despite a violent criminal record and ties to multiple sexual assaults What real accountability looks like—and what reforms might actually prevent this from happening again This is more than a reaction. It's a legal autopsy of one of the most high-profile failures in American cold case history. Watch as we connect the dots the justice system refused to for over three decades.

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Yogurt Shop Murders Solved After 34 Years: Press Confession Reactions + Bob Motta's Legal Analysis

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 1, 2025 115:52


Yogurt Shop Murders Solved After 34 Years: Press Confession Reactions + Bob Motta's Legal Analysis This is the episode that finally puts everything in perspective. In this special Hidden Killers Live breakdown, we take you inside the full Austin Police press conference announcing the long-awaited resolution of the Yogurt Shop Murders—a case that haunted Austin for 34 years. But we don't just play the tape. We unpack every revelation, contradiction, and implication in real time. And joining us for this explosive episode is defense attorney Bob Motta, host of Defense Diaries, to offer a no-BS legal breakdown from the defense side—a perspective the public rarely hears. Here's what we cover: The Y-STR DNA match that finally named Robert Eugene Brashers as the killer Why that match took decades—despite the evidence being in storage for years The false confessions that led to two innocent men being convicted—one of them sentenced to death How prosecutors ignored exculpatory DNA, clung to a collapsing narrative, and refused to back down Bob's analysis of the coercive tactics used in the interrogations, and why courts continue to let this happen The broader systemic problem: tunnel vision, evidence suppression, and a culture of “win the case” over “get it right” Why Brashers was never on the radar, despite a violent criminal record and ties to multiple sexual assaults What real accountability looks like—and what reforms might actually prevent this from happening again This is more than a reaction. It's a legal autopsy of one of the most high-profile failures in American cold case history. Watch as we connect the dots the justice system refused to for over three decades.

Passing Judgment
Legal Perspectives on Federal Action in Oregon: State vs. National Authority

Passing Judgment

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 1, 2025 8:27


In this episode of Passing Judgment, Jessica breaks down the Trump administration's move to federalize the National Guard in Oregon amid Portland protests. She explains Oregon's lawsuit against the federal government, outlining key arguments such as the improper use of federal authority, possible violations of the Posse Comitatus Act, and state sovereignty issues. Jessica evaluates each argument's strength, noting that courts usually defer to presidential discretion in these cases. The episode offers a clear overview of the unfolding legal battle and what's at stake for both state and federal powers.Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss:1. Federalization of the National Guard in OregonThe episode opens by discussing the Trump administration's decision to federalize the National Guard in Oregon—specifically Portland. This move was made over local objections and parallels previous situations, such as federal intervention during protests in Los Angeles.2. Oregon's Legal Arguments Against FederalizationThe majority of the episode breaks down the legal case Oregon is making in its suit against the federal government.3. Legal Analysis of Oregon's ChancesEach argument is weighed in terms of likely success. The host points out that courts have historically given substantial deference to presidential discretion in these national security and public order matters, making Oregon's position a difficult one.Follow Our Host: @LevinsonJessica

My Crazy Family | A Podcast of Crazy Family Stories
Yogurt Shop Murders Solved After 34 Years: Press Confession Reactions + Bob Motta's Legal Analysis

My Crazy Family | A Podcast of Crazy Family Stories

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 1, 2025 115:52


Yogurt Shop Murders Solved After 34 Years: Press Confession Reactions + Bob Motta's Legal Analysis This is the episode that finally puts everything in perspective. In this special Hidden Killers Live breakdown, we take you inside the full Austin Police press conference announcing the long-awaited resolution of the Yogurt Shop Murders—a case that haunted Austin for 34 years. But we don't just play the tape. We unpack every revelation, contradiction, and implication in real time. And joining us for this explosive episode is defense attorney Bob Motta, host of Defense Diaries, to offer a no-BS legal breakdown from the defense side—a perspective the public rarely hears. Here's what we cover: The Y-STR DNA match that finally named Robert Eugene Brashers as the killer Why that match took decades—despite the evidence being in storage for years The false confessions that led to two innocent men being convicted—one of them sentenced to death How prosecutors ignored exculpatory DNA, clung to a collapsing narrative, and refused to back down Bob's analysis of the coercive tactics used in the interrogations, and why courts continue to let this happen The broader systemic problem: tunnel vision, evidence suppression, and a culture of “win the case” over “get it right” Why Brashers was never on the radar, despite a violent criminal record and ties to multiple sexual assaults What real accountability looks like—and what reforms might actually prevent this from happening again This is more than a reaction. It's a legal autopsy of one of the most high-profile failures in American cold case history. Watch as we connect the dots the justice system refused to for over three decades.

Libertarian Podcast Review
Luigi and Tyler Legal Analysis (EP 265)

Libertarian Podcast Review

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 18, 2025 80:28


Luigi Mangione is facing charges in three different jurisdictions. One (New York) just dropped two charges. Tyler Robinson was arraigned and more details released. FIND US ON SUBSTACK Substack: tylerjanke.substack.comBecome a LPR member Odysee: https://odysee.com/@LPR:b?view=membershipSpotify: https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/libertypodreview/subscribeSupport the show with a purchase from Fox n Sons coffee. Use the promo code "Review" for 18% off an order of $25 or more. www.foxnsons.com LPR On Other Platforms Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-1988814Spotify: https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/libertypodreviewLocals: https://libertarianpodcastreview.locals/Odysee: https://odysee.com/@LPR:bSubstack: tylerjanke.substack.comThis show is an attempt to review the libertarian and libertarian adjacent podcasts or video podcasts. Send us your favorite podcasts or ones that you would like to have us critique.

The Ryan Gorman Show
Jury Selection Begins in Ryan Routh Trial with Legal Analysis from Royal Oakes

The Ryan Gorman Show

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 9, 2025 7:24


ABC News Legal Analyst Royal Oakes reports on the start of jury selection in the Ryan Routh trial,including the bizarre questions Routh wanted to ask jurors.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Ryan Gorman Show
Jury Selection Begins in Ryan Routh Trial with Legal Analysis from Royal Oakes

The Ryan Gorman Show

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 9, 2025 7:53


ABC News Legal Analyst Royal Oakes reports on the start of jury selection in the Ryan Routh trial,including the bizarre questions Routh wanted to ask jurors.

O'Connor & Company
Joe diGenova on DC Crime & More Legal Analysis

O'Connor & Company

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 25, 2025 16:26


WMAL GUEST: JOE DIGENOVA (Legal Analyst & Former U.S. Attorney, District of Columbia) on DC Crime, Bolton's Home Raided & Schiff's Mortgage Fraud Where to find more about WMAL's morning show: Follow Podcasts on Apple, Audible and Spotify Follow WMAL's "O'Connor and Company" on X: @WMALDC, @LarryOConnor, @JGunlock, @PatricePinkfile, and @HeatherHunterDC Facebook: WMALDC and Larry O'Connor Instagram: WMALDC Website: WMAL.com/OConnor-Company Episode: Monday, August 25, 2025 / 7 AM HourSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum
Crime Roundup with Sheryl McCollum and Joshua Schiffer | Gerry Spence's Legacy, A Prosecutor on the Stand, and the Melissa Wolfenbarger Case

Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 15, 2025 19:36 Transcription Available


This week on Crime Roundup, Sheryl McCollum and Joshua Schiffer celebrate the life of courtroom legend Gerry Spence, the man who never lost a civil case and built a law school on a Wyoming mountaintop. They also examine the downfall of a prosecutor whose time in the spotlight proved swagger is not a winning strategy. Finally, Sheryl shares an update on the Melissa Wolfenbarger case she has worked on for seven years, a mystery that began with human remains in a trash bag and one of the first cases featured on her Zone 7 podcast. Follow the full story in Melissa Wolfenbarger: Norma and Tina Patton | Part 1, the first in a multi-part Zone 7 series. Highlights: (0:00) Welcome to Crime Roundup with Sheryl McCollum and Joshua Schiffer (1:00) Gerry Spence remembered as the lawyer who never lost a civil case with stories that made him a legend (4:00) Behind the scenes of the Trial Lawyers College and why no classroom can match it (12:15) “He’s so proud of his story that it’s clear, it’s false”: A prosecutor takes the defense table, his strategy collapses, and the jury wastes no time (17:15) Melissa Wolfenbarger update and why Sheryl is staying quiet for now. Follow the full story in Melissa Wolfenbarger: Norma and Tina Patton | Part 1 About the Hosts Joshua Schiffer is a veteran trial attorney and one of the Southeast’s most respected legal voices. He is a founding partner at ChancoSchiffer P.C., where he has litigated high-stakes criminal, civil rights, and personal injury cases for over two decades. Known for his bold courtroom presence and ability to clearly explain complex legal issues, Schiffer is a frequent media contributor and fearless advocate for accountability. Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award-winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnline, Forensic and Crime Scene Expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and a CSI for a metro Atlanta Police Department. She is the co-author of the textbook, Cold Case: Pathways to Justice and the founder of the Cold Case Investigative Research Institute, a national nonprofit that unites universities, law enforcement, and students to work on unsolved homicides and missing persons cases.

Bitcoin Magazine
The UK's Orwellian Future: Bitcoin as the Escape Hatch w/ Freddie New | Bitcoin Politics Ep. 5

Bitcoin Magazine

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 14, 2025 53:07


The UK's Orwellian Future: Bitcoin as the Escape Hatch w/ Freddie New | Bitcoin Politics Ep. 5UK citizens are facing unprecedented restrictions under the new Online Safety Act — but what does this mean for privacy, Bitcoin, and the future of freedom tech? In this episode of Bitcoin Politics Weekly, host Frank Corva speaks with Freddy New, Chief Policy Officer & Co-Founder at Bitcoin Policy UK, about government overreach, hypocrisy in Parliament, and how individuals can defend their rights. They discuss privacy tools, Nostr, self-custody, and the importance of grassroots political action. Don't miss this deep dive into the intersection of Bitcoin and policy. Connect with Freddie New on X: https://x.com/freddienew Connect with Frank Corva on X: https://x.com/frankcorva Learn more about Bitcoin Policy UK: https://bitcoinpolicy.uk/ SIGN UP WITH DUELBITS TODAY FOR A CHANCE TO WIN UP TO 2 BTC  https://bm.b.tc/YT-Duelbits #adChapters:00:00 - Introduction and Context of the Online Safety Act02:17 - Overview and Critique of the Online Safety Act06:23 - Public Reaction and Hypocrisy Around VPN Usage08:08 - Impact on Bitcoin and Freedom Technologies like Noster09:52 - Challenges of Protocols and Front-End Interfaces10:53 - Privacy Advocacy and Practical Steps to Improve Privacy15:01 - Bitcoin as Digital Cash and Engaging Policymakers on Privacy16:15 - Legal Analysis of the Roman Storm and Samurai Cases20:03 - Further Legal Details and Prosecutorial Conduct21:29 - Frustration with Legal and Political Environment22:56 - Strategies and Philosophical Foundations for Privacy Advocacy25:25 - Individual Privacy Actions and Societal Contributions26:26 - Civics Lessons and the Need for Courage in Privacy Tech Adoption28:38 - Risks of Data Collection and the Rise of Privacy Awareness30:48 - Government Overreach and the Creation of Privacy Advocates32:00 - Challenges in Educating UK Policymakers and Public on Bitcoin34:12 - Bitcoin's Role in PayTech and Alternative Payment Systems34:50 - Political Landscape and Bitcoin Support in the UK37:00 - Mobilizing Bitcoin Supporters for Political Influence39:28 - Tools and Tactics for Grassroots Political Engagement40:56 - Building Alliances Between Bitcoin and Crypto Communities42:19 - Risk Profiles and Distinctions Between Bitcoin and Other Crypto Assets43:52 - Regulatory Perspectives on Meme Coins and Investment Risks46:33 - Humor and Realism in Crypto Investment Culture47:03 - Everyday Privacy Actions and Becoming a Bitcoiner51:04 - Emotional and Educational Aspects of Bitcoin Ownership52:29 - Closing Remarks and Contact Information#Bitcoin #Privacy #UKPolitics #OnlineSafetyAct #FreeSpeech #FinancialFreedom #Nostr #SelfCustody #BitcoinPolicy #UKLaw #FreedomTech #VPN #InternetCensorship #BitcoinAdvocacy #Cypherpunk #BitcoinUK #BitcoinMagazine #BitcoinPolitics #DigitalRights #UKBitcoin #BitcoinFreedom #BitcoinPrivacyX (formerly Twitter)Freddie New (@freddienew) on X| Head of Policy, @bitcoinpolicyuk |#npub1wl39ydk5rpecvtrzhq67afl9ykn2ty2xdxdkfmyan0rss3f3ma5sndznlxX (formerly Twitter)Frank Corva (@frankcorva) on XWhite House and political correspondent at @bitcoinmagazine | Contributor at @forbescrypto | Advisor at @heatbit | Founder at @newrencapbitcoinpolicy.ukBitcoin Policy UKWe champion good policies that will benefit all those in the UK who hold, use and mine Bitcoin

The Kevin Sheehan Show
HR1: Kevin's notes from Commanders vs Patriots, Neil from Rockville gives legal analysis on Jon Gruden's case vs NFL

The Kevin Sheehan Show

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 12, 2025 50:13


8.12.25 Hour 1, Kevin Sheehan is back and opens up the show recapping the Commanders' first preseason game while also getting the message across to not panic over preseason. Kevin Sheeha asks callers what their panic level is after the first preseason game results. Caller Neil from Rockville joins the Kevin Sheehan Show to give his legal analysis on Jon Gruden winning his case against the NFL.

The Dershow
Both sides are weaponizing the legal system: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 6, 2025 31:53


The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz  Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz   Thanks for watching!   ==============   MORE places to tune in ➡︎Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... ➡︎Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc...      / alandersh   ▶️ Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/Dershow

Bitcoin Magazine
Trump's Crypto-Dollarization Gameplan | Bitcoin Policy Hour Ep. 14

Bitcoin Magazine

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 2, 2025 61:47


In this episode of the Bitcoin Policy Hour, hosts Zack Cohen, Zack Shapiro, and Matt Pines unpack the most revealing U.S. government crypto report to date — and how it quietly lays the groundwork for a Bitcoin-aligned, post-CBDC dollar strategy.With references to the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, a clear rejection of retail CBDCs, and surprising pro-Bitcoin signals embedded in White House language, the report reads less like bureaucratic filler — and more like a covert blueprint for crypto-dollarization.The group provides an outlook on strategic bitcoin accumulation by the US government as well as the latest on Tornado Cash, Samourai Wallet and implications for open source crypto development. Read the full Digital Assets Report: https://www.whitehouse.gov/crypto/⭐ ANNOUNCING the BPI Congressional Fellowship Program 2025 - applications now open!

Summarily - A Podcast for Busy Lawyers
Smokey's in denial, Shannon's on Fire, & Tyler Perry just wants to help | Zone of Risk Episode 2

Summarily - A Podcast for Busy Lawyers

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 1, 2025 62:48


In this episode of Zone of Risk, trial attorneys Joni Mosely and Spencer Charif unpack celebrity legal drama like no other.From Smokey Robinson's ‘bad girls' defense, and Tyler Perry's helpful questioning.They break down the lawsuits, the shady legal strategies, and the pure media chaos surrounding public figures who think the courtroom is just another stage (thanks OJ).Chapters:00:19 – You are entering the Zone of Risk10:11 – The MAN Act, Federal Strategy & How Cases Get Moved  20:29 – Coerced Performances, Lawsuits Against Spouses & Civil Liability Explained  31:01 – Workplace Power Dynamics: When the Boss Crosses a Line  41:02 – Shannon Sharpe's Mouth, Legal Fallout, and Control Fails  52:08 – Crying in Court & Public Reputation Damage  62:24 – Final Thoughts: Bring Your Big Boy Pants

The Richard Heydarian Podcast
"SUPREME COURT RULING ON SARA DUTERTE": A LEGAL ANALYSIS

The Richard Heydarian Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 28, 2025 58:41


A conversation with Atty Jesus Flacks .

Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum
CRU with Sheryl McCollum and Joshua Schiffer: 7.25.25 | Kohberger Sentencing & the Power of Victim Impact

Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 25, 2025 28:23 Transcription Available


This week marks a powerful shift on Crime Roundup as Emmy-winning CSI Sheryl “Mac” McCollum welcomes her new cohost: legal heavyweight and courtroom force Joshua Schiffer. In this episode, Sheryl and Joshua unpack the sentencing of Bryan Kohberger, the man behind one of the most gut-wrenching mass murders in recent memory. Through the lens of law, justice, and most of all, parenthood, they reflect on the strength of the victims' families, the purpose of the court system, and the brutal reality of maximum-security prison. They also examine the legal mechanics behind the plea deal that spared Kohberger the death penalty, the boldness of the Chapin family’s absence, and the lasting impact of survivor statements. With heart, grit, and powerful legal insight, Sheryl and Joshua hold nothing back in honoring the victims—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—and challenging listeners to choose light in the darkest of stories. Show Notes: (0:00) Welcome to the “Schiffa Zone” – Sheryl introduces new cohost Joshua Schiffer (1:00) Kohberger’s sentencing through the eyes of parents and legal pros (2:30) “Our system hasn’t worked better... We received justice that was fulsome and appropriate.” —Joshua on justice done right (4:00) Grief, guilt, and impact: survivor and family statements that shook the courtroom (12:30) A look inside maximum-security prison: no peace, no control (15:00) “The warden don’t run that place”—violence, silence, and punishment (18:00) Justice over vengeance: why the plea deal was the right call (23:45) Why the Chapin family’s absence may have been the most powerful message (24:15) Final reflections: the power of memory, and the choice to look up --- About the Hosts Joshua Schiffer is a veteran trial attorney and one of the Southeast’s most respected legal voices. He is a founding partner at ChancoSchiffer P.C., where he has litigated high-stakes criminal, civil rights, and personal injury cases for over two decades. Known for his bold courtroom presence and ability to clearly explain complex legal issues, Schiffer is a frequent media contributor and fearless advocate for accountability. Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnLine, Forensic and Crime Scene Expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and a CSI for a metro Atlanta Police Department. She is the co-author of the textbook Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. If you enjoyed this episode, follow Crime Roundup on your favorite podcast platform and leave a review to help others find the show. Have a case you’d like Sheryl and Joshua to cover? Email coldcase2004@gmail.com, or connect with the hosts on social media: Sheryl on X at @ColdCaseTips or Facebook at @sheryl.mccollum Joshua on X at and Instagram at @lawyerschiffSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Dershow
Should Kohberger have been spared execution? My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 23, 2025 28:26


The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz  Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz   Thanks for watching!   ==============   MORE places to tune in ➡︎Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... ➡︎Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc...      / alandersh   ▶️ Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/Dershow

The Brian Lehrer Show
Legal News Roundup: The DOJ and Emil Bove

The Brian Lehrer Show

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 18, 2025 43:19


Elie Honig, senior legal analyst at CNN, New York Magazine columnist, former state and federal prosecutor and author of Untouchable: How Powerful People Get Away With it (Harper, 2023) offers legal analysis of how the DOJ is functioning during President Trump's second term, plus the latest news on Trump's controversial nomination of Emil Bove to the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals and more.

The Tudor Dixon Podcast
The Tudor Dixon Podcast: The Inside Scoop on Jeffrey Epstein with Alan Dershowitz

The Tudor Dixon Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 18, 2025 27:07 Transcription Available


In this episode, Tudor interviews attorney Alan Dershowitz, who discusses the complexities surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case, the legal implications of redacted names, and the importance of transparency in the justice system. Dershowitz emphasizes the need for a thorough investigation into accusations, the role of Ghislaine Maxwell, and the impact of conspiracy theories on public perception. The Tudor Dixon Podcast is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network. For more visit TudorDixonPodcast.com Watch The Tudor Dixon Podcast on RumbleSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Dershow
An insider view of Epstein conspiracy theories: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 14, 2025 30:30


The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz  Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz Please support our sponsor Goldco IRA.  Go to http://alanlikesgold.com to see their free gold kit. #Goldco partners  Thanks for watching!   ==============   MORE places to tune in ➡︎Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... ➡︎Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc...   =============   Follow me HERE: 

WBEN Extras
WBEN's Tom Puckett gets legal analysis on the Max Hairston civil lawsuit

WBEN Extras

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 3, 2025 0:59


WBEN's Tom Puckett gets legal analysis on the Max Hairston civil lawsuit full 59 Thu, 03 Jul 2025 08:12:00 +0000 VdnAyUKdsUfnMRkrvumsYsyGDidRhcWq news & politics,news WBEN Extras news & politics,news WBEN's Tom Puckett gets legal analysis on the Max Hairston civil lawsuit Archive of various reports and news events 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. News & Politics News False https://player.amper

The Dershow
ENDEDReplay is being prepared As I predicted Combs found not guilty, on major charges. My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 2, 2025 31:47


SUPPORT MY WORK: Our new sponsor is Goldco. Please click on the link in the description below:  https://alanlIikesgold.com    SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

Bachelor Rush Hour With Dave Neal
7-1-25 Afternoon Rush - A Chat With Omar Serrato About Laura Owens Trial & Blake Lively v Justin Baldoni Trial!

Bachelor Rush Hour With Dave Neal

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 1, 2025 31:40


The Richard Heydarian Podcast
“SARA IMPEACHMENT TRIAL”: A LEGAL ANALYSIS.

The Richard Heydarian Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 24, 2025 52:33


A conversation with Atty Dino De Leon and Atty Star Ellamparo.

The Dershow
Trump acted lawfully and properly: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 23, 2025 31:33


SUPPORT MY WORK: Our new sponsor is Goldco. Please click on the link in the description below:  https://alanlIikesgold.com    SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
SCOTUS upholds restrictions on transgender surgery and medication: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 18, 2025 32:57


SUPPORT MY WORK: Our new sponsor is Goldco please click on link in the description bellow to see their free gold kit: https://alanlIikesgold.com    SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

Brian Lehrer: A Daily Politics Podcast
Legal Analysis SCOTUS OKs States Blocking Care For Trans Kids

Brian Lehrer: A Daily Politics Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 18, 2025 22:11


This morning,  the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on gender affirming care for transgender children.On Today's Show:Kate Shaw, professor at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, co-host of the Supreme Court podcast Strict Scrutiny and a contributing opinion writer with the New York Times, discusses the latest news coming out of the Supreme Court, including the latest decision to uphold Tennessee's ban on gender affirming care for transgender children, the legal battle over the Trump administration's deployment of the National Guard in California — currently headed to a federal appeals court — and President Donald Trump's use of "the shadow docket," which has made it so SCOTUS often votes in his favor.

The Dershow
Trump V. Newsom who will win: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 9, 2025 30:54


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum
CRU with Nancy Grace: 6.6.25 | Is Diddy Controlling the Courtroom?

Zone 7 with Sheryl McCollum

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 6, 2025 38:55 Transcription Available


Today Nancy Grace and Sheryl McCollum break down the jaw-dropping courtroom antics in Diddy's case—think nodding at jurors and asking sketch artists to "soften" his look. Is he playing the jury or just playing himself? The ladies dive deep into RICO charges, witness intimidation, and public perception, all while pulling back the curtain on what really goes down behind the scenes. Plus, get the latest scoop on the Bryan Kohberger trial and what his defense might be cooking up. Sharp, smart, and just the right amount of savage. Show Notes: (0:00) Welcome! Nancy and Sheryl introduce this week’s crime roundup (0:30) Nancy Grace opens with the potential NON conviction of Diddy (1:00) Subliminal messaging in court rooms (2:30) Court room tactics and jury manipulation (7:00) RICO patterns - evidence piles up (12:00) Public relations vs. legal reality (14:30) “His whole life is like a movie he’s filming in his head” (16:30) What Happened to Ellen?: An American Miscarriage of Justice (18:00) The stretch artist controversy (20:00) The Kohberger case - a new wave of witnesses (30:00) DNA strategies and doubts (31:30) Framing theories (33:00) The need for concrete arguments in trial (37:00) Wrap up --- Nancy Grace is an outspoken, tireless advocate for victims’ rights and one of television's most respected legal analysts. Nancy Grace had a perfect conviction record during her decade as a prosecutor. She is the founder and publisher of CrimeOnline.com, a crime- fighting digital platform that investigates breaking crime news, spreads awareness of missing people and shines a light on cold cases. In addition, Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, a daily show hosted by Grace, airs on SIRIUS XM’s Triumph Channel 111 and is downloadable as a podcast on all audio platforms - https://www.crimeonline.com/ Connect with Nancy: X: @nancygrace Instagram: @thenancygrace Facebook: @nancygrace Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnLine, Forensic and Crime Scene Expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and a CSI for a metro Atlanta Police Department. She is the co-author of the textbook., Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. Connect with Sheryl: Email: coldcase2004@gmail.com X: @ColdCaseTips Facebook: @sheryl.mccollumSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Constitutionalist
#62 - The Mayflower Compact

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 6, 2025 43:48


On the sixty-second episode of the Constitutionalist, Ben, Shane, and Matthew discuss the Mayflower Compact, and its implications for American political life as one of the nation's earliest constitutional compacts. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast co-hosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives heritage nonprofits political science liberal abraham lincoln civil rights impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren ideology constitutional thomas jefferson founding fathers benjamin franklin mitt romney electoral college mitch mcconnell baylor university supreme court justice american politics joe manchin john adams marco rubio rand paul polarization chuck schumer alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar civic engagement rule of law dianne feinstein john kennedy civil liberties senate judiciary committee josh hawley mike lee claremont polarized supreme court decisions ron johnson constitutional law paul revere ideological house of representatives george clinton constitutional rights department of education federalism james smith aaron burr chris murphy rick scott tom cotton robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory senate hearings john witherspoon bob menendez political philosophy constitutional convention constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins john marshall patrick henry 14th amendment benedict arnold political history department of defense chuck grassley american government aei marsha blackburn tim kaine samuel adams john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones social activism john jay political discourse dick durbin joni ernst jack miller colonial america political thought political debate john cornyn sherrod brown mark warner david perdue tammy duckworth ben sasse political commentary abigail adams american experiment checks and balances ed markey ron wyden grad student american presidency john thune originalism michael bennet legal education constitutional studies publius electoral reform john hart political analysis department of homeland security bill cassidy legal analysis national constitution center separation of powers richard blumenthal chris coons department of labor legal history constitutionalism department of energy american founding thom tillis civic education tammy baldwin chris van hollen tina smith james lankford department of transportation summer institute stephen hopkins richard burr war powers rob portman constitutionalists bob casey angus king john morton benjamin harrison mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture mayflower compact judicial review pat toomey mike braun john dickinson social ethics jeff merkley benjamin rush plymouth colony patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters landmark cases debbie stabenow deliberative democracy historical analysis civic responsibility american constitution society demagoguery civic leadership department of veterans affairs george taylor founding principles samuel huntington political education constitutional government charles carroll cory gardner temperance movement lamar alexander ben cardin antebellum america kevin cramer department of state mike rounds george ross state sovereignty cindy hyde smith revolutionary america department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe gouverneur morris constitutional change founding era roger sherman jeanne shaheen early american republic maggie hassan contemporary politics martin heinrich constitutional advocacy john barrasso roger wicker pat roberts william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen mercy otis warren constitutional accountability center living constitution civic learning constitutional affairs department of the interior tom carper richard henry lee constitutional conventions legal philosophy mayflower pilgrims alcohol prohibition samuel chase american political development richard stockton mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional conservatism constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History
Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case? -WEEK IN REVIEW

Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 1, 2025 11:16


Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case? -WEEK IN REVIEW

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 1, 2025 11:11


Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories that made the news.       This is not your average news recap. With the sharp investigative lens of Tony and his guests, the show uncovers layers beneath the headlines, offering a comprehensive perspective that traditional news can often miss. From high-profile criminal trials to in-depth examinations of ongoing investigations, this podcast takes listeners on a fascinating journey through the world of true crime and current events.       Each episode navigates through multiple stories, illuminating their details with factual reporting, expert commentary, and engaging conversation. Tony and his guests discuss each case's nuances, complexities, and human elements, delivering a multi-dimensional understanding to their audience.  Whether you are a dedicated follower of true crime, or an everyday listener interested in the stories shaping our world, the "Week in Review" brings you the perfect balance of intrigue, information, and intelligent conversation. Expect thoughtful analysis, informed opinions, and thought-provoking discussions beyond the 24-hour news cycle. Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Constitutionalist
#61 - Bureaucracy and the Constitution w/ Joseph Natali

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later May 30, 2025 83:19


On the sixty-first episode, Shane and Ben are joined by Joseph Natali, a Ph.D. student at Baylor University dissertating on the constitutionalism of bureaucracy and how Presidents succeed or fail in exercising control over the executive branch. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew K. Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives heritage nonprofits presidents liberal political science abraham lincoln civil rights impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren ideology constitutional thomas jefferson founding fathers benjamin franklin mitt romney electoral college mitch mcconnell baylor university supreme court justice american politics joe manchin john adams marco rubio rand paul polarization chuck schumer alexander hamilton cory booker james madison bureaucracy lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar civic engagement rule of law dianne feinstein john kennedy civil liberties senate judiciary committee josh hawley mike lee claremont polarized supreme court decisions ron johnson constitutional law paul revere ideological house of representatives george clinton constitutional rights department of education federalism james smith aaron burr chris murphy rick scott tom cotton robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory senate hearings john witherspoon bob menendez political philosophy constitutional convention constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth natali susan collins john marshall patrick henry 14th amendment benedict arnold political history department of defense chuck grassley american government aei marsha blackburn tim kaine samuel adams john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones social activism john jay political discourse dick durbin joni ernst jack miller political thought political debate john cornyn sherrod brown mark warner david perdue tammy duckworth ben sasse political commentary abigail adams american experiment checks and balances ed markey ron wyden grad student american presidency john thune originalism michael bennet legal education constitutional studies publius electoral reform john hart political analysis department of homeland security bill cassidy legal analysis national constitution center richard blumenthal separation of powers chris coons department of labor legal history constitutionalism department of energy american founding thom tillis civic education tammy baldwin chris van hollen tina smith james lankford department of transportation summer institute stephen hopkins richard burr war powers rob portman constitutionalists bob casey angus king john morton benjamin harrison mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture judicial review pat toomey mike braun john dickinson social ethics jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases deliberative democracy historical analysis civic responsibility american constitution society demagoguery civic leadership george taylor department of veterans affairs founding principles samuel huntington political education constitutional government charles carroll lamar alexander cory gardner temperance movement ben cardin antebellum america kevin cramer department of state mike rounds george ross state sovereignty cindy hyde smith revolutionary america department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe gouverneur morris constitutional change founding era roger sherman jeanne shaheen early american republic contemporary politics maggie hassan constitutional advocacy martin heinrich john barrasso roger wicker pat roberts william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen mercy otis warren constitutional accountability center civic learning living constitution constitutional affairs department of the interior tom carper richard henry lee constitutional conventions legal philosophy alcohol prohibition samuel chase american political development richard stockton mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional conservatism constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Dershow
Can Trump block foreign student visas: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later May 28, 2025 31:36


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History
Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case?

Dark Side of Wikipedia | True Crime & Dark History

Play Episode Listen Later May 28, 2025 11:11


Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case? Karen Read is on trial for second-degree murder—but what if the case is less about what she allegedly did, and more about what she didn't do? In this edition of Hidden Killers, Eric Faddis, former prosecutor and legal analyst, explores the idea that inaction—not direct intent—could be central to the case. With Dr. Wolf testifying that John O'Keefe did not die immediately after his injuries, and with no evidence that Karen Read ever attempted to render aid, the legal question becomes chillingly simple: if she left him there, did that constitute a fatal decision? Tony and Eric dig into the duty to render aid, legal definitions of “depraved indifference,” and how a failure to act—especially when time could've saved a life—can cross the line into criminal liability. This isn't just about science. It's about responsibility. #KarenRead #LegalResponsibility #EricFaddis #FailureToAct #TrueCrimeAnalysis #HiddenKillers #JohnOKeefe #DutyToRenderAid #TimelineEvidence #CriminalNegligence Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case?

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Play Episode Listen Later May 28, 2025 11:11


Legal Analysis: Could Inaction Be the Crime in the Karen Read Case? Karen Read is on trial for second-degree murder—but what if the case is less about what she allegedly did, and more about what she didn't do? In this edition of Hidden Killers, Eric Faddis, former prosecutor and legal analyst, explores the idea that inaction—not direct intent—could be central to the case. With Dr. Wolf testifying that John O'Keefe did not die immediately after his injuries, and with no evidence that Karen Read ever attempted to render aid, the legal question becomes chillingly simple: if she left him there, did that constitute a fatal decision? Tony and Eric dig into the duty to render aid, legal definitions of “depraved indifference,” and how a failure to act—especially when time could've saved a life—can cross the line into criminal liability. This isn't just about science. It's about responsibility. #KarenRead #LegalResponsibility #EricFaddis #FailureToAct #TrueCrimeAnalysis #HiddenKillers #JohnOKeefe #DutyToRenderAid #TimelineEvidence #CriminalNegligence Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

The Constitutionalist
#60 - Educating the Statesman with Shilo Brooks

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later May 24, 2025 59:57


On the sixtieth episode, Matthew and Ben are joined by Shilo Brooks, Executive Director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at Princeton University, to discuss his immensely popular course "The Art of Statesmanship and the Political Life." We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew K. Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power art house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden executive director elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives heritage nonprofits liberal political science abraham lincoln civil rights impeachment public policy amendment graduate educating baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs institutions elizabeth warren ideology constitutional thomas jefferson founding fathers benjamin franklin mitt romney electoral college mitch mcconnell baylor university supreme court justice american politics joe manchin john adams marco rubio rand paul polarization chuck schumer alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar civic engagement rule of law dianne feinstein john kennedy civil liberties senate judiciary committee josh hawley mike lee claremont polarized supreme court decisions ron johnson constitutional law paul revere ideological house of representatives george clinton constitutional rights department of education federalism james smith aaron burr chris murphy rick scott tom cotton robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory senate hearings john witherspoon bob menendez political philosophy constitutional convention constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth statesman susan collins john marshall patrick henry 14th amendment benedict arnold department of defense chuck grassley american government marsha blackburn aei tim kaine samuel adams john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones social activism john jay political discourse dick durbin joni ernst jack miller political thought political debate shilo john cornyn sherrod brown mark warner david perdue tammy duckworth political leadership ben sasse political commentary abigail adams american experiment checks and balances ed markey ron wyden grad student american presidency john thune originalism michael bennet legal education constitutional studies publius electoral reform john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy political life legal analysis national constitution center richard blumenthal separation of powers chris coons department of labor legal history constitutionalism department of energy american founding civic education thom tillis tammy baldwin chris van hollen tina smith james lankford liberal education department of transportation summer institute american ideals stephen hopkins richard burr war powers rob portman bob casey constitutionalists statesmanship angus king benjamin harrison john morton james madison program mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture judicial review pat toomey mike braun social ethics john dickinson jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters landmark cases debbie stabenow historical analysis deliberative democracy civic responsibility american constitution society demagoguery civic leadership george taylor department of veterans affairs founding principles samuel huntington moral leadership political education constitutional government charles carroll temperance movement lamar alexander cory gardner ben cardin antebellum america kevin cramer department of state mike rounds george ross state sovereignty cindy hyde smith revolutionary america department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe gouverneur morris constitutional change founding era roger sherman jeanne shaheen early american republic maggie hassan contemporary politics martin heinrich constitutional advocacy john barrasso pat roberts roger wicker william williams elbridge gerry american political thought george wythe william floyd jacky rosen mercy otis warren constitutional accountability center living constitution civic learning department of the interior tom carper richard henry lee constitutional conventions legal philosophy samuel chase american political development alcohol prohibition richard stockton mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional conservatism constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
Passing Judgment
The Comey 8647 Controversy Explained

Passing Judgment

Play Episode Listen Later May 20, 2025 8:10


In this episode of Passing Judgment, we examine the legal controversy over James Comey's deleted “8647” social media post and the ensuing federal investigation. Host Jessica Levinson analyzes whether Comey's message amounted to an unlawful threat against former president Trump or was simply protected political speech. She guides listeners through the legal standards for incitement, fighting words, and true threats, concluding that the greater threat may be government efforts to silence political opponents. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss:James Comey's Social Media Post: Jessica Levinson introduces the controversy surrounding former FBI director James Comey, who is under federal investigation for a now-deleted social media post featuring shells arranged as "8647" on the beach. The crux of the issue is whether this was a coded call to "get rid of" (86) President Trump, who is both the 45th and 47th president, or simply a form of political commentary.The Legal Question: Free Speech vs. True Threats: Levinson dives into the central legal dilemma: Was Comey advocating violence, or exercising his First Amendment right to political speech? She explains the importance of distinguishing between punishable incitement or threats and protected political advocacy.Historical and Contextual Perspective: The episode puts this controversy in a broader context, mentioning similar uses of "86" by other politicians, notably Matt Gaetz, without triggering federal investigations. Levinson argues that context matters—whether the intent is referencing a metaphorical political ouster or a literal threat.Follow Our Host: @LevinsonJessica

SmartHERNews
QUICK HIT: The 100+ Year-Old Law At The Center Of Diddy's Case

SmartHERNews

Play Episode Listen Later May 7, 2025 8:40


The federal case against Sean Combs begins this week, and historic context matters. The Mann Act, of 1910, is central to the charges he faces. We cover the law's origins and its application in notable cases. Plus what to watch for next.  ~~~~ 00:00 Introduction to the Case Against Sean Combs 01:30 Understanding the Mann Act and Its Historical Context 02:51 The Application of the Mann Act in Notable Cases 06:10 Racial Dynamics and Legal Arguments in Combs's Case 08:33 Trial Expectations and Future Developments ~~~~ Love nonpartisan news? Want a bigger serving of the serious headlines?  Here's how you can become a SCOOP insider: https://www.scoop.smarthernews.com/get-the-inside-scoop/    Shop our gear!  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/smarthernews/  Website: https://smarthernews.com/  YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/smarthernews 

The Dershow
Trump's first hundred days: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 29, 2025 31:01


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

Crime Talk with Scott Reisch
The Kohberger Case: 911 Call, Autism, and Experts – Let's Talk About It!

Crime Talk with Scott Reisch

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 25, 2025 113:53


The Kohberger Case: 911 Call, Autism, and Experts – Let's Talk About It! #BryanKohberger, #TrueCrime, #KohbergerCase, #911Call, #ExpertWitness, #CourtroomDrama

The Dershow
Trump versus Harvard: Trump wins! My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 23, 2025 31:35


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
Can Trump defund and deny tax benefits to discriminating universities? My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 21, 2025 31:07


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
Can judge hold Trump in contempt for refusing to return deportees? My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 16, 2025 29:42


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
SCOTUS rules in favor of Trump's power-but not necessarily on how he uses it: my legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2025 30:38


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
Does Trump have the power to dismiss the criminal charges against mayor Adams? My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 2, 2025 31:11


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
Can Trump actually serve a third term? My legal analysis may surprise you.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 31, 2025 33:43


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
Are Trump's deportations and efforts to impeach judges lawful? My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 18, 2025 30:46


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Dershow
Are Biden auto signed documents invalid, as Trump alleges? My legal analysis.

The Dershow

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 17, 2025 31:47


SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz

The Brian Lehrer Show
Legal Analysis of Mahmoud Khalil's Arrest

The Brian Lehrer Show

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 12, 2025 25:12


U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has detailed Mahmoud Khalil—a legal permanent resident with a green card and prominent student-activist-turned-negotiator in pro-Palestine demonstrations at Colombia University. Peter Markowitz, professor of law at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and the founding faculty member and co-director of the Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic, offers legal analysis of the detention.