Podcasts about greensboro winston salem

Josh Graham of WSJS radio in Greensboro/Winston-Salem looks at Bill Belichick's first high profile public appearances as UNC coach. Chuck and Heath discuss Texas's challenges against Ohio State. Jon Sauber of the Centre Daily Times previews Penn State's CFP semifinal game.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

When primary care providers recommend mental health treatment, patients can feel apprehensive and flustered. Health care providers are asked questions such as, “What is the difference between a psychologist and a psychiatrist?” Marla Moses and Dr. Sloan Manning discuss their approaches for when it is time to transition from primary care to psychiatry. Marla Moses, FNP, PMHNP owns a private practice, IN Moses Mental Health in Indianapolis, Indiana, which is focused on mental health across the lifespan. She has previously practiced at Riley Hospital for Children and Lafayette-Arnett Indiana University Hospital. Sloan Manning, MD serves as the Medical Director at Novant Health Urgent Care & Occupational Medicine in Greensboro/Winston-Salem, North Carolina. He also serves as an Adjunct Associate Professor at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine and as the Co-Director of the Mood Disorder Clinic at Moses Cone’s Family Medicine Residency Program, in Greensboro, North Carolina. His areas of clinical interest include integrated mental health systems and physician education in primary care psychiatry. Roland Larkin, PhD, NP, is a Medical Science Liaison for Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. Dr. Larkin received his PhD from Columbia University. Speakers are paid consultants of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. Roland Larkin, PhD, NP is a paid employee of Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. MRC2.CORP.X.04262 / MRC2.CORP.X.04263

In today´s episode of Agency Intelligence, host Jason Cass interviews Jack Wingate, Founder and President of ALLCHOICE Insurance in the Greensboro/Winston-Salem, North Carolina Area. Jack Wingate talks about getting started in the insurance industry, what branding really means to him, the importance of being ok with not having all the answers so that you can find them, and why you need to spend some time outside of your agency.   

Greg Willett is the Chief Economist for RealPage. He is the nations top apartment economist that bankers, general partners and investors listen to. Here are some of his thoughts: The U.S. apartment rents climbed 3.2 percent on an annual basis as of the first quarter of 2019. Annual rent growth has topped the 3 percent mark for six consecutive months, accelerating from a pace that had hovered around 2.7 percent in all of 2017 and in the initial nine months of 2018. Occupancy stood at 95.2 percent for the first quarter, edging up from 95.1 percent a year ago. However, since the cold weather months are a period of limited leasing activity, occupancy has slipped from its third quarter 2018 seasonal peak of 95.8 percent. Greg mentioned, “It’s encouraging for apartment investors to see rent growth holding up so well when the new supply volumes are aggressive, while brand new properties still moving through the lease-up process tend to be offering discounts, pricing power actually has improved a bit for luxury developments where the initial resident base is now in place. Properties at middle-tier to lower-end price points are maintaining their already-strong rent growth momentum.” Among the country’s large metros, local rent growth leaders are Phoenix and Las Vegas, each area posting annual price jumps around 8 percent. At the next tier of performance, rent growth reaches 5 percent or a little better in Atlanta, Greensboro/Winston-Salem, Memphis and Sacramento. Some small metros are experiencing even stronger rent boosts. Rents are up 15.2 percent in the West Texas Oil Patch markets of Midland and Odessa, while price increases of roughly 7 to 8 percent are occurring in Wilmington, N.C.; Tucson, Ariz.; and Gainesville, Fla. Houston’s performance is the weakest among big metros, with rents in the first quarter matching prices from a year ago. Slight rent cuts are occurring in three small markets: College Station, Texas; Fargo, N.D.; and Santa Rosa, Calif. Visit RealPage at: RealPage.com To receive our FREE page WHITE PAPER REPORT on the (updated) 2019 FUNDAMENTALS OF MULTIFAMILY FINANCING 101 and to learn more about upcoming educational events at Old Capital Speaker Series please visit us at OldCapitalPodcast.com Are you interested in learning more about how Multifamily Syndications work? Please visit www.spiadvisory.com to learn more about Michael Becker’s Real Estate Syndication business with SPI Advisory LLC.

When that 6am alarm clock goes off, do you struggle getting up? Sometimes you just want to say FUCK IT, I DON'T NEED THIS JOB, but in reality you really do. This episode I'm join by Rocky aka Prettydoperight discussing stress in the workplace and finding a place of peace and love for what makes you get up every morning without hesitation. Don't want to forget about Promote Friends Business: @Jessicaryanwalker or Jessicaryanwalker.com and Whitney Tyler on Facebook! Also, @fatbelly_mike for your next photoshoot in the Greensboro/Winston-Salem are! Please don't forget to download the Insecure season 3 soundtrack on Apple Music! It is BOMB! Hit up Kvngbak on instagram for beats!

This is a re-broadcast or episode 9. When Star Trek was cancelled in 1969, there was no reason to think that this little science fiction show would ever come back.  But the show's failures actually helped drive its new success in the 1970s. Co-hosts Bob Turner and Kelly Casto look at the syndication juggernaut that was Star Trek in the 1970s. Failure Led to Success Star Trek had not been profitable during its NBC run.  In fact, when it was cancelled, its production costs had pushed it to be over $4 million in the red.  That's over $30 million in today's dollars! The show was considered a dead property and Paramount desperately wanted to find a way to recoup some of those costs.  So the studio decided to move the show into syndication.  This was an interesting decision at the time because conventional wisdom stated that a show needed to have at least 100 episodes to be successful. But Paramount's need to make some kind of profit from Star Trek was great so they decided to move forward with just the 79 episodes.  The studio did not expect that the show would ever make a profit in syndication.  Execs just hoped they would be able to make some money to reduce the show's deficit. Syndication Syndication gave Star Trek a new lease on life.  Kaiser Broadcasting, the first TV station group to purchase the show, used it as counter programming, scheduling it against the evening news shows by their competition.  Soon other stations around the country picked up on this idea.  As a result, Star Trek was able to connect with a new audience of older children, teens and college students.  This group was not interested in watching the news, but was eager to see the adventures of the crew of the Enterprise! With the show being broadcast everyday, it became part of their daily lives and something they looked forward to seeing. Star Trek's Ratings Almost imediately, the show began to perform well. A March 1969 advertisement by Paramount touted Star Trek as, "A Space Breakthrough on the audience response barrier," saying it was being seen in over 65 countries. A similar ad sent in August stated some numbers from when Star Trek aired on NBC.  The the show was had a 30 share or higher, or another way to put it is that it brought in 30% of the audience watching TV.  The show averaged a 39.5 share for all the 61 markets where the show was being broadcast. In February 1970, Paramount ran another ad in Broadcast Magazine quoting the following performance numbers for Star Trek in syndication: WPIX in New York - up 96% WGN in Chicago - up 40% KCOP in Los Angeles - up 77% Minneapolis/St. Paul - up 44% Prividence, RI - up 30% over lead in Las Vegas - up 31% Greensboro/Winston Salem - adult viewers up 50% This ad wrapped with the following call-to-action: "For out-of-this world Star Trek numbers in your corner of the universe, call the Paramount television office nearest you." As the decade wore on, the show's popularity grew.  An article in 1976 stated that a Star Trek episode shown during the day on Chicago's WGN was getting 374,000 viewers for reruns of reruns! A Dead Show to "The 79 Jewels" As Star Trek gained steam in syndication, the opinion of the show by Paramount changed.  By the mid-1975, when Paramount was starting to look at bringing it back, execs at the studio were concerned that a new version of Trek might damage the interest in the original It was performing so well, that studio execs quietly referred to it as "The 79 Jewels" because of the millions it brought into the studio. It should be no surprise that the show performed well in the 1970s.  It was a decade of bad news: Vietnam, Watergate, gas lines, the energy crisis.  But in the background was Star Trek, reminding us all that there would be a brighter future ahead. Seeing its positive view at a time when there was so much negativity in the real world is a major reason why Star Trek exploded in the 1970s.   The success that Trek had in reruns and the money that Paramount made from it, ensured that the property would return.  The only question was when.

When Star Trek was cancelled in 1969, there was no reason to think that this little science fiction show would ever come back.  But the show's failures actually helped drive its new success in the 1970s. Co-hosts Bob Turner and Kelly Casto look at the syndication juggernaut that was Star Trek in the 1970s. Failure Led to Success Star Trek had not been profitable during its NBC run.  In fact, when it was cancelled, its production costs had pushed it to be over $4 million in the red.  That's over $30 million in today's dollars! The show was considered a dead property and Paramount desperately wanted to find a way to recoup some of those costs.  So the studio decided to move the show into syndication.  This was an interesting decision at the time because conventional wisdom stated that a show needed to have at least 100 episodes to be successful. But Paramount's need to make some kind of profit from Star Trek was great so they decided to move forward with just the 79 episodes.  The studio did not expect that the show would ever make a profit in syndication.  Execs just hoped they would be able to make some money to reduce the show's deficit. Syndication Syndication gave Star Trek a new lease on life.  Kaiser Broadcasting, the first TV station group to purchase the show, used it as counter programming, scheduling it against the evening news shows by their competition.  Soon other stations around the country picked up on this idea.  As a result, Star Trek was able to connect with a new audience of older children, teens and college students.  This group was not interested in watching the news, but was eager to see the adventures of the crew of the Enterprise! With the show being broadcast everyday, it became part of their daily lives and something they looked forward to seeing. Star Trek's Ratings Almost imediately, the show began to perform well. A March 1969 advertisement by Paramount touted Star Trek as, "A Space Breakthrough on the audience response barrier," saying it was being seen in over 65 countries. A similar ad sent in August stated some numbers from when Star Trek aired on NBC.  The the show was had a 30 share or higher, or another way to put it is that it brought in 30% of the audience watching TV.  The show averaged a 39.5 share for all the 61 markets where the show was being broadcast. In February 1970, Paramount ran another ad in Broadcast Magazine quoting the following performance numbers for Star Trek in syndication: WPIX in New York - up 96% WGN in Chicago - up 40% KCOP in Los Angeles - up 77% Minneapolis/St. Paul - up 44% Prividence, RI - up 30% over lead in Las Vegas - up 31% Greensboro/Winston Salem - adult viewers up 50% This ad wrapped with the following call-to-action: "For out-of-this world Star Trek numbers in your corner of the universe, call the Paramount television office nearest you." As the decade wore on, the show's popularity grew.  An article in 1976 stated that a Star Trek episode shown during the day on Chicago's WGN was getting 374,000 viewers for reruns of reruns! A Dead Show to "The 79 Jewels" As Star Trek gained steam in syndication, the opinion of the show by Paramount changed.  By the mid-1975, when Paramount was starting to look at bringing it back, execs at the studio were concerned that a new version of Trek might damage the interest in the original It was performing so well, that studio execs quietly referred to it as "The 79 Jewels" because of the millions it brought into the studio. It should be no surprise that the show performed well in the 1970s.  It was a decade of bad news: Vietnam, Watergate, gas lines, the energy crisis.  But in the background was Star Trek, reminding us all that there would be a brighter future ahead. Seeing its positive view at a time when there was so much negativity in the real world is a major reason why Star Trek exploded in the 1970s.   The success that Trek had in reruns and the money that Paramount made from it, ensured that the property would return.  The only question was when.