Podcasts about dimaya

  • 16PODCASTS
  • 23EPISODES
  • 41mAVG DURATION
  • ?INFREQUENT EPISODES
  • Nov 21, 2022LATEST

POPULARITY

20172018201920202021202220232024


Best podcasts about dimaya

Latest podcast episodes about dimaya

Immigration Review
Ep. 134 - Precedential Decisions from 11/14/2022 - 11/20/2022 (termination; good moral character; DUIs; timely filings; crime of violence; change in law; equitable tolling; due diligence; jurisdiction; CAT deferral; Iraqi Chaldean Christians)

Immigration Review

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 21, 2022 38:07


Matter of Coronado Acevedo, 28 I&N Dec. 648 (A.G. 2022)termination; Matter of S-O-G- & -F-D-B-; notice and comment rulemaking Llanas-Trejo v. Garland, No. 21-3770 (8th Cir. Nov. 16, 2022)non-LPR cancellation of removal; good moral character; multiple DUIs; Matter of Cartillo-Perez; presumption; hardship to non-qualifying relative; motion to reopen; Patel Santos-De Jimenez v. Garland, No. 21-1496 (4th Cir. Nov. 15, 2022)petition for review; INA § 242(b)(1); Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26(c); filing deadline Williams v. Garland, No. 20-1854 (4th Cir. Nov. 16, 2022)Virginia of assault and battery of a police officer, obstructing justice, disorderly conduct, failure to appear; Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-57(C), 18.2-460, 18.2-415, 19.2-128; motion to reconsider; equitable tolling; aggravated felony crime of violence; Johnson; Dimaya; jurisdiction; INA § 242(a)(2)(C); de novo standard of review; mixed question of law and fact Yousif v. Garland, No. 22-0243 (6th Cir. Nov. 16, 2022)CAT deferral; Chaldean Christian; long time U.S. residence; cumulative harm; unpublished BIA decisions; material change in country conditions; cumulative evidence; particularly serious crime and Matter of B-Z-R-; Iraq*Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Capital Good Fund"A social change organization that uses financial services to tackle poverty in America."Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your host!More episodes!Case notes!Top 15 immigration podcast in the U.S.!Featured in San Diego Voyager!DISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0Support the show

Immigration Review
Ep. 68 - Precedential Decisions from 8/9/2021 - 8/15/2021 (cancellation of removal; NACARA; convention against torture; government acquiescence; continuance; U visa; motion to reopen; changed country conditions; motion to reconsider; change in law)

Immigration Review

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 16, 2021 56:45


[3:07] Matter of Hernandez-Romero, 28 I&N Dec. 374 (BIA 2021) NACARA; cancellation of removal; statutory construction [11:24] Sanchez-Ruano v. Garland, No. 18-71760 (9th Cir. Aug. 11, 2021)Cancellation of removal; INA § 240A(b); inadmissibility grounds; INA § 212; deportability grounds; INA § 237; removability vs relief[19:22] Mohamed v. Garland, No. 20-1829 (8th Cir. Aug. 13, 2021)Convention Against Torture; fact-finding; Matter of J-F-F-; more likely than not; government acquiescence; Somalia[29:01]Yusuf v. Garland, No. 20-2316 (8th Cir. Aug. 9, 2021) Motion to reopen; Convention Against Torture; changed country conditions; sua sponte; LGBT; Somalia; due process[35:21]Gonzales Quecheluno v. Garland, No. 20-2200 (8th Cir. Aug. 12, 2021)Motion to reopen; continuance; jurisdiction; admin closure; Matter of Sanchez Sosa; U Visa; [43:06] Gonzalez Hernandez v. Garland, No. 19-60274 (5th Cir. Aug. 13, 2021)Motion to reconsider; motion to reopen; change in law; aggravated felony; crime of violence; INA § 101(a)(43)(F); 18 U.S.C. § 16(b); Sessions v. Dimaya; El Salvador*Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.www.kktplaw.com/Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwisewww.docketwise.com/immigration-review"Modern immigration software & case management"*Want to become a patron of Immigration Review? Check out our Patreon page at https://www.patreon.com/immigrationreview *CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: "Immigration Review Podcast" or @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreview*About your host: https://www.kktplaw.com/attorney/gregg-kevin-a/*More episodes at: https://www.kktplaw.com/immigration-review-podcast/*Featured in the top 15 of Immigration Podcast in the U.S.! https://blog.feedspot.com/immigration_podcasts/DISCLAIMER: Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide specific legal advice. Rather, the Immigration Review® podcast offers general information and insights regarding recent immigration cases from publicly available sources. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the podcast host. The Immigration Review® podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. MUSIC CREDITS: "Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/immigrationreview)

Tipsy Friday
EP20 GUEST: Steven Dimaya (Broadcasting How-to)

Tipsy Friday

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 28, 2020 40:21


Minsan we have dreamt of being a radio broadcaster at minsan din nating ginaya ang mga boses ng mga kilalang broadcaster dito sa Pilipinas. On this episode may nagbabalik tayong bisita para ibahagi ang mga basic tips on radio/audio broadcasting, walang iba kundi si Steven Dimaya. Siya ay dating radio broadcaster ng isang morning radio segment, Kamusta Pilipinas? ng DZIQ 990AM Radyo Inquirer at ngayo'y isang Talk Show host ng kanilang programang TTTT (Tamang Talakayan ng mga Taong may Tama) Talk Show. If you liked this episode, don't forget to follow us on Spotify and Subscribe to our YouTube Channel! Also available on: YouTube: https://youtu.be/dBZsZjPofOw Episode Timestamps: (03:41) - Paano napunta si Steven Dimaya sa Broadcasting. (07:03) - Morning Radio is the most challenging program slot and the story of 7 telephones. (10:05) - Story of Steven entering broadcast industry. (13:25) - How did they do the program format of Kamusta Pilipinas Radio Program and the meeting of the minds. (15:39) - hindi pwedeng mag dead air. (16:15) - example of tourism radio program guide. (18:10) - Tips on finding your niche (audience) and program schedule. (20:28) - content is more important than episode length. (23:50) - gentle opinion about the future of broadcasting in the Philippines amidst the non-license renewal of ABS-CBN. (27:03) - role of Broadcast Editors on fake news prevention. (29:25) - advice to aspiring broadcasters. #streetwise #broadcasting #contentispower

Tipsy Friday
EP9 GUEST: Steven Dimaya (Usapang Araw ng Kalayaan, Rebolusyon, Bayani, atbp)

Tipsy Friday

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 12, 2020 35:44


Samahan ang mga feeling historiador na sina Heneral Papi at Sarhento Steve na magpapalitan ng trivia, kuro - kuro, at opinyon tungkol sa Kalayaan, Rebolusyon at Bayani.   Masayang Araw ng Kalayaan po sa ating lahat! Mabuhay ang bansang Pilipinas! Don't forget to like, share & subscribe!

Tipsy Friday
EP8 GUEST: Steven Dimaya (Usapang Songhits, Bands and Music Fanboy)

Tipsy Friday

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 5, 2020 75:13


(Better with headphones/headset) Welcome to another episode of Tipsy Friday Podcast! Ang tambayan ng mga Mandirigma! Tambay muna at pakinggan ang ating bisita, ang dating editor ng isa sa mga sikat na songhits noon, walang iba kundi si Steven Dimaya. Ibabahagi niya ang kanyang karanasan sa industriyang ito, pagmamahal sa musika, pakahilig sa banda, at iba pa.. Sana magustuhan ninyo. Please hit like and share some love to this show by clicking the subscribe button! Salamat po!

Mesh Cowork
Episode 1 Jocelyn Dimaya - Building a Creative Community

Mesh Cowork

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 29, 2019 31:23


In our inaugural episode we talk with Jocelyn Dimaya and learn all about her journey as a creative in Bakersfield. We learn about some of he struggles as a creative and how she overcame them. We dive deep in this episode and learn all about Jocelyn.

The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
He's the Burglar, I'm the Robber

The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 2, 2018 47:01


This week's episode takes a deep dive into the Armed Career Criminal Act, a Federal Sentencing Enhancement Statute that is regularly before the Supreme Court on interpretation issues.  Brett and Nazim discuss U.S. v. Stitt (Is Burglary of a Mobile Home rreeeeaaallllyyyy burglary?) and Stokeling v. U.S. (Are gentle robberies rrreeaaallllyy robberies??).  Law starts at (5:00).

Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz
If You Think a Conservative SCOTUS Will Save Us from Lower Courts, Think Again Ep. 263

Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 7, 2018 53:45


Today I'm joined by Professor Brian Fitzpatrick, a former Scalia law clerk and current law professor at Vanderbilt University. Brian gives us an expert opinion on the current trends in the lower courts and their threat to democracy.  Following up on his congressional testimony, Fitzpatrick argues that unless we reform the jurisdiction of the lower federal courts, any anomalous and extreme judge among the 7,000 district judges can wield enormous power. He warns that if you’re counting on a conservative Supreme Court to catch every mistake of the lower courts, you will surely be disappointed. SCOTUS is continuously reducing its workload and is very cautious to weigh in. Given that the Left is shopping around its lawsuits to courts that will give it victories and nationwide injunctions, the cases are never even brought to the Supreme Court.    He sees the most immediate needs as dividing up the Ninth Circuit and having Congress ban universal injunctions as the best remedies. We also discuss the need to transfer more power to state courts, particularly from lower federal courts. Congress has enormous power over the courts, if it will only use it.      Show links Prof. Fitzpatrick’s congressional testimony on reforming the courts  [written testimony] Why Gorsuch’s Dimaya ruling on criminal aliens is so dangerous Mexicans can now sue the Border Patrol for doing its job Copyright CRTV. All rights reserved. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Gravity FM
An Open Golden Door No More Part II: The Criminalization of Migration

Gravity FM

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 1, 2018 81:06


Family Separation, Mandatory Detention and DenaturalizationDiscussion with Paromita Shah on the effective criminalization of immigration and the right to asylum through mandatory detention and unlawful entry and unlawful re-entry prosecutions. We discuss family detainment and separation at the border and the deportation of undocumented parents of US citizen minors. Additionally, we discuss the recent Supreme Court decision of Dimaya, due process in immigration court and Attorney General Sessions’s use of self-referral to make radical changes in our immigration jurisprudence. We also discuss Operation Janus, the De-naturalization Task Force and the intersection of immigration and criminal law.For More Info:http://www.nationalimmigrationproject.org/pract_advisories/gen/2018_19Jun_activists.htmlhttp://www.nationalimmigrationproject.org/pract_advisories/gen/2018_05Jul_Pereira.htmlhttp://www.nationalimmigrationproject.org/PDFs/practitioners/practice_advisories/crim/2018_26Apr_sessions-v-dimaya.pdfhttps://cgrs.uchastings.edu/a-b-backgrounderhttps://uchastings.app.box.com/s/57k2hk6rpyjh7bbmebld4195r2wsdzt0https://www.dropbox.com/s/lplnnufjbwci0xn/CBP%20Report%20ACLU_IHRC%205.23%20FINAL.pdf?dl=0https://theintercept.com/2018/02/14/ice-denaturalization-naturalized-citizen-immigration/https://news.vice.com/article/the-us-keeps-mistakenly-deporting-its-own-citizenshttps://www.politico.com/interactives/2018/immigration-zero-tolerance-children-families-limbo/https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/06/trumps-child-separation-policy-has-grievously-harmed-parents-deported-without-their-children.html

The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
Decisions in Microsoft and Dimaya

The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 29, 2018 51:09


This week's episode covers two recent decisions by the Court, including Microsoft v. U.S. (where the Court determined the dispute was moot after passage of the CLOUD Act), and Dimaya v. Sessions (where the Court invalidated the Immigrant Removal Act on grounds of vagueness under the Due Process Clause).  Law starts at (08:48), but you'd be missing some pretty dope NASA talk.

Women For Greatness Podcast
Ep. 6 Learning to Thrive Where You Are w/Jocelyn Dimaya

Women For Greatness Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 26, 2018 48:55


In this Episode Jocelyn Dimaya joins me and we learn all about what it was like for her to transition from big city living and dreaming of going to La or SF and what it was like for her to well, embrace Bakersfield. Not only has Jocelyn embraced Bakersfield, but she has made it a better place. Shownotes for this episode can be found here: https://sarenahess.com/2018/04/17/ep-6-learning-to-thrive-where-you-are-w-jocelyn-dimaya/

Opening Arguments
OA167: Neil Gorsuch, Secret Liberal?

Opening Arguments

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 23, 2018 62:08


Today's episode tackles the recent (and shocking) Supreme Court decision in which Neil Gorsuch voted with the Court's liberal justices to produce a very unusual 5-4 alignment.  Is this a sign that Gorsuch isn't the right-wing hack we all thought he was?  Listen and find out!  (Hint:  No.) After that, we break down the 6th Circuit's recent opinion in EEOC v. R.G & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc., the first decision of its kind recognizing that discrimination on the basis of an individual who is transgender or transitioning violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. After that, we answer a listener question about selecting a contingent fee attorney and discuss some of the actual pitfalls as well as misconceptions about those lawyers who take "no money down!" Finally, we end with the answer to Thomas Takes the Bar Exam Question #72 about real property and the transfer of a deed.  Don't forget to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page so that you too can play along with #TTTBE! Recent Appearances None!  If you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com. Show Notes & Links We first warned you about Neil Gorusch way back in Episode 40, and we're definitely not backing down now.  If you want to check out his concurrence, you can click here to read the Supreme Court's decision in Sessions v. Dimaya.  And, as we discussed on the show, the should-have-been-straightforward holding of this case stems directly from the Court's prior opinion in Johnson v. United States. You can read the 6th Circuit's recent opinion in EEOC v. R.G & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc., and for more coverage of Title VII, check out our discussion of Hively v. Ivy Tech from Episode 60, as well as our most recent update in Episode 152. Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! And email us at openarguments@gmail.com  

Cato Daily Podcast
"Void for Vagueness" Returns in Sessions v. Dimaya

Cato Daily Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 19, 2018 11:53


When lawmakers hand to judges the power to determine the scope of a law, something has gone wrong. Clark Neily discusses the recently decided case of Sessions v. Dimaya. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Bloomberg Law
High Court Nixes Law Used to Deport Convicted Criminals

Bloomberg Law

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 18, 2018 15:42


Kevin Johnson, a professor at the University Of California Davis School Of Law, discusses the Supreme Court verdict in Sessions v. Dimaya, where the justices tossed out part of a law that allowed deportations of immigrants convicted of crimes. Plus, Daniel Stoller, senior editor for Bloomberg Law, discusses the continuing fallout surrounding Facebook’s data sharing policies, which are now under review from the European Union’s top court. They speak with Bloomberg's June Grasso.

Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz
Why Gorsuch is dead wrong and dangerous on deportations and due process Ep. 214

Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 18, 2018 42:43


As we predicted several months ago during oral arguments, Justice Gorsuch, the saint of the conservative intelligentsia, was the deciding vote nixing deportation of criminal aliens. In this episode, we dissect Sessions v. Dimaya and how Gorsuch is creating due process for criminal aliens to undermine deportations, in violation of settled law and the most foundational principles of the social compact. It is stolen sovereignty in its worst form. We are joined by CRTV’s Capitol Hill correspondent, Nate Madden, who co-hosts and shares his views of why the pseudo-conservatives are so in love with Gorsuch’s opinion and are missing the points in Thomas’ dissent. We also note that Scalia, contrary to the online pundits, agreed with Thomas on the plenary power doctrine over immigration. He would have issued a sharp dissent were he alive today. This decision will have far-reaching consequences for our sovereignty and security.        Show links Taking a part Gorsuch’s premise on deportations and due process in oral arguments What Scalia thought about the right to deport without judicial review Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Bloomberg Law
High Court Nixes Law Used to Deport Convicted Criminals

Bloomberg Law

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 18, 2018 15:42


Kevin Johnson, a professor at the University Of California Davis School Of Law, discusses the Supreme Court verdict in Sessions v. Dimaya, where the justices tossed out part of a law that allowed deportations of immigrants convicted of crimes. Plus, Daniel Stoller, senior editor for Bloomberg Law, discusses the continuing fallout surrounding Facebook's data sharing policies, which are now under review from the European Union's top court. They speak with Bloomberg's June Grasso. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS)
Sessions v Dimaya (void for vagueness)

Supreme Court decision syllabus (SCOTUS)

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 17, 2018 13:37


Court compares immigration deportation statue void for vagueness. In that it’s language was too similar to the unconstitutional language found in the ACCA.

The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
WWJND (What Would Judge Neil Do)?

The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 31, 2017 45:33


We're going back in time a bit this week to cover the cases of Sessions v. Dimaya and Jennings v. Rodriguez to discuss how Judge Neil's originalist sensibilities will impact two cases from last term that deal with immigration removal statutes.  Additionally, Brett laments the loss of Carson Wentz and predicts hell fire and brimstone if the Eagles win the Super Bowl.  Law starts at (04:42).

Audio Arguendo
SCOTUS Sessions v. Dimaya, Case No. 15-1498

Audio Arguendo

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 6, 2017


Supreme Court Audio Podcast
Sessions v. Dimaya (2017)

Supreme Court Audio Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 2, 2017


Re-argued 10/2/2017. First argued 1/17/2017. Description from Oyez.org: "A case in which the Court will decide whether the Immigration and Nationality Act’s “crime of violence” provision is unconstitutionally vague under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment."

The Supreme Court: Oral Arguments

Sessions v. Dimaya | 10/02/17 | Docket #: 15-1498 (Reargued)

docket dimaya
The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court
The Constitutionality of Immigrant Removal Statutes

The Citizen's Guide to the Supreme Court

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 30, 2017 48:33


This week's episode covers two cases, Sessions v. Dimaya & Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions, which cover the Constitutionality and fairness of removal statutes that require deportation on statutory grounds.  Law starts at (09:18), but you'd be missing discussions on French politics and a special guest appearance by Nazim's wife Katya, who discusses some helpful men's fashion tips for the summer.

Il podcast di PSINEL
13- La Defusione Cognitiva

Il podcast di PSINEL

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 30, 2014 22:36


Nella 13° puntata del podcast di PsiNeLparleremo di come "squarciare il velo diMaya" o l'illusione della "realtà"...instile Matrix.Troverai un esercizio davvero semplice cheti permette di notare come le parole chetutti i giorni "ti ripeti" non siano altroche semplici segni che noi interpretiamocome "veri"......un piccolo viaggio verso la "verità dellecose"...ecco il link al post:http://www.psicologianeurolinguistica.net/2014/03/defusione-cognitiva-come-squarciare-il.htmlIscriviti a Psinel, ricevi subito gratis 237audio in mp3 per la tua formazione:http://www.psicologianeurolinguistica.com/psinelform.htmlClicca qui per seguirmi su iTunes:https://itunes.apple.com/it/podcast/gennaro-romagnoli/id788141885?mt=2