Podcasts about CIR

ASISTA!To learn more about ASISTA's work, click here!  And follow ASISTA on all the social medias  : )Sign up here for the Wednesday, Oct. 18th at 7pm ET event, and/or make a donation to support ASISTA's work!Pesikan v. Att'y Gen. U.S., No. 20-3307 (3d Cir. Sept. 26, 2023)divisibility; 75 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3802; controlled substance; driving while under the influence of marijuana; charging document; Mathis peak Doe v. United States, No. 22-843 (2d Cir. Aug. 1, 2023)FTCA; Bivens; equitable tolling; sexual assault by ICE officers; extraordinary circumstance; due diligenceSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

Get the Toolbox Magazine! https://immigrationlawyerstoolbox.com/magazine   Guest: Kevin Gregg, Esq.   Time Stamps:  00:00 Intro 05:04 Federal Court Jurisdiction Over Discretionary Decisions 09:25 Motion to Reopen Burden (Fonseca-Fonseca v. Garland, 9th Cir.) 14:38 Changed Country Condition Motion to Reopen (Reyes-Corado v. Garland, 9th Cir.) 21:08 Phone Searches at the Border (Malik v. DHS, 5th Cir.) 27:37 Outro   Audio Podcast Link: https://sites.libsyn.com/69112/303-federal-court-update-with-kevin-a-gregg-august-2023   Itunes Link: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/303-federal-court-update-with-kevin-a-gregg-august-2023/id1111797806?i=1000629670488   Share the video: https://youtu.be/iWpP8AJGKBo   Our Website: ImmigrationLawyersToolbox.com   Not legal advice. Consult with an Attorney. Attorney Advertisement. #podcaster #Lawyer #ImmigrationLawyer #Interview #Immigration

Anti-SLAPP motions are sometimes called early summary judgment motions. But the fact that they are “early” is why they are so powerful: not only do they provide defendants a quick way to defend against claims that involve speech, they force the plaintiff to prove its case without any discovery.On this episode of the California Appellate Law Podcast, we discuss a recent 9th Circuit decision holding that denials of anti-SLAPP motions are immediately appealable as collateral orders. We also discuss:Judge Bress's criticism of the cases treating anti-SLAPP denials as collateral.Anti-SLAPP motions were designed for the powerless, but the City of Inglewood successful used it to strike an employee's retaliation complaint.How you can lose your arbitration if you don't pay the arbitrator fees in 30 days—and “the check is in the mail” doesn't cut it.A judgment issued in a sum not previously noticed is void and may be set aside at any time, but a sanctions order issued without notice is merely voidable, and may be set aside only within 6 months.Filing a notice of appeal in Los Angeles County Superior Court? Now you can pay your fees online. (Finally!)Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal's weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.The California Appellate Law Podcast thanks Casetext for sponsoring the podcast. Listeners receive a discount on Casetext Basic Research at casetext.com/CALP. The co-hosts, Jeff and Tim, were also invited to try Casetext's newest technology, CoCounsel, the world's first AI legal assistant. You can discover CoCounsel for yourself with a demo and free trial at casetext.com/CoCounsel.Other items discussed in the episode:Doe v. The Superior Court (D1d3 Sep. 8, 2023) No. A167105 (Tim's writeup).Martinez v. ZoomInfo Tech. Inc., No. 22-35305 (9th Cir. Sep. 21, 2023) (Tim's writeup).In re the Marriage of Jensen (D2d2 Sep. 5, 2023) No. B320565 (nonpub. opn.) (Tim's writeup).United States v. Sapalasan, No. 21-30251, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 23820 (9th Cir. Sep. 7, 2023) (Tim's writeup).New payment option for paying $775 appellate feeHow 'Purely Legal' Issues Ruling Applies To Rule 12 MotionsBrown v. City of Inglewood, No. B320658 (Cal. Ct. App. May 31, 2023)Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal's YouTube channel.

Questions Covered; 12:34 – I had an addiction and I surrendered it to the Lord. 21:52 – I'm a huge fan of CIR! 29:15 – I heard the 12 steps don’t have the best success rate. Does CIR have any stats to show for their success rate? 31:47 – In March I'll be 49 years sober. I can't consume the host at mass and only take a sip from the chalice. What do you recommend I do? 36:26 – Is Marijuana a gateway drug? 40:55 – My devout Catholic friend is in denial about her alcoholism. How can I approach her to seek help? …

United States v. Kousisis (CA3), Ed's Article, and Kim's Award!federal loss amount; U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1; Child Status Protection Act (CSPA); my wife! (Borat voice) St. John v. Garland, No. 22-1695 (1st Cir. Sept. 19, 2023)finality of conviction; Matter of J.M. Acosta; vacating conviction in Massachusetts; negative inferenceLink to Edward Ramos's CSPA Article!Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

VLOG 9/22: Sen Menendez, we had today's news yesterday: https://www.innercitypress.com/sdny1menendezicp092123.html SBF loses at 2d Cir, & (most) witnesses; Trump NY trial back on track? Amid #UNGA failure, Inner City Press called out UAE Al Jaber head of COP28- bots respond: https://www.innercitypress.com/ungate1cop28uae1bots092223.html

An enormous amount of work goes into planning for Election Day. For months, poll workers and election administrators prepare to run their local elections smoothly to ensure that no one is left out of the democratic process. In this episode, host Simone Leeper takes listeners on a journey through the intricate process of running a local election, from its initial stages to the final vote tally. This comprehensive exploration highlights the checks and balances in place to facilitate voter participation and to guarantee that the final results will be accurate. In interviews with election administrators and experts, this episode underscores the commitment to ensuring free, fair and secure elections while promoting inclusivity and accessibility for all eligible voters.Simone engages in a captivating conversation with two experienced election workers: Scott Jarrett from Maricopa County, Arizona, and Lorena Portillo of Las Vegas, Nevada. They provide a valuable insider's perspective on the behind-the-scenes workings of the electoral process. Simone also speaks with Campaign Legal Center's Director of Voting, Advocacy and Partnerships, Jonathan Diaz, who breaks down the election process, from voter registration and polling station setup to ballot counting and result certification. Each guest offers a detailed glimpse into the meticulous planning and execution that goes into safeguarding the democratic process. Host and Guests:Simone Leeper litigates a wide range of redistricting-related cases at CLC, challenging gerrymanders and advocating for election systems that guarantee all voters an equal opportunity to influence our democracy. Prior to arriving at CLC, Simone was a law clerk in the office of Senator Ed Markey and at the Library of Congress, Office of General Counsel. She received her J.D. cum laude from Georgetown University Law Center in 2019 and a bachelor's degree in political science from Columbia University in 2016.Scott Jarrett has been with Maricopa County Elections, a Department of the Board of Supervisors, for over four years. He currently serves as the Elections Director responsible for directing all in-person voting, tabulation operations, candidate filing, campaign finance, and warehouse operations. Scott is a wealth of knowledge directing the department operations and implementing strategic direction. He works closely with the Maricopa County Recorder, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and reports to the Maricopa County Manager. Scott is also an Elections Task Force member of the Bi-Partisan Policy Center, a member of the Election Assistance Commission Local Leadership Council and serves as president of the Election Officials of Arizona.Lorena S. Portillo was appointed the Clark County Registrar of Voters in March 2023, bringing more than 25 years of experience in elections to the office. As Registrar, Lorena serves as director of the County Election Department and is responsible for administering all local, state and federal elections for more than 1.3 million registered voters in Clark County. Lorena first joined the Election Department in 1998 as a part-time worker. She soon earned a full-time position with the department and steadily rose through the ranks, ultimately serving as Assistant Registrar of Voters for eight years. Ms. Portillo was born and raised in Las Vegas. She received a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Phoenix and is a Certified Elections Registration Administrator through The Election Center.Jonathan Diaz is Director of Voting, Advocacy and Partnerships at Campaign Legal Center. He advocates for laws and policies that expand the freedom to vote for all Americans, and coordinates CLC's relationships with national, state and local voting rights partners. Jonathan helps lead CLC's work on combating election interference and participates on behalf of CLC on a number of democracy reform coalitions, coordinating CLC's work with partner organizations at the national, state and local levels. He also litigates voting rights cases across the United States, including VoteAmerica v. Raffensperger (N.D.Ga.), LUCHA v. Fontes (D.Ariz.), and Raysor v. Lee (N.D.Fla./11th Cir./SCOTUS). Jonathan frequently provides commentary on voting rights and election law issues in the media; he has been quoted in publications including the New York Times, Miami Herald and ProPublica, and has appeared on Univision, NPR and CNN, where he was an election law analyst during the 2020 election cycle. Links:In-Person Voting AccessCount Every Vote, So Every Vote CountsElection Workers Deserve to Feel Safe. Nevada is Taking Action About CLC:Democracy Decoded is a production of Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan nonprofit organization which advances democracy through law at the federal, state and local levels, fighting for every American's right to responsive government and a fair opportunity to participate in and affect the democratic process. Learn more about us. Democracy Decoded is part of The Democracy Group, a network of podcasts that examines what's broken in our democracy and how we can work together to fix it.We want to hear from you! Thank you for taking a few minutes to complete our survey. Your feedback helps understand what you love about Democracy Decoded and how we can make it even better. To show our thanks, you'll be entered into a drawing for a chance to win a $50 American Express gift card. We appreciate your time!

Hello, AO listeners! This episode is a little bit different. Your regular hosts, Sarah and David, are unavailable—Sarah on parental leave, David on the road—so I (David Lat) have conscripted my husband, lawyer and legal commentator Zachary Baron Shemtob, to serve as guest of a guest. Zach shares his (strong) opinions on two hot topics, the Trump gag order and AO listeners' favorite subject, text/history/tradition. We also cover a noteworthy Sixth Circuit case about the retroactivity of the First Step Act and the big Google antitrust trial. We hope you enjoy this very special episode. Sarah and David will be back next week. Show notes: -Kevin and David French on Dispatch Live: Ask Me Anything -United States v. Carpenter (6th Cir. on retroactivity of First Step Act): -In Its First Monopoly Trial of Modern Internet Era, U.S. Sets Sights on Google: -The Google Trial Is Going to Rewrite Our Future: -David and Zach on Original Jurisdiction: -Cruel and Unusual: A Podcast on Punishment Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Bob Harrington and Manesh Patel discuss sudden cardiac death in athletes and the importance of the chain of survival. This podcast is intended for healthcare professionals only. To read a transcript or to comment, visit https://www.medscape.com/author/bob-harrington COVID and the Athlete's Heart https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/945282 Outcomes Registry for Cardiac Conditions in Athletes https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.029052 2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000937 Point-of-care screening for HFrEF using artificial intelligence during ECG-enabled stethoscope examination https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00256-9 International recommendations for electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw631 Elevation of Cardiac Troponins After Endurance Running Competitions https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034655 Vigorous Exercise in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1042 Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Preamble, Principles, and General Considerations https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000236 RACE-CARS Trial https://racecarstrial.org/ AHA CPR Resources https://cpr.heart.org/en/cpr-courses-and-kits/hands-only-cpr You may also like: Medscape editor-in-chief Eric Topol, MD, and master storyteller and clinician Abraham Verghese, MD, on Medicine and the Machine   https://www.medscape.com/features/public/machine Hear John Mandrola, MD's summary and perspective on the top cardiology news each week, on This Week in Cardiology   https://www.medscape.com/twic Questions or feedback, please contact   news@medscape.net

Hermosillo v. Garland, No. 18-71220 (9th Cir. Sept. 14, 2023)reasonable fear interview; reasonable possibility standard; 10%; credible testimony satisfies nexus and police acquiesce Rudnitskyy v. Garland, No. 21-1098 (9th Cir. Sept. 14, 2023)“rendered inadmissible”; INA § 240A(d)(1)(B); cancellation of removal; stop-time rule; Barton Matter of Cabrera-Fernandez, 28 I&N Dec. 747 (BIA 2023)humanitarian parole under INA § 212(d)(5)(A); conditional parole under INA § 236(a)(2)(B); Jennings; applicant for admission; Cuban Adjustment Act Peguero Vasquez v. Garland, No. 21-6380 (2d Cir. Sept. 13, 2023)possession of a forged instrument under N.Y. Pen. Law § 170.20; retroactivity; N.Y. Pen. Law. § 70.15(1-a); CIMT; one year term of imprisonment; vacatur of conviction (dicta) Avila v. Att'y Gen. U.S., No. 22-1374 (3d Cir. Sept. 14, 2023)N.J. Stat. §  2C:20-4(a); CIMT; Matter of S. Wong; definition of conviction under INA § 101(a)(48)(A); Chevron; Castillo; sexual violence asylum claims; Honduras; A-R-C-G- Munoz-De Zalaya v. Garland, No. 22-60505 (5th Cir. Sept. 12, 2023)Salvadoran business owners; nexus; particular social group; gangs; El Salvador; deficient NTA; Santos-Zacaria; exhaustion  Solis-Flores v. Garland, No. 22-1147 (4th Cir. Sept. 11, 2023)receipt of stolen property CIMT; VA Code § 18.2-108; realistic probability test; post conclusion voluntary departure; 8 C.F.R. § 1240.26(c)(3)(i); timing to advise voluntary departure bondSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

There is something for everyone on this episode. Robert and Lindsey breakdown the following cases:Stephens v. Stephens, 1st DCA (excusable neglect). Manheimer v. FPL, 3d DCA (punitive damages); Long v. Kroppke, 4th DCA (same). Goldstein v. UCF Bd. of Trs., 6th DCA (sovereign immunity). Scott v. State, 4th DCA (1st Amend.). TKH Coastal Prop. v. Talcor Grp., Inc., 5th DCA (appellate attys' fees). State Farm v. Advanced X-Ray, 3d DCA (SMJ). Kawsar v. Alhamdi Group, LLC, 5th DCA (SMJ). State v. Wallin, 2d DCA (knock & announce). McConico v. Morgan's Mill Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc., 6th DCA (injunctions). US. v. Moore, 11th Cir. (“confinement” for purposes of rule 609). Brooks v. Miller, 11th Cir. (SMJ). Hopkins v. Hosemann, 5th Cir. (8th Amend.; voter disenfranchisement). Grell v. Lopez, 9th Cir (2nd Amend.). In re: Amends. to Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.070, 12.280, & 12.340, FSC (effective 10/1/23). In Re: Amends. to Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.285(c), FSC (effective 11/1/23).Summarily is supported by BetterHelp and The Law Office of Scott N. Richardson, P.A.This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services. The information provided on this podcast is not intended to be legal advice. You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice. If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer. The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast's advertisers. This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only. Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast's creator is prohibited.

VLOG Sept 12: SBF wants jurors to be asked about "effective altruism" (book: https://amazon.com/dp/B0CFCJ68PS ) E Jean Carroll v. Trump 2d Cir. Schulte Trial 3, OneCoin Greenwood sentencing today, fraud like @UN_PGA no transparency, no answers, after PGA Ashe @SDNYLIVE

USA v. Minter, No. 21-3102 (2d Cir. Sept. 6, 2023)sale of cocaine; N.Y. Penal Law § 220.39; serious drug offense; definition of isomer; realistic probability test Matter of C-G-T-, 28 I&N Dec. 740 (BIA 2023)one-year deadline; gay men in the Dominican Republic; reasonableness of reporting harm to police; reporting harm as child; sexual identity as immutable; statement of persecutor and nexus  Ponce-Flores v. Garland, No. 21-2377 (4th Cir. Sept. 6, 2023)gang-based CAT deferral; aggregate torture; police corruption; acquiescence; former gang member; MS-13; harm in U.S. prison; Honduras Velázquez v. Garland, No. 22-9576 (10th Cir. Sept. 8, 2023)voluntary departure; deadline on a weekend; extending statutory deadline; motion to reopen; failure to depart Martinez-De Umana v. Garland, No. 22-60340 (5th Cir. Sept. 8, 2023)gang-based asylum fear; MS-13; Matter of Fuentes; fear because prison guard or police officer; Dr. Thomas Boerman; considering expert testimony; Ministry of Justice; El Salvador Alonso-Juarez v. Garland, No. 15-72821 (9th Cir. Sept. 8, 2023)reasonable fear review; Nasrallah; 30 day rule; claims processing rule; jurisdiction; Guzman Chavez; final order of removal; reinstatement; Bhaktibhai-Patel; Santos-Zacaria; Suspension ClauseSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

Join Lozano Smith attorneys Joshua Whiteside, Jennifer Baldassari, and Haley Fagan in a discussion about special education inclusion following a return to in-person schooling post-COVID.  In this episode they discuss inclusive environments, recent case law, and next steps for the future.  Listen as they delve into inclusion and travel through past and present frameworks to better understand this complex topic. Show Notes & References 1:26 – What is inclusion? 2:38 – The history of inclusion and why it matters 2:54 – Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 7:07 – Inclusion levels in classrooms 8:40 – What an inclusive environment should look like 10:36 – Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) 11:38 – Rachel H. (Sacramento City Unified School District v. Rachel H. (9th Cir. 1994) F.3d 1405) and the four-factor test 13:08 – D.R. (D.R. v. Redondo Beach Unified School District (9th Cir. 2022) 56 F.4th 636) and grade-level standards (Client News Brief 15 - April 2023) 14:57 – Why IEP goals are not tied to grade-level standards 20:16 – Learning recovery and addressing disparities 23:22 – Referrals for inclusion programs 24:10 – Social Emotional Learning (SEL) curriculum 24:52 – Next steps for the future 26:52 – Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) 28:27 – Behavior, discipline, and support for students and teachers in the classroom 35:15 – Check-in's and coming back 37:03 – Final thoughts   For more information on the topics discussed in this podcast, please visit our website at: www.lozanosmith.com/podcast.

The American Heart Association updated the Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) guidelines for the first time in a decade. Join host, Geoff Wall, as he evaluates what's new in CAD pharmacotherapy. The GameChangerCAD pharmacotherapy is dependent on aggressive lipid management whereas antiplatelet and beta-blocker therapy is now more nuanced. HostGeoff Wall, PharmD, BCPS, FCCP, BCGPProfessor of Pharmacy Practice, Drake UniversityInternal Medicine/Critical Care, UnityPoint Health ReferenceVirani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, et al. 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2023 Jul 20. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001168. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37471501.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epdf/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001168 Pharmacist Members, REDEEM YOUR CPE HERE! Not a member? Get a Pharmacist Membership & earn CE for GameChangers Podcast episodes! (30 mins/episode)CPE Information Learning ObjectivesUpon successful completion of this knowledge-based activity, participants should be able to:1. Discuss the new AHA coronary artery disease (CAD) guidelines 2. Apply AHA CAD guidelines for medical management of a patient with stable CAD 0.05 CEU/0.5 HrUAN: 0107-0000-23-295-H01-PInitial release date: 9/4/2023Expiration date: 9/4/2024Additional CPE details can be found here.Follow CEimpact on Social Media:LinkedInInstagramDownload the CEimpact App for Free Continuing Education + so much more!

Pomavilla-Zaruma v. Garland, No. 20-3230 (2d Cir. Aug. 30, 2023)credibility; border interview; credible fear interview transcript; Ramsameachire factors Trejo-Gamez v. Garland, No. 21-3329 (8th Cir. Aug. 30, 2023)jurisdiction; motion to reopen to present new evidence; ineffective assistance of counsel; Patel; abuse of discretion Uulu v. Garland, No. 22-1973 (7th Cir. Sept. 1, 2023)adverse credibility; inconsistencies; corroborating inconsistent testimony; recollection and trauma; Kyrgyzstan Al-Hasani v. DHS, No. 22-1603 (3d Cir. Aug. 30, 2023)naturalization; good moral character; INA § 101(f); definition of polygamy; bigamy; INA § 212(a)(10)(A); Chevron deference; Matter of G-; definition of practice Lin v. Garland, No. 22-3807 (6th Cir. Sept. 1, 2023)objective fear of persecution; underground house church Christian; opposition to family planning; longtime police interest in arrest; past harm and future individualized risk; reasonableness of relocation; 8 C.F.R. § 210.13(b)(3);ChinaFlores-Vasquez v. Garland, No. 20-73447 (9th Cir. Aug. 31, 2023)CIMT; Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.190; Matter of J-G-P-; assault; menacing; intent to fearSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

We know cardiac surgery can seem a bit daunting on the surface. However, most surgeons will come across cardiac surgery patients at some point whether in the OR, ICU, ED, etc. As the FIRST cardiac surgery specialty team for Behind the Knife, we are excited to bring you episodes focused on high-yield topics to help you navigate common cardiac surgery challenges, discuss relevant literature to help you in practice, and help our listeners feel more comfortable around cardiac surgery patients.  In this episode we'll discuss common cardiac surgery post-op problems. Whether you're on a cardiac surgery rotation or just covering an ICU with cardiac surgery patients for the night, these common post-op problems are bound to occur. Hosts:  - Jessica Millar, MD- PGY-5 General Surgery Resident, University of Michigan, @Jess_Millar15 - Aaron William, MD- Cardiothoracic Surgery Fellow, Duke University, @AMWilliamsMD - Nick Teman, MD- Assistant Profressor of Thorasis and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, @nickteman Learning objectives: - Understand the workup and management strategies for post-operative bleeding in the post-cardiac surgery patient.  - Understand how to recognize and manage post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in the post-cardiac surgery patient.  - Understand the workup, short-term, and long-term management for post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation.  Helpful Resources: - 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665 - 2014 AATS guidelines for the prevention and management of perioperative atrial fibrillation and flutter for thoracic surgical procedures, Executive summary: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S0022-5223(14)00835-6/fulltext For episode ideas/suggestions/feedback feel free to email Jessica Millar at: millarje@med.umich.edu Please visit https://behindtheknife.org to access other high-yield surgical education podcasts, videos and more.   If you liked this episode, check out our 4 Part Cardiac Surgery Crash Course Series here: https://behindtheknife.org/podcast/cardiac-surgery-crash-course-series-episode-1-intro-to-the-cardiac-or/

VLOG Aug 30: Bankman-Fried in run-up to today's 1 pm hearing says Internet too slow, 2d Cir appeal; fellow fraudster Greenwood of #OneCoin tries to seal all letters of support - both are in #CryptoCreeps book: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CFCJ68PS. Gabon coup, UN hypocrisy

Murillo Morocho v. Garland, No. 22-1881 (1st Cir. Aug. 21, 2023)CAT deferral; prosecution as persecution; consent or acquiesce; willful blindness; prison violence in Ecuador Montoya-Lopez v. Garland, No. 23-1036 (1st Cir. Aug. 21, 2023)past persecution; particular social group; “family members of a business owner perceived as wealthy”;  "people who have fled gangs instead of continuing to pay extortion"; extortion as persecution; economic deprivation; El Salvador Munoz-Rivera v. Garland, No. 22-3124 (7th Cir. Aug. 24, 2023)domestic violence type asylum; material inconsistency; waiver of argument Robbertse v. Garland, No. 22-1739 (8th Cir. Aug. 21, 2023)wire fraud; 18 U.S.C. § 1343; aggravated identity theft; 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(c)(5); INA § 101(a)(43)(M)(i); circumstance specific approach; over $10,000; sentencing documents and burdens; plea colloquy; particularly serious crime; N-A-M- Deng v. Garland, No. 22-3621 (8th Cir. Aug. 25, 2023)CAT deferral; child soldier; South Sudan; hypothetical link in the chain; torture in prison; mental healthSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

NCLA Presents Oral Argument Against Government-Directed Social Media Censorship The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has heard oral arguments in NCLA's landmark Missouri v. Biden lawsuit against government-directed social media censorship. The government is appealing a historic order that would bar many federal agencies and officials from pressuring or coordinating with social media companies to censor First Amendment-protected speech. Mark and Vec discuss the recent Fifth Circuit hearing in Missouri v. Biden.   NCLA Asks 5th Cir. to Approve Pathway to Challenge Unlawful SEC-Imposed Lifetime Speech Ban NCLA has filed brief urging the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to restore ChristopherNovinger's First Amendment rights. For decades, SEC has silenced people with lifetime speech bans enforced through threat of reopened prosecutions. Mr. Novinger's Gag Order permanently forbids him from contesting allegations in SEC's complaint, however inaccurate, and regardless of the truth of the forbidden speech, on pain of reopened and renewed prosecution. NCLA Senior Litigation Counsel Peggy Little breaks down NCLA's recent appeal in SEC v. Novinger.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

IntroICE tweet!Breanna Cary shout out! - bcary.law@gmail.com Matter of J-G-R-, 28 I&N Dec. 733 (BIA 2023)CAT protection; under color of law; police uniforms; § 1983; official capacity; O-F-A-S-; Ninth Circuit difference USA v. Campos, No. 21-3524 (8th Cir. Aug. 15, 2023)controlled substance offense; Texas Health & Safety Code § 481.112; means vs. elements; attempted delivery; Ochoa-Salgado; federal attempt definition  Green v. Garland, No. 22-2335 (8th Cir. Aug. 16, 2023)crime of violence; INA § 101(a)(43)(F); Hobbs Act robbery; Taylor; § 212h) review notwithstanding Patel Malik v. DHS, No. 22-10772 (5th Cir. Aug. 17, 2023)with special guest Ira Kurzban!; border search; cell phone search; reasonable suspicion; injury  Kolov v. Garland, No. 22-3760 (6th Cir. Aug. 18, 2023)jurisdiction; final order of removal; Nasrallah; reviewability; Guzman-Chavez; withholding-only proceedings; omissions; adverse credibility  Aguayo v. Garland, No. 20-9651 (10th Cir. Aug. 18, 2023)termination; Matter of Garcia-Flores; prejudice; prolonged detention; egregious constitutional violation; regulatory violation Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

In this special episode on Residual Risk: A Focus on Triglycerides, our host, Dr. Neil Skolnik will discuss Residual Risk, Triglycerides and how to reduce residual risk with Dr. Christie Ballantyne, Director of the Center for Cardiometabolic Disease Prevention, Baylor College of Medicine. This special episode is supported by an independent educational grant from Amarin. Presented by: Neil Skolnik, M.D., Professor of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University; Associate Director, Family Medicine Residency Program, Abington Jefferson Health Dr. Christie Ballantyne.  Dr. Ballantyne is a Professor of Medicine-Cardiology, and Director of the Center for Cardiometabolic Disease Prevention, Baylor College of Medicine. Selected references in the Podcast: Niacin: AIM-HIGH - N Engl J Med 2011; 365:2255-2267 Omega-3 Fatty Acids: STRENGTH trial - JAMA. 2020;324(22):2268-2280 Pemafibrate: PROMINENT - N Engl J Med 2022; 387:1923-1934 Icosapent Ethyl: JELIS - Lancet. 2007;369(9567):1090-1098 Icosapent Ethyl: REDUCE-IT - N Engl J Med 2019; 380:11-22 ADA Standards of Care: Diabetes Care 2023;46(Supplement_1):S158–S190 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: Circulation. 2023;148. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001168

Helen Tarokic's T-Visa training link! Fonseca-Fonseca v. Garland, No. 20-71977 (9th Cir. Aug. 8, 2023)prima facie standard; Coelho; L-O-G-; reasonable likelihood; motion to reopen Garcia-Gonzalez v. Garland, No. 22-60501 (5th Cir. Aug. 7, 2023)ineffective assistance of counsel motion to reopen; prima facie eligibility; prejudice; sua sponte reopening; family based particular social groupSign Rekha's Lozada Petition! https://bit.ly/3FlDGeZ Yoc Esteban v. Garland, No. 22-1778 (1st Cir. Aug. 7, 2023)ineffective assistance of counsel motion to reopen; prima facie eligibility; prejudice; failure to specific particular social group Vila-Castro v. Garland, No. 21-2011 (1st Cir. Aug. 8, 2023)unable or unwilling; acquiesce; police inaction; American Popular Revolutionary Alliance (“APRA”); Peru Reyes-Corado v. Garland, No. 18-70225 (9th Cir. Aug. 11, 2023)changed country condition motion to reopen; reliance on affidavits; Guatemalan Civil War; family dispute; no need to file new asylum application Wojciechowicz v. Garland, No. 22-1086 (7th Cir. Aug. 8, 2023)Governor's pardon; inadmissibility; statute vs. FAM; ICE ignoring stay; INA § 237(a)(2)(A)(vi) USA v. Cheboss, No. 22-2617 (8th Cir. Aug. 11, 2023)denaturalization; material misrepresentation; Maslenjak; materiality; INA § 101(f)(6); definition of testimony; false statement for someone else's immigration benefit  USA v. Lopez, No. 21-12709 (11th Cir. Aug. 7, 2023)categorical approach and conspiracy offenses; CIMT; denaturalization; conspiracy to commit money laundering; 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); divisibility; overbroad Indictment; 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B); 18 U.S.C. § 1957; base vile or depraved even if deceit; ZarateSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

Robert and Lindsey break down the following opinions issued in July.701 Palafox, LLC v. Scuba Shack, Inc., 1st DCA (amended complaint to add claim for punitive damages)Drazen v. Pinto, 11th Cir. (en banc) (standing under TCPA)Crocker v. Crocker, 5th DCA (trial court's discretion to consider an argument for the first time on rehearing) K.R. v. DCF and Statewide GAL, 4th DCA (forfeiture of court-appointed counsel)Miller v. Gordon, 1st DCA (temporary timesharing)Casiano v. Casiano, 5th DCA (attorneys' fees in a partition action; lack of transcripts) Thank you for listening. Please share the podcast with your friends and colleagues. Send your questions, comments, and feedback to summarilypod@gmail.com. Summarily is supported by The Law Office of Scott N. Richardson, P.A. Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not an advertisement for legal services.  The information provided on this podcast is not intended to be legal advice.  You should not rely on what you hear on this podcast as legal advice. If you have a legal issue, please contact a lawyer.  The views and opinion expressed by the hosts and guests are solely those of the individuals and do not represent the views or opinions of the firms or organizations with which they are affiliated or the views or opinions of this podcast's advertisers.  This podcast is available for private, non-commercial use only.  Any editing, reproduction, or redistribution of this podcast for commercial use or monetary gain without the expressed, written consent of the podcast's creator is prohibited.

Mancia v. Garland, No. 22-1599 (1st Cir. Aug. 4, 2023)NACARA; sua sponte motion to reopen; suspension of deportation; failure to depart with voluntary departure Bazile v. Garland, No. 22-1767 (1st Cir. Aug. 4, 2023)venue; Matter of Garcia; completed proceedings; CAT deferral; Lavalas; Haiti Arostegui-Maldonado v. Garland, No. 22-9554 (10th Cir. Aug. 1, 2023)CAT; under color of law; final order of removal; Nasrallah; reviewability; withholding-only proceedings; application of law to facts; mixed question of law and fact; de novo review; O-F-A-S-; Costa Rica Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

Listener feedback re observational studies, surgeons' dissent from recent guidelines, aspirin for primary prevention, and fish oil are the topics discussed by John Mandrola.MD in this week's podcast. This podcast is intended for healthcare professionals only. To read a partial transcript or to comment, visit: https://www.medscape.com/twic I. Heart Surgeons Dissent Surgical Groups Push Back Against New Revascularization Guidelines https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/966153 New Revascularization Guidelines: Key Points and Navigating Controversies https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/972014 - AHA Guidelines - https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001168 - AATS statement 2023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.03.001 - Yusef and colleagues 1994 Meta-analysis - https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91963-1 - 10-year SYNTAXES https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X - Surgeons' argument 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.12.003 - FAME 3 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2112299 - Gaudino Meta-analysis of Medical Therapy vs CABG https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.06.003 - NOBLE https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1 - EXCEL 5 years https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1909406 II. ASA for Primary Prevention Daily Aspirin Challenged in Primary Stroke Prevention: ASPREE https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/994963 - ASPREE – All-cause mortality - ASPREE (MACE and Bleeding) https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1805819 - ASPREE (disability) https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1800722 - JAMA Network Open Subanalysis  https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2807630 III. Fish Oil - OMEMI Substudy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2023.07.002 - Gencer and colleagues Meta-analysis - https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055654 - OMEMI Main Trial https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052209 You may also like: Medscape editor-in-chief Eric Topol, MD, and master storyteller and clinician Abraham Verghese, MD, on Medicine and the Machine https://www.medscape.com/features/public/machine The Bob Harrington Show with Stanford University Chair of Medicine, Robert A. Harrington, MD. https://www.medscape.com/author/bob-harrington Questions or feedback, please contact news@medscape.net

Chen v. Garland, No. 19-715 (2d Cir. July 25, 2023) credibility; probative omission; trivial inconsistency; no requirement to list all persecution in asylum statement; supplemental rather than inconsistent; cultural context; totality of circumstances; de minimus inconsistency  Amador Duenas v. Garland, No. 18-71987 (9th Cir. July 27, 2023) Constitutionality of BIA members; Appointments Clause; Principal Officers; Inferior Officers  Diaz Mejia v. Garland, No. 21-2088 (7th Cir. July 27, 2023) failure to exhaust; waiver of argument  Cela v. Garland, No. 22-1322 (4th Cir. July 28, 2023) INA § 209 adjustment of status; asylee vs. refugee; termination of asylum status; Chevron deference; Matter of T-C-A-; statutory interpretation  Bouarfa v. DHS, No. 22-12429 (11th Cir. July 28, 2023) INA § 242(a)(2)(B)(ii); revocation of I-130 petition; INA § 204(c); discretion; jurisdiction  Clement v. U.S. Att'y Gen., No. 21-13382 (11th Cir. July 28, 2023)  forfeiture of judicial review; derivate citizenship; Equal Protection; final order; motion to withdraw appeal; Ng Fung Ho; waiver of constitutional right  Bekhbat v. Garland, No. 22-2379 (8th Cir. July 27, 2023) motion to reconsider; administrative closure; automatic termination of voluntary departure Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  Capital Good Fund"A social change organization that uses financial services to tackle poverty in America."CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

One of the most biggest recent case is the split decision out of the 9th Circuit holding that a prohibition on secretly recording communications between two people violates the First Amendment. Project Veritas v. Schmidt, No. 22-35271 (9th Cir. July 3, 2023). The statute at issue here was an Oregon statute. But it suggests that two-party consent statutes, such as California's likewise may be unconstitutional.We also cover:Does "sexually derogatory" or "misogynistic" music in the workplace create employer liability? Possibly, says the 9th Circuit. Sharp v. S&S Activewear (9th Cir. - June 7, 2023).Justice Gorsuch's statement that COVID emergency orders are among `greatest intrusions on civil liberties.' (Statement here.)“Diversity” in the judiciary.Briefing extensions tighten up in the 9th Circuit.PJ Rubin on oral argument: "It's a very important thing to have lawyers feeling comfortable -- but not too comfortable -- in the courtroom. (Via Ben Shatz.)The citation signal “semble” that ignited #appellatetwitter.Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal's weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.The California Appellate Law Podcast thanks Casetext for sponsoring the podcast. Listeners receive a discount on Casetext Basic Research at casetext.com/CALP. The co-hosts, Jeff and Tim, were also invited to try Casetext's newest technology, CoCounsel, the world's first AI legal assistant. You can discover CoCounsel for yourself with a demo and free trial at casetext.com/CoCounsel.Other items discussed in the episode:Lowery v. Rhapsody Int'l, No. 22-15162, at *1 (9th Cir. June 7, 2023)Birke v. Lowe's Home Centers, No. S279470 (Cal. May 31, 2023).Supreme Court scores high in diversity study (via David Ettinger); Camper on Admission (via David Ettinger); Daily Journal's Malcolm Maclachlan's account of the story.Of president Biden's 30 nominees to the 9th Circuit and California district courts, 25 have attended one of six elite law schools. (Via Ben Shatz.) 10 law schools were responsible for approximately 33% of the federal clerk hires in the nation. (Also via Ben Shatz.)Speaking of Berkeley Law grad Justice Corrigan: Cancel "Berkeley?” (SoCalAppNews)City Had Right to Get Rid of Its Statue of Father Serra (via MetNews).CJEO draft formal opinion addressing whether a judicial officer may attend a celebration hosted by a law firm. (Via Ben Shatz.)Kleidman v. Court of AppealJustice Bedsworth on citing unpublish

 USA v. Rivera (3d Cir. July 19, 2023)federal definition of marijuana; hempMartinez v. Clark, et al., No. 21-35023 (9th Cir. May 30, 2023)detention; dangerousness; jurisdiction; INA § 236 De Leon Resendiz v. Exxon Mobil Corp., No. 21-2211 (4th Cir. July 10, 2023)42 U.S.C. § 1981; discrimination; DACA; temporary employment; alienageSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  Capital Good Fund"A social change organization that uses financial services to tackle poverty in America."Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

The assessment and treatment of chest pain--both acute and chronic--is the focus of this conversation with guest Debabrata Mukherjee, MD. Dr. Mukherjee describes risk stratification, appropriate testing, and shared decision-making with patients with chest pain, as well as the importance of preventive care.The HEART score: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6005932/2021 Chest Pain Guidelines: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In Patco Construction v. People's United Bank a US District Court in Maine held that the defendant bank was not liable for US$588,000 in fraudulent transfers that were believed to result from Zeus keylogger malware attacks. Patco was an online banking customer and account holder at People's Bank at the time of the malware attacks. Between May 7 and May 16, 2009 unknown third parties made multiple online transfers totaling US$588,851 out of Patco's account. Ultimately, the bank was able to block US$243,406 of the fraudulent transfers. Patco alleged that its losses were related to People's Bank's deficient online security. The court found that People's Bank did suffer from some security weaknesses, but that on the whole, its security procedures were commercially reasonable. Accordingly, it found that the bank was not liable for the losses resulting from the fraudulent transfers. Although the facts of this case differ from those in Experi-Metal v. Comerica, it may be a challenge to reconcile the contrast between the two decisions.[according to whom?] However, in July 2012, this decision was reversed by an appellate court. The parties later settled out of court, with People's United Bank paying the remainder of what was stolen from Patco's account, as well as $45,000 in interest. "In a landmark decision, the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals held in "Patco Construction Company, Inc. v. People's United Bank", No. 11-2031 (1st Cir. July 3, 2012) that People's United Bank (d/b/a Ocean Bank) was required to reimburse its customer, PATCO Construction Co., for approximately $580,000 that had been stolen from PATCO'S bank account. In so doing, the court reversed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine that had granted summary judgment in the bank's favor." Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experi-Metal_v._Comerica

Chicas-Machado v. Garland, No. 21-1381 (4th Cir. July 13, 2023)nexus; religion; evangelical Christian; OIL concession re: unable or unwilling to control MS-13; El Salvador Trejo Tepas v. Garland, No. 22-1049 (4th Cir. July 10, 2023)pro se asylum; Quintero; claims processing and exhaustion; unaccompanied minor; Santos-Zacaria; gang violence; El Salvador Santos Garcia v. Garland, No. 22-1463 (4th Cir. July 11, 2023)family based particular social group; gender; beyond nuclear family; Mara 18; Rodriguez-Arias v. Whitaker and J-F-F-; causal chain; El Salvador Lazo-Gavidia v. Garland, No. 20-2306 (4th Cir. July 12, 2023)deficient NTA in absentia motion to reopen; INA § 239(a); failure to update address; presumption of delivery; issue exhaustion Sanchez v. Garland, No. 22-1815 (1st Cir. July 14, 2023)nexus; particular social group; wealthy Salvadoran businessmen; family; extortion  Argueta-Hernandez v. Garland, No. 22-60307 (5th Cir. July 10, 2023)untimely petition for review; withholding; final order; Bhaktibhai-Patel; Nasrallah Arroyo-Sosa v. Garland, No. 22-1334 (8th Cir. July 13, 2023)motion to reopen; reconsider; Coelho vs L-O-G-; asylum Thok v. Garland, No. 22-2508 (8th Cir. July 13, 2023)Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-511.01; shoplifting; aggravated felony theft; § 101(a)(43)(G); appropriate; deprive; mens rea Paucar v. Garland, No. 21-6043 (2d Cir. July 12, 2023)ineffective assistance of counsel; Patel; prejudice; prima facie; reasonable probability; presumption that children will join parents; U visa; Sanchez Sosa; remand; CoelhoSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  Capital Good Fund"A social change organization that uses financial services to tackle poverty in America."CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

Liz and Andrew take a deep look at the U.S. v. Trump docket and explain how some minor-seeming procedural filings may tell us more than you'd think about how Donald Trump intends to mount a defense for crimes that he's definitely guilty of. You won't want to miss this one! Notes Trump docket https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67490071/united-states-v-trump/ Trump opp Motion for Continuance https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654.66.0.pdf Trump Speedy Trial Act report https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654/gov.uscourts.flsd.648654.72.0.pdf DOJ Denney case file https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/defendants/denney-lucas United States v. Hatfield, 466 F. App'x 775, 777 (11th Cir. 2012) https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23870839-us-v-hatfield In re Grand Jury Investigation (Mueller Challenge) https://casetext.com/case/in-re-investigation-5442 -Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law -Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs -Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com

Let's imagine something amazing, handmade pasta dishes crafted by a knowledgeable and experienced chef, french patisserie desserts crafted by a chef with an eye for beauty and flavor. Then make all of that approachable and available for dine in, take out, or via drive through?! Yep, that is WD Cravings 7110 N 102nd Cir in Omaha where you can line up a menu favorite or your own creations to satisfy your palate. Oh, did I mention a giant parmesan cheese wheel where they will swirl your hot pasta to create cheesy goodness? Hang on to your fork and listen if you're hungry!

Ullah v. Garland, No. 22-1026 (4th Cir. July 6, 2023)reasonable relocation; for the rest of one's life standard; remand for a grant of asylum; family members left behind; Pro-American imputed political opinion; DHS burden; Pakistani Taliban; Pakistan Chen v. Garland, No. 21-1371 (4th Cir. July 6, 2023)corroboration; reasonableness of obtaining evidence; Wambura; threshold determination; otherwise credible; L-A-C-; one-year asylum deadline; changed circumstances; failure to consider evidence; State Department Reports; House Church; Christian; China Osorio-Morales v. Garland, No. 22-2909 (7th Cir. July 5, 2023)unable or unwilling; family violence; failure to report to police; police investigation; systemic failure to protect; Honduras Uriostegui-Teran v. Garland, No. 22-2472 (8th Cir. July 6, 2023) particularity; social distinction; particular social group; family group; ranchers; Mexico; willful blindness  Circuit HousekeepingNinth (Mendoza Linares v. Garland) and Eleventh Circuits United States v. Lung'aho, No. 22-3168 (8th Cir. July 6, 2023) and Janis v. United States, No. 22-2471 (8th Cir. July 6, 2023)crime of violence; arson; maliciously; malice; more than recklessness; post-Borden; mens rea; murder; malice aforethought; extreme recklessness Madrid-Mancia v. Att'y Gen. U.S., No. 21-2291 (3d Cir. July 3, 2023)deficient NTA in absentia motion to reopen; § 239(a); use of the word or; follow up notice of hearing; statutory interpretation; statute as a whole; failure to update addressSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  Capital Good Fund"A social change organization that uses financial services to tackle poverty in America."Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

9th Circuit expert Cory Webster joins us to discuss several recent decisions out of the 9th Circuit. On this episode, we discuss:The Jack Daniels case: when binding precedent barred relief, Jack Daniels (and its savvy appellate team) moved for summary affirmance (you read that right) to get to the Supreme Court, which reversed in a unanimous decision.The dormant-commerce-clause case in which the 9th Circuit—with unlikely help from Justice Thomas—upheld a California statute that could affect pork production nationally.The Gap case, which demonstrates how the makeup of the 11-judge en banc pool drawn from the 29-judge circuit make a big difference.the Slack Tech. v. Pirani case, where a visiting district judge cast the deciding vote that created a circuit split—and precipitated a Supreme Court reversal setting binding precedent.When Judge Watford retired following a split decision, a petition for panel review is probably going to require filling the open slot on the panel—which could change the outcome.Cory Webster's biography and LinkedIn profile.Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal's weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.The California Appellate Law Podcast thanks Casetext for sponsoring the podcast. Listeners receive a discount on Casetext Basic Research at casetext.com/CALP. The co-hosts, Jeff and Tim, were also invited to try Casetext's newest technology, CoCounsel, the world's first AI legal assistant. You can discover CoCounsel for yourself with a demo and free trial at casetext.com/CoCounsel.Other items discussed in the episode:Perry v. Kia MotorsJack Daniel's and what to do when binding precedent squarely forecloses your position. Cory's LinkedIn post. Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products, LLC.Ninth Circuit en banc—29 votes vs. 11 judges on the en banc panel. Cory's LinkedIn post.  Lee (The Gap) v. Fisher et al. (9th tCir. Jun. 1, 2023) No. 21-15923.Visiting judge's dissent vindicated by SCOTUS: Slack Techs. v. Pirani (Jun. 1, 2023). One trial court judge sitting by designation can be the deciding vote setting binding circuit precedent (and the reason a case goes to the Supreme Court). Cory's LinkedIn post.What happens when a member of your panel leaves the court after a decision but before finality. Cory's LinkedIn post. Kelsey v. Garrett (9th Cir. May 24, 2023) No. 22-15557.The case that saved the McRib: National Pork Producers Council v. Ross (May 11, 2023) National Pork Producers—Ninth Circuit angle. Cory's LinkedIn post.Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal's YouTube channel.

United States v. Hansen, No. 22-179 (U.S. June 23, 2023)8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv); First Amendment; freedom of speech; facial challenge; criminal solicitation; criminal facilitationFlores v.  Garland, No. 22-20419 (5th Cir. June 23, 2023)EB-2A; National Interest Waiver; I-140 Petitions; Matter of Dhanasar; INA § 242(a)(2)(B)(2)Cui v. Garland, No. 22-2177 (7th Cir. June 16, 2023)Adverse credibility; INA § 101(a)(42)(B); asylum; forced sterilization and abortionBrizuela v. Garland, No. 22-1738 (8th Cir. June 27, 2023)Due process; humanitarian parole; continuance; termination; past persecution; threats; Matter of Y-S-L-C; psychological harm; persecutory conductDin v. Garland, No. 21-6586 (2d Cir. June 30, 2023)Frivolous asylum application; notice requirement for frivolousness; INA § 208(d)(6); INA § 208(a)(2)(B); INA § 208(d)(4)(A); Matter of Y-L-; 8 C.F.R. § 1208.20(2008); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.3(c)(2); adjustment of status; INA § 242(a)(2)(B)(i); discretion; INA § 212(a)(9)B)(i)(II); INA § 212(i)(1); 8 C.F.R. § 1240.12(c) Park v. Garland, No. 21-70623 (9th Cir. June 29, 2023)Particularly serious crime; CHSC §§ 11370.1(a), 11351, 11352(a); Matter of Y-L-; withholding of removal; Protection under the Convention Against Torture; Chenery doctrine; torture; 8 C.F.R. § 1208.18(a)(3); lawful sanctions, prosecution, or punishment as torture; South Korea. Ramirez Munoz v. Garland, No. 21-70431 (9th Cir. June 26, 2023)INA § 212(a)(6)(C)(ii)(I); false claim to U.S. citizenship; inadmissibility; Matter of Richmond; adjustment of statusSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  Capital Good Fund"A social change organization that uses financial services to tackle poverty in America."DISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

EPISODE 1574: In this KEEN ON show, Andrew talks to Nate Halverson, the producer and lead reporter on the new documentary movie THE GRAB, about the money, influence and rationale behind covert efforts to control the planet's most vital resource  Nate Halverson is an Emmy Award-winning senior reporter and producer at The Center for Investigative Reporting, covering business and finance with an emphasis on the global food system. Halverson broke the international news that California was literally sinking, a result of farmers over-pumping groundwater in the drought stricken Central Valley. He won a national Emmy Award for his reporting on the Chinese government's involvement in the takeover of the world's largest pork company, Smithfield Foods. He revealed the Saudi government's plan to support the acquisition of food and water resources around the world that included a 15-square-mile farm in the parched Arizona desert, and other farms across drought stricken California. He reported on classified cables from the U.S. State Department that detailed wealthy countries were concerned about looming water and food shortages, including dire shortages in Yemen that helped trigger its devastating civil war. He has reported across the world, including Russia, Guatemala, England, Zambia, China, and Venezuela, and on investigative topics ranging from financial fraud and organized crime to uncovering internal documents that helped result in a $155 million settlement with a tech company. Before joining CIR, Halverson worked on projects with the Investigative Reporting Program at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism, PBS NewsHour and at the Pulitzer Prize-winning The Press Democrat. He was awarded a 2014 McGraw Fellowship by the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism, and he received degrees in economics and journalism from the University of Minnesota. Named as one of the "100 most connected men" by GQ magazine, Andrew Keen is amongst the world's best known broadcasters and commentators. In addition to presenting KEEN ON, he is the host of the long-running How To Fix Democracy show. He is also the author of four prescient books about digital technology: CULT OF THE AMATEUR, DIGITAL VERTIGO, THE INTERNET IS NOT THE ANSWER and HOW TO FIX THE FUTURE. Andrew lives in San Francisco, is married to Cassandra Knight, Google's VP of Litigation & Discovery, and has two grown children. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

United States v. Texas, No. 22-58 (U.S. June 23, 2023)State standing to challenge Executive action; prosecutorial discretion; redressability; historical analysis  Pugin v. Garland, No. 22-23 (U.S. June 22, 2023)relating to obstruction of justice; INA § 101(a)(43)(S); aggravated felony; relating to; dictionaries; Congressional intent Figueroa Ochoa v. Garland, No. 20-72510 (9th Cir. June 20, 2023)INA 242(a)(2)(B)(i); Patel; non-LPR cancellation; vacated conviction; continuance; question of fact; Kucana; motion to remand Giron-Molina v. Garland, No. 22-6243 (2d Cir. June 20, 2023)CIMT; Arkansas Code Ann. § 5-60-101; reprehensible conduct; abuse of a corpse; realistic probability test; divisibility  A.G. v. Garland, No. 22-1499 (4th Cir. June 23, 2023)nexus; family membership; extortion; gang recruitment; harm to applicant rather than family; ignoring testimony; revenge killing; CAT; failure to report to police; MS-13; El Salvador Farnum v. Garland, No. 22-9526 (10th Cir. June 21, 2023)frivolous asylum filing; INA § 208(d)(6); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.20(a); regulatory interpretation; final agency decisionSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  Capital Good Fund"A social change organization that uses financial services to tackle poverty in America."Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show

Questions Covered: 07:08 – My granddaughter has been an addict since she was 13 and is now 30. She has many children and was just arrested in front of her oldest children. How do I get her connected to you? 14:07 – I run CIR in Wichita and can help Elizabeth. Does Scott want me to get in touch with her. 18:01 – I have OCD with scrupulosity to a great degree. How much effort should I be putting into overcoming it instead of giving in? 21:52 – Is there any addiction group for adults for trans people? 33:58 – Would your program also be helpful for people who hoard? 47:09 – In your program, does God come across in a friendly sense towards those afflicted? …

Dubin v. United States, No. 22-10 (U.S. June 12, 2023)identity theft; use; in relation to; statutory titles; “aggravated”; statutory interpretation; over-criminalization  Odei v. Garland, No. 21-1315 (1st Cir. June 15, 2023)denial of freedom;  withholding of removal; nexus; taking land; Chieftain; Ghana Alexandre-Matias v. Garland, No. 21-60798 (5th Cir. June 13, 2023)in absentia motion to reopen; due process; I-213; failure to file NTA; claims processing rule Medina Carreon v. Garland, No. 21-60391 (5th Cir. June 15, 2023)temporary BIA member; ultra vires; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(a)(4); improper appointment of Acting Attorney General; cock fighting; good moral character; Castillo Perez Medley v. Garland, No. 20-3079 (2d Cir. June 15, 2023)ICE arrest; egregious regulatory or constitutional violation; termination with prejudice where removability established King v. Garland, No. 22-2166 (8th Cir. June 14, 2023)INA § 212(h) waiver; jurisdiction; reweighing evidence; Patel Zongo v. Garland, No. 21-3847 (8th Cir. June 16, 2023)credibility; affidavit inconsistencies; Burkina Faso; exhaustion  Rincon Barbosa v. Garland, No. 22-1655 (8th Cir. June 14, 2023)divisibility; modified categorical approach; jury instructions; Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-5706(a); same punishment; Kansas definition of methamphetamine Sponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Docketwise"Modern immigration software & case management"Joorney Business Plans"Business-critical documents for every stage of your journey"For 30% off use code: REVJOORNEY30  Capital Good Fund"A social change organization that uses financial services to tackle poverty in America."Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewDISCLAIMER:Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. Rather, it offers general information and insights from publicly available immigration cases. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the host. The podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney in your state.MUSIC CREDITS:"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod - Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 Support the show