Requirement that courts respect all legal rights owed to people
POPULARITY
Categories
23 episodes with Due process
38 episodes with Due process
39 episodes with Due process
27 episodes with Due process
29 episodes with Due process
20 episodes with Due process
16 episodes with Due process
20 episodes with Due process
16 episodes with Due process
35 episodes with Due process
9 episodes with Due process
8 episodes with Due process
32 episodes with Due process
23 episodes with Due process
25 episodes with Due process
9 episodes with Due process
6 episodes with Due process
10 episodes with Due process
4 episodes with Due process
8 episodes with Due process
5 episodes with Due process
6 episodes with Due process
4 episodes with Due process
23 episodes with Due process
6 episodes with Due process
4 episodes with Due process
5 episodes with Due process
12 episodes with Due process
7 episodes with Due process
3 episodes with Due process
6 episodes with Due process
3 episodes with Due process
4 episodes with Due process
3 episodes with Due process
4 episodes with Due process
7 episodes with Due process
2 episodes with Due process
5 episodes with Due process
6 episodes with Due process
4 episodes with Due process
3 episodes with Due process
7 episodes with Due process
4 episodes with Due process
3 episodes with Due process
5 episodes with Due process
2 episodes with Due process
3 episodes with Due process
5 episodes with Due process
3 episodes with Due process
3 episodes with Due process
4 episodes with Due process
4 episodes with Due process
2 episodes with Due process
4 episodes with Due process
Slam the Gavel welcomes new guest Benjamin Thomas and Tony Pellegrino to the podcast. Today we discussed raising awareness about family court corruption, especially Ben's case taking place in the District of Columbia, Washington D.C. and Save The Family's federal constitutional challenge. We especially focused on the constitutional use of jurisdiction, the "Silver Bullet Tactics," such as Civil Protection Orders (CPO's) as well as Compelled Rule 35 (MENTAL EXAMS). Also please see video posted below, "Save The Family," and the givesendgo.https://youtu.be/Vix74uafUcohttp://givesendgo.com/savethefamilyTo Reach Tony Pellegrino: acla@yahoo.comTo Reach Benjamin Thomas: revelation riddle.comSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)Maryann Petri: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comhttps://www.tiktok.com/@maryannpetriFacebook: https://youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcast?si=INW9XaTyprKsaDklhttps://substack.com/@maryannpetri?r=kd7n6&utm_medium=iosInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/guitarpeace/Pinterest: Slam The Gavel Podcast/@guitarpeaceLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maryann-petri-62a46b1ab/ Twitter https://x.com/PetriMaryannEzlegalsuit.com https://ko-fi.com/maryannpetrihttps://www.zazzle.com/store/slam_the_gavel/aboout*DISCLAIMER* The use of this information is at the viewer/user's own risk. Content on this podcast does not constitute legal, financial, medical or any other professional advice. Viewer/user/guest should consult with the relevant professionals. IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. Reproduction, distribution, performing, publicly displaying and making a derivative of the work is explicitly prohibited without permission from content creator. The content creator maintains the exclusive copyright and any unauthorized copyright usage is strictly prohibited. Podcast is protected by owner from duplication, reproduction, distribution, making a derivative of the work or by owner displaying the podcast. Owner shall be held harmless and indemnified from any and all legal liability.Support the showSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/
In this episode, Imani and Jess break down the latest anti-trans decision from the Supreme Court, Mirabelli v. Bonta and explain how the conservative legal movement is rewriting parental rights law from the shadow docket of the Supreme Court. Expert Repro Journalism That Inspires. Episodes like this take time, research, and a commitment to the truth. If Boom! Lawyered helps you understand what's at stake in our courts, chip in to keep our fearless legal analysis alive. Become a member today. Imani's column, AngryBlackLady Chronicles, is back in 2026! Sign up for her newsletter here to read it first, and listen to Imani's new podcast, B*tch, Listen, here.
Despite the existence of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), a federal law that has been in place for 50 years, many parents face acrimonious, heartwrenching, and expensive fights to ensure that their children's unique needs are met. Debra Tisler, founder of Emergent Literacy and an educator with 30 years of experience, joins the […]
In this episode, Imani and Jess break down the latest anti-trans decision from the Supreme Court, Mirabelli v. Bonta and explain how the conservative legal movement is rewriting parental rights law from the shadow docket of the Supreme Court. Expert Repro Journalism That Inspires. Episodes like this take time, research, and a commitment to the truth. If Boom! Lawyered helps you understand what's at stake in our courts, chip in to keep our fearless legal analysis alive. Become a member today. Imani's column, AngryBlackLady Chronicles, is back in 2026! Sign up for her newsletter here to read it first, and listen to Imani's new podcast, B*tch, Listen, here.
SCOTUS blocks summary deportations of TdA detainees, ruling they must have due process and time for habeas relief. A major legal check on executive power. ⚖️Thanks for joining me for this episode! I'm a Houston- based attorney, run an HR Consulting company called Claremont Management Group, and am a tenured professor at the University of St. Thomas. I've also written several non-fiction political commentary books: Bad Deal for America (2022) explores the Vegas-style corruption running rampant in Washington DC, while The Decline of America: 100 Years of Leadership Failures (2018) analyzes – and grades – the leadership qualities of the past 100 years of U.S. presidents. You can find my books on Amazon, and me on social media (Twitter @DSchein1, LinkedIn @DavidSchein, Facebook & Instagram @AuthorDavidSchein, and YouTube @DrDaveSavesAmerica). I'd love to hear from you!As always, the opinions expressed in this podcast are mine and my guests' and not the opinions of my university, my company, or the businesses with which I am connected.
We are continuing our review of Star Trek episodes over the last 60 years with Star Trek The Next Generation episode, "The Measure of a Man."Send a textSupport the showNo part of this recording should be considered legal advice.Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok @TheLegalGeeks
UNBIASED University is in session! While Jordan is on maternity leave, she's breaking down the most critical aspects of the United States government — the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the three branches of the federal government, presidential elections, the evolution of political parties, and more. In this episode of UNBIASED Politics, we explore two foundational constitutional principles that continue to shape major legal and political debates: separation of church and state and due process. What does the First Amendment actually require when it comes to religion in public life, and how have courts interpreted the boundaries between government and faith? We break down the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, examining how the Supreme Court has navigated issues involving public schools, religious expression, and government funding. We also take a deep dive into due process, the constitutional guarantee that the government must follow fair procedures and respect certain fundamental rights before depriving someone of life, liberty, or property. From procedural protections in courtrooms to broader questions about substantive rights, this episode provides a clear, nonpartisan explanation of how these doctrines developed and why they remain central to constitutional law today. Separation of Church and State (3:17) Due Process (~25:10) SUBSCRIBE TO JORDAN'S FREE NEWSLETTER. Watch this episode on YouTube. Follow Jordan on Instagram and TikTok. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Following Russia's full-scale invasion, Western governments issued a slew of sanctions against oligarchs. But to what end? What's been achieved, and what happens next? Over the past decade, the UK has grappled with its reputation as 'Londongrad': a home for oligarchs – most often from Russia – to park and enjoy their money. Successive governments resisted calls for action against these individuals, whether the calls came from civil society, opposition MPs or European ambassadors in London. Even following the Salisbury poisonings in 2018, the oligarch community remained untouched. That all changed in February 2022 when the UK government's resistance to sanctioning oligarchs crumbled in the face of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Accommodating Russians and their money in London become indefensible. In this latest episode of the STR podcast, CFS Director Tom Keatinge is joined by expert oligarch watchers Michael O'Kane, a partner at Peters & Peters, and Natalia Kubesch, Legal Director at REDRESS. Four years since the Johnson/Truss government finally pulled the trigger on oligarch sanctions, one basic question remains unresolved: what is actually meant to happen to these sanctioned individuals — and, perhaps more importantly, to their frozen assets?
Seeking Divorce Assistance in These Locations? Our Team Can Help! Riverside: https://bit.ly/4lYPO9o Corona: https://bit.ly/44gJROv Irvine: https://bit.ly/3EvvQSL San Diego: https://bit.ly/4lOg85X Palm Desert: https://bit.ly/4jNWZzc Founded in 2021, Reel Fathers Rights APC is a Nationally Recognized Family Law Firm that focuses exclusively on representing Men and Fathers in Family Court in California. RFR boasts over 300 years of combined family court experience and was recognized as the top law Firm on the Inc 5000 List for 2025. RFR attorneys have earned dozens of awards and certifications from being named Certified Family Law Speicialist by the State Bar of California to being named Rising Stars by Best Lawyers and Ones to Watch by Super Lawyers. RFR attorneys are equipped to handle everything from contentious Child Custody disputes to high profile, high-stakes divorce, and defense of serious Domestic Violence Allegations. RFR is the go-to attorney for Men and Fathers in California Family Courts. You can learn more about Reel Fathers Rights and their services on our website www.reelfathersrights.com Mark Reel Jr. is the Founder and CEO of Reel Fathers Rights APC. Since 2021, Mark and RFR have represented thousands of Men and Fathers in California Family Courts. Mark has been named One to Watch by Best Lawyers and a Rising Star by Super Lawyers. He has also been recognized by Inc on their Ince 500 list of fastest growing companies as well as Elite Lawyer and Expertise.com About This Episode: On this episode, Mark Reel Jr. breaks down the two-part constitutional shield of due process that stands between a family and state overreach. He explains that procedural due process acts as the court's "user manual," requiring the three pillars of official notice, a meaningful opportunity to be heard, and an impartial judge to ensure the legal process is fair. Mark then dives into substantive due process, which protects the fundamental liberty interest parents have in the care and control of their children. Because these rights are fundamental, the state must meet the "strict scrutiny" standard, proving they have a compelling reason—such as preventing immediate physical harm—before they can legally interfere with a family. Ultimately, he illustrates how procedural due process protects the trial itself, while substantive due process protects the very fabric of the family.
A federal judge in the Southern District of West Virginia issued a ruling that should be making national headlines but isn't. Hawk walks through the full 34-page opinion by U.S. District Judge Joseph Godwin, who found that ICE agents wearing masks, operating from unmarked vehicles with no license plates, and making warrantless civil arrests violate the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The case centers on Anderson Jesus Urquilla Ramos, a 21-year-old Salvadoran national with a valid driver's license, lawful work authorization, and a pending asylum application, who was pulled over in West Virginia on a pretext stop. Masked federal agents in an unmarked vehicle with no license plate detained him without a warrant, without identifying themselves, and without legal justification. Judge Godwin's opinion traces the Fourth Amendment back to its founding-era roots, the colonial outrage over British general warrants and writs of assistance, and applies that history directly to modern ICE enforcement tactics. The ruling draws on James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Justice Brandeis, and citations ranging from Marbury v. Madison to Katz v. United States. The opinion concludes that a law enforcement practice whose only operational effect is the elimination of accountability is not a safety measure. It is a constitutional deficiency. Hawk also highlights the Fifth Amendment due process violations and the habeas corpus petition that brought the case before the court. This is Fourth Amendment education at its finest, delivered through one of the most clearly reasoned federal opinions in recent memory. SUPPORT & CONNECT WITH HAWK- Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mdg650hawk - Hawk's Merch Store: https://hawkmerchstore.com - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mdg650hawk7thacct - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hawkeyewhackamole - Connect on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mdg650hawk.bsky.social - Connect on Substack: https://mdg650hawk.substack.com - Connect on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hawkpodcasts - Connect on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mdg650hawk - Connect on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/mdg650hawk ALL HAWK PODCASTS INFO- Additional Content Available Here: https://www.hawkpodcasts.comhttps://www.youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts- Listen to Hawk Podcasts On Your Favorite Platform:Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3RWeJfyApple Podcasts: https://apple.co/422GDuLYouTube: https://youtube.com/@hawkpodcastsiHeartRadio: https://ihr.fm/47vVBdPPandora: https://bit.ly/48COaTB
A Supreme Court ruling will speed up the removal of illegal immigrants from the country. More With Chris Conley on the WSAU Wisconsin Morning News.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this podcast, Jeff discusses the attack on the Iranian terror regime by the U.S. and Israel — and the impact on the Middle East and the world. Will loud MAGA voices continue to do all they can to stop the fall of the mullahs of Iran? Or will they put aside their anti-semitism for the sake of America and the free world?
Diese Episode ist keine leichte – und keine schnelle.Wir klären zuerst nüchtern, wer Baal und Moloch historisch wirklich waren – jenseits der Bilder aus Social Media. Warum tauchen antike Namen in modernen Skandalen auf? Warum erzeugen große Verbrechen große Erklärungen? Und warum glaubt unser Kopf manchmal lieber an Dämonen als an banale Machtstrukturen?Wir sprechen über Emotionalisierung, Confirmation Bias, rassistische Verkürzungen und Fatalismus. Über die Dynamik sozialer Medien – und darüber, wie einfache Narrative echte Aufklärung behindern können.Dann wird es psychologisch: Wie funktionieren Rituale und Symbolik? Wo endet Spiritualität – und wo beginnt Projektion?Und schließlich geht es um Macht, Kontext und menschliches Verhalten. Um den Lucifer-Effekt. Um die Banalität des Bösen. Um die Systemfrage: Wie arbeitet Justiz? Warum gibt es keine schnellen Verhaftungen? Was bedeutet Due Process – und wie schützt man Opfer, ohne Ermittlungen zu gefährden?Diese Folge füttert keine Mythen.Sie schürt keine Wut.Sie versucht, ein schweres Thema ohne Mystifizierung zu betrachten.Denn am Ende stehen keine alten Götter vor Gericht.Sondern Menschen.Und mit ihnen die Frage nach Macht, Verantwortung und Schutz.Euer Ingmar
Red flag laws, also known as ERPOs, get talked about in the gun world like one sweeping “boogeyman”, but the reality is messier and state-specific.In this episode, Michael Sodini and Kevin Berry sit down with Dr. Chris Knoepke (University of Colorado School of Medicine's Firearm Injury Prevention Initiative) to break down how Colorado's ERPO process actually works, who can file, what due process looks like, and what the data is showing so far.They dig into what gun owners often worry about most, including false accusations, service and enforcement realities for law enforcement, and why many clinicians are hesitant to touch ERPOs at all. The conversation also explores practical improvements if these laws aren't going away, such as better training for clinicians, stronger “time and space” options, and connecting people in crisis to real support rather than luck, see you in a year.”As always, we close with the question we ask every guest: How do you tend to your mental health?Send a text Walk the Talk America would like to thank our partners who make these conversations possible and would like to highlight our top two partner tiers below! Platinum Tier:RugerArmscorBleeker Street PublicationsGold Tier:NASGWLipsey'sDavidson's
This month, Christian Sison welcomes Noah Pollack and Tomer Lehr to discuss the Board's proposed regulation change that affects the employer's right to cross-examine opposition experts. The three attorneys share the reasons why the current regulation protects the integrity of employment and offer better solutions aimed at fixing the reports of crooked doctors that are the true reason for "unnecessary" depositions. Listen in on why all stakeholders should be petitioning for the change to be rejected! What is “Third Fridays”? "Third Fridays" podcast is a live, 30-minute legal talk show from Lois Law Firm featuring moderator Christian Sison. It is the original forum in which real attorneys discuss workers' compensation issues, share their opinions and engage in colorful conversations. The goal of the show is to showcase the diverse perspectives of the attorneys handling workers' compensation cases. Attorneys discuss case law trends, practical litigation strategies, and hot topics.Special Guests: Noah Pollack and Tomer Lehr.
This episode is a recording of the "Due Process, Deportation, and Human Dignity" panel at the Association of American Law Schools Annual Meeting with Yvette Borja, Laura E. Gómez Teaching Fellow on Latinx People and the Law at UCLA Law, Evelyn Rangel-Medina, Associate Professor at Temple Law, Raquel Aldana, Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law at UC Davis, Bamby Salcedo, CEO of the Trans Latin@ Coalition, Giselle Garcia, Project Director, NorCal Resist, Laila L. Hlass, Associate Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Immigrant Rights Clinic, Tulane University Law School, Cinthia A. Ibarra, former Temple law student, and Tania Wolf, Southeast Advocacy Manager, National Immigration Project. To support the podcast, become a patron at: https://patreon.com/radiocachimbona?utm_medium=unknown&utm_source=join_link&utm_campaign=creatorshare_creator&utm_content=copyLinkFollow @radiocachimbona on Instagram, X, and Facebook
Fireworks erupted in Washington as Attorney General Pam Bondi faced heated questioning over the Epstein files. With a looming government shutdown and accusations flying from both sides, Congress once again turned oversight into spectacle.Todd Huff breaks down what reasonable Americans actually want: justice for victims, transparency without destroying due process, and accountability grounded in evidence — not political theater. From Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal's confrontation to broader questions about what really exists in the Epstein files, this episode cuts through the outrage to examine what's fact, what's politics, and what remains unknown.Is this about justice — or midterm messaging?
Fireworks erupted in Washington as Attorney General Pam Bondi faced heated questioning over the Epstein files. With a looming government shutdown and accusations flying from both sides, Congress once again turned oversight into spectacle.Todd Huff breaks down what reasonable Americans actually want: justice for victims, transparency without destroying due process, and accountability grounded in evidence — not political theater. From Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal's confrontation to broader questions about what really exists in the Epstein files, this episode cuts through the outrage to examine what's fact, what's politics, and what remains unknown.Is this about justice — or midterm messaging?
In this Season 3 episode, co-hosts Valerie Mirko, Partner at Armstrong Teasdale LLP and leader of the firm's Securities Regulation and Litigation Practice, and William Nelson, Director of Public Policy and Associate General Counsel at the Investment Adviser Association, break down a timely set of regulatory and legislative developments shaping today's securities landscape.The conversation begins with a recent House Financial Services Committee hearing, A New Day at the SEC: Restoring Accountability, Due Process, and Public Confidence, and why many in the industry have welcomed the hearing as an opportunity to reinforce transparency, accountability, and adherence to the SEC's core mission - particularly in the Commission's rulemaking and enforcement processes.Valerie and William also discuss the SEC's recent January 30, 2026 statement on tokenization, highlighting how the Commission is thinking about the application of the federal securities laws to traditional asset classes as new technologies reshape market infrastructure. The episode wraps up with a look at FINRA's rule modernization initiative, including a proposed update to the outside business activities rule, and how FINRA's efforts are aligning with broader SEC and congressional priorities.A must-listen for securities lawyers, compliance professionals, regulators, and others navigating a rapidly evolving regulatory environment.Recent Past Episodes of this Series:A Study in Contrasts: Innovation and Crypto versus the Crypto Fraud Landscape (1/21/2026)A Year of Change, Challenges, and What Comes Next (12/17/2025)When Washington Stops: What the 2025 Shutdown Means for the SEC and Congress Going Forward (11/19/2025)The SEC's New Direction: Enforcement and Governance in Focus (10/22/25) From Memecoins to Custody: What Firms Need to Know About Crypto (9/24/25)Corp Fin in Flux: What the SEC's Latest Moves Mean for Issuers and Investors (8/13/25)Please note, the positions and opinions expressed by the speakers are strictly their own, and do not necessarily represent the views of their employers, nor those of the D.C. Bar, its Board of Governors or co-sponsoring Communities and organizations.
Masked federal immigration agents are conducting unconstitutional raids across American cities, stopping citizens based solely on skin color and accent. ICE and Border Patrol officers hide their identities while detaining Americans without jurisdiction, violating Fourth Amendment protections and due process rights. Statistics reveal immigration agents face less danger than average civilians, yet they operate with masks and anonymity while regular police officers wear visible badges and name tags.Border Patrol and ICE have arrested nearly 5,000 of their own agents for crimes since 2005, with corruption rates exceeding those of undocumented immigrants. These masked federal agents have killed at least 40 people since last year, including Americans like Alex Pretti and Renee Good. Twin Cities residents, particularly Somali and Hispanic families with legal status, are hiding from immigration raids while thousands of students have stopped attending school.Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court decision gutted constitutional protections, enabling racial profiling by federal agents across the country. Immigration agents dragged an American woman from her car in Salem, Oregon, demanding papers despite having zero jurisdiction over US citizens. Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O'Hara confirmed that ICE targets families based on ethnicity, not actual immigration status.Anonymity plus immunity equals impunity. When federal agents hide their faces while wielding deadly force, accountability disappears. Law enforcement officers should be identifiable public servants, not masked enforcers terrorizing communities. Constitutional rights mean nothing when anonymous agents operate without oversight or consequences. SUPPORT & CONNECT WITH HAWK- Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mdg650hawk - Hawk's Merch Store: https://hawkmerchstore.com - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@mdg650hawk7thacct - Connect on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hawkeyewhackamole - Connect on BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/mdg650hawk.bsky.social - Connect on Substack: https://mdg650hawk.substack.com - Connect on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hawkpodcasts - Connect on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mdg650hawk - Connect on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/mdg650hawk ALL HAWK PODCASTS INFO- Additional Content Available Here: https://www.hawkpodcasts.comhttps://www.youtube.com/@hawkpodcasts- Listen to Hawk Podcasts On Your Favorite Platform:Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3RWeJfyApple Podcasts: https://apple.co/422GDuLYouTube: https://youtube.com/@hawkpodcastsiHeartRadio: https://ihr.fm/47vVBdPPandora: https://bit.ly/48COaTB
The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – With illegal immigration in the news, not to mention the demonstrations in Minneapolis, there has been a lot of talk lately about due process, especially who has a right to it. Today, we'll cut through the hype, emotion, and political posturing to answer these two questions: what is due process, and who has a right to it?
The Constitution Study with Host Paul Engel – With illegal immigration in the news, not to mention the demonstrations in Minneapolis, there has been a lot of talk lately about due process, especially who has a right to it. Today, we'll cut through the hype, emotion, and political posturing to answer these two questions: what is due process, and who has a right to it?
In today's episode of The Right Side with Doug Billings, Doug cuts through the noise surrounding government shutdowns, criminal referrals, and viral political claims to focus on something deeper: standards.What does a partial government shutdown actually mean — and why did the Founders design the system to slow power instead of accelerate it? What is a criminal referral, what it isn't, and why a Republic never confuses a request for review with a verdict.Doug introduces a practical, citizen-level framework for separating allegations from evidence, explains how investigative “files” really work, and walks listeners through the Evidence Ladder — from rumor to conviction.This is a calm, civic conversation about proof, due process, and why a free society survives not on volume, pressure, or outrage — but on standards that protect both the innocent and the truly wronged.If you believe truth should come before trends and justice should come before the crowd, this episode is for you.Support the show
The Air Force has quietly eliminated all in-person and virtual hearings for Special Access Program (SAP) appeals, replacing them with a paper-only process. It's still unclear whether the Air Force will allow individuals to submit written responses instead of a personal appearance. It is also possible that decisions will rely entirely on existing security files, with no opportunity for individuals to respond, which would be a loss of due process. For more. Federal News Network's Anastasia Obis spoke with Dan Meyer, partner at Tully Rinckey PLLC..See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Are We for the Second Amendment or Not?Alex Pretti Shooting Is a Constitutional Rubicon Watch and Listen:https://rumble.com/v758dq6-are-we-for-the-second-amendment-or-not.htmlhttps://youtu.be/uMYWDvCHgfchttps://www.spreaker.com/episode/are-we-for-the-second-amendment-or-not--69758979Read More:https://gorightnews.com/are-we-for-the-second-amendment-or-not-the-alex-pretti-shooting-is-a-constitutional-rubicon/Are we for the Second Amendment or only when it's convenient?The Alex Pretti shooting forces a hard constitutional reckoning.When federal agents kill a lawfully armed American, the Right must decide whether liberty, due process, and equal justice still mean what we say they mean, even when it's uncomfortable. #GoRight, #SecondAmendment, #Constitution, #BillOfRights, #DueProcess, #CivilLiberties, #EqualJustice, #LimitedGovernment, #FederalPower, #RightsNotPrivileges, #LibertyOverTribalism, #StandForFreedomBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/goright-with-peter-boykin-gorightnews-com--3096608/support.
In this special 23-minute episode of The Right Side with Doug Billings, we slow down the noise and restore a standard that built the American Republic: evidence over emotion, due process over mob logic, and truth over narrative.With the latest release of so-called “Epstein files” dominating headlines and social media, Doug walks listeners through what those documents actually are — and what they are not. From understanding the difference between allegations, investigative notes, and corroborated evidence, to explaining how real investigations work, this episode equips citizens with a clear framework for evaluating claims without becoming captive to viral narratives.This is not a show about protecting the powerful. It's a show about protecting the people — and the standards that keep a free nation free.If you care about justice, constitutional principles, and the survival of the Republic in an age of screenshots and outrage, this is a conversation you won't want to miss.Support the show
In a new federal court filing, the Trump Administration is using “patently absurd” and “almost laughable” so-called “evidence” to prove that 137 Venezuelans sent in the middle of the night in violation of a court order, are members of a notorious narco-terrorist gang, such as they wear Michael Jordan Chicago Bulls Jerseys!. Popok reports on new filings and Chief Judge Boesberg demanding that the Trump Administration explain why they continue to deny these 137 men Due Process despite court orders to the contrary. 3 Day Blinds: For their buy 1 get 1 50% off deal, head to https://3DayBlinds.com/LEGALAF. Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
00:01:17 — “Trump-Cons” and the War on Constitutional LimitsA new faction of Trump loyalists is framed as attacking constitutional restraints at home while branding the effort as populism. 00:06:14 — The False Binary of Open Borders vs Police StateThe immigration debate is reduced to two extremes, deliberately excluding lawful, constitutional enforcement as an option. 00:11:15 — A Conservative Judge Orders ICE to Explain LawlessnessA Minnesota judge forces ICE leadership to answer for defying court orders, exposing a clash between rule of law and executive power. 00:18:22 — “Worst of the Worst” Narratives Used to Excuse RaidsFear-based claims about criminals and terrorists are used to justify violent enforcement and dismissal of judicial oversight. 00:24:56 — ICE Shootings Surge as Enforcement Turns MilitarizedA sharp increase in shootings and fatalities signals a shift from policing toward military-style domestic intervention. 00:28:39 — Warrantless, No-Knock Raids Declare the EndgameHomeland Security asserts authority to conduct home invasions without judicial warrants, bypassing courts entirely. 00:34:54 — Gold Signals a Vote of No Confidence in Fiat MoneyThe surge in gold and silver prices is framed as systemic distrust in fiat currency rather than speculative enthusiasm. 00:41:44 — Counterparty Risk Turns Paper Gold Into a TrapETFs, tokenized metals, and derivatives are exposed as trust-based instruments vulnerable to collapse under stress. 00:49:37 — “De-Fiatization” and the Global Debt ReckoningThe crisis is framed as the unraveling of fiat currency itself, driven by unsustainable global debt and institutional exit. 01:15:28 — Due Process as a Christian and Moral ObligationLegal protections are framed not as privileges but as God-given rights that safeguard everyone, including the accused. 01:21:13 — Gun Ownership Redefined as TerrorismFederal officials frame lawful firearm possession as inherently threatening, widening the split between enforcement agencies and gun-rights advocates. 01:42:07 — Palantir Staff Revolt Against ICE Surveillance WorkInternal dissent surfaces as employees confront their role in AI-driven tracking and deportation infrastructure. Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code KNIGHT Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-david-knight-show--2653468/support.
00:01:17 — “Trump-Cons” and the War on Constitutional LimitsA new faction of Trump loyalists is framed as attacking constitutional restraints at home while branding the effort as populism. 00:06:14 — The False Binary of Open Borders vs Police StateThe immigration debate is reduced to two extremes, deliberately excluding lawful, constitutional enforcement as an option. 00:11:15 — A Conservative Judge Orders ICE to Explain LawlessnessA Minnesota judge forces ICE leadership to answer for defying court orders, exposing a clash between rule of law and executive power. 00:18:22 — “Worst of the Worst” Narratives Used to Excuse RaidsFear-based claims about criminals and terrorists are used to justify violent enforcement and dismissal of judicial oversight. 00:24:56 — ICE Shootings Surge as Enforcement Turns MilitarizedA sharp increase in shootings and fatalities signals a shift from policing toward military-style domestic intervention. 00:28:39 — Warrantless, No-Knock Raids Declare the EndgameHomeland Security asserts authority to conduct home invasions without judicial warrants, bypassing courts entirely. 00:34:54 — Gold Signals a Vote of No Confidence in Fiat MoneyThe surge in gold and silver prices is framed as systemic distrust in fiat currency rather than speculative enthusiasm. 00:41:44 — Counterparty Risk Turns Paper Gold Into a TrapETFs, tokenized metals, and derivatives are exposed as trust-based instruments vulnerable to collapse under stress. 00:49:37 — “De-Fiatization” and the Global Debt ReckoningThe crisis is framed as the unraveling of fiat currency itself, driven by unsustainable global debt and institutional exit. 01:15:28 — Due Process as a Christian and Moral ObligationLegal protections are framed not as privileges but as God-given rights that safeguard everyone, including the accused. 01:21:13 — Gun Ownership Redefined as TerrorismFederal officials frame lawful firearm possession as inherently threatening, widening the split between enforcement agencies and gun-rights advocates. 01:42:07 — Palantir Staff Revolt Against ICE Surveillance WorkInternal dissent surfaces as employees confront their role in AI-driven tracking and deportation infrastructure. Money should have intrinsic value AND transactional privacy: Go to https://davidknight.gold/ for great deals on physical gold/silver For 10% off Gerald Celente's prescient Trends Journal, go to https://trendsjournal.com/ and enter the code KNIGHT Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.com If you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-real-david-knight-show--5282736/support.
Attorney, author and podcaster Dean Obeidallah joins the program to explain why Greg Bovino, Stephen Miller and Kristi Noem need to be prosecuted. Firing is meaningless—at least if you want to stop the reign of terror being waged by ICE, CBP and DHS agents. The only way to do that is to charge Bovino, Stephen Miller and Kristi Noem with crimes for violating Minnesota state law. Plus, of course, the agents who murdered Renee Good earlier in January and Alex Pretti must be prosecuted as well.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
In this episode, we examine proposals that would restrict or revoke U.S. citizenship, including the constitutional limits on forced renunciation, dual citizenship, and the government's authority to define who belongs. We discuss population policy, free movement in Europe, and Supreme Court precedents that constrain state power over individual status. We also break down a sharp drop in the dollar, revisit the failures of mercantilism, and touch on the cultural politics surrounding Bill Belichick and the Hall of Fame. We then turn to firearms, protest, and political hypocrisy, looking closely at gun violence data, international bans, and the selective application of constitutional principles. We close by exploring free speech, due process, religious freedom, and what happens when rights give way to raw power, from domestic politics to authoritarian regimes abroad. 00:00 Introduction and Overview 00:32 The Exclusive Citizenship Act Explained 01:16 Forced Renunciation and Dual Citizenship Risks 02:30 Could the Government Strip Citizenship? 03:47 Population Reduction and the “100 Million Americans” Idea 05:20 European Passports, Borders, and Free Movement 06:57 Supreme Court Limits on Revoking Citizenship 08:32 Compelled Speech and Constitutional Conflicts 09:46 The Dollar's Worst Day and Weak Currency Politics 11:17 Mercantilism and Why Economists Rejected It 12:51 Bill Belichick and the Politics of the Hall of Fame 15:34 Minnesota Shooting and the Second Amendment Flip 16:46 When and Why People Carry Guns 18:32 What the Data Really Says About Gun Violence 21:01 International Gun Bans and Substitution Effects 22:11 Protests, Firearms, and Political Hypocrisy 24:12 Republicans, Democrats, and Reversed Principles 27:39 Principles vs Preferences in Constitutional Rights 30:11 Do People Actually Believe in Free Speech? 31:35 Rights as a Defense Against Totalitarianism 32:14 Religion, the First Amendment, and Equal Treatment 33:58 The Taliban, Education, and Religious Absolutism 37:09 Why the Second Amendment Became Politically Unique 39:03 Political Violence and State Power 41:16 Due Process, Federal Force, and Law Enforcement Norms Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
S.O.S. (Stories of Service) - Ordinary people who do extraordinary work
Send us a textA decorated Air Force logistics officer. A collapsing marriage. A system that prized appearances over proof. We sit down with Major Clarence Anderson to trace his path from special operations success to a 42‑month sentence—despite no civilian charges and a later-recorded admission of a $100,000 payment tied to perjury and motive. This isn't a salacious true-crime detour; it's a clear look at how political pressure, unlawful command influence, and lopsided resources can bend military justice away from evidence and toward outcomes that “look” tough.We walk through the key beats: Anderson's leadership roles and deployments, the domestic incidents he documented to protect himself, and the moment investigators pressed forward even as family court and local police found no case. You'll hear how a media gag order muted his side while headlines spread, why a judge-alone trial still ended in conviction, and what happened when a post-trial hearing confirmed the payment and conflicting timelines yet declined to act. Inside the brig, Anderson became a lifeline for other inmates, drafting briefs as new case law emerged—proof that resilience can grow even in confinement.Beyond one case, we dig into readiness, morale, and trust. When Article 32 becomes a rubber stamp, when prosecutors feel pushed to file without probable cause, and when accused service members lack parity of counsel and support, the force bleeds credibility and talent. We talk practical reforms: separating prosecution from command, enforcing evidentiary standards at charging, ensuring resource parity for the accused, addressing media gag asymmetry, and creating a short-term task force to audit convictions from the high-pressure years. Anderson lays out a bold ask—reinstatement and a SecDef-directed review team—to restore both justice and confidence.If you care about fairness, unit cohesion, and national security, this conversation will challenge assumptions and offer a way forward. Listen, share with a friend in uniform, and tell us what reform should come first. Subscribe for more stories that put accountability, due process, and mission readiness back where they belong.Support the showVisit my website: https://thehello.llc/THERESACARPENTERRead my writings on my blog: https://www.theresatapestries.com/Listen to other episodes on my podcast: https://storiesofservice.buzzsprout.comWatch episodes of my podcast:https://www.youtube.com/c/TheresaCarpenter76
In an order dated Monday, Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz said Todd Lyons, the acting director of ICE, must appear personally in court. Schlitz took the administration to task over its handling of bond hearings for immigrants it has detained. Please Like, Comment and Follow 'Philip Teresi on KMJ' on all platforms: --- Philip Teresi on KMJ is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever else you listen to podcasts. -- Philip Teresi on KMJ Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 AM & 105.9 FM KMJ | Website | Facebook | Instagram | X | Podcast | Amazon | - Everything KMJ KMJNOW App | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In this episode, investigative journalists Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell and attorney Eric Bland confront a troubling throughline connecting professional discipline, prosecutorial discretion, and the rapid erosion of constitutional norms. Eric recounts a chilling professional reality: an SC Bar disciplinary investigation triggered by harsh—but truthful—excise of free speech, while far more serious attorney misconduct across South Carolina goes untouched. From there, the discussion turns to newly filed deposition testimony, and the hosts break down how witness narratives can subtly “evolve” under pressure. The final segment widens the lens to the streets of Minnesota, as the team grapples with the fatal shooting of American Nurse Alex Pretti and the alarming normalization of armed federal agents operating without transparency, judicial warrants, or visible identification. At its core, this episode asks a sobering question: What happens when the systems designed to protect justice instead punish those who challenge abuse? The answer... is why journalism, courts, and public scrutiny matter now more than ever. ☕ Cups Up! ⚖️ Episode References Lawyer & Judicial Discipline Overview from SC ODC ⚖️ Explainer: Immigration Removal Proceedings and Expanded Mandatory Detention in the U.S. - National Immigration Forum, July 28, 2025
AP Washington correspondent Sagar Meghani reports on President Trump saying he wants to let investigations into the fatal shooting of a Minneapolis protester play out.
In Episode 454 of The Andrew Parker Show, Andrew Parker delivers a forceful and wide-ranging analysis of the growing breakdown of the rule of law—both at home and abroad.Andrew begins in Minneapolis, once a model of good government, now gripped by recurring unrest, political radicalization, and open resistance to federal law enforcement. He examines how state and local officials are encouraging obstruction and interference with immigration enforcement, the consequences of an unenforced border under the Biden administration, and why disagreement with policy never justifies ignoring or undermining the law itself.Drawing on historical parallels—from school desegregation to the Berkeley riots—Andrew explains why the rule of law, not political ideology, is the foundation that holds a democracy together. Protest is protected. Rioting, intimidation, and interference are not.The episode then turns overseas to Iran, where tens of thousands of protesters opposing the regime have reportedly been murdered. Andrew delivers a blunt assessment of U.S. leadership, the dangers of inaction, and what America's response—or lack thereof—signals to the world, Israel, and the future of peace in the Middle East.This episode is a warning, a history lesson, and a call for moral clarity: when the rule of law collapses, the consequences are severe—and often irreversible.Support the showThe Andrew Parker Show - Politics, Israel & The Law. Follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube and X. Subscribe to our email list at www.theandrewparkershow.com Copyright © 2025 The Andrew Parker Show - All Rights Reserved.
On Friday's Mark Levin Show, immigration proceedings are civil in nature, not criminal, and illegal aliens only have limited due process protections as established by congressional statutes and Supreme Court rulings. U.S. immigration laws explicitly restrict illegal aliens from raising certain arguments in federal courts, forbid judicial review of designated executive actions and confine jurisdiction over specific claims to particular federal courts. When federal courts exercise authority over claims that are barred, unreviewable, or jurisdictionally restricted under these statutes, they contravene federal law. In such instances, the Supreme Court should intervene as needed to reaffirm these boundaries. Also, Americanism is fundamentally incompatible with Islamism as it seeks to conquer and destroy the West, particularly the United States. The Democrat Party defends this ideology by opposing deportations and removals, allowing this cancer to spread. Instead of live and let live, Islamism demands conformity or death. If Democrats win the midterms, they will cripple President Trump's efforts to protect the nation, as they prioritize party power over the Constitution, welcoming Marxists and Islamists alike because they hate the country but love their authority. Later, the lies about ICE agents quickly get headlines from the media and when they try to set the record straight it goes to the back page. The newest one is that ICE detained a 5-year-old boy, which is a lie. ICE agents are patriotic, humane Americans who target serious criminals like killers and child predators, and Democrats seek to defund them. The Democrat Party hates hardworking, law-abiding American citizens. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
In this urgent episode of Empowered With Gina, Gina Zapanta sits down with Gina Amato, Director of the Immigrants' Rights Project at Public Counsel, for a necessary conversation about immigration, due process, and the state of the law in 2026.Gina Amato is on the front lines of litigation against the federal government, fighting to protect immigrants' constitutional rights, including access to legal counsel and protection from unlawful detention and racial profiling. She explains what many Americans misunderstand about immigration law, why immigrants are entitled to due process under the Constitution, and how denying access to attorneys threatens democracy itself.Drawing from her upbringing as the daughter of an immigrant mother, Amato shares what led her to civil rights work, the emotional weight of representing vulnerable communities, and how trauma and systemic injustice intersect with the criminal and immigration systems.The conversation breaks down what is actually happening inside detention facilities, why family separations continue, and how policies are being enforced without regard for long-standing constitutional protections. Amato also addresses the common argument that undocumented immigrants are “not entitled” to rights and explains why that belief is legally and historically wrong.This episode is about law, humanity, and the consequences of abandoning due process. It offers clarity amid misinformation and speaks directly to women doing difficult, high-stakes work who are trying to stay grounded while fighting for something bigger than themselves.
Slam The Gavel welcomes back Tanith Pereira to the podcast. Tanith is speaking out for the second time as she was last on Season 6, Episode 352. The Estoppel case continues to be dragged out by Judge Michael L. Katz in the State of New York. Tanith discussed how her rights have been violated and has not received Due Process. With a judge dragging his feet, her son is suffering in a fatherless home with a man who isn't even his father.To Reach. Tanith Pereira: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)Maryann Petri: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comhttps://www.tiktok.com/@maryannpetriFacebook: https://youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcast?si=INW9XaTyprKsaDklhttps://substack.com/@maryannpetri?r=kd7n6&utm_medium=iosInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/guitarpeace/Pinterest: Slam The Gavel Podcast/@guitarpeaceLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maryann-petri-62a46b1ab/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536 Twitter https://x.com/PetriMaryannEzlegalsuit.com https://ko-fi.com/maryannpetrihttps://www.zazzle.com/store/slam_the_gavel/aboout*DISCLAIMER* The use of this information is at the viewer/user's own risk. Content on this podcast does not constitute legal, financial, medical or any other professional advice. Viewer/user/guest should consult with the relevant professionals. IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. Reproduction, distribution, performing, publicly displaying and making a derivative of the work is explicitly prohibited without permission from content creator. The content creator maintains the exclusive copyright and any unauthorized copyright usage is strictly prohibited. Podcast is protected by owner from duplication, reproduction, distribution, making a derivative of the work or by owner displaying the podcast. Owner shall be held harmless and indemnified from any and all legal liability.Support the showSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/
Understanding the Mechanics of Due Process: A Deep DiveIn this episode of the deep dive, the hosts explore the intricate mechanics of the U.S. Constitution, focusing specifically on the due process clauses found in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. He emphasizes the importance of understanding these clauses for law students and bar exam candidates, as they serve as the foundation for constitutional litigation. The discussion begins with a breakdown of due process, highlighting its role as a gatekeeper for government intervention in personal liberties. The hosts elaborate on the distinction between procedural and substantive due process, explaining how each operates within the legal framework and the implications for individual rights.The episode delves into the complexities of procedural due process, detailing the necessary steps for legal analysis, including the Matthews v. Eldridge balancing test. The hosts also address substantive due process, tracing its historical evolution and the criteria for determining fundamental rights. He discusses landmark cases that have shaped the understanding of these rights, such as Griswold v. Connecticut and Lawrence v. Texas, while also touching on the ongoing debate surrounding the interpretation of liberty in constitutional law. The episode concludes with a synthesis of the key concepts, providing listeners with a roadmap for approaching due process issues in legal examinations.In the realm of constitutional law, mastering the intricacies of procedural and substantive due process is essential for any law student or legal professional. This blog post delves into the fundamental aspects of due process, exploring its significance in the US Constitution and its application in legal proceedings.Procedural Due Process: The HowProcedural due process is all about the fairness of the procedures used by the government when it takes away someone's life, liberty, or property. It ensures that individuals receive notice and an opportunity to be heard before any governmental deprivation. The key is to determine whether a protected interest is at stake and what kind of process is required. The Matthews v. Eldridge balancing test is crucial here, weighing the individual's interest, the risk of error, and the government's interest.Substantive Due Process: The WhatSubstantive due process, on the other hand, questions the legitimacy of the law itself. It asks whether the government has a compelling reason to regulate a particular aspect of life. This doctrine has evolved over time, with the court recognizing various fundamental rights related to privacy and personal autonomy. The bifurcated standard of review—strict scrutiny for fundamental rights and rational basis for non-fundamental rights—guides the analysis.Understanding the distinction between procedural and substantive due process is vital for navigating constitutional law. By following the structured framework and applying the appropriate tests, legal professionals can effectively analyze due process issues. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, the tension between historical precedent and evolving liberty remains a central theme in constitutional law.TakeawaysDue process is the bedrock of constitutional litigation.The Fifth Amendment applies to federal actions, while the Fourteenth Amendment applies to state actions.Procedural due process focuses on the fairness of the procedures used by the government.due process, constitutional law, Fifth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, procedural due process, substantive due process, law school, bar exam, legal analysis, fundamental rights
Ring the bell, because school is in session for Starfleet Academy. Join Josh Gilliland and Jordon Huppert for their analysis of the first two episodes of the new Star Trek series. Did Nus Braka and Anisha Mir have a fair "trial”? Where was defense counsel? Was that just a sentencing? Join Josh and Jordon for their analysis of Starfleet Academy. Send us a textSupport the showNo part of this recording should be considered legal advice.Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok @TheLegalGeeks
Jon Herold is joined by Ashe in America for an in-depth breakdown of the Colorado appellate hearing in the Tina Peters case, with Ashe reporting directly from the courtroom and walking through what unfolded in real time. The discussion centers on the judges' aggressive questioning of the state, particularly around jury misinstruction, the misdemeanor-versus-felony charging issue, and whether Peters was unlawfully sentenced for crimes the jury was never asked to consider. Ashe explains why the most damaging moments for the prosecution came not from the defense, but from the court itself, including concerns over due process violations, First Amendment implications, and sentencing that relied on uncharged conduct. The episode also explores what remedies are now on the table, from resentencing to a full retrial, how a presidential pardon factors into jurisdictional questions, and why this case has never truly been about election machines despite years of media framing. The conversation closes with analysis of what relief may realistically look like and why the appellate court's posture signals serious trouble for the state's case.
As The Electorette returns with a new season, there was only one place to start: the front lines of civil liberties. In this episode, Jen Taylor-Skinner is joined by Deirdre Schifeling, Chief Political & Advocacy Officer at the American Civil Liberties Union, for a wide-ranging and urgent conversation about what Trump's second term really represents—not chaos, but a calculated “shock and awe” strategy designed to overwhelm the law, the courts, and the public. They discuss the ACLU's unprecedented legal response, the escalating attacks on immigrant communities, and why the Supreme Court's upcoming birthright citizenship case could fundamentally redefine what it means to be American. Deirdre also explains how coordinated legal and civic pressure can slow executive overreach, why public engagement still matters in moments like this, and what people can do right now to meaningfully defend civil liberties and the rule of law. Mentioned in this episode: Firewall For Freedom: States Must Safeguard Our Rights Stop ICE's Attack On Our Communities Episode Chapters & Timestamps 00:00 — Season Return & Why the ACLU Now Jen kicks off the new season of The Electorette and explains why beginning with the ACLU is both urgent and necessary. 02:00 — “Shock and Awe” as a Governing Strategy Deirdre Schifeling explains why the current moment isn't chaos, but a deliberate strategy designed to overwhelm the law and civil society. 06:30 — The Scale of the ACLU's Legal Response How the ACLU mobilized immediately—and what it means to file hundreds of legal actions in a single year. 09:30 — Immigration Enforcement, Due Process, and Escalation A look at aggressive immigration tactics, racial profiling, and why conditions may intensify as new funding takes effect. 14:30 — Public Backlash and the Limits of Fear Politics Why demonizing immigrant communities has consequences—and where public resistance is already visible. 18:30 — Are the Courts Holding Up? An assessment of how the judicial system is responding, where it's working, and where the risks remain. 22:30 — Birthright Citizenship and the Supreme Court Test Why the birthright citizenship case is so consequential—and what's at stake for the Constitution if it fails. 28:30 — What Birthright Citizenship Really Means Historical context on why birthright citizenship exists and how it defines American equality. 33:30 — Executive Power and the Role of the Courts How recent court decisions have expanded executive authority—and where guardrails are most needed. 38:30 — What Comes Next for Civil Liberties Looking ahead: where pressure points are likely to emerge and how rights are most vulnerable. 42:30 — Civic Engagement Beyond the Courts How public participation, organizing, and legal advocacy intersect outside electoral politics. 46:30 — The ACLU's “Firewall for Freedom” Strategy How state and local governments can act as safeguards—and what that looks like in practice. 51:30 — What Individuals Can Do Right Now Concrete ways people can support civil liberties, engage locally, and stay involved. 55:30 — Final Thoughts & The Work Ahead Closing reflections on this moment, the long view, and why sustained engagement matters. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Dave Franke, a former officer for the Secretaría de Seguridad Pública (Mexico's Civilian Protection), joins us to discuss human rights violations connected to Trump's destruction of alleged Venezuelan drug boats. He states that the real purpose behind the attacks is to take over Venezuelan oil and recalls U.S. internal corruption in which the ATF supplied cartels with guns—guns that Dave would later end up fighting against himself and other interesting topics...WELCOME TO CAMP!
Behind every delayed tuition payment is a family left in limbo. This episode pulls back the curtain on what's really going on.Host Tracey Spencer Walsh is joined by Matthew Delforte, a veteran education attorney, for an eye-opening conversation about the deep systemic failures surrounding tuition reimbursement, impartial hearing orders, and how the Department of Education's delays are devastating families and schools.Together, they break down the urgent issues and the bold solutions proposed to fix them. Here is what you'll take away from this important conversation:
Slam The Gavel welcomes back Justin McPhail to the podcast. He was last on Season 6, Episode 346, talking how "It Wasn't About The Money." Justin came on the podcast to discuss the Systemic Issues within the Family Court system and how important it is to leave a paper trail. Affidavits were discussed and how import they are to the record. The breaks in Due Process invalidate Family Court proceedings. Justin also discussed more deeply how psychological evaluations and drug tests are illegal and unconstitutional. "Nothing holds true in Family Court, think for yourself, no one else is going to," states Justin.To Reach Justin McPhail: justinmcphail@att.net and SUBSTACK: @justinmcphail1Supportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)Maryann Petri: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comhttps://www.tiktok.com/@maryannpetriFacebook: https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536https://substack.com/@maryannpetri?r=kd7n6&utm_medium=iosInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/guitarpeace/Pinterest: Slam The Gavel Podcast/@guitarpeaceLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maryann-petri-62a46b1ab/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536 Twitter https://x.com/PetriMaryannEzlegalsuit.com https://ko-fi.com/maryannpetrihttps://www.zazzle.com/store/slam_the_gavel/aboout*DISCLAIMER* The use of this information is at the viewer/user's own risk. Content on this podcast does not constitute legal, financial, medical or any other professional advice. Viewer/user/guest should consult with the relevant professionals. IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. Reproduction, distribution, performing, publicly displaying and making a derivative of the work is explicitly prohibited without permission from content creator. The content creator maintains the exclusive copyright and any unauthorized copyright usage is strictly prohibited. Podcast is protected by owner from duplication, reproduction, distribution, making a derivative of the work or by owner displaying the podcast. Owner shall be held harmless and indemnified from any and all legal liability.Support the showSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/
Slam The Gavel welcomes new guest, Latesha Howard to the podcast. Latesha is a mother in San Bernardino CA. She is an advocate for Special Education and has three children of her own. She also has three adopted nieces and nephews that were taken away by CFS (CPS). Latesha is being retaliated on for being an advocate for the children regarding Special Education services. The school staff were annoyed with Latesha for advocating for services for the children and called Children and Family services on her for this reason. With all the stress Latesha has had to endure, she now suffers from Vitiligo. Latesha has filed a law suit encompassing all individuals involved in the mistreatment of her nieces and nephews. She also has court this Thursday, the 8th of January, 2025. Will follow this case.To Reach Latesha Howard: lathow2@yahoo.comSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)Maryann Petri: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comhttps://www.tiktok.com/@maryannpetriFacebook: https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536https://substack.com/@maryannpetri?r=kd7n6&utm_medium=iosInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/guitarpeace/Pinterest: Slam The Gavel Podcast/@guitarpeaceLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maryann-petri-62a46b1ab/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcasthostmar5536 Twitter https://x.com/PetriMaryannEzlegalsuit.com https://ko-fi.com/maryannpetri https://www.zazzle.com/store/slam_the_gavel/aboout*DISCLAIMER* The use of this information is at the viewer/user's own risk. Content on this podcast does not constitute legal, financial, medical or any other professional advice. Viewer/user/guest should consult with the relevant professionals. IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. Reproduction, distribution, performing, publicly displaying and making a derivative of the work is explicitly prohibited without permission from content creator. The content creator maintains the exclusive copyright and any unauthorized copyright usage is strictly prohibited. Podcast is protected by owner from duplication, reproduction, distribution, making a derivative of the work or by owner displaying the podcast. Owner shall be held harmless and indemnified from any and all legal liability.Support the showSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/
This episode was first published in May 2025. New episodes will resume on January 6, 2026. Keep the narrative flow going in the new year! Subscribe now to skip ads, get bonus content, and enjoy 24/7 access to the entire catalog of 500+ episodes. Original show notes: President Donald Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act during peacetime is unprecedented, a part of his larger effort to portray undocumented immigrants as wicked and threatening as he seeks to deport them en masse. What is not unprecedented is the federal government weaponizing the law to shred constitutional protections and civil liberties. During the Second World War, the administration of Franklin Roosevelt arrested and incarcerated Italians, Germans, and Japanese aliens under the 1798 statute, but also interned roughly 100,000 U.S. citizens of Japanese ancestry — one of the most egregious violations of civil rights in U.S. history. In this episode, the eminent historian David M. Kennedy takes us back to those perilous years and their important parallels to the current crisis. Recommended reading: Freedom From Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929-1945 by David M. Kennedy
A Federal Chief Judge, finding that the Trump Administration intentionally attempted to disappear 250 Venezuelans to El Salvador's torture prison without Due Process in the middle of the night, has issued Final Judgment requiring Trump's DOJ to immediately provide the men with Habeas Corpus Due Process rights in the US, even though they have now been shipped to Venezuela in a phony prisoner exchange by Trump. Michael Popok takes a look at the opinion and the Judge getting his chance, virtually literally, to say “F@#$% me? No, F#@$% you!” to the Trump Administration and DOJ. Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Matter of Tepec-Garcia, 29 I&N Dec. 371 (BIA 2025)termination; in absentia; DHS burden to prove alienage Matter of L-A-G-B-, 29 I&N Dec. 339 (BIA 2025)Panama cartels; CAT; snitches; series of suppositions Matter of Kim, 29 I&N Dec. 339 (BIA 2025)LPR cancellation of removal; discretion; criminal history; South Korea Matter of Lema Mizhirumbay, 29 I&N Dec. 351 (BIA 2025)discretion; weighing factors; criminal history; OSHA violations Matter of N-P-A-, 29 I&N Dec. 347 (BIA 2025)de novo; well-founded fear; ability to freely leave country; pretextual summons; Moldova Matter of Rodriguez Pena, 29 I&N Dec. 358 (BIA 2025)bond; dangerousness; threats; false claim to citizenship; victim affidavits; dismissed criminal charges Matter of Palma-Olvera, 29 I&N Dec. 355 (BIA 2025)good moral character; DUI; Castollo-Perez; rebutting presumption Sanik Herrera v. Bondi, No. 25-3207 (6th Cir. Dec. 15, 2025)motion to reopen; exhaustion; due process; sua sponte Liao v. Bondi, No. 25-60427 (5th Cir. Dec. 17, 2025)untimely petition for review; mandatory claims processing rule; Riley; prison mailbox rule; affidavits Matter of L-T-A-, 29 I&N Dec. 362 (BIA 2025) firm resettlement; some other type of permanent resettlement; A-G-G-Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years. Eimmigration "Simplifies immigration casework. Legal professionals use it to advance cases faster, delight clients, and grow their practices."Special Link! Gonzales & Gonzales Immigration BondsP: (833) 409-9200immigrationbond.com EB-5 Support"EB-5 Support is an ongoing mentorship and resource platform created specifically for immigration attorneys."Contact: info@eb-5support.comWebsite: https://eb-5support.com/Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Click me!Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATION:Email: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerSupport the show
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
