Podcasts about Due process

Immigration bond denials have jumped sharply under the second Trump administration — nowhere more than at the Adelanto ICE detention center in Southern California. On this week's Imperfect Paradise: LAist's Jared Bennett follows the case of a 70-year-old L.A. street vendor held at Adelanto for six months, what it took for his family to get him released, and what immigration advocates say is behind the shift in bond denials. Read Jared’s reporting on LAist.com. Grow your business–no matter what stage you’re in. Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period at SHOPIFY.COM/paradise Support for this podcast is made possible by Gordon and Dona Crawford, who believe that quality journalism makes Los Angeles a better place to live.

Immigration bond denials have jumped sharply under the second Trump administration — nowhere more than at the Adelanto ICE detention center in Southern California. On this week's Imperfect Paradise: LAist's Jared Bennett follows the case of a 70-year-old L.A. street vendor held at Adelanto for six months, what it took for his family to get him released, and what immigration advocates say is behind the shift in bond denials. Read Jared’s reporting on LAist.com. Grow your business–no matter what stage you’re in. Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period at SHOPIFY.COM/paradise Support for this podcast is made possible by Gordon and Dona Crawford, who believe that quality journalism makes Los Angeles a better place to live.Support LAist Today: https://laist.com/join

Joining John Maytham is Jonny Steinberg, acclaimed writer, journalist and scholar, to unpack his argument that accountability must remain firmly rooted in the law rather than public outrage. We'll discuss the constitutional safeguards around presidential impeachment, the role of evidence in holding public office bearers to account, and whether South Africa risks replacing the rule of law with what Steinberg describes as "mob justice". Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Governor Kathy Hochul announced a new busway in the Bronx. WFUV's Anne Jackson reports. The World Cup is reaching its final stage, WFUV's Sonia Weliwitigoda and Sam Giangrande talk about its semifinalists. At City Hall, New Yorkers testified on whether or not horses should be banned. WFUV's Xenia Gonikberg spoke to people who were both against and for the potential ban. In the Financial District, Uber and Lyft drivers went on strike for due process. WFUV's Sonia Weliwitigoda spoke to event organizers and attendees. Host/Producer: Sonia Weliwitigoda Editor: Nathan Ray Reporter: Anne Jackson Reporter: Sam Giangrande Reporter: Sonia Weliwitigoda Reporter: Xenia Gonikberg Theme Music: Joe Bergsieker

In this bonus episode of Talk Law Radio, host Todd Marquardt and co-host Shannon Salmon-Haas dive headfirst into three major, headline-grabbing Supreme Court rulings that are reshaping the legal and political landscape of the United States. From intense debates on biological sex and fairness in sports to historical dives into English common law, Todd and Shannon bring both legal expertise and spirited debate to the table. Whether you lean left, lean right, or just want to know how the law impacts your daily life, this episode breaks down complex constitutional arguments into a conversation you won't want to miss. Key Topics Discussed: Transgender Athletes & Title IX: A look at the landmark case West Virginia v. B.P.J.. Todd and Shannon clash over the Balance of Due Process, Title IX regulations, and safety concerns versus inclusivity in biological female sports. The Fate of Birthright Citizenship: Tracing the law from King James I in 1603 to the 14th Amendment and the Dred Scott decision, the hosts break down Trump v. Barbara. Discover why the Supreme Court upheld that if you are born here, you are a citizen—and the real-world logistical nightmare that changing it would create. Money, Speech, and Campaign Finance: An analysis of National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission. The Supreme Court overturned a 2001 precedent to rule that political parties can now coordinate unlimited spending with candidates. Todd and Shannon square off on whether "money is speech" or if this decision puts American democracy up for sale to the highest bidder. Key Takeaways: The Constitution is a Living Debate: While Todd approaches the text from a strict originalist viewpoint, Shannon highlights how modern societal complexities challenge centuries-old frameworks. The Internet Changes the Legal Burden: A major reason the Supreme Court loosened campaign finance limits was the modern availability of online disclosure and transparency tools for voters. The Buck Stops at the Supreme Court: No matter how much tax money or legislative effort is poured into executive orders and state laws, the high court remains the final arbiter of what is constitutional. Enjoying the show? Don't forget to like, subscribe, click the thumbs-up button, and leave your thoughts in the comments section! Visit marquardtlawfirm.com to submit your own business, elder law, or estate planning questions. -Sponsored by Marquardt Law Firm and Financial Planning HQ -Go to marquardtlawfirm.com and financialplanninghq.netSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Three of our favorite segments from the week, in case you missed them. Elie Mystal, justice correspondent at the Nation, assesses the Supreme Court's term (First) | Atlantic staff writer Rose Horowitch considers the question: are we in a 'postliterate' age? (Starts at 49:05) | The many insects of NYC (Starts at 1:17:25) If you don't subscribe to the Brian Lehrer Show on iTunes, you can do that here. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Can governments decide who gets access to advanced AI models? Are third-party breaches becoming impossible to control? And why are so many CISOs reaching burnout? In this special Cybersecurity Today Month in Review Panel, host Jim Love is joined by cybersecurity experts Laura Payne, David Shipley, and Mike Kim (Mycroft) to examine the biggest cybersecurity stories and trends from June 2026. The panel explores the controversy over U.S. export controls on Anthropic's Mythos and Fable AI models, what they reveal about digital sovereignty, and whether governments should be able to restrict access to frontier AI. They also discuss the continuing wave of third-party breaches, including Salesforce ecosystem compromises and the Clue breach, and why organizations must move beyond compliance toward practical risk management. The conversation examines FortiBleed, exposed administrator portals, credential reuse, and the difficult balance between software flaws, operational mistakes, and secure-by-default design. The panel also tackles one of cybersecurity's biggest human challenges: CISO burnout, executive accountability, organizational culture, and what separates successful security leaders from those set up to fail. The episode concludes with encouraging developments in international cybercrime enforcement, including Operation Riptide, and why better intelligence sharing and improved operational security are making it harder for cybercriminals to hide. Whether you're a CISO, security practitioner, IT leader, or simply interested in the rapidly changing cybersecurity landscape, this discussion offers practical insight into the trends shaping the industry. Panel Jim Love (Host) Laura Payne David Shipley Mike Kim (Mycroft) Topics covered AI export controls and digital sovereignty Anthropic Mythos and Fable Third-party and supply chain risk Salesforce ecosystem security FortiBleed and Fortinet security Secure-by-default strategies CISO burnout and executive accountability Operation Riptide Cybercrime investigations Security leadership and governance Chapters 00:00 Sponsor NordLayer 00:38 Meet the Panel 02:40 Author Scam Warning 04:51 Emotion Is the Target 08:47 AI Model Export Controls 10:01 Hype vs Real AI Security 15:01 Sovereignty and Dependency 20:35 Governments Push Back 24:14 AI Internal Voice Risks 26:12 Third Party Breach Fatigue 30:05 Compliance Limits on Risk 32:15 Blame Game to Risk Focus 33:18 Standards and Priorities 33:39 When Security Vendors Fail 34:35 FortiBleed Numbers Explained 35:44 Process Failures vs Bugs 37:32 Why Fortinet Gets Heat 39:05 Secure by Default Basics 41:04 Budget Reality and Culture 44:36 CISO Burnout and AI Pressure 46:16 Liability and Shared Ownership 50:12 What Great CISOs Do 53:07 Operation Riptide Wins 56:10 Deterrence and Due Process 58:14 Sharing Intel for ROI 59:09 Hopium and Wrap Up 01:00:46 Sponsor NordLayer Message

A Bozeman man arrested by immigration authorities last week has been ordered released after a federal judge found his detention likely unconstitutional.

On July 9, 1868, the 14th Amendment was ratified, establishing birthright citizenship, due process and equal protection under the law. The landmark Reconstruction-era amendment remains one of the Constitution's most significant guarantees of civil rights and legal equality. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed with the latest news from a leading Black-owned & controlled media company: https://aurn.com/newsletter Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Trump v. Barbara, et al., No. 25-365 (U.S. June 30, 2026)birthright citizenship; history; Second Founding Sosnava Rodriguez, et al. v. Mullin, et al., No. 26-50183 (5th Cir. July 2, 2026)procedural and substantive due; right to a bond hearing after 90 days; Mathews; fundamental liberty interest for noncitizens; EWI detention; mandatory detention Matter of T-D-E-, 29 I&N Dec. 732 (BIA 2026)credibility; clear error; failure to disclose military service in DS-160; fraud to enter U.S.; corroboration; prior false testimony; Burkina FasoMatter of Vizcaino Aybar, 29 I&N Dec. 736 (BIA 2026)bond; venue; jurisdiction Riley v. Blanche, No. 22-1609 (4th Cir. July 2, 2026)withholding-only review; jurisdiction; claims processing rule; 30-day petition for review deadline; FARO; final order of removal; clear error; BIA fact finding; BIA stating standard but not applying it Rivera-Mendoza, et. al v. Blanche, No. 21-70107 (9th Cir. June 25, 2026)child endangerment; statutory interpretation; Congressional intent; Cal. Pen. Code § 273a(a); Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.545(1); crime of child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment; INA § 237(a)(2)(E)(i); Loper Bright; criminal negligence mens rea; actus reas; dictionaries; general intent crimes  Morris v. Blanche, No. 25-3084 (6th Cir. June 25, 2026)firearms offense; motion to reopen; motion to reconsider; ineffective assistance of counsel; jurisdiction as a sword; concessions of counsel; strict Lozada compliance; proof of mailing Santillan Quiroz v. Mullin, No. 26-6019 (10th Cir. June 30, 2026)no mandatory detention of EWIs; Hurtado; seeking admission; INA § 235(a)(2)(B); § 236(a); § 236(c); Laken Riley Act; applicant for admission entry; canon of constitutional avoidance; plain text; statutory interpretation; longstanding agency interpretation; legislative history; use of the word “otherwise”; cannot against surplusage; due process rights of noncitizensKurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.eimmigration"Immigration law software you'll love to use."get.eimmigration.com/IRP Gonzales & Gonzales Immigration BondsP: (833) 409-9200immigrationbond.com Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Click me!Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATION:Email: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerSupport the show

»

In this episode of The Gray Area, we ask a uncomfortable question:Can a badge become a reset button?We break down how officers can leave one agency under a cloud, resign during an investigation, or get fired for serious misconduct — then later end up wearing another badge somewhere else.This episode looks at two major examples: Matthew Luckhurst, the former San Antonio officer tied to a nationally reported feces-related misconduct case who later became a police chief in Texas, and Sean Grayson, the former deputy convicted in the fatal shooting of Sonya Massey after working for multiple law enforcement agencies in a short period of time.But this is The Gray Area, so the answer is not as simple as “blacklist every cop who gets accused.”A complaint is not a conviction.A resignation is not an acquittal.Bad cops should not be able to outrun their history, but good cops should not be buried underneath false accusations, political discipline, or unfinished investigations.We discuss why police background checks can be extensive but still incomplete, why social skills and emotional intelligence matter in policing, and why a national employment-integrity system could help protect the public, protect the profession, and protect officers who were wrongly accused.A badge should not erase your history.An allegation should not erase your future.That is the balance.That is accountability.That is The Gray Area.Follow Two Cops One Donut for more police perspective, public accountability, and honest conversations from inside the profession.send us a message! twocopsonedonut@yahoo.comSupport the showPlease see our Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/c/TwoCopsOneDonut Join our Discord!! https://discord.gg/BdjeTEAc *Send us a message! twocopsonedonut@yahoo.com

Maryland Registered Nurse Stephanie Skipper shares her harrowing experience with false Board of Nursing complaints, board proceedings, and legal battles in the post-op care industry. This episode explores healthcare entrepreneurship and manual lymphatic drainage versus cellulite lymphatic drainage within a nurse's scope of practice. The discussion also touches on regulatory overreach, due process, extortion, fake degrees, and fighting false nursing license allegations. Thank you to Nurses Uncorked Enema Award Sponsor, Happy Bum Co. Please visit https://happybumco.com/  and use promo code NURSESUNCORKED for 20% off your first bundle. Advertise on the show! Email with the subject NURSES UNCORKED SPONSOR to: nursesuncorked@gmail.com Become a Patron! Gain early access to episodes, ad-free episodes, exclusive bonus content, giveaways, Zoom parties, shout-outs, and much more. https://patron.podbean.com/nursesuncorkedpodcast ETSY Shop:  Stop Healthcare Worker Violence! https://www.etsy.com/shop/TheNurseErica   Guest Stephanie Skipper: Instagram: @iamnursestephie  tiktok.com/@iamnursestephie   DISCLAIMER: This episode presents the personal account and perspective of Stephanie Skipper regarding her experiences with the Maryland Board of Nursing and a named individual. The statements, allegations, and opinions expressed are solely those of the guest and do not represent the views of this podcast or its producers. All claims made in this episode are alleged and unverified. The individual referenced as having filed a complaint has not been contacted for comment, and this episode does not represent their account or position. Nothing in this episode should be construed as a statement of fact regarding any third party. Listeners are encouraged to seek multiple perspectives before forming conclusions. This podcast does not intend to defame, harass, or make false statements of fact about any person or organization. Any legal proceedings or regulatory matters referenced are ongoing or concluded matters of public record and are discussed here in good faith for informational and advocacy purposes only. This content is not legal advice. Chapters: 00:00 Introduction to Stephanie's Journey 06:36 Stephanie's Nursing Background and Business Ventures 12:25 The Manual Lymphatic Drainage Massage Course that Started it All 19:45 Conflict with a Competitor 23:34 The Board of Nursing Investigation 28:36 License Suspension and Fallout from the Complaint 35:10 Investigating the Accuser 44:20 More Victims 46:39 Navigating the Board of Nursing Investigatory Process and Proceedings 55:42 Charges and Accusations 56:55 Cellulite Lymphatic Drainage versus Manual Lymphatic Drainage 1:00:42 Enema of the Week Award 1:03:09 Forged Letter 1:08:09 Witnesses and Testimonies 1:13:34 Appealing the Decision and Moving Forward 1:22:14 Going Public: The Power of Social Media 1:27:40 Due Process and Plans for Civil Lawsuits   Help the podcast grow by giving episodes a like, download, follow and a 5 ️ star rating! Please follow Nurses Uncorked at: tiktok.com/nurses-uncorked https://youtube.com/@NursesUncorkedL   You can listen to the podcast at: podcasts.apple/nursesuncorked spotify.com/nursesuncorked podbean.com/nursesuncorked iheart.com/nurses-uncorked   Follow Nurse Erica:  @TheNurseErica on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook and YouTube! https://www.youtube.com/@thenurseerica9094 https://www.instagram.com/the.nurse.erica/   DISCLAIMER: This Podcast and all related content published or distributed by or on behalf of Nurse Erica or Nurses Uncorked Podcast is for informational, educational and entertainment purposes only and may include information that is general in nature and that is not specific to you. Any information or opinions expressed or contained herein are not intended to serve as legal advice, or replace medical advice, nor to diagnose, prescribe or treat any disease, condition, illness or injury, and you should consult your health care professional regarding all matters concerning your health, including before beginning any exercise, weight loss, or health care program. If you have, or suspect you may have, a health-care emergency, please contact a qualified health care professional for treatment. The views and opinions expressed on Nurses Uncorked do not reflect the views of our employers, professional organizations or affiliates. Any information or opinions provided by guests, experts or hosts featured within website or on Nurses Uncorked Podcast are their own; not those of Nurse Erica or Nurses Uncorked LLC. Accordingly, Nurse Erica and Nurses Uncorked cannot be responsible for any results or consequences or actions you may take based on such information or opinions. All content is the sole property of Nurses Uncorked, LLC. All copyrights are reserved and the exclusive property of Nurses Uncorked, LLC.

In this Season 3 episode, co-hosts A. Valerie Mirko, Partner at Armstrong Teasdale LLP and leader of the firm's Securities Regulation and Litigation Practice, and William Nelson, Director of Public Policy and Associate General Counsel at the Investment Adviser Association, discuss recent policy shifts at the SEC. Valerie and William discuss the SEC's rescission of its “No Admit, No Deny” policy and review a recent Division of Examinations risk alert focused on economic conflicts of interest. Valerie also discusses the SEC's recent rulemaking proposals and previews what may be ahead in the “Atkins Avalanche” - a potential wave of up to 30 rule proposals in 2026 alone. William then covers the SEC's recent capital formation proposals to streamline public company offerings, as well as the Commission's new strategic plan, which focuses on innovation, stakeholder engagement, and internal efficiency. This episode is a must-listen for securities lawyers, compliance professionals, regulators, and anyone navigating today's rapidly evolving regulatory landscape.Recent Past Episodes of this Series:Redefining Retirement: New Rules, New Opportunities (5/20/2026)⁠A New Enforcement Era and the Potential Coming Wave of SEC Rulemaking⁠ (4/22/2026)⁠⁠Congress Puts the SROs Under the Microscope: SEC Oversight, Transparency, and Reform⁠⁠ (3/18/2026)⁠⁠⁠Congress Puts the SEC Under the Microscope: Accountability, Due Process, and Reform⁠⁠⁠ (2/11/2026)⁠⁠⁠⁠A Study in Contrasts: Innovation and Crypto versus the Crypto Fraud Landscape⁠⁠⁠⁠ (1/21/2026)Please note, the positions and opinions expressed by the speakers are strictly their own, and do not necessarily represent the views of their employers, nor those of the D.C. Bar, its Board of Governors or co-sponsoring Communities and organizations.Thank You to our Sponsor!⁠Posh ⁠is the 24/7 call answering service designed for legal professionals of all kinds. Save time and win business with an AI receptionist and team of live agents always at the ready. Capabilities include customized client intake, appointment scheduling, call screening and transferring, English- and Spanish-fluent receptionists, legal integrations, and much more. Simply set your availability and instructions, and Posh handles the rest. Get a free trial at posh.com/law or call 833-GET-POSH.

ustice is rarely simple. At the conclusion of this See You In Court conversation, Professor Stephen Vladeck describes justice as messy, imprecise, and complicated. Those complications, however, help give people confidence that the law is more stable, neutral, and principled than the will of whoever currently holds political power. This closing reflection connects directly to Robin Frazer Clark and Lester Tate's broader interview with Professor Vladeck about the Supreme Court's shadow docket, due process, judicial transparency, and public confidence in the legal system. Watch the complete interview on YouTube: https://youtu.be/kfK3Fl1_Qgw?si=L-yLs9z0LJkrmHEP Listen to the complete episode on Podbean: https://seeyouincourt.podbean.com/e/the-supreme-court-s-secret-power-grab-shadow-docket-explained/ Learn more: https://seeyouincourtpodcast.org/   Justice, Stephen Vladeck, Supreme Court, Shadow Docket, Rule of Law, Due Process, Judicial Transparency, Civil Justice, Legal Podcast, See You In Court  

Pastor Jordan Sunday June 7th 2026 - Adult Class

Pac Nation, I'm sitting here in Peshtigo with a fresh pot of coffee, excited to talk OTAs, Jordan Love's deep balls, and that beautiful Lambeau grass — and then this news hits like a blindside from a 350-pound tackle. Josh Jacobs facing multiple domestic violence charges and a felony strangulation count has the entire state of Wisconsin reeling. This is a massive gut punch right as we were gearing up for the climb, but we're staying grounded in due process while facing the hard reality. Key Discussion Points: The Timing & Emotional Impact: Just as OTAs open and the offense looks primed for elite production, this legal storm creates a massive distraction for the young locker room Brian Gutekunst has built. Due Process vs. Reality: Jacobs and his attorneys are pushing back hard with claims of important evidence yet to be released — innocent until proven guilty must apply, but the damage to preparation is real. Offensive Ripple Effects: Jordan Love loses his security blanket and hammer in the run game; AJ Dillon may need to carry unexpected weight early while the running back room gets tested. Bigger Picture for the Franchise: How the Packers navigate this without letting one player overshadow the G on the helmet, plus what it means for culture and the 2026 season outlook. This episode is brought to you by PrizePicks! Use code PACKDADDY and visit https://prizepicks.onelink.me/LME0/PACKDADDY to get started with America's #1 fantasy sports app. If you're feeling this same gut punch today but you're still standing with the Packers, head over to Apple Podcasts or Spotify right now, drop us that five-star review, and tell me how you're processing this news. I read every single one — we need to hear from real fans, not the headline screamers. Join the conversation because we tell it straight. To advertise on this podcast please email: ad-sales@libsyn.com Or go to: https://advertising.libsyn.com/packernetpodcast Support the Show & Explore My Projects Help keep the show growing and check out everything I'm building across the Packers and NFL world: Support: Patreon: www.patreon.com/pack_daddy Venmo: @Packernetpodcast CashApp: $packpod Projects: Grade NFL Players ➜ fanfocus-teamgrades.lovable.app Packers Hub ➜ packersgames.com Create NFL Draft Big Boards ➜ nfldraftgrades.com Watch Draft Prospects ➜ draftflix.com Screen Record ➜ pause-play-capture.lovable.app Global Economics Hub ➜ global-economic-insight-hub.lovable.app Go Pack Go. We'll stay on this one together.

Pac Nation, I'm sitting here in Peshtigo with a fresh pot of coffee, excited to talk OTAs, Jordan Love's deep balls, and that beautiful Lambeau grass — and then this news hits like a blindside from a 350-pound tackle. Josh Jacobs facing multiple domestic violence charges and a felony strangulation count has the entire state of Wisconsin reeling. This is a massive gut punch right as we were gearing up for the climb, but we're staying grounded in due process while facing the hard reality. Key Discussion Points: The Timing & Emotional Impact: Just as OTAs open and the offense looks primed for elite production, this legal storm creates a massive distraction for the young locker room Brian Gutekunst has built. Due Process vs. Reality: Jacobs and his attorneys are pushing back hard with claims of important evidence yet to be released — innocent until proven guilty must apply, but the damage to preparation is real. Offensive Ripple Effects: Jordan Love loses his security blanket and hammer in the run game; AJ Dillon may need to carry unexpected weight early while the running back room gets tested. Bigger Picture for the Franchise: How the Packers navigate this without letting one player overshadow the G on the helmet, plus what it means for culture and the 2026 season outlook. This episode is brought to you by PrizePicks! Use code PACKDADDY and visit https://prizepicks.onelink.me/LME0/PACKDADDY to get started with America's #1 fantasy sports app. If you're feeling this same gut punch today but you're still standing with the Packers, head over to Apple Podcasts or Spotify right now, drop us that five-star review, and tell me how you're processing this news. I read every single one — we need to hear from real fans, not the headline screamers. Join the conversation because we tell it straight. To advertise on this podcast please email: ad-sales@libsyn.com Or go to: https://advertising.libsyn.com/packernetpodcast Support the Show & Explore My Projects Help keep the show growing and check out everything I'm building across the Packers and NFL world: Support: Patreon: www.patreon.com/pack_daddy Venmo: @Packernetpodcast CashApp: $packpod Projects: Grade NFL Players ➜ fanfocus-teamgrades.lovable.app Packers Hub ➜ packersgames.com Create NFL Draft Big Boards ➜ nfldraftgrades.com Watch Draft Prospects ➜ draftflix.com Screen Record ➜ pause-play-capture.lovable.app Global Economics Hub ➜ global-economic-insight-hub.lovable.app Go Pack Go. We'll stay on this one together.

The news of Texas covered today includes:Our Lone Star story of the day: Just what should “due process” look like in immigration cases, especially illegal alien cases? Should those who broke the bargain of living under the Rule of Law really be able to further clog up our federal courts, depriving citizens and the law abiding of swifter justice, or should the immigration system itself serve as due process? It seems to me that if an illegal entrant to the country goes through the process and is under a deportation order, that person has experience due process no matter what the open borders tear jerker crowd claims.Our Lone Star story of the day is sponsored by Allied Compliance Services providing the best service in DOT, business and personal drug and alcohol testing since 1995.Are Soros funded groups behind the ginning up much of the hysteria surrounding the build out of computer data centers in Texas?Lubbock County Justice of the Peace GOP runoff candidate Mary Hernandez joins us.Listen on the radio, or station stream, at 5pm Central. Click for our radio and streaming affiliates.www.PrattonTexas.com

This is the sixth in a series of seven episodes regarding the terrorist leader of Al Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden.  The hunt for Bin Laden cools after he managed to escape US forces in Tora Bora, but that doesn't stop America from expanding the War on Terror.  Beyond an endless war against an impossible to defeat idea, the conflict tested America's core ideas:  Freedom of Speech, Freedom from Torture, Due Process and extrajudicial killings.  The war in Afghanistan, the War in Iraq, and the Presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama are each discussed in detail.  Contact the show at resourcesbylowery@gmail.com or on Bluesky @EmpiresPod If you would like to financially support the show, please use the following paypal link. Or remit PayPal payment to @Lowery80.  And here is a link for Venmo users. Any support is greatly appreciated and will be used to make future episodes of the show even better.   Expect new shows to drop on Wednesday mornings from September to May. Music is licensed through Epidemic Sound

In this Season 3 episode, co-hosts A. Valerie Mirko, Partner at Armstrong Teasdale LLP and leader of the firm's Securities Regulation and Litigation Practice, and William Nelson, Director of Public Policy and Associate General Counsel at the Investment Adviser Association, are joined by Kendra Isaacson, Partner at Mindset, for an in-depth discussion of major policy developments reshaping retirement savings. Kendra is a leading voice on retirement policy, bringing deep experience from her time as Pensions Policy Director for the Senate HELP Committee, at the Department of Labor, and in the private sector. During this episode, she breaks down the DOL's proposal to expand use of alternative investments in certain retirement accounts, exploring the regulatory rationale, potential benefits, and compliance considerations. The conversation also covers broader efforts to expand access to retirement savings, including recently introduced federal legislation and the Administration's newly announced IRA marketplace. Together, Valerie, William and Kendra examine how these initiatives could alter the retirement landscape for investors, advisers, and plan sponsors. This episode is a must-listen for securities lawyers, compliance professionals, regulators, and anyone navigating today's rapidly evolving regulatory landscape. Recent Past Episodes of this Series:A New Enforcement Era and the Potential Coming Wave of SEC Rulemaking (4/22/2026)⁠Congress Puts the SROs Under the Microscope: SEC Oversight, Transparency, and Reform⁠ (3/18/2026)⁠⁠Congress Puts the SEC Under the Microscope: Accountability, Due Process, and Reform⁠⁠ (2/11/2026)⁠⁠⁠A Study in Contrasts: Innovation and Crypto versus the Crypto Fraud Landscape⁠⁠⁠ (1/21/2026)⁠⁠⁠⁠A Year of Change, Challenges, and What Comes Next⁠⁠⁠⁠ (12/17/2025)⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠When Washington Stops: What the 2025 Shutdown Means for the SEC and Congress Going Forward⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (11/19/2025)⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠The SEC's New Direction: Enforcement and Governance in Focus⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ (10/22/25) Please note, the positions and opinions expressed by the speakers are strictly their own, and do not necessarily represent the views of their employers, nor those of the D.C. Bar, its Board of Governors or co-sponsoring Communities and organizations.

Lopez-Campos, et al. v. Raycraft, et al., No. 25-1965 (6th Cir. May 11, 2026)no mandatory detention of EWIs; Hurtado; seeking admission; INA § 235(a)(2)(B); Laken Riley Act; applicant for admission entry; canon of constitutional avoidance; plain text; statutory interpretation; longstanding agency interpretation; legislative history; use of the word “otherwise”; cannot against surplusage; due process rights of noncitizens B. Singh v. Blanche, No. 24-815 (9th Cir. May 15, 2026)past persecution; beatings; threats; reasonable relocation in India; Law Library of Congress report; Mann Party; Sikh; Urias Orellana; substantial evidenceKurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.eimmigration"Immigration law software you'll love to use."get.eimmigration.com/IRP Gonzales & Gonzales Immigration BondsP: (833) 409-9200immigrationbond.com Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Click me!Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATION:Email: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostCase notesRecent criminal-immigration article (p.18)Featured in San Diego VoyagerSupport the show

Are We Watching Justice or Turning Violence into Entertainment?The Luigi Mangione case has become more than a courtroom story. It has become a national flashpoint overdue process, media hype, political violence, online mobs, and whether America still understands the difference between justice and entertainment.Is Justice Still Blind or Has the Crowd Taken Over the Courtroom?In this episode of Go Right with Peter Boykin, the Constitutionalist for Liberty, we break down the legal questions surrounding the Mangione case, including the judge's ruling on evidence, the importance of constitutional protections, and why due process must apply even when the accusation is serious. We also look at the disturbing rise of online fan culture around accused killers, the way media spectacle can distort public judgment, and why victims must never be erased by political narratives or internet fame.This is not just a courtroom story. This affects the rule of law, the First Amendment, the Sixth Amendment, public safety, religious liberty, civic order, North Carolina communities, and the future of our Constitutional Republic.Should America defend due process while also rejecting the glorification of violence?Watch, listen, share, and join the conversation.Read the full article:https://gorightnews.com/are-we-watching-justice-or-turning-violence-into-entertainment/Watch on Rumble:https://rumble.com/v7a34ye-are-we-watching-justice-or-turning-violence-into-entertainment.htmlWatch on YouTube:https://youtu.be/WCAjK0Bh6oIWatch on BitChute:https://www.bitchute.com/video/vYG44gDc398Z/Listen on Spreaker:https://www.spreaker.com/episode/are-we-watching-justice-or-turning-violence-into-entertainment--72072396Visit Go Right News:https://GoRightNews.comMore from Peter Boykin:https://PeterBoykin.comMusic and patriotic tracks:https://GoRightMusic.comSupport independent constitutional commentary:Cash App: $GoRightNews#GoRight, #GoRightNews, #PeterBoykin, #LuigiMangione, #JusticeSystem, #DueProcess, #FirstAmendment, #SixthAmendment, #RuleOfLaw, #PoliticalViolence, #MediaSpectacle, #CourtroomDrama, #StopPoliticalViolence, #ConstitutionalistForLiberty, #ConstitutionalRepublic, #AmericaFirst, #FreeSpeech, #LawAndOrder, #ReligiousLiberty, #IndependentMedia, #JusticeIsNotEntertainment, #Rumble, #YouTube, #Podcast, #PoliticalCommentaryBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/go-right-with-peter-boykin-the-constitutionalist-for-liberty--3096608/support.

DEAR PAO: Consequences of non-observance of procedural due process on employee termination | May 8, 2026Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.net Follow us: Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebook Instagram - https://tmt.ph/instagram Twitter - https://tmt.ph/twitter DailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital Check out our Podcasts: Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotify Apple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcasts Amazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusic Deezer: https://tmt.ph/deezer Stitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcher Tune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein #TheManilaTimes #KeepUpWithTheTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, Grace tells Alexis about the extra violent mile, a trail of smoke, and cenobites. Episode: The Adventure of the Deranged Detective | Sherlock Holmes in the 22nd Century | Season 1 | Episode 6 | 1999 | DIC Entertainment & Scottish Television Enterprises Follow SMM on Instagram: @satmornmyst Subscribe wherever you're listening so you never miss an episode!Email us your show requests: saturdaymorningmysteries@gmail.comCheck us out on YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/satmornmystMusic: Avis Akekee, https://avisakekee.bandcamp.com/

Can the government strip you of your Temporary Protected Status overnight, without warning or a chance to defend yourself? In 2025, a major federal court ruling made it clear: No— The U.S. government cannot legally take away TPS suddenly or in secret. Courts have made clear that the government must follow the law, give proper notice, and explain its decisions. TPS holders have legal protections, and government actions can be challenged in court. If you or someone you know is under TPS, this information is for you.  

Scientific Sense ® by Gill Eapen: Prof. Lawrence Friedman is Professor of Law at New England Law School, Boston. His interests include privacy law, national security, and related issues that test the boundaries of federal and state constitutional law to the digital age. Please subscribe to this channel:https://www.youtube.com/c/ScientificSense?sub_confirmation=1

    Slam The Gavel welcomes new guest, Elizabeth Collins to the podcast. Today we are going to discuss public citizens email communications to court administration that get turned into judicial orders, then are treated by the judge as a motion that he then turns into a judicial order without any Due Process.     Elizabeth also talked about the "flying monkeys," and how court watchers are restricted via Zoom and that are blocked. The taxpayer  has got to be aware of how their tax dollars are being spent within these court houses.To Reach Elizabeth Collins:  dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)Maryann Petri: dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.comhttps://www.tiktok.com/@maryannpetriFacebook:  https://youtube.com/@slamthegavelpodcast?si=INW9XaTyprKsaDklhttps://substack.com/@maryannpetri?r=kd7n6&utm_medium=iosInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/guitarpeace/Pinterest: Slam The Gavel Podcast/@guitarpeaceLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/maryann-petri-62a46b1ab/  Twitter https://x.com/PetriMaryannEzlegalsuit.com   https://ko-fi.com/maryannpetrihttps://www.zazzle.com/store/slam_the_gavel/aboout*DISCLAIMER* The use of this information is at the viewer/user's own risk. Content on this podcast does not constitute legal, financial, medical or any other professional advice. Viewer/user/guest should consult with the relevant professionals. IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. Reproduction, distribution, performing, publicly displaying and making a derivative of the work is explicitly prohibited without permission from content creator. The content creator maintains the exclusive copyright and any unauthorized copyright usage is strictly prohibited.  Podcast is protected by owner from duplication, reproduction, distribution, making a derivative of the work or by owner displaying the podcast. Owner shall be held harmless and indemnified from any and all legal liability.Support the showSupportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/

In this episode Jeff tears apart the latest assassination attempt against Donald Trump and the staggering security failures that allowed it to happen. From an armed suspect getting dangerously close to the president to the laughable claims that the system “worked” Jeff explains why this was a complete disgrace and why the response afterward was even worse. Jeff then breaks down the war with Iran and how what started with clear objectives quickly unraveled. Bad advice, unrealistic expectations and a fundamental misunderstanding of the enemy have led to a situation where Iran is now dictating terms. Trump's focus on markets and public perception over actual victory has turned a position of strength into an avoidable mess. The bigger problem is what this moment represents. Jeff argues this was likely the last real chance to cripple the world's leading terror regime and instead the United States blinked. The result is a stronger more emboldened enemy and a future that looks far more dangerous than it needed to be. Receive new episodes directly in your inbox: https://beyondthelegallimit.com/subscribe

Former Progress Texas Advocacy Manager (and forever Progress Texas family member) Reagan Stone returns for a tour of where South Texas meets West Texas, and West meets Far West. In stark contrasts, Texas' US Congressional District 23's sky island mountains and high desert borderlands lead to its opposite dense and urban bounds, El Paso and San Antonio, respectively. Reagan welcomes former public school teacher, child welfare attorney, and now Congressional District 23's Democratic nominee Katy Padilla Stout, entrepreneur and House District 74 State Representative Eddie Morales, and former founding President of Jane's Due Process, sitting Board President of the Texas Civil Rights Project, and incoming Presidio County Commissioner Susan Hays for a discussion of this legendary and storied part of Texas - and the dire threats it now faces from nefarious forces both federal and state.Learn more about Katy Padilla Stout at https://www.katyforcongress.com/.Learn more about State Rep. Eddie Morales at https://www.moralesfortexas.com/.Learn more about Susan Hays at https://www.linkedin.com/in/hayslaw/.Learn more about Reagan Stone at https://www.reagan-stone.com/.Thanks for listening! Learn more about Progress Texas and how you can support our ongoing work at https://progresstexas.org/.

Geoffrey Pipoly and Andrew Tauber, partners at the Bryan Cave law firm, speak with Senior Editor Roger Parloff about their case, known at the Supreme Court level as Trump v. Miot. In it, they have been fighting to preserve Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for more than 350,000 Haitian immigrants. The Court is hearing the case on April 29, along with Mullin v. Dahlia Doe, which concerns the government's attempt to terminate TPS status for about 7,000 Syrians. Pipoly and Tauber explain what the TPS program is and why they contend that the government's attempt to terminate it for Haitians violates the TPS statute, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the equal protection component of the Due Process clause of the U.S. Constitution.To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Today, we are breaking down important 2025 litigation developments that impact TPS. These results are grounded in federal court rulings and ongoing litigation. In 2025, federal courts reviewed government attempts to end TPS for certain countries, especially Venezuela. The courts said that the government did not follow the correct legal process when trying to take TPS away.  

Preview: Evan Ellis examines a mass trial of 486 gang members in El Salvador under the Bukele regime. Despite due process concerns and mistaken arrests, citizens support the crackdown to achieve unprecedented public safety.1625 SALVADOR

This program was broadcast on Friday April 17, 2025. Here are the main stories… Mandelson: Murkier and murkier Oil & Gas Wars: Analysis of global situation Protest Legislation: Latest plans for further restrictions Filton 24: New trial is a 'stitch-up' Tucker Carlson: Ignites and expands debate UK Column 20th Anniversary speaker announcement – Jonathan Marshall Narratives: Starmer's latest efforts to regain control Palantir: NHS data campaign gathers pace Covid Inquiry: Vaccine module finally released – oh dear Trumps vs Everyone: And declares himself Jesus Incase You Missed It: Stories spotted by our UKC sleuths Host Mike Robinson is joined by Patrick Henningsen and Basil Valentine. 

Arkansas Bar published an AI primer for lawyers. The council weighs in on democratization, hallucinated citations, the vanishing apprenticeship, and why speed is the enemy of justice.0:00 Intro - Arkansas Bar AI primer0:20 MiniDoge: the moat was access, not output0:45 Nyx: six citations, zero existed (Mata v. Avianca)1:15 HH: you can't train a vanished apprenticeship1:30 Saarvis: you cannot cross-examine a model2:00 Saarvis: speed is not justice⚡ Learn agentic ai free - https://staas.fund/ai-workshop ⚡-----

Reps. Eric Swalwell and Tony Gonzales stepping down from Congress has reignited a major question in Washington: when should lawmakers be forced out—and what does due process really look like on Capitol Hill? To unpack it, Michael Smerconish turns to a unique voice: George Santos, one of the only members ever expelled from the House of Representatives. In a candid and often controversial conversation, Santos weighs in on the resignations, the culture inside Congress, and whether accusations alone are now enough to end a political career. He also reflects on his own expulsion, his time in prison—including weeks in solitary confinement—and the moment he learned his sentence had been commuted by former President Donald Trump. Plus, listeners join the conversation, debating whether members of Congress are held to a different standard—and what accountability in Washington should really look like. Original air date 14 April 2026. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Tahiyrah Ali Free Chaz BunchI was 16 at the time of the arrest, held on half a million dollar bond, tried, convicted, sentenced and now struggling each day to understand what it is to live a life as a regular human being upon this Earth. There are many reasons that my case has not captured media attention, one being, I am not on “Death Row,” and do not meet the urgency criteria necessary to draw that spark of public attention. However, the sensationalism aspect has always been there, with the right reporting. Due to the fact that my case is only 16 years old, as if that is not long enough time for being in prison for a crime, I'm innocent of. One day is too long, but due to no significant injustice whereby the dramatic effect of our legal system's failure would invoke the participation of those working inside the system to assist in exonerating me I believe with your help I can receive the justice envisioned by the U.S. Constitution.On the day of my arrest, the threatening physical strength of the Mahoning County, Youngstown, Ohio detectives and police department resulted in the actual culprit, who admitted to every element of the crime, thus cutting a deal for partial immunity to implicate me as a co-conspirator and ultimately the principle perpetrator. Coupled with the prosecutorial misconduct of the state's attorney to manipulate witnesses and manufacture testimonies that procured a prejudice, bias, and partial trial that put me at a detrimental disadvantage. This is just a diminutive part perpetrated by the acting dignitaries surrounding my case, court proceedings and trial. During the course of my trial my constitutional rights were clearly violated with no one to fight for me and being illiterate didn't help. I was denied Due Process of the Law, Equal Protection of the Fifth Amendment and Effective Assistance of Counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, which ultimately resulted in the deprivation of my constitutional entitlement to a fair trial. I have been denied justice as it appears in the minds of the average citizen, and I believe that with media exposure and public awareness and support my case can again rise to the level of scrutiny. And that justice can prevail in the grand scheme of justice as is conceived in the minds of most American.https://freechazbunch.wordpress.com/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-opperman-report--1198501/support.

The San Diego City Council will likely adopt an ordinance that limits how the city works with federal agencies. Plus, the county is reporting massive spikes in hydrogen sulfide levels in the South Bay over the weekend. And, the San Diego Community College District is moving forward to change the name of one of it's campuses. NBC 7's Nicole Gomez has these stories and more, including meteorologist Sheena Parveen's forecast for Tuesday, April 7, 2026.

In today's episode, The latest on the Immigration and Customs Enforcement action in South Burlington from last week, and then we'll step away from the news and listen to a track of local music that was born out of a challenge.

In this episode, Imani and Jess break down the latest anti-trans decision from the Supreme Court, Mirabelli v. Bonta and explain how the conservative legal movement is rewriting parental rights law from the shadow docket of the Supreme Court.   Expert Repro Journalism That Inspires.    Episodes like this take time, research, and a commitment to the truth. If Boom! Lawyered helps you understand what's at stake in our courts, chip in to keep our fearless legal analysis alive. Become a member today. Imani's column, AngryBlackLady Chronicles, is back in 2026! Sign up for her newsletter here to read it first, and listen to Imani's new podcast, B*tch, Listen, here.  

Despite the existence of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), a federal law that has been in place for 50 years, many parents face acrimonious, heartwrenching, and expensive fights to ensure that their children's unique needs are met. Debra Tisler, founder of Emergent Literacy and an educator with 30 years of experience, joins the […]

In this episode, Imani and Jess break down the latest anti-trans decision from the Supreme Court, Mirabelli v. Bonta and explain how the conservative legal movement is rewriting parental rights law from the shadow docket of the Supreme Court.   Expert Repro Journalism That Inspires.    Episodes like this take time, research, and a commitment to the truth. If Boom! Lawyered helps you understand what's at stake in our courts, chip in to keep our fearless legal analysis alive. Become a member today. Imani's column, AngryBlackLady Chronicles, is back in 2026! Sign up for her newsletter here to read it first, and listen to Imani's new podcast, B*tch, Listen, here.  

UNBIASED University is in session! While Jordan is on maternity leave, she's breaking down the most critical aspects of the United States government — the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the three branches of the federal government, presidential elections, the evolution of political parties, and more. In this episode of UNBIASED Politics, we explore two foundational constitutional principles that continue to shape major legal and political debates: separation of church and state and due process. What does the First Amendment actually require when it comes to religion in public life, and how have courts interpreted the boundaries between government and faith? We break down the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, examining how the Supreme Court has navigated issues involving public schools, religious expression, and government funding. We also take a deep dive into due process, the constitutional guarantee that the government must follow fair procedures and respect certain fundamental rights before depriving someone of life, liberty, or property. From procedural protections in courtrooms to broader questions about substantive rights, this episode provides a clear, nonpartisan explanation of how these doctrines developed and why they remain central to constitutional law today. Separation of Church and State (3:17) Due Process (~25:10) SUBSCRIBE TO JORDAN'S ⁠FREE NEWSLETTER⁠. ⁠Watch⁠ this episode on YouTube. Follow Jordan on ⁠Instagram⁠ and ⁠TikTok⁠. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In a new federal court filing, the Trump Administration is using “patently absurd” and “almost laughable” so-called “evidence” to prove that 137 Venezuelans sent in the middle of the night in violation of a court order, are members of a notorious narco-terrorist gang, such as they wear Michael Jordan Chicago Bulls Jerseys!. Popok reports on new filings and Chief Judge Boesberg demanding that the Trump Administration explain why they continue to deny these 137 men Due Process despite court orders to the contrary. 3 Day Blinds: For their buy 1 get 1 50% off deal, head to https://3DayBlinds.com/LEGALAF. Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, investigative journalists ⁠⁠Mandy Matney⁠⁠ and⁠ ⁠Liz Farrell⁠⁠ and attorney⁠ Eric Bland confront a troubling throughline connecting professional discipline, prosecutorial discretion, and the rapid erosion of constitutional norms. Eric recounts a chilling professional reality: an SC Bar disciplinary investigation triggered by harsh—but truthful—excise of free speech, while far more serious attorney misconduct across South Carolina goes untouched.  From there, the discussion turns to newly filed deposition testimony, and the hosts break down how witness narratives can subtly “evolve” under pressure. The final segment widens the lens to the streets of Minnesota, as the team grapples with the fatal shooting of American Nurse Alex Pretti and the alarming normalization of armed federal agents operating without transparency, judicial warrants, or visible identification. At its core, this episode asks a sobering question: What happens when the systems designed to protect justice instead punish those who challenge abuse? The answer... is why journalism, courts, and public scrutiny matter now more than ever. ☕ Cups Up! ⚖️ Episode References Lawyer & Judicial Discipline Overview from SC ODC ⚖️ Explainer: Immigration Removal Proceedings and Expanded Mandatory Detention in the U.S. - National Immigration Forum, July 28, 2025

On Friday's Mark Levin Show, immigration proceedings are civil in nature, not criminal, and illegal aliens only have limited due process protections as established by congressional statutes and Supreme Court rulings. U.S. immigration laws explicitly restrict illegal aliens from raising certain arguments in federal courts, forbid judicial review of designated executive actions and confine jurisdiction over specific claims to particular federal courts. When federal courts exercise authority over claims that are barred, unreviewable, or jurisdictionally restricted under these statutes, they contravene federal law. In such instances, the Supreme Court should intervene as needed to reaffirm these boundaries. Also, Americanism is fundamentally incompatible with Islamism as it seeks to conquer and destroy the West, particularly the United States. The Democrat Party defends this ideology by opposing deportations and removals, allowing this cancer to spread.  Instead of live and let live, Islamism demands conformity or death. If Democrats win the midterms, they will cripple President Trump's efforts to protect the nation, as they prioritize party power over the Constitution, welcoming Marxists and Islamists alike because they hate the country but love their authority. Later, the lies about ICE agents quickly get headlines from the media and when they try to set the record straight it goes to the back page. The newest one is that ICE detained a 5-year-old boy, which is a lie.  ICE agents are patriotic, humane Americans who target serious criminals like killers and child predators, and Democrats seek to defund them. The Democrat Party hates hardworking, law-abiding American citizens. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices