Podcasts about Continuance

The federal trial in the Anna Kepner case was scheduled for June 1. Eighteen days before jury selection, the defense filed Document 74 — an Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial — requesting approximately ninety additional days of preparation. The court granted the motion. The new trial date is September 8.The procedural context makes the continuance notable. The defense previously moved at exceptional speed for a case carrying two potential life sentences. The defendant, Timothy Hudson — sixteen at the time of the alleged offense — signed a written waiver requesting adult prosecution. No contested transfer hearing was held. No prior continuances were filed. The defense operated on approximately three and a half months from initial discovery production to trial. That timeline is significantly compressed by federal standards.The continuance motion cited the government's voluminous discovery production, scheduling conflicts arising from lead counsel's involvement in two other federal trials, and family obligations. The prosecution filed no opposition. The absence of a government objection is procedurally significant — in a case where the prosecution has simultaneously sought pretrial detention, agreeing to a three-month delay represents a departure from the posture of urgency.The strategic implications extend in both directions. The defense's speed-to-trial approach had identifiable advantages: jury trial over bench trial, preservation of pretrial release, and forcing the government to proceed with the case as assembled. The reversal suggests the discovery production altered the defense's assessment of trial readiness.Unresolved proceedings remain before the September date. The autopsy report is sealed. The government's detention motion is pending — the defendant remains on GPS monitoring at a relative's home rather than in federal custody. Pretrial evidentiary motions have not yet been heard. Federal Rules of Evidence will substantially determine what reaches the jury.Anna Kepner was eighteen when she was found dead aboard the Carnival Horizon during a family cruise in November 2025. Her father has publicly stated the family is troubled by the defendant's current release conditions.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #CarnivalHorizon #TimothyHudson #FederalTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForAnna #FederalProcedure #MiamiFederalCourt #CruiseShipCase

The Steadfast Continuance of the 3,000 Acts 2 1. The wonder of this steadfast continuance 2. The elements of this steadfast continuance

1. Abundant in the Measure of His Love 2. Abundant in the Continuance of His Love

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/teCaV5kdmW0  In this Case Brief, we analyze the Prosecution's formal opposition to Kouri Richins' motion to continue her sentencing. While the Defense is pushing to kick the date out to June, the State is demanding the court stick to the original May 13 schedule. We break down the arguments from both sides and what this means for the victims' family. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D. Baker YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/P1uDBg_u9Vo  In this Case Brief, we dive into the latest filings from Utah, where Kouri Richins' defense team has officially filed a Motion to Continue Sentencing. Originally scheduled for May 13, 2026, which is the victim, Eric Richins' birthday. RESOURCES Kouri Richins Trial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gIKTiEBENmlYTBxjH_fbLUO Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Sufiyan v. Bondi, No. 22-6392 (2d. Cir. Mar. 12, 2026)material support of terrorism waiver; duress; requirement to decide asylum and withholding of removal eligibility in the alternative Matter of Texperts, Inc., 29 I&N Dec. 491 (AAO 2026)fraud finding after withdrawal of application or petition; timely retraction; multiple H-1B petitions for same beneficiary; distinction between fraud or willful misrepresentation and remand for that reason; closely scrutinize fraud Matter of Pinzon Rozo, 29 I&N Dec. 507 (BIA 2026)continuance with approved SIJ petition; Visa Bulletin and wait times; DHS's interest in resolving removal proceedings Matter of Z-N-L-, 29 I&N Dec. 511 (BIA 2026)address discrepancy; flight risk; bond; sponsor affidavit but failure to establish relationship Matter of Medina Madrid, 29 I&N Dec. 514 (BIA 2026)re calendaring; administrative closure; I-601A not filed yet Maldonado-Ruiz v. Bondi, No. 25-1448 (1st Cir. Mar. 10, 2026)past persecution; nexus; sexual orientation Alonso-Juarez v. Bondi, No. 24-2476 (8th Cir. Mar. 12, 2026)exceptional and extremely unusual hardship; substantial evidence review; ability to work in Mexico Dekovic, et al. v. Rubio, et al., No. 24-1431 (10th Cir. Mar. 10, 2026)CSPA; age-out; F2A to F1 reclassification; final agency action for APA lawsuit; 8 U.S.C. § 1151(f)(2); statutory purpose; legislative history of unanimous bipartisan Congress Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.eimmigration"Immigration law software you'll love to use."get.eimmigration.com/IRP Gonzales & Gonzales Immigration BondsP: (833) 409-9200immigrationbond.com  EB-5 Support"EB-5 Support is an ongoing mentorship and resource platform created specifically for immigration attorneys."Contact: info@eb-5support.comWebsite: https://eb-5support.com/Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Click me!The Pen and SwordClick me!Discount code: ImmigrationReview26 Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!CONTACT INFORMATION:Email: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreviewAbout your hostSupport the show

 En este episodio, el abogado Jonathan explica a fondo la noticia que se volvió viral: “ICE puede entrar a tu casa sin orden judicial.” ¿Qué dice realmente el memorando? ¿Cuál es la diferencia entre una orden firmada por un juez y una orden administrativa de ICE (I-205)? Jonathan desglosa la Cuarta Enmienda, los conceptos de reasonable suspicion y probable cause, y aclara a quién están apuntando hoy (especialmente personas con orden final de deportación). Además, analizamos el caso de un padre ecuatoriano y su hijo detenidos en Minnesota pese a haber entrado “legalmente” con CBP One, las protestas y cierres de negocios en Minneapolis, y la expansión de acciones migratorias en otros estados como Maine. Cerramos con preguntas en vivo sobre ICE check-ins, fianzas, prórrogas en corte, mandamus, errores en formularios (I-485), TPS/I-130, y cómo prepararte ante un sistema más agresivo.  Capítulos00:02.029 – Bienvenida e inicio del show: agenda del episodio01:49.582 – Noticia viral: “entradas a casas sin orden” y por qué se distorsiona en redes04:15.200 – Cuarta Enmienda: reasonable suspicion vs probable cause (ejemplo DUI)06:37.998 – La casa como espacio protegido: cuándo se necesita juez09:00.446 – Orden judicial vs orden administrativa de ICE (I-205) y el memorando11:18.958 – A quién afecta hoy: enfoque en órdenes finales (y el riesgo de abuso)13:42.196 – Caso Minnesota: padre e hijo (CBP One) detenidos pese a “hacer todo bien”16:06.592 – Qué significa esto para solicitantes de asilo y entradas por frontera sur18:28.928 – Minneapolis: negocios cierran/protesta contra ICE20:54.464 – Maine: acciones de control migratorio y expansión a otros estados23:10.198 – Q&A: ICE check-in y “salida voluntaria” (no firmar sin abogado)24:22.690 – Q&A: embarazo + corte de mérito (moción/prórroga y evidencia médica)26:13.630 – Q&A: fianza y posibilidad de rearresto27:55.822 – Q&A: USCIS y asilo afirmativo; entrevistas y mandamus30:23.950 – Mandamus explicado (casos de +5 años)32:48.566 – CAT/retención y opciones si niegan asilo35:34.210 – Historia: “milagros” en corte y cambios de fecha40:22.742 – Prórroga/continuance: fundamentos y práctica (Practice Manual)44:20.590 – Revisión profesional de caso (opción para quien no tiene abogado)01:12:10.363 – Llamada: ajuste por matrimonio + error en I-485 (trabajo sin autorización)01:19:22.058 – Llamada: TPS/I-130, mala gestión con firma, y qué hacer ahora01:28:57.248 – Cierre: últimas preguntas y despedida #Inmigración #ICE #Asilo #DerechosDelInmigrante #AbogadoDeInmigración #USCIS #CorteDeInmigración #TPS #AjusteDeEstatus #CBPOne #Minnesota #Maine #CuartaEnmienda  Contenido informativo general; no sustituye asesoría legal individual.

Defense attorney Bob Motta provides legal analysis on the Sarah Grace Patrick case after the murder trial was delayed from January 2026 to August 2026.Sarah Grace Patrick, now 17, faces two counts of murder in the deaths of her mother Kristin Brock, 41, and stepfather James Brock, 45. The couple was shot in their bed in Carroll County, Georgia on February 20th, 2025. Patrick was arrested in July 2025 after authorities announced they had "mountains of evidence" against her. She has been held without bond since her arrest.The January 5th, 2026 trial date was vacated after prosecutors indicated they would need time to review a forensic neuropsychologist's evaluation prepared by the defense and potentially retain their own expert. Judge Dustin Hightower moved the trial to August 3rd, 2026, but warned there would be "slim to none" chance of another delay.Bob Motta discusses the implications of this delay for both sides. He examines why the prosecution's need for additional time raises questions about the strength of their case. He addresses the earlier denial of the defense's continuance motion and whether the court is applying different standards.Motta also analyzes the evidence questions that remain unanswered — no recovered murder weapon, no publicly disclosed forensics, and prosecution claims about disabled cameras that have not been proven. He offers perspective on how social media behavior is being used to build a narrative against a teenage defendant and whether that constitutes actual evidence.What should we expect between now and August? Bob Motta breaks it down.#SarahGracePatrick #TrueCrimeToday #BobMotta #LegalAnalysis #CarrollCounty #GeorgiaMurder #KristinBrock #JamesBrock #CriminalTrial #DefenseAttorneyJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISDOES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspodInstagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/tonybpodListen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Welcome to St. Matthew’s Baptist Church Online Bible Study SUBSCRIBE,LIKE,SHARE. #jesuschristislord #smbcnj #pastorraymondmgordon #teachingministry #soulsavingstation #beencouraged Continuing Order of Religious Education (C.O.R.E.) Bible Study Every Wednesday @ 8pm Pastor/Teacher: Dr. Raymond M. Gordon Sr., Senior Pastor Message Title: Continuance Inspite of Conflict Scripture: Mark 5 STAY CONNECTED Facebook: St. Matthew’s Baptist Church in Williamstown, NJ Instagram: smbcnj Youtube: smbctv GIVE Need to pay your tithes and offerings or donate? Helping to spread the Gospel and further the Kingdom of God Click the link this http://www.stmatthewsbc.org/giving/ Or TEXT TO GIVE ( Text your Amount) 1 (855) 628-1302 VISIT US Every Sunday Morning at 10:30am Come Worship with Us We have classes for all ages Every Sunday 9:30am 245 Glassboro Rd, Williamstown,NJ 08094 ****WE DO NOT OWN THE RIGHTS TO THIS MUSIC****

Welcome to St. Matthew’s Baptist Church Online Bible Study SUBSCRIBE,LIKE,SHARE. #jesuschristislord #smbcnj #pastorraymondmgordon #teachingministry #soulsavingstation #beencouraged Continuing Order of Religious Education (C.O.R.E.) Bible Study Every Wednesday @ 8pm Pastor/Teacher: Dr. Raymond M. Gordon Sr., Senior Pastor Message Title: Continuance Inspite of Conflict Scripture: Mark 5 STAY CONNECTED Facebook: St. Matthew’s Baptist Church in Williamstown, NJ Instagram: smbcnj Youtube: smbctv GIVE Need to pay your tithes and offerings or donate? Helping to spread the Gospel and further the Kingdom of God Click the link this http://www.stmatthewsbc.org/giving/ Or TEXT TO GIVE ( Text your Amount) 1 (855) 628-1302 VISIT US Every Sunday Morning at 10:30am Come Worship with Us We have classes for all ages Every Sunday 9:30am 245 Glassboro Rd, Williamstown,NJ 08094 ****WE DO NOT OWN THE RIGHTS TO THIS MUSIC****

Welcome to St. Matthew’s Baptist Church Online Bible Study SUBSCRIBE,LIKE,SHARE. #jesuschristislord #smbcnj #pastorraymondmgordon #teachingministry #soulsavingstation #beencouraged Continuing Order of Religious Education (C.O.R.E.) Bible Study Every Wednesday @ 8pm Pastor/Teacher: Dr. Raymond M. Gordon Sr., Senior Pastor Message Title: Continuance Inspite of Conflict Scripture: Mark 5 STAY CONNECTED Facebook: St. Matthew’s Baptist Church in Williamstown, NJ Instagram: smbcnj Youtube: smbctv GIVE Need to pay your tithes and offerings or donate? Helping to spread the Gospel and further the Kingdom of God Click the link this http://www.stmatthewsbc.org/giving/ Or TEXT TO GIVE ( Text your Amount) 1 (855) 628-1302 VISIT US Every Sunday Morning at 10:30am Come Worship with Us We have classes for all ages Every Sunday 9:30am 245 Glassboro Rd, Williamstown,NJ 08094 ****WE DO NOT OWN THE RIGHTS TO THIS MUSIC****

Welcome to E426 of Inner Voice: A Heartfelt Chat with Dr. Foojan, In this episode, Dr. Foojan Zeine, psychotherapist, author, and founder of the Awareness Integration Institute, has a deeply insightful conversation with Dr. Rogers Follansbee, philosopher and clinical psychologist. Together, they explore Structured Psychology Theory, the foundation of Relational Existence, and the true meaning behind projection, free will, and human behavior — revealing how our relationships shape who we are and how we experience the world.

In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District issued a redacted memorandum decision and order regarding the defense's motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team filed a motion requesting a delay in the trial schedule, citing the need for additional time to review discovery, conduct investigations, and adequately prepare a defense in a case of significant complexity and public scrutiny. The defense argued that proceeding without a continuance would compromise Kohberger's right to a fair trial, particularly given the volume of evidence and expert materials involved.The court, in its memorandum, acknowledged the high-profile nature of the case and the seriousness of the charges, but ultimately denied the defense's request to delay the trial. The judge emphasized the court's responsibility to balance the defendant's rights with the public's interest in a speedy trial and judicial efficiency. While recognizing the burdens faced by defense counsel, the court concluded that the current schedule provided adequate time for preparation and noted that prior delays had already accommodated many of the defense's logistical concerns. As a result, the trial is expected to proceed on its current timeline, barring any unforeseen developments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:062625+REDACTED+Memorandum+Decision+and+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District issued a redacted memorandum decision and order regarding the defense's motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team filed a motion requesting a delay in the trial schedule, citing the need for additional time to review discovery, conduct investigations, and adequately prepare a defense in a case of significant complexity and public scrutiny. The defense argued that proceeding without a continuance would compromise Kohberger's right to a fair trial, particularly given the volume of evidence and expert materials involved.The court, in its memorandum, acknowledged the high-profile nature of the case and the seriousness of the charges, but ultimately denied the defense's request to delay the trial. The judge emphasized the court's responsibility to balance the defendant's rights with the public's interest in a speedy trial and judicial efficiency. While recognizing the burdens faced by defense counsel, the court concluded that the current schedule provided adequate time for preparation and noted that prior delays had already accommodated many of the defense's logistical concerns. As a result, the trial is expected to proceed on its current timeline, barring any unforeseen developments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:062625+REDACTED+Memorandum+Decision+and+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

**Thank you for supporting this ministry, I lovingly refer to as "The Little Green Pasture." Click here: PayPal: http://paypal.me/JoanStahl **Please prayerfully consider becoming a ministry partner: Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/joaniestahl **Contact Email: jsfieldnotes@gmail.com **Subscribe to me on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-534183Throughout Christian history there has always been false prophets, false movements of the Lord and false claims. All of which came and went like tumbleweeds blowing through towns and are forever forgotten.However along with all of that there have been real men and women of God who stuck to the word and prayer. They did not follow movements. They did not give their ears over to false voices and "any minute now" prophecies. All of which never came to pass. They kept a steady, faithful, pure continuance in the Presence of Jesus Christ. They were quiet, unassuming people of few words if any. Yet they could walk into any place and whole rooms stood still. They kept themselves from running with religious crowds, they rejected and shunned any attention. Things, movements and individuals can quickly become idols if we do not discern them instantly by the Spirit of the Lord. "For all those things hath mine hand made, and all those things have been, saith the Lord: but to this man will I look, even to him that is poor and of a contrite spirit, and trembleth at my word." - Isaiah 66:2.Seek to be this kind of person, and walk with the Lord in continual consistency in His Presence. This is what He wants and who He sees.“For a Presence breathes over the silent hills, and its sweetness is living yet; The same deep calm all the hillside fills, as breathed over Olivet."- Selected

Guru wonders if the 49ers injury bug from last year has left with George Kittle and Brock Purdy going down for multiple weeks... It's undeniable they've been hit, but why more than most?

O.C.V., et al. v. Bondi, No. 23-9609 (10th Cir. Aug. 26, 2025)family-based particular social group; nexus; Matter of M-R-M-S-; Zombie precedent; vacatur of precedential BIA decision; overcoming animus Sarabia v. Noem, No. 24-50750 (5th Cir. Aug. 22, 2025)certificate of citizenship; dicta; 8 U.S.C. § 1401(a)(7); 8 U.S.C. § 1503(a); jurisdictional statement; claims processing rule; timely AAO motion to reopen or reconsider; five-year lawsuit deadline Matter of J-A-F-S-, 29 I&N Dec. 195 (BIA 2025)continuance of individual hearing; new forms of relief; prima facie eligibility; dilatory tactics; diligence Lopez Cano v. Bondi, No. 22-1941 (1st Cir. Aug. 28, 2025)cancellation; economic hardship; anxiety; nexus Ortiz Trejo v. Bondi, No. 23-1412 (1st Cir. Aug. 29, 2025)hardship; allergies; “evaluated all evidence of record”; boilerplate language Abdulla v. Att'y Gen. U.S., No. 19-1167 (3d Cir. Aug. 27, 2025)derivative citizenship; Loper Bright; untimely BIA appeal and self-certification; exhaustion; definition of the term “when”; prior panel rule Ibarra-Perez v. United States, No. 24-631 (9th Cir. Aug. 27, 2025)FTCA; jurisdiction; illegal third-country removal; INA § 242(g) Lopez v. Bondi, No. 23-870 (9th Cir. Aug. 25, 2025) (denial of en banc rehearing)Loper Bright; star decisis; CIMT definition; invalidating prior precedentSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.  Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Demo Link!Click me too!get.eimmigration.com/resources Stafi"Remote staffing solutions for businesses of all sizes"Promo Code: STAFI2025Click me! Gonzales & Gonzales Immigration BondsP: (833) 409-9200immigrationbond.com   Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page! CONTACT INFORMATIONEmail: kgregg@kktplaw.comFacebook: @immigrationreviewInstagram: @immigrationreviewTwitter: @immreview About your hostCase notes DISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

Welcome to St. Matthew’s Baptist Church Online Bible Study SUBSCRIBE,LIKE,SHARE. #jesuschristislord #smbcnj #pastorraymondmgordon #teachingministry #soulsavingstation #beencouraged Continuing Order of Religious Education (C.O.R.E.) Bible Study Every Wednesday @ 8pm Pastor/Teacher: Dr. Raymond M. Gordon Sr., Senior Pastor Message Title: Continuance in Spite of Conflict Scripture: Philippians 1:6 STAY CONNECTED Facebook: St. Matthew’s Baptist Church in Williamstown, NJ Instagram: smbcnj Youtube: smbctv GIVE Need to pay your tithes and offerings or donate? Helping to spread the Gospel and further the Kingdom of God Click the link this http://www.stmatthewsbc.org/giving/ Or TEXT TO GIVE ( Text your Amount) 1 (855) 628-1302 VISIT US Every Sunday Morning at 9:00am Come Worship with Us We have classes for all ages Every Sunday 9:30am 245 Glassboro rd, Williamstown,NJ 08094 ****WE DO NOT OWN THE RIGHTS TO THIS MUSIC****

Welcome to St. Matthew’s Baptist Church Online Bible Study SUBSCRIBE,LIKE,SHARE. #jesuschristislord #smbcnj #pastorraymondmgordon #teachingministry #soulsavingstation #beencouraged Continuing Order of Religious Education (C.O.R.E.) Bible Study Every Wednesday @ 8pm Pastor/Teacher: Dr. Raymond M. Gordon Sr., Senior Pastor Message Title: Continuance in Spite of Conflict Scripture: Philippians 1:6 STAY CONNECTED Facebook: St. Matthew’s Baptist Church in Williamstown, NJ Instagram: smbcnj Youtube: smbctv GIVE Need to pay your tithes and offerings or donate? Helping to spread the Gospel and further the Kingdom of God Click the link this http://www.stmatthewsbc.org/giving/ Or TEXT TO GIVE ( Text your Amount) 1 (855) 628-1302 VISIT US Every Sunday Morning at 9:00am Come Worship with Us We have classes for all ages Every Sunday 9:30am 245 Glassboro rd, Williamstown,NJ 08094 ****WE DO NOT OWN THE RIGHTS TO THIS MUSIC****

Welcome to St. Matthew’s Baptist Church Online Bible Study SUBSCRIBE,LIKE,SHARE. #jesuschristislord #smbcnj #pastorraymondmgordon #teachingministry #soulsavingstation #beencouraged Continuing Order of Religious Education (C.O.R.E.) Bible Study Every Wednesday @ 8pm Pastor/Teacher: Dr. Raymond M. Gordon Sr., Senior Pastor Message Title: Continuance in Spite of Conflict Scripture: Philippians 1:6 STAY CONNECTED Facebook: St. Matthew’s Baptist Church in Williamstown, NJ Instagram: smbcnj Youtube: smbctv GIVE Need to pay your tithes and offerings or donate? Helping to spread the Gospel and further the Kingdom of God Click the link this http://www.stmatthewsbc.org/giving/ Or TEXT TO GIVE ( Text your Amount) 1 (855) 628-1302 VISIT US Every Sunday Morning at 9:00am Come Worship with Us We have classes for all ages Every Sunday 9:30am 245 Glassboro rd, Williamstown,NJ 08094 ****WE DO NOT OWN THE RIGHTS TO THIS MUSIC****

A new MP3 sermon from The Narrated Puritan is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Continuance in waiting necessary to peace and consolation Subtitle: John Owen - Forgiveness of Sin Speaker: John Owen Broadcaster: The Narrated Puritan Event: Audiobook Date: 7/17/2025 Bible: Psalm 130:4 Length: 5 min.

Now, what is the way to receive that which comes from mere sovereignty and prerogative? Doth not the nature of the thing require humble waiting? If, then, either impatience cast the soul into frowardness, or weariness make it slothful (which are the two ways whereby waiting is ruined), let not such a one expect any comfortable issue of his contending for deliverance out of his depths.

The Laurie Cadden Show from July 12, 2025 features guest Rose Randazzo-Pizzuto, chairperson of Scranton Tomorrow's Mural Arts Program, joins us to talk about their latest public art project titled, "Remembrance and Continuance: the Lenape Story in Scranton." The project is a partnership between Lackawanna County Arts & Culture Department and Scranton Tomorrow. Laurie & Julie discuss some of the benefits of hiring contracted services and highlight upcoming events that everyone in the community can enjoy in and around downtown Scranton.

Abby and Patrick sit down with writer Hilary Plum to discuss her remarkable new book, State Champ. A novel at which the politics of abortion stand at the center, but far from a didactically “political novel,” State Champ gives the three an opportunity to explore a suite of deeply psychoanalytic themes and topics: from the gap between our first-person experiences of our bodies to the claims and restrictions made by others on our bodily autonomy; from the purposes of protest to our motivations for undertaking them; from discourses about “regret” versus certainty and judgement; from the knowledge we anticipate to come from experiences versus things we know already versus things that others think they better; and from sex to eating disorders to humor to running and more. The three also reflect on writing and reading novels in 2025, genre, audiences, and on what communication and psychic change we hope fiction can achieve. Hilary Plum, State Champ: https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/state-champ-9781639735433/Hilary's website: http://www.hilaryplum.com/Index for Continuance, a podcast about small press publishing, politics, and practice, hosted by Hilary Plum and Zach Peckham: https://www.csupoetrycenter.com/index-for-continuance-podcastSusan Bordo, “The Body and the Reproduction of Femininity”Have you noticed that Freud is back? Got questions about psychoanalysis? Or maybe you've traversed the fantasy and lived to tell the tale? Leave us a voicemail! (646) 450-0847A podcast about psychoanalysis, politics, pop culture, and the ways we suffer now. New episodes on Saturdays. Follow us on social media:Linktree: https://linktr.ee/OrdinaryUnhappinessTwitter: @UnhappinessPodInstagram: @OrdinaryUnhappinessPatreon: patreon.com/OrdinaryUnhappinessTheme song:Formal Chicken - Gnossienne No. 1https://open.spotify.com/album/2MIIYnbyLqriV3vrpUTxxOProvided by Fruits Music

A Wise and Faithful Woman with Nancy Goring A Bible podcast for ladies Ep466 - God's Continuance of Providing

In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District issued a redacted memorandum decision and order regarding the defense's motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team filed a motion requesting a delay in the trial schedule, citing the need for additional time to review discovery, conduct investigations, and adequately prepare a defense in a case of significant complexity and public scrutiny. The defense argued that proceeding without a continuance would compromise Kohberger's right to a fair trial, particularly given the volume of evidence and expert materials involved.The court, in its memorandum, acknowledged the high-profile nature of the case and the seriousness of the charges, but ultimately denied the defense's request to delay the trial. The judge emphasized the court's responsibility to balance the defendant's rights with the public's interest in a speedy trial and judicial efficiency. While recognizing the burdens faced by defense counsel, the court concluded that the current schedule provided adequate time for preparation and noted that prior delays had already accommodated many of the defense's logistical concerns. As a result, the trial is expected to proceed on its current timeline, barring any unforeseen developments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:062625+REDACTED+Memorandum+Decision+and+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District issued a redacted memorandum decision and order regarding the defense's motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team filed a motion requesting a delay in the trial schedule, citing the need for additional time to review discovery, conduct investigations, and adequately prepare a defense in a case of significant complexity and public scrutiny. The defense argued that proceeding without a continuance would compromise Kohberger's right to a fair trial, particularly given the volume of evidence and expert materials involved.The court, in its memorandum, acknowledged the high-profile nature of the case and the seriousness of the charges, but ultimately denied the defense's request to delay the trial. The judge emphasized the court's responsibility to balance the defendant's rights with the public's interest in a speedy trial and judicial efficiency. While recognizing the burdens faced by defense counsel, the court concluded that the current schedule provided adequate time for preparation and noted that prior delays had already accommodated many of the defense's logistical concerns. As a result, the trial is expected to proceed on its current timeline, barring any unforeseen developments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:062625+REDACTED+Memorandum+Decision+and+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District issued a redacted memorandum decision and order regarding the defense's motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team filed a motion requesting a delay in the trial schedule, citing the need for additional time to review discovery, conduct investigations, and adequately prepare a defense in a case of significant complexity and public scrutiny. The defense argued that proceeding without a continuance would compromise Kohberger's right to a fair trial, particularly given the volume of evidence and expert materials involved.The court, in its memorandum, acknowledged the high-profile nature of the case and the seriousness of the charges, but ultimately denied the defense's request to delay the trial. The judge emphasized the court's responsibility to balance the defendant's rights with the public's interest in a speedy trial and judicial efficiency. While recognizing the burdens faced by defense counsel, the court concluded that the current schedule provided adequate time for preparation and noted that prior delays had already accommodated many of the defense's logistical concerns. As a result, the trial is expected to proceed on its current timeline, barring any unforeseen developments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:062625+REDACTED+Memorandum+Decision+and+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District issued a redacted memorandum decision and order regarding the defense's motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team filed a motion requesting a delay in the trial schedule, citing the need for additional time to review discovery, conduct investigations, and adequately prepare a defense in a case of significant complexity and public scrutiny. The defense argued that proceeding without a continuance would compromise Kohberger's right to a fair trial, particularly given the volume of evidence and expert materials involved.The court, in its memorandum, acknowledged the high-profile nature of the case and the seriousness of the charges, but ultimately denied the defense's request to delay the trial. The judge emphasized the court's responsibility to balance the defendant's rights with the public's interest in a speedy trial and judicial efficiency. While recognizing the burdens faced by defense counsel, the court concluded that the current schedule provided adequate time for preparation and noted that prior delays had already accommodated many of the defense's logistical concerns. As a result, the trial is expected to proceed on its current timeline, barring any unforeseen developments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:062625+REDACTED+Memorandum+Decision+and+Order+on+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Pastor Mike teaches that we shouldn’t be discouraged if we haven’t heard God’s voice yet. Continuance is necessary. If we seek Him with our whole heart, we will hear.  Audio>  

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defense submitted a reply challenging the State's opposition to its motion to continue the trial. Kohberger's legal team argues that the prosecution's objection ignores the complex and voluminous nature of discovery materials still being reviewed, which include thousands of pages of documents, hours of surveillance footage, and extensive forensic data. The defense emphasizes that proceeding without adequate time to evaluate this evidence would compromise Kohberger's constitutional right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel.Additionally, the reply underscores that this is a capital case with unique legal and investigative demands, requiring more preparation time than the prosecution acknowledges. The defense contends that rushing the proceedings would not serve justice and that the need for a continuance is both reasonable and necessary given the gravity of the charges and the scope of the case. They urge the court to grant the motion and reject the State's assertion that further delay is unwarranted.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:061625+Defendants+Reply+to+the+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In its opposition filing, the State of Idaho argued that the defense's motion to continue the trial lacked sufficient legal or factual grounds and should be denied. Prosecutors contended that the defense had already been granted significant time and discovery accommodations, including access to thousands of documents, expert reports, and forensic evidence. They asserted that further delay would prejudice the State, undermine the public's interest in a speedy trial, and unnecessarily prolong proceedings for the victims' families. The State emphasized that trial preparation had been underway for months and that the court had a strong interest in adhering to its current scheduling order.Additionally, the State pushed back on the defense's claims regarding the complexity of the case and the need for additional time to prepare expert witnesses or review evidence. Prosecutors argued that the defense had been aware of the case's scope since the beginning and that its late-stage request for a continuance appeared more tactical than necessary. They highlighted that delaying the trial would burden witnesses and the court, and urged the judge to maintain the trial date to ensure a fair, timely, and efficient resolution of the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:060525+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

In its opposition filing, the State of Idaho argued that the defense's motion to continue the trial lacked sufficient legal or factual grounds and should be denied. Prosecutors contended that the defense had already been granted significant time and discovery accommodations, including access to thousands of documents, expert reports, and forensic evidence. They asserted that further delay would prejudice the State, undermine the public's interest in a speedy trial, and unnecessarily prolong proceedings for the victims' families. The State emphasized that trial preparation had been underway for months and that the court had a strong interest in adhering to its current scheduling order.Additionally, the State pushed back on the defense's claims regarding the complexity of the case and the need for additional time to prepare expert witnesses or review evidence. Prosecutors argued that the defense had been aware of the case's scope since the beginning and that its late-stage request for a continuance appeared more tactical than necessary. They highlighted that delaying the trial would burden witnesses and the court, and urged the judge to maintain the trial date to ensure a fair, timely, and efficient resolution of the case.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:060525+States+Opposition+to+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf

Did A Tiny Mistake Change Everything In 2023? #kohberger #deathpenalty #continuance Is the 40 page continuance submitted to the court in the Idaho 4 case all about the death penalty? Is getting rid of the death penalty in the Bryan Kohberger upcoming trial the true aim of the 40 page legal brief submitted to Judge Stephen Hippler all about a delay? Will Judge Stephen Hippler grant this dealy or proceed with the trial on Auguist 11, 2025?

NEED PRAYER? https://www.abidechurch.com/contact WANT TO GIVE TO ABIDE CHURCH? https://www.abidechurch.com/give

Let me start with this: if you have any interest at all in literary magazines or small presses, you want this book: How to Submit: Getting Your Writing Published with Literary Magazines and Small Presses. It's a wonderful book and a great guide, and will lead you into this world and help you feel good about your journey without your getting lost in the universe of scattered information that's available online. We've included a ton of links to that scattered universe below, but I encourage you to buy the book, which will ground you in your own journey.I loved doing this interview, which felt like a return to my own roots in magazine work. As Dennis puts it in the book, there is something about doing the work of shorter pieces and pushing your own boundaries that can be remarkably helpful whether or not you're also engaged in long form book, and there's nothing I love more than a roadmap and a checklist. Start, please, by reading and exploring in this world, and then we hope to hear about you contributing. Send links, always!You know, that's a thing we should do. I'm creating a chat for links and success stories. By the time you see this, it will have been rolling for a while, but go check it out and add yours HERE.And follow Dennis! Links from the podHeavy Feather Review's Where to Submit list AM/PM, Amelia GrayUnderworld, Don DelilloMaking a Literary Life, Carolyn SeeHTML GiantKathleen RooneyLaird Hunt Essay PressAutumn House PressClifford Garstang's Literary Magazine RankingsMargot Atwell's piece in LitHub about the big five thinking of small press as farm Team Dorothy, a publishing project#AmReadingDennis: God Bless You, Otis Spunkmeyer by Joseph Earl ThomasIndex for Continuance podcast Material Witness, Aditi MachadoRunaways: A Writer's Dilemma, Michael J. SeidlingerKJ: Margo's Got Money Troubles, Rufi ThorpeDeath of the Author, Nnedi Okorafor This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit amwriting.substack.com/subscribe

Lapadat, et al. v. Bondi, No. 23-1745 (9th Cir. Feb. 12, 2025)past persecution; being shot; attempted kidnapping; death & rape threats; IJ mischaracterizing testimony; Roma; “gypsies”; pernicious maltreatment; no requirement for lasting injuries; disfavored group analysis for well founded fear; relevance of EU policy Perez-Perez, et al. v. Bondi, No. 23-4240 (9th Cir. Feb. 10, 2025)FRAP 15(a)(2)(A); listing names of petitioners in case caption Murillo-Chavez v. Bondi, No. 23-1997 (9th Cir. Feb. 13, 2025)firearms offense; INA § 237(a)(2)(C); antique firearms exception; divisibility; O.R.S. § 166.250; admitted in any status for LPR cancellation; stop-time rule; SIJ status; Supreme Court effectively overruling precedent; criminal mistreatment in violation of O.R.S. § 163.205; CIMT definition & analysis post-Loper Bright Ikome v. Bondi, No. 22-60606 (5th Cir. Feb. 12, 2025)continuance; motion to remand; Patel &Wilkinson; jurisdiction to consider adjustment of status continuance; motion to remand where I-130 approved; due diligence   Porter v. Bondi, No. 24-3125 (6th Cir. Jan. 24, 2025)possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-248; no need for renumeration; CSA felony; methamphetamine isomers; drug divisibility Sanches Alves v. Bondi, No. 24-1258 (1st Cir. Feb. 12, 2025)domestic violence-type asylum claim; nexus; personal dispute Phimmady v. Bondi, No. 24-1330 (1st Cir. Feb. 10, 2025)sua sponte motion to reopen due to vacated conviction; BIA settled course of adjudication; using unpublished BIA decisions; diligence Ferchichi v. Bondi, No. 23-1123 (8th Cir. Feb. 14, 2025)inadequate medical care; nexus; spina bifida; mixed motive; future persecution; AlgeriaSponsors and friends of the podcast!Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.Cerenade"Leader in providing smart, secure, and intuitive cloud-based solutions"Click me!The Pen & Sword College (formerly The Clinic at Sharma-Crawford Attorneys at Law) Use Promo Code: ImmReview2025Link to firm: https://sharma-crawford.com/ Link to Nonprofit: https://thepen-and-swordkc.org/ Link to books: https://www.rekhasharmacrawford.com/ Want to become a patron?Click here to check out our Patreon Page!All praise to the pod's wonderful editors!Luana Lima SerraYasmin LimaDISCLAIMER & CREDITSSee Eps. 1-200Support the show

The world is changing, but as Christians, our directive stays the same. God has not called us to compromise or complain about the culture. He has called us to continue. In this series, Continue, we will discover key areas of our life that God wants us to continue developing through the grace and mercy of Jesus Christ. People all around us are desperate for answers, and we must continue to take the light of the gospel to those lost in culture's darkness.

The world is changing, but as Christians, our directive stays the same. God has not called us to compromise or complain about the culture. He has called us to continue. In this series, Continue, we will discover key areas of our life that God wants us to continue developing through the grace and mercy of Jesus Christ. People all around us are desperate for answers, and we must continue to take the light of the gospel to those lost in culture's darkness.

Demonstrating Dr. Barnhouse's acute understanding of Romans and his heart for effective preaching, these messages skillfully and reverently expound even the most difficult passages in a clear way. Dr. Barnhouse's concern for a universal appreciation of the epistle fuels this series and invites all listeners into a deeper understanding of the life-changing message of Romans. To support this ministry financially, visit: https://www.oneplace.com/donate/791/29