Podcasts about statutes

god jesus christ dna african gods laws prophecy deuteronomy affirmations amen israelites donations leviticus hosea black americans offerings statutes tithes tobit

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 13, 2026 18:28

In this Message, According to Prophecy, We Are the Israelites, I examine the identity of the biblical Israelites through one standard above all others: the prophecies written in the Word of God.Rather than relying on modern history, man-made charts, DNA arguments, or debates over appearances, this message compares the experiences of Black Americans and the African diaspora with biblical prophecies concerning slavery, ships, captivity, scattering among the nations, oppression, loss of identity, and eventual restoration.Through scriptures including Deuteronomy 28, Leviticus 26, Joel 3, Tobit 13, Hosea 1, and Luke 21, I make the case that these prophetic descriptions point directly to who we are.The ultimate question is not “Who does man say we are?” but “What does God's Word say?”According to prophecy, We Are the Israelites.“The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever.” — Isaiah 40:8Receive this message in Jesus' name. Amen.#AccordingToProphecy #WeAreTheIsraelites #Israelites #BlackHebrewIsraelites #GodsChosenPeople #Deuteronomy28 #BibleProphecy #BiblicalProphecy #12TribesOfIsrael #ChildrenOfIsrael #ScatteredIsrael #IsraelAwakening #BiblicalTruth #WordOfGod #BibleStudy #Scripture #JesusChrist #Faith #Prophecy #ExodusChurchOnline #LeoDunson #LeoDunsonMinistries #BibleStudy #Church #God #Christ #Faith Send "Tithes, Offerings, and/or Donations" to https://leodunson.com/donate or to https://cash.app/$LeoDunson Books:The Blessings of Gods' Laws; Affirmations: https://a.co/d/1M5jJ46Gods' Laws Commandments & Statutes: https://a.co/d/8qP06jcJoin Leo Dunson Ministries online community at: https://leodunsonministries.com

Feasts Of Trumpets

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 13, 2026 25:29

In this message, Feast of Trumpets, I break down the biblical meaning and importance of one of God's appointed Holy Days. From the sounding of the trumpets and remembering the Most High, to the prophetic return of Christ and gathering of His elect, the Feast of Trumpets carries a powerful message for God's people.I also break down how we can celebrate the Feast of Trumpets today—rejoicing before God, resting from our regular work, gathering together, studying God's laws, sounding the trumpet, worshiping with music, enjoying good food, and sharing with those who have nothing prepared.This is a Holy Day of remembrance, obedience, worship, giving, and JOY.“For the joy of the LORD is your strength.” — Nehemiah 8:10#FeastOfTrumpets #GodsHolyDays #HolyDays #BibleTeaching #BibleStudy #GodsLaws #Israelites #MostHighGod #Yahshua #JesusChrist #Trumpets #Nehemiah8 #Torah #BiblicalFeasts #LeoDunsonMinistriesSend "Tithes, Offerings, and/or Donations" to https://leodunson.com/donate or to https://cash.app/$LeoDunson Books:The Blessings of Gods' Laws; Affirmations: https://a.co/d/1M5jJ46Gods' Laws Commandments & Statutes: https://a.co/d/8qP06jcJoin Leo Dunson Ministries online community at: https://leodunsonministries.com

god jesus christ lord gods laws feast affirmations donations trumpets offerings most high feasts statutes holy days tithes

I Can't Victimize My Life

god israel gods laws deuteronomy affirmations donations offerings jim crow statutes tithes

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 13, 2026 18:29

In this message, “I Can't Victimize My Life,” I acknowledge the painful history of our people—from the curses of Deuteronomy 28 and the scattering of Israel to slavery, Jim Crow, and discrimination—but challenge us not to remain imprisoned by our past.God didn't only promise curses for disobedience; He also promised blessings for obedience. Our history may explain where we started, but it does not have to determine where we finish.I know what happened to us and what is currently still happening to us. But I refuse to let yesterday's curses become tomorrow's destiny.Send "Tithes, Offerings, and/or Donations" to https://leodunson.com/donate or to https://cash.app/$LeoDunson Books:The Blessings of Gods' Laws; Affirmations: https://a.co/d/1M5jJ46Gods' Laws Commandments & Statutes: https://a.co/d/8qP06jcJoin Leo Dunson Ministries online community at: https://leodunsonministries.com#ICantVictimizeMyLife #Deuteronomy28 #HebrewIsraelites #Israelites #BibleProphecy #GodsLaws #BlackHistory #Faith #JesusChrist #Sermon

The Iran War

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 13, 2026 34:15

In this message, I discuss the current war with Iran from a biblical perspective, something I have yet to hear anyone speak about. Iran, as we know it in the Bible, is Persia, and there are several scriptures that speak about Persia. However, Isaiah 13:17 says, “Behold, I will stir up against them the Medes, who have no regard for silver and no desire for gold.”This appears to be exactly what happened at the start of this war. Iran was stirred—the Medes were attacked. We discuss this scripture in greater detail, as well as Iran's tremendous military strategy in fending off the all-powerful American military, end-times prophecies, and much more.A few scriptures we discuss on the Medes (Iran):Isaiah 13:17 — “Behold, I will stir up against them the Medes, who have no regard for silver and no desire for gold.”Jeremiah 51:11 — “Sharpen the arrows, take up the shields! The Lord has stirred up the kings of the Medes, because his purpose is to destroy Babylon. The Lord will take vengeance, vengeance for his temple.”Jeremiah 51:27–29 — “Prepare against her the nations with the kings of the Medes, the captains thereof, and all the rulers thereof, and all the land of his dominion.”I also discuss Genesis 17:20, Revelation 17:16, Revelation 19:19–20, and Ephesians 6:12, and what these scriptures may reveal about the larger spiritual and prophetic picture surrounding the events unfolding in our world today.Send "Tithes, Offerings, and/or Donations" to https://leodunson.com/donate or to https://cash.app/$LeoDunson Books:The Blessings of Gods' Laws; Affirmations: https://a.co/d/1M5jJ46Gods' Laws Commandments & Statutes: https://a.co/d/8qP06jcJoin Leo Dunson Ministries online community at: https://leodunsonministries.com#TheIranWar #IranWar #Iran #BibleProphecy #Medes #MediaPersia #Persia #BiblicalProphecy #Jeremiah51 #Isaiah13 #Revelation #EndTimes #BibleStudy #JesusChrist #LeoDunsonMinistries

american lord bible revelation iran gods ephesians laws babylon affirmations behold donations persia offerings sharpen iran war statutes tithes medes

Property Fall Build: Land Transfers — Land-Sale Contracts, Marketable Title, Equitable Conversion, Deeds, Delivery, Title Covenants, Recording Acts, and Bona Fide Purchasers

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 10, 2026 73:30

Chapter 4: Called to Carmel, Called to Community: Reflections on the Carmelite Rule, Secular Constitutions, and Statutes by Tim Bete, OCDS

JIJI English News-時事通信英語ニュース-

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 8, 2026 31:05

Chapter 4 of Called to Carmel, Called to Community: Reflections on the Carmelite Rule, Secular Constitutions, and Statutes by Tim Bete, OCDS. This chapter covers Witnesses to the Experience of God (Constitutions, 17 to 23). In Called to Carmel, Called to Community, Tim Bete shares his reflections on the Carmelite Rule, OCDS Constitutions, and Provincial Statutes. The book brings the governing documents to life and connects them to the writings of St. Teresa of Avila, St. John of the Cross, and other Carmelite Saints. Through practical examples, Bete emphasizes the power of Secular Carmelite communities and how the community helps form us in holiness. If you are called to Carmel, you are called to community! The book is divided into 11 chapters, perfect for community formation classes or individual reading. It is excellent supplementary reading for Formation I, Year B: History & Charism (in the United States), and for visitors to your community. At the end of each chapter, there are reflection questions. Find the book on Amazon in paperback and e-book formats https://www.timbete.net/carmel-book Resources from the book, including the Rule, Constitutions, and Statutes from many Provinces https://www.timbete.net/carmel Contact Tim: https://www.timbete.net/contact

united states amazon community cross reflections constitution witnesses secular avila statutes bete carmelite charism ocds

KOL497 | Debate: “Should Free Cities Protect Intellectual Property?” Free Cities Foundation Annual Conference — Próspera, Honduras 2026

Kinsella On Liberty

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 7, 2026

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast: Episode 497. Yesterday (Sep. 5, 2026) I participated in the debate: “Should Free Cities Protect Intellectual Property?” with IP attorney Brian O'Beirne, moderated by Tipolis CFO Alex VossTopic, held at the Free Cities Foundation annual Conference, Próspera, Honduras, Sept. 4–7 (Sat. Sept. 5, 2026) (SK profile; O'Beirne profile) (see Free Cities Foundation Annual Conference — Próspera 2026). https://youtu.be/4GWPdxnpCOI I spoke for 4 minutes, then Brian, and then we had an exchange and audience questions for the remaining time. It was very civil unlike some other debates I've participated in. (( KOL038 | Debate with Robert Wenzel on Intellectual Property; KOL123 | Debate with Jan Helfeld on Anarchy vs. Limited Government. )) One thing I liked is that Brian started off admitting, first, that he has some sympathy for my anti-IP position, and, second, that he acknowledged that opposition to IP is the libertarian position--unlike other libertarian IP proponents who claim that IP rights are compatible with libertarianism, if not the "heart and core" (Ayn Rand) or property rights or . (( Objectivists: “All Property is Intellectual Property” A Recurring Fallacy: “IP is a Purer Form of Property than Material Resources” The “Ontology” Mistake of Libertarian Creationists. )) "primary property" (Galambos). (( Galambos and Other Nuts; Rothbard and Galambosians; The Galambosians strike back; “Around this time I met the Galambosian.”; Libertarian Sci-Fi Authors and Copyright versus Libertarian IP Abolitionists; Was Galambos an IP Thief?; Galambos the Crank; Shades of Galambos: Man tries to copyright his name. )) Transcript and shownotes below. This was also so purely a perfect 4 minutes I couldn't believe it — Alex (@AlexDVoss) September 16, 2026 Note: I misspoke a couple times in my 4-minute hurried initial presentation: I said "court" a few times when I meant the crown (king; government; state), granting patents in favor of "court" cronies; and the crown and/or church (Attila and the Witchdoctor) (( See Ayn Rand, “For the New Intellectual,” in For the New Intellectual: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand (New York: Signet/New American Library, reprint of Random House, 1961; first Signet printing December 1963), pp. 7–48; Now Online: 'Faith and Force: Destroyers of the Modern World'; "Faith" entry in Ayn Rand Lexicon; Bruce Goldberg, “Ayn Rand's ‘For the New Intellectual'” (1961), n.14. )) controlling what books could be printed via control of the scribes, pre-printing press, and of the publishing houses thereafter via the Stationer's Company. Forgive me, forgive me. Re other IP debates: In his defense, as far as I know my opponent does not purport to have a coherent theory of property or IP or libertarianism. Go here https://t.co/rRs61a68M6 and search for the word "debate" for several others -- Richard Epstein was more coherent, but totally utilitarian; he… — Stephan Kinsella (@NSKinsella) September 8, 2026 Related/mentioned “Conversation with an author about copyright and publishing in a free society” (Jan. 23, 2012) Copywrong: copyright as censorship KOL346 | Copyright and Satoshi's Legacy: The Tatiana Show, with Tatiana Moroz How to Improve Patent, Copyright, and Trademark Law FDA and Patent Reform: A Modest Proposal “Are Patents Needed to Make Up for FDA Kneecapping?” (July 2, 2011) KOL190 | On Life without Patents and Copyright: Or, But Who Would Pick the Cotton? (PFS 2015) Mark Lemley: The Very Basis Of Our Patent System… Is A Myth (July 29, 2011) Frank H. Easterbrook, “Intellectual Property Is Still Property,” Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 13, no. 1 (Winter 1990): 108–118, pp. 109–110 (on inevitable disclosure) Intellectual Property's Great Fallacy KOL190-2 | Part 2: On Life without Patents and Copyright: Or, But Who Would Pick the Cotton? — Panel Discussion, Hoppe, Dürr, Kinsella, van Dun, Daniels (PFS 2015) The Overwhelming Empirical Case Against Patent and Copyright “The Problem with Intellectual Property,” in Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics Do Business Without Intellectual Property (Liberty.me, 2014) The Universal Principles of Liberty Shownotes and Summary Overall Summary of Debate At the Free Cities Conference in Próspera, Alex Voss moderated Stephan Kinsella against Brian O'Beirne on whether intellectual property is legitimate and what a free city should do about it. Kinsella argued that property exists only to allocate scarce, rivalrous means (self-ownership, first use, contract, restitution); ideas are guides to action, not ownable things. Patent and copyright are statutory privileges—historically Crown monopolies and press control—that impose unconsented negative servitudes on other people's property, block independent inventors, enrich large firms, and should be abolished. O'Beirne treated IP as a right in human ingenuity and a last individual defense against corporate oligopoly and central banking. He granted that the present code is broken (thickets, trolls, life-plus-70) but said abolition would hand creators' work to those same firms; the answer is reform, sector-scaled terms, and symmetry of rights, not erasure. On practice they were closer. Both said Próspera should not pick a treaty fight that threatens the zone. O'Beirne wanted opportunistic protection to attract builders (CAFTA-DR/TRIPS, Infinita). Kinsella wanted the lightest lawful touch—no treble damages, no criminal copyright, shorter terms, Founders' copyright, no software copyright—and stressed that patents are territorial, so skipping a local patent office does not stop U.S. or European filings and is largely irrelevant for exporters. Audience questions (expiry of “property,” fire and the wheel, trademarks, pharma/FDA) replayed the same split: O'Beirne qualified rights by the common good and novelty; Kinsella called consistent IP perpetual, the patent-bargain a myth, and patents a patch on the FDA. Summary of Kinsella's position (from Grok, based on the transcript and his pre-debate email exchange with O'Beirne and Voss) Stephan Kinsella's case against intellectual property, as he put it to Alex Voss before the session and then on stage, has two layers that he keeps joined: a rights argument about what property is, and a practical argument about what a free city should do when it cannot get the ideal. Voss had already framed the dispute narrowly: patents and copyrights—exclusive rights in inventions and works that bind strangers without a contract. Contracts, NDAs, employment terms, and trade secrets were set aside as different questions. Voss's sketch of Kinsella's theory (conflict over scarce means; title by appropriation or transfer; creation not an independent source of title; information as patterning of an already-owned substrate; IP as a veto over others' things) Kinsella accepted, then added history, scale of harm, and institutional design. 1. What property is for The four-minute opening is the core. We do not live in the Garden of Eden. Action uses two things: scarce means that can cause results, and knowledge that tells us how to use them. Knowledge can be copied; a hammer or a factory cannot be used two incompatible ways at once. Because people have free will, conflict over those scarce means is always possible. Property rights are the norms that let people possess and use those means peacefully—self-ownership of the body; original appropriation of unowned external resources; contract; restitution for wrongs. That, he says, is the spine of Roman law, common law, and a consistent libertarianism. Ideas do not fit. They are not “conflictable.” They exist only as the patterning of some already-owned substrate (paper, a chip, a machine). You own what you make because you already owned the inputs, not because “creation” mints a new title. Patent and copyright therefore do not add a new kind of property. They give A a legally enforceable veto over how B uses B's own press, factory, or chemicals. In the debate he calls that a nonconsensual negative easement or servitude—the same structure as a restrictive covenant, minus the neighbors' consent. Consent is the whole difference. He is explicit that he does not care about “symmetry.” A rule that everyone may sue everyone for defamation, or for welfare, would be symmetric and still unjust. First-to-the-patent-office does not even guarantee uniqueness: independent inventors are blocked. That is enough, for him, to reject the system as a matter of justice, before any spreadsheet about incentives. 2. History, legislation, and the dishonest name He adds what Voss's paragraph left out. Patent began as Crown privileges to shield favorites from competition (Statute of Monopolies, 1623). Copyright began as control of the press and unapproved speech (Statute of Anne, 1710). They did not grow out of common-law title; they were statutes. In the email he presses a further institutional point: patent and copyright cannot exist without a legislature empowered to make law. Organic court-made law—Roman law, common law, Restatements, even a scholarly compilation adopted as a code—resolves disputes over scarce things. It does not invent a 17-year monopoly in a pattern. A free city that takes common-law or Restatement principles as its base, and treats legislation as rare and suspect, has a structural reason not to enact IP at all. His Universal Principles of Liberty are meant that way: not as a statute. He tells Brian that origin is not his only argument (so the “genetic fallacy” charge misses). He also opposes trademark, defamation, and trade secret, some of which did come through common law. “Sometimes the common law gets it wrong.” The name “intellectual property” is the propaganda move: a state privilege flying the flag of property and capitalism. That is why he calls it intellectual privilege and why, in the email,...

history founders conversations pr action european debate gardens ideas conference protect forgive crown audience fda property ip makeup organic contracts pol consent copyright shades honduras handbook anarchy panel discussion cotton pub patent modern world intellectual property crank grok patents ayn rand random house voss ndas attila annual conferences statutes satoshi infinita monopolies hoppe spera kinsella murray rothbard pfs signet harv limited government universal principles beirne on life stephan kinsella richard epstein philosophical foundations restatement bruce goldberg free cities foundation restatements jan helfeld ayn rand lexicon

Japanese Attempted Murder Victim Demands Statute of Limitations Removal

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 7, 2026 0:10

A victim of attempted murder in Nagoya, Aichi Prefecture, central Japan, in 2002 and his wife are advocating for the removal of the statute of limitations on such crimes.

japan japanese victim demands removal statutes attempted murder nagoya statute of limitations aichi prefecture

DEAR PAO: Executed oral sale of land is valid and beyond the ambit of the Statute of Frauds | Sept. 6, 2026

The Manila Times Podcasts

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 6, 2026 4:20

DEAR PAO: Executed oral sale of land is valid and beyond the ambit of the Statute of Frauds | Sept. 6, 2026Subscribe to The Manila Times Channel - https://tmt.ph/YTSubscribe Visit our website at https://www.manilatimes.net Follow us: Facebook - https://tmt.ph/facebook Instagram - https://tmt.ph/instagram Twitter - https://tmt.ph/twitter DailyMotion - https://tmt.ph/dailymotion Subscribe to our Digital Edition - https://tmt.ph/digital Check out our Podcasts: Spotify - https://tmt.ph/spotify Apple Podcasts - https://tmt.ph/applepodcasts Amazon Music - https://tmt.ph/amazonmusic Deezer: https://tmt.ph/deezer Stitcher: https://tmt.ph/stitcherTune In: https://tmt.ph/tunein#TheManilaTimes#KeepUpWithTheTimes Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

land sale dear fraud acast stitcher oral amazon music deezer valid statutes executed dailymotion digital edition ambit podcasts spotify

The Way of the LORD's Statutes

Calvary Protestant Reformed Church

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 6, 2026 50:48

I. The Way II. Learning the Way III. Keeping the Way

learning lord statutes

3OG TOS - Court Martial

3 Old Geeks

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 4, 2026 20:47

Rights, sir, human rights! The Bible. The Code of Hammurabi, and of Justinian. The Magna Carta. The Constitution of the United States. The Fundamental Declarations of the Martian Colonies. The Statutes of Alpha III. Gentlemen - these documents all speak of rights. Rights of the accused to a trial by his peers, to be represented by counsel. The rights of cross-examination. But most importantly, the right to listen to this podcast.Live long and prosper and Keep On Geekin' On!

united states live bible code rights constitution gentlemen statutes magna carta hammurabi justinian court martial

Chapter 3: Called to Carmel, Called to Community: Reflections on the Carmelite Rule, Secular Constitutions, and Statutes by Tim Bete, OCDS

connecticut metoo limitations catholic church jeffrey epstein statutes child sexual abuse new london hindered

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 2, 2026 28:05

Chapter 3 of Called to Carmel, Called to Community: Reflections on the Carmelite Rule, Secular Constitutions, and Statutes by Tim Bete, OCDS. This chapter covers Following Jesus in the Teresian Secular Carmel (Constitutions, 10 to 16). In Called to Carmel, Called to Community, Tim Bete shares his reflections on the Carmelite Rule, OCDS Constitutions, and Provincial Statutes. The book brings the governing documents to life and connects them to the writings of St. Teresa of Avila, St. John of the Cross, and other Carmelite Saints. Through practical examples, Bete emphasizes the power of Secular Carmelite communities and how the community helps form us in holiness. If you are called to Carmel, you are called to community! The book is divided into 11 chapters, perfect for community formation classes or individual reading. It is excellent supplementary reading for Formation I, Year B: History & Charism (in the United States), and for visitors to your community. At the end of each chapter, there are reflection questions. Find the book on Amazon in paperback and e-book formats https://www.timbete.net/carmel-book Resources from the book, including the Rule, Constitutions, and Statutes from many Provinces https://www.timbete.net/carmel Contact Tim: https://www.timbete.net/contact

united states amazon community cross reflections constitution following jesus secular avila statutes bete carmelite charism ocds

EP 997 Justice in Child Sexual Abuse Cases Hindered by Statutes of Limitation

America Trends

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 20, 2026 34:04

There may well be strong arguments for statutes of limitations, basically a deadline to file civil or criminal suits, in various areas of the law because evidence can be lost, memories fade, and witnesses may no longer be available. In the case of child sexual abuse, however, memories of what happened may be awakened many years, decades even, later when there is a triggering event or the adult self finally wants to come to terms with the trauma that has affected them throughout their lives. Yet, these statutes of limitations still exist in many states, and the federal statutes are very weak in this area. Clearly, the problems in the Catholic Church and the new attention drawn to the issue from the #MeToo movement and the Jeffery Epstein case are providing greater impetus to allowing victims to come forward when it’s right for them, in their circumstance, and not on an arbitrary timeline. To discuss this issue with us is Attorney Kelly Reardon of New London, Connecticut who has a remarkable background and much experience in this area of the law.

I Was an IRS Special Agent for 20+ Years — Here's How the IRS Actually Puts People in Prison for Taxes | Robert Nordlander

Locked In with Ian Bick

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 18, 2026 122:00

Robert Nordlander spent over 20 years as a special agent with IRS Criminal Investigation — investigating complex criminal tax and money laundering violations, working undercover operations, executing search and arrest warrants, and building the cases that sent tax evaders and money launderers to federal prison — and in this episode of Locked In with Ian Bick, he finally tells the complete truth about what that career really looked like from the inside. He shares what cases the IRS Criminal Division actually goes after and prosecutes, what it actually takes to put someone in prison for taxes, the different types of money laundering he investigated, why small business owners evade taxes more than anyone else, how cases came to him and what the investigation process actually looked like, some of the most significant cases of his career, and what the new world of influencers and social media income is producing in terms of tax crime that most people never see coming. _____________________________________________ #irs #taxes #truecrimestories #accountant #cops _____________________________________________ Thank you to CASH APP for sponsoring this episode: Download Cash App Today: https://capl.onelink.me/vFut/ksjh06pb #CashAppPod Cash App is a financial services platform, not a bank. Banking services provided by Cash App's bank partner(s). Prepaid debit cards issued by Sutton Bank, Member FDIC. Cash App Visa® Debit Flex Cards issued by Sutton Bank, Member FDIC, and The Bancorp Bank, N.A., pursuant to a license from Visa U.S.A. Inc. See terms and conditions for the Sutton prepaid card, Sutton debit flex card, and Bancorp debit flex card. Discounts and promotions provided by Cash App, a Block, Inc. brand. Visit cash.app/legal/podcast for full disclosures. _____________________________________________ Connect with Robert Nordlander: Website: https://www.nordlandercpa.com/ Buy his books: https://www.amazon.com/stores/Robert-Nordlander/author/B0BMZT4CNK?ref=ap_rdr&shoppingPortalEnabled=true&ccs_id=a4257f70-b089-4db0-8020-c9bd7e35d743 Hosted, Executive Produced & Edited By Ian Bick: https://www.instagram.com/ian_bick/?hl=en https://ianbick.com/ _____________________________________________ Timestamps: 00:00 Meet the Ex-IRS Agent 00:21 Growing Up and Early Career 02:00 From Chips to IRS Agent 03:48 The CPA Advantage 05:40 IRS CI Origins and Its Role 06:34 Stationed in Alabama 07:19 Dad's Blessing and Career Shift 09:03 First Case: Identity Theft 10:50 The IRS 'Funny Box' Explained 12:05 Tax Protesters and False Refunds 13:37 Sentencing for Tax Protesters 14:59 Statute of Limitations for Tax Crimes 15:38 Hiding Income: The Small Business Owner 16:36 How Agents Find Cases 18:40 Data Mining for Evasion 20:47 The Value of IRS CI to Prosecutors 21:09 Drug Dealers and Tax Returns 22:12 Civil vs. Criminal: Making the Call 24:30 Choosing Cases Worth Prosecuting 25:40 Cash App Sponsorship 27:40 Dollar Amounts Drive Cases 29:34 Most Common Businesses for Fraud 30:42 Contractor Cash Schemes 31:32 Investigating Contractor Fraud 32:51 Why Celebrities Don't File 34:14 The Tax Gap and Who's Responsible 35:30 Are Business Owners Honest? 36:50 Influencer Tax Issues 38:12 The Fiji Hotel Example 39:22 Influencer Contracts and Tax 40:20 Ignorance and Willfulness 41:30 Influencer Cases and Richard Hatch 43:08 Tax Preparer Liability 44:42 Return Preparers: No License Needed 45:29 Preparer Mistakes vs. Crimes 46:53 Abuse of Earned Income Tax Credit 48:55 What Happens to the Clients? 50:00 When to Tell a Subject They're Investigated 51:42 Undercover Work and Surveillance 55:27 Common Lies from Suspects 57:37 Finding the Second Set of Books 58:26 Pissed-Off Partners as Informants 58:49 State vs. Federal Cases 01:00:35 The Length of Federal Investigations 01:01:36 Finding Bank Accounts 01:03:40 Using Flight Rosters as Leads 01:05:27 Structuring: The $10,000 Myth 01:07:19 A Surprising Case: Murder and Taxes 01:12:28 Expectations of Repayment 01:13:12 Most Egregious Money Hiding 01:15:40 PayPal, Venmo, and Cash App 01:17:52 Money Laundering Evolution 01:20:51 Cryptocurrency and the IRS 01:24:17 Unreported 1099 Income 01:26:46 Tips and Minor Tax Evasion 01:27:43 Is the System Fair? 01:29:00 The Tax Boycott Myth 01:31:00 Tax Protesters Are Filing 01:34:19 Jury Trials and Complex Cases 01:37:52 Testifying and Simplifying for Juries 01:42:10 Winning at Trial: The Odds 01:44:00 Robert's Role as a Consultant 01:45:58 Retiring from the IRS 01:47:53 Life on the Defense Side 01:52:56 IRS Layoffs and Efficiency 01:56:58 The Most Important Lesson 01:58:52 Truth Has Many Friends 02:00:18 Final Thoughts and Resources _____________________________________________ To advertise on the show, contact sales@advertisecast.com or visit https://advertising.libsyn.com/LockedInWithIanBicka

Contracts Fall Launch: Defenses to Enforcement: Statute of Frauds, Capacity, Duress, Misrepresentation, Mistake, Unconscionability, Illegality, and Public Policy

Ridgeview Bible Church | Chadron, Nebraska Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 14, 2026 63:00

mental mistakes quiz traditional fraud terms contracts capacity public policy courts mutual merchant formal enforcement defenses statutes unilateral bar exam misrepresentation duress undue illegality fall launch

If You Walk In My Statutes

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 9, 2026

walk statutes

Chapter 2: Called to Carmel, Called to Community: Reflections on the Carmelite Rule, Secular Constitutions, and Statutes by Tim Bete, OCDS

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 6, 2026 33:20

Chapter 2 of Called to Carmel, Called to Community: Reflections on the Carmelite Rule, Secular Constitutions, and Statutes by Tim Bete, OCDS. This chapter covers Our Identity, Values, and Commitment (Constitutions, 1 to 9). In Called to Carmel, Called to Community, Tim Bete shares his reflections on the Carmelite Rule, OCDS Constitutions, and Provincial Statutes. The book brings the governing documents to life and connects them to the writings of St. Teresa of Avila, St. John of the Cross, and other Carmelite Saints. Through practical examples, Bete emphasizes the power of Secular Carmelite communities and how the community helps form us in holiness. If you are called to Carmel, you are called to community! The book is divided into 11 chapters, perfect for community formation classes or individual reading. It is excellent supplementary reading for Formation I, Year B: History & Charism (in the United States), and for visitors to your community. At the end of each chapter, there are reflection questions. Find the book on Amazon in paperback and e-book formats https://www.timbete.net/carmel-book Resources from the book, including the Rule, Constitutions, and Statutes from many Provinces https://www.timbete.net/carmel Contact Tim: https://www.timbete.net/contact

united states amazon community cross reflections values constitution secular avila statutes bete carmelite our identity charism ocds

Pre-Fall Law School Study Plan: Reading Like a Law Student: Cases, Statutes, Rules, Notes, Holdings, Dicta, and Efficient Case Briefing

The Future of Everything presented by Stanford Engineering

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 4, 2026 45:44

reading study students terms material efficient law schools briefing reasoning holdings statutes dismissal law students procedural bar exam dicta pre fall reading like

Daily Mass: Lord, teach me your statutes

Catholic Inspiration

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 3, 2026 6:03

Psalm 119 invites us to open our minds to receive the wisdom that comes when we seek the light of God's truth. (Lectionary #407) August 3, 2026 - Cathedral Rectory - Superior, WI Fr. Andrew Ricci - www.studyprayserve.com

god psalm statutes lectionary lord teach daily mass andrew ricci wi fr

Best of: The future of AI and the law

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 31, 2026 34:26

These days, AI is everywhere, and it's increasingly hard to separate the gains from the slop. With that in mind, we're re-releasing my conversation with Stanford Law professor Daniel Ho on the future of AI and the law. When we look for applications where AI can deliver measurable benefit, the legal profession stands out, both for its potential gains in efficiency and equity, and for how much is at stake if we get it wrong. Dan's research — from using AI to identify racist property covenants buried in county deed records, to mapping obsolete regulations that waste thousands of hours of government time — shows what's possible when the technology is applied with rigor and purpose. If you're curious about how AI can serve both justice and good governance, this one is well worth another listen. Have a question for Russ? Send it our way in writing or via voice memo, and it might be featured on an upcoming episode. Please introduce yourself, let us know where you're listening from, and share your question. You can send questions to thefutureofeverything@stanford.edu. Episode Reference Links: Stanford Profile: Dan Ho Connect With Us: Episode Transcripts >>> The Future of Everything Website Connect with Russ >>> Threads / Bluesky / Mastodon Connect with School of Engineering >>> Twitter/X / Instagram / LinkedIn / Facebook Chapters: (00:00:00) Introduction Russ Altman introduces guest Dan Ho, a professor of law, political science, and computer science at Stanford University. (00:02:19) Path into Legal AI How Ho's background shaped his interest in law, and technology. (00:03:35) What Lawyers Do What makes law a complex domain for AI. (00:05:28) Legal Hallucinations When AI performs well and when it fails. (00:07:52) Searching Legal Records in California How AI can help identify outdated, harmful, or legally important material. (00:10:28) Scaling Redaction How a model accelerated a process that overwhelmed county recorder offices. (00:13:04) Legal Reform at Scale How AI has supported legal reform by scanning massive bodies of law. (00:15:02) STARA & The City of San Francisco How AI was used to go through San Francisco's code and clean up reporting. (00:20:53) Outdated Obligations How “regulatory sludge” takes the time & resources of the public service (00:25:02) Open vs. Closed AI The differences and associated risks of the different AI systems. (00:30:58) Legal Chatbots Why legal chatbots are promising but risky. (00:33:42) Conclusion Connect With Us:Episode Transcripts >>> The Future of Everything WebsiteConnect with Russ >>> Threads / Bluesky / MastodonConnect with School of Engineering >>>Twitter/X / Instagram / LinkedIn / Facebook Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

ai school future san francisco open artificial intelligence engineering stanford university russ openai regulations ruth bader ginsburg llama simplecast future of ai rag large language models ocr statutes precedent stanford law school ai regulation stara santa clara county public records caselaw access to justice government waste stanford law equal protection california law legaltechnology legal research regulatory reform reporting requirements legal writing legal reform daniel ho us code david chiu optical character recognition statutory interpretation russ altman stanford engineering

WorkCompAcademy News - July 27, 2026

WorkCompAcademy | Weekly News

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 30, 2026 58:16

Rene Thomas Folse, JD, Ph.D. is the host for this edition which reports on the following news stories: Appellate Court Reverses WCAB and Approves Policy Cancellation. Statute of Limitations Applies After Carriers Unequivocal Claim Denial. California Overhauls Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund. Rand Reports on SB 1160 Effectiveness on UR and Medical Treatment. CMS Begins Auditing Carrier Section 111 Records. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Resolves Price Fixing Case for $29.6M. FBI's Most Wanted Healthcare Fraudster List Fugitive Arrested. Generative AI Tools Are Reshaping Insurance Fraud Risks.

fbi records jd effectiveness sb ur 6m statutes medical treatment

The Mess, Mayhem, and Madness of the Ministry of Magic

Critical Magic Theory: An Analytical Harry Potter Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 65:50 Transcription Available

Professor Julian Wamble kicks off Critical Magic Theory's summer series by unpacking the Ministry of Magic through Half-Blood Prince's opening chapter, "The Other Minister." Starting with Hagrid's offhand line to Harry about what the Ministry actually does- keep magic hidden from Muggles- Wamble traces how that founding logic hardens into structural wizarding superiority, encoded in the Trace, the Statute of Secrecy, and departments like Arthur Weasley's Misuse of Muggle Artifacts office.The episode centers on wizarding victimhood ideology: how historical persecution justifies ongoing anti-Muggle sentiment long after the threat has passed, while pure-blood supremacy against Muggle-borns operates on the exact same bias, aimed inward instead of outward. Wamble argues the Muggle-Born Registration Commission wasn't a rupture from Ministry policy but a natural escalation of infrastructure already in place.

starting magic ministry madness mess mayhem misuse secrecy statutes hagrid muggles half blood prince arthur weasley

The Quill & Sword | The FAR & Beyond Episode 47: The Foundation of Advice: Mastering Contract Research in an Evolving Landscape

The Quill & Sword

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 29, 2026 40:02

In this episode, we discuss navigating the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) using updated tools on acquisition.gov, including practitioner albums for change summaries and the new FAR Companion. The panel outlines how to locate agency-specific supplements like the AFARS and DFARS, while providing strategies for researching primary sources such as National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs) and GAO case law. Finally, the episode introduces the newly renamed Acquisition Attorney's Deskbook and explores the evolving role of closed and open AI tools in conducting streamlined legal analysis. Resources Links Deskbooks: Attorney's Acquisition Deskbook: tjaglcs.army.mil/publications Fiscal Law Deskbook: tjaglcs.army.mil/publications Primary Sources: FAR: www.acquisition.gov/ RFO: www.acquisition.gov/far-overhaul RFO Practitioner Albums: www.acquisition.gov/far-overhaul/practitioner albums FAR Companion: www.acquisition.gov/sites/default/files/page_file_uploads/far-companion.pdf AFARS Link: www.army.mil/armycontracting#org-afars DFARS: www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html and https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars_far_overhaul_class_deviations.html U.S. Code and Statutes: uscode.house.gov/ Congress: www.congress.gov/ DoD History & Library Directorate: whs mil.libguides.com/dodappropriationslaws GAO: www.gao.gov/legal/bid-protests/search Court of Federal Claims (COFC): www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/ Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA): www.asbca.mil/ Secondary Sources: Congressional Research Reports: www.congress.gov/quick-search/crs products?qs_expand=true WIFCON.com: www.wifcon.com Small Gov Con: www.smallgov.com StanHinton: www.stanhinton.com Learn more about The Quill & Sword series of podcasts by visiting our podcast page at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/thequillandsword. The Quill & Sword show includes featured episodes from across the JAGC, plus all episodes from our four separate shows: “Criminal Law Department Presents” (Criminal Law Department), “NSL Unscripted” (National Security Law Department), “The FAR and Beyond” (Contract & Fiscal Law Department) and “Hold My Reg” (Administrative & Civil Law Department).

ai advice research foundation congress code court mastering sword contract landscape evolving government accountability office statutes quill dfars rfo

The earth, O LORD, is full of thy mercy: teach me thy statutes

Solus Christus Reformed Baptist Church

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 26, 2026 6:03

earth teach o lord statutes

FULL SHOW: I Don't Know What The Statute Of Limitations Is On Refrigerating A Child

Dave & Mahoney

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 24, 2026 53:50

SHOW FEATURES: Internet Is Undefeated, Call Of Fame, Redneck Report and Pop Trash.Follow Dave & Mahoney everywhere:Instagram: @daveandmahoneyTikTok: @daveandmahoneyFacebook: @daveandmahoneyYouTube: @daveandmahoneyAgree? Disagree? Want to yell at us?Voicemail: 833-YO-DUMMY Additional Content: daveandmahoney.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

child disagree voicemail mahoney statutes statute of limitations refrigerating

Legal News for Tues 7/21 - Paramount WB Merger Frozen, Anthropic $1.5b Copyright Settlement for Piracy, DOJ Launches Probe into Harvard

Minimum Competence

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 21, 2026 6:54

This Day in Legal History: The Dodd-Frank ActOn July 21, 2010, President Barack Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the most sweeping overhaul of American financial regulation since the New Deal. It was a direct response to the 2008 financial crisis—the collapse that wiped out trillions in household wealth, toppled storied institutions like Lehman Brothers, and required massive taxpayer bailouts to keep the banking system from failing entirely.Dodd-Frank tried to attack the crisis's root causes on several fronts at once. It created the Financial Stability Oversight Council to watch for systemic risks—the danger that one firm's failure could cascade through the whole economy—and gave regulators new “resolution authority” to wind down failing giants in an orderly way, an attempt to end the problem of banks being “too big to fail.” It imposed the Volcker Rule, restricting banks from making certain speculative bets with depositors' money. It brought the shadowy derivatives market under federal oversight. And, in its most visible legacy, it created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau—a new agency dedicated to policing mortgages, credit cards, and other consumer financial products, born largely from an idea championed by then-professor Elizabeth Warren.Dodd-Frank has been contested ever since—fought over in rulemaking, trimmed by later legislation, and litigated all the way to the Supreme Court, including a major case over the constitutionality of the CFPB's structure. But its core significance endures: it represents the country's considered legal judgment that concentrated financial power, left unchecked, poses a systemic danger, and that the answer is robust administrative regulation. It's a fitting anniversary to sit alongside today's news, because so much of what we cover comes back to the same enduring question—how the law should restrain private economic power without strangling the enterprise that power creates.A federal judge has temporarily paused Paramount Skydance's roughly $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, siding for now with a coalition of twelve state attorneys general who sued to stop it. U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín issued a fourteen-day temporary restraining order, finding the deal “likely” violates antitrust law. Here's the framework. Antitrust law exists to preserve competition, and one of its central tools is blocking mergers that would concentrate too much market power in a single company. The states, led by California, sued on July 13 arguing that combining these two entertainment giants would create a media behemoth with the power to raise prices across film and television and to squeeze rivals. A temporary restraining order is exactly what it sounds like—a short-term freeze to preserve the status quo while the court takes a harder look; the “likely violates” language signals the states cleared the initial bar of showing they're reasonably likely to succeed. It is not a final ruling that the merger is illegal. The significance is twofold. First, it's a reminder that even after companies strike a deal, they still have to clear the antitrust gauntlet, and state attorneys general—not just federal enforcers—can be the ones holding the gate. Second, the sheer scale here, a hundred-and-ten-billion-dollar combination of major studios and networks, makes this a marquee test of how aggressively courts will scrutinize consolidation in an industry that shapes what Americans watch.Judge orders Paramount to temporarily pause Warner Bros. acquisition | ReutersA federal judge has granted final approval of Anthropic's $1.5 billion settlement with a class of authors who accused the AI company of misusing their books to train its chatbot Claude—the largest known copyright settlement in U.S. history. The deal works out to roughly $3,000 per work across an estimated 500,000 books, split among the authors and publishers who hold the rights. The legal backstory is important, because it's more precise than “AI company pays authors.” The now-retired Judge William Alsup, who first handled the case, drew a careful line: he suggested that training AI on lawfully acquired books could qualify as fair use, but found that Anthropic had violated authors' rights by downloading and storing more than seven million pirated books in a “central library”—copies it obtained illegitimately, regardless of whether they were ultimately used for training. In other words, the core wrong the settlement addresses is the piracy—the acquisition and hoarding of stolen copyrighted works—not simply the act of training itself. The settlement drew objections from some authors who argue it's too small, overpays the plaintiffs' attorneys, or wrongly leaves out certain rights holders, and the judge had to weigh those before signing off. The significance is that this sets a real-world price on one flavor of AI's copyright problem. It doesn't resolve the biggest open question—whether training on copyrighted material is itself lawful—but it establishes that how you got the training data matters enormously, and that building your library out of pirated books can cost you well over a billion dollars.US judge approves Anthropic's $1.5 billion settlement of copyright lawsuit | ReutersAnd finally, the Justice Department has announced a civil-rights probe into Harvard University, this time over its financial aid programs. The Department's Civil Rights Division says it has opened a “compliance review” to determine whether Harvard's China-based financial aid arrangements discriminate on the basis of national origin by steering aid to foreign—presumably Chinese—students in a way that excludes American citizens. The theory rests on an unusual inversion of civil-rights law. Statutes like Title VI of the Civil Rights Act bar recipients of federal funding from discriminating based on national origin, and they've historically been used to protect racial and ethnic minorities. Here the DOJ is deploying that framework to allege discrimination against American-citizen students. The trigger, according to the Department, was an audit of Harvard's foreign-funding disclosures showing the university has received more than $630 million from sources based in China, some of it allegedly earmarked, through donor restrictions, for aid to particular students. Harvard says it's reviewing the letter and will engage with the government. The significance is that this is the latest salvo in a sustained campaign against Harvard and other elite universities, which have faced probes and funding threats over everything from admissions to campus protests. Whatever the merits of this specific allegation, the pattern is what's notable: the machinery of federal civil-rights enforcement being aimed, repeatedly and pointedly, at a handful of institutions the administration has publicly targeted.US DOJ says it is probing Harvard over financial aid programs | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

american california ai china americans chinese barack obama judge harvard supreme court discovery frozen warner bros harvard university paramount copyright launches doj settlement merger probe elizabeth warren new deal justice department anthropic antitrust piracy lehman brothers civil rights act statutes cfpb consumer financial protection bureau dodd frank civil rights division us doj legalnews olgu title vi consumer protection act volcker rule dodd frank wall street reform financial stability oversight council

July Bar Sprint: MBE Sprint Part One — Civil Procedure, Contracts, Torts, and the Multiple-Choice Method

method fraud contracts candidates sprint procedures mbe statutes torts multiple choice civil procedure

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 21, 2026 70:08

Sacred Statutes 3: Life & Death

Grace Presbyterian Church (PCA)

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 19, 2026 45:53

The post Sacred Statutes 3: Life & Death appeared first on Grace Presbyterian Church (PCA).

death sacred life death statutes

#430 Estate Reclamation Part 1: How to Take Back What's Really Yours

Awakening

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 17, 2026 89:38 Transcription Available

In this essential Part 2 of our series on Estate Reclamation, Russell Paul Arthur continues his deep dive into the lawful procedures required to reclaim your estate from the control of the Crown Commonwealth. Building on the foundational knowledge from Part 1, Russell explains the specific affidavit processes, private trust structures, and judicial remedies available through Grace Private Court. We explore how to transition your assets from public domain control to private sovereign authority, and the exact steps required to execute an estate reclamation and restructure your life for maximum protection and asset preservation. ⏱️ Important Chapter Points & Exact Timestamps 0:00.6 Welcome to The Sovereign Man Podcast and The Awakening Podcast 0:05.9 Fifth Visit from Russell Paul Arthur 0:23.7 Russell Paul Arthur's Self-Introduction 0:42.7 Grace Private Society: A Sovereign Organization 1:01.7 Declaration of Independence from the United Kingdom 1:17.7 Grace Private Court: Handling Judiciary Matters 1:29.4 Creator of Grace Sovereignty Academy 1:59.6 System of Control and Extortion 3:18.8 The Importance of Private Courts and Corruption 3:52.7 Creating Something Outside the System 4:27.8 Current System Built on Fiction, Fraud, and Deception 5:31.7 Only Way is Out: Leave the System and Start Fresh 6:20.3 You Don't Win in Their System 6:58.4 Current Court System is a Tiered System 7:38.7 Judges Prevent Access to Court of Equity 8:05.0 All Property Locked into Public Trusts 8:25.7 System Works on Two Principles: Control and Extortion 12:24.4 What is a Public Estate? 12:49.1 Disclaimer and Advisory 15:14.5 Using Affidavit to Get Courts, Detectives, Bailiffs to Back Off 19:40.7 Public Trust Arrangements Explained 22:05.6 Deception and Fraudulent Measures: Grounds for Remedy 23:26.8 Undisclosed Arrangements: Grounds for Coming Back for Remedy 31:11.6 True Relief and Remedy Outside the System 32:08.5 The Private Estate Solution 35:37.0 Setting Up a Private Estate with Academy Members 37:54.3 Remedy and Solution: Estate Reclamation 39:10.3 The Paramount Claim 39:36.9 Estate Reclamation Done in Accordance with Law of Maxims of Equity 40:04.2 Maxim: "Equity Will Not Suffer a Wrong to Be Without a Remedy" 40:39.4 Maxim: "Equity Will Not Allow a Statute to Be Used as a Cloak for Fraud" 43:07.3 Lord Chancellery and Chancery Court of Equity 43:14.2 Equity as Remedy to Common Law 44:37.9 Most Courts Around the World Have Equity Built In 45:01.8 True Court of Equity Sits in Exclusive Equity 47:32.8 Court of Chancery: Highest of Highest Courts 47:52.9 Judges Prevent People from Going Up Through System 48:05.8 Creating Our Own Private Court with True Equity 49:50.5 Our Court is Justice by Consent 67:43.5 Estate Reclamation as Remedy and Solution 69:14.5 Maxim: "Equity Looks to the Intent and Not the Form" 70:19.1 Maxim: "Equity Regards the Beneficiary as the True Owner" 86:39 Closing Discussion and Fair Payment System 87:05.3 The 10-Week Trial System 87:37.7 10% Completion Rate and Serious Commitment Required 122:33.2 Academy Courses and Classes 122:50.7 10-Week Group Mentorship Sessions 123:04.2 Fully Informed Decision After 10 Weeks 123:19.4 Next Episode: Status Protection 123:22.7 Private Trusts and Formation 123:37.9 Operating in the Public Safely Through Private Trusts 123:47.6 Private Trusts as Lawful Avatars and Protective Shields 123:50.9 Final Links and Contact Information TOTAL DURATION: 123 minutes 57 seconds

The Three Whisky Happy Hour: Emergency Edition, with John Eastman

Power Line

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 14, 2026 52:04 Transcription Available

Lots of people didn't get the memo that the 3WHH is on hiatus for the month of July as we revamp the show's format and lineup, but since I don't want loyal listeners to go into painful withdrawals, I am offering this emergency stopgap edition, with just me and a frequently-requested guest, John Eastman.If you go only by the mainstream media coverage of the Supreme Court, you might think that the 6 - 3 decision against President Trump's executive order that attempted to curtail birthright citizenship under the emanations and penumbras of 14th Amendment was a serious setback. But discerning readers recognize that on the core constitutional question of whether birthright citizenship is anchored in the 14th Amendment, the vote was actually 5 to 4, since Justice Kavanaugh agreed with the other three dissenters that the 14th Amendment does not establish birthright citizenship, and he voted to strike down Trump's executive order because he thought it failed on statutory grounds.Statutes, of course, can be changed. And 5 - 4 Supreme Court decisions indicate that the matter is not decisively settled. Keep in mind that Roe v. Wade was a 7 - 2 decision, but the shoddiness of the reasoning in Roe became so apparent over time that it was indeed overturned. Likewise this may occur on birthright citizenship. It is most definitely not over. Consider that even as recently a decade ago no one thought a constitutional challenge to birthright citizenship could make it to the Supreme Court, let along get four votes. Many commentators thought Trump might lose this case 8 - 1, or perhaps unanimously. If there is one person above all who deserves credit for bringing this moment about, it is John Eastman. You may have heard of him. He's been in the news a bit the last few years. (Full disclosure, as the saying goes—Eastman and I were classmates, and for a time housemates—in graduate school back in the 1980s.)About 30 years ago, Eastman began writing a series of law review and other academic articles attacking the supposedly secure foundations of birthright citizenship. His argument seemed exotic at the time, and was summarily dismissed. And yet in recent years more and more eminent constitutional scholars began to come around and endorse his critique of the accepted view, which as I say now commands four votes on the Supreme Court.In our conversation here we review the course of this unfolding rethinking that has brought us to this moment, and we also take up what might be next, as Eastman has his eye on a sweeping revision of another important and highly consequential constitutional provision that nearly everyone ignores. If he can repeat the story arc of the birthright citizenship issue, it might lead to one of the most significant reforms of American government in decades.To find out that this sequel is, though, you'll just have to listen.

american donald trump supreme court emergency roe v wade whiskey amendment happy hour brett kavanaugh eastman statutes john eastman

Eleven2One - Summer Share, July 9, 2026

Eleven2one with Janice

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 9, 2026 110:15

Happy SUMMER SHARE Thursday! Dan Wolfe opens up Eleven2One today and joins Janice for the first half hour. Dan and Janice discuss the Statute of Liberty, the Gospel and the ministry of proclaiming liberty. Other topics today include the importance of reading the Bible, doing the little things, the life of Don Sisk, supporting Faith Music Radio and more. Call us at (800)600-7230 and pledge your support today or give online at FaithMusicRadio.com. CHECK OUT SHARI HOUSE'S NEW BOOK! Her Story Silhouettes: Volume 2 is now available for preorder. Janice's books What Do I Have to Lose? Books 1 and 2 are available NOW!! The complete set is just $25. Check it out at FaithMusicRadio.com. >> Also, featuring A Word of Encouragement with Vicky Mutchler, CW Today with Loretta Walker and Silhouettes with Shari House. Be sure to subscribe to this podcast and please share this podcast with your friends so we may be an encouragement to them through the music and programming on Faith Music Radio. Music is brought to you by Faith Music Missions. Learn more here >>> https://www.faithmusicmissions.org Eleven2One Facebook Eleven2One on Instagram Faith Music Radio is a listener supported Christian station.

music bible books gospel encouragement statutes silhouettes loretta walker

Don't Let Nothing Stop You

The Rundown with Kansas Legislative Division of Post Audit

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 9, 2026 10:25

In this message, I share a simple truth that has changed my life: don't let nothing stop you. Too many people allow fear, doubt, society, family, friends, or past failures to convince them that their dreams are impossible. But the Bible says, **"For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he" (Proverbs 23:7 KJV)** and Jesus said, **"Whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed... and shall not doubt in his heart... he shall have whatsoever he saith" (Mark 11:23 KJV).** Whether you're 16 or 65, there is still time to become everything God has called you to be. Believe!!!!! Stop Doubting Yourself!!!!!!! and go after your purpose with everything you've got. Don't let nothing stop you.#LeoDunson #ChristianMotivation #Faith #Mark1123 #Proverbs237 #Purpose #Success #Mindset #KingdomMindset #Motivation #Believe #JesusChrist #DontLetNothingStopYou #FaithOverFear #InspirationSend "Tithes, Offerings, and/or Donations" to https://leodunson.com/donate or to https://cash.app/$LeoDunson Books:The Blessings of Gods' Laws; Affirmations: https://a.co/d/1M5jJ46Gods' Laws Commandments & Statutes: https://a.co/d/8qP06jcJoin Leo Dunson Ministries online community at: https://leodunsonministries.com

god jesus christ bible gods proverbs laws affirmations donations offerings kjv statutes tithes

Reviewing the Reporting Accuracy and Fiscal Effects of Industrial Revenue Bonds [July 2026]

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 8, 2026 27:38

The Legislature created the Industrial Revenue Bond (IRB) program in 1961 to promote economic development. Local governments issue IRBs to fund business facilities with the goals of growing the local economy and increasing property tax revenue. Businesses that use IRBs can get a 10-year property tax exemption (IRBX). During 2010-2024, local governments issued about $18.3 billion in industrial revenue bonds and exempted about $1.1 billion in related property taxes, most of which would've likely gone to school districts and local governments. Statute requires local governments to prepare cost-benefit analyses (CBAs) if they want to offer IRBXs but provides limited guidance on their quality. We compared foregone property tax revenue estimates in 23 CBAs to the actual foregone property taxes reported by county appraisers. The CBA estimates differed greatly from county appraiser amounts (between 94% lower and 6,065% higher). Some CBAs underestimated completed project values, some overestimated how much investment would translate into appraised value, and some used erroneous figures and assumptions when estimating property taxes.Finally, we identified 3 subsidiaries of foreign businesses that received $282 million in IRB funds in 2024.

local businesses effects revenue reviewing reporting industrial bonds fiscal cba accuracy legislature statutes irb cbas irbs

Slayer Statutes, Trusts, And The Legal Gap That Matters

Elder Law Report

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 8, 2026 8:11 Transcription Available

A single estate planning detail can decide whether a family tragedy becomes a legal loophole. We start with a disturbing real-world style scenario that forces an uncomfortable question: if someone intentionally causes another person's death, can they still collect money that was meant for them, especially when those assets are held in a trust?We break down the difference between probate and trusts in plain English. Slayer statutes are designed to stop a person from benefiting from wrongdoing, but those rules often apply most clearly to the probate estate, the assets that pass through a will or through intestate succession when there is no will. Many families use revocable living trusts specifically to avoid probate, speed up administration, and keep matters private. That probate avoidance is helpful, but it can also create uncertainty if your documents don't address extreme “bad beneficiary” situations head-on.Then we get practical. We explain how an estate planning or elder law attorney can draft a trust provision that blocks a beneficiary from recovery if they cause serious injury or death to the trustmaker, and how the trust can redirect those funds to other beneficiaries, the beneficiary's children, or charity. We also talk through why trusts are so flexible, from milestone-based distributions to education-focused standards and long-term control over a legacy, along with the added benefits of smoother administration and potential creditor protection when drafted properly.If you care about protecting your family, your assets, and your intent, listen through the end, then subscribe, share this with someone who needs it, and leave a review so more people can plan before the unexpected happens.

english legal slayer trusts statutes

Chapter 1: Called to Carmel, Called to Community: Reflections on the Carmelite Rule, Secular Constitutions, and Statutes by Tim Bete, OCDS