Podcasts about statutes

Wherever you have the word "torah" (meaning, law, not the Torah in total) and the word "chukah" (meaning, statute) - then the capacity to invalidate the offering kicks in . But does that mean either/or or both? It certainly sounds like both - but the Gemara tracks it through and either/or sounds better by the end... Plus, the list of occasions or specific categories of people for which these terms are present in context in the Torah. Also, scriptural repetition about the requirements of the grain-offering establishes those details (where the repetition takes place) as essential. But the offering itself must be a permanent one for this essential status. Until the case where temporary status seems not to be a problem, in light of the number of repetitions...?

Whether you're interested in criminal law or just want to know how timing can make or break a case, this episode delivers answers in a way that's both accessible and engaging.Welcome back to Lawyer Talk! In this episode, host Steve Palmer and law student Troy Henricksen dive into a thought-provoking legal question from a listener: Can someone file charges seven years after an incident occurred?The conversation explores the complexities of statutes of limitations, who can actually bring criminal charges, and why delayed justice is such a tricky subject.Along the way, Steve Palmer and Troy Henricksen break down the differences between civil and criminal cases, how exceptions work for serious crimes like murder and rape, and the challenges that come with bringing old cases to court.Here are 3 key takeaways from their discussion:Statutes of Limitations Matter: Most criminal charges must be filed within a specific time frame set by law. For example, in Ohio, most felonies carry a 6-year limitation, but serious crimes like murder or some types of sexual assault may have no limit at all.Discovery of the Crime is Key: The clock doesn't always start ticking when the crime happens. Sometimes, it starts when the crime is discovered or should have been reasonably discovered—especially true for cases involving hidden offenses like fraud.Defendants' Rights Are Still Protected: Even if a case is technically timely, defense attorneys can argue that a long delay in prosecution causes unfair prejudice—like lost evidence or missing witnesses—which can become a powerful part of the defense.Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.Recorded at Channel 511.Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At LawMentioned in this episode:Circle 270 Media Podcast ConsultantsCircle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

Misunderstanding what Moses was trying to tell us; And Melchizedek and Abraham; "Abimelech"; "Burnt offerings"; Altars of lively stones; Rightly dividing bread from house to house; Tens, hundreds and thousands; Straying from righteousness; "Shemites"; Charity aspect of government?; John's baptism; "Corban" = oblation/offering; "Legal Charity"; Leading society into sin; Blaming world problems on other groups; Blind guides with darkened eyes; Manipulating facts; Leviticus offerings (oblation); "Israel"; "Iranians"; Spirit of sacrifice; Looking for light - whole truth; Saving the bad guys too; Lack of obedience; Lev 3:1 oblation/offering; "Without blemish"; "female" in nature; "Wood"; "Unhewn stones"; Welfare that strengthens?; Bondage of Egypt; Precepts of the LORD; Repentance; Killing the offering; Levites; Harlot riding the beast?; Public Religion; No exercising authority; Kidneys?; "Sweet savor"?; Two sons parable; Giving junk?; Intentional giving; Intent of Christ; Corruption; Hating Christ?; Is Christ your king?; Letting go of covetousness; Public flagellation?; Subtlety of Satan; Sprinkling of blood; Trees are sources; Distributing wealth?; Beginning of repentance; The faith of Abraham - living by it; aleph-hey-resh-vav-nun (Aaron); dwelling: mem+vav-shin-biet+tav+yod+mem; Ancient paths; "New Deal" of Satan; Heb 2:13; Lack of faith; Putting away idolatry; Ministers of government; Trust altars; Statutes and ordinances; Exclusively freewill offerings; Willingness to see the light; "Sin"; Protection draws subjection; Setting sheep on fire; Counterfeit Holy Spirit; Isaiah 1:1; Socialism; Citizens of the United States; Understanding the system you are in; Isa 1:10; "Gomorrah"; People bound together as merchandise; Sodom = socialist state; Creating the wrong system?; Unpayable debt; Required sacrifice; Seeking the kingdom of God and His righteousness; Praying that everybody is saved; Samuel's warnings; Network in love; Right reason; Do something!

01-16-26 - Emailer Admits Statute Of Limitations Is Up Today On The 120k He Stole - The Money Parents Spend On Kids' Sports Hoping They'll Go ProSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

01-16-26 - Emailer Admits Statute Of Limitations Is Up Today On The 120k He Stole - The Money Parents Spend On Kids' Sports Hoping They'll Go ProSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Colorado has implemented the most significant child support statute updates in over a decade. In this episode of Divorce at Altitude, co-host Amy Goscha is joined by associate attorney Kate Mulh for a clear, practical breakdown of House Bill 25-1159 and upcoming guideline changes that will impact parents across the state.From medical expense reimbursement rules to IRS-driven tax credit requirements, retroactive child support factors, and revised parenting-time calculations, this episode explains what has changed, what's coming next, and how these updates affect real families navigating divorce, child support orders, and post-decree modifications in Colorado.Guest Information: Kate MulhKate Mulh is a family law attorney at Kalamaya | Goscha, where she focuses on divorce, child support, parenting time, and post-decree matters. She regularly works with clients on complex child support calculations and statutory updates, helping families navigate changing legal and financial circumstances with clarity.Episode OutlineMajor Overhaul of Colorado's Child Support StatuteAn overview of House Bill 25-1159, the largest update to Colorado's child support framework in more than ten years, and why changes were needed to reflect modern families and economic realities.Medical Expense Updates (Effective May 31, 2025)How the statute eliminated the $250 reimbursement threshold, clarified ordinary versus extraordinary medical expenses, and established clearer reimbursement timelines.Child Support and Tax Credits Under IRS RulesWhat parents need to know about dependency claims, the IRS definition of “custodial parent,” equal parenting time scenarios, and the required use of IRS Form 8332.Retroactive Child Support Changes (Effective February 1, 2026)An explanation of retroactive child support, newly revised statutory factors, and how courts may now evaluate parental conduct, communication, and financial agreements.New Child Support Guidelines and Overnight Credits (Effective March 1, 2026)How updated child support schedules, expanded income ranges, self-support reserve adjustments, and a graduated overnight credit system address the “cliff effect” and better reflect real parenting costs.What is Divorce at Altitude? Ryan Kalamaya and Amy Goscha provide tips and recommendations on issues related to divorce, separation, and co-parenting in Colorado. Ryan and Amy are the founding partners of an innovative and ambitious law firm, Kalamaya | Goscha, that pushes the boundaries to discover new frontiers in family law, personal injuries, and criminal defense in Colorado. To subscribe to Divorce at Altitude, click here and select your favorite podcast player. To subscribe to Kalamaya | Goscha's YouTube channel where many of the episodes will be posted as videos, click here. If you have additional questions or would like to speak to one of our attorneys, give us a call at 970-429-5784 or email us at info@kalamaya.law. ************************************************************************ DISCLAIMER: THE COMMENTARY AND OPINIONS ON THIS PODCAST IS FOR ENTERTAINMENT AND INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES AND NOT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING LEGAL ADVICE. CONTACT AN ATTORNEY IN YOUR STATE OR AREA TO OBTAIN LEGAL ADVICE ON ANY OF THESE ISSUES.

VLOG 2 Jan 9 After US v. Luigi Mangione hearing in Federal court, mostly about whether interstate stalking statute is "divisible" to preserve the crime of violence on which death penalty charge rides. Trial Jan 2027 - or Sept 2026 if no death penalty on table

One on One Video Call W/George https://tidycal.com/georgepmonty/60-minute-meetingSupport the show:https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_USAverage American Debt and Lifetime Interest Payments•  Experian: Average American Debt by Age in 2025 – Reports average consumer debt at $104,755 in June 2025, closely matching the transcript's $104,215 figure. •  CNBC: How Much Americans Owe at Every Age – Breaks down average debt by generation, noting $104,755 in 2025. •  Realtor.com: Americans Face an Average of $1.8 Million in Lifetime Debt – Estimates lifetime debt payments at $1,786,810, with breakdowns including interest; useful for comparing to the transcript's $279,000 lifetime payment example. •  JG Wentworth: Life of Debt – Details average lifetime debt at $1,786,810, including interest extraction over time. •  Self: Life of Interest – What Americans Pay in Interest Over a Lifetime – Calculates average lifetime interest at $649,067, providing context for interest-based “extraction.” Student Loan Debt Statistics•  Education Data Initiative: Student Loan Debt Statistics 2025 – Covers delinquency rates and total debt trends in 2025. •  BestColleges: Average U.S. Student Loan Debt 2025 Statistics – Notes millions owing over $100,000, with total debt context. •  WINSSolutions: U.S. Student Loan Statistics in 2025 – Projects total U.S. student debt nearing $1.79 trillion by end of 2025, close to the transcript's $1.7 trillion. •  Congress.gov: A Snapshot of Federal Student Loan Debt – States nearly 43 million borrowers with over $1.6 trillion in debt (early 2025 data). Credit Card Debt and APR•  Ramp: 2025 Average Credit Card Debt Statistics – Confirms average APR at 24.37% as of January 2025, matching the transcript exactly. •  Investopedia: Average Credit Card Interest Rate for August 2025 – Tracks average rates around 23.99%, with monthly updates. •  LendingTree: Average Credit Card Interest Rate in US Today – Reports Q3 2025 average APR at 21.39%, with trends on rising rates. Medical Debt Statistics•  KFF: Americans' Challenges with Health Care Costs – Reports 41% of adults with health care debt in 2022, aligning with the transcript's 41% figure. •  NIH PMC: Medical Debt and Collections in the United States – States 36% of households had medical debt in 2024, with breakdowns on past-due bills. •  Roosevelt Institute: The US Medical Debt Crisis – Estimates 41% of adults (~107 million) with medical debt in 2025. •  Gallup: Americans Borrow Estimated $74 Billion for Medical Bills in 2024 – Discusses borrowing for medical costs, affecting 12% of adults. Mortgage Costs and Interest•  Chase: The Total Mortgage Cost and Monthly Payment for a $300K Home – Example calculation for a $300,000 home with interest over 30 years. •  Bankrate: Amortization Calculator – Tool to calculate lifetime interest; input $300,000 loan to see totals like $511,000 paid. •  Rocket Mortgage: Simple Mortgage Calculator – Estimates based on rates (6-9%), showing interest-heavy early payments. Debt Collection Practices, Expired Debt, and Companies (Encore Capital, Portfolio Recovery Associates)•  Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB): Can Debt Collectors Collect Old Debt? – Explains collection on expired (statute-barred) debt. •  Bankrate: How Long Can a Debt Collector Pursue Old Debt? – Details on buying and pursuing time-barred debt. •  Nolo: Debt Scavengers and Zombie Debt – Describes buying old debt for pennies and collection tactics. •  Encore Capital Group: 2024 Annual Report (with 10-K) – Official report; discusses portfolio purchases ($1.35B in 2024) and collections. (Note: The specific quote from page 34 in the transcript isn't found there, but risk factors on collections and profitability are in related sections.) •  Forbes: Why Debt Collectors Have Declared Open Season On Consumers – Covers Encore's operations and debt buying scale. •  CFPB: Action Against Encore and Portfolio Recovery for Deceptive Tactics – Historical context on their debt buying practices (over $200B in defaulted debt). Statute of Limitations on Debt•&nb...

Send Us Your Prayer Requests --------Thank you for listening! Your support of Joni and Friends helps make this show possible. Joni and Friends envisions a world where every person with a disability finds hope, dignity, and their place in the body of Christ. Become part of the global movement today at www.joniandfriends.org. Find more encouragement on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube.

Watch The X22 Report On Video No videos found (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:17532056201798502,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-9437-3289"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");pt> Click On Picture To See Larger PictureGermany has followed the [CB]/[WEF] green new scam and now the manufacturing jobs imploding. Germany will struggle in 2026. The debt in the US is made up of fraud, its most likely in the trillions. There a silver storm approaching and the gap between gold and silver will close as the [CB] loses control. Sound money is the only way. The [DS] is now panicking, their money laundering scheme is being exposed, the people now know that they funnel money via NGO’s and shell companies. This is bigger than anyone could ever imagine. We are in the exposure and investigative phase, Next is the cleanup, then justice. To bring down the entire corrupt system, it must be done right, it must carry weight, we must follow the rule of law, good thinks sometimes take time. Economy (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:18510697282300316,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-8599-9832"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs"); Half of Germany's Manufacturing Sectors Anticipate Significant Layoffs and Job Losses in 2026   Germany is the epicenter of the European Union's overall goal to chase the green energy agenda. For the past several years Germany has been deconstructing their fossil fuel energy production and replacing it with far more expensive alternatives.  This has led to large increases in overall energy prices, and downstream increases in manufacturing costs. The consequences have been snowballing throughout 2025, while cheap competitive alternatives coming into the EU from China have compounded their problem.  Recently a survey of major industries was conducted in Germany to determine the forecast for 2026, the results are not good. Approximately half of the industrial sectors in Germany are anticipating job losses, cuts or layoffs this year. 22 out of 46 business associations are preparing to downsize their labor force.  Only 9 of the 46 are expected to increase hiring.   Job losses are expected in auto manufacturing, the textile sector, wood and paper fabrication.  Job gains are expected in aerospace, shipbuilding and defense production – i.e. the war machinery. When the largest and most developed industrial economy in Europe is pinning its economic survival on war machinery, a particular momentum is created.  It is never a good outcome for Europe when Germany becomes reliant on war to maintain employment. Source: theconservativetreehouse.com https://twitter.com/stats_feed/status/2005654716462538992?s=20 2009 – $12T 2010 – $13.6T 2011 – $14.8T 2012 – $16.1T 2013 – $16.7T 2014 – $17.8T 2015 – $18.2T 2016 – $19.6T 2017 – $20.2T 2018 – $21.5T 2019 – $22.7T 2020 – $27T 2021 – $28.4T 2022 – $30.9T 2023 – $33.2T 2024 – $35.3T 2025 – $38.5T https://twitter.com/StephenM/status/2005494075793735925?s=20  self-loathing, self-denigration and the redistribution of our national resources to the states and peoples of the undeveloped world. https://twitter.com/profstonge/status/2005633652852437451?s=20 Political/Rights Trump-Kennedy Center Hits Jazz Star with $1M Lawsuit For Backing Out Of Christmas Eve Show Redd, a drummer and vibraphone player who has performed with legends including Dizzy Gillespie and Ray Brown, had hosted the Christmas Eve Jazz Jam at the Kennedy Center since 2006. He took over the tradition from bassist William “Keter” Betts and maintained it for nearly two decades. This year marked an abrupt departure from that longstanding commitment. “When I saw the name change on the Kennedy Center website and then hours later on the building, I chose to cancel our concert,” Redd told The Associated Press. The Trump-Kennedy Center is pursuing a $1 million lawsuit against jazz musician Chuck Redd after he withdrew from his annual Christmas Eve concert at the last minute, citing the recent addition of President Trump’s name to the venue.  Source: zerohedge.com https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/2005398115030024201?s=20 DOGE Geopolitical Trump Administration Slashes UN “Humanitarian” Funding Pledge  The United States announced a $2 billion pledge for United Nations humanitarian aid programs on Monday, marking a sharp reduction from previous years as the Trump administration pushes for major reforms in global aid spending. This pledge represents a fraction of historical U.S. contributions, which have reached up to $17 billion in recent years, with voluntary funding often in the $8-10 billion range. Administration officials describe the amount as sufficient to keep America as the world's top humanitarian donor while demanding greater efficiency from UN agencies. The funding will flow through an umbrella mechanism controlled by the UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), allowing targeted distribution to specific crises and countries. Initial priorities include 17 nations such as Bangladesh, Congo, Haiti, Syria, and Ukraine. Notably absent from the list are Afghanistan and the Palestinian territories, with officials stating Gaza aid will tie into ongoing peace efforts. Source: discernreport.com  War/Peace Did US Land Strikes On Venezuela Begin Last Week & No One Knew It? President Trump on Friday in a radio interview disclosed something which missed the attention of the US and global media. He let slip that a large land site had been knocked out by a strike from US forces in the Caribbean – however without specifying which country was hit (whether Venezuela or perhaps Colombia). o  According to the full remarks in context, the president said: “But every time I knock out a boat, we save 25,000 American lives. It’s very simple. And what’s happening is they’re having a hard time employment-wise, they can’t get anybody. And we just talked out, I don’t know if you read or you saw, they [Venezuela] have a big plant or a big facility where the ships come from. Two nights ago, we knocked that out. So we hit them very hard. But drugs are down over 97 percent. Can you believe it?” Some unnamed American officials suggested to the New York Times that the Commander-in-Chief was referring to a drug facility in Venezuela: Trump did not name the location of the facility, though American officials told the New York Times that the president was referring to a drug facility in Venezuela that was eliminated. The president's comment is the only report of such an attack. No other Latin American government, including Venezuela, has disclosed a strike of this sort. : Source: zerohedge.com  Zelensky Wants 50-Year(!) Security Guarantee From Trump A major point of disagreement remains security guarantees. Ukraine has been pushing maximalist demands for something akin to NATO Article 5 protections. It would be like getting all the benefits of being in NATO but without being a formal member of the Western military alliance. The Ukrainian side has revealed that President Trump had offered security guarantees for 15 years following a peaceful settlement, but Zelensky considered this much too short to protect from future potential Russian aggression. But in classic Zelensky fashion, he wants way more than this. Also, maximalist demands are something that European leaders have backed him on all along – and they may have even put him up to. According to The Wall Street Journal: Kyiv had asked for security guarantees to last up to 50 years after the end of the conflict during weekend discussions. In the documents currently being discussed, the U.S. offered a 15-year guarantee with the possibility of extension, Zelensky said in audio messages to journalists on Monday.   Source: zerohedge.com  Russia accuses Ukraine of military attack on Putin’s residence: ‘state terrorism’   Russia is promising retaliation against Ukraine for an alleged military attack on President Vladimir Putin’s residence in the northern Russia area of Novgorod, which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky deemed a lie intended to undermine peace talks, Reuters reports. . Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Monday that Russian air defenses destroyed all 91 long-range drones targeting Putin’s residence and that no one was injured and no damage reported. “Such reckless actions,” which Lavrov deemed “state terrorism,” will be answered with retaliatory strikes on targets in Ukraine, he said. Ukrainian President Zelensky says it’s a false claim intended to undermine peace talks  . Source: justthenews.com https://twitter.com/AutistDivision/status/2005463473006801341?s=20  geo-political territories forever. And lets be honest, they couldn’t get them back under any circumstances again. Medical/False Flags [DS] Agenda https://twitter.com/amuse/status/2005334470799565113?s=20   LAFD Battalion Chief Kenneth Cook rejected the final Palisades fire report after LAFD leadership removed critical findings tied to preparation failures before Jan. 7. Drafts obtained through public records show staffing violations, delayed assignments & ignored wind warnings were scrubbed from the final version. The report meant to save lives became a political shield. As a side note, New York City is setting themselves up for the same problem... https://twitter.com/amuse/status/2005608785990262859?s=20 https://twitter.com/EricLDaugh/status/2005622039999062219?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2005622039999062219%7Ctwgr%5E11dcdb289244b9644ea68d25359a18f753233f5d%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2025%2F12%2Fsomali-fraud-scandal-expands-as-lawyer-exposes-damning%2F   pushing for that in every single state!” “The state will, as long as the doctor has approved it, continue to pay you. It could be for 10 hours, 12 hours, up to 24 when it’s critical care.” “So you could sit at home without caring for an elderly parent who really doesn’t need it, make about $75,000 to $90,000 a year. Now you add two parents, that’s $180,000. Now you add your in-laws $250,000.” “You continue to add this and you wonder what are the services being provided? So a lot of providers came and said fraud is occurring because we said we weren’t going to rubber stamp this paperwork.” “So they went to other providers, their home health care networks saying we’ll make it worth your while. Well, sounds like a kickback to me.” “So we really need to investigate the Medicaid system and how much it’s increased since the Somalian population came and who really needs critical care because that’s meant for our disabled, our elderly and people who really need it, not to just live off our system.” “And that’s what’s happening in Ohio. I think it’s ridiculous. I think it’s despicable, but authorities are now looking at it from the Attorney General’s office to the U.S. Attorney’s office.” “I flagged them all because this is Ohio tax dollars and we have to take it seriously. I’m tired of people telling me, well, this is the way it’s always been. It’s subjective and we can’t really check. No, you can.” https://twitter.com/ArthurMacwaters/status/2005324862756127166?s=20   this not instant jail?! Like this is electoral fraud on top of Medicare fraud How is this not front page of every newspaper?! https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/2005535693918138533?s=20 https://twitter.com/amuse/status/2005657030111932568?s=20   was unanimously convicted by a jury only to have Judge Sarah West vacate the verdict. In two separate cases to other judges dismissed the cases against his wife and his brother. $7.2 million is gone and no one is being held accountable. This story is being repeated across Minnesota to the tune of more than $8 billion so far. Somali criminals in Minnesota have stolen more than Somalia’s GDP from American taxpayers. Why won’t Democrat judges hold them accountable? https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/2005496793279439182?s=20 https://twitter.com/JoeLang51440671/status/2005476678261461399?s=20   broke to being worth up to $30 million in just a year — as a massive, up to $9 billion fraud scheme involving the Somali community in her district unfolded right under her nose in Minnesota.” $9 billion in fraud happened in her district? Can I ask the question? How many Somali daycares did Ilhan Omar own? “Close to 90 people have been charged so far, including at least three with direct ties to the lefty Squad member, though she has not been charged.” https://nypost.com/2025/12/27/us-news/ilhan-omars-hubbys-30m-firm-quietly-scrubs-names-from-website-as-squad-member-faces-mounting-questions-on-sudden-wealth-amid-minnesota-welfare-fraud/ That's going to change. Have we looked into the wealth of the brother she married? I wonder if he owns some Somali daycares in Minnesota? Tick Tock!! https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/2005657804301013272?s=20  , the Google business listing for this center showed the phone number 651-201-3400, which is the official public contact line for the Office of Governor Tim Walz and Lt. Governor Peggy Flanagan    https://twitter.com/JoeLang51440671/status/2005329284785647715?s=20   significant investments in pre-K for four-year-olds as well as other early learning programs serving children and families birth-to-school entry. This year he focused on the country's youngest children and their families' need for high-quality child care.” The Obama administration was a gigantic money laundering operation. “The President explained the need in last Tuesday's address stating, “In today's economy, when having both parents in the workforce is an economic necessity for many families, we need affordable, high quality childcare more than ever.” “But the child care tax credit isn't all the President proposed.” “He would also significantly expand the Child Care and Development Fund(CCDF), a child care subsidy for low- and moderate-income families authorized under the Child Care Block Development Grant (CCDBG) Act. (CCDBG was reauthorized last year after 18 years.) By 2025, the proposed expansion would increase the reach of CCDF to an additional one million children, under four-years-old.” Taxpayers subsidies and grants for “childcare.” “The last part of the President's proposal, in typical Obama Administration-style, is a competitive grant that would promote innovation in the child care system. The proposed grants– totaling $100 million– would allow states to create pilot programs to determine the best ways to provide child care to vulnerable populations, including children with disabilities, parents who work non-traditional hours, and families who have difficulty finding high-quality child care.” https://newamerica.org/education-policy/edcentral/presidents-child-care-plan/ Taxpayers “grants” totaling $100 million (for starters) to be given to “vulnerable populations.” Can you say “Somali?” Taxpayers funding of “childcare,” was a “necessity” for the funding of the democrat party. The Somali community was always a hub of this “childcare” theft of taxpayers money. It was set up this way on purpose. A Somali community, governed by Somali's and protected by the democrat party. The Somali's were being brought into this country starting with the George W. Bush's presidency. But Obama began accelerating the number of refugees from Somalia along with other Muslim countries. Here's just the last year under Obama. “A total of 38,901 Muslim refugees entered the U.S. in fiscal year 2016, making up almost half (46%) of the nearly 85,000 refugees who entered the country in that period, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the State Department's Refugee Processing Center. That means the U.S. has admitted the highest number of Muslim refugees of any year since data on self-reported religious affiliations first became publicly available in 2002.” “Just two countries – Syria (12,486) and Somalia (9,012) – were the source of more than half of fiscal 2016's Muslim refugees. The rest are from Iraq (7,853), Burma (Myanmar) (3,145), Afghanistan (2,664) and other countries (3,741).” https://pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/10/05/u-s-admits-record-number-of-muslim-refugees-in-2016/ Obama was an installed puppet of Prince Alwaleed and was doing his bidding. Obama filled his administration with people tied to the Muslim Brotherhood, who were implementing their “civilization jihad.” These communities began electing corrupt representatives like Ilhan Omar. Infiltration not invasion. Taxpayers money was funneled into these communities through “childcare grants” and other “welfare programs,” in order to fund the democrat party. Minnesota is just the “doorway” into a much larger nationwide fraud scheme to fund the democrat party. A magnifying glass is about to be put on ALL state welfare programs that are receiving “federal funding.” These grants and benefits handed out to these crooks, are now the doorway to expose and bring them all to an end. BOOMERANG! https://twitter.com/everytime_11/status/2004718928686350461?s=20 https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/2005651406985036272?s=20 Tim Walz's Office Responds with an Outrageous Falsehood After Journalist Nick Shirley Exposes Fraud of the Century in Minnesota “The governor has worked for years to crack down on fraud and ask the state legislature for more authority to take aggressive action,” a spokesperson for Walz told Fox News. “He has strengthened oversight – including launching investigations into these specific facilities, one of which was already closed,” the spokesperson added. “(He) hired an outside firm to audit payments to high-risk programs, shut down the Housing Stabilization Services program entirely, announced a new statewide program integrity director, and supported criminal prosecutions.” Walz previously called Shirley and others who have questioned his handling of the scandal “white supremacists.” Walz's team wants the public to believe that not only does the governor have no involvement in the scandal, but he has also been a leading advocate against this corruption. They must think that every day Americans have the same >IQ as Somali citizens.   Source: thegatewaypundit.com https://twitter.com/ElectionWiz/status/2005427571861909629?s=20 https://twitter.com/KevinKileyCA/status/2005329670083145745?s=20 Back on June 24, 2025. about 31% of applications to California’s 116 community colleges were deemed likely fraudulent by the chancellor’s office—equating to over 1.2 million fake applications. These were mostly detected and blocked before enrollment or aid disbursement, but some fraud succeeded, costing millions in stolen financial aid (around $11 million total in 2024, a small fraction of the billions distributed overall).The piece discusses ongoing efforts to combat the issue, like improved detection tools, identity verification, and a proposed $10 application fee to deter bots and scammers targeting the free-application, open-access system.  https://twitter.com/CynicalPublius/status/2005388876807057913?s=20 President Trump's Plan https://twitter.com/stats_feed/status/2005654716462538992?s=20 2009 – $12T 2010 – $13.6T 2011 – $14.8T 2012 – $16.1T 2013 – $16.7T 2014 – $17.8T 2015 – $18.2T 2016 – $19.6T 2017 – $20.2T 2018 – $21.5T 2019 – $22.7T 2020 – $27T 2021 – $28.4T 2022 – $30.9T 2023 – $33.2T 2024 – $35.3T 2025 – $38.5T https://twitter.com/4nt1p4tt3rn/status/2005345471674388575?s=20  deniability to the federal and state governments, and allow them to funnel money into the NGOs to do what the governments either don’t want to (due to optics) or can’t (due to legal constraints) do. They are quite literally dismantling the United States of America, and they’re doing it with YOUR money. Quite literally money taken out of your pockets. Food taken out of your children’s mouths. They’re directly or indirectly responsible for: * the massive invasion of this country by illegals * the high cost of healthcare * the shortage and high price of homes * the shortage and high price of unimproved land * the high cost of food and other goods * the high taxes you’re forced to pay * the skyrocketing national debt * the skyrocketing federal deficit * DEI and the elimination of qualified American workers from jobs * deaths of Americans on our roadways * the broken “justice” system In other words, literally everything everyone’s complaining about. https://twitter.com/911NewsBreaks/status/2005660846848958944?s=20   planning to livestream a racially motivated extremist attack with pipe b-mbs and g-ns. https://twitter.com/HarmeetKDhillon/status/2005444604624028029?s=20   year later as special counsel in November … statute runs on his obvious shenanigans late 2027 * Democrats in Congress and those in the states colluding with Biden WH hide their behavior, some of which STILLL HASN'T come to light! Statute runs on this five years after their concealed behavior is known to the government. This means the statute could run in the next administration. STOP POSTING CLICKBAIT BS!!! You are being used! https://twitter.com/HarmeetKDhillon/status/2005446072634872033?s=20 https://twitter.com/grok/status/2005427970681217334?s=20   to Jan. 6, 2021/2026. Specific cases vary by act. ‘Ten-year stain:' Bondi asks prosecutors to probe Obama-Biden lawfare as criminal conspiracy FBI Director Kash Patel penned a memo predicating an investigation looking at the weaponization of intelligence and law-enforcement powers dating to the Russia collusion case as an ongoing conspiracy. Attorney General Pam Bondi   asked the prosecutors to investigate the Obama-Biden era of lawfare as an ongoing election-meddling conspiracy that protected Democrats from criminal investigation and infringed the civil rights of Republicans like President Donald Trump and his supporters. An “ongoing conspiracy” and the statute of limitations Such an approach allows prosecutors to charge defendants with alleged crimes outside the statute of limitations because they were connected to an ongoing conspiracy, much like those cases brought against the mafia and drug cartels. “At my direction, our U.S. Attorneys and federal agents are actively investigating instances of government weaponization nationwide,” Bondi said. “This is a ten-year stain on the country committed by high-ranking officials against the American people. Source: justthenews.com https://twitter.com/WarClandestine/status/2005434508124782615?s=20   to be deported. They opposed the One Big Beautiful Bill because it funds ICE/US MIL, and they know Trump is going to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to their cities to assist ICE in deporting the illegals. If the Dems can't cheat in elections, they lose access to our tax dollars, and thus they lose all their power. They never cared about diversity, equality, equity, inclusion, immigration or any of that shit. It was all just a transaction. Everything they say and do is just a means to justify their treasonous scheme to steal our tax dollars. That's why it's so important to nuke the filibuster, pass the Save Act, invoke the Insurrection Act, deport all the illegals, and arrest everyone involved. If we don't, the Dems will take complete control, we will become a one-party State, and they will eventually phase us out via mass immigration. That's why the Dems have been trying to destroy, obstruct, and kill Trump, ever since he came down the escalator. Because they knew that he knew about all this, and is on a mission to stop it. The American People are being replaced, and the Democrats are directly responsible for it. This is the battle for the Republic. (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:13499335648425062,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-7164-1323"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="//cdn2.customads.co/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");

How Christ used elements of a Trust to set the people free; William the Conqueror; Remedies; Common Law and new law (Equity) in 1066; "Fairs"; Pie-powder courts; Statutory Trusts; Separation of funds; Corporate governments; Sacred Purpose Trusts; Church separate from State; Ekklesia = called out; Golden Calf was a trust; Burnt offerings; Corporations don't die; 2 or 3 witnesses; Defining "trust"; Q from Mark: What is the Sacred Purpose?; "Sacred" = Holy = Separate; Temple Area; Trust purposes; Witness and record; Statutory Trusts; Corporation of Christ; Representative beneficiary; State churches; Living stones of the altars; Separated offerings; Christ's words on treasuries; William the conqueror; Common Law?; Robbing widows and orphans; Church Trust to feed God's sheep; "Sovereign Citizen"?; Statute of Mortmain; Obamacare?; Cloward and Piven - overburden welfare state?; Caring about the liberty of others; Falsely seeking asylum; Investing in your neighbor; Tens, Hundreds and Thousands; Trusting your minister; Early American example; Learning to be Israel; Blind guides for modern Christians; Legal Title; Use tax; Q from Aroostook Acoustic: Melchizedek having elements of a trust; Priests receiving offerings to redistribute to others; Corporation created for limiting liability?; Fundamental elements of a corporation; Family as a corporation; Law of the father; U.S. Corporation; State-formed marriages; Understanding legal vocabulary; "Corporation sole" - Passing one head of family to another; "world" = state; Your member ID from the world; Christ's system; Abimalec; Caesar; Calling no man Father; Hung up on "Trust"; Q: Trusts don't deal in real property?; Sheep offering example; For the benefit of another party; Elements of a trust; Federal Reserve notes - redemption; "Free Church Report" book; Church recognition; Saturninas; Establishment by witness; Purposes of Christ; How you've gotten into bondage; Welfare snares; Grantor - property given entirely - not a party to the trust; Christ's purpose - conforming to it; Christ's government; Parens patria; Risk?; Walk of faith; Q: Why call it a "trust"?; "Ministry"?; Setting our neighbor free; Charity; What makes The Church holy?; Care; Q: Duncan McLeod - Christmas songs?; Melchizedek's blessing to Abraham; Sons of God by adoption?; Moses: "Let MY people go"; Making God your father; Prodigal Son parable; Freeing others; Bah Humbug kid; Giving is not seasonal; Celebrate Christ by doing what He ACTUALLY said; Church "Service"; Doers of the Word; The song of Moses and of the Lamb; Church organization; Ministers = Men you "trust" - responsibility; Offerings belong to Christ; Citizens of the United States; Overseers and Protectors; Ministers separate from the world; Holy Spirit the comforter/protector; Pilate's trial of Christ; Right Reason of Christ (logos); "Religion" duty; "ex-officio"; Record keeping; Appetite for benefits; Loving other people; Who is worthy of trust?; Social safety net unspotted by the world; Strong delusion; The grace of God; Other peoples' money; Do what Christ said.

How Christ used elements of a Trust to set the people free; William the Conqueror; Remedies; Common Law and new law (Equity) in 1066; "Fairs"; Pie-powder courts; Statutory Trusts; Separation of funds; Corporate governments; Sacred Purpose Trusts; Church separate from State; Ekklesia = called out; Golden Calf was a trust; Burnt offerings; Corporations don't die; 2 or 3 witnesses; Defining "trust"; Q from Mark: What is the Sacred Purpose?; "Sacred" = Holy = Separate; Temple Area; Trust purposes; Witness and record; Statutory Trusts; Corporation of Christ; Representative beneficiary; State churches; Living stones of the altars; Separated offerings; Christ's words on treasuries; William the conqueror; Common Law?; Robbing widows and orphans; Church Trust to feed God's sheep; "Sovereign Citizen"?; Statute of Mortmain; Obamacare?; Cloward and Piven - overburden welfare state?; Caring about the liberty of others; Falsely seeking asylum; Investing in your neighbor; Tens, Hundreds and Thousands; Trusting your minister; Early American example; Learning to be Israel; Blind guides for modern Christians; Legal Title; Use tax; Q from Aroostook Acoustic: Melchizedek having elements of a trust; Priests receiving offerings to redistribute to others; Corporation created for limiting liability?; Fundamental elements of a corporation; Family as a corporation; Law of the father; U.S. Corporation; State-formed marriages; Understanding legal vocabulary; "Corporation sole" - Passing one head of family to another; "world" = state; Your member ID from the world; Christ's system; Abimalec; Caesar; Calling no man Father; Hung up on "Trust"; Q: Trusts don't deal in real property?; Sheep offering example; For the benefit of another party; Elements of a trust; Federal Reserve notes - redemption; "Free Church Report" book; Church recognition; Saturninas; Establishment by witness; Purposes of Christ; How you've gotten into bondage; Welfare snares; Grantor - property given entirely - not a party to the trust; Christ's purpose - conforming to it; Christ's government; Parens patria; Risk?; Walk of faith; Q: Why call it a "trust"?; "Ministry"?; Setting our neighbor free; Charity; What makes The Church holy?; Care; Q: Duncan McLeod - Christmas songs?; Melchizedek's blessing to Abraham; Sons of God by adoption?; Moses: "Let MY people go"; Making God your father; Prodigal Son parable; Freeing others; Bah Humbug kid; Giving is not seasonal; Celebrate Christ by doing what He ACTUALLY said; Church "Service"; Doers of the Word; The song of Moses and of the Lamb; Church organization; Ministers = Men you "trust" - responsibility; Offerings belong to Christ; Citizens of the United States; Overseers and Protectors; Ministers separate from the world; Holy Spirit the comforter/protector; Pilate's trial of Christ; Right Reason of Christ (logos); "Religion" duty; "ex-officio"; Record keeping; Appetite for benefits; Loving other people; Who is worthy of trust?; Social safety net unspotted by the world; Strong delusion; The grace of God; Other peoples' money; Do what Christ said.

Robert L Fitzgerald, Anya Umlauf, Raymond T Suhandynata, David J Grelotti, Marilyn A Huestis, Kyle F Mastropietro, Igor Grant, Thomas D Marcotte. Per Se Driving Under the Influence of Cannabis Statutes and Blood Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Concentrations following Short-Term Cannabis Abstinence. Clinical Chemistry, Volume 71, Issue 12, December 2025, Pages 1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf121

In 1998, 120 countries came together to adopt the Rome Statute, creating what would become the International Criminal Court. Four years later, that treaty entered into force, and the ICC officially opened its doors as a permanent court tasked with prosecuting individuals accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Now, looking around the world today, it's clear the ICC has not put an end to war crimes or crimes against humanity. But even so, the court—and the treaty that created it—have profoundly shaped international politics in ways that are often overlooked. My guest today is Mark Kersten. He's a Senior Consultant with the Wayamo Foundation and an Assistant Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of the Fraser Valley in British Columbia. We start with a brief history of the ICC, and then dig into how the court has influenced not just legal definitions of war crimes and crimes against humanity, but how states themselves behave. When we spoke, Mark had just returned from the ICC's annual Assembly of States Parties—the court's main governing body. He explains why that meeting offers a window into some of the biggest challenges the ICC now faces, including the very real possibility of U.S. sanctions—not just against individual court officials, but against the institution itself. This episode is produced in partnership with Lex International Fund, a philanthropic initiative dedicated to strengthening international law to solve global challenges. It's part of our ongoing series highlighting the real-world impact of treaties on state behavior, called "When Treaties Work."  

Lawrence Joss continues his conversation with Matthew Brickman, a Supreme Court Certified Mediator in Florida. They delve into the intricacies of mediation, discussing its purpose, the role of mediators, and how to select the right one. Matthew shares insights from his extensive experience, emphasizing the importance of continuous learning and personal growth in the field of mediation. The conversation also touches on the emotional aspects of conflict resolution and the significance of empowering individuals during the mediation process.Key TakeawaysMediation provides a structured environment for conflict resolution.The transition from emotional to business-like relationships is crucial in mediation.Understanding the four Ds of conflict: dismissed, disrespected, disvalued, disenfranchised.Mediation is often mandatory before court proceedings in many states.Choosing the right mediator involves research and personal fit.Continuous education and experience are vital for effective mediation.Mediators should empower clients to navigate their conflicts.High conflict situations often require separate rooms during mediation.Mediation can save time and money compared to court proceedings.Personal growth and emotional intelligence are essential in conflict resolution.Chapters0:39 - Introducing Matthew Brickman1:49 - Community and Resources for Parents2:02 - Owning Mistakes and Elevating Kids4:24 - What Mediation Is and Isn't6:27 - From Romance to Business: Kid Inc8:50 - The Four D's of Conflict10:49 - States, Statutes, and Mandatory Mediation13:43 - Why Courts Push Mediation16:05 - With or Without Attorneys20:03 - Neutrality, Bias, and Trust22:08 - How to Choose a Mediator31:16 - Continuous Learning and FitIf you wish to connect with Lawrence Joss or any of the PA-A community members who have appeared as guests on the podcast:Email - familydisappeared@gmail.comLinktree: https://linktr.ee/lawrencejoss(All links mentioned in the podcast are available in Linktree)Connect with Matthew Brickman:https://ichatmediation.com/⁩Please donate to support PAA programs:https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=SDLTX8TBSZNXSsa bottom partThis podcast is made possible by the Family Disappeared Team:Anna Johnson- Editor/Contributor/Activist/Co-hostGlaze Gonzales- Podcast ManagerConnect with Lawrence Joss:Website: https://parentalalienationanonymous.com/Email- familydisappeared@gmail.com

Notes: Contract Law Exam Ready GuideUnderstanding the Gatekeepers of Contract Law: A Deep DiveThis conversation delves into the complexities of contracts law, focusing on the Statute of Frauds, the Parole Evidence Rule, and contract interpretation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these doctrines for law students, particularly in the context of exam preparation. Key themes include the challenges of enforceability, the significance of written agreements, and the philosophical debates surrounding contract law. The conversation also provides practical strategies for approaching contracts law questions in exams, highlighting the need for a structured analytical approach.In the realm of contract law, the journey from handshake to enforceable agreement is fraught with complexities. This blog post explores the critical doctrines that govern this journey, focusing on the Statute of Frauds, the Parole Evidence Rule, and contract interpretation.The Statute of Frauds: Ensuring EnforceabilityThe Statute of Frauds serves as the first gatekeeper, determining whether a contract is enforceable. Originating from 17th-century English law, it requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed by the party to be charged. This doctrine aims to prevent fraud and ensure that agreements are taken seriously. Key categories include contracts for the sale of land, agreements that cannot be performed within a year, and sales of goods over $500.Navigating the Parole Evidence RuleOnce a contract is deemed enforceable, the Parole Evidence Rule comes into play, focusing on the finality of the written document. This rule bars the introduction of extrinsic evidence that contradicts the written terms of a fully integrated contract. The philosophical divide between formalists, who rely solely on the written document, and contextualists, who consider external evidence, highlights the ongoing debate in contract law.Interpreting Contract TermsThe final stage involves interpreting the contract's terms. Courts aim to recover the parties' objective intent, prioritizing expressed terms, course of performance, course of dealing, and trade usage. The tension between textualism and contextualism continues to shape modern contract law, especially in an era of digital contracts and fine print.Mastering these doctrines is essential for navigating the complexities of contract law. By understanding the balance between formal predictability and subjective justice, legal professionals can anticipate counterarguments and craft sophisticated analyses. As the legal landscape evolves, the central question remains: should the law prioritize the stability of the written word or the fairness of the real bargain?Subscribe now to stay updated on the latest insights in contract law.TakeawaysContracts law moves quickly and requires a solid understanding of key doctrines.The Statute of Frauds determines the enforceability of certain contracts.Payment alone is often insufficient to satisfy exceptions to the Statute of Frauds.The Parole Evidence Rule protects the integrity of written contracts.Integration of a writing can eliminate prior agreements from consideration.Context is crucial in understanding contract terms and intentions.The hierarchy of intent guides contract interpretation.Specific language in contracts takes precedence over general terms.Exam strategies should focus on a structured approach to contracts law.The balance between fairness and stability is a central theme in modern contract law.contracts law, statute of frauds, parole evidence rule, contract interpretation, law school, legal principles, enforceability, contract law exam, legal doctrines, law students

Matt Larosiere and Ivan T. Troll dive into a packed episode, starting with personal updates and a move. They explore the history of the Colt All American and discuss Matt Hoover’s legal challenges. The episode covers Caribbean gun trafficking and analyzes a controversial gun seizure image. They critique the Trump administration’s NFA contradictions and examine […]

Matt Larosiere and Ivan T. Troll dive into a packed episode, starting with personal updates and a move. They explore the history of the Colt All American and discuss Matt Hoover's legal challenges. The episode covers Caribbean gun trafficking and analyzes a controversial gun seizure image. They critique the Trump administration's NFA contradictions and examine an AP article on mass killings post-Bruen. The ATF's rule on interstate NFA transport is scrutinized, followed by a look at shotguns in military history and a UK man's legal issues over a shotgun photo. They end with discussions on California ammo law, Rep. Ilhan Omar's gun control, and Florida's gun law repeal. Caribbean gun trafficking tied to hubs in Florida and Georgia Both sides of the mouth: The Government Defending NFA while Taxing at 0 Additionally, they're doing the same thing in the Colon case US mass killings are down in 2025 Proposed ATF Final Rule Would Simplify Interstate Transport Of Some NFA Items Traditional Arms: Fuddbusters and Ratman America's Dumbest Shotgun Earns Another U.S. Army Contract Man Arrested in UK for Posting Shotgun Photo From Florida Trip to Linkedin MAF Corp: Fudbdusterss 9th Circuit revives California law requiring background checks for ammo purchases Rep. Ilhan Omar Pushes for Federal Gun Registry and Nationwide Buyback FFL Payments US Justice Department plans gun rights office within civil rights unit Florida: Pro-Gun Bill Repealing Adult Age Discrimination Advances to House Vote Patriot patch Co. TWIG10   Timestamps: 0:00 Introduction and sponsors 1:37 Consolidated: Ivan's updates and Matt's moving 2:31 Colt All American discussion 5:24 Matt Hoover's legal situation 6:28a Caribbean gun trafficking report 8:18 Analysis of gun seizure image 15:03 Trump admin and NFA contradictions 26:39 AP article on mass killings and crime post-Bruin 32:05 ATF rule on interstate NFA transport 38:21 Sponsor: Traditional Arms Holsters 38:58 Shotguns: History and military use 46:38 UK man's shotgun photo incident 52:22 Sponsor: MAF Corporation 53:16 Ninth Circuit and California ammo law 57:12 Rep. Ilhan Omar's gun control efforts 1:02:14 Sponsor: FFLPaymentProcessing.com 1:02:57 DOJ's gun rights office and Florida gun law repeal 1:07:49 Sponsor: PatriotPatch.co 1:09:43 Closing remarks and Patreon promotion

Today on Mea Culpa, I welcome back my longtime friend, Anthony Scaramucci, for a blistering, unfiltered breakdown of the chaos coming from our old boss. We dig into Trump's deadly “drug boat” strikes, the horrific National Guard shooting, and the growing pattern of violence fueled by political lies. Scaramucci and I expose how Trump's impulsive decision-making, collapsing inner circle, and obsession with ego over governance are destabilizing everything from foreign to domestic policy. We also unpack Trump's bizarre branding spree, from slapping his name on the U.S. Institute of Peace to chasing billions through global deals, and why the military, Congress, and even Republicans are reaching a breaking point. Thanks to our sponsors: Shopify: Sign up for a $1 per month trial period at: https://shopify.com/COHEN Aura Frames: Exclusive $35 off Carver Mat at https://on.auraframes.com/COHEN Promo Code COHEN Subscribe to Michael's Substack: https://therealmichaelcohen.substack.com/ Subscribe to Michael's YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheMichaelCohenShow Join us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/PoliticalBeatdown Add the Mea Culpa podcast feed: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen Add the Political Beatdown podcast feed: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Nicole O'Byrne speaks with John W. Burchill and Richard Jochelson about their book Ancillary Police Powers in Canada: A Critical Reassessment. Police enforce the law, but they must also obey it. Statutes circumscribe how law enforcement officers conduct their work. Controls on police power are also embedded in the decisions written by judges, spawning a controversial area of legal debate — and of policing itself. The courts have handed police many powers to stop, search, and otherwise investigate people in the pursuit of public safety and crime prevention. Ancillary Police Powers in Canada explains what these common-law police powers are; how they came to be; and, crucially, what the potential dangers are in their expanding scope. What is the difference between police duty and lawful authority? Should the Supreme Court revisit and possibly rescind powers when the police tactics they enable become controversial? This nuanced book surveys the evolution, application, and future development of judge-made police powers in Canada from various points of view. The authors, with backgrounds in law, policing, and criminal justice, bring historical perspective, critical legal theory, and empirical analysis to bear on an issue that is fundamental to constitutional protection from state interference with individual liberty. The result is a unique and thought-provoking journey into the changing practice of Canadian policing. John W. Burchill is an instructor at the University of Manitoba, chief of staff with the Winnipeg Police Service, and president of the Winnipeg Police Museum and Historical Society. Richard Jochelson is the Dean of Law at the University of Manitoba. A widely published scholar, he also spearheaded Robsoncrim.com, a leading research blog that undergirds the Criminal Law Edition of the Manitoba Law Journal. If you like our work, please consider supporting it: bit.ly/support_WTY. Your support contributes to the Champlain Society's mission of opening new windows to directly explore and experience Canada's past.

In this episode of Hiring to Firing, hosts Tracey Diamond and Emily Schifter use the hit legal drama Suits as a springboard to unpack the key differences — and surprising overlaps — between U.S. and Canadian employment law. Joined by Chris Andree, an employment partner at Gowling WLG, they explore what cross-border employers need to know about Canadian law, from the absence of at-will employment and the requirement of lengthy notice periods, to the high bar for "just cause" for employee terminations. The team also tackles drug and cannabis testing in safety-sensitive roles and generous government-mandated leave entitlements. Tune in for practical takeaways on harmonizing policies, documenting decisions, and partnering with local counsel to help ensure your real-world issues don't become TV-drama-level crises. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Episode 72:  In this episode, Timalyn addresses how long the IRS has to collect taxes from a taxpayer if they have unfiled tax returns.  Not filing taxes is not a get out of jail free card. You may yet be on the IRS' radar.  What are the different IRS statute of limitations? Many taxpayers believe that the IRS only has 3 or 6 years to assess tax for a certain year on their account. That is incorrect. What they are mistaking that for is the Assessment Statute Expiration Date (ASED). The IRS has 3 years after your taxes were initially assessed to assess additional tax for that year. If the IRS suspects frivolous activity, they have 6 years to assess tax for that tax year.  Once the tax has been assessed, the IRS has 10 years from that date to collect. This is called the collection statute expiration date (CSED).  If no tax return has been filed, the IRS has an unlimited amount of time to assess tax for that tax year. This is why Timalyn urges taxpayers to take control of the situation and not give the IRS an open door to come assess tax on their account.  When the IRS prepares the return for the taxpayer, it is called a substitute for return (SFR). The IRS takes the third-party documentation that has been reported to them and creates a return, and assesses the taxpayer penalties for not filing. The IRS does not take into consideration all of the deductions or credits that the taxpayer may be entitled to. This is another reason why Timalyn urges taxpayers to take control of their own situation and to file instead of having the IRS file for them. What if I have unfiled tax returns? Don't put your head in the sand if you have years of tax returns to file. Take a deep breath and take control. If you are expecting a refund, you only have 3 years from when the tax return was due to claim that refund. This is called the refund statute expiration date (RSED). If a payment was made that you didn't have to make toward a year, then you have 2 years from the date of the payment to claim a refund of that payment.  If you have balances or are anticipating balances that you cannot pay in full, the IRS only requires you to file the past 6 years of returns to be eligible for a payment arrangement. In addition to that, you must also get current with your withholding/ estimated tax payments.  So if you haven't filed in 10 years, don't file years 7 -10. The IRS will not require it. If you were due refunds in years 4,5, and 6, the IRS may allow you not to file those since they won't add to the balance, and you can't claim the refunds.  Once you've done you're part to get into tax compliance, you can negotiate a payment arrangement. In episode 10, Timalyn talked about Installment Agreements. She also explains what an offer in compromise is and how to qualify for an offer in compromise. If your situation doesn't fit either of those currently not collectible status may be the right option for your account. These episodes are hyperlinked as a resource for you to find out more about how they work. Timalyn doesn't judge the tax competency of taxpayers. But she does urge them to get the help they need. Even if it isn't with her. Need Tax Help Now? If you need answers to your tax debt questions, book a consultation with Timalyn via her Bowens Tax Solutions website.  Click this link to book a call. Please consider sharing this episode with your friends and family.  There are many people dealing with tax issues, and you may not know about it.  This information might be helpful to someone who really needs it.   As we conclude Episode 71, we encourage you to connect with Timalyn on social media. You'll be able to subscribe to this podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube, and many other podcast platforms.   Remember, Timalyn Bowens is America's Favorite EA, and she's here to fill the tax literacy gap, one taxpayer at a time.  Thanks for listening to today's episode. For more information about tax relief options or filing your taxes, visit https://www.Bowenstaxsolutions.com/ . If you have any feedback or suggestions for an upcoming episode topic, please submit them here:  https://www.americasfavoriteea.com/contact. Disclaimer:  This podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.  It provides a framework and possible solutions for solving your tax problems, but it is not legally binding.  Please consult your tax professional regarding your specific tax situation.

(00:00:00) Season 4 Episode 9 (The Statute of Limitations on a Delicata Squash) (00:09:04) Drinks (00:15:43) Sidney's Kvetch (00:23:46) Uel's Kvetch Just in time for the Ashes here is an episode with brand new kvetches about academia, logistics, and grocery shopping.  

This Day in Legal History: Statute of MarlboroughOn November 18, 1267, the Statute of Marlborough was enacted during the reign of King Henry III of England. It is the oldest piece of English statute law still partially in force, with four of its original twenty-nine chapters remaining on the books. The statute emerged from a period of intense baronial conflict and civil unrest, notably the Second Barons' War, and was part of a broader effort to restore royal authority and stabilize governance through legal reform. It reinforced the crown's prerogatives while addressing grievances raised by rebellious nobles, making it a compromise between royal and feudal powers.Among its most enduring provisions were regulations on the practice of “distress,” which referred to the seizure of property to compel debt repayment or enforce court judgments. The statute restricted unlawful and excessive distresses, requiring them to occur only with legal justification and in the appropriate jurisdiction. These reforms curtailed private self-help remedies and emphasized formal court processes, laying foundational principles for due process and the centralization of judicial authority. It also addressed issues like wardship, waste of land, and the obligations of tenants—key concerns in the feudal legal structure.The Statute of Marlborough built upon earlier reforms such as the Provisions of Oxford and Westminster, but had a more lasting legal impact. Its survival into modern times speaks to the durability of certain legal concepts, especially those reinforcing procedural fairness. Some of its language has been modernized, but the essence of its rules remains intact in English law. The statute reflects an early attempt to systematize and limit both public and private power through legal mechanisms. Legal historians often point to it as a stepping stone on the path to the English common law tradition.The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case challenging the federal government's authority to limit asylum processing at official U.S.-Mexico border crossings under the now-rescinded “metering” policy. Originally implemented under President Trump and formalized in 2018, metering allowed border agents to stop asylum seekers before they crossed into the U.S. and decline to process their claims, even when they were physically present at ports of entry. The Biden administration repealed the policy in 2021, but Trump's return to office has revived interest in reestablishing it.At the core of the case is the legal meaning of the phrase “arrives in the United States,” with the Ninth Circuit ruling in 2024 that it includes people who reach official border entry points—even if still on the Mexican side. That ruling held that federal law requires asylum seekers at ports of entry to be inspected and allowed to apply, regardless of logistical constraints like capacity. The advocacy group Al Otro Lado, which brought the lawsuit in 2017, argues the metering policy illegally circumvented these obligations, leaving vulnerable migrants stranded in dangerous border conditions.Trump's Justice Department contends that “arrives in” means actual entry, not mere proximity—using analogies ranging from Normandy to football to make its point. The administration has also signaled that it intends to resume the policy if conditions warrant. The case, which will likely be decided by June, comes amid broader efforts to restrict asylum protections globally and may clarify the limits of executive power over humanitarian migration policy.Supreme Court to review US government power to limit asylum processing | ReutersA California judge has blocked a proposed class action lawsuit involving 6,000 Black workers at Tesla's Fremont factory who alleged systemic racial harassment, marking a significant legal win for the company. Judge Peter Borkon ruled that the case could not proceed as a class action because the plaintiffs' attorneys failed to secure testimony from at least 200 workers—raising doubts about whether the experiences of a smaller group could represent the broader workforce. This reverses a 2024 decision by another judge who had previously allowed the class to move forward.The original lawsuit, filed in 2017 by former worker Marcus Vaughn, alleged pervasive racism at the facility, including slurs, racist graffiti, and even nooses in work areas. Tesla has denied allowing harassment and said it takes disciplinary action against those who violate company policy. While this ruling narrows the scope of Vaughn's lawsuit, Tesla still faces other legal challenges, including a similar case from California's civil rights agency and a separate federal suit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Tesla has previously settled other race discrimination lawsuits brought by individual employees.Tesla wins bid to undo race bias class action by Black factory workers | ReutersAshurst and Perkins Coie have agreed to merge, forming a global law firm with 3,000 lawyers and $2.7 billion in revenue—placing it among the world's top 20 legal outfits by size. The merger, expected to close in late 2026 pending partner approval, will create Ashurst Perkins Coie, with 52 offices across 23 countries. The move is part of a broader trend of transatlantic law firm consolidation aimed at scaling up to serve cross-border clients more effectively.Leadership will be shared between Ashurst's global CEO Paul Jenkins and Perkins Coie's managing partner Bill Malley, who emphasized the merger's value for clients in technology, financial services, and energy. Talks began in early 2025, with both firms framing the deal as a long-term strategic alignment. Perkins Coie recently gained attention for its role in successfully challenging executive orders from President Trump's administration targeting the firm and others tied to his political adversaries. While the firms say they have no current plans to expand their office footprint, the combination signals a deepening of U.K.-U.S. legal market integration.Law firms Ashurst, Perkins Coie agree merger to create global top-20 outfit | ReutersMy column for Bloomberg this week looks at OpenAI's effort to expand the CHIPS Act tax credit into a broad-based AI infrastructure subsidy—and what it reveals about the government's evolving role in underwriting the AI economy. OpenAI has asked the federal government to stretch the Advanced Manufacturing Investment Credit—originally designed to revive U.S. semiconductor manufacturing—to cover the entire AI stack, from servers to steel. That request arrives as data centers' energy consumption and land use start imposing real costs on local grids, budgets, and communities, raising the question: who's actually footing the bill for AI?I argue that this isn't a bailout so much as a bid for taxpayer-backed central planning, with a venture-capital gloss. AI infrastructure projects like OpenAI's Stargate centers already benefit from layers of state and local tax breaks, discounted electricity, and favorable land deals. Adding a 35% federal credit on top creates a subsidy stack that warps local priorities—school districts lose tax revenue, utilities are forced to reroute energy, and residents pay more on their bills. The public impact is mounting, even as the private benefit remains largely proprietary and insulated.Rather than offering blank checks, Congress should condition federal support on clear benefit-sharing requirements: job thresholds, emissions transparency, energy sourcing obligations, and clawbacks for missed targets. I propose a framework that makes federal aid contingent on upfront impact disclosures, co-investment in the grid, and full accounting of overlapping subsidies. Industrial policy isn't inherently bad—but without enforceable terms, we're not funding a public-private partnership. We're subsidizing a corporate buildout dressed up as a national security imperative. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

In this episode, Jason Gottlieb, Chair of Morrison Cohen's Digital Assets Department and White Collar & Regulatory Enforcement Practice Group, breaks down the litigation trends shaping crypto today.Timestamps:➡️ 0:44 — Why litigation is shifting from regulators to private disputes➡️ 3:37 — Statute of limitations: the five-year vs. ten-year reality➡️ 8:14 — Inside the revamped Morrison Cohen Crypto Litigation Tracker➡️ 12:41 — How judges are learning (and misunderstanding) crypto➡️ 18:03 — The importance of amicus briefs in crypto cases➡️ 20:52 — Stablecoin-freezing disputes and why issuers keep getting dragged in➡️ 26:41 — Jurisdiction battles: extraterritoriality, comity & serving by NFTSponsor: Day One Law, a boutique corporate law firm founded by Nick Pullman. Nick and his team at Day One provide strategic legal counsel to startups, crypto projects, and Web3 innovators. ⁠You can get in contact with them via this link⁠: https://www.dayonelaw.xyz/#contactResources: Morrison Cohen Crypto Litigation Tracker: cryptotracker.morrisoncohen.comDisclaimer: Jacob Robinson and his guests are not your lawyer. Nothing herein or mentioned on the Law of Code podcast should be construed as legal advice. The material published is intended for informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only. Please seek the advice of counsel, and do not apply any of the generalized material to your individual facts or circumstances without speaking to an attorney.

In this episode of The Consumer Finance Podcast, Chris Willis is joined by colleagues Jason Manning, Angelo Stio, and Rob Jenkin to unpack the surge of litigations arising from the use of tracking technologies (e.g., cookies, pixels, and session tools) on websites. This episode explains how plaintiff firms are repurposing federal and state wiretap and “trap-and-trace” laws, as well as the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), to assert claims associated with a business's use of tracking technologies without consent.The Troutman attorneys tackle the state law statutes and the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) that plaintiffs typically rely on, the statutory damages that may be available, and the defenses and mitigation options to prevent and combat the claims being pursued, including the use of consent banners, transparent disclosures, the supervision of vendors, and regular audits of the tracking technologies being deployed and the information being shared. Tune in for a concise, actionable guide to reducing litigation risk while maintaining marketing and analytics capabilities. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

November 12, 2025 ~ Anne Vanker, mother of Flynn MacKrell, joins Kevin to discuss how they are using a 1927 statute to pursue involuntary manslaughter charges against the driver that killed her son's mother. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Today the BIG guys discuss…NFL Trade Deadline, Ravens trades, Ravens recap, Pigskin Pick'em and “C'mon Yo!”

Speaker: Dr Yin Harn Lee, Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of BristolBiography: Dr Yin Harn Lee is a Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Bristol. Her research interests lie primarily in copyright law. A significant part of her research focuses on copyright and videogames, and she is also interested in historical aspects of copyright as well as the interface between intellectual property and personal property.Abstract: The exclusive right to control the copying or reproduction of a work has been described by one leading copyright treatise as ‘the most fundamental, and historically the oldest, right of a copyright owner'. The first British copyright statute, the 1710 Statute of Anne, conferred on rightholders the exclusive right to print and reprint their books. Since then, the right has expanded far beyond its legislative origins, and now encompasses acts of copying in both digital and analogue form, those that are both temporary and permanent, and those that are merely incidental to the use of the work. Scholars have expressed concern about the now-expansive scope of the right, and there have been calls to restrict the right (e.g. by removing ‘non-expressive copying' and copying that does not enable the use of the material in question ‘as a work') or to replace it altogether with a broad right of ‘commercial exploitation'.This paper will show that, while these proposals are laudable and inventive, they nevertheless encounter the same pitfalls as those faced by English courts in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries when called upon to define the scope of what constitutes ‘copying'. It will argue that the root of the problem lies in the absence of stable, developed principles for defining the legitimate scope of the rightholder's market, and that attempts at framing this as a question of statutory interpretation only obscure this fundamental fact.For more information see: https://www.cipil.law.cam.ac.uk/seminars-and-events/cipil-seminars

Today is Thursday, October 23. Here are some of the latest headlines from the Fargo, North Dakota area. InForum Minute is produced by Forum Communications and brought to you by reporters from The Forum of Fargo-Moorhead and WDAY TV. For more news from throughout the day, visit InForum.com

With tax debt comes the IRS's 10 Year Collection Statute of Limitations. Can bankruptcy have a huge effect on this number? Do you have tax debt? Call us at 866-8000-TAX or fill out the form at https://choicetaxrelief.com/If you want to see more…-YouTube:    / @loganallec  -Instagram: @ChoiceTaxRelief @LoganAllec -TikTok: @loganallec-Facebook: Choice Tax Relief // Logan Allec, CPA -Reddit:   / taxrelief   

Sometimes you just have to take a break from personal injury law and talk about treasure hunting. In this episode, we interview Lieutenant Commander and Navy JAG, Jordan Foley about maritime treasure law. Why? Because I didn't know anything about it and wanted to hit “record” while I learned. During this conversation, we take a “deep dive” into some of the misconceptions surrounding treasure law and some of the challenging legal arguments that come up during international treasure disputes. Visit Jordan online here: https://www.usni.org/people/jordan-foley. See all episodes or subscribe to the Personal Injury Marketing Minute here: https://optimizemyfirm.com/podcasts/. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eQ0BZ0M1V4 Transcript: Lindsey: Welcome to the Personal Injury Marketing Minute, where we quickly cover the hot topics in the legal marketing world. I'm your host, Lindsey Busfield. Well, I should amend my opening spiel. We usually cover the hot topics in the legal marketing world, but sometimes we're just going to talk about whatever I want to. I recently taught a CLE at the Maryland State Bar Association, and while I was there, I met Lieutenant Commander in Navy JAG, Jordan Foley. While he currently serves as the Department of Defense Fellow to Senator Mazie K. Hirono in Hawaii, he has a special background in naval warfare and a deep understanding of maritime treasure law. Knowing absolutely nothing about this myself, I wanted to take the opportunity to learn more about treasure law and invite you listeners to join me on this educational journey. Thank you so much for joining us today, Jordan.   JJ Foley: Absolutely. Thanks, Lindsey, for having me, and it was great meeting you in Ocean City, and I was glad we could talk a little A little bit.   Lindsey: And as I like to say, nerd out about treasure law. So that was fun. I mean, who doesn't love treasure law as kids? You know, we are taught to play pirates and you steal the treasure. My kids do this on their play set. You know, it's just kind of built into your childhood and development as a natural curiosity. So tell us a bit about your background and how you got involved in treasure law.   JJ Foley: Absolutely. I'll actually start with saying knowing more about treasure law takes some of the romance out of it, which we'll get into later. But it is a fun topic. But so, you know, as you stated, I'm an active duty Navy judge advocate. I started off my naval career as a submarine officer. So I got ship driving experience and deployment experience there. And they got selected for a Navy program where they sent me to law school and I became a Navy JAG through that. So I have a bit of a mix. I'm about 15 years into my career and half of it was spent on submarines and now about half of it as a judge advocate. And a lot of what I've focused on over the years has been. Naval warfare and legal analysis. So whether that is applying law to sea to board deploy missions, or sometimes weapons reviews, as I was doing at the Pentagon most recently before I joined Senator Verona's office as a defense fellow, a lot of it's been bridging the gap between my naval warfare experience and the legal and policy world.   Lindsey: And a lot of this comes with your understanding of international law, treaties, and working with our partners and allies, and sometimes even teaching and providing legal support for our partners and allies. So I've had this broad experience, and as one does in the beautiful profession of naval law and such, you find your interest areas, and mine became very quickly, for a lot of reasons you mentioned, treasure law, because it's cool and it's fun, and it's almost a bit of a hobby for me, too. But in the industry, in the private sector, it is an area that you have some specialized attorneys. He's in maritime and admiralty, and I like to see myself as maybe extra specialized with ad...

Join us this weekend as Pastor Jon continues the series, Discovering Deuteronomy with a message titled, Statutes and Ordinances based on Deuteronomy 4:5-14.

This conversation provides a comprehensive overview of tort law, focusing on the various types of damages, including compensatory, punitive, and nominal damages. It delves into the complexities of calculating damages, the role of vicarious liability, and the distinctions between wrongful death and survival actions. The discussion also covers important defenses such as mitigation of damages and the implications of statutes of limitations and repose. Overall, it serves as a valuable resource for understanding tort law and preparing for related exams.Imagine you're preparing for a torts exam, and one concept stands out as the linchpin of it all: damages. Whether it's negligence or intentional torts, the remedy is crucial. This post explores the intricacies of tort law, focusing on damages and vicarious liability.Compensatory Damages: Compensatory damages aim to address the actual loss or injury. They are divided into economic damages, like medical bills and lost wages, and non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. Understanding the distinction between lost earnings and loss of earning capacity is vital, as the former looks backward while the latter gazes into the future.Punitive and Nominal Damages: Punitive damages serve to punish and deter, requiring proof of an "evil mind." Nominal damages, though symbolic, confirm a legal right was violated, potentially unlocking significant attorney's fees.Vicarious Liability: Vicarious liability holds one party responsible for another's actions due to their relationship. The doctrine of respondeat superior is key, determining if an employer is liable for an employee's torts. The distinction between a frolic and a detour is crucial in assessing liability.Advanced Claims and Defenses: The post delves into wrongful death and survival actions, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between them. It also covers the economic loss rule, maintaining the boundary between tort and contract law, and the statutes of limitations and repose.Tort law is complex, with damages and vicarious liability at its core. Understanding these concepts is essential for anyone studying or practicing law. As the legal landscape evolves, staying informed is crucial. Subscribe now for more insights into the world of law.TakeawaysTort law revolves around remedies, primarily damages.Compensatory damages aim to make the plaintiff whole.Punitive damages serve to punish the defendant and deter future misconduct.Nominal damages are awarded to acknowledge a legal wrong without substantial harm.The collateral source rule prevents defendants from benefiting from the plaintiff's insurance.Future damages must be reasonably certain to occur to be recoverable.Non-economic damages are subjective and often capped by state laws.Vicarious liability holds employers responsible for employees' actions within the scope of employment.Loss of consortium claims are derivative and depend on the main injury claim's success.Statutes of limitations and repose set strict deadlines for filing lawsuits.tort law, negligence, damages, vicarious liability, compensatory damages, punitive damages, wrongful death, survival actions, legal remedies, law exam preparation

Police reports are often seen as the “official story” after a crash—but are they always accurate? In this episode of After the Crash Podcast, attorney David Craig and paralegal Holly Hines answer one of the most common questions families ask after a semi-truck wreck: how much weight should you give a police report?Police reports can provide details like witness names and statements, but they are not always complete—and sometimes they're wrong. Many families are surprised to learn:✔️ Reports are often delayed or missing information.✔️ Trucking companies may use them to their advantage.✔️ Reports can be challenged, corrected, or supplemented with investigation.✔️ A report alone doesn't determine fault in a truck accident case.David and Holly share stories where the initial report wrongly placed blame—and how deeper investigation uncovered the truth. They also explain what families can do if they believe a police report is inaccurate, and why hiring an experienced truck accident lawyer with the right team makes all the difference.—01:22 – Meet Steve Grover: Canadian Personal Injury Lawyer07:51 – Steve Grover's Story: Why He Chose Injury Law11:12 – Traumatic Brain Injuries in Personal Injury Cases18:08 – Jury Trials in Canada vs. the U.S.19:09 – Semi-Truck Accidents: How Long Cases Take in Canada21:56 – Legal Advertising: Canada vs. U.S. Lawyers23:12 – How to Find a Personal Injury Lawyer in Canada24:55 – Why Continuing Education Matters for Injury Lawyers27:37 – Steve Grover's Book Load 'Er Up and Drive Safe31:31 – What to Know About the Grover Law Firm33:16 – Why Resources Matter in Injury Cases37:53 – Hidden Insurance in Personal Injury Cases38:58 – Signs of a Trustworthy Law Firm40:11 – The Role of AI in Modern Law Firms42:25 – How Involved Steve Grover Is in Cases Today43:53 – Why Motorcycle Accident Cases Are a Focus for Grover45:24 – How Riding Shapes Steve Grover's Perspective46:37 – Premises Liability in Canadian Injury Law49:14 – Statute of Limitations in Canadian Injury Cases50:22 – Tort Reform: The Biggest Challenge for Injury Lawyers52:29 – How Steve Grover Gives Back to the Community—If you or someone you know has been involved in a truck crash, don't wait.Visit https://ckflaw.com or call 1-800-ASK-DAVID for experienced legal help.—Why Listen to After the Crash?Navigating the aftermath of a trucking accident can feel overwhelming, but you don't have to face it alone. This podcast is designed to educate and empower victims and their families, helping you make informed decisions about your future.—Learn About the Firm:At Craig, Kelley & Faultless, LLC, we've dedicated over 30 years to fighting for trucking accident victims. From preserving evidence to holding negligent trucking companies accountable, our mission is to protect your rights and secure the justice you deserve.—Download Semitruck Wreck for FREE:https://www.ckflaw.com/truck-accident-ebook/Follow Us on Socials:Website: https://www.ckflaw.comFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/ckflawLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/craig-kelley-&-faultless-attorneys-at-lawContact Us:Email: info@ckflaw.comPhone: 1-800-ASK-DAVID#TruckingAccidents #TruckWreckLawyer #PoliceReports #AfterTheCrashPodcast #Per

 Andrew McCarthy and Thaddeus McCotter discuss James Comey potentially being a target of the Trumpadministration, focusing on charges of lying to Congress under the broader false statements statute (1001), rather than traditional perjury. Proof of "willfulness" is required, which signifies a heightened mental state and understanding of illegality. They also analyze the Supreme Court's delay in ruling on President Trump's effort to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, deferring oral arguments until January.Preview: Andrew McCarthy and Thaddeus McCotter discuss James Comey potentially being a target of the Trumpadministration, focusing on charges of lying to Congress under the broader false statements statute (1001), rather than traditional perjury. Proof of "willfulness" is required, which signifies a heightened mental state and understanding of illegality. They also analyze the Supreme Court's delay in ruling on President Trump's effort to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, deferring oral arguments until January. 1824 SCOTUS

 Andrew McCarthy and Thaddeus McCotter discuss James Comey potentially being a target of the Trumpadministration, focusing on charges of lying to Congress under the broader false statements statute (1001), rather than traditional perjury. Proof of "willfulness" is required, which signifies a heightened mental state and understanding of illegality. They also analyze the Supreme Court's delay in ruling on President Trump's effort to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, deferring oral arguments until January.Preview: Andrew McCarthy and Thaddeus McCotter discuss James Comey potentially being a target of the Trumpadministration, focusing on charges of lying to Congress under the broader false statements statute (1001), rather than traditional perjury. Proof of "willfulness" is required, which signifies a heightened mental state and understanding of illegality. They also analyze the Supreme Court's delay in ruling on President Trump's effort to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, deferring oral arguments until January.

What makes Canadian personal injury law different from the United States? In this episode of After the Crash Podcast, David Craig sits down with Calgary lawyer Steve Grover to explore the key differences between Canadian and U.S. personal injury cases.From jury trials to tort reform, trucking accident timelines to traumatic brain injuries, Steve explains how Canadian law shapes outcomes for injury victims and their families. He also shares his story, why motorcycle cases are a major part of his practice, and how his book Load 'Er Up and Drive Safe helps educate drivers about sharing the road with semis.✔️ Key differences between Canadian & U.S. injury law✔️ How semi-truck accident cases are handled in Canada✔️ Why tort reform is a major challenge for victims✔️ Finding the right lawyer in Canada: tips for families✔️ Steve Grover's perspective as both a lawyer and riderThis episode is for anyone who wants to understand how personal injury law works in Canada—and what families need to know after a serious truck or motorcycle accident.—01:22 – Meet Steve Grover: Canadian Personal Injury Lawyer07:51 – Steve Grover's Story: Why He Chose Injury Law11:12 – Traumatic Brain Injuries in Personal Injury Cases18:08 – Jury Trials in Canada vs. the U.S.19:09 – Semi-Truck Accidents: How Long Cases Take in Canada21:56 – Legal Advertising: Canada vs. U.S. Lawyers23:12 – How to Find a Personal Injury Lawyer in Canada24:55 – Why Continuing Education Matters for Injury Lawyers27:37 – Steve Grover's Book Load 'Er Up and Drive Safe31:31 – What to Know About the Grover Law Firm33:16 – Why Resources Matter in Injury Cases37:53 – Hidden Insurance in Personal Injury Cases38:58 – Signs of a Trustworthy Law Firm40:11 – The Role of AI in Modern Law Firms42:25 – How Involved Steve Grover Is in Cases Today43:53 – Why Motorcycle Accident Cases Are a Focus for Grover45:24 – How Riding Shapes Steve Grover's Perspective46:37 – Premises Liability in Canadian Injury Law49:14 – Statute of Limitations in Canadian Injury Cases50:22 – Tort Reform: The Biggest Challenge for Injury Lawyers52:29 – How Steve Grover Gives Back to the Community—If you or someone you know has been involved in a truck crash, don't wait.Visit https://ckflaw.com or call 1-800-ASK-DAVID for experienced legal help.—Why Listen to After the Crash?Navigating the aftermath of a trucking accident can feel overwhelming, but you don't have to face it alone. This podcast is designed to educate and empower victims and their families, helping you make informed decisions about your future.—Learn About the Firm:At Craig, Kelley & Faultless, LLC, we've dedicated over 30 years to fighting for trucking accident victims. From preserving evidence to holding negligent trucking companies accountable, our mission is to protect your rights and secure the justice you deserve.—Download Semitruck Wreck for FREE:https://www.ckflaw.com/truck-accident-ebook/Follow Us on Socials:Website: https://www.ckflaw.comFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/ckflawLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/craig-kelley-&-faultless-attorneys-at-lawContact Us:Email: info@ckflaw.comPhone: 1-800-ASK-DAVID#PersonalInjuryLaw #TruckAccidents #CanadaLaw #AfterTheCrashPodcast #LegalHelp

Gregg Jarrett joins Marc Cox and Dan Buck to discuss James Comey's legal situation, the statute of limitations, and perjury by public officials. They cover the Russia investigation, presidential pardons, and accountability for figures like John Brennan and Andrew McCabe across recent administrations.

In this episode, the podcast's 80th, Jordan discusses two cases from Federal Districts in Texas and New York that address the statute of limitations, limited authorization to use trade secrets, and the reasonable measures to maintain secrecy requirement.   

In this episode of the Consumer Finance Monitor podcast, host Alan Kaplinsky welcomes Pat Utz, CEO and co-founder of Abstract, a venture capital-backed AI company headquartered in New York. Pat brings extensive expertise on artificial intelligence. The podcast focuses on current developments in AI regulation and implementation, first covering President Trump's recent "Winning the Race: America's AI Action Plan" and its potential impact on federal policy. Alan and Pat discuss the evolving landscape of AI statutes, and developments at the state-level in places like Utah and Colorado. Pat and Alan Kaplinsky provide insights into bipartisan efforts at both state and federal levels to address issues ranging from consumer safety to business innovation. They highlight the practical challenges and opportunities for businesses leveraging AI, such as the need for transparency when AI is used in customer interactions and compliance with state-level enforcement. Pat explains how open-source models are increasingly being promoted, pointing to Trump's executive order and shifts in the industry. He also underscores the importance for businesses to track where data is processed—whether with major vendors or proprietary systems—and adapt to varying regulatory frameworks, notably those set by states like California that tend to influence national practice. The episode concludes by focusing on the wide array of AI usage in financial services, specifically credit scoring and underwriting; lending; and fraud detection. Pat provides key lessons institutions should be mindful of as AI adoption continues to grow in the industry Consumer Finance Monitor is hosted by Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel at Ballard Spahr, and the founder and former chair of the firm's Consumer Financial Services Group. We encourage listeners to subscribe to the podcast on their preferred platform for weekly insights into developments in the consumer finance industry.

This message was inspired by the passing of Charlie Kirk. I don't believe he was truly a racist in real life — I met him, spent time with him, and saw another side. But his last posts online give the opposite impression. That reality made me reflect:

Welcome to another month of M&M Hour with Mandy and Melissa Reich! Mandy and Melissa get into the Real Housewives of Atlanta reunion part 2 and explain why they've been side eyeing Shamea before discussing the current drama on the Valley and this week's Real Housewives of Orange County. For all things Your Bish Therapist: Link Treelinktr.ee/yourbishtherapistFollow Melissa on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/yourbishtherapist/Follow Mandy on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mandyslutsker/

Tulsi Gabbard just dropped a truth bomb—exposing key players behind the Russia collusion hoax, and once again confirming what we've known all along: this was a coordinated political attack on President Trump, orchestrated at the highest levels. Barack Obama, John Brennan, James Clapper, and other Deep State elites weaponized our intelligence community to sabotage an incoming president. And yet—no one has been held accountable. Grant Stinchfield is furious. There is no statute of limitations for treason, but where is the Republican backbone to pursue real justice? Why won’t our so-called “leaders” in Congress dare to bring charges against the architects of the greatest political scandal in modern U.S. history? On this episode of Stinchfield, we call out the cowardice, expose the cover-up, and demand real consequences. The American people deserve justice. Anything less is surrender to tyranny. This isn’t just about the past—it’s about whether our Republic survives the next coup. Go to http://freegoldguide.com/grant or call 800 458 7356 for your free Colonial Metals Group retirement protection kit – created specifically for our listeners where you can get up to $7500 in free Silver. www.EnergizedHealth.com/Grant www.PatriotMobile.com/Grantwww.Get20Now.comTWC.Health/Grant Use "Grant" for 10% Off See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In 1710, the British Parliament passed a piece of legislation entitled An Act for the Encouragement of Learning. It became known as the Statute of Anne, and it was the world's first copyright law. Copyright protects and regulates a piece of work - whether that's a book, a painting, a piece of music or a software programme. It emerged as a way of balancing the interests of authors, artists, publishers, and the public in the context of evolving technologies and the rise of mechanical reproduction. Writers and artists such as Alexander Pope, William Hogarth and Charles Dickens became involved in heated debates about ownership and originality that continue to this day - especially with the emergence of artificial intelligence. With:Lionel Bently, Herchel Smith Professor of Intellectual Property Law at the University of CambridgeWill Slauter, Professor of History at Sorbonne University, ParisKatie McGettigan, Senior Lecturer in American Literature at Royal Holloway, University of London. Producer: Eliane GlaserReading list:Isabella Alexander, Copyright Law and the Public Interest in the Nineteenth Century (Hart Publishing, 2010)Isabella Alexander and H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui (eds), Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016)David Bellos and Alexandre Montagu, Who Owns this Sentence? A History of Copyrights and Wrongs (Mountain Leopard Press, 2024)Oren Bracha, Owning Ideas: The Intellectual Origins of American Intellectual Property, 1790-1909 (Cambridge University Press, 2016)Elena Cooper, Art and Modern Copyright: The Contested Image (Cambridge University Press, 2018)Ronan Deazley, On the Origin of the Right to Copy: Charting the Movement of Copyright Law in Eighteenth Century Britain, 1695–1775 (Hart Publishing, 2004)Ronan Deazley, Rethinking Copyright: History, Theory, Language (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006)Ronan Deazley, Martin Kretschmer and Lionel Bently (eds.), Privilege and Property: Essays on the History of Copyright (Open Book Publishers, 2010)Marie-Stéphanie Delamaire and Will Slauter (eds.), Circulation and Control: Artistic Culture and Intellectual Property in the Nineteenth Century (Open Book Publishers, 2021) Melissa Homestead, American Women Authors and Literary Property, 1822-1869 (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Adrian Johns, Piracy: The Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates (University of Chicago Press, 2009)Meredith L. McGill, American Literature and the Culture of Reprinting, 1834-1853 (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002)Mark Rose, Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright (Harvard University Press, 1993)Mark Rose, Authors in Court: Scenes from the Theater of Copyright (Harvard University Press, 2018)Catherine Seville, Internationalisation of Copyright: Books, Buccaneers and the Black Flag in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge University Press, 2006)Brad Sherman and Lionel Bently, The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law (Cambridge University Press, 1999)Will Slauter, Who Owns the News? A History of Copyright (Stanford University Press, 2019)Robert Spoo, Without Copyrights: Piracy, Publishing and the Public Domain (Oxford University Press, 2013)In Our Time is a BBC Studios Audio production