Podcast appearances and mentions of stacey plaskett

Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett, the Delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands, became the lone remaining defendant in a civil case filed by six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse after the court dismissed the claims against other parties. The survivors alleged that Plaskett was complicit in Epstein's sex trafficking operation, accusations that she forcefully denied. In April 2025, a second amended complaint reiterated the charges, to which Plaskett responded by filing a motion to dismiss, calling the claims baseless and defamatory. She has consistently framed the lawsuit as politically motivated and lacking in legal merit.Prior to this, in July 2024, Plaskett filed a motion under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking sanctions against the survivors' attorney. Rule 11 motions are designed to punish parties or lawyers for filing frivolous, unfounded, or harassing litigation. Plaskett argued that the case against her was precisely that.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.127.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

In July 2024, Delegate Stacey Plaskett filed a lawsuit under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking sanctions against the attorney representing six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse. Plaskett argued that the amended lawsuit against her was frivolously filed, lacked any factual or legal foundation, and was intended to harass rather than pursue a legitimate legal claim. She sought sanctions to penalize and deter what she viewed as a baseless and politically motivated suit.However, the court denied her Rule 11 motion, concluding that the survivors' filing was neither frivolous nor made for improper purposes. The ruling underscored that the suit was grounded in sufficient factual and legal claims, and that the plaintiffs' allegations merited judicial consideration rather than sanctions. In essence, the denial affirmed that the litigation could proceed on substantive grounds.Also....In the released segment of her May 9, 2023 deposition, Stacey Plaskett was pressed on her awareness of Jeffrey Epstein's role in the Virgin Islands and the extent of his influence with local officials and institutions. The questioning focused on whether she had knowledge of Epstein's financial relationships, his political donations, or his contacts with Virgin Islands leadership during the period when he was operating in the territory. Plaskett largely distanced herself from Epstein, stating that she had no direct involvement with him and little knowledge of his activities beyond what was publicly known.Attorneys also asked Plaskett about government oversight, her interactions with agencies connected to Epstein's business holdings, and whether she had ever received benefits, contributions, or favors traceable to Epstein or his companies. In the available transcript, she denied having such connections and emphasized that she was not involved in decisions related to Epstein's finances or residency. While limited to roughly 25 pages, the deposition underscores how central Virgin Islands political figures were to JPMorgan's defense and the USVI's allegations—whether officials ignored red flags about Epstein or knowingly permitted him to operate.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In a March 2025 ruling, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian dismissed nearly all claims against every defendant except Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett, thereby ordering the case to proceed to trial against her in her individual capacity. The court found that Plaskett's conduct—including soliciting campaign contributions from Jeffrey Epstein at his New York residence, accepting loans and political support, and approving substantial tax breaks for his businesses—created sufficient ties to New York to establish personal jurisdiction under the state's long-arm statute. Consequently, Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and negligence claims against her were allowed to move forward, while related claims against other Virgin Islands officials were dismissed on jurisdictional and legal grounds.The judge also rejected the plaintiffs' request for jurisdictional discovery, concluding they had failed to make a prima facie showing to justify it. With all other defendants out of the picture, Plaskett stands as the sole defendant facing trial in this high-profile case. The court further invited motions from both sides regarding venue transfers and potential defenses such as immunity, providing a clear path for the next legal phase.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf

Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett, the Delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands, became the lone remaining defendant in a civil case filed by six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse after the court dismissed the claims against other parties. The survivors alleged that Plaskett was complicit in Epstein's sex trafficking operation, accusations that she forcefully denied. In April 2025, a second amended complaint reiterated the charges, to which Plaskett responded by filing a motion to dismiss, calling the claims baseless and defamatory. She has consistently framed the lawsuit as politically motivated and lacking in legal merit.Prior to this, in July 2024, Plaskett filed a motion under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking sanctions against the survivors' attorney. Rule 11 motions are designed to punish parties or lawyers for filing frivolous, unfounded, or harassing litigation. Plaskett argued that the case against her was precisely that.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.127.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In July 2024, Delegate Stacey Plaskett filed a lawsuit under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking sanctions against the attorney representing six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse. Plaskett argued that the amended lawsuit against her was frivolously filed, lacked any factual or legal foundation, and was intended to harass rather than pursue a legitimate legal claim. She sought sanctions to penalize and deter what she viewed as a baseless and politically motivated suit.However, the court denied her Rule 11 motion, concluding that the survivors' filing was neither frivolous nor made for improper purposes. The ruling underscored that the suit was grounded in sufficient factual and legal claims, and that the plaintiffs' allegations merited judicial consideration rather than sanctions. In essence, the denial affirmed that the litigation could proceed on substantive grounds.Also....In the released segment of her May 9, 2023 deposition, Stacey Plaskett was pressed on her awareness of Jeffrey Epstein's role in the Virgin Islands and the extent of his influence with local officials and institutions. The questioning focused on whether she had knowledge of Epstein's financial relationships, his political donations, or his contacts with Virgin Islands leadership during the period when he was operating in the territory. Plaskett largely distanced herself from Epstein, stating that she had no direct involvement with him and little knowledge of his activities beyond what was publicly known.Attorneys also asked Plaskett about government oversight, her interactions with agencies connected to Epstein's business holdings, and whether she had ever received benefits, contributions, or favors traceable to Epstein or his companies. In the available transcript, she denied having such connections and emphasized that she was not involved in decisions related to Epstein's finances or residency. While limited to roughly 25 pages, the deposition underscores how central Virgin Islands political figures were to JPMorgan's defense and the USVI's allegations—whether officials ignored red flags about Epstein or knowingly permitted him to operate.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In a March 2025 ruling, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian dismissed nearly all claims against every defendant except Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett, thereby ordering the case to proceed to trial against her in her individual capacity. The court found that Plaskett's conduct—including soliciting campaign contributions from Jeffrey Epstein at his New York residence, accepting loans and political support, and approving substantial tax breaks for his businesses—created sufficient ties to New York to establish personal jurisdiction under the state's long-arm statute. Consequently, Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and negligence claims against her were allowed to move forward, while related claims against other Virgin Islands officials were dismissed on jurisdictional and legal grounds.The judge also rejected the plaintiffs' request for jurisdictional discovery, concluding they had failed to make a prima facie showing to justify it. With all other defendants out of the picture, Plaskett stands as the sole defendant facing trial in this high-profile case. The court further invited motions from both sides regarding venue transfers and potential defenses such as immunity, providing a clear path for the next legal phase.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The silence surrounding Stacey Plaskett's lawsuit by Epstein survivors exposes the staggering hypocrisy of both lawmakers and the legacy media. Politicians who pound the table about justice and accountability fall mute when the accusations land inside their own chamber. Journalists who dissect every lurid detail of Epstein's life suddenly find no headlines when survivors point to a sitting member of Congress. This selective outrage isn't oversight—it's complicity. Survivors are abandoned the moment their stories threaten insiders, and the system shows once again that accountability is conditional, not principled.That selective accountability corrodes credibility and turns justice into theater. By politicizing the scandal, lawmakers use survivors as pawns while letting the real villains—Epstein's network of enablers—slip quietly back into the shadows. The result is a collapse of trust: citizens see investigations as performance, predators learn power protects power, and survivors are betrayed all over again. Epstein may be dead and Maxwell imprisoned, but the system that shielded them is alive and well—sustained by cowardice, silence, and the hypocrisy of institutions that pretend to defend justice while practicing selective blindness.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The silence surrounding Stacey Plaskett's lawsuit by Epstein survivors exposes the staggering hypocrisy of both lawmakers and the legacy media. Politicians who pound the table about justice and accountability fall mute when the accusations land inside their own chamber. Journalists who dissect every lurid detail of Epstein's life suddenly find no headlines when survivors point to a sitting member of Congress. This selective outrage isn't oversight—it's complicity. Survivors are abandoned the moment their stories threaten insiders, and the system shows once again that accountability is conditional, not principled.That selective accountability corrodes credibility and turns justice into theater. By politicizing the scandal, lawmakers use survivors as pawns while letting the real villains—Epstein's network of enablers—slip quietly back into the shadows. The result is a collapse of trust: citizens see investigations as performance, predators learn power protects power, and survivors are betrayed all over again. Epstein may be dead and Maxwell imprisoned, but the system that shielded them is alive and well—sustained by cowardice, silence, and the hypocrisy of institutions that pretend to defend justice while practicing selective blindness.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The silence surrounding Stacey Plaskett's lawsuit by Epstein survivors exposes the staggering hypocrisy of both lawmakers and the legacy media. Politicians who pound the table about justice and accountability fall mute when the accusations land inside their own chamber. Journalists who dissect every lurid detail of Epstein's life suddenly find no headlines when survivors point to a sitting member of Congress. This selective outrage isn't oversight—it's complicity. Survivors are abandoned the moment their stories threaten insiders, and the system shows once again that accountability is conditional, not principled.That selective accountability corrodes credibility and turns justice into theater. By politicizing the scandal, lawmakers use survivors as pawns while letting the real villains—Epstein's network of enablers—slip quietly back into the shadows. The result is a collapse of trust: citizens see investigations as performance, predators learn power protects power, and survivors are betrayed all over again. Epstein may be dead and Maxwell imprisoned, but the system that shielded them is alive and well—sustained by cowardice, silence, and the hypocrisy of institutions that pretend to defend justice while practicing selective blindness.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The silence surrounding Stacey Plaskett's lawsuit by Epstein survivors exposes the staggering hypocrisy of both lawmakers and the legacy media. Politicians who pound the table about justice and accountability fall mute when the accusations land inside their own chamber. Journalists who dissect every lurid detail of Epstein's life suddenly find no headlines when survivors point to a sitting member of Congress. This selective outrage isn't oversight—it's complicity. Survivors are abandoned the moment their stories threaten insiders, and the system shows once again that accountability is conditional, not principled.That selective accountability corrodes credibility and turns justice into theater. By politicizing the scandal, lawmakers use survivors as pawns while letting the real villains—Epstein's network of enablers—slip quietly back into the shadows. The result is a collapse of trust: citizens see investigations as performance, predators learn power protects power, and survivors are betrayed all over again. Epstein may be dead and Maxwell imprisoned, but the system that shielded them is alive and well—sustained by cowardice, silence, and the hypocrisy of institutions that pretend to defend justice while practicing selective blindness.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against her by a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, arguing that the claims are legally baseless and politically motivated. In her filing, Plaskett maintains that she had no involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation and that the plaintiff's allegations are speculative, unsupported by evidence, and fall outside the statute of limitations. Her legal team asserts that the lawsuit is an abuse of the judicial process, designed to smear her reputation and exploit her previous associations with the Virgin Islands government during the time Epstein operated there. Plaskett categorically denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to have the case thrown out at the earliest stage.Critics, however, argue that Plaskett's motion sidesteps the deeper issue: the survivor's claim that Plaskett's political influence may have contributed to a broader effort to shield Epstein and his network from scrutiny while he operated in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The lawsuit ties her to the failure of local and federal officials to hold Epstein accountable, citing her past connections to officials who allegedly enabled his activities. While Plaskett insists she had no direct involvement, the motion to dismiss has sparked backlash from advocates who believe public figures with proximity to Epstein's orbit should be investigated rather than allowed to deflect scrutiny with procedural defenses. The case now hinges on whether the court will allow discovery or accept Plaskett's argument that the lawsuit lacks merit on its face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)

Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against her by a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, arguing that the claims are legally baseless and politically motivated. In her filing, Plaskett maintains that she had no involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation and that the plaintiff's allegations are speculative, unsupported by evidence, and fall outside the statute of limitations. Her legal team asserts that the lawsuit is an abuse of the judicial process, designed to smear her reputation and exploit her previous associations with the Virgin Islands government during the time Epstein operated there. Plaskett categorically denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to have the case thrown out at the earliest stage.Critics, however, argue that Plaskett's motion sidesteps the deeper issue: the survivor's claim that Plaskett's political influence may have contributed to a broader effort to shield Epstein and his network from scrutiny while he operated in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The lawsuit ties her to the failure of local and federal officials to hold Epstein accountable, citing her past connections to officials who allegedly enabled his activities. While Plaskett insists she had no direct involvement, the motion to dismiss has sparked backlash from advocates who believe public figures with proximity to Epstein's orbit should be investigated rather than allowed to deflect scrutiny with procedural defenses. The case now hinges on whether the court will allow discovery or accept Plaskett's argument that the lawsuit lacks merit on its face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)

Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against her by a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, arguing that the claims are legally baseless and politically motivated. In her filing, Plaskett maintains that she had no involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation and that the plaintiff's allegations are speculative, unsupported by evidence, and fall outside the statute of limitations. Her legal team asserts that the lawsuit is an abuse of the judicial process, designed to smear her reputation and exploit her previous associations with the Virgin Islands government during the time Epstein operated there. Plaskett categorically denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to have the case thrown out at the earliest stage.Critics, however, argue that Plaskett's motion sidesteps the deeper issue: the survivor's claim that Plaskett's political influence may have contributed to a broader effort to shield Epstein and his network from scrutiny while he operated in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The lawsuit ties her to the failure of local and federal officials to hold Epstein accountable, citing her past connections to officials who allegedly enabled his activities. While Plaskett insists she had no direct involvement, the motion to dismiss has sparked backlash from advocates who believe public figures with proximity to Epstein's orbit should be investigated rather than allowed to deflect scrutiny with procedural defenses. The case now hinges on whether the court will allow discovery or accept Plaskett's argument that the lawsuit lacks merit on its face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against her by a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, arguing that the claims are legally baseless and politically motivated. In her filing, Plaskett maintains that she had no involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation and that the plaintiff's allegations are speculative, unsupported by evidence, and fall outside the statute of limitations. Her legal team asserts that the lawsuit is an abuse of the judicial process, designed to smear her reputation and exploit her previous associations with the Virgin Islands government during the time Epstein operated there. Plaskett categorically denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to have the case thrown out at the earliest stage.Critics, however, argue that Plaskett's motion sidesteps the deeper issue: the survivor's claim that Plaskett's political influence may have contributed to a broader effort to shield Epstein and his network from scrutiny while he operated in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The lawsuit ties her to the failure of local and federal officials to hold Epstein accountable, citing her past connections to officials who allegedly enabled his activities. While Plaskett insists she had no direct involvement, the motion to dismiss has sparked backlash from advocates who believe public figures with proximity to Epstein's orbit should be investigated rather than allowed to deflect scrutiny with procedural defenses. The case now hinges on whether the court will allow discovery or accept Plaskett's argument that the lawsuit lacks merit on its face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against her by a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, arguing that the claims are legally baseless and politically motivated. In her filing, Plaskett maintains that she had no involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation and that the plaintiff's allegations are speculative, unsupported by evidence, and fall outside the statute of limitations. Her legal team asserts that the lawsuit is an abuse of the judicial process, designed to smear her reputation and exploit her previous associations with the Virgin Islands government during the time Epstein operated there. Plaskett categorically denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to have the case thrown out at the earliest stage.Critics, however, argue that Plaskett's motion sidesteps the deeper issue: the survivor's claim that Plaskett's political influence may have contributed to a broader effort to shield Epstein and his network from scrutiny while he operated in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The lawsuit ties her to the failure of local and federal officials to hold Epstein accountable, citing her past connections to officials who allegedly enabled his activities. While Plaskett insists she had no direct involvement, the motion to dismiss has sparked backlash from advocates who believe public figures with proximity to Epstein's orbit should be investigated rather than allowed to deflect scrutiny with procedural defenses. The case now hinges on whether the court will allow discovery or accept Plaskett's argument that the lawsuit lacks merit on its face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against her by a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, arguing that the claims are legally baseless and politically motivated. In her filing, Plaskett maintains that she had no involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation and that the plaintiff's allegations are speculative, unsupported by evidence, and fall outside the statute of limitations. Her legal team asserts that the lawsuit is an abuse of the judicial process, designed to smear her reputation and exploit her previous associations with the Virgin Islands government during the time Epstein operated there. Plaskett categorically denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to have the case thrown out at the earliest stage.Critics, however, argue that Plaskett's motion sidesteps the deeper issue: the survivor's claim that Plaskett's political influence may have contributed to a broader effort to shield Epstein and his network from scrutiny while he operated in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The lawsuit ties her to the failure of local and federal officials to hold Epstein accountable, citing her past connections to officials who allegedly enabled his activities. While Plaskett insists she had no direct involvement, the motion to dismiss has sparked backlash from advocates who believe public figures with proximity to Epstein's orbit should be investigated rather than allowed to deflect scrutiny with procedural defenses. The case now hinges on whether the court will allow discovery or accept Plaskett's argument that the lawsuit lacks merit on its face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Stacey Plaskett's long-standing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and his associates is far more damning than she publicly admits—and no amount of political backpedaling can wash the stench off. As revealed in depositions and legal filings, Plaskett personally solicited a $30,000 donation from Epstein in 2018, visiting his Manhattan mansion years after his 2008 sex crime conviction was national news. The money was initially accepted and only returned when it failed vetting. Plaskett's ties to Epstein run deeper than a one-off meeting; she previously worked at the law firm of Erika Kellerhals, Epstein's personal attorney in the Virgin Islands, and later became a key figure in the same Economic Development Authority that granted Epstein's companies hundreds of millions of dollars in tax benefits. Her claim that she had no idea who or what Epstein really was, even as she stood in his house asking for money, is beyond implausible—it's insulting.Even worse, Plaskett is the only individual still facing active civil litigation from Epstein victims after a federal judge tossed out broader claims against the Virgin Islands government but allowed the trafficking-related counts to proceed against her personally. That's not a smear—it's a legal reality. The survivors accuse her of helping facilitate an environment that enabled Epstein to operate with impunity in the territory, and the court agrees there's enough meat on those allegations to warrant a trial. Her attempt to sanitize the donations by giving them to charity doesn't erase the fact that she sought out Epstein's support well after he was a registered sex offender. Plaskett's carefully managed public persona as a crusader for justice clashes violently with the uncomfortable accusation: she helped normalize, enable, and politically legitimize a known predator, and now she's scrambling to rewrite history.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:How Jeffrey Epstein's Island Politics Helped Elect Stacey Plaskett (businessinsider.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiffs allege that Plaskett knowingly participated in and helped facilitate Epstein's sex trafficking operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands. They claim she visited Epstein's New York mansion to solicit direct campaign contributions—repeatedly requesting $30,000 for her campaigns and the Democratic National Committee—and that Epstein then used his political influence to influence policies in the Virgin Islands. As general counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority, Plaskett allegedly approved approximately $300 million in tax breaks that benefited Epstein's businesses after receiving financial and professional support, including a job at a law firm connected to Epstein's network.The survivors also contend that Plaskett leveraged her political leverage to pressure local authorities—such as customs, Coast Guard, and airport officials—to relax oversight and allow Epstein to transport women and girls between New York and the Virgin Islands without encountering legal scrutiny. The plaintiffs argue that these actions weren't isolated misjudgments but part of a calculated pattern enabling a broader trafficking enterprise, with Plaskett's contributions and interventions central to Epstein's unimpeded operation and global network.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Plaskett's attorney vows to fight 'baseless' lawsuit by Epstein victims | News | virginislandsdailynews.com

Plaintiffs allege that Plaskett knowingly participated in and helped facilitate Epstein's sex trafficking operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands. They claim she visited Epstein's New York mansion to solicit direct campaign contributions—repeatedly requesting $30,000 for her campaigns and the Democratic National Committee—and that Epstein then used his political influence to influence policies in the Virgin Islands. As general counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority, Plaskett allegedly approved approximately $300 million in tax breaks that benefited Epstein's businesses after receiving financial and professional support, including a job at a law firm connected to Epstein's network.The survivors also contend that Plaskett leveraged her political leverage to pressure local authorities—such as customs, Coast Guard, and airport officials—to relax oversight and allow Epstein to transport women and girls between New York and the Virgin Islands without encountering legal scrutiny. The plaintiffs argue that these actions weren't isolated misjudgments but part of a calculated pattern enabling a broader trafficking enterprise, with Plaskett's contributions and interventions central to Epstein's unimpeded operation and global network.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Plaskett's attorney vows to fight 'baseless' lawsuit by Epstein victims | News | virginislandsdailynews.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Plaintiffs allege that Plaskett knowingly participated in and helped facilitate Epstein's sex trafficking operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands. They claim she visited Epstein's New York mansion to solicit direct campaign contributions—repeatedly requesting $30,000 for her campaigns and the Democratic National Committee—and that Epstein then used his political influence to influence policies in the Virgin Islands. As general counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority, Plaskett allegedly approved approximately $300 million in tax breaks that benefited Epstein's businesses after receiving financial and professional support, including a job at a law firm connected to Epstein's network.The survivors also contend that Plaskett leveraged her political leverage to pressure local authorities—such as customs, Coast Guard, and airport officials—to relax oversight and allow Epstein to transport women and girls between New York and the Virgin Islands without encountering legal scrutiny. The plaintiffs argue that these actions weren't isolated misjudgments but part of a calculated pattern enabling a broader trafficking enterprise, with Plaskett's contributions and interventions central to Epstein's unimpeded operation and global network.to contact  me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Plaskett's attorney vows to fight 'baseless' lawsuit by Epstein victims | News | virginislandsdailynews.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

-Guest JD Haltigan, evolutionary psychopathologist, joins us to survey the wreckage of the mental health field wrought by Cluster B women practitioners, and the "Cluster B-ification" of society -Democrats and the left are frankly and unapologetically anti-American and pro-takeover by foreign nationals. We go through their embrace of violent anti-immigration-law riots in Los Angeles and their accusations that enforcing the law is "the real violence" -Potpourri du Moquerie featuring Rep. Stacey Plaskett's "pum-pum"See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

UW students are planning a ‘No Kings’ rally at its commencement ceremony this weekend. Senator Alex Padilla from California pulled a ridiculously stunt during Kristi Noem’s press conference today. The city of Puyallup has a new comprehensive plan that has leftists outraged. // LongForm: GUEST: Former Washington Secretary of State candidate Dale Whitaker on the madness that unfolded in Spokane last night. // Quick Hit: Scott Bessent shuts down Stacey Plaskett.

Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett joins Michael Steele on the podcast. She describes the frustration of hearing people say that Democrats aren't doing anything, despite their efforts in the House and the Senate. Rep. Plaskett also discusses not being allowed to vote for Speaker as a representative for the Virgin Islands, how Medicaid cuts would hurt Americans, Senator Joni Ernst's bizarre comments about people dying and David Hogg's disruption of the DNC. Join Michael Steele, Molly Jong-Fast, Elie Mystal, Lucy Caldwell, John Fugelsang and Karen Hunter for Part II of our barbershop livestream on Tuesday, June 10th at 10am ET on The Bulwark's YouTube page. 

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf

​In a recent ruling, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed most claims in a lawsuit filed by six anonymous women against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several officials, alleging complicity in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The court determined it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants such as former Governors John de Jongh and Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and former Senators Celestino White and Carlton Dowe, leading to the dismissal of claims against them. Additionally, claims against former First Lady Cecile de Jongh were barred due to a prior settlement agreementHowever, the court allowed claims against Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett to proceed, citing sufficient ties to New York through alleged activities such as visiting Epstein's New York residence and soliciting campaign donations there. The court found plausible allegations under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and negligence claims, asserting that Plaskett's alleged receipt of financial and political support from Epstein in exchange for favorable political actions warranted further proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge Dismisses Jane Does' Epstein Complaint Against All But Plaskett | St. Thomas Source

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

​In a recent ruling, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed most claims in a lawsuit filed by six anonymous women against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several officials, alleging complicity in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The court determined it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants such as former Governors John de Jongh and Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and former Senators Celestino White and Carlton Dowe, leading to the dismissal of claims against them. Additionally, claims against former First Lady Cecile de Jongh were barred due to a prior settlement agreementHowever, the court allowed claims against Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett to proceed, citing sufficient ties to New York through alleged activities such as visiting Epstein's New York residence and soliciting campaign donations there. The court found plausible allegations under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and negligence claims, asserting that Plaskett's alleged receipt of financial and political support from Epstein in exchange for favorable political actions warranted further proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge Dismisses Jane Does' Epstein Complaint Against All But Plaskett | St. Thomas SourceBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In a recent ruling, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed most claims in a lawsuit filed by six anonymous women against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several officials, alleging complicity in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The court determined it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants such as former Governors John de Jongh and Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and former Senators Celestino White and Carlton Dowe, leading to the dismissal of claims against them. Additionally, claims against former First Lady Cecile de Jongh were barred due to a prior settlement agreementHowever, the court allowed claims against Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett to proceed, citing sufficient ties to New York through alleged activities such as visiting Epstein's New York residence and soliciting campaign donations there. The court found plausible allegations under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and negligence claims, asserting that Plaskett's alleged receipt of financial and political support from Epstein in exchange for favorable political actions warranted further proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge Dismisses Jane Does' Epstein Complaint Against All But Plaskett | St. Thomas SourceBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Hour 1 Segment 1 Tony starts the show talking about the U.S./Russia talks resuming in Saudi Arabia as Volodymyr Zelenskyy calls for pressure on Vladimir Putin. Tony also talks about Norm Eisen going on CNN to talk about his security clearance being revoked for the third time. Hour 1 Segment 2 Tony talks about Howard Lutnick making a great point about raising the age on social security. Hour 1 Segment 3 Tony talks about Hands Off, a protest on April 5 against President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Hour 1 Segment 4 Tony wraps up the first hour of the show by talking about the new live action Snow White movie and the new Robert DeNiro movie bombing at the box office. Hour 2 Segment 1 Tony starts the second hour of the show talking about Bill Maher. Tony also talks about Mark Duplass going on Ben Shapiro. Hour 2 Segment 2 Tony talks about a video of an Amazon delivery driver throwing away an Israel supportive sign. Hour 2 Segment 3 Tony talks about Chuck Schumer rejecting calls to step down as Senate Democratic leader after he voted for the continuing resolution. Hour 2 Segment 4 Tony wraps up the second hour of the show talking about what kind of car to get his son. Hour 3 Segment 1 Tony starts the final hour of the show talking about the latest on illegal immigration from Tom Homan and Byron Donalds after President Donald Trump revokes the legal status of 500K migrants. Hour 3 Segment 2 Tony talks about a girl reacting to Canadian health care who needs to wait until 2026 for an MRI. Hour 3 Segment 3 Tony is joined with Jon Gabriel, contributor of Discourse Magazine and author of Sink the Rising Sun, to talk about DOGE. Hour 3 Segment 4 Tony wraps up another edition of the show talking about Stacey Plaskett bashing President Trump and his administration on CNN. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hour 3 Segment 1 Tony starts the final hour of the show talking about the latest on illegal immigration from Tom Homan and Byron Donalds after President Donald Trump revokes the legal status of 500K migrants. Hour 3 Segment 2 Tony talks about a girl reacting to Canadian health care who needs to wait until 2026 for an MRI. Hour 3 Segment 3 Tony is joined with Jon Gabriel, contributor of Discourse Magazine and author of Sink the Rising Sun, to talk about DOGE. Hour 3 Segment 4 Tony wraps up another edition of the show talking about Stacey Plaskett bashing President Trump and his administration on CNN. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, had significant connections to the United States Virgin Islands (USVI). Epstein owned a private estate called "Little Saint James" located on the island of Saint Thomas, which he frequently visited. This property gained notoriety as a site where Epstein allegedly engaged in illicit activities involving underage girls.Epstein's presence in the USVI drew attention from local authorities and residents due to rumors and reports of suspicious activities taking place on his private island.It was alleged that Epstein used the secluded location to operate a sex trafficking ring, exploiting underage girls for the pleasure of influential individuals, including politicians, businessmen, and celebrities.Investigations into Epstein's activities intensified in the USVI after he was arrested in July 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges in New York. Following his arrest, federal agents conducted a raid on Little Saint James, uncovering evidence that supported the allegations against him.In August 2019, Epstein was found dead in his jail cell under controversial circumstances, officially ruled as suicide. His death raised numerous questions and led to widespread speculation and conspiracy theories regarding the potential involvement of high-profile individuals in his criminal activities.After Epstein's death, legal proceedings continued, focusing on his vast estate, which included multiple properties, luxury vehicles, and extensive financial assets.The victims of Epstein's crimes pursued civil lawsuits against his estate seeking compensation and justice.The USVI government also took action to address the situation. In January 2020, the government created the Virgin Islands Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund to provide financial restitution to Epstein's victims within the territory. The fund was established to assist victims in their recovery and provide an alternative to lengthy court battles.Meanwhile, the politicians in the USVI were all stuffing their pockets full of Jeffrey Epstein's dirty money. In this episode, we take a deep dive into some of those relationships, including Stacey Plaskett.(commercial at 11:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:How Jeffrey Epstein's Island Politics Helped Elect Stacey Plaskett (businessinsider.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Tonight on The Last Word: House Republicans narrowly adopt Donald Trump's budget resolution with deep Medicaid cuts. And the Trump-Musk cuts to USAID threaten the world's most vulnerable people. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Del. Stacey Plaskett, and Erin Boyd join Lawrence O'Donnell.

Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile​.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions​. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement​.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)

Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile​.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions​. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement​.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)

Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile​.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions​. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement​.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett speaks on the significance of the U.S. Virgin Islands, the need for diversity, equity and inclusion in the democratic process; and the continued fight against marginalization. Watch the full interview here. Check out the complete "On the Record with Ebony McMorris" podcast here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In November 2023, six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse filed a class-action lawsuit against the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) government and several officials, including Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett. The plaintiffs allege that the USVI government and its representatives facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by granting him preferential treatment and overlooking his illicit activities. The lawsuit contends that Epstein's substantial political donations and personal connections enabled him to manipulate immigration procedures, allowing him to transport young women and girls into the territory without proper documentation. This purported complicity, the plaintiffs argue, was instrumental in perpetuating Epstein's criminal enterprise within the USVI.Congresswoman Plaskett, named as a defendant due to her alleged associations with Epstein, has vehemently denied any wrongdoing. She has filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit, labeling the claims as "legally and factually frivolous" and asserting that her inclusion is baseless and potentially malicious. Despite her denials, scrutiny has intensified over her past interactions with Epstein, including soliciting campaign contributions from him and extending fundraiser invitations. Critics argue that such associations, whether knowingly complicit or not, reflect a troubling lapse in judgment and raise questions about the ethical standards of public officials in the USVI.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In November 2023, six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse filed a class-action lawsuit against the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) government and several officials, including Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett. The plaintiffs allege that the USVI government and its representatives facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by granting him preferential treatment and overlooking his illicit activities. The lawsuit contends that Epstein's substantial political donations and personal connections enabled him to manipulate immigration procedures, allowing him to transport young women and girls into the territory without proper documentation. This purported complicity, the plaintiffs argue, was instrumental in perpetuating Epstein's criminal enterprise within the USVI.Congresswoman Plaskett, named as a defendant due to her alleged associations with Epstein, has vehemently denied any wrongdoing. She has filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit, labeling the claims as "legally and factually frivolous" and asserting that her inclusion is baseless and potentially malicious. Despite her denials, scrutiny has intensified over her past interactions with Epstein, including soliciting campaign contributions from him and extending fundraiser invitations. Critics argue that such associations, whether knowingly complicit or not, reflect a troubling lapse in judgment and raise questions about the ethical standards of public officials in the USVI.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, had significant connections to the United States Virgin Islands (USVI). Epstein owned a private estate called "Little Saint James" located on the island of Saint Thomas, which he frequently visited. This property gained notoriety as a site where Epstein allegedly engaged in illicit activities involving underage girls.Epstein's presence in the USVI drew attention from local authorities and residents due to rumors and reports of suspicious activities taking place on his private island.It was alleged that Epstein used the secluded location to operate a sex trafficking ring, exploiting underage girls for the pleasure of influential individuals, including politicians, businessmen, and celebrities.Investigations into Epstein's activities intensified in the USVI after he was arrested in July 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges in New York. Following his arrest, federal agents conducted a raid on Little Saint James, uncovering evidence that supported the allegations against him.In August 2019, Epstein was found dead in his jail cell under controversial circumstances, officially ruled as suicide. His death raised numerous questions and led to widespread speculation and conspiracy theories regarding the potential involvement of high-profile individuals in his criminal activities.After Epstein's death, legal proceedings continued, focusing on his vast estate, which included multiple properties, luxury vehicles, and extensive financial assets.The victims of Epstein's crimes pursued civil lawsuits against his estate seeking compensation and justice.The USVI government also took action to address the situation. In January 2020, the government created the Virgin Islands Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund to provide financial restitution to Epstein's victims within the territory. The fund was established to assist victims in their recovery and provide an alternative to lengthy court battles.Meanwhile, the politicians in the USVI were all stuffing their pockets full of Jeffrey Epstein's dirty money. In this episode, we take a deep dive into some of those relationships, including Stacey Plaskett.(commercial at 11:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:How Jeffrey Epstein's Island Politics Helped Elect Stacey Plaskett (businessinsider.com)

Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, had significant connections to the United States Virgin Islands (USVI). Epstein owned a private estate called "Little Saint James" located on the island of Saint Thomas, which he frequently visited. This property gained notoriety as a site where Epstein allegedly engaged in illicit activities involving underage girls.Epstein's presence in the USVI drew attention from local authorities and residents due to rumors and reports of suspicious activities taking place on his private island.It was alleged that Epstein used the secluded location to operate a sex trafficking ring, exploiting underage girls for the pleasure of influential individuals, including politicians, businessmen, and celebrities.Investigations into Epstein's activities intensified in the USVI after he was arrested in July 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges in New York. Following his arrest, federal agents conducted a raid on Little Saint James, uncovering evidence that supported the allegations against him.In August 2019, Epstein was found dead in his jail cell under controversial circumstances, officially ruled as suicide. His death raised numerous questions and led to widespread speculation and conspiracy theories regarding the potential involvement of high-profile individuals in his criminal activities.After Epstein's death, legal proceedings continued, focusing on his vast estate, which included multiple properties, luxury vehicles, and extensive financial assets.The victims of Epstein's crimes pursued civil lawsuits against his estate seeking compensation and justice.The USVI government also took action to address the situation. In January 2020, the government created the Virgin Islands Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund to provide financial restitution to Epstein's victims within the territory. The fund was established to assist victims in their recovery and provide an alternative to lengthy court battles.Meanwhile, the politicians in the USVI were all stuffing their pockets full of Jeffrey Epstein's dirty money. In this episode, we take a deep dive into some of those relationships, including Stacey Plaskett.(commercial at 11:45)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:How Jeffrey Epstein's Island Politics Helped Elect Stacey Plaskett (businessinsider.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender, had significant connections to the United States Virgin Islands (USVI). Epstein owned a private estate called "Little Saint James" located on the island of Saint Thomas, which he frequently visited. This property gained notoriety as a site where Epstein allegedly engaged in illicit activities involving underage girls.Epstein's presence in the USVI drew attention from local authorities and residents due to rumors and reports of suspicious activities taking place on his private island.It was alleged that Epstein used the secluded location to operate a sex trafficking ring, exploiting underage girls for the pleasure of influential individuals, including politicians, businessmen, and celebrities.Investigations into Epstein's activities intensified in the USVI after he was arrested in July 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges in New York. Following his arrest, federal agents conducted a raid on Little Saint James, uncovering evidence that supported the allegations against him.In August 2019, Epstein was found dead in his jail cell under controversial circumstances, officially ruled as suicide. His death raised numerous questions and led to widespread speculation and conspiracy theories regarding the potential involvement of high-profile individuals in his criminal activities.After Epstein's death, legal proceedings continued, focusing on his vast estate, which included multiple properties, luxury vehicles, and extensive financial assets.The victims of Epstein's crimes pursued civil lawsuits against his estate seeking compensation and justice.The USVI government also took action to address the situation. In January 2020, the government created the Virgin Islands Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund to provide financial restitution to Epstein's victims within the territory. The fund was established to assist victims in their recovery and provide an alternative to lengthy court battles.Meanwhile, the politicians in the USVI were all stuffing their pockets full of Jeffrey Epstein's dirty money. In this episode, we take a deep dive into some of those relationships, including Stacey Plaskett.(commercial at 15:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:How Jeffrey Epstein's Island Politics Helped Elect Stacey Plaskett (businessinsider.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile​.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions​. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)

Details emerge surrounding the latest assassination attempt on President Donald Trump following a Secret Service press conference yesterday, Hillary Clinton joined the mainstream media in downplaying the event, leftists are politicizing the passing of Georgia mother Amber Nicole Thurman due to abortion complications, they say the “Trump abortion ban” enabled her death, we've got the truth, National Review Editor in Chief Rich Lowry apparently said the N word with a hard R in what appears to have been a Freudian slip, which brings to mind a Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett classic, Barstool Sports Founder Dave Portnoy is pleading for Floridians to legalize marijuana, the King of Voter Registration Scott Presler joins the show, and much more!GUEST: Scott Presler | Josh Firestine$50 OFF 4-WEEK KIT / www.PrepWithCrowder.comSOURCES: https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/sources-september-17-2024Join MugClub to watch this show every day! http://louderwithcrowder.com/mugclubNEW MERCH! https://crowdershop.com/Subscribe to my podcast: https://rss.com/podcasts/louder-with-crowder/FOLLOW ME: Website: https://louderwithcrowder.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/scrowder Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/louderwithcrowder Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/stevencrowderofficialMusic by @Pogo