Podcasts about jongh

Jeffrey Epstein was able to secure political cover in the U.S. Virgin Islands through a combination of money, influence, and strategic alliances with elected officials. Court filings and investigative reports show that he funneled donations to politicians like Delegate Stacey Plaskett and leveraged his relationship with Cecile de Jongh, the former First Lady of the USVI, to shape local politics and policy in his favor. Epstein even enlisted de Jongh to help him track which politicians to support, while he quietly pushed for changes to sex-offender monitoring laws that would make it easier for him to move young women in and out of the territory. Despite his conviction, he continued to receive lucrative tax incentives and regulatory leniency, illustrating how deeply entrenched his influence was across the island's power structure.The cover extended beyond donations into active suppression of accountability. Former Attorney General Denise George secured a $105 million settlement from Epstein's estate and sued JPMorgan Chase for enabling his trafficking network, only to be abruptly fired shortly after filing the lawsuit. That firing, combined with legal dismissals in lawsuits alleging government complicity, reinforced suspicions that the USVI's political establishment protected Epstein for years. While Epstein used the islands as his base of operations, the government that should have policed him instead appeared to enable him, providing the façade of legitimacy that allowed his crimes to continue unchecked.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Met ‘Als was in haar handen' behaalde Hann van Schendel de finale van Het Rode Oor 2025. In één zin: erotiek op een douchebrancard Point of no return: ‘Zo, je benen zijn klaar. Wil je je bovenlijf ook?' Hoe het voelt: ‘Als een pop die mag dansen, maar niet de muziek mag uitkiezen' Het verhaal is ingesproken door Maxine Palit de Jongh.

Met 'Stralingshuid' behaalde Ben RJ Dictus Lambrechts de finale van Het Rode Oor 2025. De onderbuik: Mensen vertrouwen liever op angst dan op wetenschap De wetenschap: Straling kun je meten volgens wetenschappelijk protocol Het wetenschappelijke protocol: Het huidoppervlak strelen is ook meten Het verhaal is ingesproken door Maxine Palit de Jongh.

Met ‘Vespula vulgaris' behaalde Myrthe Prins de finale van Het Rode Oor 2025. Omschrijf jezelf in één zin: ‘Ik ben gulzig ja, maar ik heb systemen' Wat je nooit zou doen: ‘Een suikerhartje eten zonder eerst de tekst te lezen' Niet bang van: De steek van een wesp of een snoepbanaantje Het verhaal is ingesproken door Maxine Palit de Jongh.

Met ‘Wildgroei' behaalde Loes van Rooij de finale van Het Rode Oor 2025. Wat ze krijgt: Een kersentaart voor haar verjaardag Wat ze wil: Als de pit van een kers uit het vlees en vel gescheurd worden Wat ze doet: Kersenpitten slikken, blijven slikken Het verhaal is ingesproken door Maxine Palit de Jongh.

Met ‘Vloed' nam Dewi Broerse deel aan Het Rode Oor 2025. Het verhaal is ingesproken door Maxine Palit de Jongh.

Met ‘Aliens nam Iris Lam deel aan Het Rode Oor 2025. Het verhaal is ingesproken door Maxine Palit de Jongh.

Jeffrey Epstein was able to secure political cover in the U.S. Virgin Islands through a combination of money, influence, and strategic alliances with elected officials. Court filings and investigative reports show that he funneled donations to politicians like Delegate Stacey Plaskett and leveraged his relationship with Cecile de Jongh, the former First Lady of the USVI, to shape local politics and policy in his favor. Epstein even enlisted de Jongh to help him track which politicians to support, while he quietly pushed for changes to sex-offender monitoring laws that would make it easier for him to move young women in and out of the territory. Despite his conviction, he continued to receive lucrative tax incentives and regulatory leniency, illustrating how deeply entrenched his influence was across the island's power structure.The cover extended beyond donations into active suppression of accountability. Former Attorney General Denise George secured a $105 million settlement from Epstein's estate and sued JPMorgan Chase for enabling his trafficking network, only to be abruptly fired shortly after filing the lawsuit. That firing, combined with legal dismissals in lawsuits alleging government complicity, reinforced suspicions that the USVI's political establishment protected Epstein for years. While Epstein used the islands as his base of operations, the government that should have policed him instead appeared to enable him, providing the façade of legitimacy that allowed his crimes to continue unchecked.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jeffrey Epstein was able to secure political cover in the U.S. Virgin Islands through a combination of money, influence, and strategic alliances with elected officials. Court filings and investigative reports show that he funneled donations to politicians like Delegate Stacey Plaskett and leveraged his relationship with Cecile de Jongh, the former First Lady of the USVI, to shape local politics and policy in his favor. Epstein even enlisted de Jongh to help him track which politicians to support, while he quietly pushed for changes to sex-offender monitoring laws that would make it easier for him to move young women in and out of the territory. Despite his conviction, he continued to receive lucrative tax incentives and regulatory leniency, illustrating how deeply entrenched his influence was across the island's power structure.The cover extended beyond donations into active suppression of accountability. Former Attorney General Denise George secured a $105 million settlement from Epstein's estate and sued JPMorgan Chase for enabling his trafficking network, only to be abruptly fired shortly after filing the lawsuit. That firing, combined with legal dismissals in lawsuits alleging government complicity, reinforced suspicions that the USVI's political establishment protected Epstein for years. While Epstein used the islands as his base of operations, the government that should have policed him instead appeared to enable him, providing the façade of legitimacy that allowed his crimes to continue unchecked.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Opnieuw triest nieuws voor Igone de Jongh. In een nieuwe aflevering van Strikt Privé bespreken Evert Santegoeds en Jordi Versteegden de relatiebreuk van de actrice. Verder is het nog altijd niet bekend wie er nu naast Jan Smit gaat staan tijdens het Gouden Televizier Gala. Jordi en Evert hebben wel wat ideeën over wie er geschikt kunnen zijn voor deze taak. En wie schrijft de columns van Gordon? Hijzelf of ChatGPT?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

I'd love to hear from you 'text the show'Welcome

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.(commercial at 7:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.(commercial at 7:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.(commercial at 7:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.(commercial at 7:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein's activities.JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein's operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein's ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank's defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior​.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Pieter de Jongh refreshes Highlanders. Argentina in historic win over the All Blacks. CHAN semi-finals set.

In 2011, court filings from JPMorgan revealed that Jeffrey Epstein—already a registered sex offender—paid a $25,000 tuition bill at Skidmore College for one of Cecile de Jongh's children, upon her direct request via email subject‑lined “Please approve.” This was no act of charity; this was influence-peddling in plain sight. At the same time, de Jongh was coordinating policy to benefit Epstein, soliciting his input on softening a sex‑offender law to allow him freer movement within the territory. By drawing up legislation that Epstein could personally exploit while cashing in on his largesse, de Jongh blurred the line between public service and private profiteering.Moreover, the tuition payment fits into a broader pattern of de Jongh being Epstein's political and logistical conduit in the U.S. Virgin Islands. JPMorgan labeled her as his “primary conduit for spreading money and influence” within the territory, citing other ways she facilitated his trafficking network—from arranging visas to crafting cover‑class schemes.^1 The tuition bill is far less an isolated favor and far more an emblem of how Epstein weaponized connections with public officials to shield his abuse. De Jongh's actions weren't innocent oversights—they were integral to maintaining a corrupt system of protection and impunity.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein had close ties to U.S. Virgin Islands First Family | FortuneBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In 2011, court filings from JPMorgan revealed that Jeffrey Epstein—already a registered sex offender—paid a $25,000 tuition bill at Skidmore College for one of Cecile de Jongh's children, upon her direct request via email subject‑lined “Please approve.” This was no act of charity; this was influence-peddling in plain sight. At the same time, de Jongh was coordinating policy to benefit Epstein, soliciting his input on softening a sex‑offender law to allow him freer movement within the territory. By drawing up legislation that Epstein could personally exploit while cashing in on his largesse, de Jongh blurred the line between public service and private profiteering.Moreover, the tuition payment fits into a broader pattern of de Jongh being Epstein's political and logistical conduit in the U.S. Virgin Islands. JPMorgan labeled her as his “primary conduit for spreading money and influence” within the territory, citing other ways she facilitated his trafficking network—from arranging visas to crafting cover‑class schemes.^1 The tuition bill is far less an isolated favor and far more an emblem of how Epstein weaponized connections with public officials to shield his abuse. De Jongh's actions weren't innocent oversights—they were integral to maintaining a corrupt system of protection and impunity.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein had close ties to U.S. Virgin Islands First Family | FortuneBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Een groot succes of doelloos spektakel? Deskundigen blijven sceptisch na de Oekraïnetop van afgelopen maandag. Europese leiders spraken in het Witte Huis met de Amerikaanse president Donald Trump en de Oekraïense president Volodymyr Zelensky over een mogelijk bestand. Brussel-correspondent Daan Ballegeer vertelt hoe verschillend de top wordt bekeken. Lees: De Oekraïnetop heeft nog weinig concreets opgeleverd Gisteren troffen Extintion Rebellion en Schiphol elkaar in de rechtbank. Tot 12 keer toe demonstreerden leden van XR op de luchthaven waaronder ook achter de beveiliging. Met name de frequent flying lounge van KLM was doelwit. Voor Schiphol was de maat vol en dus werd sommige demonstranten de toegang ontzegt. Maar mag dat wel? Dat is de vraag waar de rechter zich over moet buigen, redacteur David van de Velde volgt de zaak. Lees: XR-demonstranten vechten toegangsverbod Schiphol aan bij de rechter: ‘Uit de bocht gevlogen’ Enkele Nederlandse reders overwegen om onder buitenlandse vlag te gaan varen vanwege een uitspraak van het College voor de Rechten van de Mens. Dit stelt redersvereniging KVNR nadat het College eerder deze week oordeelde dat twee reders zich schuldig hebben gemaakt aan discriminatie door Aziatische zeevarenden een veel lager loon toe te kennen dan hun Europese collega’s. Mobiliteitsredacteur Hans de Jongh vertelt hoe dat zit. Lees: Lagere beloning voor Aziatische matrozen is discriminerend Redactie: Sophia Wouda & Floyd Bonder Presentatie: Floyd Bonder See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dr Catherine Hynes brings Neuroscience and Neuropsychology underpinnings to her Clinical work with trauma and dissociation. Lisa and Catherine discuss the impact of trauma on memory, the controversies around repressed memories, recovered memories and false memories, and explore best practice guidelines for therapists working in this space. www.catherinehynes.net/training/ to learn more about Catherine's training and workshops. Recommended reading and research in this topic: Callus, E., Gallina, E., & Fernandez, I. (2024).EMDR: dispelling the false memory creation myth in response to Otgaar et al. (2022a). Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1366137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1366137 Dalenberg, C. J., Brand, B. L., Gleaves, D. H., Dorahy, M. J., Loewenstein, R. J., Cardeña, E., Spiegel, D. (2012). Evaluation of the evidence for the trauma and fantasy models of dissociation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(3), 550-588. Freyd, Jennifer (1996). Betrayal Trauma: The Logic of Forgetting Childhood Abuse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Geraerts, E., Schooler, J. W., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., Hauer, B. J. A.,& Ambadar, Z. (2007). The reality of recovered memories: Corroborating continuous and discontinuous memories of childhood sexual abuse. Psychological Science, 18, 564 –568. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01940.x Goodman-Delahunty, J., Nolan, M. & van Gijn Grosvenor, E. Empirical guidance on the effects of child sexual abuse on memory and complainants' evidence, Report for the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, 2017. Houben, S. T. L., Otgaar, H., Roelofs, J., & Merckelbach, H. (2018). Lateral eye movements increase false memory rates. Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 610–616. doi:10.1177/2167702618757658. Lee, C., de Jongh, A., & Hase, M. (2019). Lateral eye movements,EMDR, and memory changes: A critical commentary on Houben et al. (2018) [Letter]. Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 403–404. doi:10.1177/216770261983039 Loftus, E. (1993) The Reality of Repressed Memories. American Psychologist. 48(5):518-37 Pezdek, K., Finger, K., & Hodge, D. (1997). Planting false childhood memories: The role of event plausibility. Psychological Science, 8(6), 437–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00457. Ross CA, Ridgway J, Neighbors Q, Myron T. Reversal of Amnesia for Trauma in a Sample of Psychiatric Inpatients with Dissociative Identity Disorder and Dissociative Disorder Not Otherwise Specified. J Child Sex Abus. 2022 Jul;31(5):550-561. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2022.2067096. Epub 2022 Apr 19. PMID: 35437119.a van der Hart, O. & Nijenhuis, E.R.S. (1995) Amnesia for traumatic experiences. Hypnosis 1995; 22:73-86 van der Hart, O. & Nijenhuis, E.R.S. (1999) Bearing Witness to Uncorroborated Trauma: The clinician's development of reflective belief. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice. Vol 30, Number 1, pp 37-44.

Shamefully, newly uncovered emails show that Cecile de Jongh—former First Lady of the US Virgin Islands—invited convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to weigh in on updates to the territory's sex offender registration laws. “This is the suggested language; will it work for you?” she reportedly wrote to Epstein in 2011, effectively soliciting his input on legislation meant to keep predators in check. Epstein responded with self-serving suggestions—like adding lenient residency exemptions—to protect his own freedom of movement. It's not just a grotesque incompetence—it reads like willful subversion from someone supposed to protect the public.Even more vile: de Jongh didn't merely dialogue with Epstein over legislature; she allegedly helped arrange visas and tailored ESL classes for young women linked to him, enabling his trafficking network. These revelations aren't isolated lapses—they reveal a deeply compromised system where powerful officials invited a predator into the law‑making process, trading public safety for personal access. The corruption isn't metaphorical—it's documented.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein consulted on Virgin Islands sex offender law (lawandcrime.com)

Shamefully, newly uncovered emails show that Cecile de Jongh—former First Lady of the US Virgin Islands—invited convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to weigh in on updates to the territory's sex offender registration laws. “This is the suggested language; will it work for you?” she reportedly wrote to Epstein in 2011, effectively soliciting his input on legislation meant to keep predators in check. Epstein responded with self-serving suggestions—like adding lenient residency exemptions—to protect his own freedom of movement. It's not just a grotesque incompetence—it reads like willful subversion from someone supposed to protect the public.Even more vile: de Jongh didn't merely dialogue with Epstein over legislature; she allegedly helped arrange visas and tailored ESL classes for young women linked to him, enabling his trafficking network. These revelations aren't isolated lapses—they reveal a deeply compromised system where powerful officials invited a predator into the law‑making process, trading public safety for personal access. The corruption isn't metaphorical—it's documented.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Jeffrey Epstein consulted on Virgin Islands sex offender law (lawandcrime.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jumbo kan niet volhouden dat de veroordeling van voormalig topman Frits van Eerd een privézaak is na het vonnis van de rechtbank. Daarin schrijven rechters dat voormalig Jumbo-baas Van Eerd zich ten koste van het bedrijf heeft verrijkt door valse sponsorcontacten op te stellen. Jumbo heeft dus schade geleden, maar gaan ze die schade ook verhalen? We vroegen het aan redacteur Jan Braaksma. Lees: Jumbo kan na vonnis niet volhouden dat Van Eerd een privézaak is De politieke bemoeienissen van Elon Musk hebben Tesla geen goed gedaan. Het bedrijf moet vrezen voor tegenwerking door Donald Trump, terwijl het al kampt met een kopersstaking in Europa. Toch wil de onderneming Musk binnenboord houden. De ceo van de elektrische autofabrikant krijgt zelfs weer een enorm beloningspakket van $30 mrd. Gaat dat zich uitbetalen voor Tesla? We bespreken het met vervoersredacteur Hans de Jongh. Lees: Gaat Tesla's miljardenbonus voor Musk zich uitbetalen? Vamos a la playa, Sex on the Beach, The Ketchup song en ga zo maar door. Allemaal liedjes die warme herinneringen oproepen aan de zon, de zee en het strand. Maar deze zomer is er nog niet echt een nummer die boven de massa uitpringt. Redacteur Lisa van der Velde zocht uit waarom er dé zomerhit van 2025 op zich laat wachten. Zij vertelt in de podcast over het geheime recept van een hitsong en over het verdienmodel achter de nostalgische zomerhitjes. Lees: Waar blijft dé zomerhit van 2025? Redactie: Floyd Bonder en Anna de Haas Presentatie: Anna de Haas See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Kea Nonyana from Scope Prime breaks down the surprise in US Q2 GDP growth and unpacks what the Sarb MPC might do next in response to shifting global and local conditions. John Reade from the World Gold Council explains how central banks are cooling on the US dollar, while gold demand remains strong despite ongoing supply constraints. Brendan de Jongh from PortfolioMetrix emphasises the importance of filtering through the flood of financial news.

PMX's Brendan de Jongh points out that not knowing noise from signal can result in long-term damage to investment portfolios.

Highlanders turn to Pieter de Jongh.

Cecile de Jongh, the former First Lady of the U.S. Virgin Islands and wife of ex-governor John de Jongh Jr., has faced serious allegations regarding her long-standing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. According to court filings, she served as Epstein's office manager for nearly two decades and acted as his primary intermediary with local government officials and regulators. She allegedly helped secure favorable treatment for Epstein, including influencing legislation related to sex offender monitoring in ways that appeared tailored to benefit him. Internal emails reveal she worked directly with Epstein on proposed changes to Virgin Islands sex offender laws and personally asked for waivers on his behalf to avoid compliance requirements.Additionally, de Jongh is accused of facilitating educational opportunities for young women linked to Epstein, helping them obtain student visas and university placements in the territory. She also reportedly accepted financial benefits from Epstein, including tuition payments for her children and coverage of other personal expenses. These allegations form part of a broader picture painted by lawsuits and investigations suggesting that Epstein maintained a powerful and protected presence in the Virgin Islands, not just through financial institutions like JPMorgan, but through embedded local relationships with figures like de Jongh who allegedly helped shield him from scrutiny and legal accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cecile de Jongh Files Motion to Dismiss N.Y. Suit Alleging Collusion with Epstein | St. Thomas Source (stthomassource.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Cecile de Jongh, the former First Lady of the U.S. Virgin Islands and wife of ex-governor John de Jongh Jr., has faced serious allegations regarding her long-standing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. According to court filings, she served as Epstein's office manager for nearly two decades and acted as his primary intermediary with local government officials and regulators. She allegedly helped secure favorable treatment for Epstein, including influencing legislation related to sex offender monitoring in ways that appeared tailored to benefit him. Internal emails reveal she worked directly with Epstein on proposed changes to Virgin Islands sex offender laws and personally asked for waivers on his behalf to avoid compliance requirements.Additionally, de Jongh is accused of facilitating educational opportunities for young women linked to Epstein, helping them obtain student visas and university placements in the territory. She also reportedly accepted financial benefits from Epstein, including tuition payments for her children and coverage of other personal expenses. These allegations form part of a broader picture painted by lawsuits and investigations suggesting that Epstein maintained a powerful and protected presence in the Virgin Islands, not just through financial institutions like JPMorgan, but through embedded local relationships with figures like de Jongh who allegedly helped shield him from scrutiny and legal accountability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cecile de Jongh Files Motion to Dismiss N.Y. Suit Alleging Collusion with Epstein | St. Thomas Source (stthomassource.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Dinsdag sloten de VS een handelsdeal met Japan. In plaats van de eerder aangekondigde importheffing van 25%, wordt straks slechts een heffing van 15% betaalt voor Japanse import. Een opluchting voor de Japanse autobouwers, die hun aandelenkoerzen meteen zagen stegen. Maar ook voor Europese fabrikanten biedt de handelsdeal hoop, vertelt mobiliteitsredacteur Hans de Jongh. Lees: Trump sluit handelsdeal met Japan, goed nieuws voor automakers en Europese autoaandelen schieten omhoog na Japans-Amerikaans handelsakkoord Woensdag kwam Randstad met de kwartaalcijfers, die er niet heel rooskleurig uitzagen. Het bedrijf zag de nettowinst op jaarbasis dalen van 78 naar 47 mln euro. Een teken dat onze welvaart onder druk staat, stelt de ceo van Randstad Nederland. Hij spreekt van een dubbele klem voor bedrijven in Nederland: enerzijds de arbeidskrapte en anderzijds de onzekerheid over de toekomst en het gebrek aan een langetermijnvisie. Toch zijn er ook positieve ontwikkelingen, vertelt arbeidsmarktredacteur Elfanie Toe Laer. Lees: Lagere resultaten Randstad illustreren wereldwijde onzekerheid Het Internationaal Gerechtshof in Den Haag (ICJ) deed woensdag uitspraak in een van de grootste klimaatrechtszaken ooit, die werd aangespannen door eilandstaat Vanuatu. Het hof oordeelt dat vervuilende landen aansprakelijk zijn voor de klimaatschade. Daarmee geven de rechters – tot grote vregude van de aanjagers van de zaak - het signaal af dat gebrek aan actie tegen klimaatverandering schending van het internationaal recht is. Hoewel de uitspraak 'slechts' een adviserende opinie is, kan het oordeel van het hof grote invloed hebben op toekomstig klimaatbeleid, vertelt onze klimaatredacteur Eva Selderbeek. Lees: Het Internationaal Gerechtshof stelt landen verantwoordelijk voor voorkomen klimaatschade Redactie: Floyd Bonder en Anna de Haas Presentatie: Anna de Haas See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Leaders in Finance AML Event (

Het panel heeft deze week gekeken naar de nieuwe SBS 6-show Het waren 2 fantastische dagen. Hoewel de emoties wel echt waren, werd een presentator flink gemist. Al waren er wel belletjes, pakketjes en een tv-scherm die het programma flink beïnvloedden. Angela de Jong: „Ik snap werkelijk niet waarom Igone de Jongh met Wesley Sneijder en Jaimie Vaes in één huis ging zitten.” Het hart van presentator Manuel Venderbos maakte een sprongetje toen er een nieuwe Lucky TV te zien was bij Beste Kijkers. Het panel was minder enthousiast en noemde het filmpje zelfs gemakzuchtig. RTL hoort sinds deze week bij DPG Media. Er wordt besproken of dit opvallend is en of dit wel goed nieuws is. Tussendoor zijn er twee minder leuke berichten. Loretta Schrijver en Dieuwertje Blok laten een plek achter bij respectievelijk The Masked Singer en Het Sinterklaasjournaal. Loretta wordt niet vervangen en Merel Westrik zal opnieuw in december de intocht van de Sint begeleiden. In het radiohoekje een pluim voor Radio 2 dat Concert at Sea uitzond. En waarom is er eigenlijk geen liveregistratie op televisie, terwijl dit wel bij Pinkpop gebeurt? Amber Kortzorg en een grote groep BNNVara-collega’s zijn boos, omdat er weer een witte man de late talkshow gaat presenteren. Dat ze zichzelf naar voren schoof, is volgens het panel geen goed idee. Bij de omroep lopen simpelweg geen geschikte vrouwelijke kandidaten rond. Daarnaast wordt de cliffhangerweek van Goede tijden, slechte tijden zeer kritisch besproken. En in Angela’s etalage staat zuster Trui uit Dag en nacht. Luisteren dus! Naar de wekelijkse AD Media Podcast, waarin tv-columniste Angela de Jong en verslaggever Gudo Tienhooven alle hoofd-, rand-, en bijzaken bespreken op het gebied van media. De presentatie is in handen van Manuel Venderbos. Luister je liever via Spotify of Apple, of een andere podcastapp? Dat kan! Vind al onze podcasts op ad.nl/podcasts.Support the show: https://krant.nl/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this week's BizNews Rugby Show, former Springboks Juan de Jongh and Rudy Paige join insider Rory Steyn and co-host Patrick Kidd for a lively, wide-ranging conversation on the upcoming URC quarterfinals and their remarkable rugby journeys - from small-town beginnings to the world stage. They unpack the strengths and struggles of the Bulls, Stormers, Sharks and Leinster, offering sharp predictions and inside perspective on players, matchups, and playoff pressure. The duo also pay heartfelt tribute to the late Cornal Hendricks, a teammate and friend remembered with deep affection.

Adriaan en Simon spreken over: de derde symfonie van Mahler / Bronchitis en IJslands mos / een bijzondere ontmoeting in Kerkrade / nicht Babs / Heer van de vliegen als graphic novel / het mistige, andere Venetië / Tuingedichten / Jan van Nijlen reist met een valies vol droomen / levensreddend gedicht van Judith Herzberg (reprise) / Team Van Dis Ongefilterd feliciteert Leo XIV / invloeden op het Nederlands van nu / onheilszwangere voorspellende boeken / (geen) voetbal in de podcast / Adriaans voorleesstem Het laatste theatercollege van Adriaan & Simon is op 22 mei in theater Musis te Arnhem, koop uw kaartje via https://www.musisenstadstheater.nl/nl/agenda/adriaan-van-dis/9073 Na afloop een meet & greet met Adriaan, Simon en special guests producer Bart Jeroen en uitgever Tilly. Schrijvers van dienst: William Golding / Aimée de Jongh / Christophe Dabitch / Piero Macola / Cor de Niet (aka Maarten ’t Hart) / H. Koning (aka Hans Ree) / Jan Balkon met een grafdicht / Jan van Nijlen / Judith Herzberg Heer van de vliegen, de graphic novel-bewerking door Aimée de Jongh: https://libris.nl/a/aimee-de-jongh--william-golding/lord-of-the-flies/501589469#gebonden-9789493166899 De Nederlandse vertaling is in de Olympusreeks verschenen: https://www.boekenwereld.com/william-golding-lord-of-the-flies-9789020417654 Of als audioboek: https://open.spotify.com/show/1EZmpnZXQTls7yALAJ2EwY De aflevering van BoekenFM over Heer der vliegen: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4VX9DodV6dAnml6PmWRZHZ?si=J48HBAlrQ36owYs0X2pRLQ Lagune van de veerman van Christophe Dabitch en Piero Macola: https://boekenwereld.com/christophe-dabitch-de-veerman-van-de-lagune-9789493383081 Denkend aan Hollands van Khalid Mourigh is hier te bestellen: https://boekenwereld.com/khalid-mourigh-denkend-aan-hollands-9789464521962 Ook de audioboekversie van Karakter, voorgelezen door Adriaan, is (op CD!) tweedehands te vinden. De gedichten van deze aflevering: Bericht aan de reizigers van Jan van Nijlen en Toegift van Judith Herzberg Je kunt de boeken van Adriaan natuurlijk in de boekwinkel bestellen, maar veel van zijn boeken zijn ook als audioboek te beluisteren, ingesproken door Adriaan zelf. Neem nou bijvoorbeeld Klifi bij Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/340TLXeFU5057AhKWBXmYS Volg het Instagram-account van de podcast: @vandis.ongefilterd Wil je een vraag stellen of reageren? Mail het aan: vandis@atlascontact.nl Van Dis Ongefilterd wordt gemaakt door Adriaan van Dis, Simon Dikker Hupkes en Bart Jeroen Kiers. Montage door Sten Govers (Thinium Audioboekproducties). Bedankt voor uw recensie. © 2025 Atlas Contact | Adriaan van DisSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Steven de Jongh is een naam die niet mocht ontbreken in onze ploegleider serie. Want naast het feit dat hij een renner in zijn stal heeft die een sollicitatie doet naar het whatsapprgoepje en het gegeven dat Lidl-Trek over misschien wel de leukste selectie van het peloton beschikt, is het ook gewoon een heel leuke vent met mooie verhalen uit het peloton. De ambities van zijn ploeg liegen er niet om. Eerste van de wereld worden en de Tour winnen. Dat dit niet over een nacht ijs gaat weten ze bij zowel de ploeg, als de sponsor. Er is dus een meerjarenplan en dat is precies waar wij bij De Rode Lantaarn alles over willen weten

​In a recent ruling, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed most claims in a lawsuit filed by six anonymous women against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several officials, alleging complicity in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The court determined it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants such as former Governors John de Jongh and Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and former Senators Celestino White and Carlton Dowe, leading to the dismissal of claims against them. Additionally, claims against former First Lady Cecile de Jongh were barred due to a prior settlement agreementHowever, the court allowed claims against Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett to proceed, citing sufficient ties to New York through alleged activities such as visiting Epstein's New York residence and soliciting campaign donations there. The court found plausible allegations under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and negligence claims, asserting that Plaskett's alleged receipt of financial and political support from Epstein in exchange for favorable political actions warranted further proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge Dismisses Jane Does' Epstein Complaint Against All But Plaskett | St. Thomas Source

​In a recent ruling, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed most claims in a lawsuit filed by six anonymous women against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several officials, alleging complicity in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The court determined it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants such as former Governors John de Jongh and Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and former Senators Celestino White and Carlton Dowe, leading to the dismissal of claims against them. Additionally, claims against former First Lady Cecile de Jongh were barred due to a prior settlement agreementHowever, the court allowed claims against Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett to proceed, citing sufficient ties to New York through alleged activities such as visiting Epstein's New York residence and soliciting campaign donations there. The court found plausible allegations under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and negligence claims, asserting that Plaskett's alleged receipt of financial and political support from Epstein in exchange for favorable political actions warranted further proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge Dismisses Jane Does' Epstein Complaint Against All But Plaskett | St. Thomas SourceBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In a recent ruling, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed most claims in a lawsuit filed by six anonymous women against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several officials, alleging complicity in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The court determined it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants such as former Governors John de Jongh and Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and former Senators Celestino White and Carlton Dowe, leading to the dismissal of claims against them. Additionally, claims against former First Lady Cecile de Jongh were barred due to a prior settlement agreementHowever, the court allowed claims against Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett to proceed, citing sufficient ties to New York through alleged activities such as visiting Epstein's New York residence and soliciting campaign donations there. The court found plausible allegations under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and negligence claims, asserting that Plaskett's alleged receipt of financial and political support from Epstein in exchange for favorable political actions warranted further proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge Dismisses Jane Does' Epstein Complaint Against All But Plaskett | St. Thomas SourceBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) played a central role in enabling Jeffrey Epstein's vast criminal enterprise, serving as both his primary base of operations and a jurisdiction that allowed his abuse to continue unchecked for decades. Epstein's private island, Little Saint James, was the epicenter of his sex trafficking network, yet despite widespread knowledge of his illicit activities, local authorities turned a blind eye or, worse, actively facilitated his operations. The government granted Epstein extensive tax incentives and special treatment, allowing him to operate with impunity while funneling millions through shell companies registered in the territory. Even after his 2008 conviction in Florida, Epstein remained deeply entrenched in the USVI's financial and political circles, securing sweetheart business deals and leveraging his wealth to maintain influence. The failure to regulate or investigate Epstein's activities—despite glaring red flags—raises serious questions about corruption, complicity, and the true extent of the USVI's role in protecting him.Recent legal battles have further exposed how deeply the USVI government was entangled with Epstein, with officials benefiting financially from his presence while ignoring repeated warnings about his trafficking network. The territory's former first lady, Cecile de Jongh, was revealed to have worked directly for Epstein, helping him navigate regulatory loopholes and maintain access to power. Meanwhile, banks and financial institutions in the USVI facilitated the movement of Epstein's funds, ensuring his trafficking operation remained well-funded and operational. Lawsuits against JPMorgan Chase have uncovered damning evidence suggesting that USVI officials were well aware of Epstein's activities yet chose to look the other way, likely in exchange for financial incentives. The territory's recent legal posturing against Epstein's estate appears to be little more than an attempt to rewrite history, portraying themselves as victims rather than enablers. In reality, the USVI's complicity in Epstein's crimes is undeniable, raising broader concerns about the corruption and systemic failures that allowed one of the world's most notorious predators to operate so freely.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) played a central role in enabling Jeffrey Epstein's vast criminal enterprise, serving as both his primary base of operations and a jurisdiction that allowed his abuse to continue unchecked for decades. Epstein's private island, Little Saint James, was the epicenter of his sex trafficking network, yet despite widespread knowledge of his illicit activities, local authorities turned a blind eye or, worse, actively facilitated his operations. The government granted Epstein extensive tax incentives and special treatment, allowing him to operate with impunity while funneling millions through shell companies registered in the territory. Even after his 2008 conviction in Florida, Epstein remained deeply entrenched in the USVI's financial and political circles, securing sweetheart business deals and leveraging his wealth to maintain influence. The failure to regulate or investigate Epstein's activities—despite glaring red flags—raises serious questions about corruption, complicity, and the true extent of the USVI's role in protecting him.Recent legal battles have further exposed how deeply the USVI government was entangled with Epstein, with officials benefiting financially from his presence while ignoring repeated warnings about his trafficking network. The territory's former first lady, Cecile de Jongh, was revealed to have worked directly for Epstein, helping him navigate regulatory loopholes and maintain access to power. Meanwhile, banks and financial institutions in the USVI facilitated the movement of Epstein's funds, ensuring his trafficking operation remained well-funded and operational. Lawsuits against JPMorgan Chase have uncovered damning evidence suggesting that USVI officials were well aware of Epstein's activities yet chose to look the other way, likely in exchange for financial incentives. The territory's recent legal posturing against Epstein's estate appears to be little more than an attempt to rewrite history, portraying themselves as victims rather than enablers. In reality, the USVI's complicity in Epstein's crimes is undeniable, raising broader concerns about the corruption and systemic failures that allowed one of the world's most notorious predators to operate so freely.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Daniel Friebe, Lionel Birnie and Rob Hatch return to recap all the latest stories and racing as the stars of the international peloton commence their 2025 campaigns. In Oman, there's a battle royale between two Frenchmen and an Englishman – and, ultimately, the same final result as in another recent sporting contest. We also discuss an excellent week for Colombian riders, with Egan Bernal and Santiago Buitrago both flying high. Finally, in the last part of the episode, we sink our teeth into the most controversial issue of the week - the exodus of top teams from the Étoile des Bessèges amid fears for riders' safety but also for the future of small races in the sport's heartlands. To bring a little perspective on that issue, we hear from Lidl-Trek's directeur sportif in Bessèges, Steven de Jongh.  EPISODE SPONSORS NordVPN Get NordVPN two-year plan + four months extra ➼ https://nordvpn.com/tcp It's risk-free with Nord's 30-day money-back guarantee. Follow us on social media: Twitter @cycling_podcast Instagram @thecyclingpodcast Friends of the Podcast Sign up as a Friend of the Podcast at thecyclingpodcast.com to listen to new special episodes every month plus a back catalogue of more than 300 exclusive episodes. The Cannibal & Badger Friends of the Podcast can join the discussion at our new virtual pub, The Cannibal & Badger. A friendly forum to talk about cycling and the podcast. Log in to your Friends of the Podcast account to join in. The 11.01 Cappuccino Our regular email newsletter is now on Substack. Subscribe here for frothy, full-fat updates to enjoy any time (as long as it's after 11am). The Cycling Podcast is on Strava The Cycling Podcast was founded in 2013 by Richard Moore, Daniel Friebe and Lionel Birnie.

The memorandum of law in reply to Plaintiffs' opposition [ECF #148] supports Governor John de Jongh's motion to dismiss, arguing that Plaintiffs fail to present legally sufficient claims against him. The reply reiterates that the allegations lack factual and legal merit, asserting that the claims do not meet the required legal standards to proceed. It emphasizes that the Plaintiffs' opposition does not adequately refute the defense's arguments, particularly regarding sovereign immunity, statute of limitations, and failure to state a claim.Furthermore, the memorandum argues that Plaintiffs attempt to rely on conclusory statements rather than substantive evidence, making their claims insufficient for judicial consideration. It contends that even if the allegations were assumed to be true, they do not establish a valid legal basis for holding Governor de Jongh liable. The reply concludes by reinforcing that the motion to dismiss should be granted in its entirety, as the case against de Jongh lacks both jurisdictional and substantive grounds to move forward.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.159.0.pdf

The memorandum of law in reply to Plaintiffs' opposition [ECF #148] supports Governor John de Jongh's motion to dismiss, arguing that Plaintiffs fail to present legally sufficient claims against him. The reply reiterates that the allegations lack factual and legal merit, asserting that the claims do not meet the required legal standards to proceed. It emphasizes that the Plaintiffs' opposition does not adequately refute the defense's arguments, particularly regarding sovereign immunity, statute of limitations, and failure to state a claim.Furthermore, the memorandum argues that Plaintiffs attempt to rely on conclusory statements rather than substantive evidence, making their claims insufficient for judicial consideration. It contends that even if the allegations were assumed to be true, they do not establish a valid legal basis for holding Governor de Jongh liable. The reply concludes by reinforcing that the motion to dismiss should be granted in its entirety, as the case against de Jongh lacks both jurisdictional and substantive grounds to move forward.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.159.0.pdf

The memorandum of law in reply to Plaintiffs' opposition [ECF #148] supports Governor John de Jongh's motion to dismiss, arguing that Plaintiffs fail to present legally sufficient claims against him. The reply reiterates that the allegations lack factual and legal merit, asserting that the claims do not meet the required legal standards to proceed. It emphasizes that the Plaintiffs' opposition does not adequately refute the defense's arguments, particularly regarding sovereign immunity, statute of limitations, and failure to state a claim.Furthermore, the memorandum argues that Plaintiffs attempt to rely on conclusory statements rather than substantive evidence, making their claims insufficient for judicial consideration. It contends that even if the allegations were assumed to be true, they do not establish a valid legal basis for holding Governor de Jongh liable. The reply concludes by reinforcing that the motion to dismiss should be granted in its entirety, as the case against de Jongh lacks both jurisdictional and substantive grounds to move forward.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.159.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The memorandum of law in reply to Plaintiffs' opposition [ECF #148] supports Governor John de Jongh's motion to dismiss, arguing that Plaintiffs fail to present legally sufficient claims against him. The reply reiterates that the allegations lack factual and legal merit, asserting that the claims do not meet the required legal standards to proceed. It emphasizes that the Plaintiffs' opposition does not adequately refute the defense's arguments, particularly regarding sovereign immunity, statute of limitations, and failure to state a claim.Furthermore, the memorandum argues that Plaintiffs attempt to rely on conclusory statements rather than substantive evidence, making their claims insufficient for judicial consideration. It contends that even if the allegations were assumed to be true, they do not establish a valid legal basis for holding Governor de Jongh liable. The reply concludes by reinforcing that the motion to dismiss should be granted in its entirety, as the case against de Jongh lacks both jurisdictional and substantive grounds to move forward.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.159.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Jane Doe et al. v. Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands et al., 23-cv-10301, Cecile de Jongh's legal counsel has requested an informal conference to discuss staying depositions. This request is made pursuant to Local Rule 37.2 and Rule 5 of the Court's Individual Practices. The proposed stay would delay depositions until 30 days after the Court rules on the pending motions to dismiss. The argument emphasizes the importance of resolving these motions first to prevent unnecessary or premature discovery efforts.Ms. de Jongh's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 122) raises issues that mirror a previous case, Bensky v. Indyke, in which the Court granted a motion to dismiss. In that case, the Court ruled that certain claims lacked sufficient legal basis, and the defense argues this precedent strongly supports their position in the current matter. Given the similarity of legal questions and the Court's prior ruling, the request highlights the prudence of staying depositions to ensure judicial efficiency and avoid unnecessary burdens on the parties involved.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In Jane Doe et al. v. Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands et al., 23-cv-10301, Cecile de Jongh's legal counsel has requested an informal conference to discuss staying depositions. This request is made pursuant to Local Rule 37.2 and Rule 5 of the Court's Individual Practices. The proposed stay would delay depositions until 30 days after the Court rules on the pending motions to dismiss. The argument emphasizes the importance of resolving these motions first to prevent unnecessary or premature discovery efforts.Ms. de Jongh's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 122) raises issues that mirror a previous case, Bensky v. Indyke, in which the Court granted a motion to dismiss. In that case, the Court ruled that certain claims lacked sufficient legal basis, and the defense argues this precedent strongly supports their position in the current matter. Given the similarity of legal questions and the Court's prior ruling, the request highlights the prudence of staying depositions to ensure judicial efficiency and avoid unnecessary burdens on the parties involved.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Cecile De Jongh has filed a motion in the court of the USVI attempting to get the lawsuit that has been brought against her by multiple survivors as part of the USVI lawsuit tossed out.   Her defense?  Well, the same old story, and it all begins and ends with secretive deals and payouts structured specifically keep things quiet.    In this episode, we take a look at what Cecile De Jongh had to say in her newest filing and where the survivors might go from here when it comes to a response.   (commercial 9:04)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cecile de Jongh Files Motion to Dismiss N.Y. Suit Alleging Collusion with Epstein | St. Thomas Source (stthomassource.com)

Cecile De Jongh has filed a motion in the court of the USVI attempting to get the lawsuit that has been brought against her by multiple survivors as part of the USVI lawsuit tossed out.   Her defense?  Well, the same old story, and it all begins and ends with secretive deals and payouts structured specifically keep things quiet.    In this episode, we take a look at what Cecile De Jongh had to say in her newest filing and where the survivors might go from here when it comes to a response.   (commercial 9:04)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cecile de Jongh Files Motion to Dismiss N.Y. Suit Alleging Collusion with Epstein | St. Thomas Source (stthomassource.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.