POPULARITY
20 episodes with Plaskett
22 episodes with Plaskett
17 episodes with Plaskett
12 episodes with Plaskett
3 episodes with Plaskett
2 episodes with Plaskett
3 episodes with Plaskett
2 episodes with Plaskett
2 episodes with Plaskett
Nova Scotia musician Joel Plaskett got a special surprise for his 50th birthday, a cover album of his own songs — secretly recorded by his friends and some of the biggest names in Canadian music, including Sloan and Arkells. Plaskett talks to Matt Galloway in Halifax about the album, Songs from the Gang, and why it was so fascinating to hear what other people hear in his music.
In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf
In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf
In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdf
In a recent ruling, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed most claims in a lawsuit filed by six anonymous women against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several officials, alleging complicity in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The court determined it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants such as former Governors John de Jongh and Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and former Senators Celestino White and Carlton Dowe, leading to the dismissal of claims against them. Additionally, claims against former First Lady Cecile de Jongh were barred due to a prior settlement agreementHowever, the court allowed claims against Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett to proceed, citing sufficient ties to New York through alleged activities such as visiting Epstein's New York residence and soliciting campaign donations there. The court found plausible allegations under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and negligence claims, asserting that Plaskett's alleged receipt of financial and political support from Epstein in exchange for favorable political actions warranted further proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge Dismisses Jane Does' Epstein Complaint Against All But Plaskett | St. Thomas Source
In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Government of the United States Virgin Islands et al., the plaintiffs—six anonymous women—allege that they were coerced into commercial sex acts by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. They claim that the defendants, including the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several USVI political figures, facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by providing various forms of assistance and, in return, received financial benefits such as loans, payments, and campaign donations. The plaintiffs assert violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and New York tort law.Upon review, the court dismissed all claims except those against Stacey Plaskett, the USVI's delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives. The court found insufficient evidence to establish personal jurisdiction over the other defendants or to substantiate the claims against them. As a result, the case will proceed solely against Plaskett, focusing on her alleged involvement in facilitating Epstein's activities during her tenure as General Counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.202.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In a recent ruling, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed most claims in a lawsuit filed by six anonymous women against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several officials, alleging complicity in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The court determined it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants such as former Governors John de Jongh and Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and former Senators Celestino White and Carlton Dowe, leading to the dismissal of claims against them. Additionally, claims against former First Lady Cecile de Jongh were barred due to a prior settlement agreementHowever, the court allowed claims against Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett to proceed, citing sufficient ties to New York through alleged activities such as visiting Epstein's New York residence and soliciting campaign donations there. The court found plausible allegations under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and negligence claims, asserting that Plaskett's alleged receipt of financial and political support from Epstein in exchange for favorable political actions warranted further proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge Dismisses Jane Does' Epstein Complaint Against All But Plaskett | St. Thomas SourceBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In a recent ruling, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York dismissed most claims in a lawsuit filed by six anonymous women against the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and several officials, alleging complicity in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The court determined it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants such as former Governors John de Jongh and Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and former Senators Celestino White and Carlton Dowe, leading to the dismissal of claims against them. Additionally, claims against former First Lady Cecile de Jongh were barred due to a prior settlement agreementHowever, the court allowed claims against Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett to proceed, citing sufficient ties to New York through alleged activities such as visiting Epstein's New York residence and soliciting campaign donations there. The court found plausible allegations under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and negligence claims, asserting that Plaskett's alleged receipt of financial and political support from Epstein in exchange for favorable political actions warranted further proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Judge Dismisses Jane Does' Epstein Complaint Against All But Plaskett | St. Thomas SourceBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Part 1 - Kyle Fleming, Director of the VI Energy Office, joins Neville James for the Power Hour as the Trump administration begins to reverse the Biden administration's regulations on electric vehicles. Neville speaks with VI Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett, who conducted a news conference on Thursday entitled "Taxpayer Privacy After Elon Musk Meddling." During the event, Plaskett expressed concern about the DOGE's access to sensitive federal data.
In November 2023, six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse filed a class-action lawsuit against the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) government and several officials, including Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett. The plaintiffs allege that the USVI government and its representatives facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by granting him preferential treatment and overlooking his illicit activities. The lawsuit contends that Epstein's substantial political donations and personal connections enabled him to manipulate immigration procedures, allowing him to transport young women and girls into the territory without proper documentation. This purported complicity, the plaintiffs argue, was instrumental in perpetuating Epstein's criminal enterprise within the USVI.Congresswoman Plaskett, named as a defendant due to her alleged associations with Epstein, has vehemently denied any wrongdoing. She has filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit, labeling the claims as "legally and factually frivolous" and asserting that her inclusion is baseless and potentially malicious. Despite her denials, scrutiny has intensified over her past interactions with Epstein, including soliciting campaign contributions from him and extending fundraiser invitations. Critics argue that such associations, whether knowingly complicit or not, reflect a troubling lapse in judgment and raise questions about the ethical standards of public officials in the USVI.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
In November 2023, six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse filed a class-action lawsuit against the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) government and several officials, including Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett. The plaintiffs allege that the USVI government and its representatives facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking operations by granting him preferential treatment and overlooking his illicit activities. The lawsuit contends that Epstein's substantial political donations and personal connections enabled him to manipulate immigration procedures, allowing him to transport young women and girls into the territory without proper documentation. This purported complicity, the plaintiffs argue, was instrumental in perpetuating Epstein's criminal enterprise within the USVI.Congresswoman Plaskett, named as a defendant due to her alleged associations with Epstein, has vehemently denied any wrongdoing. She has filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit, labeling the claims as "legally and factually frivolous" and asserting that her inclusion is baseless and potentially malicious. Despite her denials, scrutiny has intensified over her past interactions with Epstein, including soliciting campaign contributions from him and extending fundraiser invitations. Critics argue that such associations, whether knowingly complicit or not, reflect a troubling lapse in judgment and raise questions about the ethical standards of public officials in the USVI.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
It seems like every time we hear from one of these people who were involved with Epstein in some manner, that the story is the same. I had no idea that he was a degenerate and I saw or heard nothing! Unfortunately, the same is true for Stacey Plaskett who has now responded to the new allegations within the JP Morgan lawsuit that claims that the USVI and its politicians should have stopped Epstein but instead took his money. Plaskett took multiple campaign donations from Epstein and when confronted at first, her spokesperson said she had no intentions of returning the donation. However, her tune did change and the money was donated to what her team says were charities that worked with abused women. We also hear from Jes Staley in this episode who is flaty denying the allegations made against him by JP Morgan setting the stage for a showdown between Staley and his former company.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Plaskett Speaks on Alleged Epstein Connections (viconsortium.com)source:Dem congresswoman declines to return donations from Jeffrey Epstein (nypost.com)
It seems like every time we hear from one of these people who were involved with Epstein in some manner, that the story is the same. I had no idea that he was a degenerate and I saw or heard nothing! Unfortunately, the same is true for Stacey Plaskett who has now responded to the new allegations within the JP Morgan lawsuit that claims that the USVI and its politicians should have stopped Epstein but instead took his money. Plaskett took multiple campaign donations from Epstein and when confronted at first, her spokesperson said she had no intentions of returning the donation. However, her tune did change and the money was donated to what her team says were charities that worked with abused women. We also hear from Jes Staley in this episode who is flaty denying the allegations made against him by JP Morgan setting the stage for a showdown between Staley and his former company.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Plaskett Speaks on Alleged Epstein Connections (viconsortium.com)source:Dem congresswoman declines to return donations from Jeffrey Epstein (nypost.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A class-action lawsuit has been filed by six victims of Jeffrey Epstein against the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) government and Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett, alleging a conspiracy to aid Epstein's sex-trafficking scheme. The lawsuit, which was first filed in November and amended in December, accuses high-ranking officials of the USVI of providing Epstein with a haven to operate and expand his trafficking ring from 2001 to 2019. The plaintiffs argue that the USVI officials facilitated Epstein's crimes by granting him special treatment and overlooking his illegal activitiesThe lawsuit names various former and current officials, including former Governor John de Jongh, his wife Cecile de Jongh, former Governor Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and Port Authority Director Carlton Dowe, among others. The plaintiffs allege that these officials received financial benefits and other incentives from Epstein, who was able to operate with little to no oversight due to their complicity.The defendants have moved to dismiss the case, arguing that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction and that the claims are factually and legally baseless. They contend that their interactions with Epstein were minimal and did not involve any direct facilitation of his crimes.In this episode, we take a look at her most recent comments about what went down with former president Trump and the election overall.(commercial at 12:09)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Plaskett calls out ‘hypocritical' Republicans, condemns Trump for telling supporters to 'fight' after shooting - TheGrioBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In 2023, six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit against Stacey Plaskett, the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) Delegate to Congress, and various USVI officials. The plaintiffs allege that Plaskett and other officials were complicit in Epstein's sex trafficking activities, claiming negligence and violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The lawsuit also targets former USVI governors and other high-profile officials, accusing them of enabling Epstein's crimes for personal and financial gain.Plaskett has strongly denied these allegations, calling the lawsuit "legally and factually frivolous." Her legal team argues that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's illegal actions and that her inclusion in the lawsuit is an attempt to exploit her public profile. Plaskett has filed motions to dismiss the case, asserting that the claims lack substantial basis and are a misuse of legal processes to gain monetary compensation. The court has not yet ruled on these motions to dismiss, and ongoing legal proceedings continue to address these complex allegations.In this episode, we dive into her deposition. (commercial at 13:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource9647388 Plaskett, Stacey E. 05-09-2023 [Confidential] (courtlistener.com)
In 2023, six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit against Stacey Plaskett, the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) Delegate to Congress, and various USVI officials. The plaintiffs allege that Plaskett and other officials were complicit in Epstein's sex trafficking activities, claiming negligence and violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The lawsuit also targets former USVI governors and other high-profile officials, accusing them of enabling Epstein's crimes for personal and financial gain.Plaskett has strongly denied these allegations, calling the lawsuit "legally and factually frivolous." Her legal team argues that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's illegal actions and that her inclusion in the lawsuit is an attempt to exploit her public profile. Plaskett has filed motions to dismiss the case, asserting that the claims lack substantial basis and are a misuse of legal processes to gain monetary compensation. The court has not yet ruled on these motions to dismiss, and ongoing legal proceedings continue to address these complex allegations.In this episode, we dive into her deposition. (commercial at 13:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource9647388 Plaskett, Stacey E. 05-09-2023 [Confidential] (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Part 1 - Neville James on the Candidate Speaks is joined by Stacey Plaskett a member of the U.S. House, representing Virgin Islands' At-Large Congressional District. She assumed office on January 3, 2015. Her current term ends on January 3, 2025. Plaskett is running for re-election to the U.S. House to represent Virgin Islands' At-Large Congressional District. She is on the ballot in the general election on November 5, 2024.
Today the Chicks chat about Kamala's big fail at her softball interview, Biden's chat with the HAGS at the view, and the drama surrounding Eric Adam's indictment.Your privacy matters. Go to our sponsor https://aura.com/chicks to get a 14-day free trial and see if any of your data has been exposed.Stock up on NativePath Hydrate for up to 44% off plus free shipping. Visit https://nativehydrate.com/chicks today! Visit https://coatdefense.com Save 15% off your entire order when you use Code CHICKS at checkout.
Plaskett is talking about going after people like us. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Biden is hanging out with Zelenskyy and Kamala is having her own meeting. Nothing to see here folks. Plaskett is showing why we need to break down the three letter agencies. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
In Defendant Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett's Reply in support of her Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Individual and Class Action Second Amended Complaint (Case 1:23-cv-10301-AS), Congresswoman Plaskett argues that the plaintiffs' claims should be dismissed for failing to meet legal standards required for their case to proceed. She contends that:The claims are legally insufficient: The plaintiffs have not presented facts that would warrant the continuation of the lawsuit, especially against her in her official capacity.Qualified immunity: As a government official, Plaskett argues she is protected by qualified immunity, which shields public officials from lawsuits over actions performed within their official duties unless there's a clear violation of constitutional rights.Failure to state a claim: The plaintiffs' allegations, even if accepted as true, do not establish a valid legal claim against her.No personal involvement or wrongdoing: Plaskett denies any direct involvement in the actions alleged by the plaintiffs, arguing that the complaint lacks specific allegations connecting her to any wrongdoing.(commercial at 10:34)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.162.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
In Defendant Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett's Reply in support of her Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Individual and Class Action Second Amended Complaint (Case 1:23-cv-10301-AS), Congresswoman Plaskett argues that the plaintiffs' claims should be dismissed for failing to meet legal standards required for their case to proceed. She contends that:The claims are legally insufficient: The plaintiffs have not presented facts that would warrant the continuation of the lawsuit, especially against her in her official capacity.Qualified immunity: As a government official, Plaskett argues she is protected by qualified immunity, which shields public officials from lawsuits over actions performed within their official duties unless there's a clear violation of constitutional rights.Failure to state a claim: The plaintiffs' allegations, even if accepted as true, do not establish a valid legal claim against her.No personal involvement or wrongdoing: Plaskett denies any direct involvement in the actions alleged by the plaintiffs, arguing that the complaint lacks specific allegations connecting her to any wrongdoing.(commercial at 10:34)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.162.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
In Defendant Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett's Reply in support of her Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Individual and Class Action Second Amended Complaint (Case 1:23-cv-10301-AS), Congresswoman Plaskett argues that the plaintiffs' claims should be dismissed for failing to meet legal standards required for their case to proceed. She contends that:The claims are legally insufficient: The plaintiffs have not presented facts that would warrant the continuation of the lawsuit, especially against her in her official capacity.Qualified immunity: As a government official, Plaskett argues she is protected by qualified immunity, which shields public officials from lawsuits over actions performed within their official duties unless there's a clear violation of constitutional rights.Failure to state a claim: The plaintiffs' allegations, even if accepted as true, do not establish a valid legal claim against her.No personal involvement or wrongdoing: Plaskett denies any direct involvement in the actions alleged by the plaintiffs, arguing that the complaint lacks specific allegations connecting her to any wrongdoing.(commercial at 10:34)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.162.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In 2023, six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit against Stacey Plaskett, the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) Delegate to Congress, and various USVI officials. The plaintiffs allege that Plaskett and other officials were complicit in Epstein's sex trafficking activities, claiming negligence and violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The lawsuit also targets former USVI governors and other high-profile officials, accusing them of enabling Epstein's crimes for personal and financial gain.Plaskett has strongly denied these allegations, calling the lawsuit "legally and factually frivolous." Her legal team argues that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's illegal actions and that her inclusion in the lawsuit is an attempt to exploit her public profile. Plaskett has filed motions to dismiss the case, asserting that the claims lack substantial basis and are a misuse of legal processes to gain monetary compensation. The court has not yet ruled on these motions to dismiss, and ongoing legal proceedings continue to address these complex allegations.In this episode, we dive into her deposition. (commercial at 13:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource9647388 Plaskett, Stacey E. 05-09-2023 [Confidential] (courtlistener.com)
In 2023, six survivors of Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit against Stacey Plaskett, the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) Delegate to Congress, and various USVI officials. The plaintiffs allege that Plaskett and other officials were complicit in Epstein's sex trafficking activities, claiming negligence and violations of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The lawsuit also targets former USVI governors and other high-profile officials, accusing them of enabling Epstein's crimes for personal and financial gain.Plaskett has strongly denied these allegations, calling the lawsuit "legally and factually frivolous." Her legal team argues that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's illegal actions and that her inclusion in the lawsuit is an attempt to exploit her public profile. Plaskett has filed motions to dismiss the case, asserting that the claims lack substantial basis and are a misuse of legal processes to gain monetary compensation. The court has not yet ruled on these motions to dismiss, and ongoing legal proceedings continue to address these complex allegations.In this episode, we dive into her deposition. (commercial at 13:30)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource9647388 Plaskett, Stacey E. 05-09-2023 [Confidential] (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A class-action lawsuit has been filed by six victims of Jeffrey Epstein against the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) government and Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett, alleging a conspiracy to aid Epstein's sex-trafficking scheme. The lawsuit, which was first filed in November and amended in December, accuses high-ranking officials of the USVI of providing Epstein with a haven to operate and expand his trafficking ring from 2001 to 2019. The plaintiffs argue that the USVI officials facilitated Epstein's crimes by granting him special treatment and overlooking his illegal activitiesThe lawsuit names various former and current officials, including former Governor John de Jongh, his wife Cecile de Jongh, former Governor Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and Port Authority Director Carlton Dowe, among others. The plaintiffs allege that these officials received financial benefits and other incentives from Epstein, who was able to operate with little to no oversight due to their complicity.The defendants have moved to dismiss the case, arguing that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction and that the claims are factually and legally baseless. They contend that their interactions with Epstein were minimal and did not involve any direct facilitation of his crimes.In this episode, we take a look at her most recent comments about what went down with former president Trump and the election overall.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Plaskett calls out ‘hypocritical' Republicans, condemns Trump for telling supporters to 'fight' after shooting - TheGrio
A class-action lawsuit has been filed by six victims of Jeffrey Epstein against the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) government and Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett, alleging a conspiracy to aid Epstein's sex-trafficking scheme. The lawsuit, which was first filed in November and amended in December, accuses high-ranking officials of the USVI of providing Epstein with a haven to operate and expand his trafficking ring from 2001 to 2019. The plaintiffs argue that the USVI officials facilitated Epstein's crimes by granting him special treatment and overlooking his illegal activitiesThe lawsuit names various former and current officials, including former Governor John de Jongh, his wife Cecile de Jongh, former Governor Kenneth Mapp, former Attorney General Vincent Frazer, and Port Authority Director Carlton Dowe, among others. The plaintiffs allege that these officials received financial benefits and other incentives from Epstein, who was able to operate with little to no oversight due to their complicity.The defendants have moved to dismiss the case, arguing that the Southern District of New York lacks jurisdiction and that the claims are factually and legally baseless. They contend that their interactions with Epstein were minimal and did not involve any direct facilitation of his crimes.In this episode, we take a look at her most recent comments about what went down with former president Trump and the election overall.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Plaskett calls out ‘hypocritical' Republicans, condemns Trump for telling supporters to 'fight' after shooting - TheGrioBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.(commercial at 7:27)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.(commercial at 8:41)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.(commercial at 7:09)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.(commercial at 7:09)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.(commercial at 8:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.What do the facts tell us? Let's dive in and find out.(commercial at 8:27)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.What do the facts tell us? Let's dive in and find out.(commercial at 7:39)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.What do the facts tell us? Let's dive in and find out.(commercial at 7:48)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Stacey Plaskett, the U.S. Virgin Islands Delegate to Congress, has requested to be removed from the lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein survivors against the USVI. The lawsuit, filed by six anonymous survivors, alleges that the USVI government, including several high-profile officials, played a role in enabling Epstein's sex-trafficking operations.In her motion to dismiss, Plaskett argues that the lawsuit's claims against her are unfounded and speculative. She contends that her solicitation of campaign contributions from Epstein, who she was unaware of as a sex offender at the time, does not imply complicity in his crimes. Plaskett also highlights that, as the former general counsel for the USVI Economic Development Authority, she was not involved in the decision-making process regarding tax benefits awarded to Epstein's businesses. Her legal team asserts that the plaintiffs included her in the lawsuit solely to draw attention to their case without substantial evidence linking her to Epstein's illegal activities.(commercial at 7:49)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Plaskett Seeks Removal from Epstein Civil Case, Calling Her Inclusion 'Malicious' (viconsortium.com)
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
