Word processor developed by Microsoft
POPULARITY
Categories
85 episodes with Microsoft Word
73 episodes with Microsoft Word
65 episodes with Microsoft Word
20 episodes with Microsoft Word
15 episodes with Microsoft Word
48 episodes with Microsoft Word
7 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
7 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
8 episodes with Microsoft Word
7 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
5 episodes with Microsoft Word
7 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
8 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
7 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
5 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
In a typewritten question left for the Wichita Police Department in January of 2005, Dennis Rader asked the cops, in writing, whether a floppy disk could be traced back to him. The question was inside an empty cereal box he had left for them in the bed of a pickup truck at a Home Depot parking lot. He signed it with his self-given initials. He asked them to be honest.The Wichita Police Department answered through a small classified ad in the Wichita Eagle. They told him no. A floppy disk could not be traced.That was not true.In the fifth and final chapter of True Crime Today's BTK investigation, host Tony Brueski walks through the trap Lieutenant Ken Landwehr had been building since March of 2004. The thirteen-year silence Rader broke when he could no longer tolerate being ignored. The eleven separate communications that followed. The eleven months of polite, formal responses through classified ads that fed Rader's hunger for attention while the task force quietly built its case.The episode covers the February 16, 2005, arrival of a purple Memorex floppy disk at KSAS-TV in Wichita. The Microsoft Word file metadata that named Christ Lutheran Church in Park City and a user account named Dennis. The phone call from Wichita Police to Pastor Michael Clark that ended the case in a single conversation. The DNA confirmation from Rader's daughter Kerri Rawson's medical records, obtained under warrant without her knowledge or consent at the time. The February 25, 2005, arrest. The thirty-plus-hour confession.Dennis Rader was not caught by sketches, voice recordings, or FBI profiles. He was caught by his own vanity asking a question and his own ego believing the answer.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BTK #DennisRader #FloppyDisk #TrueCrimeToday #KenLandwehr #BTKArrest #SerialKillers #BTKCase #TrueCrime #Wichita
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
On January 8, 2005, the Wichita Police Department received a typewritten question from the BTK Killer. Dennis Rader had left it inside an empty cereal box in the bed of a pickup truck at a Home Depot parking lot. He wanted the police to tell him, in writing, whether a floppy disk could be traced back to his computer. He asked them to be honest.They lied.In the fifth and final chapter of host Tony Brueski's Hidden Killers BTK investigation, the trap Lieutenant Ken Landwehr built over the eleven months of Rader's 2004 communications is walked through in detail. The thirteen-year silence Rader broke in March of 2004 when he could no longer stand being ignored. The eleven communications that followed. The Wegerle driver's license that freed Bill Wegerle by accident. The strategic decision by Landwehr to write back, politely, formally, through classified ads, instead of refusing to engage. The eleven months of feeding Dennis Rader's hunger for attention while quietly building a case.The episode covers the classified ad that ended the case: "Rex, it will be OK." The lie Rader believed. The purple Memorex floppy disk mailed to KSAS-TV on February 16, 2005. The Microsoft Word file titled Test A.RTF whose metadata named Christ Lutheran Church and a user account named Dennis. The phone call to Pastor Michael Clark. The DNA confirmation. The arrest. The confession. The sentencing speech where Dennis Rader read the names of his confirmed victims like a roll call he was finally getting to deliver. Judge Greg Waller's ten consecutive life sentences with no possibility of parole for at least one hundred seventy-five years.This is the fifth and final uncomfortable truth of the series. He caught himself.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BTK #DennisRader #KenLandwehr #BTKArrest #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #SerialKillers #FloppyDisk #BTKCase #UncomfortableTruths
Background of the LawsuitDefendants:Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate's affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.Plaintiffs:Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.Allegations and ClaimsMismanagement and Negligence:Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein's estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate's affairs.Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate's value and its ability to settle claims.Failure to Address Victims' Claims:Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein's victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate's assets and the status of the victims' claims.Legal ProceedingsFiling and Court Actions:Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.Recent Developments:Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.Broader ContextEpstein's Estate:Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein's estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate's management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein's criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein's estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.Victims' Advocacy:Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein's abuse.(commercial at 8:16)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)
Background of the LawsuitDefendants:Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate's affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.Plaintiffs:Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.Allegations and ClaimsMismanagement and Negligence:Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein's estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate's affairs.Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate's value and its ability to settle claims.Failure to Address Victims' Claims:Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein's victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate's assets and the status of the victims' claims.Legal ProceedingsFiling and Court Actions:Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.Recent Developments:Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.Broader ContextEpstein's Estate:Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein's estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate's management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein's criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein's estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.Victims' Advocacy:Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein's abuse.(commercial at 8:16)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)
Background of the LawsuitDefendants:Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate's affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.Plaintiffs:Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.Allegations and ClaimsMismanagement and Negligence:Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein's estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate's affairs.Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate's value and its ability to settle claims.Failure to Address Victims' Claims:Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein's victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate's assets and the status of the victims' claims.Legal ProceedingsFiling and Court Actions:Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.Recent Developments:Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.Broader ContextEpstein's Estate:Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein's estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate's management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein's criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein's estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.Victims' Advocacy:Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein's abuse.(commercial at 8:16)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)
Background of the LawsuitDefendants:Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate's affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.Plaintiffs:Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.Allegations and ClaimsMismanagement and Negligence:Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein's estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate's affairs.Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate's value and its ability to settle claims.Failure to Address Victims' Claims:Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein's victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate's assets and the status of the victims' claims.Legal ProceedingsFiling and Court Actions:Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.Recent Developments:Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.Broader ContextEpstein's Estate:Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein's estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate's management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein's criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein's estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.Victims' Advocacy:Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein's abuse.(commercial at 8:16)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Background of the LawsuitDefendants:Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate's affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.Plaintiffs:Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.Allegations and ClaimsMismanagement and Negligence:Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein's estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate's affairs.Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate's value and its ability to settle claims.Failure to Address Victims' Claims:Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein's victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate's assets and the status of the victims' claims.Legal ProceedingsFiling and Court Actions:Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.Recent Developments:Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.Broader ContextEpstein's Estate:Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein's estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate's management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein's criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein's estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.Victims' Advocacy:Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein's abuse.(commercial at 8:16)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Background of the LawsuitDefendants:Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate's affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.Plaintiffs:Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.Allegations and ClaimsMismanagement and Negligence:Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein's estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate's affairs.Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate's value and its ability to settle claims.Failure to Address Victims' Claims:Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein's victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate's assets and the status of the victims' claims.Legal ProceedingsFiling and Court Actions:Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.Recent Developments:Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.Broader ContextEpstein's Estate:Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein's estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate's management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein's criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein's estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.Victims' Advocacy:Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein's abuse.(commercial at 8:16)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Dennis Rader was the council president of Christ Lutheran Church in Park City, Kansas, on the morning of February 25, 2005. The Wichita Police Department was, at the same moment, on its way to arrest him. The thing that had identified him as BTK was a metadata trace from a Microsoft Word document he had saved to a church computer in his role as council president.He had volunteered for the council. He had volunteered to print agendas. He had risen through the ranks to council president, the visible layperson at a small congregation. He had been doing both jobs for years. The killing and the church. The Cub Scout pack and the typed letters to the press. The compliance officer truck and the kits in the garage.In the third chapter of host Tony Brueski's five-part Hidden Killers investigation, every official role Dennis Rader chose for himself gets examined for what it actually gave him. The ADT alarm installer job that put him inside hundreds of Wichita homes legally during the most active years of his killing. The Cub Scout pack leader role that put him in front of children while teaching them the family of knots that had been showing up at his crime scenes since 1974. The Lutheran council seat that gave him community standing and, eventually, identified him to investigators. The Sedgwick County Zoning Appeals seat. The Animal Control Advisory Board. The compliance officer truck.This episode also walks through Misty King's story. A Park City divorcee who fled the state with her two children after Dennis Rader, in his city role, made her life unlivable.This is the third uncomfortable truth of the series. Dennis Rader did not hide despite his costumes. He hid inside them.END LINKSJoin Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDISCLAIMERThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.HASHTAGS#BTK #DennisRader #ChristLutheran #ChurchCouncil #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #SerialKillers #ParkCity #ColdCase #UncomfortableTruths
Have you ever lost the joy in your creative work — that sense of fun you had when you were starting out, before the admin and the algorithms drained it away? How do mid-career creatives get it back, and what can a four-year-old teach us about play? Austin Kleon talks about productive procrastination, silly rituals, the case for paper reference books in an AI world, and how his newsletter went from a marketing cost to the day job that keeps the lights on. In the intro, Does social media still sell books? [Self-Publishing with ALLi]; Trial by algorithm [The Bookseller]; Publishing's AI Hypocrisy Problem [The New Publishing Standard]; ALLi AI survey for authors; Brave New Bookshelf Podcast, and Pics from signing at BookVault. Today's show is sponsored by ProWritingAid, writing and editing software that goes way beyond just grammar and typo checking. With its detailed reports on how to improve your writing and integration with writing software, ProWritingAid will help you improve your book before you send it to an editor, agent or publisher. Check it out for free or get 15% off the premium edition at www.ProWritingAid.com/joanna This show is also supported by my Patrons. Join my Community at Patreon.com/thecreativepenn Austin Kleon is the New York Times and international bestselling author of nonfiction books, including Steal Like an Artist, Show Your Work!, and Keep Going, as well as an artist, professional speaker, and poet. His latest book is Don't Call It Art: 10 Ways to Create Like a Kid Again. You can listen above or on your favorite podcast app or read the notes and links below. Here are the highlights and the full transcript is below. Show Notes Why Austin wrote Don't Call It Art now, and what his kids taught him about creative joy Productive procrastination, silly rituals, and treating writing like Lego Comedy as a philosophical position, and giving yourself permission to be bad in private Sharing process in the algorithm era, and why your whole life is the process Bibliomancy, paper reference books, and what AI can't give you that a dictionary can Style, the Taco Bell distinctiveness rule, and how Austin's newsletter became his day job You can find Austin at AustinKleon.com. Transcript of the interview with Austin Kleon Jo: Austin Kleon is the New York Times and international bestselling author of nonfiction books, including Steal Like an Artist, Show Your Work!, and Keep Going, as well as an artist, professional speaker, and poet. His latest book is Don't Call It Art: 10 Ways to Create Like a Kid Again. So welcome back to the show, Austin. Austin: Thank you for having me back. It's nice to talk to you again. Jo: You were on the show in March 2020, and at the time, your book was Keep Going, which was prescient considering the pandemic and politics. So I wondered, why this book, Don't Call It Art, now? Was this something you see in the creative community or your own life that made you want to write this book? Austin: Keep Going is a book about what happens when the world goes crazy around you and you're still trying to do your creative work. This is a book about what happens when inside has bottomed out. Keep Going is a book about the world bottoming out, and you're worried that your own creative work is going to bottom out too. How do you keep pushing through and keep making stuff? This book, to me, is about what happens when you bottom out inside—when you've lost that love and feeling for the thing that you wanted to do, and you're just not connecting with it in the way that you used to or the way that you want to. How do you get back? How do you return to that sense of joy and wonder and fun that we have when we're starting out? And for me, it was being around my little kids that taught me how to tap into that. My kids were natural—they didn't have any creative hangups. I would spend all day talking to people who had creative hangups, and then I'd get back in the house, and I'd just be around these beings who didn't have any of them. It was really instructive. I felt like, if I could bottle the energy of my kids when they were about four years old and try to put it in a book, I think it could really help a lot of the people that I run into, and the people with the kinds of problems I hear from. Jo: You mentioned bottoming out. How do people know when they've hit that point? Austin: You just don't want to do it anymore. You're kind of like, “This just isn't giving me back what it used to.” When we start with our creative work, that's the thing that juices us. We come away from it feeling full up. I think you hit a certain point where you start to feel drained after it. Or maybe you don't feel drained by the thing itself that you're doing—maybe it's all the stuff around it, which is more often the case. For example, if you're a mid-career writer like me, who's been publishing books for 16 years now, I still really like writing. I still really like drawing. I still really like cutting and pasting and putting things together. It's the admin around the work—the emails, the meetings, the running-a-business part of it—that's super draining for me, and that stuff can start to bleed over into the creative work. So it's really important for me to make sure that I'm having some playtime, some R&D, some research and development time, to make sure it's not just all business. When you take the thing that you love and you turn it into the thing that you make a living from, you can really run into a lot of problems. Jo: I'm at 20 years, so I know exactly what you're saying, and a lot of listeners are the same. We love writing books, but it's all the stuff that goes around it. So for those of us who do this for money as well as passion, what are some practical ways to have more fun with our creativity? Austin: Something I learned from my kids is that you really are your most creative when you're supposed to be doing something else. So one of the things I use a lot in the studio is productive procrastination. Whatever I'm supposed to be working on, I start another little project, and that's my little naughty fun time. When I first come into the studio, I try to do something that I'm not supposed to be doing—something that I won't have much to show for. That could be making one of my blackout poems. That could be making a collage in my notebook. It could also be sitting here. I have a bass in the studio now, so I can practise my bass guitar. Sometimes I'll do that for the first 15 minutes just to get in that headspace of, “Hey, what's it like to do something just for yourself? Just because you want to do it?” The juice that you get from that little naughty “I'm going to do what I'm not supposed to be doing right now” thing, that carries into the rest of the day. It's like a nice start to things. Jo: Do you think that play could be something different to what we make our money with? For me, writing novels and stories is great fun in one way, but it's also what I then publish and make money on. So writing stories is more serious, I guess, than playing with Lego or something. Austin: Right. So the trick is, how can you make writing your stories like playing with Lego? That's kind of been my whole career. I hate staring at Microsoft Word and that blinking cursor, taunting you like, “Come on, what have you got?” A lot of my creative life has been about trying to make it more playful, trying to make it feel more like a game. That's how I came up with my blackout poems. I take an article from The New York Times and I black it out until it only has a few words left behind. It sort of looks like if the CIA did haiku, for some people listening. That was one little exercise. Then weirdly, that side thing that I thought was just play, just fun—that turned into my first book. So then it's, okay, what else can I mess around with and play with? I do a lot of collage work in the studio, and I rarely actually use that for any of the books. Sometimes I use it for my newsletter to illustrate the newsletter. But it's always about trying to figure out, how can I make writing a game? How can I make it more playful? There are different things that I do to make it feel more playful. One of them's really stupid. I really believe in silly rituals because I think silliness is really powerful. People talk about their daily rituals—Mason Currey has that great book, Daily Rituals: How Artists Work. When I was reading that book, I realised it was really the silly stuff that I really liked. There was, I think it was Balzac counting out coffee beans or something before he got to write. Or Steinbeck sharpening 12 pencils or something goofy like that. So one of the things I like to do before I write is that I have these cigarette pencils. They're pencils that look like cigarettes in the studio. I put one in my mouth before I start writing, and I pretend to be some old '40s writer on a typewriter. I like doing goofy stuff in the studio because I think when you do goofy stuff—stuff that you'd be embarrassed if anyone else saw it—it gets you in that playful state. Jo: It's interesting. In your book, you have a section that says, “Don't take things too seriously.” For many of us, we write memoir for example, and that is very close to us. It's like the deepest expression of what we want to say in the world. It feels very serious. So how can we hold things more lightly and not take things so seriously? Austin: For me, comedy is actually a philosophical position. What I mean by that is, I think a lot of people set out with a tragic model of creative work. They think, “Oh, I have this special gift,” or, “I have this thing that I really need to do, and I need to put it out into the world, and I need to make the world look more like I want it to look.” They have this idea that, “Through blood and sweat and tears, I'm going to see this thing through, and I'm going to push it into the world, and I'm going to have my way.” I think there's another way of working where it's more like, “I'm just a normal person trying to play with my environment, and take my experiences and put them into something interesting. So I'm going to play and use my wits, and we're going to see what we come up with.” Those really are two modes of life. The pandemic taught me that it was really when we were keeping our sense of humour, when we were having a laugh and keeping our egos in check around the house and just acknowledging how goofy we all were and how ridiculous the situation was, that seemed to be when we were really thriving. Versus, “Well, we're in this tough situation. We've got to make it into what we want it to be.” That felt really bad. But when we cruised along and we were just improvisational, when we went at things with a kind of lightness, that worked. There's a great Italo Calvino essay about lightness in Six Memos for the Next Millennium. Lightness is really underrated. Even when we're going about heavy work, having a sense of lightness and play with it just makes the work better. That's a philosophical position of mine. I aspire to comedy. I aspire to a comic outlook on life. I'm just a creature with a body who's going to die, and I'm fundamentally ridiculous. Life is pretty absurd. You just make the best of it. Jo: There's certainly some truth there. Staying on a similar theme, you have a chapter in the book on permission to be bad. Many of the listeners also have your book Show Your Work, and it shaped many of us into sharing our work in progress. It feels quite dangerous now, in a world where judgment is much louder than it maybe was when you wrote Show Your Work. So tell us a bit about permission to be bad versus should we keep some of this private? Austin: Permission to be bad is about the making part of things. It's the private part. It's permission to be bad when you're in private, when you're actually doing the work. Show Your Work is a book about what you do after you've done the work, or while you're doing the work. It was never about putting up a webcam and running a 24/7 feed. It was more like, hey, what are the ways that I can connect with the kind of audience I can build while I'm making the work itself? So the way I see permission to be bad is, you really have to give yourself permission when you're not sharing, when you're off screen, to really be as bad as you want to be. It doesn't necessarily mean quality-wise. I think it also means letting yourself write stuff that you would never say on social media. Letting yourself read stuff that you wouldn't admit you were reading on social media. Letting yourself listen to stuff. Letting yourself really be that unfiltered, unhinged, private person that you want to be. Then when it comes to sharing, you put some time in between that input time, that making time, and the sharing time, and then you share what you think is going to be useful or helpful or interesting to other people. Jo: I think you wrote that book before TikTok, and how fast people are moving. Do you think people need to slow down a bit in what they share, maybe? Austin: I don't know. I obviously had a lot more faith in social media back then. I use all the principles from Show Your Work in my newsletter. Newsletters are very much the new kind of great thing. They're doing a lot of the work that social media used to do, in that you're still able to have this direct connection with the people that you're trying to reach. The big problem with social media now is that it's all algorithmically tuned, where the people that are following you don't see the stuff that you're doing most of the time. What you have to do now, if you want the people who are following you to see your stuff on social media, is you have to make stuff that the algorithm likes. That's a whole different thing. As far as the Show Your Work principle—which is share your process as much as your product—that carries over to any platform. In my newsletter every Friday, I share a list of 10 things that were going on behind the scenes here. It might have been what I was watching on TV, what I listened to, a new pen I was trying out, or something like that. The Friday newsletter is almost always process stuff. When I talk about process, my definition is actually very broad. For a lot of people, it's drafting, editing, whatever. For me, the process is the whole life. The process is almost everything except the finished thing. A writer's life is 24/7. My friends who have real jobs really are like, “What do you do all day?” And I'm like, “Well, what do you mean?” They're like, “Well, I see you out on your bike ride.” I'm like, “Yes, when you see me out on a bike ride, I'm thinking through something half the time.” If I'm watching TV, I'm thinking, “Hey, would this be good in the newsletter?” I'm never off. My whole life—everything is copy, as Nora Ephron said. That's part of the job. It's very hard to turn off. So I see the whole life as process, and the question becomes, what little bits and pieces of that life and that process can you share with people while you're making the things that you hope to sell them later? Right now, I'm in a cycle where I'm selling this book, but all these people have showed up because I've shared my process every week for the past seven years since I put out a book. Jo: It's funny you say that. I was at the dentist yesterday, and— My dentist literally asked me, “So where do you get all your ideas?” This is a common question for all of us, right? And it just becomes so hard to explain that to people who don't walk around in the world just constantly getting ideas. Austin: I can't believe I'm going to tell this story. I was getting my vasectomy after my second kid, and I was talking to this doctor just before the operation. He said, “So what do you do for a living?” I said, “I'm a writer.” He said, “Oh, that must be cool. You get to use your brain.” And I said, “That's everything that you want your doctor to say.” I was going to say, “Please use your brain,” before he's about to cut into you. He said, “Oh, no, no. What I mean is, I know what I'm going to do every day for the next 10 years.” He knew exactly what his day was going to look like. He said, “You have to use your brain. You've got to figure out new stuff.” I was like, “Oh, that's really interesting.” That's the trade-off, right? He's got the job security. He knows what he's going to do. Every writer has a moment where they have to talk to a normal person about what you do. Jo: I was going to say, I'm married to one. Austin: Now, my wife, on the other hand, grew up the daughter of a writer, so she knows exactly what it's like. Nothing ever phases her. She's totally used to it. She's used to me staring off into space, completely checking out of a conversation. She's used to me using lines on her that I'm going to put in a piece later. She's used to the whole rigmarole. It's very handy. I've been very lucky in that sense. Jo: Coming back to the book, you talk about your use of bibliomancy for inspiration. Since we're talking about that, tell us about it. I think all the book people listening will be happy. Austin: I'm a person who still keeps a dictionary nearby—a paper dictionary. I keep a big old American Heritage. It's just a big, thick book. When I really don't have any ideas, I will turn at random to the dictionary, close my eyes, stick my finger down the page, open my eyes, and just see what I come up with. Sometimes just that act will give me an idea. I also do that with books. I'll go around the studio, pick up a book, flip to a random page, and just see what it says there, or read an old piece of marginalia that I've left in a book. I believe deeply in the power of bibliomancy, and I think it's a case for paper books. I'm one of those people that still really believes in reference books. I've started collecting more and more of them. I have an old, big dictionary that's always open on my desk, and I look up words. I learned from John McPhee, the writer, that you should look up words that you think you know. That was the first time I'd ever heard anyone say that. So I look up words that I think I know. Instead of reaching for a thesaurus when I need a different word, I actually just look up the definition of the word that I already have. That's another McPhee tip. The other thing that happened that I thought was really interesting is, I got a Roget's for the first time—a thesaurus. I don't think most people know what an actual thesaurus is. Most people think of a thesaurus as a synonym finder, and that's not actually what a thesaurus is at all. A thesaurus is more like an encyclopaedia, weirdly. You look up things based on big concepts, and then it gives you a bunch of words to look up later. It's a very strange thing. It's not what most people think it is. I have a couple of editions of Roget's in here. I like the really old Roget's from the 1900s because they actually have opposing ideas facing each other on the page. Do you have an old-school Roget's? Have you ever looked through one? Jo: I don't have one now, but I certainly grew up with them. I was literally just thinking, I wonder if there are ones for Americans and ones for British people, because so often we say different things and mean different things. I always hear Americans say, “Oh, that's a doozy,” or something, and it means the complete opposite thing here. Austin: Like if you say “fanny pack” over there. That means something very different than it means here, right? Chips or fries, that kind of stuff. So I wonder if there are different ones for different cultural references. Jo: I don't know. Austin: As people, with ChatGPT and all these LLMs and stuff, people are like, “Why would you ever pick up a paper reference book?” And I'm like, “I actually like the friction.” I like having to move in space and go over to my dictionary. I like flipping the pages. I like having to scan a page for the word I'm looking for, because— This marvellous thing happens when you're looking for the word, where you bump into all these other words. If you're a word nerd, you get to start thinking about the root of the word—oh, why is this word next to this word? Well, it's because they share the same root. Then you're going down all these fun rabbit holes. The thing that I'm trying to do as a writer and a creative person is, I'm trying to get to the thing that I didn't know I was looking for. The thing that people misunderstand about AI, I think personally, is that it's a great tool if you know what you're looking for. If you're like, “Find me this thing. I want exactly this. I want to see a picture of a dog wearing a king's costume,” or some crap like that, then it can spit that picture out for you. Or, “I want to know what happened on this day,” and whatever. It can do that. But that's not actually what I'm doing most of the time when I'm writing or making something. I start with an idea, but what really happens—the magic of writing and the magic of making stuff in general—is when you discover something that you didn't even know you were headed for. That's the real magic for me. Sometimes I have an idea and I want to articulate it for people, but more often than not, there's something that bothers me or something that I want to talk about, and I sit down and write, and I figure out what it is that I actually have to say and what I actually think. Every writer really knows this, and that's why the dictionary, stuff like that, those are ways of training you to get in that discovery mode. “Well, let me—oh, I bumped into this. I went looking for this one thing and then I ran into this other thing.” That's why I love the library. I don't know what system you use over there, but you look for one book in the Dewey Decimal System over here, and then, okay, here's all these other weird books next to it. Then you end up with three other books other than the one that you were looking for. That's the magic. To me, that's the magic of creative work, discovering what you didn't know you were looking for. That was particularly important for me when I was writing this book because we discovered that my wife has a condition called aphantasia. It's very rare in the population, about 2 to 3% of people. There's probably some people listening to this right now who are like, “What is this? Tell me.” Jo: Aphantasia actually more common in the creative industries. Austin: Yes. What it is, is that you don't see—when I say close your eyes and picture an apple, you don't actually see the apple in your head. You can think about an apple and the qualities of an apple, but you don't actually see it. Some people, and it's a matter of degree—some people like me, I can close my eyes, I can tell you what the apple looks like, I can tell you what colour it is, I can tell you where the shading is. Someone like my wife doesn't see the apple. She can tell you what an apple is. It's really interesting because she has a degree in architecture, which is known as a very visual field. But the thing you discover about aphantasia is, it doesn't keep people from becoming artists. In fact, it's the opposite. Someone like Ed Catmull, who co-founded Pixar, writes about it in his book, and so many of the great animators at Pixar are actually aphantasics. The reason is that they learned that they had to draw in order to see things. When you don't have a picture in your head of what you want something to look like, things appear in the drawing, and you find things that you couldn't even picture. A lot of writers actually are aphantasics. John Green discovered recently that he has aphantasia. It turns out that it's a superpower for writers, because if you don't have a picture in your head, then you don't have to translate that picture into words. A lot of writers talk about thinking in radio, like they have a constant narrator. My wife—she's probably going to kill me for talking about her this much—when she describes it to me, she's like, “Oh, it's like a radio in my head. I'm constantly hearing a voice, and it's a narrator.” I was like, “Holy shit, that would be really helpful to me.” I don't have anything like that in my head. I read Mrs Dalloway for the first time, and I gave it to her and I said, “You've got to read this book. I think this must be what it's like in your head.” And she said, “Oh my God, it is.” Part of the thing that I took away from that experience—this is a long-winded way of getting here—is that I take a lot of inspiration from people with this condition. Most of the people I know in the arts or the creative fields, they set out with this grand vision, and then they start working on the thing and it's nothing like what they had in their head, and they get really depressed: “This isn't what I had in mind.” Whereas if you set out without a picture in your head, and you just start manipulating things and you see what appears, that's more of the comic mode I was talking about earlier. What would happen if we just sat down with our materials and we started playing and we saw what appeared on the page? What if we started typing and saw what appeared, and then we played with that? That's the kind of joy. That's more like how kids operate. Kids are better at that. They're better at reacting to what's actually in front of them, instead of having these grandiose visions about what they're trying to achieve. Jo: Just coming back on the longevity of a creative career. Your books are very distinctive. You have a very distinctive visual style, your handwriting and the way the books are done. I wondered if another part of the ennui, perhaps, or the draining of the later career is that we get trapped into doing something that feels like it looks the same. Or we have a voice, and we're happy in that voice, but sometimes we want to do something completely different. For authors, we have different names. I write under two different names, and that helps. But equally— How do you define author voice, and do you ever feel like doing something completely different to your normal style? Austin: Style, in a lot of ways, is self-plagiarism. Style is the repeated things that we notice in people's work. Hitchcock talked about this in films. Wes Anderson is someone like that—Wes Anderson has a style. I'm sure that he gets really sick of it too sometimes, but you also can't help it in some ways. I thought a lot about this because people worry about style so much. A lot of the time, what we call style is what Adrian Tomine one time said: “Style is just the distance between what's in my head and what comes out of my hand.” I really like that definition. With this book, I was trying to think, “Okay, if I do another book in this series, how can I push things a little bit?” And then I was reading this article about Taco Bell. You guys have Taco Bell over there, don't you? Do you have Taco Bell? Jo: No. Austin: So Taco Bell, for people who don't know, is this American Mexican chain, and they have tacos and burritos and stuff like that. They're well known for making these really insane… it's so American, this company. They make a taco with a Doritos as a shell. Doritos are crisps, I guess. Jo: Yes, we have Doritos. Austin: Okay. I spent time in England, I just don't remember if I ate Doritos when I was in England. Anyway, I was reading this article about Taco Bell. It was really funny. They have an innovation kitchen at Taco Bell, and they have a rule about new products. The rule is called the distinctiveness rule, and the rule is: you can change the flavour or you can change the taste, or you can change the form, but you can't change both at the same time. I got really obsessed with this concept because I thought, “Well, this could be kind of interesting.” If you're someone who's had success and you're known for something, this presents an interesting thing. You could do a complete break and do something completely new, or you could try the distinctiveness rule. Okay, well, what if I play with this idea of taste versus form? What if I change the taste and keep the form? So the idea for Don't Call It Art was, what if I do another one of these books, but the taste is more like if my kids made it? It had the texture of kids' art, it had lots of scribbles in it, it was loose and messy. That was kind of the idea. The actual book ended up being more like the other books. It ended up looking like an Austin Kleon book, because I just can't help that. The thing you said about having multiple names that you write under, that's kind of what I do with the newsletter. I think of the newsletter as very different from the books. The newsletter is this twice-weekly thing where I can be a little bit more of myself. In the books, I'm this very helpful, happy version of myself. It's me, but it's me on my best day. I'm really helpful and interesting for you. The newsletter is still a highlight reel in a sense, but it's a little bit more of my weird everything-I'm-into. It's more of the unclipped version of me. The newsletter becomes a place where I can do a lot of the weird stuff that's much different from the books. I have these little projects going all the time. Sometimes I'll make a bunch of prints and put them online. Sometimes I'll make a bunch of zines on a topic I haven't covered in the book. Sometimes I'll do a mixtape. As someone who's interested in a lot of different forms and genres and just different modes of output, having something like a newsletter has been really creatively fruitful for me. It's kept me from getting too bottomed out with the books because the books do a certain thing for the reader, and as much as I'd love to do a book that was radically different, I also think I've been given a real gift with the form of my books, in that I kind of own the way that they feel and look. There aren't a lot of books that look like those books and feel like those books, and so I like playing with that form. It would be hard to get rid of it now. The pseudonym for me is kind of like the newsletter in a sense. The newsletter is a little bit more of where I get to be wild and wacky. Then the books are a little bit more of a chiselled thing. Jo: The books are perfect examples of the form, as you say, but it's interesting about the newsletter. You mentioned at the beginning that we can be drained by the admin around the work. For many people listening, a newsletter becomes admin. So how does the newsletter fit into your business? The books are traditionally published, they're very professional. How do you have your independent side, and how does all of that work together in your business? Austin: Thank you for asking that question. I run the whole show at the newsletter. The newsletter is just me, and then my wife edits it, and no one else is involved. I don't have an assistant. I don't have a team. It is just me, and that's why I love it. I control everything. I pick who gets in there. I pick everything. I love that. I grew up watching David Letterman over here, and Letterman had a nightly show, and I always thought that was killer. I thought, “Man, what a fun job. You have a show every night where you have a new guest, and you have all these wacky things going on.” It was like a variety show. I always thought that would be really fun, so the newsletter is my version of that. I started the newsletter in 2013, and it was just a Friday newsletter. It quickly became a list of 10 things I thought were worth sharing. I had a friend, Hugh MacLeod, who was like, “Hey, I have a newsletter. It's bigger than any conference you've ever gone to.” He was talking about South by Southwest here in Austin. He's like, “I have a newsletter now, and it's bigger than South by Southwest.” Jo: Oh, I remember him. Austin: He would say, “Every time I have a new print, I put it out, and there's a button, and then they buy it.” He was like, “You've got to get it. This newsletter thing is killer.” This was in 2011 or something. Jo: Yes, I still have his books. Blogging in Your Underwear or something. Austin: Totally. So Hugh's a whole different story, but I was just like, “Oh, I should really get a newsletter.” Letterman always had a top 10 list on his show. I just always thought a 10 list was really fun. And of course the books are lists of 10 too. So it just worked to have a weekly list of 10. It felt good, and it felt like an infinitely repeatable format. What I'm looking for as a creative person is an infinitely repeatable format that can go on and on and on and be new every time. So the list of 10 is something that people know the form of. It goes back to the Taco Bell thing. They know the form, but they're not sure what's going to go inside. They know it's going to be a burrito, but they don't know what's going to be in the burrito, and that's the exciting part. The newsletter, business-wise, was always a marketing cost for about the first eight years of its existence. I paid MailChimp to send it out. Then in about 2021, when I hadn't done a book for a while, my agent said, “You know, you should really think about doing a paid tier of your newsletter.” And this is to his credit, because he doesn't make anything off the newsletter. He said, “There's this thing called Substack now that makes that really easy.” So we moved to Substack in 2021 in October, and I started doing a Tuesday edition of the newsletter that was just for paid people. That grew enough that it's gone from a marketing cost to something that's almost—it's not quite as much as I make on my books, but it's close. And to be candid, my books sell pretty well. So suddenly the newsletter has become this really healthy income stream. The newsletter to me is actually the day job now. The newsletter is what really keeps the lights on. It's also the perfect mix. It's the day job, it's the thing that keeps income coming in on a regular basis, but it's also the thing I like to do the most. I'm not like a traditional writer who likes to just get lost in their book and take years and years and go away. I'm someone who loves to be doing a lot of different things. The newsletter is a perfect format for me. I'm talking myself into not quitting, actually. It's funny. It's gone from this thing that was a marketing cost to now it's a significant part of our income. That journey—such a bad word, journey—that trip has been very interesting. It's been really cool. But I'm also just lucky. I've been really lucky, and I think part of my thing is, I'm always just trying not to squander my luck. Jo: Well, the book is fantastic, and I know people are going to love it. And the newsletter, of course. So tell us— Where can people find you and your books and newsletter online? Austin: The easiest thing to do is to just go to AustinKleon.com, and that has links to everything—the books, the newsletter. I do actually keep an old-school blog still. I'm one of the few people that still maintains their blog and keeps it up to date. I'm hedging my bets because I think in the end everything will come back to a self-hosted website. I think in the end everyone's going to just go back to their little websites, or at least I hope so. Jo: Well, that was great, Austin. Thanks so much. Austin: Oh, thank you. The post Don't Call It Art: Rediscovering Creative Joy With Austin Kleon first appeared on The Creative Penn.
Get the notes!Jesus Is Greater Than Moses: An Exegetical Exposition of Hebrews 3:1–11The opening chapters of the Epistle to the Hebrews construct a strict structural hierarchy designed to anchor believers under intense social and theological pressure. Moving from the cosmic, ontological domain of Christ's superiority over the angelic realm analyzed in chapters 1 and 2, Hebrews 3:1–11 pivots directly into the concrete, historical, and covenantal structures of the nation of Israel.By executing a verse-by-verse structural evaluation of Christ alongside Moses—the foundational human mediator of the Old Covenant—the text establishes a definitive standard of authority that demands complete covenantal exclusivity.1. Consecration and the Dual Offices of Christ (0:00–5:15)The corporate identity of the New Covenant community is firmly anchored in the finished, consecrating work of the cross rather than physical lineage:Hebrews 3:1 — "Therefore, holy brothers and sisters, partakers of a heavenly calling, consider Jesus, the Apostle and High Priest of our confession..." The Character of the Calling: The structural description “partakers of a heavenly calling” reorients the reader's expectation away from the localized, earthbound, territorial inheritance of the Mosaic economy toward an unshakeable, eternal reality.The Imperative to Scrutinize: The absolute command to “consider” stems textually from the Greek verb κατανοήσατε, denoting an intensive, scholarly fixing of the mind and uninterrupted mental investigation of an objective reality.The Operational Convergence: Christ is simultaneously designated as the Apostle (ἀπόστολος)—the ultimate Envoy sent forth directly from the Father to manifest final divine revelation—and the High Priest (ἀρχιερεύς), the exclusive sacrificial mediator who secures permanent access to the divine presence.2. The Architect and the Artifact: Verses 2–6 (5:16–12:10)To prevent a simplistic, hyper-critical reading of the Old Covenant, the text openly confirms Moses' flawless execution of his historic duties, drawing textually from the divine validation detailed in Numbers 12:7. Moses is explicitly situated within the boundaries of “all God's house” as a crucial, protective steward of a provisional administration.However, Verse 3 introduces a distinct categorical separation of glory based on an architectural analogy:The Analogy: The builder and designer of an estate naturally commands exponentially greater honor than the material house itself or any component within it.The Classification: Moses is historically categorized as a created component within the house, whereas Jesus is revealed as the uncreated, transcendent Builder who engineered the entire structure.The Syllogism: The formula in Verse 4 asserts that while every house is constructed by someone, the Builder of all things is God, explicitly declaring the absolute deity of the Son.This distinction culminates in a precise semantic shift in status between the two leaders:Moses as Servant (θεράπων): This term indicates a high-ranking, valued supervisor who executes tasks on property belonging to someone else. His entire ministry was prospective and forward-looking, operating as an anticipatory “testimony to the things which would be spoken later” by the programmatic declaration of the gospel.Christ as Son (υἱός): This title establishes absolute, hereditary ownership. Christ reigns directly over His own ancestral house. The living community of true believers constitutes this authentic temple, provided they actively hold fast their objective theological confidence and the triumphant boast of their hope firm until the final consummation.3. The Voice of the Spirit and the Peril of Unbelief (12:11–20:00)The latter half of the passage pivots to a sobering, pneumatological warning utilizing the text of Psalm 95:Hebrews 3:7–8 — "Therefore, just as the Holy Spirit says, 'Today if you hear His voice, do not harden your hearts as when they provoked Me...'" Scriptural Animation: The introductory formula “as the Holy Spirit says” confirms that the Old Testament Scriptures are not handled as dead historical artifacts, but as an active, living, vocalized divine warning addressed directly to the contemporary reader with absolute immediacy.The Anatomy of Rebellion: The historical collapse of the Exodus generation occurred because they witnessed visible, supernatural miracles for forty consecutive years, yet remained fundamentally blind to the structural “ways” and internal character of God.The Judicial Consequence: Systemic unbelief and progressive hardening of the heart evoke divine holy indignation, culminating in an unalterable, binding oath of absolute exclusion from the physical and spiritual rest (κατάπαυσις) of the promised land.Ultimately, this historical failure under Moses serves as internal scriptural proof that physical entry into Canaan under Joshua was never the final destination or design of God's rest. When read alongside the wider truths developed later in Hebrews 12, believers recognize that severe temporal trials are forms of divine discipline designed to strip away shallow, nominal commitment, ensuring that the covenantal community is stabilized to inherit an unshakeable kingdom.Complete Hebrews 3:1–11 Educational Resource PackageTo equip pastors, small group leaders, and serious students of Theology for deep, systematic study, the complete publication-grade curriculum portfolio for this lesson is now available for download.This digital package is engineered strictly without bullet points, utilizing a clean alphanumeric nested hierarchy (1, A, B) that preserves all indentations, typography, and structural lines when copied and pasted directly into Microsoft Word.The integrated curriculum portfolio includes:
Get the notes!Can True Christians Drift Away? Understating New Covenant Accountability in Hebrews 2:1–4The book of Hebrews contains some of the most profound christological declarations in all of Holy Scripture, but it also contains some of the most sobering warnings. In Chapter 1, the text establishes the supreme, uncreated deity of Jesus Christ. He is revealed as the exact representation of the Father's essence, the immortal Architect of the cosmos, and the Sovereign whose throne is everlasting.However, immediately following this grand opening, the inspired author abruptly pauses the doctrinal discourse. Before detailing the high-priestly necessity of Christ's humanity, he introduces the first of five major hortatory warnings found in the epistle.This systematic study guide explores the critical mechanics of spiritual drift, reconciles the text's urgent warnings with the absolute reality of eternal security, and unpacks the powerful a fortiori (lesser-to-greater) argument constructed to demonstrate New Covenant hyper-accountability.I. The Doctrinal Grounding of Exhortation (Hebrews 2:1)Hebrews 2:1 — "For this reason we must pay much closer attention to what we have heard, so that we do not drift away from it." A. The Conjunction of NecessityThe opening phrase “For this reason” functions as an architectural hinge point linking christian duty directly to the grand disclosures of Chapter 1. It establishes a permanent principle for the church: practical christian responsibility is always anchored in the objective reality of who Jesus Christ is. Because the Son is uncreated God and King, the audience bears a heightened obligation to guard His specific revelation.B. The Mandate for Urgent GuardingThe text issues a strict command to pay “much closer attention” to the received apostolic message. This identifies the primary defense against spiritual decay as continuous, purposeful immersion in the truth of the Gospel. Spiritual decline is resisted not by human willpower alone, but by actively anchoring the mind to christological truth.II. Exegesis of the Verbal Phenomenon: “Drift Away”A. Linguistic ProfilingThe text implements the specific Greek verbal form pararuomen (παραρυῶμεν). This word is classified as a hapax legomenon—occurring only this single time within the entire text of the Greek New Testament. The author chose this rare verbal marker intentionally to disrupt casual reading, forcing the student to contemplate the unique mechanical danger of spiritual sliding.B. The Nautical MetaphorIn classical Greek maritime literature, pararuomen outlines the behavior of an unanchored sailing vessel carried past its safe destination by local tides and prevailing currents. The vessel does not turn away in sudden, violent mutiny; it simply floats past its safe harbor because the crew is passive and unmonitored. This illustrates that spiritual decay within the church is rarely a deliberate departure, but rather a slow, unperceived slide into compromise caused by unresisted cultural currents.III. Theological Harmonization: Drift vs. Eternal SecurityA. Refutation of the Loss-of-Salvation PremiseArminian interpretations routinely isolate the warning language of Hebrews to claim that a true, regenerated believer can forfeit their salvation and experience ultimate condemnation. Isolating the text in this manner creates an artificial contradiction with the clear, systematic unity of the New Testament.B. The Uncompromising Blueprint of Eternal SecurityUnder the absolute blueprints of John 6:37–39, true believers are designated as a corporate love-gift from the Father to the Son. The preservation of the believer is maintained entirely by the omnipotent keeping power of Jesus Christ, who promises to lose absolutely none of those entrusted to Him, but to raise every single one on the final day. Christ performs this keeping ministry explicitly because it is the unalterable, sovereign will of the Father.C. The Nature of Salvation as an Unearned GiftSynthesizing this text with Ephesians 2:8–9 demonstrates that salvation is by grace through faith—a free gift completely detached from human works. Because human effort did not earn salvation initially, human weakness cannot dissolve it. Salvation belongs exclusively to the Lord.
SUMMARY Teo Doremus traded a litigation desk in China for a startup in San Francisco, and along the way he became convinced that the legal industry's AI moment is right now. On this episode, Teo makes the case for starting an AI-native law firm, walks through how he thinks about hallucination risk, and explains the "digital desk" concept behind Advocacy, a platform built to connect the narrative silos of litigation that have historically lived in Microsoft Word and nowhere else. Teo also shares what he got wrong about law practice, why he thinks lawyers misunderstand what AI actually does when it "helps" them, and draws the most useful analogy you will hear about what lawyers get paid for in an AI world. The pilot and the autopilot are not enemies. Neither are lawyers and AI. The question is figuring out who does what. KEY TAKEAWAYS Start building your AI-native practice now. The advantage goes to whoever gets comfortable with the technology first, not whoever waits for it to be perfect. Before deploying AI in your firm, learn what it actually is and what it is not. Understanding its fundamental limitations is your best defense against hallucinations. AI adoption in law is high on subscriptions and low on genuine daily use. Real adoption means using AI regularly enough that it changes how you work, not just having a login. Specialized legal AI tools and general AI tools are not competitors. Use both strategically depending on how much precision your task requires. The lawyer's value in an AI-assisted practice looks like the pilot who no longer holds the stick for seventeen hours: rested, prepared, and ready for whatever the automation cannot handle. WHO IS THE GUEST? Teo Doremus is the CEO and co-founder of Advocacy, a litigation-focused AI platform built around what he calls the "digital desk," a place where all the narrative silos of a case live together and AI connects them. Before founding Advocacy, Teo practiced law in China and the United States as both a litigator and a transactional attorney. He studied law in France after picking it almost by accident at 18, fell in love with it along the way, and eventually made his way to San Francisco, where a deep dive into AI convinced him the legal industry needed something that did not yet exist. Advocacy can be found at advocacy.ai. LINKS AND RESOURCES Advocacy: advocacy.ai Red Cave Law Firm Consulting: redcavelegal.com Adventures in Legal Tech Podcast: Available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, and YouTube. KEYWORDS AI-native law firm, legal AI, artificial intelligence for lawyers, AI hallucinations in law, litigation AI tools, Advocacy AI, legal tech software, law firm technology, AI adoption in legal, legal software selection, AI-powered litigation, law practice management, Red Cave Law Firm Consulting, Teo Doremus, Jared Correia, AI governance for lawyers, digital desk litigation, specialized legal AI, general AI for law firms, Adventures in Legal Tech EPISODE HIGHLIGHTS [00:02:02 - 00:02:48] Teo's immediate, unhedged answer on the AI-native firm question: do it, do it now, and do it because the technology rewards early commitment. [00:04:35 - 00:06:03] Why the hallucination conversation needs multiple angles at once, and why no single answer is going to hold. [00:06:04 - 00:06:44] What lawyers fundamentally misunderstand about AI: it does not actually understand you. When it does not know the answer, it just agrees with you. [00:10:37 - 00:11:26] Teo describes the moment AI went from a five-minute curiosity to a full obsession that changed the direction of his career. [00:13:55 - 00:14:28] The origin of the "digital desk" concept and why Microsoft Word from 1984 is still, technically, the competition. [00:21:40 - 00:23:11] The pilot analogy: if planes have flown themselves for twenty years, what exactly are pilots for? And what does that tell us about lawyers?
You can design the best HR strategy, introduce brilliant benefits, or roll out an important change - but if people do not understand it, engage with it, or take action, none of it matters.That is why employee communication sits right at the heart of your impact in HR.In this episode of HR Coffee Time, Fay is joined by Nik Nawaaz, Head of Employee Communications at Barnett Waddingham (now part of Howden) to unpack exactly how HR professionals can communicate in a way that builds trust, gets buy-in, and encourages people to take action - whether that is using their benefits, completing an engagement survey, preparing for a performance review, or navigating organisational change.With over 20 years of experience in employee communications, Nik shares practical, immediately actionable advice — no jargon, no fluff.In This Episode, You'll Learn:Why employee communication is the “connective tissue” of an organisationWhy HR can sometimes feel like a faceless department - and how to change thatThe common mistake HR professionals make when writing employee communicationsWhy your message needs to answer “So what?” within the first few secondsHow to shift from explaining features to showing benefitsWhy phrases like “HR is pleased to announce” or “Please be advised” can stop people engagingHow to make your communication feel more human, conversational and directWhy reading your message aloud can help you spot corporate languageHow to use Microsoft Word's read-aloud feature to improve scripts and written communicationWhy a one-size-fits-all approach rarely works for benefits communicationHow to tailor messages for different groups and generations in your workforceWhy line managers are so important when you want messages to landHow a simple manager toolkit can make communication more effectiveWhy listening for the first five minutes of a meeting can help build trustHow to communicate during times of fear, uncertainty and changeWhy silence can lead people to create their own “horror story”How to be honest when you do not yet have all the answersWhy storytelling and real-world proof can be more persuasive than project updatesWhy employee communication needs support from across the organisation - not just HRChapters00:00 - When great HR work goes unnoticed03:24 - What employee comms really means04:20 - Why HR can feel "faceless" — and how to fix it06:19 - The #1 mistake: writing for yourself, not your audience08:49 - Quick win: delete your opening line09:49 - Drop the corporate speak — write like a human11:35 - The Word trick that makes your writing sound natural13:04 - How to get people to actually use their benefits17:30 - Tailoring messages for different generations20:58 - Line managers as your communication allies22:59 - The "First Five" technique24:01 - Communicating through change and uncertainty25:58 - Use storytelling, not project updates28:06 - Resource recommendation: Simon Sinek's Golden CircleUseful LinksConnect with Fay on LinkedInLearn about Fay's Essential HR PlannerLearn about Fay's Inspiring HR Leadership ProgrammeTake Fay's freeHR Leadership Impact Assessment.Connect with Nik (Nikolas) Nawaaz on LinkedInFind out more about Barnett Waddingham's employee communications workWatch Simon Sinek's TED Talk:How Great Leaders Inspire ActionHelpful Episode to Listen to NextIf you enjoyed this episode and would like more support with writing clear, effective communication at work, listen to:
Get the notes!Why Is Jesus Greater Than Angels? (Hebrews 1:4–14)An Deep-Dive Expositional Study from Let's Talk ScriptureWhen believers face intense social pressure, professional pushback, or cultural isolation because of their faith, the temptation to compromise rarely looks like a dramatic, overnight abandonment of the truth. Instead, it looks like a quiet withdrawal—a slow, subtle slide into comfortable religious traditions that allow us to blend back into the background.This is precisely the pastoral crisis confronting the original readers of the Epistle to the Hebrews.In this complete expositional study, we will dig directly into Hebrews 1:4–14 to uncover a truth that shatters the illusion of any “safe” religious compromise: Jesus Christ is not merely a prominent historical prophet or an exalted spiritual option. He is the self-existent, unchangeable Creator who sits enthroned far above the highest angelic orders. —1. The Historical Emergency: The Temptation of the Quiet WithdrawalTo fully grasp the architecture of Hebrews chapter 1, we must first step into the sandals of the first-century Hebrew congregation receiving this letter.The Pressure of Persecution: These Jewish believers were enduring severe societal distress, legal threats, and intense ostracization by the broader Jewish nation. While the text notes they had not yet resisted unto blood or physical martyrdom, the emotional and economic toll of being cut off from their community was immense.The Illusion of a Lateral Shift: Internal pressure mounted to return to the public safety of Temple Judaism—the operational world of animal sacrifices and institutional Mosaic worship. Believers began to muse to themselves that they could temporarily mask or deny their public confession of Jesus, conform outwardly to localized temple rituals until the social storm blew over, and then quietly return to Christ later.The Pre-70 AD Context: Because the author frequently references operational temple sacrifices as an ongoing daily reality, we know this letter was written prior to 70 AD—the historic year Roman legions razed Jerusalem and burned the temple to the ground.The author of Hebrews writes to dismantle their compromise immediately. He establishes a profound structural truth: turning away from the final revelation of the Son to seek refuge in old, temporal shadows is not a lateral cultural shift—it is absolute theological ruin.2. Having Become So Much Better: The Paradox of Christ's Humanity“Having become so much better than the angels, as He has inherited a more excellent name than they.” — Hebrews 1:4In first-century Jewish thought, angels were held in the highest possible regard. They were viewed as glorious, disembodied celestial powers who stood directly in the Divine Council and served as the majestic mediators who delivered the Law of Moses on Mount Sinai. Proving how a historical human figure—One who walked the earth, ate, slept, and suffered a shameful physical crucifixion on a Roman cross—surpassed these immortal spiritual beings was an absolute logical necessity.The passage solves this by addressing both Christ's divine nature (ontological state) and His historic mission (redemptive state):Ontologically: As the second member of the Godhead, Jesus is inherently, eternally, and uncreationally superior to all things.Historically: In the Incarnation, Jesus took on a true human nature and was temporarily positioned “lower than the angels” in His localized, earthly state.Authoritatively: Through His absolute, sinless obedience, His finished redemptive work on the cross, and His subsequent physical resurrection, He elevated human nature within His own person. In His glorified humanity, He “became” positionally and officially superior, ascending back to the cosmos to take possession of His ultimate inheritance: the personal, holy covenant name of God, Yahweh.3. Family vs. Instrumentality: Metaphysical Sonship (Hebrews 1:5–7)The author builds an unyielding wall of contrast between the Son and the angels using the relational language of family versus the mechanical language of tools.A. The Sovereign Decree of SonshipThe author challenges the reader rhetorically: “For to which of the angels did He ever say: ‘You are My Son, Today I have begotten You'?” (quoting Psalm 2:7 and 2 Samuel 7:14).While angels are collectively labeled “sons of God” in a generic sense because they are created spiritual entities, no individual angel has ever been granted a personal decree of sonship from the Father. The phrasing “Today I have begotten You” points directly to the public coronation and cosmic enthronement of the Davidic King. Jesus is the unique, ontological Son who shares the exact inner life, substance, and nature of the Father.B. Command For Angelic WorshipInstead of treating Christ as an equal celestial peer, the Father issues an absolute imperial mandate in verse 6: “Let all the angels of God worship Him.” Holy angels strictly refuse worship from created things (as demonstrated uniformly throughout scripture, cf. Revelation 22:8–9). Therefore, the fact that the Father commands the entire angelic host to bow before the incarnate Christ is absolute biblical proof of the Son's true and total deity.C. The Mutable Status of AngelsIn stark contrast to the stable identity of the Son, verse 7 defines the boundaries of the angelic host: “Who makes His angels winds, and His ministers a flaming fire.” The key verb here is makes. Angels are created, mutable instruments. The text utilizes the Greek term leitourgos, which identifies a public officer or liturgical servant. Angels are majestic, swift, and powerful, but they are ultimately subordinate tools shaped by the Creator's will to execute localized, operational tasks.4. The Seated Monarch vs. The Standing Servants (Hebrews 1:8–14)The final section of the text provides an unmatched portrait of cosmic sovereignty, contrasting the permanent, resting posture of the King with the continuous, alert posture of His couriers. THE COSMIC CONTRAST (HEBREWS 1:13-14) [ THE SON ] [ THE ANGELS ] Ontological God Created Instruments ▼ ▼ POSTURE: SEATED POSTURE: STANDING (Right Hand of Majesty) (Attentive Before Throne) ▼ ▼ SACERDOTAL STATUS: FUNCTIONAL ROLE: Completed Sacrifice Ministering Spirits Sent to & Perfect Redemption Serve the Heirs of Salvation A. Direct Attribution of DeityIn verse 8, the Father addresses the Son directly with words that leave no room for theological ambiguity: “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever.” Jesus occupies the one true divine throne because He alone is ontologically qualified to sit upon it.B. Creator Over Blind EntropyQuoting Psalm 102, the text applies the personal name of God (Yahweh) directly to Jesus: “You, Lord, in the beginning founded the earth, and the heavens are the work of Your hands.” The material cosmos is fundamentally temporary. The author uses a vivid clothing metaphor, stating that the heavens will wear out like an old garment and be rolled up like a mantle by Jesus Himself. This reveals that the end of our physical universe is not an accident of natural thermodynamic decay or blind cosmic entropy. Rather, cosmic dissolution is an active, personal, master-stroke executed by the unchangeable, immutable hands of Christ.C. The Posture of Finished RedemptionThe climax of the chapter turns on a visual contrast:The Son Is Seated: “Sit at My right hand, till I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet.” In Old Testament tabernacle architecture, there were no chairs. The Levitical priests stood daily because their sacrifices were repetitive and could never fully remove sin. Christ's seated posture proves the finality, perfection, and non-repeatable nature of His redemptive work.The Angels Are Standing: “Are they not all ministering spirits sent to render service for the sake of those who will inherit salvation?” Angels stand attentively before the throne, waiting to be dispatched as spiritual couriers.The ultimate insight here provides profound encouragement for every believer. Though human beings are currently physically weaker than angels within our space-time framework, the ultimate cosmic inheritance does not belong to celestial spirits—it belongs to Christ and His church. Angels inherit absolutely nothing; they are assigned to serve as guardians and witnesses of the great redemption God is completing through you.Bring This Expositional Study into Your Church or Home GroupIf your soul was blessed by this deep-dive study of Hebrews 1:4–14, you can now bring the complete teaching architecture into your own ministry, small group, or personal study library. We have packaged the entire expositional workflow into a premium, publication-grade digital curriculum suite.Available Now: The Hebrews 1:4–14 Complete Curriculum SuiteThis premium digital bundle is fully optimized for immediate download and print distribution, beautifully styled in our signature deep slate blue and gold publication layout to enable seamless, text-centered instruction.What's Inside the Bundle:Master Exegetical Outline (PDF): A comprehensive, verse-by-verse academic breakdown of the text using an un-bulleted, strict alphanumeric hierarchy. It includes bold time-markers matching our video teaching, allowing you to copy, paste, and adapt the material directly into Microsoft Word without losing structural indents.Interactive Bible Study Lesson (PDF): An expositional narrative guide packed with interactive multiple-choice questions (numbered with alphabetical choices) and dedicated reflection boxes to spark robust table talk in your small group.Dual Curriculum Guides (Teacher & Student Editions): * The Teacher's Edition includes a complete instructional blueprint, pedagogical directives, and a detailed diagnostic answer key with deep theological commentary.The Student's Edition features a clean text layout and specialized, dashed write-in sections for intentional study journal notes.Complete Print Quiz & Answer Matrix (PDF): A standalone, non-interactive 13-question examination tool designed for academic evaluation, paired with a separate master answer sheet detailing extensive exegetical explanations for each correct option.Invest in uncompromising, textually grounded biblical instruction. Equip your home or church study group with the tools needed to proclaim the absolute preeminence and sovereign majesty of Jesus Christ.
En el marco de la transformación digital y la transparencia, la accesibilidad ya no es una opción, sino un mandato ético y legal para la administración pública. Un documento inaccesible representa una barrera para la ciudadanía con discapacidades visuales, motoras o cognitivas, limitando su derecho a la información. Microsoft Word ofrece herramientas potentes para romper estas barreras, siempre que se utilicen bajo criterios de diseño universal. En este podcast se mostrará cómo auditar y corregir documentos administrativos comunes (edictos, resoluciones, guías). El objetivo es desarrollar la sensibilidad y la capacidad técnica para generar archivos que puedan ser interpretados correctamente por lectores de pantalla y otras tecnologías de asistencia, cumpliendo así con el compromiso de una comunicación pública sin exclusiones.
Get the notes!Unlocking the Depth of Hebrews 1:1–3 | Complete Masterclass CurriculumFor many believers, the opening verses of the Book of Hebrews are familiar, yet their profound theological weight is often left unexamined. In just three verses, the author packs an astonishing amount of covenant history, original Greek wordplay, and high-priestly imagery to establish one undeniable truth: Jesus Christ is supreme over all.If you are looking to take your church, small group, or personal study past surface-level readings and into a rigorous, substantive exploration of scripture, our newly released Hebrews 1:1–3 Complete Masterclass Curriculum provides the ultimate professional-grade framework.The Core Lesson: The Supremacy and Sufficiency of the SonThe letter to the Hebrews was originally written to first-century Jewish Christians who were enduring intense social persecution and alienation. Under immense pressure, many were tempted to abandon their faith in Christ and retreat to the familiar, comfortable rituals of the old temple system.To counter this danger, the author of Hebrews builds an unshakeable, “better than” defense of the Christian faith, starting with the very nature of divine revelation:1. From Fragmentary Past to Final PresentIn the Old Covenant, God spoke polymerōs (“in many portions”) and polytropōs (“in many ways”). For over a millennium, revelation unfolded fragment by fragment through visions, types, and the lived object lessons of mere human prophets. But “in these last days,” God has spoken a final, definitive word to us en huiō—“in a Son”. This isn't just a change in message; it is a massive qualitative upgrade in the status of the Messenger.2. The Essential Deity of ChristJesus is explicitly revealed as the apaugasma (the absolute radiance and outshining) of God's glory and the charaktēr (the flawless, exact representation) of His essential nature. Because God does not share His glory with created beings, these precise terms establish Christ's absolute equality with the Father. He is not a lesser duplicate; He is God manifest in bodily form, actively upholding the entire cosmic order and the laws of physics by His powerful word.3. The Finished Work of the High PriestPerhaps the most revolutionary insight for a Jewish audience was the declaration that Christ “sat down” after making purification for sins. In the ancient Tabernacle and Temple structures, there were no chairs. The Aaronic priests could never sit because animal sacrifices only covered sin, meaning their work was never finished. Jesus, operating under the eternal order of Melchizedek, offered His own blood once and for all, completely removing sin and sitting down to signal that our redemption is eternally complete.Packaged for Your Ministry: What's Inside the Curriculum BundleTo help you seamlessly transfer these rich theological truths to your congregation or study circle, we have packaged this exhaustive study into a clean, publication-ready digital download. Built with structural outlines and indentations, the text copies perfectly into Microsoft Word for effortless printing and distribution.The complete package includes: Teacher's Instructional Guide: A strategic blueprint featuring an instructional roadmap, critical Greek linguistic breakdowns, historical context explanations, and engaging classroom discussion starters. Student Study Guide: A comprehensive student companion complete with a detailed vocabulary tracker (propitiation, apaugasma, charaktēr), a structural outline, and targeted reflection questions for personal life application. Evaluation Quiz: A clean, standalone, 10-question multiple-choice assessment sheet designed to reinforce student comprehension without spoiling the answers. Answer Key & Detailed Explanations: A thorough grading asset that provides paragraph-length theological defenses for every correct answer, turning evaluation into an additional teaching opportunity.Elevate Your Biblical Teaching TodayStop settling for surface-level curriculum. Give your students the substantive, mature, and objective biblical instruction they are looking for.Whether you are preaching from the pulpit, leading a Sunday school class, or guiding a home small group, the Hebrews 1:1–3 Complete Masterclass Curriculum will bring academic rigor and deep spiritual assurance to your study.[Click Here to Download the Full Hebrews 1:1–3 Curriculum Pack Now]Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Writing a book does not have to take years when the right structure, tools, and writing process are in place.In Episode 82 of the Published and Paid Podcast - 7 Tools I Use to Make the Book Writing Process Easier! Jasmine breaks down the seven tools she uses to make the book-writing process easier, more organized, and more productive for experts, speakers, leaders, coaches, and consultants.In this episode, viewers will learn:→ Why writing a quality book does not have to take years→ How Google Docs, Microsoft Word, or Pages can help organize a full manuscript→ Why chapters should be compiled into one continuous manuscript file→ How calendar blocking helps protect writing time→ Why dictation tools like Otter can help experts talk through their book content→ How a microphone can improve transcription clarity→ Why Jasmine's Signature Book Blueprint helps clients organize their ideas strategically→ How the Notes app can capture stories, examples, and ideas in real time→ How AI tools can support research without replacing the author's voiceThis episode is for coaches, authors, consultants, speakers, and leaders who are ready to stop overcomplicating the book-writing process and start using tools that support clarity, structure, and momentum.Takeaways:• Writing a book does not have to take years• A manuscript should be organized in one continuous file• Calendar blocking helps protect writing progress• Small writing windows still create momentum• Dictation can help experts move faster through content creation• Clear audio improves transcription quality• Strategic planning makes writing easier before the first draft begins• AI can support research, but it should not write the bookNotable Quotes from Jasmine:• “Writing a book should not have to take years.”• “Any progress towards the project is progress made.”• “Do not write your chapters in separate files.”• “Editing as you write can slow your progress down.”• “Use qualified data and statistics to back up what you're saying.” • Join - A 5-Day Live (Virtual) Training to Help Experts Turn Their Book Into Coaching, Speaking, Consulting, and Event Profits: → https://www.jasminewomack.com/monetize• Interested in working with us? Apply now - https://www.jasminewomack.com/apply• Subscribe - Jasmine Womack | Book Coach & Business Strategist → https://www.youtube.com/@TheJasmineWomack• Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/thejasminewomack• TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@thejasminewomack• LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/thejasminewomack/• Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/theejasminewomack00:00 - Writing a Book Shouldn't Take Years00:45 - Welcome to Published and Paid01:15 - 7 Tools Jasmine Uses to Make Writing Easier01:29 - Jasmine's Writing and Publishing Experience03:09 - Helping Authors Go From Idea to Book03:37 - Monetize Your Book Challenge Invitation04:29 - Tools That Accelerate the Writing Process04:47 - Why Books Do Not Need to Take Years05:32 - Tool 1: Google Docs06:33 - How to Organize a Manuscript07:33 - Stop Writing Chapters in Separate Files08:10 - Why Google Docs Helps With Cloud-Based Writing08:54 - Tool 2: Calendar Blocking09:48 - Why Writing Does Not Require a Retreat10:17 - How to Schedule Writing Time11:31 - Start Small With Writing Sessions12:42 - Tool 3: Otter for Dictation13:49 - Tool 4: Microphone for Better Transcription14:20 - Tool 5: Signature Book Blueprint15:27 - Tool 6: Notes App16:15 - Tool 7: ChatGPT or AI for Research Support17:38 - Why Experts Need Credible Sources18:23 - Recap and Monetize Your Book Invitation#bookwriting #thoughtleadership #publishedandpaid
Get the notes!Understanding the Supremacy of Christ: An Introduction to HebrewsThe Book of Hebrews stands as one of the most profound and structurally complex books in the New Testament. Often described as the bridge between the Old and New Covenants, it provides the definitive explanation of how the shadows of the Levitical system find their substance in Jesus Christ.Whether you are a pastor preparing a sermon series or a student of the Word seeking deeper clarity, understanding the historical and theological foundation of this epistle is essential.The Mystery of Authorship and ContextOne of the most intriguing aspects of Hebrews is its anonymity. While traditionally attributed to the Apostle Paul, many scholars point toward Barnabas as a strong candidate. As a Levite, Barnabas possessed the intricate knowledge of the sacrificial system required to write such a text.Furthermore, internal evidence suggests a pre-70 AD dating. The author uses present-tense language regarding Temple sacrifices, indicating that the Second Temple was still standing and the Aaronic priesthood was still active during the writing of this letter.Major Themes: The Power of “Better”The central theme of Hebrews is the absolute supremacy of Jesus. The author systematically proves that Christ is:Superior to Angels: The divine Son is the exact representation of God's nature.Greater than Moses: While Moses was a faithful servant in God's house, Christ is the Son over the house.A Better Priesthood: Moving beyond the line of Aaron, Jesus serves as a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.A Final Sacrifice: Unlike animal sacrifices that only “covered” sin temporarily, Christ's once-and-for-all sacrifice permanently removes sin and grants us direct access to the presence of God.Get the Complete Study CurriculumTo help you lead your congregation or study group through these deep waters, we have developed a comprehensive Hebrews Introduction Product Suite. This professional package is designed to save you hours of preparation time while providing high-level academic and spiritual insights.What is Included in the Package?This digital download is formatted for easy use in Microsoft Word and follows a professional, publication-ready style:Detailed Lesson Outline: A complete breakdown of the authorship, dating, and historical occasion of the letter. Teacher's Guide: Clear instructional objectives and key teaching points to guide your lecture. Student Study Guide: An organized outline for learners to follow along and retain key concepts. Comprehensive Quiz: A 10-question assessment to test comprehension of the historical and theological facts. Answer Key & Rationale: Deep-dive explanations for every quiz answer to facilitate further discussion.Why Use This Resource?Every component of this study is synchronized with video time markers, allowing you to reference the original teaching with precision. It is written for a Christian audience with an analytical, precise tone that honors the depth of the Scripture.[Visit our store to download the full Hebrews Introduction Suite today!]Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
nFactorial Intelligence - еженедельные новости из мира стартапов и ИИ. Летняя программа nFactorial Incubator, собрание Berkshire Hathaway, суд Илона Маска с OpenAI, развитие систем через горькую правду, использование нескольких ИИ-агентов, сатира на европейские стартапы, партнерство Claude и SpaceX, Брайан Чески о первых пользователях и Founder Mode, рост акций производителей чипов, Claude для финансовой индустрии, ИИ-модель Subquadratic, анализ личных переписок, топ стран по тратам в App Store, Джефф Безос о приоритизации идей, технологический форум GITEX и туризм в Казахстане, продуктовые команды из одного человека, архивы Сары Лэйси, Пол Грэм о гаражах для стартапов в Европе, интервью Адама Форуджи из AppLovin, Марк Андриссен о фаундерах и наемных CEO, инвестиции бигтеха в ИИ-инфраструктуру, ценность опыта провального стартапа, успех Annapurna Labs в Amazon, роботы для постройки дата-центров Масаёси Сона, ИИ-функции Microsoft Word для юристов, низкий уровень внедрения ИИ в корпорациях, инвестиции в стартап Sierra Брета Тейлора, Андрей Карпати о смерти ИИ-оберток, публикации в соцсетях и рассылка nFactorial. Рекомендации от nFactorial nFactorial Incubator 2026: построй свой ИИ-стартап с выручкой этим летом - https://2026.nfactorial.school/ Подписаться на еженедельную email-рассылку nFactorial Weekly - https://nfactorial-school.kit.com/
Get the notes!Should One Man Rule the Church? A Deep Dive into 3 JohnThe structure of church leadership is a topic of vital importance for the health and longevity of any congregation. In this new teaching series and digital study package, we take a verse-by-verse look at the Third Epistle of John to uncover the biblical mandate for church governance and the dangers of prideful, singular authority.The Conflict of Leadership: Gaius vs. DiotrephesThe letter of 3 John presents a stark contrast between two types of leaders. On one hand, we see Gaius, a beloved brother commended by the Apostle for “walking in the truth” and showing hospitality to traveling ministers. On the other, we encounter Diotrephes, a man who “loves to be first” and has seized dictatorial control over his local assembly.John's message is clear: the New Testament church was never intended to be a “one-man show.” Through careful linguistic exegesis of the Greek text, this study highlights:The Plurality of Elders: Why the biblical model requires a collective body of leaders for accountability and safety.The Error of the Despot: Identifying the warning signs of a leader who rejects apostolic authority and suppresses the congregation.The Mandate of Support: Our moral obligation to be “fellow workers with the truth” by supporting sound, faithful teaching.Equip Your Ministry: The 3 John Study BundleTo help you bring these truths to your own congregation or small group, we have packaged a complete set of professional resources. This bundle is designed for those who value deep, historical, and linguistic study presented in a clear, publication-ready format.What's included in the package:Comprehensive Lesson Outline: A detailed roadmap of the epistle with time-stamped references to the video teaching for deep-dive study.Teacher & Student Guides: Ready-to-use guides with discussion points and reflection questions to engage your audience.Master Class Bible Lesson: A verse-by-verse examination focusing on church order and the marks of a saved leader.Assessment Tools: A publication-style quiz and answer key with detailed theological rationales for every answer.Whether you are a pastor looking to strengthen your elder board or a student of the Word seeking to understand the historical church, this study provides the tools necessary to defend and implement biblical order.Get the Complete Study PackageReady to take your study further? Visit our shop to download the full 3 John Study Bundle. This digital download is optimized for Microsoft Word, ensuring all professional outlines and indentations are preserved for your use.[Link to Product Page]Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Get help reviewing contracts using a new Legal Agent for Microsoft Word. Sync up to 1 million files with OneDrive. But consult your IT Support to learn if this is right for you. Finally, Outlook gets some action with M365 Copilot. I mean, can take action... via instructions, productive ones. 0:00 Welcome 2:41 Exchange Online: Retirement of legacy TLS versions for POP and IMAP connections - MC1293480 4:35 Microsoft 365 Copilot: Use Copilot in Outlook to manage your inbox - available in Frontier Public - MC1293485 7:07 OneDrive sync supports up to 1 million items on Windows - MC1294528 10:47 Microsoft Teams: Retirement of Together mode - MC1296478 12:47 Microsoft 365 Copilot will use private community and event content as grounding sources - MC1296480 18:06 Microsoft 365 Copilot (Premium): Teams meetings as a reference in Copilot Notebooks - MC1296488 24:03 Microsoft 365 Copilot: Legal Agent for Word - MC1296877
This episode walks through how to effectively use Track Changes and Comments in Microsoft Word with JAWS, making document collaboration more accessible and manageable. Liz and Rachel break down how Track Changes works, including how to turn it on, interpret edits like insertions and deletions, and switch between different viewing modes such as Original, No Markup, Simple Markup, and All Markup. They also share practical strategies for navigating revisions more efficiently using JAWS-specific keyboard commands, including how to review edits individually, filter changes by reviewer, and use the revisions pane for a clearer overview. The discussion covers how to accept or reject changes, lock tracking to prevent further edits, and customize what types of changes are displayed. In the second half, the focus shifts to modern comments in Word. Rachel explains how comments have evolved, including features like drafting before posting, @mentions, threaded replies, and improved navigation. You'll learn multiple ways to move through comments, create new ones, and manage existing threads by editing, resolving, or deleting them. Whether you're collaborating on documents for school or work, this episode provides actionable tips and keyboard shortcuts to streamline your workflow and confidently review documents using JAWS.
Is it truly possible to love the unlovable? In our latest teaching series at Let's Talk Scripture, we dive deep into one of the most convicting and essential passages in the New Testament.This study on 1 John 4:7-21 moves beyond surface-level definitions of “love” and examines it as the primary evidence of a true relationship with God. If you are looking for biblical clarity on salvation, the nature of God, and how to handle difficult relationships within the church, this resource is for you.Understanding the Litmus Test of FaithIn this lesson, we explore the “Apostolic Witness” as the final standard for truth. We address the hard reality that while some people are difficult or “light switches” in their consistency, the command to love remains absolute.Key themes explored in this teaching include:The Ontology of God: Understanding that “God is love” refers to His very essence and nature.The Doctrine of Propitiation: How Jesus satisfied the righteous wrath of God to prove His love for us.Divine Enablement: Why the Holy Spirit is the only way we can love those who are naturally unlovable.Assurance in Judgment: How perfected love removes the fear of punishment and gives us confidence before the throne of Christ.Complete Your Resource LibraryTo help you study or teach this material effectively, we have released a Complete Digital Resource Pack. This package is designed with a professional, publication-style layout, perfect for copying into Microsoft Word for your own lessons or handouts.What you will receive in the Digital Pack:Detailed Publication-Style Outline: A comprehensive guide with time markers synchronized to the video for easy reference.Teacher & Student Guides: Expert insights for the instructor and engaging study materials for the learner.Theological Quiz: A 10-question assessment to reinforce key concepts like deity, humanity, and propitiation.Answer Key & Explanatory Guide: In-depth explanations for every answer to deepen your theological understanding.Whether you are a teacher preparing a lesson or a student of the Word looking for deeper exegesis, these materials provide the structure and depth needed for a professional Christian publication.Access the Lesson TodayStop guessing about your spiritual standing and start walking in the confidence of God's perfected love. Use the links below to watch the full video and download the complete study resource pack.[Watch the Full Video] | [Download the Resource Pack]Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Microsoft slibuje, že napraví hříchy Windows 11. Za sliby ho hodnotit nechceme, i ty jsou ovšem lepší, než přístup firmy v posledních letech. Kuba je ke všemu skeptický, přesto dokáže najít světlý bod naděje. Chválí Microsoft Word, jak pěkně funguje. Současně si myslí, že OpenOffice a jeho nástupci selhali. Petr tak přísný není a poukazuje na to, že dnešní LibreOffice je dobře fungující alternativa, která si našla své místo i v některých institucích. Francouzské četnictvo před lety udělalo krok navíc a dokonce místo Windows zavedlo Linux. Dodnes ho používá a z jejich zkušenosti bude těžit francouzská státní správa, která migruje letos. Kuba to nepovažuje za dostatečný úspěch open source a zůstává skeptikem. Pak začne hořekovat nad tím, že Evropa se dobrovolně stala technologicky závislou a promarnila potenciál RISC-V. Petr oponuje, že zde sídlí čipové firmy a významné vědecké kapacity a že se snad Evropa postaví na vlastní nohy, když jí u hlavy hlasitě zvoní budík. Dnešní díl je hodně dada. Program pořadu 01:52 – Novinky ve Windows 05:40 – Ovládací panely 08:16 – Hloupé hledání 11:33 – Pryč s Copilotem 14:10 – Office je stále super 19:30 – Microsoft slibuje změny 23:02 – Francie na Linuxu 28:18 – RISC-V 32:59 – Marný pokus o závěr
In August 2019, a plaintiff identified as "Lisa Doe" filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate, alleging that she was recruited at age 17 under the pretense of teaching a dance-based exercise class at Epstein's New York townhouse. According to the lawsuit, an associate of Epstein hired her for this role, but subsequent interactions led to Epstein soliciting massages from her. The suit claims that during these encounters, Epstein forcibly used a sex toy on her and ultimately pressured her to recruit other dancers from her studio for similar purposes.The lawsuit asserts that Epstein's actions were part of a broader pattern of abuse facilitated by a network of associates who helped recruit and control young women. Lisa Doe's allegations highlight the manipulative tactics Epstein allegedly employed, such as exploiting her aspirations in dance to lure her into abusive situations. This case is among several that have been filed against Epstein's estate, aiming to hold accountable those involved in his extensive trafficking operations and to seek justice for the survivors of his abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2019-08-20_LDoe_Complaint_for_filing (bwbx.io)
In August 2019, a plaintiff identified as "Lisa Doe" filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate, alleging that she was recruited at age 17 under the pretense of teaching a dance-based exercise class at Epstein's New York townhouse. According to the lawsuit, an associate of Epstein hired her for this role, but subsequent interactions led to Epstein soliciting massages from her. The suit claims that during these encounters, Epstein forcibly used a sex toy on her and ultimately pressured her to recruit other dancers from her studio for similar purposes.The lawsuit asserts that Epstein's actions were part of a broader pattern of abuse facilitated by a network of associates who helped recruit and control young women. Lisa Doe's allegations highlight the manipulative tactics Epstein allegedly employed, such as exploiting her aspirations in dance to lure her into abusive situations. This case is among several that have been filed against Epstein's estate, aiming to hold accountable those involved in his extensive trafficking operations and to seek justice for the survivors of his abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2019-08-20_LDoe_Complaint_for_filing (bwbx.io)
In August 2019, a plaintiff identified as "Lisa Doe" filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate, alleging that she was recruited at age 17 under the pretense of teaching a dance-based exercise class at Epstein's New York townhouse. According to the lawsuit, an associate of Epstein hired her for this role, but subsequent interactions led to Epstein soliciting massages from her. The suit claims that during these encounters, Epstein forcibly used a sex toy on her and ultimately pressured her to recruit other dancers from her studio for similar purposes.The lawsuit asserts that Epstein's actions were part of a broader pattern of abuse facilitated by a network of associates who helped recruit and control young women. Lisa Doe's allegations highlight the manipulative tactics Epstein allegedly employed, such as exploiting her aspirations in dance to lure her into abusive situations. This case is among several that have been filed against Epstein's estate, aiming to hold accountable those involved in his extensive trafficking operations and to seek justice for the survivors of his abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2019-08-20_LDoe_Complaint_for_filing (bwbx.io)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In August 2019, a plaintiff identified as "Lisa Doe" filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate, alleging that she was recruited at age 17 under the pretense of teaching a dance-based exercise class at Epstein's New York townhouse. According to the lawsuit, an associate of Epstein hired her for this role, but subsequent interactions led to Epstein soliciting massages from her. The suit claims that during these encounters, Epstein forcibly used a sex toy on her and ultimately pressured her to recruit other dancers from her studio for similar purposes.The lawsuit asserts that Epstein's actions were part of a broader pattern of abuse facilitated by a network of associates who helped recruit and control young women. Lisa Doe's allegations highlight the manipulative tactics Epstein allegedly employed, such as exploiting her aspirations in dance to lure her into abusive situations. This case is among several that have been filed against Epstein's estate, aiming to hold accountable those involved in his extensive trafficking operations and to seek justice for the survivors of his abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2019-08-20_LDoe_Complaint_for_filing (bwbx.io)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Learn how to shape a solicitation before the government even releases the final RFP. In this episode, Eric Coffey walks through a real example where his sources sought suggestions were added directly to an SDVOSB set aside solicitation on Seaport. The government added his recommended minimum past performance requirements and an organic small UAS capability, dramatically increasing his win probability from maybe to definitely. How adding minimum past performance requirements raises the standard and elbows out LPTA lowest price vendors Why the government added organic small UAS capability to the solicitation and what that tells you about the incumbent The difference between firm fixed price, cost plus fixed fee, and time and materials and which one puts risk on you How to use Naval special warfare past performance to win regular Navy weapons training contracts Why OCONUS performance in Bahrain and Virginia beach changes your pricing strategy What it means when the government keeps a contract on Seaport under an engineering NAICS code that has nothing to do with engineering EPISODE CHAPTERS: 0:00 - How a sources sought response shaped this entire solicitation 0:57 - Putting customer logos on your cover page in Microsoft Word 2:24 - Keeping it SDVOSB on Seaport to elbow out competition 2:54 - Adding minimum past performance to raise the standard for vendors 3:54 - Why best value trade off beats lowest price technically acceptable 4:22 - How the government added organic small UAS capability to the RFP 5:21 - Why the incumbent probably does not have drones and is not performing 5:51 - OCONUS performance in Bahrain and Virginia beach 6:19 - Firm fixed price means you eat every mistake you make 7:18 - Cost plus fixed fee locks your profit at 8 percent with less risk 8:16 - Time and materials is a blank check for disaster cleanup 9:09 - Why the military pays whatever it takes to stay mission capable 9:37 - Using Naval special warfare past performance for regular Navy training If you want to learn more about the community and to join the webinars go to: https://federalhelpcenter.com/ Website: https://govcongiants.org/ Connect with Encore Funding: http://govcongiants.org/funding
With Microsoft finally doing right by Windows 11 and the Windows Insider Program, it's time to start testing and provide some feedback. And then we'll see if we can really trust these people. Also, Stardock's Connection Explorer 1.0 is here! And if you want one of macOS's dumbest features on Windows 11, you can get it now. Windows Yesterday was Patch Tuesday - Another month in paradise 26H1 - Eh, 24H2/25H2 - Narrator, File Explorer, display, Pen settings, WRE, Remote Desktop improvements Microsoft reveals how it will simplify the Windows Insider Program Two top-level channels, but really three A way to enable all features in new builds, finally, and easy channel switching. But there are complexities, of course New builds for Canary, Beta, and Dev - Two for Canary, but nothing new, Beta and Dev get Storage, networking, Windows Security, and Feedback Hub improvements The first Snapdragon X2-based PC is out, and Paul has that waiting in PA, and two more PCs are coming to Mexico PC sales were somehow up 2.5 percent in Q1, but the rest of 2026 will be a bloodbath Also, smartphone sales are doing even worse NVIDIA reportedly wants to buy Dell or HP ahead of a big PC chipset push. Interesting Surface/Microsoft 365 Microsoft is forced to hike Surface prices dramatically Microsoft reportedly kills Surface Hub Microsoft College Offer: 12 months of Microsoft 365 Premium, 12 months of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, and a custom Xbox controller when students in the U.S. purchase a PC AI/Dev Microsoft AI releases a faster and more efficient image model Amazon CEO tries to explain the AI spending Google app for Windows rolls out worldwide, but the Mac gets a Gemini app Claude for Microsoft Word arrives in Beta Claude for Desktop gets a major redesign for multiple AI agents Microsoft's reported plans to charge for AI agents .NET 11 Preview 3 arrives right on schedule, but there's nothing to see here Build session catalog is up - joking, but the new Windows native app strategy should just be vibe coding Google I/O registration is open, and you are never going to believe what the main topics will be - number five will shock you Xbox & gaming New Xbox CEO says Game Pass is too expensive, also that the sky is blue Xbox will show off the next Metro game soon Starfield for PS5 is getting a fix Amazon Luna is stripping down to the basics e.g. "pulling a Stadia" Tips & picks Tip of the week: It's time to get involved App pick of the week: Stardock Connection Explorer RunAs Radio this week: Internal Corporate Communications in 2026 with Emily Mancini Brown liquor pick of the week: ScapeGrace Vanguard Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Download or subscribe to Windows Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly Check out Paul's blog at thurrott.com The Windows Weekly theme music is courtesy of Carl Franklin. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free audio and video feeds, a members-only Discord, and exclusive content. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: cyberhoot.com/windows threatlocker.com/twit
With Microsoft finally doing right by Windows 11 and the Windows Insider Program, it's time to start testing and provide some feedback. And then we'll see if we can really trust these people. Also, Stardock's Connection Explorer 1.0 is here! And if you want one of macOS's dumbest features on Windows 11, you can get it now. Windows Yesterday was Patch Tuesday - Another month in paradise 26H1 - Eh, 24H2/25H2 - Narrator, File Explorer, display, Pen settings, WRE, Remote Desktop improvements Microsoft reveals how it will simplify the Windows Insider Program Two top-level channels, but really three A way to enable all features in new builds, finally, and easy channel switching. But there are complexities, of course New builds for Canary, Beta, and Dev - Two for Canary, but nothing new, Beta and Dev get Storage, networking, Windows Security, and Feedback Hub improvements The first Snapdragon X2-based PC is out, and Paul has that waiting in PA, and two more PCs are coming to Mexico PC sales were somehow up 2.5 percent in Q1, but the rest of 2026 will be a bloodbath Also, smartphone sales are doing even worse NVIDIA reportedly wants to buy Dell or HP ahead of a big PC chipset push. Interesting Surface/Microsoft 365 Microsoft is forced to hike Surface prices dramatically Microsoft reportedly kills Surface Hub Microsoft College Offer: 12 months of Microsoft 365 Premium, 12 months of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, and a custom Xbox controller when students in the U.S. purchase a PC AI/Dev Microsoft AI releases a faster and more efficient image model Amazon CEO tries to explain the AI spending Google app for Windows rolls out worldwide, but the Mac gets a Gemini app Claude for Microsoft Word arrives in Beta Claude for Desktop gets a major redesign for multiple AI agents Microsoft's reported plans to charge for AI agents .NET 11 Preview 3 arrives right on schedule, but there's nothing to see here Build session catalog is up - joking, but the new Windows native app strategy should just be vibe coding Google I/O registration is open, and you are never going to believe what the main topics will be - number five will shock you Xbox & gaming New Xbox CEO says Game Pass is too expensive, also that the sky is blue Xbox will show off the next Metro game soon Starfield for PS5 is getting a fix Amazon Luna is stripping down to the basics e.g. "pulling a Stadia" Tips & picks Tip of the week: It's time to get involved App pick of the week: Stardock Connection Explorer RunAs Radio this week: Internal Corporate Communications in 2026 with Emily Mancini Brown liquor pick of the week: ScapeGrace Vanguard Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Download or subscribe to Windows Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly Check out Paul's blog at thurrott.com The Windows Weekly theme music is courtesy of Carl Franklin. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free audio and video feeds, a members-only Discord, and exclusive content. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: cyberhoot.com/windows threatlocker.com/twit
With Microsoft finally doing right by Windows 11 and the Windows Insider Program, it's time to start testing and provide some feedback. And then we'll see if we can really trust these people. Also, Stardock's Connection Explorer 1.0 is here! And if you want one of macOS's dumbest features on Windows 11, you can get it now. Windows Yesterday was Patch Tuesday - Another month in paradise 26H1 - Eh, 24H2/25H2 - Narrator, File Explorer, display, Pen settings, WRE, Remote Desktop improvements Microsoft reveals how it will simplify the Windows Insider Program Two top-level channels, but really three A way to enable all features in new builds, finally, and easy channel switching. But there are complexities, of course New builds for Canary, Beta, and Dev - Two for Canary, but nothing new, Beta and Dev get Storage, networking, Windows Security, and Feedback Hub improvements The first Snapdragon X2-based PC is out, and Paul has that waiting in PA, and two more PCs are coming to Mexico PC sales were somehow up 2.5 percent in Q1, but the rest of 2026 will be a bloodbath Also, smartphone sales are doing even worse NVIDIA reportedly wants to buy Dell or HP ahead of a big PC chipset push. Interesting Surface/Microsoft 365 Microsoft is forced to hike Surface prices dramatically Microsoft reportedly kills Surface Hub Microsoft College Offer: 12 months of Microsoft 365 Premium, 12 months of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, and a custom Xbox controller when students in the U.S. purchase a PC AI/Dev Microsoft AI releases a faster and more efficient image model Amazon CEO tries to explain the AI spending Google app for Windows rolls out worldwide, but the Mac gets a Gemini app Claude for Microsoft Word arrives in Beta Claude for Desktop gets a major redesign for multiple AI agents Microsoft's reported plans to charge for AI agents .NET 11 Preview 3 arrives right on schedule, but there's nothing to see here Build session catalog is up - joking, but the new Windows native app strategy should just be vibe coding Google I/O registration is open, and you are never going to believe what the main topics will be - number five will shock you Xbox & gaming New Xbox CEO says Game Pass is too expensive, also that the sky is blue Xbox will show off the next Metro game soon Starfield for PS5 is getting a fix Amazon Luna is stripping down to the basics e.g. "pulling a Stadia" Tips & picks Tip of the week: It's time to get involved App pick of the week: Stardock Connection Explorer RunAs Radio this week: Internal Corporate Communications in 2026 with Emily Mancini Brown liquor pick of the week: ScapeGrace Vanguard Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Download or subscribe to Windows Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly Check out Paul's blog at thurrott.com The Windows Weekly theme music is courtesy of Carl Franklin. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free audio and video feeds, a members-only Discord, and exclusive content. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: cyberhoot.com/windows threatlocker.com/twit
With Microsoft finally doing right by Windows 11 and the Windows Insider Program, it's time to start testing and provide some feedback. And then we'll see if we can really trust these people. Also, Stardock's Connection Explorer 1.0 is here! And if you want one of macOS's dumbest features on Windows 11, you can get it now. Windows Yesterday was Patch Tuesday - Another month in paradise 26H1 - Eh, 24H2/25H2 - Narrator, File Explorer, display, Pen settings, WRE, Remote Desktop improvements Microsoft reveals how it will simplify the Windows Insider Program Two top-level channels, but really three A way to enable all features in new builds, finally, and easy channel switching. But there are complexities, of course New builds for Canary, Beta, and Dev - Two for Canary, but nothing new, Beta and Dev get Storage, networking, Windows Security, and Feedback Hub improvements The first Snapdragon X2-based PC is out, and Paul has that waiting in PA, and two more PCs are coming to Mexico PC sales were somehow up 2.5 percent in Q1, but the rest of 2026 will be a bloodbath Also, smartphone sales are doing even worse NVIDIA reportedly wants to buy Dell or HP ahead of a big PC chipset push. Interesting Surface/Microsoft 365 Microsoft is forced to hike Surface prices dramatically Microsoft reportedly kills Surface Hub Microsoft College Offer: 12 months of Microsoft 365 Premium, 12 months of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, and a custom Xbox controller when students in the U.S. purchase a PC AI/Dev Microsoft AI releases a faster and more efficient image model Amazon CEO tries to explain the AI spending Google app for Windows rolls out worldwide, but the Mac gets a Gemini app Claude for Microsoft Word arrives in Beta Claude for Desktop gets a major redesign for multiple AI agents Microsoft's reported plans to charge for AI agents .NET 11 Preview 3 arrives right on schedule, but there's nothing to see here Build session catalog is up - joking, but the new Windows native app strategy should just be vibe coding Google I/O registration is open, and you are never going to believe what the main topics will be - number five will shock you Xbox & gaming New Xbox CEO says Game Pass is too expensive, also that the sky is blue Xbox will show off the next Metro game soon Starfield for PS5 is getting a fix Amazon Luna is stripping down to the basics e.g. "pulling a Stadia" Tips & picks Tip of the week: It's time to get involved App pick of the week: Stardock Connection Explorer RunAs Radio this week: Internal Corporate Communications in 2026 with Emily Mancini Brown liquor pick of the week: ScapeGrace Vanguard Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Download or subscribe to Windows Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly Check out Paul's blog at thurrott.com The Windows Weekly theme music is courtesy of Carl Franklin. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free audio and video feeds, a members-only Discord, and exclusive content. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: cyberhoot.com/windows threatlocker.com/twit
With Microsoft finally doing right by Windows 11 and the Windows Insider Program, it's time to start testing and provide some feedback. And then we'll see if we can really trust these people. Also, Stardock's Connection Explorer 1.0 is here! And if you want one of macOS's dumbest features on Windows 11, you can get it now. Windows Yesterday was Patch Tuesday - Another month in paradise 26H1 - Eh, 24H2/25H2 - Narrator, File Explorer, display, Pen settings, WRE, Remote Desktop improvements Microsoft reveals how it will simplify the Windows Insider Program Two top-level channels, but really three A way to enable all features in new builds, finally, and easy channel switching. But there are complexities, of course New builds for Canary, Beta, and Dev - Two for Canary, but nothing new, Beta and Dev get Storage, networking, Windows Security, and Feedback Hub improvements The first Snapdragon X2-based PC is out, and Paul has that waiting in PA, and two more PCs are coming to Mexico PC sales were somehow up 2.5 percent in Q1, but the rest of 2026 will be a bloodbath Also, smartphone sales are doing even worse NVIDIA reportedly wants to buy Dell or HP ahead of a big PC chipset push. Interesting Surface/Microsoft 365 Microsoft is forced to hike Surface prices dramatically Microsoft reportedly kills Surface Hub Microsoft College Offer: 12 months of Microsoft 365 Premium, 12 months of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, and a custom Xbox controller when students in the U.S. purchase a PC AI/Dev Microsoft AI releases a faster and more efficient image model Amazon CEO tries to explain the AI spending Google app for Windows rolls out worldwide, but the Mac gets a Gemini app Claude for Microsoft Word arrives in Beta Claude for Desktop gets a major redesign for multiple AI agents Microsoft's reported plans to charge for AI agents .NET 11 Preview 3 arrives right on schedule, but there's nothing to see here Build session catalog is up - joking, but the new Windows native app strategy should just be vibe coding Google I/O registration is open, and you are never going to believe what the main topics will be - number five will shock you Xbox & gaming New Xbox CEO says Game Pass is too expensive, also that the sky is blue Xbox will show off the next Metro game soon Starfield for PS5 is getting a fix Amazon Luna is stripping down to the basics e.g. "pulling a Stadia" Tips & picks Tip of the week: It's time to get involved App pick of the week: Stardock Connection Explorer RunAs Radio this week: Internal Corporate Communications in 2026 with Emily Mancini Brown liquor pick of the week: ScapeGrace Vanguard Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Download or subscribe to Windows Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly Check out Paul's blog at thurrott.com The Windows Weekly theme music is courtesy of Carl Franklin. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free audio and video feeds, a members-only Discord, and exclusive content. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: cyberhoot.com/windows threatlocker.com/twit
With Microsoft finally doing right by Windows 11 and the Windows Insider Program, it's time to start testing and provide some feedback. And then we'll see if we can really trust these people. Also, Stardock's Connection Explorer 1.0 is here! And if you want one of macOS's dumbest features on Windows 11, you can get it now. Windows Yesterday was Patch Tuesday - Another month in paradise 26H1 - Eh, 24H2/25H2 - Narrator, File Explorer, display, Pen settings, WRE, Remote Desktop improvements Microsoft reveals how it will simplify the Windows Insider Program Two top-level channels, but really three A way to enable all features in new builds, finally, and easy channel switching. But there are complexities, of course New builds for Canary, Beta, and Dev - Two for Canary, but nothing new, Beta and Dev get Storage, networking, Windows Security, and Feedback Hub improvements The first Snapdragon X2-based PC is out, and Paul has that waiting in PA, and two more PCs are coming to Mexico PC sales were somehow up 2.5 percent in Q1, but the rest of 2026 will be a bloodbath Also, smartphone sales are doing even worse NVIDIA reportedly wants to buy Dell or HP ahead of a big PC chipset push. Interesting Surface/Microsoft 365 Microsoft is forced to hike Surface prices dramatically Microsoft reportedly kills Surface Hub Microsoft College Offer: 12 months of Microsoft 365 Premium, 12 months of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, and a custom Xbox controller when students in the U.S. purchase a PC AI/Dev Microsoft AI releases a faster and more efficient image model Amazon CEO tries to explain the AI spending Google app for Windows rolls out worldwide, but the Mac gets a Gemini app Claude for Microsoft Word arrives in Beta Claude for Desktop gets a major redesign for multiple AI agents Microsoft's reported plans to charge for AI agents .NET 11 Preview 3 arrives right on schedule, but there's nothing to see here Build session catalog is up - joking, but the new Windows native app strategy should just be vibe coding Google I/O registration is open, and you are never going to believe what the main topics will be - number five will shock you Xbox & gaming New Xbox CEO says Game Pass is too expensive, also that the sky is blue Xbox will show off the next Metro game soon Starfield for PS5 is getting a fix Amazon Luna is stripping down to the basics e.g. "pulling a Stadia" Tips & picks Tip of the week: It's time to get involved App pick of the week: Stardock Connection Explorer RunAs Radio this week: Internal Corporate Communications in 2026 with Emily Mancini Brown liquor pick of the week: ScapeGrace Vanguard Hosts: Leo Laporte, Paul Thurrott, and Richard Campbell Download or subscribe to Windows Weekly at https://twit.tv/shows/windows-weekly Check out Paul's blog at thurrott.com The Windows Weekly theme music is courtesy of Carl Franklin. Join Club TWiT for Ad-Free Podcasts! Support what you love and get ad-free audio and video feeds, a members-only Discord, and exclusive content. Join today: https://twit.tv/clubtwit Sponsors: cyberhoot.com/windows threatlocker.com/twit
Anthropic has launched Claude for Word, a native Microsoft Word add-in currently in public beta for Team and Enterprise subscribers. This integration allows users to draft and edit documents directly within a sidebar, featuring a unique capability where AI suggestions appear as tracked changes for human review. Beyond basic text generation, the tool is strategically designed for legal and finance professionals, offering specialized features such as counterparty redline summarization, semantic navigation of clauses, and automated comment resolution. It distinguishes itself from competitors through shared context across the Microsoft 365 suite, enabling Claude to pull data from Excel or convert Word content into PowerPoint slides within a single conversation. While early feedback suggests it offers superior document logic compared to Microsoft's own Copilot, the beta remains restricted to paid professional tiers with specific security and usage guidelines. This development signals Anthropic's intent to disrupt the legal tech market by embedding sophisticated AI reasoning directly into the primary workspace of document-intensive industries.
Remember the 2020 trailer for State Of Decay 3? Turns out, that trailer was greenlit when the game was just a Microsoft Word document. Indeed, the team was barely above a handful of people and yet it got a full on trailer! That's only the start of today's story which leads us into the start of a private alpha playtest for the game. Indeed, it appears that this game truly began its work sometime in 2023 at best. The Dukes have thoughts, but much of it leans into the 'glass half full mentality' thanks to an interview by Sunny Games. In this, we learn about State Of Decay 3's direction for its co-op mode, combat, base building, choice and consequence, and plenty more. Beyond that, it was a busy week for Xbox as we finally are seeing movement on the achievements from. Naturally, there's also Halo drama to get into because when isn't that a thing? Please keep in mind that our timestamps are approximate, and will often be slightly off due to dynamic ad placement.0:00:00 - Intro0:20:31 - Game Pass refunds are dead?0:21:41 - Xbox theme parks0:25:12 - Halo Campaign Evolved release date leaks0:41:20 - Xbox is finally updating achievements0:56:29 - Mass Effect show being made for non-gamers1:12:36 - Xbox continues to tinker with back compat1:17:12 - Steam Deck 2 release date news1:23:44 - What We're Playing2:19:49 - State Of Decay 3 has a pulse2:55:35 - Halo Studios has more drama Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
He started writing at 16 during lockdown, finishing a massive first draft he'll never publish, but instead of stopping there, he kept going. That persistence turned into real momentum for Harrison Stockland, a rising crime-thriller author known for his “twisted originality” and willingness to embrace the gritty choices that traditional gatekeepers often want softened. His debut novel, Watch It Burn, sets the tone for the kind of dark, character-driven stories he's building his career on. In this episode, we talk candidly about protecting your voice as you grow as a writer—and why “the deal has to be right” if you ever sign with a publishing house. We also get practical about self-publishing and Amazon KDP: querying agents, turning down an offer, hiring an editor and cover designer, and even learning to format a book in Microsoft Word. Harrison shares how he approaches Amazon ads, explaining why his goal is often reach and breaking even rather than immediate profit, and how a short course plus consistent experimentation can outperform expensive monthly retainers with ad agencies.Marketing isn't just a buzzword here. We dig into what actually moved the needle: building genuine relationships, hosting local bookstore events and signings, growing an email list, and using an author website with email automations to nudge readers toward preorders and reviews.We also talk craft and research, how nonfiction like Mindhunter and conversations with detectives and legal professionals can elevate crime fiction, making it feel authentic without copying real cases.If you care about writing discipline, creative control, and modern publishing strategy, this episode is packed with insights.Subscribe to Read and Write with Natasha, share this with a writer friend, and don't forget to leave a review—it helps more book lovers discover the show.Send us Fan MailSupport the show
Article 19 is back! After a hibernation, we're ready to bloom again. Listen to Katie and Kristen interview longtime listener, first time caller, Raquella Freeman, as she shares her disability journey with us. While ableism and sexism tried to keep her down, Raquella leaned hard on the voices that lifted her up and is now an advocate for those who follow. At the end of the episode, Katie gives Raquella a unique gift, and Raquella undergoes a surprise metamorphosis. Listen wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about web accessibility at Tammaninc.com and document accessibility, and accessibility training and consulting at ChaxTC.com. 00:00:00,171 Article 19 Intro Recording: Expression is one of the most powerful tools we have. A voice, a pen, a keyboard. Eleanor Roosevelt Recording: “The real change which must give to people throughout the world their human rights must come about in the hearts of people. We must want our fellow human beings to have rights and freedoms which give them dignity.” Article 19 Recording: Article 19 is the voice in the room. (tech Music bed) 00:00:25 Walt Zielinski: So for me, the moment that I realized digital accessibility was something I wanted to learn more about was when it dawned on me that the same sort of fight for gay rights and being visibly queer was sort of the same exact fight being fought for people with disabilities. Accessibility is all about championing people whose voices are inherently, by society, stifled or shut down because they exist outside of the typical space. And when I realized that it was all part of the same fight, that my fight for religious freedom, for queer liberation, was the same as the fight for disability rights, it became very obvious that it was something that I had to pursue in some way. 00:01:23 Rose Bliesner: I was drawn into digital accessibility when I first met people who worked in this space. When I learned that digital accessibility was something that people had careers in and something that people dedicated their lives to, I was intrigued. I met several accessibility professionals and learned that they are the most empathetic, most passionate people, and that they really, really love what they do. And so their enthusiasm for their craft really motivated me to educate myself on how to make the world more accessible. And I have loved every minute of it. 00:01:55 Rob Underwood: When I got hired by Chax to remediate InDesign documents for assistive technologies it was the very first time I realized that digital accessibility was something that I wanted to learn more about. I've been teaching InDesign for 20 years, but I never knew how to make an accessible document. When I was hired, I was taught the process of document remediation in small, incremental steps at first. I learned about the importance of headings and document structure. Once we got into color contrast, tables, and the pack checker, I understood the importance of the job we were performing, and how accessibility wasn't a nice-to-have, it was a must. The real aha moment for me was the first time DAX showed us what the documents we created sounded like with a screen reader. For the first time, I could finally grasp how people interact with assistive technology. It was then that I realized that my skillset could provide value to the team and that I wanted to learn everything I could about document remediation. Being part of a team that is at the forefront of accessibility makes me feel good about the work I'm doing. For the first time in my life, I feel like I'm working at a job that gives me purpose. 00:03:07 Taylor Kellar: When I first started working for Chax, I had a very vague understanding as to what digital accessibility meant. I thought that because technology was ever evolving, that accessibility was something that was already being automatically considered. It wasn't until I realized that programs that I use as an able-bodied individual, like Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat, have barriers that my coworkers who don't utilize technology in the same way have trouble accessing. What inspires me to learn more about digital accessibility is my co-workers. I feel very lucky that I get a first-hand experience learning tips and tricks on how to make my own content more accessible, and as a world that's primarily online, I think we owe it to ourselves to make content accessible for everyone. 00:03:51 Katie Samson, (cohost): Hello, everyone, and welcome to Article 19. What's up, Kristen? Kristen Witucki, (cohost): Oh, it's been a minute, Katie. We're, you know, we've taken a little break, and it's really great to be back with you again and with our producer, Markus Goldman. 00:04:06 KS: Yes, we got the band back together. KW: Yeah, we did. KS: We're going to have some great music, some awesome topics coming up in 2026. And we figured we'd start a little bit easy, starting internal to Tammann and Chax. 00:04:20 KW: with our most ardent listener, our loyalist fan, perhaps our only downloader, but nevertheless, she's been there through it all and a lot more. KS: So let's bring her in. Welcome everyone to the kickoff of 2026. Article 19. Raquella Freeman. Hello. Raquella Freeman: Hi, everyone. KS: So glad to have you with us. RF: Long time listener, First time caller. Thank you. So excited to be here and be a part of this for sure. 00:04:53 KS: Raquella, can you tell our listeners where you are situated right now? RF: So I am in Green Bay, Wisconsin. It is the heat of winter, which means it's about negative something out there right now. And I think we're about to have a snowstorm beginning tonight and into tomorrow. 00:05:11 KW: So you mean another snowstorm, right? Another snowstorm. Not the first snowstorm. RF: Correct. We had our first snowstorm last week, so this will be our second snowstorm, and it's only the second week of December, so we're doing great. 00:05:26 KS: Wow. Those Wisconsinners, you guys really earn your seasons, I gotta say. RF: Yes. We spend most of our time in winter, and we really look forward to those three months of summer. 00:05:38 KS: Well, it's so great to have you with us and to kick off what I think is going to be, you know, an exciting year for us. We've got a little bit more flexibility to explore some topics. You know, you're one of our faves. So we had to do the call out first. Kristen, you want to kick us off with a softball question? KW: Yeah, yeah. Well, Maybe not the softballs, I don't know. Softballs are hard, though. I've been hit with one. So let's just start at the beginning. If you think about your family, Raquella, and your beginnings, because this is going to sound sort of random, but it all leads to the great pinnacle of you being with us now. When you think back to your, you know, your birth and your early childhood, how do you think your parents would have described those early years and how did they discover or diagnose your disability needs? 00:06:33 RF: That's a fun question. My early years were really complicated. I had health conditions right away. I was born about a month, almost two months early, and this was in the early nineties. So medical practice wasn't what it is today. And I had health complications, spent over a month in the hospital, and they weren't sure you know, what would happen after having a brain bleed. You know, they had no way of knowing what my life would be like until I grew up a little bit. And then as the years went on, my parents tell me that I was a very precocious child, like I was talking circles around them even starting as early as three years old. I could tell you about everything that ever happened and I wanted to tell you everything that I had in my head, but I couldn't sit up. So you had a child who could talk your ear off, but physically I was barely crawling, had limited mobility and couldn't sit up without a lot of support. So they knew something was going on, but the local doctors in my small town that I grew up in didn't know what it was. And they said, Oh, she'll catch up. Don't worry about it. She'll catch up. You know, we were getting older and my parents were like, this doesn't feel like a she'll catch up thing. So they took me to a more advanced doctor in Milwaukee, which is one of the bigger cities in Wisconsin. And they have a great children's hospital there where I met my doctor, Dr. Schwab, who diagnosed me within like a second of meeting me. They said they barely even walked into the exam room and he was like, Oh, so she has cerebral palsy. Like, let's get working on how we can support her and get her the support she needs. And it was him who, you know, helped my parents figure out what my diagnosis meant, started helping me get the medical equipment I needed to get support, get physical therapy and kind of get that process started in my life. And he was also the guy who did all of my surgeries for all of my young years, the surgeries that I've had. And he was great. Like he, he really did change my life. and like help my family and me figure out what the next steps were, but never held me back from anything I wanted to do. Just made sure that I had everything I needed to be successful. 00:08:53 KS: We've talked a lot, Raquella, about just the physical barriers that we have to face as wheelchair users, navigating winter, navigating a lot of things. How did you learn in those early years and in your own life about all of the barriers, I guess, and then, you know, the ableism that comes with it? Did you start to see signs of that when you were a child, when you were trying to get involved in certain activities, or did it start to kind of creep in, yeah, over time? RF: It was there pretty early. I think, you know, maybe my earliest memory of it, you know, I was… In kindergarten, I think when I started to go to school was when I noticed students treating me differently and people not knowing how to interact with me. Like that's how it began early on. And I had to learn very quickly that like this was going to be part of life for me and how to navigate that space, which I credit my grandmother for. giving me the words to work in those spaces, which because she was the one who told me, hey, people aren't going to understand how capable you are. They might make fun of you, but what's most important is that you just show them that you're just like they are. And then maybe you need a little support. Like she gave me the language to be like, Hey, you know, don't make fun of me. Like I'm good. Like gave me the strength to stop people from putting me down instantaneously and said, no, you have a voice in these spaces to do that. Which is why I think only every year after that moment was I got stronger and stronger in my convictions to not let anybody tell me what I could or could not do whether it was an education or any time in my life. And I just kind of still hold on to those words today. Any time it comes up that someone says, oh, I don't think you can do that. I hear my grandma in the back of my mind going, you can do anything and don't let anybody tell you, you can't. 00:10:56 KS: God bless grandmothers, right? RF: Absolutely. 00:10:59 KW: Yes, definitely. I can relate to some of that growing into our advocacy self, especially like that late elementary, middle school passage of life when like your whole brain is opening up that you kind of thought about one way and it's sort of more innocent childlike frame of mind suddenly gains depth and complexity and hardship sometimes. And I was wondering if you could tell us a little bit about some of the middle school struggles that you were telling me about before and how they shaped you. RF: For sure. Middle school, as I'm sure everybody knows, is a tough time for everybody. No matter where you're from, middle school is complicated and mine was no different. One of the most wild times I had in middle school was during gym, which wasn't my favorite class ever, but it was one that we all had to do. So I would go even though half the time I would spend doing more of a study hall when I couldn't really easily participate in some of the sessions that they had. But one that they always had us do was the presidential fitness test that we did every year, which I couldn't do probably 90% of the presidential fitness tests like well or at all. But the one section I could do was the push-ups section. I have very strong upper body strength. Not so much anymore, but back in my younger days when I used a walker for a majority of my mobility, I would use my arms to move around. So my arms were very strong from carrying my whole body all day. So needless to say, you can put me on the floor and I could do over a hundred push-ups in a minute with perfect form and in like the full style. Like I love doing push-ups and I like felt so good about myself for how good I was at push-ups because every other aspect of gym class I was not good at but I was really good at that. So good that the phys ed teacher actually was like, hey I'm going to use you as my example student for the perfect push-up. of like how to align your body perfectly and how to do it right and for somebody like me whose physical body mostly doesn't ever do what I want it to to have somebody say in this moment your body is a show of like perfection was a big highlight for me. So I did that and it was great. Flash forward to a couple days later, we were revisiting the topic and I was told by that same teacher that he had gotten calls from students' parents, those students happened to be boys in my class, that called and said, hey, you can't be using her as an example because my son was upset. that you were using the girl with a disability to show off the perfect pushup and not them. And so I was told at that point that I was no longer allowed to be the example student because I had hurt feelings of the boys in my class because it was me and not them. That one hurt me. I think that one still hurts me a little bit to this day because I'm in my thirties now and I still remember that moment extremely vividly. I was like realizing that even something as simple as doing push-ups in gym class would lead to somebody in my class doing something like that to show them even though I couldn't do anything else in class I could do that and they didn't appreciate that I had showed them up in some way. 00:14:37 KW: That's quite an intro to ableism and sexism like in one shot. RF: Yes, for sure. It makes me sad even to this day. 00:14:45 KS: I mean, talk about teachable moments, not only for the boys, but for the parents and for the gym teacher as well. Who's protecting who in that situation? And, you know, I can't imagine it did those boys any favors in their adult life by learning that lesson. But in a way, as a transition, I would say you are paying it forward in a really cool and awesome way. And I love the work that you do and the service work that you do for young people with disabilities. And we've talked a lot about our camp times during the summer where we go off and explore and have adventures with our like-minded disabled groups. And I wonder if you could talk about some of that work and the advocacy that you do for young people and where it's led for you today in that involvement and some of those lessons that you learned, you know, albeit painful as a child and how that kind of informs your practice with this camp and your service to your community. RF: So I work with an organization called Wisconsin Youth Leadership Forum. I've been a part of it in some capacity since 2011 when I myself was a delegate. It changed my life in that moment. It gave me a new community of people because the theme of the camp is that you're spending a week away from home in a college campus in dorm rooms with other students with disabilities who are high school age and you spend the week learning about advocacy not only for yourself but also for future planning and goals for your career and how to achieve that, and the best thing about YLF is that they also majority of the staff is also persons with disabilities. So you have all students with disabilities, and I would say probably 90% of the staff has some form of disability as well, and we're all just working together, and it's beautiful as a delegate, you get to not only meet more students with disabilities, but you also get to meet and witness staff with disabilities, working hard and doing some really cool things and I think that can be really powerful to see from both sides of not only are you participating in this camp, but people like you are running this camp. I think that just makes it even more powerful. The whole week is about building community, growing together, thinking about your future because most of these kids are one to three years at most away from graduating high school. And so their future is kind of in their hands. Do I want to go to college? Do I want to go straight into the workforce? And whatever their goals are, you know, we're sometimes one of the first people who has them really thinking about it beyond like you know the high school guidance counselor that might just have like their standard script of things that they give every student you know we're really saying no what do you want to do let's let's really talk about your goals and like what do you need what supports do you need to be able to achieve this career that you want whatever that may be and like showing them that the doors aren't closed to anything as long as and there are people out there that can support them and for so many of these kids we've been they've told us like oh i've never really thought about it because nobody asked me or you have some who have really thought about it but they're like i want to do this thing but i don't know how and i don't know who to ask for help and in this seven days together You know, we're talking with these 20 plus students about this and watching them grow and build community with each other. And it's honestly one of the most amazing things that I get to be a part of, not only as a staff member during the week, but I'm also a board member. I'm actually the president of the board at the moment. So I get to really make sure that this organization is successful and continues to grow for years to come because it is truly so important to me because I've seen the impact it can have not only as a delegate, but as somebody who's worked on staff and made connections with young people who I still am connected with today and like, you know, check on them and see how they're doing. And we have past graduates who, you know, are going to legislative meetings or going to talk to their senators or getting careers in spaces where they can use their voice for others with disabilities and knowing that they came through our program and many of them say, you know, I might not have done this legislative talk had I not been in YLF. That was the spark that they needed. And I would say personally for me that that was a spark that I needed back in 2011 as I was getting ready to graduate high school was like the first time that I did advocacy that wasn't just for myself or for like other people in my direct circle where I had met people outside of my small town and realize that there was a whole world of young people and adults doing really great things to better the lives of people with disabilities. And I wanted to be a part of that somehow. Like that's where it really, really clicked in for me that this was going to be a part of my life for the rest of my life. 00:20:08 KW: Well, and that's such a powerful message for people, young people with disabilities or anyone with disabilities to hear and internalize because, you know, I think many, many programs may be well-meaning but might communicate a very different message like, oh, we expect you only in these sorts of jobs or, you know, so that's really powerful that you really absorb what people want to be and are trying to figure out how to help them. When you think about your own journey of getting a job, were there any challenges in getting a job that aligned with your skills and your values? RF: Yeah. I think the working world is complicated for most people, but like with many things, ableism exists. And I found there to be plenty of ableism when it came to starting my career in the working world. I knew right away that I needed to get a degree because every job that I thought I'd be interested in needed one to like to make that career work. And I knew that I was not only battling for a job in general, but that I had to, or at least I felt, this is my personal feeling, I would say it's not necessarily true for everybody, but personally for me, I felt I needed to be even better than the average person, even at a basic job, because I had to make them forget about my chair. I had to make them see that I was worth the time and the money, regardless of my mode of getting around space. And so I went to school and I did well, and went out and got a job. I mean, I will say my degree probably wasn't the smartest choice if I actually wanted to say it and have somebody understand what it was and give me a job for it. If I'm being honest, it was definitely a liberal arts degree with a name that wasn't helpful. I have technically a community leadership and development degree. Nobody knows what that is, but. 00:22:13 KW: basically... Oh, it does resonate from your camp, though. RF: It does, yes. The better way to say it is non-profit management degree is what I have. So I started working in non-profit spaces, found my way in through City Year, which is an AmeriCorps program. That was the first, like, quote-unquote big girl job that I had was my City Year job, which was just a sad little stipend that got me moved to Texas, where I spent a year working in a school in San Antonio with sixth graders in English, and it was wild. Those kids were amazing. I loved them. They were why I got up every morning at 4 a.m. and braved wild transit systems to get to them to make sure that I was there for them and it was great, but I had to do a stipend job where I wasn't really making any money and I was just kind of working to exist to kind of start to get noticed in career spaces. It was my first way of finding my way into a role that worked with my degree and paid me to do something. After that, I went into other nonprofit roles that started to slowly see my experience. Most places I worked, I would start at the very, very bottom, you know, and then somebody would recognize that I had a skill and I'd be like, Oh, do you want to move into this next tier? and do other things. And the other answer was always, yes, I want to do more. Yes, I like to do things. Please let me do things. And then I would work my way through. So I kind of learned for a while that that was how my career path was going to go. It was a lot of people not really seeing me, but feeling like, oh, she's got something. There's something there. So let's put her in and we'll see how she does, and see where it goes. You know, I wasn't always ideal and I wanted more for myself, but I think it's safe to say that after, you know, over a decade of really trying to find a workplace that saw me for me and didn't just, you know, throw me a bone because my resume was decent, that finally I realized that I had enough under my belt and had the passion that I needed and applied for. a job at Tamman and Chax and found my way here. I will say I manifested this job in my own way because I loved Article 19 and ChaxChat and just wanted to work here so bad that put my resume out and just crossed my fingers and but we're here today so it's proof that you can manifest your own dreams if you really try hard. 00:24:53 KW: Seriously I mean the story is incredible and let me just back up a tiny bit and you know when I think about your life compared to mine as a blind person, you know, but both of us having experienced disability from the beginning is, you know, it's really interesting when I think about you heading into a building or a house and maybe in a lot of cases, they tell themselves at least that they're grandfathered in, they don't really need to make an accessible building for you or, you know, they think it's for you and not just for everybody. and like that's the challenge but it's so pervasive in our society that many people don't even notice until they're confronted with it and you know but when I think of what your work is which is to you take a document that maybe somebody thought was grandfathered in, and you're stripping away those barriers to the building for someone like me. And I don't know, I'm just really fascinated by your commitment to erasing barriers. And I wondered if you could talk a little bit about how you got into that checks thing specifically. RF: So I didn't start out as a document specialist. That wasn't where I thought I would end up. but it just so happened that I was working at a non-profit. I was in their development department doing fundraising and things when I overheard them say, hey, we need to start making our documents accessible because, you know, the laws are changing and it's really important that we're doing that. Do we know anybody who can do that on our team? Because we need somebody. And needless to say, I didn't know how to do it, but I was very quick to raise my hand and go, I like to learn. I'll learn, I don't know what this is, but I'll learn how to do this. And that's how I found Article 19 and ChaxChat and started learning how to do document accessibility from nothing and found out very quickly that I loved making documents accessible. That the process of walking through the tags tree and making tags for a document so that it reads in a way that if you can't see it, that it makes sense and you can still understand the information. I thought that was so powerful and so important to be able to do that. And the fact that people didn't recognize that as a thing that was necessary, unless somebody asked for it, like really hit home for me. And that's when I decided I needed to be a part of a company like Tamman and Chax that saw how important that type of work was. So I worked hard and learned as much as I could and I continue to learn to this day and I'm grateful that I'm now part of the Chax family in the way that I can continue my learning and growing and now also help others learn a passion for making documents and the web accessible for people because you don't know what you don't know. I think that's the beauty of the work that we do is not only do we make documents accessible and we know how to do that, but we provide education on how to make those things accessible and to see, you know, when we're teaching classes, that spark that happens. And you can see it finally clicks for the person on the other side of that screen of like, Oh, this is why it's important. Like when we finally say the thing that helps them. really see the benefit of doing the work because it's not always the most glamorous job and sometimes it's hard and a document is complicated and you're spending hours fighting the tags tree, but when you get it just right and it sounds good and it makes sense and you know that when I pass this off to somebody they're going to be able to read it and understand it in a meaningful way. It makes me happy. Every time I finish a document and it sounds good I get excited and that's why I love my job so much because I just know that what I'm doing it means something to somebody else besides me.Like whoever is going to read it is going to have a good experience and I played even a small part in that journey. 00:29:05 KS: I love how it's your joy for the work is really infectious. And I think, you know, our listeners would be interested in sort of learning the hard skills and also the soft skills. You talk about like patience and fortitude, like getting through the document. And, you know, I think some of that is ingrained in your personality and, you know, your 100 pushups. And also, you know, thinking about some of those hard skills of like, what did you need to learn in order to become a document accessibility specialist? Did it start with Adobe and then InDesign or did you have to learn a little bit about the design tools first and then get into like the tags tree and sort of what is, I guess, the code at the back end of a document? Because I think, you know, some people just think of a document as a document and they don't really realize that there's a way you can manipulate it. And it's never locked, right? And that whole, like, once you create a PDF, it's locked for good. And, you know, at Chax, we unlock a lot of documents. So yeah, I wondered if you could talk a little bit about that, because you could be without even meaning to planting a seed in a lot of our listeners mind, like, Oh, maybe this is something I can do. RF: Absolutely.So getting started, I did focus mostly on learning Adobe and the basics of like what making a document accessible meant in that space.Because I would say still to this day, about 90% of the documents we see on a regular basis are going to be PDFs. You know, we have some source files as well, but my early days, it was very much focused on getting the PDF to be accessible because most of them, even if they were originally created as a Word doc, the final results were PDFs. So starting there is that's usually the gateway.I think, I think it's a, it's a smart way to get your feet wet in the world of accessibility is starting in the PDF. And for me, it was actually Chad's LinkedIn learning course is where I got started. And that went over a little bit of everything. Went over a lot of PDF, a little bit of Word, a little bit of all the basics you need to know. to kind of get started. And I mean, I think the best way to start is create your first tag, you know, watch the video on, you know, where do you find the tag street and what's the process of highlighting the content and creating that first tag. And I think it starts from there is just kind of learning about the heading structure and you know, why headings matter and. and if you can at least give a document some headings and some paragraphs, it's better than it was with no tags. There's a lot more steps to it, but if you can start there and if you find that interesting and you liked the process of that, then you might have a new little career on your hands. And it's definitely something that is so important and meaningful that, you know, it's, if you enjoy it, it's worth doing. I will say, honestly, I've talked to people about the work that I do offhandedly, whether it's my family or friends who ask what I do for work. And I try to explain that I spend my day adding tags to documents that can be anywhere from one page to hundreds of pages long. and that sometimes a document can take me hours or days and I say that story and I tell them how I make a list and it requires a list and a list item and an L body and a label tag and their eyes get big and then gloss over and go And I go, yeah, but it's so satisfying when that list is done and it looks good and it sounds good. And, you know, a lot of my friends go, you have the mind for this. I can't imagine the work that you do every day. And people say to me, I don't think I would enjoy the work that you're doing. 00:33:02 KW: Well, a lot of people don't understand that what a document looks like and what it sounds like can be very different experiences. They think it's very similar. They don't mean to not make it accessible, but they're just like, hey, if I make this font big, then it's a heading. It's like, no. It's a very basic example. RF: But it's true. 00:33:23 KW: A list needs a list tag, but nobody who looks at a list would necessarily figure that out. KS: Yeah, it would almost be like going back to elementary school and working in graph paper when you were doing math problems. Like, I always sort of wonder, like, we'll just take Microsoft Word, for example, like, couldn't they have a toggle that you could toggle back and forth and sort of see the tags tree as you're building the document? So it's like, it's built into the software in a sense that there, you're seeing the structure in real time as you're writing it. So it's sort of like the equation is laid out. And then it also brings that awareness. Because I think what all of these software companies did is they tried to make all of these systems look like a notebook, or like a real like you're writing on a pad of paper, right to sort of simulate like, it can be just as good as writing or transcribing or whatever. and disguising all of the tech, wherein the tech is what is so important for the accessibility components too. I sort of was having that thought because oftentimes I feel like in technology, they're just always trying to simulate the real environment in some way. It never quite looks or works. Forget about AI, but just like some of these like old school models that we're still working with. And yeah, I think it would be really interesting to be able to see the back end a little bit more. RF: For sure. I mean, I just wish looking back that more of these systems thought about accessibility at the beginning instead of having to be retroactive about it at the end. I mean, I'm grateful that Microsoft accessibility is part of their mantra and they are making steps to make it better and make it more efficient. Um, in terms of accessibility, but I think, you know, one of our biggest. Motto that Chax has to think about accessibility at the beginning, before you even start designing that document is to consider the accessibility within it before you get to the end. Because when you think about accessibility at the end, it can be so much more complicated to implement that accessibility. But if you think about it at the beginning and throughout the process, your whole project becomes more beautiful and easier to make beautiful in accessibility space because there is that misnomer that accessibility means not pretty. That does not have to be the case as long as you're considering it from the beginning rather than having to retroactively correct it at the end. 00:35:57 KS: Yeah, that's really important.I would say you wear a lot of hats at Chax, even though your title is Document Accessibility Specialist, that you're embedded in the culture and community at Tamman. You help lead the study group. You're also a trainer, you know, an educator. So I wondered if you could kind of walk through, I guess, like a work week. So, you know, dealing with clients, getting into documents, because I think a lot of a lot of what you do is building from the strength and that scaffolding that you learned, you know, almost kind of from the nonprofit world where you kind of have to do everything, especially if you're tiny, but mighty. RF: Right. KS: And so, yeah. Can you talk us through that work week? or work day, depending on what the day is. RF: Yeah. Sure. So my average week, I probably spend a good portion of my time doing quality assurance or QA. So I'm working with documents that are provided by our client and I'm adding tags or, you know, working with the team to have tags added to the document. And then we go at the end and we listen to all of our documents to make sure they sound good because sometimes tags can be deceptive. They can look great. But sometimes how they sound isn't always perfect, so you've got to make sure you listen to your documents. So I spend a good bit of my time listening to documents.When I'm not listening to documents, it likely means I am either providing technical assistance in a training for another trainer, or I might be teaching my own training, whether it's individualized for one of our clients, or I'm teaching a drop-in class. And then when I'm not doing those things,it probably means I'm in a book talk or another fun culture-based activity within Tamman and Chax and doing work there as well. So like those are my three main things that I spend my week doing and I love all of them equally and I will say there's more that I could do, can do, sometimes get thrown in to new projects on a whim, but I am not somebody who likes to say no because even now when I have work to do. I like being busy and I like learning new things and like supporting my team as best as possible because all these new things that I can learn just ensure that our work is done well and in a timely manner that I appreciate. Working with the amazing team that we've built, Tamman and Chax, I think just makes that easier too. when I love being able to step away for an hour once a month to go to a book talk. And like, we get to just enjoy each other's company and talk about books. And the fact that that's part of the culture of the workplace is such a beautiful thing. Because not everywhere can you say, oh, it's part of my work day at least once a month to go and talk about a book. Or I happen to run a board game session in the evenings on Monday nights once a week. It's after hours, but I have created an online board game group that we meet, you know, for an hour once a week and play a board game together. It's those little moments that make the work that keeps me busy even extra special because I have a great community of people who care about the work as much as I do, but then we can also enjoy each other's company. 00:39:18 KW: Yeah, I felt so lucky and like a little bit bowled over too, to be honest. Like how did the entire company, how is everybody such a nice, caring person? And like, you know, we're not all the same, but you know, that I felt very lucky that I've landed among such a great community of people. And I just wondered if there's anything you're looking forward to next year in, well, this year, by the time the podcast comes out in 2026, you know, just like a goal that you have or, skills that you're working on or anything that you're looking forward to? That's fun. RF: Well, I mean, in general, I'm just looking forward to what next year brings. I think we have a lot of cool plans on the horizon. I'm continuing to work with the amazing collection of clients that I have that consider me their main person and building those connections even further. I am really looking forward to, I'm teaching more drop-in classes in 2026, so I will be taking over a lot of the introductory classes of, you know, how to make a document accessible in Adobe and how to test with a screen reader are some of the classes that I'll be taking lead on in 2026, which feels very special and a great opportunity because, you know, these are classes that Chad and Dax created and have fostered for a long time now and the fact that they're willing to pass these classes along to me feels very, very special and something that I will cherish the fact that I earned their trust to take over these classes and help continue to teach new people in the accessibility space how to make documents accessible is a big dream for me. I'm looking forward to what that will mean for me in the next year. Even if it means doing less quality assurance all the time and more teaching, that's great. It's not something I ever thought I would have as a job. is to do, like, direct teaching to people, even though everybody always told me that I should be a teacher someday. I said I never wanted to have a class full of children that looked up to me, but now I can have a Zoom class full of adults. So I think it's the step in a direction that I didn't expect, but I'm so excited to get started on in 2026. 00:41:25 KW: We're thrilled that we get to work with you every day, every week, and I can imagine, I haven't talked to Chad and Dax about it personally, but just knowing, you know, how much you've worked on your CPACC, which is the Certification in Accessibility Core Competencies, and then the ADS, which is the document certification that Chad and Dax basically helped to design the exam for. And now that you are one of those crowned with it, you know, I'm sure that they're just over the moon excited about that and that you can help them grow what they've started. RF: I hope so. 00:42:00 KS: Well, Raquella, thank you so much for coming on the podcast and opening yourself up to all of our questions and being really vulnerable. And I so appreciate it. RF: I'm so happy to be here. 00:42:13 KS: I know we said at the beginning of the podcast that we were getting the band back together, but I have some news. I am transitioning away from Chax Training and Consulting and Article 19 to take on a new position as Community and Programs Director of the West Collection in Philadelphia. I'm very excited and also a bit melancholy to be leaving all of you behind because this has been... KW: We'll miss you Katie. 00:42:41 KS: I know, I know it's been such a wonderful year and a half, and I've developed such incredible friendships and relationships that I know will continue, especially among the three of you, Markus, you two in the back. But I thought, while we're here and while we're in this episode, it might be a good opportunity to, you know, literally get down on one knee, since I can't physically, and propose to you, Raquella, will you merry, your skills with the crew at Article 19 and take over as co-host of this podcast. RF: Wow. I have dreamed of a day like this for years now, since I started listening to Article 19. I would love the opportunity to join Kristen and Marcus on this adventure for sure. Thank you. 00:43:34 KW: We would love it. And it really is the Article 19 pattern. You talk on it for one episode and then all of a sudden you're hosting. Katie and I both went through that. We would love for you to continue our wonderful Article 19 traditions. RF: I look forward to it. Absolutely. 00:43:49 KS: Awesome. Well, and I, you can't get rid of me too easily. I will be back in any capacity that is needed or whatever. It's a revolving door open door. I don't know whatever we want to call it, but you can't get rid of me. KW: Yeah, no, it's all a cycle. So we know that you'll. do great things in your new role, and we're really excited to hear about your journey. And always, you're always welcome back. We might even interview you for the next episode. We have no idea what we're doing yet, so. 00:44:16 KS: Awesome. Well, thanks again, and I can't wait to hear the next episode for Raquella and Kristen. KW: Thank you so much, Raquella Freeman, for sharing your lived experience and your journey with us. And also, deep thanks to Rose Bleasner, Taylor Kellar, Rob Underwood, and Walt Zielinski for offering their thoughts on accessibility for the episode. Our producer is Markus Goldman, and Katie Samson and Kristen Witucki co-hosted this episode. You can find any of us on LinkedIn.Just hit us up with your ideas or your thoughts about future episodes. Article 19 is a call for others to join us in a bigger conversation around the ADA, accessibility, and access to information. We are working to build the inclusive world every day. And to do that, we need all of us working together and learning together. Thank you so much for listening and being a part of our journey. Take care.
Get the notes!Understanding the Evidence of the New Birth: A Study in 1 John 3:1-10Are you truly walking in the light, or is your faith merely a profession? In a world of theological confusion, the Apostle John provides a clear, uncompromising standard for identifying a child of God. Our latest teaching, “The Evidence of New Birth,” takes a deep look at 1 John 3:1-10 to distinguish between religious activity and a heart truly transformed by the Holy Spirit.The Heart of the Lesson: Identity and ResponsibilityThe Christian life begins with a stunning identity: we are “children of God” because of the Father's bestowed love. However, this divine status carries a profound responsibility. As biblical scholars and believers, we must understand that our position in Christ must eventually manifest in our practice.This study explores several critical themes:Positional Truth vs. Practical Living: How we stand before God in Christ's righteousness versus how we live our daily lives.The Nature of “Practice”: A Greek word study on why a lifestyle of habitual sin is impossible for the true believer.The Indwelling Seed: Understanding how the Holy Spirit (the “seed” of God) restrains us from comfortable sin and drives us toward repentance.The Blessed Hope: Why looking forward to the return of Jesus naturally leads us to purify ourselves today.What Is Included in This Teaching Package?To help you master and teach these truths, we have packaged this lesson into a comprehensive resource suite. This digital download is designed for pastors, teachers, and serious students of the Word who desire a publication-quality study experience.Your Product Package Includes:Detailed Publication Outline: A comprehensive breakdown with exact time markers to the video teaching for easy reference.Teacher & Student Guides: Annotated notes for leaders and guided study sheets for learners to facilitate deep discussion.Biblical Assessment Tools: A 10-question quiz to verify comprehension and a detailed answer sheet with theological explanations.Publication Formatting: All documents are formatted for easy copy-pasting into Microsoft Word, preserving all professional indentations and outlines.Why This Study MattersJohn concludes that the distinction between the children of God and the children of the devil is “obvious.” This study will challenge you to examine your own walk and equip you to lead others into a deeper, more authentic relationship with Jesus Christ.[Click Here to Download the Full Teaching Package]Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
For nearly three years, Rex Heuermann said not guilty. Seven women. Seven charges. Every time, not guilty.According to multiple sources confirmed by the Associated Press, NBC, CNN, and Fox News, that is expected to change on April 8. He's expected to plead guilty to all seven Gilgo Beach murders and accept life without the possibility of parole. The families have been called. The September trial is almost certainly over before it started.I've been covering this case for a long time, and I want to walk you through everything — not just the plea, but the evidence that made it inevitable and the story behind the story that most coverage is moving past too quickly.A pizza crust pulled from a Manhattan trash can cracked this open. A murder manual — Microsoft Word document, all capitals, sections titled "Body Prep" and "Post Event," created in 2000, updated for years, recovered after he tried to delete it — left the DA saying he'd never seen anything like it in his career. Fake identities. Burner phones registered under "Andrew Roberts" and "Thomas Hawk." A Tinder account under those aliases. More than 500 contacts to sex workers, reaching out to at least 60 women. One of those phones was in his pocket when they arrested him. And according to prosecutors, he kept making those contacts even after investigators had already identified him as a suspect.From that same Gmail account, he allegedly searched the Gilgo Beach investigation over 100 times — including, per court documents: "Why hasn't the Long Island serial killer been caught." He was tracking the case from inside his own home while his family slept upstairs.His daughter Victoria says she believes her father most likely did it. His ex-wife called him her hero. DNA linked to both of them was found on five of seven victims — transferred through ordinary household objects, without their knowledge. And when they arrested him and mentioned his $6,000 watch wasn't in his property, his response was: "I guess I won't be needing that."A guilty plea closes the legal chapter. What it doesn't close is a lot harder to name. This episode covers all of it.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #LongIslandSerialKiller #TrueCrime #GuiltyPlea #SerialKiller #HiddenKillers #GilgoFour #ColdCase #LISKcase
In this episode of Disruption/Interruption, KJ sits down with Alan Paulin, co-creator of Mavis, to explore how AI is fundamentally transforming the way we write and work. Alan shares his journey from building Cash App to creating a startup that eliminates "copy-paste purgatory" between AI tools and traditional word processors. The conversation dives into why the current AI workflow is broken, how Mavis enables true human-AI collaboration, and why the education system needs to evolve for an AI-native generation. This is essential listening for anyone frustrated with bouncing between ChatGPT and Google Docs—and a glimpse into the future of iterative, intelligent document creation. Four Key Takeaways: [0:18] AI tools today force a "one-shot" workflow that doesn't match how humans actually work - Most people work iteratively, meandering through drafts, massaging thoughts, and editing as they go. Current AI interfaces require big prompts and deliver static documents that force you into copy-paste hell, abandoning you once you leave the chat interface. [18:09] The real value of AI isn't just saving time, it's increasing happiness - Professionals didn't choose their fields to spend all day writing—they chose them to solve problems. By compressing the time spent on tedious documentation, AI tools like Mavis don't just create efficiency; they give people more time to do meaningful work they actually love. [13:34] Big tech companies are too slow to innovate in the AI-writing space - Google Docs and Microsoft Word haven't fundamentally changed in decades. Their massive user bases make rapid innovation nearly impossible—they're steering the Titanic. Startups have a unique advantage to tackle niches and experiment with workflows that giants simply can't. [34:29] The future belongs to "AI-native" thinkers who use AI as an extension of themselves - Industry is actively seeking people who seamlessly integrate AI into their workflow and thinking. The education system must evolve beyond testing what calculators and AI can do—and start focusing on critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving instead. Quote of the Show (17:52):"Most of these people didn't choose that field to spend all of their time writing. They chose it to solve problems." - Alan Paulin Join our Anti-PR newsletter where we’re keeping a watchful and clever eye on PR trends, PR fails, and interesting news in tech so you don't have to. You're welcome. Want PR that actually matters? Get 30 minutes of expert advice in a fast-paced, zero-nonsense session from Karla Jo Helms, a veteran Crisis PR and Anti-PR Strategist who knows how to tell your story in the best possible light and get the exposure you need to disrupt your industry. Click here to book your call: https://info.jotopr.com/free-anti-pr-eval Ways to connect with Alan Paulin: LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alanpaulinCompany Website: https://mavislabs.ai How to get more Disruption/Interruption: Amazon Music - https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/eccda84d-4d5b-4c52-ba54-7fd8af3cbe87/disruption-interruption Apple Podcast - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/disruption-interruption/id1581985755 Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/6yGSwcSp8J354awJkCmJlDSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Clinical trial design hasn't materially changed in 25 years. Faro Health is fixing that — automating the manual labor behind protocol design for enterprise pharma and compressing ROI proof to a single quarter. Scott Chetham built what the industry refused to, and is now navigating the harder problem: scaling trust in a field where a single misstep touches billion-dollar pipelines.Topics Discussed:Why clinical trial design is still done in Microsoft Word — and what that costs the industryHow Faro compressed pilot-to-ROI proof from nearly a year to one quarterEmbedding change management as a core product function, not a services add-onSurviving a two-year market mistiming and the inflection that followedWhat it actually takes to scale enterprise trust when quality is non-negotiableNavigating a suddenly crowded market after years as the only playerBuilding leadership deliberately around your own gaps as a founderBalancing enterprise customer demand against focused product executionKey GTM Insights:Make ROI measurable before you can measure what you actually want. When Faro couldn't yet directly quantify what customers cared most about, they identified credible surrogates and sold to customers willing to treat those proxies as sufficient signal. This unlocked early enterprise revenue while the measurement infrastructure matured. As Scott put it: "The earlier sales were people who were more believers that if you could measure this surrogate for what we really want to do, that's a strong enough case to keep going." The lesson: don't wait for perfect measurement. Find a defensible proxy, be transparent about it, and find the buyers sophisticated enough to accept it.Compress time-to-ROI as a primary product investment. Faro spent years iterating specifically on the speed of value proof — getting it from nearly twelve months down to a single quarter. That compression is not a sales tactic. It's a structural product and process investment that compounds: shorter pilots close faster, expansions follow sooner, and the fundraising narrative tightens. Scott is explicit that this took years of disciplined iteration, not a single insight.Change management is not a services line — it's a retention mechanism. Faro's professional services team includes specialists — described as former consultants — whose job is not implementation but process redesign. They help customers map current workflows, define new ones, and report measurable value back to leadership. Without that function, even a product with clear ROI sits unused in entrenched organizations. Scott frames this as one of the most critical investments to their success.Mistiming the market is survivable if the thesis is structurally sound. Faro was approximately two years early for enterprise pharma readiness. Rather than pivoting toward an easier segment, they used that time to mature the platform to enterprise deployment standards. When the market inflected — Scott dates it to roughly 14 months before the recording — they were positioned to capture pull demand without advertising. The lesson is not "be early." It's that a structurally inevitable market shift can absorb a timing error if you survive long enough with discipline.Signing a contract is the start of the sale, not the end. Scott's chairman — described as one of the first CEOs of Upwork — tells the team the same thing after every closed deal: "Congratulations. Now the real sales work begins." In high-trust, high-stakes industries, retention is built on daily delivery. This isn't a platitude — it's an operational orientation that shapes how Faro allocates attention post-close.// Sponsors: Front Lines — Silicon Valley's leading Podcast Production Studio. We help B2B tech companies launch, manage, and grow podcasts that drive demand, awareness, and thought leadership. Mention you are a listener and get a 10% discount. www.FrontLines.io/Podcast-as-a-Service
Scott Stevenson is the Co-founder and CEO of Spellbook.Spellbook is an AI copilot for contract review and drafting, essentially “Cursor for lawyers.” They have 4,000 customers in 80 countries, and to my knowledge is the fastest growing AI company in Canada, and the largest company in the world built on a Microsoft Word plugin.Scott has been building in legal AI longer than almost anyone. We talk about why legal software was essentially untouched before LLM's, why the market is so hot right now, if it's sustainable, and how Spellbook navigates product differentiation compared to horizontal AI products like ChatGPT.We talk about why fine-tuning your own models was one of the biggest mistakes early AI companies made, how to build a network effect as a vertical AI product, and Spellbook's philosophy of “Don't sharpen your axe when the chainsaw is coming out tomorrow”.Spellbook spent a few years finding PMF before really taking off in 2022, and Scott shares their playbook for launching over 100 product experiments in three years, how to know when to lean in, and what it's been like scaling Spellbook post-PMF.Thank you to Numeral and Flex for supporting this episode.Try Numeral, the end-to-end platform for sales tax and compliance: https://www.numeral.comSign-up for Flex Elite with code TURNER, get $1,000: https://form.typeform.com/to/Rx9rTjFzTimestamps:(0:30) Spellbook: “Cursor for Contracts”(3:08) Building the world's largest Microsoft Word plugin(14:06) Why legal software was untouched before LLMs(18:32) $30 trillion moves through contracts annually(20:51) Why ChatGPT won't replace vertical tools(25:15) Fine-tuning was the biggest mistake in AI(30:00) Differences between pro and amateur gamers(37:38) Top-down vs. bottoms-up in legal AI(42:27) The long-tail of legal AI software(47:24) Building for models that don't exist yet(51:20) Skating where the puck is going(1:01:35) The legal bill that cost 50% of his bank account(1:09:33) Testing 100 landing pages in 3 years(1:14:06) The moment Spellbook hit PMF(1:19:17) Building new brands for each product experiment(1:23:10) Raising a Series B with a tweet(1:27:41) What Scott learned from Keith Rabois(1:31:16) Scott's favorite new AI toolReferencedSpellbook: https://www.spellbook.legal/Careers at Spellbook: https://www.spellbook.legal/careersPlaying to Win by David Sirlin: https://www.amazon.com/Playing-Win-becoming-David-Sirlin/dp/1413498817Find the Fast Moving Water by NFX: https://www.nfx.com/post/find-the-fast-moving-waterSpellbook's case study with Replit: https://replit.com/customers/spellbookTwin: https://twin.so/Follow ScottTwitter: https://x.com/scottastevensonLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottasBlog: https://blog.scottstevenson.net/Follow TurnerTwitter: https://twitter.com/TurnerNovakLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/turnernovakSubscribe to my newsletter to get every episode + the transcript in your inbox every week: https://www.thespl.it/
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
What prosecutors found on Rex Heuermann's hard drive may be the most damning evidence in the Gilgo Beach case—a deleted Microsoft Word document they say the Long Island Serial Killer used as a literal instruction manual.The file was titled HK2002-04. According to court documents, it allegedly contained eighty-seven details organized into sections: Problems, Supplies, Targets, Dump Sites, Pre-Prep, Prep, Body Prep, and Things to Remember."Remove head and hands," the Body Prep section allegedly stated. "Remove ID marks like tattoos."Jessica Taylor's remains were found along Ocean Parkway with her head removed, arms severed, and a tattoo mutilated. Valerie Mack's body was discovered in similar condition.But the "Things to Remember" section may be most disturbing. According to prosecutors, it allegedly contained LISK's lessons learned from previous crimes:"Hit harder—too many hit to take down." "Use heavy rope for neck—light rope broke under stress of being tightened." "More sleep & noise control = more play time."References to "next time" allegedly indicate prior experience being refined.And then there's the FBI connection. The Gilgo Beach Killer's document allegedly referenced specific pages in John Douglas's Mindhunter—the foundational text for behavioral analysis. Prosecutors allege LISK studied how killers get caught and used it to avoid detection.When Suffolk County investigators returned to the alleged Long Island Serial Killer's home, infrared examination allegedly revealed adhesive residue and push pins matching descriptions in the document.Rex Heuermann has pleaded not guilty. The Gilgo Beach trial is September 2026.Part 2 of 5: The Architect of Horror.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #LISK #GilgoBeachKiller #HiddenKillers #LongIslandSerialKiller #GilgoBeachMurders #PlanningDocument #OceanParkway #Mindhunter #SuffolkCounty
In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. was filed. The complaint represented not only Jane Doe 1, but a broader group of alleged victims who claimed they suffered harm tied to the actions—and alleged inaction—of JP Morgan Chase & Co. The filing formally demanded a jury trial, signaling the plaintiffs' intention to take the allegations into open court rather than resolve them quietly behind closed doors.The case was framed as both an individual and a class action complaint, raising the stakes considerably for the financial giant. By categorizing it this way, the plaintiffs positioned their claims as part of a larger systemic issue involving an entire group of alleged victims. The filing marked the beginning of what later became one of the most scrutinized legal battles connected to the Jeffrey Epstein network, setting the stage for intense public inquiry into the bank's role and potential liability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 00513854.DOCX
In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. was filed. The complaint represented not only Jane Doe 1, but a broader group of alleged victims who claimed they suffered harm tied to the actions—and alleged inaction—of JP Morgan Chase & Co. The filing formally demanded a jury trial, signaling the plaintiffs' intention to take the allegations into open court rather than resolve them quietly behind closed doors.The case was framed as both an individual and a class action complaint, raising the stakes considerably for the financial giant. By categorizing it this way, the plaintiffs positioned their claims as part of a larger systemic issue involving an entire group of alleged victims. The filing marked the beginning of what later became one of the most scrutinized legal battles connected to the Jeffrey Epstein network, setting the stage for intense public inquiry into the bank's role and potential liability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 00513854.DOCX
In the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a class action lawsuit titled Jane Doe 1, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. was filed. The complaint represented not only Jane Doe 1, but a broader group of alleged victims who claimed they suffered harm tied to the actions—and alleged inaction—of JP Morgan Chase & Co. The filing formally demanded a jury trial, signaling the plaintiffs' intention to take the allegations into open court rather than resolve them quietly behind closed doors.The case was framed as both an individual and a class action complaint, raising the stakes considerably for the financial giant. By categorizing it this way, the plaintiffs positioned their claims as part of a larger systemic issue involving an entire group of alleged victims. The filing marked the beginning of what later became one of the most scrutinized legal battles connected to the Jeffrey Epstein network, setting the stage for intense public inquiry into the bank's role and potential liability.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 00513854.DOCX
© 2020-2026 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
