Word processor developed by Microsoft
POPULARITY
Categories
38 episodes with Microsoft Word
28 episodes with Microsoft Word
20 episodes with Microsoft Word
22 episodes with Microsoft Word
48 episodes with Microsoft Word
9 episodes with Microsoft Word
7 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
5 episodes with Microsoft Word
5 episodes with Microsoft Word
8 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
5 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
5 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
5 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
5 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
6 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
5 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
5 episodes with Microsoft Word
5 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
4 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
10 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
5 episodes with Microsoft Word
3 episodes with Microsoft Word
2 episodes with Microsoft Word
Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against her by a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, arguing that the claims are legally baseless and politically motivated. In her filing, Plaskett maintains that she had no involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation and that the plaintiff's allegations are speculative, unsupported by evidence, and fall outside the statute of limitations. Her legal team asserts that the lawsuit is an abuse of the judicial process, designed to smear her reputation and exploit her previous associations with the Virgin Islands government during the time Epstein operated there. Plaskett categorically denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to have the case thrown out at the earliest stage.Critics, however, argue that Plaskett's motion sidesteps the deeper issue: the survivor's claim that Plaskett's political influence may have contributed to a broader effort to shield Epstein and his network from scrutiny while he operated in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The lawsuit ties her to the failure of local and federal officials to hold Epstein accountable, citing her past connections to officials who allegedly enabled his activities. While Plaskett insists she had no direct involvement, the motion to dismiss has sparked backlash from advocates who believe public figures with proximity to Epstein's orbit should be investigated rather than allowed to deflect scrutiny with procedural defenses. The case now hinges on whether the court will allow discovery or accept Plaskett's argument that the lawsuit lacks merit on its face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against her by a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, arguing that the claims are legally baseless and politically motivated. In her filing, Plaskett maintains that she had no involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation and that the plaintiff's allegations are speculative, unsupported by evidence, and fall outside the statute of limitations. Her legal team asserts that the lawsuit is an abuse of the judicial process, designed to smear her reputation and exploit her previous associations with the Virgin Islands government during the time Epstein operated there. Plaskett categorically denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to have the case thrown out at the earliest stage.Critics, however, argue that Plaskett's motion sidesteps the deeper issue: the survivor's claim that Plaskett's political influence may have contributed to a broader effort to shield Epstein and his network from scrutiny while he operated in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The lawsuit ties her to the failure of local and federal officials to hold Epstein accountable, citing her past connections to officials who allegedly enabled his activities. While Plaskett insists she had no direct involvement, the motion to dismiss has sparked backlash from advocates who believe public figures with proximity to Epstein's orbit should be investigated rather than allowed to deflect scrutiny with procedural defenses. The case now hinges on whether the court will allow discovery or accept Plaskett's argument that the lawsuit lacks merit on its face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against her by a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, arguing that the claims are legally baseless and politically motivated. In her filing, Plaskett maintains that she had no involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation and that the plaintiff's allegations are speculative, unsupported by evidence, and fall outside the statute of limitations. Her legal team asserts that the lawsuit is an abuse of the judicial process, designed to smear her reputation and exploit her previous associations with the Virgin Islands government during the time Epstein operated there. Plaskett categorically denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to have the case thrown out at the earliest stage.Critics, however, argue that Plaskett's motion sidesteps the deeper issue: the survivor's claim that Plaskett's political influence may have contributed to a broader effort to shield Epstein and his network from scrutiny while he operated in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The lawsuit ties her to the failure of local and federal officials to hold Epstein accountable, citing her past connections to officials who allegedly enabled his activities. While Plaskett insists she had no direct involvement, the motion to dismiss has sparked backlash from advocates who believe public figures with proximity to Epstein's orbit should be investigated rather than allowed to deflect scrutiny with procedural defenses. The case now hinges on whether the court will allow discovery or accept Plaskett's argument that the lawsuit lacks merit on its face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against her by a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, arguing that the claims are legally baseless and politically motivated. In her filing, Plaskett maintains that she had no involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation and that the plaintiff's allegations are speculative, unsupported by evidence, and fall outside the statute of limitations. Her legal team asserts that the lawsuit is an abuse of the judicial process, designed to smear her reputation and exploit her previous associations with the Virgin Islands government during the time Epstein operated there. Plaskett categorically denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to have the case thrown out at the earliest stage.Critics, however, argue that Plaskett's motion sidesteps the deeper issue: the survivor's claim that Plaskett's political influence may have contributed to a broader effort to shield Epstein and his network from scrutiny while he operated in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The lawsuit ties her to the failure of local and federal officials to hold Epstein accountable, citing her past connections to officials who allegedly enabled his activities. While Plaskett insists she had no direct involvement, the motion to dismiss has sparked backlash from advocates who believe public figures with proximity to Epstein's orbit should be investigated rather than allowed to deflect scrutiny with procedural defenses. The case now hinges on whether the court will allow discovery or accept Plaskett's argument that the lawsuit lacks merit on its face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against her by a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, arguing that the claims are legally baseless and politically motivated. In her filing, Plaskett maintains that she had no involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation and that the plaintiff's allegations are speculative, unsupported by evidence, and fall outside the statute of limitations. Her legal team asserts that the lawsuit is an abuse of the judicial process, designed to smear her reputation and exploit her previous associations with the Virgin Islands government during the time Epstein operated there. Plaskett categorically denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to have the case thrown out at the earliest stage.Critics, however, argue that Plaskett's motion sidesteps the deeper issue: the survivor's claim that Plaskett's political influence may have contributed to a broader effort to shield Epstein and his network from scrutiny while he operated in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The lawsuit ties her to the failure of local and federal officials to hold Epstein accountable, citing her past connections to officials who allegedly enabled his activities. While Plaskett insists she had no direct involvement, the motion to dismiss has sparked backlash from advocates who believe public figures with proximity to Epstein's orbit should be investigated rather than allowed to deflect scrutiny with procedural defenses. The case now hinges on whether the court will allow discovery or accept Plaskett's argument that the lawsuit lacks merit on its face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought against her by a Jeffrey Epstein survivor, arguing that the claims are legally baseless and politically motivated. In her filing, Plaskett maintains that she had no involvement in Epstein's trafficking operation and that the plaintiff's allegations are speculative, unsupported by evidence, and fall outside the statute of limitations. Her legal team asserts that the lawsuit is an abuse of the judicial process, designed to smear her reputation and exploit her previous associations with the Virgin Islands government during the time Epstein operated there. Plaskett categorically denies any wrongdoing and is seeking to have the case thrown out at the earliest stage.Critics, however, argue that Plaskett's motion sidesteps the deeper issue: the survivor's claim that Plaskett's political influence may have contributed to a broader effort to shield Epstein and his network from scrutiny while he operated in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The lawsuit ties her to the failure of local and federal officials to hold Epstein accountable, citing her past connections to officials who allegedly enabled his activities. While Plaskett insists she had no direct involvement, the motion to dismiss has sparked backlash from advocates who believe public figures with proximity to Epstein's orbit should be investigated rather than allowed to deflect scrutiny with procedural defenses. The case now hinges on whether the court will allow discovery or accept Plaskett's argument that the lawsuit lacks merit on its face.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Last Updated on August 2, 2025 by Owen McGab Enaohwo A single decision can have a profound impact on a business. Robert Goudie, the founder of Consortium Private Wealth, struggled to manage his business processes in Microsoft Word. The documents were clunky, disorganized, and difficult to update due to the system's limited features. This hindered […] The post How Consortium Private Wealth Resolved Decades of Tribal Knowledge by Streamlining Its Operations appeared first on SweetProcess.
Waar begin je met het schrijven van een roman? En hoe brei je er, na maanden zwoegen en puzzelen, uiteindelijk een eind aan? Auteur Hanna Bervoets leidt ons als nieuwe stamgast langs alle stappen van haar maakproces. Van het kauwen op muesli tot het tikken in de juiste Microsoft Word-versie, en van het verwerken van liefdesverdriet tot het dumpen van lijken in de kast: Hanna doet al haar schrijfroutines uit de doeken in de nieuwe Kroegpraat.Onze sponsor:Rijksoverheid: Biologisch voedsel is lekker, puur genieten. Met aandacht voor mens, dier en natuur. Welke biologische keuze maak jij vandaag?Productie: Meer van ditMuziek: Keez GroentemanWil je adverteren in deze podcast? Stuur een mailtje naar: Adverteerders (direct): adverteren@meervandit.nl(Media)bureaus: adverteren@bienmedia.nl Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In August 2019, a plaintiff identified as "Lisa Doe" filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate, alleging that she was recruited at age 17 under the pretense of teaching a dance-based exercise class at Epstein's New York townhouse. According to the lawsuit, an associate of Epstein hired her for this role, but subsequent interactions led to Epstein soliciting massages from her. The suit claims that during these encounters, Epstein forcibly used a sex toy on her and ultimately pressured her to recruit other dancers from her studio for similar purposes.The lawsuit asserts that Epstein's actions were part of a broader pattern of abuse facilitated by a network of associates who helped recruit and control young women. Lisa Doe's allegations highlight the manipulative tactics Epstein allegedly employed, such as exploiting her aspirations in dance to lure her into abusive situations. This case is among several that have been filed against Epstein's estate, aiming to hold accountable those involved in his extensive trafficking operations and to seek justice for the survivors of his abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2019-08-20_LDoe_Complaint_for_filing (bwbx.io)
In August 2019, a plaintiff identified as "Lisa Doe" filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate, alleging that she was recruited at age 17 under the pretense of teaching a dance-based exercise class at Epstein's New York townhouse. According to the lawsuit, an associate of Epstein hired her for this role, but subsequent interactions led to Epstein soliciting massages from her. The suit claims that during these encounters, Epstein forcibly used a sex toy on her and ultimately pressured her to recruit other dancers from her studio for similar purposes.The lawsuit asserts that Epstein's actions were part of a broader pattern of abuse facilitated by a network of associates who helped recruit and control young women. Lisa Doe's allegations highlight the manipulative tactics Epstein allegedly employed, such as exploiting her aspirations in dance to lure her into abusive situations. This case is among several that have been filed against Epstein's estate, aiming to hold accountable those involved in his extensive trafficking operations and to seek justice for the survivors of his abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2019-08-20_LDoe_Complaint_for_filing (bwbx.io)
Background of the LawsuitDefendants:Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate's affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.Plaintiffs:Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.Allegations and ClaimsMismanagement and Negligence:Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein's estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate's affairs.Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate's value and its ability to settle claims.Failure to Address Victims' Claims:Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein's victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate's assets and the status of the victims' claims.Legal ProceedingsFiling and Court Actions:Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.Recent Developments:Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.Broader ContextEpstein's Estate:Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein's estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate's management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein's criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein's estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.Victims' Advocacy:Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein's abuse.(commercial at 7:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)
In August 2019, a plaintiff identified as "Lisa Doe" filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate, alleging that she was recruited at age 17 under the pretense of teaching a dance-based exercise class at Epstein's New York townhouse. According to the lawsuit, an associate of Epstein hired her for this role, but subsequent interactions led to Epstein soliciting massages from her. The suit claims that during these encounters, Epstein forcibly used a sex toy on her and ultimately pressured her to recruit other dancers from her studio for similar purposes.The lawsuit asserts that Epstein's actions were part of a broader pattern of abuse facilitated by a network of associates who helped recruit and control young women. Lisa Doe's allegations highlight the manipulative tactics Epstein allegedly employed, such as exploiting her aspirations in dance to lure her into abusive situations. This case is among several that have been filed against Epstein's estate, aiming to hold accountable those involved in his extensive trafficking operations and to seek justice for the survivors of his abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2019-08-20_LDoe_Complaint_for_filing (bwbx.io)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In August 2019, a plaintiff identified as "Lisa Doe" filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate, alleging that she was recruited at age 17 under the pretense of teaching a dance-based exercise class at Epstein's New York townhouse. According to the lawsuit, an associate of Epstein hired her for this role, but subsequent interactions led to Epstein soliciting massages from her. The suit claims that during these encounters, Epstein forcibly used a sex toy on her and ultimately pressured her to recruit other dancers from her studio for similar purposes.The lawsuit asserts that Epstein's actions were part of a broader pattern of abuse facilitated by a network of associates who helped recruit and control young women. Lisa Doe's allegations highlight the manipulative tactics Epstein allegedly employed, such as exploiting her aspirations in dance to lure her into abusive situations. This case is among several that have been filed against Epstein's estate, aiming to hold accountable those involved in his extensive trafficking operations and to seek justice for the survivors of his abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2019-08-20_LDoe_Complaint_for_filing (bwbx.io)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
Background of the LawsuitDefendants:Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate's affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.Plaintiffs:Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.Allegations and ClaimsMismanagement and Negligence:Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein's estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate's affairs.Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate's value and its ability to settle claims.Failure to Address Victims' Claims:Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein's victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate's assets and the status of the victims' claims.Legal ProceedingsFiling and Court Actions:Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.Recent Developments:Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.Broader ContextEpstein's Estate:Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein's estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate's management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein's criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein's estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.Victims' Advocacy:Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein's abuse.(commercial at 7:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)
Background of the LawsuitDefendants:Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate's affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.Plaintiffs:Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.Allegations and ClaimsMismanagement and Negligence:Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein's estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate's affairs.Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate's value and its ability to settle claims.Failure to Address Victims' Claims:Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein's victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate's assets and the status of the victims' claims.Legal ProceedingsFiling and Court Actions:Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.Recent Developments:Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.Broader ContextEpstein's Estate:Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein's estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate's management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein's criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein's estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.Victims' Advocacy:Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein's abuse.(commercial at 7:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)
In August 2019, a plaintiff identified as "Lisa Doe" filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate, alleging that she was recruited at age 17 under the pretense of teaching a dance-based exercise class at Epstein's New York townhouse. According to the lawsuit, an associate of Epstein hired her for this role, but subsequent interactions led to Epstein soliciting massages from her. The suit claims that during these encounters, Epstein forcibly used a sex toy on her and ultimately pressured her to recruit other dancers from her studio for similar purposes.The lawsuit asserts that Epstein's actions were part of a broader pattern of abuse facilitated by a network of associates who helped recruit and control young women. Lisa Doe's allegations highlight the manipulative tactics Epstein allegedly employed, such as exploiting her aspirations in dance to lure her into abusive situations. This case is among several that have been filed against Epstein's estate, aiming to hold accountable those involved in his extensive trafficking operations and to seek justice for the survivors of his abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2019-08-20_LDoe_Complaint_for_filing (bwbx.io)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In August 2019, a plaintiff identified as "Lisa Doe" filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein's estate, alleging that she was recruited at age 17 under the pretense of teaching a dance-based exercise class at Epstein's New York townhouse. According to the lawsuit, an associate of Epstein hired her for this role, but subsequent interactions led to Epstein soliciting massages from her. The suit claims that during these encounters, Epstein forcibly used a sex toy on her and ultimately pressured her to recruit other dancers from her studio for similar purposes.The lawsuit asserts that Epstein's actions were part of a broader pattern of abuse facilitated by a network of associates who helped recruit and control young women. Lisa Doe's allegations highlight the manipulative tactics Epstein allegedly employed, such as exploiting her aspirations in dance to lure her into abusive situations. This case is among several that have been filed against Epstein's estate, aiming to hold accountable those involved in his extensive trafficking operations and to seek justice for the survivors of his abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2019-08-20_LDoe_Complaint_for_filing (bwbx.io)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
This week, we sit down with Ilona Logvinova, Director of Practice Innovation at Cleary Gottlieb, and Max Junestrand, CEO and Founder of Legora, for a deep dive into how their partnership is reshaping the legal landscape through AI-driven innovation. The conversation kicks off with the origin story behind Cleary's strategic alliance with Legora, a legal tech platform focused on collaborative, AI-first workflows. The two share how this relationship, built on a year-long pilot and mutual alignment in vision, is now delivering real-world benefits across Cleary's legal teams.Max walks listeners through the evolution of Legora's product suite, which includes a general-purpose assistant, tabular contract review, and a Microsoft Word plugin, all wrapped into a seamless collaborative workspace. Ilona elaborates on Cleary's multi-pronged AI strategy, emphasizing a hybrid approach that integrates both in-house tools (such as Springbok AI) and external partnerships like Legora. This merger of internal and external capabilities reflects a broader shift in legal innovation—from static solutions to agile, embedded systems designed for continuous learning and adaptation.One major theme explored is the shift in legal AI from isolated tools to interoperable ecosystems. Max stresses the importance of collaboration and avoiding silos, pointing to a future where legal tech isn't just smarter, but also more connected. Ilona reinforces this by describing Cleary's vision of AI as a co-worker, not a replacement, likening AI oversight to supervising junior associates. The goal, they argue, isn't to eliminate human involvement, but to elevate it—using AI to take over repetitive tasks while freeing lawyers to focus on high-value strategy and creativity.The episode also covers practical aspects of deployment and adoption, offering insight into why Cleary's rollout has been so successful. Ilona credits the intuitive design and high-value use cases as key drivers of firmwide engagement. From Zoom calls with 1,000 attendees to chatbots that feel more like using Google than enterprise software, Cleary's AI integration strategy is centered on simplicity, accessibility, and a relentless focus on user experience. The team's use of analytics and continuous feedback loops further ensures the platform evolves to meet real-world needs.In the crystal ball finale, Max and Ilona speculate on what's next. Max anticipates a dramatic consolidation in user experience across legal tech platforms, driven by agents and large language models that enable seamless workflows. Ilona envisions a future shaped by AI-native infrastructure and even screenless computing environments, where collaboration is immersive and spatial rather than tethered to screens. Their shared message is clear: the future of legal work is collaborative, AI-enhanced, and closer than we think. Whether you're a tech-savvy partner or a cautious associate, this episode offers a compelling look at how forward-thinking firms are already building the legal practice of tomorrow.Listen on mobile platforms: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube[Special Thanks to Legal Technology Hub for their sponsoring this episode.] Blue Sky: @geeklawblog.com @marlgebEmail: geekinreviewpodcast@gmail.comMusic: Jerry David DeCiccaTranscript
Background of the LawsuitDefendants:Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate's affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.Plaintiffs:Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.Allegations and ClaimsMismanagement and Negligence:Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein's estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate's affairs.Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate's value and its ability to settle claims.Failure to Address Victims' Claims:Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein's victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate's assets and the status of the victims' claims.Legal ProceedingsFiling and Court Actions:Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.Recent Developments:Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.Broader ContextEpstein's Estate:Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein's estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate's management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein's criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein's estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.Victims' Advocacy:Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein's abuse.(commercial at 7:23)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)
Background of the LawsuitDefendants:Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn: Both are lawyers who were appointed as co-executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate following his death in August 2019. They have been responsible for managing the estate's affairs, including financial assets and legal claims against Epstein.Plaintiffs:Danielle Benskey: An alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein who, along with other plaintiffs, has brought forward claims against the estate.Jane Doe 3: Another individual who has accused Epstein of abuse and is seeking justice through the legal system.Allegations and ClaimsMismanagement and Negligence:Estate Administration: The plaintiffs allege that Indyke and Kahn have mishandled the administration of Epstein's estate. This includes accusations of mismanagement of financial assets, failure to properly address claims from victims, and overall negligence in managing the estate's affairs.Financial Irregularities: There are claims that the executors may have engaged in or failed to address financial irregularities that negatively impacted the estate's value and its ability to settle claims.Failure to Address Victims' Claims:Inadequate Settlements: The lawsuit argues that Indyke and Kahn did not adequately handle or settle claims made by Epstein's victims. This includes allegations that they were unresponsive or failed to provide fair compensation to survivors like Benskey and Jane Doe 3.Lack of Transparency: The plaintiffs accuse the executors of being opaque about the handling of the estate's assets and the status of the victims' claims.Legal ProceedingsFiling and Court Actions:Lawsuit Details: The lawsuit has been filed in a civil court, where the plaintiffs seek financial damages and other remedies for the alleged mismanagement and failures in addressing their claims.Court Hearings: There have been ongoing court hearings and legal maneuvers as the case progresses, including motions, evidence submissions, and testimonies.Recent Developments:Settlement Talks: There have been discussions and negotiations regarding potential settlements, though the specifics of these talks are not always publicly disclosed.Court Orders: The court has issued various orders related to the case, including directives on evidence disclosure and procedural matters.Broader ContextEpstein's Estate:Complexity: Jeffrey Epstein's estate is highly complex, involving significant financial assets, multiple claims from survivors, and legal disputes. The estate's management has been under scrutiny, given Epstein's criminal activities and the large number of victims involved.Public Scrutiny: The handling of Epstein's estate, including the actions of Indyke and Kahn, has attracted considerable public and media attention, adding to the pressure on the executors to address the allegations and claims appropriately.Victims' Advocacy:Support for Survivors: The lawsuit is part of broader efforts by victims and their advocates to seek justice and accountability for the abuse they endured. It reflects ongoing challenges in achieving fair compensation and redress for survivors of Epstein's abuse.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.02.16 Kahn Indyke Complaint (FINAL) (wallstreetonparade.com)
The Researcher agent is coming to Microsoft Word for M365 Copilot licensed users. This feels like the right place for it to be used, bringing research prompt outputs into a highly capable documentation app. If you are a subject matter expert and you want to be recognised as one in a Viva Engage community, now you will be able to request to be one. This and more on this week's episode. - Researcher is available in Word for Microsoft 365 Copilot licensed users - Self-nomination as a community expert in Viva Engage communities - Improved backup and restore experience for Microsoft Authenticator on iOS - Microsoft 365 Copilot | Viva Engage discussion posts added to grounding sources - Pin AppBar from Hamburger context menu - Outlook: Report junk + block or unsubscribe in one same action Join Daniel Glenn and Darrell as a Service Webster as they cover the latest messages in the Microsoft 365 Message Center. Check out Darrell & Daniel's own YouTube channels at: Darrell - https://youtube.com/modernworkmentor Daniel - https://youtube.com/DanielGlenn
Recent allegations have surfaced against Sean "Diddy" Combs, claiming he employed individuals to recruit young women for intimate encounters at his parties. At a 2004 White Party in the Hamptons, men allegedly approached female attendees, suggesting it was an honor to spend private time with Combs. One woman, identified as Lisa, recounted being propositioned but declined, perceiving the true nature of the request. Another attendee accepted and later regretted the experience.These claims align with statements from former employee Phillip Pines, who alleges he was responsible for organizing and cleaning up after Combs's "Wild King Nights" between 2019 and 2021. Pines asserts he was tasked with procuring supplies for these events and is currently suing Combs for sexual battery, harassment, and trafficking. Combs faces multiple legal challenges, including criminal charges of racketeering and sex trafficking, which he denies.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.12.09 - Letter Hearing (Signed Copy).docxgov.uscourts.nysd.630244.57.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Learn how to save time and edit documents more efficiently using the Find and Replace feature in Microsoft Word with JAWS. In this episode, Ron Miller walks you through practical examples—from replacing single and multiple words, to inserting special characters like ñ, to using the built-in thesaurus to find the perfect synonym. You'll also discover handy JAWS tips like using the clipboard viewer and jumping to specific pages in long documents. Whether you're a student, professional, or just want to sharpen your editing skills, this episode offers step-by-step guidance to boost your productivity with JAWS.
This episode is a conversation with Spellbook co-founder Scott Stevenson about intersection of technology and creativity. Spellbook is a AI contract co-pilot for transactional lawyers that plugs into Microsoft Word. Despite founding a legal technology company, Scott is not a lawyer but is computer engineer by training. As a kid Scott was into video games and in fourth grade he talked his parents into getting him a computer because he wanted to figure out how to create them. By middle school he was building websites and eventually landed an internship at Electronic Arts. Scott is also interested in electronic music and he launched his first start up, Mune, with a music professor, to create a whole new musical instrument that combined the power of digital music with an acoustic instrument. It was during his time at Mune that Scott started to think about building a legal tech company. After he got his first legal bill he figured there might be a more efficient and less expensive way to do legal work. So he and lawyer buddy founded Rally, a document automation and templating engine for law firms which later begat Spellbook, but he funny thing about Spellbook, it was originally conceived as a marketing idea to generate leads for Rally. Things We Talk About in This Episode Mune (Scott's Digital Instrument Startup) Episode Credits Editing and Production: Grant Blackstock Theme Music: Home Base (Instrumental Version) by TA2MI
In this episode, Kevin Daisey talks with Hans Guntren, founder of Deliberately.ai, about how artificial intelligence is transforming the way law firms—especially in family law—manage client data, case summaries, and communications. Hans shares how his own frustrating divorce experience inspired him to create a platform that automates the manual, administrative side of legal work, allowing attorneys to focus on what really matters. Learn how AI can improve client experience, reduce burnout, and prepare your law firm for the future. Today's episode is sponsored by Answering Legal. Click here to get started with your 400 minute free trial! Chapters (00:00:00) - Law Firm Leadership: AI and How most firms survive.(00:01:04) - Law Firm Business: The Future of AI(00:02:31) - How to Get Through a Divorce(00:03:19) - In the Elevator With Silicon Valley's Elite(00:05:00) - Answering Legal(00:14:49) - How to Get Out of Your Job(00:15:26) - Beyond the Law: The Future of Family Law Software(00:18:29) - How to Connect with a Person(00:19:08) - WSJD Live: Don't Get Left Behind(00:22:07) - How to Improve Your Law Firm with Microsoft Word
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In the case of John Doe v. Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, and associated entities, the plaintiff, John Doe, has filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and various affiliated companies, including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Records LLC, and others. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, under case number 1:25-CV-00996-JLR. The plaintiff, through his legal representation, The Bloom Firm, is seeking legal action based on the allegations made by John Doe, who asserts claims arising from his personal experience and information he has gathered about the actions of the defendants.John Doe's lawsuit includes several corporate entities affiliated with Sean Combs, such as Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings Inc., and Bad Boy Books Holdings Inc. Additionally, the complaint also lists Doe Corporations 1-10 and Doe Defendants 11-20, indicating that the plaintiff may pursue further claims against other unidentified individuals or entities involved in the matter. The plaintiff is requesting a jury trial as part of his legal proceedings.to contact me:bobbycapuccisource:*Microsoft Word - 2025.01.17 Complaint REDACTEDBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
This episode helps beginners ease into the world of artificial intelligence by sharing a simple, five-step approach anyone can follow—no tech background required.Rather than getting caught up in the hype or fear, listeners are encouraged to treat AI with curiosity and explore it through tools they already use. From testing out chat-based tools like ChatGPT to leveraging built-in AI features in everyday software like Gmail, Microsoft Word, and Canva, small, consistent use can lead to big confidence gains.The key is not to overthink it—just start where you are, use it for things you already do, and build from there. And when you're ready to level up, we share a trick for writing better prompts to get the most out of AI tools.5 Simple Steps to Start Using AI:Approach AI with curiosity instead of complexity.Try chat-based tools like ChatGPT using voice or text.Use AI to assist with tasks you're already doing regularly.Explore AI features built into software like Gmail, Canva, or Microsoft Copilot.Practice writing more specific prompts for better results.Top Takeaways:You don't need to be tech-savvy to use AI.Start small and build your confidence over time.Use tools you already know to make AI less intimidating.Better prompts = better results.Practicing weekly can turn AI into a powerful everyday assistant.Click here to get the full show notes:Five Ways to Get Started with Artificial IntelligenceHost Camille Attell is a remote work strategist, career coach, and the host of The Remote Work Retirement Show. After leaving a 20-year corporate career, she transitioned to a flexible, location-independent lifestyle and has since helped thousands of professionals do the same. Through her Remote Work School program, Camille empowers mid-career professionals and retirees to find meaningful remote work opportunities, build financial security, and design a work-life on their own terms.Take her FREE remote work training: www.camilleattell.com/remote-trainingLearn how to leverage your digital products or service:www.camilleattell.com/remoteworkschoolClick below to connect with Camille online:Instagram: @camille.attellLinkedin: Camille Attell, MARead more about the RV and Remote Work Lifestyle at https://www.morethanawheelin.com/
Welcome back to our Ambulatory Survival Series where we sit down with some of the primary care leaders in the program and learn about how we can take the best care of our clinic patients!Author and Host: Dr. Ritika Kompella, Chief Medical Resident, UCONNGuest Speaker: Dr. Rebecca Andrews, Assistant Program Director and Director of Ambulatory Education with the UConn IM Residency ProgramAdditional readings:Microsoft Word - 10. Framework for Tough Conversations_CP3 Toolkit.docxAdvance Care Planning: How to Have the Conversation You Want With Your Patients | AAFP
In this episode, we dive into how complexity creeps into our systems—whether in software, organizations, or personal leadership. We start by looking at the evolution of Microsoft Word as a case study of feature creep and unintended consequences, asking why more options can end up stifling creativity.We're joined by Robert Siegel, Stanford lecturer and author of The Systems Leader, who unpacks why today is a uniquely chaotic time for leaders. He explores the cross-pressures leaders face—from balancing execution with innovation, to combining strength with empathy—and what it takes to thrive in turbulent environments.Later, we revisit a powerful 2017 conversation with Seth Godin, bestselling author and entrepreneur. Seth reframes uncertainty as an inherent feature of modern systems, not a personal failure. He shares his perspective on adapting to continual change, why embracing smaller markets and iterative progress makes us more resilient, and how redefining success helps us stay in the game.Whether you're leading a team, navigating constant change, or just trying to keep your work meaningful, this episode will give you fresh strategies for thinking and acting systemically.Five Key Learnings:Complexity Creep Is Real: As with Microsoft Word, adding features to solve edge cases often leads to more user frustration and less creative freedom. Simplicity can be a competitive advantage.Systems Leadership Is Essential: Leaders must operate with a systems mindset, recognizing the interconnectedness inside and outside their organizations rather than staying siloed.Balancing Dualities: Success today means navigating cross-pressures, such as execution vs. innovation and strength vs. empathy—not just picking one.Embrace Uncertainty: Uncertainty isn't going away; learning to see it as a product of changing systems makes it less personal and more navigable.Iterate and Focus Small: Applying your creative efforts to the smallest viable audience allows for better learning, less risk, and greater long-term impact.Get full interviews and bonus content for free! Just visit DailyCreativePlus.com.Mentioned in this episode:To listen to the full interviews from today's episode, as well as receive bonus content and deep dive insights from the episode, visit DailyCreativePlus.com and join Daily Creative+.The Brave Habit is available nowMy new book will help you make bravery a habit in your life, your leadership, and your work. Discover how to develop the two qualities that lead to brave action: Optimistic Vision and Agency. Buy The Brave Habit wherever books are sold, or learn more at TheBraveHabit.com.
Unsere Texte schreiben wir mit Microsoft Word, unser Daten speichern wir in den Clouds von Amazon, unsere Fragen stellen wir einer KI von Google. Ob zu Hause, in Unternehmen oder in der Verwaltung: Big Tech hat unsere digitale Existenz fest im Griff. Doch die Abhängigkeit von amerikanischer Technologie wird zunehmend als Sicherheitsrisiko wahrgenommen: Was, wenn Trump uns den Zugang zu wichtigen Diensten sperrt? Nicht nur im Koalitionsvertrag wird gefordert, Deutschland brauche mehr „digitale Souveränität“. Was heißt das? Und wie kriegen wir die Kontrolle über unsere digitale Infrastruktur zurück? Michael Risel diskutiert mit Prof. Dr. Irene Bertschek – Wirtschaftswissenschaftlerin, Leibniz-Zentrum für europäische Wirtschaftsforschung Mannheim; Prof. Dr. Dennis-Kenji Kipker – Experte für IT-Sicherheitsrecht, HSB Hochschule Bremen; Dr. Julia Pohle –Kommunikationswissenschaftlerin, Wissenschaftszentrum für Sozialforschung Berlin
In this episode of Chax Chat, hosts Chad Chelius and Dax Castro tackle real-world challenges in document accessibility, focusing on tools like Microsoft Word, Excel, and Adobe Acrobat. They explore common issues with tables and cells, such as merged headers and layout complexities, and share practical tips for ensuring accessibility across different formats. The conversation includes strategies for managing accessibility in spreadsheets and PDFs, highlighting the nuances of remediation. Plus we are introduced to Chad's cat, more Koi talk, and how to snag a Chax freebie.
Ready for a serious look at the future of your law firm? In this Lawyerist Podcast episode, Zack Glaser sits down with a panel of law school professors for a wake-up call about something that will fundamentally reshape your practice: the tech-savvy generation of law students entering the field. This isn't a distant trend; it's happening now, and it demands your attention. We explore how these future lawyers are already operating differently. You'll hear firsthand about their strong preference for the Google ecosystem – and why that directly impacts your firm's current reliance on tools like Microsoft Word. This isn't just about software; it's about the shifting expectations and workflows these digital natives are bringing with them as they become your colleagues. Here's where it gets interesting for you: we explore how you can leverage this change to your firm's advantage. The professors share insights on how these students are uniquely positioned to drive AI adoption within your practice. Think of them as an untapped resource, ready to experiment with and implement AI-powered services that can elevate your firm's capabilities and even open doors to new service areas. And let's be clear, you can't afford to ignore the rising importance of tech fluency, especially in AI. The professors don't mince words: a lack of understanding in this area will directly impact your ability to serve clients effectively. In a world swimming in digital data, from car sensors to smart devices, your firm's relevance depends on it. This episode is your essential guide to: Stay ahead of the curve in a rapidly evolving legal landscape Unlocking the potential of the next generation of legal talent Building a future-proof firm that thrives on innovation Tune in! Listen to our other episodes about Artificial Intelligence: #556 Hidden Data: What Lawyers Need to Know About Digital Forensics, with Cole Popkin Apple Podcasts Spotify Lawyerist #538: AI is Making Law Firms Obsolete, with Alistair Vigier Apple Podcasts Spotify Lawyerist #551: Becoming the AI Driven Leader, with Geoff Woods Apple Podcasts Spotify Lawyerist Have thoughts about today's episode? Join the conversation on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, and X! If today's podcast resonates with you and you haven't read The Small Firm Roadmap Revisited yet, get the first chapter right now for free! Looking for help beyond the book? See if our coaching community is right for you. Access more resources from Lawyerist at lawyerist.com. Chapters/Timestamps: 00:00 – Intro: The Tech-Savvy Future of Law - Google Natives vs. Word Warriors 01:13 – The Google-Native Generation of Lawyers 02:51 – Changing Communication Norms 04:35 – Meet the Guests: Law School Professors on the Frontlines 06:21 – Teaching AI in Law School: An Overview 08:01 – Dennis Kennedy on AI in the Classroom 10:11 – Nicole Morris on AI Governance and Research 15:03 – Tracy Norton on AI as a Legal Writing Tool 25:25 – Is AI Dumbing Down Legal Education? 30:23 – Why Law School Must Teach AI 35:41 – How Should Professors Grade AI-Generated Work? 41:46 – Using AI to Improve the Classroom Experience 47:00 – How AI Will Change Legal Mentorship 52:19 – The Future of Law Firms and AI Expectations 55:25 – Final Thoughts: You Can't Tap Out of AI 57:52 – Outro
Comedian Druski (Drew Desbordes) has filed a motion in a California federal court seeking sanctions against Ashley Parham and her attorneys, Ariel Mitchell and Shawn Perez, over allegations linking him to a 2018 sexual assault incident involving Sean "Diddy" Combs. Druski's legal team contends that Parham's claims are "provably false," highlighting inconsistencies in her statements and asserting that she previously identified different individuals as her assailants for the same date and location. The motion includes evidence such as a 2019 police report and a 2018 email in which Parham accused other men, not Druski, of the assault. Druski also provided documentation indicating he was in Georgia at the time of the alleged incident, not in California as claimed by Parham.In his motion, Druski argues that Parham's attorneys failed to conduct due diligence before filing the lawsuit, thereby causing reputational harm and unnecessary legal expenses. He seeks to have the court impose sanctions to cover his attorney fees and other related costs. Druski has publicly denied the allegations, stating that in 2018 he was not a public figure and lacked connections to the entertainment industry, making the claims against him implausible. He emphasizes his confidence that the evidence will exonerate him and expose the allegations as falsehoods.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025-04-07 - Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions(241103499.5).docx
Comedian Druski (Drew Desbordes) has filed a motion in a California federal court seeking sanctions against Ashley Parham and her attorneys, Ariel Mitchell and Shawn Perez, over allegations linking him to a 2018 sexual assault incident involving Sean "Diddy" Combs. Druski's legal team contends that Parham's claims are "provably false," highlighting inconsistencies in her statements and asserting that she previously identified different individuals as her assailants for the same date and location. The motion includes evidence such as a 2019 police report and a 2018 email in which Parham accused other men, not Druski, of the assault. Druski also provided documentation indicating he was in Georgia at the time of the alleged incident, not in California as claimed by Parham.In his motion, Druski argues that Parham's attorneys failed to conduct due diligence before filing the lawsuit, thereby causing reputational harm and unnecessary legal expenses. He seeks to have the court impose sanctions to cover his attorney fees and other related costs. Druski has publicly denied the allegations, stating that in 2018 he was not a public figure and lacked connections to the entertainment industry, making the claims against him implausible. He emphasizes his confidence that the evidence will exonerate him and expose the allegations as falsehoods.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025-04-07 - Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions(241103499.5).docx
Ready for a serious look at the future of your law firm? In this Lawyerist Podcast episode, Zack Glaser sits down with a panel of law school professors for a wake-up call about something that will fundamentally reshape your practice: the tech-savvy generation of law students entering the field. This isn't a distant trend; it's happening now, and it demands your attention. We explore how these future lawyers are already operating differently. You'll hear firsthand about their strong preference for the Google ecosystem – and why that directly impacts your firm's current reliance on tools like Microsoft Word. This isn't just about software; it's about the shifting expectations and workflows these digital natives are bringing with them as they become your colleagues. Here's where it gets interesting for you: we explore how you can leverage this change to your firm's advantage. The professors share insights on how these students are uniquely positioned to drive AI adoption within your practice. Think of them as an untapped resource, ready to experiment with and implement AI-powered services that can elevate your firm's capabilities and even open doors to new service areas. And let's be clear, you can't afford to ignore the rising importance of tech fluency, especially in AI. The professors don't mince words: a lack of understanding in this area will directly impact your ability to serve clients effectively. In a world swimming in digital data, from car sensors to smart devices, your firm's relevance depends on it. This episode is your essential guide to: Stay ahead of the curve in a rapidly evolving legal landscape Unlocking the potential of the next generation of legal talent Building a future-proof firm that thrives on innovation Tune in! Listen to our other episodes about Artificial Intelligence: #556 Hidden Data: What Lawyers Need to Know About Digital Forensics, with Cole Popkin Apple Podcasts Spotify Lawyerist #538: AI is Making Law Firms Obsolete, with Alistair Vigier Apple Podcasts Spotify Lawyerist #551: Becoming the AI Driven Leader, with Geoff Woods Apple Podcasts Spotify Lawyerist Have thoughts about today's episode? Join the conversation on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, and X! If today's podcast resonates with you and you haven't read The Small Firm Roadmap Revisited yet, get the first chapter right now for free! Looking for help beyond the book? See if our coaching community is right for you. Access more resources from Lawyerist at lawyerist.com. Chapters/Timestamps: 00:00 – Intro: The Tech-Savvy Future of Law - Google Natives vs. Word Warriors 01:13 – The Google-Native Generation of Lawyers 02:51 – Changing Communication Norms 04:35 – Meet the Guests: Law School Professors on the Frontlines 06:21 – Teaching AI in Law School: An Overview 08:01 – Dennis Kennedy on AI in the Classroom 10:11 – Nicole Morris on AI Governance and Research 15:03 – Tracy Norton on AI as a Legal Writing Tool 25:25 – Is AI Dumbing Down Legal Education? 30:23 – Why Law School Must Teach AI 35:41 – How Should Professors Grade AI-Generated Work? 41:46 – Using AI to Improve the Classroom Experience 47:00 – How AI Will Change Legal Mentorship 52:19 – The Future of Law Firms and AI Expectations 55:25 – Final Thoughts: You Can't Tap Out of AI 57:52 – Outro Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Comedian Druski (Drew Desbordes) has filed a motion in a California federal court seeking sanctions against Ashley Parham and her attorneys, Ariel Mitchell and Shawn Perez, over allegations linking him to a 2018 sexual assault incident involving Sean "Diddy" Combs. Druski's legal team contends that Parham's claims are "provably false," highlighting inconsistencies in her statements and asserting that she previously identified different individuals as her assailants for the same date and location. The motion includes evidence such as a 2019 police report and a 2018 email in which Parham accused other men, not Druski, of the assault. Druski also provided documentation indicating he was in Georgia at the time of the alleged incident, not in California as claimed by Parham.In his motion, Druski argues that Parham's attorneys failed to conduct due diligence before filing the lawsuit, thereby causing reputational harm and unnecessary legal expenses. He seeks to have the court impose sanctions to cover his attorney fees and other related costs. Druski has publicly denied the allegations, stating that in 2018 he was not a public figure and lacked connections to the entertainment industry, making the claims against him implausible. He emphasizes his confidence that the evidence will exonerate him and expose the allegations as falsehoods.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025-04-07 - Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions(241103499.5).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Comedian Druski (Drew Desbordes) has filed a motion in a California federal court seeking sanctions against Ashley Parham and her attorneys, Ariel Mitchell and Shawn Perez, over allegations linking him to a 2018 sexual assault incident involving Sean "Diddy" Combs. Druski's legal team contends that Parham's claims are "provably false," highlighting inconsistencies in her statements and asserting that she previously identified different individuals as her assailants for the same date and location. The motion includes evidence such as a 2019 police report and a 2018 email in which Parham accused other men, not Druski, of the assault. Druski also provided documentation indicating he was in Georgia at the time of the alleged incident, not in California as claimed by Parham.In his motion, Druski argues that Parham's attorneys failed to conduct due diligence before filing the lawsuit, thereby causing reputational harm and unnecessary legal expenses. He seeks to have the court impose sanctions to cover his attorney fees and other related costs. Druski has publicly denied the allegations, stating that in 2018 he was not a public figure and lacked connections to the entertainment industry, making the claims against him implausible. He emphasizes his confidence that the evidence will exonerate him and expose the allegations as falsehoods.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2025-04-07 - Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions(241103499.5).docxBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Recent allegations have surfaced against Sean "Diddy" Combs, claiming he employed individuals to recruit young women for intimate encounters at his parties. At a 2004 White Party in the Hamptons, men allegedly approached female attendees, suggesting it was an honor to spend private time with Combs. One woman, identified as Lisa, recounted being propositioned but declined, perceiving the true nature of the request. Another attendee accepted and later regretted the experience.These claims align with statements from former employee Phillip Pines, who alleges he was responsible for organizing and cleaning up after Combs's "Wild King Nights" between 2019 and 2021. Pines asserts he was tasked with procuring supplies for these events and is currently suing Combs for sexual battery, harassment, and trafficking. Combs faces multiple legal challenges, including criminal charges of racketeering and sex trafficking, which he denies.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Microsoft Word - 2024.12.09 - Letter Hearing (Signed Copy).docxgov.uscourts.nysd.630244.57.0.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
We are hard at work on season 3, we'll be back soon with more episodes. For now enjoy this conversation with Michele and Jake from LoveLustFear. ___ Brittani Ard, host of You Probably Think This Story's About You, joins Jake and Michele on lovelustfridays for a raw and thoughtful conversation about trauma, relationships, and the emotional weight of storytelling. She opens up about her transition from a career in architecture to podcasting, and the lessons she's learned along the way. The discussion dives into the complexities of dating in midlife—particularly for strong, independent women—touching on breakups, emotional boundaries, and the process of unintentionally emasculating men. Brit also reflects on how independence can sometimes hinder connection, and why taking small, intentional steps back into the dating world can be so valuable.Please Visit Our Sponsors!Ready to start your own podcast? Descript instantly converts your audio files into text documents—just like editing in Google Docs or Microsoft Word. It's the tool we rely on for Lovelust Fridays to keep everything running smoothly. Click here to try it for free!https://get.descript.com/pepqx4ars509 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The Easter Bunny hopped and in SharePoint tech terms - the SharePoint Easter eggs were hoppin' into your Microsoft 365 tenants! This month's (eggs) updates include: Viva Connections cards in SharePoint agents, SharePoint eSignature for Microsoft Word, SharePoint quick steps to automate common tasks and workflows, new document library template: "Resume repository", OneDrive: Ask Copilot questions on meeting recordings, and more. Plus, we recap the BIG Copilot news day and all the disclosed elements. Read this episode's corresponding blog post. 00:00 Intro 01:09 Employee engagement 03:45 Teamwork 06:45 Related items 14:39 May 2025 Teasers 15:57 Closing SharePoint | @SharePoint & @MSSharePoint.Bsky.social| SharePoint Community blog | Feedback Mark Kashman |@mkashman [co-host] Microsoft Learn - The home for Microsoft documentation for end users, developers, and IT professionals. Microsoft Tech Community Home Stay on top of Microsoft 365 changes Upcoming events: NOW ON DEMAND: Microsoft's 50th Anniversary | April 4, 2025 (Worldwide) Microsoft 365 Community Conference | May 5-8, 2025 (Vegas) Microsoft Build | May 19-22, 2025 (Seattle, WA | Online) SharePoint Intranet Festival (SWOOP Analytics) | May 21, 2025 (Online) European Collaboration Summit | May 26-28, 2025 (Düsseldorf, Germany) European Power Platform Conference | June 16-19 (Vienna, Austria) TechCon 365 - Seattle | June 23 – 27, 2025 (Seattle, WA) TechCon 365 - Atlanta | August 11-15, 2025 (Atlanta, GA) + always review and share the CommunityDays.org website Discover and follow other Microsoft podcasts at aka.ms/microsoft/podcasts. Follow The Intrazone at aka.ms/TheIntrazone.
Brittani Ard, host of You Probably Think This Story's About You, joins Jake and Michele on lovelustfridays for a raw and thoughtful conversation about trauma, relationships, and the emotional weight of storytelling. She opens up about her transition from a career in architecture to podcasting, and the lessons she's learned along the way. The discussion dives into the complexities of dating in midlife—particularly for strong, independent women—touching on breakups, emotional boundaries, and the process of unintentionally emasculating men. Brit also reflects on how independence can sometimes hinder connection, and why taking small, intentional steps back into the dating world can be so valuable. Please Visit Our Sponsors! Ready to start your own podcast? Descript instantly converts your audio files into text documents—just like editing in Google Docs or Microsoft Word. It's the tool we rely on for Lovelust Fridays to keep everything running smoothly. Click here to try it for free! https://get.descript.com/pepqx4ars509 Brittani Ard – Links Website: https://brittaniard.com/ Podcast: “You Probably Think This Story's About You” Apple Podcasts Spotify Podcasts Amazon Music Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brittani.ard/ Discussion Links https://www.thehotline.org/ Series Links lovelustfear https://www.instagram.com/lovelustfearpod/ lovelustfridays https://www.instagram.com/lovelustfridays Jake Deptula www.instagram.com/jaked3000 Michele Locke https://www.michelelocke.com/ https://www.instagram.com/attorneymichelelocke/ Haley Gray | Producer & Researcher https://www.instagram.com/HaleyGrayResearch www.HaleyGrayResearch.com National Domestic Violence Hotline (24/7/365) Call 1.800.799.SAFE (7233) Text: START to 88788 https://www.thehotline.org/ https://www.facebook.com/NationalDomesticViolenceHotline https://www.instagram.com/NDVHofficial/ guest + story | submission information If you have a dating or relationship story to share, want to participate in a discussion here on lovelustfridays, or have a topic you'd like us to cover, contact us below. E-mail | lovelustfearpod@gmail.com Instagram | https://www.instagram.com/lovelustfearpod/ submission link | https://lovelustfear.aidaform.com/lovelustfear subscription links Amazon Music Spotify Music Apple Podcasts RSS feed https://audioboom.com/channels/5125912.rss Want to hear more? Whatever app you're listening on, just rate us and/or leave us a comment or review. Thank you for your support! topics | #LovelustFridays #Pleasure #Relationships #DatingInMidlife #EmotionalAvailability #Independence #Partnership #SelfDiscovery #Attraction #PersonalNeeds #HighDrama #StabilityInRelationships #Parenting #EmotionalAbuse #SurvivorStories #Podcasting #Kindness #PersonalGrowth #MentalHealthAwareness #Healing #SelfLove #EmotionalHealing #MidlifeJourney #RelationshipGrowth #SurvivorStrength #MentalHealthMatters #YouProbablyThinkThisStorysAboutYou #BrittaniArd
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
