Podcasts about Tevet

Tisha B'Av, Rosh Hashanah, and the Power of Remembering According to the Zohar, one of the central themes of Tisha B'Av is forgetting God . Where do we see this? It says that when Yaakov Avinu had his wrestling match with Esav's angel, it took place on Tisha B'Av—the time when Esav was granted the power to impact Yaakov and bring about the Galut (exile). As we know, Esav's angel displaced Yaakov's sciatic nerve, the Gid Hanasheh . That is the simple explanation. The Deeper Meaning of Gid Hanasheh The Zohar expands on this by asking: what does Nasheh actually mean? Simply put, nasheh means to be dislocated, as the root nash means "to move." However, the Zohar points out , nasha means to forget, making the Gid Hanasheh the sinew of forgetting . Its spiritual essence causes a person to forget God. We see the word נשה meaning to forget when Yosef said, "Ki nashani" —"For God has caused me to forget ." As we know, the human body has 365 sinews, which correspond to the 365 solar days of the year and the 365 negative commandments ( mitzvot lo ta'aseh ). Each day has a matching component in man, in time, and in the Torah: In man: The physical Gid Hanasheh . In mitzvot: The prohibition against eating the Gid Hanasheh . In time: The fast of Tisha B'Av. Furthermore, the words "Et Gid" ( ) contain a hidden hint to all the dark fast days of the Churban (destruction): Et ( ): Refers to Tisha Av ( ). Gimmel ( ): The 3rd day of Tishrei— Tzom Gedalia . Yud ( ): The 10th of Tevet— Asara B'Tevet . Dalet ( ): The fast of the 4th month (Tammuz)— Shiva Asar B'Tammuz ( Tzom Harevii ). Another connection between Yaakov and the Churban on Tisha B'Av is the custom to place a stone under one's pillow on Tisha B'Av night. This stems from Yaakov Avinu placing stones around his head when he slept. Some teachings suggest that Yaakov's dream also occurred on Tisha B'Av; that is why he saw the spiritual guardians of the nations ascending and descending, and why he became terrified when he saw Edom (Esav) ascending without coming down. Regardless, we see that the primary force of Tisha B'Av is the force of forgetting . Rosh Hashanah: The Remedy of Zikaron The way we fight back against this spiritual forgetfulness is through Rosh Hashanah. Rosh Hashanah is Yom Hazikaron —the Day of Remembrance. Simply speaking, we often explain this as the day when God remembers us, which is true. However, Rav Moshe Feinstein offers a deeper insight: "remembrance" in this context means God remembering our memory of Him . The secret to our success on Rosh Hashanah is our active remembrance of God. The more we keep God in our thoughts, the more He remembers us—as we say in the Retzei Vhachaletzanu addition to Birkat HaMAzo on Shabbat : if we do not forget the Beit Hamikdash , God will not forget us. Our act of not forgetting Him and His act of not forgetting us are intrinsically linked. Of course, God never literally forgets us. When it appears He has forgotten, it is merely hester panim (the hiding of His Face). In truth, God is always watching us— metzitz min hacharakim (peeking through the lattices). In the haftarah of Parshat Shoftim, the Jewish people claim, "God has forgotten me and forsaken me." God responds: "Can a mother forget her nursing child?" Hashem adds that even if a human mother could somehow forget her child, "I will never forget you." What Does It Mean to Forget? "Forgetting" in a spiritual sense does not mean complete amnesia—like forgetting a computer password. It means that something is no longer at the forefront of your mind . If someone asks you today, "Did you think about your eighth-grade rebbi today?" You would say, "No." Did you forget who he is? No, but he was "forgotten" in the sense that he was not on your mind. Similarly, when the prophet asks if a mother could forget her child, it doesn't mean she forgot his name; it means she became distracted and left him behind. He wasn't on her mind at that moment. Conversely, Zikaron (remembrance) means actively bringing something to mind and setting it into action. The word Zachar (male/remember) is connected to action—males represent active givers, whereas females represent recipients. Therefore, to "remember" God means to actively keep Him on the front burner of our minds. When we do this, we, so to speak, put ourselves at the forefront of His mind in an active, dynamic way. Standing Before the "Spiritual MRI" The Zichronos —the section of Mussaf where we declare that God remembers all actions—is the most critical part of our Rosh Hashanah prayers. Malchuyot: Acknowledges Hashem's sovereignty—a fundamental pillar of emunah (faith) as we crown Him King. Shofrot: Recalls the revelation at Har Sinai. Zichronos: The part most personal to us, as we read how God reviews every individual's life—who will live, who will die, which countries will experience war or peace. When you internalize that God is examining your every deed, thought, and mission, it is terrifying. Rav Wolbe compares Zichronos to passing through an MRI machine. It doesn't scan for physical ailments, but for spiritual ones. What will the test results be? Usually, when you take a medical test, you get the results in a few days. But the results of this spiritual MRI do not come immediately. You only find out the results as the year unfolds: Will you buy that new house? What will happen with your health, concerns, and challenges? Since no one is handed their results on the spot, a person could theoretically sit on pins and needles all year worrying. So how do we protect ourselves? The "Life Jacket" of Ein Od Milvado Rav Wolbe notes that right in the middle of the Zichronos prayers, the Torah gives us a spiritual life jacket to keep us from drowning in fear: (Fortunate is the person who does not forget You, the human who draws strength from You.) By actively remembering God and keeping Him on our minds, we create a shield of protection. This is the essence of "Ein Od Milvado" —the ultimate realization that there is nothing in existence other than God. Rav Matisyahu Salomon quotes a powerful idea regarding this concept, citing a famous story about the Brisker Rav (a descendant of the Nefesh HaChaim ). While escaping the Nazis on a train in wartime Europe without papers, the Brisker Rav instructed his children: "Just focus entirely on the concept of Ein Od Milvado. Think only of God." As a Nazi officer approached them, the Rav briefly had a momentary lapse in focus, caught himself, and re-centered his mind on Ein Od Milvado . The Nazi turned around and walked away. Rav Matisyahu Salomon points out: If someone told you that a month from now you'd be trapped on a train surrounded by Nazis, what would you do? You would spend every single day practicing Ein Od Milvado ! There is a similar story about the Beis HaLevi (also a descendant of the Nefesh HaChaim ). The Russian authorities had blockaded a town to search warehouses for contraband goods—which many local Jews traded in out of financial necessity. One merchant, terrified because his warehouse was full of illegal goods, ran to the Beis HaLevi after Shacharit . The Beis HaLevi told him: "We are going to sit right here and study the concepts of Ein Od Milvado in the Nefesh HaChaim until it is crystal clear to you." They spent the entire morning engrossed in this study. By lunchtime, the inspectors reached the merchant's warehouse and marked an 'X' on the door before leaving for lunch. When two different inspectors came by after lunch, one saw the 'X' and said, "We already checked this one," and walked past. The man was saved. Bringing Remembrance Into Action Rav Matisyahu Salomon explains that Rosh Hashanah is our personal Ein Od Milvado moment. We need Hashem on our minds the entire day, and the entire month of Elul is designed to prepare us for this focus. We even bring this mindfulness into our Rosh Hashanah festive meals through the Simanim (symbolic foods). The Meiri asks: Why do we recite the Yehi Ratzon requests in the middle of the meal rather than before it? He explains that the prayers were recited as people ate. Why? Because we don't want to forget God even while eating! When we eat pomegranate salad, we recite Yirbu Mitzvotenu K'Rimon to connect the food back to God. When we eat the head of a lamb, we recall Akeidat Yitzchak . Every step of the way—even during a physical meal—is about keeping Hashem at the forefront of our minds. Rav Wolbe teaches that we must maximize every single second of Rosh Hashanah. While it takes effort, keeping God in our thoughts is the ultimate antidote to the spiritual forgetfulness of Tisha B'Av, realigning our lives and ushering in a sweet, blessed new year.

Daily Bitachon: The Power of Unanswered Prayer Welcome to Daily Bitachon . We are continuing our series on the topic of Nechama (comfort), as we enter the Seven Weeks of Nechama . We didn't have much time to cover Parashat Va'etchanan in detail, but it contains a critical message: Moshe Rabbeinu offered 515 prayers —the numerical value ( gematria ) of the word Va'etchanan ( ואתחנן ). After these 515 prayers, Hashem tells Moshe: "Rav lach" — "That is enough, do not speak to Me anymore on this matter." Our Sages tell us that had Moshe prayed just one more time , his prayer would have been answered. At first glance, this sounds like a depressing note on which to begin the season of comfort: Moshe Rabbeinu prays incessantly, yet he isn't answered! The Mystery of 515 What is the significance of the number 515? 1. The Connection to Every Tefilla The Megalleh Amukot points out that the standard gematria of the word tefilla ( תפלה ) is 515 . This means that every single prayer we recite connects back to this concept of Moshe Rabbeinu praying and not receiving the answer he sought. Furthermore, the Megalleh Amukot explains that this is why we recite Psalm 90 ( Tefilla L'Moshe ) on Shabbat, ending with: יראה אל עבדיך פעלך "Let Your work be shown to Your servants..." Moshe is pleading to see Hashem's handiwork by being granted entry into Eretz Yisrael . 2. The Mathematical Breakdown ( Pnei Yehoshua ) The Pnei Yehoshua ( Berachot 32a) offers a fascinating calculation: If you count the days from Tu B'Av until the 7th of Adar (the day Moshe Rabbeinu passed away), using the standard calendar alternating between full and short months: Av: 16 days Elul: 29 days Tishrei: 30 days Cheshvan: 29 days Kislev: 30 days Tevet: 29 days Shevat: 30 days Adar: 7 days Total: 200 days 200 days 3 daily prayers = 600 prayers. Subtract the 28 Shabbatot during this period (where personal petitions are not made): . On his final day, after 515 prayers, Hashem told Moshe to stop before he could recite the 516th prayer. Moshe began praying on Tu B'Av—the day of turnaround and joy—and prayed continuously until his final hours, only to be stopped just one prayer short of his goal. Why Did Hashem Stop Him? The Sefer Chasidim (ch. 612), quoting Rabbeinu Saadia Gaon, notes that one reason a prayer might not be answered is due to a final decree ( gzar din ). But why would Hashem issue a decree that prevents such sincere prayer from being accepted? The Or HaChaim HaKadosh explains that entering the Land was ultimately not for Moshe's (or the Jewish people's) true benefit : Anything Moshe Rabbeinu built was eternal because his spiritual attribute was Netzach (eternity). Had Moshe entered Eretz Yisrael and built the Beit HaMikdash , it could never have been destroyed. Consequently, when Israel sinned in the future, Hashem would not have been able to vent His wrath on wood and stone; the destruction would have fallen entirely upon the Jewish people themselves. By not entering the Land, Moshe effectively took a hit for the Jewish nation. As Moshe later reflects: וגם בי התאנף ה' בגללכם "Hashem was also angry with me on your account." Moshe realized that his prayer was held back for the ultimate protection and salvation of Am Yisrael . This realization is itself a profound level of nechama (comfort). Sometimes we pray relentlessly for something, but Hashem withholds it because He knows it is not ultimately good for us. A Second Calculation: High Holidays to Shemini Atzeret The Sefer HaToda'ah offers an alternate tradition: Moshe offered these prayers from Rosh Hashanah through the morning of Shemini Atzeret —the window of cosmic judgment. 21 days 24 hours = 504 hours. Add the 12 hours of the eve of Shemini Atzeret = 516 total units/prayers. Hashem stopped Moshe in that final 516th hour—the exact moment the decree was being sealed and handed down—to prevent the decree from being annulled, because the outcome was necessary for the greater good. The Lesson of Nechama: No Prayer is Wasted Why do we read Parashat Va'etchanan every year during these seven weeks of comfort? The Pri Tzadik explains that reading this portion gives us strength during this period. We often ask ourselves week after week: "Where is the comfort? Why aren't our prayers bringing the immediate redemption we long for?" The Torah reassures us: Do not feel defeated if your personal prayers seem unanswered. No prayer is ever wasted. כל המתאבל על ירושלים זוכה ורואה בנחמתה "Whoever mourns for Jerusalem merits to see her joy." The Steipler Gaon writes in Chayei Olam (ch. 28) that even if years or decades pass and you feel your prayers haven't worked, never give up . Every single prayer accomplishes something vital. He quotes a Midrash illustrating that some prayers are answered after 3 days, some after 30 years, and some even after 100 years. We cannot see the divine timetable, but every word of tefilla builds something lasting. If Moshe Rabbeinu—the greatest leader who ever lived—had prayers that were withheld for a higher, hidden good, we shouldn't lose heart when our own prayers seem to go unanswered. Trust that Hashem hears every word, and every prayer accomplishes its purpose in its proper time. We will continue more on this topic tomorrow, B'ezrat Hashem.

Daily Bitachon: Erev Tisha B'Av Message Welcome to Daily Bitachon for our Erev Tisha B'Av message. As we prepare for Tisha B'Av, one of our essential obligations is to trace the roots of our exile—to look into the sources and understand why we fell and went into Galut . 1. The Root Cause: Disdain for Torah In Midrash Rabbah (in the introductions, and specifically where Rav Huna and Rav Yirmeya quote Shmuel bar Yitzchak), we find a striking statement: Hashem was willing to forgo punishment for the three cardinal sins—idolatry, promiscuity, and bloodshed—but He did not forgo punishment for the disdain of Torah ( Miyuso shel Torah ). This is explicitly derived from the prophecy in Yirmiyahu: "For what reason did the land perish..." (Yirmiyahu 9:11) The verse does not say the land was destroyed because of idolatry, immorality, or murder. Hashem explicitly answers: "...Because they have forsaken My Torah." The Midrash continues in the name of Rav Chiyya bar Abba, quoting the verse: "They have forsaken Me, and My Torah they did not keep" ( Yirmiyahu 16:11 ). Upon which Hashem says: הַלְוַאי אוֹתִי עָזָבוּ וְתוֹרָתִי שָׁמָרוּ "If only they had forsaken Me, but still kept My Torah! For the light within it would have brought them back to the good." Resolving the Contradiction This presents an obvious problem: The Gemara in Yoma (9b) explicitly states that the First Beit HaMikdash was destroyed because of the three cardinal sins! Furthermore, these three sins carry the death penalty—how could neglecting Torah study be considered a worse trigger for destruction? Rav Aharon Kotler zt"l ( Mishnat Rabbi Aharon , Vol. 1, p. 28) answers: The Power of Remedy: The three cardinal sins are undeniably grave. However, as long as the Jewish people engaged in Torah study, Hashem delayed their punishment. Why? Because the Torah possesses an inherent light that eventually guides a person back to Teshuva (repentance). Loss of the Shield: Once they abandoned and held disdain for Torah study, they discarded the very tool that could save them. Without the antidote, their sins stood unaddressed, and their doom was sealed. Rav Elchanan Wasserman's Mashal: In warfare, two armies may trade blows, but if one side manages to destroy the enemy's armory or airfields, the target becomes completely defenseless. We are in a constant war with the Yetzer Hara (evil inclination). Hashem created the Yetzer Hara , but He created Torah as its antidote ( "Bara'ti Yetzer, Bara'ti Torah Tavlin" ). Abandoning Torah means disarming ourselves in the middle of battle. 2. The Battle with the Sar shel Esav The ongoing historical struggle between Yaakov and Esav is captured in the all-night wrestling match between Yaakov Avinu and the guardian angel of Esav ( Sar shel Esav ). The Timing: Sefarim point out that this wrestling match took place on the eve of Tisha B'Av . The Remint in the Text: The Torah notes that the angel injured the גִּיד הַנָּשֶׁה ( Gid HaNasheh ): גִּיד ( Gid ) hints at the three fast days: ג (Gimmel) = Tzom Gedaliah (3rd of Tishrei) י (Yud) = Asara B'Tevet (10th of Tevet) ד (Dalet) = Shiva Asar B'Tammuz (17th of Tammuz, the 4th month) את ( HaNasheh ) acronym for Tisha B'Av. ת שעה א ב Why Attack Yaakov? Notice that the angel did not attack Avraham (who represents Chesed ) or Yitzchak (who represents Tefillah ). He attacked Yaakov , who represents Torah . Esav's angel targeted the ultimate weapon of the Jewish people. Yaakov's Body (Talmidei Chachamim) --> Could not harm Yaakov's Thighs (Tomchei D'Oraita) --> Successfully struck As the Chafetz Chaim explains (citing the Zohar), the legs/thighs symbolize Tomchei D'Oraita —the supporters who uphold the Torah. The angel realized he could not destroy the Talmidei Chachamim directly, so he tried to weaken the supporters' appreciation for Torah. The Modern Reframe Current Support: Baruch Hashem , in our generation, we are witnessing unprecedented support for Torah learning globally, with initiatives raising hundreds of millions of dollars to sustain Eretz Yisrael's centers of learning. Rav Yaakov Hillel's Insight: When governments reduce funding for Torah institutions, people naturally worry. But Rav Yaakov Hillel offers a profound reframe: Hashem wants the Torah to be sustained purely by those who cherish it—the Charedim v'Dvar Hashem . He is elevating the purity and stature of Torah support. 3. Mourning and the Absence of Torah Why did Esav wait to attack Yaakov? יִקְרְבוּ יְמֵי אֵבֶל אָבִי וְאַהַרְגָה אֶת יַעֲקֹב אָחִי "The days of mourning for my father draw near; then I will kill my brother Yaakov." (Bereshit 27:41) Classic commentators explain: As long as Yaakov was immersed in Torah study, the rule of "Hakol kol Yaakov" applied, and Esav had no power over him. Esav specifically waited for a time of mourning ( Aveilut ) , because a mourner is forbidden from studying Torah. He calculated that during an absence of Torah study, Yaakov would be vulnerable to attack. On Tisha B'Av—the ultimate day of national mourning—we do not engage in standard Torah study. Yet on this very day of darkness, the light of Mashiach is born to turn our mourning into joy. 4. The Halacha of Netilat Yadayim There are only two days in the year when we do not wash our hands up to the wrist for morning Netilat Yadayim (washing only up to the knuckles): Tisha B'Av and Yom Kippur . Day The Spiritual Reality Why We Wash Only to the Knuckles Tisha B'Av Peak power of the Sitra Achra (Esav) The spiritual impurity ( Tuma ) is so thick that standard washing cannot completely remove it; we do only the bare minimum required for the morning. Yom Kippur Peak power of Kedusha (Holiness) Esav is banished ( Se'ir La'Azazel ). The atmosphere is so elevated that impurity has no foothold—only a minimal wash is necessary. Conclusion Our goal this Tisha B'Av is to bridge these two realities: to transform the heavy, vulnerable energy of Tisha B'Av into the pure, triumphant elevated state of Yom Kippur. By recognizing that Torah learning is our ultimate lifeline and protective weapon, may we strengthen our dedication to Limud Torah and its support, and merit seeing the ultimate transformation of this day into a festival of comfort and redemption.

The Deep Opportunities of the Three Weeks: Balancing Truth, Peace, and Teshuva The Scriptural Source of the Fasts We begin our discussion on Shiva Asar B'Tammuz (the 17th of Tammuz) by looking at its earliest source in Tanach. In Zechariah 8:19 , the prophet states: "Koh Amar Hashem: The fast of the fourth, the fast of the fifth, the fast of the seventh, and the fast of the tenth, will turn around to days of rejoicing, happiness, and moadim tovim (holidays). Therefore, love truth and peace ( V'ha'emet v'hashalom ehavu )." In Sephardic communities, this verse is traditionally used to formally announce the upcoming fasts of the 17th of Tammuz and the 10th of Tevet. According to Rashi , the four fasts mentioned correspond to the months of our exile: The Fourth Month: Tammuz ( Shiva Asar B'Tammuz ) The Fifth Month: Av ( Tisha B'Av ) The Seventh Month: Tishrei ( Tzom Gedalia ) The Tenth Month: Tevet ( Asara B'Tevet ) The Ultimate Balance: Emet (Truth) and Shalom (Peace) The Radak notes that the conclusion of the verse—"love truth and peace"—is actually the prerequisite. For these somber days to transform into holidays, we must cultivate both truth and peace. The Brisker Rav raises a powerful question: Seemingly, emet and shalom are contradictory. If a person stands strictly for absolute truth, conflict often follows. If a person pursues peace at all costs, they may compromise on the truth. How can they coexist? The answer lies in achieving a masterful, ultimate spiritual balance. We see this model exemplified by Pinchas. In Malachi 2:5 , the prophet refers to the covenant with the Kohanim: "My covenant was with him of life and peace ( chayim veshalom )." Referring to Pinchas. The Radak notes that Pinchas lived an exceptionally long life. But where do we see that he embodied peace? On the surface, his act of zealotry against Zimri seemed aggressive. Rav Shamshon Raphael Hirsch explains that by standing up for absolute truth ( emet ), Pinchas restored the fractured relationship between God and the Jewish people, thereby bringing ultimate, enduring peace ( shalom ). Sometimes, an act that appears disruptive is the very mechanism that establishes true peace. This is why he was uniquely granted the Beriti Shalom —the Divine "Peace Prize." Furthermore, verse 6 continues: "The Torah of truth was in his mouth, and he walked with Me in peace and uprightness." The Ibn Ezra explains that this blueprint defines Aharon HaKohen, Pinchas, and all future High Priests. Balancing unwavering truth with deep peace is the exact tool we need to transform the three weeks. The Spiritual Purpose of Fast Days What is the core purpose of these communal fasts? The Rambam ( Hilchot Ta'aniot 5:1) emphasizes that these fasts are an obligation for the entire nation, not just an act of extra piety. The Goal: To arouse the hearts ( lehitorer halevavot ) and open the pathways of repentance ( liftoach darkei teshuvah ). It is a time to remember that our current difficulties are rooted in the unresolved missteps of our history, giving us the opportunity to rectify them. A Hidden Hint: If you unscramble the Hebrew letters of the month Tammuz ( תמוז ) , they form the phrase Zemanei Teshuvah (times of repentance) are approaching. Early Sources for Mourning the Three Weeks While Zechariah introduces the fast days, other early sources point to a distinct status for the entire three-week period: Daniel 10:2-3: Daniel records that he fasted and abstained from meat and wine for "three full weeks." The Shibolei HaLeket (Siman 263) quotes Saadia Gaon , explaining that this is an early source for practicing physical customs of mourning throughout this entire period. Eicha 1:3: The verse states, "All her pursuers overtook her between the straits (bein hametzarim)." Rashi explains that "between the straits" refers to the literal bookends of the three weeks: the 17th of Tammuz and the 9th of Av. Overcoming Challenges: The 42 Travels The Sefer Avodat Yisrael (Parshat Masei) offers a beautiful, uplifting interpretation of this period. Accessibility of the King: The verse says "All her pursuers overtook her." On a deeper level, this means that anyone who "pursues" a connection with God can easily "attain" Him during these days. When a king is closed away in his palace, he is hard to reach. But when the king is out in the field, anyone can approach him. During the three weeks, the Divine presence is, so to speak, highly accessible to us if we call out. Mishlei 27:8 compares God during this time to a bird wandering from its nest—close, exposed, and reachable. The Vessel for the High Holidays: The Me'or Vashemesh (Parshat Pinchas) teaches that these three weeks form the necessary vessel ( kli ) to hold the intense spiritual lights of the upcoming High Holidays. Rav Wobe used to say "If you have a priceless, vintage wine but no glass, you cannot enjoy it." The High Holidays are the premium wine; the three weeks of introspection are the glass that holds it. The 42 Journeys: We always read Parshat Mattot-Masei during this time. If you take the 21 days of Bein HaMetzarim and count both their days and nights, they equal 42 . This corresponds to the 42 encampments of the Jewish people in the desert. Just as the nation experienced 42 travels globally, every individual goes through 42 personal life challenges and journeys. Experiencing the three weeks correctly allows us to elevate and sweeten those personal struggles. The Tzror Hamor (Bamidbar 33:1) adds that we review these desert travels specifically to plant a deep root of absolute trust ( bitachon ) in the future redemption . It reminds us that throughout history, despite the harsh terrains, Hashem watched over us closely. Even when the generation leaving Egypt was spiritually lacking, they were redeemed in the merit ( zechus ) of leadership like Moshe and Aharon. In our current, prolonged exile, Hashem continues to look over us and will send us the righteous leaders to redeem us. Practical Takeaways for the Fast The three weeks are fundamentally a period of tremendous spiritual opportunity, not just heavy mourning. They set the stage for the Sheva D'nechemta —the seven weeks of immense comfort that follow Tisha B'Av from Shabbat Nachamu until Rosh Hashanah. To tap into this energy, we must avoid the temptation on a fast day to just "make the day pass" by drowning ourselves in work until the final hours. Consider integrating these meaningful practices: Dedicate Introspective Time: Even in a busy office, close your door for 20 or 30 minutes to reflect on the meaning of the day and our relationship with our Creator. Recitng Tikkun Rachel : The Arizal suggests that even those who do not regularly recite Tikkun Chatzot throughout the year should make an effort during the three weeks to sit on the floor after midday ( chatzot hayom ) and recite Tikkun Rachel , mourning the destruction of the Temple. Note: The Kaf Hachayim (551:221-222) notes that this prayer is omitted on Friday afternoons, the day before Rosh Chodesh, Rosh Chodesh itself, and Tisha B'Av. The Shield of Mourning: Rav Chaim Palagi ) see Moed L'Kol chai 10:95 ) shares a profound spiritual rule regarding establishing a remembrance for the destruction ( Churban ): When a person willingly takes a small measure of sincere mourning for the Churban upon themselves, that act serves as a spiritual shield, protecting them from experiencing other personal reasons for grief. Take some time to study the specific halachot (laws) of the week of Tisha B'Av ( Shavua Shechal Bo ). Understanding the physical boundaries of these laws acts as a catalyst for genuine spiritual growth. Through sincere reflection, may we merit to see these days transform speedily from mourning into our ultimate joy.

According to Yosi ben Yasiyan and Rabbi Yehuda the Baker, ben Beteira permits returning a kometz taken in a disqualified manner to the original dough, provided it has not yet been placed in a sanctified vessel. Rav Nachman challenges this ruling: if taking the kometz is a significant ritual, the act should be irreversible; if it is not, placing it in a sanctified vessel should be meaningless. Rav Nachman resolves this by explaining that while taking the kometz is indeed a ritual act, it is not complete until the kometz is placed in the vessel. If so, the Gemara objects, returning the kometz to the original dough - which is also held in a sanctified vessel - should complete the act and permanently disqualify it. This difficulty is answered in two ways. Rabbi Yochanan answers that one can derive a principle from here: sanctified vessels only sanctify items if they are placed inside with intent to sanctify. The Gemara questions this assumption, noting that it implies one could intentionally sanctify disqualified items; yet, Rabbi Yochanan previously answered Reish Lakish that disqualified items cannot be sanctified for the altar by being placed in a sanctified vessel. This contradiction is resolved by distinguishing between sanctifying an item to permit it to be offered on the altar (which is not effective) and sanctifying an item merely to disqualify it (which is effective). Rav Amram answers the original question by qualifying the case to when the kometz is returned to a heaping bowl. As a sanctified vessel only sanctifies what is within the walls of the vessel, the kometz is not sanctified to be disqualified when placed back in the original vessel. After raising a difficulty regarding the reality of this case, his answer is partially modified to a level bowl, not heaping. Rabbi Yirmia tells Rabbi Zeira that he derives from the fact that they did not suggest returning it to the vessel when it was on the ground, that the actions of kemitza do not need to be performed while a kohen is holding the vessel in his hands. Rabbi Zeira points out that this was an issue raised by Rav Nachman to Avimi, who explained that the kohen indeed needs to be holding the vessel. Rav Sheshet disagrees, holding that the Kohen does not need to be holding the vessel for all the actions of kemitza. He derives this from the laws of the Showbread, as he understands from a Mishna that the kohanim did not hold up the Table when the Showbread and bowls of frankincense was switched at the end of each week. Rav brings a third position: The first two actions - placing the dough in the bowl and taking the kemitza - do not require the kohen to be holding the vessel, but the kometz must be placed in a vessel held by a kohen, as it is parallel to accepting the blood of a sacrifice.

Yom Shabbat Service - 28 Tevet, 5786 / January 17, 2026     Parshat Vaera - I appeared   Torah: Exodus 6:2-9:35 Haftarah: Ezekiel 28:25-29:21

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

There are three different opinions about the status of the mincha offering of the omer that is offered for the sake of a different offering. Rav says it is completely disqualified, Reish Lakish holds it is valid, but the obligation to bring the mincha is not fulfilled and a new one must be brought, and Rava holds that it is valid and the obligation is fulfilled. Rav added another disqualified case to the list – a guilt offering of the nazir and leper. After a discussion about why he would distinguish between that guilt offering and a guilt offering for theft or misuse of consecrated property, the Gemara brings a braita that clearly contradicts Rav as it says explicitly that a guilt offering of a leper offered for the sake of the wrong sacrifice is brought on the altar. A difficulty is raised against Reish Lakish's position. If the omer offering that is brought for the sake of the wrong offering does not fulfill its obligation, how can it be offered on the altar as one can only offer on the altar items that can be eaten by Jews and this is an offering from the chadash (new grain) and the chadash is only permitted with the omer offering. Two answers are brought to resolve this difficulty. The first answer is brought by Rav Ada bar Ahava who suggests that since it will be permitted later that day, when the omer offering is brought correctly, it is not considered a forbidden item. Three difficulties are raised against Rav Ada, two are resolved but the last one is not. Rav Papa offers an alternative answer – that the actual omer offering does not permit the chadash, but the illumination of the eastern horizon on that day permits it (16th of Nisan). This suggestion of Rav Papa is further supported by claiming that Rabbi Yochanan and Reish Lakish both agreed that the chadash is permitted from that time and not from the offering of the omer, as is derived from a statement of Reish Lakish. A braita teaches that one can derive from a verse "from the cattle" that a treifa cannot be brought on the altar. However, the braita suggests that it could have been derived by a kal v'chomer, but since one can raise a difficulty against that kal v'chomer, it is derived from a verse. However, it is unclear what the difficulty could have been and the Gemara brings several possible suggestions. But difficulties are raised against each of them.

Rav Sheisha brings a fifth explanation of an ambiguous line in the braita brought on Menachot 5b, "If you had raised a difficulty on the logical argument." As in all the previous explanations, also this one is rejected. Rav Ashi suggests that one could knock out the logical argument from the beginning as perhaps one could not even bring a kal v'chomer from blemished animals as they have a stringency. This suggestion of Rav Ashi is modified a few times and ultimately his explanation is that if one were to make a kal v'chomer with both blemished animals and ones born not through natural childbirth, one could reject that kal v'chomer as they both have a stringency that is not in a treifa as they have noticeable issues, whereas a treifa is not necessarily noticeable. The braita concluded that the source for a treifa not being able to be offered on the altar is derived from "from the cattle." However, two other verses also are used to exclude a treifa. Why are all three verses necessary? The Mishna rules that any meal offering that the kemitza is done by a non-kohen, onen, impure person, etc. (i.e. not in the proper manner), is disqualified. Ben Beteira disagrees and explains that if it was done with the left hand, one returns the kometz to the pile and redoes it with the right hand. If a kohen took the kemitza but there was something else in there like a pebble or frankincense, it is invalid as the kemitza must be a precise handful, no more and no less. The Gemara first questions the language of the Mishna – why does it list the mincha offering brought for a sin together separately from the others. The answer is that the Mishna is highlighting that even according to Rabbi Shimon who holds that a sinner's offering should not be glorious, it still needs to be done properly. Even though in Zevachim, the parallel Mishna relating to sacrifices does not single out the sin offering, the Gemara explains why there was no need there to explain it according to Rabbi Shimon, but there was a need here. Rav explains that any disqualification can be fixed by redoing it. At first, they question Rav's ruling in light of the rabbis' position in the Mishna, but then they explain that Rav holds like ben Beteira and is coming to explain that even though ben Beteira only mentioned the disqualification of the left hand in the Mishna, his ruling applies for all disqualifications. The Gemara raises a difficulty on this from tannaitic sources that show that this was clear even before Rav made his statement. To resolve the difficulty, they bring a different explanation – that Rav was pointing out that ben Beteira permits it to be redone even if the kometz was placed in a sanctified vessel, which disagrees with a tannaitic opinion that it can be fixed only if it wasn't yet placed in a sanctified vessel. According to others, Rav is coming to teach the exact opposite and to show that he agrees with the tannaitic opinion that it can only be fixed if it was not yet placed in the vessel.

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

What was clear to Raba on one hand and Rava on the other - regarding how to understand Rabbi Shimon's words and whether a noticeably incorrect intent (machshava nikeret) disqualifies or not - was not clear to Rav Hoshaya, who deliberated on how to interpret Rabbi Shimon's position. The Gemara explains why he did not accept the opinions of Raba, Rava, or Rav Ashi as a sufficient explanation for his doubt. The Mishna mentions two exceptions to the rule of a meal offering (mincha) that was perfomed for the wrong purpose (where the offering is valid but the owner has not fulfilled their obligation): the sinner's meal offering (minchat choteh) and the jealousy offering  of a Sotah (minchat kenaot) are completely disqualified if perfomed for the wrong purpose (shelo lishmah). What is the source for this? The Gemara initially presents a derivation for each of them from the sin offering (chatat), but after rejecting these derivations due to a difficulty regarding the guilt offering (asham), it brings a different exposition based on a gezeirah shava (verbal analogy) to both of these meal offerings. Rav adds the Omer meal offering to this list, stating that if it was performed for the wrong purpose, it is disqualified because it is intended to permit the consumption of the "new grain" (chadash), and if brought for the wrong purpose, it fails to permit it and is useless. He says the same regarding the nazirite's guilt offering (asham nazir) and the leper's guilt offering (asham metzora). If so, why are this meal offering and these sacrifices not mentioned in the Mishnayot in Menachot and Zevachim that list those disqualified if they were brought for the wrong purpose? The Gemara answers this question and settles the difficulty. The Gemara further challenges Rav: if the asham nazir and asham metzora are meant to "enable" (le'hachshir) a status change and fail to do so when brought for the wrong purpose, then the guilt offering for misappropriation (asham me'ilot) and the guilt offering for theft (asham gezeilot) - which are meant to "atone" (le'chaper) - likewise fail to atone; why then are they valid if brought for the wrong purpose? Rabbi Yirmiya makes a distinction between offerings that "enable" status (machshirim) and those that "atone" (mechaperim). He brings proof from the laws of sacrifices brought after the death of the owner, specifically citing a Mishna regarding a woman after childbirth (yoledet). Rabbi Yehuda, son of Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi, challenges this distinction (regarding the laws after death) from a Mishna in Nazir, where an enabling sacrifice is indeed brought after death.  

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

Study Guide There are three ways to resolve the contradiction between the statements of Rabbi Shimon in two braitot: in one, he states that a meal-offering (mincha) brought for a different purpose than its original intent is valid and fulfills the owner's obligation, while in the other, he states that it is valid but does not fulfill the owner's obligation. Raba, Rava, and Rav Ashi each offer different resolutions to this contradiction. Raba explains Rabbi Shimon's words according to their simple meaning - that when it is evident from a person's actions that their stated thought was not sincere (or was a lie), we can disregard the thought and validate the offering. The Gemara raises nine challenges to Raba's position from other cases involving bird offerings and animal sacrifices where the actions clearly contradict the stated intent, yet the sacrifice still does not fulfill the owner's obligation. For most of these challenges, the Gemara answers that the cases are not truly comparable, but in some instances, it concedes that Rabbi Shimon would indeed agree that the sacrifice fulfills the owner's obligation in those scenarios as well. Rava and Rav Ashi resolve the difficulty differently. According to both, the principle of "its actions prove its intent" (ma'asav mochiach alav) must be interpreted in a different way. The Gemara raises a challenge against each of their views and subsequently resolves them. According to Rava's final position, it emerges that Rabbi Shimon would even validate a specific case of a sin-offering offered as a different sin-offering, and it would be accepted as fulfilling the obligation.

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

Study Guide If one takes a dough of a mincha that was designated for a specific type of meal offering and takes the kemitza with the intention that it be offered for a different type of mincha, the sacrifice is not invalidated. It must still be offered according to its original designation. However, it does not fulfill the obligation of the person who brought the mincha. There are exceptions to this rule - cases in which the wrong intent completely disqualifies the offering - specifically in a mincha of a sinner and of the sotah. The Gemara raises a question: Why does the Mishna use the word "ela" ("but") instead of "ve" ("and") in the phrase "but with the wrong intent does not fulfill the owner's obligation"? The answer given is that although the sacrifice does not fulfill the owner's obligation, its original sanctity and designation remain intact. Therefore, the remaining sacrificial rites must be performed in accordance with its original purpose. This explanation aligns with a statement made by Rava, and two reasons are offered to support this ruling - one derived from a biblical verse, and the other based on logical reasoning. It seems, at first glance, that the Mishna does not accord with the opinion of Rabbi Shimon, who explains that a mincha offered for the sake of a different sacrifice is valid and fulfills the obligation of the owner. The Gemara refers then to a contradiction between two different sources within Rabbi Shimon - in one it says it does fulfill the obligation, in the other it says it does not. Raba, Rava, and Rav Ashi each offer different resolutions to the contradiction. According to Rav Ashi's resolution, one can reconcile our Mishna with Rabbi Shimon in the same manner. But according to Raba and Rava, that is not possible, as their explanations for the second braita cannot be used for our Mishna, as the language of our Mishna would not fit with that explanation. Therefore, according to them, Rabbi Shimon must be offering a position that is counter to the position of our Mishna. After making mention of the contradictory sources of Rabbi Shimon, the Gemara brings the other braita and begins to explain the resolutions. Raba's explanation is brought and Abaye raises a difficulty, which Raba himself resolves. Then a number of other questions are raised against Raba.

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

Sponsored by Anonymous:This is the second of 6 shows sponsored in memory of Eliyahu ben Yehuda, niftar 27 Tevet 5776, on his 10th yahrzeit, commemorating the 250th anniversary of the United States of America.

In this week's Weekly Energy Boost, Elisheva Balas is joined by Daniel Naor for a powerful conversation on pressure, free will, and love. Drawing on the wisdom of Kabbalah, the Zohar, Torah teachings, and kabbalistic astrology, this episode reframes life's challenges as invitations for growth rather than obstacles to avoid.Together, they explore how control often masks fear, why avoidance keeps us stuck, and how true spiritual clarity comes from trusting the heart over constant calculation. This week's energy calls us to pause, listen, and respond with greater awareness—before small signals turn into heavier lessons.In this episode, you'll discover:Why pressure can be an expression of love and mercyHow time creates space for change and repairThe link between control, guilt, and self-loveHow surrender unlocks clarity and forward movementWeekly Energy Boost is your spiritual weather report for the week—offering practical tools to help you transform pressure into purpose and realign with the flow of life. Join us for the next episode of Weekly Energy Boost with @ElishevaBalas and special guest, @Daniel.Naor72.Watch LIVE Sundays at 10 am PT / 1 pm ET on The Kabbalah Centre YouTube or catch the latest episode wherever you listen to podcasts. Find out more about our work, dig into our archives, and send us a message at: www.weeklyenergyboost.com.You can also help make Weekly Energy Boost possible by making a tax-deductible contribution atwww.weeklyenergyboost.com/donate-today.

During the period when the Tabernacle stood in Nov and Givon, it was permitted to offer sacrifices on private bamot. This is derived from Devarim 12:9: "For you have not yet arrived at the menucha and the nachala." Menucha refers to Shiloh, and nachala refers to Jerusalem. The additional word "to" between them serves to separate the two stages, indicating that bamot were permitted in the interim period. Reish Lakish asked Rabbi Yochanan why maaser sheni is not mentioned in the Mishna regarding the period of Nov and Givon. Rabbi Yochanan answered that when there is no Ark, there is no maaser sheni, based on a gezeira shava linking the two. When Reish Lakish challenges this - arguing that according to that gezeira shava, the Pesach offering and other sacrificial foods should also not be eaten - Rabbi Yochanan offers a different explanation: the Mishna follows Rabbi Shimon's view that only obligatory sacrifices with a fixed time were brought, which excludes animal tithes. Since maaser sheni (grain tithes) is comparable to animal tithes, it too would not apply. According to this second explanation, Rabbi Yehuda would hold that maaser sheni was brought during the period of Nov and Givon, a view supported by a statement of Rav Ada and a braita cited by Rav Yosef. Although the verse in Devarim 12:9 was initially explained as referring to Shilo and Jerusalem through the terms menucha and nachala, three additional interpretations are presented, each examined in the context of the verse. The Mishna states that one who consecrates an animal for sacrifice at a time when bamot are permitted, but offers it when bamot are forbidden, is not liable for karet. Rav Kahana limits this exemption to slaughtering outside the Temple; one who actually offers the sacrifice outside is liable for karet. After Rav Kahana explains his derivation, Raba rejects his position on two grounds. The Mishna lists several differences between the sacrificial procedures on the large bama and on smaller bamot. The Gemara provides the Torah sources for each distinction. Two versions are recorded regarding a limitation taught by Rami bar Hama, and a braita is cited to either challenge or support his view. Finally, an alternative position is presented in the name of Rabbi Elazar.

  Rabbi Zeira raises the question of an offering designated for a private altar: if it was slaughtered on the private altar, then brought into the Tabernacle, and afterward taken back out, must it now be returned to the Tabernacle and treated like a public‑altar sacrifice with all its associated requirements? Initially, the Gemara suggests that this issue might hinge on the dispute between Rava and Rav Yosef regarding high level sanctity offerings that were slaughtered in the South instead of the required Northern area and were then mistakenly placed on the altar. Ultimately, however, the Gemara distinguishes between the two cases and rejects the comparison. Another discussion concerns a sacrifice slaughtered at night on a private altar. Rav and Shmuel disagree about whether such an offering is valid. Rav and Rabbi Yoḥanan also dispute whether burnt offerings brought on private altars require hefshet and nituach - flaying and cutting into pieces - just as they do on the public altar. Although private altars operate with fewer restrictions, several laws apply equally to both private and public offerings. A braita entertains the possibility that time‑based limitations might not apply to private‑altar sacrifices, just as spatial limitations do not. However, a verse is cited to demonstrate that time restrictions indeed remain binding even for offerings brought on private altars.

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai held that during the period of the Temple there were four distinct "camps," since the Ezrat Nashim constituted its own camp. However, in the period of Shilo there were only two camps. The Gemara struggles to identify which camp, according to Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai, did not exist in Shilo, since the Torah clearly assigns separate zones for each category of impurity - one who is impure from contact with a corpse, a zav, and a leper - implying the need for three distinct camps. Ultimately, the Gemara concludes that Rabbi Shimon's statement refers to an entirely different issue: during the period of Shilo, the Levite area did not function as a place of refuge for someone who killed unintentionally. This implies that in the wilderness the Levite camp did serve as a refuge zone, a point further supported by derashot on Shemot 21:13. A braita presents five different rabbinic opinions regarding which sacrifices were offered during the fourteen years after entering the Land, when the Tabernacle stood in Gilgal. Some maintain that only voluntary offerings brought by individuals were permitted. Rabbi Meir holds that meal offerings and Nazirite offerings were also brought. Rabbi Yehuda adds that even obligatory offerings could be brought in the Tabernacle (bama gedola), distinguishing between the central sanctuary and other locations. Rabbi Shimon limits which public offerings were brought. The Gemara then cites the scriptural basis for Rabbi Meir's position. Shmuel restricts the dispute between the rabbis and Rabbi Meir specifically to the obligatory offerings of a Nazirite. However, after Rava introduces a contradictory braita, the Gemara revises Shmuel's statement, concluding that the dispute concerns specifically the voluntary offerings of a Nazirite. The Gemara brings a source from the Torah for the opinion of the rabbis (the second view) in the braita.

The Gemara explains the basis of the disagreement in the braita between Rabbi Yehuda and the Rabbis, and how the second position of the Rabbis differs from the first position in the name of the rabbis in that same braita. Rabbi Shimon's source in the Torah for his view limiting the communal offerings brought in Gilgal is a verse in Yehoshua 5:10, which describes the Jews bringing the Paschal offering just a few days after crossing the Jordan River into the Land of Israel.  The reason the structure of Shilo was built with stone walls while its ceiling was only a curtain is derived from seemingly contradictory verses - some referring to Shilo as a "house" and others as a "tent." Four rabbis each cite a different verse to explain the law that during the period when the Tabernacle stood in Shilo, kodshim kalim and maaser sheni could be eaten anywhere within sight of Shilo. There is also a debate about whether the Tabernacle in Shilo was located in the territory of Yosef or Binyamin.  A braita discusses how many years the Tabernacle remained in each location and explains the calculations: thirty-nine years in the desert, fourteen in Gilgal, fifty-seven in Nov and Givon, and three hundred sixty-nine in Shilo.

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

Before the Tabernacle was erected, even blemished animals or male or female could be offered as sacrifices. This is derived from the juxtaposition of animals to birds in Bereishit 8:20, which describes the offerings Noach brought after the Flood; since blemishes do not disqualify birds and females can be brought as burnt offerings, they likewise did not disqualify blemished animals or females. However, if an animal was missing a limb, it could not be offered. This is learned from Bereishit 6:19, "From all live animals," implying that only fully intact animals were acceptable. The Gemara asks why this verse is not used to exclude a treifa, and answers by identifying a different source for excluding a treifa. Only kosher animals could be offered, even before the Tabernacle was built. But since this was before the Torah was given, how could there be a distinction between kosher and non‑kosher animals? Rabbi Shmuel bar Nachmani explains that the distinction refers to animals that would eventually be considered kosher. Noach brought two of each species into the Ark, but of the kosher species he brought seven of each so that he would have animals available for sacrifice after the Flood. How did Noach know which animals would later be deemed kosher? Either this was revealed miraculously, or the animals entered the Ark on their own, with the kosher species arriving in groups of seven while the non‑kosher species arrived only in pairs. There is a tannaitic dispute regarding whether, before the Tabernacle was erected, people brought only burnt offerings or also peace offerings. This debate hinges on whether the descendants of Noach were permitted to bring peace offerings, a question derived from Hevel's sacrifice - specifically the phrase "from the fat thereof" - and from a verse in Shir HaShirim 4:16. A challenge is raised against the opinion that peace offerings were not brought, based on Yitro's offering of peace offerings. The resolution depends on whether Yitro's sacrifice occurred before or after the giving of the Torah. Indeed, there is a tannaitic dispute about the timing of Yitro's arrival, rooted in the question of what he heard that motivated him to come and convert: Israel's victory over Amalek, the giving of the Torah, or the splitting of the Sea. Non‑Jews may offer sacrifices anywhere and at any time, since the prohibition against sacrificing outside the Temple applies only to Jews. However, Jews may not serve as their agents in performing the sacrifice. The Gemara relates a story about Ofrah Hermiz, the mother of the Persian king Shapur, who asked him to bring a sacrifice on her behalf. Rava advised her on the matter but arranged for non‑Jews to perform the actual sacrificial act. In the desert, the Israelites were permitted to eat kodashim kalim anywhere within the camp. Rav Huna stated that they could eat them anywhere that Jews were present. The rabbis sought to clarify his statement, given that the desert encampment clearly consisted of distinct camps, while his words seemed to imply otherwise.

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

We're kicking off 2026 with clarity, intention, and powerful cosmic support. In this week's Weekly Energy Boost, we welcome back Kabbalistic astrologer Miriam Ashkenazi to explore where to focus our energy in the first months of the year, how to get the greatest reward for our effort, and how to navigate upcoming opportunities and challenges.As multiple new cycles begin—astrologically and spiritually—we discuss major planetary shifts, including Saturn and Neptune entering Aries, and what they mean for growth, maturity, manifestation, and compassion. You may notice old patterns or situations resurfacing; Kabbalah guides us to reframe them as invitations for deeper healing and transformation.This is your spiritual seven-day weather forecast, offering practical Kabbalistic tools you can use this week—and all year long—to create a more aligned, empowered start to 2026.Visit https://guidance.kabbalah.com/teachers/miriam-ashkenazi to book your session with our 20% listener discount code: NEWYEAR20

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

The 10th of Tevet, how this date could change everything

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

As we close out 2025 and prepare for 2026, this week's Weekly Energy Boost explores what it truly means to feel alive. Drawing on Kabbalistic wisdom, we reveal why fulfillment doesn't come from external success or constant inspiration, but from cultivating desire—the spiritual vessel that allows Light, motivation, and blessings to flow.This episode shares practical tools for reigniting passion when motivation fades, whether in relationships, career, or spiritual growth. You'll learn how disciplined action, intentional giving, and proactive investment can awaken desire even before clarity arrives.If you're feeling stuck, uninspired, or uncertain as the new year approaches, this is an episode you don't want to miss. There's a unique Light available right now—listen and step into 2026 with renewed purpose, energy, and momentum.Join us for the next episode of Weekly Energy Boost with @ElishevaBalas and @EitanYardeni.Watch LIVE Sundays at 10 am PT / 1 pm ET on The Kabbalah Centre YouTube or catch the latest episode wherever you listen to podcasts.Find out more about our work, dig into our archives, and send us a message at: www.weeklyenergyboost.com.You can also help make Weekly Energy Boost possible by making a tax-deductible contribution at www.weeklyenergyboost.com/donate-today.

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

www.dailybreadmoms.com Now coming to busy moms all over the world as a daily podcast! Daily Bread follows the weekly Torah Portion, one part each day, together with a healthy balance from the rest of Scripture — all in one year. More than just a one-year Bible reading plan, Daily Bread is designed as a journal, with a comprehensive Hebrew calendar. To support the podcast - www.patreon.com/dailybreadmoms Check out the Daily Bread Torah Class, LIVE from Israel! Join anytime. larsenarson.com/torah The Journals are available here: arielmedia.shop/

Managing the intensity of Tevet