Podcasts about functionalist

Jess Cahill, travel + adventure host and business manager, is back on the Strong and Unfiltered podcast.  In this episode we talk about: Breakdown of Jess's Cats Blueberries in my teeth Jess is a recovering vacuum Litty Titty Spirit airlines.. yay or nay? FLorida!!!!! (Is one hell of a drug) Remember the Alamo BANFF!!! The circle of life Bunnies can swim Marriage and weddings Joy and butthole puckering Your subconscious The Empowered Team Owning your own business Functionalist perspectives Want to come hang with us summer 2025 in Banff?! Join the party!  Learn more about working with me  Shop my masterclasses (learn more in 60-90 minutes than years of dr appointments for just $19.99) Follow me on IG Follow Empowered Mind + Body on IG  Learn more about traveling with Jess (and me!) Follow Jess on IG 

Samantha BessonCollège de FranceAnnée 2022-2023Droit international des institutionsColloque - Democratic Representation in and by International Organizations : No International Democratic Representation without Sovereignty—Lifting the Democratic Veil of Functionalist, Incorporation and Agency Theories of Representation by International Intervenant(s) :Pr José Luis Martí, Pompeu Fabra University, BarcelonaInternational organizations (IOs) play a central role in contemporary international law-making: they institutionalize many of the processes through which international law is adopted today, be it through international law-making conferences, international courts or as IO secondary law. Yet, the question of democratic representation (by Member States and/or other public or private institutions or persons involved such as non-governmental organizations, multinational corporations, trade unions, employer's associations, cities, regions or religious groups) in IOs, but also by IOs when they become members of other IOs or intervene as participants in other international law-making processes remains difficult, to say the least. It is one of the many dimensions of the deficit in democratic legitimacy of international law, but one that is rarely addressed as such today –although it has not always been the case and not with respect to all IOs equally. There are many reasons for the contemporary side-lining of the question of democratic representation both in international organizations' law and in international democratic theory. It suffices to mention two of them here: one is the vexed relationship between IOs and "politics" (not to mention democratic politics), and another lies in the (over)emphasis on civil society "participation" and other forms of "stakeholder" inclusion.The conference's aims will be to discuss those issues, but also to examine how IOs could be designed and organized under international law in the future so as to ensure sufficient democratic representation of all those they claim to bind legally, either directly or through their Member States. Various specialists of representation in both international organizations' law and democratic theory have been invited to explore those issues and many others at the conference. The conference is organized around three sets of issues: representation inside IOs (i.e. the different types of public and private representatives and their articulation in different IO deliberation and decision-making processes) (i), through IOs (i.e. the contribution of those forms of public and private representation within IOs to the institutionalization and organization of the relevant public and private representative institutions as such) (ii) and by IOs (i.e. when they become members of other IOs or participate in external international law-making processes) (iii).Speakers: Jochen von Bernstorff (University of Tübingen); Samantha Besson (Collège de France, Paris and University of Fribourg); Francis Cheneval (University of Zurich); Édouard Dubout (University Paris-Panthéon-Assas); Melissa J. Durkee (University of Georgia; Athens); Olivier de Frouville (University Paris-Panthéon-Assas); Évelyne Lagrange (University Paris 1-Panthéon-Sorbonne); Marieke Louis (Centre Marc Bloch, Berlin); Terry MacDonald (University of Melbourne); José Luis Martí (University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona); Anne Peters (Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg); Philip Pettit (University of Princeton and Australian National University, Canberra); Dominique Ritleng (University of Strasbourg); Pierre Rosanvallon (Collège de France, Paris); Marie-Clotilde Runavot (University of Perpignan Via Domitia).Commentators: Olivier de Frouville (University Paris-Panthéon-Assas); Charles Girard (University Jean Moulin Lyon 3); Bernard Manin (EHESS, Paris); Yves Sintomer (University Paris 8-Vincenne-Saint-Denis).Les organisations internationales (OI) jouent un rôle central dans l'élaboration du droit international contemporain. Pourtant, la question de la représentation démocratique par les (représentants des) États membres et/ou les (représentants des) nombreuses autres institutions ou personnes publiques ou privées (comme les organisations non gouvernementales, les entreprises multinationales, les syndicats ou les villes) qui participent aux procédures de délibération et/ou de décision au sein des OI demeure redoutablement difficile. C'est encore davantage le cas de la représentation démocratique par les OI lorsque ces organisations deviennent membres d'autres OI ou interviennent en tant que participantes à part entière au sein d'autres processus multilatéraux d'élaboration du droit international. Les moyens d'assurer un contrôle populaire ultime et effectif sur ces représentants et les procédures auxquelles ils participent ne sont en effet que rarement donnés, comme d'ailleurs le respect de l'égalité politique entre les peuples du monde et entre leurs citoyens au sein de ces procédures.Ce manque de représentativité démocratique des procédures d'adoption du droit international dans les OI et des OI elles-mêmes est l'une des nombreuses dimensions du déficit plus large de légitimité démocratique du droit international. Malgré sa centralité, la question, plus technique, de la représentation démocratique dans et par les OI n'est que rarement abordée en tant que telle. Différents spécialistes du droit des organisations internationales et de la théorie démocratique ont été invités pour en débattre lors de ce colloque. Il s'agit d'établir ce que devrait recouvrir la notion de représentation démocratique internationale en elle-même et dans/par les OI, puis comment les OI pourraient être réorganisées en droit international de manière à assurer une représentation démocratique suffisante de tous ceux qu'elles prétendent lier juridiquement.Le colloque sera organisé autour de trois séries de questions : la représentation dans, à travers et par les organisations internationales. Il s'agira d'examiner, premièrement, par quelles institutions publiques et privées la représentation démocratique peut et doit se faire au sein des OI conçues comme des systèmes de représentation internationale multiple (i) ; deuxièmement, comment, ce faisant, le droit des OI peut et doit faciliter l'institutionnalisation de ces multiples représentants tant publics (p. ex. les villes) que privés (p. ex. les ONG) en premier lieu et avant leur articulation systématique en son sein (ii) ; et, enfin, comment la représentation par les OI dans d'autres OI ou d'autres procédures internationales peut et doit être organisée pour pouvoir être considérée comme démocratique (iii).Intervenantes et intervenants confirmésJochen von Bernstorff (Université de Tübingen) ; Samantha Besson (Collège de France, Paris) ; Francis Cheneval (Université de Zurich) ; Édouard Dubout (Université Paris 2-Panthéon-Assas) ; Melissa J. Durkee (Université de Géorgie) ; Jacob Katz Cogan (University of Cincinnati) ; Évelyne Lagrange (Université Paris 1-Panthéon-Sorbonne) ; Marieke Louis (Centre Marc-Bloch, Berlin) ; Terry Macdonald (Université de Melbourne) ; José Luis Martí (Université Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona) ; Anne Peters (Institut Max-Planck pour le droit public international et comparé, Heidelberg) ; Philip Pettit (Université de Princeton et Australian National University) ; Dominique Ritleng (Université de Strasbourg) ; Pierre Rosanvallon (Collège de France, Paris) ; Marie-Clotilde Runavot (Université de Perpignan).Commentateurs confirmésOlivier de Frouville (Université Paris-Panthéon-Assas) ; Charles Girard (Université Jean-Moulin-Lyon 3) ; Franck Petiteville (Sciences Po, Grenoble) ; Yves Sintomer (Université Paris 8-Vincenne-Saint-Denis).Le colloque aura lieu en anglais (à l'exception de quelques interventions en français), sans traduction simultanée.Le colloque bénéficie du soutien financier de la Fondation du Collège de France.

Check out my free video series about what's missing in AI and Neuroscience Support the show to get full episodes and join the Discord community. James Woodward is a recently retired Professor from the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh. Jim has tremendously influenced the field of causal explanation in the philosophy of science. His account of causation centers around intervention - intervening on a cause should alter its effect. From this minimal notion, Jim has described many facets and varieties of causal structures. In this episode, we discuss topics from his recent book, Causation with a Human Face: Normative Theory and Descriptive Psychology. In the book, Jim advocates that how we should think about causality - the normative - needs to be studied together with how we actually do think about causal relations in the world - the descriptive. We discuss many topics around this central notion, epistemology versus metaphysics, the the nature and varieties of causal structures. Jim's website.Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation.Causation with a Human Face: Normative Theory and Descriptive Psychology. 0:00 - Intro 4:14 - Causation with a Human Face & Functionalist approach 6:16 - Interventionist causality; Epistemology and metaphysics 9:35 - Normative and descriptive 14:02 - Rationalist approach 20:24 - Normative vs. descriptive 28:00 - Varying notions of causation 33:18 - Invariance 41:05 - Causality in complex systems 47:09 - Downward causation 51:14 - Natural laws 56:38 - Proportionality 1:01:12 - Intuitions 1:10:59 - Normative and descriptive relation 1:17:33 - Causality across disciplines 1:21:26 - What would help our understanding of causation

Chapter 18 of Sloterdijk's Critique of Cynical Reason. Depersonalization and Alienation. Functionalist Cynicisms I.

Chapter 19 of Sloterdijk's Critique of Cynical Reason. Artificial Limbs. Functionalist Cynicisms II: On the Spirit of Technology

Richard looks at Functionalist theories of education for your A Level Sociology exam. In this episode, he will look what Functionalists believe is the value of education. Ideal for preparing you for your A Level Sociology exam. Click here for the full course, or visit this link: http://bit.ly/30id5tm

Continuing on functionalism with David M. Armstrong’s "The Causal Theory of the Mind" (1981). Your four hosts start afresh the day after Part One on Putnam to discuss this version of functionalism that is supposed to clear the way for the scientific identification of mental states with brain states. Mental states are defined by their causal relations with other states and with behavior, and the content of a mental state is exhausted by its intentional object, e.g. the content of a perception is the thing you're perceiving which (normally) causes the perception. So what about things like colors and sounds that aren't really out in the world? Can functionalism explain how these seem to us? Listen to part one first or get the full, ad-free Citizen Edition. Please support PEL! End song: "Pain Makes You Beautiful" by Jeff Heiskell's JudyBats, as featured on Nakedly Examined Music #5. Sponsors: Visit thegreatcoursesplus.com/PEL and BroadwayRadio.com. Subscribe to Mark's new podcast at prettymuchpop.com.

On Hilary Putnam's "The Nature of Mental States" (1973). What is the mind? Functionalist theories identify the mental with not with the brain exactly, but with something the brain does. So some other creature without a brain (maybe a computer) might be able to do that same thing if it could duplicate the structure of what our brains do. Is this a satisfying account of the mind? Don't wait for part 2! Get the full, ad-free Citizen Edition now. Please support PEL! Sponsors: Visit omnifocus.com for a free trial of a great to-do list manager. Visit the St. John's College Graduate Institute: partiallyexaminedlife.com/sjcgi. Check out our new culture/entertainment podcast, Pretty Much Pop, at prettymuchpop.com.

The philosophy of G.W.F. Hegel is a major focus of Robert Brandom's work. Brandom makes Hegel's thought accessible to analytic philosophy by developing a semantic interpretation of the "Phenomenology of Spirit". In his Munich lectures, Brandom is going to present new texts on the "Introduction" of Hegel's Phenomenology for the first time.

Richard looks at Functionalist theories of education for your A Level Sociology exam. In this episode, he will look what Functionalists believe is the value of education. Ideal for preparing you for your A Level Sociology exam. For more info visit www.senecalearning.com

In this episode: Fastlane, when to change jobs, Structs vs Classes in Swift, Exporting assets, and writing APIs in Rails! If you have questions of your own, you can tweet us at @immutablefm, email us at questions@immutable.fm, or join our Slack team! Sponsors: Hired Topic 1: Can you go a little into what you use Fastlane for; and if it makes sense to start using as an indie dev or only at a company, or both? Fastlane Fabric Felix Krause Topic 2: What do you do when you get offers for better opportunities with more pay and better perks soon after you just switched jobs because it was a better opportunity with more pay and better perks? Topic 3: I am fairly new to programming and Swift and I am a bit confused after watching the WWDC on protocol-orientated programming. When should we choose to use a Struct over a Class in iOS and is POP something that you are using when writing your apps? Protocol-Oriented Programming in Swift Object-Oriented Programming Andy Matuschak Andy Matuschak - "Functioning as a Functionalist" Justin Spahr-Summers Justin Spahr-Summers - "Enemy of the State" Topic 4: When coming up with mockups for clients, is there an easier way of exporting multiple variations/sizes of a mockup quickly with one click For example a logo in illustrator exported in three different colors for the client to choose. Is there a faster, easier way to mass export without saving each variation as pdf or png individually? Adobe Illustrator Adobe Generator Affinity Designer Gulp gulp-svg-sprite Sketch Figma Topic 5: I have a question for the show that arose from the Parse discussion. As a mobile developer I would love to start doing some small backend stuff and write my own API. Where is the best place to get started on that journey? Sam mentioned Ruby on Rails as his go to. Would love to hear more about how we can transition to backend stuff. Railscasts.com Treehouse Outro Today w/ Teehan & Jacks: Episode 2 (We've already stopped doing it because it takes too much time.) Personal Sam Spec's Slack Team

In this episode: investing money, finding AppleTV devs, introducing developers to Swift, self-teaching, and state machines! If you have questions of your own, you can tweet us at @immutablefm, email us at questions@immutable.fm, or join our Slack team! Topic 1: As a software dev, we make pretty good salaries. What type of things do you guys invest in? I know Sam has mentioned owning a house, but how do you guys manage your $$$? CPA Andrew's website CPA Andrew on Twitter Topic 2: How do I find AppleTV devs? tvOS Drew Wilson Kloc - Drew Wilson's AppleTV app Github Topic 3: How can I best introduce someone to Swift? Swift Objective-C C++ Treehouse Apple's iBook on Swift "The Swift Programming Language" Pasan Premaratne Amit Bijlani Topic 4: Self-teaching on a large solo project or multiple mini projects? Treehouse Code School One Month Codecademy StackOverflow Canvas Apple Developer Forums Topic 5: How do you learn problem solving techniques or create own algorithms for problems? Little background of how this question came into my mind: some time back while working on app which has many states (stages) and based on the server response the app will behave. I went ahead and wrote some dirty codes and my friend suggested me to take a look at “State Machine” which i never heard of. After couple of hours i started customising the same in objc. Now i feel more happy and any change come in is solvable very easy now a days. So now i am actively searching for new techniques or algorithms to solve problem. finite-state machines or "state machines" Andy Matuschak "Functioning as a Functionalist" at Functional Swift Conf. Justin Spahr-Summers "Enemy of the State" at Functional Swift Conf. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software

This week we discuss Trends in Mobile Apps in 2014, compiled by App Annie. We also discuss the use of 'final' modifier in Swift when declaring classes, methods and properties. Also discussed is the growth of zombie apps on the app store. This week's picks: Apple's Mystery Car, PhoneExpander, Gentlemen...Ricochet Mini! and building Frameworks in iOS 8.   Space Shuttle Discovery at Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Virginia Ray Wenderlich gets feedback from an attendee at RWDevCon Episode 25 Show Notes: App Annie reveals the top 9 mobile trends of 2014 The Importance of Being `final` - Human Friendly The Official raywenderlich.com Swift Style Guide. Andy Matuschak on Twitter Functioning as a Functionalist - Andy Matuschak “Zombie” Apps On The Rise – 83% Of Apps Not On Top Lists, Up From 74% Last Year Rob Enderle Bill Simmons on ESPN Securing iOS User Data: The Keychain, Touch ID, and 1Password - Tim Mitra Episode 25 Picks: Apple's Mystery Car Gentlemen...Ricochet Mini! PhoneExpander - public beta TimmyMe (the Canadian reference for Jaime that Tim couldn't remember.) Creating a Framework

Listen! This week, Mark and Gordon take a fairly deep dive into the Legend of Zelda franchise. There's also some Swift and bindings and stuff. Remember when this used to be a technical show? Professor Layton and the Curious Village The Legend of Zelda Collectors Edition The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past The Legend of Zelds: Link's Awakening NSArrayController Runes Argo Andy Matuschak - Functioning as a Functionalist NSNorth 2015 (Gordon is speaking)

Among the small number of Czech directors in competition at the Karlovy Vary festival, which gets underway next weekend, will be documentarian Martin Dušek, with his latest work Into the Clouds We Gaze. The witty filmmaker, who comes from the North Bohemian town of Česká Lípa, suggests as the starting point for our tour of “his Prague” the place where he works. One of the city’s most distinctive Functionalist structures, it’s a large building by Vltavská metro station owned by developer Orco and currently home to rather rough and ready office spaces.

The perspective of functionalism is used to examine the social structure of a circus. Each of the performers has a role and a function that insures that the social order of the troupe is maintained.