Podcasts about freespeach

Canadian journalist Nora Loreto reads the latest headlines for Monday, September 30, 2024.TRNN has partnered with Loreto to syndicate and share her daily news digest with our audience. Tune in every morning to the TRNN podcast feed to hear the latest important news stories from Canada and worldwide.Find more headlines from Nora at Sandy & Nora Talk Politics podcast feed.Help us continue producing radically independent news and in-depth analysis by following us and becoming a monthly sustainer.Sign up for our newsletterLike us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterDonate to support this podcastSupporting articles:Story 1 - Ontario will continue to house migrants in prisons for another year, despite promising to end the practice. Story 2 - OPP unmarked cruiser strikes and kills a pedestrian early Sunday morning in Bala, Ontario.Story 3 - Ford government sends directive to school boards that no politics in the classroom will be tolerated on the eve of the Oct. 7 anniversary. Story 4 - Moodies lowers Israel's credit rating. Story 5 - 48 people are missing after boat sinks off the coast of the Canary Islands.

Carol Vorderman and Gary Lineker have been very vocal on social media, but only one of them have lost their job.The BBC's announcement of an independent review of its social mediaguidelines was aimed at defusing the crisis over Gary Lineker's tweets over government ministers' language about its asylum policies and bring the presenter back into the fold, at least in the short term.However, the practicalities of creating a set of rules to rein in star behaviour, while avoiding accusations of stifling free speech, are far from straightforward. What is to be done: Mark and Pete have the answers.

Carol Vorderman and Gary Lineker have been very vocal on social media, but only one of them have lost their job.The BBC's announcement of an independent review of its social mediaguidelines was aimed at defusing the crisis over Gary Lineker's tweets over government ministers' language about its asylum policies and bring the presenter back into the fold, at least in the short term.However, the practicalities of creating a set of rules to rein in star behaviour, while avoiding accusations of stifling free speech, are far from straightforward. What is to be done: Mark and Pete have the answers.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/mark-and-pete--1245374/support.

Wipe our debt --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/gypsy-moon/support

Should there be freespeach --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/jc-banks/support

Met Police apologises to Christian preacher Hatun Tash an ex muslim and pays £10,000 in damages after she was wrongly arrested at Speakers' Corner having been subject threats and physical intimidation by Islam enthusiasts. Who is in the right?

Met Police apologises to Christian preacher Hatun Tash an ex muslim and pays £10,000 in damages after she was wrongly arrested at Speakers' Corner having been subject threats and physical intimidation by Islam enthusiasts. Who is in the right?

Met Police apologises to Christian preacher Hatun Tash an ex muslim and pays £10,000 in damages after she was wrongly arrested at Speakers' Corner having been subject threats and physical intimidation by Islam enthusiasts. Who is in the right?

Musk buys Twitter and sets the bird free, firing top executives and many of the bulldogs of censorship. Now one of the biggest stories on Twitter is Pelosi's sexcapades with the man-whore. If this was a movie we could call it "The Bird, Pelosi and the hammer"

Adam & JEB sit down on and empty their minds into your lap. We Talk Adult film sadness. Pee and consent. FREESPEACH and also interstate travel comes up. Strap in and Learn!

Adam & JEB sit down on and empty their minds into your lap. We Talk Adult film sadness. Pee and consent. FREESPEACH and also interstate travel comes up. Strap in and Learn!

The Future Of FREE Speech! http://FrankSpeech.comTrue News Podcast!https://www.spreaker.com/show/retired-marine-sounds-offPlease Support My Sponsorshttp://EndlessPayChecks.com - Online HempWorx Tour!http://FiveStarQuality.com - Join My Team Here!http:.//SteveMotley.com

Piers Morgan, the 55-year-old former Good Morning Britain star quit the ITV show last week following a complaint from Meghan Markle on his reporting of her and her husband Prince Harry. Can't anyone have an opinion any more. Mark and Pete have the answers.

Piers Morgan, the 55-year-old former Good Morning Britain star quit the ITV show last week following a complaint from Meghan Markle on his reporting of her and her husband Prince Harry. Can't anyone have an opinion any more. Mark and Pete have the answers.

Piers Morgan, the 55-year-old former Good Morning Britain star quit the ITV show last week following a complaint from Meghan Markle on his reporting of her and her husband Prince Harry. Can't anyone have an opinion any more. Mark and Pete have the answers.

This week on Taking it Deep with Thee Godfrey we dive DEEP into the Wallstreet / Gamestop controversy. Plus we have our cuck of the week and mush of the week. #GME #wallstreetbets #reddit #Gamsestop #wallstreet #mush #nokia #robinhood #trading #freespeech

Stress is a symptom associated with loss of control. We all experience it often on a daily basis. Trauma is the outcome when under severe stress either acutely or over a prolonged period of time. At least one third of the population have suffered trauma at some point in their lives. Trauma develops if the event or series of events that led to the stress is so unpleasant or terrifying that the brain automatically avoids the pain of processing it and it appears as flash backs during the day and or nightmares.However if you do not process less stressful events but treat them as valid examples to re interpret yourself by then these behave just like minor traumas leading to avoidant and or faulty behaviour patterns in future life further spreading ripples of dysfunction outwards. It is therefore very helpful to write about ones experiences and just doing this even once (writing not typing) can be so effective at combing through life's everyday experiences that this alone can improve physical and psychological health. Sometimes it is too painful for the individual to manage to write about and reflect without professional help, and done properly there is nothing that cannot be worked through and resolved should you want to do so.During lock down taking time to reflect, write things down and , crucially, re integrate with family and close community can be powerfully therapeutic. Next week we will discuss how professional help for stress and trauma works.

Stress is a symptom associated with loss of control. We all experience it often on a daily basis. Trauma is the outcome when under severe stress either acutely or over a prolonged period of time. At least one third of the population have suffered trauma at some point in their lives. Trauma develops if the event or series of events that led to the stress is so unpleasant or terrifying that the brain automatically avoids the pain of processing it and it appears as flash backs during the day and or nightmares.However if you do not process less stressful events but treat them as valid examples to re interpret yourself by then these behave just like minor traumas leading to avoidant and or faulty behaviour patterns in future life further spreading ripples of dysfunction outwards. It is therefore very helpful to write about ones experiences and just doing this even once (writing not typing) can be so effective at combing through life's everyday experiences that this alone can improve physical and psychological health. Sometimes it is too painful for the individual to manage to write about and reflect without professional help, and done properly there is nothing that cannot be worked through and resolved should you want to do so.During lock down taking time to reflect, write things down and , crucially, re integrate with family and close community can be powerfully therapeutic. Next week we will discuss how professional help for stress and trauma works.

Senator Duffy joins Marc with a look at the economic and political storm facing Canada due to Wuhan Coronavirus. Peter Gossman and Jocelyn Bamford want government to help small and medium sized business. Spencer Fernando on the attacks on the government's attack on free speech and Miles Kristan with the Trump's handling of the crisis in the U.S

John Mykytyshyn joins Marc with the latest on the Conservative Party Leadership race. Spencer Fernando on the federal government's attack on free speech, Miles Kristan on the Democratic Party leadership race and Andrew Lawton on the Coronavirus spread and Canada's failure to respond.

Ofcourse Trump is racist but then so are at least two of the women in the "Squad" as one has made anti Israel comments and another anti Jewish comments. If he was not racist he could have said that if anyone does not like it America then go somewhere they do like. However his comment is not actual proof of his racism rather he is seeking to inflame the silent majority of white people who are racist. Humans are all racist as we have evolved to like that which is familiar and reject that which is different. It is reflected in the need for corporate identity and the requirement to fit into that or to Football fans being eternal brothers with supporters of the same team but enemies of supporters of rival teams. The lunacy of this being exposed when England is playing abroad in which case enemies become brothers once more unified by National Identity. The manifestation of racism is the sign of poor leadership and government as shared values and National Identity (apart from religion) starts there. Trump's comment is therefore manipulative for personal gain and divisive. Much better to bolster the American Constitution and ensure Americans are united behind it and then tell anyone who does not like it to leave instead of having the need to criticize which is the enemy of structure and organisation unless it is confined to those whose have nothing to gain from free speach apart from improving society with no conflict of interest. Is there anyone like this? Not yet. At least in Medieval Times there was the Court Jester who was allowed to criticise the king or queen in order to keep them grounded. The price he paid was that he had to be am object of ridicule so others would never want to relate to him. Otherwise free speach would have damaged respect for the Monarchy and weakened the state.

Ofcourse Trump is racist but then so are at least two of the women in the "Squad" as one has made anti Israel comments and another anti Jewish comments. If he was not racist he could have said that if anyone does not like it America then go somewhere they do like. However his comment is not actual proof of his racism rather he is seeking to inflame the silent majority of white people who are racist. Humans are all racist as we have evolved to like that which is familiar and reject that which is different. It is reflected in the need for corporate identity and the requirement to fit into that or to Football fans being eternal brothers with supporters of the same team but enemies of supporters of rival teams. The lunacy of this being exposed when England is playing abroad in which case enemies become brothers once more unified by National Identity. The manifestation of racism is the sign of poor leadership and government as shared values and National Identity (apart from religion) starts there. Trump's comment is therefore manipulative for personal gain and divisive. Much better to bolster the American Constitution and ensure Americans are united behind it and then tell anyone who does not like it to leave instead of having the need to criticize which is the enemy of structure and organisation unless it is confined to those whose have nothing to gain from free speach apart from improving society with no conflict of interest. Is there anyone like this? Not yet. At least in Medieval Times there was the Court Jester who was allowed to criticise the king or queen in order to keep them grounded. The price he paid was that he had to be am object of ridicule so others would never want to relate to him. Otherwise free speach would have damaged respect for the Monarchy and weakened the state.

The police have had to warn the press against publishing anything else politically sensitive which could damage the prospects of UK as a whole . Is this an outrageous challenge to our treasured entitlement to free speech? This is as a result of the British Ambassador To America resigning this week as a result of his classified report being leaked to the press. Should the press be allowed to decide what to publish under the guise of free speech? If so should anyone be held accountable for the ramifications of press profiteering from apparently saleable digital print? The mere fact that the press stand to profit causes a conflict of interest in the decision of what is of public interest and what is just saleable. Therefore the politically correct mask of free speech supposedly allowing the press to print what they want is just that. A fallacy. In this case information was leaked that was protected by the Official Secrets Act and therefore the law was broken. The press then profited from the proceeds of breaking the law and published something that many people have said many times before and in so doing made it impossible for the ambassador to continue in his current role thus forcing his resignation (nothing to do with conservative leadership candidates supporting him or not -and indeed supporting him showed no knowledge of the fact he was no longer able to fulfil his role) as well as damaging the relationship between Britain and the USA at a critical time in Brexit. It achieved nothing positive and only destroyed just for some inches of saleable digital print. This is an example of all that is bad in today's press and shows they are not worthy of the privilege of free speech or even close to it. Indeed we argue that free speech as it stands only serves to challenge and weaken structure and order as it is usually inflammatory and emotion ridden which makes logical discussion and consensus a scientific impossibility. Would a corporation or indeed the military function with free speech ? Of course not. They would be weakened immeasurably . They function with clear identity structure and hierarchy . We say that free speech is important but only in specific well defined forums for rare people specifically engaged in bettering society with nothing to gain from it apart from the good that they do. Indeed an excellent example of this was the Court Jester who's job it was to say exactly what he though of the King or Queen and even ridicule them for it. The purpose being to remind them that they were human and fallible and not divine.

The police have had to warn the press against publishing anything else politically sensitive which could damage the prospects of UK as a whole . Is this an outrageous challenge to our treasured entitlement to free speech? This is as a result of the British Ambassador To America resigning this week as a result of his classified report being leaked to the press. Should the press be allowed to decide what to publish under the guise of free speech? If so should anyone be held accountable for the ramifications of press profiteering from apparently saleable digital print? The mere fact that the press stand to profit causes a conflict of interest in the decision of what is of public interest and what is just saleable. Therefore the politically correct mask of free speech supposedly allowing the press to print what they want is just that. A fallacy. In this case information was leaked that was protected by the Official Secrets Act and therefore the law was broken. The press then profited from the proceeds of breaking the law and published something that many people have said many times before and in so doing made it impossible for the ambassador to continue in his current role thus forcing his resignation (nothing to do with conservative leadership candidates supporting him or not -and indeed supporting him showed no knowledge of the fact he was no longer able to fulfil his role) as well as damaging the relationship between Britain and the USA at a critical time in Brexit. It achieved nothing positive and only destroyed just for some inches of saleable digital print. This is an example of all that is bad in today's press and shows they are not worthy of the privilege of free speech or even close to it. Indeed we argue that free speech as it stands only serves to challenge and weaken structure and order as it is usually inflammatory and emotion ridden which makes logical discussion and consensus a scientific impossibility. Would a corporation or indeed the military function with free speech ? Of course not. They would be weakened immeasurably . They function with clear identity structure and hierarchy . We say that free speech is important but only in specific well defined forums for rare people specifically engaged in bettering society with nothing to gain from it apart from the good that they do. Indeed an excellent example of this was the Court Jester who's job it was to say exactly what he though of the King or Queen and even ridicule them for it. The purpose being to remind them that they were human and fallible and not divine.

Jo Brand thought it was OK to say she would rather throw battery acid than milkshakes over right wing politicians under the guise of comedy and free speach. However we are all responsible how we come across regardless of intent. Part of that is considering whether you are a role model of influence in society. Secondly comedy allows us to discuss difficult issues more openly by using humour. Not to conjure up even worse scenarios. Comedy is a serious influencer. Just like there is a crime of reckless driving there should be a crime of reckless incitement of violence to allow for lack of intent. Let alone the fact it was not even funny in our opinion.

Jo Brand thought it was OK to say she would rather throw battery acid than milkshakes over right wing politicians under the guise of comedy and free speach. However we are all responsible how we come across regardless of intent. Part of that is considering whether you are a role model of influence in society. Secondly comedy allows us to discuss difficult issues more openly by using humour. Not to conjure up even worse scenarios. Comedy is a serious influencer. Just like there is a crime of reckless driving there should be a crime of reckless incitement of violence to allow for lack of intent. Let alone the fact it was not even funny in our opinion.

The problem with, The Arguments against and The Solution for the Facebook ban.

I read from my blog www.birgittaville.com and expound. Using special pronouns in all their cases, for 50 gender-identities, isn't really so easy.

I read from my blog www.birgittaville.com and expound. Using special pronouns in all their cases, for 50 gender-identities, isn't really so easy.

Should William Sitwell have reached any news outlet at all? Or did the recipient of his email simply dislike him enough to manipulate a viral outbreak of politically correct identity politics turmoil? It is another example of competence getting you there but being disliked enough dethroning you even if the reason is not proportional. We discuss how the lack of structure and boundaries in society are allowing the chaos of political correctness which is an example of unregulated free speach to further erode any existing structure left. The lack of financial structure led to the financial crisis and it still has not been reinstated. As individuals we can respond by being self aware instead of being controlled by illusionary needs. Equal opportunity does not mean equal outcome because we are all different and as such we are as a society in desperate need of unification and guidance.

Should William Sitwell have reached any news outlet at all? Or did the recipient of his email simply dislike him enough to manipulate a viral outbreak of politically correct identity politics turmoil? It is another example of competence getting you there but being disliked enough dethroning you even if the reason is not proportional. We discuss how the lack of structure and boundaries in society are allowing the chaos of political correctness which is an example of unregulated free speach to further erode any existing structure left. The lack of financial structure led to the financial crisis and it still has not been reinstated. As individuals we can respond by being self aware instead of being controlled by illusionary needs. Equal opportunity does not mean equal outcome because we are all different and as such we are as a society in desperate need of unification and guidance.

Are we in control of our lives? Do we actually have a say of how we Iive our lives or are we at the mercy of the giant corporations driving the engine of our modern consumerist society? One thing is for sure ; we are not happy. Are we just fodder ,Matrix style, to keep the wheels of capitalism rolling? Yet we have free speach, political correctness , a free press. Surely these are positive signs that we have a voice? If not how do we cope? We gird our loins over coffee and seek mutual enlightenment.

Are we in control of our lives? Do we actually have a say of how we Iive our lives or are we at the mercy of the giant corporations driving the engine of our modern consumerist society? One thing is for sure ; we are not happy. Are we just fodder ,Matrix style, to keep the wheels of capitalism rolling? Yet we have free speach, political correctness , a free press. Surely these are positive signs that we have a voice? If not how do we cope? We gird our loins over coffee and seek mutual enlightenment.