Podcasts about migrants

For early San Franciscans, seafood was an important source of nutrition and a feature of social life, inspiring culinary developments that remain components in California cuisine more than a century later. Consumers interested in flavorful alternatives to meat and associated health benefits could follow recipes for nearly fifty types of marine life from state waters, such as salmon, flounder, and oysters. Others are no longer available, out-of-vogue, or simply forgotten. Further, overfishing and environmental damage decimated many local seafood stocks, providing a cautionary tale with global significance. In San Francisco Seafood: A History from Ocean to Table (Bloomsbury, 2026), Dr. Paul Stangl traces the development of San Francisco's fisheries, seafood markets, cookery, and dining culture from the Gold Rush to the 1920s. Migrants from around the world imported fishing techniques and cuisines, then slowly adapted as they came to understand local resources and each other. Newcomers found the tastiest fish through trial and error and assimilated the “best” into a new cuisine. Different ethnic and occupational groups collaborated, fought, and learned from one another as they irreversibly altered the natural world around them. By the end of the First World War, San Francisco's seafood cuisine scarcely resembled that of the 1850s, due to cultural adaptation, technological advancements, and changes to the natural environment. It was no longer derivative of New England and France, but included influences from the Southern states, Asia, and South America.San Francisco Seafood chronicles the city's transformation from a fish-barren town-where restaurants served canned, pickled, and dried fish from the East Coast-to a seafood-rich metropolis that harvested seafood from Mexico to Alaska. He emphasizes how the impacts on nature and local labor serve as a necessary cautionary tale for today's global seafood trade. This is a thorough and insightful history of a once emerging, and now essential, cuisine for food and history buffs alike. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

For early San Franciscans, seafood was an important source of nutrition and a feature of social life, inspiring culinary developments that remain components in California cuisine more than a century later. Consumers interested in flavorful alternatives to meat and associated health benefits could follow recipes for nearly fifty types of marine life from state waters, such as salmon, flounder, and oysters. Others are no longer available, out-of-vogue, or simply forgotten. Further, overfishing and environmental damage decimated many local seafood stocks, providing a cautionary tale with global significance. In San Francisco Seafood: A History from Ocean to Table (Bloomsbury, 2026), Dr. Paul Stangl traces the development of San Francisco's fisheries, seafood markets, cookery, and dining culture from the Gold Rush to the 1920s. Migrants from around the world imported fishing techniques and cuisines, then slowly adapted as they came to understand local resources and each other. Newcomers found the tastiest fish through trial and error and assimilated the “best” into a new cuisine. Different ethnic and occupational groups collaborated, fought, and learned from one another as they irreversibly altered the natural world around them. By the end of the First World War, San Francisco's seafood cuisine scarcely resembled that of the 1850s, due to cultural adaptation, technological advancements, and changes to the natural environment. It was no longer derivative of New England and France, but included influences from the Southern states, Asia, and South America.San Francisco Seafood chronicles the city's transformation from a fish-barren town-where restaurants served canned, pickled, and dried fish from the East Coast-to a seafood-rich metropolis that harvested seafood from Mexico to Alaska. He emphasizes how the impacts on nature and local labor serve as a necessary cautionary tale for today's global seafood trade. This is a thorough and insightful history of a once emerging, and now essential, cuisine for food and history buffs alike. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/food

Visa fee increases across several Australian visa categories came into effect on 1 July. One of the most significant changes is the steep increase in the Resident Return Visa (RRV) fee, a move expected to have the biggest impact on Australia's permanent residents. In this conversation, migration agent Suman Dua explains why the RRV fee has increased so significantly and the key points permanent residents should be aware of.

For early San Franciscans, seafood was an important source of nutrition and a feature of social life, inspiring culinary developments that remain components in California cuisine more than a century later. Consumers interested in flavorful alternatives to meat and associated health benefits could follow recipes for nearly fifty types of marine life from state waters, such as salmon, flounder, and oysters. Others are no longer available, out-of-vogue, or simply forgotten. Further, overfishing and environmental damage decimated many local seafood stocks, providing a cautionary tale with global significance. In San Francisco Seafood: A History from Ocean to Table (Bloomsbury, 2026), Dr. Paul Stangl traces the development of San Francisco's fisheries, seafood markets, cookery, and dining culture from the Gold Rush to the 1920s. Migrants from around the world imported fishing techniques and cuisines, then slowly adapted as they came to understand local resources and each other. Newcomers found the tastiest fish through trial and error and assimilated the “best” into a new cuisine. Different ethnic and occupational groups collaborated, fought, and learned from one another as they irreversibly altered the natural world around them. By the end of the First World War, San Francisco's seafood cuisine scarcely resembled that of the 1850s, due to cultural adaptation, technological advancements, and changes to the natural environment. It was no longer derivative of New England and France, but included influences from the Southern states, Asia, and South America.San Francisco Seafood chronicles the city's transformation from a fish-barren town-where restaurants served canned, pickled, and dried fish from the East Coast-to a seafood-rich metropolis that harvested seafood from Mexico to Alaska. He emphasizes how the impacts on nature and local labor serve as a necessary cautionary tale for today's global seafood trade. This is a thorough and insightful history of a once emerging, and now essential, cuisine for food and history buffs alike. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

For early San Franciscans, seafood was an important source of nutrition and a feature of social life, inspiring culinary developments that remain components in California cuisine more than a century later. Consumers interested in flavorful alternatives to meat and associated health benefits could follow recipes for nearly fifty types of marine life from state waters, such as salmon, flounder, and oysters. Others are no longer available, out-of-vogue, or simply forgotten. Further, overfishing and environmental damage decimated many local seafood stocks, providing a cautionary tale with global significance. In San Francisco Seafood: A History from Ocean to Table (Bloomsbury, 2026), Dr. Paul Stangl traces the development of San Francisco's fisheries, seafood markets, cookery, and dining culture from the Gold Rush to the 1920s. Migrants from around the world imported fishing techniques and cuisines, then slowly adapted as they came to understand local resources and each other. Newcomers found the tastiest fish through trial and error and assimilated the “best” into a new cuisine. Different ethnic and occupational groups collaborated, fought, and learned from one another as they irreversibly altered the natural world around them. By the end of the First World War, San Francisco's seafood cuisine scarcely resembled that of the 1850s, due to cultural adaptation, technological advancements, and changes to the natural environment. It was no longer derivative of New England and France, but included influences from the Southern states, Asia, and South America.San Francisco Seafood chronicles the city's transformation from a fish-barren town-where restaurants served canned, pickled, and dried fish from the East Coast-to a seafood-rich metropolis that harvested seafood from Mexico to Alaska. He emphasizes how the impacts on nature and local labor serve as a necessary cautionary tale for today's global seafood trade. This is a thorough and insightful history of a once emerging, and now essential, cuisine for food and history buffs alike. This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda's interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

European leaders and citizens are teaming up to force the European Union Commission to consider a plan to secure the borders, stop the mass migration, and send home many immigrants through “re-migration,” explained Polish conservative leader Mariusz Skrobała in this interview with The New American magazine’s Alex Newman.  Skrobała, one of the seven leaders who ... The post Plan to “Save Europe” by Sending Migrants Home Begins at EU appeared first on The New American.

Les Européens durcissent leur politique migratoire mais ils ne découragent pas celles et ceux qui estiment n'avoir rien à perdre en quittant leur pays, excepté la vie. À la mi-avril, plus de 1 000 personnes avaient déjà trouvé la mort en essayant de traverser la Méditerranée pour atteindre l'Europe, selon l'OIM. Et quel accueil est réservé à ceux qui arrivent ? S'il est digne, en général, il est aussi souvent fait de vexations, d'abus et d'hostilité. Migrants, demandeurs d'asile, réfugiés : entre hostilité et solidarité Entretien avec Béatrice Giblin, géographe, directrice de la revue Hérodote. Reportage aux Pays-Bas. À Loosdrecht au printemps 2026, des individus ont incendié un centre d'accueil dont la mairie avait annoncé l'ouverture prochaine. Si le calme était revenu après plusieurs jours de tensions, deux mois après les faits, un petit groupe d'habitants regroupés sous la bannière « Defend Loosdrecht » continue à faire pression aux abords du centre pour obtenir sa fermeture. Robin Dussenne s'est rendu sur place. À lire aussiLe Royaume-Uni de plus en plus divisé sur l'accueil des migrants dans son pays Exemple de solidarité en Irlande où des habitants s'engagent à accueillir ou soutenir des familles réfugiées et à favoriser leur intégration, sur plusieurs années. Le parrainage communautaire est un modèle soutenu par la Croix-Rouge irlandaise et le Conseil irlandais pour les réfugiés. Clémence Pénard nous explique comment ça marche. À lire aussiIrlande: à Dublin, des clôtures anti-migrants démontées par des associations de soutien ************************************************************************************   Peut-on encore être opposant politique en Turquie ?  Il y a 10 ans, le 15 juillet 2016, une sanglante tentative de coup d'État visait le président turc. Ce jour-là, des militaires déployaient des chars dans les rues pendant que des avions survolaient Istanbul et Ankara, et bombardaient plusieurs sites dont le Parlement. Les partisans de Recep Tayyip Erdogan descendus dans les rues avaient mis fin au soulèvement, mais dans les mois et les années qui ont suivi, cet événement a permis au chef de l'État d'asseoir son pouvoir au prix d'une interminable répression visant la société civile et ses opposants politiques. Dix ans plus tard, la question se pose : est-il encore possible d'être un opposant en Turquie ? Éléments de réponse à Ankara dans ce reportage d'Anne Andlauer. À lire aussiTurquie: cinq ans après le coup d'État manqué, Erdogan a mis au pas les institutions

Les Européens durcissent leur politique migratoire mais ils ne découragent pas celles et ceux qui estiment n'avoir rien à perdre en quittant leur pays, excepté la vie. À la mi-avril, plus de 1 000 personnes avaient déjà trouvé la mort en essayant de traverser la Méditerranée pour atteindre l'Europe, selon l'OIM. Et quel accueil est réservé à ceux qui arrivent ? S'il est digne, en général, il est aussi souvent fait de vexations, d'abus et d'hostilité. Migrants, demandeurs d'asile, réfugiés : entre hostilité et solidarité Entretien avec Béatrice Giblin, géographe, directrice de la revue Hérodote. Reportage aux Pays-Bas. À Loosdrecht au printemps 2026, des individus ont incendié un centre d'accueil dont la mairie avait annoncé l'ouverture prochaine. Si le calme était revenu après plusieurs jours de tensions, deux mois après les faits, un petit groupe d'habitants regroupés sous la bannière « Defend Loosdrecht » continue à faire pression aux abords du centre pour obtenir sa fermeture. Robin Dussenne s'est rendu sur place. À lire aussiLe Royaume-Uni de plus en plus divisé sur l'accueil des migrants dans son pays Exemple de solidarité en Irlande où des habitants s'engagent à accueillir ou soutenir des familles réfugiées et à favoriser leur intégration, sur plusieurs années. Le parrainage communautaire est un modèle soutenu par la Croix-Rouge irlandaise et le Conseil irlandais pour les réfugiés. Clémence Pénard nous explique comment ça marche. À lire aussiIrlande: à Dublin, des clôtures anti-migrants démontées par des associations de soutien ************************************************************************************   Peut-on encore être opposant politique en Turquie ?  Il y a 10 ans, le 15 juillet 2016, une sanglante tentative de coup d'État visait le président turc. Ce jour-là, des militaires déployaient des chars dans les rues pendant que des avions survolaient Istanbul et Ankara, et bombardaient plusieurs sites dont le Parlement. Les partisans de Recep Tayyip Erdogan descendus dans les rues avaient mis fin au soulèvement, mais dans les mois et les années qui ont suivi, cet événement a permis au chef de l'État d'asseoir son pouvoir au prix d'une interminable répression visant la société civile et ses opposants politiques. Dix ans plus tard, la question se pose : est-il encore possible d'être un opposant en Turquie ? Éléments de réponse à Ankara dans ce reportage d'Anne Andlauer. À lire aussiTurquie: cinq ans après le coup d'État manqué, Erdogan a mis au pas les institutions

In late June, public health experts warned that an unlawful anti-migrant deadline could spark a crisis, and that warning has now become reality. Within days, tens of thousands of people were displaced by violence or its threat and processed through sites like Musina and the Beitbridge border post. Despite the South African government's rapid response, serious concerns remain about overcrowding, poor sanitation, disrupted medical care, and rising psychological trauma. Today, we unpack the public health implications of this crisis and what must be done to protect lives and uphold constitutional rights. We spoke to Prof Hassan Mahomed, a public health specialist in solidarity with Healthcare Workers Against Xenophobia (HCWAX).

« Irrationnelle, inefficace, dangereuse » : le constat est sans appel. Après six mois d'enquête, une commission migratoire menée à la frontière franco-britannique depuis plus de vingt ans. Malgré des milliers d'interceptions chaque année, plus de 40 000 personnes parviennent toujours à traverser la Manche. Et les naufrages continuent de faire des victimes. Comment expliquer un tel échec ? Pourquoi la gestion de cette frontière est-elle si complexe ? Que propose la commission d'enquête pour mettre fin à cette spirale ?  Avec Charlotte Oberti, journaliste à Infomigrants.  

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Pakistan carries out another wave of deportations of thousands of Afghan migrants and refugees.It cites national security concerns. But is politics involved in the rising tension between the neighbours? And how is Kabul dealing with the influx of returnees? In this episode: Arafat Jamal - Representative of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees in Afghanistan Obaidullah Baheer - Adjunct lecturer at the American University of Afghanistan Kamran Bokhari - Senior Fellow with the Middle East Policy Council in Washington DC Zahid Mahmood - Pakistani defence analyst and former senior officer of the Pakistan Army Host: Scott McLean Connect with us: @AJEPodcasts on X, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube

Covering a couple of different topics that tie to Trump and what he's been pushing over the last year and a half, and how that's impacting different parts of the world.Opinion | Trump's Indiscriminate War on Migrants Is a War on the Best of America | Common DreamsThe dramatic Trumpification of Latin America

Emergency interventions to assist migrants in Musina - Qari Ziyaad Patel by Radio Islam

The extractivism, neoliberalism and dictatorship that drives migrants to SA - Patrick Bond by Radio Islam

This Day in Legal History: The Execution of Sir Thomas MoreOn July 6, 1535, Sir Thomas More was beheaded at Tower Hill in London, convicted of high treason against King Henry VIII. More had been one of the most powerful men in England—a lawyer, a scholar, a former Lord Chancellor, the King's own friend—and he went to the scaffold because he would not say the words the King demanded.The dispute was, at its heart, about supremacy. Henry VIII had broken with Rome and declared himself Supreme Head of the Church of England, and Parliament had passed the Act of Supremacy and an Act of Succession requiring subjects to swear an oath acknowledging the King's new status and the legitimacy of his marriage to Anne Boleyn. More refused to take the oath. Crucially, he did not denounce the King. He said nothing at all. He believed that by staying silent he stayed within the law—that under the old maxim, silence gives consent, and no court could convict a man for what he had not said.The Crown answered that theory with new law. The Treason Act of 1534, which took effect in early 1535, made it treason to “maliciously” deprive the King or Queen of their “dignity, title, or name”—and the government argued that More's conspicuous silence about the King's supremacy was itself a denial of it. More was tried on July 1, 1535, before a panel that included Anne Boleyn's father, brother, and uncle. The decisive testimony came from Richard Rich, the solicitor general, who claimed More had privately rejected the King's title in conversation in the Tower. More insisted the testimony was perjured. The jury deliberated for about fifteen minutes and found him guilty. He was sentenced to be hanged, drawn, and quartered; the King, in what passed for mercy, commuted the sentence to beheading.More's case endures in the legal imagination because it sits at the fault line between law as an instrument of power and law as a limit on power. More was a formidable lawyer who tried to use the law's own rules—the presumption that silence is not a crime, the requirement of proof—to protect his conscience, and the state simply rewrote the rules and manufactured the proof. His famous last words, that he died “the King's good servant, but God's first,” draw the line between obedience to the state and obedience to something the state cannot command. Four centuries later, we still cite More when we argue about compelled speech, about the right to remain silent, about loyalty oaths, and about what a person owes a government that has turned the machinery of law against him. He is a patron saint of lawyers precisely because he lost—because his trial shows how thin the protection of law can be when those in power decide they would rather have a conviction than a fair one.A federal appeals court has ruled that Immigration and Customs Enforcement cannot detain migrants for more than ninety days without giving them a chance to seek release at a bond hearing. In a 2-1 decision, the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals—one of the most conservative in the country—sided against the administration, a ruling that could affect thousands of people held in detention in states like Texas and Louisiana.When the government seeks to deport someone, that process can take months or even years, and in the meantime the government often detains the person. The legal question is whether the government can simply hold someone indefinitely while the case grinds on, or whether at some point that person is entitled to a hearing where a neutral decision-maker asks whether they actually need to be locked up—whether they're a flight risk or a danger, or whether they can safely be released on bond while they wait. The administration argued that certain migrants are subject to “mandatory detention” with no such hearing at all. The Fifth Circuit said that after ninety days, that position runs into constitutional trouble.Imagine being held in a jail cell for months, not because a judge decided you were dangerous, but because a statute was read to mean nobody ever has to ask the question. The core idea the court is protecting is an old one: the government generally cannot deprive a person of physical liberty without some individualized process, some moment where a human being reviews your particular case. A bond hearing is that moment. It doesn't guarantee release—it guarantees that someone with authority has to look at you and decide.The Department of Homeland Security said it disagreed with the ruling and remained confident in its legal position on mandatory detention, which signals a likely appeal, possibly to the Supreme Court. But for now, the decision draws a line: prolonged civil detention without any bond hearing is constitutionally suspect, and the length of confinement matters. The ruling is significant not only for the thousands of detainees it directly affects, but because it comes from a court that rarely rules against this administration—a reminder that even sympathetic judges have limits when the question is indefinite detention without a hearing.Appeals court bars mandatory detention for migrants past 90 days without bond hearing | Fox NewsCourt Blocks Immigration Detention Without HearingsThe Supreme Court has refused to hear Donald Trump's appeal seeking to overturn the jury verdict finding him liable for abusing and defaming the writer E. Jean Carroll. With the Court declining to take the case, the 2023 verdict and the roughly five-million-dollar judgment against him stand.In 2023, a civil jury found that Trump sexually abused Carroll in a New York department store in the mid-1990s and later defamed her by branding her account a lie. He was ordered to pay her about five million dollars. Trump appealed and lost in the lower courts, then asked the Supreme Court to step in. Last week the Court denied that request. When the Supreme Court denies review—what lawyers call denying “certiorari”—it isn't endorsing the verdict or ruling on the merits. It's simply declining to hear the case, which leaves the lower court's decision in force. But the practical effect is the same as a loss: the judgment is final, and there are no more appeals to pursue.It helps to separate two things people often blur together. This is a civil case, not a criminal one. Carroll didn't send anyone to prison; she sued for money and for the harm to her reputation, and a jury of ordinary citizens weighed the evidence and believed her. The Supreme Court's role at this stage isn't to re-try the facts—juries find facts, and appellate courts generally don't second-guess them. The question the Court was asked was narrower and more legal, and the Court decided it wasn't worth their time to review.The significance here is partly about accountability and partly about the ordinariness of the outcome. A private citizen brought a claim, a jury sided with her, the appellate courts affirmed, and the highest court in the country let that stand—the system working exactly as it's supposed to, regardless of the defendant's power. It's also a marker of the limits of that power: the office does not come with a trapdoor out of a civil judgment. The verdict is now as final as verdicts get.Supreme Court rejects Trump effort to overturn E. Jean Carroll sexual abuse and defamation verdict | NBC NewsThe Supreme Court's next term, beginning in October, is already set to feature major cases involving gun rights, voting rules, LGBT rights, immigration detention, and corporate disputes. One of the highest-profile cases concerns whether states and local governments may ban assault-style rifles such as AR-15s, with challenges coming from Connecticut and Cook County, Illinois. Gun rights advocates argue that these weapons are commonly owned and protected by the Second Amendment, while government officials describe them as military-style firearms that pose serious public safety risks.The Court will also hear a voting rights dispute over Arizona rules that would impose stricter proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration and allow removal of suspected noncitizens from voter rolls. A lower court blocked parts of that law after finding that they conflicted with federal voter registration protections. Another case involves whether certain immigrants with criminal convictions can be held for long periods during deportation proceedings without receiving bond hearings. The Trump administration is asking the Court to uphold that detention policy, while a lower court found that prolonged detention without a hearing can violate due process. The Court will also consider a religious rights case from Colorado involving Catholic groups that want an exemption from nondiscrimination rules tied to a state preschool funding program. That case adds to the Court's ongoing disputes over how to balance religious liberty claims against LGBT anti-discrimination protections. The term will also include business-related cases involving ExxonMobil and Suncor, Apple and Epic Games, and PepsiCo.US Supreme Court to hear gun, LGBT, voting rights cases in next term | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

EWN’s Ntuthuzelo Nene speaks to Amy MacIver about foreigners from other African countries who have been stuck on an open field in Cape Town after repatriation centres were closed. Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

AP correspondent Rica Ann Garcia reports on Pope Leo the Fourteenth's message highlighting the plight of migrants during mass on Italy's Lampedusa island.

In the Usap Tayo segment, we discussed the growing participation of Filipino migrants in Australia's diverse sports scene and how it helps them integrate into their new home. - Sa Usap Tayo, pinag-usapan ang iba't ibang sports na sikat sa Australia at paano ito niyayakap ng mga migranteng Pinoy.

Australian Bureau of Statistics national census spokesperson Emily Walter told SBS Urdu that Census Night is the official snapshot of everyone physically present in Australia, regardless of residency status. Census participation is compulsory for migrants, international students, temporary visa holders and visitors, with limited exceptions such as foreign diplomats. Learn more about the 2026 Census in this podcast. - آسٹریلیا میںہر پانچ سال بعد ہونے والی قومی مردم شماری اس سال 11 اگست 2026 کو منعقد ہوگی۔ اس بار مردم شماری فارم میں کچھ اہم تبدیلیاں شامل ہیں۔ آسٹریلین بیورو آف اسٹیٹسٹکس کی قومی مردم شماری کی ترجمان ایمیلی والٹر کے مطابق یہ معلومات مستقبل کی پالیسی سازی میں اہم کردار ادا کریں گی۔ تفصیل جانئے اس پوڈکاسٹ سیریز کی پہلے قسط میں۔Explore more ways to listen to the Urdu program here: Listen to SBS Urdu. Install our mobile app “SBS Audio” on Apple (iPhone) or Android devices: SBS Audio App. Download on Apple App Store, Download on Google Play. Follow us on social media: SBS Urdu on Facebook and on SBS Urdu on Instagram. - جانئے کس طرح ایس بی ایس اردو کے مرکزی صفحے کو بُک مارک کریں ہر بدھ اور جمعہ کا پورا پروگرام اس لنک پرسنئے, اردو پرگرام سننے کے دیگر طریقے, “SBS Audio”کےنام سےموجود ہماری موبائیل ایپ ایپیل (آئی فون) یااینڈرائیڈ , ڈیوائیسزپرانسٹال کیجئے۔ ہمیں فیس بُک اور انسٹا گرام پر فالو کیجئے۔

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Le gouvernement de Madrid a prolongé lundi 29 juin le dispositif de répartition territoriale des mineurs non accompagnés qui arrivent aux îles Canaries d'un an. La mesure s'inscrit dans un contexte de baisse du nombre d'arrivées de migrants sur l'archipel : 3 200 entre janvier et juin, soit 70 % de moins par rapport à 2025. Pour ceux qui n'ont pas rejoint l'Espagne continentale, le foot sert à la fois d'exutoire pour de longues journées et de vecteur d'intégration. L'équipe D de l'Union sportive Las Palmas est née il y a presque 10 ans pour soutenir les jeunes en risque d'exclusion sociale : aujourd'hui, elle est surtout composée de migrants. Un reportage de notre envoyé spécial à Las Palmas, à retrouver en intégralité dans l'émission Accents d'Europe à 19h40 TU sur RFI.

The US Supreme Court has handed President Donald Trump one of the biggest legal defeats of his second term, rejecting his bid to restrict birthright citizenship. The ruling preserves automatic citizenship for children born in the United States, including those whose parents are undocumented or in the country temporarily. But while the Court has ruled against the President's executive order, the political fight over who gets to be American is far from over.

Protests take place in several South African cities against undocumented migrants. Demonstrators say they're taking jobs from locals, putting pressure on public services and causing crime. Many immigrants have already been forced to leave. Also: people in Venezuela are still searching damaged buildings for missing family and friends following last week's earthquakes. A Chinese tycoon who moved to the United States has been sent to prison for 30 years for fraud. Britain has announced a large increase in defence spending to meet an increased threat from Russia. And Nasa is preparing to launch a mission to save an ageing telescope, and stop it from falling back to earth.The Global News Podcast brings you the breaking news you need to hear, as it happens. Listen for the latest headlines and current affairs from around the world. Politics, economics, climate, business, technology, health – we cover it all with expert analysis and insight. Get the news that matters, delivered twice a day on weekdays and daily at weekends, plus special bonus episodes reacting to urgent breaking stories. Follow or subscribe now and never miss a moment. Get in touch: globalpodcast@bbc.co.uk Photo: Anti-immigrant protesters march in Durban, South Africa. Credit: Reuters/Rogan Ward

Your daily news in under three minutes. At Al Jazeera Podcasts, we want to hear from you, our listeners. So, please head to https://www.aljazeera.com/survey and tell us your thoughts about this show and other Al Jazeera podcasts. It only takes a few minutes! Connect with us: @AJEPodcasts on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube

The U.S. Supreme Court hands President Donald Trump the power to fire independent regulators but draws a line at the Federal Reserve. In South Africa, fears mount that planned anti-immigrant marches could turn violent. Police say an Australian man has made a partial confession to causing the death of a 17-year-old Thai girl. NATO warships drill off the U.S. East Coast as Trump threatens to pull back from Europe. And Paraguay knocks four-time champions Germany out of the World Cup on penalties.   Listen to the Morning Bid podcast ⁠⁠here⁠⁠. Sign up for the Reuters Econ World newsletter ⁠⁠here⁠⁠. Listen to the Reuters Econ World podcast ⁠⁠here⁠⁠. Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit megaphone.fm/adchoices to opt out of targeted advertising. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode of the WOLA Podcast, recorded on June 25, 2026, host Adam Isacson speaks with Elijah Maurus, an attorney based in Tijuana who has worked principally with LGBTQ+ asylum seekers since 2018. Maurus relocated to Tijuana during the major migrant caravan that arrived in late 2018, initially working with Al Otro Lado before launching a pilot legal project dedicated to LGBT asylum seekers in October 2019. The conversation moves roughly south to north, tracing the dangers LGBTQ+ migrants face crossing Mexico to reach safety in the United States. Maurus describes how Tijuana—which requires a difficult "left turn" across territory controlled by multiple cartels—nonetheless became one of the few border cities with dedicated LGBT shelters, though these remain scarce and small. He explains how vulnerabilities multiply "exponentially" for transgender and gender-nonconforming migrants at every checkpoint, river crossing, and cartel-controlled bus stop. He recounts witnessing the human toll of policies like "metering," the Migrant Protection Protocols (Remain in Mexico), Title 42, and the cancellation of CBP One appointments. The second half of the discussion turns to the rapid deterioration of asylum protections in the United States since President Trump's return to office in January 2025. Maurus details both the headline-grabbing measures—the suspension of asylum at the border, Supreme Court decisions issued that very morning upholding metering and allowing the removal of Temporary Protected Status from roughly 350,000 Haitians—and the quieter "death by a thousand cuts." These include courthouse arrests after government attorneys move to dismiss cases, the use of "pretermission" to reject incomplete asylum applications, Asylum Cooperative Agreements that ship asylum seekers to third countries like Guatemala or Ecuador, and the gutting of the immigration court system through mass firings of judges and their replacement with "deportation judges." Maurus devotes significant attention to immigration detention, which he calls a political and financial choice rather than a punishment. With $45 billion newly allocated and a goal of detaining 100,000 people per day in largely private facilities, he describes the elimination of the limited protections for transgender detainees that had existed under prior administrations—including the end of gender-affirming care, the housing of trans women among men, prolonged solitary confinement for trans men, and the disappearance of oversight mechanisms. He also raises the alarming practice of sending people with withholding-of-removal protections to dangerous third countries such as Eswatini or Uganda, where LGBTQ+ people face legal persecution. Despite the bleak picture, Maurus closes on a note of resolve. He argues that asylum remains salvageable but that advocates must stop ceding the narrative and avoid treating individual horror stories as isolated anecdotes rather than the products of deliberate policy. He emphasizes the importance of local-level storytelling, documentation for future accountability, and the simple insistence that turning people away violates the lessons learned after refugees were turned back to die during World War II.

En Afrique du Sud, les étrangers fuient massivement le pays alors que des groupes xénophobes ont exigé le départ de tous les migrants illégaux avant la date butoir de ce mardi, le 30 juin. « La terreur et les larmes » des Malawites contraints d'abandonner leur vie en Afrique du Sud, fait la Une du Daily Maverick. Le quotidien sud-africain s'est rendu sur le site de l'ancien cinéma en plein-air de Durban, la plus grande ville de la province du KwaZulu-Natal dans l'est du pays. C'est là sur un site d'un kilomètre carré, qu'Azadi attend, « son bébé endormi sur sa poitrine ». C'est avec « tristesse » que ce père de famille retourne au Malawi mais il ne voit pas d'autre option car « la situation n'est pas bonne » en Afrique du Sud pour tous ceux qui ne sont pas Sud-Africains. « Ce n'est pas la première fois que le pays est en proie à une poussée de fièvre xénophobe, écrit la correspondante du Monde Afrique. Mais jamais des étrangers terrorisés n'avaient ainsi fait leurs bagages en masse (…). Pratiquement inconnu il y a trois mois, le mouvement March and March, à l'origine de la mobilisation, appelle à des manifestations pacifiques. Mais dans son sillage, depuis des semaines, une campagne ultraviolente déferle sur les réseaux sociaux », poursuit le journal qui rappelle que le mouvement a déjà fait « au moins quatre morts, peut-être plus ». En danger À Mankweng, dans le nord du pays, « plus de 600 zimbabwéens » campent devant le poste de police, rapporte le Daily Sun. Nombre d'entre eux sont sans-papiers, pas tous, Juliat, elle, a « des documents légaux pour rester en Afrique du Sud » mais elle a été forcée de quitter le logement qu'elle louait. Cette mère de deux enfants vit désormais dans la peur, raconte le quotidien sud-africain. Dans la nation arc-en-ciel, « requiem pour l'Ubuntu et le legs de Madiba », titre Aujourd'hui au Faso. L'Ubuntu, c'est cette « philosophie de la compassion chère à Nelson Mandela », précise le journal. Si « le chômage, la corruption endémique et la dégradation des sévices publics (…) font le lit de cette chasse au faciès », le pays devrait pourtant « avoir les ressorts pour conjurer ce genre de comportement. L'apartheid, c'était seulement avant hier ». Réforme constitutionnelle au Sénégal Au Sénégal, « l'Assemblée nationale a adopté, en séance plénière, la proposition de loi portant sur la révision de la Constitution, écrit Dakaractu. Les députés du groupe parlementaire Pastef, qui disposent d'une majorité dans l'hémicycle, ont voté le texte ». Un texte qui renforce le pouvoir du Parlement et du Premier ministre au détriment du président. « Le vote s'est tenu dans un climat de fortes tensions entre le Pastef et la coalition Diomaye Président, qui soutient le chef de l'État et réclamait le retrait du projet au profit d'une concertation plus large », poursuit Dakaractu. « Bassirou Diomaye Faye a décidé de soumettre au référendum la proposition de révision constitutionnelle adoptée », indique Le Soleil. Ousmane Sonko, le président de l'Assemblée, lui, demande au chef de l'État « de promulguer la loi sans passer par un référendum », précise Senego. « Le bras de fer s'intensifie entre les deux hommes », poursuit le média. Selon Afrik.com, ce référendum sera « un test personnel pour Bassirou Diomaye Faye (…), une victoire du oui conforterait le projet de refondation institutionnelle porté par Ousmane Sonko et confirmerait sa popularité auprès des Sénégalais ». Performance marocaine Au Mondial de football, la « qualification héroïque du Maroc face au Pays-Bas, titre Médias24. Menés à un quart d'heure de la fin du terme, les Lions de l'Atlas ont trouvé les ressources nécessaires pour égaliser » puis éliminer les Hollandais aux tirs aux buts, se réjouit le média marocain. Afrik foot évoque la performance des Marocains qui ont « imposé leur jeu », avec 70% de possession de balle en leur faveur. Les Marocains affronteront les Canadiens samedi en 8e de finale.

"Migrants Don't Steal Jobs — Bad Policy Does": Economist Dawie Roodt by Radio Islam

On this episode of O'Connor and Company, we dive into the controversy surrounding the Great American State Fair, where some states have chosen to boycott the event due to its perceived politicization. We also discuss the recent Supreme Court decisions, including the ruling on temporary protected status and the implications for Haitian nationals living in the US. The episode touches on the complexities of immigration policy, with the Larry highlighting the need for a more nuanced approach. We also hear from a guest who shares their personal experience with the impact of immigration on their community. Additionally, the conversation turns to the topic of the Daughters of the American Revolution, who have recently made a decision that has sparked outrage among some of its members.Become a Townhall VIP member with promo code "LARRY": https://townhall.com/subscribeSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

En Floride, le centre de rétention de migrants Alligator Alcatraz, comme l'a surnommé Donald Trump, a fermé ses portes. Un immense centre qui accueillait des immigrés en attente d'expulsion. Les associations ont toujours affirmé que c'était un lieu de détention inhumain. Écoutez RTL autour du monde du 29 juin 2026.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

This Day in Legal History: Furman v. GeorgiaOn June 29, 1972, in a narrow 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court delivered what many thought was a death blow to capital punishment in America. In Furman v. Georgia, the Court held that the death penalty, as it was then being administered, violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment because it was imposed arbitrarily and inconsistently.The case involved William Henry Furman, a man convicted of murder in Georgia. Furman was sentenced to death. But the critical issue wasn't whether Furman committed the crime—it was whether the death penalty itself was constitutional. The Supreme Court's nine justices were deeply divided. Five justices voted to overturn the death penalty as then applied, but they disagreed on why. Some thought the death penalty was always unconstitutional. Others thought it could be acceptable if applied fairly, but the current system was arbitrary.Here's why the decision was so important: Under the death penalty laws at the time, juries had nearly unlimited discretion in deciding who lived and who died. Two people could commit the same crime, but one would receive a death sentence while the other received life in prison. There was no clear standard. Race played a role—Black defendants were disproportionately sentenced to death. Geographic location mattered—you were more likely to be executed in the South than elsewhere. Whether you could afford a good lawyer mattered. The Supreme Court found this arbitrariness violated the Eighth Amendment. The Court didn't say states could never execute anyone, but it said the current system was too random and unpredictable.The Eighth Amendment says the government can't impose cruel and unusual punishment. If the death penalty is imposed so randomly that there's no consistency—no clear rules about who lives and who dies—then it becomes essentially random. It's like a lottery where the prize is death. That randomness itself violates the Constitution's guarantee that punishment won't be arbitrary.The immediate effect was stunning: Furman invalidated every death penalty statute in the country. Roughly 600 death row inmates had their sentences commuted to life imprisonment. For four years, there were no executions in America.But the story didn't end there. States quickly rewrote their death penalty laws to address the Court's concerns about arbitrariness. They created more detailed guidelines for when death was appropriate. They required separate penalty hearings where juries would hear aggravating and mitigating factors. By 1976, in a case called Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court approved these new, more detailed death penalty statutes. Executions resumed in 1977.What's remarkable about Furman is that it shows how constitutional law can shift dramatically. A 5-4 decision blocked capital punishment across the nation. But when states rewrote their laws to address the constitutional concerns, the Court allowed executions to resume. The case demonstrates both the power of constitutional law and its limits. The Constitution banned arbitrary death sentences, but it didn't ban capital punishment itself—states just had to impose it in a more systematic way.Furman remains one of the most consequential Supreme Court decisions in American history. It shows that the Constitution evolves to address serious injustices—in this case, the arbitrary imposition of death. The case is a reminder that when the Supreme Court identifies a fundamental constitutional violation, it can force the entire nation to reckon with it. For four years, there was no capital punishment in America because the Court said the system violated the Constitution. When executions resumed, they were more regulated and systematic, at least nominally, because the Court had demanded consistency and reason in what had been an arbitrary process.Luigi Mangione, the suspect charged in connection with the killing of a health insurance company executive, appeared in court for a hearing on significant legal matters related to his case. The high-profile nature of the case has drawn intense media attention and raised important questions about corporate accountability and public anger at insurance companies. Here's what's at stake: A health insurance CEO was killed in what many saw as a targeted attack motivated by anger at insurance company practices. Mangione was arrested and charged. The case has sparked national debate about the role of insurance companies in healthcare and whether the widespread frustration with how they deny coverage is justified.The case raises questions about institutional responsibility. Insurance companies make profit-driven decisions about what medical treatments to cover and what to deny. When patients can't get coverage for necessary treatment, people die. Families go bankrupt. The anger is real and widespread. The question for the legal system is: Does that anger justify killing?The answer from the law is no—violence is not an acceptable response, even to unjust systems. Mangione's hearing addresses procedural questions about bail, evidence, and the rights of the accused. Whatever the merits of anger at insurance companies, everyone—including those accused of crimes—deserves due process, the right to challenge evidence, and the presumption of innocence.The case highlights the tension between systemic injustice and individual criminal responsibility. It's raising national conversation about what we owe each other as a society when institutions harm people. It's also a reminder that the legal system must protect both victims and the accused, even in cases that inspire strong public emotions. The case will likely result in a trial that examines both the facts of the killing and, implicitly, the role of insurance companies in healthcare.Mangione faces hearing ahead of trial over US health insurance CEO's killing | ReutersFederal immigration officials have signaled that migrants with temporary legal status should either pursue permanent residency or prepare to leave the country. The policy shift is part of the Trump administration's broader restrictive immigration agenda.Many migrants in the United States have “temporary protected status” (TPS) or similar temporary visa categories. These are people who fled violence, natural disaster, or persecution in their home countries and were granted temporary permission to stay and work in America. They contribute to the economy, pay taxes, and have built lives here. Some have been in America for decades. But temporary status is not permanent. The Trump administration is now saying that those with temporary status should either apply for permanent residency or leave.Imagine you've been told you could stay in a house temporarily. You've lived there for 10 or 20 years. You've built a home. Your children were born there. You have a job and community. Now someone is saying you must either buy the house or leave. For many migrants with temporary status, there's no legal pathway to permanent residency. The Trump administration makes it hard to qualify for permanent status. Some people simply can't meet the legal requirements. They're faced with an impossible choice: apply for status they don't qualify for, or leave the country where they've built their lives.This policy will likely push many migrants to leave the United States, disrupting industries that depend on their labor and breaking up families. It reflects the Trump administration's philosophy that immigration should be severely restricted. It also highlights a fundamental problem: the legal immigration system doesn't create pathways for people who are already here, contributing to society, and building lives. The policy raises questions about what we owe people who have contributed to our communities, even if they don't yet have permanent status.Migrants in US on temporary status should seek permanent residence or leave, Homeland Secretary says | ReutersBail bond insurers have agreed to pay $69 million to settle a class action lawsuit accusing them of illegally fixing prices and coordinating to keep bail bond costs artificially high. The settlement represents a significant victory for consumers who have been overcharged for bail bonds.When someone is arrested and held in jail, they can often post bail to be released while awaiting trial. If they can't afford bail, they can buy a bail bond from a bail bond company. The bail bondsman posts the bail amount to the court, and the defendant pays a percentage of that as a fee. The problem: Bail bond companies were allegedly coordinating with each other to keep their fees uniformly high rather than competing.In a free market, if one company charges too much, customers go to a competitor who charges less. But if all the companies secretly agree to charge the same high price, there's no real competition. Customers have no choice—they have to pay whatever price is set. That's price-fixing, and it's illegal. The companies allegedly communicated to ensure all bail bond fees stayed high, eliminating genuine price competition. This hit poor people hardest—those who are arrested and can't afford bail are often the people least able to afford high bail bond fees. The settlement requires the insurers to pay $69 million, which will go to class members who overpaid for bail bonds.This case shows that even industries that seem far from consumer consciousness can be subject to antitrust law and consumer protection suits. Bail bond companies thought they could secretly coordinate on pricing. A class action exposed the scheme and forced compensation. The settlement reminds us that when companies illegally eliminate competition, consumers pay. The case also highlights how the bail system itself can burden poor people—they have to pay high fees just to get out of jail while awaiting trial, which itself violates fairness principles. The settlement provides some compensation, but it also raises bigger questions about whether the bail system itself needs reform.Bail bond insurers to pay $69 million to settle price-fixing class action | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Chaque année, des milliers de Sénégalais rentrent au pays après une tentative de migration irrégulière. Retourner chez soi ne signifie pas toujours tourner la page. À Vélingara, dans le Sud du Sénégal, certains migrants de retour ont réussi à relancer une activité grâce à l'appui de partenaires comme l'Organisation internationale pour les migrations (OIM). D'autres, en revanche, continuent de faire face à la précarité et aux jugements de la société. De notre envoyé spécial à Vélingara, Habib Diao Dans son atelier au marché de Vélingara, les clients se succèdent. Derrière sa machine à coudre, Abdourahmane Sow s'est construit un nouveau quotidien. Une activité qui contraste avec son parcours. Pendant trois ans, le vingtenaire a vécu en Libye avant d'être rapatrié au Sénégal. Grâce à un financement de l'OIM, il a pu ouvrir son atelier de couture. « J'ai eu la chance d'obtenir un financement pour mon retour. Ce qui m'a permis de reprendre mon activité. Aujourd'hui, je travaille pour mon propre compte et je m'en sors bien. Je ne pense plus à repartir à défaut d'avoir un visa, bien sûr. »  Mais tous les migrants de retour ne dressent pas le même bilan. Pathé Baldé en sait quelque chose : parti en 2016 pour la Libye, il y passera trois ans, dont un an et demi en prison. À son retour, il bénéficie lui aussi d'un financement de l'OIM pour relancer une activité. Une aide saluée, même s'il estime qu'il attendait davantage de l'État sénégalais. « J'ai été rapatrié et je suis arrivé chez moi les mains vides. J'ai reçu un financement de 650 000 francs CFA, une somme que j'ai utilisée pour relancer mes activités dans l'élevage et dans l'agriculture. Comme vous le voyez ici, c'est très compliqué de s'en sortir. J'essaye de survivre avec ma famille avec le peu que me rapporte cette activité, il faut quand même l'avouer, il y a un défaut d'accompagnement de l'État. » À lire aussiSénégal: la difficile réinsertion des migrants de retour d'exil Le retour est difficile : « Toute la famille t'abandonne »  Pour d'autres, le retour a été encore plus difficile. Rentré en 2009 sans accompagnement, Filly Baldé peine encore à se relever. À ces difficultés s'ajoutent les regards et préjugés qu'il subit depuis son retour. « Je suis retourné au pays depuis lors, on est là. On se débrouille seul parce que même dans la famille, les gens vraiment te détestent d'abord. Parce que si tu retournes au pays avec zéro franc, rien, là tu es considéré comme un vaurien. Tu es considéré comme quelqu'un qui n'a pas d'ambition. Surtout si tu étais accompagné d'un ami et que lui, il est arrivé en Espagne et toi tu es retourné. Toute la famille t'abandonne. »  Selon le bilan du bureau d'accueil, d'orientation et de suivi des Sénégalais de l'extérieur et des migrants, 3 080 Sénégalais en détresse ont été rapatriés au cours de l'année 2025, dont 1 197 ont bénéficié d'un accompagnement à caractère social. À lire aussiSénégal: l'armée intercepte 201 migrants en partance pour l'Espagne dans le delta du Sine Saloum

Wednesday, June 25th, 2025 Today, former DoJ lawyer Erez Reuveni issues a bombshell whistleblower account of Emil Bove's intentional defiance of court orders on the eve of his judicial confirmation hearing; US intelligence assessments indicate that Iran's nuclear sites were not destroyed and they can be back up and running in a few months; Florida is paving over the Everglades to build its own concentration camp; a federal judge has blocked Trump's termination of University of California research grants; the Senate parliamentarian nixes the public lands selloff in the Billionaire Bailout Bill; four tech execs are sworn in as lieutenant colonels in the Army; Senator Lisa Murkowski signals she may turn Independent and caucus with Democrats; House Dems choose youth over seniority in the House Oversight ranking member election; and Allison delivers your Good News. Check out Dana's social media campaign highlighting LGBTQ+ heroes every day during Pride Month -  Dana Goldberg (@dgcomedy.bsky.social) Guest: Martha BarnetteFriends with Words Adventures in Languageland - book by Martha BarnetteMarthaBarnette.comA Way with Words Podcast @marthabarnette - BlueSky, Martha Barnette (@martha.barnette) - Instagram, MarthaBarnette - twitterStoriesStrike Set Back Iran's Nuclear Program by Only a Few Months, U.S. Report Says | The New York Times Live updates: Trump lashes out at Israel and Iran amid accusations of ceasefire violations | NBC News What Big Tech's Band of Execs Will Do in the Army | WIRED Florida Builds ‘Alligator Alcatraz' Detention Center for Migrants in Everglades | The New York Times House Democrats Elect Robert Garcia for Top Oversight Post | The New York Times Judge blocks Trump's termination of UC research grants | Courthouse News Service Murkowski suggests she could become an Independent in the right circumstance - Live Updates | POLITICO GOP budget bill could threaten public lands, conservation groups voice opposition | NBC Montana Good Trouble Uncomplicated Kitchen works to increase food security and food literacy by teaching cooking classes using local, in-season produce as well as budget-friendly pantry staples.uncomplicatedkitchen.org Shout out a local non-profit, so we can share it on the show.   From The Good Newsuncomplicatedkitchen.org 'No Kings' Protests see thousands in San Antonio area speak out, joining national movement Gay Men's Chorus Of Washington, DC Potomac Fever (@potomac.fever) -  Instagram ‘Get ready to sweat!' The animal mega-marathon stampeding from the Congo to the Arctic | Stage | The Guardian Be Biscuit's Hero - AZ Humane SocietyStar 67 - The Daily Beans - Apple PodcastsJoin the private Facebook GroupBehind The Beans | Facebook Reminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:https://apple.co/3XNx7ckWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?https://patreon.com/thedailybeanshttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/https://apple.co/3UKzKt0 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Partis pour regagner l'Europe dans l'espoir d'une vie meilleure, certains migrants disparaissent sans laisser de traces. Derrière eux, des familles vivent pendant des années dans l'attente et l'incertitude. Dans la commune de Vélingara, au sud du Sénégal, ces absences prolongées sont devenues une réalité qui plonge plusieurs foyers dans une résignation totale. Des familles continuent à chercher des nouvelles de leurs proches disparus sur les routes de la migration.  De notre envoyé spécial à Vélingara, Habib Diao À Vélingara, Assane Baldé est sans nouvelles de son frère Ndiaga depuis octobre 2016. Parti pour rejoindre l'Europe, il n'a plus jamais donné signe de vie.  « Le dernier message que j'ai reçu de lui, c'était vers le 24 octobre 2016, pour lui demander ce qui se passait, parce que nous étions tous inquiets. On voulait savoir dans quelles conditions il était. Il ne répondait pas. C'est vers le début du mois de novembre 2016 qu'on nous a fait savoir qu'il était porté disparu. Les gens dont on espérait pouvoir avoir des nouvelles de lui ne l'avaient pas vu », raconte-t-il.  Comme lui, d'autres continuent de chercher des réponses. Dans le village voisin de Kayel Bessel, Gnada Baldé attend le retour de son fils disparu depuis 2006. Une attente qui l'a même conduite à être victime d'une escroquerie après qu'un inconnu lui a promis des informations sur son enfant.  « L'année dernière, quelqu'un m'a appelé pour me dire qu'il savait où se trouvait mon fils disparu. Il m'a demandé le montant de 65 000 francs CFA pour le libérer de la prison dans laquelle il était détenu en Libye. Il disait qu'il était atteint de troubles mentaux. J'ai tout fait pour rassembler la somme et la lui envoyer. Mais depuis, cette personne ne m'a plus jamais donné de nouvelles. C'est comme ça que je me suis fait arnaquer », raconte-t-il. Les épouses des migrants disparus vivent elles aussi avec ce vide. Mariama Sabaly n'a plus reçu de nouvelles de son mari depuis 20 ans. Sans certitude sur son sort, elle poursuit sa vie avec résignation.  Elle expose sa situation et son désarroi : « Cela fait maintenant 20 ans qu'il est parti. La dernière fois que j'ai eu de ses nouvelles, il était encore à Dakar. C'était juste avant qu'il ne parte vers l'Europe. Depuis, personne n'a eu de ses nouvelles. J'ai quitté la maison conjugale pour retourner vivre chez mes parents avec nos deux enfants. On en avait quatre, deux sont décédés. Et, aujourd'hui, les deux qui restent sont au courant de la disparition de leur père. C'est très compliqué, là, je suis totalement perdue. Et rien ne me dit qu'il est toujours en vie ». Depuis 2014, la Croix-Rouge sénégalaise et le Comité international de la Croix-Rouge mettent en place un programme d'accompagnement de ces familles affectées par la disparition de proches sur les routes de la migration. Cela inclut, entre autres, un appui psychosocial, économique et un accompagnement juridique. 

1. “Activist” District Attorney in Philadelphia Focuses on Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner He improperly seeks to overturn murder convictions He “confesses error” in court to release prisoners A court ruling is cited criticizing the DA’s conduct, including: Lack of candor Misrepresentation of facts Inadequate investigation Broader narrative: Connects Krasner’s actions to George Soros, portrayed as funding progressive prosecutors Argues these policies lead to increased crime and societal instability 2. Federal Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan Blocks Voter Verification Tool The judge blocked use of a database (SAVE system) intended to: Check immigration status in relation to eligibility (such as voting or benefits) The ruling’s justification (as described): Concerns about privacy violations Risk of wrongful removal of eligible voters Commentary strongly criticizes the ruling: Calls it “activist” and legally incorrect Argues the law allows the government to verify data internally 3. Supreme Court Immigration Decisions Two Supreme Court rulings (described as 6–3 decisions): Case 1: Migrants outside U.S. Court ruled that migrants outside U.S. territory are not entitled to full legal protections Supports policies like “Remain in Mexico” Case 2: Temporary Protected Status (TPS) Court ruled that: The executive branch (Trump administration) can revoke TPS protections Means certain groups (e.g., Haitian, Syrian migrants) could lose legal status The podcast presents these as: “Major victories” for border enforcement Restoration of presidential authority on immigration Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

La junte burkinabé a annoncé vendredi la rupture des relations diplomatiques avec la France. Les relations entre les deux pays étaient très dégradées. La junte a franchi un pas et les conséquences pourraient être nombreuses.

1.

As stories of immigration top the national and world news headlines, Father Dave welcomes author Mary Fontana to share her experience with a unique Catholic resource that serves the vulnerable at the border. Mary spotlights Annunciation House, a migrant shelter in El Paso, TX in her new book called "Strangers in the Province of Joy: Practicing Radical Hospitality on the US - Mexico Border."  

Police in South Africa have assured the safety of migrants and local businesses as civic organisations including the March and March anti-migrant group intensify calls for foreigners to leave. This precedes heightened tensions towards a June 30 deadline declared by the groups for migrants to leave the country. Meanwhile in Kuwait, the fate of domestic workers mainly from some African countries remains unknown as authorities introduce new labour laws preventing the recruitment of domestic staff from over twenty countries including Kenya, Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo.Presenter: Nkechi Ogbonna Producers:  Ayuba Iliya Technical Producer:  Herbert Masua Senior Producer: Keikantse Shumba Editors: Charles Gitonga and Maryam Abdalla

http://www.mofpodcast.com/http://www.pbnfamily.comhttps://www.facebook.com/matteroffactspodcast/https://www.facebook.com/groups/mofpodcastgroup/https://rumble.com/user/Mofpodcastwww.youtube.com/user/philrabhttps://www.instagram.com/mofpodcasthttps://twitter.com/themofpodcasthttps://www.cypresssurvivalist.org/Support the showMerch at: https://southerngalscrafts.myshopify.com/Shop at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2ora9riPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/mofpodcastPurchase American Insurgent by Phil Rabalais: https://amzn.to/2FvSLMLShop at MantisX: http://www.mantisx.com/ref?id=173*The views and opinions of guests do not reflect the opinions of Phil Rabalais, Andrew Bobo, Nic Emricson, or the Matter of Facts Podcast*With Phil and Nic safely back home from Summer Camp, the boys indulge in a quick wrap up then pivot to the kerfuffle developing in Ireland specifically and Europe in general, as multiculturalism without cultural assimilation, a two-tiered justice system, and a government deaf to the complaints of its' citizens all build towards an increasingly frustrated and combative populace.Matter of Facts is now live-streaming our podcast on our YouTube channel, Facebook page, and Rumble at 7:30 PM Central on Thursdays . See the links above, join in the live chat, and see the faces behind the voices. Intro and Outro Music by Phil Rabalais All rights reserved, no commercial or non-commercial use without permission of creator

Full Title Name: Cardinal Mueller's letter to four SSPX priests to be consecrated? Leo in Spain on migrants? Lady broadcaster on Starmer condemning Irish uprising in Belfast? Leo's Sodomal Church and Pride? Trump acknowledges humanity of in vitro embryos? "Forever war for ever more" mentality? Sacred Heart and human dignity. This episode was recorded on 6/16/2026. Our Links: http://linkwcb.com/ Please consider making a monetary donation to What Catholics Believe. Father Jenkins remembers all of our benefactors in general during his daily Mass, and he also offers one Mass on the first Sunday of every month specially for all supporters of What Catholics Believe. May God bless you for your generosity! https://www.wcbohio.com/donate Subscribe to our other YouTube channels: ‪@WCBHighlights‬ ‪@WCBHolyMassLivestream‬ May God bless you all!

Sources:https://substack.com/@returntotradition1Contact Me:Email: return2catholictradition@gmail.comSupport My Work:Patreonhttps://www.patreon.com/AnthonyStineSubscribeStarhttps://www.subscribestar.net/return-to-traditionBuy Me A Coffeehttps://www.buymeacoffee.com/AnthonyStinePhysical Mail:Anthony StinePO Box 3048Shawnee, OK74802Follow me on the following social media:https://www.facebook.com/ReturnToCatholicTradition/https://twitter.com/pontificatormax+JMJ+#popeleoXIV #catholicism #catholicchurch #catholicprophecy#infiltration

PLUS, Trump Says His Deal Better Than ‘Stupid Son Of A B*tch' Obama's, As Concerns Grow Over Potential $300 Billion Fund for Iran – TUNE IN & SHARE

Big Bad Iran may be tamed by the Peace Deal, but we're killing ourselves by suicidal empathy towards terrorists.Suicidal empathy, or sympathy for those who want to kill us, may seem like a virtuous quality, but it is really madness and will bring about our demise. This episode, hosted by Carole Lieberman, M.D., The Terrorist Therapist®, features examples of suicidal empathy from the U.S. to the U.K. and shows how we've been bullied into submission since 9/11 by others calling us Islamophobes.In Arizona, a school board member, had the gall to suggest that Islam would take over America. Though she accurately stated terrorists' intentions, the more ignorant of those in hercommunity are calling for her resignation. In North Carolina, the Muslim high school valedictorian tossed the speech that had been vetted by her school to go into a rant about Israel, America and ICE. In New Jersey, Hisham ‘Adam' Hamaway celebrated his Democrat primary victory by having Muslim supporters shout "Allahu Akbar!”In the U.K., Radical Islamist migrants have reached the tipping point, even influencing the Bank of England to drop Winston Churchill from banknotes. There is barbarism in Belfast, where these migrants, following the Quran, decapitate the Irish in broad daylight. No woman is safe, as men from Pakistan to Palestine claim it's legal under Sharia Law to rape young non-Muslim girls.  Yet when a noted authority in terrorism testified before Congress about the danger of Sharia Law seeping into America, only some of the Congressmen took the threat seriously enough. Others reflected the general tendency of Americans to remain in denial.

In the third and final installment of the series, President Theodore Roosevelt mobilizes the full industrial might of United States to “make the dirt fly” in Panama and succeed where the French Syndicate failed. But many perils await them in “The Zone”. From disease-bearing mosquitos and intractable terrain, to labor problems and lethal accidents, the Panamanian jungle will not be tamed without a fight.    SOURCES: Burton, Anthony. The Canal Pioneers: Canal Construction from 2500 BC to the Early 20th Century. Barnsley, UK: Pen & Sword Maritime, 2018. Charles River Editors. The Panama Canal: The Construction and History of the Waterway Between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. CreateSpace Independent Publishing, 2013. Diaz Espino, Ovidio. How Wall Street Created a Nation: J.P. Morgan, Teddy Roosevelt, and the Panama Canal. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows, 2003. Greene, Julie. The Canal Builders: Making America's Empire at the Panama Canal. New York: Penguin Press, 2009. Karabell, Zachary. Parting the Desert: The Creation of the Suez Canal. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2003. Keller, Ulrich. The Building of the Panama Canal in Historic Photographs. New York: Dover Publications, 1983. Lasso, Marixa. Erased: The Untold Story of the Panama Canal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019. Lindsay, John. Emperors in the Jungle: The Hidden History of the U.S. in Panama. 2003. Lopez, Sean J. Chokepoint: The Epic History of the Suez Canal. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2024. Marlowe, Elias. A History of Panama: Canal, Conquest, and Independence. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2012. McCullough, David. The Path Between the Seas: The Creation of the Panama Canal, 1870–1914. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1977. Morton, Levi P. “No. 105. Mr. Morton to Mr. Frelinghuysen.” Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, Transmitted to Congress, With the Annual Message of the President, December 1, 1884, U.S. Department of State Office of the Historian, 5 July 1884,https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1884/d105 Parker, Matthew. Panama Fever: The Epic Story of the Building of the Panama Canal. New York: Doubleday, 2007. Cohen, Lucy M. “The Chinese of the Panama Railroad: Preliminary Notes on the Migrants of 1854 Who ‘Failed.'” Ethnohistory 18, no. 4 (1971): 309–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/481071. “The Tragedy of the Chinese.” Panama Railroad Historical Society, www.panamarailroad.org/chinesetragedy.html “Many Canal Workers Killed,” Black Virginia: The Richmond Planet, 1894-1909, accessed May 16, 2026, https://blackvirginia.richmond.edu/items/show/1085. https://newsroompanama.com/2026/03/22/clear-rules-and-fair-compensation-indio-river/?utm_source=chatgpt.com https://frontera.library.ucla.edu/recordings/coge-el-pandero-que-se-te-va-0 “Wilson Blows Up Last Bar Between Oceans; Canal Becomes Reality.” The Audubon County Journal (Audubon, Iowa), October 17, 1913. Colorado Historic Newspapers Collection. “Canal Is Opened by Wilson's Finger.” The New York Times, October 11, 1913. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Joseph Sternberg explains China's reform of the Hukou residency system, which has limited internal migration since the 1950s. By granting migrants access to urban social services like healthcare and education, Beijing aims to reduce high household saving rates and stimulate domestic consumption to revitalize its slowing, multi-trillion dollar communist national economy. (7)1793

Preview for Later Today: Joseph Sternberg analyzes China's policy shift allowing internal migrants to access urban social services, an effort by Beijing to maintain social stability and address income inequality as the nation's economic growth begins slowing.

A BBC investigation has found that more than 300 migrants heading to the UK last summer were kidnapped, tortured and threatened with forced organ removal. The young men, all from Iraqi Kurdistan, were captured in Libya by a militia which demanded a ransom of $5,000 from each of their families. Newshour hears from Libya expert Tim Eaton.Also in the programme: the chief executive of US Soccer on the coming World Cup, and illegal fishing off the coast of Sierra Leone.(Photo: Iraqi people smuggler Noah Aaron who is now serving a 10-year jail sentence in France)

Trump ripped off his mic and ran from Meet the Press. Then it got worse. In this episode: Trump storms off Meet the Press when Welker keeps asking for proof Hegseth uses a D-Day speech to compare immigrants to invading Nazis JD Vance blames a British killing on immigrants — when both men were born in Britain More than 200 killed on boats in strikes the Pentagon's own lawyers call illegal Trump blames the "dirty FBI" for January 6th — again Pardoned January Sixers getting re-arrested The billionaire swallowing CNN and CBS while Colbert gets fired Mamdani's plan to abolish ICE — as ICE quietly stops reporting inmate deaths South Carolina and Maine primaries: Graham Platner vs. Democratic Party Key figures covered: Donald Trump, Kristen Welker, Pete Hegseth, JD Vance, Usha Vance, David Ellison, Stephen Colbert, Nancy Mace, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Zohran Mamdani, Graham Platner, Susan Collins, Bernie Sanders.