Podcasts about political authority an examination

https://youtu.be/upjLndKbdY4 Bryan Caplan is a professor of Economics at George Mason University and New York Times Bestselling author. Website: http://bcaplan.com/ Myth of the Rational Voter: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691138737/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_MVN4R4ZQ39G2BKMB0EGQ   Jason Brennan (Ph.D., 2007, University of Arizona) is Robert J. and Elizabeth Flanagan Family Professor of Strategy, Economics, Ethics, and Public Policy at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University. Website: https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/faculty-publications?id=00336000014RXIUAA4 When All Else Fails: The Ethics of Resistance to the State: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691211507/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_ZV888N99PH828AHZ08T4   Michal Huemer is a professor of philosophy at the University of Colorado. Website: http://owl232.net/ The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1137281650/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LBRY / Odysee: https://odysee.com/@KeithKnightDontTreadOnAnyone:b/3-BRILLIANT-Professors:0 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/1nb3DtQdwpI5tQnb4pd4xK Archive: https://archive.org/details/Huemer-Caplan-Brennan Minds: https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1263212196404801536?referrer=KeithKnightDontTreadOnAnyone

Bryan Caplan is a professor of Economics at George Mason University and New York Times Bestselling author. Website: http://bcaplan.com/ Myth of the Rational Voter: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691138737/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_MVN4R4ZQ39G2BKMB0EGQ Jason Brennan (Ph.D., 2007, University of Arizona) is Robert J. and Elizabeth Flanagan Family Professor of Strategy, Economics, Ethics, and Public Policy at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University. Website: https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/faculty-publications?id=00336000014RXIUAA4 When All Else Fails: The Ethics of Resistance to the State: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691211507/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_ZV888N99PH828AHZ08T4 Michal Huemer is a professor of philosophy at the University of Colorado. Website: http://owl232.net/ The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1137281650/ --------------------------------------- If you find value in the content, please consider donating to my PayPal KeithKnight590@gmail.com LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@KeithKnightDontTreadOnAnyone:b BitChute: KeithKnightDontTreadOnAnyone https://www.bitchute.com/channel/keithknightdonttreadonanyone/ Minds: https://www.minds.com/KeithKnightDontTreadOnAnyone/ MeWe: mewe.com/i/keithknight25 Flote: https://flote.app/VoluntaryistKeith Gab: https://gab.com/Voluntarykeith Twitter: @an_capitalist The Libertarian Institute: https://libertarianinstitute.org/dont-tread-on-anyone/ One Great Work Network: https://www.onegreatworknetwork.com/keith-knight

We had an awesome discussion with Professor Michael Huemer, author of works such as The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey, Dialogues on Ethical Vegetarianism, Skepticism and the Veil of Perception & more.  We talked about authority in general, the basis of the state's authority, the ridiculous social contract, anarchism peaking, political irrationality, strategies on convincing others to consider anarchism, breaking the programming & more! Professor Huemer's website, his books, CV & blog: https://www.owl232.net/  his Amazon catalogue: https://www.amazon.com/Books-Michael-Huemer/s?rh=n%3A283155%2Cp_27%3AMichael+Huemer  his YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/owl235/videos  Youse Guys are (support us on Twitter & spread the word!): @youseguyspod @angel_soundgirl @thebloodletting @jaycoleau @bryanp789 https://www.etsy.com/shop/AkronApothecary   Check out our sponsor! Enjoy our content? Want exclusive content? Please support us on Patreon: patreon.com/Youseguyspod Youse Guys are on: youseguyspod.com  check out our merch!! insta, facebook, twitter email: youseguysandthat@gmail.com & info@youseguyspod.com Youse Guys and that YouTube Channel Youse Guys and that BitChute Channel Youse guys can be listened to on: iTunes, podbean, spotify, google podcasts,  iHeartRadio, stitcher & Tune In (Amazon/Alexa)

In this episode: Aristotle's Rhetorical Triangle, how I escaped a cult, why we must care about others, and how it can all be applied to persuasion, art creation, ideology, and modern life. We delve into some of the philosophical reasons behind what makes one “good” at rhetoric. I talk about how some of Lacan's, Freud's, and Jung's psychological writings can be used to cultivate authority, humanity, and logic. As I explain each pillar of the triangle, I'll then use that same method to analyze my own life to give a better idea of who I am: my ethos of what led me to co-found Jam Street Media, the pathos of my grandmother's imperative to me, and the logos of the book that caused my exodus from religion. My Photography - www.instagram.com/faseycrancoMy Twitter - www.Twitter.com/faseycrancoMy Website - CaseyFranco.comJam Street Media - JamStreetMedia.comSuggest a topic: godsmastersandclout@gmail.comChapters -00:56 - Episode Introduction4:20 - The Rhetorical Triangle14:40 - Ethos (The Concept)30:55 - My Ethos (What I'm Credible to Speak On)39:24 - Pathos (The Concept)55:16 - My Pathos (How My Grandmother Sees Me)1:00:10 - Logos (The Concept)1:12:45 - My Logos (Using Logic to Escape a Cult)1:29:53 - The Wrap-upLinks and Citations -School of Liberal Arts Rhetorical Triangle Analysis - https://www.lsu.edu/hss/english/files/university_writing_files/item35402.pdfSalvoj Zizek on Gratification of Capitalist Consumption - https://youtu.be/P18UK5IMRDIManipulation vs Persuasion by Michael Roberts - https://medium.com/@michaelwroberts/the-difference-between-persuasion-and-manipulation-27eb4c02fd2dMeerkat Facts - https://www.natgeokids.com/au/discover/animals/general-animals/meerkat-facts/Social Contract Theory - https://iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/Michael Heumer, The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to ObeyLiberalism - https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/244/Stanley Milgram's Experiment on Obedience and Authority - https://www.sparknotes.com/psychology/psych101/socialpsychology/section7/How to understand power - Eric Liu - https://youtu.be/c_Eutci7ackLacan's “Big Other” - http://www.english.hawaii.edu/criticalink/lacan/terms/other.htmlFreud's “Superego” - https://www.simplypsychology.org/psyche.htmlSam Harris on Freewill and Genetic determinism - https://samharris.org/the-illusion-of-free-will/Lacan on Desire - https://www.lacanonline.com/2010/05/what-does-lacan-say-about-desire/Zizek on the lack of a “Big Other” - "What is the big other?" - The Pervert's Guide To Ideology 2012 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwIDNW89AqQTurlock's churches - https://townsquarepublications.com/turlock-worship/Videos I made for iHeart -Lacan on “The Subject” - http://www.english.hawaii.edu/criticalink/lacan/terms/subject.htmlEmpathy - https://lesley.edu/article/the-psychology-of-emotional-and-cognitive-empathy#:~:text=According%20to%20Hodges%20and%20Myers,but%20without%20the%20self%20actuallyEffects of the Agricultural Revolution - https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-worldhistory2/chapter/effects-of-the-agricultural-revolution/#:~:text=The%20increase%20in%20agricultural%20production,loosely%20regulated%20agricultural%20market%2C%20andYuval Noah Harari on Human Superiority - https://ideas.ted.com/why-humans-run-the-world/Lacan's “Signifiers” - https://nosubject.com/SignifierReptile Brain vs Mammalian Brain - https://thebrain.mcgill.ca/flash/d/d_05/d_05_cr/d_05_cr_her/d_05_cr_her.htmlGenetic predisposition vs Experience - https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-nature-versus-nurture-2795392Structuralism - Calhoun, Craig, ed. 2002. "Structuralism." In Dictionary of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN9780195123715.Joseph Campbell's “The Hero With a Thousand Faces” - https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/588138.The_Hero_With_a_Thousand_FacesDavid Hume's Moral Philosophy - https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-moral/Lacan's “Signifiers” - https://nosubject.com/SignifierLacan's “The Real” - https://cla.purdue.edu/academic/english/theory/psychoanalysis/definitions/real.htmlPriming - https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/basics/primingCarl Jung on “The Stages of Life” - https://www.philosophicalsociety.com/archives/Carl%20Jung's%20Stages%20of%20Life.htmInitiations into Adulthood - https://robertmoore-phd.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.display&page_id=35Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning - https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/inductive-deductive-reasoning/The Scientific Method - https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-method/Rationalism vs Empiricism - https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothetico-deductive_modelScience and Absolute Truth - https://bit.ly/3bG4VAwThe Validity of The Theory of Evolution - https://www.globaltruthproject.com/single-post/the-present-truth-about-life?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIjY6Jtt7c6wIVl4WRCh3AcgsjEAAYASAAEgKNsfD_BwEPhilosophy Tube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8NVy00tfdICrime Correlates Poverty -  https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=242128How race corresponds to poverty - https://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Pathways_SOTU_2017_poverty.pdfThe Lies of “The Bell Curve” - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBc7qBS1UjoSFX and Music -GMaC Theme by Camille StennisAmericana Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Ancient Rite Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Kalimba Relaxation Music Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/Sonatina in C Minor performed by Kevin MacLeod

Recently, CJ got a chance to speak with Pete Quinones, host of the Free Man Beyond the Wall podcast, about a new documentary film he was involved with making -- The Monopoly on Violence -- a film which explores the history and characteristics of the state as an institution, the problems it creates, and criticisms & alternatives to it, from a libertarian anarchist perspective. (This film features commentary from many of the leading anti-statist intellectuals of today, including James C. Scott, Thaddeus Russell, Scott Horton, Jeff Deist, Tom Woods, Michael Huemer, Judge Andrew Napolitano, Tom Woods, Dave Smith, & many more! Join Pete & CJ as they discuss the making and content of The Monopoly on Violence. Support the Dangerous History Podcast via Patreon, SubscribeStar, or Bitbacker. CJ's official DHP Amazon Wish List Other ways to support the show The Dangerous History Podcast is a member of the Recorded History Podcast Network, the Dark Myths Podcast Collective & LRN.fm's podcast roster. External Links The Monopoly on Violence Free Man Beyond the Wall (Pete's podcast) CJ's Picks: Amazon Affiliate Links The Kids Are Not Alright: A Meme Enhanced Primer On Encroaching Marxism In The West by Mance Rayder/Pete Quinones Freedom Through Memedom: The 31-Day Guide to Waking Up to Liberty by Mance Rayder/Pete Quinones The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia by James C. Scott Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States by James C. Scott The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey by Michael Huemer Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Michael Huemer, a professor of philosophy at the University of Colorado at Boulder and author of The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey, explains the fallacies of the Hobbesian argument for government and discusses the problems of democracy.

Professor Michael Huemer claims that if normal people acted like governments do, we would generally be horrified and find their behavior morally contemptible…so why do most people intuitively feel that government is justified in its actions? Professor Huemer, Aaron, and Trevor tackle problems of political obligation, political legitimacy, and political authority, and explain the differences between each of these terms.Show Notes and Further ReadingMichael Huemer, The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey (book)Michael Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism (book)Prof. Huemer’s personal web site. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Michael Huemer, professor of philosophy at the University of Colorado at Boulder, discusses his book The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey.

The philosopher Robert Nozick once claimed that the most basic question of Political Philosophy is “Why not Anarchy?” Political philosophers pose this question often with the intent of demonstrating that there is indeed a good philosophical reason why governments should exist. Indeed, we often simply take for granted that the state and its vast coercive apparatus is morally justified. Similarly, we tend to think that anarchy is both a practically untenable and morally undesirable mode of social association. But governments claim not only power but authority over their citizens. And a few moments of reflection on the idea of authority suffices to see how curious an idea it is. To have authority is to have a right to create moral obligations in others simply by issuing commands, and a corresponding right to coerce compliance when others fail to obey one’s commands. It seems a puzzling phenomenon: The government claim to be able to make it the case that you’re morally required to do something simply in virtue of the fact that it has told you to do it. And they claim the moral right to imprison you for failing to do what they say. In The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey(Palgrave Macmillan 2013), Michael Huemer explores this puzzling phenomenon, and defends the conclusion that in fact there is no such thing as political authority. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The philosopher Robert Nozick once claimed that the most basic question of Political Philosophy is “Why not Anarchy?” Political philosophers pose this question often with the intent of demonstrating that there is indeed a good philosophical reason why governments should exist. Indeed, we often simply take for granted that the state and its vast coercive apparatus is morally justified. Similarly, we tend to think that anarchy is both a practically untenable and morally undesirable mode of social association. But governments claim not only power but authority over their citizens. And a few moments of reflection on the idea of authority suffices to see how curious an idea it is. To have authority is to have a right to create moral obligations in others simply by issuing commands, and a corresponding right to coerce compliance when others fail to obey one’s commands. It seems a puzzling phenomenon: The government claim to be able to make it the case that you’re morally required to do something simply in virtue of the fact that it has told you to do it. And they claim the moral right to imprison you for failing to do what they say. In The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey(Palgrave Macmillan 2013), Michael Huemer explores this puzzling phenomenon, and defends the conclusion that in fact there is no such thing as political authority. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The philosopher Robert Nozick once claimed that the most basic question of Political Philosophy is “Why not Anarchy?” Political philosophers pose this question often with the intent of demonstrating that there is indeed a good philosophical reason why governments should exist. Indeed, we often simply take for granted that the state and its vast coercive apparatus is morally justified. Similarly, we tend to think that anarchy is both a practically untenable and morally undesirable mode of social association. But governments claim not only power but authority over their citizens. And a few moments of reflection on the idea of authority suffices to see how curious an idea it is. To have authority is to have a right to create moral obligations in others simply by issuing commands, and a corresponding right to coerce compliance when others fail to obey one’s commands. It seems a puzzling phenomenon: The government claim to be able to make it the case that you’re morally required to do something simply in virtue of the fact that it has told you to do it. And they claim the moral right to imprison you for failing to do what they say. In The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey(Palgrave Macmillan 2013), Michael Huemer explores this puzzling phenomenon, and defends the conclusion that in fact there is no such thing as political authority. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices