Podcast appearances and mentions of Stanley Milgram

This week's Extra Alarm insights come to us from Battalion Chief (ret.) Greg Rogers, addressing the critical issue of conflicting orders in fire department operations and underscoring the importance of adhering to the established chain of command. Rogers acknowledges the tendency of individuals to obey authority figures, even when orders are conflicting or unsafe, as demonstrated by infamous Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments. This behavior can lead to dangerous situations on the fireground, especially when orders are issued by officers outside a firefighter's direct chain of command. The article provides a real-world scenario where a firefighter receives conflicting orders from two different officers, leading to a failure in executing a critical task and endangering lives, plus guidance for ensuring a strong chain of command.

Collega's die te makkelijk meegaan in beslissingen en beleid kunnen een groot risico voor een organisatie zijn. Jeanne leerde op Harvard veel over de motieven van mensen om volgzaam en gehoorzaam te zijn en vooral hoe je dat kunt voorkomen. In deze aflevering leer je over een duister sociaal experiment dat de volgzaamheid van mensen pijnlijk blootlegt, de koppeling met de rol als L&D-er en trainer en hoe je kunt voorkomen dat mensen te volgzaam worden.Lees hier het blog over deze podcast:https://www.brainbakery.com/brainsnacks/een-ode-aan-de-rebel-waarom-we-meer-dwarsdenkers-nodig-hebbenOp https://www.brainbakery.com/brainsnacks vind je onze blogs.Wil je meepraten, laat een voice berichtje achter:https://www.speakpipe.com/brainbakerySupport the show

keywords obedience, authority, genocide, psychology, neuroscience, ethical research, social dynamics, moral dilemmas, justice, trauma summary In this conversation, David Jones and Naomi Murphy speak with Emilie Caspar, a social and cognitive neuroscientist, about her research on obedience to authority, particularly in the context of genocide. They discuss the ethical challenges of studying such sensitive topics, the psychological profiles of perpetrators, and the decision-making processes involved in committing atrocities. Emily shares insights from her studies in various countries affected by genocide, highlighting the importance of understanding the social dynamics that lead to obedience and the potential for resilience and resistance among individuals. The conversation also touches on the emotional toll of researching these topics and the significance of role models in shaping moral decisions. Anyone who has come across the work of Stanley Milgram with find this fascinating.   Just Following Orders: Atrocities and the Brain Science of Obedience https://www.amazon.co.uk/Just-Following-Orders-Atrocities-Obedience/dp/1009385437

keywords obedience, authority, genocide, psychology, neuroscience, ethical research, social dynamics, moral dilemmas, justice, trauma summary In this conversation, David Jones and Naomi Murphy speak with Emilie Caspar, a social and cognitive neuroscientist, about her research on obedience to authority, particularly in the context of genocide. They discuss the ethical challenges of studying such sensitive topics, the psychological profiles of perpetrators, and the decision-making processes involved in committing atrocities. Emily shares insights from her studies in various countries affected by genocide, highlighting the importance of understanding the social dynamics that lead to obedience and the potential for resilience and resistance among individuals. The conversation also touches on the emotional toll of researching these topics and the significance of role models in shaping moral decisions. Anyone who has come across the work of Stanley Milgram with find this fascinating.   Just Following Orders: Atrocities and the Brain Science of Obedience https://www.amazon.co.uk/Just-Following-Orders-Atrocities-Obedience/dp/1009385437

- Et toi tu fais quoi dans la vie ? - Je suis chercheuse en psychologie cognitive. - Ah, tu devrais étudier mon cerveau, je suis sûr.e que tu y trouverais quelque chose d'intéressant ! - Euh j'ai plus l'habitude de faire passer des expériences à des groupes de participant.es volontaires. - Ah, tu manipules les gens comme des rats de laboratoire c'est ça ? Voilà, ça c'est ce à quoi j'ai le droit quand je parle de recherche en psychologie. Et c'est normal. La psychologie étudie l'esprit et le comportement humain. Ça et les représentations de vilains scientifiques comme le docteur Frankenstein, facile de s'imaginer les pires scénarios. Et des dérives, il y en a eu ! Par exemple, dans les expériences de Stanley Milgram, des participant.es ont été incité.es à infliger des chocs électriques qu'ils pensaient potentiellement mortels à d'autres sous l'autorité d'un expérimentateur, sans savoir le vrai but de l'étude, ce qui a causé une grande détresse chez certain.e.s (1, 2, 3). Heureusement, les choses ont bien évolué, les psychologues n'en font plus qu'à leur tête ! Nous faisons en sorte d'agir de façon moralement responsable. Le questionnement éthique est donc au centre de notre pratique. https://milgram.ulb.be/100g/episodes-100g/pratiques-ethiques/

What if the path to a meaningful life isn't paved with comfort, but with deliberate discomfort? In this episode, we explore the insidious nature of "flabbiness" - not just of body, but of mind and spirit. We'll uncover how our modern world lulls us into a state of complacent existence, and why the easy path often leads to the hardest life. Through stories of transformation and philosophical insights, we'll challenge the notion that happiness comes from avoiding difficulty. Instead, we'll discover how embracing challenge and responsibility can lead to a life of purpose and fulfillment. This isn't just about self-improvement; it's about redefining what it means to truly live in a world that often encourages us to merely exist: Choose your hard: Decide which difficulties are worth embracing Create your own resistance: Design challenges that grow you Reframe comfort: See ease as a tool, not a destination Are you ready to trade comfort for meaning? The choice is yours. Upgrade to Premium:

Smile, you're listening to a podcast about Candid Camera. Created by Allen Funt, Candid Camera was America's first prank reality show. A case could be made that this show is responsible for the reality television trend that led to a con man being packaged as a “successful businessman” and is now pranking America as prez. Strange Country cohosts Beth and Kelly talk about this pioneering show whilst smiling through their tears. Theme music: Big White Lie by A Cast of Thousands. Cite your sources:   “Candid Camera | Television Academy Interviews.” Television Academy Interviews |, 1997, https://interviews.televisionacademy.com/shows/candid-camera. Accessed 26 January 2025.   Engle, Harrison. “Hidden Cameras and Human Behavior—An Interview with Allen Funt.” ida, 1 October 2000, Hidden Cameras and Human Behavior—An Interview with Allen Funt.   Flagler, J.M. “Student of the Spontaneous.” The New Yorker, 2 December 1960, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1960/12/10/student-of-the-spontaneous.   Funt, Allen, and Philip Reed. Candidly, Allen Funt: A Million Smiles Later. Barricade Books, 1994.   Miller, Robert Nagler. “Q&A: The keeper of ‘Candid Camera's' zany TV legacy.” The Jewish News of Northern California, 12 July 2018, https://jweekly.com/2018/07/12/qa-the-keeper-of-candid-cameras-zany-tv-legacy/. Accessed 6 February 2025.   Nussbaum, Emily. Cue the Sun! The Invention of Reality TV. Random House Publishing Group, 2024.   Perry, Gina. “Stanley Milgram and Candid Camera.” Gina Perry, 10 April 2012, https://www.gina-perry.com/2012/04/10/candid-camera/. Accessed 6 February 2025.   Saxon, Wolfgang. “Allen Funt, Creator of 'Candid Camera,' Is Dead at 84.” The New York Times, 7 September 1999, https://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/07/arts/allen-funt-creator-of-candid-camera-is-dead-at-84.html. Accessed 25 January 2025.   Stewart, Travis. “How “Candid Camera” May Have Destroyed America.” Travelanche, 16 September 2020, https://travsd.wordpress.com/2020/09/16/how-candid-camera-may-have-destroyed-america/.

Zdravo. Živahni klepet o življenju, vesolju in sploh vsem tokrat začnemo z glasnostjo, nadaljujemo z misijo na Mars, ki nas čaka v svetleči prihodnosti, ki se jo tako želimo. Opozarjamo, da kondomi NISO za večkratno uporabo, zato je tokratni naslov epizode še bolj zavajajoč (še posebej, ker se spet pogovarjamo o mokrih maijcah). V epizodi boste lahko slišali tudi o koči na plaži, Milgramovem testu, veganske usnju, kljub zabavi in divjim štosom je vredno ponoviti: varna spolnost je zelo pomembna in je vredno biti pozoren če jo raziskujete na tem planetu ali na sosednjih. Aja, še to: če so vas ugrabili vesoljci, se nam javite. Discord, dopisnice ali družabna omrežja čakajo, da se nam oglasite. Hvala!

LINK - https://youtu.be/Wejpw4ngU8w ErnestoMiami analiza la compleja relación entre obediencia y control en Cuba, utilizando como base el famoso Experimento Milgram de la Universidad de Yale. A través de un análisis científico y social, explora por qué es incorrecta la percepción del pueblo cubano como "cobarde", examinando cómo los mecanismos de control del régimen comunista se asemejan a los factores estudiados en el experimento de Stanley Milgram. El contenido aborda la naturaleza humana de la obediencia, el concepto de "la banalidad del mal" de Hannah Arendt, y cómo estos elementos se relacionan con la situación actual en Cuba. ErnestoMiami analiza el papel del exilio cubano, la represión sistemática, y los mecanismos psicológicos que mantienen el control social en la isla. El video ofrece una perspectiva que combina psicología social, historia y análisis político para entender mejor la realidad cubana actual y los desafíos que enfrenta su población bajo un régimen comunista y totalitario. #Cuba #Historia #HistoriadeCuba #cubanosporelmundo #cubanos #cubanosenmiami #cubanosenhouston #cubanosenusa #FidelCastro #ernestomiami **** Para más videos VISITA - www.ErnestoMiami.com

Criminal Behaviorology  Episode # 59 Title:  Remembering Phil Zimbardo: Obedience and Authority in the Stanford Prison Study The entire interview can be found on our YouTube channel:  @criminalbehaviorology - https://youtu.be/VKiItBjp-_c The views of our guests do not necessarily reflect those of Criminal Behaviorology, nor our sponsors.  Donate to Criminal Behaviorology Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=81930699 In October of this year (2024) Philip Zimbardo passed at the age 91. After a legendary career in psychology, he is known for a very innovative study at Stanford University. A group of students, who were about to get quite a surprise, were randomly assigned be either guards or prisoners. In this episode we look back at Zimbardo's life and the surprising outcomes of some of his most controversial research on the dynamics of incarceration. Show Highlights: The life and career of one Philip Zimbardo. The BBC special on the Stanford Prison Study. Zimbardo's inspiration from the Attica Prison uprising. Students randomly assigned to be “guards” and “prisoners.” The Stanley Milgram experiment on obedience to authority. Shocking results. Guards who became sympathetic, and those who become “hardliners.” Controversies and conclusions about this infamous study. Links for this podcast: Psychology: The Stanford Prison Experiment - BBC Documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4txhN13y6A - Found on this Channel on YouTube (Patricia Im): https://www.youtube.com/@patriciaim4861 Zimbardo: https://zimbardo.socialpsychology.org/contact Obituary of Philip Zimbardo: https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/legacyremembers/philip-zimbardo-obituary?id=56549140 https://www.prisonexp.org  The Man Who Shocked the World (about Stanley Milgram): https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/articles/200203/the-man-who-shocked-the-world Look up CrimBehav on Facebook:  facebook.com/CrimBehav. Criminal Behaviorology on Blogger.  CB Podcast Sites: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/dashboard/episodes https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/criminal-behaviorology/id1441879795?mt=2&uo=4 https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy83MzY4OWFjL3BvZGNhc3QvcnNzhttps://open.spotify.com/show/5VM7Sjv762u7nb91YWGczZ https://www.breaker.audio/criminal-behaviorology https://overcast.fm/itunes1441879795/criminal-behaviorology https://pca.st/Q38w https://radiopublic.com/criminal-behaviorology-GEv2AZ https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/anchor-podcasts/criminal-behaviorology On YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKSVoZOBwCG28xMnuPq_Gtw On Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-1826027 On Locals Social Media: https://criminalbehaviorology.locals.com/?showPosts=1 https://criminalbehaviorology.locals.com On Twitter: https://twitter.com/CrimBehav On Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=81930699 Amazon: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/a3604516-0645-4341-a792-75d10754556d/criminal-behaviorology Please write a review on any of our podcast sites listed above.  Questions, comments, and requests for transcripts to: criminalbehaviorology@gmail.com Thank you for listening. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/criminalbehaviorology/support

Gehorsam Menschen Stromstöße verabreichen: Wie weit gehen wir? Psychologe Stanley Milgram (gestorben 20.12.1984) veränderte die klassische Vorstellung von Gut und Böse. Von Veronika Bock ;Ulrich Biermann.

Wie groß ist die Bereitschaft, Autoritäten gegenüber gehorsam zu sein? Das erforscht Stanley Milgram mit einer Versuchsanordnung, die heute als Milgram-Experiment bekannt ist.

Se você tem preocupação com a censura e o acesso restrito a conteúdos internacionais, a solução é usar uma VPN. Ao buscar liberdade e segurança na navegação, use a NordVPN, que permite acessar conteúdos globais, encontrar melhores preços e navegar sem rastros. Acesse https://nordvpn.com/cafebrasil para obter um desconto e quatro meses extras grátis, além da opção de reembolso em 30 dias. Stanley Milgram, na década de 1960, conduziu na Universidade de Yale o famoso "Experimento da Obediência à Autoridade", que revelou até que ponto as pessoas obedecem a figuras de autoridade, mesmo contrariando seus valores morais. Surpreendentemente, 80% dos participantes seguiram ordens ilegítimas, enquanto apenas 20% resistiram. O estudo, um marco na psicologia social, continua relevante, desafiando-nos a refletir sobre a influência das estruturas de autoridade e a importância do pensamento crítico para resistir a ordens injustas. Qualquer semelhança com nossa realidade não é mera coincidência.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this class series, Rabbi Shmuly will explore the Torah of the mind. Examining thinkers like Freud, Piaget, Maslow, Frankl, and so many others over 50 interactive sessions, we will explore how Jewish thought intersects with modern psychological studies and theories. Looking at consciousness, moral reasoning, ego, love, learning, and evil, how can we better understand why humans act as they do? Considering our relationships, traumas, memories, conflicts, and self-esteem, how can reflecting on the deep complexity of our minds help us live more meaningful lives? Further, how might Jewish ethics and Jewish philosophy help us ask not just “how do we live” but “how might we live?” Join us for a deep dive into the collective, individual, and the Jewish mind.Attended these classes live over Zoom by becoming a member for just $18 per month: https://www.valleybeitmidrash.org/become-a-member.------------------Stay Connected with Valley Beit Midrash:• Website: https://www.valleybeitmidrash.org• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ValleyBeitMidrash ★ Support this podcast ★

Send me a DM here (it doesn't let me respond), OR email me: imagineabetterworld2020@gmail.comToday I'm honored to introduce you all to: MK ULTRA, child trafficking, and Milgram Experiment survivor and whistleblower, human rights activist, organic gardener, camping lover, hiker, fisherwoman, frisbee golf extraordinaire, home birth and midwife advocate, published author and writer, podcaster, YouTuber, janitorial service subcontractor, and an incredible inspiration to the survivor movement: Carol StanhopeA little bit about Carol's testimony and what we will be diving into today…Carol's father came to the US in 1939 as an immigrant at the age of 17 and was intercepted by the OSS - which was the former CIA - at Boston Harbor where they gave him an ultimatum to participate as an asset OR be deported back to Finland. Her father chose the former as he didn't want to be conscripted into the Finnish army. When the OSS learned of his rare RH negative blood type and Norse lineage, they forcibly enlisted him in the merchant marines where his job was to safeguard precious gems and metals. They then used him in various drug mule positions in Thailand and Portugal. He eventually met Carol's mother in Chicago in the early 1950's and Carol was born in Minnesota in 1962, and her family was absorbed into the intelligence agency by proxy. In 1967 at just five years of age, her father offered her up to MKULTRA, Monarch and Project Bluebird - as well as for Dr. Stanley Milgram's Cyranoid experiments. These took place at Duluth Air Force Base and the University of Minnesota. The protocols Carol was subjected to were electroshock treatments, sensory deprivation, forced ingestion of urine, sexual abuse and more. This past January, Carol discovered the stimoceiver and multi-lead needle electrodes that were implanted in her brain by Stanley Milgram's Yale colleague, Dr. Jose Delgado. The electrodes bulge out of her skull and are visible on her shaved head. Carol was also used in child exploitation material in the 1970s and had to escape from a baby breeding program in the 1980s. She eventually participated in a UN ladies group called Persons Against Non-State Torture. Two UN nurses helped her with her deprogramming in the mid to late 2000's and mentored her to become an activist and advocate. Carol released a documentary in 2018, an autobiography in 2021, and is currently in the process of writing her second manuscript and book.Carol's testimony is vitally important as it weaves together a horrific counter-narrative behind the benign mainstream narrative regarding Stanley Milgram and the experiments on obedience he was conducting. In the mainstream narrative, Milgram's experiments are heralded with disclaimers of ‘no humans were hurt in these experiments and the test subjects are all promoted as being consenting adults. The reality, however, is much darker as Milgram's experimentation on humans crossed over into MK ULTRA as well as using unconsenting children as test subjects - things MSM will never tell us. Carol is here today to share the truth of what was actually happening behind closed doors, as well as to show proof of the experimentation done on her at the hands of people who should have been protecting her. CLICK HERE FOR 15% OFF YOUR RIFE ORDER:Rife Technology – Real Rife TechnologyCODE: 420CLICK HERE FOR FREE SHIPPING ON CZTL'S METHYLENE BLUE:Buy ultra high purity Methylene Blue – CZTLCONNECT WITH CAROL: FB: @Carol Stanhope - FacebookYouTube: @Carol StanhopeSupport the show

In 1961, infamous psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted a controversial experiment that answered the question: "Would good people do horrible things so long as they were just following orders?". This movie explores the life and career of Milgram as he tries to distance himself from the controversial experiment.

Thank you for listening! On this episode, Reggie sits down with Sheem and Monet and they discuss a good amount of topics. Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn, predicts that 9-to-5 jobs will be extinct by 2034 A North Carolina resident: My father-in-law has refused all FEMA help because he is listening to Trump. He doesn't believe FEMA. He just believes Trump. https://x.com/kamalahq/status/1844399831361454585?s=46 Quick Clips: 1962: The Milgram Experiment reveals why humans keep committing atrocities throughout history. One of the most famous psychological experiments of our time - Stanley Milgram demonstrates how easy it is to get others following orders from a person in an authoritative position. https://x.com/historyinmemes/status/1844566339374944427?s=46 Elon Musk's “Optimus” Robots are here: https://x.com/tarabull808/status/1844593360658629118?s=46 New Federal Wiretap Law May effect relationships: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DBT75-ORFNL/?igsh=MWVuNHpnMDJmcGVjdg== Songs of the DAE$: Monet: Kendrick Lamar ft Summer Walker “Purple Heart” Sheem: Sir ft Jill Scott “Still Blue” Reggie: Chris Brown “Red” --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/reggie-daes/support

The social science that supports our work with cults has been questioned in the last decade. We discuss the complaints about Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment, Stanley Milgram's Yale shock machine studies, and Sherif's Robbers Cave Experiment. Note: this was recorded a few days before Dr. Zimbardo passed. He was truly a titan of our field and will be sorely missed. Links: Dr. Zimbardo's Heroic Imagination project At the center of 'Veneer Theory': Are people fundamentally good or evil? Jane Eliott's brown-eyed/ blue-eyed study on racism Muzafer Sherif's Robbers Cave Experiment A Painful Reminder #Zimbardo

What makes normal people do terrible things? Are there really bad apples — or just bad barrels? And how should you deal with a nefarious next-door neighbor? SOURCES:Jonathan Haidt, professor of ethical leadership at New York University's Stern School of Business.Christina Maslach, professor of psychology at the University of California, Berkeley.Stanley Milgram, 20th century professor of psychology at Yale University.Edward R. Murrow, 20th century American broadcast journalist and war correspondent.Alexander Pope, 17-18th century English poet.Adrian Raine, professor of criminology, psychiatry, and psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.Oskar Schindler, 20th century German businessman.Philip Zimbardo, professor emeritus of psychology at Stanford University. RESOURCES:"Mental Illness and Violence: Debunking Myths, Addressing Realities," by Tori DeAngelis (Monitor on Psychology, 2021)."How 'Evil' Became a Conservative Buzzword," by Emma Green (The Atlantic, 2017)."The Double-Edged Sword: Does Biomechanism Increase or Decrease Judges' Sentencing of Psychopaths?" by Lisa G. Aspinwall, Teneille R. Brown, and James Tabery (Science, 2012)."The Psychology of Evil," by Philip Zimbardo (TED Talk, 2008).The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil, by Philip Zimbardo (2007)."When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize," by Jonathan Haidt and Jesse Graham (Social Justice Research, 2007)."Abu Ghraib Whistleblower Speaks Out," by Michele Norris (All Things Considered, 2006).Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View, by Stanley Milgram (1974). EXTRAS:"Does Free Will Exist, and Does It Matter?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."Are You Suffering From Burnout?" by No Stupid Questions (2023).Lolita, by Vladimir Nabokov (1955)."Essay on Man, Epistle II," poem by Alexander Pope (1733).

Kdo ali kaj nas prepriča, da ravnamo v nasprotju s svojimi lastnimi moralnimi normami in vestjo? Med najbolj znanimi psihološkimi študijami vseh časov je prav gotovo tudi tako imenovani Milgramov eksperiment. Leta 1963 ga je izvedel profesor psihologije na ameriški Univerzi Yale Stanley Milgram. Opravil je poskus, v katerem se je osredotočil na konflikt med posameznikovo poslušnostjo avtoriteti in osebno vestjo. Kaj prevaga – prvo ali drugo? Kakšne okoliščine povzročijo, da ljudje ravnamo v nasprotju z lastnimi moralnimi normami, kar posledično lahko vodi do najbolj krutih dejanj. Ko so namreč ljudje po drugi svetovni vojni izvedeli za koncentracijska taborišča in druga nacistična grozodejstva, za holokavst, so bili osupli. Kako je možno, da so pri zločinih in okrutnih dejanjih sodelovali tudi številni na pogled običajni ljudje? Profesorju na Stanleyu Milgramu ta moralni konflikt, po njegovih besedah, ni dal miru: "Vprašal sem se, kako je mogoče, da so navadni ljudje, ki so bili sicer v svojem vsakdanjem življenju prijazni in spodobni, lahko ravnali tako brezčutno, nečloveško, brez kakršnihkoli zavor." Do kakšnih spoznanj je Milgram s svojim eksperimentom prišel, v oddaji Glasovi svetov pojasnjuje psiholog prof. dr. Bojan Musil z Oddelek za psihologijo Filozofske fakultete v Mariboru. Foto: Milgramova "električna škatla" za proženje elektrošokov/ Isabelle/ Flickr, cc

What are Mike and Angela's favorite songs to cry to? Can upbeat music lift you out of a bad mood? And what is Angela going to sing the next time she does karaoke? SOURCES:Matthew Desmond, professor of sociology at Princeton University.Daniel Kahneman, professor emeritus of psychology and public affairs at Princeton University.Joshua Knobe, professor of philosophy, psychology, and linguistics at Yale University.Simon McCarthy-Jones, professor of psychiatry at Trinity College Dublin.Yael Millgram, senior lecturer of psychological sciences at Tel Aviv University.Stanley Milgram, 20th-century American social psychologist.Ruth Reichl, food writer.Laurie Santos, professor of psychology at Yale University.Barbara Tversky, professor emerita of psychology at Stanford University. RESOURCES:"On the Value of Sad Music," by Mario Attie-Picker, Tara Venkatesan, George E. Newman, and Joshua Knobe (The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 2024)."The Reason People Listen to Sad Songs," by Oliver Whang (The New York Times, 2023)."Adele 30: The Psychology of Why Sad Songs Make Us Feel Good," by Simon McCarthy-Jones (The Conversation, 2021)."Why Do Depressed People Prefer Sad Music?" by Sunkyung Yoon, Edelyn Verona, Robert Schlauch, Sandra Schneider, and Jonathan Rottenberg (Emotion, 2020).Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City, by Matthew Desmond (2016)."Sad as a Matter of Choice? Emotion-Regulation Goals in Depression," by Yael Millgram, Jutta Joormann, Jonathan D. Huppert, and Maya Tamir (Psychological Science, 2015)."Music and Emotion Through Time," by Michael Tilson Thomas (TED Talk, 2012).Thinking, Fast and Slow, by Daniel Kahneman (2011). EXTRAS:Girl Power Sing-Along with Laurie Santos and Catherine Price, at the Black Squirrel Club in Philadelphia (September 28, 2024)."What Makes a Good Sense of Humor?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."How Contagious Is Behavior? With Laurie Santos of 'The Happiness Lab' (Replay)," by No Stupid Questions (2023).

Milgramov eksperiment Profesor psihologije na ameriški Univerzi Yale Stanley Milgram je leta 1963 izvedel enega najbolj znanih socialno-psiholoških eksperimentov vseh časov. Opravil je poskus, v katerem se je osredotočil na konflikt med posameznikovo poslušnostjo avtoriteti in osebno vestjo. Kaj prevaga – prvo ali drugo? Kdo ali kaj nas lahko prepriča, da ravnamo v nasprotju s svojimi lastnimi moralnimi normami in vestjo? Ko so ljudje po drugi svetovni vojni izvedeli za koncentracijska taborišča in druga nacistična grozodejstva, za holokavst, so bili osupli. Kako je možno, da so pri zločinih in okrutnih dejanjih sodelovali tudi številni povsem običajni ljudje? Milgramu ta moralni konflikt ni dal miru: »V moji stroki, socialni psihologiji, je sicer že obstajalo nekaj študij, za katere se je zdelo, da dajejo odgovor na vprašanje, kako je mogoče, da so običajni ljudje, ki so bili sicer v svojem vsakdanjem življenju prijazni in spodobni, ravnali tako brezčutno, nečloveško, brez kakršnihkoli zavor. Problem, ki sem ga želel preučiti, je bil nekoliko drugačen; šel je še dlje: izpostavil je vprašanje avtoritete. Pod kakšnimi pogoji posameznik uboga avtoriteto, čeprav mu ta zaukaže, naj stori dejanja, ki so v nasprotju s posameznikovim moralnimi normami in vestjo? To sem želel raziskati na univerzi Yale.« Kaj je Stanley Milgram ugotovil? Kakšen je rezultat njegovega najbolj znanega eksperimenta, bo v oddaji Ultrazvok pojasnil psiholog prof. dr. Bojan Musil z Oddelek za psihologijo Filozofske fakultete v Mariboru. Foto: Milgramova električna "škatla" za proženje elektrošokov/ Isabelle/ Flickr, cc Zimbardov oziroma Stanfordski zaporniški eksperiment. Ta pa je nakazal, kako hitro lahko pade meja med dobrim in zlim. TUKAJ

In this episode, I delve into the fascinating Milgram experiment conducted by psychologist Stanley Milgram in the early 1960s. This series of social experiments measured the willingness of participants to obey authority figures, even when instructed to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. The experiment revealed that a significant majority, 65%, were willing to administer the highest level of shocks to a learner, despite hearing their apparent suffering. I discuss how this experiment highlights the concept of a "slippery slope," where small incremental steps can lead individuals to perform increasingly severe actions. However, I also explore the idea of a positive slippery slope, where small, manageable steps can lead to substantial improvements in habits and lifestyle. For instance, starting with a short walk each day can eventually lead to a consistent exercise routine, or adding one vegetable to a meal can lead to healthier eating habits over time. I share my personal experience of training for a half marathon by gradually increasing my running distance each week. This method helped me build a strong foundation and significantly improve my performance. I emphasize the importance of being mindful of the small influences in our daily lives, as they can have both positive and negative impacts. Additionally, I touch on the role of technology and how it can be a double-edged sword, offering both positive and negative slippery slopes. For example, using a Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) can help make better health decisions but can also lead to obsessive behavior. I encourage listeners to reflect on how they can apply the concept of a positive slippery slope in their own lives and to be mindful of the influences they allow into their daily routines. I also invite feedback on how technology impacts our lives and the lives of our children. Thank you for spending your precious time with me. I hope you found this episode helpful and thought-provoking. To work with me: https://www.drmarbas.com/ A Big Thank You To Our Sponsors: If you want to work with the best Whole Foods plant-based body recomposition coach, I highly recommend checking out what www.fitvegancoaching.com offers. I did their program and was able to lose 7% of body fat, build lean muscle, and improve my running time. As a loyal subscriber, you get $250 savings on their coaching services. To learn plant-based cooking and get your medical questions answered, join The Healing Kitchen, taught by Brittany Jaroudi and me! Click here to learn more: https://www.drmarbas.com/the-healing-kitchen

Inspiration for Mattos Masai

Send us a Text Message.Can leadership failures create a breeding ground for misconduct in correctional facilities?In this episode of the Prison Officer Podcast, we confront this critical question head-on. Through the lens of Stanley Milgram's famous 1963 obedience study, we unravel the often unseen dynamics of authority in corrections, exploring when and how the duty to intervene should override blind obedience. Recent cases of systemic leadership breakdowns are scrutinized, revealing how these lapses can foster environments where illegal and immoral actions flourish. I discuss the emotional rollercoaster faced by both staff and inmates during crises and why intervention is as crucial as physical action in preventing escalation.  What It's Like To Be...What's it like to be a Cattle Rancher? FBI Special Agent? Professional Santa? Find out!Listen on: Apple Podcasts SpotifyPepperBallFrom crowd control to cell extractions, the PepperBall system is the safe, non-lethal option.OMNIOMNI is cutting-edge software designed to track inmates and assets within your prison or jail. Command PresenceBringing prisons and jails the training they deserve!Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.Support the Show.Contact us: mike@theprisonofficer.comFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/ThePrisonOfficerTake care of each other and Be Safe behind those walls and fences!

In this compelling episode of the Performance Initiative Podcast, hosts Dr. Grant Cooper and Dr. Zinovi Mailer converse with Dr. Robert Cialdini, an eminent expert on persuasion and influence. Key topics include trustworthy appearances, the reciprocity principle, and practical persuasion techniques used by professionals such as CIA agents and waiters. The discussion includes fascinating examples such as Ethiopia's unexpected aid to Mexico and the impact of a simple piece of chocolate. Dr. Cialdini details the roles of genuine customer affection, scarcity, and social proof in decision-making, and highlights the significance of authority through Stanley Milgram's experiment. The conversation also explores strategies like Tupperware's sales methods, admitting weaknesses like Warren Buffett and Domino's Pizza, and the psychological impacts of scarcity, freedom of choice, and commitment consistency. The episode underscores the 'but you are free' technique, unified group identity, and cognitive dissonance while stressing the importance of authenticity in communication and tackling manipulation.(00:00) Introduction to the Rule of Reciprocation(02:58) The Power of Small Changes(03:51) The Ethiopia-Mexico Story(06:32) The Reagan Study on Reciprocity(09:52) The Impact of Small Gifts(24:44) The Benjamin Franklin Effect(31:26) The Rejection-Then-Retreat Technique(49:11) The Power of Social Proof(57:10) Breaking Through Pluralistic Ignorance(58:49) The Power of Social Proof(01:03:16) Authority and the Milgram Experiment(01:10:09) Trustworthiness in Communication(01:23:35) The Principle of Scarcity(01:32:03) Commitment and Consistency(01:43:53) The Principle of Unity(01:54:10) Conclusion and Final ThoughtsDr. Robert Cialdini is a renowned psychologist and professor emeritus of psychology and marketing at Arizona State University, widely recognized for his groundbreaking research in the field of social influence and persuasion. His seminal work, "Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion," has become a cornerstone in understanding how and why people comply with requests, uncovering key principles such as reciprocity, commitment and consistency, social proof, authority, liking, and scarcity. Cialdini's insights have had a profound impact on both academic research and practical applications in marketing, negotiation, and organizational behavior, making him a highly sought-after speaker and consultant for businesses and governments worldwide.#Influence #Persuasion #Cialdini #BehavioralScience #SocialPsychology #Reciprocity #SocialProof #Authority #Liking #CommitmentConsistency #Scarcity #Unity #Psychology #Marketing #BehavioralEconomics #RobertCialdini #PersuasiveTechniques #SocialInfluence #PerformanceInitiativePodcast

In 1961, the American psychologist Stanley Milgram began a series of controversial experiments on ‘obedience to authority'.His study aimed to show how ordinary people could be capable of committing evil acts, if ordered to do so. He wanted to understand the psychology behind genocide, telling the BBC: “How is it possible that ordinary people who were courteous and decent in everyday life, can act callously, inhumanely, without any limitations of conscience?”During the tests, participants were led to believe that they were assisting an unrelated experiment, in which they had to administer electric shocks to another person.These fake shocks gradually increased to levels that would have been harmful had they been real volunteers.Vicky Farncombe looks back at the experiment, using BBC archive.This programme includes original recordings of the experiments which listeners may find disturbing.(Photo: Stanley Milgram beside the shock generator. Credit: BBC)

This week on Hashtag History, we will be discussing the Milgram Experiment which was a series of psychological experiments conducted by psychologist Stanley Milgram in which he was testing the blind obedience of a participant to an authority figure. These were the experiments where one participant would serve in the role of a “teacher” while the other played a “student”. The teacher would ask the student a question and, if the student got the answer incorrect, the teacher was instructed to administer an electric shock to the student. With each incorrect answer, the shock levels were incrementally increased all the way from 15 volts to 450 (which is a fatal level). When you watch the video footage of these experiments, you can see that many of the “teacher” participants hesitate and even refuse to administer such intense shocks to the innocent “student”. But, shockingly (no pun intended), Milgram would find that - with the right amount of pressure applied to the “teacher” from an authoritative figure - every single participant was willing to go up to 300 volts, and a whopping 65% of the participants were willing to administer the maximum voltage levels of 450! Milgram, whose Jewish parents had immigrated to the United States during the first World War, was particularly inspired by Nazi Germany and how so many members of the Nazi Party obeyed authority so blindly when they murdered thousands upon thousands of innocent Jews during the Holocaust. As was revealed during the Nuremberg Trials, Nazi leader after Nazi leader professed that they only did what they did because they were following orders from authorities. The results of this test are pretty disturbing, to say the least. Lucky for us…they may not be true. For one, the device used to inflict electric shock upon innocent participants…wasn't actually real. And those innocent participants…they were members of Milgram's own staff. But that's not even the most surprising revelations about the Milgram study to surface in more recent years. Australian psychologist Gina Perry has reevaluated the experiment and found that much of the raw data does not reflect Milgram's final conclusion. In fact, that 65% number that we got earlier - the number of participants willing to blindly follow orders - is actually only based on a tiny fraction of those that ultimately participated in the test. Over 700 people took part in the Milgram Experiment, and yet Milgram's final results derive from 40 of those participants. Additionally, Milgram's gauge on “obedience” was skewed. Even if a participant refused to inflict electronic shock on the other participant upwards of twenty times before they complied, Milgram documented this as blindly obeying.  The problem with all of this is that Milgram's Experiment is still so widely known - inaccurately so - and still referred to as factual. Follow Hashtag History on Instagram @hashtaghistory_podcast for all of the pictures mentioned in this episode. Citations for all sources can be located on our website at www.HashtagHistory-Pod.com. You can also check out our website for super cute merch! You can now sponsor a cocktail and get a shout-out on air! Just head to www.buymeacoffee.com/hashtaghistory or head to the Support tab on our website! You can locate us on www.Patreon.com/hashtaghistory where you can donate $1 a month to our Books and Booze Supply. All of your support goes a long ways and we are endlessly grateful! To show our gratitude, all Patreon Supporters receive an automatic 15% OFF all merchandise in our merchandise store, a shoutout on social media, and stickers! THANKS FOR LISTENING! - Rachel and Leah --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/hashtaghistory/support

Tonight's episode is a tribute to Stanley Milgram—and a reminder to trust the experts, distinguished by their coats and clipboards.It includes:Gems, jewels, and avant-garde life advice to help you become who you are—if not someone far superiorAdvice from Ask a Sadist, LA's most feared agony columnistHow to use meditation for dominance and revengeTwo Bite-Sized Erotic Thrillers:A rogue behavioral science experiment that punishes bad tasteA dark love triangle of cults, wine, drugs, graffiti, karaoke, shock humor, transgressive literature, and abysmal communication...and more!CW: Emotional abuse, drug abuse, cynical and dubious life advice, hate, misery, various forms of sex and violence, severe depression, suicide.Emerson Dameron bears sole responsibility for the content of this show. If you'd rather skip this one, it's all good. Take care of yourself.Music by Mr. Pancakes, Chris Rogers, and Emerson Dameron.Emerson Dameron's Medicated Minutes is a production of Emerson Dameron and KCHUNG.Donate to KCHUNG now—while you're thinking about it.http://kchungradio.org/donateSupport the show

(0:00) Intro(1:02) About the podcast sponsor: The American College of Governance Counsel.(1:49) Start of interview. (2:37) Katherine Henderson's "origin story."(5:05) Amy Simmerman's "origin story."(8:02) The origin and focus of their Delaware Corporate Law and Litigation Year in Review.(9:14) Caseload of Delaware Court of Chancery judges.(12:51) Cases involving director oversight duties ("Caremark duties"). Reference to the Blue Bell case (2019). "Mission critical risk areas." Reference to Section 220 Books and Records Demands.(19:56) Duty of Oversight Applies to Officers (McDonald's case). Dismissal of case against directors (McDonald's II).(23:13) Controlling Stockholders and conflicts of interest. (DE reconsiders scope of the MFW Doctrine in Match.com case)(24:57) Distinctions between public and private company litigation. Reference to the NEA vs Rich case.(30:36) On Delaware vs other states. Reference to the TripAdvisor case (Delaware company seeking to reincorporate in NV).(36:55)  Innovations in AI Governance. The example of Anthropic AI (use of PBCs and LTBT).(43:24) On shareholder activism and validity of stockholder agreement-based restrictions over corporate governance matters (Moelis case).(45:13) Securities claims on misleading risk disclosures.(46:55) What are the 1-3 books that have greatly influenced your life: Amy:Obedience to Authority by Stanley Milgram (1974)Steppenwolf by Herman Hesse (1927)Katherine:The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan (1963)(48:02) Who were their mentors, and what they learned from them.(49:00) Quotes they think of often or live their life by.(49:52) An unusual habit or an absurd thing that they love.(50:35)  The living person they most admire.__Katherine Henderson and Amy Simmerman are partners at the law firm Wilson Sonsini Goorich & Rosati.  You can follow Evan on social media at:Twitter: @evanepsteinLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/ Substack: https://evanepstein.substack.com/__You can join as a Patron of the Boardroom Governance Podcast at:Patreon: patreon.com/BoardroomGovernancePod__Music/Soundtrack (found via Free Music Archive): Seeing The Future by Dexter Britain is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

La situación de ELDT es bastante crítica a día de hoy. Ayuda a que El libro de Tobias pueda continuar en Marzo: https://www.paypal.com/pools/c/91liJSURk5 El experimento Milgram fue un estudio de psicología social que llevó a cabo Stanley Milgram, psicólogo de la Universidad de Yale para estudiar el comportamiento de una persona para obedecer a las órdenes de la autoridad, aunque éstas entren en conflicto con su conciencia personal. Este experimento comenzó en julio de 1961, tres meses después de que Adolf Eichmann (alto cargo del régimen nazi durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial) fuera juzgado y sentenciado a muerte en Jerusalén, por crímenes contra la humanidad. Durante el juicio, Eichmann argumentó en su defensa que sólo cumplía órdenes. Canciones: • “Empty Walls" de Serj Tankian • “Lie Lie Lie” de Serj Tankian Narración: Asier Menéndez Marín Diseño logo Podcast: albacanodesigns (Alba Cano) Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

La desobediencia se produce cuando la presión que tienes en tu entorno te hace difícil o imposible seguir callado ante algo que consideras ilógico. A veces incluso, dan lugar a revoluciones. ¿De dónde viene ese deseo de desobediencia? ¿Por qué se produce? Vamos a ahondar sobre ello y las causas. ¿Por qué desobedecemos? La psicología de la desobediencia La desobediencia es una conducta que implica no cumplir con las normas o las órdenes que se nos imponen. Aunque suele tener una connotación negativa, la desobediencia también puede ser una forma de expresar nuestra libertad, nuestra personalidad y nuestros valores. ¿Qué factores influyen en la desobediencia? ¿Qué consecuencias tiene para el individuo y la sociedad? ¿Qué papel juega la educación en el desarrollo de la desobediencia? Estas son algunas de las cuestiones que la psicología ha intentado responder a lo largo de la historia. Los factores de la desobediencia La desobediencia no es una conducta homogénea ni estática, sino que varía según el contexto, el momento y la persona. Algunos de los factores que pueden influir en la desobediencia son: - El tipo de norma o de orden. No es lo mismo desobedecer una norma legal que una norma moral, o una orden arbitraria que una orden razonable. Según el psicólogo Lawrence Kohlberg, existen diferentes niveles de desarrollo moral, que van desde el acatamiento de las normas por miedo al castigo hasta el cuestionamiento de las normas por principios éticos universales. Así, la desobediencia puede ser más o menos justificada según el nivel moral de la persona y la naturaleza de la norma o la orden. - El grado de autoridad. La autoridad es la capacidad de influir en el comportamiento de los demás mediante el uso de la fuerza, el poder o el prestigio. La autoridad puede ser legítima o ilegítima, y puede ser aceptada o rechazada por los subordinados. El psicólogo Stanley Milgram realizó un famoso experimento en el que demostró que la mayoría de las personas eran capaces de infligir dolor a otra persona si se lo ordenaba una autoridad aparentemente legítima. Sin embargo, también encontró que algunos sujetos se negaban a obedecer, sobre todo si la autoridad era débil, inconsistente o ausente. - El grado de conformidad. La conformidad es la tendencia a adaptar nuestro comportamiento, nuestras actitudes y nuestras creencias a las de los demás, sobre todo a las de nuestro grupo de referencia. La conformidad puede tener efectos positivos, como facilitar la cohesión y la cooperación, pero también puede tener efectos negativos, como inhibir la creatividad y la crítica. El psicólogo Solomon Asch realizó otro experimento clásico en el que mostró que la mayoría de las personas se dejaban influir por la opinión mayoritaria, incluso cuando era claramente errónea. No obstante, también halló que algunos individuos se atrevían a discrepar, sobre todo si tenían apoyo de otros disidentes. Las consecuencias de la desobediencia La desobediencia puede tener consecuencias tanto para el individuo como para la sociedad. Algunas de estas consecuencias son: - Para el individuo. La desobediencia puede suponer un riesgo de sufrir sanciones, represalias o rechazo por parte de la autoridad o del grupo. Sin embargo, también puede ser una fuente de satisfacción, autoestima y reconocimiento, al permitir al individuo afirmar su identidad, defender sus derechos y expresar sus ideas. La desobediencia puede favorecer el desarrollo de habilidades como el pensamiento crítico, la creatividad y la resiliencia. - Para la sociedad. La desobediencia puede generar conflictos, inestabilidad o violencia, al romper el orden establecido y desafiar a la autoridad o al grupo. No obstante, también puede ser un motor de cambio, de progreso y de justicia, al cuestionar las normas injustas, denunciar las situaciones de opresión y proponer alternativas más democráticas y solidarias. La desobediencia puede contribuir al avance de la ciencia, el arte y la cultura. El papel de la educación en la desobediencia La educación es un factor clave en el desarrollo de la desobediencia, ya que puede fomentarla o reprimirla, según el estilo educativo que se adopte. Algunas de las características de la educación que pueden influir en la desobediencia son: - El tipo de disciplina. La disciplina es el conjunto de normas y de medidas que se aplican para regular el comportamiento de los educandos. La disciplina puede ser autoritaria, permisiva o democrática, según el grado de control, de participación y de negociación que se establezca. La disciplina autoritaria puede generar obediencia ciega, rebeldía o sumisión, mientras que la disciplina permisiva puede generar indiferencia, irresponsabilidad o dependencia. La disciplina democrática puede generar obediencia razonada, autonomía o cooperación. - El tipo de motivación. La motivación es el conjunto de factores que impulsan y orientan la conducta de los educandos. La motivación puede ser extrínseca o intrínseca, según el origen y el valor de los incentivos que se ofrecen. La motivación extrínseca se basa en recompensas o castigos externos, que pueden aumentar el rendimiento pero también disminuir el interés y la creatividad. La motivación intrínseca se basa en el placer o el desafío de la actividad en sí misma, que pueden mejorar el aprendizaje pero también generar conflicto con las expectativas sociales. - El tipo de aprendizaje. El aprendizaje es el proceso por el que los educandos adquieren conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes. El aprendizaje puede ser memorístico o significativo, según el grado de comprensión, de aplicación y de reflexión que se promueva. El aprendizaje memorístico se centra en la repetición y la reproducción de la información, que pueden facilitar el éxito académico pero también limitar el pensamiento crítico y la innovación. El aprendizaje significativo se enfoca en la construcción y la transformación de la información, que pueden potenciar el desarrollo cognitivo pero también provocar la desobediencia a las verdades establecidas. Conclusión La desobediencia es una conducta compleja y ambivalente, que puede tener aspectos positivos y negativos, según el contexto, el momento y la persona. La psicología ha estudiado los factores, las consecuencias y el papel de la educación en la desobediencia, con el fin de comprender mejor este fenómeno y de orientar su desarrollo hacia fines más éticos y sociales. La desobediencia puede ser una forma de ejercer nuestra libertad, nuestra personalidad y nuestros valores, siempre que se haga con responsabilidad, con respeto y con diálogo. Otros temas en el programa: 28:50 La reinvención de la Ciencia 49:15 Ikigai, una filosofía de vida 1:01:52 7 Tesoros de leyenda No soy un serial killer - Capítulo 11 Puedes leer más y comentar en mi web, en el enlace directo: https://luisbermejo.com/desobediencia-zz-podcast-05x24/ Puedes encontrarme y comentar o enviar tu mensaje o preguntar en: WhatsApp: +34 613031122 Paypal: https://paypal.me/Bermejo Bizum: +34613031122 Web: https://luisbermejo.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ZZPodcast/ X (twitters): https://x.com/LuisBermejo y https://x.com/zz_podcast Instagrams: https://www.instagram.com/luisbermejo/ y https://www.instagram.com/zz_podcast/ Canal Telegram: https://t.me/ZZ_Podcast Canal WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va89ttE6buMPHIIure1H Grupo Signal: https://signal.group/#CjQKIHTVyCK430A0dRu_O55cdjRQzmE1qIk36tCdsHHXgYveEhCuPeJhP3PoAqEpKurq_mAc Grupo Whatsapp: https://chat.whatsapp.com/FQadHkgRn00BzSbZzhNviThttps://chat.whatsapp.com/BNHYlv0p0XX7K4YOrOLei0

Todas las sociedades convergen en siete principios fundamentales: ama a tu familia, ayuda a tu grupo, devuelve los favores, sé valiente, obedece a la autoridad, sé justo y respeta la propiedad de los otros. Así lo documenta el antropólogo Oliver Scott Curry. Las reglas morales fortalecen la cooperación intragrupal, levantando barreras con los pueblos vecinos. Estamos darwinianamente diseñados para trabajar con la tribu. El psiquiatra Pablo Malo analiza nuestra mente primitiva en Los peligros de la moralidad. Kapital es posible gracias a sus colaboradores: El mundo de las criptomonedas intimida a muchos inversores y Criptan te facilita el acceso desmitificando el activo y simplificando el uso. Yo, como usuario de la app, estoy muy satisfecho con la experiencia. Criptan es una fintech española que cubre todas las partes de una estrategia financiera: el ahorro, la inversión y también el gasto. En una misma plataforma, custodias tus criptomonedas, con rentabilidades que pueden llegar al 8%, para luego consumir con tu propia tarjeta de débito. Utiliza el código KAPITAL durante el registro para obtener beneficios extra en todas tus cuentas. Más información en Criptan.com. Tú dinero, tú decides. ¿Llevas meses siguiendo los contenidos de Kapital y tienes ya ganas de operar tu propia cartera de valores? Trade Republic es entonces el bróker para dar ese salto. Las operaciones se ejecutan allí de forma simple, en una plataforma transparente con millones de usuarios en toda Europa. Los precios son siempre claros, pudiendo invertir en acciones, bonos y fondos ETF de manera fraccionada y desde tan solo 1 euro. Trade Republic te ofrece un amplio catálogo de productos financieros para que automatices las inversiones en un plan de ahorro único. Invertir hecho sencillo. Índice: 2.00. El origen de la moralidad. 11.45. Deshumanizar antes de aniquilar. 23.39. «Ha ocurrido y, por consiguiente, puede volver a ocurrir». 30.10. Cómo empezar un movimiento. 39.50. This claim is disputed by theology experts. 52.09. El irracional optimismo de Pinker. 56.05. Asusta la falta de empatía de Hillary. 1.04.28. Instituciones controlan instintos maladaptados. 1.12.30. La naturaleza asesina del hombre. 1.22.58. El tuit de Pérez-Reverte. 1.27.28. La miopía del heroísmo. 1.30.46. Netanyahu en el podcast de Lex. 1.31.46. Toda la psicología es evolutiva. 1.37.21. Postureo moral en redes. 1.41.54. El rigor científico de Darwin. 1.43.01. Lecciones vitales de un psiquiatra. Apuntes: Los peligros de la moralidad. Pablo Malo. Evolución y neurociencias. Pablo Malo. Sapiens. Yuval Noah Harari. Si esto es un hombre. Primo Levi. Obedience to authority. Stanley Milgram. A study of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison. Philip Zimbardo. Google's ideological echo chamber. James Damore. The ape that understood the universe. Steve Stewart-Williams. La tabla rasa. Steven Pinker. How the mind works. Steven Pinker. La mente de los justos. Jonathan Haidt. El origen de las especias. Charles Darwin.

Esta semana os proponemos un viaje a los rincones más oscuros de la psique humana. Hablaremos de los controvertidos experimentos realizados por Stanley Milgram (entre ellos, 'electrocutar' personas para saber cómo reaccionamos los humanos a la autoridad) del extraño panteón de los cerebros, del proyecto MK Ultra y mucho más. No te pierdas 'La Semilla del Diablo en Castilla-La Mancha'. Temporada completa ya disponible: https://bit.ly/3q57yqN Si has disfrutado con este programa, compártelo en redes sociales y participa dejando tu comentario: - YouTube: https://cutt.ly/wORVJYY - Twitter: https://cutt.ly/9GUvgov - Instagram: https://cutt.ly/yGUvlV8 - Facebook: https://cutt.ly/NGUvnlK Dirige y presenta: Jesús Ortega

Bạn đã bao giờ nghe đến cái tên Stanley Milgram chưa? Ông ấy là một nhà tâm lý học xã hội người Mỹ, ông được mọi người biết đến bởi cuộc thí nghiệm tâm lý vào năm 1961 nhằm tìm hiểu xem sự tuân thủ mệnh lệnh của con người và bản chất của cái ác. Điều đặc biệt ở cuộc thí nghiệm này là, mặc dù những người tham gia thử nghiệm không hề có ai bị thiệt mạng, nhưng nó vẫn bị mang tiếng là thí nghiệm ‘'vô nhân tính'' nhất trong lịch sử loài người. Trong video này, cùng khám phá những tội ác kinh hoàng cho đến chân tướng và cuối cùng là sự tuyệt vọng qua bài viết “Thí nghiệm tâm lý gây sốc nhất trong lịch sử Tâm Lý Học” của tác giả David Vu đăng tải trên website Spiderum. Hy vọng các bạn có thể bình tĩnh, kiên nhẫn xem hết video, sau đó hãy bình luận cho chúng mình biết suy nghĩ của các bạn về thí nghiệm này nhé. __ Tủ sách hoành tráng của Spiderum: https://shope.ee/6KbpEZS9D2 Các đầu sách bạn có thể quan tâm: - Người trong muôn nghề - Định hướng nghề nghiệp toàn diện: https://shope.ee/AURO9YQc3A - Người trong muôn nghề: Ngành IT có gì?: https://shope.ee/9pBhMKT9Oy - Người trong muôn nghề: Ngành Kinh tế có gì? - Tập 1: https://shope.ee/9UYqxiUQ4w - Người trong muôn nghề: Ngành Kinh tế có gì? - Tập 2: https://shope.ee/9KFQlPV3Pv - Người trong muôn nghề: Ngành Sáng tạo - Nghệ thuật có gì?: https://shope.ee/9zV7YdSW47 - Người trong muôn nghề: Ngành Xã hội - Nhân văn có gì?: https://shope.ee/5pfYayiNWK - Mùi mẹ - Món quà dành tặng người phụ nữ yêu thương: https://shope.ee/6AIOzah6qU - DevUP - Phát triển toàn diện sự nghiệp lập trình viên: https://shope.ee/9esHA1Tmjx - Seneca: Những Bức Thư Đạo Đức – Chủ Nghĩa Khắc Kỷ Trong Đời Sống - Tập 1: https://shope.ee/6zrW08ngb2 - Seneca: Những Bức Thư Đạo Đức – Chủ Nghĩa Khắc Kỷ Trong Đời Sống - Tập 2: https://shope.ee/A9oXkwRsj8 - Mở khóa thương mại điện tử Việt Nam: https://shope.ee/5V2iCMjeCI - Doing good better - Làm việc thiện đúng cách: https://shope.ee/6KbpBtgTVV - Động lực nội tại - Làm sao để yêu công việc và đạt đến thành công: https://shope.ee/6UvFOCfqAW - Bước ra thế giới: Cẩm nang du học và săn học bổng: https://shope.ee/5fM8Ofj0rJ - Chuyện người chuyện ngỗng (Vũ Hoàng Long): https://shope.ee/4AXKcUjKAQ __ Hóng các cuộc hội thoại thú vị, nhiều kiến thức bổ ích trên kênh Talk Sâu: https://b.link/talksau Lắng nghe những câu chuyện về thế giới nghề nghiệp cùng podcast Người Trong Muôn Nghề: https://b.link/NTMN-Podcast ______________ Bài viết: Thí nghiệm tâm lý gây sốc nhất trong lịch sử Tâm Lý Học Được viết bởi: David Vu Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Thi-ngh... ______________ Giọng đọc: Pinkdot Editor: Tê ______________ Bản quyền video: Spiderum Bản quyền nhạc: Youtube Audio Library, Epidemic Sound ______________ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/spiderum/support

Mark Granovetter has made and remade our understanding of social networks, social theory, collective action, and economic sociology, making and remaking our world in the process. It would not be hyperbole to say that few living scholars have had the influence of Mark Granovetter.  Origins Podcast WebsiteFlourishing Commons NewsletterShow Notes:Attorney for the Damned by John A. Farrell (9:00)Interest in world history (10:00)A History of the Modern World (11:00)Why are there revolutions? (12:00)Philosophy of science (13:00)Carl Hempel (13:00)What does it mean to explain in science? Talcott Parsons (15:00)BF Skinner (16:00)A philosophy of asking questions (17:00)"The function of general laws in history" (18:00)Universal peeking out from the particular (20:00)Max Weber (23:00)Norbert Weiner (30:00)The Strength of Weak Ties (30:00)The Great Fear of 1789  by Georges Lefebvre (31:00)Harrison White (33:00)Anatol Rapoport (37:00)Stanley Milgram (40:30)Danielle Allen (43:00)Threshold analysis (45:00)Lightning round (54:00)Book: Economy and Society by Max WeberPassion: anywhere asking questions that expand youHeart Sing: working on new book and teachingScrewed up: life balanceFind Mark online:https://sociology.stanford.edu/people/mark-granovetter'Five-Cut Fridays' five-song music playlist series  Mark's playlistLogo artwork by Cristina GonzalezMusic by swelo on all streaming platforms or @swelomusic on social media

¡Vótame en los Premios iVoox 2023! Stanley Milgram fue un psicólogo social estadounidense conocido por sus controversiales experimentos sobre la obediencia a la autoridad. En la década de 1960, Milgram realizó una serie de experimentos en la Universidad de Yale en los que midió la disposición de los participantes para obedecer órdenes que conllevaran dañar a otros. Los sujetos creían que estaban participando en un estudio sobre memoria y aprendizaje, cuando en realidad estaban evaluando su obediencia a una figura de autoridad. Sorprendentemente, la gran mayoría obedeció las órdenes, incluso cuando estas implicaban infligir choques eléctricos aparentemente dolorosos. Los experimentos de Milgram revelaron hasta qué punto las personas pueden actuar en contra de su conciencia por obediencia a una autoridad. Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

durée : 00:04:06 - Le Biais de Lionel Naccache - par : Lionel Naccache - Le carnage du Hamas en Israël remet en question l'idée d'une communauté humaine universelle. Selon les neurosciences, plusieurs processus peuvent amener à une telle violence, démontrés par les expériences sur l'obéissance de Stanley Milgram ou encore la théorie de déshumanisation.

Esta é a segunda e última parte do episódio duplo sobre a edição 2023 do prêmio IgNobel, trazendo as categorias Medicina, Nutrição, Educação, Psicologia e Física.Confira no papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.> OUÇA (39min 55s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAAprofunde-se de vez: garantimos conhecimento com profundidade e diversidade, para se tornar um profissional em T - incluindo programação, front-end, data science, devops, ux & design, mobile, inovação & gestão.Navegue sua carreira: são mais de 1300 cursos e novos lançamentos toda semana, além de atualizações e melhorias constantes.Conteúdo imersivo: faça parte de uma comunidade de apaixonados por tudo que é digital. Mergulhe na comunidade Alura.Aproveite o desconto para ouvintes Naruhodo no link:https://bit.ly/naruhodo_alura*PRÊMIO DE MEDICINA [EUA, CANADÁ, MACEDÔNIA, IRÃ, VIETNÃ]Christine Pham, Bobak Hedayati, Kiana Hashemi, Ella Csuka, Tiana Mamaghani, Margit Juhasz, Jamie Wikenheiser e Natasha Mesinkovska, por usar cadáveres para explorar se há o mesmo número de pelos em cada uma das duas narinas de uma pessoa.REFERENCE: “The Quantification and Measurement of Nasal Hairs in a Cadaveric Population,” Christine Pham, Bobak Hedayati, Kiana Hashemi, Ella Csuka, Margit Juhasz, and Natasha Atanaskova Mesinkovska, Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 83, no. 6, 2020, pp. AB202-AB202. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.902PRÊMIO DE NUTRIÇÃO [JAPÃO]Homei Miyashita e Hiromi Nakamura, por experimentos para determinar como hashis eletrificados e canudos podem alterar o sabor dos alimentos.REFERENCE: “Augmented Gustation Using Electricity,” Hiromi Nakamura and Homei Miyashita, Proceedings of the 2nd Augmented Human International Conference, March 2011, article 34. doi.org/10.1145/1959826.1959860PRÊMIO DE EDUCAÇÃO [CHINA, CANADÁ, REINO UNIDO, HOLANDA, IRLANDA, EUA, JAPÃO]Katy Tam, Cyanea Poon, Victoria Hui, Wijnand van Tilburg, Christy Wong, Vivian Kwong, Gigi Yuen e Christian Chan, por estudar metodicamente o tédio de professores e estudantes.REFERENCE: “Boredom Begets Boredom: An Experience Sampling Study on the Impact of Teacher Boredom on Student Boredom and Motivation,” Katy Y.Y. Tam, Cyanea Y. S. Poon, Victoria K.Y. Hui, Christy Y. F. Wong, Vivian W.Y. Kwong, Gigi W.C. Yuen, Christian S. Chan, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 90, no. S1, June 2020, pp. 124-137. doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12549REFERENCE: “Whatever Will Bore, Will Bore: The Mere Anticipation of Boredom Exacerbates its Occurrence in Lectures,” Katy Y.Y. Tam, Wijnand A.P. Van Tilburg, Christian S. Chan, British Journal of Educational Psychology, epub 2022. doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12549PRÊMIO DE PSICOLOGIA [EUA]Stanley Milgram, Leonard Bickman e Lawrence Berkowitz por experimentos em uma rua da cidade para ver quantas pessoas param para olhar para cima quando veem estranhos olhando para cima.REFERENCE: “Note on the Drawing Power of Crowds of Different Size,” Stanley Milgram, Leonard Bickman, and Lawrence Berkowitz, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 13, no. 2, 1969, pp. 79-82. psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0028070PRÊMIO DE FÍSICA [ESPANHA, GALÍCIA, SUÍÇA, FRANÇA, REINO UNIDO]Bieito Fernández Castro, Marian Peña, Enrique Nogueira, Miguel Gilcoto, Esperanza Broullón, Antonio Comesaña, Damien Bouffard, Alberto C. Naveira Garabato e Beatriz Mouriño-Carballido, por medir até que ponto a mistura de água do oceano é afetada pela atividade sexual de anchovas.REFERENCE: “Intense Upper Ocean Mixing Due to Large Aggregations of Spawning Fish,” Bieito Fernández Castro, Marian Peña, Enrique Nogueira, Miguel Gilcoto, Esperanza Broullón, Antonio Comesaña, Damien Bouffard, Alberto C. Naveira Garabato, and Beatriz Mouriño-Carballido, Nature Geoscience, vol. 15, 2022, pp. 287–292. doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00916-3*REFERÊNCIASThe 33rd First Annual Ig Nobel Prize Ceremonyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9UQi0ORXv4Naruhodo #29 - O que é e como acontece o déjà vu?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsgpP0CWrZsNaruhodo #141 - Cheirar pum faz bem a saúde?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISe5ObqFjT0Naruhodo #375 - Por que cutucamos o nariz?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_iB-EHHh5gNaruhodo #384 - Por que tomamos choque quando encostamos em certas coisas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhKsqKRHwswNaruhodo #389 - Por que repetir palavras deixa elas estranhas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKN89pAb10UNaruhodo #397 - Por que ficamos entediados?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAZ9BPv_6O4Naruhodo #151 - Especial Prêmio Ig Nobel 2018 - Parte 1 de 2https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-151-especial-premio-ig-nobel-2018-parte-1-de-2/Naruhodo #152 - Especial Prêmio Ig Nobel 2018 - Parte 2 de 2https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-152-especial-premio-ig-nobel-2018-parte-2-de-2/Naruhodo #202 - Especial Prêmio Ig Nobel 2019 - Parte 1 de 2https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-202-especial-premio-ig-nobel-2019-parte-1-de-2/Naruhodo #203 - Especial Prêmio Ig Nobel 2019 - Parte 2 de 2https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-203-especial-premio-ig-nobel-2019-parte-2-de-2/Naruhodo #254 - Especial Prêmio Ig Nobel 2020 - Parte 1 de 2https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-254-especial-premio-ignobel-2020-parte-1-de-2/Naruhodo #255 - Especial Prêmio Ig Nobel 2020 - Parte 2 de 2https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-255-especial-premio-ignobel-2020-parte-2-de-2/Naruhodo #302 - Prêmio IgNobel 2021 - Parte 1 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tos9wQyGSTINaruhodo #303 - Prêmio IgNobel 2021 - Parte 2 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3QDkBx7_osNaruhodo #355 - Prêmio IgNobel 2022 - Parte 1 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIx5uHKgHLsNaruhodo #356 - Prêmio IgNobel 2022 - Parte 2 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIOVn1hDt8s*APOIE O NARUHODO PELA PLATAFORMA ORELO!Um aviso importantíssimo: o podcast Naruhodo agora está no Orelo: https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-oreloE é por meio dessa plataforma de apoio aos criadores de conteúdo que você ajuda o Naruhodo a se manter no ar.Você escolhe um valor de contribuição mensal e tem acesso a conteúdos exclusivos, conteúdos antecipados e vantagens especiais.Além disso, você pode ter acesso ao nosso grupo fechado no Telegram, e conversar comigo, com o Altay e com outros apoiadores.E não é só isso: toda vez que você ouvir ou fizer download de um episódio pelo Orelo, vai também estar pingando uns trocadinhos para o nosso projeto.Então, baixe agora mesmo o app Orelo no endereço Orelo.CC ou na sua loja de aplicativos e ajude a fortalecer o conhecimento científico.https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-orelo

The one and only Eric Peters from Eric Peters Autos drops by for his weekly visit. Eric always has an informed take on the latest developments in our journey through Bizarro World. The instant popularity of singer Oliver Anthony likely is in proportion to how deeply his message regarding the "Rich Men North of Richmond" resonates with the forgotten citizens of this nation. J.B. Shurk warns the elite that the economic troubles will come for them too. In that same vein, members of the educated class might be wise to pick up on the fact that many Americans have little reason to trust them. Jon Gabriel says the elites could use a lesson in humility. Article of the Day: If you're not familiar with psychologist Stanley Milgram's experiments, you should consider taking a closer look. Here's a great piece from Armando Simón on the relevance of Milgram's experiments today. Sponsors: Monticello College Life Saving Food  TMCP Nation Climbing Upward

Stanley Milgram was a social psychologist who wanted to test a theory about his upbringing and authority. Check out this episode that was lost, and re-recorded just for you! Check out diagnosingakiller.com :)Become a patreon member!Gold Medal Wine Club discount! -> https://www.pntrac.com/t/3-302314-293495-170534Lindt Chocolate discount -> https://www.pjtra.com/t/2-554597-293495-140704We love you, YOU ARE NOT ALONE!!! National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: (800) 273-8255The Trevor Project: (212) 695-8650 https://www.thetrevorproject.org

Join Alex and guest host Sophie Halliday as they chat about the historical and psychological impact of Stanley Milgram's famous experiments on obedience and social influence in Michael Almereyda's Experimenter (2015), the other historical psychology movie that came out that year. This biopic stars Peter Sarsgaard as the titular character, with Winona Ryder, Jim Gaffigan, and several other star appearances as participants in the obedience studies. This witty drama-comedy takes the audience into the creation and data collection of the shock studies, but also other social influence experiments Milgram conducted over his 30ish year career. There are so many fourth wall breaks, you feel like Milgram is talking directly to the audience, to get his side of the story that followed him throughout his career. Would you shock someone because the experiment — AND SCIENCE! — demanded it? Please leave your feedback on this post, the main site (cinemapsychpod.swanpsych.com), on Facebook (@CinPsyPod), or Twitter (@CinPsyPod). We'd love to hear from you! Don't forget to check out our Paypal link to contribute to this podcast and keep the lights on! Don't forget to check out our MERCH STORE for some great merch with our logo! Legal stuff: 1. All film clips are used under Section 107 of Title 17 U.S.C. (fair use; no copyright infringement is intended). 2. Intro and outro music by half.cool ("Gemini"). Used under license. 3. Film reel sound effect by bone666138. Used under license CC BY 3.0. 4. Additional music: "Et Voila". Used under license.

This is more of a rant than a book review and one in which we only read from a small portion of the book before making unrelated and tenuous assertions. If you are looking for slightly philosophical entertainment, here it is!

Leading social psychologist Jerry Burger joins Tim to talk about landmark experiments on human obedience conducted by Stanley Milgram, and how decades later Jerry did a similar study that only validated Milgram's earlier disturbing findings. Jerry describes his own research project in 2006 that re-affirmed some of the conclusions from a landmark obedience research project from 45 years earlier. Will people do what they're told even if it harms someone else? We find out. https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/shapingopinion/Jerry_Burger_auphonic.mp3 Any student of history knows that during World War II, the Nazis exterminated roughly 6 million Jews in the Holocaust. They did it in a number of horrific ways.  It all started with the creation of a system of concentration camps, staffed by obedient Nazi and German troops. The horrors that happened in those camps are well documented. In the post-war interrogations and trials of Nazi officers and other Germans involved in war crimes, one refrain kept coming up. “I was just following orders.” “I just did what I was told.” No one questioned. No one objected. Everyone obeyed. In 1961, an American psychologist at Yale named Stanley Milgram pondered a question. Could nations other than Germany conform to authority in the same way? Would Americans conform to authority in the same way, or would there be differences? So, he decided to conduct an experiment. He created a reason for test subjects to participate. The cover story was that this would be a learning project. He recruited 40 men between the ages of 20 and 50. Volunteer participants in the study were told that they would be paired up with another participant. They would be assigned to teach the other participant certain things, and then they would question the other participant. If that participant got an answer wrong, the volunteer teacher would deliver punishment in the form of electric shock. That's what these unsuspecting participants were told. What they didn't know was that they were the only ones in the study who didn't know what was going on. The person they were supposed to be teaching – the learner – was in on it. The volunteer teacher's fellow instructors were in on it. The only ones who didn't know that the electric shocks were fake was the person assigned to be the teacher, the person assigned to press the buttons to deliver those electric shocks. What Milgram wanted to find out was, how long would it be before the teacher in the study would stop and reject orders to punish his fellow participant. Jerry Burger is a psychologist and researcher who was intrigued by the Milgram experiment and would later conduct a similar one to compare his results with Milgram's. Links Jerry Burger Website More Shocking Results: New Research Replicates Milgram's Findings, American Psychological Association Four Decades After Milgram, We're Still Willing to Inflict Pain, New York Times How Would People Behave in Milgram's Experiment Today?, Behavioral Scientist About this Episode's Guest Jerry Burger Jerry Burger is Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Santa Clara University. As a scholar, he is best known for his work on the psychological processes underlying deplorable and inhumane acts like atrocities and genocide. His research in this area was the subject of a New York Times editorial and was featured in a 60-minute broadcast of ABC News' Primetime and in the Discovery Channel documentary, How Evil Are You? His presentations on this topic include an invited address before the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, France. Retirement has allowed Jerry to start what he thinks of as his second career as a fiction writer. His short stories have appeared in several literary magazines, including one selected for the Best American Mystery Stories 2020. He also has published a novel, The Shadows of 1915 (Golden Antelope Press) which examines the generational effects of the 1915 Arm...

Heather Grzych interviews podcaster and psychedelic expert Zach Leary about why such a high percentage of people are turning to psychedelics today to improve their wellbeing, and the importance of using these medicines with ritual and sacredness. Zach explains why your life changes after a psychedelic experience, and why integration is so important, whether you're using LSD, psilocybin from mushrooms, MDMA, ayahuasca or other natural or synthetic medicines in the psychedelic category. They discuss how the psychedelic movements actually led to modern Americans connecting with Indian sciences like yoga, meditation and Ayurveda, despite these medicines often being frowned upon in these communities. They also delve into how technology and AI is being used to recreate famous deceased teachers like Timothy Leary, Ram Dass, Alan Watts, etc.  Heather Grzych is the author of The Ayurvedic Guide to Fertility and the host of the Wisdom of the Body podcast. A board-certified Ayurvedic practitioner, she teaches the Regenerative Fertility Method to support future generations worldwide. Heather is on the board of directors for the National Ayurvedic Medical Association (NAMA) and has been a consultant for doctors, governments, and insurance companies. She offers virtual consultations and programs worldwide. www.heathergrzych.com   Zach Leary is a podcaster,  writer, cognitive dissident, yogi and psychedelic advocate. Growing up in Beverly Hills in the 1980s, he came to realise that the man who often took him to school in the morning and “tossed the ball” in the backyard with him, was not only one of the instigators of the counterculture movement of the 1960s, but also “had a front row seat for some of the most important cultural movements of the late twentieth century.” This led Zach to create a path for himself that's been rich with many different incarnations ranging from digital marketing ace for Apple to futurist to psychedelic integration specialist and advocate. Zach currently hosts The MAPS podcast and has in depth knowledge of psychedelic assisted facilitation, is a trained meditation teacher, a student of bhakti yoga, an IFS enthusiast and expert in the history of psychedelic culture and its many methodologies. Zach is also a facilitator at the Evolution Retreat Center in Negril, Jamaica. Evolution Retreats is a beautiful retreat center that does legal psilocybin retreats using the most modern and effective methodologies available. As an author, Zach's first book “And Now, The Work Begins – Psychedelics in the 21st Century and How to Use Them” will be published by SoundsTrue in late 2023. Books referenced: Obedience to Authority by Stanley Milgram, Ayurvedic Pharmacology and Therapeutic Uses of Medicinal Plants Dravyagunavignyan by Vaidya V.M. Gogte, Be Here Now by Ram Dass, and Zach's book in development about the history and modern use of psychedelics being used safely, wisely and effectively.  Connect with Heather: Instagram.com/heathergrzych Facebook.com/grzychheather   Read the first six pages of The Ayurvedic Guide to Fertility for FREE: https://www.heathergrzych.com   Connect with Heather to balance your health for your fertility: https://www.heathergrzych.com/book-online   This podcast is for educational and entertainment purposes only.

The investigation is finding out more and more strange things about Lighthouse. We hear what happens when people start to question what is happening. Catrin speaks with Erin who raised concerns about Lighthouse and was accused of being "a cynical little old witch". Meanwhile Lighthouse is getting increasingly obsessed with its critics and former members. What happens when a life coach takes over your life? Catrin Nye and her team expose control, intimidation and fear at a sinister life coaching company. Reporter: Catrin Nye Written by: Jamie Bartlett and Catrin Nye Producers: Osman Iqbal, Natalie Truswell, Ed Main & Jo Adnitt Researcher: Aisha Doherty Executive Producer: Ravin Sampat Sound Mixing: James Bradshaw Original Music by: Phil Channell Commissioner: Rhian Roberts Archive clips from Stanley Milgram, Solomon Asch Conformity experiment re-enactment, 1974: copyright Alexandra Milgram and Alexander Street.

This episode was inspired by reading Influence, The Psychology of Persuasion by Professor Robert Cialdini, who says certain triggers can influence human decisions almost automatically.  Trusting in authority is beneficial on many fronts. Too much blind trust, however, and we get a dictatorship. Not enough we end up with anarchy. Today, I'm referring to mindless obedience to authority. Automatic obedience to authority often occurs via chains of command - military, religion, academia, medicine… No one thinks to question it! Or at least it's not accepted or permissible to do so. For example in 1986, to protest shipments of arms by USA military to Nicaragua, three men laid down on railroad tracks. They informed the military of their intent three days prior… On the day of the shipment, the civilian train engineers were instructed by the military NOT to stop and ended up running a man over and severed both legs. The Institute of Medicine, which reports to the USA Congress, stated that hospital deaths from medical errors exceed all accidents… In the book, Medication Errors: Causes and Prevention, Temple University professors of pharmacy attribute mindless deference to their bosses as a major contributor. A physician wrote out a prescription for ear drops for an ear infection in the right ear. The ear drops were given in the anus, by the nurse. She blindly followed what she read on the bottle. She did not think critically about the fact that the doctor wrote “R ear”, which meant right ear, not REAR… This topic began to be important to me in the last few years. I could not for the life of me understand why so many intelligent people just blindly went along with the narratives - locking themselves inside, not going to church or temples, injecting untested and unproven experimental vaccines in their bodies and more. One of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. The procedure was that the participant was paired with another person and they drew lots to find out who would be the ‘learner' and who would be the ‘teacher.' The draw was fixed so that the participant was always the teacher, and the learner was one of Milgram's confederates (pretending to be a real participant). The learner was taken into a room and had electrodes attached to his arms, and the teacher and researcher went into a room next door that contained an electric shock generator and a row of switches marked from “15 volts (Slight Shock)” to “375 volts (Danger: Severe Shock)” to “450 volts (XXX)”. Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figure, even to the extent of killing an innocent human being. Obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up. People tend to obey orders from other people if they recognize their authority as morally right and/or legally based. This response to legitimate authority is learned in a variety of situations, for example in the family, school, and workplace. It's important to understand how obedience and compliance works, what healthy dissent is, and to look critically at each situation we're in. Make sure you're following authority that aligns with your own inner compass!  ~ ~ ~ If you're looking for a way to get empowered today... Here is one way, by listening to and learning to translate the massages from your 'vehicle' within which YOU reside: FREE Video Training: The Operator's Manual to Your Vehicle Abundant Blessings, Lou

On this edition of Parallax Views, Ramon Glazov, whose articles have been featured in such publications as Jacobin and Overland Magazine, returns to the program to discuss the problematic elements of political philosophers Hannah Arendt's famous "Banality of Evil" hypothesis born out SS-Obersturmbannführer Adolf Eichmann's trial in Jerusalem after the Holocaust. Among the topics covered in this conversation: - Ramon's interest in the topic and the classic cinematic thriller Boys from Brazil - Virulent antisemitic politics vs. the "Banality of Evil" hypothesis as an explanation for Eichmann's actions - Heidegger's Children: Hannah Arendt, Karl Lowith, Hans Jonas, and Herbert Marcuse by Richard Wolin; Arendt's relationship with the German philosopher and Nazi party member Maritn Heidegger; Arendt's identification with high German culture; her condescending views on Eastern European Jews; how did these things potentially inform Arendt's views on the Holocaust? - The question of deviance in understanding Eichmann; the concept of thoughtlessness in Arendt's "Banality of Evil" hypothesis ; the idea of the dark side of the Enlightenment; Horkheimer, Adorno, the Frankfurt School, and the Dialectic of the Enlightenment; the Enlightenment, modernity, and the Holocaust; - The question of whether or not Adolf Eichmann was a true believer or a functionary bureaucrat "desk murderer" who was "just following orders" - Bettina Stangneth's biography Eichmann Before Jerusalem: The Unexamined Life of a Mass Murderer - The myth and reality of Adolf Eichmann; Eichmann was in charge of logistics for the Holocaust and put on trial; did Eichmann seek to craft/present a specific image of himself at the trial?; - Eichmann, Immanuel Kant, and the Kant's categorical imperative; claims that Eichmann was "just doing his job" rather than a committed antisemite and political supporter of Nazism; the psychiatric examination of Eichmann and Eichmann as a fake or simulated neurotic - Eichmann's career in the SS as a flamboyant glory-hound who quickly rose up through the ranks; Eichmann's relationship with the Jewish people (specifically in Vienna, Austria) and his spying on Jewish communities as an SS officer; evidence of Eichmann's loyalty to the Nazi cause - Eichmann's study of Hebrew, his self-presentation as an expert in Hebrew, and his self-mythology claiming that he was born in Palestine (this is before the trial; he was actually a German Austrian); Eichmann's grandiose myth-making about himself - High-ranking Nazi official Herman Göring's comment at a trial that "This Wisliceny is just a little swine, who looks like a big one because Eichmann isn't here" in reference to SS officer Dieter Wisliceny and Eichmann's role in the Holocaust - Simon Wiesenthal and the rise of the Nazi hunters; false rumors about Eichmann being in the Middle East and stirring up Arab nationalists against Israel in the post-war period when he was really hiding out in Argentina - Eichmann's own myth making as indicative of someone who wasn't banal but cunning and knowing in his actions - While in Argentina Eichmann wrote a large amount of written materials justifying himself; examining Eichmann's Argentina papers and what they tell us about Eichmann before his trial; he attacks humanism and Kant in these papers despite later claiming to have been a Kantian led astray; Eichmann treats the Holocaust as being a justified military operation in these papers rather than a genocide - Eichmann wasn't non-philosophical; he was deeply interested in Heidegger; Eichmann's Black Notebooks and his views on "calculation" and modernity; Eichmann's view of modernity being a product of Jewish culture and the Holocaust as a "self-annihilation" - Eichmann, the Frankfurt School, Arendt, Romanticism, and the Enlightenment; differences and similarities between the left and right critiques of modernity, instrumentalization of reason, etc. - The consequences of the "Banality of Evil" hypothesis; the application of the "Banality of Evil" hypothesis to Colonialism; obfuscation of the deliberate actions taken by oppressors over oppressed group - Rwanda, Modernity, the "Banality of Evil", and the paradigms of evil and genocide - How Arendt's "Banality of Evil" hypothesis has impacted both Anglo-thinkers and Continental-thinkers in psychology and psychoanalysis; Stanley Milgram and the Milgram experiment; the problems with the Milgram experiment; - Slavoj Zizek and the Eichmann-ization of concept of the pervert in psychoanalytic thought; the Marquis de Sade and Lacan's essay "Kant With Sade" that appears after Eichmann's execution; the pervert as a functionary following directions from "the Big Other"; the pervert as the perfect conformist; pre-Eichmann trial views of the concept of the pervert and how they differ from the Eichmann-ized pervert; psycho-dynamics and the pervert as inherently conservative in the post-Eichmann trial period - A slight digression into the changing views about the Marquis de Sade over the years; the Marquis de Sade as the ancestor of 007 James Bond creator Ian Fleming - Hannah Arendt and her philosophical hero Socrates; Arendt's attempt to grapple with what constitutes thinking; Arendt and thought as the antidote to totalitarian atrocities; Socrates and the Thirty Tyrants; Socrates as a not particularly pro-democracy philosopher even in the narrower, ancient sense of the term; Socrates, Plato, and Xenophon; Socrates in Athens; The Trial of Socrates by I.F. Stone; the charge of impiety against Socrates and his execution - Are there real world consequences to examining the world and social phenomena through the lens of the "Banality of Evil" hypothesis; the "Banality of Evil" as downplaying the specific cultural racial bigotries/hatreds and their role in social phenomena; the "Banality of Evil" as an elitist hypothesis - The range of personalities that supported the Nazi cause; the movement was not just supported by philistine thugs but elements of the society's well-educated as well - And much, much more!

If you're a psychology nerd or always wanted to be, the premier episode of Season 3: Class of Cults is all for you. Allison gathers with two of her dearest friends, Chris from 80s High, who also happens to have a psychology degree, and Dr. Bart Abplanalp, noted forensic psychologist, to discuss what cults are, what types of cults exist, and all the ways in which every one of us is vulnerable to a cultic mindset through the manipulation of emotions and language.In order to illustrate this, we begin with a discussion on the Stanley Milgram Obedience Study and then venture on to Philip Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment and its impacts on humanity's views of authority, before talking about cognitive dissonance,  personality disorders, and a myriad of other ways groups of humans can assemble in dysfunctional and destructive ways.Hopefully this will set a firm foundation for the upcoming season chock full of education on all the cults and organizations that behave suspiciously like them. Arm yourself with knowledge!Additional Info:Sponsor: Local Hero Press: https://localheropress.com Book SourcesCults Inside Out by Rick Alan Rosshttps://www.amazon.com/Cults-Inside-Out-How-People-ebook/dp/B00OZR1QNOCultish: The Language of Fanaticism by Amanda Montell https://www.amazon.com/Cultish-Language-Fanaticism-Amanda-Montell/dp/0062993151Chris's Podcast, 80s High: https://the80shigh.podbean.com/Dr Bart's HORR-O Horror Movie Bingo Game: https://horr-o.com/Dr Bart's YouTube Page, Ask Dr Bart: https://www.youtube.com/user/bartpsy/videosMilgram Experiment Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experimentStanford Prison Experiment Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experimentShow Credits:Graphics -- Nathaniel Dickson: http://ndickson.comMusic -- Spencer Morelock, Ken DicksonDing Dong Darkness Time Media:Twitter: @dddarknesstimeInstagram: dddarknesstimeGmail: dddarknesstime@gmail.com

Law Fare and Super-hero Attorney, Leigh Dundas discusses the latest deffense ofour liberties and examines why human nature sometimes complies and obeys and obeys tyrannical authoritarian rules. From Monkey Pox to gun control and a look into human nature & obedience and the work of Stanley Milgram.