Podcast appearances and mentions of Stanley Milgram

En los años 60, el psicólogo Stanley Milgram puso a prueba la obediencia humana en un laboratorio. Invitó a participantes a administrar supuestas descargas eléctricas a otra persona cada vez que fallaba en una tarea. Aunque no eran reales los choques, muchos continuaron aplicando niveles cada vez más altos, solo porque una voz de autoridad les decía que siguieran. Este estudio demostró que personas comunes pueden acatar órdenes injustas incluso cuando creen que causan daño, cuestionando la idea de que solo “malos” cometen atrocidades. Y descubre más historias curiosas en el canal National Geographic y en Disney +. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Likez, commentez, obéissez : bienvenue dans la dictature la plus populaire du monde ! Conçus à l'origine pour connecter l'Humanité, les réseaux sociaux ont redessiné nos comportements jusqu'à devenir des outils de contrôle et de manipulation à l'échelle planétaire. Dans la première partie de cet épisode, Gaël et Geoffroy décryptent la fabrique du consentement 2.0 et dissèquent les rouages d'un modèle économique toxique qui capte notre attention pour mieux la vendre. De Facebook à TikTok, en passant par Instagram, ils plongent à la source d'un système façonné pour créer la dépendance et transformer les utilisateurs en cobayes.FacebookInstagramXwww.toutsavoir.frContact : tousparano@gmail.com

The Story Science Forgot: Why Psychotherapy Needs Narrative More Than Ever by Joel Blackstock LICSW-S MSW PIP no. 4135C-S | Dec 15, 2025 | 0 comments Joseph Campbell is arguably one of the most influential intellectuals of the twentieth century. If you have watched a Marvel movie or read a modern fantasy novel or sat in a screenwriter's workshop you have encountered his fingerprints. George Lucas explicitly credited Campbell's The Hero with a Thousand Faces as the structural backbone of Star Wars. Every major Hollywood studio has copies of his work floating around their development offices. Even filmmakers who actively deconstruct his monomyth model still have to be in conversation with Campbell to do so. You cannot escape him if you are telling stories in the Western tradition. But here is the thing about Joseph Campbell that we need to hold in our minds when we think about what psychology has become. He was a showman. He was a legitimate scholar but also someone who understood that the truth sometimes needs a little theatrical assistance. The Showman and the Bear Bones One of Campbell's favorite presentation techniques involved showing an image of ancient bear bones that were perhaps two million years old and discovered in a cave. The bones had been arranged in a particular way with pieces shoved back into the bear's mouth. Campbell would present this with his characteristic gravitas and explain that the ancients understood that nature must eat of itself. They knew that to take life is to participate in a cyclical loop of giving and receiving. The bear consuming itself was a ritual recognition that we are all food for something else. It is a beautiful interpretation. It is probably even partially true. We know through depth psychology and early anthropology that prehistoric humans were almost certainly trying to make meaning of existential realities. Ritual practices around death and consumption are well documented across cultures. Campbell was not fabricating this from nothing. But also come on Campbell. These are two million year old bones shoved in a hole. Maybe the jaw just collapsed that way. Maybe soil shifted. Maybe an animal disturbed them centuries after burial. He did not know. He could not know. And yet he presented it with the confidence of revealed truth. Here is why this matters. Campbell's influence is incalculable despite his methodological looseness. He told a story that resonated so deeply with something in the human psyche that it became the invisible architecture of our entire entertainment industry. He was not objectively right about those bear bones but he was pointing at something real about how humans make meaning. The story he told about that meaning making was more powerful than any peer reviewed paper could have been. We need to remember this when we think about psychotherapy and what it has become. The Dream I Had and the World I Found When I first entered the field of psychotherapy I had a fantasy. I thought I was going to be Joseph Campbell. I was going to find my way to someplace like Berkeley and immerse myself in the grand conversation between psychology and mythology and anthropology and philosophy. I imagined something like the Esalen Institute in the 1970s where Fritz Perls developed Gestalt therapy and where researchers and mystics and clinicians sat together in hot springs and argued about the nature of consciousness. Those places barely exist anymore. What I found instead was a competitive model built on H-indexes and impact factors. I found academic departments that had been siloed into increasingly narrow specializations. Each department defended its territorial boundaries against incursion from neighboring disciplines. The institute model where a psychologist might spend an afternoon talking to an anthropologist about ritual has been systematically dismantled. What we have instead are specialists who do not read outside their sub specialty and researchers whose entire careers depend on defending one narrow hypothesis. We have an incentive structure that actively punishes the kind of cross pollination that leads to genuine discovery. The Hollow Room: How the Biomedical Model Fails This is not just an academic inconvenience. It is a catastrophe for the human sciences and for the actual treatment of patients. There is a reason Freud stuck around. It is not because psychoanalysis was rigorously validated through randomized controlled trials. It is because as the science writer John Horgan observed old paradigms die only when better paradigms replace them. Freud lives on because science has not produced a theory of and therapy for the mind potent enough to render psychoanalysis obsolete once and for all. The biomedical model promised us a better story. It told us that humans are biological machines and that suffering is just a mechanical malfunction. It promised that if we could just find the right neurotransmitter or the right gene we could fix the machine. But look at what that looks like in practice. It looks like the 15 minute medication management appointment. A person comes in with their life falling apart. They are grieving a divorce or wrestling with the trauma of their childhood or facing a crisis of meaning. And the doctor looks at a checklist. They ask about sleep. They ask about appetite. They ask about energy levels. They treat the symptoms like check engine lights on a dashboard. They prescribe a pill to dim the lights and they send the person away. It looks like manualized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. This is the gold standard of evidence based treatment. But in the vacuum of a manual it becomes absurd. A patient might be crying about the loss of a child and a therapist who is strictly adhering to the protocol has to redirect them to the agenda for Module 3 which is identifying cognitive distortions. The model has no room for the tragedy of the situation. It only has room for the erroneous thought that the patient is having about the tragedy. The result is that by most measures we are not actually helping people more effectively than we were fifty years ago. To understand the depth of this failure, we must look at the “smoking gun” of the psychiatric establishment: the STAR*D study. For nearly two decades, this massive, taxpayer-funded study was held up as the irrefutable proof that the “medication merry-go-round” worked. It cost $35 million and was cited thousands of times to justify the idea that if a patient didn't get better on one antidepressant, you simply switched them to another, and then another. The study claimed a “cumulative remission rate” of 67%. It told us that two-thirds of people would be cured if they just complied with the protocol. This was a lie built on methodological quicksand. A forensic re-analysis of the data (Pigott et al., 2023) revealed that the researchers had inflated their success rates through a series of stunning methodological sleights of hand. The original design called for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) to be the primary outcome measure. But when that scale wasn't showing the numbers they wanted, investigators switched to a secondary, unblinded, self-report questionnaire (the QIDS-SR) which painted a rosier picture. Furthermore, the re-analysis exposed that hundreds of patients who dropped out due to side effects were excluded from the failure count, effectively scrubbing the negative data. Even worse, over 900 patients who didn't even meet the minimum severity for depression were included to boost the numbers. When the data was re-analyzed using the study's original criteria and including all participants, the cumulative remission rate plummeted from 67% to 35%. But the most damning statistic is the sustained recovery rate. Of the 4,041 patients who entered the trial, only a tiny fraction achieved remission and actually stayed well. When accounting for dropouts and relapses over the one-year follow-up period, a mere 108 patients achieved remission and stayed well without relapsing. That is a sustained recovery rate of 2.7%. If a heart surgery or cancer treatment had a failure rate of 97.3%, it would be abandoned. Yet, this study was championed by investigators with deep financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry, and the results were codified into clinical guidelines that still rule the profession today. This is the indictment: we have built an entire system of care on a statistical fabrication, prioritizing the protection of the model over the healing of the human. I have big problems with Freud. I have big problems with classical psychoanalysis. I am more of a Jungian. But here is what the depth psychologists understood that the biomedical model forgot. Humans are not just biological machines. We are meaning making creatures who navigate the world through story. When you take away our stories you do not make us more rational. You make us lost. The Flock of Dodos This separation of science from narrative has hurt the researchers too. In his book The Ghost Lab journalist Matt Hongoltz-Hetling uses the flock of dodos metaphor to describe this phenomenon. He argues that specialized creatures that are perfectly adapted to narrow environments become extinct when conditions change. Academic science has become a flock of dodos. A neuroscientist studies one particular brain region. A psychologist studies one particular therapeutic intervention. An anthropologist studies one particular culture. Nobody is allowed to step back and ask what all of this means together. When you silo information into separate academic disciplines instead of organizing it into a holistic understanding you kill the narratives that are already there. You cannot see the story until you step back far enough to recognize the pattern. Heidegger and the AI Bubble One of the primary functions of a subjective narrative in an objective field like psychotherapy is that it lets us start with things we consider self evident. These are things that do not need evidence because they are the ground upon which evidence stands. Things like humanity is important. Things like we contain multiplicities and conflicting parts. Things like consciousness is a mystery. The biomedical model has no way to accommodate these self evident truths because they are not measurable. You cannot run a randomized controlled trial on human dignity. Martin Heidegger understood this trajectory. He warned that science and technology were becoming self justifying systems that asked only whether something could be done and never whether it should be done. We are watching this play out right now with Large Language Models and Artificial Intelligence. The tech industry is boiling seawater and consuming enormous amounts of our remaining resources to build ever larger systems. As Ed Zitron has documented the current AI boom is likely a bubble that will crash and burn. It may leave us with a Google monopoly on Gemini that will not actually help anybody. Should we be doing this? Should we be fundamentally restructuring our economy around technology whose benefits are speculative at best? The Heideggerian answer is that we are not even capable of asking these questions properly because we have lost the narrative framework within which “should” makes sense. When everything is reduced to capability and efficiency the concept of values disappears. The Perennial and the Possible Can we just recognize that having a livable planet is probably a self evidencing goal? Can we recognize that having a psychotherapy willing to engage with perennial philosophy might be more valuable than another meta analysis demonstrating small effect sizes for manualized interventions? This is what I mean by reintroducing narrative. I do not mean replacing evidence with myth. I mean recognizing that the facts do not speak for themselves. Data requires interpretation. Interpretation requires a framework. And frameworks are stories about what matters. The story science forgot is the story of science itself. It is the story of how inquiry emerged from human communities trying to understand their world. We can recover this story. We can rebuild the connections that the academic silos have severed. The path is there. It always has been. We just need to be brave enough to walk it. The Exodus of the Sick If academic science has become a flock of dodos clinical practice has become something arguably worse. It has become a reenactment of the Milgram experiment where the system plays the role of the authority figure and the patient plays the victim. We often remember Stanley Milgram's famous 1961 study as a lesson about the capacity for evil but its deeper lesson was about the capacity for distance. When the subject had to physically touch the victim compliance with the order to harm them dropped to 30 percent. The White Coat only retained its authority when it created a buffer between the human actions and their consequences.   Modern psychotherapy has built a massive administrative White Coat that separates the healer from the healed. This is not just a metaphor. It is a structural reality that is actively driving patients out of the profession and into the arms of pseudoscience. The Bureaucracy as Trauma For a patient in crisis the Evidence Based system often functions as a machine of exclusion. A study on healthcare administrative burdens reveals that the psychological cost of navigating billing and insurance denials and intake forms acts as a friction that hits the most vulnerable the hardest. We ask trauma survivors to retell their stories to three different intake coordinators before they ever see a therapist. This process is itself retraumatizing. When they finally reach a provider they are often met with the biomedical gaze which is a checklist driven assessment that reduces their complex narrative of suffering to a code for billing. As the Australian Psychological Society has noted the chemical imbalance theory and the medicalization of distress have failed to reduce stigma and have instead left patients feeling defective and unheard. The result is a profound Low Trust environment. Theodore Porter in his book Trust in Numbers argues that we only rely on strict mechanical numbers when we do not trust people. We use the DSM and manualized protocols because insurers do not trust clinicians to judge and clinicians do not trust themselves to deviate. The Great Split: Why Research and Practice Are Divorcing This creates a fundamental schism that explains why the profession feels like it is cracking in half. On one side you have the academic researchers who are incentivized by grant funding and publication metrics. To get these rewards they must isolate variables and create reproducible manualized protocols. This means they must strip away the very thing that makes therapy work which is the messy and unrepeatable human relationship. On the other side you have the clinicians who are incentivized by patient outcomes. They are in the room with the messiness. They see that the manualized protocol fails the complex trauma patient so they improvise. They integrate. They use intuition. The academic looks at the clinician and sees a cowboy who ignores the data. The clinician looks at the academic and sees a bureaucrat who has never treated a suicidal patient. This is why the research is no longer informing the practice. We have created two different languages. The researcher speaks in p-values and population averages while the clinician speaks in case studies and individual breakthroughs. Why Pseudoscience Wins the Trust War This low trust environment creates a vacuum that wellness influencers are all too happy to fill. We often mock the public for turning to unverified supplements and TikTok diagnosticians and quantum mysticism. But we have to ask what these influencers are providing that we are not. They are providing narrative. They are providing connection. They are providing a. parasocial yes but still, High Trust experience. A recent analysis suggests that wellness fads thrive not because people are stupid but because the influencers offer a feeling of personal validation that the medical system denies. Even AI chatbots are now being described by users as more humane than doctors because the AI listens to the whole story without looking at a watch or a checklist. When a patient is told by a doctor that their pain is idiopathic or psychosomatic because it does not show up on a lab test and then an influencer tells them I see you and I believe you and here is a story about why this is happening the patient will choose the influencer every time. The trust gap drives them away from care that might actually help and toward solutions that feel good but do nothing. The Clinician's Moral Injury This leaves the ethical psychotherapist in a state of moral injury. We are forced to participate in a system that we know is alienating the very people we are trying to help. We are trained to value the therapeutic alliance or the bond of trust above all else yet we work in a system designed to sever it with paperwork and time limits and standardized protocols. We have to put down the White Coat of administrative distance. We have to stop hiding behind the Evidence Based label when that label is being used to deny the reality of the person in front of us. Proposals for a Unified Future If we want to stop this exodus and heal the split we need specific structural changes. We cannot just hope for better insurance reimbursement. We need to change what we consider valid science. First we must re-legitimize the systematic case study. For a century the detailed narrative of a single patient was the gold standard of learning. We replaced it with the aggregate data of the randomized controlled trial. We need to bring it back. We need journals that publish rigorous detailed accounts of what actually happens in the room when a patient gets better. Second we need to build open source repositories for clinical observation. Currently the wisdom of the field is locked behind for profit paywalls or lost in the private notes of isolated therapists. We need a Wikipedia of Clinical Practice where thousands of clinicians can document what they are seeing in real time. If ten thousand therapists report that somatic processing helps complex trauma that is a data set that rivals any RCT. Third we need to teach philosophy and narrative in graduate school again. We are training technicians when we should be training healers. A therapist who knows how to read a spreadsheet but does not know how to understand a story is useless to a human being in crisis. If we do not offer a therapy that is human and narrative and deeply relational we will continue to lose our patients to those who do even if what they are offering is a lie. The Mirror and the Map: Why Math is a Story We often treat mathematics as if it were the bedrock of reality itself. We act as though a p-value is a piece of the universe, like a rock or a proton. But we must remember that math is not the thing itself. It is a representation of the thing. It is a map, not the territory. It is a mirror, not the face. Theodore Porter's work in Trust in Numbers reminds us that we reach for these mirrors when we do not trust our own eyes. But the mirror is useless without someone to look into it and interpret the reflection. Data by itself is pointless. It is a pile of bricks without an architect. It requires interpretation to become meaning, and interpretation is fundamentally a narrative act. When we try our best to make a purely objective study, we are still telling a story. We are saying, “These numbers represent this phenomenon.” Then another researcher comes along, looks at the same numbers, and tells a different story: “No, they represent that.” This conflict isn't a failure of science; it is science. The Storytellers of Science The greatest breakthroughs in history did not come from people who just crunched numbers. They came from people who could see the story the numbers were trying to tell. These stories are really damn interesting, often stranger and more beautiful than fiction. Consider August Kekulé. He didn't discover the structure of the benzene molecule by staring at a spreadsheet. He discovered it by dreaming of a snake eating its own tail—the Ouroboros. His subjective, narrative brain provided the image that unlocked the objective chemical reality. The data was there, but it needed a myth to make it intelligible. Look at Quantum Physics. The raw math of quantum mechanics is cold and abstract. But when physicists like Erwin Schrödinger or Werner Heisenberg looked at that data, they saw a story about uncertainty, about cats that are both alive and dead, about a universe that only decides what it is when it is observed. They didn't just calculate; they interpreted. They told a story about reality that was so radical it changed how we understand existence. Even in psychology, the data of the “talking cure” was messy and anecdotal until Freud and Jung gave us the language of the Unconscious and the Archetype. Were they objectively “right” in every detail? No. But they gave us a framework—a story—that allowed us to navigate the chaos of the human mind. They provided the map that allowed us to enter the territory. The Final Integration We have spent the last fifty years trying to strip this storytelling capacity out of our profession in a misguided attempt to be taken seriously by the “hard” sciences. In doing so, we have thrown away our most powerful tool. The brain is a story-processing machine. To treat it with checklists and spreadsheets is to deny its fundamental nature. We need to be brave enough to pick up the mirror again. We need to be brave enough to look at the data—whether it's the 2.7% recovery rate of STAR*D or the trembling pupil of a trauma patient—and ask, “What is the story here?” The path forward isn't about choosing between science and narrative. It is about realizing that science is a narrative. It is the grandest, most complex, most rigorous story we have ever tried to tell. And it is time we started telling it properly again.   More @ https://gettherapybirmingham.com/

You may have heard of Stanley Milgram's controversial 1960s social psychology experiments that measured the willingness of participants to obey an authority figure. This week Alasdair Tremblay-Birchall joins us to challenge the traditional narrative of these experiments and blows the whole thing wide open! Are people inherently evil? Or is this even more controversial that we were led to believe? This is the second most voted for topic of Block 2025! This is a comedy/history podcast, the report begins at approximately 15:22 (though as always, we go off on tangents throughout the report).For all our important links: https://linktr.ee/dogoonpod Check out our other podcasts:Book Cheat: https://play.acast.com/s/book-cheatPrime Mates: https://play.acast.com/s/prime-mates/Listen Now: https://play.acast.com/s/listen-now/Who Knew It with Matt Stewart: https://play.acast.com/s/who-knew-it-with-matt-stewart/Jess Writes A Rom-Com: https://shows.acast.com/jess-writes-a-rom-comOur awesome theme song by Evan Munro-Smith and logo by Peader ThomasDo Go On acknowledges the traditional owners of the land we record on, the Wurundjeri people, in the Kulin nation. We pay our respects to elders, past and present. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Send us a textWelcome to today's between-the-seasons bonus episode, in which I explore the fascinating—and deeply challenging—findings of Stanley Milgram's famous Obedience to Authority experiments and consider what they reveal about human nature, authority, and morality from a biblical perspective.This post was originally made available as a special post for those who follow me on Patreon. patreon.com/JeremyMcCandlessMilgram's research highlights the unsettling reality of how easily people can obey authority figures, even to the point of causing harm to others. As Christians, these findings prompt us to reflect on humanity's inherent moral weakness, the biblical doctrine of original sin, and the importance of standing firm in God's truth when confronted with ethical dilemmas.We'll explore questions like:What do Milgram's experiments reveal about the human heart?How does this align with the Bible's teaching on original sin?How can Christians cultivate discernment and moral courage when pressured to conform?Study Notes for Today's EpisodeKey Themes:The Nature of Obedience: Milgram's research reveals humanity's tendency to conform to authority, even when it conflicts with personal conscience.Original Sin: This aligns with the biblical teaching that human nature is inherently flawed (Romans 5:12; Jeremiah 17:9).Moral Responsibility: Scripture emphasizes individual accountability for actions (Romans 14:12; Genesis 3).Resisting Sinful Authority: Christians are called to obey God over human leaders when moral conflict arises (Acts 5:29).Practical Takeaways:Cultivate a Biblically Informed Conscience: Regular study of Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16-17) and prayer help shape our moral compass.Rely on the Holy Spirit: God's Spirit empowers us to resist sinful authority and stand firm (Galatians 5:16).Lead by Example: Just as participants in Milgram's experiments were more likely to resist when others did, Christians are called to be salt and light (Matthew 5:13-16).Reflection Questions:How does understanding the doctrine of original sin help us make sense of Milgram's findings?Can you think of a time when you had to choose between following orders and doing what was right?How can you strengthen your moral courage in moments of ethical pressure?Thank you for joining metoday! As always, let's keep diving deeper into God's Word and applying its truth to the challenges of our modern world.BibliographyBiblical ReferencesRomans 5:12Romans 7:15Romans 8:13Catch On Fire PodcastsThis channel does a deep dive into the scriptures so as to teach what it means to be...Listen on: Apple Podcasts SpotifySupport the showTo listen to my monthly church history podcast, subscribe at; https://thehistoryofthechristianchurch.buzzsprout.com For an ad-free version of my podcasts plus the opportunity to enjoy hours of exclusive content and two bonus episodes a month whilst also helping keep the Bible Project Daily Podcast free for listeners everywhere support me at;|PatreonSupport me to continue making great content for listeners everywhere.https://thebibleproject.buzzsprout.com

Na década de 1960, Stanley Milgram conduziu um estudo psicológico notório sobre obediência à autoridade - visto, atualmente, como um experimento repleto de problemas éticos. Como foi esse experimento? Ele continua válido hoje?Confira o papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.>> OUÇA (58min 55s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*APOIO: INSIDERIlustríssima ouvinte, ilustríssimo ouvinte do Naruhodo, neste momento INSIDER, vou dar uma opinião polêmica.Preparado? Então, toma essa: calças jeans são desconfortáveis.Eu usei calças jeans por anos a fio. Mesmo sentindo desconforto. Aquele tecido grosso, pouco maleável e que retém muito calor.Porque eu sempre achei calça social muito coxinha - não combinava comigo.Mas os meus problemas acabaram. Eu conheci a Calça FutureForm da INSIDER.Ela é o meio-termo perfeito: visual elegante, conforto real, com bolso funcional e tecido que não precisa passar. Tem conforto de moletom e cara de calça de sair. Vai do trabalho ao rolê sem trocar de roupa.É ou não é a calça ideal?Então fica aqui meu convite: experimente INSIDER e aproveite o desconto de 15% para ouvintes do NARUHODO.Para isso, o jeito mais fácil é usar o endereço: creators.insiderstore.com.br/NARUHODO - o cupom NARUHODO será aplicado automaticamente no carrinho.INSIDER: inteligência em cada escolha. #InsiderStore*REFERÊNCIASObedience to Autority - Milgramhttps://www.psicopolis.com/psicopedia/boxpdf/milgram2.pdfThe Perils of Obediencehttps://bxscience.edu/ourpages/auto/2013/2/7/66623602/Milgram-Obedience.pdfRevisitando Milgram:https://content.myconnectsuite.com/api/documents/ea54446ef72741eeba17f1d994f16829.pdfBehaviorism's Impact on Advertising: Then and Nowhttps://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=journalismdiss#:~:text=In%201913%2C%20John%20B.,(Buckley%2C%201982%2C%20p.John B. Watson at J. Walter Thompson: The Legitimation of "Science" in Advertising https://www.jstor.org/stable/4188763Stanley Milgram papershttps://archives.yale.edu/repositories/12/resources/4865An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem https://www.jstor.org/stable/2786545?origin=crossrefA banalidade do mal entre o direito e a internet: o discurso de ódio a partir de uma releitura arendtiana nas redes de relacionamento socialhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/handle/1843/47862Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evilhttps://archive.org/details/arendt-hannah-eichmann-in-jerusalemZona de Interessehttps://www.adorocinema.com/filmes/filme-266159/Naruhodo #137 - O experimento da prisão de Stanford é uma fraude?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyTbX9jmMWMNaruhodo #242 - O experimento do Parque dos Ratos ainda é válido?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBI0twj0wD4Naruhodo #272 - Quais são os grandes desafios da psicologia no Brasil?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kxt23k6HCa0Naruhodo #304 - Como saber se uma pesquisa científica foi feita de forma ética?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-qrIWD_x2UNaruhodo #387 - Somos bons (ou maus) por natureza? - Parte 1 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fx37e0PUgY4Naruhodo #388 - Somos bons (ou maus) por natureza? - Parte 2 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwAEaMyfm0Q*APOIE O NARUHODO!O Altay e eu temos duas mensagens pra você.A primeira é: muito, muito obrigado pela sua audiência. Sem ela, o Naruhodo sequer teria sentido de existir. Você nos ajuda demais não só quando ouve, mas também quando espalha episódios para familiares, amigos - e, por que não?, inimigos.A segunda mensagem é: existe uma outra forma de apoiar o Naruhodo, a ciência e o pensamento científico - apoiando financeiramente o nosso projeto de podcast semanal independente, que só descansa no recesso do fim de ano.Manter o Naruhodo tem custos e despesas: servidores, domínio, pesquisa, produção, edição, atendimento, tempo... Enfim, muitas coisas para cobrir - e, algumas delas, em dólar.A gente sabe que nem todo mundo pode apoiar financeiramente. E tá tudo bem. Tente mandar um episódio para alguém que você conhece e acha que vai gostar.A gente sabe que alguns podem, mas não mensalmente. E tá tudo bem também. Você pode apoiar quando puder e cancelar quando quiser. O apoio mínimo é de 15 reais e pode ser feito pela plataforma ORELO ou pela plataforma APOIA-SE. Para quem está fora do Brasil, temos até a plataforma PATREON.É isso, gente. Estamos enfrentando um momento importante e você pode ajudar a combater o negacionismo e manter a chama da ciência acesa. Então, fica aqui o nosso convite: apóie o Naruhodo como puder.bit.ly/naruhodo-no-orelo

How do you think you would fair in an experiment that administered negative consequences for incorrect behavior or responses? Would you be able to follow your moral compass and avoid destructive obedience? Amy and Tim discuss the famous experiment conducted by Stanley Milgram in 1961 that sought to answer just these questions. Like Amy and Tim, you may be surprised (hopefully, I guess) by the results of the experiment - and if not, well let's never plan on meeting on a college campus!

In this gripping episode of Right On Radio, the host delves into the overwhelming flow of today's news, likening it to drinking from a fire hose. Despite the chaotic environment, this episode promises to cut through the noise and provide clarity on the topics that are often overlooked by mainstream and alternative media alike. The episode kicks off with a discussion on the "agentic state" in the context of AI and public administration, shedding light on the worrying developments in AI governance and how they might impact our lives. Drawing from Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments, the show explores the psychological conditioning that leads individuals to surrender personal responsibility in favor of executing authoritarian commands, a theme that's alarmingly relevant today. The host then turns to a largely unreported bombshell regarding the U.S. Justice Department's designation of Venezuela's leader Maduro as a terrorist, analyzing its implications for international politics and the 2020 election investigation. As the episode progresses, listeners are taken on a deep dive into the murky waters of "Obamagate" and "Hillarygate", with a particular focus on how seditious conspiracies defy statutes of limitations. The discussion offers an unprecedented perspective on how these political intrigues could eventually unfold in the courts. Tuning into the audience's pulse, the host also features a reflective segment comparing Psalms and invites listeners to engage in re-evaluating their own beliefs and truths amid the chaos. As a finale, a poignant song is dedicated to President Trump, serving as a message laden with political and personal nuance. This episode is an unmissable exploration for those seeking to connect the dots between AI advancements, political maneuvers, and the ever-unravelling global narrative. Stay informed, stay engaged, and prepare for a wild ride. Thank you for Listening to Right on Radio. Prayerfully consider supporting Right on Radio. Click Here for all links, Right on Community ROC, Podcast web links, Freebies, Products (healing mushrooms, EMP Protection) Social media, courses and more... https://linktr.ee/RightonRadio Live Right in the Real World! We talk God and Politics, Faith Based Broadcast News, views, Opinions and Attitudes We are Your News Now. Keep the Faith

Send us a textWe dive deep into the psychology of collective obedience during the COVID-19 pandemic, examining how fear, authority, and group dynamics influenced behavior on a massive scale. Michael Aponsis' paper "Six Feet of Separation from Reality" serves as our guide for understanding how societies fell in line with unprecedented uniformity.• The COVID-19 response characterized as a "global obedience experiment" where policies spread alongside the virus• Comparison to Stanley Milgram's obedience studies, with pandemic compliance driven by internal fear rather than direct commands• How fear served as the primary engine for compliance, creating visceral rather than rational responses• The transformation of science into "sacred science" where questioning became taboo• Matthias Desmet's concept of "mass formation" explaining how isolated, anxious populations gravitate toward unifying narratives• The shift from seeing obedience as following orders to "emotional obedience" where moral pressure drives compliance• The costs beyond restrictions: loss of intellectual humility, curiosity, and interpersonal trust• People reduced to potential threats rather than fellow humans, fundamentally changing social dynamics• The dangerous elevation of obedience as the highest virtue and questioning as harmful• Aponte's call to action: normalizing dissent, embracing nuance, and rebuilding tolerance for uncertaintyPlease check out Michael Aponte's "Obedient Nation" series on the Thinking to Think podcast for more insights on this vital topic.Support the show

Send us a textSeries: Obedient NationEpisode 1 of 5: The Psychology of ObedienceHosts:  Dr. Elias Quinn and Lyra Morgan We explore the startling capacity of ordinary people to obey authority figures, even when directed to perform acts that violate their personal conscience and moral codes.• Drawing from Michael Aponte's "The Shock Heard Around the World," we examine Milgram's famous obedience experiments• 65% of participants administered what they believed were potentially lethal shocks simply because an authority figure instructed them to continue• Three psychological mechanisms enable blind obedience: the agentic state, incremental compliance, and moral framing • These same forces operate in cults, political tribalism, and groupthink scenarios• The COVID-19 pandemic revealed similar patterns of compliance, social pressure, and suppression of dissent• Understanding these mechanisms within ourselves is the first step toward maintaining independent critical thinking• Cultivating awareness and discernment helps us resist harmful influence while holding true to our valuesSubscribe, like, and share this episode to help spread these important conversations about human psychology and critical thinking in today's complex world.Support the show

Pourquoi des individus ordinaires peuvent-ils commettre l'irréparable simplement parce qu'on le leur a demandé ? Cette question troublante est au cœur de l'expérience de Milgram, menée au début des années 1960 à Yale. Le psychologue américain Stanley Milgram voulait comprendre jusqu'où une personne ordinaire pouvait aller par simple obéissance à l'autorité.Le principe était simple mais redoutable : des volontaires devaient administrer des chocs électriques à une autre personne (complice de l'expérience) chaque fois qu'elle répondait mal à une question. Les chocs devenaient de plus en plus puissants, et pourtant, près de 65 % des participants ont obéi jusqu'au bout, infligeant des douleurs fictives extrêmes, simplement parce qu'un chercheur en blouse blanche leur disait de continuer.Mais ce que Milgram avait mis en lumière, ce n'était pas une cruauté innée, mais un mécanisme profondément humain : la délégation de responsabilité. Face à une autorité perçue comme légitime, beaucoup cessent de se voir comme les auteurs de leurs actes. Ils obéissent, et transfèrent le poids moral de leurs gestes à celui qui donne l'ordre.Soixante ans plus tard, des chercheurs belges de l'université de Gand ont voulu pousser l'analyse plus loin : que se passe-t-il concrètement dans notre cerveau quand nous obéissons ? Grâce à l'imagerie cérébrale, ils ont observé que lorsqu'un individu reçoit un ordre, l'activité dans les zones du cerveau liées à la prise de décision autonome et au jugement moral diminue significativement.En d'autres termes, le cerveau “se met en veille” sur le plan moral lorsqu'il obéit. Les chercheurs ont aussi noté une baisse de l'activation dans le cortex préfrontal, une région-clé impliquée dans le raisonnement éthique et la réflexion personnelle. Résultat : nous ne ressentons pas la même culpabilité que si nous avions agi de notre propre chef.Plus surprenant encore, les chercheurs ont constaté que le simple fait de recevoir un ordre rendait les participants moins sensibles à la souffrance d'autrui. Comme si leur empathie était anesthésiée par la hiérarchie.Cela ne signifie pas que nous sommes tous des exécutants sans conscience, mais que notre cerveau est câblé pour privilégier la cohésion sociale et l'obéissance, parfois au détriment du libre arbitre. Historiquement, cela a pu être utile dans des groupes organisés. Mais dans certaines circonstances, cela peut mener au pire.Ainsi, que ce soit dans un laboratoire ou dans l'Histoire, l'obéissance n'est jamais neutre. Et comprendre comment notre cerveau y réagit, c'est se donner une chance d'y résister. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Pourquoi des individus ordinaires peuvent-ils commettre l'irréparable simplement parce qu'on le leur a demandé ? Cette question troublante est au cœur de l'expérience de Milgram, menée au début des années 1960 à Yale. Le psychologue américain Stanley Milgram voulait comprendre jusqu'où une personne ordinaire pouvait aller par simple obéissance à l'autorité.Le principe était simple mais redoutable : des volontaires devaient administrer des chocs électriques à une autre personne (complice de l'expérience) chaque fois qu'elle répondait mal à une question. Les chocs devenaient de plus en plus puissants, et pourtant, près de 65 % des participants ont obéi jusqu'au bout, infligeant des douleurs fictives extrêmes, simplement parce qu'un chercheur en blouse blanche leur disait de continuer.Mais ce que Milgram avait mis en lumière, ce n'était pas une cruauté innée, mais un mécanisme profondément humain : la délégation de responsabilité. Face à une autorité perçue comme légitime, beaucoup cessent de se voir comme les auteurs de leurs actes. Ils obéissent, et transfèrent le poids moral de leurs gestes à celui qui donne l'ordre.Soixante ans plus tard, des chercheurs belges de l'université de Gand ont voulu pousser l'analyse plus loin : que se passe-t-il concrètement dans notre cerveau quand nous obéissons ? Grâce à l'imagerie cérébrale, ils ont observé que lorsqu'un individu reçoit un ordre, l'activité dans les zones du cerveau liées à la prise de décision autonome et au jugement moral diminue significativement.En d'autres termes, le cerveau “se met en veille” sur le plan moral lorsqu'il obéit. Les chercheurs ont aussi noté une baisse de l'activation dans le cortex préfrontal, une région-clé impliquée dans le raisonnement éthique et la réflexion personnelle. Résultat : nous ne ressentons pas la même culpabilité que si nous avions agi de notre propre chef.Plus surprenant encore, les chercheurs ont constaté que le simple fait de recevoir un ordre rendait les participants moins sensibles à la souffrance d'autrui. Comme si leur empathie était anesthésiée par la hiérarchie.Cela ne signifie pas que nous sommes tous des exécutants sans conscience, mais que notre cerveau est câblé pour privilégier la cohésion sociale et l'obéissance, parfois au détriment du libre arbitre. Historiquement, cela a pu être utile dans des groupes organisés. Mais dans certaines circonstances, cela peut mener au pire.Ainsi, que ce soit dans un laboratoire ou dans l'Histoire, l'obéissance n'est jamais neutre. Et comprendre comment notre cerveau y réagit, c'est se donner une chance d'y résister. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Vita e pensiero di Solomon Asch - psicologo polacco -  e Stanley Milgram, suo allievo, e i loro studi sull'autorità e il condizionamento sociale.

This week's Extra Alarm insights come to us from Battalion Chief (ret.) Greg Rogers, addressing the critical issue of conflicting orders in fire department operations and underscoring the importance of adhering to the established chain of command. Rogers acknowledges the tendency of individuals to obey authority figures, even when orders are conflicting or unsafe, as demonstrated by infamous Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments. This behavior can lead to dangerous situations on the fireground, especially when orders are issued by officers outside a firefighter's direct chain of command. The article provides a real-world scenario where a firefighter receives conflicting orders from two different officers, leading to a failure in executing a critical task and endangering lives, plus guidance for ensuring a strong chain of command.

Collega's die te makkelijk meegaan in beslissingen en beleid kunnen een groot risico voor een organisatie zijn. Jeanne leerde op Harvard veel over de motieven van mensen om volgzaam en gehoorzaam te zijn en vooral hoe je dat kunt voorkomen. In deze aflevering leer je over een duister sociaal experiment dat de volgzaamheid van mensen pijnlijk blootlegt, de koppeling met de rol als L&D-er en trainer en hoe je kunt voorkomen dat mensen te volgzaam worden.Lees hier het blog over deze podcast:https://www.brainbakery.com/brainsnacks/een-ode-aan-de-rebel-waarom-we-meer-dwarsdenkers-nodig-hebbenOp https://www.brainbakery.com/brainsnacks vind je onze blogs.Wil je meepraten, laat een voice berichtje achter:https://www.speakpipe.com/brainbakerySupport the show

keywords obedience, authority, genocide, psychology, neuroscience, ethical research, social dynamics, moral dilemmas, justice, trauma summary In this conversation, David Jones and Naomi Murphy speak with Emilie Caspar, a social and cognitive neuroscientist, about her research on obedience to authority, particularly in the context of genocide. They discuss the ethical challenges of studying such sensitive topics, the psychological profiles of perpetrators, and the decision-making processes involved in committing atrocities. Emily shares insights from her studies in various countries affected by genocide, highlighting the importance of understanding the social dynamics that lead to obedience and the potential for resilience and resistance among individuals. The conversation also touches on the emotional toll of researching these topics and the significance of role models in shaping moral decisions. Anyone who has come across the work of Stanley Milgram with find this fascinating.   Just Following Orders: Atrocities and the Brain Science of Obedience https://www.amazon.co.uk/Just-Following-Orders-Atrocities-Obedience/dp/1009385437

keywords obedience, authority, genocide, psychology, neuroscience, ethical research, social dynamics, moral dilemmas, justice, trauma summary In this conversation, David Jones and Naomi Murphy speak with Emilie Caspar, a social and cognitive neuroscientist, about her research on obedience to authority, particularly in the context of genocide. They discuss the ethical challenges of studying such sensitive topics, the psychological profiles of perpetrators, and the decision-making processes involved in committing atrocities. Emily shares insights from her studies in various countries affected by genocide, highlighting the importance of understanding the social dynamics that lead to obedience and the potential for resilience and resistance among individuals. The conversation also touches on the emotional toll of researching these topics and the significance of role models in shaping moral decisions. Anyone who has come across the work of Stanley Milgram with find this fascinating.   Just Following Orders: Atrocities and the Brain Science of Obedience https://www.amazon.co.uk/Just-Following-Orders-Atrocities-Obedience/dp/1009385437

What if the path to a meaningful life isn't paved with comfort, but with deliberate discomfort? In this episode, we explore the insidious nature of "flabbiness" - not just of body, but of mind and spirit. We'll uncover how our modern world lulls us into a state of complacent existence, and why the easy path often leads to the hardest life. Through stories of transformation and philosophical insights, we'll challenge the notion that happiness comes from avoiding difficulty. Instead, we'll discover how embracing challenge and responsibility can lead to a life of purpose and fulfillment. This isn't just about self-improvement; it's about redefining what it means to truly live in a world that often encourages us to merely exist: Choose your hard: Decide which difficulties are worth embracing Create your own resistance: Design challenges that grow you Reframe comfort: See ease as a tool, not a destination Are you ready to trade comfort for meaning? The choice is yours. Upgrade to Premium:

Smile, you're listening to a podcast about Candid Camera. Created by Allen Funt, Candid Camera was America's first prank reality show. A case could be made that this show is responsible for the reality television trend that led to a con man being packaged as a “successful businessman” and is now pranking America as prez. Strange Country cohosts Beth and Kelly talk about this pioneering show whilst smiling through their tears. Theme music: Big White Lie by A Cast of Thousands. Cite your sources:   “Candid Camera | Television Academy Interviews.” Television Academy Interviews |, 1997, https://interviews.televisionacademy.com/shows/candid-camera. Accessed 26 January 2025.   Engle, Harrison. “Hidden Cameras and Human Behavior—An Interview with Allen Funt.” ida, 1 October 2000, Hidden Cameras and Human Behavior—An Interview with Allen Funt.   Flagler, J.M. “Student of the Spontaneous.” The New Yorker, 2 December 1960, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1960/12/10/student-of-the-spontaneous.   Funt, Allen, and Philip Reed. Candidly, Allen Funt: A Million Smiles Later. Barricade Books, 1994.   Miller, Robert Nagler. “Q&A: The keeper of ‘Candid Camera's' zany TV legacy.” The Jewish News of Northern California, 12 July 2018, https://jweekly.com/2018/07/12/qa-the-keeper-of-candid-cameras-zany-tv-legacy/. Accessed 6 February 2025.   Nussbaum, Emily. Cue the Sun! The Invention of Reality TV. Random House Publishing Group, 2024.   Perry, Gina. “Stanley Milgram and Candid Camera.” Gina Perry, 10 April 2012, https://www.gina-perry.com/2012/04/10/candid-camera/. Accessed 6 February 2025.   Saxon, Wolfgang. “Allen Funt, Creator of 'Candid Camera,' Is Dead at 84.” The New York Times, 7 September 1999, https://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/07/arts/allen-funt-creator-of-candid-camera-is-dead-at-84.html. Accessed 25 January 2025.   Stewart, Travis. “How “Candid Camera” May Have Destroyed America.” Travelanche, 16 September 2020, https://travsd.wordpress.com/2020/09/16/how-candid-camera-may-have-destroyed-america/.

Zdravo. Živahni klepet o življenju, vesolju in sploh vsem tokrat začnemo z glasnostjo, nadaljujemo z misijo na Mars, ki nas čaka v svetleči prihodnosti, ki se jo tako želimo. Opozarjamo, da kondomi NISO za večkratno uporabo, zato je tokratni naslov epizode še bolj zavajajoč (še posebej, ker se spet pogovarjamo o mokrih maijcah). V epizodi boste lahko slišali tudi o koči na plaži, Milgramovem testu, veganske usnju, kljub zabavi in divjim štosom je vredno ponoviti: varna spolnost je zelo pomembna in je vredno biti pozoren če jo raziskujete na tem planetu ali na sosednjih. Aja, še to: če so vas ugrabili vesoljci, se nam javite. Discord, dopisnice ali družabna omrežja čakajo, da se nam oglasite. Hvala!

LINK - https://youtu.be/Wejpw4ngU8w ErnestoMiami analiza la compleja relación entre obediencia y control en Cuba, utilizando como base el famoso Experimento Milgram de la Universidad de Yale. A través de un análisis científico y social, explora por qué es incorrecta la percepción del pueblo cubano como "cobarde", examinando cómo los mecanismos de control del régimen comunista se asemejan a los factores estudiados en el experimento de Stanley Milgram. El contenido aborda la naturaleza humana de la obediencia, el concepto de "la banalidad del mal" de Hannah Arendt, y cómo estos elementos se relacionan con la situación actual en Cuba. ErnestoMiami analiza el papel del exilio cubano, la represión sistemática, y los mecanismos psicológicos que mantienen el control social en la isla. El video ofrece una perspectiva que combina psicología social, historia y análisis político para entender mejor la realidad cubana actual y los desafíos que enfrenta su población bajo un régimen comunista y totalitario. #Cuba #Historia #HistoriadeCuba #cubanosporelmundo #cubanos #cubanosenmiami #cubanosenhouston #cubanosenusa #FidelCastro #ernestomiami **** Para más videos VISITA - www.ErnestoMiami.com

Criminal Behaviorology  Episode # 59 Title:  Remembering Phil Zimbardo: Obedience and Authority in the Stanford Prison Study The entire interview can be found on our YouTube channel:  @criminalbehaviorology - https://youtu.be/VKiItBjp-_c The views of our guests do not necessarily reflect those of Criminal Behaviorology, nor our sponsors.  Donate to Criminal Behaviorology Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=81930699 In October of this year (2024) Philip Zimbardo passed at the age 91. After a legendary career in psychology, he is known for a very innovative study at Stanford University. A group of students, who were about to get quite a surprise, were randomly assigned be either guards or prisoners. In this episode we look back at Zimbardo's life and the surprising outcomes of some of his most controversial research on the dynamics of incarceration. Show Highlights: The life and career of one Philip Zimbardo. The BBC special on the Stanford Prison Study. Zimbardo's inspiration from the Attica Prison uprising. Students randomly assigned to be “guards” and “prisoners.” The Stanley Milgram experiment on obedience to authority. Shocking results. Guards who became sympathetic, and those who become “hardliners.” Controversies and conclusions about this infamous study. Links for this podcast: Psychology: The Stanford Prison Experiment - BBC Documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4txhN13y6A - Found on this Channel on YouTube (Patricia Im): https://www.youtube.com/@patriciaim4861 Zimbardo: https://zimbardo.socialpsychology.org/contact Obituary of Philip Zimbardo: https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/legacyremembers/philip-zimbardo-obituary?id=56549140 https://www.prisonexp.org  The Man Who Shocked the World (about Stanley Milgram): https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/articles/200203/the-man-who-shocked-the-world Look up CrimBehav on Facebook:  facebook.com/CrimBehav. Criminal Behaviorology on Blogger.  CB Podcast Sites: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/dashboard/episodes https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/criminal-behaviorology/id1441879795?mt=2&uo=4 https://www.google.com/podcasts?feed=aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmNob3IuZm0vcy83MzY4OWFjL3BvZGNhc3QvcnNzhttps://open.spotify.com/show/5VM7Sjv762u7nb91YWGczZ https://www.breaker.audio/criminal-behaviorology https://overcast.fm/itunes1441879795/criminal-behaviorology https://pca.st/Q38w https://radiopublic.com/criminal-behaviorology-GEv2AZ https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/anchor-podcasts/criminal-behaviorology On YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKSVoZOBwCG28xMnuPq_Gtw On Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-1826027 On Locals Social Media: https://criminalbehaviorology.locals.com/?showPosts=1 https://criminalbehaviorology.locals.com On Twitter: https://twitter.com/CrimBehav On Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=81930699 Amazon: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/a3604516-0645-4341-a792-75d10754556d/criminal-behaviorology Please write a review on any of our podcast sites listed above.  Questions, comments, and requests for transcripts to: criminalbehaviorology@gmail.com Thank you for listening. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/criminalbehaviorology/support

Gehorsam Menschen Stromstöße verabreichen: Wie weit gehen wir? Psychologe Stanley Milgram (gestorben 20.12.1984) veränderte die klassische Vorstellung von Gut und Böse. Von Veronika Bock ;Ulrich Biermann.

Wie groß ist die Bereitschaft, Autoritäten gegenüber gehorsam zu sein? Das erforscht Stanley Milgram mit einer Versuchsanordnung, die heute als Milgram-Experiment bekannt ist.

Se você tem preocupação com a censura e o acesso restrito a conteúdos internacionais, a solução é usar uma VPN. Ao buscar liberdade e segurança na navegação, use a NordVPN, que permite acessar conteúdos globais, encontrar melhores preços e navegar sem rastros. Acesse https://nordvpn.com/cafebrasil para obter um desconto e quatro meses extras grátis, além da opção de reembolso em 30 dias. Stanley Milgram, na década de 1960, conduziu na Universidade de Yale o famoso "Experimento da Obediência à Autoridade", que revelou até que ponto as pessoas obedecem a figuras de autoridade, mesmo contrariando seus valores morais. Surpreendentemente, 80% dos participantes seguiram ordens ilegítimas, enquanto apenas 20% resistiram. O estudo, um marco na psicologia social, continua relevante, desafiando-nos a refletir sobre a influência das estruturas de autoridade e a importância do pensamento crítico para resistir a ordens injustas. Qualquer semelhança com nossa realidade não é mera coincidência.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send me a DM here (it doesn't let me respond), OR email me: imagineabetterworld2020@gmail.comToday I'm honored to introduce you all to: MK ULTRA, child trafficking, and Milgram Experiment survivor and whistleblower, human rights activist, organic gardener, camping lover, hiker, fisherwoman, frisbee golf extraordinaire, home birth and midwife advocate, published author and writer, podcaster, YouTuber, janitorial service subcontractor, and an incredible inspiration to the survivor movement: Carol StanhopeA little bit about Carol's testimony and what we will be diving into today…Carol's father came to the US in 1939 as an immigrant at the age of 17 and was intercepted by the OSS - which was the former CIA - at Boston Harbor where they gave him an ultimatum to participate as an asset OR be deported back to Finland. Her father chose the former as he didn't want to be conscripted into the Finnish army. When the OSS learned of his rare RH negative blood type and Norse lineage, they forcibly enlisted him in the merchant marines where his job was to safeguard precious gems and metals. They then used him in various drug mule positions in Thailand and Portugal. He eventually met Carol's mother in Chicago in the early 1950's and Carol was born in Minnesota in 1962, and her family was absorbed into the intelligence agency by proxy. In 1967 at just five years of age, her father offered her up to MKULTRA, Monarch and Project Bluebird - as well as for Dr. Stanley Milgram's Cyranoid experiments. These took place at Duluth Air Force Base and the University of Minnesota. The protocols Carol was subjected to were electroshock treatments, sensory deprivation, forced ingestion of urine, sexual abuse and more. This past January, Carol discovered the stimoceiver and multi-lead needle electrodes that were implanted in her brain by Stanley Milgram's Yale colleague, Dr. Jose Delgado. The electrodes bulge out of her skull and are visible on her shaved head. Carol was also used in child exploitation material in the 1970s and had to escape from a baby breeding program in the 1980s. She eventually participated in a UN ladies group called Persons Against Non-State Torture. Two UN nurses helped her with her deprogramming in the mid to late 2000's and mentored her to become an activist and advocate. Carol released a documentary in 2018, an autobiography in 2021, and is currently in the process of writing her second manuscript and book.Carol's testimony is vitally important as it weaves together a horrific counter-narrative behind the benign mainstream narrative regarding Stanley Milgram and the experiments on obedience he was conducting. In the mainstream narrative, Milgram's experiments are heralded with disclaimers of ‘no humans were hurt in these experiments and the test subjects are all promoted as being consenting adults. The reality, however, is much darker as Milgram's experimentation on humans crossed over into MK ULTRA as well as using unconsenting children as test subjects - things MSM will never tell us. Carol is here today to share the truth of what was actually happening behind closed doors, as well as to show proof of the experimentation done on her at the hands of people who should have been protecting her. CLICK HERE FOR 15% OFF YOUR RIFE ORDER:Rife Technology – Real Rife TechnologyCODE: 420CLICK HERE FOR FREE SHIPPING ON CZTL'S METHYLENE BLUE:Buy ultra high purity Methylene Blue – CZTLCONNECT WITH CAROL: FB: @Carol Stanhope - FacebookYouTube: @Carol StanhopeSupport the show

In 1961, infamous psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted a controversial experiment that answered the question: "Would good people do horrible things so long as they were just following orders?". This movie explores the life and career of Milgram as he tries to distance himself from the controversial experiment.

Thank you for listening! On this episode, Reggie sits down with Sheem and Monet and they discuss a good amount of topics. Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn, predicts that 9-to-5 jobs will be extinct by 2034 A North Carolina resident: My father-in-law has refused all FEMA help because he is listening to Trump. He doesn't believe FEMA. He just believes Trump. https://x.com/kamalahq/status/1844399831361454585?s=46 Quick Clips: 1962: The Milgram Experiment reveals why humans keep committing atrocities throughout history. One of the most famous psychological experiments of our time - Stanley Milgram demonstrates how easy it is to get others following orders from a person in an authoritative position. https://x.com/historyinmemes/status/1844566339374944427?s=46 Elon Musk's “Optimus” Robots are here: https://x.com/tarabull808/status/1844593360658629118?s=46 New Federal Wiretap Law May effect relationships: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DBT75-ORFNL/?igsh=MWVuNHpnMDJmcGVjdg== Songs of the DAE$: Monet: Kendrick Lamar ft Summer Walker “Purple Heart” Sheem: Sir ft Jill Scott “Still Blue” Reggie: Chris Brown “Red” --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/reggie-daes/support

The social science that supports our work with cults has been questioned in the last decade. We discuss the complaints about Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment, Stanley Milgram's Yale shock machine studies, and Sherif's Robbers Cave Experiment. Note: this was recorded a few days before Dr. Zimbardo passed. He was truly a titan of our field and will be sorely missed. Links: Dr. Zimbardo's Heroic Imagination project At the center of 'Veneer Theory': Are people fundamentally good or evil? Jane Eliott's brown-eyed/ blue-eyed study on racism Muzafer Sherif's Robbers Cave Experiment A Painful Reminder #Zimbardo

What makes normal people do terrible things? Are there really bad apples — or just bad barrels? And how should you deal with a nefarious next-door neighbor? SOURCES:Jonathan Haidt, professor of ethical leadership at New York University's Stern School of Business.Christina Maslach, professor of psychology at the University of California, Berkeley.Stanley Milgram, 20th century professor of psychology at Yale University.Edward R. Murrow, 20th century American broadcast journalist and war correspondent.Alexander Pope, 17-18th century English poet.Adrian Raine, professor of criminology, psychiatry, and psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.Oskar Schindler, 20th century German businessman.Philip Zimbardo, professor emeritus of psychology at Stanford University. RESOURCES:"Mental Illness and Violence: Debunking Myths, Addressing Realities," by Tori DeAngelis (Monitor on Psychology, 2021)."How 'Evil' Became a Conservative Buzzword," by Emma Green (The Atlantic, 2017)."The Double-Edged Sword: Does Biomechanism Increase or Decrease Judges' Sentencing of Psychopaths?" by Lisa G. Aspinwall, Teneille R. Brown, and James Tabery (Science, 2012)."The Psychology of Evil," by Philip Zimbardo (TED Talk, 2008).The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil, by Philip Zimbardo (2007)."When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize," by Jonathan Haidt and Jesse Graham (Social Justice Research, 2007)."Abu Ghraib Whistleblower Speaks Out," by Michele Norris (All Things Considered, 2006).Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View, by Stanley Milgram (1974). EXTRAS:"Does Free Will Exist, and Does It Matter?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."Are You Suffering From Burnout?" by No Stupid Questions (2023).Lolita, by Vladimir Nabokov (1955)."Essay on Man, Epistle II," poem by Alexander Pope (1733).

What are Mike and Angela's favorite songs to cry to? Can upbeat music lift you out of a bad mood? And what is Angela going to sing the next time she does karaoke? SOURCES:Matthew Desmond, professor of sociology at Princeton University.Daniel Kahneman, professor emeritus of psychology and public affairs at Princeton University.Joshua Knobe, professor of philosophy, psychology, and linguistics at Yale University.Simon McCarthy-Jones, professor of psychiatry at Trinity College Dublin.Yael Millgram, senior lecturer of psychological sciences at Tel Aviv University.Stanley Milgram, 20th-century American social psychologist.Ruth Reichl, food writer.Laurie Santos, professor of psychology at Yale University.Barbara Tversky, professor emerita of psychology at Stanford University. RESOURCES:"On the Value of Sad Music," by Mario Attie-Picker, Tara Venkatesan, George E. Newman, and Joshua Knobe (The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 2024)."The Reason People Listen to Sad Songs," by Oliver Whang (The New York Times, 2023)."Adele 30: The Psychology of Why Sad Songs Make Us Feel Good," by Simon McCarthy-Jones (The Conversation, 2021)."Why Do Depressed People Prefer Sad Music?" by Sunkyung Yoon, Edelyn Verona, Robert Schlauch, Sandra Schneider, and Jonathan Rottenberg (Emotion, 2020).Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City, by Matthew Desmond (2016)."Sad as a Matter of Choice? Emotion-Regulation Goals in Depression," by Yael Millgram, Jutta Joormann, Jonathan D. Huppert, and Maya Tamir (Psychological Science, 2015)."Music and Emotion Through Time," by Michael Tilson Thomas (TED Talk, 2012).Thinking, Fast and Slow, by Daniel Kahneman (2011). EXTRAS:Girl Power Sing-Along with Laurie Santos and Catherine Price, at the Black Squirrel Club in Philadelphia (September 28, 2024)."What Makes a Good Sense of Humor?" by No Stupid Questions (2024)."How Contagious Is Behavior? With Laurie Santos of 'The Happiness Lab' (Replay)," by No Stupid Questions (2023).

In this episode, I delve into the fascinating Milgram experiment conducted by psychologist Stanley Milgram in the early 1960s. This series of social experiments measured the willingness of participants to obey authority figures, even when instructed to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. The experiment revealed that a significant majority, 65%, were willing to administer the highest level of shocks to a learner, despite hearing their apparent suffering. I discuss how this experiment highlights the concept of a "slippery slope," where small incremental steps can lead individuals to perform increasingly severe actions. However, I also explore the idea of a positive slippery slope, where small, manageable steps can lead to substantial improvements in habits and lifestyle. For instance, starting with a short walk each day can eventually lead to a consistent exercise routine, or adding one vegetable to a meal can lead to healthier eating habits over time. I share my personal experience of training for a half marathon by gradually increasing my running distance each week. This method helped me build a strong foundation and significantly improve my performance. I emphasize the importance of being mindful of the small influences in our daily lives, as they can have both positive and negative impacts. Additionally, I touch on the role of technology and how it can be a double-edged sword, offering both positive and negative slippery slopes. For example, using a Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) can help make better health decisions but can also lead to obsessive behavior. I encourage listeners to reflect on how they can apply the concept of a positive slippery slope in their own lives and to be mindful of the influences they allow into their daily routines. I also invite feedback on how technology impacts our lives and the lives of our children. Thank you for spending your precious time with me. I hope you found this episode helpful and thought-provoking. To work with me: https://www.drmarbas.com/ A Big Thank You To Our Sponsors: If you want to work with the best Whole Foods plant-based body recomposition coach, I highly recommend checking out what www.fitvegancoaching.com offers. I did their program and was able to lose 7% of body fat, build lean muscle, and improve my running time. As a loyal subscriber, you get $250 savings on their coaching services. To learn plant-based cooking and get your medical questions answered, join The Healing Kitchen, taught by Brittany Jaroudi and me! Click here to learn more: https://www.drmarbas.com/the-healing-kitchen

Inspiration for Mattos Masai

Send us a Text Message.Can leadership failures create a breeding ground for misconduct in correctional facilities?In this episode of the Prison Officer Podcast, we confront this critical question head-on. Through the lens of Stanley Milgram's famous 1963 obedience study, we unravel the often unseen dynamics of authority in corrections, exploring when and how the duty to intervene should override blind obedience. Recent cases of systemic leadership breakdowns are scrutinized, revealing how these lapses can foster environments where illegal and immoral actions flourish. I discuss the emotional rollercoaster faced by both staff and inmates during crises and why intervention is as crucial as physical action in preventing escalation.  What It's Like To Be...What's it like to be a Cattle Rancher? FBI Special Agent? Professional Santa? Find out!Listen on: Apple Podcasts SpotifyPepperBallFrom crowd control to cell extractions, the PepperBall system is the safe, non-lethal option.OMNIOMNI is cutting-edge software designed to track inmates and assets within your prison or jail. Command PresenceBringing prisons and jails the training they deserve!Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.Support the Show.Contact us: mike@theprisonofficer.comFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/ThePrisonOfficerTake care of each other and Be Safe behind those walls and fences!

In this compelling episode of the Performance Initiative Podcast, hosts Dr. Grant Cooper and Dr. Zinovi Mailer converse with Dr. Robert Cialdini, an eminent expert on persuasion and influence. Key topics include trustworthy appearances, the reciprocity principle, and practical persuasion techniques used by professionals such as CIA agents and waiters. The discussion includes fascinating examples such as Ethiopia's unexpected aid to Mexico and the impact of a simple piece of chocolate. Dr. Cialdini details the roles of genuine customer affection, scarcity, and social proof in decision-making, and highlights the significance of authority through Stanley Milgram's experiment. The conversation also explores strategies like Tupperware's sales methods, admitting weaknesses like Warren Buffett and Domino's Pizza, and the psychological impacts of scarcity, freedom of choice, and commitment consistency. The episode underscores the 'but you are free' technique, unified group identity, and cognitive dissonance while stressing the importance of authenticity in communication and tackling manipulation.(00:00) Introduction to the Rule of Reciprocation(02:58) The Power of Small Changes(03:51) The Ethiopia-Mexico Story(06:32) The Reagan Study on Reciprocity(09:52) The Impact of Small Gifts(24:44) The Benjamin Franklin Effect(31:26) The Rejection-Then-Retreat Technique(49:11) The Power of Social Proof(57:10) Breaking Through Pluralistic Ignorance(58:49) The Power of Social Proof(01:03:16) Authority and the Milgram Experiment(01:10:09) Trustworthiness in Communication(01:23:35) The Principle of Scarcity(01:32:03) Commitment and Consistency(01:43:53) The Principle of Unity(01:54:10) Conclusion and Final ThoughtsDr. Robert Cialdini is a renowned psychologist and professor emeritus of psychology and marketing at Arizona State University, widely recognized for his groundbreaking research in the field of social influence and persuasion. His seminal work, "Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion," has become a cornerstone in understanding how and why people comply with requests, uncovering key principles such as reciprocity, commitment and consistency, social proof, authority, liking, and scarcity. Cialdini's insights have had a profound impact on both academic research and practical applications in marketing, negotiation, and organizational behavior, making him a highly sought-after speaker and consultant for businesses and governments worldwide.#Influence #Persuasion #Cialdini #BehavioralScience #SocialPsychology #Reciprocity #SocialProof #Authority #Liking #CommitmentConsistency #Scarcity #Unity #Psychology #Marketing #BehavioralEconomics #RobertCialdini #PersuasiveTechniques #SocialInfluence #PerformanceInitiativePodcast

In 1961, the American psychologist Stanley Milgram began a series of controversial experiments on ‘obedience to authority'.His study aimed to show how ordinary people could be capable of committing evil acts, if ordered to do so. He wanted to understand the psychology behind genocide, telling the BBC: “How is it possible that ordinary people who were courteous and decent in everyday life, can act callously, inhumanely, without any limitations of conscience?”During the tests, participants were led to believe that they were assisting an unrelated experiment, in which they had to administer electric shocks to another person.These fake shocks gradually increased to levels that would have been harmful had they been real volunteers.Vicky Farncombe looks back at the experiment, using BBC archive.This programme includes original recordings of the experiments which listeners may find disturbing.(Photo: Stanley Milgram beside the shock generator. Credit: BBC)

This week on Hashtag History, we will be discussing the Milgram Experiment which was a series of psychological experiments conducted by psychologist Stanley Milgram in which he was testing the blind obedience of a participant to an authority figure. These were the experiments where one participant would serve in the role of a “teacher” while the other played a “student”. The teacher would ask the student a question and, if the student got the answer incorrect, the teacher was instructed to administer an electric shock to the student. With each incorrect answer, the shock levels were incrementally increased all the way from 15 volts to 450 (which is a fatal level). When you watch the video footage of these experiments, you can see that many of the “teacher” participants hesitate and even refuse to administer such intense shocks to the innocent “student”. But, shockingly (no pun intended), Milgram would find that - with the right amount of pressure applied to the “teacher” from an authoritative figure - every single participant was willing to go up to 300 volts, and a whopping 65% of the participants were willing to administer the maximum voltage levels of 450! Milgram, whose Jewish parents had immigrated to the United States during the first World War, was particularly inspired by Nazi Germany and how so many members of the Nazi Party obeyed authority so blindly when they murdered thousands upon thousands of innocent Jews during the Holocaust. As was revealed during the Nuremberg Trials, Nazi leader after Nazi leader professed that they only did what they did because they were following orders from authorities. The results of this test are pretty disturbing, to say the least. Lucky for us…they may not be true. For one, the device used to inflict electric shock upon innocent participants…wasn't actually real. And those innocent participants…they were members of Milgram's own staff. But that's not even the most surprising revelations about the Milgram study to surface in more recent years. Australian psychologist Gina Perry has reevaluated the experiment and found that much of the raw data does not reflect Milgram's final conclusion. In fact, that 65% number that we got earlier - the number of participants willing to blindly follow orders - is actually only based on a tiny fraction of those that ultimately participated in the test. Over 700 people took part in the Milgram Experiment, and yet Milgram's final results derive from 40 of those participants. Additionally, Milgram's gauge on “obedience” was skewed. Even if a participant refused to inflict electronic shock on the other participant upwards of twenty times before they complied, Milgram documented this as blindly obeying.  The problem with all of this is that Milgram's Experiment is still so widely known - inaccurately so - and still referred to as factual. Follow Hashtag History on Instagram @hashtaghistory_podcast for all of the pictures mentioned in this episode. Citations for all sources can be located on our website at www.HashtagHistory-Pod.com. You can also check out our website for super cute merch! You can now sponsor a cocktail and get a shout-out on air! Just head to www.buymeacoffee.com/hashtaghistory or head to the Support tab on our website! You can locate us on www.Patreon.com/hashtaghistory where you can donate $1 a month to our Books and Booze Supply. All of your support goes a long ways and we are endlessly grateful! To show our gratitude, all Patreon Supporters receive an automatic 15% OFF all merchandise in our merchandise store, a shoutout on social media, and stickers! THANKS FOR LISTENING! - Rachel and Leah --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/hashtaghistory/support

(0:00) Intro(1:02) About the podcast sponsor: The American College of Governance Counsel.(1:49) Start of interview. (2:37) Katherine Henderson's "origin story."(5:05) Amy Simmerman's "origin story."(8:02) The origin and focus of their Delaware Corporate Law and Litigation Year in Review.(9:14) Caseload of Delaware Court of Chancery judges.(12:51) Cases involving director oversight duties ("Caremark duties"). Reference to the Blue Bell case (2019). "Mission critical risk areas." Reference to Section 220 Books and Records Demands.(19:56) Duty of Oversight Applies to Officers (McDonald's case). Dismissal of case against directors (McDonald's II).(23:13) Controlling Stockholders and conflicts of interest. (DE reconsiders scope of the MFW Doctrine in Match.com case)(24:57) Distinctions between public and private company litigation. Reference to the NEA vs Rich case.(30:36) On Delaware vs other states. Reference to the TripAdvisor case (Delaware company seeking to reincorporate in NV).(36:55)  Innovations in AI Governance. The example of Anthropic AI (use of PBCs and LTBT).(43:24) On shareholder activism and validity of stockholder agreement-based restrictions over corporate governance matters (Moelis case).(45:13) Securities claims on misleading risk disclosures.(46:55) What are the 1-3 books that have greatly influenced your life: Amy:Obedience to Authority by Stanley Milgram (1974)Steppenwolf by Herman Hesse (1927)Katherine:The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan (1963)(48:02) Who were their mentors, and what they learned from them.(49:00) Quotes they think of often or live their life by.(49:52) An unusual habit or an absurd thing that they love.(50:35)  The living person they most admire.__Katherine Henderson and Amy Simmerman are partners at the law firm Wilson Sonsini Goorich & Rosati.  You can follow Evan on social media at:Twitter: @evanepsteinLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/ Substack: https://evanepstein.substack.com/__You can join as a Patron of the Boardroom Governance Podcast at:Patreon: patreon.com/BoardroomGovernancePod__Music/Soundtrack (found via Free Music Archive): Seeing The Future by Dexter Britain is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

La situación de ELDT es bastante crítica a día de hoy. Ayuda a que El libro de Tobias pueda continuar en Marzo: https://www.paypal.com/pools/c/91liJSURk5 El experimento Milgram fue un estudio de psicología social que llevó a cabo Stanley Milgram, psicólogo de la Universidad de Yale para estudiar el comportamiento de una persona para obedecer a las órdenes de la autoridad, aunque éstas entren en conflicto con su conciencia personal. Este experimento comenzó en julio de 1961, tres meses después de que Adolf Eichmann (alto cargo del régimen nazi durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial) fuera juzgado y sentenciado a muerte en Jerusalén, por crímenes contra la humanidad. Durante el juicio, Eichmann argumentó en su defensa que sólo cumplía órdenes. Canciones: • “Empty Walls" de Serj Tankian • “Lie Lie Lie” de Serj Tankian Narración: Asier Menéndez Marín Diseño logo Podcast: albacanodesigns (Alba Cano) Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

Bạn đã bao giờ nghe đến cái tên Stanley Milgram chưa? Ông ấy là một nhà tâm lý học xã hội người Mỹ, ông được mọi người biết đến bởi cuộc thí nghiệm tâm lý vào năm 1961 nhằm tìm hiểu xem sự tuân thủ mệnh lệnh của con người và bản chất của cái ác. Điều đặc biệt ở cuộc thí nghiệm này là, mặc dù những người tham gia thử nghiệm không hề có ai bị thiệt mạng, nhưng nó vẫn bị mang tiếng là thí nghiệm ‘'vô nhân tính'' nhất trong lịch sử loài người. Trong video này, cùng khám phá những tội ác kinh hoàng cho đến chân tướng và cuối cùng là sự tuyệt vọng qua bài viết “Thí nghiệm tâm lý gây sốc nhất trong lịch sử Tâm Lý Học” của tác giả David Vu đăng tải trên website Spiderum. Hy vọng các bạn có thể bình tĩnh, kiên nhẫn xem hết video, sau đó hãy bình luận cho chúng mình biết suy nghĩ của các bạn về thí nghiệm này nhé. __ Tủ sách hoành tráng của Spiderum: https://shope.ee/6KbpEZS9D2 Các đầu sách bạn có thể quan tâm: - Người trong muôn nghề - Định hướng nghề nghiệp toàn diện: https://shope.ee/AURO9YQc3A - Người trong muôn nghề: Ngành IT có gì?: https://shope.ee/9pBhMKT9Oy - Người trong muôn nghề: Ngành Kinh tế có gì? - Tập 1: https://shope.ee/9UYqxiUQ4w - Người trong muôn nghề: Ngành Kinh tế có gì? - Tập 2: https://shope.ee/9KFQlPV3Pv - Người trong muôn nghề: Ngành Sáng tạo - Nghệ thuật có gì?: https://shope.ee/9zV7YdSW47 - Người trong muôn nghề: Ngành Xã hội - Nhân văn có gì?: https://shope.ee/5pfYayiNWK - Mùi mẹ - Món quà dành tặng người phụ nữ yêu thương: https://shope.ee/6AIOzah6qU - DevUP - Phát triển toàn diện sự nghiệp lập trình viên: https://shope.ee/9esHA1Tmjx - Seneca: Những Bức Thư Đạo Đức – Chủ Nghĩa Khắc Kỷ Trong Đời Sống - Tập 1: https://shope.ee/6zrW08ngb2 - Seneca: Những Bức Thư Đạo Đức – Chủ Nghĩa Khắc Kỷ Trong Đời Sống - Tập 2: https://shope.ee/A9oXkwRsj8 - Mở khóa thương mại điện tử Việt Nam: https://shope.ee/5V2iCMjeCI - Doing good better - Làm việc thiện đúng cách: https://shope.ee/6KbpBtgTVV - Động lực nội tại - Làm sao để yêu công việc và đạt đến thành công: https://shope.ee/6UvFOCfqAW - Bước ra thế giới: Cẩm nang du học và săn học bổng: https://shope.ee/5fM8Ofj0rJ - Chuyện người chuyện ngỗng (Vũ Hoàng Long): https://shope.ee/4AXKcUjKAQ __ Hóng các cuộc hội thoại thú vị, nhiều kiến thức bổ ích trên kênh Talk Sâu: https://b.link/talksau Lắng nghe những câu chuyện về thế giới nghề nghiệp cùng podcast Người Trong Muôn Nghề: https://b.link/NTMN-Podcast ______________ Bài viết: Thí nghiệm tâm lý gây sốc nhất trong lịch sử Tâm Lý Học Được viết bởi: David Vu Link bài viết: https://spiderum.com/bai-dang/Thi-ngh... ______________ Giọng đọc: Pinkdot Editor: Tê ______________ Bản quyền video: Spiderum Bản quyền nhạc: Youtube Audio Library, Epidemic Sound ______________ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/spiderum/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/spiderum/support

Mark Granovetter has made and remade our understanding of social networks, social theory, collective action, and economic sociology, making and remaking our world in the process. It would not be hyperbole to say that few living scholars have had the influence of Mark Granovetter.  Origins Podcast WebsiteFlourishing Commons NewsletterShow Notes:Attorney for the Damned by John A. Farrell (9:00)Interest in world history (10:00)A History of the Modern World (11:00)Why are there revolutions? (12:00)Philosophy of science (13:00)Carl Hempel (13:00)What does it mean to explain in science? Talcott Parsons (15:00)BF Skinner (16:00)A philosophy of asking questions (17:00)"The function of general laws in history" (18:00)Universal peeking out from the particular (20:00)Max Weber (23:00)Norbert Weiner (30:00)The Strength of Weak Ties (30:00)The Great Fear of 1789  by Georges Lefebvre (31:00)Harrison White (33:00)Anatol Rapoport (37:00)Stanley Milgram (40:30)Danielle Allen (43:00)Threshold analysis (45:00)Lightning round (54:00)Book: Economy and Society by Max WeberPassion: anywhere asking questions that expand youHeart Sing: working on new book and teachingScrewed up: life balanceFind Mark online:https://sociology.stanford.edu/people/mark-granovetter'Five-Cut Fridays' five-song music playlist series  Mark's playlistLogo artwork by Cristina GonzalezMusic by swelo on all streaming platforms or @swelomusic on social media

¡Vótame en los Premios iVoox 2023! Stanley Milgram fue un psicólogo social estadounidense conocido por sus controversiales experimentos sobre la obediencia a la autoridad. En la década de 1960, Milgram realizó una serie de experimentos en la Universidad de Yale en los que midió la disposición de los participantes para obedecer órdenes que conllevaran dañar a otros. Los sujetos creían que estaban participando en un estudio sobre memoria y aprendizaje, cuando en realidad estaban evaluando su obediencia a una figura de autoridad. Sorprendentemente, la gran mayoría obedeció las órdenes, incluso cuando estas implicaban infligir choques eléctricos aparentemente dolorosos. Los experimentos de Milgram revelaron hasta qué punto las personas pueden actuar en contra de su conciencia por obediencia a una autoridad. Escucha el episodio completo en la app de iVoox, o descubre todo el catálogo de iVoox Originals

durée : 00:04:06 - Le Biais de Lionel Naccache - par : Lionel Naccache - Le carnage du Hamas en Israël remet en question l'idée d'une communauté humaine universelle. Selon les neurosciences, plusieurs processus peuvent amener à une telle violence, démontrés par les expériences sur l'obéissance de Stanley Milgram ou encore la théorie de déshumanisation.

Esta é a segunda e última parte do episódio duplo sobre a edição 2023 do prêmio IgNobel, trazendo as categorias Medicina, Nutrição, Educação, Psicologia e Física.Confira no papo entre o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.> OUÇA (39min 55s)*Naruhodo! é o podcast pra quem tem fome de aprender. Ciência, senso comum, curiosidades, desafios e muito mais. Com o leigo curioso, Ken Fujioka, e o cientista PhD, Altay de Souza.Edição: Reginaldo Cursino.http://naruhodo.b9.com.br*PARCERIA: ALURAAprofunde-se de vez: garantimos conhecimento com profundidade e diversidade, para se tornar um profissional em T - incluindo programação, front-end, data science, devops, ux & design, mobile, inovação & gestão.Navegue sua carreira: são mais de 1300 cursos e novos lançamentos toda semana, além de atualizações e melhorias constantes.Conteúdo imersivo: faça parte de uma comunidade de apaixonados por tudo que é digital. Mergulhe na comunidade Alura.Aproveite o desconto para ouvintes Naruhodo no link:https://bit.ly/naruhodo_alura*PRÊMIO DE MEDICINA [EUA, CANADÁ, MACEDÔNIA, IRÃ, VIETNÃ]Christine Pham, Bobak Hedayati, Kiana Hashemi, Ella Csuka, Tiana Mamaghani, Margit Juhasz, Jamie Wikenheiser e Natasha Mesinkovska, por usar cadáveres para explorar se há o mesmo número de pelos em cada uma das duas narinas de uma pessoa.REFERENCE: “The Quantification and Measurement of Nasal Hairs in a Cadaveric Population,” Christine Pham, Bobak Hedayati, Kiana Hashemi, Ella Csuka, Margit Juhasz, and Natasha Atanaskova Mesinkovska, Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 83, no. 6, 2020, pp. AB202-AB202. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.902PRÊMIO DE NUTRIÇÃO [JAPÃO]Homei Miyashita e Hiromi Nakamura, por experimentos para determinar como hashis eletrificados e canudos podem alterar o sabor dos alimentos.REFERENCE: “Augmented Gustation Using Electricity,” Hiromi Nakamura and Homei Miyashita, Proceedings of the 2nd Augmented Human International Conference, March 2011, article 34. doi.org/10.1145/1959826.1959860PRÊMIO DE EDUCAÇÃO [CHINA, CANADÁ, REINO UNIDO, HOLANDA, IRLANDA, EUA, JAPÃO]Katy Tam, Cyanea Poon, Victoria Hui, Wijnand van Tilburg, Christy Wong, Vivian Kwong, Gigi Yuen e Christian Chan, por estudar metodicamente o tédio de professores e estudantes.REFERENCE: “Boredom Begets Boredom: An Experience Sampling Study on the Impact of Teacher Boredom on Student Boredom and Motivation,” Katy Y.Y. Tam, Cyanea Y. S. Poon, Victoria K.Y. Hui, Christy Y. F. Wong, Vivian W.Y. Kwong, Gigi W.C. Yuen, Christian S. Chan, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 90, no. S1, June 2020, pp. 124-137. doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12549REFERENCE: “Whatever Will Bore, Will Bore: The Mere Anticipation of Boredom Exacerbates its Occurrence in Lectures,” Katy Y.Y. Tam, Wijnand A.P. Van Tilburg, Christian S. Chan, British Journal of Educational Psychology, epub 2022. doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12549PRÊMIO DE PSICOLOGIA [EUA]Stanley Milgram, Leonard Bickman e Lawrence Berkowitz por experimentos em uma rua da cidade para ver quantas pessoas param para olhar para cima quando veem estranhos olhando para cima.REFERENCE: “Note on the Drawing Power of Crowds of Different Size,” Stanley Milgram, Leonard Bickman, and Lawrence Berkowitz, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 13, no. 2, 1969, pp. 79-82. psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0028070PRÊMIO DE FÍSICA [ESPANHA, GALÍCIA, SUÍÇA, FRANÇA, REINO UNIDO]Bieito Fernández Castro, Marian Peña, Enrique Nogueira, Miguel Gilcoto, Esperanza Broullón, Antonio Comesaña, Damien Bouffard, Alberto C. Naveira Garabato e Beatriz Mouriño-Carballido, por medir até que ponto a mistura de água do oceano é afetada pela atividade sexual de anchovas.REFERENCE: “Intense Upper Ocean Mixing Due to Large Aggregations of Spawning Fish,” Bieito Fernández Castro, Marian Peña, Enrique Nogueira, Miguel Gilcoto, Esperanza Broullón, Antonio Comesaña, Damien Bouffard, Alberto C. Naveira Garabato, and Beatriz Mouriño-Carballido, Nature Geoscience, vol. 15, 2022, pp. 287–292. doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00916-3*REFERÊNCIASThe 33rd First Annual Ig Nobel Prize Ceremonyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9UQi0ORXv4Naruhodo #29 - O que é e como acontece o déjà vu?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsgpP0CWrZsNaruhodo #141 - Cheirar pum faz bem a saúde?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISe5ObqFjT0Naruhodo #375 - Por que cutucamos o nariz?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_iB-EHHh5gNaruhodo #384 - Por que tomamos choque quando encostamos em certas coisas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhKsqKRHwswNaruhodo #389 - Por que repetir palavras deixa elas estranhas?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKN89pAb10UNaruhodo #397 - Por que ficamos entediados?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAZ9BPv_6O4Naruhodo #151 - Especial Prêmio Ig Nobel 2018 - Parte 1 de 2https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-151-especial-premio-ig-nobel-2018-parte-1-de-2/Naruhodo #152 - Especial Prêmio Ig Nobel 2018 - Parte 2 de 2https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-152-especial-premio-ig-nobel-2018-parte-2-de-2/Naruhodo #202 - Especial Prêmio Ig Nobel 2019 - Parte 1 de 2https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-202-especial-premio-ig-nobel-2019-parte-1-de-2/Naruhodo #203 - Especial Prêmio Ig Nobel 2019 - Parte 2 de 2https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-203-especial-premio-ig-nobel-2019-parte-2-de-2/Naruhodo #254 - Especial Prêmio Ig Nobel 2020 - Parte 1 de 2https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-254-especial-premio-ignobel-2020-parte-1-de-2/Naruhodo #255 - Especial Prêmio Ig Nobel 2020 - Parte 2 de 2https://www.b9.com.br/shows/naruhodo/naruhodo-255-especial-premio-ignobel-2020-parte-2-de-2/Naruhodo #302 - Prêmio IgNobel 2021 - Parte 1 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tos9wQyGSTINaruhodo #303 - Prêmio IgNobel 2021 - Parte 2 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3QDkBx7_osNaruhodo #355 - Prêmio IgNobel 2022 - Parte 1 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIx5uHKgHLsNaruhodo #356 - Prêmio IgNobel 2022 - Parte 2 de 2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIOVn1hDt8s*APOIE O NARUHODO PELA PLATAFORMA ORELO!Um aviso importantíssimo: o podcast Naruhodo agora está no Orelo: https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-oreloE é por meio dessa plataforma de apoio aos criadores de conteúdo que você ajuda o Naruhodo a se manter no ar.Você escolhe um valor de contribuição mensal e tem acesso a conteúdos exclusivos, conteúdos antecipados e vantagens especiais.Além disso, você pode ter acesso ao nosso grupo fechado no Telegram, e conversar comigo, com o Altay e com outros apoiadores.E não é só isso: toda vez que você ouvir ou fizer download de um episódio pelo Orelo, vai também estar pingando uns trocadinhos para o nosso projeto.Então, baixe agora mesmo o app Orelo no endereço Orelo.CC ou na sua loja de aplicativos e ajude a fortalecer o conhecimento científico.https://bit.ly/naruhodo-no-orelo

The one and only Eric Peters from Eric Peters Autos drops by for his weekly visit. Eric always has an informed take on the latest developments in our journey through Bizarro World. The instant popularity of singer Oliver Anthony likely is in proportion to how deeply his message regarding the "Rich Men North of Richmond" resonates with the forgotten citizens of this nation. J.B. Shurk warns the elite that the economic troubles will come for them too. In that same vein, members of the educated class might be wise to pick up on the fact that many Americans have little reason to trust them. Jon Gabriel says the elites could use a lesson in humility. Article of the Day: If you're not familiar with psychologist Stanley Milgram's experiments, you should consider taking a closer look. Here's a great piece from Armando Simón on the relevance of Milgram's experiments today. Sponsors: Monticello College Life Saving Food  TMCP Nation Climbing Upward

Stanley Milgram was a social psychologist who wanted to test a theory about his upbringing and authority. Check out this episode that was lost, and re-recorded just for you! Check out diagnosingakiller.com :)Become a patreon member!Gold Medal Wine Club discount! -> https://www.pntrac.com/t/3-302314-293495-170534Lindt Chocolate discount -> https://www.pjtra.com/t/2-554597-293495-140704We love you, YOU ARE NOT ALONE!!! National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: (800) 273-8255The Trevor Project: (212) 695-8650 https://www.thetrevorproject.org

Join Alex and guest host Sophie Halliday as they chat about the historical and psychological impact of Stanley Milgram's famous experiments on obedience and social influence in Michael Almereyda's Experimenter (2015), the other historical psychology movie that came out that year. This biopic stars Peter Sarsgaard as the titular character, with Winona Ryder, Jim Gaffigan, and several other star appearances as participants in the obedience studies. This witty drama-comedy takes the audience into the creation and data collection of the shock studies, but also other social influence experiments Milgram conducted over his 30ish year career. There are so many fourth wall breaks, you feel like Milgram is talking directly to the audience, to get his side of the story that followed him throughout his career. Would you shock someone because the experiment — AND SCIENCE! — demanded it? Please leave your feedback on this post, the main site (cinemapsychpod.swanpsych.com), on Facebook (@CinPsyPod), or Twitter (@CinPsyPod). We'd love to hear from you! Don't forget to check out our Paypal link to contribute to this podcast and keep the lights on! Don't forget to check out our MERCH STORE for some great merch with our logo! Legal stuff: 1. All film clips are used under Section 107 of Title 17 U.S.C. (fair use; no copyright infringement is intended). 2. Intro and outro music by half.cool ("Gemini"). Used under license. 3. Film reel sound effect by bone666138. Used under license CC BY 3.0. 4. Additional music: "Et Voila". Used under license.

Leading social psychologist Jerry Burger joins Tim to talk about landmark experiments on human obedience conducted by Stanley Milgram, and how decades later Jerry did a similar study that only validated Milgram's earlier disturbing findings. Jerry describes his own research project in 2006 that re-affirmed some of the conclusions from a landmark obedience research project from 45 years earlier. Will people do what they're told even if it harms someone else? We find out. https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/shapingopinion/Jerry_Burger_auphonic.mp3 Any student of history knows that during World War II, the Nazis exterminated roughly 6 million Jews in the Holocaust. They did it in a number of horrific ways.  It all started with the creation of a system of concentration camps, staffed by obedient Nazi and German troops. The horrors that happened in those camps are well documented. In the post-war interrogations and trials of Nazi officers and other Germans involved in war crimes, one refrain kept coming up. “I was just following orders.” “I just did what I was told.” No one questioned. No one objected. Everyone obeyed. In 1961, an American psychologist at Yale named Stanley Milgram pondered a question. Could nations other than Germany conform to authority in the same way? Would Americans conform to authority in the same way, or would there be differences? So, he decided to conduct an experiment. He created a reason for test subjects to participate. The cover story was that this would be a learning project. He recruited 40 men between the ages of 20 and 50. Volunteer participants in the study were told that they would be paired up with another participant. They would be assigned to teach the other participant certain things, and then they would question the other participant. If that participant got an answer wrong, the volunteer teacher would deliver punishment in the form of electric shock. That's what these unsuspecting participants were told. What they didn't know was that they were the only ones in the study who didn't know what was going on. The person they were supposed to be teaching – the learner – was in on it. The volunteer teacher's fellow instructors were in on it. The only ones who didn't know that the electric shocks were fake was the person assigned to be the teacher, the person assigned to press the buttons to deliver those electric shocks. What Milgram wanted to find out was, how long would it be before the teacher in the study would stop and reject orders to punish his fellow participant. Jerry Burger is a psychologist and researcher who was intrigued by the Milgram experiment and would later conduct a similar one to compare his results with Milgram's. Links Jerry Burger Website More Shocking Results: New Research Replicates Milgram's Findings, American Psychological Association Four Decades After Milgram, We're Still Willing to Inflict Pain, New York Times How Would People Behave in Milgram's Experiment Today?, Behavioral Scientist About this Episode's Guest Jerry Burger Jerry Burger is Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Santa Clara University. As a scholar, he is best known for his work on the psychological processes underlying deplorable and inhumane acts like atrocities and genocide. His research in this area was the subject of a New York Times editorial and was featured in a 60-minute broadcast of ABC News' Primetime and in the Discovery Channel documentary, How Evil Are You? His presentations on this topic include an invited address before the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, France. Retirement has allowed Jerry to start what he thinks of as his second career as a fiction writer. His short stories have appeared in several literary magazines, including one selected for the Best American Mystery Stories 2020. He also has published a novel, The Shadows of 1915 (Golden Antelope Press) which examines the generational effects of the 1915 Arm...

Heather Grzych interviews podcaster and psychedelic expert Zach Leary about why such a high percentage of people are turning to psychedelics today to improve their wellbeing, and the importance of using these medicines with ritual and sacredness. Zach explains why your life changes after a psychedelic experience, and why integration is so important, whether you're using LSD, psilocybin from mushrooms, MDMA, ayahuasca or other natural or synthetic medicines in the psychedelic category. They discuss how the psychedelic movements actually led to modern Americans connecting with Indian sciences like yoga, meditation and Ayurveda, despite these medicines often being frowned upon in these communities. They also delve into how technology and AI is being used to recreate famous deceased teachers like Timothy Leary, Ram Dass, Alan Watts, etc.  Heather Grzych is the author of The Ayurvedic Guide to Fertility and the host of the Wisdom of the Body podcast. A board-certified Ayurvedic practitioner, she teaches the Regenerative Fertility Method to support future generations worldwide. Heather is on the board of directors for the National Ayurvedic Medical Association (NAMA) and has been a consultant for doctors, governments, and insurance companies. She offers virtual consultations and programs worldwide. www.heathergrzych.com   Zach Leary is a podcaster,  writer, cognitive dissident, yogi and psychedelic advocate. Growing up in Beverly Hills in the 1980s, he came to realise that the man who often took him to school in the morning and “tossed the ball” in the backyard with him, was not only one of the instigators of the counterculture movement of the 1960s, but also “had a front row seat for some of the most important cultural movements of the late twentieth century.” This led Zach to create a path for himself that's been rich with many different incarnations ranging from digital marketing ace for Apple to futurist to psychedelic integration specialist and advocate. Zach currently hosts The MAPS podcast and has in depth knowledge of psychedelic assisted facilitation, is a trained meditation teacher, a student of bhakti yoga, an IFS enthusiast and expert in the history of psychedelic culture and its many methodologies. Zach is also a facilitator at the Evolution Retreat Center in Negril, Jamaica. Evolution Retreats is a beautiful retreat center that does legal psilocybin retreats using the most modern and effective methodologies available. As an author, Zach's first book “And Now, The Work Begins – Psychedelics in the 21st Century and How to Use Them” will be published by SoundsTrue in late 2023. Books referenced: Obedience to Authority by Stanley Milgram, Ayurvedic Pharmacology and Therapeutic Uses of Medicinal Plants Dravyagunavignyan by Vaidya V.M. Gogte, Be Here Now by Ram Dass, and Zach's book in development about the history and modern use of psychedelics being used safely, wisely and effectively.  Connect with Heather: Instagram.com/heathergrzych Facebook.com/grzychheather   Read the first six pages of The Ayurvedic Guide to Fertility for FREE: https://www.heathergrzych.com   Connect with Heather to balance your health for your fertility: https://www.heathergrzych.com/book-online   This podcast is for educational and entertainment purposes only.

The investigation is finding out more and more strange things about Lighthouse. We hear what happens when people start to question what is happening. Catrin speaks with Erin who raised concerns about Lighthouse and was accused of being "a cynical little old witch". Meanwhile Lighthouse is getting increasingly obsessed with its critics and former members. What happens when a life coach takes over your life? Catrin Nye and her team expose control, intimidation and fear at a sinister life coaching company. Reporter: Catrin Nye Written by: Jamie Bartlett and Catrin Nye Producers: Osman Iqbal, Natalie Truswell, Ed Main & Jo Adnitt Researcher: Aisha Doherty Executive Producer: Ravin Sampat Sound Mixing: James Bradshaw Original Music by: Phil Channell Commissioner: Rhian Roberts Archive clips from Stanley Milgram, Solomon Asch Conformity experiment re-enactment, 1974: copyright Alexandra Milgram and Alexander Street.