Podcasts about Examination

Greg looks at the Ohio Valley Conference from a stylistic and betting standpoint, examines the rosters of every team in the OVC with Blake Lovell of Southeastern 16 & Greg gives his projected order of finish for each team in the conference for the 2025-26 seasonPodcast Highlights2:31-Betting trends & styles of the Ohio Valley Conference13:36-Examination of all the OVC rosters & transfers with Blake Lovell40:50-Greg's projected order of finish for the OVC

In this episode, Mitch and David look back at the 6th Core Episode from 3 years ago. They discuss the difference between a sole-proprietor, LLC, S-Corp, and C-Corp and which one could be right for you. They go over how to pay yourself, and what to set aside for taxes, the importance of discussing situations with an attorney or accountant. Not ready for a full blown CRM, this is a great option. Build jobs, bids, and invoice straight from the app. TW Job Calculator APPS https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tradewinsconsulting.jobcalculator https://apps.apple.com/us/app/trade-wins-job-calculator/id6744992264?platform=iphone Trade Wins by Trading Content https://www.facebook.com/groups/1309829410166761 If you have questions you'd like us to answer, please feel free to email them to AskMitch@MitchSmedley.com Thanks for listening and thanks for sharing! Enjoy the show! If you'd like more insight from Mitch and David, you need to check out Trade Wins. Trade Wins can help you start your business or take your newer business and get it to a very healthy level. For more information about Trade Wins, check out https://www.tradewinsconsulting.com/ FieldPulse is the Official Field Service Management Software of The Void Podcast. Their software is ideal for you and your business. For more information about how FieldPulse can benefit you, check them out here: https://www.fieldpulse.com/book-demo?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=partner&utm_campaign=TheVoid/TradeWins http://empowerpayments.com/TheVoid Contact us: askmitch@mitchsmedley.com

Greg looks at the Mountain West from a stylistic and betting standpoint, examines the rosters of every team in the conference with Sean Paul of the Field of 68, & Greg gives his projected order of finish for the Mountain West for the 2025-26 season!Podcast Highlights2:36-Betting trends & styles of the Mountain West14:18-Examination of every Mountain West roster with Sean Paul41:25-Greg's projected order of finish for the Mountain West

Today, examine your heart in light of Jesus, asking God to shape you with deeper humility, fervent love, and genuine faith so that when you are weighed on his scales, you are not found wanting. -------- Thank you for listening! Your support of Joni and Friends helps make this show possible.     Joni and Friends envisions a world where every person with a disability finds hope, dignity, and their place in the body of Christ. Become part of the global movement today at www.joniandfriends.org   Find more encouragement on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube.

Family, this one got me. Come watch Monday at 8:30 PM EST | https://youtu.be/kDMh_me7yzsOn this episode of The Love You Moore Show, I sit down with my brother Dee-1, rapper, teacher, and faith leader, whose grandfather's final lesson rerouted his life. From near-death moments to purpose on purpose, Dee-1 breaks down how legacy, discipline, and faith turned pressure into calling. Flatout!

In this episode, Mitch and David look back at the 5th Core Episode from 3 years ago. They discuss the importance of Accounting, learning quickbooks, banking, and how all 3 of these things need to work together to create a picture of where you are at in your business. Before you even start. Not ready for a full blown CRM, this is a great option. Build jobs, bids, and invoice straight from the app. TW Job Calculator APPS https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tradewinsconsulting.jobcalculator https://apps.apple.com/us/app/trade-wins-job-calculator/id6744992264?platform=iphone Trade Wins by Trading Content https://www.facebook.com/groups/1309829410166761 If you have questions you'd like us to answer, please feel free to email them to AskMitch@MitchSmedley.com Thanks for listening and thanks for sharing! Enjoy the show! If you'd like more insight from Mitch and David, you need to check out Trade Wins. Trade Wins can help you start your business or take your newer business and get it to a very healthy level. For more information about Trade Wins, check out https://www.tradewinsconsulting.com/ FieldPulse is the Official Field Service Management Software of The Void Podcast. Their software is ideal for you and your business. For more information about how FieldPulse can benefit you, check them out here: https://www.fieldpulse.com/book-demo?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=partner&utm_campaign=TheVoid/TradeWins http://empowerpayments.com/TheVoid Contact us: askmitch@mitchsmedley.com

In this episode, FNO: InsureTech hosts a conversation with Spencer McInvaille, Director of Digital Forensics at Envista Forensics, to examine the expanding role of digital evidence in insurance investigations. The discussion explores practical methods for extracting and interpreting data from everyday devices—such as cell phones and vehicles—to assist with claims validation. Listeners gain a measured perspective on how location information, privacy considerations, rapid advancements in technology, and evolving threats like AI-manipulated imagery intersect in contemporary claims handling. Key Highlights Comprehensive overview of digital forensics as applied in the insurance space, with emphasis on how cell phones, computers, and vehicle data are leveraged to answer critical questions in claims and litigation. Practical applications of digital location data: Spencer explains how investigators may use cell phone and carrier records to determine an individual's whereabouts during an alleged loss and support or refute policyholder narratives. Data privacy, security, and generational perspectives are addressed together—touching on device security practices, informed consent, differences in comfort levels across age groups, and the realities of data retention and access. Discussion of connected vehicle data and the volume of information modern vehicles and rentals may store; Spencer references an “Inside Edition” segment that illustrated data retrieval capabilities, noting this as a demonstration of industry techniques rather than proprietary information. Examination of artificial intelligence in the investigative process—Spencer discusses both the use of AI to manage large digital datasets and the growing need to detect manipulated images or synthetic media; only general capabilities are described, with no specific product endorsements or recommendations. Guidance for insurance practitioners and the public on applying basic device security measures, understanding personal data tradeoffs, and responding swiftly to preserve evidence following an incident.

Greg looks at the MEAC from a stylistic standpoint and the betting trends that were profitable last season, chats with Herbert Seward III of Fansided for in-depth analysis on all 8 teams' rosters before Greg gives his projected order of finish for the conference for the 2025-26 season!Podcast Highlights2:49-Betting trends, conference schedule notes & styles of the MEAC12:34-Examination of all the MEAC rosters & conference play logistics with Herbert Seward III37:46-Greg's projected order of finish for the MEAC

This explosive monologue uncovers what the host calls a "Marxist revolution" threatening to dismantle American society. The host presents a series of shocking revelations that he claims are proof of a sinister agenda by government agencies and political figures. The segment's most dramatic claims include: The Sins of USAID: The host reveals "insane" and "corrupt" spending by the U.S. Agency for International Development, alleging that taxpayer money has been funneled into a radical social agenda, including funding for "sex changes" in Guatemala and "transgender opera in Colombia," while also providing aid to terrorists. The War on Our Streets: The host frames a brutal carjacking incident in Washington D.C.—in which a young man was mercilessly beaten for intervening—as a direct consequence of a political agenda that has turned Democrat-run cities into "no-go zones" run by gangs and criminals. He praises the young man, Edward Corstine, as a hero for his courageous act. The Great Olympic Power Grab: The host claims that Trump's creation of a new Olympic Committee for the LA Games is a necessary measure to prevent chaos and "street violence" funded by the Chinese Communist Party. He paints a picture of a desperate struggle to protect the country from internal and external enemies. The Vaccine Lie: The host presents what he calls a "bombshell" confession, claiming that the federal government, through the RFK, has admitted that mRNA vaccines failed to stop the pandemic and actually caused variants. He alleges that this was a deliberate lie, and that the FBI actively censored scientists, including the founder of mRNA technology, Dr. Robert Malone, to prevent a scientific debate. The host warns of the devastating long-term health consequences of the vaccines, claiming they may cause sterility in young girls, and frames the entire pandemic response as a conspiracy to destroy the economy and impose an authoritarian lockdown. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-democratic-legislators-flee-state-to-protest-gops-redistricting-plan/#:~:text=Democratic%20lawmakers%20who%20fled%20Texas%20speak%20out%20after%20being%20threatened,more%20than%20its%20current%20districts.

Greg looks at the Missouri Valley Conference from a stylistic and betting standpoint, examines the rosters of every team in the conference with Kevin Sweeney of the CBB Central podcast & SI.com before Greg gives his projected order of finish for each team in the conference for the 2025-26 season!Podcast Highlights2:50-Betting trends & styles of the Missouri Valley Conference11:34-Examination of every Missouri Valley Conference roster with Kevin Sweeney31:44-Greg's projected order of finish for the Missouri Valley Conference

In this episode Fr. Des looks at an Ignation form of prayer which is the examination of consciousness. L'articolo E36 | Chatechesis – Fr Des Farren – Examination of Consciousness proviene da Radio Maria.

Did you know that 27 million Americans ride horses annually, surpassing both golf and tennis in popularity? This surprising statistic underscores the widespread exposure to potential horse allergens, even in urban areas. In this episode, we tackle the allergies commonly seen in rural environments. We explore the intriguing hygiene hypothesis, comparing asthma rates in Amish and Hutterite communities, and uncover the unexpected prevalence of horse allergies in urban settings. From barn dust to cross-reactive allergens, we dissect the complex interplay of rural allergens, their far-reaching effects, and the critical role of specific IgE testing in identifying these often-overlooked triggers. Gain insights into the unique challenges of diagnosing allergies in rural patients, the importance of thorough clinical histories, and strategies for distinguishing between allergic and non-allergic respiratory symptoms in agricultural settings. Resources and references available here: https://www.thermofisher.com/phadia/us/en/resources/immunocast/horse-allergies-and-rural-allergies-in-agricultural-environments.html?cid=0ct_3pc_05032024_9SGOV4

Dr. Dan Schneider is an Adjunct Professor of Theology at Franciscan University of Steubenville and an Associate Staff Member at the St. John Henry Newman Research Centre for Theology at Maryvale Institute in Birmingham, England. A former U.S. Army attack helicopter pilot, Gulf War veteran, and amateur boxer, Schneider has nearly two decades of experience in Catholic evangelization and teaching.  As a founding member of Liber Christo, a movement with Fr. Chad Ripperger, he provides resources for priests and laity in the apostolate of deliverance and exorcism. Schneider is the author of The Liber Christo Method: A Field Manual for Spiritual Combat (TAN Books, 2023), offering practical “guerrilla warfare” tactics for spiritual battles, including five key strategies: Renunciation of Evil Influences, Repentance, Examination of Conscience, Learning Power and Authority, and Prayer. A sought-after speaker, he advocates for sacramental living and spiritual discipline to combat diabolical influences, drawing on his military and theological expertise. Shawn Ryan Show Sponsors: https://americanfinancing.net/srs NMLS 182334, nmlsconsumeraccess.org https://tryarmra.com/srs https://betterhelp.com/srs This episode is sponsored. Give online therapy a try at betterhelp.com/srs and get on your way to being your best self. https://meetfabric.com/shawn https://shawnlikesgold.com https://hexclad.com/srs https://hillsdale.edu/srs https://ketone.com/srs Visit https://ketone.com/srs for 30% OFF your subscription order https://ROKA.com – USE CODE SRS https://trueclassic.com/srs https://USCCA.com/srs https://blackbuffalo.com Dan Schneider Links: The Liber Christo Method - https://tanbooks.com/products/books/the-liber-christo-method-a-field-manual-for-spiritual-combat Spiritual Warfare Q & A - https://tanbooks.com/products/books/spiritual-warfare-q-and-a-for-priests-and-laity Website - https://liberchristo.org Website - https://montechristo.net FB - https://www.facebook.com/VirginMostPowerful Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Greg looks at the MAC from a stylistic standpoint and the betting trends that were profitable last season, chats with Rob Donaldson of the Rob's Best Bets Show for in-depth analysis on all 13 teams' rosters before Greg gives his projected order of finish for the conference for the 2025-26 season!Podcast Highlights2:51-Betting trends, conference schedule notes & styles of the MAC11:36-Examination of all the MAC rosters & conference play logistics with Rob Donaldson36:56-Greg's projected order of finish for the MAC

The salient point of this episode is the exploration of dispensational premillennialism, which is presented as a coherent theological framework that maintains a distinct separation between Israel and the Church. Throughout the discussion, we delve into the intricacies of biblical interpretation, particularly emphasizing the importance of understanding scripture within its original context. We engage in a rigorous examination of various eschatological views, highlighting the unique contributions of dispensationalism to Christian theology. Furthermore, the conversation touches upon the implications of these beliefs on personal faith and community dynamics, urging listeners to consider how eschatological perspectives can influence their walk with Christ. Ultimately, we aim to encourage a deeper understanding of scripture, fostering a spirit of inquiry and respectful dialogue among differing theological viewpoints.The discourse presented within this episode delves into the intricate nature of religious beliefs and the biases that accompany them, particularly as they pertain to the examination of various faiths. The dialogue invites listeners to reflect on the phenomenon of confirmation bias and its implications for individuals scrutinizing religious doctrines. The speakers engage in thoughtful analysis, highlighting the tendency of practitioners to scrutinize the fallacies of competing belief systems while remaining blind to inconsistencies within their own. This episode serves as a compelling reminder of the need for self-reflection and intellectual honesty in discussions surrounding faith and belief, urging us to confront our own biases with the same rigor we apply to others' beliefs. The overarching message emphasizes the importance of a balanced approach to religious discourse, where individuals are encouraged to examine their own doctrines critically, leading to a deeper understanding of faith as a whole.Takeaways: The discussion elucidates the tendency for individuals to discern fallacies within religions other than their own while remaining blind to similar flaws within their own belief systems, thereby revealing inherent biases. The podcast emphasizes the critical examination of eschatological views, particularly the distinctions between amillennialism, postmillennialism, and dispensational premillennialism, and how these perspectives interpret biblical prophecies differently. Listeners are encouraged to engage actively with theological discussions, asking difficult questions about God and the Bible, which promotes a deeper understanding of faith and doctrine. The episode highlights the importance of interpreting scripture through its original context, asserting that each passage must convey its intended meaning without imposing extraneous interpretations. A key takeaway is the assertion that studying eschatology instills a sense of urgency and accountability in believers, motivating them to pursue a life of holiness and fervent devotion to God. The podcast underscores the idea that not all who identify as part of Israel genuinely represent the covenantal lineage of faith, drawing parallels to contemporary discussions about identity and spirituality in relation to biblical promises.

The salient point of this episode is the exploration of dispensational premillennialism, which is presented as a coherent theological framework that maintains a distinct separation between Israel and the Church. Throughout the discussion, we delve into the intricacies of biblical interpretation, particularly emphasizing the importance of understanding scripture within its original context. We engage in a rigorous examination of various eschatological views, highlighting the unique contributions of dispensationalism to Christian theology. Furthermore, the conversation touches upon the implications of these beliefs on personal faith and community dynamics, urging listeners to consider how eschatological perspectives can influence their walk with Christ. Ultimately, we aim to encourage a deeper understanding of scripture, fostering a spirit of inquiry and respectful dialogue among differing theological viewpoints.The discourse presented within this episode delves into the intricate nature of religious beliefs and the biases that accompany them, particularly as they pertain to the examination of various faiths. The dialogue invites listeners to reflect on the phenomenon of confirmation bias and its implications for individuals scrutinizing religious doctrines. The speakers engage in thoughtful analysis, highlighting the tendency of practitioners to scrutinize the fallacies of competing belief systems while remaining blind to inconsistencies within their own. This episode serves as a compelling reminder of the need for self-reflection and intellectual honesty in discussions surrounding faith and belief, urging us to confront our own biases with the same rigor we apply to others' beliefs. The overarching message emphasizes the importance of a balanced approach to religious discourse, where individuals are encouraged to examine their own doctrines critically, leading to a deeper understanding of faith as a whole.Takeaways: The discussion elucidates the tendency for individuals to discern fallacies within religions other than their own while remaining blind to similar flaws within their own belief systems, thereby revealing inherent biases. The podcast emphasizes the critical examination of eschatological views, particularly the distinctions between amillennialism, postmillennialism, and dispensational premillennialism, and how these perspectives interpret biblical prophecies differently. Listeners are encouraged to engage actively with theological discussions, asking difficult questions about God and the Bible, which promotes a deeper understanding of faith and doctrine. The episode highlights the importance of interpreting scripture through its original context, asserting that each passage must convey its intended meaning without imposing extraneous interpretations. A key takeaway is the assertion that studying eschatology instills a sense of urgency and accountability in believers, motivating them to pursue a life of holiness and fervent devotion to God. The podcast underscores the idea that not all who identify as part of Israel genuinely represent the covenantal lineage of faith, drawing parallels to contemporary discussions about identity and spirituality in relation to biblical promises.

The Warehouse 15 crew breaks down major issues in American taekwondo competition structures after back-to-back USAT and AAU tournaments, examining why development has become watered down and what's needed for the sport to thrive again.• Critical analysis of running Under-21 Team Trials and Senior Nationals back-to-back, forcing athletes to make difficult competition choices• Discussion on what true development means beyond simply attending tournaments• Concern over American athletes lacking international exposure needed to believe they can defeat opponents from powerhouse nations• Examination of the diminished value of making national teams when some weight categories require minimal competition• Candid talk about political realities in USA Taekwondo organizations that discourage speaking out about problems• Criticism of inconsistent refereeing decisions and electronic scoring system issues at recent tournaments• Positive news about AAU national team budget reportedly doubling, potentially providing more international competitive opportunities• Call for more random weigh-ins to ensure athletes can consistently make competition weight• Reflections on the courage needed to vote for organizational changes even when it means voting yourself out of powerWe're always keeping it real here at Warehouse 15 - sorry not sorry!

Rebecca Little and Colleen Long join us to discuss their powerful book "I'm Sorry for My Loss: An Urgent Examination of Reproductive Care in America." Rebecca and Colleen are two lifelong friends and both journalists who've experienced devastating pregnancy losses. This book is an investigation into why reproductive care in America is so broken; their findings are both heartbreaking and essential.Rebecca experienced six pregnancies: 2 uneventful pregnancies of her oldest living kids followed by chemical pregnancy, missed miscarriage at 8 weeks, stillbirth in 2014 and TFMR of twins at 23 weeks for a fatal heart condition, followed by a life-threatening uterine rupture that nearly killed her. Colleen lost her first baby to stillbirth in 2012 and has two living kids. Together, they've created the book they wish they'd had: one that doesn't just offer comfort, but also asks the hard questions:Why are we so bad at grief?Why is our language so limited?Why aren't we even researching women's reproductive health?This conversation goes deep into the impossible navigation of TFMR grief when neither "pro-choice" nor "pro-life" language fits your experience. We explore how “the myth of control over pregnancy” leaves families isolated when things go wrong, and why having language that fits your loss can be life-changing.RESOURCES MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE:For more on their book, find Rebecca and Colleen here: https://www.alittlelong.com/And on Instagram at: https://www.instagram.com/imsorryformylossbook/Get the book here: https://bookshop.org/p/books/i-m-sorry-for-my-loss-undoing-our-cultural-ignorance-around-pregnancies-that-end-without-a-baby-rebecca-little/20974919 or here: https://www.amazon.com/Im-Sorry-Loss-Examination-Reproductive/dp/1728292786MORE TFMR GRIEF SUPPORT RESOURCES:www.thetfmrdoula.com/resources to see guides, meditations, courses and current group offerings

Chris Hughen sat down with Luke Heath to discuss all things ACL. We dive into the initial examination after a knee injury, the first exam following an ACL Reconstruction, daily and weekly check-ins, testing, key phases of rehab, and much more. Watch the full episode: https://youtu.be/lFGccLIrqnA  Episode Resources: Aspetar ACL Protocol Aspetar ACL Clinical Practice Guideline Aspetar Clinical Knee Exam Podcast Outline --- Follow Us: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/e3rehab  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/e3rehab/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/E3Rehab --- Rehab & Performance Programs: https://store.e3rehab.com/  Newsletter: https://e3rehab.ck.page/19eae53ac1  Coaching & Consultations: https://e3rehab.com/coaching/  Mentoring: https://e3rehab.com/mentorship-intake-form/  Articles: https://e3rehab.com/articles/  --- Podcast Sponsors: The Science PT: Get 5% off all online courses using “E3podcast” at checkout! - https://thesciencept.com/courses/online-courses/ Vivo Barefoot: Get 15% off all shoes! - https://www.vivobarefoot.com/e3rehab --- @dr.surdykapt @tony.comella @dr.nicolept @chrishughen @nateh_24 --- This episode was produced by Kody Hughes

What if everything you thought you knew about heart disease was wrong? In this eye-opening episode of the Metabolic Freedom Podcast, Ben Azadi sits down with Dr. Philip Ovadia, a heart surgeon who once followed the standard medical playbook until he realized it wasn't helping his patients or himself. Together, they dive into one of the most misunderstood topics in health: what really causes heart disease. And it's probably not what you've been told. It's not cholesterol — it's insulin resistance. Dr. Ovadia explains how testing your fasting insulin could be the missing piece in your health journey. He also shares why he gave up carbs for a more carnivore-style diet and questions whether statins are really the miracle drug they're often made out to be. This isn't just medical theory. Dr. Ovadia has lived it. He brings both personal and professional insight to the table, helping you learn how to spot metabolic issues early and take meaningful steps toward better health. If you're ready to rethink everything you've been told about heart disease, this is an episode you won't want to miss.

Episode DescriptionJoin Bishop Andy Lewter and Bishop D. A. Sherron in this illuminating theological discussion as they delve deep into one of Christianity's most debated phenomena: the speaking in tongues as recorded in Acts chapter 2 during the Day of Pentecost. This scholarly conversation moves beyond denominational perspectives to examine the historical, linguistic, and theological significance of glossolalia in the early Christian church.Drawing from extensive biblical scholarship, archaeological evidence, and historical context, both bishops bring their academic expertise to bear on critical questions surrounding this pivotal moment in Christian history. They explore the distinction between the xenoglossia (speaking in known foreign languages) described in Acts 2 and contemporary practices of glossolalia, examining the original Greek text and its implications for understanding the apostolic experience.The discussion addresses the socio-cultural backdrop of first-century Jerusalem, the diverse linguistic landscape of the Roman Empire, and the strategic importance of the miraculous communication that occurred when devout Jews "from every nation under heaven" witnessed the apostles speaking in their native tongues. The bishops analyze the theological purpose behind this supernatural manifestation—whether it served as a sign for unbelievers, a reversal of the Tower of Babel narrative, or the inaugural moment of the church's universal mission.This episode offers a balanced, academically rigorous exploration that will appeal to theology students, biblical scholars, clergy, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of this foundational Christian event. The conversation examines various interpretative frameworks while maintaining respect for different theological traditions and their approaches to pneumatology and charismatic gifts.

Episode 530 of the Sports Media Podcast features John Pollock, a reporter and writer at POST Wrestling and the co-host of the Pollock and Thurston podcast. In this podcast we discuss the death of Hulk Hogan; Hogan's impact on the wrestling business and American sporting culture; Hogan's making the front of the April 29, 1985 issue of Sports Illustrated when the magazine was a publicity monster; why Hogan became the face and bulked-up body that led pro wrestling into America's mainstream culture; the direct line from Hogan to WWE Network's launch in February  2014 to Endeavor acquiring the WWE in a deal valuing WWE at $9.3 billion; Hogan's racism; getting booed during his Netflix appearance last January; how WWE will cover his death and more. You can subscribe to this podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The primary focus of this podcast episode revolves around an in-depth examination of the screenplay for "Star Wars: Duel of the Fates," which was conceived as the original narrative for Episode 9 before the advent of "Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker." Through this discourse, Joshua Noel and TJ Blackwell endeavor to elucidate the thematic resonance and narrative structure of this unproduced screenplay, which is readily accessible online. The discussion aims not only to critique the screenplay itself but also to underscore the significance of literary engagement in all its forms, aligning with our overarching mission in the "All Reading Counts" series. This initiative seeks to promote literacy while concurrently raising funds to support local libraries, thereby fostering a culture of reading within our communities. As we delve into the intricacies of "Duel of the Fates," we invite our audience to reflect on how narratives shape our understanding of beloved universes and the characters within them.The discourse presented by Joshua Noel and TJ Blackwell intricately delves into the screenplay of Star Wars: Duel of the Fates, an untethered narrative that was initially conceived as the ninth episode of the renowned Star Wars saga. This analytical review is embedded within the larger context of the All Reading Counts series, which aims to champion literacy and generate financial support for local libraries. The speakers meticulously dissect the screenplay, juxtaposing its thematic and narrative elements against the eventual release of Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker. They illuminate the profound implications of the script—particularly its character arcs, plot intricacies, and the resonant motifs that reflect on the nature of heroism and villainy. The analysis is accentuated by an exploration of the script's unproduced elements, revealing a vision for the franchise that remains tantalizingly elusive yet markedly enriching when examined through the lens of literary critique.Takeaways: In this episode, we delve into the screenplay for Star Wars: Duel of the Fates, exploring its narrative intricacies and character developments that starkly contrast with The Rise of Skywalker. We emphasize the significance of promoting literacy through our All Reading Counts series, which aims to raise funds for local libraries and enhance community engagement in literature. Duel of the Fates reintroduces beloved characters such as Luke and Rey, providing them with more coherent arcs that resonate with the overarching themes of the Star Wars saga. The discussion highlights the screenplay's exploration of moral ambiguity, suggesting that both light and dark sides of the Force can coexist in harmony for the greater good. Listeners are encouraged to reflect on the implications of reading screenplays as a literary form, fostering imagination and creativity in interpreting visual narratives. We conclude by contrasting the compelling elements of Duel of the Fates against the perceived shortcomings of The Rise of Skywalker, inviting our audience to consider alternate narratives in the Star Wars universe. .Check out the rest of our 'All Reading Counts' series:https://player.captivate.fm/collection/3706021e-22e5-4598-ae1d-732ec8e275a9.Listen to all of our Star Wars episodes:https://player.captivate.fm/collection/8a69b978-b30c-4515-9e5d-a38a84cc367f.Check out other episodes with Joshua:

In this episode, Mitch and David look back at the 4th Core Episode from 3 years ago. They discuss the importance of running flat rate pricing through a Pricebook so that you can understand the value of having a consistent price structure and how it not only benefits the business but the employees as well. They break down CRM softwares and how they work together with your Pricebook. Come to Vegas and learn the ins and outs of marketing, not to mention, it's a great freaking time. Get you tickets for the 2025 Vegas Event here: https://tradewinsconsulting.com/events Not ready for a full blown CRM, this is a great option. Build jobs, bids, and invoice straight from the app. TW Job Calculator APPS https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tradewinsconsulting.jobcalculator https://apps.apple.com/us/app/trade-wins-job-calculator/id6744992264?platform=iphone Trade Wins by Trading Content https://www.facebook.com/groups/1309829410166761 If you have questions you'd like us to answer, please feel free to email them to AskMitch@MitchSmedley.com Thanks for listening and thanks for sharing! Enjoy the show! If you'd like more insight from Mitch and David, you need to check out Trade Wins. Trade Wins can help you start your business or take your newer business and get it to a very healthy level. For more information about Trade Wins, check out https://www.tradewinsconsulting.com/ FieldPulse is the Official Field Service Management Software of The Void Podcast. Their software is ideal for you and your business. For more information about how FieldPulse can benefit you, check them out here: https://www.fieldpulse.com/book-demo?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=partner&utm_campaign=TheVoid/TradeWins http://empowerpayments.com/TheVoid Contact us: askmitch@mitchsmedley.com

I. A relationship of serving, of working, of doing (even before saving) - Adam  •  Tend the Garden (Adam)  •  Build the Ark (Noah)  •  Leave your Home (Abraham)  •  Lead My People (Moses)   •  Leave Egypt (Exodus)  •  Love Your Neighbor (Leviticus)   •  Love Me (Deuteronomy)   •  Cross the Jordan (Joshua)  •  Rebuild My Temple (Go get wood)   •  Mt. 7:24-27; Ja 1:22-24; Heb. 11   •  The Book of Romans begins and ends with the phrase “obedience of faith” AND it is connected to reaching the nations (Haggai 2)  •  Romans 1:1-7; Romans 16:17-27  •  The Past, Present, Future Temples= Message One - God's Judgment and the call to rebuild the Temple - chap. 1= Message Two - God's Prophetic Promise of the Future Glory of the Temple - 2:1-9= Message Three - God's Requirement of the People's Purity - 2:10-19= Message Four - God's Re establishing of the Messianic Line - 2:20-23 (Matthew 1:13)I. The Material (wood) - Ezra 5:8; Nehemiah 8:15  1.  In the mountains of Jerusalem?  2.  King of Tyre (Hiram)- I Kings 5:1-18  3.  Cedars of Lebanon - Ezra 3:7II. The Purposes - EXAMINATION   1.  That God be pleased - Scripture (John 8:29; Ephesians 5:10; Philippians 4:18; Colossians 1:9-12  2.  That God be glorified - I Kings 8   3.  We are His Temple - I Cor 3:16; 6:18-20; I Thessalonians 4:1; I Timothy 2:3; 5:4; Titus 2:9; Hebrews 13:15-16; 20-21 (is God pleased and glorified in us?)III. ACCESS - There are Two Veils   1.  In the Holy of Holies- Matt 27:51  2.  Over the hearts of the Hebrews - II Corinthians 3:12-16; 4:3

Greg looks at the MAAC from a stylistic and betting standpoint, examines the rosters of every team in the conference with Sam Federman of Mid Major Madness before Greg gives his projected order of finish for the MAAC for the 2025-26 season!Podcast Highlights2:45-Betting trends & styles of the MAAC14:47-Examination of all the MAAC rosters & conference play logistics with Sam Federman49:07-Greg's projected order of finish for the MAAC

Greg looks at the Ivy League from a stylistic and betting standpoint, examines the rosters of every team in the conference with Sam Federman of Mid Major Madness before Greg gives his projected order of finish for the Ivy League for the 2025-26 season!Podcast Highlights3:28-Betting trends, conference schedule notes & styles of the Ivy League13:46-Examination of all the Ivy league rosters & conference play logistics with Sam Federman44:23-Greg's projected order of finish for the Ivy League

Sermon Bible Verse: Judges 7:4

In this episode, Mitch and David look back at the 3rdCore Episode from 3 years ago. They re-evaluate why it is so important to have a plan when it comes to preparing your business finances before you start your business. Have everything you can think of on a list and then budget those items so that you know how much it's going to take to open your doors. Your plan could make or break you. Come to Vegas and learn the ins and outs of marketing, not to mention, it's a great freaking time. Get you tickets for the 2025 Vegas Event here: https://tradewinsconsulting.com/events Not ready for a full blown CRM, this is a great option. Build jobs, bids, and invoice straight from the app. TW Job Calculator APPS https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tradewinsconsulting.jobcalculator https://apps.apple.com/us/app/trade-wins-job-calculator/id6744992264?platform=iphone Trade Wins by Trading Content https://www.facebook.com/groups/1309829410166761 If you have questions you'd like us to answer, please feel free to email them to AskMitch@MitchSmedley.com Thanks for listening and thanks for sharing! Enjoy the show! If you'd like more insight from Mitch and David, you need to check out Trade Wins. Trade Wins can help you start your business or take your newer business and get it to a very healthy level. For more information about Trade Wins, check out https://www.tradewinsconsulting.com/ FieldPulse is the Official Field Service Management Software of The Void Podcast. Their software is ideal for you and your business. For more information about how FieldPulse can benefit you, check them out here: https://www.fieldpulse.com/book-demo?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=partner&utm_campaign=TheVoid/TradeWins http://empowerpayments.com/TheVoid Contact us: askmitch@mitchsmedley.com

Greg previews the Horizon League from a stylistic and betting standpoint, examines the rosters of every team in the conference & the offseason coaching changes with Bob McDonald of HoriZone Roundtable & Greg gives his projected order of finish for the conference for the 2024-25 season!Podcast Highlights2:37-Betting trends & styles of the Horizon League12:12-Examination of each Horizon team rosters with Bob McDonald33:25-Greg's projected order of finish for the Horizon League

Send us a textWe dive into the complex world of NBA officiating, exploring the technical definitions and real-world applications of flagrant and technical fouls with certified referee Nick.• Technical foul: penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct or non-physical infractions of rules• Flagrant foul: contact considered unnecessary per the NBA rulebook, with varying severity levels• Analysis of the 2016 NBA Finals incident between LeBron James and Draymond Green• Comparison to Draymond's kick on Steven Adams and questions of consistency in officiating• Examination of WNBA flagrants between Angel Reese and Caitlin Clark• Discussion of how blocks and head contact are officiated• Insight into referee training on root cause vs rule enforcement• Perspective on the challenges referees face making split-second decisionsBe kind to your referees – they're making tough calls in real-time without the benefit of slow-motion replay, and they're rarely the reason you lose a game.Support the showhttps://linktr.ee/GetABucketShow for more content!!!

Greg looks at Conference USA from a stylistic and betting standpoint, examines the rosters of every team in the conference with Zay Galindo of ESPN Radio 600 in El Paso Texas before Greg gives his projected order of finish for Conference USA for the 2024-25 season!Podcast Highlights3:02-Betting trends & styles of Conference USA13:24-Examination of the CUSA team rosters & coaching changes with Zay Galindo35:18-Greg's projected order of finish for Conference USA

We're back for Part Two of our deep dive into The Turner Diaries, and if you thought things couldn't get more outrageous, buckle up. This episode, we wade through the book's most jaw-dropping plot twists—mass murder, drive-by bombings, and a logic so twisted it would make a pretzel jealous.As we dissect the second half, the book's attempts to blame “the media” for the public's resistance to terrorism are almost as laughable as its wild leaps of logic. And then there's the infamous claim that feminism somehow leads to the legalization of rape—a narrative so ridiculous, we had to double-check we weren't reading satire. Spoiler: we weren't.Of course, the racism and antisemitism get dialed up to eleven, with the author spinning conspiracy theories that would be right at home in some of today's darkest internet corners. But as always, we don't just call out the hate—we skewer it with our signature humour. Sometimes, the only way to confront such absurdity is to laugh at it, and we make sure to highlight just how preposterous these arguments really are.Throughout the episode, we reflect on how far society has come (and how far we still have to go) in challenging bigotry and hate. With Greg Hall's insights and our own lived experiences, we draw connections between these extremist ideas and the rhetoric we see online today.So join us as we take on the most toxic parts of The Turner Diaries - armed with critical thinking, a refusal to let hate go unchallenged, and, as always, a healthy dose of irreverence. It's grim, it's outrageous, but we promise it's never boring.- Recap of Part One and the escalation of violence in the book's plot (including mass murder and bombings)- Analysis of the novel's attempts to blame the media for public resistance to the “Organization”- Dissection of the book's absurd logic: drive-by bombings, casual sexism, and the demonization of liberalism- Deep dive into the most ludicrous narrative twist—claiming feminism leads to the legalization of rape- Examination of the book's overt racism and antisemitism, including wild conspiracy tropes about minorities and Jews- Discussion on how the novel frames progressive social changes as existential threats and slippery slopes- Hosts and guest react to the most shocking, offensive, and preposterous passages—with trademark SDCIC humour- Drawing parallels between the book's rhetoric and current far-right talking points online and in media- Reflection on changing social attitudes and the importance of challenging bigotry, racism, and sexism- Greg Hall shares insights on how these extremist ideas have evolved and spread in modern discourse- Emphasis on using satire, wit, and critical thinking to dismantle hate-filled narrativesAD FREE EPISODES ARE AVAILABLE AT https://www.patreon.com/somedarecallitconspiracy FOR JUST $2 PER MONTH TWO EPISODES PER WEEK AVAILABLE FOR $5 (PATREONS ARE CURRENTLY 5 EPISODES OF T.W.A.T.S. AHEAD OF SPOTIFY/APPLE USERS) JOIN US AND SUPPORT THE PODCASTBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/some-dare-call-it-conspiracy--5932731/support.

Ollie reports progressive weakness in his legs and tingling sensations in his hands and feet after a recent upper respiratory infection. On examination, he has moderate dorsiflexor weakness, and mild gait instability. Which of the following is the MOST anticipated finding? A) Hyperreflexia with distal weaknessB) Loss of tactile sensationC) Severe gross hip muscle weaknessD) Limb contracturesDOWNLOAD THIS EPISODE'S CHEATSHEET:www.nptecheatsheet.com/gbs25

Jenise & Leci discuss the beauty of nature as a reflection of God's creation, the significance of confession and reconciliation in their spiritual lives, and how they navigate teaching their children about faith. The dialogue emphasizes the challenges and rewards of maintaining a spiritual practice in the modern world, highlighting the grace that comes from vulnerability and honesty in their journeys.The following link is a great resource on going to confession and includes a downloadable Examination of Conscience. You can find it here.

Greg previews the Coastal Athletic Association (CAA) from a stylistic and betting standpoint, examines the rosters of every team in the conference with Hofstra play by play voice Dylan Brett & Greg gives his projected order of finish for the conference for the 2025-26 season!Podcast Highlights2:48-Betting trends & styles of the Coastal Conference11:31-Examination of each CAA team rosters with Dylan Brett36:28-Greg's projected order of finish for the CAA

Send us a textNikki Blue, former interim head coach of the Phoenix Mercury, is suing the organization over alleged pay disparities and claims she was set up to fail with her roster. The lawsuit highlights complex discussions around race, gender, and compensation in WNBA coaching positions, though Blue's claims face scrutiny given team performance metrics.• Detailed explanation of interim head coach roles in professional basketball• Examination of pay differences between Blue ($250,000 for half-season) versus Vanessa Nygaard ($375,000 for full season)• Analysis of current Mercury success under new head coach Nate Tibbitt with NBA coaching experience• Comparison of 2023 Phoenix Mercury roster to Seattle Storm showing potential team performance issues• Discussion of optics surrounding transitions between coaches of different racial backgrounds• Consideration of how Mercury's current success might impact public perception of the lawsuitLike, subscribe, and comment your thoughts on the Phoenix Mercury being sued by Nikki Blue. Check out the WNBA's page as well as mine, and let me know if you think she has a legitimate case.Support the showhttps://linktr.ee/GetABucketShow for more content!!!

Interview Summary So, you two, along with a number of other people in the field, wrote a chapter for a recently published book called The Handbook of Children and Screens. We discussed that book in an earlier podcast with its editors, Dmitri Christakis and Kris Perry, the executive director of the Children and Screens organization. And I'd like to emphasize to our listeners that the book can be downloaded at no cost. I'd like to read a quote if I may, from the chapter that the two of you wrote. 'Screen time continues to evolve with the advent of continuous and immersive video reels, voice activated assistance, social media influencers, augmented and virtual reality targeted advertising. Immersive worlds where children can virtually shop for food and beverages, cook or work in a fast-food outlet from a smartphone, a tablet, a computer, or an internet connected tv and more.' So as much as I follow the field, I still read that and I say, holy you know what. I mean that's just an absolutely alarming set of things that are coming at our children. And it really sounds like a tidal wave of digital sophistication that one could have never imagined even a short time ago. Amanda, let's start with you. Can you tell us a little bit more about these methods and how quickly they evolve and how much exposure children have? I think you're right, Kelly, that the world is changing fast. I've been looking at screen media for about 20 years now as a researcher. And in the earlier years, and Tom can attest to this as well, it was all about TV viewing. And you could ask parents how much time does your child spend watching TV? And they could say, well, they watch a couple shows every night and maybe a movie or two on the weekend, and they could come up with a pretty good estimate, 1, 2, 3 hours a day. Now, when we ask parents how much time their children spend with media, they have to stop and think, 'well, they're watching YouTube clips throughout the day. They're on their smartphone, their tablet, they're on social media, texting and playing all these different games.' It really becomes challenging to even get a grasp of the quantity of screen time let alone what kids are doing when they're using those screens. I will say for this book chapter, we found a really great review that summarized over 130 studies and found that kids are spending about three and a half or four hours a day using screens. Yet some of these studies are showing as high as seven or eight hours. I think it's probably under-reported because parents have a hard time really grasping how much time kids spend on screens. I've got a one-year-old and a five-year-old, and I've got some nieces and nephews and I'm constantly looking over their shoulder trying to figure out what games are they playing and where are they going online and what are they doing. Because this is changing really rapidly and we're trying to keep up with it and trying to make sure that screen time is a safe and perhaps healthy place to be. And that's really where a lot of our research is focused. I can only imagine how challenging it must be to work through that landscape. And because the technology advances way more quickly than the policies and legal landscape to control it, it really is pretty much whatever anybody wants to do, they do it and very little can be done about it. It's a really interesting picture, I know. We'll come back later and talk about what might be done about it. Tom, if you will help us understand the impact of all this. What are the effects on the diets of children and adolescents? I'm thinking particularly when Amanda was mentioning how many hours a day children are on it that three to four hours could be an underestimate of how much time they're spending. What did kids used to do with that time? I mean, if I think about when you and I were growing up, we did a lot of different things with that time. But what's it look like now? Well, that's one of the important questions that we don't really know a lot about because even experimental studies that I can talk about that look at reducing screen time have not been very good at being able to measure what else is going on or what substitutes for it. And so, a lot of the day we don't really know exactly what it's displacing and what happens when you reduce screen time. What replaces it? The assumption is that it's something that's more active than screen time. But, you know, it could be reading or homework or other sedentary behaviors that are more productive. But we really don't know. However, we do know that really the general consensus across all these studies that look at the relationship between screen time and nutrition is that the more time children spend using screens in general, the more calories they consume, the lower the nutritional quality of their diets and the greater their risk for obesity. A lot of these studies, as Amanda mentioned, were dominated by studies of television viewing, or looking at television viewing as a form of screen use. And there's much less and much more mixed results linking nutrition and obesity with other screens such as video games, computers, tablets, and smartphones. That doesn't mean those relationships don't exist. Only that the data are too limited at this point. And there's several reasons for that. One is that there just haven't been enough studies that single out one type of screen time versus another. Another is what Amanda brought up around the self-report issue, is that most of these studies depend on asking children or the parents how much time they spend using screens. And we know that children and adults have a very hard time accurately reporting how much time they're using screens. And, in fact when we measure this objectively, we find that they both underestimate and overestimate at times. It's not all in one direction, although our assumption is that they underestimate most of the time, we find it goes in both directions. That means that in addition to sort of not having that answer about exactly what the amount of screen time is, really makes it much tougher to be able to detect relationships because it adds a lot of error into our studies. Now there have been studies, as I mentioned, that have tried to avoid these limitations by doing randomized controlled trials. Including some that we conducted, in which we randomized children, families or schools in some cases to programs that help them reduce their screen time and then measure changes that occur in nutrition, physical activity, and measures of obesity compared to kids who are randomized to not receive those programs. And the randomized trials are really useful because they allow us to make a conclusion about cause-and-effect relationships. Some of these programs also targeted video games and computers as well as television. In fact, many of them do, although almost all of them were done before tablets and smartphones became very common in children. We still don't have a lot of information on those, although things are starting to come out. Most of these studies demonstrated that these interventions to reduce screen use can result in improved nutrition and less weight gain. And the differences seen between the treatment and control groups were sometimes even larger than those commonly observed from programs to improve nutrition and increased physical activity directly. Really, it's the strongest evidence we have of cause-and-effect relationships between screen use and poor nutrition and risk for obesity. Of course, we need a lot more of these studies, particularly more randomized controlled studies. And especially those including smartphones because that's where a lot of kids, especially starting in the preteen age and above, are starting to spend their time. But from what we know about the amount of apparent addictiveness that we see in the sophisticated marketing methods that are being used in today's media, I would predict that the relationships are even larger today than what we're seeing in all these other studies that we reviewed. It's really pretty stunning when one adds up all that science and it looks pretty conclusive that there's some bad things happening, and if you reduce screen time, some good things happen. So, Amanda, if you know the numbers off the top of your head, how many exposures are kids getting to advertisements for unhealthy foods? If I think about my own childhood, you know, we saw ads for sugar cereals during Saturday morning cartoon televisions. And there might have been a smattering if kids watch things that weren't necessarily just directed at kids like baseball games and stuff like that. But, and I'm just making this number up, my exposure to those ads for unhealthy foods might have been 20 a week, 30 a week, something like that. What does it look like now? That is a good question. Kelly. I'm not sure if anyone can give you a totally accurate answer, but I'll try. If you look at YouTube ads that are targeting children, a study found that over half of those ads were promoting foods and beverages, and the majority of those were considered unhealthy, low nutritional value, high calorie. It's hard to answer that question. What we used to do is we'd take, look at all the Saturday morning cartoons, and we'd actually record them and document them and count the number of food ads versus non-food ads. And it was just a much simpler time in a way, in terms of screen exposure. And we found in that case, throughout the '90s and early 2000s, a lot of food ads, a lot of instances of these food ads. And then you can look at food placement too, right? It's not an actual commercial, but these companies are paying to get their food products in the TV show or in the program. And it's just become much more complicated. I think it's hard to capture unless you have a study where you're putting a camera on a child, which some people are doing, to try to really capture everything they see throughout their day. It's really hard to answer, but I think it's very prolific and common and becoming more sophisticated. Okay, thanks. That is very helpful context. Whatever the number is, it's way more than it used to be. Definitely. And it also sounds as if and it's almost all for unhealthy foods, but it sounds like it's changed in other ways. I mean, at some point as I was growing up, I started to realize that these things are advertising and somebody's trying to sell me something. But that's a lot harder to discern now, isn't it with influencers and stuff built in the product placements and all that kind of stuff. So, to the extent we had any safeguards or guardrails in the beginning, it sounds like those are going to be much harder to have these days. That's right. It really takes until a child is 6, 7, 8 years old for them to even identify that this is a commercial. That this is a company that's trying to sell me something, trying to persuade. And then even older children are having to really understand those companies are trying to make money off the products that they sell, right? A lot of kids, they just look at things as face value. They don't discriminate against the commercial versus the non-commercial. And then like you're suggesting with social influencers, that they're getting paid to promote specific products. Or athletes. But to the child that is a character or a person that they've learned to love and trust and don't realize, and as adults, I think we forget sometimes too. That's very true. Amanda, let me ask about one thing that you and Tom had in your chapter. You had a diagram that I thought was very informative and it showed the mechanisms through which social media affects the diet and physical activity of children. Can you describe what you think some of the main pathways of influence might be? That figure was pretty fun to put together because we had a wonderful wealth of knowledge and expertise as authors on this chapter. And people provided different insight from the scientific evidence. I will say the main path we were trying to figure out how does this exposure to screen really explain changes in what children are eating, their risk for obesity, the inactivity and sedentary behavior they're engaging in? In terms of food, really what is I believe the strongest relationship is the exposure to food advertisement and the eating while engaging in screen time. You're getting direct consumption while you're watching screens, but also the taste preferences, the brand loyalty that's being built over time by constantly seeing these different food products consistently emerge as one of the strongest relationships. But we identified some other interesting potential mechanisms too. While kids are watching screens or engaging in screens, there's some evidence to indicate that they're not able to read their body as well. Their feelings of hunger, their feelings of satiety or fullness. That they're getting distracted for long periods of time. Also, this idea of instant gratification, just like the reward process of instant gratification with using the screen. They're so interactive. You can go online and get what you want and reach what you want. And the same thing is happening with food. It becomes habitual as well. Children get off of school and they go home, and they grab a snack, and they watch tv or they watch their YouTube clips or play their games. And it becomes an eating occasion that may not have otherwise existed. But they're just associating screen time with eating. There's some evidence even on screen time impacting inhibition and controlling impulse and memory. And that's more emerging, but it's interesting to just consider how this prolonged screen time where you're not interacting with someone in person, your eyes are focused on the screen, might actually be having other cognitive impacts that we may not even be aware of yet. If we ask the question why Is screen time having a bad impact on children and their diets? It's almost let us count the ways. There are a lot of possible things going on there. And speaking of that, there's one question in particular I'd like to ask you, Tom. Certainly marketing might affect what kids prefer. Like it might make them want to have a cereal or a beverage A or snack food B or whatever it happens to be. But could it also affect hunger? How much kids want to eat? I mean, you think, well, hunger is biological, and the body sends out signals that it's time to eat. How does that all figure in? The research suggests it can. Advertising in particular but even non-advertising references or images of food can trigger hunger and eating whether or not you felt hungry before you saw them. And I'm guessing almost everyone's experienced that themselves, where they see an image of food, and all of a sudden, they're craving it. It can be as simple as Pavlov's dogs, you know, salivating in response to cues about food. In addition, I think one of the mechanisms that Amanda brought up is this idea that when you're distracted with a screen, it actually overruns or overwhelms your normal feelings of fullness or satiety during eating. When distracted, people are less aware of how much they're eating. And when you're eating while using a screen, people tend to eat until they've finished the plate or the bag or the box, you know? And until that's empty, till they get to the bottom, instead of stopping when they start to get full. Well, there's sort of a double biological whammy going on there, isn't there? It is affecting your likelihood of eating in the first place, and how hungry you feel. But then it also is affecting when you stop and your satiety happening. And you put those two together there's a lot going on, isn't there? Exactly. And it's really one of the reasons why a lot of our programs to reduce weight gain and improve nutrition really put a lot of emphasis on not eating in front of screens. Because our studies have shown it accounts for a large proportion of the calories consumed during the day. Oh, that's so interesting. Amanda, you mentioned influencers. Tell us a little bit more about how this works in the food space. These social influencers are everywhere, particularly Instagram, TikTok, et cetera. Kids are seeing these all the time and as I mentioned earlier, you often build this trusting relationship with the influencer. And that becomes who you look to for fads and trends and what you should and shouldn't do. A lot of times these influencers are eating food or cooking or at restaurants, even the ones that are reaching kids. As you analyze that, oftentimes it's the poor nutrition, high calorie foods. And they're often being paid for the ads too, which as we discussed earlier, kids don't always realize. There's also a lot of misinformation about diet and dieting, which is of concern. Misinformation that could be harmful for kids as they're growing and trying to grow in a healthy way and eat healthy foods. But kids who may look to overly restrict their foods, for example, rather than eating in a healthier manner. So that's definitely a problem. And then also, oftentimes these social influencers really have these unattainable beauty standards. Maybe they're using a filter or maybe they are models or whatnot. They're projecting these ideal body images that are very difficult and sometimes inappropriate for children to try to attain. Now, we've seen this in other forms, right? We've seen this in magazines going back. We've seen this on websites. But now as soon as a kid turns on their smartphone or their tablet and they're online, it's in front of them all the time. And, and they're interacting, they're liking it, they're commenting and posting. I think the social influencers have just really become quite pervasive in children's lives. Somebody who's an influencer might be recording something that then goes out to lots and lots of people. They're eating some food or there's some food sitting in the background or something like that. And they're getting paid for it, but not saying they're getting paid for it. Probably very few people realize that money is changing hands in all of that, I'm suspecting, is that right? Yes, I do believe they're supposed to do hashtag ad and there are different indicators, but I'm not sure the accountability behind that. And I'm also not sure that kids are looking for that and really understand what that means or really care what that means. Okay. Because they're looking to sense what's popular. But there's an opportunity to perhaps further regulate, or at least to educate parents and kids in that regard that I think would be helpful. Tom, while we're on this issue of conflicts of interest, there was recent press coverage, and then there were reports by reporters at the Washington Post and The Examination showing that the food industry was paying dieticians to be influencers who then posted things favorable to industry without disclosing their funding. How big of a problem do you think this is sort of overall with professionals being paid and not disclosing the payments or being paid even if they disclose things. What kind of a negative impact that's having? Yes, I find it very concerning as you would guess, knowing me. And I believe one of the investigations found that about half of influencers who were being paid to promote foods, drinks, or supplements, didn't disclose that they were paid. It was quite a large magnitude. It goes throughout all types of health professionals who are supposed to be sources of quality information and professional organizations themselves which take advertising or take sponsorships and then don't necessarily disclose it. And you know in this day when we're already seeing drops in the public's trust in science and in research, I think this type of information, or this type of deception just makes it a lot worse. As you know, Kelly, there's quite a bit of research that suggests that being paid by a company actually changes the way you talk about their products and even conduct research in a way that's more favorable to those products. Whether you think it does or not, whether you're trying to be biased or not. Tom, just to insert one thing in my experience. If you ask people in the field, does taking money from industry affect the way scientists do their work and they'll almost always say yes. But if you say, does it influence your work, they'll almost always say no. There's this unbelievable blind spot. And one might conclude from what you were telling us is that disclosure is going to be the remedy to this. Like for the half of people who didn't disclose it, it would be okay if they took the money as long as they disclosed it. But you're saying that's obviously not the case. That there's still all kinds of bias going on and people who are hearing some disclosure don't necessarily discount what they're hearing because of it. And it's still a pretty bad kettle of fish, even if disclosure occurs. It's especially pernicious when it doesn't, but it seems even when disclosure happens, it's not much of a remedy to anything. But you may not agree. No, I definitely agree with that. And that's only, you know, part of it too because there's the other side of the audience that Amanda brought up as well. And in particular what kids, but also adults, how they react to disclosures. And, while it's been possible to teach people to recognize potential bias, you know, when there's a disclosure. And to make people aware, which is a good thing, we want disclosure, I guess, so people are aware to be more vigilant in terms of thinking about what biases may be in the messages. There's not much evidence that teaching people that or making them aware of that changes their behavior. They still believe the advertising. Right. They still act in the same way. It's still just as persuasive to them. One more little editorial insertion. The thing that has always puzzled me about disclosure is that it implies that there's something bad going on or else, why would you have to disclose it? And the solution seems not to disclose it, but not to do the bad thing. And it's like, I could come up and kick you in the leg, but it's okay if I disclose that I kick you in the leg. I mean, it just makes no sense to me. But let me move on to something different. Amanda, I'd like to ask you this. I assume the food industry gets a lot more impact and reach per dollar they spend from when the only option was to run ads on national television and now, they're doing things at much less expense, I think, that can have, you know, orders of magnitude more impact and things. But is my perception correct? And how do you think through that? I think of it like the Tupperware model, right? You're building these trusted local or national celebrities, spokespeople for kids. Oftentimes these young adults or teenagers who are doing funny things and they're engaging, and so you're building this trust like you did with the Tupperware. Where you go and train people to go out to people's homes and their neighbors and their friends and their church and sell the product. It's really similar just in an online space. I think you're right; the cost is likely much less. And yet the reach and even the way these influencers are paid is all about the interaction, the likes, the comments, that sort of thing. The reposts. It's become quite sophisticated, and clearly, it's effective because companies are doing this. And one other thing to mention we haven't talked about yet is the food companies themselves have hired young people who use humor as a way to create a following for the different brands or products. It's not a person now, it's either the branded character or the actual company itself. And I think that has great influence of building some loyalty to the brand early in life. So that child is growing up and not only persuading their parents to purchase these products, but as they have more disposable income, they're going to continue purchasing the product. I wonder if Edward Tupper or I don't know if I remember his first name right, but I wonder if you could have ever imagined the how his plastic invention would permeate more of society than he ever thought? Tom, what about the argument that it's up to parents to decide and to monitor what their children are exposed to and the government needs to back off. Oh, it would be so nice if they were that easy, wouldn't it? If we could depend on parents. And I think every parent would love to be able to do that. But we're talking about individual parents and their kids who are being asked to stand up against billions, literally billions and billions of dollars spent every year to get them to stay on their screens as long as possible. To pay attention to their marketing, as Amanda was talking about the techniques they use. And to really want their products even more. If you could think of a parent with endless knowledge and time and resources, even they are really unable to stand up to such powerful forces working against them. Unfortunately, and this is not unique to the issues of screens in children's health, but really many of the issues around health, that in the absence of government regulation and really lack of any oversight, this really difficult job is dumped on parents. You know, not their choice, but it's sort of in their lap. We still try and help them to be better at this. While we're waiting for our elected representatives to stand up to lobbyists and do their jobs, we still in a lot of our interventions we develop, we still try and help parents as well as schools, afterschool programs, teachers, health professionals, develop the skills to really help families resist this pool of media and marketing. But that shouldn't be the way it is. You know, most parents are really already doing the best they can. But it's drastically unfair. It's really an unfair playing field. That all makes good sense. We've been talking thus far about the negative impacts of media, but Amanda, you've done some work on putting this technology to good use. Tell us about that if you will. I do enjoy trying to flip the script because technology is meant to help us, not harm us. It's meant to make our lives more efficient, to provide entertainment. Now with video chatting, to provide some social connection. A lot of my work over the past 20 years has been looking at what's commercially available, what kids are using, and then seeing let's test these products or these programs and can we flip them around to promote healthier eating? To promote physical activity? Can we integrate them for kids who are in a weight management program? Can we integrate the technology to really help them be successful? It doesn't always work, and we certainly aren't looking to increase screen time, but we also need to recognize that achieving zero hours of screen time is really unattainable pretty much universally. Let's try to evaluate the screen time that is being used and see if we can make it healthier. A few examples of that include when the Nintendo Wii came out about 18 years ago now. I was part of a group that was one of the first to test that video game console system because up until that point, most of the games you sat down to play, you held a remote in your hand. There were Dance Dance Revolution games and arcade halls so you could do a little bit of movement with games. But pretty much they were sedentary. Nintendo Wii came out and really changed a lot because now you had to get up off the couch, move your body, move your arms and legs to control the game. And we found it cut across all demographics. Men, women, boys, girls, different age groups. There was content available for a lot of different groups. These types of games became really popular. And I did some of the earlier studies to show that at least in a structured program that kids can engage in what we call moderate levels of physical activity. They're actually moving their bodies when they play these games. And over time, I and others have integrated these games into programs as a way to be an in with kids who may not be involved in sports, may not go outside to play, but they're willing to put on a video game and move in their living room at home. Building from that, we've developed and tested various apps. Some of these apps directly reach the parents, for example, teaching the parents. These are strategies to get your child to eat healthier. Prepare healthier meals, grocery shop, be more physically active as a family. We've looked at different wearables, wristwatches that can help kids and parents. Maybe they'll compete against each other to try to get the most steps of a day and that sort of thing. And then some of my recent work is now integrating chatbots and artificial intelligence as ways to provide some tailored feedback and support to kids and families who are looking to be more physically active, eat healthier. And then one study I'm really excited about uses mixed reality. This is virtual reality where you're putting on a headset. And for that study we are integrating children's homework that they would otherwise do on their Chromebook. And we're removing the keyboard and computer mouse so that they now have to use their body to click and point and drag and move the screen. And these are just a few examples. I do not think this is the magical solution. I think as Tom alluded to, there are different levels of government regulation, educating parents, working with schools. There's working with the food industry. There's a lot that we need to do to make this a healthier media space for kids. But I think this is something we should be open to, is figuring out if people are going to spend a lot of time using screens, what can we do to try to make those screens healthier? You make me smile when I'm hearing that because all these things sound really exciting and like there's plenty of potential. And you're right, I mean, if they're going to be on there anyway, maybe there can be some positive way to harness that time. And those all sound really important and really good. And let's hope that they spread enough to really touch lots and lots of children and their families. Tom, you and I keep caught up. We see each other at professional meetings or we just have periodic phone calls where we tell each other what we're up to. And you've been telling me over the past couple years about this really amazing project you're heading up tracking screen usage. Could you tell us a little bit about that? I'd love to. Really it addresses the problem that came up before, which is really how we measure what people are doing and seeing on their screens. Basically all the studies of media effects for the past a hundred plus years that the field has been studying media, has been dependent on people telling us what they do and what they saw. When in fact, we know that's not particularly accurate. So now we have technology that allows us to track exactly what people are doing and seeing on their screens. We call this screenomics, like genomics, except instead of studying how genes affect us, it's studying how screens affect us and how the screens we experience in our lives really are a reflection of our lives. The way we are doing this is we put software on your phone or your laptop, and it can be on other screens as well, and it runs in the background and takes a screenshot every five seconds. And it covers everything on the screen because it's just taking a picture of the screen. All the words, all the images. Then we use AI to help us decipher [00:34:00] what was on those screens. And so far, we've collected over 350 million screenshots from several hundred adults and teenagers who've participated in our studies for periods of six months to a year. Some of our most interesting findings, I think, is how much idiosyncrasy there is in people's screen use. And this has a huge impact on how we do research on the effects of screens, I believe. Because no two people really have the same screenomes, which is what we call the sequence of screenshots that people experience. And even for the same person, no two hours or days or weeks are the same. We're looking at both how different people differ in their screen use, and how that's related to their mental health, for example. But also how changes over time in a single person's screenome is related to their mental health, for example. Comparing your screen use this afternoon to your screen use this morning or yesterday, or last week or last month. And how that changes your health or is at least associated with changes in your health at this point. Eventually, we hope to move this into very precise interventions that would be able to monitor what your screen experience is and give you an appropriate either change in your screen or help you change your behavior appropriate to what you're feeling. One of our current studies is to learn really the details of what, when, how, why, and where foods and beverages appear in adolescent screenomes. And how these factors relate to foods and beverages they consume and their health. In fact, we're currently recruiting 13- to 17-year-olds all over the US who can participate in this study for six months of screenome collection and weekly surveys we do with them. Including detailed surveys of what they're eating. But this sort of goes back to an issue that came up before that you had asked us about how much is advertising? I can tell you that at least some of our preliminary data, looking at a small number of kids, suggests that food, it varies greatly across kids and what they're experiencing, especially on their phones. And, we found, for example, one young girl who 37% of all her screens had food on them. About a third, or more than a third of her entire screenome, had food in it. And it wasn't just through advertising and it wasn't just through social media or influencers. It was everywhere. It was pictures she was taking of food. It was influencers she was following who had food. It was games she was playing that were around food. There are games, they're all about running a restaurant or making food and serving and kitchen work. And then there were also videos that people watched that are actually fairly popular among where you watch other people eat. Apparently it's a phenomenon that came out of Korea first. And it's grown to be quite popular here over the last several years in which people just put on their camera and show themselves eating. I mean, nothing special, nothing staged, just people eating. There's all kinds of food exists everywhere throughout the screenome, not just in one place or another, and not just in advertising. Tom, a study with a hundred data points can be a lot. You've got 350 million, so I wish you the best of luck in sorting all that out. And boy, whatever you find is going to be really informative and important. Thanks for telling us about this. I'd like to end with kind of a basic question to each of you, and that is, is there any reason for hope. Amanda, let's, let's start with you. Do you see any reason to be optimistic about all this? We must be optimistic. No matter how we're facing. We have no choice. I think there's greater awareness. I think parents, policy makers, civic leaders are really recognizing this pervasive effective screen use on mental health, eating, obesity risk, even just the ability to have social interactions and talk to people face to face. And I think that's a good sign. I've seen even in my own state legislature in Louisiana, bills going through about appropriately restricting screens from schools and offering guidance to pediatricians on counseling related to screen use. The American Academy of Pediatrics changed their guidelines a number of years ago. Instead of just saying, no screens for the really little ones, and then limit to fewer than two hours a day for the older ones. They recognized and tried to be more practical and pragmatic with family. Sit down as a family, create some rules, create some boundaries. Make sure you're being healthy with your screen use. Put the screens away during mealtime. Get the screens out of the bedroom. And I think going towards those more practical strategies that families can actually do and sustain is really positive. I'd like to remain optimistic and let's just keep our eyes wide open and talk to the kids too. And ask the kids what they're doing and get them part of this because it's so hard to stay up to date on the technology. Thanks. I appreciate that positive note. Tom, what do you think? Yeah, I agree with Amanda. I can be positive about several things. First of all, I think last year, there were two bills, one to protect child privacy and the other to regulate technology aimed at children. COPPA 2.0 (Children's Online Private Protection Act) and KOSA (Kid's Online Safety Act). And they passed the Senate overwhelmingly. I mean, almost unanimously, or as close as you can get in our current senate. Unfortunately, they were never acted upon by the house, but in the absence of federal legislature regulation, we've had, as Amanda mentioned, a lot of states and also communities where they have actually started to pass bills or regulate social media. Things like prohibiting use under a certain age. For example, social media warning labels is another one. Limiting smartphone use in schools has become popular. However, a lot of these are being challenged in the courts by tech and media industries. And sadly, you know, that's a strategy they've borrowed, as you know well, Kelly, from tobacco and food industry. There also have been attempts that I think we need to fight against. For the federal legislature or the federal government, congress, to pass legislation to preempt state and local efforts, that would not allow states and local communities to make their own laws in this area. I think that's an important thing. But it's positive in that we're hearing advocacy against that, and people are getting involved. I'm also glad to hear people talking about efforts to promote alternative business models for media. I believe that technology itself is not inherently good or bad, as Amanda mentioned, but the advertising business models that are linked to this powerful technology has inevitably led to a lot of these problems we're seeing. Not just in nutrition and health, but many problems. Finally, I see a lot more parent advocacy to protect children and teens, especially around tech in schools and around the potential harms of social media. And more recently around AI even. As more people start to understand what the implications of AI are. I get the feeling these efforts are really starting to make a difference. Organizations, like Fair Play, for example, are doing a lot of organizing and advocacy with parents. And, we're starting to see advocacy in organizing among teens themselves. I think that's all really super positive that the public awareness is there, and people are starting to act. And hopefully, we'll start to see some more action to help children and families. Bios Developmental psychologist Dr. Amanda Staiano is an associate professor and Director of the Pediatric Obesity & Health Behavior Laboratory at Pennington Biomedical Research Center at Louisiana State University. She also holds an adjunct appointment in LSU's Department of Psychology. Dr. Staiano earned her PhD in developmental psychology and Master of Public Policy at Georgetown University, followed by a Master of Science in clinical research at Tulane University. Her primary interest is developing and testing family-based healthy lifestyle interventions that utilize innovative technology to decrease pediatric obesity and its comorbidities. Her research has involved over 2500 children and adolescents, including randomized controlled trials and prospective cohorts, to examine the influence of physical activity and sedentary behavior on body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors. Thomas N. Robinson, MD, MPH is the Irving Schulman, MD Endowed Professor in Child Health, Professor of Pediatrics and of Medicine, in the Division of General Pediatrics and the Stanford Prevention Research Center at Stanford University School of Medicine, and Director of the Center for Healthy Weight at Stanford University and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford. Dr. Robinson focuses on "solution-oriented" research, developing and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention interventions for children, adolescents and their families to directly inform medical and public health practice and policy. His research is largely experimental in design, conducting school-, family- and community-based randomized controlled trials to test the efficacy and/or effectiveness of theory-driven behavioral, social and environmental interventions to prevent and reduce obesity, improve nutrition, increase physical activity and decrease inactivity, reduce smoking, reduce children's television and media use, and demonstrate causal relationships between hypothesized risk factors and health outcomes. Robinson's research is grounded in social cognitive models of human behavior, uses rigorous methods, and is performed in generalizable settings with diverse populations, making the results of his research more relevant for clinical and public health practice and policy.

In this episode, Mitch and David look back at the 2nd Core Episode from 3 years ago. They re-evaluate why it is so important to have a plan when it comes to preparing your personal finances before you start your business. Get rid of credit card debt, re-evaluate your car loans. How to get alone or have money set aside for when you need it. Your plan could make or break you. Come to Vegas and learn the ins and outs of marketing, not to mention, it's a great freaking time. Get you tickets for the 2025 Vegas Event here: https://tradewinsconsulting.com/events Not ready for a full blown CRM, this is a great option. Build jobs, bids, and invoice straight from the app. TW Job Calculator APPS https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tradewinsconsulting.jobcalculator https://apps.apple.com/us/app/trade-wins-job-calculator/id6744992264?platform=iphone Trade Wins by Trading Content https://www.facebook.com/groups/1309829410166761 If you have questions you'd like us to answer, please feel free to email them to AskMitch@MitchSmedley.com Thanks for listening and thanks for sharing! Enjoy the show! If you'd like more insight from Mitch and David, you need to check out Trade Wins. Trade Wins can help you start your business or take your newer business and get it to a very healthy level. For more information about Trade Wins, check out https://www.tradewinsconsulting.com/ FieldPulse is the Official Field Service Management Software of The Void Podcast. Their software is ideal for you and your business. For more information about how FieldPulse can benefit you, check them out here: https://www.fieldpulse.com/book-demo?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=partner&utm_campaign=TheVoid/TradeWins http://empowerpayments.com/TheVoid Contact us: askmitch@mitchsmedley.com

Compton, California resident Jessica Ortiz joined the podcast Friday to discuss her recent brush with an apparent non-human intelligent being. Just after 1 a.m. on June 5, 2025, Ortiz and her teenage son heard a noise outside of their home. Ortiz then received an alert that one of her three Ring cameras captured movement next to her side porch. Examination of the footage revealed a three-foot-tall being walking next to her house.Links/Sources: Jessica's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/just_jjessica?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet&igsh=cGNxOGhmY2ZzaGcxEpisode 101 the Compton 'Alien', verified 6.5.25 - Crime Scene Time Machine | Podcast on SpotifyCompton Strange Visitor investigation 6 5 25Support Extraterrestrial Reality/Quirk Zone on Patreon:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/c/Extraterrestrial_Reality⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Check out my YouTube channel:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Quirk Zone - YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Extraterrestrial Reality Book Recommendations:Link to ROSWELL: THE ULTIMATE COLD CASE: CLOSED: https://amzn.to/3O2loSILink to COMMUNION by Whitley Strieber: https://amzn.to/3xuPGqiLink to THE THREAT by David M. Jacobs: https://amzn.to/3Lk52njLink to TOP SECRET/MAJIC by Stanton Friedman: https://amzn.to/3xvidfvLink to NEED TO KNOW by Timothy Good:  https://amzn.to/3BNftfTLink to UFOS AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY STATE, VOLUME 1:  https://amzn.to/3xxJvlvLink to UFOS AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY STATE, VOLUME 2: https://amzn.to/3UhdQ1lLink to THE ALLAGASH ABDUCTIONS: https://amzn.to/3qNkLSgUFO CRASH RETRIEVALS by Leonard Stringfield: https://amzn.to/3RGEZKsFLYING SAUCERS FROM OUTER SPACE by Major Donald Keyhoe: https://amzn.to/3S7WkxvCAPTURED: THE BETTY AND BARNEY HILL UFO EXPERIENCE by Stanton Friedman and Kathleen Marden: https://amzn.to/3tKNVXn

Compton, California resident Jessica Ortiz joined the podcast Friday to discuss her recent brush with an apparent non-human intelligent being. Just after 1 a.m. on June 5, 2025, Ortiz and her teenage son heard a noise outside of their home. Ortiz then received an alert that one of her three Ring cameras captured movement next to her side porch. Examination of the footage revealed a three-foot-tall being walking next to her house.Links/Sources: Jessica's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/just_jjessica?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet&igsh=cGNxOGhmY2ZzaGcxEpisode 101 the Compton 'Alien', verified 6.5.25 - Crime Scene Time Machine | Podcast on SpotifyCompton Strange Visitor investigation 6 5 25Support Extraterrestrial Reality/Quirk Zone on Patreon:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.patreon.com/c/Extraterrestrial_Reality⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Check out my YouTube channel:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Quirk Zone - YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Extraterrestrial Reality Book Recommendations:Link to ROSWELL: THE ULTIMATE COLD CASE: CLOSED: https://amzn.to/3O2loSILink to COMMUNION by Whitley Strieber: https://amzn.to/3xuPGqiLink to THE THREAT by David M. Jacobs: https://amzn.to/3Lk52njLink to TOP SECRET/MAJIC by Stanton Friedman: https://amzn.to/3xvidfvLink to NEED TO KNOW by Timothy Good:  https://amzn.to/3BNftfTLink to UFOS AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY STATE, VOLUME 1:  https://amzn.to/3xxJvlvLink to UFOS AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY STATE, VOLUME 2: https://amzn.to/3UhdQ1lLink to THE ALLAGASH ABDUCTIONS: https://amzn.to/3qNkLSgUFO CRASH RETRIEVALS by Leonard Stringfield: https://amzn.to/3RGEZKsFLYING SAUCERS FROM OUTER SPACE by Major Donald Keyhoe: https://amzn.to/3S7WkxvCAPTURED: THE BETTY AND BARNEY HILL UFO EXPERIENCE by Stanton Friedman and Kathleen Marden: https://amzn.to/3tKNVXn

Streamed live on Jul 8, 2025 The SITCH and ADAM Show! (Full Livestreams)New media channel:    / @howtokillafranchise  

Send us a textSt. George mayoral candidate Aros Mackey who shares his vision for preserving the "Dixie spirit" while fostering economic growth and community leadership.• Exploring St. George's unique position as the "800-pound gorilla" in Utah that handles more complex infrastructure and city management than nearly any other Utah city except Salt Lake• Discussion of Southern Utah's pioneer heritage and the values that shaped the region: faith, patriotism, hard work, personal responsibility, and sacrifice• Aros explains his background in intelligence, criminal justice, and his work combating human trafficking while running a private security agency specializing in executive protection• Examination of the proper role of government with Aros describing himself as a "constitutional purist" who believes authority comes from the peopleVisit votearos.com to learn more about the candidate's platform. Primary election ballots will be mailed starting July 22nd, with voting on August 12th.

Jesse Cope explores the disconnect between our claimed priorities and our actual behavior, challenging listeners to honestly evaluate whether they're giving proper attention to God, family, and country. He examines how we willingly spend hours on our phones and social media while complaining about the "burden" of prayer and Bible reading.• Scripture study of 1 Corinthians 6 emphasizes that Christians should not seek judgment from those who reject God• Discussion of why we should be cautious about accepting moral guidance from those who openly mock Christian values• Examination of marriage as a sacred relationship we often take for granted despite its uniqueness• Analysis of education reform and why maintaining high standards produces better results than lowering expectations• Exploration of why any educational system without God at its center will ultimately fail America• Historical examples from Fox's Book of Martyrs showing the courage of those who refused to compromise their faith• Insights from the American Revolution on the Massachusetts colonists' refusal to accept tyrannyHave you made time for God today? Have you made time to talk to your spouse? When our actions don't align with our professed priorities, we need to be honest with ourselves and make meaningful changes.Support the showThe American Soul Podcasthttps://www.buzzsprout.com/1791934/subscribe

In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital commerce, staying ahead of technological advancements is important for businesses seeking to deliver seamless and efficient customer experiences. This discussion explores the future of commerce innovation, featuring expert perspectives from Kchitij Kumar (KK) of Tumi, Kieran Lane of Amplience, and Becky Simmons from CONA Services. They address topics such as the dismantling of technology silos, the role of composable architecture, and the power of AI and metadata.  KK offers a glimpse into Tumi's strategic use of AI-driven customer segmentation to foster loyalty through personalized experiences. The episode also covers the integration of human capital with technology, the rise of retail media for omnichannel experiences, and the role of emotional loyalty in consumer decision-making. Show Highlights: Discussion on breaking down technology and process silos to enhance efficiency in commerce. The evolution of Salesforce Commerce Cloud and Amplience's role in composable architecture. Use of AI and metadata in asset management to save time and resources. Tumi's retail strategy evolution and AI-driven personalized customer experiences. Examination of B2B commerce strategies and e-commerce storefronts. Follow and Review: We'd love for you to follow us if you haven't yet. Click that purple '+' in the top right corner of your Apple Podcasts app. We'd love it even more if you could drop a review or 5-star rating over on Apple Podcasts. Simply select “Ratings and Reviews” and “Write a Review,” then a quick line with your favorite part of the episode. It only takes a second, and it helps spread the word about the podcast. Supporting Resources: Kchitij Kumar - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kchitij/ | Tumi: https://www.tumi.com/  Kieran Lane - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kieranlane/ | Amplience: https://amplience.com/  Becky Simmons - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/beckygranato/ | CONA: https://www.conaservices.com/  Learn more about Agentforce for Commerce: https://www.salesforce.com/commerce/ai/  Join the Commerce Cloud Community Unofficial Slack: https://sforce.co/commercecrew *** Episode Credits If you like this podcast and are thinking of creating your own, consider talking to my producer, Emerald City Productions. They helped me grow and produce the podcast you are listening to right now. Find out more at https://emeraldcitypro.com. Let them know I sent you.

Greg previews the Big West from a stylistic and betting standpoint, examines the rosters of every team in the conference Connor Hope of Heat Check CBB & Greg gives his projected order of finish for the conference for the 2025-26 season!Podcast Highlights3:33-Betting trends & styles of the Big West13:42-Examination of the Big West team rosters & conference logistics with Connor Hope42:28-Greg's projected order of finish for the Big West

https://youtu.be/AZyekZnIXdM Link to the book: https://www.amazon.com/Perfect-Age-Christ-Centered-Examination-Dispensational/dp/B0FF2B349M/ref=sr_1_1?crid=H8ZN3NVWB4LO&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.lIq3HpKC1Wps8i1oxjLSEw.y013qYkKo3TIlm0MCPx3m2f-89AJT-SEcg8KnqPwk1c&dib_tag=se&keywords=the+perfect+age+book+rabon+byrd&qid=1751909043&sprefix=%2Caps%2C104&sr=8-1    

In this episode, Mitch and David look back at the 1st Core Episode from 3 years ago. They re-evaluate why it is so important to have a clear vision for your company, for your future. Without a vision for what your business is, there is no pathway to follow, there are no goals to strive to. It is the most underrated aspect of starting your own business. Come to Vegas and learn the ins and outs of marketing, not to mention, it's a great freaking time. Get you tickets for the 2025 Vegas Event here: https://tradewinsconsulting.com/events Not ready for a full blown CRM, this is a great option. Build jobs, bids, and invoice straight from the app. TW Job Calculator APPS https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tradewinsconsulting.jobcalculator https://apps.apple.com/us/app/trade-wins-job-calculator/id6744992264?platform=iphone Trade Wins by Trading Content https://www.facebook.com/groups/1309829410166761 If you have questions you'd like us to answer, please feel free to email them to AskMitch@MitchSmedley.com Thanks for listening and thanks for sharing! Enjoy the show! If you'd like more insight from Mitch and David, you need to check out Trade Wins. Trade Wins can help you start your business or take your newer business and get it to a very healthy level. For more information about Trade Wins, check out https://www.tradewinsconsulting.com/ FieldPulse is the Official Field Service Management Software of The Void Podcast. Their software is ideal for you and your business. For more information about how FieldPulse can benefit you, check them out here: https://www.fieldpulse.com/book-demo?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=partner&utm_campaign=TheVoid/TradeWins http://empowerpayments.com/TheVoid Contact us: askmitch@mitchsmedley.com mitch@tradewinsconsulting.com