Podcasts about abbe gluck

Howie and Harlan are joined by Abbe Gluck of Yale Law School to discuss how law shapes the health of Americans. Harlan explains how flaws in data privacy affect patients; Howie gives an update on the millions losing their Medicaid coverage, often despite qualifying for the program. Links: Harlan Krumholz: “In the US, patient data privacy is an illusion” “Medical Legal Partnerships” “A prospective cohort study examining exposure to incarceration and cardiovascular disease (Justice-Involved Individuals Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology – JUSTICE study): a protocol paper” Abbe Gluck: COVID-19 and the Law: Disruption, Impact and Legacy “Explaining Litigation Challenging the ACA's Preventive Services Requirements: Braidwood Management Inc. v. Becerra” “Abortion pill case: where does the lawsuit against the pill currently stand” “Chevron case: Supreme Court could take sledgehammer to agency power” “SAFFORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. #1 v. REDDING (No. 08-479)” “What Do the Early Medicaid Unwinding Data Tell Us?” “As Medicaid Purge Begins, ‘Staggering Numbers' of Americans Lose Coverage” Learn more about the MBA for Executives program at Yale SOM. Email Howie and Harlan comments or questions.

Howie and Harlan are joined by Abbe Gluck of Yale Law School to discuss how law shapes the health of Americans. Harlan explains how flaws in data privacy affect patients; Howie gives an update on the millions losing their Medicaid coverage, often despite qualifying for the program. Links: Harlan Krumholz: “In the US, patient data privacy is an illusion” “Medical Legal Partnerships” “A prospective cohort study examining exposure to incarceration and cardiovascular disease (Justice-Involved Individuals Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology – JUSTICE study): a protocol paper” Abbe Gluck: COVID-19 and the Law: Disruption, Impact and Legacy “Explaining Litigation Challenging the ACA's Preventive Services Requirements: Braidwood Management Inc. v. Becerra” “Abortion pill case: where does the lawsuit against the pill currently stand” “Chevron case: Supreme Court could take sledgehammer to agency power” “SAFFORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. #1 v. REDDING (No. 08-479)” “What Do the Early Medicaid Unwinding Data Tell Us?” “As Medicaid Purge Begins, ‘Staggering Numbers' of Americans Lose Coverage” Learn more about the MBA for Executives program at Yale SOM. Email Howie and Harlan comments or questions.

This episode features Dr. Charles Fuchs, Senior Vice President - Global Head of Oncology & Hematology Drug Development at Genentech and Roche and Professor Abbe Gluck, Professor of Law and Faculty Director at Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale Law School. Here, they discuss their new book “A New Deal for Cancer: Lessons from a 50 Year War”, what new developments and challenges the war on cancer is currently facing, plus more.

This episode features Dr. Charles Fuchs, Senior Vice President - Global Head of Oncology & Hematology Drug Development at Genentech and Roch and Professor Abbe Gluck, Professor of Law and Faculty Director at Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale Law School. Here, they discuss their new book “A New Deal for Cancer: Lessons from a 50 Year War”, what new developments and challenges the war on cancer is currently facing, plus more.

(11/18/21) Cancer is a complex, evasive enemy and there are no quick victories in the fight against it. But the battle has been a monumental feat of medical and scientific research and fundraising acumen. In their new book A New Deal for Cancer: Lessons from a 50-Year War, editors Charles Fuchs and Abbe Gluck bring together some of today's leading thinkers, activists and medical visionaries to describe the many victories and setbacks in the search for a cure. Join us for a look at the past, present and future of treating this terrible disease in this installment of Leonard Lopate at Large on WBAI.

This episode explores the multidistrict litigation (MDL) from their origins to current examples and recommended reforms.When complex issues effect large numbers of people, MDLs are often seen as the most efficient way to consolidate and manage those cases, recent examples include opioids and Roundup.Led by MDL expert and scholar Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, participants will discuss the nuances of MDLs and examine how all involved in the process should never lose sight of the human element in these cases. The panel will also explore the role of the MDL judge and address MDL’s pain points as they relate to appellate opportunities, plaintiffs’ attorneys, and more. The episode will conclude with the panel offering some of their own ideas for reform.Moderator: Elizabeth Chamblee Burch – University of Georgia School of LawPanelists:John H. Beisner – SkaddenAbbe Gluck – Yale Law SchoolShanin Specter – Kline and Specter

Abbe Gluck, a professor at Yale Law School, discusses the Supreme Court oral arguments on the fate of the Affordable Care Act that provides health-insurance to 20 million people, and why it is likely that there are enough votes to uphold the law. June Grasso hosts.  Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Abbe Gluck, a professor at Yale Law School, discusses the Supreme Court oral arguments on the fate of the Affordable Care Act that provides health-insurance to 20 million people, and why it is likely that there are enough votes to uphold the law. June Grasso hosts. 

The executive branch's bureaucracy gets a lot of attention. But Congress's bureaucracy gets much less—yet it is extremely important. In a new Gray Center working paper titled “ The Congressional Bureaucracy,” Professors Abbe Gluck and Jesse Cross analyze several parts of Congress's bureaucracy—some well-known, like the Government Accountability Office, and others less so, like the Office of Law... Source

The executive branch’s bureaucracy gets a lot of attention. But Congress’s bureaucracy gets much less—yet it is extremely important. In a new Gray Center working paper titled “The Congressional Bureaucracy,” Professors Abbe Gluck and Jesse Cross analyze several parts of Congress’s bureaucracy—some well-known, like the Government Accountability Office, and others less so, like the Office […]Join the conversation and comment on this podcast episode: https://ricochet.com/podcast/arbitrary-capricious/thinking-about-the-congressional-bureaucracy-with-abbe-gluck-jesse-cross-and-josh-chafetz-congress-and-the-administrative-state-series/.Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing: https://ricochet.com/membership/.Subscribe to Arbitrary & Capricious in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

This week, we sit down with Abbe Gluck, a former clerk to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who passed away last week, on the eve of Rosh Hashanah. A professor of law and founding faculty director of the Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale Law School, she and fellow former clerk Gillian Metzger penned an op-ed in The New York Times just days after Justice Ginsburg’s passing, recalling her impact on them and on gender equality in the United States. Professor Gluck joins us to reflect on that legacy.

Abbe Gluck, a professor at Yale Law School, discusses the Supreme Court ruling that federal government must abide by a pledge to pay insurers $12 billion to cover some of the losses they incurred providing risky policies under Obamacare. She speaks to host June Grasso. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Abbe Gluck, a professor at Yale Law School, discusses the Supreme Court ruling that federal government must abide by a pledge to pay insurers $12 billion to cover some of the losses they incurred providing risky policies under Obamacare. She speaks to host June Grasso.

Last week, the Department of Justice surprised many by reversing its position on the Affordable Care Act—stating that it agrees with U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor that the ACA is unconstitutional, and won’t defend the law. Judge O’Connor’s December 2018 decision in Texas v. United States held that because the tax penalty that enforced the individual mandate had been reduced to $0 in Congress’s 2017 tax reforms, the rest of the ACA could not stand. The House of Representatives, along with several states, has intervened in the case to defend the ACA. Joining host Jeffrey Rosen to break down this case and the legal and constitutional arguments on both sides are ACA experts Abbe Gluck of Yale University and Tom Miller of the American Enterprise Institute. For more information and resources, visit constitutioncenter.org/podcasts. Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.

Last week, the Department of Justice surprised many by reversing its position on the Affordable Care Act—stating that it agrees with U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor that the ACA is unconstitutional, and won’t defend the law. Judge O’Connor’s December 2018 decision in Texas v. United States held that because the tax penalty that enforced the individual mandate had been reduced to $0 in Congress’s 2017 tax reforms, the rest of the ACA could not stand. The House of Representatives, along with several states, has intervened in the case to defend the ACA. Joining host Jeffrey Rosen to break down this case and the legal and constitutional arguments on both sides are ACA experts Abbe Gluck of Yale University and Tom Miller of the American Enterprise Institute. For more information and resources, visit constitutioncenter.org/podcasts. Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.

On this week's episode of Versus Trump, Charlie and Jason discuss Friday's unexpected ruling that the current version of the Affordable Care Act—that is, Obamacare—is unconstitutional and must be entirely struck down. Jason and Charlie first discuss the nature of the case and wonder whether anyone actually has standing to bring this claim, though they are less skeptical than some others that there is no standing here. They then briefly discuss the constitutional merits and agree that the mandate is technically unconstitutional under the first Obamacare Supreme Court case. But what happens next? Both Jason and Charlie are skeptical that the whole law must fall, as the court held.You can find us at @VersusTrumpPod on twitter, or send us an email at versustrumppodcast@gmail.com. You can buy t-shirts and other goods with our super-cool logo here. NotesThe ruling in Texas v. U.S. is here.Take Care contributor Nick Bagley's piece on standing in The Atlantic is here.Jason mentioned a Cato post criticizing the decision. That's here.Abbe Gluck's post about what the ACA contains is here. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

This week on Briefly we continue our discussion of the Opioid Crisis. This show is part two of a two-part episode. We discuss opioid litigation and its role in the overall policy response to the Crisis. Our guests this episode are Keith Humphreys, Esther Ting Memorial Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University, and Abbe Gluck, Professor of Law and Faculty Director of the Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy. This episode was produced by David Sandefer and Yosef Schaffel. Music from bensound.com

It’s no secret that President Donald Trump and his administration oppose the Affordable Care Act. But what's gone under the radar: a lawsuit that’s trying to use Trump’s own words to prove that his "sabotage" violates his constitutional responsibilities. On the podcast, Zach Klein — the attorney for Columbus, Ohio — explains to POLITICO's Dan Diamond why he decided to join the multi-city lawsuit against the Trump administration and how efforts to weaken the ACA could harm his constituents. After the break, Yale law professor Abbe Gluck explains the legal theory behind the case and whether she thinks it has a shot at success. We'd appreciate your help: Please share PULSE CHECK and rate us on your favorite podcast app! Have questions, suggestions or feedback? Email ddiamond@politico.com. MENTIONED ON THE SHOW Columbus joined Baltimore, Chicago and other cities in suing the Trump administration. Abbe Gluck in October 2017 laid out the argument that Trump's moves to undermine the Affordable Care Act were illegal.

Abbe Gluck, director of the Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale Law School, and Timothy Jost, professor at Washington and Lee University Law School, discuss the future of Obamacare subsidies after Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price said that "no decision has been made" on the destiny of the Affordable Care Act subsidies. They speak with June Grasso and Michael Best on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Abbe Gluck, director of the Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale Law School, and Timothy Jost, professor at Washington and Lee University Law School, discuss the future of Obamacare subsidies after Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price said that "no decision has been made" on the destiny of the Affordable Care Act subsidies. They speak with June Grasso and Michael Best on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law."

(Bloomberg) -- Timothy Jost, a professor at Washington and Lee University, and Abbe Gluck, a professor at Yale University, discuss the Senate healthcare bill, which was released on Thursday. They speak with June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

(Bloomberg) -- Timothy Jost, a professor at Washington and Lee University, and Abbe Gluck, a professor at Yale University, discuss the Senate healthcare bill, which was released on Thursday. They speak with June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law."

Alden Bianchi, a member at Mintz Levin, and Abbe Gluck, Faculty Director of the Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale University, discuss republican plans for an Obamacare repeal. They speak with June Grasso and Michael Best on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Alden Bianchi, a member at Mintz Levin, and Abbe Gluck, Faculty Director of the Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale University, discuss republican plans for an Obamacare repeal. They speak with June Grasso and Michael Best on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law."

(Bloomberg) -- Alden Bianchi, a member at Mintz Levin, and Abbe Gluck, Faculty Director of the Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale University, discuss republican plans for an Obamacare repeal. They speak with June Grasso and Michael Best on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law."

(Bloomberg) -- Alden Bianchi, a member at Mintz Levin, and Abbe Gluck, Faculty Director of the Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale University, discuss republican plans for an Obamacare repeal. They speak with June Grasso and Michael Best on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Abbe Gluck, a professor at Yale University Law School, discusses legal challenges to the affordable care act, which Republicans have pledged to repeal as the 115th congress gets sworn in. They speak with Greg Stohr and June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Bob Moon and Karen Moscow discuss the days top legal stories. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

Abbe Gluck, a professor at Yale University Law School, discusses legal challenges to the affordable care act, which Republicans have pledged to repeal as the 115th congress gets sworn in. They speak with Greg Stohr and June Grasso on Bloomberg Radio's "Bloomberg Law." Bob Moon and Karen Moscow discuss the days top legal stories.

As the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in the latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act -- King v. Burwell -- Dahlia Lithwick hears from experts on both sides of what could be the most important case in the Court’s entire term. First, she speaks with Jonathan Adler, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University and a one of the lawsuit’s chief architects. Then she hears from Abbe Gluck, a professor at Yale Law School and a co-author of an amicus brief submitted in the case. ************** This week’s episode is sponsored by HBO. Its new documentary series “The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst” airs Sundays at 8. We’re also sponsored by the Great Courses. Save up to 80% off their most bestselling courses here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Last year’s cert denials in various same-sex marriage cases led to renewed discussion concerning the counterintuitive (to Christian, at least) notion but conventional wisdom that state courts are not bound to follow lower federal courts’ interpretations of federal law. While we discussed and debated this last fall, Amanda Frost was putting the finishing touches on an article reviewing, challenging, and otherwise completely examining this curious doctrine. Was Michael Dorf’s Hammer Blow, as we named the episode with him, the final blow or might some of Christian’s naive doubts be rehabilitated by Prof. Frost’s exhaustive analysis? Yep, that kind of cliffhanger is how we roll around here. Also, North Dakota and the permissibility of “funny business” in our email address. This show’s links: Amanda Frost’s faculty profile and writing A helpful list of North Dakota landmarks 2 Hidden Ways to Get More from Your Gmail Address The Georgia Law Summer Program in China, where you can be misinformed by Christian in person and in China Amanda Frost, Inferiority Complex: Should State Courts Follow Lower Federal Court Precedent on the Meaning of Federal Law? Our trilogy of prior episodes on this issue: with Anthony Kreis, with Michael Dorf, and with Steve Vladeck The series of blog posts coinciding with those episodes: from Michael Dorf here and here, Steve Vladeck, and Christian Turner Michael Dorf, Even More Thoughts on State Court (Non)Obligation to Follow Federal Appeals Court Precedents (Wherein I Respond to Professor Frost) Amanda Frost, The “Inferior” Federal Courts Chief Justice Roy Moore’s Administrative Order Eric Eckholm, Supreme Court Undercuts Alabama Chief Justice’s Argument to Delay Same-Sex Marriages Lockhart v. Fretwell, in which Justice Thomas concurred and briefly argued that the “Supremacy Clause demands that state law yield to federal law, but neither federal supremacy nor any other principle of federal law requires that a state court's interpretation of federal law give way to a (lower) federal court's interpretation” Cooper v. Aaron Martin v. Hunter’ Lessee Amanda Frost, Overvaluing Uniformity Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins; see also our episode all about Erie About the adequate and independent state grounds doctrine James Pfander, One Supreme Court: Supremacy, Inferiority, and the Judicial Power of the United States (see also this very brief book review) Dice v. Akron, Canton and Youngstown Railroad Co. Bush v. Gore (Rehnquist’s concurring opinion arguing that state courts may not interfere, even through state constitutional judgments, with certain legislatively enacted election laws that interact in advantageous ways with federal law) About Chevron deference Abbe Gluck, The States as Laboratories of Statutory Interpretation United States Telecom Association v. FCC Peter Strauss, One Hundred Fifty Cases Per Year: Some Implications of the Supreme Court's Limited Resources for Judicial Review of Agency Action Special Guest: Amanda Frost.

This is the week the circuits split. We discuss Judge Sutton’s opinion for a panel of the Sixth Circuit upholding bans on gay marriage in several states. Although Joe and Christian mainly agree about this case, Joe finds plenty of other things Christian says and does to be irritating, especially during our first eighteen minutes when we discuss feedback. This show’s links: Michael Dorf, Why Danforth v. Minnesota Does Not Undermine My View About State Court Decisions to Follow Lower Federal Court Precedent Our episode with Peabody award winner, Tom Goldstein About typefaces (and the difference between typefaces and fonts) About King v. Burwell, the case the Supreme Court has taken up challenging subsidies on federally run exchanges; see also Christian’s take and Abbe Gluck’s The Unrecorded Podcast Michelle Meyer, Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways from Maine DHHS v. Hickox (which Christian wrongly attributed to Hank Greely, who has also written on Ebola, but is in fact from fantastic friend of the show Michelle Meyer - sorry Michelle), further to our last episode on the domestic side of the Ebola DeBoer v. Hodges, the Sixth Circuit decision by Judge Sutton upholding various state marriage bans Oral Argument 36: Firehose of Inequality (guest Anthony Kreis) Baskin v. Bogan, Judge Posner’s decision striking down state marriage bans and Christian’s post about the Seventh Circuit’s oral arguments in that case About Baker v. Nelson Hicks v. Miranda Loving v. Virginia Plessy v. Ferguson Romer v. Evans Balkinization Symposium on Unconstitutional Animus (We’d apologize for the error of attributing this to SCOTUSblog, but we don’t have time to apologize for all of our errors.) William Eskridge, Jr. A History fo Same Sex Marriage