Podcasts about Canton

Donner la priorité aux résidents de la Ville pour l'attribution des logements sociaux. C'est une des propositions de l'UDC Genève pour les élections municipales. Vincent Schaller, l'un de ses candidats, était invité de Béatrice Rul, à 7h30.Vous souhaitez une baisse du centime additionnel. C'est réjouissant pour notre porte monnaie, mais le budget de la Ville est déjà déficitaire, la dette se creuse et devrait atteindre 1,786 milliards. La Ville va présenter un plan de retour à l'équilibre, au Canton, avec neuf millions d'économies, par an… Bref, la Ville peut-elle vraiment se permettre de baisser les impôts?"Dans le budget de la ville, vous avez des activités qui sont indispensables. La voirie, les pompiers, bien que ce soit désormais intercommunal, on est d'accord. L'entretien des parcs. Et puis après, vous avez deux autres tiers du budget qui sont consacrés à des activités que l'on exerce mais pour des raisons politiques. Ce sont des choix politiques mais qui ne sont pas des activités obligatoires. Par exemple la culture, c'est un tiers. Je ne dis pas que la culture, ce n'est pas important mais il faut savoir que la culture, vous avez le financement par l'impôt, vous avez le financement par les mécènes et puis par la billetterie. Et à Genève, la part de l'impôt dans le financement de la culture est une part qui est considérable. C'est un record au niveau suisse".Vous souhaitez que les logements sociaux soient attribués en priorité aux personnes résidant déjà dans la commune. Une espèce de préférence communale. Ca sonne bien MCG, tout ça… "Non, ça ne sonne pas MCG. Il s'agit de recréer une solidarité nationale. Vous avez un parc de logements sociaux en ville de Genève que les contribuables ont constitué avec les années et qui devrait fonctionner de notre point de vue comme une assurance. C'est-à-dire que le jour où vous avez un coup dur, ce parc de logements sociaux doit pouvoir être disponible pour la famille résidente de longue date ou suisse qui a un coup dur. Il n'est pas normal que cette famille de la classe moyenne soit contrainte de s'exiler hors de la ville de Genève, même hors du canton, parce qu'aujourd'hui, les logements sociaux de la ville sont attribués en fonction de critères d'urgence. Si on s'en tient à ce critère d'urgence, sans ajouter une forme de priorité pour la population locale, la population locale se fait systématiquement couper la priorité par des personnes qui arrivent dans le canton, qui sont nécessairement dans des situations plus urgentes que les locaux. Il y a assez de logements en ville de Genève. C'est une question d'attribution. Ce que l'on veut c'est appliquer au niveau de la commune, de la ville de Genève, une priorité aux résidents de longue date et citoyens suisses, une règle qui doit s'appliquer d'office!"

1/9/25 - Hour 1 Rich and the guys debate which QB in the NFL playoffs is under the most pressure to win the Super Bowl this season.   Pro Football Hall of Famer Calvin Johnson and Rich discuss the Lions' chances to finally win a Super Bowl this season, why head coach Dan Campbell is able to connect so well with Detroit's locker room, if his former teammate Matthew Stafford will be joining him in Canton, Ohio some day, the and more.    Rich lists the top 5 storylines he got wrong during the 2024 NFL season. Please check out other RES productions: Overreaction Monday: http://apple.co/overreactionmonday  What the Football with Suzy Shuster and Amy Trask: http://apple.co/whatthefootball The Jim Jackson Show: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-jim-jackson-show/id1770609432 No-Contest Wrestling with O'Shea Jackson Jr. and TJ Jefferson: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/no-contest-wrestling/id1771450708 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Longtime NFL writer and author Clark Judge gives a clinic on Hall of Fame voting and discusses Lamar and King Henry running Ravens to a Super Bowl in New Orleans next month. Also a primer here on Terrell Suggs, Marshal Yanda and Steve Smith Sr. bids for Canton immortality. The post Clark Judge gives a clinic on Hall of Fame voting and discusses Lamar and King Henry pairing for Ravens glory first appeared on Baltimore Positive WNST.

Canton Concrete Company (470-863-3247) has updated its concrete design and installation services for homeowners in Canton, GA. Canton Concrete Company City: Canton Address: Canton GA Website: https://www.cantongaconcretecontractor.com/

Karen Read returned to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read returned to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Send Kris and Rob a Text Message!Rod Matthews: The Classmate Killer Who Sought to Feel the Thrill of MurderRod Matthews was a seemingly typical 14-year-old boy living in Canton, Massachusetts, in 1986. However, beneath the surface of his suburban life lurked a chilling curiosity: he wanted to know what it felt like to kill someone. His victim? A fellow classmate, Sean Ouillette.The Build-Up to MurderRod Matthews wasn't your average teenager. Classmates described him as quiet, but he had a dark obsession with violent movies and crime stories. As his fascination grew, so did his urge to commit a heinous act. Matthews allegedly told friends that he wanted to kill someone to see how it felt.Sean Ouillette, a kind-hearted 14-year-old, had no idea that his invitation to hang out with Matthews on November 20, 1986, would be a fatal mistake. Lured into the woods near Matthews' home, Ouillette was brutally beaten to death with a baseball bat.The InvestigationWhen Sean didn't return home, his parents reported him missing. Days later, a search party found his body in the woods. The evidence pointed to Matthews, whose friends later admitted that he had confessed to the murder. The chilling part? Matthews seemed disturbingly calm when recounting the crime.Trial and ConvictionRod Matthews was arrested and charged with first-degree murder. Despite his young age, he was tried as an adult and convicted. In 1987, he was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 15 years. Matthews has sought parole multiple times, but the nature of his crime and his lack of remorse kept him behind bars for 37 years. In 2024 when Rod was released at the age of 51.The Psychology Behind the CrimeMatthews' case is a stark reminder of how untreated mental health issues and violent obsessions can lead to tragedy. Experts who reviewed the case noted that Matthews exhibited signs of psychopathy, including a lack of empathy and a fascination with violence.The Legacy of Sean OuilletteSean Ouillette's murder shocked the nation and left a lasting impact on the small community of Canton. His family has worked tirelessly to keep his memory alive, advocating for victims' rights and harsher penalties for juvenile offenders who commit heinous crimes.Sources used for this podcastSupport the showJOIN THE HITCHED 2 HOMICIDE IN-LAWS AND OUTLAWSSTART KRIS CALVERT'S BOOKS TODAY FOR FREEH2H WEBSITEH2H on TWITTERH2H on INSTA

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read returned to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Karen Read is returning to court Tuesday for a motions hearing ahead of her retrial on second-degree murder charges in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. The case has captured widespread attention, marked by allegations of foul play, contentious expert testimony, and a mistrial last summer. Prosecutors allege that Read, 43, drove drunk after a night out and struck O'Keefe, 46, with her car before leaving him to die in a snowbank near his Canton home. Read's defense, however, claims she is being framed by investigators, casting doubt on the credibility of the case against her. “We have evidence of a rushed and incomplete investigation,” said Read's attorney. “Karen Read is innocent, and we intend to prove this in court.” The upcoming Daubert hearing, a critical step in the pretrial process, will examine the admissibility of expert testimony. One key witness is Dr. Marie Russell, who previously testified about injuries O'Keefe sustained, including dog bites, raising questions about the timeline and circumstances of his death. During the first trial, Dr. Russell's analysis of wounds on O'Keefe's body played a pivotal role in the defense's argument that the injuries may not have been caused by Read's vehicle. Prosecutors, however, counter that the evidence overwhelmingly supports their theory of the crime. “The evidence shows a tragic but clear sequence of events: Karen Read struck John O'Keefe with her vehicle and left him in the snow,” said a representative for the Commonwealth. The case has been mired in controversy since the beginning. Critics have questioned the investigation's integrity, while supporters of both O'Keefe and Read have expressed frustration over delays and legal wrangling. The mistrial declared in July 2024, stemming from undisclosed issues during jury deliberations, added another layer of complexity. Despite the contentious nature of the case, Read maintains her innocence. “This has been a nightmare, but I believe the truth will come out,” Read stated in a previous court appearance. The motions hearing is expected to address procedural matters and the scope of evidence admissible in the retrial, which is scheduled for later this year. Both the prosecution and defense are preparing for a high-stakes trial that could ultimately hinge on expert testimony, forensic evidence, and competing narratives. As the legal battle continues, the case remains a focal point of public and media interest, drawing attention to issues of justice, law enforcement, and accountability. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #BostonNews #CourtUpdates #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #Massachusetts Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Fall of Trooper Michael Proctor: A Trail of Misconduct and Broken Trust On January 15, 2025, Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor will face a disciplinary hearing that could mark the end of his career. The hearing follows a cascade of controversies involving Proctor's investigative conduct in several high-profile cases, each raising serious questions about the integrity of law enforcement practices in Massachusetts. From the Karen Read murder trial to the disturbing death of Sandra Birchmore, Proctor's involvement has been marred by allegations of misconduct, mishandled evidence, and professional impropriety. As the public watches closely, the hearing promises to be a pivotal moment for the Massachusetts State Police. The Karen Read Case: A Mistrial and Questions of Bias In January 2022, Karen Read was accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly backing her SUV into him during a snowstorm. Trooper Michael Proctor was assigned as the lead investigator in the case, a role that would later become a focal point of controversy. During the trial, Proctor's conduct came under fire when defense attorneys revealed unprofessional and derogatory text messages he had sent regarding Read. In one particularly damning message, Proctor expressed hope that Read would harm herself, a sentiment he later admitted to under cross-examination. The defense alleged that Proctor's investigative methods were not only biased but also aimed at confirming Read's guilt rather than pursuing an impartial search for the truth. Questions were raised about the handling of physical evidence, including the broken taillight from Read's SUV and the analysis of O'Keefe's injuries. In July 2024, the case ended in a mistrial, further eroding public confidence in the investigation. Read's retrial is now scheduled for April 2025, but the shadow of Proctor's alleged misconduct continues to loom large. The Brian Walshe Case: Doubts About Credibility Proctor's troubles did not end with the Karen Read case. In early 2023, he was assigned as the lead investigator in another high-profile case: the murder of Ana Walshe. Her husband, Brian Walshe, was accused of killing and dismembering her in one of the most shocking domestic violence cases in recent memory. Despite the gravity of the allegations, prosecutors announced in September 2024 that Proctor would not be called to testify during Walshe's trial. The decision was widely interpreted as an acknowledgment of the credibility issues stemming from Proctor's prior conduct in the Read case. Defense attorneys in the Walshe case seized upon Proctor's tarnished reputation, questioning whether his investigative methods could be trusted. While the details of his involvement remain limited due to the decision to sideline him as a witness, the controversy surrounding Proctor has undoubtedly impacted public perception of the case, which is set to go to trial later in 2025. The Myles King and Shawn Johnson Cases: A Pattern of Concern Proctor's involvement in other cases has also come under scrutiny. In the case of Myles King, accused of killing Marquis Simmons in Milton in 2021, defense attorneys expressed concerns about Proctor's role in the investigation. Similar concerns arose in the case of Shawn Johnson, who faces murder charges related to a deadly shooting outside a Randolph country club on July 4, 2022. In both instances, defense teams highlighted Proctor's alleged misconduct in the Read and Walshe cases as a basis for questioning the integrity of the investigations. The Sandra Birchmore Case: A Tragic Loss and a Broken System Perhaps the most harrowing of all is the case of Sandra Birchmore, a 23-year-old woman whose death was initially ruled a suicide. Birchmore was found dead in her Canton, Massachusetts apartment in February 2021. The initial investigation by local authorities concluded that she had taken her own life, but federal investigators later determined that her death was a homicide. Former Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell was indicted in August 2024 for Birchmore's murder. Farwell, who allegedly groomed Birchmore from the time she was a teenager, was accused of maintaining a years-long inappropriate relationship with her. When Birchmore became pregnant, Farwell allegedly staged her death to appear as a suicide, a revelation that sent shockwaves through the community. While Proctor was not directly involved in the Birchmore investigation, the case has drawn parallels to others he handled, particularly in the context of law enforcement misconduct. The Birchmore tragedy underscores systemic failures within Massachusetts' law enforcement agencies and has intensified calls for comprehensive reforms. Implications for Massachusetts State Police The upcoming disciplinary hearing for Michael Proctor is more than just a review of one officer's conduct; it is a litmus test for the Massachusetts State Police's commitment to accountability and reform. Proctor's suspension without pay since July 2024, following an internal affairs investigation, has already signaled the department's willingness to address serious allegations. However, public trust in the force remains precarious. The Massachusetts State Police have stated that the trial board's recommendations will be reviewed by the Superintendent, who will determine the final outcome. This process is being closely watched by advocacy groups, legal experts, and the families of those affected by the cases Proctor investigated. The results of the hearing could have far-reaching implications, not only for Proctor's career but also for the integrity of the Massachusetts State Police as a whole. Public and Media Reaction The media has extensively covered the controversies surrounding Proctor, painting a picture of a deeply troubled investigator whose alleged misconduct has jeopardized multiple cases. Public response has been equally intense, with many calling for greater transparency and accountability in law enforcement. Advocacy groups have emphasized the need for systemic reforms, including improved oversight mechanisms and stricter standards for investigative practices. The cases involving Karen Read, Brian Walshe, and Sandra Birchmore have become rallying points for those demanding justice and institutional change. As public pressure mounts, the Massachusetts State Police face a critical juncture: Will they take decisive action to restore trust, or will they allow the shadow of these controversies to linger? Conclusion and Anticipated Developments The disciplinary hearing on January 15, 2025, is expected to be a watershed moment. Whether Michael Proctor faces permanent disciplinary action or is allowed to continue his career will depend on the findings of the trial board and the Superintendent's decision. Meanwhile, the Karen Read retrial, the Brian Walshe trial, and the legal proceedings in the Sandra Birchmore case will continue to unfold, each carrying the weight of Proctor's controversial legacy. As Massachusetts grapples with these complex and emotionally charged cases, one thing is clear: The pursuit of justice demands more than just individual accountability. It requires a commitment to systemic change, ensuring that tragedies like those of Sandra Birchmore and John O'Keefe are never repeated. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

On January 15, 2025, Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor will face a disciplinary hearing that could mark the end of his career. The hearing follows a cascade of controversies involving Proctor's investigative conduct in several high-profile cases, each raising serious questions about the integrity of law enforcement practices in Massachusetts. From the Karen Read murder trial to the disturbing death of Sandra Birchmore, Proctor's involvement has been marred by allegations of misconduct, mishandled evidence, and professional impropriety. As the public watches closely, the hearing promises to be a pivotal moment for the Massachusetts State Police. The Karen Read Case: A Mistrial and Questions of Bias In January 2022, Karen Read was accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly backing her SUV into him during a snowstorm. Trooper Michael Proctor was assigned as the lead investigator in the case, a role that would later become a focal point of controversy. During the trial, Proctor's conduct came under fire when defense attorneys revealed unprofessional and derogatory text messages he had sent regarding Read. In one particularly damning message, Proctor expressed hope that Read would harm herself, a sentiment he later admitted to under cross-examination. The defense alleged that Proctor's investigative methods were not only biased but also aimed at confirming Read's guilt rather than pursuing an impartial search for the truth. Questions were raised about the handling of physical evidence, including the broken taillight from Read's SUV and the analysis of O'Keefe's injuries. In July 2024, the case ended in a mistrial, further eroding public confidence in the investigation. Read's retrial is now scheduled for April 2025, but the shadow of Proctor's alleged misconduct continues to loom large. The Brian Walshe Case: Doubts About Credibility Proctor's troubles did not end with the Karen Read case. In early 2023, he was assigned as the lead investigator in another high-profile case: the murder of Ana Walshe. Her husband, Brian Walshe, was accused of killing and dismembering her in one of the most shocking domestic violence cases in recent memory. Despite the gravity of the allegations, prosecutors announced in September 2024 that Proctor would not be called to testify during Walshe's trial. The decision was widely interpreted as an acknowledgment of the credibility issues stemming from Proctor's prior conduct in the Read case. Defense attorneys in the Walshe case seized upon Proctor's tarnished reputation, questioning whether his investigative methods could be trusted. While the details of his involvement remain limited due to the decision to sideline him as a witness, the controversy surrounding Proctor has undoubtedly impacted public perception of the case, which is set to go to trial later in 2025. The Myles King and Shawn Johnson Cases: A Pattern of Concern Proctor's involvement in other cases has also come under scrutiny. In the case of Myles King, accused of killing Marquis Simmons in Milton in 2021, defense attorneys expressed concerns about Proctor's role in the investigation. Similar concerns arose in the case of Shawn Johnson, who faces murder charges related to a deadly shooting outside a Randolph country club on July 4, 2022. In both instances, defense teams highlighted Proctor's alleged misconduct in the Read and Walshe cases as a basis for questioning the integrity of the investigations. The Sandra Birchmore Case: A Tragic Loss and a Broken System Perhaps the most harrowing of all is the case of Sandra Birchmore, a 23-year-old woman whose death was initially ruled a suicide. Birchmore was found dead in her Canton, Massachusetts apartment in February 2021. The initial investigation by local authorities concluded that she had taken her own life, but federal investigators later determined that her death was a homicide. Former Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell was indicted in August 2024 for Birchmore's murder. Farwell, who allegedly groomed Birchmore from the time she was a teenager, was accused of maintaining a years-long inappropriate relationship with her. When Birchmore became pregnant, Farwell allegedly staged her death to appear as a suicide, a revelation that sent shockwaves through the community. While Proctor was not directly involved in the Birchmore investigation, the case has drawn parallels to others he handled, particularly in the context of law enforcement misconduct. The Birchmore tragedy underscores systemic failures within Massachusetts' law enforcement agencies and has intensified calls for comprehensive reforms. Implications for Massachusetts State Police The upcoming disciplinary hearing for Michael Proctor is more than just a review of one officer's conduct; it is a litmus test for the Massachusetts State Police's commitment to accountability and reform. Proctor's suspension without pay since July 2024, following an internal affairs investigation, has already signaled the department's willingness to address serious allegations. However, public trust in the force remains precarious. The Massachusetts State Police have stated that the trial board's recommendations will be reviewed by the Superintendent, who will determine the final outcome. This process is being closely watched by advocacy groups, legal experts, and the families of those affected by the cases Proctor investigated. The results of the hearing could have far-reaching implications, not only for Proctor's career but also for the integrity of the Massachusetts State Police as a whole. Public and Media Reaction The media has extensively covered the controversies surrounding Proctor, painting a picture of a deeply troubled investigator whose alleged misconduct has jeopardized multiple cases. Public response has been equally intense, with many calling for greater transparency and accountability in law enforcement. Advocacy groups have emphasized the need for systemic reforms, including improved oversight mechanisms and stricter standards for investigative practices. The cases involving Karen Read, Brian Walshe, and Sandra Birchmore have become rallying points for those demanding justice and institutional change. As public pressure mounts, the Massachusetts State Police face a critical juncture: Will they take decisive action to restore trust, or will they allow the shadow of these controversies to linger? Conclusion and Anticipated Developments The disciplinary hearing on January 15, 2025, is expected to be a watershed moment. Whether Michael Proctor faces permanent disciplinary action or is allowed to continue his career will depend on the findings of the trial board and the Superintendent's decision. Meanwhile, the Karen Read retrial, the Brian Walshe trial, and the legal proceedings in the Sandra Birchmore case will continue to unfold, each carrying the weight of Proctor's controversial legacy. As Massachusetts grapples with these complex and emotionally charged cases, one thing is clear: The pursuit of justice demands more than just individual accountability. It requires a commitment to systemic change, ensuring that tragedies like those of Sandra Birchmore and John O'Keefe are never repeated. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Last time we spoke about the Aitape-Wewak Campaign. General Dunckel's task force successfully invaded Mindoro, establishing airfields to support operations on Luzon. With General Eichelberger's 8th Army and General Krueger's 6th Army poised to capture Lingayen Gulf, guerrilla forces on Luzon provided crucial intelligence. As plans for the Luzon invasion solidified, General Yamashita prepared defenses, predicting an assault between January 10 and 20. Despite dwindling resources, he aimed to delay the enemy's advance. Meanwhile, Allied forces readied for a swift amphibious attack to secure Manila and restore the Philippine government. In December, Australian forces established outposts at Yasile and Yambes, successfully repelling Japanese attacks. After fierce clashes, they advanced 40 miles along the coast. Meanwhile, the U.S. military bolstered defenses in Saipan and launched bombing raids on Japanese facilities, achieving mixed results. Despite heavy losses, they began to impact Japanese production capabilities. As the month ended, the Japanese launched a final assault on the Marianas, but the Allies continued their strategic advances, setting the stage for future operations. This episode is the Invasion of Luzon Welcome to the Pacific War Podcast Week by Week, I am your dutiful host Craig Watson. But, before we start I want to also remind you this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Perhaps you want to learn more about world war two? Kings and Generals have an assortment of episodes on world war two and much more  so go give them a look over on Youtube. So please subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry for some more history related content, over on my channel, the Pacific War Channel you can find a few videos all the way from the Opium Wars of the 1800's until the end of the Pacific War in 1945.  We last left off with the plans for Operation Mike 1 being finished. General Swift's 1st Corps was ready to land on the eastern beaches of Lingayen Gulf, while General Griswold's 14th Corps prepared to go ashore on the western beaches. Additionally, successful diversionary operations had been conducted on Mindoro, and Admiral McCain's Task Force 38 executed several moderately successful strikes against Formosa and the Ryukyu Islands in early January. Meanwhile, the 14th Corps elements staging at New Britain completed loading on 10 December; those mounting at Bougainville finished two days later. On the 17th all groups of the III Amphibious Force rendezvoused at Huon Gulf, eastern New Guinea, to rehearse the Lingayen assault. General Griswold felt that the 37th Division's rehearsal was satisfactory but had much fault to find with the 40th Division, remarking upon a "general failure to observe the spirit of the rehearsal." As a result, further training was conducted at Manus Island in the Admiralties, where the convoy reassembled on 22 December. On December 27, Admiral Wilkinson dispatched his LSTs and LSMs, followed by the remainder of Task Force 79 four days later. On the same day, Admiral Barbey's convoy, which included Major-General Leonard Wing's 43rd Division, loaded at Aitape before proceeding to Sansapor to load Major-General Edwin Patrick's 6th Division. Task Force 78 departed Sansapor on December 30, heading to a rendezvous point with other elements of Admiral Kinkaid's Luzon Attack Force. By January 4, all components of Task Force 77 had successfully gathered at Leyte Gulf, with MacArthur personally boarding the light cruiser Boise. Kinkaid's minesweepers, Admiral Oldendorf's Bombardment and Fire Support Group, and most of Admiral Durgin's escort carriers had already left the gulf on January 2 to conduct preliminary operations off Luzon. By January 6, the rest of the Luzon Attack Force began moving toward Lingayen Gulf, led by Admiral Berkey's light cruisers. As Mindoro-based aircraft significantly increased the intensity of their assaults during the last week of December—sinking seven transports and two escorts, and destroying over 140 aircraft. General Yamashita's tense and expectant forces were still racing against time to complete,their battle preparations when the first warnings came that the enemy was again on the move. At 1322 on 2 January, a naval lookout post on Surigao Strait reported that a long train of about 80 enemy ships, screened by destroyers, was moving through the strait into the Mindanao Sea. Other reports which followed immediately warned that large numbers of invasion craft were gathered in the Leyte, Palau and Marianas areas, and that enemy submarines had appeared in force off the west coast of Luzon. At first it was thought that the enemy convoy was merely a reinforcement and resupply group destined for Mindoro. On 3 January, however, developments began to point more conclusively toward a full-scale amphibious operation against Luzon. In the afternoon, just as the initially sighted enemy group passed into the Sulu Sea, a large enemy naval task force, including 12 escort carriers, four battleships and eight cruisers, was reported following in its wake through Surigao Strait. Another delayed report stated that an enemy transport convoy of 90 ships, under strong naval escort, had been spotted the previous day northwest of Palau, heading in the direction of Leyte Gulf. General Yamashita grew concerned that a large-scale amphibious operation against Luzon was imminent. Consequently, he decided to relocate his headquarters to Baguio. These concerns were validated in early January when Japanese lookouts spotted Kinkaid's warships and transports approaching the island. In response, General Tominaga ordered aggressive kamikaze attacks on the Allied vessels, with a major assault on January 4 causing severe damage to the escort carrier Ommaney Bay, which ultimately had to be scuttled. The following day, Japanese attacks persisted, damaging two escort carriers, two cruisers, and three destroyers, among other ships. In retaliation, Durgin's carrier aircraft launched strikes on Manila Bay, successfully sinking the destroyer Momi and damaging the Hinoki. On January 6, McCain's carriers joined the effort, with American pilots tasked with targeting air facilities at Manila and Clark Field. Despite adverse weather conditions limiting the effectiveness of the strike, they succeeded in sinking one transport and six oilers, as well as destroying 32 Japanese aircraft. Meanwhile, as Oldendorf's warships commenced their bombardment and minesweeping operations, kamikaze attacks continued. The destroyer minesweeper USS Long (DD-209/DMS-12) missed the attack on Pearl Harbor by about two days, but then immediately started anti-submarine patrols and escort missions. Its long trajectory in the Pacific War saw it make escort runs to Midway, Palmyra and Canton; participate in the invasions of Amchitka, Attu and Kiska in Alaskan waters; escort reinforcements to Roi and Namur in the Marshalls; participate in the invasions of the Admiralties, Hollandia, Saipan and Palau; and be one of the first vessels to enter into Leyte Gulf back in October. During the invasion of Lingayen Gulf, Long began mine sweeps on January 6, evading and firing upon Japanese aircraft as she carried out her intricate mission. Shortly after noon, beginning her second run, Long spotted two Zeros heading for her. Long went to 25 knots and opened fire, but a kamikaze crashed into her portside below the bridge about 1 foot above the waterline. With fires and explosions amidships, Long lost power and internal communications, and was unable to fight fires forward. Her commanding officer, Lieutenant Stanley Caplan, fearing an explosion in the forward magazine, gave permission for men trapped on the forecastle to leave the ship; but through a misunderstanding the crew abandoned ship. Later that afternoon a second plane attacked Long and exploded at the same spot, destroying the bridge and breaking the ship's back. Long finally capsized and sank the following morning. Alongside the Long, battleships California and New Mexico, along with the cruisers Columbia, Australia, and Louisville, five destroyers, another minesweeper, and one transport were damaged. Admiral Oldendorf was worried with good reason. Previously, kamikaze operations against his ships and those of other naval commands, though dangerous, had generally been executed by relatively untrained pilots who had taken few precautions to avoid detection and anti-aircraft fire and who often appeared to be flying partially damaged, lightly armored planes carrying little ordnance. In January the kamikazes had been operating in a far different manner. There was now a definite program of kamikaze operations, for the vast majority of the perhaps 100 Japanese aircraft that had attacked the forces under Admiral Oldendorf's command since January 2 had at least attempted kamikaze crashes. In addition, the pilots seemed to be more skilled. They took every advantage of radar-blanketing terrain, especially in the Lingayen Gulf area, and flew toward target ships at extremely low altitudes, thus helping to avoid both radar and visual detection. Flight tactics included radical maneuvering designed not only to avoid anti-aircraft fire and Allied planes but also to confuse observers as to which ship was the actual target. Finally, many of the kamikaze planes were heavily armored and armed. The Allies had expected great results from the relatively new proximity fuze for shipboard 5-inch antiaircraft weapons, but the Japanese planes usually appeared so suddenly and took such violent evasive action that 5-inch batteries could seldom track properly. The employment of the expensive special ammunition was, therefore, generally useless, and was sometimes even dangerous to friendly ships. Having missed approaching kamikazes by such distances that fuzes were not activated, shells sometimes sailed on to explode on or near Allied vessels, thereby causing some damage and many casualties.  Concerned about the effectiveness of the kamikaze attacks and recognizing that achieving air superiority did not prevent the enemy's suicide planes, Oldendorf opted for a psychological strategy. He ordered the minesweeper and bombardment groups to persist with their operations, even while sustaining damage, to convince the Japanese that their suicide missions were failing. Kinkaid shared these concerns and requested the cessation of all diversionary air operations to concentrate the main air offensive on Luzon. As a result, Admiral Halsey's carrier-based aircraft and General Kenney's ground forces were tasked with neutralizing all Japanese airfields in Luzon, supported by Durgin's escort carriers. On January 7, McCain's strikes on Luzon and Oldendorf's bombardment of the Lingayen beaches continued, while underwater demolition teams entered the gulf to undertake the dangerous mission of dismantling beach obstacles. Again contrary to expectations, no beach obstacles were found. The "frog men" encountered only a little rifle and machine gun fire, and the few beach defenses they observed appeared to be unoccupied. Their tasks and those of hydrographic ships were completed on the 8th. In retaliation, 20 to 25 kamikazes targeted various segments of the Luzon Attack Force, managing to sink two minesweepers and damage one LST. That night, Kinkaid's destroyers successfully sank the Hinoki off Manila Bay. However, on January 8, the 3rd Fleet units began advancing towards Formosa, as MacArthur and Admiral Nimitz suspected that the kamikazes were launching from there. Without Halsey's additional air support, the Japanese suicide planes once again attacked the Luzon Attack Force, this time damaging the cruiser Australia and the escort carriers Kitkun Bay and Kardashan Bay, as well as inflicting damage on an LSI, an LST, and an APA. Due to significant losses, by the end of the day, the 2nd Air Fleet and the 1st Combined Base Air Force headquarters were disbanded. The 1st Air Fleet received orders to withdraw to Formosa for reorganization, while the severely weakened units of the 4th Air Army were set to continue limited attack operations for a short time until a final evacuation could be carried out. Returning on the morning of the 8th to resume bombardment about 08:00, one section again hit the Lingayen area. About ten minutes later a destroyer standing close inshore and a spotting plane from a battleship reported that Filipinos were forming a parade, complete with United States and Philippine flags, in the town of Lingayen. The fire was shifted to more westerly targets while leaflets were quickly prepared instructing the Filipinos to clear the area. A spotting plane dropped the leaflets and the paraders dispersed. Bombardment started again as soon as the area seemed vacated. The reasons for resuming the bombardment of Lingayen and its environs in the face of this friendly demonstration ashore are unknown, especially since neither underwater demolition teams nor spotting planes had discovered any signs of Japanese activity in the area. The town, at least, seemed safely in the hands of the Filipinos. The most obvious explanation is that erroneous intelligence, having indicated that strong defenses would be encountered in the area, made it incumbent upon Admiral Oldendorf to continue the bombardment whether he wanted to or not. Too much was at stake to take a chance. The Filipinos in the Lingayen area could hardly have been pleased as they saw their homes and public buildings damaged or destroyed by what to them must have seemed an unnecessary bombardment. It seems a tribute both to the Filipinos and to the prewar administration of the United States in the islands--as well as a severe and obvious indictment of Japanese occupation policies--that the people of the Philippines took such adversities in their stride, not permitting personal resentments to overcome judgment and loyalty. Throughout the rest of 8 January, bombardment of the landing beach areas continued without incident. Practically no military installations or targets were found in the Lingayen town and airstrip area, and relatively few were discovered in the San Fabian region. The San Fabian bombardment vessels ran out of targets by 1530 and moved back up the gulf to strike the San Fernando area for another forty-five minutes, completing the task that the Japanese kamikazes had interrupted on the 6th. The Lingayen area ships had long since ceased their firing for the day. Thus ended preliminary bombardment operations. The heavy bombardment of the San Fernando sector on the 6th aroused great anxiety in General Yamashita's headquarters. An enemy landing in that sector would fall north of the main positions of the 58th Independent Mixed Brigade and create serious danger of a thrust toward Baguio over the Bauang-Naguilian Highway. The only means of meeting this potential threat was to change the planned employment of the 19th Division. The division was still in the San Fernando-Naguilian area due to postponement of its scheduled movement inland, and intense enemy air activity over the whole Lingayen area made it improbable that it could move in any case. Consequently, on 7 January, the Area Army ordered the division to assume responsibility for the defense of the sector north of a line running through Santiago, Magungunay, Mt. Bilbil, and Asin. Its main strength was to be concentrated between Naguilian and Baguio. With preliminary operations finished, Kinkaid's amphibious attack convoys arrived at the entrance to Lingayen Gulf around 04:00 on January 9. As the amphibious ships began landing operations, the fire support vessels of Admirals Barbey and Wilkinson positioned themselves for final pre-assault bombardment. In support of these efforts, McCain struck Formosa, destroying 47 Japanese aircraft, sinking seven ships, and damaging eleven others. Throughout the week, the fast carriers conducted a total of 3,030 offensive sorties, dropping approximately 700 tons of bombs at the cost of 86 aircraft. Pleased with the results of the anti-kamikaze operation, Nimitz finally permitted Halsey to launch a major raid into the South China Sea, codenamed Operation Gratitude. Meanwhile, back in Luzon, the pre-assault bombardment commenced at 07:00, gradually shifting fire from the landing beaches to the flanks of the assault area. At 09:00, the first amphibious vehicles began their approach from a departure line about 4,500 yards offshore, while rocket-armed landing craft and aircraft bombarded the beaches. The landing beaches of the 14th Corps were located across the middle of Lingayen Gulf's southern shores and centered on Lingayen airstrip and the nearby grounds of the capitol of Pangasinan Province. In peacetime one would have considered the shore line a beautiful swimming beach, a magnificent strand of firm sand stretching eastward almost 9 miles from the mouth of the Calmay River to the mouth of the Dagupan. The east bank of the Dagupan, which enters the gulf midway between Lingayen and San Fabian, delineated the boundary between the 14th and the 1st Corps, and bridges over the Dagupan were expected to provide the first easy means of contact between the two corps. Since there was a gap of over 6 miles between the 1st Corps' westernmost beaches and the 14th Corps' easternmost, it was imperative that the Dagupan crossings be seized without delay. Planners anticipated that inasmuch as 1st Corps troops would be a mile or so closer to the river at the moment of landing they would be the first to reach the bridges, but it was 14th Corps' responsibility to relieve 1st Corps at the crossings as soon as possible. The 37th Division was to drive toward the Dagupan, while the 40th Division would make a quick thrust west and northwest to Port Sual and Alaminos. Port Sual, located at the southwestern corner of Lingayen Gulf, and at the western extremity of the Army Beachhead Line, possessed some importance as the site of minor port facilities. Alaminos, about twelve miles northwest of Port Sual, lay inland on the Bolinao Peninsula. Early capture of road junctions at Alaminos would help forestall Japanese attempts to organize counterattacks against the 6th Army's right flank. In contrast, the beaches assigned to the 1st Corps were more widely spaced. The units of the 6th Division were scheduled to land on the Blue Beaches, located midway between the Dagupan River mouth and that of the Bued River. The 103rd Regiment was to land on White Beach 3 at San Fabian, while the 169th Regiment would land on White Beach 2, nearly two miles to the northeast. Additionally, the 2nd Battalion of the 172nd Regiment was set to land on the nearby White Beach 3. Fortunately for the American forces, they encountered minimal resistance as the initial waves approached the shore, facing only some challenges from the ebb tide. Shortly after 09:30, the 1st and 20th Regiments landed on the Blue Beaches, with the 1st Regiment quickly securing the mouth of the Bued River and advancing three miles inland to Mangaldan, while the 20th Regiment moved toward Dagupan. Meanwhile, Wing's regiments landed on their designated beaches to the northeast but faced harassment from snipers, artillery, and mortar fire from Lieutenant General Nishiyama Fukutaro's 23rd Division. However, the assault waves of the 14th Corps moved more slowly than expected, reaching the western beaches only by 09:40. The 185th Regiment captured Orange Beach, the 160th Regiment took Green Beach, the 148th Regiment secured Yellow Beach, and the 129th Regiment landed unopposed on Crimson Beach. After landing on the beaches, the 1st Battalion of the 185th Regiment marched to the Agno River's mouth. Meanwhile, the 40th Reconnaissance Troop established a roadblock on the main road, just three miles east of Port Sual. The 2nd Battalion of the 185th Regiment advanced directly inland through Lingayen, successfully crossing the Calmay River and an east-west segment of the Agno River. Similarly, the 160th Regiment crossed the Calmay and assembled nearly four miles inland. The reserve 2nd Battalion of the 108th Regiment landed at Lingayen, while the 148th Regiment moved straight inland, crossing both the Calmay and Dagupan Rivers toward San Carlos. The 129th Regiment entered Dagupan and crossed the Patan River to reach Calasiao, with its 3rd Battalion eventually extending the line to connect with the 148th. By the end of the day, Griswold had established a beachhead stretching northwestward from Calasiao for nearly twenty miles to the outpost near Port Sual. At the same time, Wing's units encountered the most significant resistance from three tiers of ridges that overlooked the 43rd Division's beaches from the north, northeast, and east.  The 43rd Division had the most hazardous and difficult S-day tasks. On the division's left low hills lay scarcely three-quarters of a mile inland from WHITE Beaches 1 and 2. Stretching northward, and coming still closer to Lingayen Gulfs eastern shore, a first line of low, grass-covered hills formed a somewhat broken ridge line, the seaward slopes of which grew steeper as the hills proceeded north along the coast. Beyond this first range, which averaged less than 250 feet in height, lay another, more irregular north-south ridge that rose to 350 feet. Still further east--a little over three miles inland--was yet a third steep-sided, grass-covered ridge line, this one averaging around 600 feet high. The three tiers of ridges overlooked the 43rd Division's beaches from the north, northeast, and east. They provided the Japanese with natural defensive terrain, excellent observation, good positions from which to deliver direct fire on the beaches, and cover behind which there was protection from the essentially flat trajectory of naval support fires. Moreover, the ridges were close to assembly areas further inland that could provide large Japanese forces with cover and concealment. In a single night the Japanese could move considerable strength from these assembly points into the tiers of hills to launch a counterattack against the 6th Army's left. While the 2nd Battalion of the 172nd Regiment advanced toward Hill 247, the 169th Regiment moved eastward, successfully reaching Binday and extending its lines north along the gentle slopes leading to Hill 470. Meanwhile, the 2nd Battalion of the 172nd Regiment quickly secured the barrios of Mabilao and Alacan, ultimately capturing Hill 247 despite scattered resistance. As small arms and mortar fire intensified, combat patrols advanced toward Hill 385, coinciding with the remainder of the 172nd coming ashore. Finally, the 103rd Regiment took control of San Fabian without facing any opposition and then advanced generally south and southeast toward Hill 200, halting just north of San Jacinto by the end of the day. While the assault units of the 1st Corps successfully landed by dusk on January 9, Swift's advance was not as deep as Griswold's, leaving several dangerous gaps between his units. Throughout the day, the Japanese launched sporadic kamikaze attacks on the Luzon Attack Force, causing significant damage to the battleship Mississippi, hitting the cruisers Columbia and Australia again, and damaging one destroyer escort. Meanwhile, friendly anti-aircraft fire resulted in numerous casualties aboard the battleship Colorado. In response to the enemy landings, Yamashita decided to deploy the 2nd Tank Division to the Agno River line near Tayug, where the armored units were to execute a counterattack from the northern flank if the enemy overextended. He also sent five battalions under Lieutenant-General Tsuda Yoshitake to secure the Cabanatuan area, ordered Lieutenant-General Okamoto Yasuyuki's 10th Division to position elements in the Triangle Hill and Tayug sectors to counter a potential enemy advance from Lingayen toward San Jose, stationed the majority of the 11th Independent Regiment at Bongabong, and directed the Noguchi Detachment to move from Bicol to the Manila area. During the night, the 12th Surface Raiding Regiment, based at Port Sual, attempted to disrupt further enemy landings with a full-scale suicide boat attack on ships near the beachhead. Taking advantage of the element of surprise, the small explosive-laden boats approached undetected but only succeeded in sinking one LCI and damaging eight other vessels. In other areas, increased guerrilla activities and Allied airstrikes in northern Luzon had nearly stopped the Japanese from collecting and transporting vital food supplies to the critical defense zones within the Baguio-Mankayan-Bambang triangle. This disruption would hinder the 14th Area Army's capacity to conduct a prolonged defensive campaign. Although plans for a desperate, full-scale counteroffensive were developed, Yamashita decisively rejected this strategy, instead ordering the 2nd Tank Division to cancel its intended counterattack and regroup at Lupao, approximately eight miles northwest of San Jose. Meanwhile, on January 10, Griswold's forces continued their advance inland: the 185th Regiment moved west toward Port Sual; the 160th Regiment progressed southward about eight miles; the 148th Regiment quickly advanced to San Carlos; and the 129th Regiment pushed forward to Malasiqui, where the 14th Corps faced enemy resistance for the first time since the landing. Additionally, the reserve 108th and 145th Regiments successfully landed on the Lingayen beaches. To the north, the 6th Division shifted generally south and southeast, covering about four miles across flat, dry, open farmland, and by nightfall, it secured a front of approximately seven miles from west to east. As they continued northeast, the 103rd Regiment expanded its front, with its 2nd Battalion advancing toward Manaoag while the other two battalions moved to the area northwest of Hill 200. Lastly, the 169th and 172nd Regiments encountered the most intense resistance thus far, providing an early glimpse of the challenges that would impede the 43rd Division for the upcoming month. The 1st Battalion, 169th Regiment, supported by close artillery and mortar fire, engaged in combat along the steep, grassy slopes of Hill 470, ultimately capturing the summit by nightfall. Meanwhile, the rest of the regiment advanced across the Bued River toward Hills 355 and 318, but halted near the river due to heavy artillery, mortar, and machine-gun fire. To the north, the 172nd Regiment cleared Hill 385 and then moved toward Hills 351 and 580, gradually advancing along the southern section of the third ridge line, which was located inland from the beaches. Additionally, its 1st Battalion progressed two miles along the graveled coastal road and conducted patrols along the ridge crest. By nightfall, Krueger had determined that the 6th Army Reserve should be deployed in the 1st Corps' area, as outlined in the pre-assault plans, due to the significant resistance faced by the 43rd Division. He suspected that the apparent lack of enemy resistance to the west was a trap, designed to lure the 6th Army into overextending its lines, making its flanks susceptible to a counterattack from the east. Fortunately for the Americans, Tominaga's kamikaze attacks began to diminish in the days following the landing, with an attack on January 10 resulting in damage only to the destroyer escort LeRay Wilson and one transport ship. The next day, the 43rd Division continued to face challenges in Luzon. The Japanese mortar and artillery fire along the 172nd's eastern front was so severe that Wing decided to shift the regiment's attack direction from east to north, resulting in minimal progress as they redeployed to strike toward Hills 351 and 580 from Hill 470. Additionally, the reserve 158th Regiment was landed to relieve the 1st Battalion, 172nd Regiment, on the coastal road. Looking southeast, the 169th Regiment nearly encircled Hill 318. However, despite receiving maximum support from Durgin's carrier aircraft, naval gunfire, and division artillery, they were unable to dislodge the Japanese forces, who had entrenched themselves in the hillside. Meanwhile, Griswold's advance inland to secure the Army Beachhead Line continued to progress well on January 11. On the 11th the 185th Infantry patrolled and consolidated its positions on the west flank, suffered no casualties, killed 5 Japanese, and captured another. Early in the morning a Chevrolet sedan of 1940 or 1941 vintage, occupied by two Japanese, came calmly down the coast road from the direction of Port Sual. Obviously unaware that Company C, 185th Infantry, maintained a roadblock on the highway, the Japanese practically ran into the American outpost before they realized their situation. Before they could recover from their surprise and consternation, both Japanese were dead, and Company C had acquired some luxurious transportation. Meanwhile the 160th Regiment reached Aguilar, a road junction already held by Filipino guerrillas. The 108th Regiment closely followed the 160th, and the 148th Regiment established a line from Dumpay westward for four miles to Bacnar, with patrols extending further south to Urbiztondo and Bayambang. By the end of the day, the 14th Corps had either occupied or outposted nearly all the territory within the Army Beachhead Line in its sector. However, with Swift's units unable to keep up with the advance southward, Griswold faced the risk of exposing his eastern flank if he continued to push forward. Therefore, the 1st Corps needed reinforcement to prevent widening the gap along the corps boundary. As a result, the reserve 63rd Regiment and the 13th Armored Group were deployed in the San Fabian area, while the 6th Ranger Battalion, which had landed at Blue Beaches the previous day, moved to the Dagupan area. Additionally, Major-General Charles Mullins' 25th Division began to assemble between the Agoi and Patalan Rivers. Despite these developments, casualties had been significantly lower than expected, with 55 men killed and around 185 wounded, primarily from the 43rd Division. Japanese casualties in ground operations were also relatively low, with American estimates suggesting between 150 and 200 Japanese killed. Meanwhile, Task Force 38 made its way into the South China Sea via the Luzon Strait on January 10, accompanied by the refueling group. Although poor weather conditions thwarted a scheduled refueling on that day, Task Force 38 was completely fueled by noon on January 11 and prepared to carry out Halsey's ambitious raid. I would like to take this time to remind you all that this podcast is only made possible through the efforts of Kings and Generals over at Youtube. Please go subscribe to Kings and Generals over at Youtube and to continue helping us produce this content please check out www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals. If you are still hungry after that, give my personal channel a look over at The Pacific War Channel at Youtube, it would mean a lot to me. As Allied forces prepared for a major assault on Luzon, kamikaze attacks intensified, leading to fierce battles and unexpected challenges, but Filipino resilience shone through despite devastation. On the shores of Lingayen Gulf, American forces launched a strategic landing, facing minimal resistance, but soon encountered fierce Japanese counterattacks as they advanced inland.

The Fall of Trooper Michael Proctor: A Trail of Misconduct and Broken Trust On January 15, 2025, Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor will face a disciplinary hearing that could mark the end of his career. The hearing follows a cascade of controversies involving Proctor's investigative conduct in several high-profile cases, each raising serious questions about the integrity of law enforcement practices in Massachusetts. From the Karen Read murder trial to the disturbing death of Sandra Birchmore, Proctor's involvement has been marred by allegations of misconduct, mishandled evidence, and professional impropriety. As the public watches closely, the hearing promises to be a pivotal moment for the Massachusetts State Police. The Karen Read Case: A Mistrial and Questions of Bias In January 2022, Karen Read was accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, by allegedly backing her SUV into him during a snowstorm. Trooper Michael Proctor was assigned as the lead investigator in the case, a role that would later become a focal point of controversy. During the trial, Proctor's conduct came under fire when defense attorneys revealed unprofessional and derogatory text messages he had sent regarding Read. In one particularly damning message, Proctor expressed hope that Read would harm herself, a sentiment he later admitted to under cross-examination. The defense alleged that Proctor's investigative methods were not only biased but also aimed at confirming Read's guilt rather than pursuing an impartial search for the truth. Questions were raised about the handling of physical evidence, including the broken taillight from Read's SUV and the analysis of O'Keefe's injuries. In July 2024, the case ended in a mistrial, further eroding public confidence in the investigation. Read's retrial is now scheduled for April 2025, but the shadow of Proctor's alleged misconduct continues to loom large. The Brian Walshe Case: Doubts About Credibility Proctor's troubles did not end with the Karen Read case. In early 2023, he was assigned as the lead investigator in another high-profile case: the murder of Ana Walshe. Her husband, Brian Walshe, was accused of killing and dismembering her in one of the most shocking domestic violence cases in recent memory. Despite the gravity of the allegations, prosecutors announced in September 2024 that Proctor would not be called to testify during Walshe's trial. The decision was widely interpreted as an acknowledgment of the credibility issues stemming from Proctor's prior conduct in the Read case. Defense attorneys in the Walshe case seized upon Proctor's tarnished reputation, questioning whether his investigative methods could be trusted. While the details of his involvement remain limited due to the decision to sideline him as a witness, the controversy surrounding Proctor has undoubtedly impacted public perception of the case, which is set to go to trial later in 2025. The Myles King and Shawn Johnson Cases: A Pattern of Concern Proctor's involvement in other cases has also come under scrutiny. In the case of Myles King, accused of killing Marquis Simmons in Milton in 2021, defense attorneys expressed concerns about Proctor's role in the investigation. Similar concerns arose in the case of Shawn Johnson, who faces murder charges related to a deadly shooting outside a Randolph country club on July 4, 2022. In both instances, defense teams highlighted Proctor's alleged misconduct in the Read and Walshe cases as a basis for questioning the integrity of the investigations. The Sandra Birchmore Case: A Tragic Loss and a Broken System Perhaps the most harrowing of all is the case of Sandra Birchmore, a 23-year-old woman whose death was initially ruled a suicide. Birchmore was found dead in her Canton, Massachusetts apartment in February 2021. The initial investigation by local authorities concluded that she had taken her own life, but federal investigators later determined that her death was a homicide. Former Stoughton Police Officer Matthew Farwell was indicted in August 2024 for Birchmore's murder. Farwell, who allegedly groomed Birchmore from the time she was a teenager, was accused of maintaining a years-long inappropriate relationship with her. When Birchmore became pregnant, Farwell allegedly staged her death to appear as a suicide, a revelation that sent shockwaves through the community. While Proctor was not directly involved in the Birchmore investigation, the case has drawn parallels to others he handled, particularly in the context of law enforcement misconduct. The Birchmore tragedy underscores systemic failures within Massachusetts' law enforcement agencies and has intensified calls for comprehensive reforms. Implications for Massachusetts State Police The upcoming disciplinary hearing for Michael Proctor is more than just a review of one officer's conduct; it is a litmus test for the Massachusetts State Police's commitment to accountability and reform. Proctor's suspension without pay since July 2024, following an internal affairs investigation, has already signaled the department's willingness to address serious allegations. However, public trust in the force remains precarious. The Massachusetts State Police have stated that the trial board's recommendations will be reviewed by the Superintendent, who will determine the final outcome. This process is being closely watched by advocacy groups, legal experts, and the families of those affected by the cases Proctor investigated. The results of the hearing could have far-reaching implications, not only for Proctor's career but also for the integrity of the Massachusetts State Police as a whole. Public and Media Reaction The media has extensively covered the controversies surrounding Proctor, painting a picture of a deeply troubled investigator whose alleged misconduct has jeopardized multiple cases. Public response has been equally intense, with many calling for greater transparency and accountability in law enforcement. Advocacy groups have emphasized the need for systemic reforms, including improved oversight mechanisms and stricter standards for investigative practices. The cases involving Karen Read, Brian Walshe, and Sandra Birchmore have become rallying points for those demanding justice and institutional change. As public pressure mounts, the Massachusetts State Police face a critical juncture: Will they take decisive action to restore trust, or will they allow the shadow of these controversies to linger? Conclusion and Anticipated Developments The disciplinary hearing on January 15, 2025, is expected to be a watershed moment. Whether Michael Proctor faces permanent disciplinary action or is allowed to continue his career will depend on the findings of the trial board and the Superintendent's decision. Meanwhile, the Karen Read retrial, the Brian Walshe trial, and the legal proceedings in the Sandra Birchmore case will continue to unfold, each carrying the weight of Proctor's controversial legacy. As Massachusetts grapples with these complex and emotionally charged cases, one thing is clear: The pursuit of justice demands more than just individual accountability. It requires a commitment to systemic change, ensuring that tragedies like those of Sandra Birchmore and John O'Keefe are never repeated. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Keith discusses the pros and cons of investing in single-family rentals versus apartment buildings. He highlights that less than 10% of U.S. building materials are imported, reducing the impact of tariffs. Single-family rentals offer better tenant quality, lower vacancy rates, and higher appreciation potential. They also have lower financing costs and are more divisible.  Conversely, apartment buildings offer economies of scale and lower per-unit maintenance costs. He emphasizes the importance of owning more property, especially new-builds, which offer lower insurance premiums and attractive financing options Work with expert investment coaches to find the best off-market deals and maximize your returns.  GRE Free Investment Coaching: GREmarketplace.com/Coach For access to properties or free help with a GRE Investment Coach, start here: GREmarketplace.com Show Notes: GetRichEducation.com/535 Get mortgage loans for investment property: RidgeLendingGroup.com or call 855-74-RIDGE  or e-mail: info@RidgeLendingGroup.com Invest with Freedom Family Investments.  You get paid first: Text FAMILY to 66866 Will you please leave a review for the show? I'd be grateful. Search “how to leave an Apple Podcasts review”  For advertising inquiries, visit: GetRichEducation.com/ad Best Financial Education: GetRichEducation.com Get our wealth-building newsletter free— text ‘GRE' to 66866 Our YouTube Channel: www.youtube.com/c/GetRichEducation Follow us on Instagram: @getricheducation Complete episode transcript:   Automatically Transcribed With Otter.ai    Keith Weinhold  0:01   welcome to GRE. I'm your host. Keith Weinhold, talking about how most home building materials are US sourced and not affected by tariffs, the little understood pros and cons of investing in apartment buildings versus single family rental homes, then what really makes sense to invest in in this particular era and more today on Get Rich Education.   Speaker 1  0:28   since 2014 the powerful get rich education podcast has created more passive income for people than nearly any other show in the world. This show teaches you how to earn strong returns from passive real estate investing in the best markets without losing your time being a flipper or landlord. Show Host Keith Weinhold writes for both Forbes and Rich Dad advisors and delivers a new show every week since 2014 there's been millions of listener downloads of 188 world nations. He has a list show, guess who? Top Selling personal finance author Robert Kiyosaki, get rich education can be heard on every podcast platform, plus it has its own dedicated Apple and Android listener phone apps build wealth on the go with the get rich education podcast. Sign up now for the get rich education podcast or visit get rich education.com   Corey Coates  1:13   You're listening to the show that has created more financial freedom than nearly any show in the world. This is get rich education.   Keith Weinhold  1:29   Welcome GRE from Tallahassee, Florida to Waxahachie, Texas and across 188 nations worldwide. I'm Keith Weinhold, and you are inside, G, R, E, we are here for you every Monday, without fail, 52 weeks a year, and we have never replayed an old episode either, always original content. Thanks for being here, but you're not here for me. You are here for you as another year dawns before we get into the meaty real estate content of today's show, including single family rentals versus apartments. Take a moment to check in with your own goals. Maybe you think about that is just buying your first investment property, or maybe you own 83 rental units, and you're looking to get to 100 this year. But no matter really real estate is just the fuel for your goal. It's probably not the end goal itself is your goal to have the time freedom to watch all of your kids basketball games this year. What about beyond this year? Are you really dreaming big enough you've got to question yourself on that sometimes, for example, forget flying first class. What if you want to own your own private jet, like Taylor Swift's luxurious Dassault 7x jet for $54 million? how about real estate fueling a dream that's even bigger than that? Yet, last month, the Philadelphia Eagles received the NFL approval for the sale of an 8% interest of the team to two different family investors. Okay, do you find say that interesting owning part of a major pro sports team. And by the way, what would something like that look like for you? I mean, do you even have the headspace to conceive of such a thing? It's good to ask yourself questions like this. Sometimes that sale was based on a valuation of the team of up to $8.3 billion and yet, after all that, the Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie, he still maintains complete control of the team. Okay, so if each of the two family investors got a 4% interest at this valuation, that is up to a $332 million investment for each family. Maybe that could be a Weinhold the family goal. We'll see about that one. And you know, when it comes to making yourself a bigger you and dreaming a bigger dream, I like to listen to what the doers say. I found it so interesting in a Jeff Bezos interview at the deal book Summit, Bezos said it's human nature to overestimate risk and underestimate opportunity. Bezos also said entrepreneurs would be well advised to try and bias against that piece of human nature, the risks are probably not as big as you perceive, and the opportunities may be bigger than you perceive. That's the end of what bezel said. I really think that that's spot on stuff. now two weeks ago, when I gave GREs national home price appreciation forecast for this year. You might remember that I said that potential Trump tariffs just don't matter as much as people think when it comes to real estate. And understanding more about why I say this, it can help you understand real estate materials and sourcing and home building in the United States, America's overwhelming majority of sourced building materials are not imported, so therefore something like a supply chain bottleneck that's more worth watching, really. It's a huge misunderstanding of the home building market to assume that most building materials come from overseas. They do not, not even 10% of residential construction building materials are imported. The National Association of Home Builders will tell you so. And really, the majority of those few imports that do come from elsewhere, they come from, Canada in the form of timber. You might have heard about that before. Now, there are some things like finishes and fixtures that get sourced from, oh, various other countries, but yeah, the biggest potential tariff expense impacting home builders would come from enacting a cost on Canadian lumber. But I and a lot of economists as well, they're pretty skeptical that the administration would really enact a tariff on a close ally like that, on Canada's raw materials. In fact, Chief Economist Lawrence Yoon of the NAR he conceded that even potential lumber tariffs, they might be given a phasing in period, and that would encourage American timber mills to fill in any production gap. It's also important to you know, remember that doors, windows, cabinets that builders utilize, they are typically produced within us, borders. Windows, doors, cabinets made domestically, unless it's something that relies on raw materials that are imported, they ought to be little affected by tariffs. One example is that kitchen sinks now they largely went from being sourced in China, then Malaysia, then Indonesia, and one main customer is now talking about sourcing them out of Mexico or the Dominican Republic. So there are a few things that less than 10% that's imported. Another imported item is flooring, which moved away from China, went to India for a while, went a little bit back to Brazil, and now more is being sourced by Ecuador. But the important thing to remember is that these are outlier components. Not even 10% of residential construction building materials are imported. That's what you want to remember, concrete, us, rebar, us. So you know, as a real estate investor, you can feel good that as your portfolio grows, each one of your properties was chiefly built with us, labor that you already knew, but it is also built predominantly with us, materials as well. How likely are single family rental investors to say that they want to buy more investment property this year. Well, year ago, 60% of them said that. Today it is up to 76% yes, that many say that they are either likely or very likely to buy single family rental property in the next 12 months, and that same group that was surveyed is also unlikely to sell their property, and they also said that they are more likely to raise the single family rent this year. And all this is according to a joint lending one resi club survey. However, most fall in the range of raising the rent between just 1% and 6% this year, so pretty modest rent increases. In fact, in every region of the US, the majority of single family rental investors describe their rental market as either strong or very strong. But can you guess the weakest region? Okay, this region is the one that still has a majority of landlords that say that their market is strong, but yet the weakest of them all is the South West, and that is largely due to over building and in the survey, what expense increased the most the past 12 months? Well, number one is that 37% of respondents these landlords said it is still insurance premiums. Second place was that 23% say property taxes are increasing the most. And then third was. And 21% say that maintenance and repair costs have increased the most for them. So the top three expenses cited expense increases that is in order, are insurance, property tax, and then maintenance and repairs. And a few weeks ago, I discussed with you, you might remember about how upgrading or remodeling a unit that helps you in at least five different ways simultaneously. Let me talk about this, since I touched on raising the rent and a little comprehension test here. Do you remember what those five ways are? the five ways your help by upgrading or remodeling a unit. And no, these are not the famed real estate pays five ways when you upgrade a vacant unit for rent, or at times, you can even actually upgrade a unit while the tenant is still occupying the property, if it's not a disruptive upgrade type. Okay, I mean, sometimes that tenant can be appreciative that they're getting an upgrade while they live there, but the five ways that upgrading a unit helps you are, first, well, obviously it helps you be able to get more rent in cash flow. Secondly, you tend to attract a higher quality tenant. And then in a five plus unit apartment building, it also increases your noi, therefore a greater overall property value. Fourth is pride of ownership. And then fifth is that higher rents help you offset those erstwhile higher operating expenses.    And here's the thing, when you get free help from one of our GRE investment coaches, like you can do at GRE marketplace.com those properties are either already extensively renovated or they are completely brand new build. So because of that fact, this means that from day one, your rent income is already optimized. You already have the best chance of landing a quality tenant, and you get some sense of having a pride of ownership. And all of those things, they're already optimized for you. You don't have to tinker with anything else, because those GRE marketplace properties, more than 95% of them are either renovated or new build. I would say, using properties conducive to the BRRRR method, they would be the few exceptions there and on GRE marketplace, you can find lower cost renovated single family homes, up to million dollar apartment buildings, either new or renovated. And another pro tip here to help you with something actionable in a premium place to source your growing income property portfolio. You've heard me mention them before, is mid south home buyers, but I'll tell you more about what's going on with them. Yeah, they're an especially good place to add your portfolio if you either haven't invested outside of your home market before, or you don't have as much liquidity right now, because their prices are just 100 to 180k they are still in that range. And yes, that 100 to 180k that is indeed the entire capital price for the asset. So that means down payment and closing costs being about 25% therefore it's just 25k to 45k Yes, you can still get started for that little with a wonderfully renovated property in either Memphis or Little Rock. Those are the two markets where mid south home buyers operates, and they are some of the most investor advantage markets in the entire nation. And then the US is one of the most investor advantage markets in the world. And last month, I met and spoke with a 19 year old guy that lives in Dallas, and he just bought his first ever investment property from mid south home buyers in Memphis. And in fact, it was his goal to have his first income producing property at age 18, and he bought it the day before he turned 19, so he barely met that goal. But yeah, they are total pros at mid south they've been doing it for over two decades. They say that they are the nation's highest rated turnkey property provider. They might even be the first provider in the nation, if you like. They also manage the property for you, and their property managers are really aware that their investors, like you, seek a return on investment, so they often have a line a waiting list. To get their properties. Last I checked the line at mid south had shortened globally attractive cash flows an A plus rating with a better business bureau, and they've now renovated over 5000 houses. And over there, they do a lot of things with their management that you just wish every provider would do, there is zero markup on maintenance. Their average occupancy rate is almost 99% average renter stays more than three and a half years. And you know that three and a half years, that duration of tenancy that could be poised to go even higher now, with the affordability crisis for these want to be first time homebuyers now, most of what mid south has are single family rentals, quite a few duplexes too. Every home has brand new components, a full one year warranty, bumper to bumper, new 30 year roofs. And then the really important part expect a high quality renter that they screen and find in place for you. So let me give you an example of two real properties. And now, if these two aren't under contract already, they probably soon will be, since I'm mentioning them. And of course, duplexes cost more than single family rentals. This duplex is in Jacksonville, Arkansas. It's just northeast of Little Rock. It is 913 and 915 Ruth Ann drive, the combined rent from both sides is $1,775 the all in cost is about 210k 2099, in total, it's 1600 square feet. So 800 square feet each side, it's two bed, one bath each side. The Property taxes are really low, $1,300 a year, really nicely renovated with good quality materials. I mean, I love owning properties like this all day. So that's a duplex in the Little Rock market. Another one from mid south is this, Memphis single family rental. The address is 400 Bonita drive. It is $1,200 rent on a $148,100 purchase price. Gosh, those numbers work. This single family rental is three bed one and a half bath, 1164 square feet. Gosh. Again, low property tax in these regions, just $1,120 annually. All right, so that property tax rate is just three quarters of 1% of the purchase price. So really low on a national basis, a big backyard, eat in kitchen, separate laundry room, walking distance to schools. I mean, this is the type of property a tenant family could live in for five or 10 years, beautifully renovated. And I'm bringing these up because these are all at prices that Metro New Yorkers or coastal Californians can barely believe. So each property has hundreds of dollars of projected positive monthly cash flow. Each one increases your income 2000 to $5,000 per year. And I have personally toured mid south home buyers office in Memphis and their properties in person in Memphis. And I've seen their properties in each stage. I walked a tear down that they were doing, and I saw all the debris in the backyard. And I have seen their hardwood floors shine inside newly renovated property that I walked with both Terry and Liz from over there at Mid South. She is a pretty popular and extremely knowledgeable woman there. Liz, you can ask for her or one of her team members about getting on the list over there. Yes, these are 100k to 180k already renovated. Yes, that's truly the all in price, and they are in decent, working class pride of ownership neighborhoods in Memphis, Tennessee and Little Rock, Arkansas. And a lot of people get their start in investing there, I suspect it's now in the hundreds, with the number of GRE listeners that have bought from them. But even veteran investors, with dozens of units, they scoop up properties from them due to the low prices, some even pay gasp, all cash, yes, no leverage for them. And mid south homebuyers has investor tours monthly, where they load everyone on a bus, and you can check out the properties, because they are really proud of what they offer there coming up next, I'm comparing single family rental investments to apartments. But yeah, right there. That was a pro tip that really ought to help you out. Expect cash flow from day one. A 19 year old is doing it. You can start yourself at mid south homebuyers.com. More next. I'm Keith Weinhold. You're listening to get rich education.    Oh geez, the national average bank account pays less than 1% on your savings, so your bank is getting rich off of you. You've got to earn way more, or else you're losing your hard earned cash to inflation. Let the liquidity fund help you put your money to work with minimum risk, your cash generates up to a 10% return and compounds year in and year out. Instead of earning less than 1% in your bank account, the minimum investment is just 25k you keep getting paid until you decide you want your money back. Their decade plus track record proves they've always paid their investors 100% in full and on time. And you know how I'd know because I'm an investor in this myself, earn 10% like me and GRE listeners are. Text family to 66866, to learn about freedom. Family investments, liquidity fund on your journey to financial freedom through passive income. Text family to 66866.    Hey, you can get your mortgage loans at the same place where I get mine, at Ridge lending group NMLS, 420056, they provided our listeners with more loans than any provider in the entire nation because they specialize in income properties. They help you build a long term plan for growing your real estate empire with leverage. You can start your pre qualification and chat with President Caeli Ridge personally. Start Now while it's on your mind at Ridge lendinggroup.com that's Ridge lendinggroup.com   Kathy Fettke  21:55   you this is the real wealth network's Kathy Fettke, and you are listening to The always valuable get rich education with Keith Weinhold.   Keith Weinhold  22:12   Keith, welcome back for the 535th week in a row you are listening to get rich Education. I'm your host, Keith Weinhold, and I'm really grateful to have you here if you self manage your properties. One software that can really simplify your life is called Hemlane, H, E, M, as in Mary, l, a, n, e, Hemlane. You might have heard about it before. I now know quite a few people that use it. It's been getting some really good reviews. You can manage your properties from anywhere, even through your phone. And Hemlane has got some really good integrations, and now it's more than just investors like you that are using it. Agents and property managers are using Hemlane too, from advertising to tenant screening to maintenance and repair and accounting, and I just learned that they recently got all of the state specific lease agreements integrated on their platform as well. That's why it was on top of mind. If you prefer to self manage and you want to make it easier, what you can do is book a free demo and they show you how it works. Over there, it's just hemlane.com where you can do that if you like. Let them know that I told you about it.    Before I share something else actionable with you, let's do some learning and talk about apartment buildings and single family rental properties, and compare the two, some pros and cons of each. And perhaps the most obvious advantage of apartment buildings is their economies of scale. A 12 unit apartment only has one roof to maintain and one insurance policy to maintain. Another efficiency is that shared common areas and plumbing and HVAC systems that can lower your individual maintenance costs on a per unit basis as well in those apartments. And right now, at this time in the mid 2020s, decade, another advantage of apartments is that this time in the cycle is where values are just about bottoming out. Apartment buildings in a lot of national regions have fallen 20% fallen, 25% or even fallen 30% or more from their highs that were seen two to three years ago, and that's due to those higher interest rates. And the reason that this is an advantage for apartments is that you might be able to buy low, buy the dip, apartment cap rate. Have settled in the mid five range. Now, well located Class A has dropped back into the fours. Long time investors already know about some of the advantages, but you know, even some long time investors, they often overlook some of the advantages that single family rental properties have over apartments. So let me share some of those with you. Now, as you know, I started off with my first two investment properties, both being four Plex buildings, and then after that, I added larger apartment buildings and single family rental properties, and I still do buy and own single family rentals. So let me tell you about why I love them. They might have the best risk adjusted return anywhere even after 2008 great recession. Those that bought single families for cash flow persevered with single families. You get a better quality of tenant than you do in apartments. They take care of the premises. They tend to be in a better neighborhood. Single families tend to appreciate better over time, and are also more likely to be in a better school district. Single families have a retention advantage. Tenants stay longer, and that creates less vacancy and expense, and the reason that they do stay longer are those aforementioned neighborhood and school district characteristics, common areas. You know, single family rentals, they don't have any common areas that you have to clean and maintain. I think I pointed that out to you before, because that's like an overlooked profit drag that I missed when I bought my first larger apartment building. Yeah, apartments have hallways and stairs and laundry rooms and commonal door grounds that a custodian has got to service. Single families have an advantage when it comes to utility payments, because tenants often pay all of the utilities and they even care for the lawn. The larger the apartment building is, the more likely that you are going to be the one paying the utility costs. Then there's divisibility. What if you've got a property that's underperforming out there and it just isn't meeting your expectations? Well, if you had, say, 10 single family rental homes, you can sell off the one or the two that aren't performing, but yet, with a 10 unit apartment building, you've either got to keep them all or sell them all. It is not divisible. What about fire and pestilence, something a lot of people don't talk about? I mean fire and pests. They are more easily controlled in single family rentals, even if you're adequately insured, these conditions often affect multiple units and families. They can spread in an apartment building. Financing is a huge one income single family homes, they have both lower mortgage interest rates than apartments and typically lower down payment requirements than apartments. I think you already know you can secure 10 single family rental loans, single 20 if you're married at the best rates and terms through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with just 20% down payments, you can even go less than 20% on non owner occupied in some cases, but apartments rarely, if ever, have 30 year fixed rate terms like single family rentals do, and this right here in particular, that really started bringing down a lot of apartment investors, beginning in 2022 and 2023 when their interest rates reset much higher, doubling, or even more than doubling. How about vacancy rate? It is true that if your single family is vacant, then your vacancy rates 100% if your say four Plex has one vacancy, well then your vacancy rates only 25% but yeah, the same is true if you own four single family rentals and one is vacant. How about management? If you hire professional management, your manager would likely rather deal with higher quality, single family residence. And if you're self managing, this is a demographic of people that you would likely rather handle yourself. Then there's supply and demand, there just absolutely still are not enough low cost, single families that make the best rentals nationally, demand still exceeds supply. That's the opposite condition for apartments, and this is something that's going to continue in the short and the medium term market risk that is an overlooked criterion. You've got to keep your properties filled with rent paying tenants that have jobs. If you think you'll be able to buy 10 rental units in the near future, well, your 10 unit apartment building that's only going to be in one location, and that's going to leave you exposed to just one geography's economic fortunes. But if you have 10 single families, you could have four of them in Central Florida, three of them in Fort Worth Texas, and three of them in Memphis. And you got to think about exit strategy. A lot of people don't think about this. Think about the exit before you even get in, because years down the road, when it's time to sell your income property, hopefully, after you've had years of handsome profits, and real estate pays five ways and all of that, you know what? Down the road, there is going to be a greater buyer pool for your single family rental than your apartment building. In almost every case, more buyers can afford the lower price, and unlike apartments, you even have access to a pool of buyers that might want to occupy the single family rental themselves. It might even be your current tenant that buys it, but the market and the numbers have to make sense for someone to want to buy an apartment building, but if an owner occupant buys it from you, that family doesn't have to have any numbers that make sense. So your single family rental is more liquid on your exit and professional management, that's another reason that single families can make sense. Because see single family rentals, they can be spread all over a metro area diffusely, and if you self manage, that is a lot of little trips that can get to be a hassle. But if you use a pro manager, well, they're the ones that have to manage the scattered sites. And a lot of times, managers don't charge you much more to handle your single families than they do your apartment buildings. So right now, there were a ton of advantages, a good 15 or 20 advantages there that single family rentals have over apartment buildings. And it's important I discuss them, because there are a lot of investors that don't factor all of those in. Even veteran investors tend to overlook some of those things. Again, I really like apartment buildings as well. They could very well be my second favorite investment to single family rentals, and I would like to now, with that understanding, really say something that I probably don't say quite often enough if you want to benefit from all these wealth building forces here that I've talked to on the show for for more than 10 years. You need to own more property, or get started with your first property.   Now I've already given you one great resource for that. And yes, what do they say? The turtle never got ahead until he stuck his neck out. Now the uncertainty, I mean uncertainty. That's just that condition that never completely abates. But in a sense, I think you can say today that the future is already here because we've got substantially more economic certainty and political certainty than we have had in recent years. The presidency was decided peacefully. Recession fears have abated. The Fed after screwing up with high inflation a few years ago, they have now engineered a soft landing, meaning lower inflation with still high employment. So now is a good time. What about real estate prices? I'll tell you something about that all of my investor life, every single property that I've ever bought, without exception, it felt aggressively priced at the time, and then, typically, it always happens when as little as one year or two years goes by, it already looked like a good decision. And I'd like to encourage you to do something else in this era, if you can swing it, buy new build property. That's something that wasn't always true. They do cost more. It's probably going to be 300k plus for a new build rental, single family home, but either way, be sure to own more property, existing or new benefit from what we talk about now. In some parts of the nation, including Florida, builders built a few too many properties, and they are willing to give you a discount for that. They might even cut the price a little and give you a rate discount, buying down discount points for you so that you can get a mortgage loan interest rate in the fives or even in the fours on new build income property right now in a volatile insurance market, new builds also have some super low insurance premiums because the property is built to today's more stringent codes. I mean, a. Just put an example out here. If you say, buy 10 rental, single family homes for $3 million total, 10 properties, 300k each. Okay, it's just 5% appreciation, which is what I projected for this year in our home price appreciation forecast. Two weeks ago, on $3 million worth of property, that's 150k per year, every year growing that you can pull out of the properties completely tax free. But to get that 150k per year tax free, you would have only had to make a 750k down payment and closing costs 25% on this that's not even counting the cash flow that the properties generate, plus your loan, of course, is simultaneously being paid down by tenants. And on top of that, inflation would just relentlessly debase your two and a quarter million dollars of fixed rate debt. Yes, all while the appreciation and the cash flow occurs, inflation debases your debt by another $67,500 every single year, and your tenant pays down some more principal on top of that. And then there are the other tax benefits too. And this is where you are massively getting ahead. All right, that was a $3 million portfolio, but if you can only do 1/10 of that own, just say one more new build, 300k single family rental, then you get 1/10 of those benefits that I mentioned, and either way, a total return on investment of 30% or more annually that is achievable. It's actually even conservative. I mean, just with the 5% appreciation, with four to one leverage, that's a 20% return just on the appreciation component alone.    And our GRE investment coaches can make this real for you. They can talk to you about these properties and others, including those mortgage rate buy downs into the fives and the fours properties in investor advantage markets in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Oklahoma, Texas, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Arkansas and some others. In fact, let me give you two examples of what our investment coaches can help you with right now. This is pretty fun, actually, as I talk about these properties, because you might even end up owning the ones that I discuss right here on the show. The first of two is a brand new build, single family in Palma Coast, Florida. Gosh, it's a ranch home. Really good looking. Two car garage, is what I'm looking at here. It's 1200 square feet, three, bed, two, bath. It's called the Bing model, and it's got the type of layout that tenants really want today. I mean, your resident could stay there for a long time. $2,100, in rent for a purchase price of $289,900 I mean those numbers, along with the mortgage rate buy down to four and a half percent, plus new build insurance premiums that are going to be low. That really works today. That is really attractive there in Palm Coast, Florida. And the last one I'll mention is an older single family rental in Canton, Ohio. Yes, that's the home of the Pro Football Hall of Fame. The address is 2422 6th Street, Northwest in Canton. Rent of 1225, and a purchase price of just $135,000 The size is 1036 square feet, and it is four beds, one and a half baths. The renovations really look quite good. As you recall, those benefits of buying property that's already renovated, like I discussed earlier, all for 135k in today's market. So these properties and so many more like them, that's what our investment coaches can help you with. Their service is always completely free, but first what they do is they learn a little about you, and they can then put together an entire investment real estate portfolio for you, if you like. So they'll assess and evaluate what you've got, where you want to go, what property types are conducive to aligning with your strategy, and are there any best geographies for you? And more. So it's really important to stay in touch with your coach. I mean, we might find out, for example, tomorrow, that a home builder that we work with decided to offer some massive mortgage rate buy down incentives for you because, say, they built too much. So I really encourage you to set up that touch point for the first time, or to stay in touch and see what's happening, free coaching off market opportunities, and it's easy to set up a short meeting over the phone or on zoom with an investment coach. You can do that at GRE marketplace. It really can be quite a life changing venture for you from GRE marketplace.com just click on the coaching area until next week. I'm your host. Keith Weinhold, don't quit your Daydream.   Speaker 2  40:49   Nothing on this show should be considered specific, personal or professional advice. Please consult an appropriate tax, legal, real estate, financial or business professional for individualized advice. Opinions of guests are their own. Information is not guaranteed. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. The host is operating on behalf of get rich Education LLC, exclusively.   Keith Weinhold  41:09   The preceding program was brought to you by your home for wealth, building, getricheducation.com.  

Tuesday, December 24th 2024

 This week on the Superlative Podcast, host and aBlogtoWatch Founder Ariel Adams is joined by Peter Cho, the Co-founder of Jack Mason Watches. They dive right into Jack Mason's collaboration with Dr. Pepper and how that came to fruition, as well as the design process and community reaction to the collaboration. Ariel and Peter also cover the launch of the Canton collection, the differences between Swiss-made and American assembly, and the impact of politics on the watch industry. Throughout this conversation, Peter discusses the challenges of price increases in the watch industry while emphasizing the need for transparency with the importance of creating value beyond just the product. He also highlights the significance of community-building through events like the Intersect show, which fosters direct interaction between brands and consumers. Peter also addresses the complexities of consumer feedback, advocating for a balanced approach that combines listening to customers with maintaining a clear brand vision, and so much more on this week's episode of the Superlative Podcast. - Website - https://jackmasonbrand.com/  - Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/jackmasonbrand/ - YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@JackMasonbrand SUPERLATIVE IS NOW ON YOUTUBE! To check out Superlative on Youtube as well as other ABTW content:- YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@ablogtowatch To check out the ABTW Shop where you can see our products inspired by our love of Horology:- Shop ABTW - https://store.ablogtowatch.com/To keep updated with everything Superlative and aBlogtoWatch, check us out on:- Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/ablogtowatch/- Twitter - https://twitter.com/ABLOGTOWATCH- Website - https://www.ablogtowatch.com/If you enjoy the show please Subscribe, Rate, and Review!

Evangelical Free Church of Canton

In the early morning hours of Saturday, January 29th, 2022, Boston Police officer John O'Keefe was found dead in a snowbank outside a home in Canton, Massachusetts. According to the medical examiner, O'Keefe had died from blunt force trauma and hypothermia. At first it seemed like a tragic accident, maybe a slip on the ice, a fall that ended in death. But as investigators dug deeper, things became far more complicated and Karen Read, O'Keefe's girlfriend, became the center of the investigation. Evidence that there had been trouble in paradise in the romantic relationship began to surface, but so did other disturbing possibilities. What seemed like a domestic tragedy was quickly clouded by allegations of police corruption and cover-up, and an investigation that many believe was compromised from the start. What if the very people tasked with upholding the law were covering up the truth? Was John O'Keefe's death a result of an angry lovers rage- or the collateral damage of a police force protecting its own? In this case, the line between justice and corruption becomes confusingly blurred. Evidence disappears, witnesses are silenced, and as the truth slowly rises to the surface, it may reveal a web of lies that's more dangerous than anyone could have predicted. Was Karen Read the scapegoat in a larger cover-up? And what role did corruption within the police department play in distorting facts. This may not be just a story of love gone wrong, it may in fact turn out to be a story of power, deceit, and the price people will pay to keep the darkest of dark secrets buried. Join us as we delve deep into the case of John O'Keefe and Karen Read, and help us see if we can get closer to the truth. Try our coffee!! - www.CriminalCoffeeCo.com Become a Patreon member -- > https://www.patreon.com/CrimeWeekly Shop for your Crime Weekly gear here --> https://crimeweeklypodcast.com/shop Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CrimeWeeklyPodcast Website: CrimeWeeklyPodcast.com Instagram: @CrimeWeeklyPod Twitter: @CrimeWeeklyPod Facebook: @CrimeWeeklyPod ADS: 1. ProlonLife.com/CrimeWeekly - Get 15% off your 5-Day Nutrition Program!

This is a turnkey rehab property in Canton, OH Price $139,000 Cash Flow: $368/mo Bed: 4 Bath: 1.5 Built in 1920 Square Footage: 1354   Find more information at www.RentToRetirement.com or call 1-800-311-6781 We offer high quality, turnkey rental properties in markets that maximize cash flow, equity & appreciation! All properties are renovated, leased & managed allowing you to passively build a rental portfolio while you learn along the way. Please contact us for our full inventory, or to schedule a consultation. Rent To Retirement is your partner in achieving financial freedom through real estate investing! *Information given is to the best knowledge of Rent to Retirement. All individuals are solely responsible for conduction of their own evaluation and verifying all data related to any specific property.

The panel is back one more time to think back on Christmas Eve and the importance of the Incarnation. God took on flesh and dwelt among us in Jesus. Why is this so important to our faith during Christmas and even beyond? Guests on the Podcast: Rev. Stephanie Schneider: Village Baptist & First Baptist, Glens Falls & Ft. Edward, NY Rev. Peggy Hanson: Madison UMC, Madison SD Rev. Teresa Whetsel: Flame of Faith UMC, West Fargo, ND Beata Ferris: Discipleship Coordinator at Pierre First UMC, Pierre, SD Eric Stearns: Lay Leader at Canton UMC, Canton, SD Connect with the Canton UMC!

About This SeriesMany people in first-century Israel had expectations that the Promised One would be a conquering king, a strict enforcer, or a political liberator. But Jesus shattered these assumptions, revealing Himself as a humble servant, a compassionate healer, and a friend to the outcast. Two thousand years later, many people still misunderstand who Jesus truly is. This Christmas, we'll explore common misconceptions about the Messiah and uncover the powerful truths of His mission, offering a fresh perspective on the Savior who defied expectations and changed the world.This Week's EpisodePeople expected the Messiah to associate with the religious elite and those in power. Instead, Jesus spent time with the marginalized, such as tax collectors, sinners, and the poor, demonstrating that God's love extends to everyone.Ready For More?Check out firstchristian.com to find opportunities to connect and grow.We'd love to see you this coming Sunday on-campus or streaming online at 9 and 11am.Follow @fcccanton on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter to stay connected!Support the show

Send us a textIn this in-depth episode of *2 Giants Goofballs: New York Giants News & Updates*, Drew and Rob tackle the aftermath of the Giants' stunning 45-33 victory over the Indianapolis Colts. While the win broke a ten-game losing streak and provided a much-needed morale boost, it also came with a significant downside: the Giants are no longer in position to claim the first overall pick in the upcoming NFL Draft. With the team now sitting at the fourth pick, they explore the ripple effects this outcome will have on the Giants' future.The episode dives into whether this victory might have saved the jobs of Head Coach Brian Daboll and General Manager Joe Schoen. Drew and Rob analyze if ownership might now view the duo's leadership in a more favorable light or if the team's overall struggles are too glaring to overlook. Could Schoen's draft strategy, particularly with a high but not top pick, be the deciding factor in his fate?  Shifting focus to the draft itself, the hosts discuss the Giants' options at the fourth spot and the tantalizing possibility of trading up to reclaim the top pick. Breaking down the points value of draft selections, they assess whether the Giants could package their additional picks or future assets to move up and secure a potential franchise quarterback like Shedeur Sanders or Cam Ward. The mock draft discussion includes profiles of standout prospects like Michigan CB Will Johnson, West Virginia G Wyatt Milum, and Cincinnati DT Dontay Corleone, showcasing the talent the Giants could still land even without the top selection.  Drew and Rob also cover how Shedeur Sanders has seemingly hinted at an interest in joining the Giants, with rumors of Giants-themed cleats and a growing connection to the team. Is there a legitimate chance that Deion Sanders would steer his son to New York, similar to how the Manning family maneuvered Eli to the Giants two decades ago?The episode doesn't stop there. Drew and Rob tackle hot topics like Cam Ward's controversial decision to sit out the second half of Miami's Pop Tarts Bowl loss and Eli Manning's candidacy as a finalist for the Pro Football Hall of Fame. They examine whether Ward's actions were worse than players who opt out of bowl games entirely and debate if Eli's New York legacy will help push him into Canton on his first ballot.Don't miss this jam-packed episode as Drew and Rob break down the critical moments shaping the New York Giants' future. Whether you're celebrating the win or lamenting the draft implications, this is the must-watch show for all Giants fans.#giants #nygiants #nflSupport the showAll Episodes are shot LIVE with fan interactions on Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, & TwitchSponsor the show at: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/2giantgoofballsInterested in starting a podcast. We recommend using buzzsprout: https://www.buzzsprout.com/?referrer_id=2012368

Evangelical Free Church of Canton

Daily Mass Readings and reflection for 12/28/24 from Fr Ovidiu Marginean, from St George Romanian Byzantine Catholic Cathedral in Canton, Ohio.

CTL Script/ Top Stories of December 28th Publish Date: December 28th   PRE-ROLL: 01.20.25 ETOWAH MILL HOLIDAY SCREEN & RINK_FINAL From the Ingles Studio Welcome to the Award-Winning Cherokee Tribune Ledger Podcast  Today is Saturday, December 28th and Happy Birthday to Denzel Washington ***12.28.24 - BIRTHDAY – DENZEL WASHINGTON*** I’m Peyton Spurlock and here are the stories Cherokee is talking about, presented by Credit Union of Georgia.  Keep Cherokee Beautiful Recycling Christmas Trees Starting Jan. 4 Cherokee Sheriff Deputies Graduate from Training Center Cherokee Recycling Center Collects Over 16K Pounds of Electronics We’ll have all this and more coming up on the Cherokee Tribune-Ledger Podcast, and if you’re looking for Community news, we encourage you to listen and subscribe!  Commercial: 06.26.24 CU OF GA FREE CHECKING_REV_FINAL STORY 1: Keep Cherokee Beautiful Recycling Christmas Trees Starting Jan. 4 Cherokee Recreation and Parks, along with Keep Cherokee Beautiful, will host the "Bring One for the Chipper" event starting January 4 at Hobgood Park. Participants can drop off Christmas trees, free of lights and ornaments, from January 4 to 11, between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. Trees will be recycled into mulch for Patriots Park. On January 4, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., KCB volunteers will distribute tree seedlings at the park's parking lot. This initiative promotes recycling and replenishing natural resources. For more details, contact Cherokee Recreation and Parks or visit their website. STORY 2: Cherokee Sheriff Deputies Graduate From Training Center On December 20, three deputies from the Cherokee Sheriff's Office—Vincent Montgomery, Abby Rogers, and Cameron Pinson—graduated from the Georgia Public Safety Training Center in Alpharetta. They completed 408 hours of P.O.S.T. mandated police training over 11 weeks. These deputies are now assigned to the Cherokee County Adult Detention Center. STORY 3: Cherokee Recycling Center Collects Over 16K Pounds of Electronics Cherokee County residents recycled over 16,000 pounds of electronics at an event on December 14, organized by the Cherokee County Recycling Center. The event, held at the Cherokee County Administration Building, saw about 250 vehicles drop off items like personal computers and large tube TVs. Partnering with ECO Trading LLC and other organizations, the event raised nearly $2,000 for Keep Cherokee Beautiful. County employees and volunteers facilitated the successful four-hour drive-thru event. For more recycling information, residents can contact the recycling center. We have opportunities for sponsors to get great engagement on these shows. Call 770.874.3200 for more info.    Back in a moment  Break: Drake Realty (Cherokee County) STORY 4: John Harmon Resigning From Cherokee School Board Cherokee County School Board Member John Harmon is resigning after 10 years of service because he is moving outside his district's boundaries. Representing Post 3, which includes River Ridge and Sequoyah High Schools, Harmon announced his resignation at the December 19 board meeting, expressing continued support for the district. The board will officially accept his resignation and discuss next steps at their January 16 meeting. The meeting will be held at the Dr. Frank R. Petruzielo Educational Services Facility in Canton. STORY 5: Cherokee County Farm Bureau Receives State Award The Cherokee County Farm Bureau (CCFB) was honored with the GFB Rewarding Excellence in Ag Program (REAP) Harvester Award for outstanding member programs and agricultural advocacy. This recognition, in the large membership division, was awarded at the 87th Annual Georgia Farm Bureau Convention on Jekyll Island. The REAP Awards celebrate achievements in organization, advocacy, leadership, education, and outreach from September 2023 to August 2024. GFB President Tom McCall praised the dedication of volunteers supporting Georgia agriculture. William Grizzle leads CCFB, with Rhonda Stargel as office manager and Denise Forward as program coordinator. Commercial: 12.14.24 FALANY DEC_FINAL STORY 6: Decision on Downtown Canton Master Plan Postponed to Jan. 16 The Canton City Council postponed a vote on the proposed Downtown Master Plan to January 16, following a 6-1 vote on December 19. Councilmember Bryan Roach opposed the plan due to the "Main Street Road Diet" project, which would reduce Main Street to one lane and extend sidewalks for outdoor dining. Roach cited stakeholder concerns and safety issues. City Engineer Bethany Watson noted the plan was based on public input, but adjustments can be made. The plan includes 20 transportation recommendations, 16 redevelopment concepts, and seven policy recommendations, focusing on enhancing downtown Canton. STORY 7: Cherokee County Sheriff Frank Reynolds Sworn In to New Term Cherokee County Sheriff Frank Reynolds was sworn in for another term, starting in January, after running unopposed for re-election. Probate Judge Keith Wood conducted the swearing-in ceremony, attended by Reynolds' wife, Jennifer, and son, Frank Jr. Reynolds has served as sheriff since being elected in 2016 and taking office in 2017.   We’ll have closing comments after this.    COMMERCIAL: Ingles Markets 7   SIGN OFF –   Thanks again for hanging out with us on today’s Cherokee Tribune Ledger Podcast. If you enjoy these shows, we encourage you to check out our other offerings, like the Cherokee Tribune Ledger Podcast, the Marietta Daily Journal, or the Community Podcast for Rockdale Newton and Morgan Counties. Read more about all our stories and get other great content at www.tribuneledgernews.com Did you know over 50% of Americans listen to podcasts weekly? Giving you important news about our community and telling great stories are what we do. Make sure you join us for our next episode and be sure to share this podcast on social media with your friends and family. Add us to your Alexa Flash Briefing or your Google Home Briefing and be sure to like, follow, and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Produced by the BG Podcast Network Show Sponsors: www.ingles-markets.com www.drakerealty.com cuofga.org #NewsPodcast #CurrentEvents #TopHeadlines #BreakingNews #PodcastDiscussion #PodcastNews #InDepthAnalysis #NewsAnalysis #PodcastTrending #WorldNews #LocalNews #GlobalNews #PodcastInsights #NewsBrief #PodcastUpdate #NewsRoundup #WeeklyNews #DailyNews #PodcastInterviews #HotTopics #PodcastOpinions #InvestigativeJournalism #BehindTheHeadlines #PodcastMedia #NewsStories #PodcastReports #JournalismMatters #PodcastPerspectives #NewsCommentary #PodcastListeners #NewsPodcastCommunity #NewsSource #PodcastCuration #WorldAffairs #PodcastUpdates #AudioNews #PodcastJournalism #EmergingStories #NewsFlash #PodcastConversations See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.