Podcast appearances and mentions of greg stohr

The Supreme Court's long-awaited order over the president's firing of Democratic members of independent agencies is puzzling, according to the lawyer representing one of the fired individuals. Gupta Wessler founder Deepak Gupta joins Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr to discuss what the divided court did and did not do in allowing the administration to move forward with the firings. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases and Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

The practicalities of birthright citizenship being restricted in some states but not others appeared to be a concern of key justices on the US Supreme Court. President Donald Trump has asked the justices to narrow lower court rulings that blocked his executive order limiting automatic citizenship to babies born with at least one parent who's a citizen or permanent resident. Cases and Controversies hosts Greg Stohr and Lydia Wheeler discuss Thursday's arguments and highlight the exchanges that seemed to show the justices are wary of letting Trump start enforcing his restrictions. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases and Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

The Supreme Court will sit for a special session May 15 to hear a challenge to President Donald Trump's birthright citizenship order. The merits, however, are not before justices at this time. Instead, the court will consider the scope of relief temporarily available to the parties, and in particular whether federal district courts can enjoin a policy nationwide as to all persons affected. Joining Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr is University of Virginia law professor Amanda Frost, a leading expert on both birthright citizenship and so-called nationwide injunctions. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases and Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Wayne Reichle – who's been in the fishing business his whole life – had never heard of the Chevron doctrine. That's the two-step legal test that courts used for the past 40 years to decide whether a federal agency had the authority to make a regulation. "No idea," said Reichle, president of New Jersey-based Lund's Fisheries. "Myself, and many, many fellow fishermen had no idea what the Chevron doctrine was." That changed after a group of fishermen challenged a federal regulation requiring the herring industry to pay for onboard federal observers. "I think there's quite a few that know what the Chevron doctrine is today," Reichle said. This season on UnCommon Law, we're exploring the limits of agency power. To what extent are federal agencies authorized to create and implement regulations that aren't explicitly mandated by Congress? And what happens when an agency goes too far? In this episode, the story of the fishermen who fought back. Featuring: Wayne Reichle, president of Lund's Fisheries Jeff Kaelin, director of sustainability and government relations at Lund's Fisheries Ryan Mulvey, counsel with the Cause of Action Institute Erica Fuller, senior counsel with the Conservation Law Foundation Leif Axelsson, captain of the Dyrsten fishing vessel Greg Stohr, Supreme Court reporter for Bloomberg News *** Hosted and produced by Matthew S. Schwartz Editor/Executive Producer: Josh Block Additional Editing: Andrew Satter Cover Art: Jonathan Hurtarte

Obamacare is back before the Supreme Court in a challenge to its no-cost coverage requirements for certain preventive health services. The justices will weigh the constitutionality of the US Preventive Services Task Force, which recommends the tests and treatments insurers should cover, when they return to the bench on Monday for the April sitting. If the lower court's decision is upheld, "it is possible, given the posture of the case, that over 150 million Americans lose free coverage of hundreds of benefits," said Sara Rosenbaum, an emerita professor of health law and policy at George Washington University. Rosenbaum joins Cases and Controversies hosts Greg Stohr and Lydia Wheeler to talk about why the case is more about power than it is public health and what's at stake if the court does away with the insurance coverage that's caught in its crosshairs. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies, Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

The US Supreme Court's attempt to avoid a confrontation with President Donald Trump has real world costs, said Georgetown Law professor Stephen Vladeck. Vladeck spoke with Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr about the flurry of recent rulings from the justices in emergency requests involving the administration's policies. The majority of the justices have been careful not to be overly critical of the president and have at times granted him "modest procedural wins," Vladeck said. But those efforts have real world costs, he added. Vladeck pointed to the court's recent action, lifting a temporary pause on the deportation of alleged Venezuelan gang members. "The question is, how long can the justices get away with walking this tightrope before they're actually sacrificing too much in the name of not unduly provoking the confrontation with Trump," Vladeck said. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases and Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

The Supreme Court will consider a case at the end of March that could limit Congress' ability to let federal regulators determine what public health and safety standards are necessary. Depending on what the court decides, any statute that grants discretion to an agency could be open for re-review, said Jessica Ellsworth, a partner at Hogan Lovells. "There's probably hundreds of thousands of places in the US code that there are terms used like 'in the public interest,' whether something is 'necessary' and 'appropriate,' whether something is 'reasonable,' whether something is 'fair' or 'unfair,' whether it's 'essential,'" she said. Ellsworth joins Cases and Controversies hosts Greg Stohr and Lydia Wheeler to discuss the nondelegation doctrine and how this legal principle, which the court has been asked to revive, could impact the federal telecom subsidy program at issue and other regulations more broadly. The hosts also chat about a social media post from President Donald Trump that garnered a rare response from Chief Justice John Roberts. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases and Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

In this episode of Passing Judgment, we examine the Trump administration's controversial attempt to use the Alien Enemies Act, an 18th-century law, to deport Venezuelan nationals. With guest Greg Storer, Jessica Levinson explores the historical precedent of the statute, the current legal arguments, and the implications for executive power. They also discuss the Supreme Court's role in these matters and other pressing legal issues. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss:Alien Enemies Act: The discussion centers around the Trump administration's attempt to use the Alien Enemies Act, a law from 1798, to deport individuals from Venezuela. The act has rarely been used and traditionally only in times of declared war. The Trump administration's approach has raised questions about its applicability without an official war declaration.Legal Proceedings and Executive Orders: There were significant legal maneuvers following Trump's proclamation about deporting Venezuelan nationals. The podcast delves into the temporary restraining order issued by a judge to halt these deportations, the legal arguments around jurisdiction, and differences in verbal and written orders.Supreme Court Considerations: The conversation segues into what cases might reach the Supreme Court, with a focus on significant issues such as birthright citizenship, the president's authority related to immigration laws, and overarching constitutional questions.Follow Our Host and Guest: @LevinsonJessica@GregStohr

A fight over plans for a privately owned nuclear waste storage facility in Texas seemed to divide the US Supreme Court as the justices wrestled with a federal agency's regulatory authority and who can challenge it. Cases and Controversies hosts Greg Stohr and Lydia Wheeler unpack Wednesday's arguments in the dispute over a Nuclear Regulatory Commission license that would have moved as much as 40,000 tons of spent nuclear fuel to a privately owned facility. The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled the agency didn't have the authority to grant the license after Texas and neighboring landowners challenged it in court. It's unclear if the court will affirm that ruling. A decision is due by the end of June or early July. The hosts also chat about the most significant ruling to come from the Supreme Court so far in litigation against actions President Donald Trump has taken since returning to office. A divided court rejected his request to toss out a district court order that forced him to pay $2 billion in federal foreign aid. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

The US Supreme Court is confronting the stark reality that, unlike the other two branches of government, the court has no real power to enforce its decisions. Should someone — whether government official or private citizen — refuse to comply, the justices have no army or constitutional spending power to use as a cudgel, Bloomberg Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr writes in a new longform essay. That age-old quandary is becoming newly relevant as Donald Trump tries to bulldoze his way through longstanding legal constraints in the opening weeks of his second term as president. As lawsuits over birthright citizenship, spending cuts, and workforce purges make their way to the high court, the cases carry the potential for a genuine constitutional crisis. What happens, Chief Justice John Roberts must ask himself, if Trump loses and then defies the court? A lawsuit filed in 1801 when the Supreme Court was an untested institution posed a similar dilemma for Chief Justice John Marshall — and more recently, danger signs have been growing. Article by Greg Stohr read by Catherine Vassilopolos Do you have feedback on Cases and Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690

After an eventful 2024, the justices are now on winter break until Jan. 10. "Cases and Controversies" hosts Kimberly Robinson, Lydia Wheeler, and Greg Stohr review all the biggest news stories from the justices in 2024, from Justice Samuel Alito's flag controversy to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dream-come-true Broadway debut. They also look ahead to the cases to be heard in 2025, which include an expedited appeal over the social media platform TikTok to another case that could cut back the power of administrative agencies. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies, Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Justices from across the ideological spectrum appeared primed to limit the scope of environmental impact reviews, but it's unclear if they need a new test to do so. Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr breakdown the Dec. 10 arguments in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, an environmental case about how deep agencies must go in looking at the potential effects of new projects. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies, Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

A case testing the federal government's ability to regulate potentially harmful tobacco products will kick off arguments at the US Supreme Court in December. The Biden Administration is fighting to keep off the market new liquids for e-cigarettes sold under flavors like "Blackberry Lemonade" and "Killer Kustard Blueberry" that can attract kids in its appeal of a US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decision to set aside the Food and Drug Administration's orders denying their approval. Typically, the court doesn't agree to hear a case "to pat the lower court on the head and say, 'Really good job,'" said Carter Phillips, a partner at Sidley Austin who's argued 90 cases before the justices. But, he said, "this is a court that is much more skeptical of agency decision-making than the court has ever been, at least in the time that I've been practicing before it." Phillips joins “Cases and Controversies” hosts Greg Stohr and Lydia Wheeler to talk about the case and why his client, the nonprofit Global Action to End Smoking Inc., is supporting neither side in this dispute,. Guest: Carter Phillips, Sidley Austin LLP Hosts: Greg Stohr and Lydia Wheeler Producer: Mo Barrow Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

The US Supreme Court struggled with where to draw the appropriate lines in bread-and-butter cases involving Nvidia Corp., criminal law, and immigration deadlines. In the securities case, the court looked for what Chief Justice John Roberts called a "sweet spot" in the Nvidia investor suit alleging the chipmaker at the heart of the AI boom misled the public about its dependence on crypto-mining revenue. In the criminal case, the justices described the argument that an attempted murder-for-hire scheme isn't a crime of violence as "absurd." But they found similar irrationality in the government's argument on the other side. And finally, the justices similarly struggled over whether to give immigrants who voluntarily agree to leave the country more flexibility to appeal their deportation. Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr breakdown the justices' concerns in the latest episode. Hosts: Kimberly Robinson and Lydia Wheeler. Producer: Mo Barrow. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

A truck driver consumed CBD oil, failed a drug test, and was fired from his job, but can he sue the companies that make the product for three times his lost wages? That was the question before the Supreme Court in a case that tests the scope of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a federal law otherwise known as RICO that was designed to fight organized crime. RICO is a criminal law, but it allows people to bring a civil suit to get three times their damages and attorneys' fees if their "business or property" is hurt by a criminal enterprise. The manufacturers of the CBD product say the truck driver in this case suffered a personal injury not an injury to his business or property and can't sue them under the law. Cases and Controversies hosts Greg Stohr and Lydia Wheeler look at the arguments and try to figure out where the justices might come down on this dispute. Hosts: Greg Stohr and Lydia Wheeler Producer: David Schultz and Mo Barrow Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Oklahoma death row inmate Richard Glossip appears likely to achieve a rare victory at the Supreme Court despite a conservative majority that's often hostile to capital defendants.  One factor setting Glossip's case apart from others is that the state's Republican attorney general sided with him in his bid for a new trial. But the fact that it's still a question whether Glossip will prevail after arguments Oct. 9 shows the steep climb capital defendants have a the Supreme Court. Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr run through the arguments and the hurdles that Glossip must clear. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases and Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Solemn anniversary of the October 7th, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, Hurricane Milton strengthens to a very dangerous Category 5, Bloomberg News' Greg Stohr on new Supreme Court term.(42) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Emergency requests, book tours, and security threats kept the justices busy while the US Supreme Court was on its summer recess. Get up to speed with Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson, Lydia Wheeler, and Greg Stohr before the court kicks off its new term on Oct. 7. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases and Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

President Joe Biden has called for Supreme Court term limits and ethic rules, stating no one is above the law. SCOTUS reporter Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News joined us to explain the proposed reforms.

Maria Keena joins the KMOX Newsroom discussing the investigation now closed with the CVPA shooting. Greg Stohr, Bloomberg News Supreme Court Reporter talks President Biden calling for supreme court reforms.

Amy Marxkors and Michael Kelley talk with Andrew Egger about potential Kamala Harris VP picks. Polo Ascencio talks Disney and Olympics. Matt Pauley touches on Cardianls trade deadline plans. Greg Stohr talks President Biden Supreme Court reform. 

Today on the show: Do we need to revisit what we teach in schools? Massive plumber shortage in the U.S. Scott Slade joins us live. Bloomberg News Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr on Jack Smith's latest move. Plus, David Bowie author Suzi Ronson! 9am-noon on 95.5 WSB.

Madlin Mekelburg, Bloomberg Legal Reporter, and Greg Stohr, Bloomberg Supreme Court Reporter, discuss the upcoming Supreme Court case on the abortion pill mifepristone. Josh Kastenberg, Professor of Law at the University of New Mexico, breaks down what to expect from Alec Baldwin's upcoming involuntary manslaughter case. And Bloomberg Legal Reporter Tiana Headley discusses Louisiana Senator John Kennedy's tendency to test judicial nominees on the law.Hosted by June Grasso.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Madlin Mekelburg, Bloomberg Legal Reporter, and Greg Stohr, Bloomberg Supreme Court Reporter, discuss the upcoming Supreme Court case on the abortion pill mifepristone. Josh Kastenberg, Professor of Law at the University of New Mexico, breaks down what to expect from Alec Baldwin's upcoming involuntary manslaughter case. And Bloomberg Legal Reporter Tiana Headley discusses Louisiana Senator John Kennedy's tendency to test judicial nominees on the law.Hosted by June Grasso.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Watch Joe and Kailey LIVE every day on YouTube: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF. Bloomberg Washington Correspondents Joe Mathieu and Kailey Leinz deliver insight and analysis on the latest headlines from the White House and Capitol Hill, including conversations with influential lawmakers and key figures in politics and policy. On this edition, Joe and Kailey speak with: Greg Stohr, Bloomberg Supreme Court reporter breaks down the Supreme Court's decision to allow former President Donald Trump on Presidential ballots, ending Trump's eligibility fight citing the 14th amendment David Kochel, owner of Red Wave Communications and longtime Republican strategist joins to talk through the GOP Presidential race after a weekend of Trump wins and heading into Super Tuesday Bloomberg politics contributors Jeanne Sheehan Zaino and Rick Davis for their thoughts on the state of the campaign trail Dave Reichert, former Congressman and Republican candidate for Washington governor to discuss the state of the GOP party Hagar Chemali, former Director for Syria and Lebanon at the National Security Council and founder of Greenwich Media Strategies for the latest in the Israel-Hamas conflict, including Vice President Kamala Harris calling for a ceasefire See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Greg Stohr, Bloomberg News Supreme Court Reporter joins Tom and Megan discussing the Supreme Court decision that Former President Trump could not be removed from the ballot.     Credit: © Megan Smith / USA TODAY NETWORK

Listen to this segment of The Chris & Amy Show where Amy and Michael are joined by Bloomberg News Supreme Court Reporter Greg Stohr. They discuss the SCOTUS' latest Colorado ruling which allows Donald Trump to stay on the Republican primary ballot.

 In this segment , we delve into the surprising decision by the Supreme Court to hear the case involving Donald Trump's immunity assertion. Loyola Law School professor Jessica Levinson provides insights into the implications of this decision and its potential impact on the timeline for criminal proceedings. Bloomberg Supreme Court Reporter Greg Stohr joins the discussion, offering analysis on the court's approach and the varied perspectives on this crucial legal matter.

 Chris and Amy discuss the recent Supreme Court decision on Trump's immunity assertion, Mitch McConnell's decision to step down as the Republican Leader of the Senate, and the significance of both Joe Biden and Donald Trump visiting the southern border on the same day. Chief Washington correspondent for CBS News, Major Garrett, joins the show to share insights and analysis on these developments.

In this episode, we dissect the unexpected Supreme Court decision to hear Donald Trump's immunity case, exploring its implications with Loyola Law School professor Jessica Levinson and Bloomberg Supreme Court Reporter Greg Stohr. Join Chris and Amy as they analyze Mitch McConnell's resignation as the Republican Leader of the Senate and the noteworthy coincidence of Joe Biden and Donald Trump visiting the southern border simultaneously. Special guest Major Garrett, Chief Washington correspondent for CBS News, provides in-depth insights into these pivotal political events.

Bloomberg News Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr, discusses upcoming cases at the Supreme Court in 2024. Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland & Knight, discusses the record number of migrants crossing the border and legal solutions. Martin Edel, co-chair of the Sports Law Practice at Goulston & Storrs, discusses the trial that could change the business model at the NCAA. June Grasso hostsSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Arguing at the Supreme Court is no walk in the park. The justices ask tough questions and give hypotheticals that can trip up even the most prepared advocate. As the year comes to a close, Cases and Controversies hosts Lydia Wheeler and Greg Stohr look back at the most memorable moments from Supreme Court arguments so far this term since the court follows its own calendar. There were some uncomfortable, even awkward, exchanges during the free speech fight over a “Trump too small” trademark, the challenge to the $6 billion bankruptcy settlement involving opioid manufacturer Purdue Pharma, and the spat over the SEC's use of in-house judges in fraud cases. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Bloomberg Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr discusses some of the high profile cases of the Supreme Court term in 2024. Bankruptcy expert Joseph Acosta, a partner at Dorsey & Whitney, discusses US corporate bankruptcies this year. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Greg Stohr covers the Supreme Court for Bloomberg News and he joined us today to discuss the steps moving forward after the ruling and whether SCOTUS will take the case.

Amy and Chris discuss the incident in which a St. Louis City police officer overcorrected and crashed into Bar:PM. Plus, Greg Stohr on the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling on Donald Trump.

The Supreme Court added two high profile disputes to its docket and suggested it will fast-track a third involving former President, adding to an already consequential term. Hosts Kimberly Robinson, Lydia Wheeler, and Greg Stohr discuss the new cases on access to the abortion drug mifepristone, a challenge to Jan. 6 prosecutions, and immunity for former President Donald Trump on his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

On this edition of the Bloomberg Law Show, Greg Stohr and Kimberly Robinson speak with Securities lawyer Susan Hurd of Alston & Bird on the SEC's use of an in-house tribunal system to handle fraud complaints. Plus, they get the latest on the Justice Department's challenge to JetBlue's takeover of Spirit Airlines with Bloomberg Antitrust Reporter Leah Nylen.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Supreme Court appeared likely to require the Securities and Exchange Commission to bring certain enforcement actions in federal court, rather than resolve them in-house. The only question appeared to be whether the justices' ruling will ensnare other federal agencies.  Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr discuss how the court might limit its ruling. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman to serve on the Supreme Court has died at the age of 93. Newsline with Brigitte Quinn examined her legacy with Bloomberg Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr.

On this special best-of-edition of Bloomberg Law we recap some of the big legal stories of the year. Bloomberg Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr discusses why an outsize share of the high court's biggest cases will come from the ultraconservative 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. Heidi Li Feldman, a professor at Georgetown Law, discusses the Supreme Court reinstating Biden administration ghost gun rules. Laurel Calkins, Bloomberg Law reporter, discusses a prolific inventor and patent troll.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett made news this week when she became the latest justice to back a high court ethics code, but her tale of rocking out to the turn-of-the-century hit "Who Let the Dogs Out" in the stately halls of the highest court in the land stole the show.  Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr catch up on all the justices' latest activities. They also highlight the biggest cases being argued during the court's November sitting, from guns, to social media, to the "Trump Too Small" trademark dispute. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Bloomberg News Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr discusses a case that could have serious implications for the next Congressional races. International law expert Mary Ellen O'Connell, a professor at Notre Dame Law School, discusses the law governing international conflicts like the Israel-Hamas war. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this weekend's episode, three segments from this past week's Washington Journal  First – Former Representatives, Democrat Steve Israel and Republican Zach Wamp discuss the removal of Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker – and what it means for House Republicans and the functioning of Congress. Then - Bloomberg Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr previews the major cases before the High Court this term - including on gun rights, abortion medication, and social media.  Plus – Politico education reporter Michael Stratford discusses the resumption of federal student loan payments this month – and what the Biden administration hopes to do to help borrowers.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Bloomberg Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr discusses why an outsize share of the high court's biggest cases will come from the ultraconservative 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, whose far-reaching rulings are proving impossible for the Supreme Court to ignore. Bloomberg legal reporter Ava Benny-Morrison discusses the upcoming trial of Sam Bankman-Fried and how JPMorgan Chase & Co. resolved cases over its relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. June Grasso hosts.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

From Antonin Scalia's sudden death, to four new justices, a leaked opinion draft, the overturning of abortion rights, and the pandemic-era introduction of live audio for oral arguments—a lot has happened at the Supreme Court in the past decade and Cases and Controversies has been there for all of it. The Bloomberg Law podcast started in very lo-fi way in a virtual closet has grown over the years as a staple of Supreme Court coverage with studio space with really good microphones, its own producer in David Schultz, and up to three hosts offering behind-the-scene takes, and insight and analysis of court happenings and all of the turbulence that's gone along with it. Created by Tom Taylor, Bloomberg Law's former high court correspondent and now its newsroom's chief of staff, Cases and Controversies marks 10 years this term with a special edition. Taylor and current co-hosts Kimberly Robinson, Greg Stohr, and Lydia Wheeler offer their observations on heightened public interest in the court, what's changed for the justices and how the court operates, and what may be in store in coming years. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

The Supreme Court heads into the final week of the term for argued cases with a flurry of opinions on tap, including what could be a blockbuster on affirmative action in higher education and the fate of Joe Biden's student loan relief plan. Ten 10 cases remain with work expected to be wrapped up by June 30. Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr take listeners down the homestretch and behind the scenes of what court watchers might expect and whether surprises are in store. They also break down the opinions most recently handed down. That includes Friday's decision clearing the way for the Biden administration to shift immigration enforcement priorities to focus on people who recently crossed the border or are a threat to public safety. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Bloomberg's Madison Mills speaks with Supreme Court reporter Greg Stohr about how a conservative supermajority on the court is remaking US laws on the environment, health and firearms. Plus, Spencer Soper explains why the FTC is going after Amazon. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ketanji Brown Jackson continues to draw notice on the Supreme Court, this time writing the first solo dissent from a first-term justice since Clarence Thomas in 1991. Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr discuss Jackson's dissent in the labor case, and how she's handled herself since joining the court in October. They'll also analyze some of the 27 cases still outstanding with the term nearing an end, and how a few of the big ones might play out. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

The Supreme Court kicked off opinion season with five rulings, leaving 39 more to get out before the term wraps up in June. Hosts Kimberly Robinson and Greg Stohr break down decisions covering immigration, public corruption, and state morality laws.  Supreme Court veteran Daniel Geyser, of Haynes and Boone, also joins the podcast to look back on changes to high court arguments post-pandemic, including some sessions that now go way beyond the scheduled time. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Based on its series of seismic changes to the law last Term, the Supreme Court starts a new term with record-low public support and deep disapproval in the legal profession. But the Court appears undaunted and poised to take up another set of cases that portend huge transformations for the law and US society. In an episode taped live at the Texas Tribune Festival, court experts Melissa Murray, and Greg Stohr, and Steve Vladeck join Harry to consider what the Court has in store in its new Term.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.