Podcasts about administrative state

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sense of profound transformation and potential upheaval in the U.S. federal government becomes increasingly clear. This initiative, born out of a convergence of conservative ideologies and strategic planning, aims to reshape the very fabric of American governance in ways that are both sweeping and contentious.Project 2025 is the brainchild of a coalition of conservative organizations, notably the Heritage Foundation, and was formalized in a 927-page policy blueprint released in April 2023. This document, often referred to as “Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise,” outlines a radical restructuring of the federal government, with each of its 30 chapters dedicated to a specific department. The overarching goal is stark: to “destroy the Administrative State” and consolidate executive power under the presidency[5].At the heart of Project 2025 lies the unitary executive theory, an expansive interpretation of presidential power that seeks to centralize control over the government in the White House. Proponents argue that this concentration of power is necessary for efficient governance, but critics warn it could lead to an unprecedented erosion of checks and balances. Kevin Roberts, a key figure in this initiative, has stated that all federal employees should answer directly to the president, a notion that resonates with the Federalist Society and conservative justices who have supported stronger executive powers since the Reagan administration[4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its plan for the Department of State. Kiron Skinner, who authored the State Department chapter, advocates for the dismissal of all leadership roles within the department before January 20, 2025. These positions would then be filled with ideologically vetted appointees who do not require Senate confirmation. Skinner's rationale is that many current State Department employees are too left-wing and thus need to be replaced by those more loyal to a conservative president. When questioned about specific instances where State Department employees obstructed Trump policies, Skinner admitted she could not provide any examples[4].This approach is not isolated to the State Department; it is part of a broader strategy to ensure that key positions across the federal government are filled with political loyalists. Project 2025 includes a 180-day playbook detailing specific steps for implementing these reforms, starting with a stack of prepared Executive Orders ready for the new president to sign on the first day in office. This playbook is designed to expedite the transition and ensure that political appointees, rather than career civil servants, hold the reins of power[5].A critical component of this plan is the use of Schedule F, a scheme that allows for the hiring of unlimited political appointees without expiration dates. This mechanism also enables the transfer of apolitical civil service employees into Schedule F, stripping them of their civil service protections and leaving them vulnerable to political overreach and abuse of power. This move would grant the president and their loyalists unparalleled control over the Executive Branch, raising significant concerns about corruption and the politicization of federal agencies[5].The implications of these proposals are far-reaching and have sparked intense debate. For instance, Project 2025 seeks to eliminate the independence of various federal agencies, including the Department of Justice, the FBI, the Federal Communications Commission, and the Federal Trade Commission. This centralization of power under the presidency could undermine the integrity and autonomy of these agencies, potentially leading to a loss of public trust and the erosion of democratic institutions[4].Experts and critics alike have sounded the alarm about the potential consequences of Project 2025. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has highlighted the immense impact that such a reorganization could have on civil liberties and the rule of law. The AFL-CIO's Federal Employees union (AFGE) warns that up to 1 million federal workers could be terminated as part of this restructuring, exacerbating job insecurity and destabilizing essential public services[2][4].As we approach the 2024 elections and the potential implementation of Project 2025 in 2025, the stakes are high. The success of this initiative hinges on a Republican victory in the upcoming elections, after which the blueprint's detailed proposals would be swiftly executed. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether this radical vision for American governance will become a reality.In reflecting on Project 2025, it becomes clear that this is not just a policy initiative but a fundamental challenge to the existing structure of the U.S. government. As we move forward, it is imperative to engage in a nuanced and informed discussion about the potential impacts of such profound changes. The future of American governance hangs in the balance, and the decisions made in the next year will shape the course of the country for years to come.

Social media is dominated by trolls, and they have used their influence to wreak mass destruction on and off line.  Topics include: making sense of things, no allegiances, social media interactions, Tim Pool, bots, trolls, sarcasm, communication, social media Nihilism, trolling is now seen as good, MAGA riding dark online wave, Russian money, Tenet Media, targets of propaganda, alternative thinking taboos, American decline, divide and conquer, Trump vs Musk, telling jokes, rising to top by being an internet troll, comedy routine at debate, Vivek Ramaswamy, being the biggest winner and loser at the same time, billionaires acting like clowns, pro wrestling, is the fight real?, technocratic overlords, Heritage Foundation, Project 2025, Administrative State, privatized system of control, attention economy, pay to play, possible schism within right wing world, MTG, Alex Jones, making excuses for Palantir, hall of mirrors, alternative is already the new mainstream, Steve Albini, being confrontational for its own sake, recanting edge lord past, analog media is dead, living a virtual reality, deflecting, nebulous enemies, literally demonizing your enemy, Golden Age, Western geopolitical alliances breaking on purpose, alchemical dissolution, nebulous ideas as enemies, Red Pill, cosplaying The Matrix, 3 AIs talking to each other

The Age of Transitions and Uncle 6-6-2025AoT#464Social media is dominated by trolls, and they have used their influence to wreak mass destruction on and off line. Topics include: making sense of things, no allegiances, social media interactions, Tim Pool, bots, trolls, sarcasm, communication, social media Nihilism, trolling is now seen as good, MAGA riding dark online wave, Russian money, Tenet Media, targets of propaganda, alternative thinking taboos, American decline, divide and conquer, Trump vs Musk, telling jokes, rising to top by being an internet troll, comedy routine at debate, Vivek Ramaswamy, being the biggest winner and loser at the same time, billionaires acting like clowns, pro wrestling, is the fight real?, technocratic overlords, Heritage Foundation, Project 2025, Administrative State, privatized system of control, attention economy, pay to play, possible schism within right wing world, MTG, Alex Jones, making excuses for Palantir, hall of mirrors, alternative is already the new mainstream, Steve Albini, being confrontational for its own sake, recanting edge lord past, analog media is dead, living a virtual reality, deflecting, nebulous enemies, literally demonizing your enemy, Golden Age, Western geopolitical alliances breaking on purpose, alchemical dissolution, nebulous ideas as enemies, Red Pill, cosplaying The Matrix, 3 AIs talking to each otherUtp#372Jesse Ventura is back on the broadcast to talk with Uncle. Topics include: climbing and getting there, Animal House, Pacifico, best concerts, Live Aid, seeing bands before they get big, Round One arcade, TikTak, live-streaming, odd type messages popping up on social media videos,  subliminal messages, comedy performance enhancing substances, Eric Clapton Trump supporter, Van Halen, RFK Jr, Covid masks, Jesse Ventura back on the show, Macho Warrior wrestler, at the Baja, Sacramento Kings, NBA FinalsFRANZ MAIN HUB:https://theageoftransitions.com/PATREONhttps://www.patreon.com/aaronfranzUNCLEhttps://unclethepodcast.com/ORhttps://theageoftransitions.com/category/uncle-the-podcast/FRANZ and UNCLE Merchhttps://theageoftransitions.com/category/support-the-podcasts/Email Chuck or PayPalblindjfkresearcher@gmail.comBE THE EFFECTListen/Chat on the Sitehttps://ochelli.com/listen-live/TuneInhttp://tun.in/sfxkxAPPLEhttps://music.apple.com/us/station/ochelli-com/ra.1461174708Ochelli Link Treehttps://linktr.ee/chuckochelli

In this episode of Right to Life Radio, Sarah Goring and Linda Teliha share two powerful Stories from the Sidewalk—“Faith,” a teen who chose life after seeing a fetal model and discovering she was carrying a girl, and “Jack,” a young father whose life and faith were transformed through support despite domestic abuse trauma. Later, Jonathan Keller explains why the Trump administration dropped the Biden-era EMTALA lawsuit that would have forced hospitals in pro-life states to provide abortions, and discusses the long-term strategy for protecting unborn children. The show concludes with new research from the Charlotte Lozier Institute debunking the “safer than Tylenol” myth about the abortion pill and revealing how complications are often misreported as miscarriages.

What if the recent crackdown on elite universities didn't start with Trump—but with Obama? In this episode, we trace a surprising through-line connecting Obama's Title IX enforcement to Trump's Title VI threats. Harvard Law Professor Jacob Gersen joins us to reveal how both presidents used informal bureaucratic tools to reshape higher education—often without Congress. What does this say about presidential power and academic freedom in America?Papers discussed:“The Sex Bureaucracy”: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2750143“The Six Bureaucracy”: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5199652

The SEC was created to protect investors—but is it now protecting incumbents instead? In this episode of Context, we explore the rise of unelected bureaucracies and their hostility to innovation, using crypto regulation as a lens into a larger democratic dysfunction.   From the roots of the administrative state to today's battle between blockchain pioneers and entrenched financial regulators, we explore how bureaucratic overreach can derail progress—and what it would take for America to rediscover its courage to build.   Topics include: • SEC vs. Ripple Labs and Coinbase • Regulatory capture and the death of oversight • Blockchain, XRP, and the Internet of Value • American innovation and bureaucratic stagnation   Support the show: patreon.com/bradcoleharris

On this episode: From local zoning laws to federal education funding, rules created by the administrative state shape daily life in more ways than most people realize. Amy Handlin — a new member of Ballotpedia's Policy team — unpacks how the modern regulatory system developed in response to 20th-century corruption, how it expanded through citizen demand and federal policy, and how it continues to evolve today. Amy and our host Norm Leahy explore why criticisms of bureaucracy persist, what could be lost in efforts to dismantle it, and how everyday people can influence the system without needing a law degree.Learn more by exploring our portal: https://ballotpedia.org/Administrative_stateThis year, we're hoping to learn more about what our audience and what topics you want us to tackle. Complete a brief 5 minute survey to review the show and share some feedback: https://forms.gle/zPxYSog5civyvEKX6 Sign up for our Newsletters: https://ballotpedia.org/Ballotpedia_Email_Updates Stream "On the Ballot" on Spotify or wherever you listen to podcasts. If you have questions, comments, or love for BP, feel free to reach out at ontheballot@ballotpedia.org or on X (formerly Twitter) @Ballotpedia.*On The Ballot is a conversational podcast featuring interviews with guests across the political spectrum. The views and opinions expressed by them are solely their own and are not representative of the views of the host or Ballotpedia as a whole.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, I couldn't help but feel a sense of unease about the profound implications this initiative could have on the fabric of American governance. Conceived in the spring of 2022 by a coalition of conservative extremists and political operatives, Project 2025 is a sweeping 927-page policy blueprint designed to reshape the federal government in the event of a Republican victory in the 2024 presidential election.This radical plan, also known as "Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise," was released by the Heritage Foundation in April 2023 and is backed by 100 advisory coalition partners, including far-right groups and organizations funded by billionaires. The project's central goal is to "destroy the Administrative State," a term that resonates with a broader conservative agenda to dismantle the existing bureaucratic structure of the federal government.At the heart of Project 2025 is a 180-day playbook that outlines specific steps for implementing proposed reforms from the very first day of a new Republican administration. This playbook includes a prepared stack of Executive Orders ready for the president's signature on January 20, 2025. According to the plan, these executive actions will be pivotal in consolidating executive power and ensuring that political loyalists fill key positions across the federal government.One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its advocacy for the expansion of presidential powers, rooted in the controversial unitary executive theory. This theory posits that the president should have complete control over the executive branch, eliminating the independence of agencies like the Department of Justice, the FBI, the Federal Communications Commission, and the Federal Trade Commission. Kevin Roberts, a key figure behind the project, has stated that all federal employees should answer directly to the president, reflecting a vision of centralized control that has been gaining traction since the Reagan administration.The implications of such a shift are far-reaching. For instance, Project 2025 recommends the dismissal of all Department of State employees in leadership roles before January 20, 2025, to be replaced by ideologically vetted leaders appointed to acting roles that do not require Senate confirmation. Kiron Skinner, who authored the State Department chapter of the project, has expressed her belief that many State Department employees are too left-wing and need to be replaced by those more loyal to a conservative president. When asked if she could recall a time when State Department employees obstructed Trump policy, Skinner admitted she could not, highlighting the subjective nature of these proposed purges.The project's proposals extend to every department of the federal government, with detailed chapters outlining radical restructuring plans. For example, the plan seeks to dismantle various federal agencies, potentially terminating up to 1 million federal workers. This would not only disrupt the functioning of these agencies but also have devastating consequences for workers and the broader public that relies on these services[2][3].The potential impacts of Project 2025 are multifaceted and profound. By centralizing power in the White House, the initiative threatens to undermine the checks and balances that are fundamental to American democracy. Experts warn that such a concentration of power could lead to unchecked executive authority, eroding the independence of critical agencies and compromising the rule of law.As I navigated through the dense pages of Project 2025, it became clear that this initiative is not just a policy document but a manifesto for a new era of governance. It reflects a broader conservative vision that seeks to redefine the relationship between the executive branch and the rest of the government. The project's backers argue that this is necessary to restore efficiency and accountability, but critics see it as a dangerous power grab that could destabilize the very foundations of American governance.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025 hinges on the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. If a Republican candidate wins, the stage will be set for a rapid and radical transformation of the federal government. The next few months will be crucial, as the public and policymakers grapple with the implications of this blueprint.As the clock ticks closer to January 20, 2025, the nation stands at a crossroads. Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in how the federal government could operate, with far-reaching consequences for every American. Whether this vision of governance materializes remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the future of American democracy hangs in the balance.

In this season's final installment of the Hard Look Series , we take a focused look back at the first 100 days of Donald Trump's presidency—not through the lens of news headlines or viral clips, but through the quieter, often more consequential corridors of administrative law. Professors Jennifer Selin and Chris Walker join us to reflect.View the transcription here.Show Notes:Presidential Documents on the Federal Register (Updated Daily)Congressional Research Service: “The Good Cause Exception to Notice and Comment Rulemaking: JudicialReview of Agency Action” (January 29, 2016)FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLCThe Presentment Clause (Article I, Section 7 of the U.S.Constitution)Presidential Action: Restoring Accountability toPolicy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce (January 20, 2025)The Hill: “Law Firms Divided Over Response to TrumpOrder” (March 25, 2025)Presidential Action: Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies (February 18, 2025)SCOTUS Blog: “Justices Will Hear Arguments on Trump'sEffort to End Birthright Citizenship” (April 17, 2025) More From Our Guests:Jennifer Selin, “Constraining the Executive Branch:Delegation, Agency Independence, and Congressional Design of Judicial Review”Chris Walker, “Congress and the Shifting Sands inAdministrative Law”

Steve Bannon: Trump Is Waging ‘Economic Warfare' on the Chinese Communist Party This is the full version of Jan Jekielek's interview with Steve Bannon. The interview was originally released on Epoch TV on May 3, 2025. “Never before in history have two great trading entities ever engaged in outright economic warfare, like is being engaged today. And that's why I say we're living in historic times,” says Steve Bannon, former White House chief strategist during President Donald Trump's first administration and host of the “War Room” show. “It's not just tariffs. They're a tool. [Trump]'s reorganizing the world system of commerce and of trade,” Bannon says. In this episode, we dive into the U.S.–China trade war, Trump's tariff strategy, his first 100 days in office, and where America is headed in the weeks and months to come. “The next 100 days are going to be three times more intense, dramatic, and meaningful than the first 100 days,” Bannon says. Watch the video of this program at- https://youtu.be/pFgYuwPA4xw?si=ftDnvi0LneEp35lG American Thought Leaders - The Epoch Times 460K subscribers 114,389 views Premiered May 5, 2025

In this episode of The Ultimate Assist, John Stockton and Ken Ruettgers welcome back constitutional attorney and FDA “Dragon Slayer” Jonathan Emord for a high-powered takedown of the bureaucratic machine. Emord pulls no punches, exposing the unconstitutional rise of the administrative state, Big Pharma collusion, Fauci's alleged betrayal, and the disturbing ideological agenda behind modern regulatory overreach. From COVID censorship to energy policy to education warfare, Emord lays out how America's founding principles are under assault—and why restoring individual liberty is the ultimate act of resistance.

An interview with Russell Muirhead, co-author of the new book, Ungoverning: The Attack on the Administrative State and the Politics of Chaos. The book details how a concentrated attack on political institutions threatens to disable the essential workings of government.

The rule of law is essential to the flourishing of liberal democracy and capitalism. Yet, it is now under pressure in the United States, and corporate law firms are in the eye of the storm. Over the last few weeks, President Donald Trump has issued executive orders against several prominent law firms that represented his political adversaries and promoted diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Some of these law firms have caved into the administration's demands to end such practices and provide pro bono services to the government, whereas others are fighting back.To discuss the financial reasons why some firms have capitulated while others have held out, and what the consequences are for the survival of the rule of law, Bethany and Luigi speak to John Morley, Augustus E. Lines Professor of Law at Yale University and an expert on the economics of law. Are Trump's orders unconstitutional, and if so, why have so many law firms reached a deal with him? How have changes to law firms' business models left them particularly vulnerable to a moment like this? Why are some firms more vulnerable to political attacks than others? Together, the three discuss the firms' reciprocal agreements with the administration, the possibilities for a collective-action response, and how this moment may profoundly reshape the future of law, democracy, and capitalism in America.Show Notes:Watch a recording of the panel “Antitrust and the 1st Amendment” from the 2025 Stigler Center Antitrust and Competition Conference, featuring Greg Day, Eleanor Fox, and Matt Stoller, and moderated by Maciej Bernatt. The panel highlights how antitrust may stand in the way of collective action, competitive markets, and free speech.

As President Trump reaches his 100th day, his assault on federal agencies continues as he expands his authority over every aspect of the Executive Branch of the federal government.  Join David, Nita, and Burt's spirited debate on the impact of Trump's plans to eliminate undesired regulations, unwanted labor agreements, and bothersome legal theories, like disparate impact, on employers, workers, and the role government.Contact Fortney & Scott: Tweet us at @fortneyscott Follow us on LinkedIn Email us at info@fortneyscott.com Thank you for listening! https://www.fortneyscott.com/

www.marktreichel.comhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/Presidential Power and Independent Agency Autonomy: The 2025 NCUA Board Removal CaseI. Legal and Constitutional FrameworkA Constitutional Showdown BeginsFrom "At Pleasure" to Independence: The 1978 RestructuringThe Humphrey's Executor Precedent: Protecting Independent AgenciesUnitary Executive vs. Congressional DesignThe Narrowing Path of Agency IndependenceSwan v. Clinton: The Precedent That Wasn't Quite50 Years of Respect for Fixed TermsII. The NCUA's Specific Structure and FunctionsThe Removed Regulators: Harper and OtsukaThe NCUA: A Core Financial RegulatorExecutive Function or Independent Regulation?The NCUSIF: Owned by Credit Unions, Not GovernmentThe Central Liquidity Facility: A Link to TreasuryOperating Without a QuorumFinancial Stability at StakeIII. Litigation Strategy and Broader ImplicationsSix Legal Theories for VictoryDavid vs. Goliath: The Legal TeamThe Long Road to the Supreme CourtBeyond NCUA: Implications for the Administrative State

In this episode of Passing Judgment, Jessica talks with USA Today reporter Erin Mansfield about the Trump administration's efforts to overhaul and reduce the federal workforce. They discuss the administration's push for greater executive power, the agencies hit hardest by job cuts, and the impact on public services like education and food safety. Erin also explains the legal battles unfolding over these changes, including the significance of the landmark Supreme Court case Humphrey's Executor and the future independence of federal agencies. Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss:The Federal Workforce Under the Trump Administration: Trump's administration is undertaking dramatic efforts to reshape--and notably reduce--the federal workforce, prompting widespread job insecurity, potential displacements, and structural overhauls throughout the government.Who is Affected by Federal Workforce Reductions: Erin outlines which agencies are most impacted. Socially-oriented agencies—like the Department of Education, Health and Human Services, USDA, and the Environmental Protection Agency—face the brunt of the cutbacks, while national security, law enforcement, and immigration agencies are largely exempt. She clarifies that massive cuts are not equally distributed across all departments. Real-Life Impacts of Workforce Reduction: Jessica and Erin discuss how these changes might touch everyday Americans. Reductions in the workforce could affect everything from food safety inspections and educational grant administration to public health services and climate research—potentially making certain public services less effective or slower.Follow Our Host and Guest: @LevinsonJessica@_erinmansfield

3pm: Guest - John Vecchione - Attorney for Civil Liberites Alliance // Mr. Vecchione is a Senior Litigation Counsel for the non-profit New Civil Liberties Alliance representing clients against the Administrative State. // Crabbers sue US state of Washington over GPS surveillance of vessels // I Stand Corrected - Ask, Tell, Correct or Yell at John about anything // Curley, I’m curious to hear your thoughts on this Maryland guy who was apparently accidentally sent to that prison in El Salvador. // Braves Sideline Reporter demonstrates excellent game while calling the game

6pm: Guest - John Vecchione - Attorney for Civil Liberites Alliance // Mr. Vecchione is a Senior Litigation Counsel for the non-profit New Civil Liberties Alliance representing clients against the Administrative State. // Crabbers sue US state of Washington over GPS surveillance of vessels // I Stand Corrected - Ask, Tell, Correct or Yell at John about anything // Curley, I’m curious to hear your thoughts on this Maryland guy who was apparently accidentally sent to that prison in El Salvador. // Braves Sideline Reporter demonstrates excellent game while calling the game

The 2nd Trump administration has begun tearing down the administrative state, firing thousands, cancelling contracts, and shuttering agencies. But they have also used the power of the state to ramp up summary deportations, crack down on universities, and threaten prosecutions of their political opponents. So is this the culmination of Republican efforts to scale back government or a sign that they just want to redirect its goals? Nicholas Jacobs and Sidney Milkis find that we have overestimated conservative efforts to reduce the size and scope of government and underestimated their usage of the enlarged state to pursue conservative goals.

Led by the Trump administration and Elon Musk's DOGE, Americans are debating once again how our government should hire civil servants, but are we asking the right questions? In this episode, we dive into a compelling new study on the Pendleton Act, one of the most significant bureaucratic reforms in U.S. history, which introduced merit-based civil service exams to combat corruption and incompetence. But did it work?We speak with economist Santiago Perez about his paper “Civil Service Exams and Organizational Performance: Evidence From The Pendleton Act” and his surprising findings that while the reform did help hire more qualified and stable employees, it didn't clearly improve government efficiency. Also, what unintended consequences may have emerged, such as manipulation of salary thresholds and persistent power dynamics among political appointees.So, what can the Pendleton Act teach us about modern bureaucracy, accountability, and fairness? And could reintroducing merit-based exams actually fix today's polarized and politicized civil service—or make it even worse?

Join special guest host Jay Shepard as he and Ericka welcome nationally recognized American Majority CEO, conservative strategist, and author Ned Ryun to Of The People. Together, they discuss Ned's recently released documentary, American Leviathan—a timely and urgent exposé on the rise of Progressive Authoritarianism and the unchecked power of the Administrative State. Brash, irreverent, and […]

Violence in the Administrative State by California Law Review

Amid potentially massive job cuts by the federal government, how should leaders manage this disruption?     The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) seeks to cut hundreds of thousands of federal jobs while shrinking or eliminating many agencies. How can leaders guide the federal workforce through such disruptions, both for those affected and those who remain?     Join Steve Odland and guest Diana Scott, Center Leader of the US Human Capital Center at The Conference Board, to find out how DOGE is shrinking the federal workforce, what change management looks like, and why emotional intelligence is a crucial skill for leaders right now.    (00:50) Objectives and Actions of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) (02:16) Impact on Federal Workforce and Schedule F Reclassification (03:38) Challenges and Risks of Workforce Reduction (05:15) Advising Leaders on Managing Change (08:27) Importance of Communication and Transparency (17:51) Emotional Intelligence and Support During Change (22:07) Opportunities for the Private Sector   For more from The Conference Board:  Progress Under Pressure: Preparing Federal Employees for Turbulent Times  Federal Worker Separations Will Impact Talent Markets: Take Advantage  Current Efforts to Redefine Control of the Administrative State 

Send us a textNed Ryun, the creator of the new “American Leviathan” documentary, urged Americans to demand the “representative government” they were promised, not  “the rule of the bureaucrat.”  Support - https://alphanews.revv.co/donate-todayAlpha News Links - https://linktr.ee/AlphaNewsLiz Collin Reports - https://alphanews.buzzsprout.com/Support the show

For years, unelected bureaucrats have stretched vague laws to impose regulations that Congress never explicitly approved. But with a new executive order, President Trump is taking steps to rein in the administrative state and ensure that federal agencies stay within their constitutional limits. In this episode of American Potential, host David From speaks with Ryan Mulvey, Policy Counsel for Americans for Prosperity Foundation, to break down what this executive order means, how it builds on key Supreme Court doctrines, and what impact it could have on federal regulations, agency overreach, and the economy. They discuss: ✅ The Major Questions Doctrine and why it limits bureaucratic power ✅ How the Chevron Doctrine's demise shifts power back to judges and Congress ✅ The role of Congress in making these changes permanent ✅ What this could mean for business owners, taxpayers, and individual freedoms Could this executive order mark a turning point in restoring constitutional balance and limiting government overreach? Tune in for an in-depth conversation on the fight to restore accountability in Washington.

Preview: Professor John Yoo identifies the Roberts Court as critical in the rejection of the Chevron doctrine that empowered the administrative state. More soon. 1945 SECRETARY OF COMMERCE HARRIMAN

Today on The McCarthy Report, Andy and Rich discuss Trump's tussles with bureaucracy, who's actually heading DOGE, and more. This podcast was edited and produced by Sarah Colleen Schutte.

by Paul D. Clement Founding Partner, Clement & Murphy, PLLC 43rd Solicitor General of the United States The 2025 Presidents' Day Lecture Thomas Aquinas College, California February 21, 2025

  When Professor Nancy Rosenblum joined us months back, she and Russell Muirhead had written a book called “Ungoverning” The Attack on the Administrative State and the Politics of Chaos.”  Their case study was the first Trump Administration.  And while every modern state is an administrative state, the bureaucracy at all levels of government has … Read More Read More

In 2025, antitrust and consumer protection remain hot topics in the legal world as a new Congress and Administration begin. Join this FedSoc Forum as we discuss possible antitrust and Federal Trade Commission reforms in the 119th Congress.Featuring:Adam Cella, Chief Counsel for the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust, House Committee on the JudiciaryThomas DeMatteo, Chief Counsel, Senate Judiciary CommitteeDaniel Flores, Senior Counsel, Committee on Oversight and Reform, U.S. House of RepresentativesLynda Garcia, Chief Counsel to Senator Cory A. Booker, U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee at United States SenateModerator: Svetlana Gans, Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher--To register, click on the link above.

Townhall Review – February 22, 2025

Guests: Mollie Hemingway & Mark P. Mills Host Scot Bertram talks with Mollie Hemingway, senior journalism fellow at Hillsdale College and editor-in-chief at The Federalist, about the first month of President Donald Trump’s second term in office. And Mark P. Mills, senior fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and director of the National Center on […]

Guests: Mollie Hemingway & Mark P. Mills Host Scot Bertram talks with Mollie Hemingway, senior journalism fellow at Hillsdale College and editor-in-chief at The Federalist, about the first month of President Donald Trump's second term in office. And Mark P. Mills, senior fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and director of the National Center on Energy Analytics, talks about the economics and future of electric vehicles.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Donald Trump has taken aim at the administrative state in his first term, but does government bureaucracy have to be a bad thing? Complex societies require complex organizations to manage their functions. Can right-wingers make the administrative state work for them or is there something inherently dangerous about its existence? Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry, host of the "PolicySphere" podcast, joins me to discuss. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, Carl Jackson discusses Doge's discoveries regarding government waste and accountability, particularly in immigration policies. Finally, Jackson covers Pam Bundy's legal actions against New York's immigration policies, emphasizing the need for accountability and reform. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshow http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.com NEW!!!! THE CARL JACKSON SHOW MERCH IS HERE. SUPPORT THE PODCAST GETTING A T-SHIRT NOW! https://carljacksonmerch.itemorder.com See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode, Carl Jackson discusses Doge's discoveries regarding government waste and accountability, particularly in immigration policies. Finally, Jackson covers Pam Bundy's legal actions against New York's immigration policies, emphasizing the need for accountability and reform. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carljacksonradio Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecarljacksonshow http://www.TheCarlJacksonShow.com NEW!!!! THE CARL JACKSON SHOW MERCH IS HERE. SUPPORT THE PODCAST GETTING A T-SHIRT NOW! https://carljacksonmerch.itemorder.com See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ivey Gruber, President Michigan Talk Network.

The Trump administration has begun firing bureaucrats within the DOJ and FBI who weaponized government against the American people, but is it enough? In this episode of The P.A.S. Report Podcast, Professor Nick Giordano exposes the deep-rooted corruption inside our federal agencies and explains why real reform is necessary to prevent future abuses. He breaks down the National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism, how it has been used to silence political opposition, and why simply firing bad actors won't fix the problem. Professor Giordano lays out a blueprint to dismantle the administrative state and restore accountability before it's too late. Tune in for a hard-hitting analysis on why this is about more than Trump or Biden. It's about the survival of our republic.   Episode Highlights: Firing rogue bureaucrats in the FBI and DOJ isn't enough. How do we stop the deep state from returning? How Biden's National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism was weaponized against Americans What must happen next? A roadmap for dismantling the administrative state and restoring accountability  

Ned Ryun CEO of American Majority shares his new book "American Leviathan: The Birth of the Administrative State and Progressive Authoritarianism".See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On President Trump's first day in office, he issued an executive order titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” attempting to change the current understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment by declaring that the children of illegal immigrants or people on temporary visas born in the United States are not granted citizenship. While many Americans may agree that the unfortunate realities of “birth tourism” and “anchor babies” in the U.S. need to be curbed or stopped, Trump's executive order has been criticized as unconstitutional and the wrong way to approach the issue. How are presidents of both parties subverting Congress in their pursuit of legislative goals? And how did President Obama's action on DACA and President Biden's declaration on the Equal Rights Amendment help create precedent for Trump's actions today? Adam White is the Laurence H. Silberman Chair in Constitutional Governance and senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, where he focuses on the Supreme Court and the administrative state. Concurrently, he codirects the Antonin Scalia Law School's C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State. Before joining AEI, he was a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution and an adjunct fellow at the Manhattan Institute.Read the transcript here. Subscribe to our Substack here.

In this episode of American Potential, host David From sits down with Congresswoman Harriet Hageman, Wyoming's at-large representative and chair of the new Article One Task Force, to discuss her mission to rein in the administrative state and defend constitutional freedoms. Rep. Hageman shares her experiences as a trial attorney fighting federal overreach, including cases that highlight the unchecked power of unelected bureaucrats. She discusses the significant implications of the Loper Bright Supreme Court decision and the urgent need for Congress to reclaim its legislative authority. Learn how the Article One Task Force aims to limit regulatory overreach and strengthen the role of elected representatives in shaping clear and accountable laws. The conversation also explores her proposed First Amendment Accountability Act, which would hold government officials personally responsible for violating Americans' constitutional rights. Rep. Hageman emphasizes the critical importance of ensuring that government agencies remain transparent, fair, and accountable to the people. Tune in to hear how Rep. Hageman is leading the charge to right-size government, protect individual freedoms, and ensure that the principles of the Constitution remain at the heart of American governance. Visit American Potential for more inspiring stories of Americans fighting for freedom and opportunity.

In this episode, Tudor and Tyler O'Neil discuss the intricate web of dark money and political influence that shapes modern activism and policy. They delve into the findings in his new book "The Woketopus," a term coined to describe the vast network of organizations and funding sources that promote leftist agendas. The conversation covers the role of Arabella Advisors, the influence of unions, corporate compliance with DEI initiatives, and the impact of the Human Rights Campaign. They also explore the rise of the administrative state, the ACLU's involvement in immigration policy, and the significance of ballot initiatives in shaping public opinion. The Tudor Dixon Podcast is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network. For more visit TudorDixonPodcast.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ned Ryun CEO of American Majority shares his new book "American Leviathan: The Birth of the Administrative State and Progressive Authoritarianism".See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

It's Casual Friday! Sam and Emma speak with Krystal Ball, co-host of Krystal, Kyle, & Friends and Breaking Points, to round up the week in news. First, Sam and Emma run through updates on Trump's assault on civil servants, his attempt to overturn birthright citizenship, the arrival of federal troops to the southern border, Trump's dangerous empowerment of ICE, the likely confirmation of Pete Hegseth, more Trump pardons, Meta's anti-abortion actions, Mike Johnson's request of Casey Hutchinson, and Trump's halting of police reform agreements, before expanding on the role of Trump's “Schedule F” attack on civil servants, and watching Jeff Merkley come right at Russ Vought for his desire to trap sick people in poverty. Krystal Ball then joins, diving right into Trump's clear and active effort to exercise his plan of maximalist lawlessness, with blanket pardons to violent January 6th rioters, blatantly unconstitutional acts like overturning birthright citizenship, and the launching of a shady cryptocurrency to hide backroom dealings. Expanding on this, Ball explores the particular role the Big Tech oligarchy plays in backing the Trump regime, with mass amounts of wealth stored in and funding the world of AI and cryptocurrency – two institutions whose primary uses are in bolstering and protecting exploitation – and why this political move by the industry is a necessity in an era where they are becoming more and more representative of the massive, unproductive hoards of wealth tied up among elite capitalists. After tackling the particular role the Democratic Party played in making this era of Big Money and Big Tech a bipartisan one, and how that, alongside the corporate capture of the media, has created an environment with utterly weakened opposition to fascism – with Dems having capitulated to the Trump worldview in the hopes of bringing about a kinder, gentler fascism –  wrapping up with the need to stay clear about the anti-fascist and anti-oligarchy messaging, and the environmental, social, and economic impacts they create. Sam and Emma also touch on Trump's recent actions to overturn the federal pledge to not discriminate in federal contracts, and the snitch-order sent out over federal DEI practices. And in the Fun Half: Sam and Emma unpack the immediate impact of Trump's severe mass criminalization and threat of deportation of undocumented migrants, with farmers in the citrus and dairy industries seeing their workforce disappear overnight, before talking with Kieth from Chicago about Trump's NIH shutdown and the collective nature of science, and exploring Trump's crackdown on the administrative state with the perspective of USDA worker Leo from CA. Elon sycophants Ben Shapiro and PBD jump to his defense over the “did a literal Sieg Heil at the inauguration” allegations, and the MR Team reflects on videos from the Aldaghma family in the wake of a tentative ceasefire in Gaza, plus, your calls and IMs! Follow Krystal on Twitter here: https://x.com/krystalball Check out Krystal, Kyle & Friends: https://krystalkyleandfriends.substack.com/ Check out Breaking Points here: https://www.youtube.com/c/breakingpoints Donate to the Gaza Bakery here: https://www.gofundme.com/f/gaza-bakery-feeding-displaced-families Become a member at JoinTheMajorityReport.com: https://fans.fm/majority/join Follow us on TikTok here!: https://www.tiktok.com/@majorityreportfm Check us out on Twitch here!: https://www.twitch.tv/themajorityreport Find our Rumble stream here!: https://rumble.com/user/majorityreport Check out our alt YouTube channel here!: https://www.youtube.com/majorityreportlive Gift a Majority Report subscription here: https://fans.fm/majority/gift Subscribe to the ESVN YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/esvnshow Subscribe to the AMQuickie newsletter here: https://am-quickie.ghost.io/ Join the Majority Report Discord! https://majoritydiscord.com/ Get all your MR merch at our store: https://shop.majorityreportradio.com/ Get the free Majority Report App!: https://majority.fm/app Go to https://JustCoffee.coop and use coupon code majority to get 10% off your purchase! Check out today's sponsors: Ritual: Essential for Men is a quality multivitamin from a company you can actually trust. Get 25% off your first month for a limited time at https://ritual.com/MAJORITY. That's https://ritual.com/MAJORITY for 25% off your first month. Sunset Lake CBD: Head on over to https://SunsetLakeCBD.com and use code Tincture to save 35% on tinctures. See their site for terms and conditions. Follow the Majority Report crew on Twitter: @SamSeder @EmmaVigeland @MattLech @BradKAlsop Check out Matt's show, Left Reckoning, on Youtube, and subscribe on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/leftreckoning Check out Matt Binder's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/mattbinder Subscribe to Brandon's show The Discourse on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/ExpandTheDiscourse Check out Ava Raiza's music here! https://avaraiza.bandcamp.com/ The Majority Report with Sam Seder - https://majorityreportradio.com/

What do a dirt bike, a taillight, and the Supreme Court have in common? In this fascinating episode of American Potential, Jeff Crank and new host David From delve into the groundbreaking case United States vs. Pheasant—a seemingly small dispute over a $100 fine that could reshape the boundaries of government power. Joined by Casey Maddox, Vice President for Legal Strategies, they explore the constitutional principles at stake, including the non-delegation doctrine, and how this case challenges the unchecked power of federal agencies like the Bureau of Land Management. They also discuss the broader implications of other pivotal cases, such as Loper Bright, and the Supreme Court's role in right-sizing government to align with the founders' vision. Hear how ordinary citizens like Mr. Pheasant are making extraordinary contributions to defending liberty and holding government accountable. This episode is a must-listen for anyone who values freedom, opportunity, and the principles of constitutional government.

The conversation about limited government has morphed from looking at ways to reduce bureaucracy to an effort to eliminate large pieces of the government all together. Russell Muirhead is Robert Clements Professor of Democracy and Politics at Dartmouth College, and he joins host Krys Boyd to discuss why non-elected workers in “the administrative state” find themselves in the crosshairs from both the right and the left, how Donald Trump's term might affect them, and what elimination of their functions might mean for the nation. His book, written with Nancy L. Rosenblum, is “Ungoverning: The Attack on the Administrative State and the Politics of Chaos.”

Ned Ryun on who's planning to sabotage the Trump administration from within. (00:00) Three Things Trump Needs to Fix Before the Left Destroys Our Country (10:46) Will Tulsi Gabbard and Bobby Kennedy be Confirmed? (30:59) Trump's Plan to Shatter the Deep State into a Million Pieces (39:10) Will DOGE Succeed? (48:50) The Reality of Watergate (01:01:30) Pardoning the J6 Defendants Paid partnerships with: ExpressVPN: Get 3 months free at https://ExpressVPN.com/Tucker Hallow prayer app: Get 3 months free at https://Hallow.com/Tucker Cozy Earth: Promo code “Tucker” for up to 40% off at https://CozyEarth.com/Tucker PureTalk: Get 50% off first month at https://PureTalk.com/Tucker Ned Ryun is founder and CEO of American Majority. He's also the author of American Leviathan: The Birth of the Administrative State and Progressive Authoritarianism. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Can Elon Musk colonize Mars? Or, even more challenging, can he take down the administrative state? Sarah and David take a look at his roadmap for the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and debate the likelihood of regulatory reform. The Agenda: —Legal questions for the Trump 2.0 administration —Will DOGE work? —Unitary executive magic wands —Honoring James Garfield's memory —Challenging birthright citizenship —Stepchild of the First Amendment: Commercial speech —Marihuana case —Gravity is the weakest force Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch's offerings—including Sarah's Collision newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices