Podcasts about justices

Hour 1: Questioning everything is part of critical thinking. Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court have different thoughts when it comes to wearing masks. Michael explains the premise of statements and questions and why you shouldn't accept it. Americans have distrust in society, especially with the government, news media, and social media according to the Edelman report.

NTD Evening News—01/19/2022 1. Biden Speaks Ahead of One-Year Anniversary 2. Biden Pressed by Reporters on Promises Made 3. WH to Distribute 400 Million Free N95 Masks 4. SCOTUS Justices Deny Friction Over Masks 5. U.S. Supporting Ukraine Amid Escalation

In our news wrap Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch deny a reported rift over mask wearing. In Afghanistan, the Taliban urged foreign governments to recognize their regime and loosen aid restrictions. New information from Tonga confirms severe damage on several islands after Saturday's volcano eruption. Interest jitters sent major stock indexes down. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

2022 is a big year for supporters of Supreme Court reform. Roe v. Wade, the landmark case that gave women nationwide the right to have abortions, might be overturned, and the debate around changing the way we structure the bench — in particular, packing the court — is getting only more heated.The past decade has brought a shift in the makeup of the court — from Brett Kavanaugh, appointed despite sexual assault allegations, to Merrick Garland, blocked from confirmation, and Amy Coney Barrett, rushed to confirmation.It's the culmination of decades of effort by Republicans to make the courts more conservative. And now Democrats want to push back by introducing some radical changes.Today, Jane Coaston brings together two guests who disagree on whether altering Supreme Court practices is the right call and, if yes, what kind of changes would make sense for the highest judicial body in the nation.Russ Feingold is the president of the American Constitution Society and was a Democratic senator from Wisconsin from 1993 to 2011. And Russ Miller is an attorney and law professor at Washington and Lee and the head of the Max Planck Law Network in Germany.Mentioned in this episode:“Americans No Longer Have Faith in the U.S. Supreme Court. That Has Justices Worried,” by Russ Feingold in The Guardian, published in October 2021.“We Don't Need to Reform The Supreme Court,” by Russ Miller in Just Security, published in February 2021.“The Future of Supreme Court Reform,” by Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman in Harvard Law Review, published in May 2021.

The United States Supreme Court issued two new opinions addressing President Biden's vaccine mandates we review the opinions. The Biden Administration has been having a rough week and Jen Psaki addresses the media during a press briefing. 

The Justices blocked a vaccine-or-testing rule by OSHA, aimed at businesses with over 100 workers, while keeping a mandate on healthcare staff. What do these rulings mean, as the Biden administration wrestles with the Omicron variant? Plus, Senator Kyrsten Sinema's defense of the filibuster seemingly sinks the Democratic election bill. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

FULL HOUR | On today's Dom Giordano Program, Dom leads off by asking listeners which book they think Michael Avenatti has been forced to read in prison, after the former political powerhouse deemed “the creepy porn lawyer” complained about his treatment by guards. Then, Giordano breaks down the huge Supreme Court decision that came down yesterday, after the court voted 6-3 in favor of disallowing Biden's federal vaccine mandate using OSHA. Giordano reads back some of the opinions made by the Justices, including why Gorsuch decided to vote for the mandate. Then, Giordano and Dan discuss the upcoming slate of the NFL Wildcard games. Giordano and Dan first discuss the Eagles matchup with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, giving their predictions as to what will happen to the hometown team on Sunday. Then, Giordano offers up a clip from Bart Scott on ESPN, who suggested that Josh Allen should use Viagra to stay warm, arguing that the drug would help with circulation and keep the Quarterback warm. In addition, Giordano gives the newest update in a line of carjackings, and reveals new tips released by the city of Philadelphia in combating the spike.

Please subscribe now for as little as 5$ and gain access to a community of over 800 awesome, curious, kind, funny, brilliant, generous souls Check out StandUpwithPete.com to learn more Today's sponsor is Indeed.com/Standup Today's Sponsor is TrueBill.com/Standup  Eric J. Segall graduated from Emory University, Phi Beta Kappa 27  and summa cum laude, and from Vanderbilt Law School, where he was the research editor for the Law Review and member of Order of the Coif. He clerked for the Chief Judge Charles Moye Jr. for the Northern District of Georgia, and Albert J. Henderson of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. After his clerkships, Segall worked for Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and the U.S. Department of Justice, before joining the Georgia State faculty in 1991. Segall teaches federal courts and constitutional law I and II. He is the author of the books Originalism as Faith and Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court is not a Court and its Justices are not Judges. His articles on constitutional law have appeared in, among others, the Harvard Law Review Forum, the Stanford Law Review On Line, the UCLA Law Review, the George Washington Law Review, the Washington University Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, the Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, and Constitutional Commentary among many others. Segall's op-eds and essays have appeared in the New York Times, the LA Times, The Atlantic, SLATE, Vox, Salon, and the Daily Beast, among others. He has appeared on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and France 24 and all four of Atlanta's local television stations. He has also appeared on numerous local and national radio shows. Listen and Subscribe to Eric's Podcast Supreme Myths and follow him on Tik Tok!   Ophira Eisenberg is a Canadian-born standup comedian and writer. She hosted NPR's nationally syndicated comedy trivia show Ask Me Another (airing on 400+ stations) where she interviewed, joked, and played silly games with some of the biggest and funniest folks in the world.  Lauded as “hilarious, high risk, and an inspiration,” Ophira filmed her comedy special Inside Joke, when she was 8½ months pregnant. The show's material revolves around how she told everyone that she was never going to have kids, and then unexpectedly found herself expecting at “an advanced maternal age.” Inside Joke can be found on Amazon and iTunes, along with her two other comedy albums, Bangs!and As Is. She has appeared on Comedy Central, This Week at The Comedy Cellar, Kevin Hart's LOL Network, HBO's Girls, Gotham Live, The Late Late Show, The Today Show, and VH-1. The New York Times called her a skilled comedian and storyteller with “bleakly stylish” humor. She was also selected as one of New York Magazine's “Top 10 Comics that Funny People Find Funny,” and hailed by Forbes.com as one of the most engaging comics working today. Ophira is a regular host and teller with The Moth and her stories have been featured on The Moth Radio Hour and in two of The Moth's best-selling books, including the most recent New York Times Bestseller Occasional Magic: True Stories About Defying the Impossible. Ophira's first book, Screw Everyone: Sleeping My Way to Monogamyi s a comedic memoir about her experiments in the field as a single woman, traveling from futon to futon and flask-to-flask, gathering data, hoping to put it all together and build her own perfect mate. She is also sought after as a brilliant interviewer and moderator, and has interviewed dozens of celebrities, writers, and actors. Originally from Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Ophira graduated with a Cultural Anthropology and Theater degree from McGill University. She now lives in Brooklyn, NY where she is a fixture at New York City's comedy clubs Christian Finnegan  is an American stand-up comedian, writer and actor based in New York City. BUY HIS NEW ALBUM--- "Show Your Work: Live at QED"   Finnegan is perhaps best known as one of the original panelists on VH1's Best Week Ever and as Chad, the only white roommate in the “Mad Real World” sketch on Comedy Central's Chappelle's Show. Additional television appearances as himself or performing stand up have included “Conan”, “The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson”, "Would You Rather...with Graham Norton", “Good Afternoon America” and multiple times on The Today Show and Countdown with Keith Olbermann, and on History's I Love the 1880s. He hosted TV Land's game show "Game Time". As an actor, Finnegan portrayed the supporting role of "Carl" in the film Eden Court, a ticket agent in "Knight and Day" and several guest roles including a talk show host on "The Good Wife". In October 2006, Finnegan's debut stand up comedy CD titled Two For Flinching was released by Comedy Central Records, with a follow-up national tour of college campuses from January to April 2007. “Au Contraire!” was released by Warner Bros. Records in 2009. His third special "The Fun Part" was filmed at the Wilbur Theatre in Boston on April 4, 2013 and debuted on Netflix on April 15, 2014. Check out all things Jon Carroll Follow and Support Pete Coe Also check out Gareth Sever  Pete on YouTube Pete on Twitter Pete On Instagram Pete Personal FB page  

The United States Supreme Court ruled that President Joe Biden does not have the legal authority to require American corporations to enforce a Covid-19 vaccine mandate for employees. The mandate was rejected by six of the Court's nine justices. Only Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan voted in favor of the mandate. In addition to discussing the Court decision, Doc Burkhart and Rick Wiles will also tell you the name of the lethal drug used by Needle Nazis to euthanize Covid patients on ventilators. Airdate 1/13/22

SCOTUS hears oral arguments over the Biden jab mandates and there was a ton of disinformation and propaganda. The truth starts to come out over CCP virus deaths. Biden is tanking the economy...on purpose and Big Ron DeSantis continues to deliver on his promises.Copyright Sean Casey All Rights Reserved

Weekend Extra!!! Hear all about it. Sorry. This is not a full show or really a show. Its just a very important conversation with one of the most pre eminent Constitutional Legal Scholars of our Time. I hope you listen to it and inflate my monthly download numbers and .... Please subscribe now for as little as 5$ and gain access to a community of over 800 awesome, curious, kind, funny, brilliant, generous souls Check out StandUpwithPete.com to learn more  Eric J. Segall graduated from Emory University, Phi Beta Kappa 27  and summa cum laude, and from Vanderbilt Law School, where he was the research editor for the Law Review and member of Order of the Coif. He clerked for the Chief Judge Charles Moye Jr. for the Northern District of Georgia, and Albert J. Henderson of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. After his clerkships, Segall worked for Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and the U.S. Department of Justice, before joining the Georgia State faculty in 1991. Segall teaches federal courts and constitutional law I and II. He is the author of the books Originalism as Faith and Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court is not a Court and its Justices are not Judges. His articles on constitutional law have appeared in, among others, the Harvard Law Review Forum, the Stanford Law Review On Line, the UCLA Law Review, the George Washington Law Review, the Washington University Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, the Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, and Constitutional Commentary among many others. Segall's op-eds and essays have appeared in the New York Times, the LA Times, The Atlantic, SLATE, Vox, Salon, and the Daily Beast, among others. He has appeared on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and France 24 and all four of Atlanta's local television stations. He has also appeared on numerous local and national radio shows. Listen and Subscribe to Eric's Podcast Supreme Myths and follow him on Tik Tok! Follow and Support Pete Coe Pete on YouTube Pete on Twitter Pete On Instagram Pete Personal FB page Stand Up with Pete FB page

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE AND LIKE FOR MORE AMAZING CONTENT! Switch away from supporting the globalists by shopping at Walmart and Target.  Discover the alternative where you can buy directly from the manufacturer right here in the USA!SwitchSocieties.com*Sponsor* Alula Wellness *Diet*: https://alulawellness.com/breakthrough-m2/get-started/ Code: WOKE2021*Sponsor* Flip City Mag: https://flip-city-magazine.myshopify.com?ref:scott Code: Woke10 10% offMerch Store for all your Woke Swag: https://wokesocieties.com/store-2/Locals: Exclusive Content https://wokefam.locals.com/Live Streaming Platforms:Fox Hole: https://thefoxhole.app/#/home/1172Rumble: https://rumble.com/vs588j-ws145-extreme-justices-cuck-out.htmlDLive:https://dlive.tv/WokeSocietiesOdysee: https://odysee.com/ws145:4a8ad06710285386d5f193d66c8736e4b76acb20Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/wokesocietiesBitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/su0VFFviTYDs/Gab TV: https://tv.gab.com/channel/wokesocietiesEmail: wokesociety1111@gmail.comWebsite: www.wokesocieties.comFollow me @Telegram:https://t.me/wokesocietiesGab: https://gab.com/WokeSocietiesTwitter: https://twitter.com/wokesocieties--------------------------------Support the show (https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/wokesocieties)

The Supreme Court heard two emergency appeals Friday on whether to allow the Biden administration to impose vaccination or testing requirements on huge swaths of the American workforce. On this week's episode of The Term, senior employment reporter Vin Gurrieri joins us to discuss the more than 3 hours of oral arguments, how the justices seemed to be leaning, and when we can expect a ruling on this urgent hot button issue.

Does the Biden administration have the authority to impose a Covid-19 vaccine-or-testing mandate? On Friday the Supreme Court's liberal justices seemed to think so, as the Omicron variant spreads far and wide. The conservative Justices, though, aired concerns about government overreach. Plus, the panelists react to President Biden's speech addressing the Capitol riot last Jan. 6. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

With live analysis as the oral arguments rage at the Supreme Court, Charlie goes through what the Justices have to say about the OSHA vaccine mandate in their own words piece by piece, offering his own commentary and insight into the proper role of the Judicial Branch and how the left-leaning justices of the court are failing to live up to the responsibilities that come with wearing the black robe. He gives his predictions for how the trial will turn out and hammers down on the conservative justices who may need a little more encouragement to do the right thing. If you're worried about losing your job over a vaccine mandate or if you know someone who is, listen & SHARE this episode all around to offer some hope in our current fight against medical tyranny at the hands of the Biden Regime. Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/support See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hakim Jeffries is probably going to be taking over for Nancy pelosi as house majority leader --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/kylechaosaaronorder/support

Mary and Elizabeth could have told us when life begins! The so-called "clump of cells" in Mary's womb was causing a spiritual reaction in the fetus inside Elizabeth - and a physical reaction, too! These humble mothers knew more than some of our learned Justices. Starting from this incident, and all through His life, Jesus confronted people with the fact that, though He is human, He is more than that. Jim calls this sermon, He Was Always God. Listen to Right Start Radio every Monday through Friday on WCVX 1160AM (Cincinnati, OH) at 9:30am, WHKC 91.5FM (Columbus, OH) at 5:00pm, WRFD 880AM (Columbus, OH) at 9:00am. Right Start can also be heard on One Christian Radio 107.7FM & 87.6FM in New Plymouth, New Zealand. You can purchase a copy of this message, unsegmented for broadcasting and in its entirety, for $7 on a single CD by calling +1 (800) 984-2313, and of course you can always listen online or download the message for free. RS12242021_0.mp3Scripture References: Luke 1 & 2; Matthew 27

Last week your hosts said that you wouldn’t hear from them until the new year, but the Supreme Court had different plans. The Justices handed down their decision in the Texas Heartbeat Bill case, declined to take up a Free Exercise challenge to New York’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate, and granted several new cases. Zack and […]

Last week your hosts said that you wouldn't hear from them until the new year, but the Supreme Court had different plans. The Justices handed down their decision in the Texas Heartbeat Bill case, declined to take up a Free Exercise challenge to New York's COVID-19 vaccine mandate, and granted several new cases. Zack and GianCarlo unpack those decisions, and then GianCarlo interviews D.C. District Judge Trevor McFadden. Tune in to hear about his fascinating career in law enforcement from police officer, to prosecutor, to DOJ lawyer, to judge. Lastly, Zack quizzes GianCarlo with trivia about the earliest SCOTUS confirmations.Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating!Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Stand Up is a daily podcast. I book,host,edit, post and promote new episodes with brilliant guests every day. Please subscribe now for as little as 5$ and gain access to a community of over 800 awesome, curious, kind, funny, brilliant, generous souls Check out StandUpwithPete.com to learn more All this month and next I will be promoting GiveWell.org and I hope you will consider sending them a donation. They will match new donors up to $250! Please go to GiveWell.org/StandUp Get your holiday gifts from one of the sponsors of the show! GetQuip.com/STANDUP Indeed.com/STANDUP and start a store or shop at Shopify.com/Standup 34 mins Dr. Jason Johnson is an associate professor of politics and journalism in the School of Global Journalism & Communication at Morgan State University and author of the book Political Consultants and Campaigns: One Day to Sell. He focuses on campaign politics, political communication, strategy and popular culture. He hosts a podcast on Slate called "A Word" He is a political analyst for MSNBC, SIRIUS XM Satellite Radio and The Grio. He has previously appeared on CNN, Fox News, Al Jazeera, Current TV and CBS. His work has been featured on The Daily Show with Trevor Noah, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert and on ESPN. He has been quoted by The Guardian, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, The Wallstreet Journal, Buzzfeed, The Hill newspaper, the Cleveland Plain Dealer and the Atlanta Journal Constitution. Dr. Johnson is a University of Virginia alumnus and earned his PhD in Political Science from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 1:02 Chabeli Carrazana is the 19th News economy reporter. Previously, she worked as a business reporter for the Miami Herald, where she covered the tourism industry, and the Orlando Sentinel, where she covered NASA, the private space industry and labor issues. Follow her on Twitter  read "Did the pandemic change dads forever?" 1:21 Eric J. Segall graduated from Emory University, Phi Beta Kappa 27  and summa cum laude, and from Vanderbilt Law School, where he was the research editor for the Law Review and member of Order of the Coif. He clerked for the Chief Judge Charles Moye Jr. for the Northern District of Georgia, and Albert J. Henderson of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. After his clerkships, Segall worked for Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and the U.S. Department of Justice, before joining the Georgia State faculty in 1991. Segall teaches federal courts and constitutional law I and II. He is the author of the books Originalism as Faith and Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court is not a Court and its Justices are not Judges. His articles on constitutional law have appeared in, among others, the Harvard Law Review Forum, the Stanford Law Review On Line, the UCLA Law Review, the George Washington Law Review, the Washington University Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, the Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, and Constitutional Commentary among many others. Segall's op-eds and essays have appeared in the New York Times, the LA Times, The Atlantic, SLATE, Vox, Salon, and the Daily Beast, among others. He has appeared on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and France 24 and all four of Atlanta's local television stations. He has also appeared on numerous local and national radio shows. Listen and Subscribe to Eric's Podcast Supreme Myths and follow him on Tik Tok! Check out all things Jon Carroll Follow and Support Pete Coe Pete on YouTube Pete on Twitter Pete On Instagram Pete Personal FB page Stand Up with Pete FB page

Interview with Law Professor Thane Rosenbaum, the brilliant columnist/essayist and analyst, and is also the CBS News Radio Legal analyst. Last week, The Supreme Court heard the Mississippi case of Dobbs V. Jackson where the state is looking to restrict abortions after 15 weeks. Will their decision overturn Roe v Wade? Were the Justices questions about advocacy or the law? Is adoption a viable and reasonable alternative to abortion? Two weeks ago, Kyle Rittenhouse was found NOT guilty in a court of law, but was found EXTREMELY GUILTY by the media and left-wing mobs, who, while decrying so-called “vigilante justice,” were demanding “social justice” which doesn't require a trial. Their only criteria is race and if a firearm was used. Are Soros-Funded DA's responsible for the new crime wave across big cities? Our conversation discussed whether our justice system is still based on what our Founding Father's had hoped for or do we have a new system which takes into account factors NOT related to the evidence, such as "racial equity." The Definitive Rap 15DEC2021 - PODCAST

Roe v. Wade didn't give women anything. What it did do is give doctors the right to kill babies. “Roe really isn't about the woman's choice... It's about the doctor's freedom to practice his profession as he thinks best.It was not woman centered. It was physician centered.” - Ruth Bader Ginsburg, University of Chicago lecture May 10, 2013 The media doesn't tell you this. Very few people understand Roe. It is in fact an amalgam of two separate decisions that were then ‘conjoined' by the Court. Roe v. Wade addressed a Texas law. Doe v. Bolton dismissed the abortion laws of Georgia. On Jan 22nd, 1973, they were both handed down simultaneously and “conjoined” by the Court as one ruling. Many now call this conjoined action “Roe” or “the Roe regime.” Though they dealt with two different states, and each has very different tone, the net effect of the combined decision was to strike down not only those two states' laws, but the laws of every other state as well! In the Doe portion of the decision, the author, Justice Blackmun, inserted a special ‘health exception.' He intentionally defined it in the broadest possible terms. The reasons need not be written down, but only exist, ‘in the judgement of the doctor.' If the abortionist felt there may be any sociological or psychological implications for that woman's motherhood, “all of these things may be considered health. (Roe and Doe @183).  A physically healthy child could be killed inside of a physically healthy mother – throughout pregnancy – if his judgement called for it. In dissent, Justice White summed up this late term, ‘psychobabble' exception: “… for anyone of such reasons, or no reason at all, and without asserting or claiming any threat to life or health… [it was now to be legal for] any medical advisor willing to take up the procedure…. I dissent.” (Roe and Doe dissent @221).  It's funny how media analysts avoid any discussion of this ‘little' exception.  Since then, the media narrative has reduced the debate, and simply summed all this up as, ‘a woman's choice.' The media is intent on simplifying issues for consumption. But such simplicity often comes at the cost of stultifying its consumers as well. That's us. If you examine her statement carefully, Justice Ginsburg was right: the conjoined, twin decisions of Roe and Doe are clear. The choice and decision are the abortionist's alone. The woman, even if ‘uncomfortable,' simply needs to go along with what ‘the doctor' has in mind. A killing profession was pulled from centuries of shadows. It was given license and legitimacy on that day.  For millennia, the Hippocratic Oath had unequivocally condemned this killing of vulnerable children. And legally, abortion has always been frowned on by the law since at least Common Law times and in many cases long before that. But Blackmun and his fellows declared the healing profession turned on its head. Doctors were now free to be fully licensed killers. Their personal thoughts and judgments considered supreme in life or death. The Oath and its centuries of influence on law and society were pronounced dead via Roe and Doe. ‘If babies are to be killed, then a professional will do it.'   Today's USSC In the oral arguments of this December 1st, Justice Kavanaugh very politely complimented abortion advocates, but summed up the challenge in contemplating Roe. There are two competing interests and legal principles at stake, he said. The one, “the liberty interest,” (or ‘right to choose') was forcefully and effectively presented by the Solicitor General of the United States, who was arguing the case. He gave her a ‘hat tip.' But the other competing interest is the right to life which is at stake. These two interests exist in direct variance. We cannot ‘split the difference': either one or the other will dominate. They cannot,“both win.” The other five pro-life Justices who are oft-times silent, also offered questions and comments - yes, each spoke – and confirmed their pro-life positions.  The three, abortion-supporting Justices: Kagan, Sotomayor, and Breyer, not only commented, but with acerbic resignation seemed to ooze bitterness.  Their jibes about contrary ‘political decisions,' and the ‘danger to the court;' their affection for ‘court precedence' all seemed to aim directly at influencing the Chief Justice. Their implications: 'If you do this, our Democrat Party may need to change the structure of this Court. We will pack it.' Chief Justice Roberts, known to be very susceptible to pressure regarding the image and nature of the Court, made statements that seemed to be supportive of the Mississippi law and of its 15-week limit. But this desire to ‘split the difference,' while seeming to ‘cross the line' that Roe had drawn, is in fact in direct variance with Justice Kavanaugh's open statement that you can't somehow cut the baby in two' and ‘allow both the liberty interest and the right to life be given equal weight.' While there are six openly pro-life votes on the Court, I urge you not to use the simplistic media analysis: ‘It's a black and white, apolitical-head count.'  Yes, the hearing bodes well for life. But I sat with colleagues in 1992 as we read the result of the Casey decision. Remember, that Pennsylvania law was, “going to bring down Roe.” But Casey itself was, as they say in boxing, a split decision.  Few of the judges really agreed. The result was that Casey had to be ‘cobbled together.' At the end of the day, Roe was in fact still upheld! Each of the justices had gone in different, nuanced directions.  This became what the court officially calls a “joint decision.”  Some judges upheld portions of the Pennsylvania law yet insisted on striking others.  There was no clear majority.  Justice Blackmun, Roe's author, was still on the court in 1992. Predictably, his decision in Casey proudly upheld Roe. Back in Casey, then Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist voted with a plurality - Scalia, White, and Thomas, to ‘adjust' Roe ( he did not have the votes to overturn.) But he attempted to continue to dismantle it. The Court jettisoned the false and deceptive ‘trimester' framework, (Has the media EVER told you that the trimester system was long-ago ruled meaningless and arbitrary? The Court also conceded that there was not in fact, a‘fundamental right' to abortion. Does ANY local, or even national reporter ever comment on that? Nope. The actual status of abortion law is continually misrepresented by a simplistic media.) But after Casey, and despite loss of credibility, Roe still stood. But in a simplistically meaningless salute to ‘choice' and the legal folly of stare decisis (the legal insistence that a ‘previous decision continue to stand'). Chief Justice Rehnquist stated in his ruling, “Roe continues to exist, but only in the way that a storefront on a western movie set exists: a mere façade to give the illusion of reality... Behind the façade an entirely new method of analysis without any roots in constitutional law…”   Casey Joint Decision, 1992 For us today, the question for 2022 is: What will this Court now do? You just read that Chief Justices will throw their decisions in surprisingly unlikely corners - this to help frame and ‘craft' the final decisions their colleagues may be offering.  Will Justice Roberts, widely known for such politicking, try that? Will he attempt to ‘split the difference' yet again? But with five other solid lifers, could he? I fully expect the old façade known as Roe to topple. This diseased tree will indeed fall. But in which direction?   A bigger issue, that is almost never addressed, undergirds this entire debate: “Will doctors be free to continue in their now 50-year-old license to do what they want, even to kill? Justice Ginsburg, and a handful of others, knew this issue just never gets discussed.  Whatever happens in the coming decision, you can expect the major media to enjoy the controversy. Just don't expect them to get it right. ----- Here's a nice thought: the media has stopped talking about the Texas abortion law heard by the court two weeks earlier. But that law is powerful. The Court has allowed it to remain in effect.  Abortions have come to a halt in Texas.  So, the media has joined in the terrified silence of the abortion industry regarding that law.  Wouldn't it be nice if the Court decided to rule on Texas as well? Then, as they did in 1973, perhaps issue a conjoined decision, but this time protecting the right of unborn children to be protected and honored under the law?    Brian Johnston is the author of Evil Twins - Roe and Doe: How the Supreme Court Unleashed Medical Killing available on Amazon and wherever fine books are sold.

The future of abortion in America is on the line. The Supreme Court has just ruled on a case and is preparing a decision on a second that could end Roe v Wade. In this episode, I talk to the co-lead counsel on one of the abortion cases before the US Supreme Court, Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization.Hillary Schneller is Senior Staff Attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights. The group is leading the fight against both the Texas 6-week abortion ban and the Mississippi 15-week abortion ban. We spoke Friday, hours after the Supreme Court ruled on the Texas law. Justices found that abortion providers can challenge the state's abortion law in lower courts. But they did not stay the law, meaning the near abortion ban stays in effect and women in Texas can't get an abortion after 6 weeks. It also means that vigilante citizens can bring enforcement cases against abortion providers and others.At the same time the country anxiously awaits a ruling in another case. Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization asks the court to overturn Roe v Wade, and find that women don't have a constitutionally protected right to abortion. In this episode we discuss what the lawyers argued before the court, what it all means, and what resources pregnant people and reproductive rights activists have if Roe is gutted.Hillary SchnellerTwitter: twitter.com/hischnellerYou can follow Jessica Yellin here:Instagram: instagram.com/jessicayellin​Twitter: twitter.com/jessicayellinWebsite: NewsNotNoise.comNewsletter: newsnotnoise.bulletin.comSupport this work:patreon.com/NewsNotNoiseJessica Yellin is the founder of News Not Noise, a channel dedicated to giving you news with real experts and providing information, not a panic attack. Jessica is a veteran of network news, traveling the globe, covering conflict and crisis. A former Chief White House Correspondent for CNN, she reported from around the world and won awards. Now, Yellin uses her voice to break down the news, calmly and clearly for you -- free of punditry, provocation, and yelling.

Despite the alarms, the Justices' ruling on Friday was a technical one on the issue of legal standing, and the real action is still in the Mississippi case. Plus, the New York City Council moves to let 800,000 noncitizens vote in local elections, as long as they've been residents for 30 days. But what does the state constitution say? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The court is poised to overturn Roe V. Wade which will change forever not only the way abortion rights are treated across the country but the way that the American public views the Court. Are the Justices just political hacks? Has it always been like this? Will President Biden's commission lead to the structural reforms necessary to fix it? Host David Rothkopf sits down to discuss these and other legal issues with Dahlia Lithwick of Slate and Katie Barlow of the Words Matter Podcast and SCOTUSBlog. Don't miss this vital conversation.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/deepstateradio. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The court is poised to overturn Roe V. Wade which will change forever not only the way abortion rights are treated across the country but the way that the American public views the Court. Are the Justices just political hacks? Has it always been like this? Will President Biden's commission lead to the structural reforms necessary to fix it? Host David Rothkopf sits down to discuss these and other legal issues with Dahlia Lithwick of Slate and Katie Barlow of the Words Matter Podcast and SCOTUSBlog. Don't miss this vital conversation.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/deepstateradio. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

It has been 50 years of scalding debate since the High Court seized control of abortion away from voters and elected legislatures. Never in that half-century has Roe v. Wade been so threatened as it is right now. Washington Times Opinion Editor Charlie Hurt joins Andy Parks with his take on the latest abortion case before the United States Supreme Court. Charlie says the only question, at this point, is how much one of those justices will allow the political storms outside the Court's chamber to affect his decision.

The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments about a case that could overturn Roe vs. Wade and fundamentally change abortion rights in this country. So what happened in court, and what did the Justices say about the case? What would changing the Court's position on abortion mean for abortion access across the country, and what would it mean for the Supreme Court itself? And how did we get to a place in 2021 where abortion rights seem likely to be altered? We wanted to dig into this case so we caught up with Dr. Susan Liebell, Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph's University. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A Mississippi law banning abortions after 15 weeks has made its way up to the Supreme Court and has the potential to overturn Roe v. Wade. The Justices have already heard the arguments and are ready to make their final decision which will be released in June 2022. So, what if Roe is overturned? What does that mean for states and pro-life individuals? Family Policy Alliance's Autumn Leva delves into the details of the case and the potential outcome in this episode of Engage with Eagle Forum. Timestamps: 2:25 What is Dobbs v. Jackson? 5:00 How is Dobbs different than the TX Heartbeat case? 8:57 Can Dobbs overturn Roe v. Wade? 11:15 What are the freedoms of states? 13:10 AfterRoe.com Engage with Eagle Forum FB: https://www.facebook.com/engagewithea... Podcast: https://engagewitheagleforum.podbean.com Learn more about Eagle Forum: https://EagleForum.org/​​ Become an Eagle Forum Member: http://bit.ly/Join-EagleForum​​ Join the Eagle Forum email list: https://bit.ly/EagleForumEmail​​ Eagle Forum: 200 W 3rd St., Ste. 502 • Alton, IL 62002

Tony Oliva, Jim Kaat, Gil Hodges, Minnie Minoso, Bud Fowler and the great Buck O'Neill all got into the Baseball Hall of Fame. Dick Allen, once again, came up short by a single vote. There is no reason for that. Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors! Built Bar Built Bar is a protein bar that tastes like a candy bar. Go to builtbar.com and use promo code “LOCKED15,” and you'll get 15% off your next order. BetOnline AG There is only 1 place that has you covered and 1 place we trust. Betonline.ag! Sign up today for a free account at betonline.ag and use that promocode: LOCKEDON for your 50% welcome bonus. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Fresh off the contentious argument over Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban and the future of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court turns toward its final hearings of 2021. They include cases on religious-school funding, immigration, ERISA, and criminal procedure, including an ineffective assistance of counsel case that could lead to an innocent person being executed. Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin recap Dec. 1's abortion argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization before previewing the cases that'll be argued the week of Dec. 6. Have feedback on this episode of Cases and Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

This week, hosts Mark Masselli and Margaret Flinter examine the latest details about the omicron COVID variant, including the important role community health centers continue to play in the pandemic. In addition, we revisit their recent conversation with Planned Parenthood Federation of America President and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson on the Supreme Court hearing on the Mississippi law banning abortion after 15 weeks, posing the greatest threat to Roe v. Wade in half a century. She also talks about systematic... Read More Read More The post Health News This Week: Omicron Makes Gains Around the World as U.S. Supreme Court Justices Hear Mississippi Abortion Case appeared first on Healthy Communities Online.

Hi! This is Lexie of Read by AI. I read human-curated content for you to listen to while working, exercising, commuting, or any other time. Without further ado: The Justices Are Having An Open Fight About The Legitimacy Of The Supreme Court by Zoe Tillman from Buzzfeed.

Today's Midday podcast covers the latest Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling on how the state's next legislative and congressional maps should be drawn. Justices ruled in favor of the Republican-backed least changes approach to drawing new district boundaries. They also ruled new maps will not take partisan makeup into consideration.

More than reading the tea leaves of where the nine Justices may come down, in today's episode, Chris cautions that reading into the questions they ask is not always representative of the outcome they ultimately come to decide.  So while the arguments can be instructive in getting a sense of what they seek to understand, it is not always dispositive of their leaning.Then, Chris and Vick tick through the Justices' questions and arguments that generally fall into three camps of outcome: kick it to the states and uphold Mississippi; a compromise of allowing Mississippi law to go to 15 weeks but keeping Roe in tact; or allowing the 50 years of precedent to hold firm as many Justices have reiterated over the years since Roe and then Casey were decided.Chris explains that while a lot is made of past judicial decisions,  something is stare decisis (the Latin term in the law for standing by things decided) until it isn't.  In other words: precedent is only precedent until they change it.And Another Thing:  A beat on the continual need to keep calm and carry on when it comes to the Omicron variant, and Chris' prescription to not to let panic get ahead of the facts. Plus:  An introduction to the Cuomo family dogs, all three!

The future of Roe v. Wade is uncertain. The case legalized a woman's right to an abortion in 1973, and this week the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that considers the legality of a Mississippi state law banning abortion 15 weeks after conception. How likely is an overruling of Roe v. Wade? And what did this week's hearings tell us about the Justices' stances on abortion? Want to support 1A? Give to your local public radio station and subscribe to this podcast. Have questions? Find us on Twitter @1A.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday in one of the highest profile cases of the term. The question is whether Mississippi's law banning most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy is constitutional. Senior writer and legal reporter Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux discusses how the Justices approached the question and what Americans think about abortion policy.

Steve Gruber discusses news and headlines.

Stand Up is a daily podcast. I book,host,edit, post and promote new episodes with brilliant guests every day. Please subscribe now for as little as 5$ and gain access to a community of over 800 awesome, curious, kind, funny, brilliant, generous souls Check out StandUpwithPete.com to learn more also please donate to GiveWell.org/StandUp and start a store or shop at Shopify.com/Standup 34 mins Billy Baker is a staff writer for TheBoston Globe, where he writes narrative features and humorous columns. A native of South Boston, he is a graduate of Boston Latin School, Tulane University, and the Columbia Journalism School. He has received the Deborah Howell Award for Writing Excellence from the American Society of News Editors, and was a member of the Globe team that was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for coverage of the Boston Marathon bombings. 1:26 Eric J. Segall graduated from Emory University, Phi Beta Kappa 27  and summa cum laude, and from Vanderbilt Law School, where he was the research editor for the Law Review and member of Order of the Coif. He clerked for the Chief Judge Charles Moye Jr. for the Northern District of Georgia, and Albert J. Henderson of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. After his clerkships, Segall worked for Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and the U.S. Department of Justice, before joining the Georgia State faculty in 1991. Segall teaches federal courts and constitutional law I and II. He is the author of the books Originalism as Faith and Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court is not a Court and its Justices are not Judges. His articles on constitutional law have appeared in, among others, the Harvard Law Review Forum, the Stanford Law Review On Line, the UCLA Law Review, the George Washington Law Review, the Washington University Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, the Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, and Constitutional Commentary among many others. Segall's op-eds and essays have appeared in the New York Times, the LA Times, The Atlantic, SLATE, Vox, Salon, and the Daily Beast, among others. He has appeared on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and France 24 and all four of Atlanta's local television stations. He has also appeared on numerous local and national radio shows. Listen and Subscribe to Eric's Podcast Supreme Myths and follow him on Tik Tok! Check out all things Jon Carroll Follow and Support Pete Coe Pete on YouTube Pete on Twitter Pete On Instagram Pete Personal FB page Stand Up with Pete FB page

Tonight's guests are Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights; Dahlia Lithwick senior editor and legal correspondent for Slate; and Rep. Bennie Thompson, chair of the January 6th Committee.

On this Special Abortion Rights Edition of the top-rated weekly US law and politics news analysis podcast -- MeidasTouch's LegalAF anchored by MT founder and civil rights lawyer, Ben Meiselas and national trial lawyer and strategist, Michael Popok, discuss today's (Tuesday December 1, 2021) 2-hour, US Supreme Court oral argument for Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, addressing the issue of whether a state can ban pre-viability abortions. The 9 justices wasted no time getting to the heart and heat of the matter: Does the Constitution and the current majority of the Justices support a woman's right to choose and have bodily autonomy and integrity, or don't they? Ben and Popok line up the current justice's from Left (Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan) to Far Right (Roberts, Gorsuch, Barrett, Kavanaugh, Alito and Thomas), and predict how this case and the majority opinion shakes out by the Summer. Reminder and Programming Note:  Watch a live recording of Legal AF pod each Saturday night at 7 pm ET on YouTube, followed by the audio pod dropping each Sunday morning. Click here to subscribe, follow + and review: https://pod.link/1580828595 Follow Legal AF by MeidasTouch on Twitter here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Justices hear oral arguments on a Mississippi abortion law that could lead to the overturning or solidifying of the landmark ruling reached in Roe v. Wade. Will the Court rely on the doctrine of "stare decisis" and stand by its previous decisions? And how much will politics play into the eventual ruling? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This morning (December 1), the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a landmark case that could change access to legal abortions in the United States. A law in Mississippi called the Gestational Age Act,passed in 2018,  prohibits a woman from having an abortion if she has been pregnant for more than 15 weeks. The law was challenged by the only remaining place in Mississippi that provides abortions, a clinic in the state's largest city, Jackson, called the Jackson Women's Health Clinic. If the court decides the Mississippi law is constitutional, the legal precedent established in the Court's 1973 ruling in the case of Roe v. Wadewill be eliminated. Recent polls show that 70% of Americans support the right to an abortion guaranteed in Roe v Wade, but the current Court, with six conservative Justices and three liberal Justices, may decide to overturn that historic ruling. A decision in the case is expected by summer. Joining Tom today with analysis and perspective is the legal scholar Kim Wehle, a law professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, a former Assistant US Attorney, and the author of two excellent books, How to Read the Constitution-And Why,and What You Need to Know About Voting-And Why.  Wehle is also the host of the Instagram & YouTube Show called #Simple Politics. Kim Wehle joins us on our digital line from her office in Baltimore. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Justices on the US Supreme Court are considering two challenges to abortion restrictions that could have wide-reaching implications for access to abortion across the country. In this episode, we look at what's at stake, and how else abortion laws are changing around the world.Featuring Amanda Jean Stevenson, assistant professor of sociology, University of Colorado Boulder; Sydney Calkin, lecturer in political geography, Queen Mary University of London and Jane Marcus Delgado, professor of political science, College of Staten Island, CUNY. We talk to a forensic scientist, Patrick Randolph-Quinney, Associate Professor of Forensic Science, Northumbria University, Newcastle in England. He explains how he studied bones to help solve the mystery of how to tell if a person was killed by a lightning strike.And Wale Fatade, commissioning editor at The Conversation in Lagos, gives us some recommended reading. The Conversation Weekly is produced by Mend Mariwany and Gemma Ware, with sound design by Eloise Stevens. Our theme music is by Neeta Sarl. You can sign up to The Conversation's free daily email here. Full credits for this episode available here.Further readingThe erosion of Roe v. Wade and abortion access didn't begin in Texas or Mississippi – it started in Pennsylvania in 1992, by Alison Gash, University of OregonPoland's abortion ruling amounts to a ban – but it will not end access, by Sydney Calkin, Queen Mary University of LondonStudy shows an abortion ban may lead to a 21% increase in pregnancy-related deaths, by Amanda Jean Stevenson, University of Colorado BoulderForensic science is unlocking the mysteries of fatal lightning strikes, by Patrick Randolph-Quinney, Northumbria University, Newcastle; Nicholas Bacci and Tanya Nadine Augustine, University of the WitwatersrandAfrican marine rules favour big industry, leaving small-scale fishers in the lurch by Ifesinachi Okafor-Yarwood, University of St Andrews; Edward H. Allison, CGIAR System Organisation My formula for a tasty and nutritious Nigerian soup - with termites by Adedayo Adeboye, Osun State University See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

This week's episode is the podcast's favorite tradition, which is answering listener-submitted questions about Thanksgiving, the law, and somehow both of those topics together.  This year includes Biden's Supreme Court, Justices as Thanksgiving dessert, and the proper evaluation of Turkey.  Happy Thanksgiving and we'll be back on December 4, 2021.

New York restricts who can concealed carry for self-defense, but its laws are hard to square with the Second Amendment. Meanwhile, the Justices search for a way to block Texas's new abortion law. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

For the first time in more than a decade Republicans will hold top spots in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Glenn Youngkin beat Democrat Terry McAuliffe for Governor and other top of the ballot GOPers prevailed over their Democratic opponents. President Biden had won the state by 10 points in the 2020 Presidential Election. So is Virginia a preview of the red wave that's to come as we approach the upcoming 2022 Midterms? Jared and FOX News Political Analyst Josh Kraushaar discuss. As Supreme Court Justices returned to the bench this week, they heard oral arguments from two of the most high profile cases: guns and abortions. Up first was the Texas abortion law that bans the procedure in most cases after six weeks of pregnancy, with no exceptions in the cases of rape or incest. Next was a New York State gun law and the requirements it puts on gun owners to carry a concealed weapon. FOX News Contributor and Law Professor at George Washington University, Jonathan Turley breaks down the two cases and explains why all eyes will be on newer Justices.

During the first two weeks of November, the Justices will hear ten oral arguments on cases including the Second Amendment, free speech, abortion, and religious freedom. The case names, issues, and dates of argument are listed below: Whole Women’s Health v. Jackson – Abortion – November 1 United States v. Texas – Abortion, Federal Jurisdiction […]

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of SB 8, the controversial Texas law that bans abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy and deputizes private citizens to enforce it. We'll analyze what the justices' responses may signal about the fate of the law, and we'll look ahead to other cases on the Court's docket bearing on the regulation of guns, greenhouse gas emissions and immigration.