Podcasts about trip around

(1) David Cobb on Grizzlies' Opening Night, NBA on NBC, CFB News & Notes (2) Trip Around the NFL: Dolphins, Jets, Commanders, Bucs, Ravens (3) "small talk" with Gabe Kuhn - College Football and Tech tortilla-gate

6:20 - A trip around the NFC East full 947 Sat, 11 Oct 2025 00:13:46 +0000 DEw51I4w02FLQchEcIXffaMiU01FCYd6 sports GBag Nation sports 6:20 - A trip around the NFC East The G-Bag Nation - Weekdays 10am-3pm 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Sports False https://player.amperwavepodcasting.com?feed-link=https%3A%2

Hour 5: Red River Storylines, Trip around the NFC East, Cross talk with FAD full 2068 Sat, 11 Oct 2025 01:34:43 +0000 wUwpvQkQ1KLuzDrwm1zPiiYKqawkMdxU sports GBag Nation sports Hour 5: Red River Storylines, Trip around the NFC East, Cross talk with FAD The G-Bag Nation - Weekdays 10am-3pm 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc. Sports False https://player.am

A new wave of scrutiny has reignited public attention on figures once connected to Jeffrey Epstein, with developments spanning finance, politics, and media. Billionaire investor Leon Black, who resigned from Apollo Global Management in 2021 after revelations he paid Epstein more than $150 million for “tax and estate planning,” is reportedly in talks to anchor a bid for The Telegraph, one of Britain's most storied newspapers. The move, seen by critics as an attempt at reputation rehabilitation, has drawn renewed criticism over Black's past ties to Epstein — particularly as he seeks control of a media institution traditionally associated with moral conservatism.Across the Atlantic, former Labour heavyweight Peter Mandelson has been ousted from his ambassadorial role after emails emerged showing him describing Epstein as a “good friend” and advocating for his early release even after the financier's sex crime conviction. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who initially defended Mandelson, reversed course swiftly once the correspondence became public, declaring the longtime political operator would have “no future role” in government. The episode has underscored the enduring reputational risks tied to Epstein's network, years after his death, and how proximity to his name continues to derail public careers.Meanwhile, journalist and author Michael Wolff has resurfaced with claims that Epstein's “ghost” still haunts former president Donald Trump — a relationship both men have publicly minimized. Wolff's insinuations, based largely on anecdotal accounts and suggestive sourcing, have been met with skepticism, yet continue to generate headlines in a political environment where scandal and spectacle often overshadow substance. Collectively, the stories of Black, Mandelson, and Trump — filtered through a media ecosystem eager for intrigue — illustrate how Epstein's legacy remains an open wound in elite circles, where power, money, and image intersect in a never-ending struggle between denial and exposure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

A new wave of scrutiny has reignited public attention on figures once connected to Jeffrey Epstein, with developments spanning finance, politics, and media. Billionaire investor Leon Black, who resigned from Apollo Global Management in 2021 after revelations he paid Epstein more than $150 million for “tax and estate planning,” is reportedly in talks to anchor a bid for The Telegraph, one of Britain's most storied newspapers. The move, seen by critics as an attempt at reputation rehabilitation, has drawn renewed criticism over Black's past ties to Epstein — particularly as he seeks control of a media institution traditionally associated with moral conservatism.Across the Atlantic, former Labour heavyweight Peter Mandelson has been ousted from his ambassadorial role after emails emerged showing him describing Epstein as a “good friend” and advocating for his early release even after the financier's sex crime conviction. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who initially defended Mandelson, reversed course swiftly once the correspondence became public, declaring the longtime political operator would have “no future role” in government. The episode has underscored the enduring reputational risks tied to Epstein's network, years after his death, and how proximity to his name continues to derail public careers.Meanwhile, journalist and author Michael Wolff has resurfaced with claims that Epstein's “ghost” still haunts former president Donald Trump — a relationship both men have publicly minimized. Wolff's insinuations, based largely on anecdotal accounts and suggestive sourcing, have been met with skepticism, yet continue to generate headlines in a political environment where scandal and spectacle often overshadow substance. Collectively, the stories of Black, Mandelson, and Trump — filtered through a media ecosystem eager for intrigue — illustrate how Epstein's legacy remains an open wound in elite circles, where power, money, and image intersect in a never-ending struggle between denial and exposure.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

October 3, 2025, turned into another reminder that Jeffrey Epstein's ghost still looms large over politics, culture, and public life. On the National Mall, a guerrilla statue of Donald Trump and Epstein holding hands was reinstalled, sparking outrage, laughter, and confusion from passersby while reigniting conversations about Epstein's ties to the powerful. Across the Atlantic, Hartlepool Council voted unanimously to strip Lord Peter Mandelson of his “Freedom of the Borough” honor, citing his associations with Epstein as incompatible with the town's values—a stinging rebuke for the former Labour heavyweight in his old political stronghold. Both stories underscored the theme that proximity to Epstein remains a toxic liability, even years after his death.Meanwhile, in Washington, Rep. Jimmy Gomez added a dose of satirical flair with a parody movie poster titled “Forgetting Jeffrey Epstein,” a direct jab at Trump that spread rapidly across social media. Critics dismissed it as childish, while supporters praised it as a cultural weapon that keeps the scandal in circulation. Taken together, the statue, the borough vote, and the meme illustrate how Epstein's legacy refuses to fade, resurfacing in art, politics, and public ridicule. The powerful may beg for the world to “move on,” but cultural memory—and a heavy dose of sarcasm—keeps dragging Epstein's shadow back into the spotlight.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

October 3, 2025, turned into another reminder that Jeffrey Epstein's ghost still looms large over politics, culture, and public life. On the National Mall, a guerrilla statue of Donald Trump and Epstein holding hands was reinstalled, sparking outrage, laughter, and confusion from passersby while reigniting conversations about Epstein's ties to the powerful. Across the Atlantic, Hartlepool Council voted unanimously to strip Lord Peter Mandelson of his “Freedom of the Borough” honor, citing his associations with Epstein as incompatible with the town's values—a stinging rebuke for the former Labour heavyweight in his old political stronghold. Both stories underscored the theme that proximity to Epstein remains a toxic liability, even years after his death.Meanwhile, in Washington, Rep. Jimmy Gomez added a dose of satirical flair with a parody movie poster titled “Forgetting Jeffrey Epstein,” a direct jab at Trump that spread rapidly across social media. Critics dismissed it as childish, while supporters praised it as a cultural weapon that keeps the scandal in circulation. Taken together, the statue, the borough vote, and the meme illustrate how Epstein's legacy refuses to fade, resurfacing in art, politics, and public ridicule. The powerful may beg for the world to “move on,” but cultural memory—and a heavy dose of sarcasm—keeps dragging Epstein's shadow back into the spotlight.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The fight over Jeffrey Epstein's unreleased government files has intensified as several new developments converge on Capitol Hill. House Speaker Mike Johnson is under fire from Democrats for delaying the swearing-in of Adelita Grijalva, Arizona's newly elected Democrat, who would likely provide the 218th signature needed to force a vote on a discharge petition requiring the release of Epstein's records. Democrats argue the delay is politically motivated, pointing to instances where Republicans were sworn in within 24 hours of certification. The issue comes amid a PBS NewsHour/NPR/Marist poll showing nearly three-quarters of Americans want all Epstein files released and 61 percent disapprove of the Trump administration's handling of the case, signaling broad bipartisan frustration with secrecy.At the same time, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick sparked new controversy by publicly claiming Epstein avoided harsher punishment by handing over blackmail videos of powerful clients, calling him “the greatest blackmailer ever.” The remarks prompted Rep. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, to announce plans to compel Lutnick to testify under oath about his comments. Democrats say the combination of Johnson's delay, overwhelming public demand, and Lutnick's statement highlights a pattern of obstruction and underscores the urgency for full transparency. With Grijalva still awaiting her seat, Lutnick facing potential testimony, and a discharge petition one vote short, the battle over Epstein's files is set to remain a defining political fight in the weeks ahead.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The fight over Jeffrey Epstein's unreleased government files has intensified as several new developments converge on Capitol Hill. House Speaker Mike Johnson is under fire from Democrats for delaying the swearing-in of Adelita Grijalva, Arizona's newly elected Democrat, who would likely provide the 218th signature needed to force a vote on a discharge petition requiring the release of Epstein's records. Democrats argue the delay is politically motivated, pointing to instances where Republicans were sworn in within 24 hours of certification. The issue comes amid a PBS NewsHour/NPR/Marist poll showing nearly three-quarters of Americans want all Epstein files released and 61 percent disapprove of the Trump administration's handling of the case, signaling broad bipartisan frustration with secrecy.At the same time, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick sparked new controversy by publicly claiming Epstein avoided harsher punishment by handing over blackmail videos of powerful clients, calling him “the greatest blackmailer ever.” The remarks prompted Rep. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, to announce plans to compel Lutnick to testify under oath about his comments. Democrats say the combination of Johnson's delay, overwhelming public demand, and Lutnick's statement highlights a pattern of obstruction and underscores the urgency for full transparency. With Grijalva still awaiting her seat, Lutnick facing potential testimony, and a discharge petition one vote short, the battle over Epstein's files is set to remain a defining political fight in the weeks ahead.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

(1) Geoff Calkins on Div Winners, Grizz Media Day, PJ Haggerty, Tiger Sports (2) Trip Around the NFL: Jets, Jags, Giants, Phins, Ravens

The fight over the Epstein files has erupted into a raw political brawl that exposes Washington's deep fractures. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene lit the fuse with a fiery post claiming she's “not suicidal” and warning that “foreign governments or powerful people” might silence her for pushing to release Epstein's secrets. Sen. Ted Cruz quickly branded her “crazy,” accusing her of antisemitic undertones, while Greene hit back, calling his charge “disgusting” and painting him as beholden to donors. Their feud became a sideshow to the larger push in Congress, where survivors and lawmakers alike are demanding the full, unredacted release of documents that could reveal just how deep Epstein's network ran.Meanwhile, Rep. Robert Garcia joined survivor Annie Farmer in Long Beach to call out the DOJ's “sham” 33,000-page dump of mostly recycled records. Together with bipartisan sponsors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, they are pushing a discharge petition to force a floor vote requiring full disclosure of all unclassified files. Democrats are united, but Republicans remain divided, torn between protecting power and exposing it. For survivors like Farmer, this isn't politics—it's about justice, closure, and breaking decades of silence. And for the public, the battle has become a test of whether Washington will finally confront the truth or bury it once more under redactions, excuses, and self-preservation.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The fight over the Epstein files has erupted into a raw political brawl that exposes Washington's deep fractures. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene lit the fuse with a fiery post claiming she's “not suicidal” and warning that “foreign governments or powerful people” might silence her for pushing to release Epstein's secrets. Sen. Ted Cruz quickly branded her “crazy,” accusing her of antisemitic undertones, while Greene hit back, calling his charge “disgusting” and painting him as beholden to donors. Their feud became a sideshow to the larger push in Congress, where survivors and lawmakers alike are demanding the full, unredacted release of documents that could reveal just how deep Epstein's network ran.Meanwhile, Rep. Robert Garcia joined survivor Annie Farmer in Long Beach to call out the DOJ's “sham” 33,000-page dump of mostly recycled records. Together with bipartisan sponsors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, they are pushing a discharge petition to force a floor vote requiring full disclosure of all unclassified files. Democrats are united, but Republicans remain divided, torn between protecting power and exposing it. For survivors like Farmer, this isn't politics—it's about justice, closure, and breaking decades of silence. And for the public, the battle has become a test of whether Washington will finally confront the truth or bury it once more under redactions, excuses, and self-preservation.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The fight over the Epstein files has erupted into a raw political brawl that exposes Washington's deep fractures. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene lit the fuse with a fiery post claiming she's “not suicidal” and warning that “foreign governments or powerful people” might silence her for pushing to release Epstein's secrets. Sen. Ted Cruz quickly branded her “crazy,” accusing her of antisemitic undertones, while Greene hit back, calling his charge “disgusting” and painting him as beholden to donors. Their feud became a sideshow to the larger push in Congress, where survivors and lawmakers alike are demanding the full, unredacted release of documents that could reveal just how deep Epstein's network ran.Meanwhile, Rep. Robert Garcia joined survivor Annie Farmer in Long Beach to call out the DOJ's “sham” 33,000-page dump of mostly recycled records. Together with bipartisan sponsors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, they are pushing a discharge petition to force a floor vote requiring full disclosure of all unclassified files. Democrats are united, but Republicans remain divided, torn between protecting power and exposing it. For survivors like Farmer, this isn't politics—it's about justice, closure, and breaking decades of silence. And for the public, the battle has become a test of whether Washington will finally confront the truth or bury it once more under redactions, excuses, and self-preservation.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jeffrey Epstein's shadow continues to shape headlines across politics and public life. A RadarOnline report suggested former President Bill Clinton's health is deteriorating under stress tied to his Epstein connections, claiming he has been seen with a portable defibrillator as subpoenas and scrutiny mount. At the same time, Elon Musk found himself denying allegations after his name appeared in Epstein's 2014 calendar. Musk insisted he never visited the island, admitted only to a brief visit to Epstein's Manhattan townhouse with his ex-wife, and accused media outlets of pushing a “false narrative.”On Capitol Hill, the battle over Epstein's files has intensified. A discharge petition in the U.S. House, aimed at forcing the Department of Justice to release all unclassified records, has reached 217 signatures and is expected to succeed once a new member is sworn in. Missouri's Republican delegation has largely sidestepped the issue: only Rep. Mark Alford and Rep. Ann Wagner have spoken publicly, and even then in limited terms, while the rest of the state's GOP representatives have remained silent. The lack of clarity has drawn scrutiny as pressure builds for lawmakers to take a position.One of the most outspoken Republicans on the issue has been Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. Greene not only signed the discharge petition but also declared on X that she is “not suicidal,” framing her demand for transparency as a personal stand against powerful interests that may want the Epstein records kept sealed. Her warning, paired with the silence of other GOP members and the denials from figures like Musk and Clinton, underscores how the Epstein scandal remains both a political flashpoint and a reputational minefield for America's most powerful institutions and individuals.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Jeffrey Epstein's shadow continues to shape headlines across politics and public life. A RadarOnline report suggested former President Bill Clinton's health is deteriorating under stress tied to his Epstein connections, claiming he has been seen with a portable defibrillator as subpoenas and scrutiny mount. At the same time, Elon Musk found himself denying allegations after his name appeared in Epstein's 2014 calendar. Musk insisted he never visited the island, admitted only to a brief visit to Epstein's Manhattan townhouse with his ex-wife, and accused media outlets of pushing a “false narrative.”On Capitol Hill, the battle over Epstein's files has intensified. A discharge petition in the U.S. House, aimed at forcing the Department of Justice to release all unclassified records, has reached 217 signatures and is expected to succeed once a new member is sworn in. Missouri's Republican delegation has largely sidestepped the issue: only Rep. Mark Alford and Rep. Ann Wagner have spoken publicly, and even then in limited terms, while the rest of the state's GOP representatives have remained silent. The lack of clarity has drawn scrutiny as pressure builds for lawmakers to take a position.One of the most outspoken Republicans on the issue has been Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. Greene not only signed the discharge petition but also declared on X that she is “not suicidal,” framing her demand for transparency as a personal stand against powerful interests that may want the Epstein records kept sealed. Her warning, paired with the silence of other GOP members and the denials from figures like Musk and Clinton, underscores how the Epstein scandal remains both a political flashpoint and a reputational minefield for America's most powerful institutions and individuals.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

A newly proposed bill in the New Mexico legislature seeks to launch a formal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's alleged activities at Zorro Ranch, establishing what proponents call a “truth commission” with subpoena power to force document production rather than relying solely on voluntary disclosure. State Representative Andrea Romero has announced plans to introduce the measure in January, contending that the commission should uncover the “truth about what went on” in Santa Fe County—even if some alleged offenses now fall outside existing statutes of limitations.  The proposal also includes provisions to change state law in order to allow victims whose claims might otherwise be time-barred to come forward and seek some form of recourse. While the mechanics are still being drafted, the initiative reflects growing pressure in New Mexico to revisit the legacy of Epstein's ownership of the ranch and the lingering shadow his crimes cast over local communities.A newly surfaced People report highlights an internal FBI memo from September 2008 confirming that Jeffrey Epstein “provided information to the FBI as agreed upon.” The memo, tied to his 2007 non-prosecution agreement, undercuts later statements by FBI Director Kash Patel, who claimed Epstein was never a source. The document closed out a subfile on Epstein's alleged asset forfeiture and suggested prosecutors found utility in his cooperation even as they opted not to pursue broader charges at the time. This revelation has reignited debate over how much intelligence Epstein offered and whether his cooperation shielded him from more serious exposure.The Epstein estate has delivered a new batch of unredacted documents to the House Oversight Committee, including calendars, call logs, cash ledgers, and message books, adding to earlier releases such as Epstein's will, his 2007 non-prosecution agreement, and his infamous “birthday book.” While the Committee has pledged to redact victims' names before any public release, the handover intensifies bipartisan pressure for full transparency, with Democrats pushing to expose all connections and Republicans warning against selective publication. The disclosures have deepened scrutiny of Epstein's networks and raised fresh questions about the powerful figures named within.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New Mexico lawmaker to propose investigation into Epstein's Zorro RanchEpstein estate turns over new documents - POLITICOJeffrey Epstein Provided Information to FBI: Internal Memo

Hour 2--Gabe Kuhn Show- Thursday 9/26/25--Geoff Calkins on NBA Rankings for Ja & Jaren, Skinny Luka & Zion, Iisalo + Trip Around the NFL: 49ers, Jets, Raiders, Giants

A newly proposed bill in the New Mexico legislature seeks to launch a formal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's alleged activities at Zorro Ranch, establishing what proponents call a “truth commission” with subpoena power to force document production rather than relying solely on voluntary disclosure. State Representative Andrea Romero has announced plans to introduce the measure in January, contending that the commission should uncover the “truth about what went on” in Santa Fe County—even if some alleged offenses now fall outside existing statutes of limitations.  The proposal also includes provisions to change state law in order to allow victims whose claims might otherwise be time-barred to come forward and seek some form of recourse. While the mechanics are still being drafted, the initiative reflects growing pressure in New Mexico to revisit the legacy of Epstein's ownership of the ranch and the lingering shadow his crimes cast over local communities.A newly surfaced People report highlights an internal FBI memo from September 2008 confirming that Jeffrey Epstein “provided information to the FBI as agreed upon.” The memo, tied to his 2007 non-prosecution agreement, undercuts later statements by FBI Director Kash Patel, who claimed Epstein was never a source. The document closed out a subfile on Epstein's alleged asset forfeiture and suggested prosecutors found utility in his cooperation even as they opted not to pursue broader charges at the time. This revelation has reignited debate over how much intelligence Epstein offered and whether his cooperation shielded him from more serious exposure.The Epstein estate has delivered a new batch of unredacted documents to the House Oversight Committee, including calendars, call logs, cash ledgers, and message books, adding to earlier releases such as Epstein's will, his 2007 non-prosecution agreement, and his infamous “birthday book.” While the Committee has pledged to redact victims' names before any public release, the handover intensifies bipartisan pressure for full transparency, with Democrats pushing to expose all connections and Republicans warning against selective publication. The disclosures have deepened scrutiny of Epstein's networks and raised fresh questions about the powerful figures named within.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New Mexico lawmaker to propose investigation into Epstein's Zorro RanchEpstein estate turns over new documents - POLITICOJeffrey Epstein Provided Information to FBI: Internal MemoBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A newly proposed bill in the New Mexico legislature seeks to launch a formal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's alleged activities at Zorro Ranch, establishing what proponents call a “truth commission” with subpoena power to force document production rather than relying solely on voluntary disclosure. State Representative Andrea Romero has announced plans to introduce the measure in January, contending that the commission should uncover the “truth about what went on” in Santa Fe County—even if some alleged offenses now fall outside existing statutes of limitations.  The proposal also includes provisions to change state law in order to allow victims whose claims might otherwise be time-barred to come forward and seek some form of recourse. While the mechanics are still being drafted, the initiative reflects growing pressure in New Mexico to revisit the legacy of Epstein's ownership of the ranch and the lingering shadow his crimes cast over local communities.A newly surfaced People report highlights an internal FBI memo from September 2008 confirming that Jeffrey Epstein “provided information to the FBI as agreed upon.” The memo, tied to his 2007 non-prosecution agreement, undercuts later statements by FBI Director Kash Patel, who claimed Epstein was never a source. The document closed out a subfile on Epstein's alleged asset forfeiture and suggested prosecutors found utility in his cooperation even as they opted not to pursue broader charges at the time. This revelation has reignited debate over how much intelligence Epstein offered and whether his cooperation shielded him from more serious exposure.The Epstein estate has delivered a new batch of unredacted documents to the House Oversight Committee, including calendars, call logs, cash ledgers, and message books, adding to earlier releases such as Epstein's will, his 2007 non-prosecution agreement, and his infamous “birthday book.” While the Committee has pledged to redact victims' names before any public release, the handover intensifies bipartisan pressure for full transparency, with Democrats pushing to expose all connections and Republicans warning against selective publication. The disclosures have deepened scrutiny of Epstein's networks and raised fresh questions about the powerful figures named within.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:New Mexico lawmaker to propose investigation into Epstein's Zorro RanchEpstein estate turns over new documents - POLITICOJeffrey Epstein Provided Information to FBI: Internal MemoBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

This morning's Epstein-related headlines captured a mix of political, legal, and royal fallout. In Washington, a provocative bronze statue of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein holding hands was installed overnight on the National Mall and swiftly removed by U.S. Park Police for lacking proper authorization. The work, titled “Best Friends Forever,” was claimed by an anonymous art collective as political satire, provoking crowds and online debate before authorities dismantled it. The episode highlighted ongoing tensions around Trump's past ties to Epstein and the broader fight over transparency in the case.At the same time, James O'Keefe released hidden-camera footage of former DOJ official Glenn Prager alleging that Trump is blocking the release of Epstein-related files, even claiming Epstein had been a CIA asset—remarks that DOJ dismissed as misleading. Meanwhile, Princess Eugenie launched an anti-trafficking campaign in New York to address exploitation in counterfeit fashion supply chains. Her initiative, though welcomed by some human rights groups, was quickly overshadowed by renewed scrutiny of her parents' ties to Epstein, underscoring how the scandal continues to reverberate across politics and royalty alike.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A bronze statue depicting Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein holding hands was recently placed on the National Mall, drawing widespread attention and debate. The installation, which many see as a provocative statement rather than traditional art, sparked both criticism and support. While some dismissed it as tasteless or political theater, others argued that it serves as a reminder of Epstein's broader connections and the controversies surrounding him.Meanwhile, a special election in Arizona has gained significance in the ongoing push for transparency. The newly elected House member may play a key role in whether sealed Epstein-related files are made public, as the chamber remains closely divided. Supporters of disclosure believe this could be a step toward accountability, while opponents continue to cite concerns about privacy and security.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

A bronze statue depicting Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein holding hands was recently placed on the National Mall, drawing widespread attention and debate. The installation, which many see as a provocative statement rather than traditional art, sparked both criticism and support. While some dismissed it as tasteless or political theater, others argued that it serves as a reminder of Epstein's broader connections and the controversies surrounding him.Meanwhile, a special election in Arizona has gained significance in the ongoing push for transparency. The newly elected House member may play a key role in whether sealed Epstein-related files are made public, as the chamber remains closely divided. Supporters of disclosure believe this could be a step toward accountability, while opponents continue to cite concerns about privacy and security.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A bronze statue depicting Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein holding hands was recently placed on the National Mall, drawing widespread attention and debate. The installation, which many see as a provocative statement rather than traditional art, sparked both criticism and support. While some dismissed it as tasteless or political theater, others argued that it serves as a reminder of Epstein's broader connections and the controversies surrounding him.Meanwhile, a special election in Arizona has gained significance in the ongoing push for transparency. The newly elected House member may play a key role in whether sealed Epstein-related files are made public, as the chamber remains closely divided. Supporters of disclosure believe this could be a step toward accountability, while opponents continue to cite concerns about privacy and security.to  contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

“She has achieved something that hardly anyone dares to attempt: She travelled around Australia- on a scooter! 59-year-old German Sylke Muzyk spent a year alone, without any support vehicle, just with a tent, sleeping bag — and a great sense of adventure. 15,000 kilometers are now behind her: from the start in Perth via Adelaide, Melbourne, Sydney, up to Queensland, through the North and finally back to the West Coast. Today she is back where it all began: in Perth. - „Sie hat etwas geschafft, was kaum jemand wagt: Mit dem Tretroller einmal um Australien! Ein Jahr war die 59-jährige Deutsche Sylke Muzyk unterwegs, ganz allein, ohne Begleitfahrzeug, nur mit Zelt, Schlafsack – und einer Menge Abenteuerlust. 15.000 Kilometer liegen nun hinter ihr: vom Start in Perth über Adelaide, Melbourne, Sydney, hoch nach Queensland, durch den Norden und schließlich wieder zurück an die Westküste. Heute ist sie wieder dort, wo alles begann: in Perth.

The story of Alexander Acosta and Kash Patel reveals how two different stages of the Jeffrey Epstein saga were managed by institutions more interested in containment than justice. Acosta, as U.S. Attorney in 2008, has long been portrayed as the architect of Epstein's sweetheart plea deal, but in reality he acted as a middleman executing a decision sanctioned by Main Justice. The immunity clause that protected Epstein's co-conspirators was not his invention; it was authorized at higher levels of the DOJ. Acosta ultimately became the convenient scapegoat, forced to resign years later and repeatedly grilled by Congress, while the true architects of Epstein's leniency remained untouched and hidden from public view.Patel's more recent denial before Congress that there was “no credible evidence” Epstein trafficked girls to others represents the next phase of institutional failure. His statement directly dismissed sworn survivor testimony and years of documented evidence, effectively signaling that the FBI had no interest in exposing Epstein's wider network. Instead of closing the book, Patel reignited demands for transparency, with lawmakers and survivors calling for the release of sealed FBI interview files. Together, Acosta and Patel's roles illustrate how the system managed Epstein's case: first by gutting prosecution, then by narrowing investigation, both times protecting the powerful while leaving survivors unheard.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The story of Alexander Acosta and Kash Patel reveals how two different stages of the Jeffrey Epstein saga were managed by institutions more interested in containment than justice. Acosta, as U.S. Attorney in 2008, has long been portrayed as the architect of Epstein's sweetheart plea deal, but in reality he acted as a middleman executing a decision sanctioned by Main Justice. The immunity clause that protected Epstein's co-conspirators was not his invention; it was authorized at higher levels of the DOJ. Acosta ultimately became the convenient scapegoat, forced to resign years later and repeatedly grilled by Congress, while the true architects of Epstein's leniency remained untouched and hidden from public view.Patel's more recent denial before Congress that there was “no credible evidence” Epstein trafficked girls to others represents the next phase of institutional failure. His statement directly dismissed sworn survivor testimony and years of documented evidence, effectively signaling that the FBI had no interest in exposing Epstein's wider network. Instead of closing the book, Patel reignited demands for transparency, with lawmakers and survivors calling for the release of sealed FBI interview files. Together, Acosta and Patel's roles illustrate how the system managed Epstein's case: first by gutting prosecution, then by narrowing investigation, both times protecting the powerful while leaving survivors unheard.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The story of Alexander Acosta and Kash Patel reveals how two different stages of the Jeffrey Epstein saga were managed by institutions more interested in containment than justice. Acosta, as U.S. Attorney in 2008, has long been portrayed as the architect of Epstein's sweetheart plea deal, but in reality he acted as a middleman executing a decision sanctioned by Main Justice. The immunity clause that protected Epstein's co-conspirators was not his invention; it was authorized at higher levels of the DOJ. Acosta ultimately became the convenient scapegoat, forced to resign years later and repeatedly grilled by Congress, while the true architects of Epstein's leniency remained untouched and hidden from public view.Patel's more recent denial before Congress that there was “no credible evidence” Epstein trafficked girls to others represents the next phase of institutional failure. His statement directly dismissed sworn survivor testimony and years of documented evidence, effectively signaling that the FBI had no interest in exposing Epstein's wider network. Instead of closing the book, Patel reignited demands for transparency, with lawmakers and survivors calling for the release of sealed FBI interview files. Together, Acosta and Patel's roles illustrate how the system managed Epstein's case: first by gutting prosecution, then by narrowing investigation, both times protecting the powerful while leaving survivors unheard.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Former Attorney General William Barr resurfaced in the Epstein debate this week, testifying before Congress that Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 death was “undoubtedly suicide.” Barr acknowledged severe lapses in prison security, including broken cameras and inattentive guards, but maintained that these amounted to negligence, not conspiracy. His certainty, however, reignited public skepticism, as many critics argue the unanswered questions surrounding Epstein's death make any definitive conclusion premature.Meanwhile, FBI Director Kash Patel faced heated questioning in a separate congressional hearing about the bureau's handling of Epstein's files. Patel insisted the FBI has complied with all legal obligations but admitted he had not personally reviewed the materials, a revelation that angered lawmakers and survivor advocates. Democrats accused him of stonewalling to shield powerful figures, while Republicans defended his position that releasing certain documents could compromise ongoing cases.Adding further intrigue, Patel confirmed the FBI is open to investigating whether a disputed 2003 signature in Epstein's “birthday book” belongs to Donald Trump. Trump has denied its authenticity, calling it a forgery, but Democrats quickly demanded an independent forensic review. With Barr closing the door on further questions about Epstein's death, Patel hedging on transparency, and the Trump signature stirring new controversy, the scandal remains unresolved—continuing to haunt America's political, legal, and social institutions six years after Epstein's death.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Former Attorney General William Barr resurfaced in the Epstein debate this week, testifying before Congress that Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 death was “undoubtedly suicide.” Barr acknowledged severe lapses in prison security, including broken cameras and inattentive guards, but maintained that these amounted to negligence, not conspiracy. His certainty, however, reignited public skepticism, as many critics argue the unanswered questions surrounding Epstein's death make any definitive conclusion premature.Meanwhile, FBI Director Kash Patel faced heated questioning in a separate congressional hearing about the bureau's handling of Epstein's files. Patel insisted the FBI has complied with all legal obligations but admitted he had not personally reviewed the materials, a revelation that angered lawmakers and survivor advocates. Democrats accused him of stonewalling to shield powerful figures, while Republicans defended his position that releasing certain documents could compromise ongoing cases.Adding further intrigue, Patel confirmed the FBI is open to investigating whether a disputed 2003 signature in Epstein's “birthday book” belongs to Donald Trump. Trump has denied its authenticity, calling it a forgery, but Democrats quickly demanded an independent forensic review. With Barr closing the door on further questions about Epstein's death, Patel hedging on transparency, and the Trump signature stirring new controversy, the scandal remains unresolved—continuing to haunt America's political, legal, and social institutions six years after Epstein's death.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Former Attorney General William Barr resurfaced in the Epstein debate this week, testifying before Congress that Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 death was “undoubtedly suicide.” Barr acknowledged severe lapses in prison security, including broken cameras and inattentive guards, but maintained that these amounted to negligence, not conspiracy. His certainty, however, reignited public skepticism, as many critics argue the unanswered questions surrounding Epstein's death make any definitive conclusion premature.Meanwhile, FBI Director Kash Patel faced heated questioning in a separate congressional hearing about the bureau's handling of Epstein's files. Patel insisted the FBI has complied with all legal obligations but admitted he had not personally reviewed the materials, a revelation that angered lawmakers and survivor advocates. Democrats accused him of stonewalling to shield powerful figures, while Republicans defended his position that releasing certain documents could compromise ongoing cases.Adding further intrigue, Patel confirmed the FBI is open to investigating whether a disputed 2003 signature in Epstein's “birthday book” belongs to Donald Trump. Trump has denied its authenticity, calling it a forgery, but Democrats quickly demanded an independent forensic review. With Barr closing the door on further questions about Epstein's death, Patel hedging on transparency, and the Trump signature stirring new controversy, the scandal remains unresolved—continuing to haunt America's political, legal, and social institutions six years after Epstein's death.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In Britain, a state visit by Donald Trump was jolted when activists projected massive images of Trump and Jeffrey Epstein onto the walls of Windsor Castle. The stunt, which British police quickly shut down, resulted in four arrests on charges of “malicious communications.” Photos of the projection spread globally within minutes, hijacking the carefully staged optics of a royal ceremony and forcing Epstein's name back into headlines through spectacle and shock.Across the Atlantic, a federal judge in Manhattan ruled against unsealing the identities of two women once described as potential co-conspirators in Epstein's network. Prosecutors never charged the women, and the court argued disclosure would expose them to unnecessary harm. The decision reignited frustration among survivors and transparency advocates, who see secrecy as another barrier to accountability, ensuring that questions about who enabled Epstein remain unanswered.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

In Britain, a state visit by Donald Trump was jolted when activists projected massive images of Trump and Jeffrey Epstein onto the walls of Windsor Castle. The stunt, which British police quickly shut down, resulted in four arrests on charges of “malicious communications.” Photos of the projection spread globally within minutes, hijacking the carefully staged optics of a royal ceremony and forcing Epstein's name back into headlines through spectacle and shock.Across the Atlantic, a federal judge in Manhattan ruled against unsealing the identities of two women once described as potential co-conspirators in Epstein's network. Prosecutors never charged the women, and the court argued disclosure would expose them to unnecessary harm. The decision reignited frustration among survivors and transparency advocates, who see secrecy as another barrier to accountability, ensuring that questions about who enabled Epstein remain unanswered.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In Britain, a state visit by Donald Trump was jolted when activists projected massive images of Trump and Jeffrey Epstein onto the walls of Windsor Castle. The stunt, which British police quickly shut down, resulted in four arrests on charges of “malicious communications.” Photos of the projection spread globally within minutes, hijacking the carefully staged optics of a royal ceremony and forcing Epstein's name back into headlines through spectacle and shock.Across the Atlantic, a federal judge in Manhattan ruled against unsealing the identities of two women once described as potential co-conspirators in Epstein's network. Prosecutors never charged the women, and the court argued disclosure would expose them to unnecessary harm. The decision reignited frustration among survivors and transparency advocates, who see secrecy as another barrier to accountability, ensuring that questions about who enabled Epstein remain unanswered.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Epstein scandal continues to resurface through new waves of headlines, each one pulling different corners of power back into the spotlight. Donald Trump has filed a $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, accusing it of maliciously tying him to Epstein through disputed documents and reporting. At the same time, Melania Trump secured a rare retraction and apology from The Daily Beast after it published claims—based on Michael Wolff's commentary—that she was introduced to Donald through Epstein's world. Both stories underscore how volatile and litigious the Epstein narrative remains, especially when it brushes against the Trump family.Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, Congressman James Comer has vowed to release any Department of Justice or Epstein estate documents tied to Prince Andrew, promising the American public full transparency. The files are said to include correspondence, travel logs, and testimonies that could reignite scrutiny of Andrew's dealings with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace, which has spent years shielding Andrew from the worst fallout, is bracing for renewed scandal, while survivor advocates welcome the promise of sunlight after decades of secrecy. The potential publication of these files signals that the Epstein story remains unfinished and still capable of shaking global institutions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The Epstein scandal continues to resurface through new waves of headlines, each one pulling different corners of power back into the spotlight. Donald Trump has filed a $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, accusing it of maliciously tying him to Epstein through disputed documents and reporting. At the same time, Melania Trump secured a rare retraction and apology from The Daily Beast after it published claims—based on Michael Wolff's commentary—that she was introduced to Donald through Epstein's world. Both stories underscore how volatile and litigious the Epstein narrative remains, especially when it brushes against the Trump family.Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, Congressman James Comer has vowed to release any Department of Justice or Epstein estate documents tied to Prince Andrew, promising the American public full transparency. The files are said to include correspondence, travel logs, and testimonies that could reignite scrutiny of Andrew's dealings with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace, which has spent years shielding Andrew from the worst fallout, is bracing for renewed scandal, while survivor advocates welcome the promise of sunlight after decades of secrecy. The potential publication of these files signals that the Epstein story remains unfinished and still capable of shaking global institutions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The Epstein scandal continues to resurface through new waves of headlines, each one pulling different corners of power back into the spotlight. Donald Trump has filed a $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times, accusing it of maliciously tying him to Epstein through disputed documents and reporting. At the same time, Melania Trump secured a rare retraction and apology from The Daily Beast after it published claims—based on Michael Wolff's commentary—that she was introduced to Donald through Epstein's world. Both stories underscore how volatile and litigious the Epstein narrative remains, especially when it brushes against the Trump family.Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, Congressman James Comer has vowed to release any Department of Justice or Epstein estate documents tied to Prince Andrew, promising the American public full transparency. The files are said to include correspondence, travel logs, and testimonies that could reignite scrutiny of Andrew's dealings with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Buckingham Palace, which has spent years shielding Andrew from the worst fallout, is bracing for renewed scandal, while survivor advocates welcome the promise of sunlight after decades of secrecy. The potential publication of these files signals that the Epstein story remains unfinished and still capable of shaking global institutions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Peter Mandelson's removal as Britain's ambassador to the United States has become one of the most high-profile political casualties linked to Jeffrey Epstein in years. Newly surfaced emails showed Mandelson referring to Epstein as his “best pal” and encouraging him to fight his 2008 conviction, undercutting his earlier claims of minimal contact. The backlash was swift: Prime Minister Keir Starmer dismissed him within days, while his consultancy, Global Counsel, severed ties amid fears of reputational damage. Survivors and advocates say the emails highlight how elite figures defended and normalized Epstein even after his conviction, reinforcing concerns that political and business networks actively shielded him. The scandal left the UK scrambling to fill a key diplomatic post and reignited debate over how thoroughly Epstein's ties to power have been scrutinized.At the same time, Washington is battling over transparency around Epstein's records. The House Oversight Committee has released hundreds of estate documents, including Epstein's “birthday book,” while the Treasury Department has agreed to provide suspicious activity reports flagging his financial transactions. Survivors say only full disclosure will deliver accountability, but Senate Republicans blocked efforts to force wider releases, fueling accusations of ongoing protectionism. The disclosures coincide with renewed scrutiny of JPMorgan Chase, which processed more than $1 billion for Epstein despite repeated compliance warnings. While the bank has paid massive settlements, critics argue financial institutions and regulators enabled Epstein's operation by ignoring red flags. Together, Mandelson's downfall, the transparency fight, and JPMorgan's exposure illustrate how the Epstein saga continues to reverberate, forcing political, financial, and regulatory institutions to confront their roles in one of the most notorious scandals of modern times.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Peter Mandelson's removal as Britain's ambassador to the United States has become one of the most high-profile political casualties linked to Jeffrey Epstein in years. Newly surfaced emails showed Mandelson referring to Epstein as his “best pal” and encouraging him to fight his 2008 conviction, undercutting his earlier claims of minimal contact. The backlash was swift: Prime Minister Keir Starmer dismissed him within days, while his consultancy, Global Counsel, severed ties amid fears of reputational damage. Survivors and advocates say the emails highlight how elite figures defended and normalized Epstein even after his conviction, reinforcing concerns that political and business networks actively shielded him. The scandal left the UK scrambling to fill a key diplomatic post and reignited debate over how thoroughly Epstein's ties to power have been scrutinized.At the same time, Washington is battling over transparency around Epstein's records. The House Oversight Committee has released hundreds of estate documents, including Epstein's “birthday book,” while the Treasury Department has agreed to provide suspicious activity reports flagging his financial transactions. Survivors say only full disclosure will deliver accountability, but Senate Republicans blocked efforts to force wider releases, fueling accusations of ongoing protectionism. The disclosures coincide with renewed scrutiny of JPMorgan Chase, which processed more than $1 billion for Epstein despite repeated compliance warnings. While the bank has paid massive settlements, critics argue financial institutions and regulators enabled Epstein's operation by ignoring red flags. Together, Mandelson's downfall, the transparency fight, and JPMorgan's exposure illustrate how the Epstein saga continues to reverberate, forcing political, financial, and regulatory institutions to confront their roles in one of the most notorious scandals of modern times.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Peter Mandelson's removal as Britain's ambassador to the United States has become one of the most high-profile political casualties linked to Jeffrey Epstein in years. Newly surfaced emails showed Mandelson referring to Epstein as his “best pal” and encouraging him to fight his 2008 conviction, undercutting his earlier claims of minimal contact. The backlash was swift: Prime Minister Keir Starmer dismissed him within days, while his consultancy, Global Counsel, severed ties amid fears of reputational damage. Survivors and advocates say the emails highlight how elite figures defended and normalized Epstein even after his conviction, reinforcing concerns that political and business networks actively shielded him. The scandal left the UK scrambling to fill a key diplomatic post and reignited debate over how thoroughly Epstein's ties to power have been scrutinized.At the same time, Washington is battling over transparency around Epstein's records. The House Oversight Committee has released hundreds of estate documents, including Epstein's “birthday book,” while the Treasury Department has agreed to provide suspicious activity reports flagging his financial transactions. Survivors say only full disclosure will deliver accountability, but Senate Republicans blocked efforts to force wider releases, fueling accusations of ongoing protectionism. The disclosures coincide with renewed scrutiny of JPMorgan Chase, which processed more than $1 billion for Epstein despite repeated compliance warnings. While the bank has paid massive settlements, critics argue financial institutions and regulators enabled Epstein's operation by ignoring red flags. Together, Mandelson's downfall, the transparency fight, and JPMorgan's exposure illustrate how the Epstein saga continues to reverberate, forcing political, financial, and regulatory institutions to confront their roles in one of the most notorious scandals of modern times.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The first story focuses on Jeffrey Epstein's notorious 50th birthday scrapbook, compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell, which has resurfaced as a source of fresh outrage and renewed scrutiny. The book is filled with messages from some of the most powerful and influential men in politics, finance, and entertainment, including one alleged note from Donald Trump laced with sexual innuendo. Among the disturbing details is also the image of a $22,500 check written in Trump's name, raising new questions about the depth of Epstein's financial and social ties. The scrapbook, far from being an innocent memento, reads like a who's-who of elite figures who either tolerated or outright embraced Epstein even after his predatory behavior had been whispered about in elite circles.The second story zeroes in on Prince Andrew, who is once again under the microscope as reports suggest that more than 100 secret emails linked to Epstein could soon be released. These emails, reportedly involving Andrew, Maxwell, and Epstein, are being described as potentially devastating—enough to “destroy” what little remains of Andrew's public reputation following his disastrous legal entanglements and ties to Epstein's network. If the emails are made public, they may further expose not only Andrew's role in Epstein's world but also raise difficult questions about how much the monarchy knew, tolerated, or overlooked. The looming shadow of these unreleased communications has reignited fears inside Buckingham Palace of another scandal explosion that could eclipse past embarrassments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The first story focuses on Jeffrey Epstein's notorious 50th birthday scrapbook, compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell, which has resurfaced as a source of fresh outrage and renewed scrutiny. The book is filled with messages from some of the most powerful and influential men in politics, finance, and entertainment, including one alleged note from Donald Trump laced with sexual innuendo. Among the disturbing details is also the image of a $22,500 check written in Trump's name, raising new questions about the depth of Epstein's financial and social ties. The scrapbook, far from being an innocent memento, reads like a who's-who of elite figures who either tolerated or outright embraced Epstein even after his predatory behavior had been whispered about in elite circles.The second story zeroes in on Prince Andrew, who is once again under the microscope as reports suggest that more than 100 secret emails linked to Epstein could soon be released. These emails, reportedly involving Andrew, Maxwell, and Epstein, are being described as potentially devastating—enough to “destroy” what little remains of Andrew's public reputation following his disastrous legal entanglements and ties to Epstein's network. If the emails are made public, they may further expose not only Andrew's role in Epstein's world but also raise difficult questions about how much the monarchy knew, tolerated, or overlooked. The looming shadow of these unreleased communications has reignited fears inside Buckingham Palace of another scandal explosion that could eclipse past embarrassments.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The release of thousands of emails from Jeffrey Epstein's personal account has detonated across politics and business. In the UK, Peter Mandelson — once a towering figure in Labour politics — was exposed as far closer to Epstein than he had admitted, referring to him as his “best pal” and even defending him after his conviction. The backlash was swift: Prime Minister Keir Starmer dismissed Mandelson from his ambassadorship, and his consultancy firm Global Counsel announced it would cut him out entirely, leaving his reputation and career in ruins.In the United States, Epstein's shadow now hangs over Congress. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is pushing to force the Department of Justice to release every Epstein file within 30 days, including FBI reports, plea deal records, and potentially even intelligence documents. The move could unearth years of hidden material, but it has both parties rattled, since Epstein's network spanned Democrats and Republicans alike. For survivors and the public, it represents the closest chance yet to break through the wall of secrecy that has long shielded Epstein's protectors.The most grotesque revelations come from the emails tying Ghislaine Maxwell even more tightly to Epstein. Beyond her role managing his properties and finances, the correspondence shows her planning fertility treatments with him — laying out procedures, timing, and logistics for having children together. This detail obliterates Maxwell's longstanding defense that she was distant from Epstein, revealing instead a relationship that was personal, operational, and intimate. Together, these headlines underscore that the Epstein story is still unraveling, and that every new leak peels back another layer of protection around the elite who enabled him.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The release of thousands of emails from Jeffrey Epstein's personal account has detonated across politics and business. In the UK, Peter Mandelson — once a towering figure in Labour politics — was exposed as far closer to Epstein than he had admitted, referring to him as his “best pal” and even defending him after his conviction. The backlash was swift: Prime Minister Keir Starmer dismissed Mandelson from his ambassadorship, and his consultancy firm Global Counsel announced it would cut him out entirely, leaving his reputation and career in ruins.In the United States, Epstein's shadow now hangs over Congress. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is pushing to force the Department of Justice to release every Epstein file within 30 days, including FBI reports, plea deal records, and potentially even intelligence documents. The move could unearth years of hidden material, but it has both parties rattled, since Epstein's network spanned Democrats and Republicans alike. For survivors and the public, it represents the closest chance yet to break through the wall of secrecy that has long shielded Epstein's protectors.The most grotesque revelations come from the emails tying Ghislaine Maxwell even more tightly to Epstein. Beyond her role managing his properties and finances, the correspondence shows her planning fertility treatments with him — laying out procedures, timing, and logistics for having children together. This detail obliterates Maxwell's longstanding defense that she was distant from Epstein, revealing instead a relationship that was personal, operational, and intimate. Together, these headlines underscore that the Epstein story is still unraveling, and that every new leak peels back another layer of protection around the elite who enabled him.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The latest Epstein fallout played out on both sides of the Atlantic, exposing the same tired playbook of elites protecting their own. In Britain, Ambassador Peter Mandelson was sacked after leaked emails revealed he described Epstein as his “best pal” and defended his conviction as “wrongful.” Across the U.S., Senate Republicans blocked a Democratic measure to release Epstein's case files, hiding behind “national security” while proving once again that child-protection rhetoric vanishes when real accountability is on the line. Meanwhile, newly leaked emails from Epstein's Yahoo account demolished Ghislaine Maxwell's courtroom defense, showing her not as a victim but as the COO of his trafficking operation—micromanaging flights, properties, and staff like it was a corporate empireTogether, these stories show that nothing has really changed since Epstein's death. Politicians feign outrage, the press acts surprised, and the powerful keep burying the truth. Mandelson will quietly resurface, the Senate will keep stonewalling, and Maxwell's receipts will fade into the next news cycle. Survivors remain sidelined while the system that built and protected Epstein carries on intact. What's sold to the public as accountability is really just theater—carefully staged scandals, controlled leaks, and token sacrifices to keep the machinery of power untouched. Epstein may be gone, but the joke is still on us.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

The latest Epstein fallout played out on both sides of the Atlantic, exposing the same tired playbook of elites protecting their own. In Britain, Ambassador Peter Mandelson was sacked after leaked emails revealed he described Epstein as his “best pal” and defended his conviction as “wrongful.” Across the U.S., Senate Republicans blocked a Democratic measure to release Epstein's case files, hiding behind “national security” while proving once again that child-protection rhetoric vanishes when real accountability is on the line. Meanwhile, newly leaked emails from Epstein's Yahoo account demolished Ghislaine Maxwell's courtroom defense, showing her not as a victim but as the COO of his trafficking operation—micromanaging flights, properties, and staff like it was a corporate empireTogether, these stories show that nothing has really changed since Epstein's death. Politicians feign outrage, the press acts surprised, and the powerful keep burying the truth. Mandelson will quietly resurface, the Senate will keep stonewalling, and Maxwell's receipts will fade into the next news cycle. Survivors remain sidelined while the system that built and protected Epstein carries on intact. What's sold to the public as accountability is really just theater—carefully staged scandals, controlled leaks, and token sacrifices to keep the machinery of power untouched. Epstein may be gone, but the joke is still on us.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The latest batch of Jeffrey Epstein revelations strips away any remaining illusion that his crimes were carried out in isolation. Congress's release of his “birthday book” revealed not only grotesque sketches and disturbing memorabilia but also affectionate notes from world leaders, celebrities, and power brokers who once insisted they barely knew him. A novelty check joking about Epstein “selling” a woman to Donald Trump, UK Ambassador Peter Mandelson's “best pal” message, and illustrations trivializing abuse all point to a culture where Epstein's depravity wasn't hidden—it was normalized, celebrated, and even turned into party humor.At the same time, financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase enabled him with staggering impunity, processing over $1 billion in transactions for Epstein long after his conviction. The picture is clear: elites wrote the notes, signed the checks, drew the cartoons, and laundered the money. Survivors were left voiceless while those in power toasted a predator. The birthday book isn't just a scrapbook; it's a mirror, reflecting the true faces of the people who laughed with Epstein while he destroyed lives, and it reminds us that in their world, we were never invited to the party.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

(1) Geoff Calkins on Watching His Bills, MNF Reactions, Memphis FB This Weekend (2) Trip Around the NFL: Bears, Eagles, 49ers, Dolphins

(1) David Cobb on CFB QB Power Rankings, SEC Weekend Slate, and Billy Napier (2) Trip Around the NFL: Packers, Cowboys, Jets, Dolphins

The latest batch of Jeffrey Epstein revelations strips away any remaining illusion that his crimes were carried out in isolation. Congress's release of his “birthday book” revealed not only grotesque sketches and disturbing memorabilia but also affectionate notes from world leaders, celebrities, and power brokers who once insisted they barely knew him. A novelty check joking about Epstein “selling” a woman to Donald Trump, UK Ambassador Peter Mandelson's “best pal” message, and illustrations trivializing abuse all point to a culture where Epstein's depravity wasn't hidden—it was normalized, celebrated, and even turned into party humor.At the same time, financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase enabled him with staggering impunity, processing over $1 billion in transactions for Epstein long after his conviction. The picture is clear: elites wrote the notes, signed the checks, drew the cartoons, and laundered the money. Survivors were left voiceless while those in power toasted a predator. The birthday book isn't just a scrapbook; it's a mirror, reflecting the true faces of the people who laughed with Epstein while he destroyed lives, and it reminds us that in their world, we were never invited to the party.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Laurence Holmes & Carmen Vitali preview the NFC North.